Ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C does not modify HIV viral load in HIV-1 positive patients under antiretroviral treatment

Interferon convencional versus interferon peguilado associados à ribavirina no tratamento de pacientes coinfectados pelo vírus da hepatite C (genótipo 1) e da imunodeficiência humana

CONTEXTO: Tem sido sugerido que os pacientes coinfectados por vírus da hepatite C e da imunodeficiência humana (VHC/HIV) devam ser tratados com interferon peguilado associado à ribavirina (PEG+RBV) porque as taxas de resposta virológica sustentada seriam maiores do que aquelas obtidas com interferon convencional associado à ribavirina (IFN+RBV). No entanto, há escassez de trabalhos na literatura comparando as duas opções de tratamento nesta população de pacientes, em especial fora do cenário de ensaios clínicos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a resposta virológica sustentada ao tratamento com IFN+RBV versus PEG+RBV em pacientes coinfectados pelo vírus da hepatite C genótipo 1 e vírus da imunodeficiência humana (VHC-1/HIV), no âmbito do programa do Ministério da Saúde. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de estudo de coorte misto, onde foram revisados prontuários de pacientes coinfectados por VHC-1/HIV tratados com IFN+RBV (antes de 2002) ou PEG+RBV (a partir de 2002) pelo período de 48 semanas, no âmbito da Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas (idade, gênero e peso), contagem de células CD4 e histopatologia - atividade inflamatória (A) e fibrose - segundo classificação METAVIR. O nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5%. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 81 pacientes coinfectados por VHC-1/HIV, 22 que utilizaram IFN+RBV e 59 que utilizaram PEG+RBV por 48 semanas. Os grupos eram semelhantes no que tange à média de idade, gênero, peso, contagem de células CD4 e grau de fibrose. Os pacientes que utilizaram IFN+RBV apresentaram maior atividade histológica com proporção de A2+A3 que superava aqueles que utilizaram PEG+RBV (P<0,01). A resposta virológica sustentada foi 14% no grupo que utilizou IFN+RBV e 23% naqueles que utilizaram PEG+RBV (P = 0,54), com Odds Ratio de 1,9 (0,5 a 7,3). CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes coinfectados por HCV-1/HIV tratados com PEG+RBV apresentaram chance 1,9 vezes maior de obter resposta virológica sustentada do que aqueles tratados com IFN+RBV, no entanto, este resultado não apresentou significância estatística.

Low Response to Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin in HIV-Infected Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Treated with Abacavir

Background

There is little information about the influence of antiretroviral drugs on the antiviral activity of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) against hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Methods

All HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who received first-line PEG-IFN plus RBV were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients in whom virological stopping rules were applied and who did not change their antiretrovirals were chosen. Plasma RBV concentrations were measured at week 4.

Results

A total of 493 patients (78% males, mean age 41 years, 78% on antiretroviral therapy, mean CD4+ T-cell count 561 cells/μl) fit the study inclusion criteria. Mean baseline serum HCV RNA was 5.89 log10 IU/ml, 65% were infected by genotypes 1 or 4 and 40% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3F4). The overall rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38%. Factors associated with lack of SVR in the multivariate analyses (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P-value) were higher baseline serum HCV RNA (2.42 per log10 IU/ml [1.31–4.46], 0.005), HCV genotypes 1 or 4 (5.95 [2.50–14.29], <0.001) and lower RBV plasma trough concentrations (1.74 per μg/ml [1.15–2.63], 0.009). Interestingly, a trend was noticed for abacavir use (2.22 [0.91–5.40], 0.08), which become significant when only considering the subset of patients with RBV plasma levels <2.3 μg/ml (7.63 [1.39–41.67], 0.02).

Conclusions

The use of abacavir might interfere with the anti-HCV activity of PEG-IFN plus RBV. As both antivirals are guanosine analogues, an inhibitory competition between abacavir and RBV might explain this observation, which is more prominent in patients with lower RBV exposure.

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection in patients infected with the hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

Three different groups of patients were considered: group 1, 385 HCV/HIV coinfected; group 2, 198 HIV monoinfected; and group 3, 311 HCV monoinfected. Demographic and epidemiological data were collected. Blood tests included anti-HCV, HCV-RNA test, genotyping, CD4 cell count, anti-HIV, and HIV viral load. Treatment with interferon and ribavirin was proposed. The fibrosis progression rate was assessed.

RESULTS

The most prevalent risk factor in the group of coinfected was the use of intravenous drugs; in the HIV monoinfection group, heterosexual relations at risk; in the HCV monoinfection group, the transfusion of blood. There was no difference concerning the distribution of genotypes or HCV viral load between groups 1 and 3. Although the mean time of duration of HCV infection was greater in group 3 than in group 1, there was no difference when the fibrosis progression rate was evaluated. The response to treatment was similar.

CONCLUSION

In the present series there was no relevant impact of HCV infection in patients with HIV.

Valor de la respuesta virológica precoz como factor predictivo de respuesta virológica sostenida al tratamiento con interferón α-2b y ribavirina en pacientes con hepatitis crónica C con o sin coinfección por el VIH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The most effective currently available therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection is the combination of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin both, in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and in patients without coinfection. In an attempt to avoid morbidity and health costs we searched for an indicator of early virologic response (EVR). We evaluated the EVR efficiency at 4 and 12-weeks after the initiation of antiviral combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A total of consecutive 127 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with combination therapy for 12 months in genotypes 1 and 4 and for 6 months in genotypes 2 and 3, were studied, 62 HIV-coinfected and 65 non-coinfected. They were evaluated for sustained virologic response and EVR at 4 and 12-weeks to initial therapy.

RESULTS

Sustained virologic response was greater in the non-coinfected group than coinfected group; these differences were significant for genotypes 1 and 4. In both groups EVR had a 100% predictive negative value at 12-weeks after the initiation of therapy in genotypes 1 and 4, however came down in 79% at 4-weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The EVR at 12-weeks after the initiation of therapy has a 100% predictive negative value in coinfected and non-coinfected patients. Patient adherence to prescribed antiviral therapy is a predictive value of response.

Antiretroviral therapy 2006: Pharmacology, applications, and special situations

As we approach the completion of the first 25 years of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, there have been dramatic improvements in the care of patients with HIV infection. These have prolonged life and decreased morbidity. There are twenty currently available antiretrovirals approved in the United States for the treatment of this infection. The medications, including their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and dosing are reviewed. In addition, the current approach to the use of these medicines is discussed. We have included a section addressing common comorbid conditions including hepatitis B and C along with tuberculosis.

Coinfection with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus in Injection Drug Users and Minority Populations

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common. In the United States, it has been estimated that 25% of persons infected with HIV are also infected with HCV. The prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV is highest among those infected via percutaneous routes. In fact, in urban areas in the United States, 50%-90% of persons infected with HIV via injection drug use are coinfected with HCV. In addition, limited data from drug treatment centers in these urban areas suggest that the prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV may be highest among African Americans and Hispanics. Little information is available with regard to the epidemiology of coinfection with HIV and HCV among injection drug users (IDUs) or minority populations. Likewise, although there is a growing body of data on the potential complexities of treating HCV among IDUs and the poor response to current anti-HCV treatment among African Americans, few data address the therapy of coinfection with HIV and HCV among IDUs and minority populations.

In Vitro Combination Studies of Tenofovir and Other Nucleoside Analogues with Ribavirin against HIV-1

In patients coinfected and treated for both HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV), administration of ribavirin (RBV) may result in altered intracellular drug levels of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors through inhibition of inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Drug interactions between tenofovir and RBV were studied in vitro in order to provide insights into the safety of co-administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) and RBV in HCV/HIV-1-coinfected patients. In accordance with previous in vitro studies, strongly increased anti-HIV activity was observed when RBV was combined with didanosine (ddI). In contrast, low-level anti-HIV antagonism was observed when RBV was combined with either tenofovir or abacavir. Significantly stronger anti-HIV antagonism was observed when RBV was combined with either zidovudine, stavudine, emtricitabine or lamivudine. Thus, although tenofovir and ddI are both adenosine analogues, their in vitro interactions with RBV are markedly different. These results suggest a low potential for increased toxicity upon co-administration of teno-fovir DF with RBV in patients.

Comparaison des cinétiques de l’ARN et de l’antigène de capside du virus de l’hépatite C dans le suivi thérapeutique des patients co-infectés par le virus de l’hépatite C et le virus de l’immunodéficience humaine, traités par bithérapie interféron–ribavirine, dans le cadre du protocole RIBAVIC

AIM OF STUDY

The RIBAVIC protocol, established by ANRS in 2001 and closed in 2003, compared the efficacy and the tolerance of two bitherapy anti-Hepatitis C Virus for HIV-HCV co-infected patients: IFN-ribavirin and PEG-IFN-ribavirin for 48 weeks. Two hundred patients from protocol were tested for hepatitis C virus core antigen, to study this viral marker kinetics, before and under treatment, in comparison with hepatitis C virus RNA evolution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The available samples for the 204 patients of our study were tested for RNA detection (COBAS AMPLICOR v2.0, Roche Diagnostics) and quantification (VERSANT HCV RNA v3.0, Bayer Diagnostics) and for quantification of core antigen (Ortho trak-C Assay, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics). The viral kinetics were established from samples quantified at D0, W2, W4, W12, W24, W48, W52, W72 (W =week), according to virological response assessed by PCR, six month after the end of treatment (non responders, sustained responders, relapsers et breakthroughs).

RESULTS

We obtained, for each type of response, similar evolution of both viral markers. Trak-C assay show to be enough sensitive, with similar results whatever genotype of hepatitis C virus. The Pearson's correlation is excellent (R =0.94; P <0.001). The intergenotype correlation is correct too, whatever HCV genotype (1, 2, 3, 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The HCV core antigen quantification by trak-C assay is a new tool for the follow-up of the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV co-infected.

Treatment of the hepatitis C virus in patients coinfected with HIV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common among individuals with HIV, and the progression of liver disease is accelerated in coinfected individuals compared with those with HCV alone. HCV coinfection also can decrease tolerability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, the presence of HCV appears to increase morbidity and mortality in these individuals, and as such the management of both HCV and HIV in coinfected individuals requires careful consideration. Although coinfected patients should be considered for HCV therapy, the limited information to date indicates a lower rate of virologic response with current HCV therapies. Moreover, interactions between HCV and HIV antiviral medications may occur and potentially affect treatment efficacy. Thus, the decision to undertake HCV treatment must be individualized.

Hepatitis C and HIV co-infection

HIV accelerates progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. There are conflicting data on the effect of HCV on the risk of HIV progression and CD4 response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Long-term prospective cohort studies are clearly required to resolve these issues. The optimal management of the co-infected patient is also unclear. For the co-infected patient, the optimal HAART regimen for best immune CD4 recovery and least adverse reactions remains unclear. Unfortunately, current HCV treatment is associated with significant side effects and a considerable proportion of HIV co-infected patients are poor candidates for HCV treatment. Better and more effective treatment for HCV (preferably not based on interferon) is urgently required for this group of patients. Patients with good CD4 cell count and with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 are likely to have a reasonable response to treatment.

HIV and HCV coinfection in haemophilia

A substantial number of haemophilic patients are infected with both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV). HIV has been shown to accelerate the course of HCV chronic liver disease and there is evidence that HCV infection may worsen the prognosis of HIV. As many HIV infected patients are stable on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) HCV should be actively managed in coinfected individuals. Pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)/ribavirin combination therapy is the treatment of choice for HCV infection and should be considered in patients with stable HIV on or off HAART with CD4 counts >200 x 10(6)/l. Results of on-going trials of combination therapy in coinfected individuals are awaited. For coinfected patients with end stage liver disease who are stable on HAART liver transplantation should be considered.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin

One hundred six HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were randomized to receive ribavirin (RBV) 400 mg bid plus interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) at two different doses, 3 mU tiw (control arm) or 5 mU daily for the first 6 weeks, followed by 3 mU tiw until completing 6 months of therapy (induction arm). All patients had CD4 counts above 350 cells/microl and 89% were taking antiretroviral therapy. Adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 12.3% of patients, a rate quite similar to that seen in HCV-monoinfected patients. Negative serum HCV-RNA values (< 60 IU/ml) were recorded in 24.7% and 35.5% of patients at 3 and 6 months of therapy. However, in the intent-to-treat analysis, sustained response was reached by only 16% of patients (22.4% in the on-treatment analysis). No differences between treatment arms were noticed. Patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 had a 7-fold higher response rate than those with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Therefore, early, end-of-treatment, and sustained response rates are lower in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with RBV/IFN-alpha combination therapy. Since HCV-related liver disease is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected patients, new treatment options are urgently needed for coinfected individuals.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in the coinfected patient

Since hepatitis C virus (HCV) was first identified in 1989, the impact of HCV infection on the HIV-infected population has been steadily increasing. It is now known that HCV affects the course and treatment of HIV disease in coinfected individuals (those infected with both HCV and HIV). Although there are significant data regarding the treatment of HCV in non-coinfected individuals, there are numerous questions that still remain regarding how to monitor and treat HCV infection in the coinfected population. This article reviews the available data regarding treatment of HCV in the coinfected population as well as how these individuals should be monitored, before and during HCV therapy, as well as how to address the numerous side effects associated with HCV treatment. To meet the demands of the coinfected population. HIV nurses must be willing to expand their knowledge to support, educate, assess, and advocate for coinfected individuals.

Pretreatment of chronic active hepatitis C in patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus reduces the hepatotoxicity associated with subsequent antiretroviral therapy

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an independent risk factor for antiretroviral-related hepatotoxicity, but little is known about the frequency of severe liver toxicity in patients with HIV-HCV coinfection first treated for HCV (pretreated). The aim of this prospective study of 105 patients was to compare the incidence of progression to severe antiretroviral-related liver toxicity in 66 patients pretreated (36 with interferon-alpha [IFNalpha], 30 with IFNalpha plus ribavirin), and 39 patients not pretreated. The subjects could choose whether to receive anti-HCV therapy. Severe liver toxicity was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level > or =5-times the upper limit of normal in patients with normal baseline levels and > or =3.5-times in those with increased baseline levels. The authors also estimated the hepatotoxicity-related risk of discontinuing antiretroviral therapy. During antiretroviral therapy, 10 subjects (9.5%) experienced severe hepatotoxicity: 4 of 66 pretreated patients and 6 of 39 untreated patients (24-month survival: 94% +/- 2.9% vs. 85% +/- 5.8%). After adjusting for baseline CD4 cell counts, ALT levels, histologic scores, HCV and HIV viremia, HCV genotype (genotype 1 in 29% of pretreated patients and 20% of patients not pretreated), and previous anti-HCV therapy, the risk of discontinuing anti-HIV treatment was significantly higher in the anti-HCV untreated patients (RR = 10.4; 95% CI: 1.6-66; p =.0127) and in those with increased baseline ALT levels (RR = 1.014; 95% CI: 1.006-1.021; p =.0005). The authors' data suggest that previous treatment of chronic active HCV is an independent factor associated with a decrease of severe liver toxicity as the result of a subsequent antiretroviral regimen. The authors also confirm that the baseline level of ALT is an important prognostic factor for increased liver damage during antiretroviral therapy.

HCV chronic hepatitis in patients with HIV: clinical management issues

HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common and affects more than one-third of all HIV infected persons worldwide. Prevalence among risk categories varies according to shared risk factors for transmission, mainly intravenous drug use (IDU) and hemophiliacs. Chronic HCV infection seems to accelerate the course of HIV disease, resulting in a worsened clinical and immunological progression. At the same time, several studies suggest that HIV disease modifies the natural history of HCV infection, leading to a faster course of progression from active hepatitis to cirrhosis, to end stage liver disease and death. HCV infection mimics opportunistic diseases because its natural history is significantly accelerated in HIV patients. Since highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has slowed the progression of HIV disease and decreased the rate of HIV associated mortality, the prognosis of HIV disease has been modified, and the need to treat HCV coinfection become a significant issue. Because of the poor response rate obtained by either interferon alone or interferon thrice weekly plus ribavirin, the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin will probably become the standard of care, although the clinicians should be aware of the overlapping toxicity of nucleoside analogues and ribavirin. Many selected categories of patients pose particular challenges to physicians treating HCV infection: nonresponders to interferon, cirrhotic patients, and patients infected with both HCV and HBV. Liver transplantation in HIV patients is currently under evaluation, but should become the rescue therapy for HIV patients with end stage liver disease.

Clinical experiences with interferon as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection accelerates progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) toward cirrhosis. Thus, with the increase of life expectancy observed after introduction of combination antiretroviral treatment, liver disease is becoming an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. In addition, HCV co-infection blunts CD4 restoration induced by HAART and increases HAART hepatotoxicity. For all these reasons, anti-HCV treatment is mandatory in HIV seropositives. The perfect treatment of hepatitis C should not only be safe and effective, but it should not have any adverse impact on HIV diseases and concurrent anti-HIV therapy. Two drugs are currently licensed for treatment of HCV: interferon alfa (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. Three hundred and thirty-eight patients have been included in pilot studies on the efficacy and tolerability of IFNalpha monotherapy: 16% showed sustained response and 10% dropped out. No significant adverse impact of IFNalpha monotherapy on HIV diseases or antiretroviral treatment has been observed. IFNalpha and ribavirin in combination have been introduced more recently: only 88 patients were included in pilot studies published as full papers with a 25% sustained response and an 11% rate of drop outs. Anemia and cumulative toxicity with didanosine were the most important side effects of combination treatment, but it did not affect HIV disease progression. Higher rates of sustained response (33%) without increase of side effects have been observed in preliminary experiences with the new long-acting pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin. The search for the perfect treatment continues.

Management of hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Hepatitis C virus-related liver disease and its associated complications are steadily emerging health concerns in persons co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. The increasing number of liver-related deaths in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus co-infected individuals supports the compelling argument for more aggressive treatment in these patients. The safety and efficacy of interferon/ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients is currently under evaluation. Despite well-documented concern over highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated hepatotoxicity human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients should be offered antiretroviral therapy. Since management of co-infected patients is complex a multidisciplinary approach is needed in order to facilitate care and help patients to achieve a positive outcome.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis in HIV-infected patients: Spanish Consensus Conference. October 2000

Co-infection by human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B and C viruses is quite common because they share similar routes of transmission. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients in the last few years. However, chronic viral hepatitis represents an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, either as a result of end-stage liver disease or as a consequence of hepatotoxicity induced by antiretroviral drugs. The main goal of the Consensus Conference was to establish specific recommendations for the management of chronic viral hepatitis B and C in HIV-infected patients. The role of orthotopic liver transplantation for co-infected individuals with end-stage liver disease was also assessed.

Hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients--therapeutic approach

The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has extended the lifespan of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As the prognosis of HIV infection has improved, liver disease associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become clinically significant in patients with HIV, liver failure being a frequent cause of death in this population. HIV infection may accelerate the course of liver disease in patients co-infected with HCV, so infection with HCV should be treated like any other opportunistic disease in these patients. Nowadays, combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-negative patients. Preliminary results of combination therapy in HIV/HCV co-infected patients have been promising, showing a sustained response rate in 40% of these patients. Patients with higher CD4 counts and lower HCV/HIV viral load and those infected with HCV genotype 3a have a better response to therapy. Potential drug interactions between HAART therapy and interferon and ribavirin treatment emphasize the importance of initiating treatment of HCV infection in HIV-positive individuals as soon as possible and ideally before the need for anti-HIV therapy. Recent case reports have suggested that liver transplantation might be an appropriate procedure in HIV patients with undetectable HIV viral load, high CD4 counts and HCV advanced liver disease. However, the limited amount of available information and the complexities of drug interactions between HAART therapy and immunosuppressive drugs oblige us to be prudent within considering such a procedure.

Hepatitis C and human immune deficiency coinfection at the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been widely studied before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART). We reviewed the potential impact of HAART on hepatitis C as well as the interactions between HIV and HCV therapies. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of: (i) symptomatic liver disease in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients at the era of triple antiretroviral therapy; (ii) potential liver deterioration paralleling immune restoration; (iii) lack of impact of triple antiretroviral therapy on HCV load; and (iv) potential drug-related hepatitis which may modify the natural history of HCV-related liver disease. Liver biopsies should be performed regularly in these patients in order to identify patients with severe liver disease who require early initiation of anti-HCV therapy under close monitoring of their immune status. Treatment is, to date, based on the combination of ribavirin and interferon with an expected sustained response rate around 25%. An important unresolved issue is to better delineate the temporal place of anti-HCV and anti-HIV antiviral therapies. At least in coinfected patients with significant liver disease, namely necro-inflammatory activity and/or fibrosis >or= 2, we believe that anti-HCV therapy is the priority since it lessens the risk of drug-induced hepatitis and of hepatitis due to immune restoration.

The impact of HIV therapy on co-infection with hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses

Improving survival for people with HIV has brought management of co-morbidities into focus. In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, co-infection with either hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis C virus, and HIV therapies themselves, have increased liver disease-related morbidity and mortality. The dual anti-HIV and anti-hepatitis B activity of several established and emerging therapeutic agents provides the opportunity to both restore immune function and prevent liver disease progression in people with HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infection. Improving hepatitis C antiviral therapy also provides optimism around management of liver disease in people with HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infection. However, formulation of appropriate therapeutic strategies for HIV-hepatitis B and HIV-hepatitis C co-infection requires further research, including clinical trials of combination antiviral therapy with specific anti-hepatitis B and anti-hepatitis C activity. A possible role may also exist for combined antiviral and immune-based therapies.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infections

Hepatitis C coinfection is common in patients with HIV, particularly in injection-drug users. Hepatitis C virus levels tend to be higher in coinfected patients, and histologic progression is more rapid than in patients with HCV alone. The efficacy of interferon monotherapy in HIV patients with an adequate CD4 cell count is comparable to that observed in patients without HIV. The combination of interferon plus ribavirin and pegylated interferon will further improve response rates. Interferon therapy is associated with leukopenia and a decrease in absolute CD4 cell count. Some concern remains that ribavirin might reduce the activity of pyrimidine analogues such as zidovudine and stavudine, and HIV-RNA levels should be followed when these medications are given concurrently. It is hoped that in time, new drug development will make the multiple-drug therapeutic strategy that has been highly successful in the management of HIV feasible for the treatment of HCV.

Risk factors for severe hepatic injury after introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of HIV infection with highly antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may be limited by liver toxicity. Its incidence and risk factors are not well known.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review. Naive patients beginning HAART between January 1997 and January 2000. Severe transaminase elevation was defined as fivefold or higher rise over upper normal limits, or as > or =3.5-fold rise above abnormal baseline values.

RESULTS

Of 222 study subjects, 38%, 5%, and 2% were coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis D virus, respectively. Besides two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 96 patients received protease inhibitors (PIs), 90 received nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and 35 received a PI + NNRTI combination. Severe hepatic injury developed in 21 (9%): 10% PI, 9%, and 9% PI + NNRTI. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified alcohol abuse, HCV coinfection, and older age as independent risk factors. Predictor variables in the final multivariate model were: alcohol abuse (risk ratio [RR], 5.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-23.15; p =.01], positive HCV serology (RR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.32-12.10; p =.01], and older age (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 10% of study subjects who start HAART experience severe transaminase elevation, irrespective of the treatment. Avoidance of alcohol abuse, especially in study subjects coinfected with HCV, will reduce the risk of hepatic injury after HAART. When possible, prior treatment for chronic HCV infection should be considered.

Characteristics of hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected people

Knowledge pertaining to hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection is currently incomplete or conflicting. Several points are well studied, however. Plasma HCV RNA levels are higher in matched HIV-infected people than in HIV-seronegative control subjects and are inversely correlated with CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts. HCV genotype does not appear to influence this value. Co-infected individuals develop histological and clinical features of HCV liver disease more rapidly than HIV-seronegative patients. Co-infected individuals appear to respond to interferon-alpha therapy equally as well as HIV-seronegative HCV-infected adults, but minimal information exists regarding the efficacy and toxicity of combination HCV therapy (interferon-alpha plus ribavirin) in this population. Adverse consequences of highly active antiretroviral therapy in co-infected patients include hepatic toxicity and, in a minority of patients, an 'immune restoration syndrome'. It is unclear whether long term, highly active antiretroviral therapy positively or negatively influences the natural history of HCV infection.