Re-occurrence of HIV-1 drug mutations after treatment re-initiation following interruption in patients with multiple treatment failure

Kinetics of archived M184V mutation in treatment-experienced virally suppressed HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the kinetics of drug-resistant viral variants (DRVs) harboring the M184V mutation in the proviral DNA of long-term virally suppressed patients, and factors associated with DRV persistence.

METHODS

HIV-DNA from blood cells stored in 2019 and 2016 was sequenced using both Sanger and ultradeep sequencing (SS and UDS, with a detection threshold of 1%) in ART-treated patients with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 5 years, with past M184V mutation documented in HIV-RNA.

RESULTS

Among the 79 tested patients, by combining SS and UDS, the M184V was found to be absent in 26/79 (33%) patients (M184V- patients), and persisted in 53/79 (67%) (M184V+ patients). The M184V+ patients had a longer history of ART, a lower CD4 nadir and higher pretherapeutic HIV-RNA. Among the 37 patients with viral sequences assessed by UDS, the proportion of M184V+ DRVs significantly decreased between 2016 and 2019 (40% versus 14%, p=0.005). The persistence of M184V was associated with the duration and level of HIV-RNA replication under 3TC/FTC (p=0.0009 and p=0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

While it decreased over time in HIV-DNA, the M184V mutation was more frequently persistent in the HIV-DNA of more experienced patients with longer past replication under 3TC/FTC.

Resistance against Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors and Relevance to HIV Persistence

Drug resistance prevents the successful treatment of HIV-positive individuals by decreasing viral sensitivity to a drug or a class of drugs. In addition to transmitted resistant viruses, treatment-naïve individuals can be confronted with the problem of drug resistance through de novo emergence of such variants. Resistant viruses have been reported for every antiretroviral drug tested so far, including the integrase strand transfer inhibitors raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir. However, de novo resistant variants against dolutegravir have been found in treatment-experienced but not in treatment-naïve individuals, a characteristic that is unique amongst antiretroviral drugs. We review here the issue of drug resistance against integrase strand transfer inhibitors as well as both pre-clinical and clinical studies that have led to the identification of the R263K mutation in integrase as a signature resistance substitution for dolutegravir. We also discuss how the topic of drug resistance against integrase strand transfer inhibitors may have relevance in regard to the nature of the HIV reservoir and possible HIV curative strategies.

Comparison of resistance mutation patterns in historical plasma HIV RNA genotypes with those in current proviral HIV DNA genotypes among extensively treated patients with suppressed replication

OBJECTIVES

Heavily treatment-experienced patients with good virological control could be at risk of virological failure on switching to a new regimen if pre-existing drug resistance is not taken into account. We examined whether genotyping based on cellular HIV-1 DNA during controlled viraemia identifies resistance mutations detected in plasma HIV-1 RNA during treatment with previous antiretroviral regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 169 patients enrolled in the Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA (ANRS) 138-intEgrase inhibitor MK_0518 to Avoid Subcutaneous Injections of EnfuviRtide (EASIER) trial had already received three antiretroviral drug classes [nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and protease inhibitor (PI)] and had plasma HIV-1 RNA<400 copies/ml at baseline. The results of previous resistance genotyping of plasma HIV-1 RNA in individual patients were compared with those of resistance genotyping of whole-blood HIV-1 DNA at randomization.

RESULTS

A median of 4 plasma RNA genotypes were available for the 169 patients. The median numbers of resistance mutations in HIV-1 RNA and DNA were, respectively, 5 and 4 for NRTIs, 2 and 1 for NNRTIs, and 10 and 8 for PIs. The difference was significant for all three drug classes (P=0.001). Resistance to at least one antiretroviral drug was detected exclusively in HIV-1 RNA or in DNA in 63% and 13% of patients for NRTI, 47% and 1% of patients for NNRTI, and 50% and 7% of patients for PI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that, among highly treatment-experienced patients on effective highly active antiretroviral therapy, resistance genotyping of HIV-1 DNA detects fewer resistance mutations than previous analyses of HIV-1 RNA. These results have implications for patient management and for the design of switch studies.

Factors influencing the emergence and spread of HIV drug resistance arising from rollout of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Background

The potential for emergence and spread of HIV drug resistance from rollout of antiretroviral (ARV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an important public health concern. We investigated determinants of HIV drug resistance prevalence after PrEP implementation through mathematical modeling.

Methodology

A model incorporating heterogeneity in age, gender, sexual activity, HIV infection status, stage of disease, PrEP coverage/discontinuation, and HIV drug susceptibility, was designed to simulate the impact of PrEP on HIV prevention and drug resistance in a sub-Saharan epidemic.

Principal Findings

Analyses suggest that the prevalence of HIV drug resistance is influenced most by the extent and duration of inadvertent PrEP use in individuals already infected with HIV. Other key factors affecting drug resistance prevalence include the persistence time of transmitted resistance and the duration of inadvertent PrEP use in individuals who become infected on PrEP. From uncertainty analysis, the median overall prevalence of drug resistance at 10 years was predicted to be 9.2% (interquartile range 6.9%–12.2%). An optimistic scenario of 75% PrEP efficacy, 60% coverage of the susceptible population, and 5% inadvertent PrEP use predicts a rise in HIV drug resistance prevalence to only 2.5% after 10 years. By contrast, in a pessimistic scenario of 25% PrEP efficacy, 15% population coverage, and 25% inadvertent PrEP use, resistance prevalence increased to over 40%.

Conclusions

Inadvertent PrEP use in previously-infected individuals is the major determinant of HIV drug resistance prevalence arising from PrEP. Both the rate and duration of inadvertent PrEP use are key factors. PrEP rollout programs should include routine monitoring of HIV infection status to limit the spread of drug resistance.

Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV/AIDS patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy era

Despite the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in improving clinical outcomes, treatment failure remains a significant challenge, particularly for highly treatment-experienced patients. This review evaluates current issues in the management of HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients. It may provide guidance in selecting active, tolerable drug combinations that promote a reasonable quality of life, full adherence and a durable treatment response. Current treatment guidelines and clinical trial data were reviewed to identify reasons for treatment failure and to summarize therapy options for treatment-experienced and highly treatment-experienced patients. Current treatment options include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and inhibitors of viral fusion, entry and integration. The use of NRTIs may be limited by resistance and short- and long-term toxicities. Resistance has restricted the NNRTI class with cross-resistance preventing their sequential use. Etravirine, a next-generation NNRTI, however, demonstrates effective virological suppression in patients with baseline NNRTI resistance. Boosted PIs are key components of ART for treatment-experienced patients. The newer boosted PIs tipranavir and darunavir have demonstrated impressive activity in patients with resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs, as well as in less treatment-experienced patients for darunavir. The fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide has demonstrated efficacy in heavily treatment-experienced patients, although injection-site reactions can be problematical. The recently approved integrase inhibitor raltegravir has also shown impressive potency and tolerability in highly treatment-experienced patients. Finally, the entry inhibitor maraviroc has also been approved recently, although its use is somewhat limited by the need for HIV tropism testing. The availability of potent next-generation PIs, NNRTIs, integrase and entry-inhibitors may offer improved therapy for treatment-experienced patients, including those with multiresistant virus. These new drugs may reduce HIV immunological and clinical progression and in doing so may also reduce treatment costs.

Perinatal acquisition of drug-resistant HIV-1 infection: mechanisms and long-term outcome

Background

Primary-HIV-1-infection in newborns that occurs under antiretroviral prophylaxis that is a high risk of drug-resistance acquisition. We examine the frequency and the mechanisms of resistance acquisition at the time of infection in newborns.

Patients and Methods

We studied HIV-1-infected infants born between 01 January 1997 and 31 December 2004 and enrolled in the ANRS-EPF cohort. HIV-1-RNA and HIV-1-DNA samples obtained perinatally from the newborn and mother were subjected to population-based and clonal analyses of drug resistance. If positive, serial samples were obtained from the child for resistance testing.

Results

Ninety-two HIV-1-infected infants were born during the study period. Samples were obtained from 32 mother-child pairs and from another 28 newborns. Drug resistance was detected in 12 newborns (20%): drug resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was seen in 10 cases, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in two cases, and protease inhibitors in one case. For 9 children, the detection of the same resistance mutations in mothers' samples (6 among 10 available) and in newborn lymphocytes (6/8) suggests that the newborn was initially infected by a drug-resistant strain. Resistance variants were either transmitted from mother-to-child or selected during subsequent temporal exposure under suboptimal perinatal prophylaxis. Follow-up studies of the infants showed that the resistance pattern remained stable over time, regardless of antiretroviral therapy, suggesting the early cellular archiving of resistant viruses. The absence of resistance in the mother of the other three children (3/10) and neonatal lymphocytes (2/8) suggests that the newborns were infected by a wild-type strain without long-term persistence of resistance when suboptimal prophylaxis was stopped.

Conclusion

This study confirms the importance of early resistance genotyping of HIV-1-infected newborns. In most cases (75%), drug resistance was archived in the cellular reservoir and persisted during infancy, with or without antiretroviral treatment. This finding stresses the need for effective antiretroviral treatment of pregnant women.

Dynamics of NRTI resistance mutations during therapy interruption

Abstract To date, very little information is available regarding the evolution of drug resistance mutations during treatment interruption (TI). Using a survival analysis approach, we investigated the dynamics of mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) during TI. Analyzing 132 patients having at least two consecutive genotypes, one at last NRTI-containing regimen failure, and at least one during TI, we observed that the NRTI resistance mutations disappear at different rates during TI and are lost independently of each other in the majority of patients. The disappearance of the K65R and M184I/V mutations occurred in the majority of patients, was rapid, and was associated with the reemergence of wild-type virus, thus showing their negative impact on viral fitness. Overall, it seems that the loss of NRTI drug resistance mutations during TI is not an ordered process, and in the majority of patients occurs without specific interaction among mutations.

CD4+ T-cell decline after the interruption of antiretroviral therapy in ACTG A5170 is predicted by differential expression of genes in the ras signaling pathway

Patterns of expressed genes examined in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of seropositive persons electing to stop antiretroviral therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5170 were scrutinized to identify markers capable of predicting the likelihood of CD4+ T-cell depletion after cessation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). A5170 was a multicenter, 96-week, prospective study of HIV-infected patients with immunological preservation on ART who elected to interrupt therapy. Study entry required that the CD4 count was greater than 350 cells/mm(3) within 6 months of ART initiation. Median nadir CD4 count of enrollees was 436 cells/mm(3). Two cohorts, matched for clinical characteristics, were selected from A5170. Twenty-four patients with an absolute CD4 cell decline of less that 20% at week 24 (good outcome group) and 24 with a CD4 cell decline of >20% (poor outcome group) were studied. The good outcome group had a decline in CD4+ Tcell count that was 50% less than the poor outcome group. Significance analysis of microarrays identified differential gene expression (DE) in the two groups in data obtained from Affymetrix Human FOCUS GeneChips. DE was significantly higher in the poor outcome group than in the good outcome group. Prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM-R) identified genes that classified persons as to progression with greater than 80% accuracy at therapy interruption (TI) as well as at 24 weeks after TI. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified a set of genes in the Ras signaling pathway, associated with the downregulation of apoptosis, as significantly upregulated in the good outcome group at cessation of ART. These observations identify specific host cell processes associated with differential outcome in this cohort after TI.

Immunological responses and long-term treatment interruption after human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) lipopeptide immunization of HIV-1-infected patients: the LIPTHERA study

We studied the time course of immunological and virological markers after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) interruption in chronically human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients immunized with an HIV lipopeptide preparation. In a prospective open pilot study, 24 HIV-1-infected HAART-treated patients with undetectable plasma viral loads (pVLs) and CD4(+) T-cell counts above 350/mm(3) were immunized at weeks 0, 3, and 6 with a candidate vaccine consisting of six HIV lipopeptides. At week 24, patients with pVLs of <1.7 log(10) copies/ml were invited to stop taking HAART. Antiretroviral therapy was resumed if the pVL rose above 4.47 log(10) copies/ml and/or if the CD4(+) cell count fell below 250/mm(3). Immunological and virologic parameters were studied before and after HAART interruption. The median baseline and nadir CD4(+) cell counts were 482 (interquartile range [IQR], 195 to 826) and 313 (IQR, 1 to 481)/mm(3), respectively. New specific CD8(+) cell responses to HIV-1 epitopes were detected after immunization in 13 (57%) of 23 assessable patients. Twenty-one patients were evaluated 96 weeks after HAART interruption. The median time to pVL rebound was 4 weeks (IQR, 2 to 6), and the median peak pVL was 4.26 (IQR, 3 to 5) log(10) copies/ml. Thirteen of these 21 patients resumed HAART a median of 60 weeks after immunization (IQR, 9.2 to 68.4 weeks), when the median pVL was 4.8 (IQR, 2.9 to 5.7) log(10) copies/ml and the median CD4(+) cell count was 551 (IQR, 156 to 778)/mm(3). Eight patients were still off therapy at 96 weeks, with a median pVL of 4 (IQR, 1.7 to 4.6) log(10) copies/ml and a median CD4(+) cell count of 412 (IQR, 299 to 832)/mm(3). No clinical disease progression had occurred. Despite the lack of a control arm, these findings warrant a randomized study of therapeutic vaccination with HIV lipopeptides followed by long-term HAART interruption in AIDS-free chronically infected patients.

Potential impact of antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis on HIV-1 transmission in resource-limited settings

Background

The potential impact of pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) on heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 infection in resource-limited settings is uncertain.

Methodology/Principle Findings

A deterministic mathematical model was used to simulate the effects of antiretroviral PrEP on an HIV-1 epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa under different scenarios (optimistic, neutral and pessimistic) both with and without sexual disinhibition. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the effect of uncertainty in input parameters on model output and included calculation of partial rank correlations and standardized rank regressions. In the scenario without sexual disinhibition after PrEP initiation, key parameters influencing infections prevented were effectiveness of PrEP (partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) = 0.94), PrEP discontinuation rate (PRCC = −0.94), level of coverage (PRCC = 0.92), and time to achieve target coverage (PRCC = −0.82). In the scenario with sexual disinhibition, PrEP effectiveness and the extent of sexual disinhibition had the greatest impact on prevention. An optimistic scenario of PrEP with 90% effectiveness and 75% coverage of the general population predicted a 74% decline in cumulative HIV-1 infections after 10 years, and a 28.8% decline with PrEP targeted to the highest risk groups (16% of the population). Even with a 100% increase in at-risk behavior from sexual disinhibition, a beneficial effect (23.4%–62.7% decrease in infections) was seen with 90% effective PrEP across a broad range of coverage (25%–75%). Similar disinhibition led to a rise in infections with lower effectiveness of PrEP (≤50%).

Conclusions/Significance

Mathematical modeling supports the potential public health benefit of PrEP. Approximately 2.7 to 3.2 million new HIV-1 infections could be averted in southern sub-Saharan Africa over 10 years by targeting PrEP (having 90% effectiveness) to those at highest behavioral risk and by preventing sexual disinhibition. This benefit could be lost, however, by sexual disinhibition and by high PrEP discontinuation, especially with lower PrEP effectiveness (≤50%).

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Structured Treatment Interruption in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (Canadian HIV Trials Network Study 164)

OBJECTIVE

To determine prospectively the impact of switching treatment-experienced patients with virologic failure to a salvage regimen with or without a 12-week structured treatment interruption (STI). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a 3-month sustained HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. At least 2 new antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, based on patient history, were included in the salvage regimen, as determined before randomization and guided by resistance testing.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were randomized: 79 to the immediate switch (IS) arm and 68 to the STI arm. Success was achieved by 64% in the IS arm and 51% in the STI arm (95% confidence interval for the difference from 5% in favor of STI to 30% in favor of IS). During the STI, the median decrease in CD4 count was 80 cells/mm and the increase in viral load was 0.8 log10 copies/mL. There were no differences in median CD4 cell counts or HIV RNA levels at week 60. Two unrelated deaths (1 in each arm) and 3 AIDS-defining events (in the STI arm) occurred.

CONCLUSION

A 12-week STI before the initiation of salvage ARV therapy did not increase the proportion of patients with 3 months of sustained suppression of HIV RNA to <50 copies/mL.

Approach to the Treatment-Experienced Patient

The management of treatment-experienced patients is complex and challenging. Fortunately, new agents continue to be developed that offer hope to those who have developed resistance to currently available agents. Knowing when, how, and in whom to use new agents is never easy and highlights the importance of expert care for HIV-infected patients. The management of treatment-experienced patients requires considerable expertise, especially now that patients with highly resistant virus can hope to achieve full virologic suppression.

Clinical trials for heavily pretreated patients: update in 2006

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report on recent clinical studies in highly experienced patients with multiple exposures and failures to therapies using new drugs - either new drugs with a different resistance profile or a new class of drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The major concern in a situation of salvage therapy is the capacity to build an antiretroviral regimen with sufficient potency to circumvent the intensity of viral replication and resistance of the virus. New drugs represent the major weapon in that fight. Several drugs have been developed in the past few years that have allowed a change in the paradigm for salvage therapy. They belong either to the old class of protease inhibitors but have been designed to target resistant viruses (tipranavir, darunavir), or to a new class such as fusion inhibitors, entry co-receptor inhibitors or integrase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Due to their potency and their ability to combine in a salvage regimen, the new drugs have allowed us to revisit the paradigm for managing treatment failure. Until recently it was estimated that one log drop in viral load was acceptable as the primary endpoint in salvage studies. Recent results now suggest that undetectability of the viral load has become a realistic target.

Blinded, multicenter comparison of methods to detect a drug-resistant mutant of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 at low frequency

We determined the abilities of 10 technologies to detect and quantify a common drug-resistant mutant of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (lysine to asparagine at codon 103 of the reverse transcriptase) using a blinded test panel containing mutant-wild-type mixtures ranging from 0.01% to 100% mutant. Two technologies, allele-specific reverse transcriptase PCR and a Ty1HRT yeast system, could quantify the mutant down to 0.1 to 0.4%. These technologies should help define the impact of low-frequency drug-resistant mutants on response to antiretroviral therapy.

Structured treatment interruptions (STI) in chronic unsuppressed HIV infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Structured treatment interruptions (STI) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been investigated as part of novel treatment strategies, with different aims and objectives depending on the populations involved. These populations include: 1) patients who initiate ART during acute HIV infection; 2) patients with chronic HIV infection, on ART, with successfully suppressed viremia; and 3) patients with chronic HIV infection and treatment failure, with persistent viremia due to multi-drug resistant HIV (Hirschel 2001; Deeks 2002; Miller 2003). In an earlier Cochrane review (Pai 2005), we had summarized the evidence about the effects of STI in chronic suppressed HIV infection. In this review, we summarize the evidence on STI in patients with chronic unsuppressed HIV infection due to drug-resistant HIV. Unsuppressed HIV infection describes those patients who cannot suppress viremia, due to the presence of multi-drug-resistant virus. It is also referred to as treatment failure. Drug resistance is identified by the presence of resistant mutations at baseline.STI as a treatment strategy in HIV-infected patients with chronic unsuppressed viremia involves interrupting ART in controlled clinical settings, for a pre-specified duration of time. These interruptions have various aims, including the following: 1) to allow wild virus to re-emerge and replace the resistant mutant virus, with the hope of improving the efficacy of a subsequent ART regimen; 2) to halt development of drug resistance and to preserve subsequent treatment options; 3) to alleviate treatment fatigue and reduce drug-related adverse effects; and 4) to improve quality of life (Miller 2003; Montaner 2001; Vella 2000;).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our systematic review was to synthesize the evidence on the effect of structured treatment interruptions in adult patients with chronic unsuppressed HIV infection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We included all available intervention studies (randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials) conducted in HIV-infected patients worldwide. We searched nine databases, covering the period from January 1996 to February 2006. We also scanned bibliographies of relevant studies and contacted experts in the field to identify unpublished research, abstracts and ongoing trials. In the first screen, a total of 3186 potentially eligible citations from nine databases and sources were identified, of which 2047 duplicate citations were excluded. The remaining 1139 citations were examined in detail, and we further excluded 951 citations that were modeling studies, animal studies, case reports, and opinion pieces. As shown in Figure 01, 188 citations were identified in the second screen as relevant for full-text screening. Of these, 60 basic science studies, editorials and abstracts were excluded and 128 full-text articles were retrieved. In the third screen, all full-text articles were examined for eligibility in our review. These were subclassified into three categories: 1) chronic suppressed HIV infection; 2) chronic unsuppressed HIV infection; and 3) acute HIV infection. Studies were further excluded if their abstracts did not contain enough information for inclusion in our reviews. A total of 62 studies were finally classified into chronic suppressed, acute, and chronic unsuppressed categories. Of these, 17 trials met the eligibility criteria for this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteriaAll available randomized or non-randomized controlled trials investigating planned treatment interruptions among patients with chronic unsuppressed HIV infection. Early pilot non-randomized prospective studies on treatment interruptions of fixed and variable durations were also included. Relevant abstracts on randomized controlled trials were also included if they contained sufficient information. Exclusion criteriaEditorials, reviews, modeling studies, and basic science studies were excluded. Studies on STI among patients with chronic suppressed HIV infection were summarized in a separate review. Studies on STI in primary HIV infection were beyond the scope of this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data, evaluated study eligibility and quality. Disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer.A total of seventeen studies on STI were included in our review. However, due to significant heterogeneity across studies (i.e. in study design, populations, baseline characteristics, and reported outcomes; and in reporting of measures of effect, hazard ratios, and risk ratios), we considered it inappropriate to perform a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

In early pilot non-randomized trials, a pattern was evident across studies. During treatment interruption, a decline in CD4 cell counts, increase in viral load, and a shift in the level of genotypic drug resistance towards more of a wild-type HIV virus was reported. This suggests that STI may be used to increase drug susceptibility to an optimized salvage regimen upon treatment re-initiation. These studies generated useful data and hypotheses that were later tested in randomized controlled trials. Randomized controlled trials rated high on quality. Of the eight randomized controlled trials reviewed, seven had been completed while one was ongoing and remains blinded. Of the seven completed randomized controlled trials, six have reported consistent virologic and immunologic patterns, and found no significant benefit in virologic response to subsequent ART in the STI arm, compared to the control arm. In addition, the largest completed randomized trial reported greater numbers of clinical disease progression events and evidence of prolonged negative impact on CD4 cell counts in the STI arm (Beatty 2005; Benson 2004; Deeks 2001; Lawrence 2003; Walmsley 2005; Ruiz 2003). The single RCT with divergent findings from the others (GigHAART), reporting a significant virologic and immunologic benefit due to STI, was different in prescribing a shorter STI duration and a salvage ART regimen of 8-9 drugs. There were also differences in the patient population characteristics with this study, targeting those with very advanced HIV disease (Katlama 2004). Although we await the unblinded results of the eighth RCT (OPTIMA), the evidence so far does not support STI in the setting of chronic unsuppressed HIV infection with antiretroviral treatment failure (Brown 2004; Holodniy 2004; Kyriakides 2002; Singer 2006).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current available evidence primarily supports a lack of benefit of STI before switching therapy in patients with unsuppressed HIV viremia despite ART. There is evidence of harm in attempting STI in patients with relatively advanced HIV disease, due to the associated CD4 cell decline and the increased risk of clinical disease progression. At this time, there is no evidence to recommend the use of STI in this clinical category of patients with treatment failure.

Persistence of drug-resistant HIV-1 and possible implications for antiretroviral therapy

Antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of subjects infected with HIV-1. However, the establishment of persistent infection and the development of drug-resistant variants are major obstacles facing the eradication of HIV-1. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the persistence of drug-resistant HIV-1 acquired by transmission, or due to therapy failure and the possible implications for antiretroviral therapeutic strategies.

Selection and persistence of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 in patients starting and stopping non-nucleoside therapy

BACKGROUND

Understanding the selection and decay of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants is important for designing optimal antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a high-throughput, real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to quantify non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant variants K103N (AAT or AAC alleles) at frequencies as low as 0.1%, and to apply this to monitor these variants before, during, and after NNRTI therapy.

METHODS

HIV-1 RNA in longitudinal plasma samples obtained from patients starting and stopping NNRTI therapy was converted to cDNA and the target sequence region amplified and quantified by real-time PCR. Approximately 10 copies/reaction provided a template for a second round of PCR using primers that discriminated between the mutant and wild-type alleles. Amplification specificity was confirmed by thermal denaturation analysis.

RESULTS

Frequencies of 103N similar to assay background (0.029%) were observed in longitudinal samples from 9 of 12 treatment-naive patients; three patients had transient increases in 103N frequency to a range of 0.21-0.48%, which was 7-16.5 times assay background. Analysis of longitudinal plasma samples from six NNRTI-experienced patients showed three patterns: persistence of 103N variants after stopping NNRTI therapy, codon switching of 103N between AAC and AAT during NNRTI therapy, and decay of 103N variants to below assay background after cessation of NNRTI therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Allele-specific RT-PCR quantified the emergence and decay of drug-resistant variants in patients over a broad range of frequencies (0.1-100%). The rate of decay of K103N variants after stopping NNRTI therapy was highly variable.

HIV-1 resistant strains acquired at the time of primary infection massively fuel the cellular reservoir and persist for lengthy periods of time

OBJECTIVE

Characterization of the early establishment of the viral reservoir in patients acquiring resistant strains at primary HIV-1 infection (PHI), and longitudinal analysis of resistance mutations in circulating virions and intracellular HIV strains.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Drug-resistance was compared between HIV RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-HIV DNA at the time of PHI in 44 patients enrolled in the Primo Cohort and harbouring plasma HIV-1 resistant to at least one antiretroviral drug. Longitudinal monitoring of viral load and resistance genotype was performed in plasma-HIV RNA and PBMC HIV DNA for at least 24 months in a subset of 10 patients. Phylogenetic analysis of HIV DNA protease gene clones was used to explore the diversity of quasi-species at baseline.

RESULTS

Baseline resistance profile was identical in paired HIV RNA and PBMC HIV DNA for all 44 patients. All resistance-associated mutations persisted in plasma and PBMC over 2 years in the five untreated patients. Of the five patients started on empirical HAART, two achieved undetectable HIV RNA at month 6, with long-term persistence of archived drug-resistance mutations in PBMC HIV DNA. Virological failure was observed in the other three patients, resulting in the accumulation of additional drug-resistance mutations in HIV RNA and HIV DNA for two of them. Phylogenetic analysis of HIV DNA clones showed highly homogenous and exclusively resistant quasi-species in the cellular reservoir at baseline.

CONCLUSION

HIV resistant strains acquired at the time of PHI massively fuel the cellular reservoir, and their prolonged persistence is supported by the early expansion of a dominant homogenous and resistant viral population. Results in treated patients showed that classical empirical triple-combination may be suboptimal.

Long-term persistence of primary genotypic resistance after HIV-1 seroconversion

Primary infection with drug-resistant HIV-1 is well documented. We have followed up patients infected with such viruses to determine the stability of resistance-associated mutations. Fourteen patients who experienced primary infection with genotypic evidence of resistance were followed for up to 3 years. Drug resistance-associated mutations persisted over time in most patients studied. In particular, M41L, T69N, K103N, and T215 variants within reverse transcriptase (RT) and multidrug resistance demonstrated little reversion to wild-type virus. By contrast, Y181C and K219Q in RT, occurring alone, disappeared within 25 and 9 months, respectively. Multidrug resistance in 2 patients was found to be stable for up to 18 months, the maximum period studied. We conclude that certain resistance-associated mutations are highly stable and these data support the recommendation that all new HIV diagnoses in areas where primary resistance may occur should undergo genotyping irrespective of whether the date of seroconversion is known.

Evolution of HIV resistance during treatment interruption in experienced patients and after restarting a new therapy

BACKGROUND

To analyse the evolution of resistance patterns in patients undergoing treatment interruption (TI) and re-initiating highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

HIV-RT and -PR gene-sequences were analysed in 14 patients (>5 failing prior drugs) before and during TI and under a new HAART. Genotypes were interpreted using two bioinformatics systems. Additionally, virus load (VL) and CD4(+)-T-cell counts were measured.

RESULTS

Six patients (42%) achieved sustained undetectable VL up to one year after TI (responders), while 8 (57%) maintained VL of more than 2,000 copies/mL (non-responders). Different patterns of resistance-mutations evolution were detected. During TI loss of all mutations was observed in three patients, a reduction of mutations was detected in seven patients, and no alteration was seen in four patients. In the responders, 87.5% of protease inhibitor (PI)-resistance mutations waned during TI and remained undetectable under the new treatment. In contrast, in the non-responder group most PI-resistance mutations continued noticeable under the new therapy. Loss of primary PI-resistance mutations and the presence of one fully active PI in the new regimen significantly correlated with success of subsequent treatment (p=0.028). In two patients new reverse transcriptase associated mutations were detected during TI, G190A (NNRTI mutation) and K70R (NRTI mutation). Appearance of K70R could be explained by a reverse direction of a previously described pathway of thymidin analogues mutation resistance development, while G190A could be due to prolonged subinhibitory drug levels after cessation of NNRTIs.

CONCLUSION

In the evolution of HAART-resistance, different patterns were observed in responders and non-responders during but not before TI. Absence of PI-resistance associated mutations during and after TI and administration of a predicted fully active PI for the new therapy correlated with success. Newly detected mutations during TI may indicate reversibility of previously described mutational pathways.

Virological and pharmacological factors associated with virological response to salvage therapy after an 8-week of treatment interruption in a context of very advanced HIV disease (GigHAART ANRS 097)

Both highly potent antiretroviral drug rescue multi therapy and treatment interruption (TI) have been suggested to be effective in HIV-1 infected-patients with multiple treatment failure. GigHAART-ANRS 097 was the only randomized trial during which an 8-week TI was beneficial in heavily pre-treated patients with multi-drug resistant virus on resuming a multiple-drug salvage regimen. The aim of this study was to analyze virological and pharmacological factors associated with a virological response. Clonal resistance analysis showed that although the viral population was highly mutated and nearly monoclonal at baseline, the 8-week interruption therapy allowed the re-emergence of more susceptible quasispecies to the subsequent salvage therapy, which were not detected by classical genotypic resistance testing. The fact that not every viral clone harbored all resistance viral mutations could explain a part of the virological response to a six to eight drug regimen for patients enrolled in the TI group. This phenomenon was associated with a transient virological response after the use of a GigHAART therapy, but was followed by the re-emergence of baseline resistance pattern and acquisition of additional mutations in patients failing this strategy. A combined factor of protease inhibitor (PI) concentration and genotypic score, expressed as a genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ), was used to assess the importance of genotypic resistance and plasma drug levels in the rate of response to multiple PI combination. The GIQ of each PI used in the regimen was not associated with virological success. However, the sum of PI GIQs was predictive of a virological response. These results suggest that pharmacological enhancement might overcome viral resistance and that there is some benefit in adding the activity of several boosted-PIs to improve the response to a salvage regimen.

Structured treatment interruptions (STI) in chronic suppressed HIV infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Although antiretroviral treatment (ART) has led to a decline in morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients in developed countries, it has also presented challenges. These challenges include increases in pill burden; adherence to treatment; development of resistance and treatment failure; development of drug toxicities; and increase in cost of HIV treatment and care. These issues stimulated interest in investigating the short-term and long-term consequences of discontinuing ART, thus providing support for research in structured treatment interruptions (STI). Structured treatment interruptions of antiretroviral treatment involve taking supervised breaks from ART. STI are defined as one or more planned, timing pre-specified, cyclical interruptions in ART. STI are attempted in monitored clinical settings in eligible participants. STI have generated hopes of reducing drug toxicities, decreasing costs and total time on treatment in HIV-positive patients. The first STI was attempted in the case of a patient in Germany, who later permanently discontinued treatment. This successful anecdotal case report led to several trials on STI worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of structured treatment interruptions (STI) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the management of chronic suppressed HIV infection, using all available high-quality studies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Nine databases covering the time period from January 1996 to March 2005 were searched. Bibliographies were scanned and experts contacted in the field to identify unpublished research and ongoing trials. Two reviewers independently extracted data, and evaluated study eligibility and quality. Disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer. Data from 33 studies were included in the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

STI is a planned, timing pre-specified experimental intervention. In our review, we decided to include all available intervention trials in HIV-infected patients, with or without control groups. We reviewed evidence from 18 randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, and 15 single arm trials. Single arm trials were included because these pilot studies made significant contribution to the early development and refutation of hypotheses in STI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials included in this review varied in study participants, methodology and reported inconsistent measures of effect. Due to this heterogeneity, we did not attempt to meta-analyse them. Results were tabulated and a qualitative systematic review was done

MAIN RESULTS

For the purpose of this review, STI strategies were classified either as a timed-cycle STI strategy or a CD4-guided STI strategy. In timed-cycle STI strategy, a predetermined period of fixed duration (e.g. one week, one month) off ART was attempted followed by resumption of ART, while closely monitoring changes in CD4 levels and viral load levels. Predetermined criteria for interruption and resumption were laid out in this strategy. Timed-cycle STI fell out of favor due to reports of development of resistance in many studies. Moreover, there were no significant immunological and virological benefits, and no reduction in toxicities, reported in these studies. In CD4-guided STI strategy, ART was interrupted for variable durations guided by CD4 levels. Participants with high nadir CD4 levels qualified for this approach. A reduction in costs of ART, a reduction in mutation, and a better tolerability of this CD4-guided STI strategy was reported. However, concerns about long-term safety of this strategy on immunological, virological, and clinical outcomes were also raised.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Timed-cycle STI have not been proven to be safe in the short term. Although CD4-guided STI strategy has reported favorable outcomes in the short term, the long-term safety, efficacy and tolerability of this strategy has not been fully investigated. Based on the studies we reviewed, the evidence to support the use of timed-cycle STI and CD4-guided STI cycles as a standard of care in the management of chronic suppressed HIV infection is inconclusive.

No benefit of a structured treatment interruption based on genotypic resistance in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential benefits of a tailored antiretroviral treatment interruption with duration based on the observed reversion of resistance mutations.

METHODS

In this open single-arm pilot study, 23 patients with multiple treatment failure interrupted therapy and underwent longitudinal genotypic resistance testing. Salvage gigatherapy was started when resistance mutations to at least two antiretroviral drug classes reverted. The primary endpoint was a fall in viral load by > 1 log10 copies/ml after 12 weeks of salvage therapy.

RESULTS

Baseline median viral load was 5.14 log copies/ml and CD4 cell count 43 x 10 cells/l. Genotypic resistance testing showed a median of six, two and nine resistance mutations to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, respectively; viral strains were susceptible to no more than one drug in 17/23 patients. The median duration of treatment interruption was 24 weeks (range, 12-37), leading to median changes from baseline of + 0.54 log10 copies/ml and -30 x 10(6) cells/l. At the end of treatment interruption, plasma HIV was susceptible to at least three drugs in 16/23 patients. After 12 weeks of salvage multitherapy, only one patient had a decrease in viral load > 1 log copies/ml. All baseline resistance mutations recurred after treatment resumption. AIDS-defining events occurred in two-thirds of patients during the study period.

CONCLUSION

In HIV-infected patients with multiple failures and no therapeutic options at baseline, significant reversion of resistance mutations after prolonged treatment interruption failed to restore antiviral efficacy of a salvage regimen and was clinically deleterious.

Approach to the Treatment-experienced patient

Failure of antiretroviral therapy can occur for a variety of reasons, but is often caused by or accompanied by drug resistance, which increases with continued time on nonsuppressive, failing regimens. Response to early virologic failure on an initial regimen may be associated with minimal or no resistance and can sometimes be managed simply by reinforcing adherence or by intensifying therapy. Resistance testing is an important tool for managing patients who are failing therapy; it should be used in most cases to guide selection of the next regimen. For patients with extensive treatment experience and drug resistance, there are a variety of approaches that have been suggested when fully suppressive options are not available. Clinicians caring for such patients must balance the benefit of slower progression associated with continued therapy against the risk of increasing drug resistance and loss of future treatment options.

Multiple, linked human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance mutations in treatment-experienced patients are missed by standard genotype analysis

To investigate the extent to which drug resistance mutations are missed by standard genotyping methods, we analyzed the same plasma samples from 26 patients with suspected multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by using a newly developed single-genome sequencing technique and compared it to standard genotype analysis. Plasma samples were obtained from patients with prior exposure to at least two antiretroviral drug classes and who were on a failing antiretroviral regimen. Standard genotypes were obtained by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and sequencing of the bulk PCR product. For single-genome sequencing, cDNA derived from plasma RNA was serially diluted to 1 copy per reaction, and a region encompassing p6, protease, and a portion of RT was amplified and sequenced. Sequences from 15 to 46 single viral genomes were obtained from each plasma sample. Drug resistance mutations identified by single-genome sequencing were not detected by standard genotype analysis in 24 of the 26 patients studied. Mutations present in less than 10% of single genomes were almost never detected in standard genotypes (1 of 86). Similarly, mutations present in 10 to 35% of single genomes were detected only 25% of the time in standard genotypes. For example, in one patient, 10 mutations identified by single-genome sequencing and conferring resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs), nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were not detected by standard genotyping methods. Each of these mutations was present in 5 to 20% of the 20 genomes analyzed; 15% of the genomes in this sample contained linked PI mutations, none of which were present in the standard genotype. In another patient sample, 33% of genomes contained five linked NNRTI resistance mutations, none of which were detected by standard genotype analysis. These findings illustrate the inadequacy of the standard genotype for detecting low-frequency drug resistance mutations. In addition to having greater sensitivity, single-genome sequencing identifies linked mutations that confer high-level drug resistance. Such linkage cannot be detected by standard genotype analysis.

HIV therapy after treatment interruption in patients with multiple failure and more than 200 CD4+T lymphocyte count

The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a salvage therapy initiated after interrupting treatment in patients with virological failure and more than 200 CD4(+) T lymphocyte count. In this prospective study, 77 patients who received failing regimens had stopped completely all medication for 3 months before starting an optimised regimen consisting of 3-5 drugs. Patients were tested for HIV resistance before and after treatment interruption. Discontinuation of therapy for 3 months was associated with a median increase in HIV RNA of 1.1 log(10), a median decrease in CD4(+) T cell count of 136 x 10(6)/L and five clinical events related to HIV, but no AIDS-defining event. Eighty-seven percent of patients showed a shift from a drug resistant genotype to a wild-type genotype based on the major resistance mutations. Forty-seven percent of patients with a genotype shift reached fewer than 200 HIV RNA copies/ml of plasma 6 and 12 months after treatment resumption whereas none of those without a genotype shift did so (P = 0.03). However, the genotypic shift was not associated with a sustained virological response by multivariate analysis. The use of a new therapeutic class of compound in the salvage regimen was the only predictor of the sustained virological response. Salvage therapy with 3-5 drugs after interrupting treatment for 3 months can be a safe and effective strategy provided the HIV disease is not too advanced. Randomised trials in this population are needed to assess the clinical benefit of this strategy.

Drug-Resistant Variants That Evolve During Nonsuppressive Therapy Persist in HIV-1–Infected Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells After Long-Term Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

The aim of this study was to determine whether drug-resistant virus persists in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after long-term suppression of virus replication. Proviral DNA was extracted from the PBMCs of 11 patients on long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Genotyping of the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease gene of several proviral variants was performed using limiting dilution polymerase chain reaction and single-copy sequencing. All patients were on successful HAART for a mean period of 59 months but had a history of suboptimal therapy and genotypic drug resistance before. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of the RT and protease gene in the different proviral variants, with that of the plasma virus isolated before HAART treatment, revealed that the different drug-resistant viral variants that evolved during the process of gradually building up resistance were still detectable in the PBMCs in 10 of the 11 patients tested. The proportion of resistant variants was found to correlate with the time that the resistant variants had been able to replicate. These data clearly show that virus variants that are able to replicate for a certain period enter the latent reservoir and remain archived in the PBMCs for a very long period.

Comparison of the dynamics of resistance-associated mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors after cessation of antiretroviral combination therapy

The dynamics of mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs were analyzed after cessation of therapy. The results showed that the kinetics of the shift to wild-type amino acid residues were significantly faster for protease inhibitors, intermediate for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and slower for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Benefit of treatment interruption in HIV-infected patients with multiple therapeutic failures: a randomized controlled trial (ANRS 097)

BACKGROUND

Both highly potent antiretroviral drug rescue therapy and treatment interruption have been suggested to be effective in patients with multiple treatment failure.

OBJECTIVE

To assess both the benefits and risks of an 8-week treatment interruption associated with a six to nine-drug rescue regimen in patients with multiple treatment failures.

DESIGN

A randomized comparative controlled trial in 19 university hospitals in France.

PATIENTS

Sixty-eight HIV-infected patients with multiple previous treatment failures and CD4 cell counts less than 200 x 10(6) cells/l and plasma HIV-1-RNA levels of 50,000 copies/ml or greater.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with at least a 1 log10 decrease (copies/ml) in the plasma HIV-1-RNA level after 12 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Treatment interruption followed by multidrug salvage therapy led to a greater proportion of patients achieving virological success (i.e. 1 log10 decrease) at 12 weeks compared with patients receiving multidrug therapy alone (62 versus 26%, intent-to-treat analysis; P = 0.007). The median decrease in the HIV-1-RNA level was -1.91 and -0.37 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.008), respectively. Treatment interruption led to an increase in the number of sensitive drugs of the multidrug regimen (71 versus 35% of regimen with at least two sensitive drugs; P = 0.004). Factors associated with virological success were treatment interruption, the reversion of at least one mutation to wild type, adequate plasma drug concentration, and the use of lopinavir.

CONCLUSION

Treatment interruption was beneficial for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with advanced HIV disease and multidrug-resistant virus.

Evolutionary characteristics of HIV type 1 variants resistant to protease inhibitors in the absence of drug-selective pressure

To understand the evolutionary characteristics of HIV-1 variants resistant to protease inhibitors (PI), the replicating plasma virus was analyzed in three patients shifted to PI-sparing regimen after virological failure. The dynamic features of carryover mutations associated with PI resistance in the absence of selective pressure on the protease gene indicate that viral variants resistant to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and bearing mutations of the protease sequence can maintain efficient replication capacity in vivo.

Can structured treatment interruptions (STIs) be used as a strategy to decrease total drug requirements and toxicity in HIV infection?

Structured treatment interruptions (STIs) are a new strategy under investigation in clinical trials involving a number of different HIV-infected populations. These populations include patients with prolonged HIV RNA suppression who were treated in either seroconversion or later in disease, and patients with virologic failure despite HAART, prior to the initiation of a salvage regimen. The goals of STI vary in each of these groups. Until the results of clinical trials are available, the use of STIs must be considered experimental. There are a number of potential risks, including the loss of a significant number of CD4 cells with the development of opportunistic infections, rebound of HIV RNA, emergence of drug resistance, and reseeding of viral reservoirs. However, STIs also hold the promise for decreasing antiretroviral drug burden and toxicity, and improving quality of life. Given that much of the world's population infected with HIV does not have access to continuous HAART, the development of strategies that could decrease overall drug burden and cost is important. This paper provides an update of the recently published and presented studies on the use of STIs in various populations of HIV-infected patients. In particular, it discusses what is known and unknown about the relative risks and benefits of this approach, and what studies are ongoing. Lastly, it identifies how the use of STIs could decrease drug burden and toxicity in patients receiving therapy.

Structured treatment interruption in patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND

We compared two strategies for treating patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

METHODS

Patients with multidrug-resistant HIV and HIV RNA levels of more than 5000 copies per milliliter were randomly assigned to a four-month structured interruption of treatment followed by a change in antiretroviral regimen (treatment-interruption group) or to an immediate change in regimen (control group). Genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing was performed. Disease progression, death, and changes in genotypic resistance, CD4 cell counts, HIV RNA levels, and quality of life were assessed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 11.6 months, disease progression or death occurred in 22 of the 138 patients in the treatment-interruption group and in 12 of the 132 patients in the control group (P=0.01), with a hazard ratio of 2.57 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.5) for the treatment-interruption group. There were eight deaths in each group. In the treatment-interruption group, the mutant HIV populations completely or partially reverted to wild type by four months in 64.0 percent of patients. As compared with the control group, the treatment-interruption group had a mean CD4 cell count that was 85 cells per cubic millimeter lower from months 0 through 4 (P<0.001), 47 cells per cubic millimeter lower from months 5 through 8 (P<0.001), and 31 cells per cubic millimeter lower after eight months (P=0.11). The mean HIV RNA levels were 1.2 log copies per milliliter higher (on a base-10 scale) in the treatment-interruption group during months 0 through 4 (P<0.001), but they were not significantly different from those in the control group after month 4. The overall quality of life was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV, structured interruption of treatment was associated with greater progression of disease and did not confer immunologic or virologic benefits or improve the overall quality of life.

Theoretical rationale for the use of sequential single-drug antiretroviral therapy for treatment of HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Subpopulations of HIV with mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs often have reduced replicative capacity, so virus with resistance mutations for all existing and new antiretroviral drugs is likely to be appreciably impaired. Issues of toxicity, quality of life and economics mean that the simultaneous use of all these drugs in combination is unrealistic. We aimed to explore the use of sequential monotherapy regimens using a mathematical model of quasi-species dynamics, to see if these could take advantage of the poor replicative capacity of highly resistant virus.

METHODS

We assume for each of seven drugs that a single mutation is associated with the ability to replicate (effective reproductive ratio, R > 1) in the presence of that drug as monotherapy. Parameters included were drug efficacy, the cost of resistance mutations and the number of new target cells arising daily.

RESULTS

The use of seven drugs in a daily/weekly sequential monotherapy cycle led to substantial viral suppression (in the presence of all resistant viral subpopulations) for a wider range of parameter values than a continuous five-drug regimen. Although on any one day/week there is a viral subpopulation with R > 1 (e.g. that with resistance only to the current drug), this subpopulation does not have time to grow sufficiently during the short period when that drug is being taken.

CONCLUSION

These results provide a rationale for trials of sequential regimens, using as wide a number of drugs with different resistance-associated mutations as possible, as a potential 'resistance-proof' strategy for achieving significant viral load suppression.

Persistence of drug-resistant HIV-1 after a structured treatment interruption and its impact on treatment response

OBJECTIVE

Among treated patients with drug-resistant viremia, structured treatment interruptions often result in the re-emergence of drug-susceptible HIV-1. Theoretically, this may allow for a more durable response to salvage therapy. We therefore studied the long-term treatment outcome to antiretroviral therapy in a cohort of patients who had previously interrupted therapy, focusing on the determinants of treatment success versus failure.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study of the response to antiretroviral therapy in patients resuming therapy after a treatment interruption. Virological and immunological studies were performed every month for 3 months and then every 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent a structured treatment interruption and resumed therapy after a variable period of time (median 20 weeks). The median duration of treatment after the treatment interruption was 109 weeks. A transient virological response was observed in all patients who resumed a regimen containing no drug to which their pre-interruption virus was fully susceptible. Virus isolated during virological failure was genotypically and phenotypically identical to the pre-interruption virus, exhibited reduced replicative capacity, and replicated at levels similar to the pre-interruption baseline. In contrast, durable viral suppression (< 200 copies/ml) was observed in patients who initiated a regimen containing only one drug to which their pre-interruption virus was fully susceptible. Despite viral suppression, the pre-interruption drug-resistant virus population remained detectable in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Although drug-resistant HIV-1 persists at low levels during and after the interruption of therapy, durable suppression of this virus population may be achieved with a combination regimen containing only one fully active agent.

No evidence for persistence of multidrug-resistant viral strains after a 7-month treatment interruption in an HIV-1-infected individual

The number of HIV-1-infected patients harboring multidrug-resistant viruses is increasing. Since new antiretroviral drugs with favorable resistance profiles are limited, innovative strategies are urgently needed. Treatment interruptions can lead to a loss in HIV resistance followed by improved response to reinitiated therapy. The authors report the case of a patient with sustained antiretroviral response for 3.5 years after a 7-month treatment interruption. Concomitant with an increase in replication capacity, multidrug-resistant viruses gradually disappeared during treatment interruption. Resistance to protease inhibitors (PI) was completely lost, and resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors was still present when therapy was reinitiated. PI-resistant variants were not detected at four time points after treatment reinitiation. The alignment of the nucleic acid sequences from all different time points suggested that the viruses obtained after treatment reinitiation evolved from less-resistant variants prior to treatment interruption. This was supported by in vitro propagation of the viral plasma population and an individual clone derived from the time point of treatment interruption. This is consistent with a model favoring reversible binding of HIV-1 to reservoirs, as has recently been proposed for follicular dendritic cells. Understanding of this process could help to exploit the reduced fitness of drug-resistant viruses for treatment interruptions.

Origin of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 quasispecies emerging after antiretroviral treatment interruption in patients with therapeutic failure

The emergence of antiretroviral (ARV) drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) quasispecies is a major cause of treatment failure. These variants are usually replaced by drug-sensitive ones when the selective pressure of the drugs is removed, as the former have reduced fitness in a drug-free environment. This was the rationale for the design of structured ARV treatment interruption (STI) studies for the management of HIV-1 patients with treatment failure. We have studied the origin of drug-sensitive HIV-1 quasispecies emerging after STI in patients with treatment failure due to ARV drug resistance. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were obtained the day of treatment interruption (day 0) and 30 and 60 days afterwards. HIV-1 pol and env were partially amplified, cloned, and sequenced. At day 60 drug-resistant variants were replaced by completely or partially sensitive quasispecies. Phylogenetic analyses of pol revealed that drug-sensitive variants emerging after STI were not related to their immediate temporal ancestors but formed a separate cluster, demonstrating that STI leads to the recrudescence and reemergence of a sequestrated viral population rather than leading to the back mutation of drug-resistant forms. No evidence for concomitant changes in viral tropism was seen, as deduced from env sequences. This study demonstrates the important role that the reemergence of quasispecies plays in HIV-1 population dynamics and points out the difficulties that may be found when recycling ARV therapies with patients with treatment failure.

Management of HIV-infected Patients with Multidrug-resistant Virus

Heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients with multidrug-resistant virus remain a clinical challenge to the treating physician. While the goal of therapy in such patients is still controversial, sustained immunologic and clinical benefit have only been demonstrated with complete suppression of plasma viral load below detectable levels. Expert use of resistance testing may help in the selection of the salvage regimen, and monitoring of plasma drug levels may help optimize the potency and tolerability, especially of complex, multiple drug regimens where adherence remains a critical determinant of treatment outcome. The potential roles of newer agents, adjuvants, treatment interruptions, and immune-based therapies remain under investigation.

Structured Treatment Interruption: Approaches and Risks

Although highly active antiretroviral therapy suppresses HIV replication resulting in extraordinary clinical benefits, toxicity, adherence difficulties, and the monetary cost of medications limit the long-term effectiveness and availability of therapy for many HIV-infected individuals. Strategies to interrupt therapy have been proposed as a means to enhance the sustainability of antiretroviral treatment. Widely different approaches with varied patient populations, theoretical concepts, and clinical designs are frequently lumped together as "structured treatment interruptions." This review summarizes the approaches and risks of treatment interruptions in HIV infection. Currently, none of these strategies can be recommended in standard clinical practice.