The repeatability of corneal thickness measures

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different imaging devices

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values and evaluate the agreement obtained with three different devices in healthy eyes.

METHODS

A total of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals (36 men and 24 women) were enrolled in this retrospective study. CCT measurements were performed using an optical biometer (AL-Scan), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) (Topcon 3D) and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) (Accupach VI), and the results were compared. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the agreement between methods.

MAIN RESULTS

The mean patient age was 28±5.73years (18-40years). The mean CCT values obtained by AL-Scan, UP, and SD-OCT were 532.4μm±29.7, 549μm±30.4, and 547μm±30.6, respectively. The mean differences in CCT were 15.30±9.52μm between AL-Scan and OCT (P<0.01), 17.15±8.42μm between AL-Scan and UP (P<0.01), and 1.85± 8.78μm between UP and OCT (P=0.067). All three methods of CCT measurement were closely correlated with each other.

CONCLUSION

The present study results suggest that, despite good agreement between the three devices, AL-Scan significantly underestimated CCT compared to UP and OCT. Therefore, clinicians should be aware that different results can be obtained using different devices for CCT measurements. It would be a better approach not to use them as interchangeable in clinical practice. CCT examination and follow-up should be performed using the same device, especially for patients who will undergo refractive surgery.

Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera

PURPOSE

To compare and analyze the interchangeability in measuring central corneal thickness (CCT) using ultrasonic pachymetry (USP, PACHMATE 2, DGH, Inc, Exton, PA, USA), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM, CEM-530, Nidek CO, LTD, Gamagori, Japan) and a high-resolution Scheimpflug Camera (Pentacam HR, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany).

METHODS

An observational, cross-sectional study was performed recruiting 216 volunteers, for a sample size of 216 eyes with no ocular abnormalities other than refractive errors. All subjects underwent pachymetric measurements obtained by USP, NCSM and Pentacam HR. Examinations were performed by the same examiner with USP always following the noncontact examinations.

RESULTS

The mean CCT (± SD) was 560.30 ± 38.80 μm, 556.76 ± 36.83 μm and 547.31 ± 35.28 μm for USP, NCSM and Pentacam HR, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the highest concordance was found between USP and NCSM, with differences between - 13.18 μm and 20.26 μm. For the differences between measurements obtained with Pentacam HR and USP, the differences at Bland-Altman plot were between - 28.25 and 13.57 μm. The lowest concordance was found for the CCT values measured with Pentacam HR and NCSM, with differences between - 25.67 and 6.86 μm. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between all pairs of measurements was between 0.979 and 0.987, suggesting that the mean measurements were strongly correlated.

CONCLUSION

Measurements obtained with all three devices had high correlation. USP and NCSM were found in good agreement and high concordance, too. The above results indicate that these two devices are interchangeable in clinical practice. Pentacam HR may be a useful alternative for measuring CCT; however, it significantly underestimates CCT and cannot be used interchangeably with the other devices that we studied.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on quantitative corneal anatomy – A systemic review

Background: Corneal changes occur as a direct consequence of diabetes mellitus (DM). The central corneal thickness (CCT) is a useful parameter that provides information about the status of the metabolism of the cornea and can therefore help monitor the progression of DM.Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of DM on CCT and its correlation with diabetes duration and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.Methods: The systematic review was undertaken to answer: (1) What effect does DM have on CCT values? (2) What effect does DM duration have on CCT values? (3) What effect does HbA1c levels have on CCT values? The Web of Science was used to conduct a computerised search for articles of CCT values in DM.Results: A total of 38 articles that met the criteria for inclusion were included in this systemic review. The researchers found 27 articles that observed increased CCT values in DM patients compared with control subjects. There were six studies in which increased CCT values were related to DM duration and 12 studies in which DM duration did not alter CCT values. Also, eight studies showed that CCT values increased with glycated haemoglobin levels, and 12 studies did not observe this.Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus patients usually present with increased CCT values although there is no unanimity about the effect of DM duration and increased HbA1c levels (poor glycaemic control) in the CCT values of DM patients. 

Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets

"The Diseases of the Horny-coat of The Eye", known today as keratoconus, is a progressive, multifactorial, non-inflammatory ectatic corneal disorder that is characterized by steepening (bulging) and thinning of the cornea, irregular astigmatism, myopia, and scarring that can cause devastating vision loss. The significant socioeconomic impact of the disease is immeasurable, as patients with keratoconus can have difficulties securing certain jobs or even joining the military. Despite the introduction of corneal crosslinking and improvements in scleral contact lens designs, corneal transplants remain the main surgical intervention for treating keratoconus refractory to medical therapy and visual rehabilitation. To-date, the etiology and pathogenesis of keratoconus remains unclear. Research studies have increased exponentially over the years, highlighting the clinical significance and international interest in this disease. Hormonal imbalances have been linked to keratoconus, both clinically and experimentally, with both sexes affected. However, it is unclear how (molecular/cellular signaling) or when (age/disease stage(s)) those hormones affect the keratoconic cornea. Previous studies have categorized the human cornea as an extragonadal tissue, showing modulation of the gonadotropins, specifically luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Studies herein provide new data (both in vitro and in vivo) to further delineate the role of hormones/gonadotropins in the keratoconus pathobiology, and propose the existence of a new axis named the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal-Corneal (HPAC) axis.

Corneal Eccentricity in a Rural Japanese Population: The Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS)

PURPOSE

To determine normal corneal eccentricity in a rural Japanese population and to examine factors associated with eccentricity value.

METHODS

This used data from the Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS) project between 2009 and 2012. Residents of Minamiaizu and Tadami in Fukushima, Japan, who were aged 40 years or over, were invited for a comprehensive eye examination. For 1371 patients with no history of internal eye surgery, corneal eccentricity was measured using a Pentacam.

RESULTS

Of 1371 people recruited to the study, 1215 (1215 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean eccentricity was 0.46 (SD = 0.18; range, -0.85 to 0.88). Corneal eccentricity was significantly associated with age, spherical equivalent, pupil diameter, anterior chamber angle, anterior chamber volume, and central corneal thickness, but not with gender or body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the normal cornea in this Japanese population was prolate. Corneal eccentricity was likely to decrease with increasing age. Also, spherical equivalent and other anterior segment parameters had an influence on corneal eccentricity. Corneal eccentricity measurements might be helpful in the diagnosis of corneal diseases and in calculations for intraocular lens implantation and corneal refractive surgery.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Tono-pachymetry and Ultrasound Pachymetry

Purpose: We compared the accuracy of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements according to CCT measured by noncontact Tono-pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry (USP). Methods: CCT was measured in 90 eyes of 90 subjects by two optometrists. The CCT measurements were compared and the correlations between the measurements were analyzed. To evaluate whether the measurements varied depending on CCT, the subjects were classified into three groups according to CCT (group 1: thin thickness group; group 2: medium thickness group; and group 3: thick thickness group). The differences in CCT obtained by the two devices (△CCT = Tono-pachymetry-USP) were compared and analyzed among the three groups. Results: The average CCT measurements by Tono-pachymetry and USP were 523.26 ± 32.93 μm and 527.08 ± 37.33 μm, respectively. CCT by Tono-pachymetry was significantly thinner than by USP (△CCT= -3.82 ± 15.34, p = 0.020). The two measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.912, p < 0.001). The △CCT values were 5.40 ± 12.13 μm in group 1, -6.37 ± 15.07 μm in group 2, and -10.50 ± 14.39 μm in group 3 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CCT measured by tono-pachymetry was thinner on average compared to the value measured by USP and the differences in measurements between the two devices were different according to CCT. The thinner the CCT, the thicker the measurement, and the thicker the CCT, the thinner the measurement. Therefore, this trend should be considered when interpreting tono- pachymetry results in clinical practice.

Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non‐contact specular microscopy on the central cornea and inter‐session repeatability on the peripheral cornea

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare specular microscopy (SM) and a new corneal topographer with rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam) for non-contact pachometry of the central cornea. The repeatability of Pentacam for topographic pachometry was also studied.

METHODS

Thirty-nine subjects were recruited and one eye was selected randomly for non-contact pachometry by SM and by Pentacam, in random order. The corneal thickness (CT) was monitored at 30-second intervals for 10 minutes. Baseline CT was defined as the average of all measurements taken over the 10 minutes. Subjects were required to return within one to two weeks for a second corneal evaluation by Pentacam. Comparisons were made on the central CT between the two devices and on the topographic CT from Pentacam between the two visits.

RESULTS

The spontaneous variation of central CT was similar for the two instruments. Central CT varied within +/-2.3 microm during the 10 minutes. The 95% limits of agreement between SM and Pentacam were within +/-15 microm for the central CT. The spontaneous variation of peripheral CT was within +/-3.1 microm. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two visits on CT at different regions. Further analysis found that with Pentacam three measurements should be taken to obtain topographic CT measurement of one per cent precision.

CONCLUSION

Non-contact specular microscopy and Pentacam have good agreement for central CT measurement. Topographic pachometry from Pentacam requires three repeated measurements for one per cent precision.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with three different devices working according to optical principle in healthy eyes.

Methods:

60 eyes of 60 individuals (30 men and 30 women) were enrolled in this study. CCT measurements performed with Scheimpflug–Placido topographer (Sirius), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue) with an anterior segment module, and optical biometer (AL-Scan) were compared. Bland–Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods.

Results:

The mean age was 30.07 ± 7.313 years (range, 18–47 years). The mean CCT values obtained by RTVue, Sirius, and AL-Scan were 518.25 ± 36.38 µm, 526.08 ± 36.33 µm, and 513.50 ± 39.09 µm, respectively. The mean differences in CCT were 7.83 ± 14.15 µm between Sirius and RTVue, 12.58 ± 11.87 µm between Sirius and AL-Scan, and 4.75 ± 4.50 µm between RTVue and AL-Scan. The mean CCT was statistically different among the three groups (p < 0.05). All three modalities of CCT measurements correlated closely with each other, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranging from 0.924 to 0.961. The 95% limits of agreement were −19.90 to 35.56 µm between Sirius and RTVue, −10.69 to 35.85 µm between Sirius and AL-Scan, and −4.07 to 13.58 µm between RTVue and AL-Scan.

Conclusion:

Different results could be obtained through different noncontact devices in CCT measurements. Although the measurement values obtained by these devices show a high level of correlation, it would be a more correct approach to not use them directly interchangeably in clinical practice. Evaluation and follow-up of CCT should be performed using the same device.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Contact and Non-contact Pachymetry Devices

Aim and objective

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by handheld contact ultrasound pachymetry (HCUP) and non-contact pachymetry devices.

Materials and methods

Ninety eyes of 90 patients (52 male and 38 female) were included in the study. Measurements from two non-contact devices, -specular microscopy (SM, Konan Medical, CA, USA) and Oculus Pentacam (Oculus Inc., Germany)-were compared against HCUP (Pachmate 2, DGH Technology, Inc, PA, USA). Ultrasound measurements were obtained 3 times by the same user and averaged. The differences were calculated by one-way ANOVA. Agreement between measurements were assessed by Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient tests. Coefficient of repeatability (%, CR) was defined as 1.96*standard deviations of the differences between pairs of measurements divided by the average of the means.

Results

The mean age was 34.31 ± 14.39 (14-74) years, and the mean intraocular pressure was 16.48 ± 2.63 mm Hg (12-21). Mean CCT measured by HCUP, SM, and Pentacam was 557.76 ± 36.76 μm, 550.29 ± 43.74 μm, and 541.41 ± 35.7 μm, respectively (p < 0.05). In the Bland-Altman plot, 95% limit of agreements were 19.5 and 14.18 μm among HCUP measurements, 34.55 μm between HCUP and Pentacam, 41.49 μm between SM and Pentacam, and 46.98 μm between HCUP and SM. CR values (%) were 3.49, 2.54, 6.28, 7.68, and 8.47, respectively.

Conclusion

There were significant differences between the mean CCT values of the measurement devices.

Clinical significance

Contact and non-contact devices may not interchangeable in the clinical assessment of CCT.

How to cite this article

Mayali H, Altinisik M, Diri I, et al. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Contact and Non-contact Pachymetry Devices. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021;15(1):28-31.

Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurements by three methods of pachymetry in small incision lenticule extraction eyes

Background: The accurate evaluation of corneal thickness (CT) post small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is clinically relevant to reduce the risk of complications. We aimed to analyze repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and mid-peripheral corneal thickness (MPCT) measurements using Scheimpflug imaging, anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (AS-SS-OCT, CASIA 1000, Tomey), and ultrasound pachymetry (USP, SP-3000, Tomey) in eyes with previous SMILE. Methods: Ninety-one eyes of 91 patients were included. Within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability (TRT), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to evaluate repeatability. Agreement was assessed by repeat-measurement analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The above three instruments revealed that Sw was <5.91 µm, CoV was <1.08%, TRT was <16.38 µm, and ICC was >0.94. The 95% limits of agreement were relatively narrow and Bland-Altman plots were more concentrated at the CCT, at the TCT, and at the CT_2mm. However, it was shown to be wide at the CT_5mm. Conclusions: The three devices provide good repeatability of CT measurements in patients who undergone SMILE. Agreement between measurements at the CCT, TCT, and CT_2mm were high, but measurement agreements among CT_5mm revealed poor agreement.

Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound (U/S) pachymetry in keratoconic eyes, and investigate factors that affect the agreement.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis within a prospective, observational non-randomised study preformed at the Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, included crosslinking candidates with progressive keratoconus (KC). Main outcome measures were the agreement of CCT measurement between Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) and U/S pachymetry (PachPen 24-5100, Accutome Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA), and factors that affect the agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 794 keratoconic eyes of 456 subjects with a mean age of 27.6±8.0 years (69.7% males and 49.6% right eyes) were included. Agreement between devices was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient: 74.9%, Bland-Altman limits of agreement: -48.5 μm to +62.5 μm). In a multivariable analysis, cone decentration (p<0.001, coefficient +10.13 [+6.73 to +13.53 95% CIs]) and Kmax (p<0.001, coefficient +0.68 [+0.46 to +0.90 95% CIs]) were significantly associated (both clinically and statistically) with the level of agreement between the devices; the discrepancy in CCT between the devices increased on average by 10.13 μm for every mm of cone decentration, and by 6.8 μm for every 10D of Kmax. Age, corneal astigmatism and spherical equivalent were statistically but not clinically significant factors affecting agreement.

CONCLUSION

The agreement of CCT measurement between Scheimpflug imaging and U/S pachymetry in KC was moderate. To ensure the safety of crosslinking in keratoconic corneas, Scheimpflug and U/S CCT measurements should not be used interchangeably, especially in steep corneas and corneas with decentred cones.

Limbal Metabolic Support Reduces Peripheral Corneal Edema with Contact-Lens Wear

Purpose

To assess the influence of limbal metabolic support on corneal edema during scleral-lens (SL) and soft-contact-lens (SCL) wear for healthy lens wearers.

Methods

A two-dimensional (2D) model of the cornea and sclera was designed on Comsol Multiphysics 5.4 along with SL and SCL architectures to mimic lens-wear induced hypoxia. The cornea is suffused with oxygen and metabolites from the limbus and aqueous humor. Air oxygen is supplied from and carbon dioxide is expelled to the atmosphere. Lens-oxygen permeability (Dk) was adjusted to investigate lens-wear safety against edema in different wear conditions. The 2D concentrations of oxygen, carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, lactate, sodium, chloride, glucose, and pH are quantified. Central-to-peripheral swelling of the cornea is determined by the change in stromal hydration caused by changing metabolite concentrations at the endothelium during hypoxia.

Results

The metabolic model assesses central-to-peripheral corneal swelling with different types of lenses, and oxygen Dks. Limbal metabolic support reduces edema from the periphery to approximately 1 mm away from the central cornea. Despite thicker lens designs, the peripheral cornea exhibits practically zero swelling due to limbal metabolic support.

Conclusions

The metabolic model accurately predicts central-to-peripheral corneal edema with various contact-lens designs, post-lens tear-film thicknesses, and lens oxygen Dk values. Despite the thicker periphery of most contact-lens designs, lactate and bicarbonate support from the limbus significantly reduces peripheral and mid-peripheral corneal edema, whereas oxygen has a lesser effect.

Translational Relevance

By utilizing metabolic kinetics, we provide a 2D computational tool to predict oxygenation safety across the entire cornea with various types and designs of contact lenses.

Corneal Total and Epithelial Thickness Measured by Sonogage Ultrasound Pachometry and High-resolution Optical Coherence Tomography

SIGNIFICANCE

This research questions the validity of using the Sonogage ultrasound (US) pachometer to measure corneal epithelial thickness and coincidentally provides confirmation for the conventional view of the mechanism of orthokeratology (OK) based on central epithelial thinning.

PURPOSE

The Sonogage (Corneo-Gage Plus 1) pachometer uses A-scan US to measure total corneal thickness. It is claimed that this instrument can also measure corneal epithelial thickness. We sought to validate this claim by comparing total and epithelial thickness measurements with the Sonogage with those obtained with high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

Fourteen non-contact lens wearers and 14 subjects who had worn Paragon CRT OK lenses overnight for greater than 1 month were recruited. Three OCT and five US measurements were taken in one eye of each subject. Depending on normality of data, paired t tests or Wilcoxon tests were used to compare total and epithelial thicknesses measured with the Sonogage pachometer and the Tomey Casia OCT. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine relationships between measurements obtained with the two instruments.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in total corneal thickness measurements between the two instruments. Although a significant correlation was found (r = 0.916, P < .001), the Sonogage consistently measured greater total corneal thickness than did the OCT (+19.5 ± 9.2 μm; P < .001). Epithelial thickness using the Sonogage showed little variation (range, 46.4 to 50.0 μm), whereas epithelial thickness using the OCT ranged from 30.7 to 54.7 μm. There was no significant correlation between epithelial thicknesses obtained with the two instruments (r = -0.135, P = .49). Epithelial thickness measured by OCT was significantly thinner in OK wearers (35.8 ± 2.8 μm) than in nonlens wearers (46.7 ± 4.5 μm, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Sonogage is not able to measure epithelial thickness in vivo, returning essentially identical measurements over a range of epithelial thicknesses. Optical coherence tomography measurements confirm the conventional view of the mechanism of OK based on central epithelial thinning.

Measurement of central corneal thickness using Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry (Palm Scan AP 2000) in measuring central corneal thickness.

METHODS

Prospective observational cross-sectional study of ninety-two eyes of 48 patients with normal corneas was conducted. Central corneal thickness was measured via Pentacam HR, Orbscan 3 and ultrasound pachymetry. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between various methods.

RESULTS

Ninety-two eyes of 46 subjects were enrolled. The mean age was 29.67 years (18-59). The average measurements of central corneal thickness were 545.73 ± 29.35 μm, 549.34 ± 29.14 μm and 545.78 ± 31.48 μm for the Pentacam HR, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry, respectively. The three devices measurements are closely correlated, with Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.868 to 0.929. The 95 % limits of agreement were 25.2 to - 18 μm between Orbscan and Pentacam central corneal thickness, 25.2 to - 25.7 μm between Pentacam and pachymetry central corneal thickness and 34.4 to - 27.2 μm between Orbscan and pachymetry central corneal thickness.

CONCLUSION

In spite of advancement of Orbscan 3, still there are wide agreement limits between CCT measurements obtained via Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry; thus, interchangeable use in clinical practice is not recommended.

Preoperative Risk Assessment for Progression to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Following Cataract Surgery in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To identify preoperative corneal tomographic features that predict progression to endothelial keratoplasty (EK) following cataract surgery in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and establish a regression model to identify high-risk patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study.

METHODS

Setting: Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

STUDY POPULATION

Sixty-eight patients (84 eyes) with FECD who underwent phacoemulsification.

INTERVENTION

We assessed preoperative best-corrected visual acuity; ultrasound central corneal thickness; pachymetric, anterior chamber depth, and corneal backscatter variables using Scheimpflug imaging; and endothelial cell density.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Progression to EK.

RESULTS

A total of 33 eyes (39.3%) needed EK after phacoemulsification to rehabilitate vision. On multivariate analysis, anterior layer (AL) corneal backscatter between 0 and 2 mm from the apex and relative increase in central corneal thickness from the "relative pachymetry display" by the Pentacam were significant predictors of the risk of progression to EK. Using these 2 variables, a risk score (RISC score) was derived from the regression model (area under the curve = 0.973; best cutoff point with a specificity of 95% representing a sensitivity of 96%). Excluding corneal backscatter data from the multivariate regression model, corneal thickness at the pupil center by the Pentacam and relative increase in central corneal thickness were significant predictors and provided a modified risk score (RIPT score) with similar performance.

CONCLUSION

Both scores demonstrated accuracy in predicting progression to EK using easily accessible preoperative data. This approach, which can be readily implemented by surgeons, allows for individualized risk assessment.

Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements-Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specular microscopy).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of data from routine clinical practice in which preoperative CCT measurements of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed. Two consecutive CCT measurements were measured using Zeiss IOL Master 700 and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 by the same examiner. The repeatability of CCT measurements was analyzed by mean intraobserver difference, coefficient of repeatability (CR), and intraclass correlation. The agreement between the 2 methods was analyzed by mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The mean absolute intraobserver difference between the 2 measurements by Zeiss and Tomey were 3.41 ± 3.98 μm and 8.62 ± 9.52 μm (P < 0.0001), respectively. For Zeiss, the CR was 10.3 μm with 95% LoA of -10.5 to 10.1 μm. For Tomey, the CR was 25.2 μm with 95% LoA of -25.2 to 25.2 μm. The mean CCT measurements ± standard deviation by Zeiss and Tomey were 544.0 ± 38.1 μm and 532.6 ± 40.0 μm, respectively (P = 0.003). The 95% LoA in CCT between the 2 methods was -15.8 to 38.7 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

Zeiss IOL Master 700 has superior intraobserver repeatability and consistency than Tomey EM-3000. Zeiss produced higher CCT measurements than Tomey; hence, in clinical practice, interchangeability between these 2 methods is limited.

Effect of Demographic Variables on the Regional Corneal Pachymetry

PURPOSE

The measurement of corneal thickness by corneal pachymetry provides valuable information in the setting of corneal disease; however, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-based assessment of different corneal sectors has been scarce in Pakistan.

DESIGN

We aimed to obtain a whole-corneal thickness map using SD-OCT and to evaluate its correlation with age, sex, and axial length.

METHODS

Our study included 214 subjects with healthy corneas; each eye was scanned with an SD-OCT covering a 9-mm diameter, and reproducibility was evaluated in a subset of 50 participants by means of an identical scan protocol repeated by 2 different OCT operators.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed corneal thickness to be thinnest inferotemporally whereas thickest in the superior and superonasal quadrants. No statistically significant differences could be detected between male and female participants with respect to corneal thickness, age, intraocular pressure, axial length, and refractive errors. However, we identified a significant negative correlation between age and corneal thickness in all corneal sections, excluding the inner and middle superior, inner superonasal, and inner and middle superotemporal quadrants. Conversely, the correlation between axial length and corneal thickness was found to be positive in the central region (P = 0.03, R = 0.149), the outer inferotemporal quadrant (P = 0.012, R = 0.171), throughout the temporal quadrant (P = 0.024, R = 0.154 for inner; P = 0.025, R = 0.153 for middle; P = 0.006, R = 0.186 for outer), and in the inner superotemporal quadrant (P = 0.018, R = 0.162).

CONCLUSIONS

Different corneal sectors may interact heterogeneously with patient-related characteristics. This may provide incentive to evaluate whole-corneal thickness as a distinct parameter for clinical identification of disease processes.

Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer

AIM:

This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and TMS-5 topographer with that taken with the gold standard digital Ultrasonic pachymeter (USP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A total of 61 subjects (122 eyes) were prospectively and consecutively studied in a period from June 2016 to June 2017 at Sudan Eye Centre (SEC), Khartoum, Sudan. Besides the visual and refractive data, measurements of CCT were taken using OCT, TMS-5 and USP. Data analyzed using SPSS software for windows (IBM SPSS 20, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS:

A statistically significant differences in mean CCT was detected between the three instruments (P < 0.001). USP was found to measure the CCT 29μm thicker than OCT and 22μm thicker than TMS-5 topographer. A significant difference was also found between OCT and TMS-5. OCT found to give the lower values of CCT compared to both USP and TMS-5 topographer. Further analysis showed that the three procedures were significantly and strongly correlated to each other (USP vs OCT, r = 0.77), (USP vs TMS-5, r = 0.78) and (OCT vs TMS-5, r = 0.80).

CONCLUSION:

Mean central corneal thicknesses (CCT) were comparable among OCT, TMS-5 topographer and the gold standard USP. However, there is a reproducible systematic difference between CCT measurements taken with the three devices. It is important to note in clinical practice, that measurements acquired by these three modalities are not directly interchangeable.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices

BACKGROUND

To compare the repeatability and agreements of central corneal thickness measurements of healthy individuals obtained by Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius), anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis) (AS-OCT), optical biometry (AL-Scan) and ultrasonic pachymetry.

METHODS

Sixty-four eyes of 32 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in this study. Central corneal thickness measurements performed with Sirius, AS-OCT, optical biometry AL-Scan and ultrasonic pachymetry were compared. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed by using intraclass correlation co-efficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients were enrolled (25 male and seven female). The mean age was 23.8 years (range 21-28 years). The mean central corneal thickness was 560.8 ± 37.2 μm, 528.8 ± 32.0 μm, 546.4 ± 33.8 μm, 543.4 ± 35.8 μm for the ultrasonic pachymetry, optical biometry AL-Scan, Sirius and AS-OCT values, respectively. The thickest mean central corneal thickness (560.8 ± 37.2 μm) was obtained from ultrasonic pachymetry. The thinnest mean central corneal thickness (528.8 ± 32.0 μm) was obtained from optical biometry AL-Scan. All four modalities of central corneal thickness measurements correlated closely with each other. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs > 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, although measurements obtained by various methods correlate well, the measurements are not directly interchangeable. Between ultrasonic pachymetry and the three optical instruments tested, significant diferences can be seen. Therefore, the same imaging method should be used in corneal thickness follow-ups.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by community optometrists to those obtained in secondary care

PURPOSE

Corneal central thickness (CCT) is an important risk factor for glaucoma, which also influences intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Recently, all community optometrists in Scotland were provided with pachymeters. This study examined the accuracy of CCT measured by community optometrists compared to measurements in the glaucoma clinic.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred to the glaucoma clinic at a university hospital between June and November 2016. 142 of 715 (19.9%) patients had CCT measurements included in the referral, all of whom had repeat measurements in the glaucoma clinic. CCT was measured using the PachPen (Accutome Inc) which generates a CCT reading by automatically taking the average of up to 9 measurements. Measurements were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

CCT measured by community optometrists was slightly thicker than CCT in the glaucoma clinic (558.3 ± 41.5 vs. 552.6 ± 58.8 µm, P < 0.001), however the mean difference was only 13.8 ± 18.0 µm. In 223 of 284 eyes (78.5%), CCT measurements taken by community optometrists were within 20 µm of those obtained in the glaucoma clinic. 61 of 284 (21.5%) differed by >20 µm, 40 (14.1%) by >30 µm and 17 (6.0%) by >50 µm. There was no significant relationship between difference in CCT and IOP (-0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.002, P = 0.077), gender (0.00, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.01, P = 0.805), or age (-0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.06, P = 0.791).

CONCLUSIONS

There was good overall agreement between CCT measured by community optometrists and measurements obtained in the glaucoma clinic. The tendency for thicker CCT measurements by community optometrists may be due to more peripheral or non-perpendicular positioning of the pachymeter relative to the cornea.

Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness

PURPOSE

To compare and analyze the interchangeability of three measuring systems, each based on a different technique, for central corneal thickness (CCT) analysis.

METHODS

CCT measurements were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasonic pachymetry (USP) in 60 eyes of 60 healthy patients with a mean age of 66.5±15.0 years and a mean spherical equivalent of 0.43±1.14 D. Analysis of variations in measurement concordance and correlation among the three different methods were performed. Comparison of CCT measurements were done using Bland-Altman plots (with bias and 95% confidence intervals), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and paired t-student analysis.

RESULTS

Mean CCT values were: 549.20±26.91μm for USP (range 503-618μm), 514.20±27.49μm for NCSM (range 456-586μm) and 542.80±25.56μm for OCT (range 486-605μm). CCT values obtained with NCMS were significantly lower than those obtained with OCT and USP methods. NCMS CCT value was 36.08±10.72μm lower than USP value (p<0.05), and NCMS CCT value was 7.88±8.86μm lower than OCT value (p<0.05). ICC between USP-NCSM pair was 0.488 and 0.909 between USP-OCT pair.

CONCLUSION

OCT and UPS offered highly comparable results, whereas NCSM offered lower mean CCT values compared to the other two methods. Therefore, NCSM should not be considered a reliable method for measuring CCT and should rather be considered for assessing longitudinal changes in the same patient.

Effects of 5% sodium chloride ophthalmic ointment on thickness and morphology of the normal canine cornea

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of 5% sodium chloride ophthalmic ointment (5% NaCl) on thickness and morphology of the normal canine cornea using ultrasonic pachymetry (USP), in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT).

METHODS

Five healthy laboratory Beagles received ophthalmic examinations including USP, IVCM, and FD-OCT prior to and at fixed intervals following treatment. The right and left eyes were treated with 5% NaCl and artificial tears ophthalmic ointment (AT), respectively, every 2 hours for 4 treatments/d (days 2-9), and then hourly for 7 treatments/d (day 10). Treatment groups were statistically compared using mixed-effects linear regression.

RESULTS

Treatment with 5% NaCl resulted in a 12 μm decrease in corneal thickness from baseline (P < .001), while there was no significant difference in corneal thickness between values obtained at baseline and following treatment with AT (P = .82). Epithelial cell density significantly increased from baseline (530 ± 52 cells/mm² ) to 577 ± 43 and 567 ± 15 cells/mm² with 5% NaCl and AT, respectively (P = .003 and .005, respectively). However, keratocyte cell density in the anterior and posterior stroma and endothelial cell density did not significantly differ following treatment with 5% NaCl or AT ointment (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term topical treatment with 5% NaCl decreased corneal thickness in normal dogs with no observable changes in corneal morphology or signs of ocular toxicity.

Accuracy of Corneal Thickness by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Camera in Virgin and Treated Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To assess intraobserver repeatability, intersession reproducibility, and agreement of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Scheimpflug camera in measuring corneal thickness in virgin and grafted eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

Thirty-six control eyes, 35 FECD eyes, 30 FECD with corneal edema eyes, 25 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) eyes, and 29 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) eyes were included. The apical center, pupillary center, and thinnest corneal thickness were determined in 3 consecutive images and repeated 2 weeks later. Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between measurements were calculated. Agreement between devices was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Corneal thickness measurements were highly reproducible and repeatable with both systems. SS-OCT showed better repeatability in all corneal locations in the normal, FECD, FECD with edema, DSAEK, and DMEK groups (coefficient of variation ≤0.60%, ≤0.36%, ≤0.43%, ≤1.09%, and ≤0.48%, respectively) than the Scheimpflug (coefficient of variation ≤1.15%, ≤0.92%, ≤1.10%, ≤1.25%, and ≤1.14%, respectively). Between-session 95% LOA for SS-OCT was less than 3% for all groups except for the FECD with edema group, being almost double using the Scheimpflug camera. Differences between instruments were statistically significant in all groups and locations (P < 0.01) except in the DSAEK group (P ≤ 0.51); however, SS-OCT underestimated all measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

SS-OCT provides better reproducible and repeatable measurements of corneal thickness than those obtained with the Scheimpflug camera in patients with FECD or an endothelial transplant. Variations between examinations higher than the 95% LOA observed in our study should raise awareness of changes in the endothelial function.

Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) and IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).

METHODS

In this prospective clinical study, the authors measured ACD of 145 phakic eyes of 30 healthy volunteers and 115 patients using Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Average patient age was 52.9+/-19.4 (range 16 to 87) years. ACD was evaluated from corneal epithelium to anterior lens surface. Additionally, axial length (AL) was measured using the Zeiss IOLMaster to calculate the regression coefficient between AL and ACD.

RESULTS

Mean ACD was 3.35+/-0.43 mm (range 2.01 mm to 4.37 mm) using Orbscan II and 3.36+/-0.41 mm (range 2.09 mm to 4.24 mm) using IOLMaster. Mean total axial length was 24.04 mm +/- 2.1 mm (range 20.7 mm to 31.41 mm). The linear regression coefficient of ACD between both methods was R=0.95. ACD and AL correlated only slightly (R=0.57). The Spearman coefficients of rank correlation were 0.94 and 0.61, respectively. A p value less than 0.01 (paired Wilcoxon test) was considered statistically significant. However, a significant difference was not calculated comparing ACD measurements using both systems and the Bland-Altman-Plot showed 95% of the differences ranging between 0.25 and -0.27 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding clinical application, both systems seem to be equally good and interchangeable in clinical practice in terms of ACD evaluation.

Quantitative Corneal Anatomy in Emmetropic Subjects

PURPOSE

Currently there is little information available about the corneal thickness values of healthy emmetropic subjects. Therefore, the authors decided to analyze the corneal thickness in healthy emmetropic subjects.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the difference in thickness values between the thinnest corneal site and the central and paracentral cornea in 124 eyes of 124 healthy emmetropic white subjects.

RESULTS

The mean difference between the thinnest site of the cornea and the thickness values obtained in the areas analyzed was as follows: 12+/-6 microm center; 140+/-19 microm superonasal; 133+/-23 microm nasal; 117+/-26 microm inferonasal; 122+/-19 microm superotemporal ; 89+/-22 microm temporal; and 99+/-29 microm inferotemporal (p<0.001; one way analysis of variance test).

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy emmetropic white subjects the thinnest site of the cornea is statistically lower than the central and paracentral cornea.

Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements in Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to characterize intraday and interday variation in central corneal thickness (CCT) in healthy and glaucomatous subjects.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 40 healthy subjects and 42 subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent CCT measurements by ultrasonic pachymetry on 5 days over 1 year: first at baseline, then at 1 week and 1, 6, and 12 months after baseline. On 1visit, CCT was measured every 2 hours from 08:00 to 20:00. Intraday CCT variance was compared with interday CCT variance.

RESULTS

Mean CCT at all visits and time points ranged from 561 to 574 µm in healthy eyes and from 548 to 563 µm in glaucomatous eyes. The mean intraday CCT range (highest minus lowest readings) was 21±10 µm in healthy participants and 21±10 µm in glaucoma patients. The mean interday CCT range was 27±13 µm in healthy participants and 24±14 µm in glaucoma patients. Within-subject variance was significantly larger among the interday CCT measurements than the intraday CCT measurements in both healthy subjects and glaucoma patients (P<0.0001 for both) demonstrating that measurements taken on separate days are more different than measurements taken on the same day. Interday CCT differences of ≥30 µm were seen in 27.7% of normal subjects and 30% of glaucoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT measurements exhibit intraday and interday variation, with the latter being significantly greater than the former. A single CCT assessment inadequately characterizes CCT and may impact risk assessment in patients with suspect and/or diagnosed glaucoma.

Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of four noncontact devices in healthy eyes.

Materials and Methods:

In a sample of 45 healthy controls, CCT was measured using an optical biometer (IOLMaster 700) based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam HR), spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) device with an anterior segment module (Spectralis), and noncontact pachymetry (NCP) device (Topcon TRK-2P). Agreement among the devices was analyzed using mean differences (i.e., bias) and Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA).

Results:

Mean CCT measurements were 537.5 ± 47.5 μm for SS-OCT optical biometer, 532.3 ± 43.8 μm for Scheimpflug system, 521.3 ± 44.7 μm for SD-OCT device, and 518.0 ± 43.1 μm for NCP (P < 0.001). The SD-OCT device and NCP showed the closest agreement, with a bias of 2.6 μm (95% LoA, −3.6–8.8 μm), whereas the SS-OCT optical biometer and NCP showed the least agreement, with a bias of 18.7 μm (95% LoA, −2.1–39.5 μm). Bias was 16.1 μm (95% LoA, −3.1–35.3 μm) for SS-OCT optical biometer and SD-OCT, 5.1 μm (95% LoA, −6.8–17.0 μm) for SS-OCT optical biometer and Scheimpflug system, 10.9 μm (95% LoA, −15.1–36.9 μm) for SD-OCT device and Scheimpflug system, and 13.6 μm (95% LoA, −5–32.2 μm) for Scheimpflug system and NCP.

Conclusions:

SS-OCT optical biometer overestimates CCT measurements compared to Scheimpflug system, SD-OCT device, and NCP. Given mean differences and range variations in CCT measurements between devices, SS-OCT optical biometer and Scheimpflug system are interchangeable as are SD-OCT and NCP.

Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices

Background. To estimate repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratometry measurements obtained by four different devices in healthy eyes. Methods. Fifty-five healthy eyes from 55 volunteers were enrolled in this study. CCT (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT) and keratometry readings (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign) were measured. For statistical analysis, the corneal spherocylinder was converted into power vectors (J0, J45). Repeatability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results. The analysis of repeatability of CCT data of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT showed high ICCs (range 0.995 to 0.999). The comparison of CCT measurements revealed statistically significant differences between Pentacam HR versus IOLMaster 700 (p < 0.0001) and Pentacam HR versus Cirrus HD-OCT (p < 0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in CCT measurements between IOLMaster 700 and Cirrus HD-OCT (p = 0.519). The repeatability of keratometry readings (J0 and J45) of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign was also high with ICCs ranging from 0.974 to 0.999. The Pentacam HR revealed significantly higher J0 in comparison to IOLMaster 700 (p = 0.009) and iDesign (p = 0.041); however, no significant difference was between IOLMaster 700 and iDesign (p = 0.426). Comparison of J45 showed no significant difference between IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign. These results were in accordance with Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT as well as keratometry readings.

Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability and agreement of keratometry and pachymetry measurements obtained using 3 tomographers in eyes with keratoconus.

DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

METHODS

setting: Institutional.

STUDY POPULATION

Fifty eyes of 50 participants with keratoconus. observational procedure: Steep keratometry, flat keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measurements using Galilei, Orbscan II, and Pentacam HR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (S_W), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to evaluate agreement between device pairs.

RESULTS

For all studied parameters, ICC was >0.97 with the least repeatable measurements obtained using Orbscan II. Mean steep keratometry values were similar while mean flat keratometry values were significantly different between all devices. The Galilei and Pentacam HR had the lowest 95% LoA for both CCT and TCT. There were no significant differences in mean CCT between Galilei and Pentacam HR. Mean Orbscan II CCT measurements were not significantly different overall but had wide 95% LoA with Pentacam HR (-47.95 to 58.09 μm) and Galilei (-43.70 to 53.91 μm). Mean Orbscan II CCT measurements were significantly lower when an acoustic factor of 0.92 was applied (-33.6 μm vs Pentacam HR, P < .001; -33.6 μm vs Galilei; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Keratometric and pachymetric measurements of keratoconic eyes obtained by Galilei, Orbscan II, and Pentacam were disparate. Measurements were less repeatable with Orbscan II compared with Pentacam HR and Galilei, although overall repeatability was high for all instruments.

Role of percent peripheral tissue ablated on refractive outcomes following hyperopic LASIK

Objectives

To determine the effect of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (H-LASIK) on corneal integrity, by investigating relationships between proportionate corneal tissue ablated and refractive outcomes at 3 months.

Methods

18 eyes of 18 subjects treated with H-LASIK by Technolas 217c Excimer Laser were included in the study. Orbscan II Topography System was used to determine corneal volume and pachymetry 3mm temporally (3T). The volume of corneal tissue ablated was determined from the laser nomogram. Univariate associations between age, treatment, corneal volume, overall proportion of tissue removed, proportion of tissue removed at 3T, residual bed thickness at 3T and refractive outcomes 3 months post-LASIK were examined and independent factors associated with refractive outcomes determined using linear regression models.

Results

At 3 months post-LASIK, the mean difference to expected refractive outcome was -0.20 ± 0.64 (Range -2.00 to +1.00). In univariate analysis, difference to expected refractive outcome was associated with proportion of tissue removed at 3T (P<0.01, r = -0.605) and total number of pulses (P< 0.05, r = -0.574). In multivariable analysis, difference to expected refractive outcome was associated with the proportion of tissue removed at 3T only.

Conclusion

Subjects undergoing H-LASIK, may present as either over or under-corrected at 3 months. The proportion of tissue removed at 3T was the single significant determinant of this outcome, suggesting unexpected biomechanical alterations resulting in corneal steepening. Future hyperopic LASIK procedures could consider proportionate volume of corneal tissue removed at 3T in addition to laser nomograms to achieve improved refractive outcomes.

Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices

Aim

The aim of the study is to compare the measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) performed by two examiners with four different methods at different times inter- and intra-individually.

Methods

Thirty healthy people were included in the study. In these measurements, an optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), an optic coherence tomography (OCT), a specular microscopy (SM), and a corneal topography (CT) were used. Two examiners performed the measurements in a consecutive manner. After 1–7 days of the first measurements, the second measurements were performed again consecutively. The mean of three measurements was taken in each session for all devices.

Results

In OCT measurements, there was a significant difference between two examiners in both sessions (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found between two examiners in first and second sessions in SM, CT, and OLCR measurements. When each examiner’s measurements were compared to two sessions, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05, for all) except the SM measurements of the first examiner (p = 0.041). When the first measurements of two examiners were compared, the smallest values were of OCT. At the first session of two examiners, there was a significant difference between OCT and CT measurements, and between OCT and OLCR (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 for the first examiner and p < 0.001 for the second examiner, respectively).

Conclusion

Our study showed that CCT measurements made by CT and OLCR methods were almost same and highly correlated for both the examiners’ measurements. CCTs measured by OCT were on average 30 μm thinner than CT and OLCR.

Effects of Mydrin eye-drops on central corneal thickness values in adult patients with myopia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Mydrin eye-drops on central corneal thickness values and investigate the duration of the effect.

METHODS

In this prospective randomised self-controlled study, we enrolled 60 myopic patients (120 eyes) undergoing corneal laser refractive surgery. The central corneal thickness was measured before and one and four hours after administration of Mydrin eye-drops (major components are tropicamide and phenylephrine hydrochloride) using the Orbscan II anterior segment analysis system and a SP-2000P non-contact specular microscope, respectively.

RESULTS

Using the Orbscan II system, the baseline central corneal thickness (545 ± 27 µm) was significantly lower than that at one hour after Mydrin eye-drop application (559 ± 31 µm; p < 0.001); it was comparable to that at four hours post-Mydrin eye-drop administration (544 ± 26 µm; p < 0.74). Measured by non-contact specular microscopy, the baseline central corneal thickness (508 ± 26 µm) was significantly lower than that at one hour after Mydrin eye-drop application (521 ± 29 µm; p < 0.001); it was comparable to that at four hours after Mydrin eye-drop administration (506 ± 24 µm; p = 0.62). A significant difference was observed in the central corneal thickness at one and four hours after Mydrin eye-drop application by both methods (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed agreement between the measurements by the two methods at different times.

CONCLUSION

Central corneal thickness increases one hour after topical application of Mydrin eye-drops and is normalised at four hours following the administration of the drops. For patients scheduled to undergo excimer laser corneal refractive surgery, the central corneal thickness should be measured before or four hours after administration of Mydrin eye-drops.

Central Corneal Thickness Measurement Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Rotating Scheimpflug Camera, and Scanning-slit Topography Exclusively in Thin Non-keratoconic Corneas

Purpose:

To evaluate the agreement among Pentacam, Orbscan and ultrasound (US) pachymetry for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) in thin corneas with normal topographic pattern.

Methods:

We included 88 eyes of 44 refractive surgery candidates with thinnest pachymetric readings of 500 micrometers (μm) or less on Orbscan, a normal topographic pattern, no sign of keratoconus, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20. Pentacam, Orbscan and US were performed in one session by the same examiner. Exclusion criteria were history of ocular surgery, topographic abnormalities suggesting forme fruste keratoconus or keratectasia, and recent contact lens wear.

Results:

The difference in CCT measurements by US pachymetry and Orbscan II [using an acoustic factor (AF) of 0.92] ranged from −34 to +34 μm. The difference between the thinnest point and central readings measured by US reached 16 μm with Orbscan II (AF: 0.92) and 2 μm with Pentacam. Mean differences between the employed devices were 0.2 μm for Pentacam versus US (P = 0.727), 30.1 μm for uncorrected Orbscan versus US (P < 0.001), 10.4 μm for Orbscan II (AF = 0.92) versus US (P < 0.001), and 0.2 μm for Orbscan II (AF = 0.94) versus US (P = 0.851).

Conclusion:

In normal thin corneas, Pentacam demonstrated better agreement with US pachymetry as compared to corrected Orbscan readings. Results achieved by Orbscan were better consistent with US pachymetry using an AF of 0.94. We speculate that a dynamically graded AF in reverse proportion to CCT constitutes a better approach for correcting Orbscan measurements.

Effect of 2% fluorescein on Scheimpflug central corneal thickness measurements

AIM

To assess central corneal thickness (CCT) changes measured with Scheimpflug device following instillation of 2% fluorescein in normal subjects.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized study of 60 hospital volunteers. After baseline CCT measurements of both eyes of 40 subjects were obtained using Scheimpflug system, a drop of preservative-free 2% fluorescein, was instilled in one eye and in other eye, one drop of normal saline (control). Measurements were repeated after 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60min (continuous assessment group). Twenty subjects had baseline CCT taken, then fluorescein was instilled in one eye and measurements were taken at 1min. Ten eyes had saline rinse after 1min and 10 other eyes did not, measurements were repeated at 2min (eye rinse group).

RESULTS

The mean baseline CCT for continuous assessment group was 546.2 ±32.1 µm (range, 489.0-606.0), control eyes was 546.6±30.7 µm (range, 489.0-602.0). At 1min after fluorescein instillation, CCT significantly increased by 37.0±34.0 µm (P<0.001), then decreased gradually, reaching baseline at 60min. CCT variations were not significant in control group (P>0.05). For eye rinse group, CCT mean differences between baseline and 2min were 18.2 µm (95 % CI: -54.7 to 18.3) with rinse and 26.5 µm (95% CI: -62.9 to 9.9) without rinse; paired sample tests were not significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of fluorescein increased CCT value to a clinically relevant level of 6.8%. Eye rinse did not significantly reduce the effect at 2min post fluorescein timepoint.

Reliability of Pentacam HR Thickness Maps of the Entire Cornea in Normal, Post-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis, and Keratoconus Eyes

PURPOSE

To measure the repeatability and reproducibility of Pentacam HR system thickness maps for the entire cornea in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK), and keratoconus (KC) eyes.

DESIGN

Reliability study.

METHODS

Sixty normal subjects (60 eyes), 30 post-LASIK subjects (60 eyes), and 14 KC patients (27 eyes) were imaged with the Pentacam HR system by 2 well-trained operators. For pachymetry the cornea was divided into 4 zones: a central zone (2-mm diameter) and concentric pericentral zone (2-5 mm), transitional zone (5-7 mm), and peripheral zone (7-10 mm). The 3 concentric zones were subdivided into 8 sectors. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of entire corneal thickness maps were tested by the repeatability and reproducibility coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, and 95% limits of agreement.

RESULTS

From central to peripheral zones, the precision of corneal thickness measurements became gradually smaller. Central zone repeatability and reproducibility were the best in the normal, post-LASIK, and KC groups. The peripheral superior sectors showed poorer repeatability and reproducibility for all subjects. The intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for all zones were ≤19.3 μm, ≤22.1 μm, and ≤20.7 μm, in the normal, post-LASIK, and KC groups, respectively. The intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of variation for all zones were ≤1.3%, ≤1.6%, and ≤1.6% for all 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam HR system pachymetry of the entire cornea provided good precision in normal, post-LASIK, and KC corneas. Thickness measurements in the peripheral cornea should be interpreted with caution in abnormal corneas after surgery or with diseases.

Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam) and a combined Placido-optical coherence tomography device (Visante OMNI) in measuring corneal curvature, thickness and elevation values in normal and keratoconic eyes.

METHODS

Corneal measurements of 110 normal eyes (one eye per subject) and 70 keratoconic eyes were obtained from both devices and compared. Agreement was determined using the Bland-Altman analysis 95% limits of agreement (LoA).

RESULTS

The Pentacam measured significantly greater keratometry readings in the flattest (K1) and steepest meridians (K2) in normal and keratoconic eyes. The 95% LoA in normal eyes were -0.32 to 0.59 dioptres (D) (K1) and -0.41 to 0.74 D (K2). In keratoconic eyes, the 95% LoA were -1.35 to 1.92 D (K1) and -1.38 to 1.99 D (K2). The Pentacam recorded significantly higher central corneal thickness (CCT) values in both groups of eyes. The 95% LoA were -4.31 to 39.89 microns (μ) and -12.92 to 41.35 μ in normal and keratoconic eyes, respectively. Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevations were significantly greater in both groups of eyes. The devices demonstrated excellent repeatability and reproducibility for corneal curvature and thickness but not elevation measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pentacam measured significantly greater corneal curvature, thickness and elevation values compared to the Visante OMNI in normal and keratoconic eyes. The devices agree moderately for anterior corneal elevations in normal eyes and do not appear to be interchangeable for corneal measurements in clinical practice.

Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan

Background

Central corneal thickness (CCT) can be measured by using contact and non-contact methods. Ultrasound pachymetry (US pachymetry) is a contact method for measuring CCT and is perhaps the most commonly used method. However, non-contact methods like scanning slit topography (Orbscan II), slit-lamp optical coherence tomography (SL-OCT), and specular microscopy are also used. Not many studies have correlated the measurement of CCT with all four modalities. The purpose of this study was to compare and correlate the CCT measurements obtained by US pachymetry with SL-OCT, specular microscopy, and Orbscan.

Method

This is a prospective, comparative study done in an institutional setting. Thirty-two eyes of 32 subjects with no known ocular disease and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 were enrolled. CCT measurements were obtained using SL-OCT, specular microscopy, scanning slit topography (Orbscan), and US pachymetry. Three measurements were made with each instrument by the same operator. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation were calculated for CCT measurements acquired by the four measurement devices. Bland–Altman plot was constructed to determine the agreements between the CCT measurements obtained by different equipment.

Results

The mean CCT was 548.16±48.68 μm by US pachymetry. In comparison, CCT averaged 546.36±44.17 μm by SL-OCT, 557.61±49.92 μm by specular microscopy, and 551.03±48.96 μm by Orbscan for all subjects. Measurements by the various modalities were strongly correlated. Correlations (r²) of CCT, as measured by US pachymetry compared with other modalities, were: SL-OCT (r²=0.98, P<0.0001), specular microscopy (r²=0.98, P<0.0001), and Orbscan (r²=0.96, P<0.0001). All modalities had a linear correlation with US pachymetry measurements.

Conclusion

In subjects with healthy corneas, SL-OCT, specular microscopy, and Orbscan (with correction factor) can be used interchangeably with US pachymetry in certain clinical settings. The four modalities showed significant linear correlations with one another.

[Influence of corneal pachymetric changes on functional results after cataract surgery]

BACKGROUND

In the early postoperative period following uncomplicated cataract surgery, the correlation of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the increase in corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth (ACD) are investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 54 cataract patients with a mean age of 70 ± 8.4 years were included in this prospective study. Surgery was carried out on one eye of each patient according to the study protocol. Refraction, CDVA and ACD were evaluated 1 day and 1 week postoperatively and compared with the pachymetry results measured with the Pentacam.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative CDVA significantly improved from 0.31 ± 0.24 logMAR to 0.18 ± 0.22 logMAR after one day and up to 0.06 ± 0.13 logMAR one week after surgery (p < 0.05). The mean spherical equivalent was - 0.52 ± 0.69 D after one day and - 0.50 ± 0.82 D one week after surgery and showed only minimal differences compared to the mean target refraction of - 0.39 ± 0.70 D. Postoperative corneal thickness showed a significant increase compared to the preoperative results (p < 0.05) on both visits: the mean difference was 33.26 ± 50.20 µm (- 17 to 315 µm) on the first day and 20.22 ± 23.15 µm (- 10 to 99 µm) one week after surgery. Up to 7 days postoperatively the increase in corneal thickness and CDVA showed only moderate or no correlations (r = 0.465 vs. r = 0.072, respectively). Regarding pachymetry and ACD values, no or only low correlations were found.

CONCLUSION

The significant increase in corneal thickness on the first and seventh day shows no to moderate correlation to the CDVA. Nevertheless, a good and early rehabilitation of visual acuity following uncomplicated cataract surgery is possible. Intraocular pressure measurement can lead to false high results due to an increase in corneal thickness.

Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of post-surgical corneal edema on the reliability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior-segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients planned for cataract surgery (n = 16) or vitrectomy (n =  6) were included in a prospective study. The non-surgery eye was used as control. Two investigators acquired two measurements each, with the Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and the AS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) in a randomized order, followed by USP (Tomey SP-100, Germany). CCT was evaluated using the apex value for Pentacam, the corneal apex cut in AS-OCT and averaging eight single measurements for USP. Coefficients of variation (COV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined.

RESULTS

Post-surgery corneas showed a thickness of (investigators 1 and 2): Pentacam (615.9 ± 58.02 μm and 615.1 ± 60.17 μm), USP (601.4 ± 63.77 μm and 614.5 ± 70.91 μm), AS-OCT (608.8 ± 65.67 μm and 606.9 ± 64.41 μm) ,with no significant difference (ANOVA p > 0.99). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for control eyes were: Pentacam (0.78 ± 0.52 and 0.70 ± 0.76), USP (0.66 ± 0.29 and 0.98 ± 0.44), AS-OCT (0.59 ± 0.61 and 0.59 ± 0.40). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for post-surgical eyes were: Pentacam (0.98 ± 1.25 and 0.97 ± 0.73), USP (0.73 ± 0.64 and 1.35 ± 0.85), AS-OCT (1.34 ± 1.57 and 1.19 ± 1.18).The ICC was determined in post-surgery corneas (ICC > 0.96) and control corneas (ICC > 0.95).

CONCLUSION

USP measurements have the highest user dependence. Post-surgical corneal edema leads to higher intraobserver variability. All methods reached a high level of agreement in CCT determination in edematous as well as healthy corneas.