New onset diabetes mellitus in patients presenting with extremity infections

Upper limb infections: A comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Upper limb infections are common among patients with diabetes mellitus and their sequelae can be debilitating. They tend to present with severe infections but minimal symptoms probably due to neuropathy and vasculopathy among diabetics. The study aims to compare the demographic characteristics, clinical presentations and outcomes of upper limb infections between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

METHODS

All patients with upper limb infections who were admitted in a tertiary hospital from June 2017 to December 2020 were included in this study. Demographic data, clinical presentations, investigations and outcomes were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical record. There were 117 patients with diabetes mellitus and 127 with no diabetes mellitus. Comparisons were made between these two groups, and statistical analysis was done with SPSS.

RESULTS

There were 244 patients included; 117 were diabetic and 127 were non-diabetic. Diabetic patients were more likely to present with emergent scenarios, especially necrotizing fasciitis and infective tenosynovitis (p < .05) with higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) readings (p < .05). Their microbiological cultures were less likely to be negative (p < .05). Diabetic patients also had poorer clinical outcomes with higher risk of amputation, re-operation and longer duration of hospital stay (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Upper limb infections among diabetic patients should be treated aggressively. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention might decrease the morbidity and mortality in this group. Prevention of infections should be emphasized.

Diabetic Hand Infection: An Emerging Challenge

Background: Hand infection in diabetics is an often ignored but challenging condition. If not addressed effectively, it may result in long term disability, contracture, amputation and even death.

Methods: From August 2014 to December 2015, a study was done in our centre, where 49 diabetic hand infection cases were analyzed in two groups, superficial and deep hand infection.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 51.63 years. There were 21 superficial infections and 28 deep infections. Cause of infection was unknown or spontaneous in 16 cases, traumatic laceration or crush in 14 patients, following minor prick in 10 cases. Most of the cases were the results of neglected minor wound. Forty-one patients were insulin dependent. Five cases were diagnosed as diabetic at the time of treatment. Four patients were treated conservatively and 45 (92%) cases required operation in the form of incision, drainage and debridement. In 16 (35%) cases, wound was left open and was healed by secondary intention following regular dressing. In five patients, wound was closed secondarily. Partial thickness skin graft was applied in 15 cases. Seven patients were treated with flap coverage. Partial digital or ray amputation were done in 16 cases. All fingers except thumb were amputated in one case and amputation from wrist was done in another patient. Wound swabs were taken, and antibiotics were changed or continued accordingly. But reports of 26 cases were available. No growth was found in four cases, monomicrobial infection was found in 15 patients and polymicrobial in seven cases. Infection resolved with healing in 47 cases. Two patients died during treatment from sepsis, both were insulin dependent, had associated renal failure and from deep infection group. One patient developed severe mental disorder.

Conclusions: For diabetic hand infection, early diagnosis and prompt treatment with appropriate antibiotics and emergency surgery with extensile incision is crucial. Primary amputation of the part could be life and limb saving.

Trauma in the Diabetic Limb

Poorly controlled diabetes with comorbid manifestations negatively affects outcomes in lower extremity trauma, increasing the risk of short-term and long-term complications. Management strategies of patients with diabetes that experience lower extremity trauma should also include perioperative management of hyperglycemia to reduce adverse and serious adverse events.

Diabetes and its negative impact on outcomes in orthopaedic surgery

An estimated 285 million adults (aged 20-79 years) worldwide were diagnosed to have diabetes mellitus (DM) in 2010, and this number is projected to grow to 439 million adults by the year 2030. Orthopaedic surgeons, regardless of their subspecialty interest, will encounter patients with DM during their career since this epidemic involves both developed and emerging countries. Diabetes results in complications affecting multiple organ systems, potentially resulting in adverse outcomes after orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology of DM and its potential for impacting orthopaedic surgery patients. Diabetes adversely affects the outcome of all orthopaedic surgery subspecialties including foot and ankle, upper extremity, adult reconstructive, pediatrics, spine surgery and sports medicine. Poorly controlled diabetes negatively impacts bone, soft tissue, ligament and tendon healing. It is the complications of diabetes such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, and end stage renal disease which contributes to adverse outcomes. Well controlled diabetic patients without comorbidities have similar outcomes to patients without diabetes. Orthopaedic surgeons should utilize consultants who will assist in inpatient glycemic management as well as optimizing long term glycemic control.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HAND INFECTION — A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN YEAR 2000 AND 2009

This study aims to analyze the bacteriology and antibiotic resistance in hand infection between 2000 and 2009 at a local hospital in Asia. It is a retrospective study involving all adult patients with hand infections that were treated surgically, with tissue or wound culture sent. A total of 100 cases in 2000 and 98 cases in 2009 were included in this study. Standard epidemiology information, bacteriology, antibiotic sensitivity and treatment outcome were analyzed. Particular interest was given to diabetic hand infection. There was no significant difference of outcome in hand infection between the two years. The outcome of diabetics was not statistically worse than the non-diabetics. Comparing the patients in 2000 and 2009, more younger patients were affected with hand infection in 2009. While length of stay is shorter in 2009. Mixed infection was more common in diabetics in 2009. There was trend of clindamycin resistance in methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus in 2009.

[Bacterial osteitis. Special considerations in immunocompromised patients]

With increasing life expectancy and better medical competence, the number of older patients with multimorbidity is growing. Patients with a deficient immune system need more attention during diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis.