Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia

β-catenin, Pax2, and Pten Panel Identifies Precancers Among Histologically Subdiagnostic Endometrial Lesions

Despite refinements in histologic criteria for the diagnosis of endometrioid precancers, many challenging cases are encountered in daily practice, creating diagnostic uncertainty and suboptimal patient management. Recently, an immunohistochemical 3-marker panel consisting of β-catenin, Pax2, and Pten was identified as a useful diagnostic adjunct. However, previous studies focused either on cancers or diagnostically unambiguous precancers, leaving questions about the applicability and utility of the panel in endometria with architectural features near or below the threshold of accepted histologic criteria for endometrioid precancers. Here, in a retrospective study of 90 patients, we evaluated the performance of the 3-marker panel. Notably, the panel detected a subset of disordered proliferative endometria (8/44, 18%), nonatypical hyperplasias (19/40, 48%), and cases with ambiguous features (3/6, 50%) with aberrancy for ≥1 markers. Marker-aberrant cases were more likely to progress to endometrioid precancer or cancer ( P =0.0002). Patterns of marker aberrancy in the index and progressor cases from individual patients provided evidence for origin in a common precursor, and next-generation sequencing of the progressor cases rationalized marker aberrancy for β-catenin and Pten. The results unequivocally demonstrate that some lesions that do not approach current histologic thresholds are bona fide neoplastic precursors with clinically-relevant driver events that can be detected by the 3-marker panel. The findings provide further validation for the diagnostic utility of the panel in clinical practice and its application in difficult or ambiguous cases.

Reliable Identification of Endometrial Precancers Through Combined Pax2, β-Catenin, and Pten Immunohistochemistry

The diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) remains challenging and subjective in some cases, with variable histologic criteria and differences of opinion among gynecologic pathologists, potentially leading to under/overtreatment. There has been growing interest in the use of specific immunohistochemical markers as adjuncts in AH/EIN diagnosis. For example, the World Health Organization 2020 Classification specifies that loss of Pten, Pax2, or mismatch repair proteins are desirable diagnostic criteria. Other markers, most notably β-catenin and Arid1a, are also aberrantly expressed in some AH/EIN. However, the performance of some markers individually-and more importantly as a group-has not been rigorously explored, raising questions as to which marker(s) or combination(s) is the most effective in practice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from AH/EIN cases (n=111) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for 6 markers: Pax2, Pten, Mlh1, β-catenin, Arid1a, and p53. Aberrant expression was tabulated for each case and marker. An additional set of normal endometria (n=79) was also analyzed to define optimal diagnostic criteria for marker aberrance. The performance characteristics of each marker, the entire panel, and subsets thereof were quantitatively and statistically analyzed. In order of number of cases detected, the most frequently aberrant markers in AH/EIN were Pax2 (81.1% of cases), Pten (50.5%), β-catenin (47.7%), Arid1a (7.2%), Mlh1 (4.5%), and p53 (2.7%). The majority of cases showed aberrant expression of ≥2 markers. All 6 markers together identified 92.8% of cases. Arid1a, Mlh1, and p53 were robust and readily scored markers, but all cases showing aberrant expression of these 3 markers were also detected by Pax2, Pten, or β-catenin. A focused panel of only 3 markers (Pax2, Pten, and β-catenin) showed optimal performance characteristics as a diagnostic adjunct in the histopathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN. Use of this panel is practicable and robust, with at least 1 of the 3 markers being aberrant in 92.8% of AH/EIN.

Serial genomic analysis of endometrium supports the existence of histologically indistinct endometrial cancer precursors

The endometrium is unique as an accessible anatomic location that can be repeatedly biopsied and where diagnostic biopsies do not extirpate neoplastic lesions. We exploited these features to retrospectively characterize serial genomic alterations along the precancer/cancer continuum in individual women. Cases were selected based on (1) endometrial cancer diagnosis/hysterectomy and (2) preceding serial endometrial biopsies including for some patients an early biopsy before a precancer histologic diagnosis. A comprehensive panel was designed for endometrial cancer genes. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded specimens for each cancer, preceding biopsies, and matched germline samples were subjected to barcoded high‐throughput sequencing to identify mutations and track their origin and allelic frequency progression. In total, 92 samples from 21 patients were analyzed, providing an opportunity for new insights into early endometrial cancer progression. Definitive invasive endometrial cancers exhibited expected mutational spectra, and canonical driver mutations were detectable in preceding biopsies. Notably, ≥1 cancer mutations were detected prior to the histopathologic diagnosis of an endometrial precancer in the majority of patients. In 18/21 cases, ≥1 mutations were confirmed by abnormal protein levels or subcellular localization by immunohistochemistry, confirming genomic data and providing unique views of histologic correlates. In 19 control endometria, mutation counts were lower, with a lack of canonical endometrial cancer hotspot mutations. Our study documents the existence of endometrial lesions that are histologically indistinct but are bona fide endometrial cancer precursors. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer

Currently, endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common genital cancer in high-income countries. Some types of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) may be progressing to this malignancy. The diagnosis of EC and EH is based on time consuming histopathology evaluation, which is subjective and causes discrepancies in reassessment. Therefore, there is a need to create methods of objective evaluation allowing the diagnosis of early changes. The study aimed to simultaneously asses Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy combined with multidimensional analysis to identify the tissues of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and the normal control group, and differentiate them. The results of FTIR and Raman spectroscopy revealed quantitative and qualitative changes in the nucleic acid and protein in the groups of cancer and atypical hyperplasia, in comparison with the control group. Changes in the lipid region were also observed in Raman spectra. Pearson correlation coefficient demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between Raman spectra for the cancer and atypical hyperplasia groups (0.747, p < 0.05) and for atypical hyperplasia and the controls (0.507, p < 0.05), while FTIR spectra demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation for the same group as in Raman data and for the control and cancer groups (0.966, p < 0.05). To summarize, the method of spectroscopy enables differentiation of atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer tissues from the physiological endometrial tissue.

miRNAs as Candidate Biomarker for the Accurate Detection of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia/Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Estrogen-dependent tumors (type I, endometrioid) account for 80% of cases and non-estrogen-dependent (type II, non-endometrioid) account for the rest. Endometrial cancer type I is generally thought to develop via precursor lesions along with the increasing accumulation of molecular genetic alterations. Endometrial hyperplasia with atypia/Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia is the least common type of hyperplasia but it is the type most likely to progress to type I cancer, whereas endometrial hyperplasia without atypia rarely progresses to carcinoma. MicroRNAs are a class of small, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression mainly binding to 3′-untranslated region of target mRNAs. In the current study, we identified a microRNAs signature (miR-205, miR-146a, miR-1260b) able to discriminate between atypical and typical endometrial hyperplasia in two independent cohorts of patients. The identification of molecular markers that can distinguish between these two distinct pathological conditions is considered to be highly useful for the clinical management of patients because hyperplasia with an atypical change is associated with a higher risk of developing cancer. We show that the combination of miR-205, −146a, and −1260b has the best predictive power in discriminating these two conditions (>90%). With the aim to find a biological role for these three microRNAs, we focused our attention on a common putative target involved in endometrial carcinogenesis: the oncosuppressor gene SMAD4. We showed that miRs-146a,−205, and−1260b directly target SMAD4 and their enforced expression induced proliferation and migration of Endometrioid Cancer derived cell lines, Hec1a cells. These data suggest that microRNAs-mediated impairment of the TGF-β pathway, due to inhibition of its effector molecule SMAD4, is a relevant molecular alteration in endometrial carcinoma development. Our findings show a potential diagnostic role of this microRNAs signature for the accurate diagnosis of Endometrial hyperplasia with atypia/Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia and improve the understanding of their pivotal role in SMAD4 regulation.

Assessing the prognostic value of PAX2 and PTEN in endometrial carcinogenesis

In order to avoid the consequences of over- and under-treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, diagnostic accuracy and progression risk assessment must be improved. The aim of this study was to assess whether PAX2 or PTEN expression could predict progression-free survival in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Immunohistochemistry for detection of PAX2 and PTEN was performed on 348 endometrial samples; 75 proliferative endometrium (PE), 36 EIN and 237 EEC. Cases classified as PTEN null (1 or more glands negatively stained) were more prevalent in EEC than in PE and EIN (64% EEC vs 11% PE/EIN). A progressive decrease in PAX2 expression was observed from PE to EIN to EEC. Long-term clinical follow-up (6-310 months, median: 126) was available for 62 PE cases, all 36 EIN cases and 178 EEC cases. No patients with PE demonstrated progression to EIN or EEC. Progression of disease was observed in 10 (28%) EIN patients. These patients had significantly lower PAX2 expression than those that regressed (P = 0.005). Progression-free survival analysis revealed that EIN patients with a high-risk PAX2 expression score (H-score ≤75) had a higher probability of progression of disease in comparison to those with a low-risk score (H-score >75). PAX2 expression was not prognostic in EEC nor was PTEN status of prognostic value in either EIN or EEC. PAX2 expression analysis by means of H-score has prognostic potential for the identification of high-risk progression cases in EIN but needs to be validated in a larger cohort.

Disparate genomic characteristics of concurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and ovarian granulosa cell tumor, revealed by targeted next-generation sequencing

Concurrence of both endometrial adenocarcinoma and ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor (aGCT) is believed to be related to high estrogen milieu, but genomic alterations of the concurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and aGCT are not known. For this, we analyzed an uterine endometrial adenocarcinoma and an ovarian aGCT in a same patient by a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). We found a germline mutation in STK11 (p.L113fs). The endometrial adenocarcinoma harbored FGFR2 and TP53 mutations and the aGCT harbored a FOXL2 (p.C134 W) mutation. These germline and somatic mutations have been reported in non-concurrent tumors. These two tumors harbored 20 CNAs but only one CNA was exactly overlapped in the tumors. Our findings indicate that the concurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and aGCT in this patient might not be genetically related to each other at germline or somatic level and suggest that such concurrence might be originated from non-genetic backgrounds including stimulated estrogen milieu.

Internal quality control in an academic cytopathology laboratory for the introduction of a new reporting system for endometrial cytology

BACKGROUND

To evaluate reproducibility of a reporting system for endometrial cytology.

METHODS

Cytologic slides from 49 patients, prepared via liquid based cytology, were blindly examined by five cytopathologists of various experience levels, applying a recently introduced reporting system as previously reported. The agreement among cytopathologists was evaluated via Kappa (κ) statistics and the Kendall's Coefficient of Variation (W); cytologic results were compared with the relevant histologic report.

RESULTS

Substantial agreement among all five raters was found in the benign, ACE-L and malignant categories, fair agreement in inadequate and ACE-H categories, whereas only slight agreement in ACE-U. For the three more experienced cytopathologists, an almost perfect agreement was found in inadequate, benign, and ACE-L categories, substantial agreement in ACE-H and malignant categories and fair agreement in ACE-U category. Overall agreement for all five cytopathologists and for all categories was moderate, whereas it was very high for the three senior raters. Using the Kendall's test, both five cytopathologists (W = 0.81) and the three senior ones (W = 0.93) had very high agreement. Sensitivity: 83.33-92.59%, specificity: 83.33-94.74%, ROC area: 71.72-90.3%.

CONCLUSION

Application of appropriate statistical tests shows that integration of a new reporting cytologic system is effective with an overall accuracy around 90%. Both statistical tests applied disclosed lower agreement rates among both all five raters and the three most experienced ones in the intermediate categories constituting the gray zone, thus delineating the need for better training of cytopathologists to correctly identify diagnostic criteria for classification of a given case into these categories.

New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a uterine pathology representing a spectrum of morphological endometrial alterations. It is predominantly characterized by an increase in the endometrial gland-to-stroma ratio when compared to normal proliferative endometrium. The clinical significance of EH lies in the associated risk of progression to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) and 'atypical' forms of EH are regarded as premalignant lesions. Traditional histopathological classification systems for EH exhibit wide and varying degrees of diagnostic reproducibility and, as a consequence, standardized patient management can be challenging.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

EC is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. The incidence of EC is rising, with alarming increases described in the 40-44-year-old age group. This review appraises the current EH classification systems used to stratify women at risk of malignant progression to EC. In addition, we summarize the evidence base regarding the use of immunohistochemical biomarkers for EH and discuss an emerging role for genomic analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for original peer-reviewed primary and review articles, from January 2000 to January 2016. The following search terms were used: 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia', 'atypical hyperplasia', 'complex atypical hyperplasia', 'biomarker', 'immunohistochemistry', 'progression', 'genomic', 'classification' and 'stratification'.

OUTCOMES

Recent changes to EH classification reflect our current understanding of the genesis of endometrioid ECs. The concept of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) as a mutationally activated, monoclonal pre-malignancy represents a fundamental shift from the previously held notion that unopposed oestrogenic stimulation causes ever-increasing hyperplastic proliferation, with accumulating cytological atypia that imperceptibly leads to the development of endometrioid EC. Our review highlights several key biomarker candidates that have been described as both diagnostic tools for EH and markers of progression to EC. We propose that, moving forwards, a 'panel' approach of combinations of the immunohistochemical biomarkers described in this review may be more informative since no single candidate can currently fill the entire role.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

EC has historically been considered a predominantly postmenopausal disease. Owing in part to the current unprecedented rates of obesity, we are starting to see signs of a shift towards a rising incidence of EC amongst pre- and peri-menopausal woman. This creates unique challenges both diagnostically and therapeutically. Furthering our understanding of the premalignant stages of EC development will allow us to pursue earlier diagnosis and facilitate appropriate stratification of women at risk of developing EC, permitting timely and appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Expression of Glut-1 in Normal Endometrium and Endometrial Lesions: Analysis of 336 Cases

Background: Glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) is a membrane glycoprotein that is, together with other glucose transporters, responsible for the regulation of glucose uptake. An increased expression of this protein seems to be a general feature of several malignant tumors that are able to reprogram their metabolism and switch from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis. Methods: We performed comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of Glut-1 expression in 336 endometrial samples, including tumors, nontumor lesions, and normal tissues. Results: Expression of Glut-1 was found in 87% of endometrioid carcinomas (160/184 cases), 100% of serous carcinomas (29/29 cases), 100% of clear cell carcinomas (17/17 cases), 50% of polyps with atypical hyperplasia (8/16 cases), 12.5% of polyps with non-atypical hyperplasia (3/24 cases), 77% of hyperplasias with atypias (10/13 cases), 9% of hyperplasias without atypias (1/11 cases), 87% of secretory endometrium samples (13/15 cases), and in none of the nonsecretory endometrium samples (0/27 cases). In endometrioid carcinomas, Glut-1 was expressed in a marked geographical pattern. In nontumor lesions, its expression was more common in atypical hyperplasia and polyps with atypical hyperplasia compared with polyps with non-atypical hyperplasia and hyperplasias without atypia ( P = .00032). Conclusion: Our study confirms the high expression of Glut-1 not only in endometrioid carcinomas but also in other carcinomas of endometrium including clear cell and serous types. Glut-1 expression can be used as a surrogate marker in differential diagnosis between hyperplasia with and without atypia. Because of common Glut-1 expression in malignant tumors, therapeutic strategies influencing this protein or its signaling pathways can be beneficial.

The role of immunohistochemical adrenomedullin and Bcl-2 expression in development of type-1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: Adrenomedullin expression in endometrium

BACKGROUND

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a pluripotent peptide first discovered from human pheochromocytoma. AM expression has been shown in various cancer types including endometrium cancer. Bcl-2 is an antiapoptotic protein which might be regulated by AM in hypoxic conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of AM and Bcl-2 expressions in carcinogenesis of type-1 endometrium cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Study group consisted of 10 proliferative endometrium, 22 simple endometrial hyperplasia, 23 endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and 30 Grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients. AM and Bcl-2 expressions were investigated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Mean AM Allred score was 3±2.6, 5.6±1.6 and 5.7±2.5 in benign, EIN and adenocarcinoma groups, respectively. AM expression was significantly higher in EIN and adenocarcinoma groups than in benign endometrium group (p<0.05). Mean Bcl-2 Allred score was 6.4±2.1, 5.2±2.6, 2.3±2 in benign endometrium, EIN and adenocarcinoma groups, respectively. Mean Bcl-2 Allred score was similar between benign endometrium and EIN groups (p>0.05). However, it was significantly lower in adenocarcinoma group (p<0.05). An inverse correlation between AM and Bcl-2 expressions was found (r: -0.4, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that AM expression increased in progression from benign endometrium to EIN and type-1 adenocarcinoma while expression of Bcl-2 decreased in transition from EIN to carcinoma.

Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification

AIMS

To compare the reproducibility of the current (2003) World Health Organization (WHO), endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and European Working Group (EWG) classifications of endometrial endometrioid proliferations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine expert gynaecological pathologists from Europe and North America reviewed 198 endometrial biopsy/curettage specimens originally diagnosed as low-grade lesions. All observers were asked to classify the cases by using the categories described in each scheme: six for WHO, four for EIN, and three for EWG. The results were evaluated by kappa statistics for more than two observations. The analysis was repeated using only two major categories (benign versus atypical/carcinoma). Both the WHO and EIN classifications showed poor interobserver agreement (κ = 0.337 and κ = 0.419, respectively), whereas the EWG classification showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.530). Full agreement between pathologists occurred in only 28% for the WHO classification, 39% for the EIN classification, and 59% for the EWG classification. With only two diagnostic categories, kappa values increased in all classifications, but only the EWG classification reached a substantial level of agreement (κ = 0.621); similarly, full agreement among all pathologists increased to 70% for the WHO classification, 69% for the EIN classification, and 72% for the EWG classification.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-tier classification of endometrial endometrioid proliferative lesions improves reproducibility, and should be considered for the diagnosis of endometrial biopsy/curettage specimens.

Biomarkers of progestin therapy resistance and endometrial hyperplasia progression

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify biomarkers associated with progestin therapy resistance and persistence/progression of endometrial hyperplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a nested case-control study among women with complex (n = 73) and atypical (n = 41) hyperplasia treated with oral progestin, followed up 2-6 months for persistence/progression. We evaluated index endometrial protein expression for progesterone receptor isoform A, progesterone receptor isoform B (PRB), PTEN, Pax-2, and Bcl-2. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Among women with atypical hyperplasia, high PRB expression was associated with 90% decreased risk of persistence/progression (95% CI, 0.01-0.8). High expression of progesterone receptor A and PRB suggested decreased risk of persistence/progression (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.02-1.0). These findings were not observed among women with complex hyperplasia. No associations were found with PTEN, Pax-2, and Bcl-2 protein expression.

CONCLUSION

PRB expression shows promise as a biomarker of progestin response. Further research is warranted to understand how PRB expression may guide treatment decisions.

PAX2 loss by immunohistochemistry occurs early and often in endometrial hyperplasia

Immunohistochemical markers to assist in the diagnosis and classification of hyperplastic endometrial epithelial proliferations would be of diagnostic use. To examine the possible use of PAX2 as a marker of hyperplastic endometrium, cases of normal endometrium, simple and complex hyperplasia without atypia, atypical hyperplasia, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade 1 endometrioid carcinomas were stained for PAX2. Two hundred and six endometrial samples were available for interpretation of PAX2 staining. The percentage of cases with complete PAX2 loss (0% of cells staining) increased with increasing severity of hyperplasia: 0% of normal proliferative and secretory endometrium (n=28), 17.4% of simple hyperplasia (n=23), 59.0% of complex hyperplasia (n=83), 74.1% of atypical hyperplasia (n=54), and 73.3% of FIGO grade 1 endometrioid cancers (n=15). Partial loss of PAX2 expression did occur in normal endometrium (17.9%) but in smaller proportions of tissue and was less frequent than in simple hyperplasia (47.8% with partial loss), complex hyperplasia (32.5%), atypical hyperplasia (22.2%), and FIGO grade 1 carcinomas (20.0%). Uniform PAX2 expression was rare in complex (8.4%) and atypical hyperplasia (3.7%) and carcinoma (6.7%). When evaluating loss of PAX2 in histologically normal endometrium adjacent to lesional endometrium in a given case, statistically significant differences in staining were observed for simple hyperplasia (P=0.011), complex hyperplasia (P<0.001), atypical hyperplasia (P<0.001), and FIGO grade 1 endometrioid cancer (P=0.003). In summary, PAX2 loss seems to occur early in the development of endometrial precancers and may prove useful in some settings as a diagnostic marker in determining normal endometrium from complex and atypical hyperplasia and low-grade carcinomas. However, it is not useful in distinguishing between these diagnostic categories.

Reproducibility of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis is good, but influenced by the diagnostic style of pathologists

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) applies specific diagnostic criteria to designate a monoclonal endometrial preinvasive glandular proliferation known from previous studies to confer a 45-fold increased risk for endometrial cancer. In this international study we estimate accuracy and precision of EIN diagnosis among 20 reviewing pathologists in different practice environments, and with differing levels of experience and training. Sixty-two endometrial biopsies diagnosed as benign, EIN, or adenocarcinoma by consensus of two expert subspecialty pathologists were used as a reference comparison to assess diagnostic accuracy of 20 reviewing pathologists. Interobserver reproducibility among the 20 reviewers provided a measure of diagnostic precision. Before evaluating cases, observers were self-trained by reviewing published textbook and/or online EIN diagnostic guidelines. Demographics of the reviewing pathologists, and their impressions regarding implementation of EIN terminology were recorded. Seventy-nine percent of the 20 reviewing pathologists' diagnoses were exactly concordant with the expert consensus (accuracy). The interobserver weighted κ values of 3-class EIN scheme (benign, EIN, carcinoma) diagnoses between expert consensus and each of reviewing pathologists averaged 0.72 (reproducibility, or precision). Reviewing pathologists demonstrated one of three diagnostic styles, which varied in the repertoire of diagnoses commonly used, and their nonrandom response to potentially confounding diagnostic features such as endometrial polyp, altered differentiation, background hormonal effects, and technically poor preparations. EIN diagnostic strategies can be learned and implemented from standard teaching materials with a high degree of reproducibility, but is impacted by the personal diagnostic style of each pathologist in responding to potential diagnostic confounders.

PTEN-loss and nuclear atypia of EIN in endometrial biopsies can predict the existence of a concurrent endometrial carcinoma

AIM

The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether nuclear atypia or PTEN-loss in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), could help to predict in endometrial curettage material, the prevalence of concurrent carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-institution study included women who were diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia (simple or complex) and underwent hysterectomy within 12weeks from the initial diagnosis without interval treatment. All endometrial curettage slides were reviewed by three experienced pathologists and only cases that fulfilled the criteria of EIN were used for further analysis. For each case, the nuclear atypia and the immunohistochemically detected expression of PTEN were evaluated. The hysterectomy slides were also reviewed and the findings were used in the subsequent analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 83 cases that were enrolled in the study, 33 (39.76%), had a concurrent endometrial carcinoma. Nuclear atypia in EIN cases with a final histology of endometrial cancer was found in 31 out of 33 cases (93.94%) but only in 27 out of 50 benign cases (54%). There was no PTEN-loss in 8 out of 33 EIN cases (24.24%) that proved to be cancer and 22 out of 50 EIN cases (44%) that proved to be benign. Either atypia or PTEN-loss or both were found in 33/33 (100%) cancer cases and in 39/50 (78%) benign cases; this difference was statistically significant (Fisher exact test, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PTEN-loss, as an independent variable, was not found to be a predictor of endometrial cancer in the final histology. However, biopsies presented with EIN, featuring nuclear atypia and recognized as PTEN-null are more likely to be finally diagnosed with endometrial cancer.

Complex hyperplasia with and without atypia: clinical outcomes and implications of progestin therapy

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist to inform clinicians and patients as to the likelihood of long-term endometrial hyperplasia response to progestin therapy, especially for atypical hyperplasia. We evaluated women with complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, comparing those prescribed progestin with those not prescribed progestin.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 1985-2005 among women aged 18-88 years at an integrated health plan in Washington State. Women were ineligible if they achieved an outcome (endometrial carcinoma, hysterectomy, or both) within 8 weeks of hyperplasia diagnosis. Exposure was progestin use for at least 14 days by duration and recency. Outcomes included rate of 1) endometrial carcinoma, 2) hysterectomy, or 3) both. Analyses performed included Kaplan-Meier, incident rate ratios, and Cox proportional hazard ratios.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred forty-three eligible women were identified. One thousand two hundred one had complex (n=164 no progestin) and 242 had atypical (n=62 no progestin) hyperplasia. During follow-up, a median of 5.3 years (range 8 weeks to 20.8 years), 71 women were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (35 complex, 36 atypia) and 323 underwent hysterectomy (216 complex, 107 atypia). Among women with complex and atypical hyperplasia, rates of endometrial carcinoma among progestin users were 3.6 and 20.5 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively (compared with women who did not use progestin, 10.8 and 101.4). Among women with complex and atypical hyperplasia, rates of hysterectomy among progestin users were 23.3 and 61.4 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively (compared with women who did not use progestin, 55.1 and 297.3).

CONCLUSION

Endometrial carcinoma risk is diminished approximately threefold to fivefold in women diagnosed with complex or atypical endometrial hyperplasia and dispensed progestin; hysterectomy risk is also decreased.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison of WHO and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classifications in predicting the presence of coexistent malignancy in endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

The most commonly used classification system for endometrial hyperplasia is the World Health Organization system which is based on subjective criteria. Another classification system is endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) system which uses diagnostic criteria including cytological demarcation, crowded gland architecture, minimum size of 1 mm, and careful exclusion of mimics, and aims to identify a precancer or cancer. The objective of this study was to compare the two classification systems in terms of predicting the presence of a coexistent cancer in surgically treated patients.

METHODS

Biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of 49 women who were subjected to surgery with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) according to the WHO system were re-evaluated retrospectively by using EIN system.

RESULTS

Among the 49 patients, 69.4% had complex atypical EH and 75.5% had EIN at biopsy specimens. EIN was detected in 94.1% of complex atypical EH, and 41.7% of non-atypical EH. Nine women (18.4%) had endometrial cancer. Among women with cancer, all had complex atypical EH or EIN. The rate of coexistent endometrial cancer was 26.5% in women with complex atypical EH and 24.3% in women with EIN.

CONCLUSION

Diagnoses of atypical or complex atypical EH and EIN had similar sensitivities and negative predictive values in predicting the coexistent endometrial cancer. Either of these two classification systems may be used safely when an experienced pathologist is available. However, use of the objective EIN system may be preferred whenever possible to prevent diagnostic errors in centers where an experienced pathologist is not available.

Endometrial polyps and the risk of atypical hyperplasia on biopsies of unremarkable endometrium: a study on 694 patients with benign endometrial polyps

The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between benign endometrial polyps and the underlying endometrium, analyzing factors associated with endometrial hyperplasia with and without atypia. Six hundred and ninety-four consecutive patients with benign endometrial polyps underwent hysteroscopic removal of the polyps combined with 2 biopsies of unremarkable endometrium. Hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps with 2 endometrial biopsies far from the base of the polyp were performed. The weight of each polyp was determined. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used examining factors potentially associated with endometrial hyperplasia with and without atypia on endometrial biopsies. Overall, 18% of women had hyperplasia without atypia and 7.3% had atypia (with simple/complex hyperplasia) on hysteroscopically unremarkable endometrium. In postmenopause, 21.6% had hyperplasia without atypia, 12% atypia, and 1.2% adenocarcinoma on the sampled endometrium. At multivariable analysis, postmenopausal women with larger polyps had a 3.6-fold higher likelihood of atypia (odds ratio=3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-10.3); in premenopause the likelihood of atypia was significantly associated with polyp weight and age above 40 years. Our findings suggest that important endometrial lesions are not always evident by hysteroscopic visualization. Therefore, endometrial biopsies should not be limited only to hysteroscopically evident lesions. Polypectomy should be combined with a histopathologic evaluation of the background endometrium, particularly in women with higher-risk characteristics.

Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to estimate the age-specific incidence of endometrial hyperplasia: simple, complex, and atypical, in order of increasing likelihood of progression to carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Women aged 18-90 years with endometrial pathology specimens (1985-2003) at a large integrated health plan were identified using automated data. Incidence rates were obtained by dividing the number of cases by the estimated number of female health plan enrollees who retained a uterus.

RESULTS

Endometrial hyperplasia peak incidence was: simple, 142 per 100,000 woman-years, complex, 213 per 100,000 woman-years, both in the early 50s; and atypical, 56 per 100,000 woman-years in the early 60s. Age-adjusted incidence decreased over the study period, especially for atypical hyperplasia.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial hyperplasia incidence without and with atypia peaks in the early postmenopausal years and in the early 60s, respectively. Given that some cases of endometrial hyperplasia likely go undiagnosed, the figures provided should be viewed as minimum estimates of the true incidence.

Progestin therapy of complex endometrial hyperplasia with and without atypia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the likelihood of histologic persistence/progression of complex hyperplasia and atypical hyperplasia among women treated with progestin compared with those not treated, with attention to type, dose, and duration.

METHODS

This was a cohort study at an integrated health plan of women, ages 18-85 years, with complex or atypical hyperplasia on independent pathology review with a second endometrial specimen in the 2-6 months after the index diagnosis. Progestin therapy between index diagnosis and follow-up biopsy was determined from the pharmacy database. Medical record abstraction was performed. Relative risks (RRs), adjusted for age and body mass index, were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 185 women, average age 55.9 years, follow-up 16.1 weeks, 115 had complex and 70 had atypical hyperplasia. Among women with complex hyperplasia, 28.4% of those treated with progestin and 30.0% of those not treated had persistence/progression (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-2.72). Among women with atypical hyperplasia, 26.9% of those treated with progestin and 66.7% of those not treated had persistence/progression (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.70); there was a suggestion that use of at least a medium dose, or a duration of at least 3 months, was associated with a particularly low probability of persistence/progression.

CONCLUSION

Although progestin treatment of women with atypical hyperplasia was associated with a substantial increase in the likelihood of regression of the lesion during the ensuing 2-6 months, persistence/progression was nonetheless present in more than one quarter of treated women. Regression of complex hyperplasia without atypia was common whether progestin had or had not been used.

Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran

Background

Management of endometrial precancerous lesions has been of much debate due to inconsistencies in their classification, natural history and histologic diagnosis. Endometrial hyperplasia constitutes a wide range of histomorphologic features associated with high intra and interobserver diagnostic variability.

Although traditional microscopic diagnosis is by far the most applicable method and the gold standard for histomorphologic diagnosis, digitized image analysis has been used as a powerful adjunct to maximize the histologic data retrieval and to add some detailed objective criteria for correct diagnosis in difficult cases.

Methods

A series of 100 endometrial curettage specimens with diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or well differentiated adenocarcinoma were blindly reviewed by 5 pathologists; their intra and interobserver reproducibility determined and further compared to the objective morphometric data i.e. D-score and volume percent of stroma (VPS).

Results

The results were assessed using the weighted kappa statistics. Mean intraobserver kappa value was 0.8690 (99.44% agreement). Mean interobserver kappa values by diagnostic category were: simple hyperplasia without atypia: 0.7441; complex hyperplasia without atypia: 0.3379; atypical hyperplasia: 0.3473, and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma: 0.6428; with a kappa value of 0.5372 for all cases combined.

Interobserver agreement was in substantial rate for simple hyperplasia (SH) and well differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDA) but was in fair limit for complex hyperplasia (CH) and atypical hyperplasia (AH). Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect. The specimens were divided in two groups according to the computerized morphometric analysis: Endometrial Hyperplasia (EH) ( D Score ≥ 1 or VPS ≥ 55%) and Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN) (D-Score < 1 or VPS < 55%). Morphometric findings were closely compatible with routine WHO classification made by one expert pathologist; however; diagnosis of (CH) and (AH) made by other pathologists were not concordant with morphometric data.

Conclusion

It may be necessary to make some revisions in WHO classification for endometrial hyperplasia and precancerous lesions.

Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma

The primary presenting symptom of endometrial neoplasia is abnormal uterine bleeding, which typically prompts an endometrial biopsy to rule out carcinoma. Approximately 70% of women with abnormal uterine bleeding are diagnosed with benign findings and 15% are diagnosed with carcinoma. The remaining 15% receive a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia (EH), which includes a broad range of lesions, from mild, reversible proliferations to the immediate precursors of carcinoma. The widely used World Health Organization (WHO) system classifies EH according to four combinations of glandular crowding and nuclear atypia: simple (SH), complex (CH), simple atypical (SAH), or complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), although the two forms of atypical hyperplasia (AH) are often collapsed into one category. Diagnoses of EH raise three issues. First, the low interobserver reproducibility-less than 50% in almost all studies-hinders the ability of WHO-based classification to effectively guide clinical management. Second, approximately 50% of women diagnosed with AH have concurrent carcinoma. Not surprisingly, most women with AH undergo hysterectomy as primary treatment, but non-surgical management can be effective. Third, data on progression risks for women with EH who retain their uterus are extremely limited. Emerging data indicate the long-term risk among women with SH or CH is less than 5%, but the risk among women with AH is approximately 30%. These data highlight priority areas for future research, such as increasing the diagnostic reproducibility of EH, improving the discrimination between AH and carcinoma, and identifying biomarkers to stratify risks or serve as indicators of response to clinical treatment.

Presence of endometrial adenocarcinoma in situ in complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia is associated with increased incidence of endometrial carcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy

The distinction of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia from endometrial adenocarcinoma is often problematic. Foci of back-to-back arrangement of glands or foci of cribriform arrangement of glands smaller than 2.1 mm in diameter are considered insufficient for the diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma by some authors, and sufficient to be diagnosed as endometrial adenocarcinoma by other authors. We refer to these foci as endometrial adenocarcinoma in situ. In this study, we evaluated findings in subsequent hysterectomy in complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients with and without adenocarcinoma in situ. Follow-up findings, including the presence or absence of endometrial adenocarcinoma in the hysterectomy specimen, the grade of the carcinoma and the depth of myometrial invasion were analyzed. Of the total 87 patients with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 33 patients had adenocarcinoma in situ and 54 lacked adenocarcinoma in situ. Of 33 patients 22 (66%) with adenocarcinoma in situ had endometrial adenocarcinoma on subsequent hysterectomy vs 13 of 54 (24%) patients without adenocarcinoma in situ (P=0.0001). Myoinvasive endometrial adenocarcinoma was present in 20 of 33 (61%) patients with adenocarcinoma in situ vs 8 of the 54 (15%) patients without adenocarcinoma in situ (P< or =0.0001). The depth of myometrial invasion in cases with myoinvasion was 24.5+19.4% in patients with adenocarcinoma in situ and 12.8+8.5% in patients without adenocarcinoma in situ (P=0.05). Among patients younger than age of 50, 5 of the 7 (71%) with adenocarcinoma in situ had myoinvasive carcinoma vs 2 of the 13 (15%) without adenocarcinoma in situ (P=0.02). The likelihood of finding endometrial adenocarcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy in patients with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia is significantly increased if adenocarcinoma in situ is present in prior endometrial sampling. Endometrial adenocarcinomas in patients with adenocarcinoma in situ are far more frequently myoinvasive, and invade to a greater depth than endometrial adenocarcinomas seen in patients without adenocarcinoma in situ. Use of adenocarcinoma in situ terminology could lead to improved management of patients with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Risk of subsequent endometrial carcinoma associated with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification of endometrial biopsies

BACKGROUND

Histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial biopsies is used to estimate the risk of progression to carcinoma and guide clinical management. Problems with the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) system for classifying endometrial hyperplasia (EH) have prompted the development of an alternative system based on endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). The authors estimated progression risk associated with EIN among endometrial biopsies in a nested case-control study of EH progression.

METHODS

Index biopsies with original community pathology diagnoses of disordered proliferative endometrium (DPEM) or EH that were independently confirmed by a panel of pathologists were independently reviewed and assigned EIN classifications (inadequate, benign, EIN, or cancer) by a second panel of pathologists. Cases (N = 138) progressed to carcinoma at least 1 year (median, 6 years) after their index biopsy. Controls (N = 241) also had EH, did not progress to carcinoma, and were individually matched to cases based on age at EH, date of EH, and length of follow-up. By using conditional logistic regression, the authors estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for progression to carcinoma for EIN versus benign.

RESULTS

In the EIN system, 71 (52.6%) cases and 159 (66.8%) controls were classified as benign and 42 (31.1%) cases and 65 (27.3%) controls were classified as EIN. The RR for EIN versus benign was 7.76 (95% CI, 3.36-17.91). In the WHO system, the RR for atypical hyperplasia (AH) versus DPEM, simple hyperplasia, or complex hyperplasia was 9.19 (95% CI, 3.87-21.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women observed for at least 1 year after receiving a biopsy-based EH diagnosis, EIN and AH were both found to have similarly increased risks of progression to carcinoma.

Significance of concurrent endometrial cancer in women with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were (1) to review the rate of concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH); (2) to determine the proportion of patients with concurrent endometrial cancer who have high-risk disease; and (3) to re-evaluate our surgical management of AEH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had surgery on the basis of a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia between January 2001 and December 2006. Demographic data, the method of preoperative diagnosis, postoperative grade of tumour, and other postoperative findings were recorded. When applicable, this included cancer stage, lymph node status, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion. In postoperative review, patients were considered to be high risk if they had disease beyond the uterus or a combination of other risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients, 25 (35.7%) were found to have concurrent endometrial cancer. This was higher than the commonly accepted rate of 25% (P = 0.03). Of the 25 patients upgraded, 4 (16%) had high-risk cancer on final pathologic evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Simple hysterectomy in women with AEH may result in inadequate surgical management. Simple methods are required to identify patients with a preoperative diagnosis of AEH who may harbour significant cancers.

Immunohistochemical markers in endometrial hyperplasia: is there a panel with promise? A review

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in defining the biology of endometrial carcinomas, there has been little progress in determining markers that distinguish preinvasive endometrial proliferations. The goal of this literature review was to identify studies on endometrial hyperplasia (EH) that describe markers with potential to predict response to progestin therapy or potential for progression to invasive disease.

METHODS

Articles published between January 2000 and October 2006 were identified using the key words endometrial hyperplasia and progesterone receptor or estrogen receptor or biologic marker or immunohistochemistry/immunohistochemical. Articles that reported immunohistochemical studies on specimens of human EH +/-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma with a normal comparison group were included. Only those who reported hyperplasia with atypia separately from nonatypical hyperplasia and with a sample size greater than 10 specimens for the sum of complex and atypical samples were included.

RESULTS

A total of 289 abstracts were reviewed and 150 articles potentially met inclusion criteria. Of these, 123 described immunohistochemical studies on human EH specimens. Only 46 met all criteria for analysis of 61 different markers.

CONCLUSIONS

PTEN seems to have the greatest potential for diagnostic utility in EH, perhaps in combination with Bcl-2 and Bax. However, more uniform and rigorous studies are required to confirm these and additional markers' utility diagnostically in a diagnostic panel. As a major clinical priority is to determine which lesions can be treated medically and which require surgical intervention, focusing future studies on markers that distinguish response to hormone therapy or are involved in hormone regulation, will be important future considerations.

Diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia: why is it so difficult to agree?

Current World Health Organization classification of endometrial hyperplasia is problematic because of poor diagnostic reproducibility. We sought to determine factors that cause diagnostic disagreement in a review of 2601 endometrial specimens. Blinded random specimens of normal endometrium, hyperplasias, and carcinoma were reviewed by 2 pathologists, with review by a third pathologist in cases with disagreement. All cases of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma were scored for degree of glandular crowding, architectural complexity, and cytologic atypia. Sample adequacy, hyperplasia volume, presence of metaplasia, or endometrial polyp were also scored. The overall kappa for agreement was 0.71, with a lower kappa of 0.36 when cases called "no hyperplasia" were excluded. The percent specific agreement was 90.3% for no hyperplasia, 31.1% for simple hyperplasia, 51.1% for complex hyperplasia, 49.8% for atypical hyperplasia, and 57.5% for adenocarcinoma. Cases categorized as "low volume hyperplasia" had more diagnostic disagreement than "high volume," (62% vs. 39%, P=0.003). Similarly, cases called "scant" had more diagnostic disagreement than "not scant" (65% vs. 57%, P=0.013). The histologic feature associated with the most diagnostic disagreement was cytologic atypia (P<0.0001). Architectural crowding, architectural complexity, or the presence of a polyp were all associated with diagnostic disagreement (P<0.0001). High diagnostic disagreement in endometrial hyperplasia is related to both sample adequacy and interpretation of histologic features present. Although obtaining additional tissue may increase diagnostic reproducibility, differences in interpretation of key histologic features like cytologic atypia remain major factors contributing to diagnostic disagreement.

Endometrial hyperplasia involving endometrial polyps: report of a series and discussion of the significance in an endometrial biopsy specimen

OBJECTIVES

Endometrial polyps are a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding. Rarely, a hyperplasia, either complex or atypical in type, is identified within a polyp in a biopsy or polypectomy specimen. Currently, it is not known whether the hyperplasia is likely to be confined to the polyp or also involve nonpolypoid endometrium. We aim to assess the likelihood of hyperplasia being confined to an endometrial polyp.

DESIGN

In this study, we identified 32 women from pathology archives in whom endometrial hyperplasia was present within a polyp. The number of endometrial polyps during the study period was 1031 and therefore 3.1% of all endometrial polyps diagnosed during the study period contained a hyperplasia.

SETTING

A major teaching hospital in the UK.

METHODS

The biopsies were retrieved from the pathology archives of Royal Group of Hospitals, Belfast, between 2000 and 2006. We traced any follow-up biopsy or hysterectomy specimens to evaluate the status of the surrounding endometrium.

RESULTS

The hyperplasias were complex (n = 23) or atypical (n = 9) in type. In 14 of 27 (52%) women in whom nonpolypoid endometrium was available for histological evaluation, either on the original biopsy or in a follow-up specimen, hyperplasia involved the nonpolypoid endometrium, and in three other women, hyperplasia was present in a polyp in follow-up specimens. Women with atypical hyperplasia in a polyp were slightly more likely to have hyperplasia in the surrounding endometrium than those with complex hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates that the risk of endometrial hyperplasia in a polyp concurrently involving nonpolypoid endometrium is significant. We suggest a strategy for the management of women with hyperplasia identified within an endometrial polyp in a biopsy or polypectomy specimen.

Cytopathologic diagnoses of fine-needle aspirations from endoscopic ultrasound of the mediastinum

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy through the esophagus (EUS-FNA) or the bronchial tree (endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration [EBUS-TBNA]) may be used to obtain specimens from mediastinal structures. The accuracy of this procedure has been well documented. However, no studies have studied the reproducibility of the pathologic assessment of the aspirated material.

METHODS

A total of 102 slides from EUS-FNA or EBUS-TBNA were assessed 2 times by 4 pathologists who classified each slide to 1 of 5 diagnostic categories and judged if the aspirate came from a lymph node. Between the 2 rounds the criteria to be used in the assessment of the slides were reviewed in a limited education session. The 4 observers had at least 15 years of pathology experience, but their experience in EUS-FNA and/or EBUS-TBNA varied from almost none to more than 10 years. The kappa statistic was applied for the analysis of reproducibility.

RESULTS

The reproducibility of the diagnoses in the first round was good to excellent (kappa, 0.52-0.89). The teaching session led to a significant improvement of the reproducibility between the least and the most experienced observers (kappa ranges of 0.52-0.55 in the first round improved to 0.65-0.71 in the second round).

CONCLUSIONS

The reproducibility of the diagnosis on EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA is excellent among pathologists experienced with these types of samples. Pathologists who are generally experienced but have little experience with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA show a steep learning curve. From a pathologic point of view, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA are feasible, but only experienced pathologists should do the assessments.

Objective risk definition for endometrial lesion spectrum: A diagnostic algorithm

OBJECTIVE

Investigations for risk definition in endometrial lesion spectrum still go on. In this study, molecular, morphometric, immunohistochemical techniques were combined with conventional morphology to realize whether an algorithm is definable for risk assessment to progress an invasive carcinoma in endometrial glandular lesion spectrum is possible.

METHODS

The study was carried out on 20 benign endometria, 35 hyperplasias, and 20 adenocarcinoma cases. Clonality of glandular cells, the volume percent of endometrial stroma (VPS), PTEN inactivation, and proliferative index (PI) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was evaluated to set an objective algorithm.

RESULTS

All benign tissues had polyclonal (PC), whereas all malignant tissues had monoclonal (MC) glandular epithelium. Of hyperplasias, 19 were MC, and 16 were PC. VPS value of 55% had 100% sensitivity, and 80% specificity (n=67) to distinguish MC from PC. Neither PTEN nor PI data augmented the specificity or the sensitivity of clonal distinction.

CONCLUSION

Clonality and VPS values were found to be significant in differential of endometrial lesions. With this rationale, a diagnostic algorithm for endometrial risk lesions was set. This algorithm is based on HE morphology, VPS and clonality findings, and has 100% sensitivity and specificity to discriminate neoplastic endometrium from hyperplasia.

Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

Endometrial "hyperplasia," as currently diagnosed, includes the changes caused by an abnormal hormonal state and those caused by a separate category of monoclonal premalignant disease. The appearance of the disease in these 2 functional categories is discontinuous, permitting more specific diagnosis of the condition using the terms "benign endometrial hyperplasia" and "endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia" (EIN), respectively. Benign endometrial hyperplasia involves the entire endometrial compartment and, with protracted estrogen exposure, shows the progressive development of cysts, remodeled glands, vascular thrombi, and stromal microinfarcts. They are best construed as a sequence of changes whereby the appearance at any single time point is uniquely dependent on the preceding combination and the duration of hormonal exposures. In contrast, the premalignant clone of an EIN lesion is characteristically offset from the background endometrium by its altered cytology and crowded architecture. The use of an internal standard for cytology assessment, combined with the distinctive topography of a clonal process, enables the diagnosis of EIN lesions with a long-term cancer risk 45-fold greater than that of their benign endometrial hyperplasia counterparts. The resolution of hormonal and premalignant subsets of traditional "endometrial hyperplasias" is possible using redefined diagnostic criteria, enabling patient therapy to be appropriately matched with the underlying disease mechanisms.

GLUT-1 is preferentially expressed in atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial adenocarcinoma

The facilitative transport of monosaccharides in human cells is accomplished by a family of transmembrane proteins, GLUT-1 to GLUT-7, that differ in their tissue distribution, affinities for specific monosaccharides, and physiologic regulation. GLUT-1, a high-affinity glucose transporter, is normally expressed in erythrocytes, the perineurium of peripheral nerves, and capillary endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier. Although the aberrant expression of GLUT-1 has been reported in a wide spectrum of epithelial malignancies, its possible correlation with the malignant transformation of endometrial epithelium has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which benign, hyperplastic, atypical, and malignant endometrial epithelia express GLUT-1. The authors examined the IHC expression of GLUT-1 in cases of proliferative endometrium (n=12), secretory endometrium (n=10), endometrial polyps (n=10), adenomyosis (n=18), simple hyperplasia (n=14), complex hyperplasia without atypia (n=17), complex hyperplasia with atypia (n=17), and adenocarcinoma (n=31). Positive staining was defined as distinct, linear membrane staining, particularly at cell-cell borders. Cells that showed only cytoplasmic staining were considered negative. The percentages of positive cells and staining intensity were assessed in a semiquantitative fashion and scored (1+ to 3+). All cases from proliferative endometrium, secretory endometrium, adenomyosis, and simple hyperplasia and 90% (9/10 cases) of the endometrial polyps were negative for GLUT-1. GLUT-1 was expressed in 24% (4/17 cases) of complex hyperplasia without atypia, 71% (12/17 cases) of complex hyperplasia with atypia, and 90% (28/31 cases) of adenocarcinomas. The extent of staining ranged from occasional positive foci to extensive multifocal staining. GLUT-1 positivity increased in intensity as the distance of tumor cells to stroma increased. The authors conclude that GLUT-1 is preferentially expressed in complex hyperplasia with atypia and in adenocarcinoma and that GLUT-1 immunostaining is useful in distinguishing benign hyperplasia from hyperplasia strongly associated with malignancy. GLUT-1-mediated glucose transport may allow hypoxic tumor cells distant from stromal blood vessels to survive through glycolysis. These data suggest that the expression of GLUT-1 transporter may be closely related to the malignant transformation of epithelial endometrial tumors by supporting their increased need for glucose metabolism.

My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings

A major proportion of the workload in many histopathology laboratories is accounted for by endometrial biopsies, either curettage specimens or outpatient biopsy specimens. The increasing use of pipelle and other methods of biopsy not necessitating general anaesthesia has resulted in greater numbers of specimens with scant tissue, resulting in problems in assessing adequacy and in interpreting artefactual changes, some of which appear more common with outpatient biopsies. In this review, the criteria for adequacy and common artefacts in endometrial biopsies, as well as the interpretation of endometrial biopsies in general, are discussed, concentrating on areas that cause problems for pathologists. An adequate clinical history, including knowledge of the age, menstrual history and menopausal status, and information on the use of exogenous hormones and tamoxifen, is necessary for the pathologist to critically evaluate endometrial biopsies. Topics such as endometritis, endometrial polyps, changes that are induced by hormones and tamoxifen within the endometrium, endometrial metaplasias and hyperplasias, atypical polypoid adenomyoma, adenofibroma, adenosarcoma, histological types of endometrial carcinoma and grading of endometrial carcinomas are discussed with regard to endometrial biopsy specimens rather than hysterectomy specimens. The value of ancillary techniques, especially immunohistochemistry, is discussed where appropriate.

Molecular and Pathologic Aspects of Endometrial Carcinogenesis

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy, with 41,000 new cases projected in the United States for 2006. Two different clinicopathologic subtypes are recognized: the estrogen-related (type I, endometrioid) and the non–estrogen-related types (type II, nonendometrioid such as papillary serous and clear cell). The morphologic differences in these cancers are mirrored in their molecular genetic profile with type I showing defects in DNA-mismatch repair and mutations in PTEN, K-ras, and beta-catenin, and type II showing aneuploidy and p53 mutations. This article reviews the genetic aspects of endometrial carcinogenesis and progression. We will define the precursor lesion of type I endometrioid cancer and the role of genetics and estrogen in its progression.

Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Most gynecologists determine therapy based on current International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists (ISGP)/World Health Organization classification of endometrial hyperplasia, the reproducibility of which has been questioned. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) initiated a protocol to assess the efficacy of hormonal therapy of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Primary goals of the first phase (Part A) were to prospectively determine reproducibility of referring institution's pathologist's diagnosis of AEH by a panel of 3 gynecologic pathologists and to determine reproducibility of diagnoses by panel members.

METHODS

Three hundred six women were entered on this protocol with a referring institution's pathologist diagnosis of AEH based on biopsy or curettage. Available slides were assessed independently and interpreted by each of a panel of 3 gynecologic pathologists who used International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists (ISGP)/World Health Organization criteria. The majority diagnosis was based on diagnostic concordance by at least 2 of the 3 panelists.

RESULTS

The referring institution's pathologist's diagnosis of AEH was supported by the majority of the panel in only 38% of cases. Overall kappa value for the panel diagnosis of AEH was 0.28. The majority diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 29%, cycling endometrium in 7%, and nonatypical hyperplasia in 18% of cases. Unanimous agreement for any diagnosis was reached among all 3 of the panel in 40% of cases. For the panel, paired kappa values for any diagnosis ranged 0.34-0.43, with an overall kappa value of 0.40.

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of referring institution's pathologists' diagnosis of AEH by a panel of gynecologic pathologists is poor. Both underestimation and overestimation of the severity of the lesion are very common. The level of reproducibility among subspecialist panel members for diagnosis of AEH in these specimens also is poor. Better criteria and better sampling are needed to improve reproducibility of this diagnosis, particularly if it is to be used for clinical decisions.

Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, accounting for approximately 36,000 diagnoses of invasive carcinoma annually. The most common histologic type, endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC), accounts for 75-80% of patients. The objective of this work was to estimate the prevalence of concurrent carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of the precursor lesion, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH).

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included women who had a community diagnosis of AEH. Diagnostic biopsy specimens were reviewed independently by three gynecologic pathologists who used International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists/World Health Organization criteria. Study participants underwent hysterectomy within 12 weeks of entry onto protocol without interval treatment. The hysterectomy slides also were reviewed by the study pathologists, and their findings were used in the subsequent analyses.

RESULTS

Between November 1998 and June 2003, 306 women were enrolled on the study. Of these, 17 women were not included in the analysis: Two patients had unreadable slides because of poor processing or insufficient tissue, 2 patients had only slides that were not endometrial, the slides for 5 patients were not available for review, and 8 of the hysterectomy specimens were excluded because they showed evidence of interval intervention, either progestin effect or ablation. In total, 289 patients were included in the current analysis. The study panel review of the AEH biopsy specimens was interpreted as follows: 74 of 289 specimens (25.6%) were diagnosed as less than AEH, 115 of 289 specimens (39.8%) were diagnosed as AEH, and 84 of 289 specimens (29.1%) were diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma. In 5.5% (16 of 289 specimens), there was no consensus on the biopsy diagnosis. The rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma for analyzed specimens was 42.6% (123 of 289 specimens). Of these, 30.9% (38 of 123 specimens) were myoinvasive, and 10.6% (13 of 123 specimens) involved the outer 50% of the myometrium. Among the women who had hysterectomy specimens with carcinoma, 14 of 74 women (18.9%) had a study panel biopsy consensus diagnosis of less than AEH, 45 of 115 women (39.1%) had a study panel biopsy consensus diagnosis of AEH, and 54 of 84 women (64.3%) had a study panel diagnosis of carcinoma. Among women who had no consensus in their biopsy diagnosis, 10 of 16 women (62.5%) had carcinoma in their hysterectomy specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of endometrial carcinoma in patients who had a community hospital biopsy diagnosis of AEH was high (42.6%). When considering management strategies for women who have a biopsy diagnosis of AEH, clinicians and patients should take into account the considerable rate of concurrent carcinoma.

Lack of PTEN expression in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is correlated with cancer progression

We tested the hypothesis that PTEN inactivation may stratify cancer progression risk among putative endometrial hyperplasias, classified prognostically by means of the morphometric D score (DS). The DS, calculated from 3 morphometric variables measured in routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained endometrial biopsy slides, is the most sensitive and specific method of endometrial cancer risk prediction currently available. Clinical outcomes of 103 women with endometrial hyperplasia on biopsy were tallied according to the DS. Seven (7/103; 7%) patients with carcinoma during follow-up were all distributed within the high-risk prognostic group (ie, DS <1 = endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia [EIN]) (7/21; 33% progression). None of the 82 cases with a DS higher than 1 progressed. All cases that progressed were PTEN null, indicating that this genotype is capable of further stratifying cancer progression risk in hyperplasias irrespective of histological categorization. However, only 16% of the PTEN-null cases progressed. When PTEN expression pattern was combined with EIN, the prognostic power was greatly increased (specificity from 63% for PTEN and 85% for EIN to 93% when combined; positive predictive value from 16% and 33% to 50%). We conclude that loss of PTEN expression is the first biomarker in EIN that increases the accuracy of the prognostic DS to predict cancer progression risk. Unless endometrial hyperplasias are stratified by histological morphometric D-Score, PTEN has a low positive predictive value.

Study on the morphology and reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial lesions utilizing liquid-based cytology

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to determine the diagnostic cytomorphologic criteria for liquid-based cytology and to evaluate the reproducibility and usefulness of the cytologic diagnosis in endometrial lesions.

METHODS

A total of 162 direct endometrial samplings taken from postmenopausal women were evaluated by 2 skilled cytopathologists in endometrial cytology. The cytologic diagnosis was made according to the 1994 classification scheme of the World Health Organization. After establishment of the criteria, three additional cytopathologists without any experience in liquid-based endometrial cytology examined the same cases to determine interobserver variability. The intraobserver variability also was evaluated by all the observers.

RESULTS

The cytomorphologic criteria were established in the following four diagnostic categories: atrophic endometrium, hyperplasia without atypia, hyperplasia with atypia, and adenocarcinoma. The overall interobserver agreement was nearly perfect with a kappa value of 0.89 during the checking round and ranged from moderate to substantial with kappa values of 0.48-0.80, respectively, in the other diagnostic rounds (P < 0.0001); hyperplasia with atypia was found to be the most difficult category to identify correctly. Furthermore, the intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to perfect with kappa values of 0.61-1.00 in all diagnostic rounds (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liquid-based cytology allows for standardized and reproducible endometrial preparations, which in turn allows the application of common diagnostic criteria among cytopathologists. Furthermore, liquid-based cytology in combination with endometrial sampling could be a useful tool for the outpatient diagnosis of endometrial lesions, which could reduce unnecessary curettage.

Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progestogen treatment

In most cases, the endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is preceded by hyperplasia with different risk of progression into carcinoma. The original histologic slides from 560 consecutive cases with complex and atypical hyperplasia were re-examined to assess the interobserver-correlation. The hyperplasias were analyzed separately for their likelihood of progression to carcinoma in patients with and without progestogen hormonal therapy. In all cases, a fractional re-curreting was performed to establish the state of the disease. The leading symptom was vaginal bleeding in 65.5% of the cases in the postmenopausal period. Eighty-six percent of the patients presented with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)), 23% had had an exogeneous use of estrogens. Twenty-two cases were reclassified as simple hyperplasia and excluded from further analysis. The interobserver-correlation was 91% for complex, 92% for atypical hyperplasia, and 89% for endometrioid carcinoma, representing an overall correlation of 90%. Two percent of the cases with complex hyperplasia (8/390) progressed into carcinoma and 10.5% into atypical hyperplasia. Fifty-two percent of the atypical hyperplasias (58/112) progressed into carcinomas. In the case of progestogen treatment (n = 208; P < 0.0001) 61.5% showed remission confirmed by re-curetting, compared with 20.3% of the cases without hormonal treatment (n = 182; P < 0.0001). Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia is likely to respond to hormonal treatment. Especially in postmenopausal situation, atypical hyperplasia should be treated with total hysterectomy.

Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia

Accurate morphological classification of endometrial hyperplasia is crucial as treatments vary widely between the different categories of hyperplasia and are dependent, in part, on the histological diagnosis. However, previous studies have shown considerable inter-observer variation in the classification of endometrial hyperplasias. The aim of this study was to develop a decision support system (DSS) for the classification of endometrial hyperplasias. The system used a Bayesian belief network to distinguish proliferative endometrium, simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. These diagnostic outcomes were held in the decision node. Four morphological features were selected as diagnostic clues used routinely in the discrimination of endometrial hyperplasias. These represented the evidence nodes and were linked to the decision node by conditional probability matrices. The system was designed with a computer user interface (CytoInform) where reference images for a given clue were displayed to assist the pathologist in entering evidence into the network. Reproducibility of diagnostic classification was tested on 50 cases chosen by a gynaecological pathologist. These comprised ten cases each of proliferative endometrium, simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The DSS was tested by two consultant pathologists, two junior pathologists and two medical students. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was calculated following conventional histological examination of the slides on two occasions by the consultants and junior pathologists without the use of the DSS. All six participants then assessed the slides using the expert system on two occasions, enabling inter- and intra-observer agreement to be calculated. Using unaided conventional diagnosis, weighted kappa values for intra-observer agreement ranged from 0.645 to 0.901. Using the DSS, the results for the four pathologists ranged from 0.650 to 0.845. Both consultant pathologists had slightly worse weighted kappa values using the DSS, while both junior pathologists achieved slightly better values using the system. The grading of morphological features and the cumulative probability curve provided a quantitative record of the decision route for each case. This allowed a more precise comparison of individuals and identified why discordant diagnoses were made. Taking the original diagnoses of the consultant gynaecological pathologist as the 'gold standard', there was excellent or moderate to good inter-observer agreement between the 'gold standard' and the results obtained by the four pathologists using the expert system, with weighted kappa values of 0.586-0.872. The two medical students using the expert system achieved weighted kappa values of 0.771 (excellent) and 0.560 (moderate to good) compared to the 'gold standard'. This study illustrates the potential of expert systems in the classification of endometrial hyperplasias.