The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: introduction and overview

Health Service Use in Children With Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

The number of children identified early with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss (MUHL) has increased over the past 3 decades due to population-based newborn hearing screening initiatives. Early identification involves additional hearing-related services for these children in the early years. Despite the growing number of children, little information exists regarding their use of health care services. We examined overall health care utilization for this population of children with hearing loss in a Canadian pediatric center as well as the factors associated with audiology and early intervention service utilization.

DESIGN

As part of a longitudinal MUHL research program, we examined health care utilization in a population-based cohort of 182 children with MUHL who were identified in one Canadian pediatric center from 2014 to 2018 and followed up to 6 years. Audiologic characteristics were collected prospectively, and health care utilization data were collected retrospectively through administrative databases. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize health care encounters. We used negative binomial regression models to examine the relationship between several clinical factors including age of diagnosis, degree, and laterality (unilateral/mild bilateral) of hearing loss, use of hearing technology, developmental concerns, and services used in audiology and early intervention.

RESULTS

The 182 children were diagnosed at a median age of 4.1 months (interquartile range: 1.9, 55.7) and mean follow-up time was 48.6 (SD: 20.0) months. A total of 9867 hospital encounters were recorded in the medical chart including 2247 audiology, 3429 early intervention, and 701 Ear Nose and Throat service encounters. For audiology services, health care utilization (rate of visits per month of follow-up) was related to whether hearing loss was mild bilateral or unilateral, use of hearing aid(s), progressive hearing loss, developmental concerns, and age of diagnosis. Children with mild bilateral hearing loss had 68% more visits compared with children with unilateral hearing loss. Children with hearing aid(s) had 86%more visits than those without amplification. During the study period, 68.1% of children had at least one early intervention visit. In multivariable regression, after controlling for time followed, earlier age at diagnosis, bilateral hearing loss, use of hearing aid(s), progressive hearing loss, more severe hearing loss, and developmental concerns were all significantly associated with more early intervention service utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide a comprehensive profile of hearing-related services provided to a population-based cohort of early-identified children with MUHL. Children with mild bilateral loss required more audiology services than those with unilateral hearing loss. Two-thirds of the children with MUHL utilized some early intervention services. Use of hearing aid(s), bilateral hearing loss, progressive hearing loss, and earlier age of diagnosis result in more service utilization for both audiology and early intervention. Understanding the intensity of care use among various subgroups of children with hearing loss can shed light on the impact of these hearing losses and inform resource planning.

Sensorineural hearing loss among children at risk: A 16-year audiological records review in a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVES

Hearing loss (HL) constitutes an increasing worldwide health problem. Neonatal hearing screening improved early detection and management to alleviate HL detriments on the person and society. Still, HL in childhood, beyond infancy, is under-investigated, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of HL in childhood amongst Jordanian children with HL risk factors and investigate the associated risk factors.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional review of audiological records in a tertiary public and teaching hospital. The data of 1307 children aged 0-15 years who underwent audiological assessment from 2000 to 2016 were included. A review of diagnostic audiological and medical records was conducted to investigate the prevalence of sensorineural HL in high-risk (HR) children and the most contributing risk factors.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of sensorineural HL was 29.2% in the study sample. The HL was bilateral in 95% and mild to moderate HL in 73%. The mean age at the diagnosis was around 4.5 years. The most common risk factors were parental concern about their child's hearing, ototoxic drug use, and developmental and speech delay. The Chi-squared test showed that parental concern and ototoxic drug use were associated with an increased probability of having HL.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HL amongst at-risk children in Jordan is relatively high, and the diagnosis is delayed. The results highlight the importance of implementing a hearing screening program in at-risk children. This needs to start from birth and include a serial follow-up to detect cases of delayed-onset HL.

Joint Profile Characteristics of Long-Latency Transient Evoked and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions

PURPOSE

In clinical practice, otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are interpreted as either "present" or "absent." However, OAEs have the potential to inform about etiology and severity of hearing loss if analyzed in other dimensions. A proposed method uses the nonlinear component of the distortion product OAEs together with stimulus frequency OAEs to construct a joint reflection-distortion profile. The objective of the current study is to determine if joint reflection-distortion profiles can be created using long-latency (LL) components of transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) as the reflection-type emission.

METHOD

LL TEOAEs and the nonlinear distortion OAEs were measured from adult ears. Individual input-output (I/O) functions were created, and OAE level was normalized by dividing by the stimulus level yielding individual gain functions. Peak strength, compression threshold, and OAE level at compression threshold were derived from individual gain functions to create joint reflection-distortion profiles.

RESULTS

TEOAEs with a poststimulus window starting at 6 ms had I/O functions with compression characteristics similar to LL TEOAE components. The model fit the LL gain functions, which had R ² > .93, significantly better than the nonlinear distortion OAE gain functions, which had R ² = .596-.99. Interquartile ranges for joint reflection-distortion profiles were larger for compression threshold and OAE level at compression threshold but smaller for peak strength than those previously published.

CONCLUSIONS

The gain function fits LL TEOAEs well. Joint reflection-distortion profiles are a promising method that could enhance diagnosis of hearing loss, and use of the LL TEOAE in the profile for peak strength may be important because of narrow interquartile ranges.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20323593.

Early Biomarkers and Hearing Impairments in Patients with Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Identifying biomarkers for hearing impairments (HIs) in patients with neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), to initialize early hearing habilitation, is crucial. Seventy-eight neonates with HIE were divided into the following two groups: those with HIs and those without HIs. We compared those patients with 11,837 newborns without HIE, and analyzed the risk factors of HIs among neonatal HIE. Of the 78 patients, 11 were confirmed to have an HI, which is a substantially higher percentage than in the 11,837 newborns without HIE (14.1% vs. 0.87%; p < 0.001). More patients with moderate-to-severe HIE had confirmed HIs (p = 0.020; odds ratio, 8.61) than those with mild HIE. Clinical staging, and blood lactate and glucose levels could be predictive factors for HIs among patients with HIE. The patients who exhibited HIs had significantly higher lactate (104.8 ± 51.0 vs. 71.4 ± 48.4; U = 181, p = 0.032) and serum glucose (159.5 ± 86.1 vs. 112.1 ± 62.3; U = 166, p = 0.036) levels than those without HIs. A higher prevalence of HIs was noted in the patients with stage III HIE than those with stage II HIE (43.8% vs. 10%; p = 0.008). The degree of HI correlated with brain anomalies and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 1 year of age. Clinical staging, and blood lactate and glucose levels could be predictive factors for HIs among patients with HIE.

Audiologists' perspectives on management of mild bilateral hearing loss in infants and young children

OBJECTIVE

Universal newborn hearing screening programs have led to early identification of infants with congenital mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The current lack of evidence-based protocols to guide audiological management of infants with MBHL has led to clinical equipoise about fitting of hearing aids. The purpose of this study was to increase understanding about the perspectives of paediatric audiologists on factors influencing their management of MBHLin infants and young children.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive research methodology involving semi-structured interviews with audiologists.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty-three paediatric audiologists in diagnostic and rehabilitation settings in Victoria, Australia.

RESULTS

Three main themes that influenced management were identified. These include: (1) evidence, or the lack of it, influences audiologists' practice; (2) audiologists recognise the need to be fluid; and (3) family characteristics and parents' perspectives. "Audiologists delivering family-centred practice" was identified as an overarching theme across these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Audiologists recognised the importance of adopting a family-centred approach in their management of MBHL in infants and young children. Embodied in their practice was the acknowledgement of limited evidence, the consideration of multiple child and family factors, and the incorporation of perspectives of parents and families in adopting a fluid approach to provide individualised services.

The History of Pediatric and Adult Hearing Screening

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To document the history of hearing seeing in children and adults.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search in all languages was carried out with the terms of hearing screening from the following sources: Pub Med, Science Direct, World Catalog, Index Medicus, Google scholar, Google Books, National Library of Medicine, Welcome historical library and The Library of Congress.

METHODS

The primary sources consisting of books, scientific reports, public documents, governmental reports, and other written material were analyzed to document the history of hearing screening.

RESULTS

The concept of screening for medical conditions that, when found, could influence some form of the outcome of the malady came about during the end of 19th century. The first applications of screening were to circumscribe populations, schoolchildren, military personnel, and railroad employees. During the first half of the 20th century, screening programs were extended to similar populations and were able to be expanded on the basis of the improved technology of hearing testing. The concept of universal screening was first applied to the inborn errors of metabolism of newborn infants and particularly the assessment of phenylketonuria in 1963 by Guthrie and Susi. A limited use of this technique has been the detection of genes resulting in hearing loss. The use of a form of hearing testing either observational or physiological as a screen for all newborns was first articulated by Larry Fisch in 1957 and by the end of the 20th century newborn infant screening for hearing loss became the standard almost every nation worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing screening for newborn infants is utilized worldwide, schoolchildren less so and for adults many industrial workers and military service undergo hearing screening, but this is not a general practice for screening the elderly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 131:S1-S25, 2021.

Early Prelingual Auditory Development of Infants and Toddlers With Unilateral Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of congenital and permanent unilateral hearing loss (UHL) on early prelingual auditory development (EPLAD) of infants and toddlers.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional and case-controlled design.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Sixty-five young children (median with interquartile ranges: 4.4 [3.3, 7.7] mo) with UHL, 70 children (6.0 [3.8, 9.0] mo) with bilateral normal hearing (BNH) and 32 children (5.8 [3.9, 12.1] mo) with bilateral mild hearing loss (BMHL) were enrolled and grouped. Children with UHL were further grouped according to the severity of impairment and the ear that was impaired.

INTERVENTIONS

Children involved were assessed by the 9-item Infant-toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (ITMAIS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) EPLAD assessed by ITMAIS, 2) functions of sound detection, sound discrimination and identification and preverbal vocalization assessed by dividing ITMAIS into three sections, 3) trajectories of EPLAD estimated by ITMAIS.

RESULTS

Compared with BNH, children with UHL lagged behind in the function of sound discrimination and identification, preverbal vocalization, as well as trajectory of EPLAD. Children with severe to profound UHL exhibited more severe EPLAD handicaps than children with mild to moderate losses. The auditory functions and EPLAD trajectory of children with UHL were similar to those with BMHL.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with congenital and permanent UHL demonstrate delays in EPLAD, which are evident soon after birth before initial development of speech and language. The ITMAIS is an appropriate tool to identify these delays both in children with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment.

Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Campania region (Italy) between 2013 and 2019

Purpose

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) in the first month of life is crucial for facilitating both early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) of significant permanent hearing impairment (PHI). In Campania region, UNHS has been introduced in 2003 by the Regional Council Resolution and started on January 2007. The aim of this paper is to update a previous article describing the performance of the program since its implementation in the period between 2013 and 2019.

Methods

A longitudinal retrospective study was carried at the Regional Reference Center III on 350,178 babies born in the analysis period. The paper reports the main results of overall coverage, referral rate, lost-to-follow-up rate,yield for PHI and shall determine various risk factor associations with hearing impairment

Results

In Campania region, 318,878 newborns were enrolled at I level, with a coverage rate of 91.06%, 301,818 (86.18%) Well Infant Nurseries (WIN) and 17,060 (5.35%) Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) babies. PHI was identified in 413 children, 288 (69.73%) bilaterally and 125 (30.26%) unilaterally. The overall cumulative incidence rate of PHI was 1.29 per 1000 live-born infants (95% CI 1.17–1.42) with a quite steady tendency during the whole study period.

Conclusions

This study confirms the feasibility and effectiveness of UNHS in Campania region also in a setting with major socioeconomic and health organization restrictions.The program meets quality benchmarks to evaluate the progress of UNHS. Nowadays, it is possible to achieve an early diagnosis of all types of HL avoiding the consequences of hearing deprivation.

Auditory, Social, and Behavioral Skills of Children With Unilateral/Mild Hearing Loss

This study explored the impact of mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss on auditory, social, and behavior skills in early school-aged children. Thirty-two children (aged 5-9 years) were evaluated with parent and teacher questionnaires. Most outcomes were within the range of expected scores. However, functional auditory skills were below published results for children with typical hearing. On the social skills scale, about 21.4% (parent-reported) and 20.0% (teacher-reported) of children were below one standard deviation (SD) of the normative mean (i.e., a standard score below 85). On the parent-reported behavior test, over a quarter of children scored beyond 1 SD on some subscales. Laterality of hearing loss had no effect on outcomes (p > .05). Agreement between parents and teachers varied from poor (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: .162) to moderate (ICC: .448). Results indicate that these children are functioning in most areas like their peers with typical hearing. Additional research on this population of children who may benefit from early identification and amplification is warranted.

What Contribution Did Economic Evidence Make to the Adoption of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Policies in the United States?

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), when accompanied by timely access to intervention services, can improve language outcomes for children born deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) and result in economic benefits to society. Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs promote UNHS and using information systems support access to follow-up diagnostic and early intervention services so that infants can be screened no later than 1 month of age, with those who do not pass their screen receiving diagnostic evaluation no later than 3 months of age, and those with diagnosed hearing loss receiving intervention services no later than 6 months of age. In this paper, we first document the rapid roll-out of UNHS/EHDI policies and programs at the national and state/territorial levels in the United States between 1997 and 2005. We then review cost analyses and economic arguments that were made in advancing those policies in the United States. Finally, we examine evidence on language and educational outcomes that pertain to the economic benefits of UNHS/EHDI. In conclusion, although formal cost-effectiveness analyses do not appear to have played a decisive role, informal economic assessments of costs and benefits appear to have contributed to the adoption of UNHS policies in the United States.

Exploring reasons for late identification of children with early-onset hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have shown that early identification of childhood hearing loss leads to better language outcomes. However, delays in the confirmation of hearing loss persist even in the presence of well-established universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). The objective of this population-based study was to document the proportion of children who experienced delayed confirmation of congenital and early onset hearing loss in a UNHS program in one region of Canada. The study also sought to determine the reasons for delayed confirmation of hearing loss in children.

METHODS

Population level data related to age of first assessment, age of identification and clinical characteristics were collected prospectively for all children identified through the UNHS program. We documented the number of children who experienced delay (defined as more than 3 months) from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of hearing loss. A detailed chart review was subsequently performed to examine the reasons for delay to confirmation.

RESULTS

Of 418 children identified from 2003 to 2013, 182 (43.5%) presented with congenital or early onset hearing loss, of whom 30 (16.5%) experienced more than 3 months delay from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of their hearing disorder. The median age of first assessment and confirmation of hearing loss for these 30 children was 3.7 months (IQR: 2.0, 7.6) and 13.8 months (IQR: 9.7, 26.1) respectively. Close examination of the factors related to delay to confirmation revealed that for the overwhelming majority of children, a constellation of factors contributed to late diagnosis. Several children (n = 22; 73.3%) presented with developmental/medical issues, 15 of whom also had middle ear dysfunction at assessment, and 9 of whom had documented family follow-up concerns. For the remaining eight children, additional reasons included ongoing middle ear dysfunction for five children, complicated by family follow-up concerns (n = 3) and mild hearing loss (n = 1) and the remaining three children had isolated reasons related to family follow-up (n = 1) or mild hearing loss (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Despite the progress made in the early detection of pediatric hearing loss since UNHS, a substantial number of children referred for early assessment can experience late confirmation and intervention. In particular, infants with developmental and/or medical issues including middle ear disorders are at particular risk for longer time to confirmation of hearing loss.

Synaptic distribution and plasticity in primary auditory cortex (A1) exhibits laminar and cell-specific changes in the deaf

The processing sequence through primary auditory cortex (A1) is impaired by deafness as evidenced by reduced neuronal activation in A1 of cochlear-implanted deaf cats. Such a loss of neuronal excitation should be manifest as changes in excitatory synaptic number and/or size, for which the post-synaptic correlate is the dendritic spine. Therefore, the present study sought evidence for this functional disruption using Golgi-Cox/light microscopic techniques that examined spine-bearing neurons and their dendritic spine features across all laminae in A1 of early-deaf (ototoxic lesion <1 month; raised into adulthood >16 months) and hearing cats. Surprisingly, in the early-deaf significant increases in spine density and size were observed in the supragranular layers, while significant reductions in spine density were observed for spiny non-pyramidal, but not pyramidal, neurons in the granular layer. No changes in dendritic spine density consistent with loss of excitatory inputs were seen for infragranular neurons. These results indicate that long-term early-deafness induces plastic changes in the excitatory circuitry of A1 that are laminar and cell-specific. An additional finding was that, unlike the expected abundance of stellate neurons that characterize the granular layer of other primary sensory cortices, pyramidal neurons predominate within layer 4 of A1. Collectively, these observations are important for understanding how neuronal connectional configurations contribute to region-specific processing capabilities in normal brains as well as those with altered sensory experiences.

Characteristics of children with unilateral hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL), examine deterioration in hearing, and explore amplification decisions.

DESIGN

Population-based data were collected prospectively from time of diagnosis. Serial audiograms and amplification details were retrospectively extracted from clinical charts to document the trajectory and management of hearing loss.

SAMPLE

The study included all children identified with UHL in one region of Canada over a 13-year period (2003-2015) after implementation of universal newborn hearing screening.

RESULTS

Of 537 children with permanent hearing loss, 20.1% (108) presented with UHL at diagnosis. They were identified at a median age of 13.9 months (IQR: 2.8, 49.0). Children with congenital loss were identified at 2.8 months (IQR: 2.0, 3.6) and made up 47.2% (n = 51), reflecting that a substantial portion had late-onset, acquired or late-identified loss. A total of 42.4% (n = 39) showed deterioration in hearing, including 16 (17.4%) who developed bilateral loss. By study end, 73.1% (79/108) of children had received amplification recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 20% of children with permanent HL are first diagnosed with UHL. About 40% are at risk for deterioration in hearing either in the impaired ear and/or in the normal hearing ear.

Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in High Risk Infants

Hearing impairment is prevalent in the general population, early intervention facilitates proper development. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of hearing impairment in high-risk infants born between 2013 and 2014. 100 newborns were evaluated using evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion produce and auditory behavior. Tests were reported if the results were altered. If altered results persisted, the child was referred for impedance testing and when necessary for medical evaluation. Infants referred for BOA and OAE undergone Brainstem auditory evoked potential testing. Of 100 children, 85 children have hearing within normal limits. Hearing impairment was found in 15 out of which 7 had unilateral hearing loss and 8 had bilateral hearing loss. The high prevalence of hearing impairment in this population underlines the importance of early audiological testing.

Children With Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Parents' Reflections on Experiences and Outcomes

Children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss are now commonly identified early through newborn hearing screening initiatives. There remains considerable uncertainty about how to support parents and about which services to provide for children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. The goal of this study was to learn about parents' experiences and understand, from their perspectives, the impact of hearing loss in the mild range on the child's functioning. Parents of 20 children in Ontario, Canada, participated in the study. The median age of identification of hearing loss was 4.6 months (interquartile range: 3.6, 10.8). Parents appreciated learning early about hearing loss, but their experiences with the early process were mixed. Parents felt that professionals minimized the importance of milder hearing loss. There was substantial uncertainty about the need for hearing aids and the findings suggest that parents need specific guidance. Parents expressed concerns about the potential impact of hearing loss on their child's development, particularly at later ages.

Sign Language and Spoken Language for Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Permanent hearing loss affects 1 to 3 per 1000 children and interferes with typical communication development. Early detection through newborn hearing screening and hearing technology provide most children with the option of spoken language acquisition. However, no consensus exists on optimal interventions for spoken language development.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of early sign and oral language intervention compared with oral language intervention only for children with permanent hearing loss.

DATA SOURCES

An a priori protocol was developed. Electronic databases (eg, Medline, Embase, CINAHL) from 1995 to June 2013 and gray literature sources were searched. Studies in English and French were included.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers screened potentially relevant articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

Outcomes of interest were measures of auditory, vocabulary, language, and speech production skills. All data collection and risk of bias assessments were completed and then verified by a second person. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to judge the strength of evidence.

RESULTS

Eleven cohort studies met inclusion criteria, of which 8 included only children with severe to profound hearing loss with cochlear implants. Language development was the most frequently reported outcome. Other reported outcomes included speech and speech perception.

LIMITATIONS

Several measures and metrics were reported across studies, and descriptions of interventions were sometimes unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Very limited, and hence insufficient, high-quality evidence exists to determine whether sign language in combination with oral language is more effective than oral language therapy alone. More research is needed to supplement the evidence base.

Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence and referral rates in well born and high risk babies using two step hearing screening protocol with Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR).

METHOD

A prospective study was carried out on 1405 neonates (983 well born babies and 422 high risk babies) who were screened during May 2013 to January 2015 at Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Madras Medical College, Chennai. All neonates were screened using two step screening protocol. They were initially tested with DPOAE. Referred babies in DPOAE were screened with AABR subsequently.

RESULTS

Among 1405 (100%) neonates 983 (69.96%) were well born babies and 422 (30.03%) were high risk babies. Total referral rate in DPOAE was found to be 311 (22.13%) among which 195 (13.87%) were well born babies and 116 (8.25%) were high risk babies. Out of 311 babies 31 (2.20%) babies were referred in AABR screening. In 31 babies referred in AABR 11(0.78%) were from well born group and 20 (1.42%) were from the high risk group. Further diagnostic evaluation of these babies, 2 (0.14%) were confirmed to have hearing loss. This study reveals, the prevalence of congenital hearing loss in our population is 1.42 per 1000 babies.

CONCLUSION

Using two step protocol especially AABR along with DPOAE at the initial level of testing significantly reduces referral rates in new born screening programs. Also AABR decreases the false positive responses hence increasing the efficiency of screening program.

Risk indicators for congenital and delayed-onset hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risk indicators for congenital and delayed onset hearing loss in a cohort of newborns who underwent newborn hearing screening, and to evaluate the impact of use of the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations on requirements for ongoing monitoring of infants identified as at risk for hearing loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohort of 26,341 newborns entered in a prospectively collected database as part of the University of Michigan Universal Newborn Hearing Screening program, with 90 patients identified. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate putative risk indicators for congenital and delayed onset hearing loss. An estimate of the cost burden of ongoing monitoring imposed by the use of differing risk indicators was performed.

RESULTS

After controlling for the impact of other risk indicators, intensive care unit length of stay greater than 5 days and exposure to loop diuretics are not associated with an increased risk of congenital or delayed onset hearing loss. Inclusion of these risk indicators as a requirement for ongoing audiologic monitoring results in a high monitoring cost per additional case identified.

DISCUSSION

This study confirms that the majority of the risk indicators currently recommended by the JCIH are effective at identifying infants at increased risk of congenital and delayed onset hearing loss. However, use of neonatal intensive care unit length of stay greater than 5 days and exposure to ototoxic medications are associated with small gains in the number of infants correctly identified as at risk of hearing loss. Further evaluation of the utility of these risk indicators, preferably with a diversity of patient population and healthcare settings, is warranted.

Evaluation of the effects of phototherapy on cochlear function in newborns

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate any potential effects of phototherapy on cochlear function in newborns using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-seven newborns, undergoing phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia without any other risk factors, and a control group of 53 healthy newborns, were administered the TEOAE test prior to and following phototherapy. In the newborns undergoing phototherapy, otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurements obtained at baseline and following phototherapy were compared. Moreover, pre-phototherapy OAE measurements obtained in the newborns undergoing phototherapy were compared with the OAE measurements of the control group.

RESULTS

In newborns undergoing phototherapy, there was no significant difference between pre- and post-phototherapy TEOAE amplitudes, nor in the reproducibility ratios. Similarly, no difference was found in the pre-treatment measurements of amplitude and reproducibility ratios between phototherapy-receiving newborns and controls (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The normal TEOAE results observed in the newborns undergoing phototherapy suggest that phototherapy does not exert negative effects on the cochlea.

Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests are currently used to screen newborns for congenital hearing loss in many Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs. However, there are concerns about high referral and false-positive rates. Various protocols have been used to address this problem. The main objective of this review is to determine the effects of different screening protocols on the referral rates and positive predictive values (PPV) of the OAE newborn screening test.

METHODS

Eligible studies published in English from January 1990 until August 2012 were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Medline In-Process, Embase, PubMed (NCBI), ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical controlled trials. Two reviewers independently screened the data sources, using pre-defined inclusion criteria to generate a list of eligible articles. Data extracted included the number of newborns screened, age at screening, OAE pass criteria, frequencies screened, number of retests, referral rates, and the number of newborns identified with permanent congenital hearing loss.

RESULTS

Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 119,714 newborn participants. The pooled referral rate was 5.5%. Individual referral rates ranged from 1.3% to 39%; the PPV from 2 to 40%. Increasing the age at initial screening and performing retests reduced the referral rate. Likewise, screenings involving higher frequencies had lower referral rates.

CONCLUSION

Delaying newborn hearing screening improves test results but may not be practical in all contexts. The use of higher frequencies and more sophisticated OAE devices may be useful approaches to ensure better performance of the OAE test in newborn hearing screening.

The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Permanent childhood hearing loss affects 1 to 3 per 1000 children and frequently disrupts typical spoken language acquisition. Early identification of hearing loss through universal newborn hearing screening and the use of new hearing technologies including cochlear implants make spoken language an option for most children. However, there is no consensus on what constitutes optimal interventions for children when spoken language is the desired outcome. Intervention and educational approaches ranging from oral language only to oral language combined with various forms of sign language have evolved. Parents are therefore faced with important decisions in the first months of their child's life.

METHODS/DESIGN

This article presents the protocol for a systematic review of the effects of using sign language in combination with oral language intervention on spoken language acquisition. Studies addressing early intervention will be selected in which therapy involving oral language intervention and any form of sign language or sign support is used. Comparison groups will include children in early oral language intervention programs without sign support. The primary outcomes of interest to be examined include all measures of auditory, vocabulary, language, speech production, and speech intelligibility skills. We will include randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and other quasi-experimental designs that include comparator groups as well as prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Case-control, cross-sectional, case series, and case studies will be excluded. Several electronic databases will be searched (for example, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) as well as grey literature and key websites. We anticipate that a narrative synthesis of the evidence will be required. We will carry out meta-analysis for outcomes if clinical similarity, quantity and quality permit quantitative pooling of data. We will conduct subgroup analyses if possible according to severity/type of hearing disorder, age of identification, and type of hearing technology.

DISCUSSION

This review will provide evidence on the effectiveness of using sign language in combination with oral language therapies for developing spoken language in children with hearing loss who are identified at a young age. The information from this review can provide guidance to parents and intervention specialists, inform policy decisions and provide directions for future research.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42013005426.

Feasibility and effectiveness of a population-based newborn hearing screening in an economically deprived region of Italy

AIM

To describe the effectiveness of a population-based newborn hearing screening program in an economically deprived region of southern Italy.

METHODS

A screening protocol was proposed for all newborns of the Campania region, starting on January, 2007. For infants identified with hearing loss, information on degree and type of hearing loss and presence of risk factors was collected.

RESULTS

The infants born in the 3-year study period were 182,188. Among them, 146,026 (80%) were tested with OAE. Sensorineural hearing loss ≥40dBnHL was established for 159 infants (1.1×1000). Among the NICU and WIN infants, the rate of hearing loss was respectively 9×1000 and 0.67×1000. Follow-up information was available for 111 children (70%), as 48 (30%) got care in other regions or health facilities. Most infants were fitted hearing aids by 1 month after diagnosis and 15 children (13.5%) received a cochlear implant at a mean age of 25 months (SD 10).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in a setting of population poverty, a universal newborn screening program can deliver satisfactory outcomes. The coverage and the tracking system of the program need to be improved, as well as the cooperation between public and private health services.

Universal newborn hearing screening in Zefat, Israel: the first two years

OBJECTIVE

Unidentified hearing loss at birth can adversely affect speech and language development as well as academic achievement and social-emotional development. Historically, moderate-to-severe hearing loss in young children was not detected until well beyond the newborn period. Around 0.5 to 5 in every 1000 neonates and infants have congenital or early childhood onset sensorineural hearing impairment. When identification and intervention occur at no later than 6 months of age, the infants perform much higher on school-related measures. Therefore, early detection is vitally important. Toward the end of 2009, the Israeli ministry of health issued a directive establishing a universal newborn hearing screening program in all hospitals in the country from 01.01.10. The objectives of this study are to evaluate a newly established universal newborn hearing screening program, to assess performance and to compare measurements of performance to performance benchmarks representing a consensus of expert opinion. The benchmarks are the minimal requirements that should be attained by high-quality early hearing detection programs.

METHODS

As specified by the ministry of health, a two-stage screening protocol was implemented using otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response. Screening results of all neonates born from the initiation of the program on 15th March 2010 until the end of 2011 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The total number of live births during the study period was 5496. Of these, 5334 (97%) started screening for hearing loss but only 5212 completed the screening process, giving a screening coverage of 94.8%. Of the 5212 neonates completing the screening process, 270 (5.18%) were referred for full diagnostic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly established universal newborn hearing screening program at the Ziv Medical Center in Zefat closely approaches, but does not yet meet the minimal requirements that should be attained by high-quality early hearing detection programs. Every effort should be made to complete the screening tests before discharge from hospital. Screening staff should actively encourage parents to participate in all stages of early detection.

Identifying quality improvement opportunities in a universal newborn hearing screening program

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programs are encouraged to maintain quality assurance protocols, but many hospitals lack the time and resources to initiate this process. We studied a practical approach to measuring baseline quality indicators and identifying improvement opportunities in UNHS programs.

METHODS

We determined screening processes and quality indicators for UNHS programs at 4 hospitals through site visits and a 2-year retrospective review of nursery and audiology records. Nurses, audiologists, and otolaryngologists met for feedback of hospital-specific quality indicators. The sessions identified improvement opportunities and proposed system changes for immediate implementation.

RESULTS

Hospitals screened 21 957 newborns for hearing loss. Screening rates were >99% at all hospitals. Rates of referral and diagnostic testing varied significantly between hospitals. Low referral rates prompted 2 hospitals to adjust screening processes to reduce potential false-negative screening results. Two other hospitals addressed poor diagnostic follow-up by changing the referral process to include additional family contact information. Hospitals also increased referrals to Early Intervention Child Find services on the basis of our finding that these referrals increased the likelihood of diagnostic follow-up fourfold. We could not fully assess indicators of hearing aid eligibility and enrollment in early intervention services due to insufficient documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of nursery and audiology records successfully established most quality indicators for the UNHS programs we studied. Feedback of quality indicators identified multiple improvement opportunities and facilitated endorsement of immediate system changes. This study demonstrates a practical and data-driven approach to quality improvement that can be used by any UNHS program.

Neonatal hearing screening in Benin City

OBJECTIVE

Congenital hearing loss is a major health care problem that tends to retard the developmental milestones of children. It takes early detection and intervention to avoid a permanent loss in acquisition of speech and cognitive functions. Hence, the importance of hearing screening in all newborns especially in the developing world for accurate statistics and early intervention. Therefore, this work was aimed at detecting the crude prevalence of congenital hearing loss among the newborns in Benin City.

METHODOLOGY

Consecutive neonates at designated immunization centers in Benin City metropolis were screened for hearing loss via the detection and analysis of distortion product otoacoustic emissions from both ears. The handheld otoacoustic machine model MAICO 8172 was employed and the outcome results presented in tables. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.

RESULTS

A total of 400 neonates (218 males and 182 females) were screened for the presence of otoacoustic emission in both ears. Ninety neonates (22.5%) p<0.05 were referred. Bilateral hearing loss was seen in 26 (6.5%) whereas 64 (16%) had unilateral loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening tests suggest a high crude prevalence (6.5%) of bilateral neonatal hearing impairment in Benin City necessitating confirmation and intervention. The study fortifies the need for hearing screening among all new born in developing countries.

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-Up: A University Clinic Perspective

Purpose

To evaluate the referral and follow-up procedures at a university clinic to determine whether the early intervention program is achieving the goals of diagnosis of hearing loss by 3 months, amplification within 1 month of diagnosis, and intervention services by 6 months, as outlined in the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH; 2007) position statement.

Method

Files for 142 infants were examined, and the following data were collected from each file: date of birth, birth hospital, hometown, parents' ages, ethnicity, nursery status (well baby or neonatal intensive care unit), medical history, age at initial evaluation and at diagnosis, results of evaluation(s), and age at hearing aid fitting and start of early intervention services.

Results

Results revealed that 17% of infants were older than 3 months at the initial evaluation, and 18% of infants who needed further evaluation were lost to follow-up. None of the infants identified with hearing loss received amplification within 1 month of diagnosis or early intervention services by the age of 6 months.

Conclusions

The findings provide further evidence of the challenges of early intervention programs as stated by the JCIH (2007), and they emphasize the importance of communication between practitioners and implementation of monitoring systems and checks and balances to improve the efficacy of early intervention programs.

Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria

OBJECTIVES

Current protocols presumably use criteria that are chosen on the basis of the sensitivity and specificity rates they produce. Such an approach emphasizes test performance but does not include societal implications of the benefit of early identification. The purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate an approach to selecting criteria for use in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs that uses benefit-cost ratio (BCR) to demonstrate an alternative method to audiologists, administrators, and others involved in UNHS protocol decisions.

DESIGN

Existing data from more than 1200 ears were used to analyze BCR as a function of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) level. These data were selected because both audiometric and DPOAE data were available on every ear. Although these data were not obtained in newborns, this compromise was necessary because audiometric outcomes (especially in infants with congenital hearing loss) in neonates are either lacking or limited in number. As such, it is important to note that the characteristics of responses from the group of subjects that formed the bases of the present analyses are different from those for neonates. This limits the extent to which actual criterion levels can be selected but should not affect the general approach of using BCR as a framework for considering UNHS criteria. Estimates of the prevalence of congenital hearing loss identified through UNHS in 37 states and U.S. territories in 2004 were used to calculate BCR. A range of estimates for the lifetime monetary benefits and yearly costs for UNHS were used, based on data available in the literature. Still, exact benefits and costs are difficult to know. Both one-step (DPOAE alone) and two-step (DPOAE followed by automated auditory brainstem response, AABR) screening paradigms were considered in the calculation of BCR. The influence of middle ear effusion was simulated by incorporating a range of expected DPOAE level reductions into an additional BCR analyses

RESULTS

Our calculations indicate that for a range of proposed benefit and cost estimates, the monetary benefits of both one-step (DPOAE alone) and two-step (DPOAE followed by AABR) NHS programs outweigh programmatic costs. Our calculations indicate that BCR is robust in that it can be applied regardless of the values that are assigned to benefit and cost. Maximum BCR was identified and remained stable regardless of these values; however, it was recognized that the use of maximum BCR could result in reduced test sensitivity and may not be optimal for use in UNHS programs. The inclusion of secondary AABR screening increases BCR but does not alter the DPOAE criterion level at which maximum BCR occurs. The model of middle ear effusion reduces overall DPOAE level, subsequently lowering the DPOAE criterion level at which maximum BCR was obtained

CONCLUSION

BCR is one of several alternative methods for choosing UNHS criteria, in which the evaluation of costs and benefits allows clinical and societal considerations to be incorporated into the pass/refer decision in a meaningful way. Although some of the benefits of early identification of hearing impairment cannot be estimated through a monetary analysis, such as improved psychosocial development and quality of life, this article provides an alternative to audiologists and administrators for selecting UNHS protocols that includes consideration of societal implications of UNHS screening criteria. BCR suggests that UNHS is a worthwhile investment for society as benefits always outweigh costs, at least for the estimations included in this article. Although the use of screening criteria that maximize BCR results in lower test sensitivity compared with other criteria, BCR may be used to select criteria that result in increased test sensitivity and still provide a high, although not maximal, BCR. Using BCR analysis provides a framework in which the societal implications of NHS protocols are considered and emphasizes the value of UNHS.

Neonatal hearing screening in Albania: Results from an ongoing universal screening program

The paper describes the outcomes of an ongoing universal hearing screening program in Tirana, Albania. The main objectives of the project were the evaluation of the feasibility of a neonatal hearing screening program in Albania, and an evaluation of the prevalence of risk factors in the NICU environment. One thousand five hundred and sixty-one (1561) infants from both the WB and NICU were screened with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). A detailed history of risk factors was collected in each case, thus it was possible to evaluate the main factors influencing the output of the screening program. It was concluded that the program had the capacity to identify infants with congenital hearing loss provided that an informative component is well-structured and delivered. Also, although the prevalence of risk factors appeared high, the reduction of 'case leakage' would allow the precise estimation of the incidence of hearing loss in the Albanian population.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the first year in term infants: a longitudinal study

Understanding of any age-related differences in distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) during infancy is important for the use of DPOAEs in detection of cochlear impairment in infants. We studied DPOAEs at 10 frequencies of f2 primary tone between 500 Hz to 10 kHz longitudinally during the first year of life in 70 ears of 35 normal term infants. On days 3-5 after birth DPOAE pass rates ranged between the highest 98.6% at f2 frequencies 6-10 kHz and the lowest 22.9% at 750 Hz. The higher the frequency, the higher was the pass rate. At 6 months the pass rates at various frequencies were generally similar to those on days 3-5, and were greater than 91% across the frequencies of 3-10 kHz. At 12 months the pass rates were 100% or near 100% across 3-10 kHz. During the first year the pass rate was always very low at 750 Hz (<40%) and tended to decrease at 1 kHz with the increase in age. DPOAE level at f2 frequencies 4kHz increased from birth to 6 months but then reduced slightly at 12 months. At lower frequencies the age-related DPOAE levels change was less significant. These results indicate that there are no major changes in DPOAE or cochlear function during the first year of life at most frequencies. However, the interpretation of DPOAE results in infants need to take into account the age-related difference in DPOAE pass rate at low-frequency and in DPOAE level at high-frequency.

Hearing screening practices among a national sample of primary care pediatricians

The objective of this study was to describe variations in hearing screening using a survey mailed to a national sample of primary care pediatricians prior to the 2003 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) hearing screening guidelines. Of the 390 primary care respondents, only 303 (78%) performed audiometry, routinely beginning at age 3 (32%), 4 (44%), or 5 (17%); 81% defined abnormal audiometry primarily as failure to hear at a specified decibel level: 15 dB hearing level (HL) (<1%), 16 to 20 dB HL (10%), 21 to 25 dB HL (23%), 26 to 30 dB HL (44%), 31 to 40 dB HL (16%), and more than 40 dB HL (6%). This study serves as a baseline for comparison with postguideline practices.

Hearing Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Follow-Up of Referrals

Purpose

The goal of this study was to examine the rate of diagnostic testing after newborn hearing screening (NHS) referral, evaluate timeliness of follow-up, and evaluate the use of multilevel auditory brainstem response (ABR) in screening of high-risk infants.

Method

Telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had been admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from 1999 to 2002 and referred on NHS. An ABR screen was combined with a multilevel ABR (40, 70, and 90 dB nHL) for referrals.

Results

Parents of 206 infants participated; 69% of the infants underwent diagnostic follow-up. Of those with follow-up, 37% had normal hearing, 38% had hearing loss, and parents were unsure of hearing test results for 25%. Follow-up by 6 months of age occurred for 13% in 1999, increasing to 31% by 2002. Infants who did not pass their screening in both ears had confirmed hearing loss in 56% vs. 25% in those who passed in 1 ear. Also, 67% of infants with bilateral pass levels of 90 dB nHL or more had confirmed hearing loss, vs. 32% in all others.

Conclusions

Timely follow-up after NHS referral in our program has improved over time. Multilevel ABR may facilitate allocation of appropriate resources to track and ensure follow-up in infants at high risk for hearing loss.

Ten-year outcome of newborn hearing screening in Austria

OBJECTIVE

Current health care standards recommend that congenital hearing loss be confirmed before age three months and intervened for before age six months. This study evaluated to what extent the Austrian universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) program achieves this goal. The Austrian UNHS program is a hospital-based, two-stage screen based on transient oto-acoustic emissions, as promoted in 1995 in a position paper of the Austrian ENT Society.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review and data analysis. All Austrian institutions engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss were requested to provide their data on children with permanent congenital sensorineural hearing impairment registered since 1990. Children who had undergone hearing screening, were compared to those who had not. Main outcome measures were age at confirmation of and age at intervention for the hearing loss. In each group, the percentage of children, whose hearing loss was confirmed by age three months, and intervened for by age six months, was determined.

RESULTS

Data from 321 hearing-impaired children were useable. Of these children, 167 were screened and 154 were not. At age three months, a hearing loss was diagnosed in 35% of screened children, but in only 2% of unscreened. These percentages rose to 69% and 6%, respectively, at age six months and to 81% and 12%, respectively, at age one year. Intervention mostly started within less than one month after diagnosis. At age six months, 61% of screened children, but only 4% of unscreened children, had undergone intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing screening enormously increases the number of early-detected children. However, in quite a few screened children hearing loss is neither confirmed within three months after birth, nor intervened for within six months after birth. Reasons for the delay must be paid attention in order to warrant that UNHS can be as effective as possible.

A Multisite Study to Examine the Efficacy of the Otoacoustic Emission/Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Newborn Hearing Screening Protocol

Purpose: This article examines whether changes in hearing screening practices are warranted based on the results of the recent series of studies by J. L. Johnson, K. R. White, J. E. Widen, J. S. Gravel, B. R. Vohr, M. James, T. Kennalley, A. B. Maxon, L. Spivak, M. Sullivan-Mahoney, Y. Weirather, and S. Meyer (Johnson, White, Widen, Gravel, James, et al., 2005; Johnson, White, Widen, Gravel, Vohr, et al., 2005; White et al., 2005; Widen et al., 2005) that found a significant number of infants who passed an automated auditory brainstem response (A-ABR) screening after failing an initial otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening later were found to have permanent hearing loss in one or both ears.

Method: Similar to the approach used by F. H. Bess and J. Paradise (1994), this article addresses the public health tenets that need to be in place before screening programs, or in this case, a change in screening practice (use of a 2-step screening protocol) can be justified.

Results: There are no data to suggest that a 2-step OAE/A-ABR screening protocol should be avoided.

Conclusion: Research is needed before any change in public policy and practice surrounding current early hearing detection and intervention programs could be supported.

Sensorineural hearing loss in children

During the past three to four decades, the incidence of acquired sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children living in more developed countries has fallen, as a result of improved neonatal care and the widespread implementation of immunisation programmes. The overall decrease has been accompanied by a relative increase in the proportion of inherited forms of SNHL. The contribution made by one gene in particular, GJB2, to the genetic load of SNHL has strongly affected the assessment and care of children with hearing loss. These changes in the incidence of SNHL have not been seen in children living in less developed countries, where the prevalence of consanguinity is high in many areas, and both genetic and acquired forms of SNHL are more common, particularly among children who live in poverty. Focused genetic counselling and health education might lead to a decrease in the prevalence of inherited SNHL in these countries. Establishment of vaccination programmes for several vaccine-preventable infectious diseases would reduce rates of acquired SNHL. Although the primary purpose of such programmes is the prevention of serious and in many cases fatal infections, a secondary benefit would be a reduction in disease-related complications such as SNHL that cause permanent disability in survivors.

Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice

Recent technological advances have made feasible universal newborn hearing screening and therefore early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Over the past three years, new information has been published on whether early intervention is beneficial, the possibility of harm arising from newborn screening, and its cost. Dramatic progress has been made in the large scale implementation of universal screening in many parts of the western world.

The Effect of Different ‘Pass-Fail’ Criteria on the Results of a Newborn Hearing Screening Program

'Pass' criteria in newborn hearing screening programs are important, since they affect the operating characteristics of the programs. In the present study, we intended to compare the results of two screening procedures, using different 'pass' criteria, in two samples from the same pool of screened newborns. The subjects were divided into two study groups, screened consecutively during 6 months. Testing and all procedures were exactly the same in both groups, differing only in the 'pass' criteria. In the first group a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 3 dB in the frequency bands of 1-2, 2-3 and 3-4 kHz was considered necessary for a 'pass', whereas a signal-to-noise ratio > or =6 dB was used in the second group, at the same frequency bands. During the period of the study, no other minor or major modification of the protocol was applied. The comparison of the screening predischarge results between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the 'pass-refer' results. Thus, it appears that the 3-dB signal-to-noise ratio is as valid as the 6-dB criterion, and it may be confidently used, especially in settings where rescreening is not available.

Early hearing detection and intervention programs: Opportunities for genetic services

Congenital hearing loss is relatively frequent and has serious negative consequences if it is not diagnosed and treated during the first few months of life. Babies with hearing loss who are identified early and provided with appropriate intervention develop better language, cognitive, and social skills. As a result of improvements in screening equipment and procedures, newborn hearing screening programs have expanded rapidly in recent years, and almost 90% of all newborns are now screened for hearing loss before leaving the hospital. Because 50% or more of congenital hearing loss is due to genetic causes, providers of genetic services should play an increasingly important role in newborn hearing screening, diagnostic, and intervention services. For this to happen, parents, public health officials, and primary health care providers need to become better informed about the benefits of genetic services for children with hearing loss and their families. Providers of genetic services also need to become better informed about the current status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs and how they can contribute to continued improvement of these programs.

The current status of EHDI programs in the United States

The importance of identifying congenital hearing loss during the first few months of life has been recognized for almost 60 years. Unfortunately, until more effective newborn hearing screening equipment and procedures were developed in the late 1980s, it was not practical to implement programs for identifying hearing loss during the first few months of life. This paper reviews the activities implemented by the federal government in the last 15 years to promote more effective Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs, and summarizes legislation passed by states related to universal newborn hearing screening. In surveys conducted in 1998 and 2001, State EHDI Coordinators were asked to rate the degree to which various issues were obstacles to implementing effective EHDI programs. The most serious obstacles are the shortage of qualified pediatric audiologists, inadequate reimbursement for screening and diagnosis, and lack of knowledge among primary health care providers about EHDI issues. Opposition to EHDI programs by hospital administrators was rated substantially lower in 2001 than in 1998. State EHDI Coordinators were also surveyed about how well their EHDI program is addressing issues related to screening, diagnosis, early intervention, linkages to medical home providers, tracking and data management, and family support programs. Although substantial progress has been made, many gaps remain with current EHDI programs.

Early childhood hearing loss: a frequently overlooked cause of speech and language delay

The explosion of information regarding the genetics of hearing loss, the extraordinary effectiveness of early intervention, and the widespread practice of universal newborn hearing screening make for exciting times for those who serve young children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing and their families. These rapid changes in the knowledge base and practice standards also require the cooperation and help of pediatricians to enable children to take full advantage of available opportunities to optimize development of early communication.

Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia

AIM

To report the preliminary findings of a pilot program to screen newborn babies for congenital bilateral permanent hearing loss.

SETTING

The five largest maternity hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. Screening was gradually introduced over seven months from February to August 2000.

PARTICIPANTS

All babies born at these hospitals after the introduction of hearing screening until 30 June 2001.

METHODS

One or both of two automated screening devices were used: one measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and the other automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR). If a "pass" was not obtained in both ears, screening was repeated. All babies who did not obtain a pass in either ear at follow-up were referred for audiological assessment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of permanent bilateral hearing loss.

RESULTS

Of 13 214 eligible babies, 12 708 (96.2%) received screening. The main reason for missing screening was early hospital discharge (309; 2.3%). Of the screened babies, 99% had a pass response in both ears at either the initial or follow-up screen. Twenty-three babies were referred for audiological assessment, and nine were diagnosed with bilateral permanent hearing loss (0.68/1000; 95% CI, 0.31-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite our program meeting process quality indicators, our detection rate was low. Before extending the program to smaller hospitals, we need to validate our screening instruments and put in place a system to monitor false negative results.

Universal newborn screening: a dream realized or a nightmare in the making?

There is a very strong movement to develop universal newborn hearing screening. This effort is the end product of a long international research effort to determine the most effective means to screen newborns. Now that OAE and ABR together offer a superior mechanism to achieve universal screening, problems related to middle ear effusion, non-high-risk children and adequate resources for all aspects of identification, diagnosis and treatment have come to the fore. Further, what to do in the developing world is also a major problem as audiology embarks on this exciting new frontier. This paper discusses some of the issues, raises some concerns and offers a few small solutions.