Pharmacologic treatment of intimal hyperplasia after metallic stent placement in the peripheral arteries. An experimental study

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol Prescription in Patients With Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease After Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol prescription in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) after endovascular therapy (EVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after femoropopliteal EVT of PAD up to September 2022. Clinical outcomes of interest included primary patency, in-stent restenosis (ISR), vessel re-occlusion, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), repeat revascularization, all-cause mortality, amputation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs), and bleeding complication.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies containing a total of 4898 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency after femoropopliteal artery EVT (odds ratio [OR]=1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50-1.87, p<0.001, I2=33.2%), a lower risk of ISR (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.29-0.63, p<0.001, I2=37.6%), repeat revascularization (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.24-0.76, p<0.005, I2=27.4%), and vessel re-occlusion (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.38-0.93, p<0.05, I2=0%). There was an increase in freedom from TLR rate (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.58-3.05, p<0.001, I2=0%), as well as a reduction in the occurrence of MALEs (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.29-0.85, p<0.05, I2=0%). However, there was no significant difference in amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding complications. Subgroup analysis showed that cilostazol treatment in patients with femoropopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remained associated with higher primary patency and a lower risk of ISR.

CONCLUSIONS

After EVT of femoropopliteal artery lesions, additional oral cilostazol enhances primary patency, reduces the occurrences of ISR and vessel re-occlusion, diminishes the risks associated with MALEs, lowers the need for repeat revascularization, and increases freedom from TLR rates. However, it does not impact amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, or major bleeding complications. These findings suggest cilostazol as a potentially safe and effective adjunct therapy in patients with femoropopliteal PAD after EVT.

CLINICAL IMPACT

After undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery lesions, the addition of cilostazol to antiplatelet therapy can significantly improve primary patency, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis, repeat revascularization, vessel re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events while increasing freedom from target lesion revascularization rate. The simultaneous use of drug-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery lesions, combined with cilostazol, potentially results in a synergistic anti-stenotic effect. This therapeutic approach does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events or all-cause mortality. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the treatment of anti-stenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions after EVT.

Update on Cilostazol: A Critical Review of Its Antithrombotic and Cardiovascular Actions and Its Clinical Applications

Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, has vasodilating and antiplatelet properties with a low rate of bleeding complications. It has been used over the past 25 years for improving intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Cilostazol also has demonstrated efficacy in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures for both PAD and coronary artery disease. In addition to its antithrombotic and vasodilating actions, cilostazol also inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via phosphodiesterase III inhibition, thus mitigating restenosis. Accumulated evidence has shown that cilostazol, due to its "pleiotropic" effects, is a useful, albeit underutilized, agent for both coronary artery disease and PAD. It is also potentially useful after ischemic stroke and is an alternative in those who are allergic or intolerant to classical antithrombotic agents (eg, aspirin or clopidogrel). These issues are herein reviewed together with the pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of cilostazol. Large studies and meta-analyses are presented and evaluated. Current guidelines are also discussed, and the spectrum of cilostazol's actions and therapeutic applications are illustrated.

Therapeutic Potential of Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Endothelial Dysfunction- Related Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are considered a major health problem worldwide, being the main cause of mortality in developing and developed countries. Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by a decline in nitric oxide production and/or bioavailability, increased oxidative stress, decreased prostacyclin levels, and a reduction of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor is considered an important prognostic indicator of various CVD. Changes in cyclic nucleotides production and/ or signalling, such as guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate (cGMP) and adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate (cAMP), also accompany many vascular disorders that course with altered endothelial function. Phosphodiesterases (PDE) are metallophosphohydrolases that catalyse cAMP and cGMP hydrolysis, thereby terminating the cyclic nucleotide-dependent signalling. The development of drugs that selectively block the activity of specific PDE families remains of great interest to the research, clinical and pharmaceutical industries. In the present review, we will discuss the effects of PDE inhibitors on CVD related to altered endothelial function, such as atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, stroke, aging and cirrhosis. Multiple evidences suggest that PDEs inhibition represents an attractive medical approach for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction-related diseases. Selective PDE inhibitors, especially PDE3 and PDE5 inhibitors are proposed to increase vascular NO levels by increasing antioxidant status or endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activation and to improve the morphological architecture of the endothelial surface. Thereby, selective PDE inhibitors can improve the endothelial function in various CVD, increasing the evidence that these drugs are potential treatment strategies for vascular dysfunction and reinforcing their potential role as an adjuvant in the pharmacotherapy of CVD.

Outcomes with cilostazol after endovascular therapy of peripheral artery disease

The role of cilostazol after endovascular therapy (EVT) of peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis for all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after EVT of PAD from January 2000 through November 2018 with the outcomes of interest including primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation. We included eight studies (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies) with a total of 3846 patients (4713 lesions). During a mean follow-up duration of 12.5 ± 5 months, the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency (OR 2.28, 95% CI (1.77, 2.94), p < 0.001, I² = 24%), lower risk of TLR (OR 0.37, 95% CI (0.26, 0.52), p < 0.001, I² = 0%), and lower risk of major amputation (OR 0.15, 95% CI (0.04, 0.62), p = 0.008, I² = 0%). The use of cilostazol in RCTs was associated with significantly higher odds of primary patency compared with observational studies (OR 3.37 vs 2.28, p-interaction = 0.03). After further subgroup analysis, cilostazol remained associated with higher primary patency regardless of the use of anticoagulants (warfarin) (p-interaction = 0.49). We conclude that the use of cilostazol after EVT of femoropopliteal and iliac lesions is associated with improved primary patency and lower risk of major amputation and TLR. The favorable impact of cilostazol is independent of the use of warfarin. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018092715.

Clinical outcomes of balloon angioplasty alone versus nitinol stent implantation in patients with small femoropopliteal artery disease: Observations from the Retrospective Multicenter Analysis for Femoropopliteal Stenting (REAL-FP)

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess whether balloon angioplasty (BA) alone for small femoropopliteal disease improved the outcome following endovascular therapy as compared with stent implantation.

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy of endovascular therapy for small vessel arteries in femoropopliteal disease remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 337 consecutive patients (371 limbs) with femoropopliteal arteries 4.0 mm or less in diameter and 150 mm or less in length.

RESULTS

Cumulative 3-year incidence of primary patency was significantly higher in the BA group than in the stent group (53.8% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.002). While assisted-primary patency and freedom from any major adverse limb events were also significantly higher in the BA group than in the stent group (70.9% vs. 44.2%, P < 0.001 and 60.6% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.001, respectively), secondary patency did not significantly differ between the two groups (86.9% vs. 86.9%, P = 0.67). Predictors of restenosis were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.31; P = 0.01), no administration of cilostazol (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.07-2.13; P = 0.02), stent implantation (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.41; P = 0.01), and lesion length >75.0 mm(HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.50-2.92; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions in small (<4.0 mm diameter) FP vessels demonstrated better primary patency at 3 years when successfully treated with balloon angioplasty alone as opposed to routine or bailout stenting. This difference was especially pronounced for lesions 75 to 150 mm in length.

Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol: a critical review of the literature

Cilostazol is a unique antiplatelet agent that has been commercially available for over two decades. As a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, it reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation yet also possesses vasodilatory and antiproliferative properties. It has been widely studied in a variety of disease states, including peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention. Overall, cilostazol appears to be a promising agent in the management of these disease states with a bleeding profile comparable to placebo; even when combined with other antiplatelet agents, cilostazol does not appear to increase the rate of bleeding. Despite the possible benefit of cilostazol, its use is limited by tolerability as some patients often report drug discontinuation due to headache, diarrhea, dizziness, or increased heart rate. To date, it has been predominantly studied in the Asian population, making it difficult to extrapolate these results to a more diverse patient population. This paper discusses the evolving role of cilostazol in the treatment of vascular diseases.

Effect of cilostazol on neointimal hyperplasia in iliac arteries of pigs after transluminal angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate whether systemic administration of cilostazol reduces neointimal hyperplasia in iliac arteries of pigs submitted to balloon catheter angioplasty.

METHODS

twenty pigs underwent angioplasty with a 6x40 mm balloon catheter in the right common iliac artery, guided by Doppler ultrasound. The animals were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n=10), which received 50mg cilostazol twice a day, and group 2 (n=10), control. After 30 days, the animals were killed and the iliac arteries prepared for histological analysis. The histological sections were digitized and analyzed by digital morphometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

when comparing the iliac arteries submitted to angioplasty with those not subjected to angioplasty, there was significant neointimal hyperplasia (0.228 versus 0.119 mm2; p=0.0001). In arteries undergoing angioplasty, there was no difference between group 1 (cilostazol) and group 2 (control) as for the lumen area (2.277 versus 2.575 mm2; p=0.08), the tunica intima (0.219 versus 0.237 mm2; p=0.64), the tunica media (2.262 vs. 2.393 mm2; p=0.53) and the neointimal occlusion percentage (8.857 vs. 9.257 %; p=0.82).

CONCLUSION

the use of cilostazol 50mg administered in two daily doses did not reduce neointimal hyperplasia in iliac arteries of pigs submitted to balloon angioplasty catheter.

Levels and values of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, galectin-3, RhoA/ROCK, and endothelial progenitor cells in critical limb ischemia: pharmaco-therapeutic role of cilostazol and clopidogrel combination therapy

Objective

We tested the hypothesis that clopidogrel and cilostazol combination therapy could effectively attenuate systemic inflammatory reaction, facilitate proliferation of circulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC), and improve the clinical outcomes of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in patients unsuitable for surgical revascularization or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

Methods

A total 55 patients (mean age, 72 years; 56% female) were consecutively enrolled. Clopidogrel and cilostazol combination therapy was administered throughout the study period.

Results

As compared with the baseline, circulating endothelial progenitor cell level (as shown by flow cytometry) was significantly increased (p < 0.003), whereas the CLI-related ulcers and painfulness were significantly improved (all p < 0.01) by day 90 after treatment. On the other hand, after clopidogrel and cilostazol combination therapy, galectin-3 level, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ gene expression, and RhoA/ROCK-related protein expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were significantly suppressed (all p < 0.01). Eventually, by day 90, 5 patients (9.1%) died of other etiologies, 3 (5.5%) withdrew from the study, 6 (10.9%) required amputation, and the remaining 41 had satisfactory clinical improvement with complete wound healing in 9 (16.4%) patients.

Conclusion

The results of the present study highlight that clopidogrel and cilostazol combination therapy may be considered to be an alternative method for treating patients with CLI unsuitable for surgical revascularization or PTA.

Succesfull multidisciplinary treatment in a case of Buerger

A 58-year-old male patient had diagnosed with Buerger's disease for 30 years. Patient referred us with non-healing scar on his right thumb. In another center, amputation was suggested due to his non-healing scar. We have assessed the patient multidisciplinary with cardiovascular and plastic reconstructive esthetic surgery for non-healing scar. During the multidisciplinary surgical treatment we applied radial artery endarterectomy, cross finger flap reconstruction, after operation medically we have treated with cilostazol. Patient's scar completely healed. Follow up one year patient have no problem and radial artery in angiography was opened.

Impact of cilostazol on angiographic restenosis after balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether cilostazol reduces restenosis and revascularization after infrapopliteal angioplasty.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February and April 2011, 63 patients (68 limbs, 101 lesions) with critical limb ischemia (CLI) were enrolled. Of these, 32 were cilostazol treated and 31 were the non-cilostazol-treated group. Outcome measures were binary restenosis by angiogram, reocclusion, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb salvage rate and complete wound healing at 3 months.

RESULT

Procedural success was obtained in all patients. The backgrounds and lesion characteristics of patients with isolated tibial artery disease and CLI did not differ significantly between the two groups. In a lesion-based analysis, binary restenosis and reocclusion were significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the non-cilostazol group (56.8% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.015, 20.5% vs. 43.6%; p = 0.015, respectively). The TLR was also significantly lower in the cilostazol group (27.5% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.014). After adjustment for covariables, cilostazol was found to be associated with reduced angiographic restenosis, reocclusion and TLR rates in CLI patients at 3 months after infrapopliteal angioplasty. However, it remained unclear whether cilostazol was also associated with improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Cilostazol may be associated with reduced restenosis, reocclusion and clinically driven TLR at 3 months after infrapopliteal angioplasty.

Combination of cilostazol and clopidogrel attenuates rat critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Procedural failure and untoward clinical outcomes after surgery remain problematic in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. This study tested a clopidogrel-cilostazol combination treatment compared with either treatment alone in attenuating CLI and improving CLI-region blood flow in rats.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 40) were equally divided into five groups: control, CLI induction only, CL I + cilostazol (12.0 mg/day/kg), CLI + clopidogrel (8.0 mg/kg/day) and CLI + combined cilostazol-clopidogrel. After treatment for 21 days, Laser Doppler imaging was performed.

RESULTS

On day 21, the untreated CLI group had the lowest ratio of ischemic/normal blood flow (p < 0.001). Inflammation measured by VCAM-1 protein expression; oxidative stress; PAI-1, MMP-9 and TNF-α mRNA expressions; and immunofluorescence staining (IF) of CD68+ cells was lower with combined treatment than with the other treatments, and lower in the two single-treatment groups than the untreated CLI group (all p < 0.01). Anti-inflammatory mRNA expression of interleukin-10, and eNOS showed a reverse pattern among these groups. Apoptosis measured by Bax, caspase-3 and PARP; and muscle damage measured by cytosolic cytochrome-C, and serum and muscle micro-RNA-206 were all lowest with combination treatment, and the two single-treatment groups showed lower values than the untreated group (all p < 0.001). Angiogenesis measured by eNOS, IF staining of CD31+ and vWF + cells; and number of vessels in CLI region were highest with combination treatment and higher in the single-treatment groups than the untreated group (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Combined cilostazol-clopidogrel therapy is superior to either agent alone in improving ischemia in rodent CLI.

Cilostazol added to aspirin and clopidogrel reduces revascularization without increases in major adverse events in patients with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The effects of cilostazol added to aspirin and clopidogrel (triple antiplatelet therapy: TAT) on clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAT with aspirin and clopidogrel (dual antiplatelet therapy: DAT) in DES patients. Clinical end points were target lesion (TLR) and/or vessel (TVR) revascularization, death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), bleeding, rash, gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, and drug discontinuation. We calculated the pooled estimate based on a fixed-effects model using Peto odds ratio (OR) for rare events. If heterogeneity was observed across an individual RCT, an analysis based on a random-effects model was performed.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3590 patients (TAT:DAT=1800:1790). Up to 24 months, TAT showed a significant reduction in TLR (OR: 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43 to 0.78, p<0.001) and TVR (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.83, p=0.003) compared with DAT. The incidence of death, MI, ST, or overall or major bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups, whereas the proportion of rash (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.52 to 4.10, p<0.001), GI side effects (OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.79 to 5.50, p<0.001), or drug discontinuation (OR: 6.81, 95% CI: 2.12 to 21.86, p<0.001) was higher in TAT than DAT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, TAT was associated with significantly effective outcomes for TLR and TVR without any increase in major adverse events but was associated with tolerance issues compared with DAT after DES implantation.

Use of Cilostazol in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the addition of cilostazol to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients receiving coronary stenting.

DATA SOURCES:

Relevant information was identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-November 2011), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1960-2011), and Cochrane Databases (publications archived until November 2011) using the terms cilostazol, percutaneous coronary intervention, triple therapy, and antiplatelet agents.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

English-language prospective and retrospective studies, including registry data in adults, were eligible for inclusion if triple therapy with cilostazol was compared with DAT with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. Article bibliographies were also reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Cilostazol uniquely possesses antiproliferative properties in addition to its antiplatelet effects. Several prospective and retrospective clinical trials evaluated it as a third agent in standard antiplatelet regimens after PCI with both bare metal and drug-eluting stents. Both angiographic and clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), have been improved with the addition of cilostazol to DAT in most trials, without increasing bleeding risk. Higher-risk patients, such as elderly individuals and patients with diabetes, long lesions, or small vessels, seem to benefit the most from triple therapy. Patients who are poor responders to clopidogrel also appear to benefit from the addition of cilostazol by improving platelet reactivity with standard DAT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Triple therapy with cilostazol has been shown to reduce MACEs by providing increased inhibition of platelet aggregation and reducing the rates of in-stent thrombosis compared to DAT without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. Further studies are needed to identify proper patient selection based on risk factors for the addition of cilostazol. Additionally, studies comparing cilostazol with newer antiplatelet therapies, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, are needed.

Effect of cilostazol in preventing restenosis after carotid artery stenting using the carotid wallstent: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Restenosis after CAS is a postoperative problem, with a reported frequency of approximately 2%-8%. However differences in stent design, procedure, and the antiplatelet agent appear to affect the incidence of restenosis. We assessed the frequency of restenosis and the effect of the antiplatelet agent CLZ in preventing restenosis after CAS by the standard procedure using the CWS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2010 and October 2011, 62 lesions in 60 consecutive patients underwent CAS using the CWS at 4 medical institutions, and all patients were followed clinically and assessed by sonography, 3D-CTA, or angiography at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% stenosis. The incidence of restenosis and the variation in the incidence of restenosis by the difference in type of antiplatelet agent between the CLZ group (n = 30; aspirin, 100 mg, and CLZ, 200 mg) and the non-CLZ group (n = 32; aspirin, 100 mg, and clopidogrel, 75 mg [n = 29]; or ticlopidine, 100 mg [n = 2] or 200 mg [n = 1]) were retrospectively investigated. Two antiplatelet agents were given starting 1 week preoperatively until at least 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Restenosis occurred in 5 patients (8.3%), but all were cases of asymptomatic lesions in the follow-up period. All 5 patients with restenosis were in the non-CLZ group, with no cases of restenosis in the CLZ group; the difference was significant (P = .0239).

CONCLUSIONS

The restenosis rate after CAS by using the CWS was 8.3%. CLZ was associated with significant inhibition of restenosis.

The effectiveness and safety of triple-antiplatelet treatment based on cilostazol for patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

The combination of cilostazol, aspirin, and clopidogrel (triple therapy) after percutaneous coronary intervention has been considered as an alternative therapy. We performed a meta-analysis based on 8 randomized controlled trials with a total of 3332 patients to compare the effectiveness and safety of this triple therapy with traditional dual therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel). Our findings suggested that the triple therapy is more effective than dual therapy in preventing restenosis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.66, P < 0.00001), maintaining minimal lumen diameter (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.20, P < 0.00001), and avoiding target-vessel revascularization (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82, P = 0.001). There is also no significant difference in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 2 therapies, except the smaller occurrence rate of target-lesion revascularization in the triple-therapy group (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.69, P = 0.0005). However, the triple therapy is associated with a higher level of adverse drug events, including rash (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.41-4.23, P = 0.001), gastrointestinal disorders (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.26-5.30, P = 0.009), and drug discontinuation (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 1.59-9.10, P = 0.003), but it has no difference in bleeding compared with the dual therapy (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.71-1.55, P = 0.80).

Use of covered stents in the central vein: a feasibility study in a canine model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of using covered stents vs. bare stents in a model of central vein stenosis with an arteriovenous graft created to mimic the conditions in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

In 7 mongrel dogs, an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol stent was placed in one common iliac vein and a bare stent was placed in the contralateral vein. Arteriovenous grafts were created bilaterally between the common femoral artery and vein to induce endothelial damage. Neointima formation in the covered stents was compared to the bare stents at 12 weeks using microscopy and histochemical staining.

RESULTS

Two dogs were excluded due to thrombosis and infection of the arteriovenous grafts, but all stents in the remaining 5 dogs were patent. Smooth, complete neointimal coverage was observed on the inner surface of all the covered stents without intraluminal thrombus. In contrast, incomplete neointimal coverage was seen in all bare stents, with small focal thrombi adhering to the neointima on 3 bare stents. Focal nodular neointimal hyperplasia with denudation of the endothelium was observed in only 2 bare stents. Mean neointimal thickening was significantly greater in the covered stents. Eccentric neointimal thickening was observed at the inflow and outflow segments of both types of stents.

CONCLUSION

Covered stents are technically feasible for the treatment of central vein stenosis, and they demonstrate complete, smooth neointimal coverage in normal central veins, but they also display greater neointimal thickening than bare stents.

Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy

The techniques and materials used during percutaneous coronary intervention have advanced considerably over the past 3 decades, yet restenosis remains one of the major drawbacks of this procedure. Many innovative technologies, including drug-eluting stents, with or without specific polymers, and fully biodegradable stents have been and continue to be developed in the search for a safe and effective antirestenosis therapy. Remarkable advances in stent design and nanoparticle delivery systems ('nanovehicles') have already fueled revolutionary changes in the prevention and treatment of in-stent restenosis. In this Review we provide an overview of the latest innovations for optimizing outcomes of coronary stenting, and up-to-date information about prevention and treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Triple antiplatelet therapy vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an evidence-based approach to answering a clinical query

AIMS

Outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents (BMS) have not been evaluated separately for specific dual and triple antiplatelet agent use. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether triple antiplatelet therapy (combination of clopidogrel, aspirin and cilostazol) has any advantage in efficacy compared with standard dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Electronic and printed sources were searched till May 2008 for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of cilostazol in combination with aspirin and clopidogrel. Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of four RCTs including 1457 patients with a median follow-up period of 6-9 months were included in the analysis. The rates of major adverse cardiac and/or cerebrovascular events (MACE/MACCE), stent thrombosis and bleeding were not significantly different between triple and dual antiplatelet therapy groups. Pooled analysis showed that cilostazol was associated with significantly decreased incidence of in segment restenosis (ISR) (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38, 0.68; P < 0.00001), increased minimum luminal diameter (MLD) (WMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.10, 0.22; P < 0.00001) for both DES and BMS and also individually. However, the rates of target vessel revascularization (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25, 0.83; P = 0.01 and late lumen loss (pooled WMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.2, 0.07; P = 0.001) were decreased significantly only in the DES group receiving triple therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol appears to be effective in reducing the rates of ISR without any significant benefit for MACE/MACCE.

Addition of cilostazol to aspirin and a thienopyridine for prevention of restenosis after coronary artery stenting: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding cilostazol to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridine) on rates of restenosis after coronary artery stenting. A meta-analysis is conducted of randomized, controlled trials comparing 3 drug regimens (cilostazol, thienopyridine, aspirin [triple therapy]) with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting. A total of 5 studies are included for analysis. The analysis reveals that triple therapy is used in 796 patients, whereas dual therapy is used in 801 patients. Approximately 56% of patients receive a drug-eluting stent. The 6-month restenosis rates are significantly lower with triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy (12.7% vs 21.9%; odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.66; P < .001). This benefit is seen regardless of whether a bare-metal or drug-eluting stent is used. Rates of major adverse cardiac events and bleeding are reported for 3 of the 5 studies (n = 1426); analysis of these outcomes shows no difference between treatment groups (P = .21 and .48, respectively). The addition of cilostazol to standard dual antiplatelet therapy reduces angiographic restenosis and increases MLD at 6 months without significantly affecting rates of major adverse cardiac events or bleeding.

Early combined treatment with cilostazol and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells markedly attenuates pulmonary arterial hypertension in rats

We investigated whether early combined cilostazol and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell (BMDEPC) treatment offers synergistic benefit in ameliorating monocrotaline (MCT)-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10/group) were randomized to receive saline injection only (group 1), MCT (70 mg/kg) (group 2), and MCT plus cilostazol (20 mg/kg/day) (group 3), MCT plus BMDEPCs (2.0 x 10(6) cells) (group 4), and MCT plus combined cilostazol/BMDEPCs (group 5). Intravenous BMDEPCs and oral cilostazol were given on day 3 after MCT administration. By day 42, connexin43 protein expression in right ventricle (RV) was reduced in group 2 compared with other groups and also was decreased in groups 3 and 4 compared with groups 1 and 5 (all p < 0.05). In addition, mRNA expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-9, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and caspase-3 were higher, whereas Bcl-2 and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase were lower in lung and RV in group 2 compared with the other groups (all p < 0.05). The number of alveolar sacs and lung arterioles was lower in group 2 than in other groups and lower in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5 (all p < 0.05). RV systolic pressure (RVSP) and weight were increased in group 2 compared with the other groups (all p < 0.0001). Moreover, RVSP and RV-to-left ventricle plus septum weight ratio were higher in groups 3 and 4 than in groups 1 and 5 (p < 0.001) but showed no difference between groups 1 and 5. In conclusion, early combined autologous BMDEPC/cilostazol treatment is superior to BMDEPC or cilostazol only for preventing MCT-induced PAH.

Efficacy of cilostazol after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease in patients with intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cilostazol reduces restenosis and revascularization after endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

Cilostazol improves walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication and reduces restenosis after coronary intervention, but its efficacy remains unclear after EVT for femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

This study was performed as a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. Eighty patients (mean age 70.7 +/- 6.2 years, 84% men) with intermittent claudication due to a femoropopliteal lesion were randomly assigned to receive or not receive cilostazol in addition to aspirin. The primary end point was freedom from target vessel revascularization, and the secondary end points were the rate of restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and leg amputation.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up information was obtained in all patients. Patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Stenting was performed in 36 patients (cilostazol, 16; control, 20; p = 0.36). Freedom from target vessel revascularization at 2 years after EVT was significantly higher compared with the control group (84.6% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.04). The rate of restenosis was lower in the cilostazol group (43.6% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.02), and freedom from target lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events was higher in the cilostazol group (87.2% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.046, 76.8% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.006, respectively). There was no major bleeding in either group during follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol reduced restenosis and repeat revascularization after EVT in patients with intermittent claudication due to femoropopliteal disease.

Cilostazol therapy attenuates monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in rat model

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance caused by a proliferation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, resulting in occlusion of the lumen of small pulmonary arteries. Cilostazol, with its antiproliferative effects on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, may ameliorate monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH in rats.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Male Sprague - Dawley rats (n=10/each group) were randomized to receive MCT (75 mg/kg) only (group 1), MCT plus cilostazol (20 mg .kg(-1 ). day(-1)) (group 2) and saline injection only (group 3). Hemodynamic measurement on day 28 following MCT treatment indicated the development of significant PAH on MCT-treated groups (p<0.0001). Cilostazol was given to group 2 orally on days 28-90. By day 90 following MCT treatment, the right ventricular (RV) systolic blood pressure and RV hypertrophy were significantly higher in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (all values of p<0.01). Additionally, connexin43 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expressions of lung and RV, and Bcl-2 protein expression of RV, were significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (all values of p<0.01). Furthermore, the number of alveolar sac and small arterioles of the lung were significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (all values of p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Cilostazol therapy effectively attenuates of MCT-induced PAH.

Effects of cilostazol and k-134 on reconstructive surgery using prosthetic grafts in the abdominal aorta of beagle dogs

Problems associated with prosthetic graft replacement are stenosis at the anastomosis site and thrombus formation on the inner surface. Cilostazol is known to have antiplatelet activity and inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima thickening. A cilostazol derivative, (-)-6-[3-[3-cyclopropyl-3-[(1R,2R)-2-hydroxycyclohexyl]ureido]-propoxy]-2-(1H)-quinolinone (K-134), has more potent anti-platelet activity and anti-neointimal thickening activity than cilostazol in the in-vitro platelet aggregation and in-vivo anti-hyperplastic activity assay. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of cilostazol and K-134 on thrombus formation and neointimal thickening at the site of prosthetic graft replacement. Beagle dogs underwent infrarenal abdominal aortic resection with straight Dacron graft replacement, which were allocated to the control, cilostazol, and K-134 groups. Two dogs were dead without confirming the cause of death. After 6 months, all dogs were necropsied. All prosthetic grafts were patent in each group. Ratios of red thrombus to prosthetic graft area were 0.3+/-6.4%, and 3.3+/-4.5% in the cilostazol and K-134 groups, respectively, which were significant different from that in the control group (24.4+/-16.8%). However, no clear difference was seen among the 3 groups with respect to neointimal thickness (control group, 0.70+/-0.13 mm; cilostazol group, 0.59+/-0.14 mm; K-134 group, 0.67+/-0.14 mm). Cilostazol and K-134 significantly inhibited thrombus formation on the inner surface of the prosthetic graft at 6 months after graft replacement. Neointimal thickening on the inner surface was slight even in control-group animals, and the effects of cilostazol and K-134 on such thickening were unclear.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials appraising the impact of cilostazol after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but may pose a risk of thrombosis. Cilostazol, an oral antiplatelet agent with pleiotropic effects including inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, could hold the promise of preventing both restenosis and thrombosis. We systematically reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the angiographic and clinical impact of cilostazol after PCI.

METHODS

We searched RCT in BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, and PubMed (November 2007). Coprimary end points were binary angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization, abstracted and pooled by means of random-effect relative risks (RRs). Small study/publication bias was appraised with multiple methods.

RESULTS

A total of 23 RCTs were included (5428 patients), with median follow-up of 6 months. Pooled analysis showed that cilostazol was associated with statistically significant reductions in binary angiographic restenosis (RR = 0.60 [0.49-0.73], P < .001) and repeat revascularization (RR = 0.69 [0.55-0.86], P = .001). Cilostazol appeared also safe, with no significant increase in the risk of stent thrombosis (RR = 1.35 [0.71-2.57], P = .36) or bleeding (RR = 0.71 [0.43-1.16], P = .17). However, small study bias was evident for both binary restenosis (P < .001) and repeat revascularization (P < .001), suggesting that at least part of the apparent benefits of cilostazol could be due to this type of confounding effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol appears effective and safe in reducing the risk of restenosis and repeat revascularization after PCI, but available evidence is limited by small study effects. Awaiting larger RCTs, this inexpensive treatment can be envisaged in selected patients in which drug-eluting stents are contraindicated or when there is a need for neointimal hyperplasia inhibition.

Effect of cilostazol on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after coronary artery stenting: a quantative coronary angiography and volumetric intravascular ultrasound study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of cilostazol on the prevention of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia as measured by both quantitative coronary angiography (CAG) and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (39 men, age 62 years) undergoing elective coronary stenting were randomly assigned to receive aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine (Group I, n=28, 30 lesions) or aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine plus cilostazol (Group II, n=31, 35 lesions). CAG and IVUS were performed and repeated at 6 months to assess the primary endpoints of minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and in-stent neointimal hyperplasia volume. Follow-up CAG was performed on all patients and follow-up IVUS study was available for 50 lesions in 48 patients (24 lesions in Group I, 26 in Group II). There were no significant differences in the baseline angiographic data between the 2 groups. At 6 months follow-up, in-stent MLD was 1.90+/-0.76 mm in Group I and 2.41+/-0.85 mm in Group II (p=0.006). Volumetric IVUS at 6 months demonstrated that in-stent intimal hyperplasia volume per stent length was 2.2+/-1.4 mm3/mm in Group I and 1.0+/-0.5 mm3/mm in Group II (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol seems to be more effective at preventing in-stent neointimal hyperplasia than a dual antiplatelet regimen.

improved patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: the efficacy of cilostazol for the prevention of pseudointimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of oral administration of cilostazol to inhibit pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models.

METHODS

Successful TIPS creation was carried out in 11 of 12 healthy young pigs (20-25 kg). In the treatment group (n = 6), both cilostazol and aspirin were administered daily, from the first day of TIPS creation. The control group (n = 5) was administered only aspirin. The animals were followed-up for 2 weeks and then killed. The specimen (including portal vein, hepatic parenchymal tract, hepatic vein, and inferior vena cava) and stents were carefully bisected in a longitudinal fashion. The control group was compared with the treatment group by means of a gross and histologic evaluation of the degree of pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in the shunt.

RESULTS

At the gross evaluation, the control group showed considerably more pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia than the treatment group. Using microscopic evaluation, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean maximum pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia thickness between the control group (2.97 +/- 0.33 mm) and treatment group (0.73 +/- 0.27 mm).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of cilostazol may have been effective in reducing pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models.

Comparison of triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation (from the DECLARE-Long trial)

To evaluate the impact of cilostazol on neointimal hyperplasia after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for long coronary lesions, we performed a randomized multicenter prospective study comparing triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; triple group, n = 250) and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel; standard group, n = 250) for 6 months in patients with long lesions (> or =25 mm) requiring a long DES (> or =32 mm). The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 6-month angiography. The 2 groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. In-stent late loss (0.22 +/- 0.48 mm vs 0.32 +/- 0.51 mm, p = 0.031) and in-segment late loss (0.34 +/- 0.49 mm vs 0.51 +/- 0.49 mm, p = 0.001) at 6-month follow-up angiography were significantly lower in the triple group versus the standard group. There was a trend toward lower rates of in-segment restenosis in the triple group versus the standard group (6.7% vs 11.2%, p = 0.104). Target lesion revascularization (TLR; 2.8% vs 6.8%, p = 0.036) and major adverse cardiac events (2.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.016), including death, myocardial infarction, and TLR at 9 months were significantly lower in the triple group than in the standard group. At 9 months, the 2 groups had similar rates of stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 0.4%, p = 0.999), death (0% vs 0.8%, p = 0.499), and myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.4%, p = 0.999). In conclusion, cilostazol significantly reduced late loss at 6 months after DES implantation and the occurrence of TLR and major adverse cardiac events in patients with long coronary lesions.

Cilostazol reduces target lesion revascularization after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is being widely used for the treatment of stenosis of peripheral arteries, the high in-stent restenosis rate (50-60%) in the femoropopliteal artery still remains an unsolved issue. Cilostazol is a unique antiplatelet drug that has vasodilatory effects and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 141 consecutive patients scheduled for PTA in the femoropopliteal artery between September 1999 and April 2004 were retrospectively analyzed for the use of cilostazol. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as repeated PTA in patients who had a recurrence of symptoms with diameter stenosis >50% by angiography. Patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the cilostazol (+) and cilostazol (-) groups. Use of other medications was similar between the groups, except for ticlopidine, which was more frequently used in the cilostazol (-) than in the cilostazol (+) group (15% vs 61%, p<0.01). TLR was significantly reduced in the cilostazol (+) group (12% [8/68] vs 32% [23/73], p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was retrospective and nonrandomized, the results suggest that cilostazol reduces TLR after PTA in the femoropopliteal artery.

RACTS: a prospective randomized antiplatelet trial of cilostazol versus ticlopidine in patients undergoing coronary stenting: long-term clinical and angiographic outcome

We compared the efficacy of cilostazol for the prevention of late restenosis and acute or subacute stent thrombosis with that of ticlopidine. Cilostazol has been used for antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation, but the results are controversial. Patients scheduled for stent implantation were randomly assigned to receive either cilostazol (100 mg twice daily for 6 months, n=201) or ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily for 1 month, n=196). All patients also received oral aspirin (100 mg once daily for 6 months). Coronary angiography was performed at baseline and immediately and 6 months after coronary stenting. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 9 months postprocedure. There was no significant difference in the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis between the 2 groups [cilostazol (1.5%) versus ticlopidine (3.6%), P=0.216], but the target lesion revascularization rate per patient was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group (22.9% vs 32.7%, P=0.030) 9 months post-coronary stenting. Medication withdrawn because of drug-related side effects tended to be higher in the ticlopidine group than that in the cilostazol group (3.5% vs 8.2%, P=0.054). At follow-up angiography, the minimal luminal diameters (2.31+/-1.06 vs 2.10+/-1.16, P=0.057) tended to be larger and the restenosis rates lower (23.3% vs 30.9%, P=0.086) in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group. Aspirin plus cilostazol is a comparable antithrombotic regimen to aspirin plus ticlopidine after elective coronary stenting, but the rate of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group.

Coronary Stent Restenosis in Patients Treated With Cilostazol

Background— Restenosis after implantation of coronary artery stents remains a significant clinical problem. We undertook a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether cilostazol, a drug that suppresses intimal proliferation, would reduce renarrowing in patients after stent implantation in native coronary arteries.

Methods and Results— We assigned 705 patients who had successful coronary stent implantation to receive, in addition to aspirin, cilostazol 100 mg BID or placebo for 6 months; clopidogrel 75 mg daily was administered to all patients for 30 days. Restenosis was determined by quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months. The minimal luminal diameter at 6 months for cilostazol-treated patients was 1.77 mm for the analysis segment (stent plus 5-mm borders) compared with 1.62 mm in the placebo group ( P =0.01). Restenosis, defined as ≥50% narrowing, occurred in 22.0% of patients in the cilostazol group and in 34.5% of the placebo group ( P =0.002), a 36% relative risk reduction. Restenosis was significantly lower in cilostazol-treated diabetics (17.7% versus 37.7%, P =0.01) and in those with small vessels (23.6% versus 35.2%, P =0.02), long lesions (29.9% versus 46.6%, P =0.04), and left anterior descending coronary artery site (19.3% versus 39.8%, P =0.001). There was no difference in bleeding, rehospitalization, target-vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or death.

Conclusions— Treatment with the drug cilostazol resulted in a significantly larger minimal luminal diameter and a significantly lower binary restenosis rate compared with placebo-treated patients. These favorable effects were apparent in patients at high risk for restenosis.

Effects of Cilostazol on Human Venous Smooth Muscle

In this study, we evaluated the effect of therapeutic doses of cilostazol on human venous smooth muscle. Saphenous vein rings (two to four per patient sample) were suspended in tissue baths for isometric tension recordings. At the beginning of the experiment, optimal tension for isometric contraction was achieved for each ring in a stepwise fashion in the presence of norepinephrine (10(-2) M). Norepinepherine was then added cumulatively in half-molar increments and isometric tension developed by the rings was measured, thereby obtaining a dose-response curve. Following washout and reequilibration, the rings were precontracted with a 30-50% submaximal dose of norepinepherine determined from the dose-response curve and allowed to contract until a stable plateau was reached. Cilostazol was then added in a cumulative manner (680-2,720 microg/L), and the tension generated was recorded. A total of 76 venous rings were tested, and all relaxed in the presence of cilostazol. The amount of relaxation increased as the concentration of cilostazol increased. Relaxation of 15 +/- 1.9% (mean +/- SEM) at low cilostazol doses (680 microg/L) to 37+/-3% at high cilostazol doses (2,720 microg/L) was demonstrated. A second finding of this study was demonstrated when the patient samples were divided according to the presence or absence of risk factors for arteriosclerosis. The specific risk factors examined included diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. The presence or absence of hypertension (n = 52) or hypercholesterolemia (n = 18) did not affect the amount of relaxation of the venous rings. Smokers (n = 46) had less relaxation 16 +/- 2.4% (680 microg/L) to 41 +/- 3.6% (2,720 microg/L) compared to nonsmokers (n = 53) who relaxed 22 +/- 3.5% (680 microg/L) to 48 +/- 5.7% (2720 microg/L). This did not reach statistical significance at any concentration cilostazol (p = 0.11-0.18). Diabetics (n = 53) did have statistically significantly less relaxation at every concentration of cilostazol compared to nondiabetics (n = 11, p < 0.05). All venous rings relaxed in the presence of cilostazol. Veins of nondiabetics relaxed statistically significantly more than those of diabetics. Smokers had less relaxation than non-smokers, but this was not statistically significant. We are the first to demonstrate that human venous smooth muscle cells undergo relaxation when exposed to therapeutic concentrations of cilostazol.

The Arterial Folding Point During Flexion of the Hip Joint

PURPOSE

Endovascular stents placed in periarticular vessels may be at a greater risk of neointimal hyperplasia and eventual occlusion than those placed in non-periarticular vessels. The purpose of this study was to investigate the location of maximal conformational change along the iliac and femoral artery, the folding point, during flexion of the hip joint and its location relative to the hip joint and the inguinal ligament.

METHODS

Seventy patients undergoing femoral artery catheterization were evaluated. The patients were 47 men and 23 women and ranged in age from 26 to 75 years (mean 54 years). The arteries (right:left=34:36) were measured using a marked catheter for sizing vessels. Fluoroscopic images were obtained in anteroposterior and lateral projections in neutral position, and in the lateral projection in flexed position of the hip joint. The folding point was determined by comparing the lateral projection images in the neutral and flexed positions. The distance from the acetabular roof to the folding point and the distance from the inguinal ligament to the folding point was evaluated.

RESULTS

The folding point was located 42.8 +/- 28.6 mm cranial to the acetabular roof and 35.1 +/- 30.1 mm cranial to the inguinal ligament. As the patient's age increased, the folding point was located more cranially (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The folding point during flexion of the hip joint was located 42.8 +/- 28.6 mm cranial to the acetabular roof and 35.1 +/- 30.1 mm cranial to the inguinal ligament. As the patient's age increased, the folding point was located more cranially. When a stent is inserted over this region, more attention may be needed during follow-up to monitor possible occlusion and stent failure.

Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter, cilostazol for RESTenosis (CREST) trial

Restenosis of a segment of diseased coronary artery following metallic stenting is a common clinical problem and a major limitation of the procedure. Systemic pharmacologic interventions to deal with this problem have met with little success. Several small studies suggest that cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor whose pharmacologic properties include antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and vasodilatory effects; a beneficial effect on serum lipids; and in vitro inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, may help prevent platelet aggregation and impede the accumulation of new intimal tissue in the stented artery. The Cilostazol for RESTenosis (CREST) trial will aim to evaluate more definitively the ability of cilostazol to prevent restenosis following uncomplicated stent implantation for de novo coronary artery stenosis. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 700 patients will receive clopidogrel, aspirin, and either cilostazol or placebo after successful intracoronary stent implantation. The primary endpoint is minimal luminal diameter (MLD) of the first lesion stented after 6 months; secondary endpoints include MLD in all lesions, mean percent diameter stenosis, target lesion revascularization, and major angiographic endpoints. Safety endpoints are abnormal complete blood count and liver function tests at 1, 3, and 6 months. The trial has been initiated, and enrollment is anticipated to be concluded in 2003. Cilostazol has properties that may reduce or avert in-stent coronary restenosis. The CREST trial is a large, rigorously conducted trial that may corroborate the favorable effects of cilostazol on coronary stent restenosis suggested by earlier studies.

Antiplatelet therapy in peripheral arterial disease. Consensus statement

OBJECTIVES

Antiplatelet agents are commonly prescribed to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and graft occlusion in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The objective was to summarise current evidence and provide recommendations on the use of antiplatelet agents in PAD.

METHODS

A consensus group was assembled including 20 specialists from a variety of fields involved in the management of patients with PAD. Data was circulated in a systematic manner prior to a main consensus meeting held in November 2001. The document subsequently produced was circulated within the group to ensure agreement in the interpretation and presentation of its findings.

RESULTS

Consensus recommendations are provided in 7 common or contentious scenarios in PAD. The recommendations are graded to reflect the evidence available and interpretations of the group. Although the document provides recommendations, it is stressed that they must be interpreted in the light of individual patient circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet agents have an important role in the management of patient with PAD. Although this document provides consensus recommendations, the optimum treatment in many scenarios remains unclear due to a lack of focussed clinical trials in PAD.

Potential emerging therapeutic strategies to prevent restenosis in the peripheral vasculature

Despite the availability of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies, recent advances in catheter and stent technology and improved operator skill, restenosis remains the most frequent problem associated with percutaneous and surgical revascularization interventions for both coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Prevention of restenosis in the coronary vasculature has been demonstrated with cilostazol, trapidil, probucol, tranilast, nitric oxide donors, and clopidogrel. Given the similarities in revascularization procedures and in the pathophysiology of restenosis, it is possible that these results may be extrapolated to the setting of restenosis in the peripheral vasculature, making trials with these agents imperative. Several new agents have shown promising preliminary results for the prevention of restenosis in the peripheral vasculature, including cilostazol, low-molecular-weight heparins, and elastase. Several nonpharmacologic treatment modalities are also under study to prevent peripheral and coronary restenosis and have shown favorable initial results. These include endovascular radiation brachytherapy, arterial gene therapy, photoangioplasty, and several novel treatment delivery systems.

Cilostazol (pletal): a dual inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 3 and adenosine uptake

Cilostazol (Pletal), a quinolinone derivative, has been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of symptoms of intermittent claudication (IC) since 1999 and for related indications since 1988 in Japan and other Asian countries. The vasodilatory and antiplatelet actions of cilostazol are due mainly to the inhibition of phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and subsequent elevation of intracellular cAMP levels. Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated that cilostazol also possesses the ability to inhibit adenosine uptake, a property that may distinguish it from other PDE3 inhibitors, such as milrinone. Elevation of interstitial and circulating adenosine levels by cilostazol has been found to potentiate the cAMP-elevating effect of PDE3 inhibition in platelets and smooth muscle, thereby augmenting antiplatelet and vasodilatory effects of the drug. In contrast, elevation of interstitial adenosine by cilostazol in the heart has been shown to reduce increases in cAMP caused by the PDE3-inhibitory action of cilostazol, thus attenuating the cardiotonic effects. Cilostazol has also been reported to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and has been demonstrated in a clinical study to favorably alter plasma lipids: to decrease triglyceride and to increase HDL-cholesterol levels. One, or a combination of several of these effects may contribute to the clinical benefits and safety of this drug in IC and other disease conditions secondary to atherosclerosis. In eight double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials, cilostazol significantly increased maximal walking distance, or absolute claudication distance on a treadmill. In addition, cilostazol improved quality of life indices as assessed by patient questionnaire. One large randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter competitor trial demonstrated the superiority of cilostazol over pentoxifylline, the only other drug approved for IC. Cilostazol has been generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events being headache, diarrhea, abnormal stools and dizziness. Studies involving off-label use of cilostazol for prevention of coronary thrombosis/restenosis and stroke recurrence have also recently been reported.

Endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with intermittent claudication

Intermittent claudication (IC), the most common symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), most often results from flow-reducing lesions in the arteries of the lower extremity that cause exercise-induced muscle ischemia. Intermittent claudication has a significant impact on quality of life and calls attention to PAD, which is secondary to systemic atherosclerosis and a major marker for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Most IC patients improve with a regimen that includes aggressive risk-factor modification, exercise, platelet inhibition, and pharmacotherapy to improve walking distance. Selected patients may require endovascular or surgical intervention if it can be offered with low risk. Endovascular procedures, most often percutaneous balloon angioplasty with or without stenting, are recommended for short-segment stenotic lesions in the aortoiliac and infrainguinal arterial segments. Combined platelet inhibition and endoluminal radiation are under study and may be useful to improve long-term outcome with these procedures. Percutaneous hemostatic puncture closure devices can also be used to reduce bleeding complications and allow more aggressive and immediate antithrombotic therapy, further improving results. Operative revascularization is recommended for patients with long-segment and multisegment disease, especially if obstruction is present. Aortofemoral reconstruction is associated with a low operative mortality and an 80% to 85% 5-year patency rate. Iliac reconstruction is recommended for isolated unilateral iliac arterial disease. Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction is associated with a 60% to 80% 5-year patency rate, with better outcomes noted for autogenous conduits than for prosthetic devices. Mechanical modification and pharmacotherapy with platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants improve long-term patency.

Effect of cilostazol on restenosis after coronary angioplasty and stenting in comparison to conventional coronary artery stenting with ticlopidine

BACKGROUND

The role of antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine plus aspirin in the prevention of subacute thrombosis after coronary artery stenting has been established. However, restenosis remains a major limitation in coronary artery stenting.

METHODS

To compare the effect of cilostazol on restenosis after coronary angioplasty and stenting with that of ticlopidine after coronary artery stenting, 213 patients with 230 lesions who underwent successful coronary interventions were evaluated. Optimal results (residual stenosis less than 30%) were obtained by balloon angioplasty in 112 lesions, 64 lesions were treated with aspirin 81 mg/day (balloon-aspirin group) and 48 lesions with cilostazol 200 mg/day and aspirin 81 mg/day (balloon-cilostazol group). Stent implantation was performed in the remaining 118 lesions; 55 lesions were treated with ticlopidine 200 mg/day and aspirin 243 mg/day (stent-ticlopidine group) and 63 lesions with cilostazol 200 mg/day and aspirin 81 mg/day (stent-cilostazol group). Concomitant medications were continued for 4 to 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

No adverse events including acute occlusion and subacute thrombosis occurred in any groups. Although immediate gain and minimal lumen diameter immediately after angioplasty were significantly larger in stent groups than those in balloon groups, net gain at follow-up was significantly larger in cilostazol groups (1.54+/-0.83 mm in balloon-cilostazol group and 1.65+/-0.78 mm in stent-cilostazol group) than other groups (1.02+/-0.81 mm in balloon-aspirin group and 1.21+/-0.70 in stent-ticlopidine group) as a result of significantly lower late loss and loss index in cilostazol groups. The restenosis rate was significantly lower in cilostazol groups (12.5% in balloon-cilostazol group and 14.3% in stent-cilostazol group) than other groups (43.8% in balloon-aspirin group and 32.7% in stent-ticlopidine group). The rate of recurrent angina was significantly lower in cilostazol groups (4.3% in balloon-cilostazol group and 1.9% in stent-cilostazol group) than in other groups (17.5% in balloon-aspirin group and 14.0% in stent-ticlopidine groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Both optimal balloon angioplasty with cilostazol and coronary artery stenting with cilostazol have a potential to reduce restenosis compared with optimal balloon angioplasty with aspirin or conventional coronary artery stenting with ticlopidine plus aspirin.

Inhibitors of platelet signal transduction as anti-aggregatory drugs

In the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases, inhibition of platelet aggregation is of fundamental importance. Inhibition of platelet aggregation can be achieved by either inhibition of membrane receptors or by interception of signalling pathways. While receptor antagonism provides high specificity, the inhibition of platelet signal transduction is more effective. The effectiveness results from the inhibition of platelets, regardless of the cause of activation. These common pathway inhibitors are either intercepting platelet activating mechanisms or amplifying the action of endogenous platelet inhibitors. The physiological anti-aggregants are the endothelial factors NO and prostacyclin, which elevate intracellular cGMP or cAMP content, respectively. By administration of NO-releasing agents, prostacyclin analogues or other cyclic nucleotide elevating drugs the platelet anti-aggregatory action of endothelial factors can be effectively mimicked. Besides antiplatelet activity these drugs also act on vascular smooth muscle causing relaxation and therefore vasodilation, an additional beneficial effect. Inhibition of phosphodiesterases causes elevation of platelet cyclic nucleotide content and thus inhibits platelet aggregation and causes vasodilation. Another relevant target for anti-aggregatory treatment is the arachidonic acid metabolic pathway. This pathway can be intercepted by blockade of either cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) or thromboxane synthase. Inhibition of these enzymes may be further amplified by additional antagonism of the thromboxane receptor thus not only preventing formation of thromboxane but also activation of thromboxane receptor by thromboxane precursors, which were particularly effective in clinical trials. In vivo these precursors may be metabolised to prostacyclin in the endothelium and consequently provide additional platelet anti-aggregatory activity. A rather new target for platelet anti-aggregatory treatment is the ecto-nucleotidase CD-39 which limits the plasma level of nucleotides. While several of the novel anti-aggregatory drugs were disappointing in clinical studies combinations of drugs with different effector enzymes showed potent antithrombotic efficacy.

Effects of cilostazol on late lumen loss and repeat revascularization after Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Cilostazol is an antiplatelet agent that increases the intracellular concentration of cyclic adenosine monophosphate by inhibiting phosphodiesterase III; it has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia in animal balloon injury models.

METHODS

One hundred thirty patients who underwent elective stenting (Palmaz-Schatz stent) were randomly assigned to cilostazol treatment 200 mg/d (n = 65) or to ticlopidine treatment 200 mg/d (n = 65). Angiographic follow-up was performed at 6 months, and clinical follow-up was continued up to 1 year.

RESULTS

One sudden death and one myocardial infarction resulting from subacute occlusion were observed in the ticlopidine group. Drug adverse effects were observed in 3 patients in the cilostazol group, as opposed to 6 patients in the ticlopidine group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 56 patients (61 lesions) in the cilostazol group and 58 patients (58 lesions) in the ticlopidine group were assessed with quantitative coronary angiography. Late loss in the cilostazol group was smaller (0.58+/-0.52 mm vs. 1.09+/-0.65 mm, P<.0001) than in the ticlopidine group. The restenosis rate was lower in the cilostazol group than in the ticlopidine group (16% vs. 33%, P = .044). The target vessel revascularization rate at 1 year was 23% in the cilostazol group and 42% in the ticlopidine group (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that cilostazol may be a safe medication that is effective in preventing restenosis after stent implantation.