Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis

WITHDRAWN: Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters

This review has been withdrawn as the topic is covered by Ullman AJ, Cooke ML, Mitchell M, Lin F, New K, Long DA, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 , Issue 9 . Art. No.: CD010367. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010367.pub2 .

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device–Related Infections

The “Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections” is designed to reduce the incidence of intravascular device-related infections by providing an over view of the evidence for recommendations considered prudent by consensus of Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisor y Committee (HICPAC) members. This two-part document updates and replaces the previously published Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) Guideline for Intravascular Infections (Am J Infect Control1983;11:183-199). Part I, “Intravascular Device-Related Infections: An Over view” discusses many of the issues and controversies in intravascular-device use and maintenance. These issues include definitions and diagnosis of catheter-related infection, appropriate barrier precautions during catheter insertion, inter vals for replacement of catheters, intravenous (IV) fluids and administration sets, catheter-site care, the role of specialized IV personnel, and the use of prophylactic antimi-crobials, flush solutions, and anticoagulants. Part II, “Recommendations for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections” provides consensus recommendations of the HICPAC for the prevention and control of intravascular device-related infections. A working draft of this document also was reviewed by experts in hospital infection control, internal medicine, pediatrics, and intravenous therapy. However, all recommendations contained in the guideline may not reflect the opinion of all reviewers.

Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters (CVCs) facilitate venous access, allowing the intravenous administration of complex drug treatments, blood products and nutritional support, without the trauma associated with repeated venepuncture. However, CVCs are associated with a risk of infection. Some studies have indicated that the type of dressing used with them may affect the risk of infection. Gauze and tape, transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Tegaderm® and Opsite®, and highly vapour-permeable transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Opsite IV3000®, are the most common types of dressing used to secure CVCs. Currently, it is not clear which type of dressing is the most appropriate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare gauze and tape with transparent polyurethane CVC dressings in terms of catheter-related infection, catheter security, tolerance to dressing material and dressing condition in hospitalised adults and children.

SEARCH METHODS

For this third update, we searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (10 May 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to April Week 4 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, May 11, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 18); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 6 May 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of dressing type (e.g. gauze and tape versus transparent polyurethane dressings) on CVC-related infection, catheter security, tolerance to dressing material and dressing condition in hospitalised patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were included in earlier versions of the review. In this update two of the previously included papers have been excluded and two new trials have been added. Of these six trials, four compared gauze and tape with transparent polyurethane dressings (total participants = 337) and two compared different transparent polyurethane dressings (total participants = 126). Catheter-related bloodstream infection was higher in the transparent polyurethane group when compared with gauze and tape; OR 4.19 (95%CI 1.02 to 17.23) however these small trials were at risk of bias so this evidence is graded low quality. There was no evidence of a difference between highly permeable polyurethane dressings and other polyurethane dressings in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (low quality evidence). No other significant differences were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found a four-fold increase in the rate of catheter related blood stream infection when a polyurethane dressing was used to secure the central venous catheter however this research was at risk of bias and the confidence intervals were wide indicating high uncertainty around this estimate; so the true effect could be as small as 2% or as high as 17-fold. More, better quality research is needed regarding the relative effects of gauze and tape versus polyurethane dressings for central venous catheter sites.

Central venous catheter use in the pediatric patient: mechanical and infectious complications

OBJECTIVE

Following the introduction and widespread use of central venous catheters (CVCs) in adults, these devices are being used with increasing frequency in the pediatric population. This review will focus on differences between adults and children regarding CVC use and its potential complications. Both mechanical and infectious complications will be discussed.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

CVC-related complications in pediatric patients are closely linked to age, body size, and age-related immune status. In older children, many complications are similar to those encountered in adult patients. Because of ongoing growth and body changes, a cutoff point beyond which children can be regarded as "young adults" is difficult to define; many of our recommendations are therefore age-related. More frequently than in adults, an implanted port may be the first choice in pediatric patients when long indwelling times are expected. The optimal site of insertion also depends on factors such as the patients' age as well as the need for sedation and analgesia during the insertion procedure. In contrast to guidelines in adult patients, we recommend that a radiograph always be made following CVC insertion to check the position of the catheter. Regarding prevention of infectious complications, we recommend full sterile barrier precautions during CVC insertion and strict protocols for catheter care. CVCs should be removed as soon as possible when they are no longer needed, but there is no place for elective CVC replacement on a routine basis. New developments such as the use of impregnated catheters might help reduce infection rates; however, additional research will be required to provide more evidence of benefit in the pediatric population.

Central venous catheter dressings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gauze and tape or transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Tegaderm, Opsite or Opsite IV3000 are the most common types of dressing used to secure central venous catheters (CVCs). Currently, there are no clear guidelines as to which type of dressing is the most appropriate.

AIMS

To identify whether there are any differences between gauze and tape and/or transparent polyurethane film dressings in the incidence of CVC-related infection, catheter-related sepsis, catheter security, tolerance to dressing material, dressing condition and ease of application in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Medline, Embase and CancerLit databases were searched to identify any controlled trials comparing the effects of gauze and tape and/or transparent polyurethane dressings on CVCs. Additional references were sought from published and non-published literature. Twenty-three studies were reviewed. Data were extracted independently from each paper by two members of the review team and results compared. Differences were resolved either by consensus or referral to a third person. Authors were contacted for missing information.

RESULTS

Of the 23 studies reviewed, 15 were excluded. Of the remaining eight, data were available for meta-analysis from six studies. Of the six included studies, two compared gauze and tape with Opsite IV3000, two compared Opsite with Opsite IV3000, one compared Tegaderm with Opsite IV3000, and one compared Tegaderm with Opsite.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of any difference in the incidence of infectious complications between any of the dressing types compared in this review. Each of these comparisons was based on no more than two studies and all of these studies reported data from a small patient sample. Therefore it is unlikely that any of these comparisons would have had sufficient power to detect any differences between groups.

Central venous catheter site care for blood and marrow transplant recipients

Treatment-induced neutropenia, long central venous catheter (CVC) dwell times, and the use of immunosuppressive agents place blood and marrow transplant recipients at high risk for CVC infection. The most common causative organisms of CVC infection are ubiquitous skin flora of hospitalized patients. A great deal of research on CVC care, including dressing change procedures and frequency, has been conducted; however, variations in study design, patients studied, and terminology used to define CVC infection limit the generalizability of the findings. This article reviews significant studies of CVC care and infection rates and describes the findings of a survey of CVC care practices of Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Special Interest Group members of the Oncology Nursing Society.

Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters facilitate venous access, allowing the intravenous administration of complex drug treatments, blood products and nutritional support, without the trauma associated with repeated venepuncture. However, central venous catheters are associated with a risk of infection. Some studies have indicated that the type of dressing used for central venous catheters may affect the risk of infection. Gauze and tape or transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Tegaderm, Opsite or Opsite IV3000 are the most common types of dressing used to secure central venous catheters. Currently, it is not clear which type of dressing is the most appropriate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane central venous catheter dressings in terms of catheter related infection, catheter security, tolerance to dressing material and dressing condition in hospitalised adults and children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register (October 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (4th Quarter 2002) and the databases; MEDLINE (1966-December 2002, CINAHL (1982-October 2002) and EMBASE (1980-December 2002) were searched to identify any randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of gauze and tape and/or transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheter sites. Additional references were identified from bibliographies of published literature and were also sought from other sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of dressing type (i.e. gauze and tape and/or transparent polyurethane dressings) on central venous catheter related infection, catheter security, tolerance to dressing material and dressing condition in hospitalised patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty-three studies were reviewed. Data was extracted from each paper by two members of the review team independently and results then compared. Differences were resolved either by consensus or by referral to a third member of the review team. Authors were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 23 studies reviewed, 14 were excluded. Nine studies were included. Data was only available for meta-analysis from six of the nine included studies. Of the six included studies with available data, two compared gauze and tape with Opsite IV3000, two compared Opsite with Opsite IV3000, one compared gauze and tape with Tegaderm, and one compared Tegaderm with Opsite. There was no evidence of any difference in the incidence of infectious complications between any of the dressing types compared in this review. Each of these comparisons was based on no more than two studies and all of these studies reported data from a small patient sample. Therefore it is probable that the finding of no difference between dressing types is due to the lack of adequate data.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is a high level of uncertainty regarding the risk of infection with the central venous catheter dressings identified in this review. Therefore, at this stage it appears that the choice of dressing for central venous catheters can be based on patient preference. To identify the most appropriate central venous catheter dressings, further research is necessary. It is paramount that any future studies investigating this issue must be rigorously performed randomised controlled trials.

Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine

In order to evaluate the complications and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring, we reviewed the literature published from 1978 to 2001. We closely examined the three most commonly used arterial cannulation sites. The reviewed papers included a total of 19,617 radial, 3899 femoral and 1989 axillary artery catheterizations. Factors that contribute to higher complication rates were investigated. Major complications occurred in fewer than 1% of the cases, and rates were similar for the radial, femoral and axillary arteries. We conclude that arterial cannulation is a safe procedure.

Parenteral nutrition for the acutely ill

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is one of the most sophisticated forms of intravenous therapy in use today. Intravenous feeding is a life-saving technology for patients unable to maintain their nutritional status using the gastrointestinal tract. Although PN has become an integral component of patient care, the risks associated with this therapy must be weighed against the potential benefits. Comprehensive clinical management includes selection of candidates, implementation and monitoring of therapy, and ensuring a seamless transition when PN is no longer required. Optimal parenteral nutrition demands expertise in caring for vascular access devices. A collaborative approach to care minimizes the risks associated with PN and ensures positive patient outcomes.

Success rates and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic combinations for initial treatment of central-venous-line infections during total parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Central-venous-line infections can be successfully treated with appropriate antibiotics, thus avoiding the need for catheter removal. Based on our experience, vancomycin, gentamicin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, and amphotericin, alone or in combination, are usually administered, pending sensitivity results. This empirical list, however, has never been verified against actual sensitivity results nor has it been tested for cost or efficacy.

METHODS

Medical records of inpatients on hyperalimentation over 1 year were reviewed. Success rate, therapy duration, and drug acquisition cost and charge were assessed for central-venous-line infections. Antibiotics then were paired and evaluated in terms of charge and efficacy against all microorganisms as determined by sensitivity results.

RESULTS

In 500 inpatients receiving hyperalimentation for 9,698 patient-days, 8.4 central-venous-line infections/1,000 patient-days occurred. Staphylococcus non-aureus, Candida species, Enterococcus faecium, and Staphylococcus aureus predominantly were isolated. Of the infections, 51 (67%) were sensitive to one or more of the initial antibiotics. A 2-week course of antibiotics successfully treated 50 (66%) catheter infections without line removal. Appropriate initial therapy on average reduced treatment duration by 8 to 10 days and drug charges by $400 to $700.

CONCLUSIONS

Amikacin-vancomycin appears to be the most cost-effective selection for presumed central-venous-line infections, pending sensitivity results, followed by valid alternatives. Lower failure rates are well worth the extra cost in pharmaceutical charges.

A 25-year study of nosocomial bacteremia in an adult intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To identify the organisms, their antibiotic susceptibility, and the associated focus on infection causing nosocomial bacteremia in patients in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) between 1971 and 1995.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

A 12-bed general adult ICU in a 1,000-bed tertiary referral teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Four hundred eighty-six episodes of bacteremia involving 570 organisms in 425 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood cultures taken from patients with suspected nosocomial infection were analyzed. Isolated organisms were identified, and their susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics was determined. Clinical details, including antibiotic treatment, were recorded for all patients. From 1986 to 1995, culture results of samples obtained from other sites were used to help identify the focus of infection causing bacteremia. All results were collected prospectively by clinical microbiologists. Between 1971 and 1990, the number of bacteremias and the relative frequency of isolation of individual organisms changed little, with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella species predominating. During 1991 to 1995, the number of bacteremias increased two-fold, largely attributable to increased isolation of Enterococcus species, coagulase-negative staphylococci, intrinsically antibiotic-resistant gram-negative organisms (particularly P. aeruginosa), and Candida species. The most commonly used antibiotics for the treatment of bacteremic patients throughout the 1970s were amoxicillin and gentamicin. After the introduction of cephalosporins in the early 1980s, their use increased progressively to equal that of gentamicin in the 1990s, whereas amoxicillin use decreased. Since the introduction of cephalosporins, increases in the antibiotic resistance of gram-negative organisms have been largely confined to an outbreak of gentamicin- and ceftazidime-resistant organisms caused by contaminated arterial pressure monitors during 1992 and 1993 and a two-fold increase in ceftazidime resistance of the Pseudomonas species. Gentamicin resistance of gram-negative aerobes remained unchanged (excluding the arterial pressure monitor outbreak), despite gentamicin being one of the most frequently prescribed antibiotics throughout the 25-yr period. Between 1986 and 1995, two thirds of all bacteremic organisms were cultured from intravascular catheters, which were designated as the focus of infection, 7% were secondary to gastrointestinal pathology, but only approximately 3% were secondary to wound, respiratory tract, or urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteremias have become more frequent in the ICU, probably because of the increased use of intravascular catheters, which are the most frequent foci for bacteremic infection. The spectrum of organisms has changed, and this can be temporally related to the changes in the antibiotics prescribed. Gentamicin resistance of gram-negative organisms has not increased during a 25-yr period, despite being one of the most frequently prescribed antibiotics in the ICU.

Incidence and predictors of central venous catheter related infection in intensive care patients

This study investigated the incidence of and risk factors for central venous catheter (CVC) infection in intensive care. CVCs were prospectively studied in patients who had lines inserted in general or neurosurgical intensive care and were expected to have the line in situ for at least 72 hours. Catheters (n = 119) were cultured for CVC-related infection (CRI; > 15 colony forming units) and blood cultures done when indicated. CRI was identified in 32 (26.9%) catheters, CVC related bacteraemia in five cases (4.2%) and CVC related sepsis in none. After adjustment for duration of catheterization, independent predictors of CVC related infection were catheter insertion site, with jugular sites having the highest risk, and primary diagnosis, with neurosurgical patients at least risk.

Catheter-related infections following axillary vein catheterization

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of infectious complications following axillary vein cannulation and to compare to that observed after internal jugular vein catheterization.

METHODS

A prospective comparative open study was carried out to determine the rate of infectious complications related to the use of catheters inserted via the axillary vein or the internal jugular vein. During the study period all patients submitted to central venous catheterization were evaluated. A total of 141 patients entered and completed the study. Catheter insertion sites were either the axillary vein punctured in the axilla, or the internal jugular vein punctured using an anterior approach. Catheter tips were cultured using a quantitative technique. Clinical information pertaining to the analysis was prospectively collected.

RESULTS

A total of 141 catheters from 141 patients entered was studied. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for catheter infection were similar in both groups. The incidence of catheter-related infection (including catheter-related sepsis, and bacteremia) was not different between the two groups (axillary vein: 8.1%; internal jugular vein: 7.6%). Catheter-related bacteremia were seen at a rate of 3.7% in the internal jugular vein group and a rate of 1.6% in the axillary vein group (NS). The incidence of catheter colonization was similar in both groups (axillary vein: 14.5%; internal jugular vein: 11.4%).

CONCLUSION

Catheter-related infection after axillary vein catheterization was similar to that observed after internal jugular vein catheterization. The chance of developing catheter-related sepsis was less than 10% with either route when catheters were used for the treatment of severely ill patients.

The "hands-off" catheter and the prevention of systemic infections associated with pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective study

The Arrow "Hands-Off" thermodilution catheter (AHO) is completely shielded during balloon testing, preparation, and insertion. To assess the value of the AHO in the prevention of systemic infections associated with pulmonary artery catheterization (SIAPAC), we conducted a randomized prospective study over an 18-mo period. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which one received the thermodilution catheter routinely used in our department and the other, the AHO catheter. The diagnosis of SIAPAC was based on recovery of the same organism from the thermodilution catheter (TC) and blood samples, absence of any other infectious focus, and improvement or resolution of clinical evidence of infection after removal of the TC. A total of 166 TCs were randomized in 150 patients. The two groups (mean +/- SD) were comparable in terms of age, SAPS on admission (15.6 +/- 5.2 versus 15.2 +/- 6.2), SAPS on the day of catheter insertion (17.6 +/- 4.8 versus 17.3 +/- 5.8), duration of catheter insertion (22.8 +/- 11.3 versus 25.3 +/- 19.5 min), insertion site, hemodynamic status, duration of use of the TC (3.6 +/- 1.3 versus 3.5 +/- 1.5 d), and outcome. A total of eight cases of SIAPAC were diagnosed in the standard TC group, versus none in the AHO group (p < 0.002). No cases of SIAPAC occurred in those patients who had their TC for less than four days. This study demonstrates the value of the AHO for preventing systemic infections associated with prolonged pulmonary artery catheterization.

Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in critically ill patients in intensive care units. However, infectious complications are common and may limit their utility. We critically review the literature to determine the impact of CVC design and composition, insertion site selection, insertion procedures, care and removal of temporary CVCs on infectious complications. Relevant articles were identified and selected for review using a database search (Medline and manual of the English language literature) based upon study design and sample size with an emphasis on prospective randomized trials. To minimize infectious complications and maintain a reasonable cost-benefit ratio, we recommend: i) use a single lumen catheter unless clear indications for a multi-lumen catheter exist; ii) insert the catheter via the subclavian vein if no relative contraindication exists (bleeding diathesis, positive pressure ventilation); iii) disinfect the insertion site employing sterile technique; iv) apply a dry, sterile dressing and change the dressing every other day; v) inspect the insertion site for signs of infection and remove the catheter if pus is present; vi) if a catheter-related infection is suspected, change the catheter over a guidewire and culture the distal segment. The replacement catheter should be removed if an original catheter segment culture is positive.

Guidelines for good practice in central venous catheterization. Hospital Infection Society and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians

Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly used in clinical practice and are associated with several complications, including early and late onset infection. In these guidelines, an outline of good practice for the use of CVC and the prevention of associated infections is presented. Definitions of both localized and systemic catheter-related sepsis are given. Subsequent good practice in relation to the insertion of CVC, including patient preparation, planned duration of catheterization, catheter materials and design of the CVC, are presented. Skin fixation and insertion site care, including the use of dressings and administration sets, as well as an approach to flow obstructions, are also reviewed. The clinical and microbiological diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis and its treatment is next presented. Finally, guidelines for CVC removal and replacement are given. The guidelines are designed to facilitate the development of good practice in the use of CVC, allowing appropriate protocols to be formulated and to reduce infection risk.

Vascular catheter-related sepsis: diagnosis and prevention

Although catheter-related sepsis (CRS) is an important cause of nosocomial infection and the major complication of intravenous catheter use, there is, as yet, no consensus concerning either a useful definition of CRS or the optimal method of catheter management and prevention of infection. Semiquantitative culture of catheter tips is a useful method of diagnosis of CRS but other techniques such as quantitative catheter blood cultures and Gram staining of the catheter have roles in selected patients. The most significant impact on the prevention of CRS is made by the introduction of an intravenous therapy team. The site and method of catheter insertion, type of dressing and antisepsis, catheter flushing and use of prophylactic antibiotics are also important issues. Techniques such as guide-wire exchange and catheters such as triple lumen and total implantable venous access devices have their own infection problems. Many new and interesting approaches to the prevention of CRS are being formulated. To facilitate further progress, a standardized definition for diagnosis, and revised recommendations for prevention of CRS would be helpful.

Improved sterile technique diminishes the incidence of positive line cultures in cardiovascular patients

In order to determine the incidence of positive line cultures, especially as affected by differing protocols for line insertion, cultures were obtained from lines in residence for up to 4 days from cardiac patients (who received Cefuroxime) and vascular patients (who received Cefazolin) as prophylaxis perioperatively. Positive cultures were obtained from 95 (19%) of 496 lines in cardiac patients and 83 (31%) of 261 lines in vascular patients. There was a linear relationship between duration of line residence and the incidence of positive line cultures, increasing from 14% on Day 1 to 33% on Day 4. The use of full sterile technique at the time of insertion halved the incidence of subsequent positive line cultures. Four of the 403 (1%) patients each had a single episode of postoperative line sepsis. Another four patients developed wound infections with the same organisms as cultured from their lines. One patient has had a vascular graft infection with the same organism cultured as was isolated from a Swan-Ganz line 1 year previously. These data suggest that monitoring lines should be inserted using full sterile technique and removed as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable.

Prevention of hemodialysis subclavian vein catheter infections by topical povidone-iodine

Subclavian catheter (SCC) related infections are a major cause of morbidity in hemodialysis patients, the vast majority due to staphylococci species. Povidone-iodine (PI) has proven anti-staphylococcal activity. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial of topical PI ointment was undertaken to evaluate the impact of this prophylactic intervention on the incidence of SCC related infections in hemodialysis patients. The role of S. aureus nasal carrier state in the acquisition of infection was also evaluated. Patients requiring SCC for temporary hemodialysis access were randomized to receive the treatment (T; N = 63) or sterile gauze dressings alone (C; N = 66). Catheter duration ranged from 2 to 210 days in both groups, with a mean of 38.6 days in T and 36.2 days in C (NS). Exit site (ES) infections were significantly less in T (5%) versus C (18%) (P less than 0.02); tip colonization (TC) was 17% in T versus 36% in C (P less than 0.01), while the incidence of septicemia (S) was also significantly less in T (2%) versus C (17%; P less than 0.01). S. aureus nasal carriers were at a threefold higher risk of SCC related septicemia (0.009/day) than noncarriers (0.003/day; P less than 0.05). The beneficial effect of PI ointment was most evident in this high risk group of S. aureus carriers: ES = 0% T versus 24% C, TC = 12% T versus 42% C, S = 0% T versus 29% C, P less than 0.05. There were no adverse effects of the treatment. The routine application of topical PI ointment to temporary hemodialysis catheter exit sites is effective in reducing SCC related infections.

The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping

To delineate the pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery (PA) catheters, a prospective clinical study of hospitalized adult medical and surgical patients was done. Role of catheter material was assessed by randomizing insertions to heparin-bonded PA catheters made of polyvinylchloride or polyurethane. Sources of infection and pathogenesis were studied by culturing skin, the introducer, the PA catheter tip, all hubs, infusate from each lumen, and the extravascular portion of the PA catheter beneath the external protective plastic sleeve. Concordance between isolates from sources and infected catheters was determined by speciation, antibiogram, and for coagulase-negative staphylococci, plasmid profile analysis. Risk factors for infection were determined by stepwise logistic regression. Overall, 65 (22%) of 297 Swan-Ganz catheters showed local infection of the introducer (58 catheters) or the intravascular portion of the PA catheter (20 catheters); only two catheters (0.7%) caused bacteremia. Eighty percent of infected Swan-Ganz catheters (the introducer or PA catheter) showed concordance with organisms cultured from skin of the insertion site, 17% with a contaminated hub and 18% with organisms contaminating the extravascular portion of the PA catheter beneath the sleeve. Isolates from infected PA catheters were most likely to show concordance with concomitantly infected introducers (71%). Cutaneous colonization of the insertion site with greater than 10(2) cfu/10 cm2 (relative risk [RR] 5.5; p less than 0.001), insertion into an internal jugular vein (RR 4.3; p less than 0.01), catheterization greater than 3 days (RR 3.1; p less than 0.01), and insertion in the operating room using less stringent barrier precautions (RR 2.1; p = 0.03) were each associated with a significantly increased risk of catheter-related infection. The risk of bacteremic infection with Swan-Ganz catheters is now low, in the range of 1%, with reasonable care. Swan-Ganz catheters are vulnerable to contamination from multiple sources, but the patient's skin is the single most important source of organisms causing invasive infection, which in most cases involves the introducer rather than the PA catheter. Heavy colonization of the insertion site, percutaneous insertion in the internal jugular vein rather than subclavian vein, catheterization longer than 3 days, and insertion with less stringent barrier precautions significantly increase the risk of catheter-related infection. These findings hold promise for application to management of Swan-Ganz catheters and research in catheter design to reduce the risk of catheter-related infection.

Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients

To determine the incidence rate of complications associated with vascular catheters in intensive care unit patients and to analyze risk factors for a positive vascular culture, we performed a multicenter study of intensive care unit patients at eight French hospitals. During the study period, 865 intravenous catheters were inserted in 566 patients; 362 (41.8%) were peripheral catheters, and 503 (58.2%) were central catheters. Local complications (i.e., infiltration) occurred significantly more often with peripheral than with central catheters (P less than 0.001); in contrast, fever and bacteremia were significantly more often associated with central than with peripheral catheters (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). The culture of the vascular-catheter tip was positive for 24% of central catheters (32 of 1,000 catheters days) and for 9% of peripheral catheters (21 of 1,000 catheters days). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common microorganism isolated from both peripheral and central catheters, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No significant risk factor associated with positive cultures for peripheral catheters was found by univariate analysis. In contrast, the purpose of the cannula (nutrition and monitoring of central venous pressure), the insertion site (jugular), the dressing type (semipermeable transparent dressing), the antiseptic used to prepare the insertion site (povidone iodine), and routine changing of the intravenous administration set were significantly associated with positive cultures of central catheters. Three factors, duration of catheterization, use of a semipermeable transparent dressing, and the jugular insertion site, were found to be independently associated with positive cultures of central catheters by multivariate analysis.

Catheter related infection. A plea for consensus with review and guidelines

Although there has been a proliferation of catheter related infection literature there is still little consensus regarding infection statistics and optimal catheter management techniques. This paper analyses the various factors that have contributed to these inconsistencies and thereby attempts to provide a standardised framework for future research and communication on the subject. An attempt has also been made from available data to provide management guidelines that are practicable in the intensive care environment.

Central venous catheter infections

When used wisely, central venous catheters are capable of providing vital circulatory access in any patient with a remarkably low risk of infection or major complication. Tunneled silicone catheters are the route of choice for long-term or outpatient use, particularly for oncology or TPN patients; insertion of such a catheter should occur early in the hospitalization of a newly diagnosed patient on chemotherapy. The greatest experience has accrued with the cuffed silicone catheters (for example, Broviac), but the totally implantable devices (for instance, Port-a-cath) may become the device of choice in pediatric outpatients. For infants, small, percutaneously inserted noncuffed silicone catheters appear to offer the greatest safety. Among acute care patients, percutaneous plastic central venous catheters fulfill a vital role but represent an important source of infection. Scrupulous technique, the minimizing of manipulation, and a readiness to replace the catheter at any suggestion of trouble are important to achieving the best results. Within a given design, it is generally best to use the smallest diameter catheter capable of performing the desired tasks. However, on the basis of currently available data, there need be no hesitation to use a multilumen catheter if the care of the patient demands multiple access ports. The various silicone catheters can usually be left in place while infection is treated, although fungal and certain other infections are more likely to require catheter removal. Percutaneous plastic catheters should be removed or changed over a wire if infection is suspected; if tip culture of the removed catheter is positive, and the catheter was replaced over a wire, then the replacement catheter should be promptly removed.

Microbiology of indwelling central intravascular catheters

Indwelling central-line catheters (n = 502) from 362 patients in intensive care units were analyzed prospectively. The skin site, 6-cm-distal and -proximal subcutaneous segments of the catheter, exudates, and blood were cultured. Semiqualitative roll plate cultures of the catheter segments were followed by broth cultures and examined for 72 h. All isolates were identified, and susceptibilities were determined. Line infections, defined clinically, yielded 22 different microbial species; 10 different species were recovered from colonized lines. Of the Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates recovered, 39% occurred singly and 21% occurred in combination with other microorganisms; Enterococcus faecalis, S. hominis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were next in frequency of isolation. Line infections also yielded other staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, several members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, acinetobacters, anaerobic bacteria, Candida spp., and Aspergillus fumigatus. While S. epidermidis was also the most frequent isolate among the line colonizers, different species and different frequencies of isolation were found among this group. The study showed that the distal catheter segment broth culture was the best predictor of clinical line infections; in addition, gram-negative bacteria were isolated only from the catheters of patients with overt infections.

Central catheter infections: single- versus triple-lumen catheters. Influence of guide wires on infection rates when used for replacement of catheters

A prospective study was conducted over six months to determine if triple-lumen catheters were associated with a higher rate of infection than single-lumen catheters. A total of 502 central intravascular catheters were prospectively collected from 362 consecutive patients in the adult intensive care units. Semiquantitative and broth cultures were performed on distal and proximal catheter segments, with peripheral blood culture specimens drawn in febrile patients. The overall infection rate for the 502 catheters was 11.8 percent or 2.2 infections per 100 days at risk. The infection rates were: single-lumen lines, 8 percent; triple-lumen lines, 32 percent; and triple-lumen pulmonary artery catheters, 12 percent. When corrected for time at risk, the triple-lumen lines and the triple-lumen pulmonary artery catheters had the same rate of infection, which was three times greater than that of the single-lumen catheters. After correction for confounding variables such as the presence of diabetes mellitus, the use of hyperalimentation, the degree of illness, dialysis, or ultrafiltration, and the use of a guide wire to place a replacement line over a pre-existing one, the risk of infection remained significantly higher for triple-lumen than for single-lumen catheters. The use of a guide wire to place a new line over an old one also was associated with a trend towards an increased risk of infection.

Vascular-access infections in hospitalized patients

Vascular catheters are a common source of nosocomial infections, although many of these infections are potentially preventable. A long duration of catheterization, multiple catheter manipulations, the inexperience of some inserters, use of transparent plastic dressings, violations of aseptic technique, the use of multilumen catheters, and inadequate sterilization of reusable pressure transducers all increase the risk of these infections. The only interventions that have been proved to reduce the risk are standardized insertion and maintenance technique by an intravenous-therapy team, preinsertion skin preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate, and the use of topical antibiotics at the insertion site. The goal of the physician should be to prevent catheter infection, because the treatment of established infection can be difficult and costly. Treatment must be individualized for each patient on the basis of the clinical presentation and the causative organism.