The role of abacavir (ABC, 1592) in antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, trial. CNA3002 European Study Team

CRF08_BC subtype is more prone to ART failure and new generation NNRTI-resistance under long-term first line ART

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and their contextual influence on drug susceptibility in CRF07_BC and CRF_08BC subtypes.

METHODS

Patients with virological failure were genotyped using phylogenetic analysis. DRMs and susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs were analyzed using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database.

RESULTS

Six HIV subtypes were identified among 1296 successfully amplified sequences, with the CRF07_BC subtype prevailing at a rate of 91.7%, followed by CRF08_BC. Overall, the CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC subtypes were similar in the distribution and frequency of DRMs, the most common DRMs were K103N and M184V. However, among patients with ART duration of ≥3 years who developed resistance, CRF08_BC exhibited a higher mutation frequency at sites 184, 138, 221, and 188 (Chi-square test, p<0.05), and compared with CRF07_BC, patients with CRF08_BC had higher prevalence of abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, doravirine, etravirine, and rilpivirine resistance. Moreover, there was an increased prevalence of cross-resistance between efavirenz/nevirapine and new generation NNRTIs in patients with CRF08_BC; doravirine (r=1.0), rilpivirine (r=0.93), and etravirine (r=0.86) resistance highly correlated with efavirenz/nevirapine.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides valuable insights into the profile of DRMs and resistance patterns in patients with CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC experiencing treatment failure in Butuo. These findings have the potential to contribute to future strategies for HIV control and treatment.

Abacavir adverse reactions related with HLA-B*57: 01 haplotype in a large cohort of patients infected with HIV

OBJECTIVE

Carriage of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*57:01 allele increases the risk of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction. Therefore, since 2008 HIV treatment guidelines recommend HLA-B*57:01 screening before abacavir administration, greatly reducing hypersensitivity reaction rate. However, clinically suspected abacavir-related hypersensitivity reactions are described in allele non-carriers. Major aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between HLA-B*57:01 pattern and abacavir-related hypersensitivity reaction, focusing on hypersensitivity reaction prevalence in allele non-carriers.

METHODS

We included all outpatients aged >18 years old with HIV infection and known HLA-B*57:01 pattern, followed at our Department from January 2000 until December 2017. Patients were divided according to HLA-B*57:01 pattern and first antiretroviral treatment prescribed (containing or not abacavir) as follows: HLA-B*57:01 allele carriers treated with abacavir and HLA-B*57:01 allele non-carriers treated with abacavir. We considered all adverse events reported during first abacavir administration, differentiating between confirmed hypersensitivity reactions and non-hypersensitivity reactions, according to abacavir hypersensitivity reaction definition included in the abacavir EU Summary of Product Characteristics and the US Prescribing Information.

RESULTS

A total of 3144 patients had a known HLA-B*57:01 pattern. About 5.4% of them showed allele polymorphism; Caucasian ethnicity was the most represented. In this cohort, 1801 patients were treated with a first abacavir-containing regimen (98.2% of them was represented by allele non-carriers). 191 out of 1801 patients discontinued abacavir because of toxicity/intolerance; among them 107 described adverse events fulfilled the criteria of confirmed abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (22/32 allele-positive patients and 85/1769 allele-negative patients). After having experienced a confirmed abacavir hypersensitivity reaction, abacavir was re-administered to eight HLA-B*57:01 negative patients. Seven of them re-experienced a syndrome consistent with hypersensitivity reaction, finally leading to drug discontinuation. Overall, no fatal reactions were described.

CONCLUSION

Not all abacavir-related side effects occur as a result of classic HLA-B*57:01-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, as they can develop irrespective of HLA-B*57:01 status. Clinical vigilance must be an essential part of the management of individuals starting abacavir, at any time during treatment. In a 'real-life' setting, clinical diagnosis of suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in allele non-carriers remains crucial for further clinical decision making.

Removing inactive NRTIs in a salvage regimen is safe, maintains virological suppression and reduces treatment costs: results from the VERITAS study (TMC114HIV4054)

BACKGROUND

Despite the benefit of maintaining inactive Nucleotide/side reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in salvage regimens, they are associated with increased toxicity and treatment costs. Current evidence suggests that NRTI-sparing regimens in patients failing ART are non-inferior to NRTI-including regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of removing at least one inactive NRTI on virologic, safety, and financial outcomes.

METHODS

Drug-resistant, virologically suppressed patients with CD4 >250 cells/ml on a stable regimen of four or more antiretrovirals (ARVs) were enrolled in a 48-week prospective, open-label pilot trial. One inactive NRTI was removed at baseline. Patients taking over five ARVs had a second inactive NRTI removed at 24 weeks. Viral load, CD4 count, and adverse events were assessed at baseline, 24, and 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-one male patients participated. Twenty-nine (94%) patients had lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) removed and four patients had an additional NRTI removed. One patient was excluded at week 26 for discontinuing an active NRTI. All patients maintained undetectable viral loads at weeks 24 (100%) and 48 [PP = 100%; Intent-to-treat (ITT) = 97%]. At 48 weeks, patients had a median gain of 20 CD4 (IQR: - 50, +133; mean +39) compared to baseline. Three patients exhibited Grade III bilirubin elevation (two Grade II and one Grade III at baseline), which returned to baseline levels. No serious adverse events were observed. Removal of one or two ARVs equated to a mean annual savings of $3319 CDN (11%) and $8630 CDN (24%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Removing inactive NRTIs in patients with a controlled viral load appears to be safe, maintains virological suppression, and reduces treatment costs.

Machine Learning to Improve the Effectiveness of ANRS in Predicting HIV Drug Resistance

OBJECTIVES

Human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is one of the major burdens of disease in developing countries, and the standard-of-care treatment includes prescribing antiretroviral drugs. However, antiretroviral drug resistance is inevitable due to selective pressure associated with the high mutation rate of HIV. Determining antiretroviral resistance can be done by phenotypic laboratory tests or by computer-based interpretation algorithms. Computer-based algorithms have been shown to have many advantages over laboratory tests. The ANRS (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA) is regarded as a gold standard in interpreting HIV drug resistance using mutations in genomes. The aim of this study was to improve the prediction of the ANRS gold standard in predicting HIV drug resistance.

METHODS

A genome sequence and HIV drug resistance measures were obtained from the Stanford HIV database (http://hivdb.stanford.edu/). Feature selection was used to determine the most important mutations associated with resistance prediction. These mutations were added to the ANRS rules, and the difference in the prediction ability was measured.

RESULTS

This study uncovered important mutations that were not associated with the original ANRS rules. On average, the ANRS algorithm was improved by 79% ± 6.6%. The positive predictive value improved by 28%, and the negative predicative value improved by 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that there is a significant improvement in the prediction ability of ANRS gold standard.

Retrovirus Reverse Transcriptases Containing a Modified YXDD Motif

The YXDD motif, where X is a variable amino acid, is highly conserved among various viral RNA-dependent DNA polymerases. Mutations in the YXDD motif can abolish enzymatic activity, alter the processivity and fidelity of enzymes and decrease virus infectivity. This review provides a summary of the significant documented studies on the YXDD motif of HIV-1, simian immunodeficiency virus, feline immunodeficiency virus and murine leukaemia virus and the impact of mutation that this motif has had on viral pathogenesis and drug treatment.

Analysis of Treatment Costs for HIV RNA Reductions and CD4 Increases for Darunavir Versus Other Antiretrovirals in Treatment-Experienced, HIV–Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

For patients with preexisting HIV drug resistance, a wide range of antiretrovirals are used, with differences in efficacy and cost. The additional cost per incremental 25 cell rise in CD4 count, or 0.5 log reduction in HIV RNA, was calculated for 8 antiretrovirals using pivotal clinical trials data.

METHOD

For approved antiretrovirals in HIV therapy--experienced patients, 24-week efficacy (benefit over control in HIV RNA and CD4 count) was extracted from pivotal trials in published reports and compared with the additional treatment cost versus the control arm of each trial (2006 US wholesale acquisition costs). Treatment costs in the POWER trials were calculated directly from the treatment use database.

RESULTS

Data were available from 11 clinical trials in more than 4,000 antiretroviral treatment--experienced patients: Gilead 907 (TDF vs. placebo), TORO1/2 (T-20/OBR vs. OBR), RESIST-1/2 (TPV/r vs. control PI), BMS-045 (ATV/r vs. LPV/r), CONTEXT (fAPV/r vs. LPV/r), CAESAR (3TC vs. placebo), CNA3002 (ABC vs. placebo), and POWER 1/2 (DRV/r vs. control PI). Additional cost per 0.5 log reduction in HIV RNA was $152 for ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r), $4,453 for lamivudine (3TC), $4,274 for abacavir (ABC), $4,641 for tenofovir (TDF), and $13,217 for enfuvirtide (T-20). Cost per 25 cell rise in CD4 ranged from $132 for darunavir/r to $16,464 for T-20.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide range of costs associated with efficacy improvements across the classes of antiretrovirals used for antiretroviral treatment--experienced patients. This analysis does not account for differences in toxicity, use of concomitant medications, or long-term adherence, which could also influence value assessments.

HIV-1 genetic diversity and drug resistance among Senegalese patients in the public health system

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations and genetic variability among Senegalese patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the public health system. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 72 patients with suspected therapeutic failure. HIV-1 genotyping was performed with Viroseq HIV-1 Genotyping System v2.0 or the procedure developed by the ANRS AC11 resistance study group, and a phylogenetic analysis was performed. The median follow-up visit was at 40 (range, 12 to 123) months, and the median viral load was 4.67 (range, 3.13 to 6.94) log(10) copies/ml. The first-line therapeutic regimen was nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus efavirenz (EFV) or NRTIs plus nevirapine (NVP) (54/72 patients; 75%), and the second-line therapy was NRTIs plus a protease inhibitor (PI/r) (18/72; 25%). Fifty-five patients (55/72; 76.39%) had at least one drug resistance mutation. The drug resistance rates were 72.22 and 88.89% for the first-line and second-line ARTs, respectively. In NRTI mutations, thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) were found in 50.79% and the M184V mutation was found in 34.92% of the samples. For non-NRTI resistance, we noted a predominance of the K103N mutation (46.27%). For PI/r, several cases of mutations were found with a predominance of M46I and L76V/F at 24% each. The phylogenetic analysis revealed CRF02_AG as the predominant circulating recombinant form (43/72; 59.72%). We found a high prevalence of resistance mutations and a high rate of TAMs among Senegalese patients in the public health system. These findings emphasize the need to improve virological monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV/AIDS patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy era

Despite the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in improving clinical outcomes, treatment failure remains a significant challenge, particularly for highly treatment-experienced patients. This review evaluates current issues in the management of HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients. It may provide guidance in selecting active, tolerable drug combinations that promote a reasonable quality of life, full adherence and a durable treatment response. Current treatment guidelines and clinical trial data were reviewed to identify reasons for treatment failure and to summarize therapy options for treatment-experienced and highly treatment-experienced patients. Current treatment options include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and inhibitors of viral fusion, entry and integration. The use of NRTIs may be limited by resistance and short- and long-term toxicities. Resistance has restricted the NNRTI class with cross-resistance preventing their sequential use. Etravirine, a next-generation NNRTI, however, demonstrates effective virological suppression in patients with baseline NNRTI resistance. Boosted PIs are key components of ART for treatment-experienced patients. The newer boosted PIs tipranavir and darunavir have demonstrated impressive activity in patients with resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs, as well as in less treatment-experienced patients for darunavir. The fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide has demonstrated efficacy in heavily treatment-experienced patients, although injection-site reactions can be problematical. The recently approved integrase inhibitor raltegravir has also shown impressive potency and tolerability in highly treatment-experienced patients. Finally, the entry inhibitor maraviroc has also been approved recently, although its use is somewhat limited by the need for HIV tropism testing. The availability of potent next-generation PIs, NNRTIs, integrase and entry-inhibitors may offer improved therapy for treatment-experienced patients, including those with multiresistant virus. These new drugs may reduce HIV immunological and clinical progression and in doing so may also reduce treatment costs.

Quadruple Nucleoside Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, Abacavir and Tenofovir in the Treatment of HIV

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. However, problems such as short-term or long-term toxicity and the development of drug resistance could necessitate a change in the therapy regimen. Whereas various HAART options with low pill burden and favourable long-term tolerability profiles are available for naive patients, treatment of experienced patients tends to be more complex and remains a challenge. Treatment with class sparing nucleoside-only regimens could be an option in this context, but the combination of zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC) and abacavir (ABC) has shown to be inferior in terms of virological efficacy compared with the standard regimen. More promising data were obtained when AZT, 3TC and ABC were intensified with tenofovir (TDF), resulting in a quadruple nucleoside therapy. This regimen has demonstrated comparable potency to a standard regimen with AZT, 3TC and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients. Additionally, it has shown to be an efficient treatment option especially in moderately pretreated patients. This is accredited to the potency of the single components and the antagonistic selection pressure of AZT and TDF. The presence of L210W, or at least two of the mutations 41L, 67N, 70R, 215F/Y or 219Q/E, at or before baseline seems to be a predictor of non-response, whereas the presence of M184V does not impede virological response and might even be advantageous. This review summarizes current data on the combined use of AZT, 3TC, ABC and TDF in regard to virological and immunological outcome as well as genotypic predictors of response.

The Effect of HIV-1 Resistance Mutations after First-Line Virological Failure on the Possibility to Sequence Antiretroviral Drugs in Second-Line Regimens

Background

One of the more vigorous debates in the field of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is how to start it and what the optimal drug sequence is.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed. The aim was to evaluate which variables could influence the virological response to second-line genotypic-based HAART in patients with virological documented first-line HAART failure. A positive response was defined as a confirmed HIV RNA level <50 copies/ml.

Results

Two hundred and eight patients were included. Demographic characteristics, risk factors for HIV acquisition, and drugs included in the initial treatment did not significantly influence the considered outcome. According to a multiple logistic model, the presence of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) had a negative association with the virological outcome ( P=0.006), whereas the use of a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) in second-line HAART was positively associated with the endpoint ( P=0.001). Patients receiving a genotypic-based second-line HAART containing a boosted PI achieved a viral load <50 copies/ml in a 74.2% of cases compared with 52.2% of those whose therapy did not contain a boosted PI. This difference was statistically significant ( P=0.002) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.63 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 1.46 to 4.76. This last variable positively influenced the outcome even when the analysis was restricted to patients harbouring a virus presenting TAMs. In this case, second-line HAART was successful in 66.7% of cases with an OR of 3.25 and a 95% CI ranging from 1.28 to 8.25 ( P=0.014).

Conclusions

the wider range of available therapeutic options has made resistance and drug-sequencing considerations a crucial point in selecting first-line HAART. Our data indicate that, by limiting the risk of selecting or accumulating TAMs, it could be possible to save further therapeutic options. In second-line regimens, the higher antiviral effect and genetic barrier of boosted PIs may overcome the limits of the use of NRTI backbones, which retain only a partial effectiveness.

Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation

Interpreting the results of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotypic drug-resistance tests is one of the most difficult tasks facing clinicians caring for HIV-1-infected patients. There are many drug-resistance mutations, and they arise in complex patterns that cause varying levels of drug resistance. In addition, HIV-1 exists in vivo as a virus population containing many genomic variants. Genotypic-resistance testing detects the drug-resistance mutations present in the most common plasma virus variants but may not detect drug-resistance mutations present in minor virus variants. Therefore, interpretation systems are necessary to determine the phenotypic and clinical significance of drug-resistance mutations found in a patient's plasma virus population. We describe the scientific principles of HIV-1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation and the most commonly used Web-based resources for clinicians ordering genotypic drug-resistance tests.

Stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine combination therapy for treatment of HIV infection and AIDS in adults

BACKGROUND

A favourable regimen for people infected with HIV/AIDS is one that provides optimal efficacy, durability of antiretroviral activity, tolerability, and has low adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. The combination of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine (NVP), and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, stavudine (d4T) and lamivudine (3TC), is widely used as first-line therapy, especially in low-resource countries. Analysis of the efficacy, durability and tolerability of the regimen is thus important to clinicians, consumers and policy-makers living in both rich and poor countries.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of the stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine regimen for the treatment of HIV infection and AIDS in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the comprehensive search strategy developed specifically by the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Review Group to identify HIV/AIDS randomised controlled trials, and searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (searched July 2004); Embase (searched October 2004); and CENTRAL (July 2004). This search was supplemented with a search of AIDSearch (April 2005) to identify relevant conference abstracts, as well as searching reference lists of all eligible articles. The search was not limited by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of the stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine regimen, compared with any other regimens for treating HIV/AIDS, in antiretroviral treatment-naive or antiretroviral treatment-experienced adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search resulted in 1,148 records, of which two studies described trials that met our inclusion criteria. One trial was a small single-centre Australian trial of 70 antiretroviral-naive participants, while the other trial was a large, multicentre trial, conducted in 14 countries, of 1,216 antiretroviral-naive participants. In both trials over 60% of participants were male. As the therapeutic combinations compared in both trials were not identical, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis to increase the power of the results. The main findings, therefore, are from the much larger trial, which was of a high quality. This trial found that there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy (measured by treatment failure) between nevirapine and efavirenz (EFZ), when used in combination with 3TC and d4T (RR = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.95, 1.41). There was no statistically significant difference between once daily or twice-daily dosing of NVP, when used in combination with 3TC and d4T (RR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.83; 1.21). It also showed that, compared with NVP plus EFZ, 3TC and d4T, a once-daily dosing of NVP, in combination with 3TC and d4T, performs better in averting treatment failure (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.67, 1.00) than does twice-daily dosing of NVP with 3TC and d4T (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69; 0.97). Frequency of toxicity was higher in participants receiving NVP, compared with EFZ.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The combination of nevirapine, 3TC and d4T is as efficacious as a combination of efavirenz, 3TC and d4T. Once-daily NVP with twice-daily 3TC and d4T is as efficacious as twice-daily NVP, 3TC and d4T. However, toxicity may be increased in the once-daily NVP regime. Additional trials of sufficient duration are required to provide better evidence for the use of this combination as a first line therapy. Ideally, trials should use standardised assessment measures especially with respect to measuring viral load, so that results can be compared and combined in meta-analyses.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir double-dose in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: The tenoplus study

Drug resistance is an increasing problem in the treatment of HIV infection. Tenofovir has been shown to inhibit HIV replication even with thymidine-associated resistance mutations (TAMs) if they are limited to two or less. Double-dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (600 mg QD) was used to determine weather the drug could be virologically effective in patients harbouring HIV-strains resistant to nucleoside analogues (NRTI). A pilot, open, non-comparative add-on study, where patients failing a current antiretroviral regimen, with at least two TAMs, and naive for tenofovir, were given tenofovir 600 mg once-daily for 4 weeks, in addition to their current failing antiretroviral regimen. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with plasma viral load (VL) reduction of at least 0.8 log(10) between baseline and week 4 (W4). Ten patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median viral load was 3.66 log(10) copies/ml (range 3.13-4.03) and the median CD4 cell count was 407/mm(3) (range 136-1102). The percentage of patients with reduction the viral load > or =0.8 log(10) was 40% at W4. After 4 weeks of treatment with tenofovir 600 mg, the median decrease in the viral load was -0.61 log(10) (range -0.05; -0.88) and the median gain of CD4 was +109/mm(3). Despite a twofold increase tenofovir plasma concentrations, no serious drug-related adverse event were recorded except for one patient experiencing an de Fanconi syndrome at week 2. This add-on pilot study supports the concept of double dose tenofovir to virologically overcome the decreased sensitivity of NRTI-resistant viruses. However, the safety of this regimen needs to be considered carefully.

Impact of Newly Available Drugs on Clinical Progression in Patients with Virological Failure after Exposure to Three Classes of Antiretrovirals

Objective

To study the prognosis of HIV-infected patients with virological failure after exposure to three classes of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs).

Design

Cohort study. Setting: French Hospital Database on HIV.

Patients

Patients previously exposed to at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), two protease inhibitors and one non-NRTI, with viral load (VL) values of >5000 copies/ml after the exposure criteria were met and a new treatment initiated between 1998 and 2001 with VL >5000 copies/ml.

Main outcome measures

Risk of new AIDS-defining-events (ADEs) or death from first introduction of a drug never used before occurring between 1998 and 2001 defined as baseline.

Results

The main baseline characteristics of the 1092 patients were: previous ADE in 49% of cases, median CD4 cell count 181 μl, median VL 4.9 log10 copies/ml, median duration of ARV therapy 5.0 years and previous exposure to a median of nine ARVs. The crude progression rates were 20.1/100 patient-years among patients included in 1998, 15.1 in 1999, 11.1 in 2000 and 8.6 in 2001. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the calendar year of inclusion was associated with the risk of clinical progression ( P<0.001). When the types of newly available drugs used at baseline or during follow-up were introduced into the model, year of inclusion was no longer associated with the risk of clinical progression ( P=0.42), while exposure to amprenavir/r, lopinavir/r, abacavir or tenofovir was associated with a lower risk.

Conclusions

The clinical prognosis of heavily pretreated patients experiencing virological failure improved between 1998 and 2001, mainly thanks to the use of newly available drugs with more favourable resistance profiles.

Factors associated with virological response in HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the antiviral response to optimized therapy following genotypic resistance testing and to identify factors associated with virological response in HIV-1-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in 344 HIV-1-infected patients who underwent genotypic resistance testing because of virological failure. Virological response was defined as a plasma HIV RNA level below 200 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL or a drop of plasma viral load from baseline of more than 1 log10. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with virological response.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 40 years, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Fifty-one per cent of patients had received the three major classes of antiretrovirals and the median duration of previous antiretroviral therapy was 4.6 years. At baseline, the median plasma HIV RNA level was 4.4 log10 copies/mL and the median CD4 cell count was 274 cells/microL. At 3 months, 55% of patients (188 of 344) had a virological response, which was sustained at 6 months (53%). Predictors of virological response were exposure to two or fewer protease inhibitors [odds ratio (OR) 1.8; P=0.046], and use in optimized therapy of a new class of antiretrovirals (OR 2.9; P=0.006), of more than two new drugs (OR 3.0; P<0.0001), of abacavir (OR 1.9; P=0.03), or of lopinavir/ritonavir (OR 3.7; P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients achieved a short-term virological response in this cohort study. Patients with the least experience of protease inhibitor treatment and in whom a new class of antiretroviral, more than two new drugs, abacavir or lopinavir/ritonavir was used in optimized therapy had the best virological outcome.

Stereoselective synthesis of 9-β-d-arabianofuranosyl guanine and 2-amino-9-(β-d-arabianofuranosyl)purine

9-beta-d-Arabianofuranosyl guanine (6) and 2-amino-9-(beta-d-arabianofuranosyl)purine (8) were prepared from 2-amino-6-chloro-9-(2,3,5-triphenylmethoxyl-beta-d-arabianofuranosyl)purine (4), a key intermediate which was stereoselectively prepared from 2,3,5-triphenylmethoxyl-d-arabianofuranose and 2-amino-6-chloro-purine. The yield of the intermediate was obviously improved and only beta-isomer was formed by using the activated molecular sieve as environmental friendly catalyst, overcoming the defect that a 1:1 mixture of alpha- and beta-isomers was formed, which was difficult to separate, when toxic mercury cyanide was previously used as catalyst.

Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in children

Much of the success attributed to HIV therapy in the last few years has resulted from improved ways of using existing drugs in combination therapy regimens. The availability of new, more potent drugs such as protease inhibitors and more accurate viral load tests to aid decisions to start or change treatment has also contributed to the success. Published recommendations for pediatric HIV therapy, generated by a panel of experts and specialists, are readily available and regularly updated. Preferred regimens of 'potent' therapy (referred to as highly active antiretroviral therapy, or HAART) currently consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) combined with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a protease inhibitor. More intense four-drug regimens using an NNRTI or a second protease inhibitor as a fourth drug are being evaluated. Problems with HAART include: unpalatable drug formulations and adverse effects, coupled with lack of data on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of various drug combinations. Adherence is a major factor influencing the efficacy and outcome of antiretroviral therapy. Many children cannot adhere to complex multidrug regimens, which cause virologic failure, despite excellent CD4+ cell count responses. This means a rapid progression through the limited number of treatment regimens available. Simpler regimens such as those containing three NRTIs have been proposed as a method of treatment that will allow suppression of the virus, yet circumvent many of the problems previously mentioned. An additional benefit would be the preservation of antiretroviral drugs from other classes for future treatment options if required. The major advantages of triple NRTI regimens are the simplicity of the regimen, good tolerability, few drug-drug interactions, and infrequent adverse effects coupled with a low pill burden. However, abacavir hypersensitivity remains a major problem. Up to 3% of patients may develop an early idiosyncratic hypersensitivity reaction - fever, malaise, and mucositis with or without rash, which can progress to more advanced stages of shock and death. A major concern is the apparently inferior virologic control of triple NRTI therapy as demonstrated in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5095 study with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir (Trizivir) combination in adults. Such a combination should only be considered in special situations. Examples cited include informed patient choice based on anticipated poor adherence on other treatment regimens, or if concomitant drugs such as tuberculosis medication are prescribed. The low pill burden of triple NRTI regimens (especially if combined in a single pill such as Trizivir), offers hope that regimen simplification may still be possible in the future.

[Identification of factors influencing the response of antiretroviral treatment]

OBJECTIVE

The authors had an aim to define the ideal patient profile by determining the factors responsible for an initial variation of CD4 lymphocytes and viral load, and the effect of these factors on the therapeutic response after 12 months of treatment in HIV infected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective study was made on data concerning the clinical stage, the HIV phenotype strain, the therapeutic status, and the type of treatment. This data was compared to the CD4 count and the viral load before and after 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Initially, CD4 lymphocytes values were low in case of: phenotype SI (p = 0.012), patient in clinical stage C (p < 0.0001), or treated with protease inhibitor (p < 0.0002). The viral loads were high for patients in stage C (p < 0.0002) and treated with protease inhibitor (p < 0.0001). After 12 months of treatment, the increase of CD4 count was lower in patients with phenotype SI (p = 0.05). Furthermore, the viral load was statistically more important in naive patient (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

According to our study, the ideal patient is naive and presents with phenotype NSI.

Zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir have different effects on resting cells infected with human immunodeficiency virus in vitro

We have previously described an in vitro model for the evaluation of the effects of different immunomodulatory agents and immunotoxins (ITs) on cells latently infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We demonstrated that latently infected, replication-competent cells can be generated in vitro after eliminating CD25+ cells with an IT. Thus, by selectively killing the productively infected cells with an anti-CD25 IT we can generate a population of latently infected cells. CD25- cells generated in this manner were treated with nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors and subsequently activated with phytohemagglutinin in the presence of the drugs. The antiviral activities of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and abacavir (ABC) were evaluated by using this model. 3TC and ABC demonstrated significant activity in decreasing HIV production from recently infected resting cells following their activation, whereas the effect of ZDV was more modest. These results suggest that the differences in antiviral activity of nucleoside analogs on resting cells should be considered when designing drug combinations for the treatment of HIV infection. The model presented here offers a convenient alternative for evaluating the mechanism of action of new antiretroviral agents (J. Saavedra, C. Johnson, J. Koester, M. St. Claire, E. Vitteta, O. Ramilo, 37th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. I-59, 1997).

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutation selection during in vitro exposure to tenofovir alone or combined with abacavir or lamivudine

Mutations selected or deselected during passage of human immunodeficiency virus strain HXB2 or resistant variants with tenofovir (TFV), abacavir (ABC), and lamivudine (3TC) differed depending on the drug combination and virus genotype. In the wild-type virus, TFV-ABC and TFV-3TC selected K65R (with reduced susceptibility to all three inhibitors) and then Y115F. TFV-containing regimens might increase K65R selection, which confers multiple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance.

K65R with and without S68: A New Resistance Profile in Vivo Detected in Most Patients Failing Abacavir, Didanosine and Stavudine

Antiretroviral treatment with three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is widely used, but the combination of abacavir, didanosine and stavudine has never been investigated.

We describe the surprising and consistent genotypic and phenotypic outcome in patients failing this combination. As part of a Danish multicentre study, 60 antiretroviral-naive patients were randomized to treatment with abacavir, didanosine and stavudine. Failure was defined as one HIV-1 RNA >400 copies/ml. Genotyping was performed using TrueGene™ HIV-1 assay (Visible Genetics, London, UK). Phenotypic susceptibilities were determined with the Virco Antivirogram assay.

Eight patients failed treatment with a median viral load of 2.980 copies/ml (range 478-5.950).

At baseline, five patients were wild-type. Three patients harboured nucleoside excision mutations (NEMs), but phenotypic susceptibilities were within normal range.

All five patients with wild-type virus developed K65R and four of these patients also acquired the S68G mutation. Phenotypic susceptibility decreased towards abacavir (median 8.9-fold) and didanosine (median 3.2-fold), while susceptibility towards stavudine was unchanged (median 0.8-fold). Susceptibility towards lamivudine and tenofovir decreased median 14.2- and 4.0-fold, respectively. In two patients with baseline resistance mutations, further accumulation of NEMs and V75T or L74V was observed. One patient developed Q151M.

Failure of a triple NRTI regimen is possible and frequent with only the K65R mutation. Under adequate selection pressure K65R can easily emerge in vivo and may compromise several future treatment options including newer NRTIs. The unexpected high incidence of S68G suggests a functional role of this mutation in viruses harbouring K65R.

M184V is associated with a low incidence of thymidine analogue mutations and low phenotypic resistance to zidovudine and stavudine

The resistance of HIV clinical isolates with or without M184V was analysed in relation to plasma HIV-1-RNA level and time on therapy. The number of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) was lower in isolates with M184V, this was independent of plasma HIV-1-RNA level and time on therapy for T215F/Y, D67N and L210W. This suggests a direct effect of M184V on the reduced selection of TAMs. Lamivudine use was significantly associated with lower median fold resistance to zidovudine and stavudine.

Tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-experienced patients: results from a 48-week, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once daily doses of tenofovir DF (TDF) administered in combination with other antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients with incomplete virological suppression.

DESIGN

One-hundred and eighty-nine subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels between 400 and 100,000 copies/ml and stable ART (> or = 8 weeks) were randomized (2 : 2 : 2 : 1 ratio) to add TDF 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg or placebo to existing ART in a double-blinded manner. After 24 weeks, patients initially randomized to placebo received blinded TDF 300 mg.

METHODS

Efficacy was analyzed by the mean changes HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/ml plasma; DAVG(xx)) from week 0 to weeks 4, 24, and 48. Safety was analyzed by incidence of grade 3 or 4 clinical and laboratory adverse events.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients had mean 4.6 years prior ART use with 94% having HIV-1 with nucleoside-associated resistance mutations. There were statistically significant decreases in DAVG(4) and DAVG(24) for all doses of TDF compared with placebo, with the greatest effect seen with TDF 300 mg (DAVG(4), -0.62, P < 0.001; DAVG(24), -0.58; P < 0.001; DAVG(48), -0.62). The incidence of adverse events was similar among the TDF groups and placebo through week 24. Throughout the 48-week study, no significant changes in renal function were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment-experienced patients with baseline nucleoside resistance mutations, TDF provided dose-related, durable reductions in HIV-1 RNA. Through 24 weeks, the safety profile of TDF was similar to that of placebo.

Evolution of Antiretroviral Phenotypic and Genotypic Drug Resistance in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Children Treated with Abacavir/Lamivudine, Zidovudine/Lamivudine or Abacavir/Zidovudine, with or without Nelfinavir (The Penta 5 Trial)

Purpose and methods

To describe the evolution of resistance to zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), abacavir (ABC) and nelfinavir (NFV), 113 previously untreated children in the PENTA 5 trial had resistance assayed at baseline, rebound and/or 24, 48, 72 weeks (VIRCO: phenotyping and genotyping with ‘Virtual Phenotype’ interpretation).

Results

At baseline, few reverse transcriptase mutations and no primary protease inhibitor mutations were observed. Time to detectable HIV-1 RNA with reduced phenotypic susceptibility to any drug was shortest in the ZDV+3TC arm (overall logrank P=0.02). Through a median follow-up of 55 weeks, at their last assessment 11 (28%), 16 (40%) and 13 (32%) children with detectable HIV-1 RNA and a resistance test available had mutations conferring resistance to none, one, or two or more trial drugs, respectively, according to the virtual phenotype. Reduced phenotypic susceptibility to ABC only occurred in the 3TC+ABC arm and required K65R and/or L74V in addition to M184V. NFV-resistant virus was selected slowly through D30N or L90M pathways, and selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare.

Conclusions

Selection of 3TC-resistant virus was most frequent, followed by NFV and/or ABC; selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare. Importantly, although in vitro, ABC selects for M184V as the first mutation, ABC did not select for M184V when combined with ZDV without 3TC. The most sustained HIV-1 RNA response was in the 3TC+ABC arm, but mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to 3TC and/or ABC evolved more frequently if virological failure occurred with 3TC+ABC than with ZDV+ABC.

Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction

A hypersensitivity reaction occurs in association with initiation of abacavir therapy as part of combination antiretroviral therapy in approximately 3.7% of patients. The reaction is possibly the result of a combination of altered drug metabolism and immune dysfunction, which is poorly understood. White patients appear to be at higher risk and patients of African descent at lower risk of abacavir hypersensitivity. Clinical management involves supportive measures and discontinuation of abacavir therapy. Rechallenge with abacavir in a hypersensitive patient should be avoided because it might precipitate a life-threatening reaction.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

Comparison of dual nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens with and without nelfinavir in children with HIV-1 who have not previously been treated: the PENTA 5 randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for children with HIV-1 are limited. We aimed to compare activity and safety of three dual-nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimens with or without a protease inhibitor in previously untreated children with HIV-1.

METHODS

In our multicentre trial, we randomly assigned 36 children to zidovudine and lamivudine, 45 to zidovudine and abacavir, and 47 to lamivudine and abacavir. Children who were symptom-free (n=55) were also randomly assigned to receive nelfinavir or placebo. Children with more advanced disease received open-label nelfinavir (73). Primary endpoints were change in plasma HIV-1 RNA at 24 and 48 weeks for the NRTI comparison and occurrence of serious adverse events for both randomised comparisons. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Children had a median CD4 percentage of 22% (IQR 15-29) and a mean HIV-1 RNA concentration of 5.0 log copies/mL (SD 0.8). One child was lost to follow-up and one died of sepsis. At 48 weeks, in the zidovudine/lamivudine, zidovudine/abacavir, and lamivudine/abacavir groups, mean HIV-1 RNA had decreased by 1.71, 2.19, and 2.63 log copies/mL, respectively (estimated in absence of nelfinavir) (p=0.02 after adjustment for baseline factors). One child had a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir; and three with possible reactions stopped abacavir. There were 24 serious adverse events--six in the symptom-free children (all on nelfinavir), but none were attributed to nelfinavir.

INTERPRETATION

Regimens containing abacavir were more effective than zidovudine/lamivudine. Such regimens could be combined with protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for safe and effective treatment of previously untreated children with HIV-1.

Abacavir expanded access program for adult patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Expanded access programs (EAPs) provide medication to patients with life-threatening, treatment-refractory illnesses before regulatory approval and allow the acquisition of safety information. A 2-part, multisite EAP to evaluate abacavir, a carbocyclic nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor for use in combination antiretroviral therapy, was conducted. The EAP involved >13,000 adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who no longer responded to commercially available treatment regimens. Part A (open-label trials) examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of abacavir, and part B (provision of abacavir through expanded access) assessed only the occurrence of serious adverse events. By month 2 of abacavir-containing treatment, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels decreased by > or =0.5 log(10) in 31.4% of patients, and 5.6% of the patients had HIV-1 RNA levels decrease to <400 copies/mL. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported by 7.7% of patients, the most common of which were nausea, skin rash, diarrhea, malaise or fatigue, and fever. Approximately 4.6% of patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction that was possibly drug related. Overall, the types and incidences of adverse events reported in the abacavir EAP were similar to those reported in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating abacavir.

Mutations in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase during Therapy with Abacavir, Lamivudine and Zidovudine in HIV-1-Infected Adults with No Prior Antiretroviral Therapy

Objective

To evaluate HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) drug resistance in patients receiving abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine therapy.

Methods

In a randomized, double-blind study, 173 anti-retroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults received abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine or lamivudine/zidovudine for up to 48 weeks. After week 16, patients could switch to open-label abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine, and those with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) >400 copies/ml could add other antiretrovirals. From weeks 16 to 48, samples with vRNA >400 copies/ml were collected for genotyping and phenotyping.

Results

At baseline, 90% of isolates were wild-type (WT). At week 16, vRNA was >400 copies/ml in seven of 72 (10%) patients receiving abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and in 41 of 66 (62%) receiving lamivudine/ zidovudine. At week 16, the genotypes in isolates from the abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone ( n=3 cases), WT ( n=3) and M184V plus thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) ( n=1). The genotypes in isolates from the lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone ( n=37), WT ( n=1) and M184V plus TAMs ( n=3). In the four cases where M184V plus TAMs were detected some mutations were present at baseline. Despite detectable M184V in 74% of patients on lamivudine/zidovudine, addition of abacavir with or without another antiretroviral therapy resulted in a reduction in vRNA, with 42 of 65 (65%) patients having week 48 vRNA <400 copies/ml (intent-to-treat with missing=failure). At week 48, the most common genotype was M184V alone in the abacavir/ lamivudine/zidovudine group (median vRNA 1–2 log10 below baseline), and M184V with or without TAMs in patients originally assigned to lamivudine/zidovudine. At week 48, phenotypic results were obtained for 11 isolates for patients from both arms, and all had reduced susceptibility to lamivudine but all remained sensitive to stavudine, all protease inhibitors and all non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Three, three and two isolates had reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine and zidovudine, respectively.

Conclusions

Abacavir retained efficacy against isolates with the M184V genotype alone. TAMs did not develop during 48 weeks of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine therapy and were uncommon when abacavir was added after 16 weeks of lamivudine/zidovudine therapy. Limited mutations upon rebound on this triple nucleoside combination allows for several subsequent treatment options.

Prediction of abacavir resistance from genotypic data: impact of zidovudine and lamivudine resistance in vitro and in vivo

Abacavir is frequently used in antiretroviral combination therapies as a potent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). Four mutations are selected for by abacavir in vitro and in vivo: K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V. Abacavir resistance has also been observed in NRTI multidrug-resistant samples. Furthermore, abacavir resistance has been described in the context of zidovudine resistance. To evaluate the genetic basis of abacavir resistance, the viral genotype and phenotypic resistance were analyzed for 307 patient samples. Low- and high-level resistances were defined as 2.5- to 5.5-fold- and >5.5-fold-reduced susceptibility, respectively. If all samples with abacavir-selected and NRTI multidrug resistance-associated mutations were scored as resistant, 27.6% of the samples were misclassified, mainly due to samples falsely scored as susceptible. Therefore, the relative frequencies of other mutations were evaluated. Mutations at codons 44 and 118 were rarely detected in abacavir-susceptible samples but were overrepresented in resistant samples. Site-directed mutagenesis of E44D, V118I, and M184V resulted in low-level resistance for the double mutant 44/184 and the triple mutant. Low-level abacavir resistance was also detected for a viral clone carrying zidovudine mutations only. Additional insertion of M184V into the zidovudine background doubled the resistance, whereas 44/118 did not lead to a further increase. Incorporating combinations of zidovudine mutations and M184V into the scoring system markedly reduced the number of misclassified samples, whereas 44/118 did not improve the prediction. In conclusion, the combination of M184V with zidovudine mutations gives rise to high-level abacavir resistance, which may be clinically relevant. Thus, options for useful sequential combinations of NRTI are limited.

HIV drug resistance and implications for the introduction of antiretroviral therapy in resource-poor countries

The development and transmission of HIV drug-resistant viruses is of serious concern and has been shown to significantly diminish the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. In addition, cross-resistance between drugs of the same class can seriously limit therapeutic options and may potentially be most problematic in resource-poor settings where new drugs are not widely available. Strategies based on avoidance of virological failure are therefore essential for the long-term success of therapy. In this regard, regionally adapted programs to facilitate proper adherence with therapy need to be urgently implemented, concomitant with expanded access to new antiretroviral drugs. The value of genotypic resistance testing as a prognostic tool to help guide therapeutic decisions has been established. However, the relatively high cost of this novel technology does not warrant its routine utilization at this time in resource-poor countries. Lastly, the genetic barrier of the antiretroviral agents that are prescribed is also an important consideration that needs to be integrated with knowledge of HIV-1 subtypes, drug pharmacology, and medical management of concurrent illnesses. The selection of appropriate first-line antiretroviral combination regimens may be an even more important consideration in developing than developed countries, given that options in the aftermath of treatment failure may be more limited in such settings.

Simplification with abacavir-based triple nucleoside therapy versus continued protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA

OBJECTIVE

To assess the antiviral efficacy, safety and adherence in patients switched to an abacavir-containing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen after long-term HIV-1 RNA suppression with a dual NRTI/protease inhibitor (PI) combination.

METHODS

In an open-label, multicentre study, patients receiving 2NRTI plus PI for at least 6 months, with a history of undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA since the initiation of therapy and plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening, were randomly assigned to replace the PI with abacavir (n = 105) or continue the same treatment (n = 106). Clinical assessments included plasma HIV-1 RNA, chemistry, haematology, lymphocyte counts, and adverse event reports. Adherence to treatment was assessed by patient self-report.

RESULTS

A significantly longer time to treatment failure was demonstrated in the abacavir arm compared with the PI arm (P = 0.03) while treatment failure was experienced by significantly more patients in the PI arm: 24 (23%) versus 12 (12%) (P = 0.03). Therapy-limiting toxicity led to treatment failure in eight versus 14 cases in the abacavir and PI arms, respectively, whereas virological rebound was the cause in four versus two cases. Significant reductions in cholesterol and non-fasting triglyceride plasma levels at 48 weeks were observed in the abacavir arm (P < 0.001 andP = 0.035, respectively). The number of patients reporting no difficulty in taking their therapy showed a marked increase from baseline in the abacavir arm.

CONCLUSION

The replacement of PI by abacavir in a triple combination regimen following prolonged suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA provides continued virological suppression, significant improvements in lipid abnormalities and enhanced ease of dosing.

Treatment Intensification with Abacavir in HIV-Infected Patients with at Least 12 Weeks Previous Lamivudine/Zidovudine Treatment

Objectives

To demonstrate that lamivudine and zidovudine, given separately (lamivudine/zidovudine) or as a single combination tablet (Combivir™), had equivalent efficacy. To evaluate the safety and antiretroviral activity of intensification with abacavir in patients treated with lamivudine/zidovudine for ≥12 weeks.

Design

A 12-week, equivalence study of lamivudine/ zidovudine versus Combivir. Patients who completed this study could enter a 48-week, intensification study of Combivir plus abacavir.

Methods

In the equivalence study, treatment-naive patients were assessed for HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count and genotype. The same assessments plus phenotype were made in the intensification study. Serious adverse events were recorded in the equivalence study and all adverse events in the intensification study.

Results

Lamivudine/zidovudine ( n=40) and Combivir ( n=35) gave equivalent reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at week 12. An identical proportion of patients (74%) in each treatment group harboured virus with the M184V mutation after 12 weeks. Fifty-two patients entered the intensification study and 44 completed 48 weeks of treatment. At the time of intensification with abacavir, all 35 patients with evaluable isolates harboured HIV-1 containing M184V. Addition of abacavir to Combivir led to further decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA and increases in CD4 cell counts compared with the start of intensification ( P<0.001 at week 48). After 48 weeks of triple therapy, multi-nucleoside resistance mutations at codons 69 and 151 were not detected in any patients. All treatment regimens were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Lamivudine/zidovudine and Combivir have equivalent antiretroviral activity over 12 weeks. Adding abacavir to Combivir can be a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients, including those harbouring virus with the M184V mutation.

A randomized, double-blind study of triple nucleoside therapy of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine versus lamivudine and zidovudine in previously treated human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. The CNAA3006 Study Team

OBJECTIVES

Abacavir (ABC) is a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase. We compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combination therapy with ABC, lamivudine (3TC), and zidovudine (ZDV) versus 3TC and ZDV in antiretroviral experienced HIV-1-infected children over 48 weeks.

METHODS

Two hundred five HIV-1-infected children who had received previous antiretroviral therapy and had CD4(+) cell counts >/=100 cells/mm(3) were stratified by age and by previous treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive ABC (8 mg/kg twice daily [BID]) plus 3TC (4 mg/kg BID) and ZDV (180 mg/m(2) BID; ABC/3TC/ZDV group) or ABC placebo plus 3TC (4 mg/kg BID) and ZDV (180 mg/m(2); 3TC/ZDV group). Participants who met a protocol-defined switch criteria (plasma HIV-1 RNA >0.5 log(10) copies/mL above baseline at week 8 or >10 000 copies/mL after week 16) had the option to switch to open-label ABC plus any antiretroviral combination or continue randomized therapy or withdraw from the study.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence interval) of the proportion of participants who maintained HIV-1 RNA levels </=10 000 copies/mL for 48 weeks or more was significantly better in the ABC/3TC/ZDV group compared with the 3TC/ZDV group: 33% (23%-42%) versus 21% (13%-29%). At week 48, the proportions of participants with HIV-1 RNA </=10 000 copies/mL were 36% versus 26% for the ABC/3TC/ZDV and 3TC/ZDV groups, respectively, by intent-to-treat analysis. For the subgroup of participants with baseline HIV-1 RNA >10 000 copies/mL, a significantly higher proportion of participants in the ABC/3TC/ZDV group had HIV-1 RNA </=10 000 copies/mL compared with the 3TC/ZDV group (29% vs 12%) but no difference was observed in the subgroup of participants with baseline HIV-1 RNA </=10 000 copies/mL (78% vs 72%). The median changes from baseline in CD4(+) cell counts were greater in the ABC/3TC/ZDV group than in the 3TC/ZDV group. Few participants (3%) experienced abacavir-related hypersensitivity reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

ABC, in combination with 3TC and ZDV, provides additional antiretroviral activity over 48 weeks, compared with combination therapy with 3TC and ZDV in antiretroviral experienced HIV-1-infected children. ABC was safe and generally well-tolerated and should be considered an active component of combination antiretroviral therapy in this pediatric population.

An Introduction to Nucleoside and Nucleotide Analogues

The introduction of newer and more potent agents has diverted attention away from the importance of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in modern antiretroviral drug regimens. As a class, these proviral chain terminators lack the virological potency of either non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) drugs, due largely to their competitive mode of inhibition and requirement for metabolic activation. However, neither NNRTIs nor PIs alone can maintain the complete suppression of HIV replication required for extended therapy, and both suffer from serious class cross-resistance on therapeutic failure. Thus, the NRTIs will remain essential components of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the foreseeable future, both for their contribution to a regimen's virological potency and the subsequent preservation of the more potent drug classes used with them. However, it has become apparent in recent years that the current NRTIs exhibit duration-dependent adverse events as a class, which may limit the length of time for which they can be safely used. An independent contribution to peripheral fat wasting in lipodystrophy syndrome has been established for the use of NRTI drugs. Of greater clinical concern is their established association with potentially fatal lactic acidaemia and hepatic steatosis. Both these class events, as well as several individual drug events, such as peripheral neuropathy, can be linked to progressive mitochondrial destruction with a greater or lesser degree of confidence. Mitochondrial toxicity, due in large part to the high affinity of several NRTI agents for uptake by mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ, has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. New chain-terminating agents are urgently needed that address issues of improved virological potency, greater efficacy in NRTI-experienced individuals, and greater long-term safety. The nucleotide class of reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI), currently under clinical development, addresses improved potency by abbreviating the intracellular activation pathway to allow a more rapid and complete conversion to the active agent. These nucleoside monophosphate analogues are taken as masked prodrugs bearing labile lipophilic groups to facilitate penetration of target cell membranes. Subsequent unmasking by endogenous chemolytic enzymes releases a partially activated nucleoside analogue metabolite. The NtRTI furthest along the developmental process is tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an orally available acyclic adenine phosphonate analogue, currently in Phase III clinical trials. This agent has shown high potency and an unusually durable response in trials of single-agent therapy intensification in highly treatment-experienced individuals, and its active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, exhibits a long intracellular half-life in both resting and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells that permits once daily dosing. Tenofovir diphosphate also exhibits a very low affinity for DNA polymerase γ in vitro, suggesting a low degree of in vivo mitochondrial toxicity may be observed on long-term follow-up, although clinical data to support this inference are not yet available. The introduction of TDF and other NtRTIs as ‘second-generation’ nucleoside analogues carefully evaluated for potential long-term toxicity, can be expected to significantly improve the therapeutic options for both those currently on HAART and those yet to begin.