A matched pairs analysis of venoarterial and venovenous extracorporeal life support in neonatal respiratory failure

Pediatric ECLS Neurologic Management and Outcomes

Neurologic complications associated with extracorporeal life support (ECLS), including seizures, ischemia/infarction, and intracranial hemorrhage significantly increase morbidity and mortality in pediatric and neonatal patients. Prompt recognition of adverse neurologic events may provide a window to intervene with neuroprotective measures. Many neuromonitoring modalities are available with varying benefits and limitations. Several pre-ECLS and ECLS-related factors have been associated with an increased risk for neurologic complications. These may be patient- or circuit-related and include modifiable and non-modifiable factors. ECLS survivors are at risk for long-term neurological sequelae affecting neurodevelopmental outcomes. Possible long-term outcomes range from normal development to severe impairment. Patients should undergo a neurological evaluation prior to discharge, and neurodevelopmental assessments should be included in each patient's structured, multidisciplinary follow-up. Safe pediatric and neonatal ECLS management requires a thorough understanding of neurological complications, neuromonitoring techniques and limitations, considerations to minimize risk, and an awareness of possible long-term ramifications. With a focus on ECLS for respiratory failure, this manuscript provides a review of these topics and summarizes best practice guidelines from international organizations and expert consensus.

Cannulation approach and mortality in neonatal ECMO

OBJECTIVE

Identify associations between cannulation approach and mortality in neonates who received ECMO support for respiratory failure.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of neonates receiving ECMO for respiratory indications at a single quaternary-referral NICU. Associations between cannulation approach and mortality were assessed after adjustment for Neo-RESCUERS score. Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable and outcome.

RESULTS

Among 244 neonates, overall survival was 88%, with 71% undergoing VV cannulation. After adjusting for Neo-RESCUERS score, VA cannulation was associated with higher mortality during ECMO when compared with VV cannulation (HR 4.189, 95% CI 1.480-11.851, P = 0.0069). Disease-specific comparisons revealed no statistical difference in Neo-RESCUERS score between VA and VV cohorts; however, VA cannulation was associated with higher ECMO mortality for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (50% vs. 5.5%, Χ² = 8.5965, P = 0.0034) and PPHN (20% vs. 1.8%, Χ² = 9.1047, P = 0.0025) when compared with VV cannulation.

CONCLUSION

VA cannulation was associated with increased mortality in neonates while on ECMO for respiratory failure, which was independent of illness severity.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to transplant in neonates with fatal pulmonary conditions: A review

Neonates with progressive respiratory failure should be referred early for subspecialty evaluation and lung transplantation consideration. ECMO should be considered for patients with severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and a high likelihood of death while on maximal medical therapy, either in the setting of reversible medical conditions or while awaiting lung transplantation. While ECMO offers hope to neonates that experience clinical deterioration while awaiting transplant, the risks and benefits of this intervention should be considered on an individual basis. Owing to the small number of infant lung transplants performed yearly, large studies examining the outcomes of various bridging techniques in this age group do not exist. Multiple single-centre experiences of transplanted neonates have been described and currently serve as guidance for transplant teams. Future investigation of outcomes specific to neonatal transplant recipients bridged with advanced devices is needed.

Risk Factors for Brain Injury in Newborns Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association of clinical risk factors with severity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain injury in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-center retrospective study conducted at an outborn level IV neonatal intensive care unit in a free-standing academic children's hospital. Clinical and MRI data from neonates treated with ECMO between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. MRI injury was graded by two radiologists according to a modified scoring system that assesses parenchymal injury, extra-axial hemorrhage, and cerebrospinal fluid spaces. MRI severity was classified as none (score = 0), mild/moderate (score = 1-13.5), and severe (score ≥ 14). The relationship between selected risk factors and MRI severity was assessed by Chi-square, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate. Combinative predictive ability of significant risk factors was assessed by logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

MRI data were assessed in 81 neonates treated with ECMO. Veno-arterial (VA) patients had more severe injury compared with veno-venous patients. There was a trend toward less severe injury over time. After controlling for covariates, duration of ECMO remained significantly associated with brain injury, and the risk for severe injury was significantly increased in patients on ECMO beyond 210 hours.

CONCLUSION

Risk for brain injury is increased with VA ECMO and with longer duration of ECMO. Improvements in care may be leading to decreasing incidence of brain injury in neonatal ECMO patients.

KEY POINTS

· Veno-arterial ECMO is associated with more brain injury by MRI compared with veno-venous ECMO.. · Longer duration of ECMO is significantly associated with severe brain injury by MRI.. · Risk for neurologic injury may be decreasing over time with advances in neonatal ECMO..

Overview of the bicaval dual lumen cannula

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a form of extracorporeal life support that provides total gas exchange (CO2 and O2) within the central venous circulation. The bicaval dual lumen cannula (DLC) is an option for patients requiring respiratory support with VV-ECMO. The catheter is inserted via the internal jugular vein into the superior and inferior vena cava, drains blood into the ECMO circuit for gas exchange, and then returns arterialized blood to the right heart for circulation. The DLC facilitates physical therapy, ambulation, and early extubation. This chapter will review the uses, advantages, and unique complications of the DLC.

Inotrope Needs in Neonates Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how inotropic requirements in neonates with respiratory failure are affected by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) mode and whether high requirements predict mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective chart review included all neonates undergoing ECMO for primary respiratory failure from 2010 to 2016 at a single institution. The vasoactive inotropy score (VIS) was calculated as described in the literature. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 110 identified neonates, 96 underwent venovenous (VV) (87%), 11 (10%) venoarterial, and 3 (3%) converted from VV to venoarterial. The median precannulation VIS score was 33.02 for patients who underwent VV compared with 28.93 for venoarterial (P = .25) and 15 for infants converted. VIS decreased dramatically by 4 hours of ECMO in both groups. The VIS before cannulation was similar in survivors and nonsurvivors, but was significantly higher in nonsurvivors after 24 hours of ECMO (median VIS, 12 [IQR, 8-25] vs 8 [IQR, 3.0-14.5]; P = .035) and at decannulation (10 [IQR, 7-19] vs 3 [IQR, 0-7]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with respiratory failure can be successfully managed on VV ECMO even with considerable vasoactive requirements. Vasoactive requirement after 24 hours of ECMO was predictive of mortality.

An overview of medical ECMO for neonates

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a life-saving therapy for respiratory and cardiac failure, was first used in neonates in the 1970s. The indications and criteria for ECMO have changed over the years, but it continues to be an important option for those who have failed other medical therapies. Since the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry was established in 1989, more than 29,900 neonates have been placed on ECMO for respiratory failure, with 84% surviving their ECMO course, and 73% surviving to discharge or transfer. In this chapter, we will review the basics of ECMO, patient characteristics and criteria, patient management, ECMO complications, special uses of neonatal ECMO, and patient outcomes.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support for Neonatal Respiratory Failure: Indications and Impact on Mortality

Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for neonatal respiratory failure is associated with increased mortality compared with venovenous (VV) ECLS. It is unclear whether this is a causal relationship or reflects differences in baseline disease severity between infants managed with these two strategies. Our objective was to identify clinical variables associated with the preferential selection of VA over VV ECLS, as these may confound the association between VA ECLS and increased mortality. We identified documented indications for preferential VA selection through chart review. We then assessed how the presence of common indications impacted mortality. Thirty-nine cases met eligibility. Severity of hypotension/degree of inotropic support and ventricular dysfunction on echocardiogram before cannulation were the most common specific indications for preferential VA ECLS. Mortality was 12.5% when neither high inotropic support nor ventricular dysfunction was present. Mortality rose to 20% with high inotropic support and 25% with ventricular dysfunction present alone and to 50% when both were present. We conclude that severe hypotension and ventricular dysfunction before ECLS cannulation are common indications for VA ECLS that likely influence survival. Research assessing the impact of ECLS cannulation mode on survival should adjust for baseline differences between groups for these important variables.

Extracorporeal life support: experience with 2,000 patients

This is a review of the University of Michigan experience with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) also known as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Two thousand patients were managed with ECMO from 1973 to 2010. The first 1,000 patients were reported previously. Of the 2,000 patients, 74% were weaned from ECLS, and 64% survived to hospital discharge. In patients with respiratory failure, survival to hospital discharge was 84% in 799 neonates, 76% in 239 children, and 50% in 353 adults. Survival in patients with cardiac failure was 45% in 361 children and 38% in 119 adults. ECLS during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 129 patients, with 41% surviving to discharge. Survival decreased from 74 to 55% between the first and second 1,000 patients. The most common complication was bleeding at sites other than the head, with an incidence of 39%, and the least frequent complication was pump malfunction, with a 2% incidence. Intracranial bleeding or infarction occurred in 8% of patients, with a 43% survival rate. This is the largest series of ECLS at one institution reported in the world to date. Our experience has shown that ECLS saves lives of moribund patients with acute pulmonary and cardiac failure in all age groups.

Venoarterial versus venovenous ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) continues to be an important rescue therapy for newborns with a variety of causes of cardio-respiratory failure unresponsive to high-frequency ventilation, surfactant replacement, and inhaled nitric oxide. There are approximately 800 neonatal respiratory ECMO cases reported annually to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization; venoarterial ECMO has been used in approximately 72% with a cumulative survival of 71% and venovenous has been used in 28% with a survival of 84%. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is now the most common indication for ECMO. This article reviews the development of the two types of extracorporeal support, venoarterial and venovenous ECMO, and discusses the advantages of each method, the current selection criteria, the procedure, and the clinical management of neonates on ECMO.

Outcome analysis of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with venovenous vs venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

PURPOSE

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VA) is used more commonly in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) than venovenous ECMO (VV). We hypothesized that VV may result in comparable outcomes in infants with CDH requiring ECMO.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) database (1991-2006). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare VV- and VA-associated mortality.

RESULTS

Four thousand one hundred fifteen neonates required ECMO, with an overall mortality rate of 49.6%. Venoarterial ECMO was used in 82% and VV in 18% of neonates. Pre-ECMO inotrope use and complications were equivalent between VA and VV. The mortality rate for VA and VV was 50% and 46%, respectively. After adjusting for birth weight, gestational age, prenatal diagnosis, ethnicity, Apgar scores, pH less than 7.20, Paco(2) greater than 50, requiring high-frequency ventilation, and year of ECMO, there was no difference in mortality between VV vs VA. Renal complications and on-ECMO inotrope use were more common with VV, whereas neurologic complications were more common with VA. The conversion rate from VV to VA was 18%; conversion was associated with a 56% mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcomes of VV and VA are comparable. Patients with CDH who fail VV may be predisposed to a worse outcome. Nevertheless, VV offers equal benefit to patients with CDH requiring ECMO while preserving the native carotid.

Extracorporeal life support

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) denotes the use of prolonged extracorporeal cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with acute, reversible cardiac or respiratory failure. As technology has advanced, organ support functions other than gas exchange, such as liver, renal, and cardiac support, have been provided by ECLS, and others, such as immunologic support, will be developed. The future of ECLS will include improvements in devices accompanied by circuit simplification and auto-regulation. Such enhancements in technology will allow application of ECLS to populations currently excluded from such support; for example, thromboresistant circuits will eliminate the need for systemic anticoagulation and lead to the use of this technique in premature newborns. As the ECLS technique becomes safer and simpler, and as morbidity and mortality are minimized, criteria for application of ECLS will be relaxed. New approaches to ECLS, such as pumpless arteriovenous bypass, the artificial placenta, arteriovenous CO(2) removal (AVCO(2)R), and intravenous oxygenators (IVOX), will become more commonly applied. Such advances in technology will allow broader and more routine application of ECLS for lung and other organ system failure.

Central nervous system complications during pediatric extracorporeal life support: incidence and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Identify the incidence and risk factors for development of acute, severe central nervous system (CNS) complications of pediatric extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

DESIGN

Retrospective review of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry database.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care units of 115 tertiary centers internationally.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients, 1 month to 18 yrs of age, who had ECLS between the years 1981-2002.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data concerning 4,942 patients who underwent one run of ECLS were analyzed. Six hundred thirty-six patients (12.9%) developed acute, severe CNS complications. Patients who required ECLS during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 161; 3.3%) were more likely to develop CNS complications (n = 42; 26.1%) than patients who did not have extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p < .001; odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-3.57). Stepwise logistic regression analysis of therapies patients received before initiation of ECLS showed that the use of a left ventricular assist device (p = .001; OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.64-7.22), bicarbonate (p < .001; OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.26-2.05), and vasopressor/inotropic medications (p = .035; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48) were significant independent predictors of development of CNS complications. Among patients who had pulmonary failure as an indication for ECLS, the CNS complication rate was significantly higher for those treated with venoarterial ECLS than those who had venovenous ECLS (13.5% vs. 5.7%; p < .001; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67). Multiple logistic regression analysis of the complications other than CNS complications associated with the use of ECLS showed that pH <7.20, creatinine concentration >3.0 mg/dL, use of inotropes, presence of myocardial stun, and requirement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ECLS independently predicted development of CNS complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have metabolic acidosis, a bicarbonate or inotrope/vasopressor requirement, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or a left ventricular assist device before initiation of ECLS are at greater risk for development of CNS complications. After initiation of ECLS, patients who develop renal failure or metabolic acidosis or undergo venoarterial ECLS should be closely monitored for development of CNS complications.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: a decade of experience with venovenous ECMO

BACKGROUND

Despite the emergence of new therapies for respiratory failure of the newborn with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has a significant role as a rescue modality in these infants. Our objective was to compare the use of venovenous (VV) vs venoarterial (VA) ECMO in newborns with MAS who need ECMO and to ascertain the impact of new therapies in these infants during the last decade. We also evaluated how disease severity or time of ECMO initiation affected mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

A report of 12 years experience (1990-2002) of a single center, comparing VV and VA ECMO, is given. Venovenous ECMO was the preferred rescue modality for respiratory failure unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. Venoarterial ECMO was used only when the placement of a VV ECMO 14-F catheter was not possible; 128 patients met ECMO criteria, 114 were treated with VV ECMO, and 12 with VA ECMO. Two patients were converted from VV to VA ECMO.

RESULTS

Venovenous and VA ECMO patients had comparable birth weight (mean +/- SEM, 3.48 +/- 0.05 vs 3.35 +/- 0.15 kg) and gestational age (40.3 +/- 0.1 vs 40.7 +/- 0.3 weeks). Before ECMO, there was no difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in oxygenation index (60 +/- 3 vs 63 +/- 8), mean airway pressure (19.5 +/- 0.4 vs 20.8 +/- 1.5 cm H2O), alveolar-arterial O2 gradient (630 +/- 2 vs 632 +/- 4 torr), ECMO cannulation age (median [25th-75th percentiles], 23 [14-47] vs 26 [14-123] hours), or in the % of patients who needed vasopressors/inotropes (98% vs 100%). From November 1994, inhaled nitric oxide (NO) was available. Before VV ECMO, 67% of the patients received NO, 24% received surfactant, and 48% were treated with high-frequency ventilation (HFV). There was no significant difference between VV and VA ECMO patients in survival rate (94% vs 92%), ECMO duration (88 [64-116] vs 94 [55-130] hours), time of extubation (9 [7-11] vs 14 [9-15] days), age at discharge (23 [18-30] vs 27 [15-41] days), or incidence of short-term intracranial complications (5.3% vs 16.7%). For the total cohort of 126 infants, indices of disease severity (oxygenation index, alveolar-arterial O 2 gradient, mean airway pressure) did not correlate with outcome measures. Delay in ECMO initiation (> 96 hours) was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospitalization (P < .01). New therapies (NO, HFV, surfactant) in the second part of the decade were associated with a longer ECMO duration (98 [80-131] vs 87 [60-116] hours; P < .05), no delay in ECMO initiation time (23 [10-40] vs 24 [14-52] hours), and no significant change in survival (97% vs 92.5%). No patient was treated with VA ECMO after 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Venovenous ECMO is as reliable as VA ECMO in newborns with MAS in severe respiratory failure who need ECMO. Delay in ECMO initiation may result in prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased length of hospital stay. The emergence of new conventional therapies (NO, HFV, surfactant) and particularly increased experience enable sole use of VV ECMO with no significant change in survival in infants with MAS.

Comparison of the effect of venovenous versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on renal blood flow in newborn lambs

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) using double lumen catheters is an alternative to venoarterial (VA) ECMO and allows for total blood flow using the patient's cardiac output in comparison to partial blood flow provided during VA ECMO.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of VV versus VA ECMO on renal blood flow.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Research laboratory in a hospital.

SUBJECT

Newborn lambs 1-7 days of age (n = 15).

INTERVENTIONS

In anesthetized, ventilated lambs, femoral artery and vein were cannulated for monitoring and renal venous blood sampling. An ultrasonic flow probe was placed on the left renal artery for continuous renal blood flow measurements. Animals were randomly assigned to control (non-ECMO), VV ECMO and VA ECMO groups. After systemic heparinization, the animals were cannulated and studied at bypass flows of 120 mL/kg/min (partial bypass) for two hours in both ECMO groups and 200 mL/kg/min (full bypass) for an additional 30 min in the VA group. Changes in blood pressure and renal flow on ECMO and during ECMO bridge unclamping were recorded continuously. Plasma renin activity (PRA) levels were sequentially sampled.

RESULTS

Systemic blood pressure was not different in VV or VA ECMO at partial bypass flow. However, systemic blood pressure increased significantly at maximal bypass flow in the VA ECMO group. There was no change in renal flow in either VV or VA ECMO groups. PRA levels did not correlate with bypass flow change. During unclamping of the ECMO bridge, blood pressure and renal flow drop significantly in the VA group, but not in the VV group.

CONCLUSION

VV and VA ECMO at partial bypass flows had comparable effect on blood pressure, renal blood flow and PRA level in this short-term study. However, unclamping of the ECMO bridges did differentially affect blood pressure and renal blood flow between VV and VA groups. We speculate that this repeated acute change in long-run VA ECMO support may play a role in the persistent hypertension seen in some patients.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in inotrope dependent neonates

It is often stated that venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) should not be used in inotrope dependent patients. It is our practice to use VV ECMO in most patients with respiratory failure even though many of these patients are receiving significant doses of inotropes. Our objective was to review the mode of ECMO in relation to precannulation doses of inotropes administered to neonates treated with ECMO for respiratory failure. Forty-three consecutive case notes were reviewed. Data were collected for basic demographic and ECMO parameters. Inotropic doses were converted to a single score for ease of comparison, with one point equivalent to 1 microg/kg/min dopamine. Forty-three neonates were studied; 37(86%) were treated with VV ECMO and 6 (14%) were treated with VA ECMO. Significant pre-ECMO inotropic support (score > 10) was present in 30 (70%) of the 43 cases. Of these patients, 26 were treated via VV ECMO with a survival rate of 84%, while 4 were treated with VA ECMO with a survival of 75%. Inotrope scores fell to nonsignificant levels (< 10) within 24 hours, regardless of ECMO mode. Mean arterial blood pressure remained above precannulation levels in both groups. VV ECMO allows safe treatment of neonatal respiratory failure in the presence of significant inotropic support. We recommend VV ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure in all cases except where double lumen cannulation is impossible or when septic shock is refractory to inotropic support (i.e., mean blood pressure < 35 mm Hg despite inotrope score of > 100).

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 2001. The odyssey continues

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was established as a standard of care by demonstrating its ability to save lives in moribund infants. The designs of early studies provided no living cohorts of similarly ill patients by which to measure accurately other (and perhaps to many more important) outcomes of interest: long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes or cost. Prospective cohort studies of neurodevelopmental outcomes post-ECMO demonstrate: (1) because ECMO, as used, saves lives, there will be an increase in the absolute number of handicapped children surviving; (2) there is little evidence that ECMO creates a relative increase in the percent of handicapped children surviving severe respiratory failure. The high direct costs of an ECMO program are measured and well publicized. When such costs are compared with similar therapies in other fields (in such terms as cost per survivor), the cost of ECMO does not seem to be an outlier. Trials of newer therapies, such as iNO, show the capacity to decrease the use of ECMO but have failed to demonstrate either cost-effectiveness or better long-term outcomes. It has not been shown that either society or individual patients have benefited from the decreased need for ECMO.

Venovenous versus venoarterial extracorporeal life support for pediatric respiratory failure: are there differences in survival and acute complications?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry database of infants and children with acute respiratory failure to compare outcome and complications of venovenous (VV) vs. venoarterial (VA) Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

ELSO registry for pediatric pulmonary support.

PATIENTS

All nonneonatal pediatric pulmonary support ECLS cases treated at U.S. centers and reported to the ELSO registry as of July 1997. Patients were excluded if they had one or more of the following diagnoses: hematologic-oncologic, cardiac, abdominal surgical, burn, metabolic, airway, or immunodeficiency disorder.

INTERVENTIONS

Venoarterial or venovenous extracorporeal life support for severe pulmonary failure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From 1986 to June of 1997, 763 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 595 were initially managed with VA bypass, and 168 with VV bypass. The VA group was younger (mean +/- SD, 26.1+/-42.2 months for VA vs. 63.5+/-68.7 months for VV) and smaller (11.8+/-15.1 kg vs. 22.9+/-23.8 kg) (p<.001). There were no differences between groups in number of days on mechanical ventilation before ECLS, number of hours on ECLS, or number of hours on mechanical ventilation post-ECLS in survivors. Mean pH and Paco2 values, positive end-expiratory pressure, and mean airway pressure just before placing the patient on ECLS were also similar. VA-treated patients had higher Fio2 requirements (p = .034), lower Pao2 (p = .047), and lower Pao2/Fio2 ratio (p = .014) just before cannulation. There was a trend of higher peak inspiratory pressure in VA-treated patients (p = .053). Overall, survival rate was not different for the two groups (55.8% for VA vs. 60.1% for VV; p = .33). Central nervous system complications were not different between the two groups. Examination of the same variables was then conducted after dividing the patients into four subgroups. There were no significant differences in survival or complications during bypass between VV and VA modes of ECLS in any subgroup. Stepwise logistic regression modeling was performed to control for variables associated with the outcome survival for VV and VA-treated groups, and variables measured before bypass were identified as being associated with improved survival. There was a trend of improved survival in the VV-treated patients (p = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival of pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure supported by VA or VV ECLS was comparable. A randomized clinical trial may be useful in clarifying these observations.

Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage during neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

To identify independent predictors of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) during neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort consisted of all neonates who did not have an ICH before treatment with ECMO identified in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry from 1992 to 1995 (n = 4550). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently correlated with ICH and to develop a model that could be used to predict the risk of ICH in neonates treated with ECMO.

RESULTS

ICH was identified in 9.9% of patients. The factors associated with ICH remaining after adjusting for other significant variables (P <.01) were gestational age (GA) <34 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 12.1, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [6.6, 22]), GA 34 to <36 weeks (OR 4.1, CI [2.9, 5.8]), GA 36 to <38 weeks (OR 2.1, CI [1.6, 2.8]) primary diagnosis of sepsis (OR 1.8, CI [1.4, 2.3]), epinephrine use (OR 1.9, CI [1.5, 2.5]), coagulopathy (OR 1. 6, CI [1.1, 2.2]), arterial pH <7.0 (OR 2.5, CI [1.6, 3.9]), and arterial pH 7.0 to <7.2 (OR 1.8 CI [1.3, 2.5]). ICH rates for neonates receiving venovenous versus venoarterial ECMO and for those treated with or without cephalic jugular venous drainage were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational age, acidosis, sepsis, coagulopathy, and treatment with epinephrine are major independent factors associated with ICH in neonates treated with ECMO. In particular, GA <34 weeks remains a major barrier for use of current ECMO technologies.

The Edmonton experience with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Despite the proven effectiveness of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in the treatment of neonates with severe respiratory failure, this technique is not widely used. The purpose of this study was to assess the authors' policy of preferred use of VV ECMO with a cephalad catheter and to compare the results with those of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry.

METHODS

Charts of neonatal ECMO candidates were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected for gestational age, birth weight, and diagnosis. Severity of illness was assessed by oxygenation index, lactate levels, and inotropic requirements before cannulation. Patients were divided into three groups: venovenous (VV), venoarterial (VA), and VV to VA ECMO. A cephalad catheter was inserted in the distal part of the jugular vein.

RESULTS

Sixty-five neonates were supported with ECMO. Cannulation with a double lumen venovenous (VVDL) catheter was attempted in 63 neonates and successfully accomplished in 57. A survival rate of 86% was observed in neonates initially placed on VV ECMO. Five neonates initially placed on VV ECMO underwent conversion to VA ECMO.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the authors' preferred policy of VV ECMO did not result in an increase in mortality rate based on a comparison with ELSO data. VV ECMO with a cephalad catheter provides adequate support for unstable neonates with respiratory failure.

Principles and Practice of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Over the past several years, the use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased. The primary advantage of venovenous (VV) over venoarterial (VA) ECMO is preservation of the carotid artery. Its primary disadvantage is that it does not provide circulatory support. While VV ECMO is technically similar to VA ECMO, clinical application of VV ECMO is quite different from VA ECMO. Recent clinical data show that VV ECMO is safe and effective. The purpose of this review is to discuss these differences between VV and VA ECMO, to review the various forms of VV ECMO, and finally to offer recommendations on the safe clinical use of VV ECMO.