Synergistic effects of combined converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on blood pressure in conscious telemetered spontaneously hypertensive rats

Oral administration of soluble guanylate cyclase agonists to rats results in osteoclastic bone resorption and remodeling with new bone formation in the appendicular and axial skeleton

Orally administered small molecule agonists of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) induced increased numbers of osteoclasts, multifocal bone resorption, increased porosity, and new bone formation in the appendicular and axial skeleton of Sprague-Dawley rats. Similar histopathological bone changes were observed in both young (7- to 9-week-old) and aged (42- to 46-week-old) rats when dosed by oral gavage with 3 different heme-dependent sGC agonist (sGCa) compounds or 1 structurally distinct heme-independent sGCa compound. In a 7-day time course study in 7- to 9-week-old rats, bone changes were observed as early as 2 to 3 days following once daily compound administration. Bone changes were mostly reversed following a 14-day recovery period, with complete reversal after 35 days. The mechanism responsible for the bone changes was investigated in the thyroparathyroidectomized rat model that creates a low state of bone modeling and remodeling due to deprivation of thyroid hormone, calcitonin (CT), and parathyroid hormone (PTH). The sGCa compounds tested increased both bone resorption and formation, thereby increasing bone remodeling independent of calciotropic hormones PTH and CT. Based on these studies, we conclude that the bone changes in rats were likely caused by increased sGC activity.

Handle region peptide counteracts the beneficial effects of the Renin inhibitor aliskiren in spontaneously hypertensive rats

To investigate whether the putative (pro)renin receptor blocker, the handle region peptide (HRP), exerts effects on top of the blood pressure-lowering and cardioprotective effects of the renin inhibitor aliskiren, spontaneously hypertensive rats were implanted with telemetry transmitters to monitor heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a 2-week recovery period, vehicle, aliskiren, HRP (100 and 1 mg/kg per day, respectively), and HRP+aliskiren were infused for 3 weeks using osmotic minipumps. Subsequently, the heart was removed to study coronary function according to Langendorff. Baseline MAP and heart rate in vehicle-treated rats were 146±3 mm Hg and 326±4 bpm. HRP did not affect MAP, whereas aliskiren and HRP+aliskiren lowered MAP (by maximally 29±2 and 20±1 mm Hg, respectively) without affecting heart rate. Aliskiren significantly reduced MAP throughout the 3-week infusion period, whereas the blood pressure-lowering effect of HRP+aliskiren returned to baseline within 2 weeks of treatment. In comparison with vehicle, aliskiren increased the endothelium-dependent response to bradykinin and decreased the response to angiotensin II in the coronary circulation, whereas these responses were not altered after treatment with HRP or HRP+aliskiren. HRP did not alter plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin levels, or the renal angiotensin content, either alone or on top of aliskiren, nor did it alter the aliskiren-induced decrease in renal Ang II type 1 receptor expression. Yet, it did reverse the aliskiren-induced reduction in cardiomyocyte area, without affecting this area when given alone. In conclusion, HRP counteracts the beneficial effects of aliskiren on blood pressure, coronary function, and cardiac hypertrophy in an angiotensin-independent manner.

Beneficial cardiac effects of the renin inhibitor aliskiren in spontaneously hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND

The blood pressure-lowering effect of the renin inhibitor aliskiren equals that of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers. Whether aliskiren offers end-organ protection remains to be investigated. Here, we compared the cardiac effects of aliskiren, the AT1 receptor blocker irbesartan and the ACE inhibitor captopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) at equi-hypotensive doses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SHR were treated for 1-3 weeks with vehicle, aliskiren, captopril or irbesartan (100, 3 and 15 mg/kg per day, respectively) using an osmotic minipump, and compared to vehicle-treated Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) controls. All drugs lowered (but not normalized) mean arterial pressure in SHR equi-effectively, as monitored by radiotelemetry, without altering heart rate. All drugs also reduced the increased cardiomyocyte area in SHR, and tended to normalize the elevated brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels. In the Langendorff set-up, all drugs normalized the diminished endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to bradykinin in SHR. Moreover, aliskiren and irbesartan, but not captopril, decreased the enhanced coronary Ang II response in SHR. Aliskiren reduced plasma renin activity and the plasma and tissue angiotensin levels at 1 week of treatment; yet, after 3 weeks of aliskiren treatment only the cardiac angiotensin levels remained suppressed, whereas no tissue angiotensin reductions were seen with captopril or irbesartan.

CONCLUSION

For a given decrease in blood pressure, aliskiren improves coronary endothelial function and decreases cardiac hypertrophy in SHR to at least the same degree as ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade. In addition, aliskiren diminishes the enhanced Ang II response in the coronary circulation of SHR and offers superior long-term cardiac angiotensin suppression.

Renin inhibition with aliskiren: where are we now, and where are we going?

With the development of aliskiren, blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at the level of the interaction of renin with a substrate has become a clinical reality. This review covers the specific features of the first agent likely to achieve widespread clinical exposure, aliskiren. The potential of renin inhibition must be viewed in the context of the remarkable efficacy of both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The implications of blockade of the renin system at its rate-limiting step are reviewed, with the therapeutic implications for both the renin inhibitor employed alone or the renin inhibitor combined with an ACE inhibitor or ARB. The relevant and necessary studies are ongoing.

Preventing end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients - dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (Part II)

Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of diabetes related morbidity and mortality. The first part of the current review was published in the last issue of this journal and discussed the important role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in diabetic nephropathy and the genetic influence on development of endstage renal disease (ESRD) in diabetic patients. This second part of the review focus on the potential improvement of the current treatment strategy to slow down the loss of kidney function using dual blockade of the RAS with both ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Substantial evidence from short-term studies using surrogate endpoints indicates a beneficial impact of dual blockade of the RAS, not obtainable with single agent blockade alone, both in diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease. This conclusion has been confirmed and extended in a longterm trial with regard to prevention of ESRD in non-diabetic renal disease. Results indicate that dual blockade of the RAS may further slow down, but not arrest progressive loss of renal function. However, studies defining the optimal dose of ACE-I / ARBs without additional adverse effects are essential to ensure relevant comparison with dual blockade therapy. Trials using primary renal endpoints in diabetic nephropathy are still needed, and will finally establish the role of dual blockade of the RAS in a clinical setting.

Aliskiren, a novel, orally effective renin inhibitor, lowers blood pressure in marmosets and spontaneously hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVES

Aliskiren is a new renin inhibitor of a novel structural class that has recently been shown to be efficacious in hypertensive patients after once-daily oral dosing. We report the results of animal experiments performed in marmosets and rats in order to characterize aliskiren before its recent investigation in humans.

METHODS

The effects of aliskiren were investigated in sodium-depleted marmosets (oral dosing) and in spontaneously hypertensive rats (dosing via subcutaneous osmotic minipumps). Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were measured by radiotelemetry.

RESULTS

In sodium-depleted marmosets, single oral doses of aliskiren (1-30 mg/kg) dose-dependently lowered BP. At a dose of 3 mg/kg, peak effects were observed 1 h after dosing (-30 +/- 4 mmHg, n = 6) and the response persisted for more than 12 h. A single oral dose of 3 mg/kg aliskiren was more effective than the same dose of either remikiren or zankiren, two orally active renin inhibitors previously tested in humans. Aliskiren (10 mg/kg) was at least as effective as equal doses of the AT1-receptor blocker valsartan or the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril. In spontaneously hypertensive rats, aliskiren dose-dependently (10-100 mg/kg per day) decreased BP. Aliskiren also potentiated the antihypertensive effects of low doses of valsartan or benazeprilat (1 or 3 mg/kg per day).

CONCLUSIONS

Aliskiren is an orally effective, long-lasting renin inhibitor that shows antihypertensive efficacy in animals superior to previous renin inhibitors and at least equivalent to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1-receptor blockers. Aliskiren may therefore represent an effective, novel approach to the treatment of hypertension and related disorders, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents.

Comparison of antihypertensive effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium antagonist and a diuretic in patients with hypertension not controlled by angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the additional antihypertensive effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and a diuretic in patients whose hypertension is not controlled by full-dose angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Individuals with an ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) that was not controlled by valsartan 160 mg once daily were allocated randomly to two groups: those in group A (n = 35) were assigned randomly to treatment with benazepril 20 mg once daily or chlorthalidone 12.5 mg once daily, whereas patients in group B (n = 29) were assigned randomly to benazepril 20 mg once daily or amlodipine 5 mg once daily. All individuals continued to receive background valsartan 160 mg once daily. After 5 weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative valsartan-based combination treatment of each group for a second 5-week period. Twenty-four-hour ABP monitoring was performed before the random allocation to groups and at the end of each randomized combination pharmacotherapy period.

RESULTS

Sixty-four individuals completed the study: 32 men and 32 women (mean +/- SD age 48.2 +/- 7.9 years, average 24-h ABP on valsartan monotherapy 143.4 +/- 12.6/87.7 +/- 7.8 mmHg). Significant additional antihypertensive effects on the average 24-h ABP were obtained with benazepril (8.6 +/- 8.8/6.3 +/- 6.7 mmHg), amlodipine (15.2 +/- 12.9/9.9 +/- 6.8 mmHg) and chlorthalidone (13.5 +/- 11.6/9.5 +/- 7.7 mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all additional antihypertensive effects). The additional effects of amlodipine and chlorthalidone added to valsartan were approximately 6/3.5 mmHg (P < 0.05) greater than that of benazepril.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients in whom hypertension was not controlled by full-dose ARB monotherapy, a diuretic, a calcium antagonist or an ACE inhibitor provided significant additional antihypertensive effect. The antihypertensive effects of the ARB-diuretic and the ARB-calcium antagonist combinations were superior to that of the ARB-ACE inhibitor combination.

Combined blockade of AT1-receptors and ACE synergistically potentiates antihypertensive effects in SHR

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN

To check whether antihypertensive effects are additive or synergistic upon blockade of both angiotensin (AT1)-receptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were treated with candesartan-cilexetil (0.1-30 mg/kg per day), ramipril (0.03-10 mg/kg per day), the calcium-antagonist mibefradil (1-150 mg/kg per day) or combinations thereof. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), left ventricular weight (LVW) and the cardiac activity/mRNA levels of ACE were determined.

RESULTS

SBP was decreased by candesartan-cilexetil [inhibitory concentration (IC50) (mg/kg): 2.47], ramipril (1.97), mibefradil (4.41), candesartan-cilexetil/ramipril (0.68), and candesartan-cilexetil/mibefradil (5.68). Combining candesartan-cilexetil with ramipril increased SBP reduction synergistically rather than additively, since the dose-response curve was shifted 6.6-fold leftwards compared to a hypothetically generated additive curve, calculated by summing up the doses and corresponding effects of the ramipril and candesartan-cilexetil monotreatment regimes. A total threshold dose < 5.14 mg/kg (derived from dose-response curves) was found to exert synergistic effects when candesartan-cilexetil was combined with ramipril. Antihypertensive effects of mibefradil can not be increased when combined with candesartan-cilexetil. When LVW was correlated with SBP reduction, regression lines of candesartan-cilexetil, ramipril and their combination were congruent, while that for mibefradil was significantly flatter and became steeper under candesartan-cilexetil co-administration. Cardiac ACE activity was greatly reduced by ramipril independently of SBP reduction and dosage. With SBP-ineffective doses of ramipril, cardiac ACE mRNA levels were doubled, indicating a positive feedback mechanism. The increase in ACE mRNA was renormalized when SPB-effective ramipril doses were applied, suggesting a blood pressure-dependent regulation of cardiac ACE expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Since synergy was observed only after combining low doses of ramipril and candesartan-cilexetil, prospective clinical trials should be performed on a low-dose combination, revealing the antihypertensive/antiproliferative benefits.

Haemodynamic effects of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in spontaneously hypertensive rats: influence of salt

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the adverse renal effects induced by dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the role of salt therein.

METHODS

The effects of enalapril, losartan and their combination on blood pressure, renal haemodynamics, renal function and RAS were investigated over a wide range of doses in spontaneously hypertensive rats fed either a low-sodium or a high-sodium diet.

RESULTS

In rats fed the low-sodium diet, the losartan-enalapril combination induced the same dose-dependent haemodynamic and hormonal changes as did three- to 10-fold greater doses of enalapril or losartan alone. When a strong decrease (> 50%) in blood pressure was achieved (with 10 mg/kg enalapril plus 10 mg/kg losartan, 100 mg/kg enalapril or 100 mg/kg losartan), a massive renal vasoplegia occurred and renal insufficiency developed. In addition, because of the huge release of renin, angiotensinogen concentrations were reduced, leading to a decrease in intrarenal angiotensins. In rats fed the high-sodium diet, those treated with the enalapril 30 mg/kg plus losartan 30 mg/kg combination, despite complete functional RAS blockade, exhibited smaller decreases in blood pressure and renal resistance, lesser release of renin and angiotensinogen consumption, and a normal renal function. These effects were similar to those produced by 100 mg/kg of enalapril or losartan in rats fed the high-salt diet, or by 10 mg/kg of enalapril or of losartan in rats fed the low-salt diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual RAS blockade could be either beneficial, when sodium intake is unrestricted, or dangerous, when sodium intake is restricted.

Novel Dual Action AT1 and ETA Receptor Antagonists Reduce Blood Pressure in Experimental Hypertension

Angiotensin II and endothelin-1 activate their respective AT(1) and ET(A) receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells, producing vasoconstriction, and both peptides are implicated in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Angiotensin II potentiates the production of endothelin, and conversely endothelin augments the synthesis of angiotensin II. Both AT(1) and ET(A) receptor antagonists lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients; thus, a combination AT(1)/ET(A) receptor antagonist may have greater efficacy and broader utility compared with each drug alone. By rational drug design a biphenyl ET(A) receptor blocker was modified to acquire AT(1) receptor antagonism. These compounds (C and D) decreased Sar-Ile-Angiotensin II binding to AT(1) receptors and endothelin-1 binding to ET(A) receptors, and compound C inhibited angiotensin II- and endothelin-1-mediated Ca(2+) transients. In rats compounds C and D reduced blood pressure elevations caused by intravenous infusion of angiotensin II or big endothelin-1. Compound C decreased blood pressure in Na(+)-depleted spontaneously hypertensive rats and in rats with mineralocorticoid hypertension. Compound D was more efficacious than AT(1) receptor antagonists at reducing blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats, and its superiority was likely due to its partial blockade of ET(A) receptors. Therefore compounds C and D are novel agents for treating a broad spectrum of patients with essential hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Dual renin???angiotensin system blockade restores blood pressure???renin dependency in individuals with low renin concentrations

BACKGROUND

The prevailing sodium intake and renin-angiotensin system status influence the blood pressure response to an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist or an angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor, which is known to be reinforced by a low sodium intake or administration of a diuretic.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possibility that combining both drugs might be more effective in conditions of high sodium intake than blocking the renin-angiotensin system in a single step.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study in 12 normotensive volunteers who received a high sodium chloride intake (more than 250 mmol/day for 6 days), the haemodynamic and renin effects of a single oral dose of irbesartan 150 mg combined with fosinopril 20 mg were compared with those of a usual daily dose of fosinopril (20 mg) and a high dose of irbesartan (300 mg).

RESULTS

The changes in blood pressure induced by fosinopril and irbesartan alone were not different from those of placebo, whereas the combination significantly decreased blood pressure. Simultaneously, it increased plasma active renin and prorenin concentrations to a greater extent than did each single-site blocker.

CONCLUSION

In low-renin conditions, combined renin-angiotensin system blockade enables the demonstration of a persistent renin-dependency of the blood pressure. Through its more efficient blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, demonstrated by the increase in renin and prorenin, combined renin-angiotensin system blockade is more effective than doubling the usual dose of an AT1 receptor antagonist. This may offer an alternative strategy for treating patients with a range of renin concentrations, and may potentially increase the cardio- and nephrotective benefits through a more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system.

Cardiovascular status following combined angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptor inhibition in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats

1. Combined treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with AT1 receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been shown to reduce mean arterial pressure (MAP) more than monotherapy with either agent. The aims of the present study were to investigate the effects of chronic dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition using non-hypotensive doses of the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan cilexetil and the ACE inhibitor perindopril on cardiovascular function and structure. 2. Adult male SHR, aged 15 weeks, were divided into four groups: (i) candesartan cilexetil (0.5 mg/kg per day in drinking water); (ii) perindopril (0.3 mg/kg per day in drinking water); (iii) combined treatment (dual RAS inhibition); or (iv) the appropriate vehicle (0.1% ethanol/0.1% polyethylene glycol/1.5 mmol/l sodium bicarbonate dissolved in water for candesartan cilexetil; distilled water for perindopril). Systolic blood pressure was measured weekly using the tail-cuff method and urinary microalbuminuria was measured fortnightly. 3. After 4 weeks, rats were instrumented for intravenous drug administration and measurement of MAP. At this time, the cardiovascular effects of angiotensin (Ang) I and AngII (5-20 ng) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and acetylcholine (ACh; 1-5 micro g) were assessed. In addition, left ventricular : bodyweight and media : lumen ratios were determined as indices of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy, respectively. 4. Candesartan cilexetil and perindopril alone had minimal effect on MAP when measured both directly and indirectly, whereas direct MAP was significantly decreased in the combined treatment group (131 +/- 6 mmHg; P < 0.05) compared with the vehicle group (156 +/- 9 mmHg). Pressor responses to AngI were significantly decreased in all groups compared with the vehicle-treated group and pressor responses to AngII were significantly decreased in the candesartan cilexetil-treated (P < 0.01) and combined treatment groups (P < 0.01) compared with the vehicle-treated group. Depressor responses to ACh and SNP were not significantly affected by any of the antihypertensive therapies compared with vehicle-treated SHR. 5. Vascular hypertrophy was significantly decreased in the candesartan cilexetil and combined groups compared with the vehicle-treated group, whereas cardiac hypertrophy was reduced, with the rank order of effect being: dual RAS inhibition > perindopril > candesartan cilexetil. Urinary albumin tended to decrease with dual RAS inhibition, but was not significantly affected by this short-term treatment. 6. These results demonstrate the efficacy of low-dose dual RAS inhibition as an antihypertensive modality, at least in SHR, not only in reducing arterial pressure, but also in improving cardiovascular structure.

Renoprotective effects of valsartan and enalapril in STZ-induced diabetes in rats

Effects of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist valsartan and the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril were studied in streptozotocine (STZ)-induced diabetes in rats on the basis of microalbuminuria (Ma) and renal morphology. Five groups of Wistar rats were used, one group was the non-diabetic control, one group consisted of untreated STZ-diabetics and 3 groups of STZ-diabetics were treated with either enalapril and/or valsartan for 30 days. Blood glucose (BG) and Ma levels, body and kidney weight and glomerular size were measured. Immunohistochemical staining with an anti-transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) antibody was performed as well. In STZ-diabetics, BG and Ma levels were significantly increased when compared with the non-diabetic group. Although Ma levels in the valsartan-treated group was found to be higher than those in the non-diabetics group after 15 days of treatment, in all treated diabetic groups Ma levels were significantly decreased as compared with STZ-diabetics at the end of the experiment. Thickening of the glomerular and tubular basement membranes, increased mesangial matrix and glomerular size were found in the untreated diabetic group. All these changes were less in the treated groups. A significant increase in TGF-beta1 immunoreactivity was found in glomeruli of untreated STZ-diabetics as compared with non-diabetics. Again, TGF-beta1 expression was decreased in the treated groups as compared with untreated STZ-diabetics. We conclude that valsartan and enalapril have renoprotective effects in diabetic nephropathy. A combined therapy has an advantage because lower dosages of these drugs can be used. Their beneficial effects are related to a blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and a decrease in TGF-beta1 expression in glomeruli.

Role of endothelial adenosine receptor-mediated vasorelaxation in ethanol-induced hypotension in hypertensive rats

Our previous findings showed that chronic ethanol feeding lowers blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. The present study investigated the role of the adenosine receptor-endothelial nitric oxide (NO) pathway in the hypotensive response to ethanol. Changes in blood pressure were evaluated in radiotelemetered pair-fed rats receiving liquid diet with or without ethanol (2.5% or 5%, w/v) for 12 weeks. The vasorelaxant activity of the adenosine analogue 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) in isolated aortic rings obtained from ethanol and control rats were evaluated. Ethanol (2.5% and 5%) lowered blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. The hypotension started at week 1, reached its maximum at week 4 and remained so thereafter. In aortas with intact endothelium, NECA (10(-10) to 10(-4) M) produced a concentration-dependent relaxation of the phenylephrine-precontracted aortas. Compared with control rats, ethanol (2.5% and 5%) caused significant and concentration-related increases in NECA responses. This effect of ethanol was attenuated by the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-sulfophenyltheophylline and the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). Further, endothelium denudation abolished the ethanol-evoked enhancement of NECA responses. The vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside in aortic rings were not influenced by ethanol. In conclusion, the present findings suggest that chronic ethanol enhances the NO-dependent vasorelaxant responses to adenosine receptor activation and this may explain, at least partly, the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of ethanol in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism in rats with chronic renal failure

The current study was undertaken to compare the organ protective effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, temocapril, with those of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, CS-866 (olmesartan medoxomil), alone or combined, in the remnant kidney model of rats. Eight-week-old spontaneously hypertensive male rats were subjected to five-sixths nephrectomy. At the age of 10 weeks, the rats were randomly allocated to groups that received two doses of CS-866 (CS-L, 3 mg/kg/day; CS-H, 10 mg/kg/day), temocapril (TEM, 10 mg/kg/day), CS-866 (3 mg/kg/day) plus temocapril (10 mg/kg/day), or a vehicle alone (untreated control group). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urinary protein excretion (UprotV) were measured every 2 weeks. When the rats were 18 weeks old, biochemical measurement and histologic examination were performed. All the drug treatments significantly reduced SBP, UprotV, glomerular sclerosis index (GSI), relative interstitial volume (RIV), and heart weight. The hypotensive effects were on the order of combination therapy > CS-H = TEM > CS-L. Correlational analysis was based on the values for SBP and UprotV derived from the average of values obtained when the rats were 12 to 18 weeks of age. UprotV, GSI, and RIV were found to be highly correlated with SBP among the individual rats pooled from all the groups, and the correlation was maintained among the group means. A similar correlation was found between heart weight and SBP. The results suggest that the organ protective effects of temocapril, CS-866, and combination therapy are closely related to the magnitude of their antihypertensive effects.

Interaction of ACE inhibitors and AT(1)-receptor blockers on maximum blood pressure response in spontaneous hypertensive rats

This study in spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) was designed to determine whether a greater fall in blood pressure (BP) could be achieved with the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and an AT(1)-receptor blocking drug than with higher doses of either drug alone. The peak effect of captopril occurred 3 4 hours post-dose and a plateau response was achieved with 10 mg/kg. The peak effect of losartan occurred 7 8 hours post-dose and a plateau response was achieved with 10 mg/kg. Increasing the dose of either drug caused no greater fall in BP, but increased the duration of the effect. Captopril, 10 mg/kg, administered with losartan 10 mg/kg caused a greater fall in BP than captopril or losartan, 20 mg/kg. This was present after acute doses or after one week of daily therapy. The combination of ACE-I and AT(1)-blocking drugs is more effective than either therapy alone and may be a useful combination to manage hypertension and/or cardiac failure.

Combination antihypertensive therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease and is often associated with other macrovascular complications such as ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (AIIR) have both been shown to have a protective effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy and have thus become the first choice for treatment of hypertension and/or renal involvement in patients with diabetes. However, most of these patients, especially those with type 2 diabetes, require two of more medications in order to reduce their blood pressure to the levels, which have been proposed in recently published consensus papers. These target blood pressure levels are 130/80 mm Hg in diabetic subjects with proteinuria of up to 1 g/day and 125/75 mm Hg in those with proteinuria in excess of 1 g/day. Combinations of different medications may have a synergistic effect. Some of the early studies using a combination of either a nondihydropyridine or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with ACE-I demonstrated a synergistic effect on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. However, these studies have not been substantiated, but calcium channel blockers, with their proven ability to reduce blood pressure, play an important role in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. The combination of ACE-I with AIIR may have several theoretical advantages. Many studies using this combination have been performed in animal models of diabetes and in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Some of these studies have demonstrated a synergistic effect of the combination on proteinuria or hypertension, but the results have not been consistent in all studies. It may be concluded that, until additional studies provide more convincing evidence, this combination could be used in patients whose proteinuria or hypertension has not responded to either one of the agents as monotherapy or to a combination of other medications.

Effects of combined administration of ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor antagonist are prevented by a high NaCl intake

BACKGROUND

To prevent the action of angiotensin II by blockade with either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE I) or an angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARA) is difficult due to the physiological compensations. Combined therapy with both drugs may enable complete blockade, and in rats in high doses this has produced a syndrome that results in death.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of combined blockade using losartan (10 mg/kg per day) and perindopril (6 mg/kg per day) on blood pressure, cardiac growth, renal function and behaviour, and to determine how this is influenced by different salt intakes in normotensive Sprague Dawley rats.

METHODS

Rats were fed an 0.2 or 4% NaCl diet and received the above drugs intraperitoneally. Blood pressure was measured by telemetry. Cardiac weight was measured after 10 days of therapy. Renal function was assessed by plasma creatinine and electrolytes, plasma renin and angiotensinogen concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

On 0.2% NaCl intake, combined blockade lowered blood pressure progressively; at day 7, rats on 0.2% NaCl developed a syndrome of listlessness and failure to eat which led to loss of weight and death. Cardiac size was dramatically reduced. Plasma creatinine was elevated to 50% above normal. There was a polyuria. The syndrome was reversed by adding NaCl to the drinking water or prevented in rats on a 4% NaCl intake. In rats on 0.2% NaCl plasma renin rose dramatically with medication and angiotensinogen became depleted. Haematocrit in all groups of rats did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Combined blockade of the renin-angiotensin system can cause death in rats on a reduced NaCl intake. This was prevented by a high salt intake. The syndrome may result from depletion of angiotensinogen and the failure to synthesize sufficient angiotensin II that may be critical for normal cardiac growth and function and critical for survival.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade prevents lethal malignant hypertension: relation to kidney inflammation

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II is elevated in malignant hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade can prevent the development of malignant hypertension even in the absence of a blood pressure-lowering effect.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two-kidney, 1-clip rats were followed up for 28 days; blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography and intra-arterially. After a 2-week run-in phase, rats received valsartan at a dose of 0.3 (n=14) or 3 (n=12) mg. kg(-1). d(-1) or solvent (n=27). Only the higher dose of valsartan, but not the lower dose, decreased blood pressure. Both doses of valsartan prevented the development of lethal malignant hypertension. Twenty of 27 solvent-treated renovascular hypertensive rats died, but only 3 of 14 rats treated with the low dose and 1 of 12 rats treated with the high dose of valsartan died. Histological signs of malignant nephrosclerosis were found in all rats examined that had died throughout the study and in 6 of 7 surviving solvent-treated renovascular hypertensive animals. Increased expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and prominent interstitial influx of macrophages occurred in the nonclipped kidneys exposed to high pressure in solvent-treated rats. These alterations were prevented by valsartan at both doses, irrespective of blood pressure effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade by valsartan prevents lethal malignant hypertension independently of blood pressure. The results suggest that reduction of angiotensin-induced inflammation in the kidney may contribute to the protective effects of valsartan.

Combined angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockade and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition on survival and cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure in rats

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) and angiotensin II AT(1)-receptor blockade are effective at improving survival and limiting cardiac remodeling in the rat model of postischemic heart failure. Whether their combination yields additive/synergistic effects is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Rats underwent coronary artery ligation and 7 days later were treated orally for 9 months with placebo (controls), 5 mg/kg valsartan, 1 mg/kg enalapril (doses submaximally effective at reducing mortality in the experimental model used), or 5 mg/kg valsartan and 1 mg/kg enalapril combined. Compared with controls, valsartan, enalapril, and their combination decreased mortality by 40% (P =.006), 21% (P =.065), and 33% (P =.032), respectively, but there was no significant difference between the 3 treatments. At the doses used, valsartan, but neither enalapril nor the combination, slightly limited cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis development and reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure as assessed in the surviving animals at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In experimental chronic heart failure in rats, valsartan reduces mortality similar to other AT(1)-receptor blockers and a combination of AT(1)-receptor blockade (valsartan) and ACEI (enalapril) at submaximal doses does not exert additive/synergistic beneficial effects on mortality.

Persistent cardiovascular effects of chronic renin-angiotensin system inhibition following withdrawal in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVES

It is generally accepted that short-term (4 weeks) inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) of young spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) in their prehypertensive phase confers long-lasting protection from fully hypertensive levels in adulthood. However, there is very little data pertaining to the effects of such treatment in adult SHR with established hypertension. Therefore, we determined the relative effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition (perindopril), AT1 receptor blockade (candesartan cilexetil) and RAS-independent vasodilatation (hydralazine) and their withdrawal in adult SHR, on blood pressure measured by radiotelemetry, as well as on cardiac and vascular structure.

METHODS

Adult male SHR were instrumented with radiotelemetry probes to measure blood pressure and heart rate continuously. SHR were given either vehicle, perindopril (1 mg/kg per day), candesartan cilexetil (2 mg/ kg per day) or hydralazine (30 mg/kg per day) at equieffective depressor doses for 4 weeks (treatment study). Separate groups of animals were also given identical treatments but were then monitored for a further 8 weeks after drug withdrawal (withdrawal study). An indirect in-vivo assessment of whole body vascular hypertrophy (mean arterial pressure during maximum vasoconstriction) was made during and after drug withdrawal, as was the pressor activity evoked by angiotensin I and angiotensin II. The effect of antihypertensive treatment on microalbuminuria was also assessed during and after drug withdrawal. Finally, left ventricular: body weight (Iv: bw) and mesenteric media: lumen ratios were determined either immediately after 4-week treatment (treatment study) or 8 weeks later (withdrawal study).

RESULTS

Perindopril persistently lowered blood pressure in adult SHR whereas blood pressure returned to vehicle levels within approximately 4 and 15 days after withdrawal of hydralazine and candesartan cilexetil, respectively. Cardiac hypertrophy was reduced by all three treatments, but to a lesser extent by hydralazine (treatment study), and this regression of cardiac hypertrophy persisted only with both types of RAS inhibition (withdrawal study). Vascular hypertrophy, measured indirectly and directly, was also reduced by all three treatments, with perindopril and candesartan cilexetil causing hypotrophic and eutrophic remodelling, respectively (treatment study), although these changes were generally not maintained after drug withdrawal (withdrawal study). Angiotensin I-induced pressor responses were equally inhibited during treatment with either candesaran cilexetil or perindopril (and were unaffected by hydralazine) but normalized rapidly in both groups (within approximately 2-4 days) after withdrawal of RAS inhibition. In addition, there was a small age-related increase in microalbuminuria over the study period, which was not significantly affected by any treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Following 4-week treatment, candesartan cilexetil, perindopril and hydralazine caused similar antihypertensive effects; however, only perindopril persistently reduced blood pressure following drug withdrawal. Both types of RAS inhibition and hydralazine caused marked cardiac and vascular remodelling during treatment, whereas only the RAS inhibitors persistently regressed cardiac hypertrophy 8 weeks later. Collectively, these results indicate the importance of the RAS for the maintenance of hypertension and cardiovascular hypertrophy in adult SHR, as well as identifying differential effects of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade on persistent blood pressure reduction.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition potentiates angiotensin II type 1 receptor effects on renal bradykinin and cGMP

Angiotensin (Ang) receptor blockers (ARBs) increase bradykinin (BK) by antagonizing Ang II at its type 1 (AT(1)) receptors and diverting Ang II to its counterregulatory type 2 (AT(2)) receptors. Because the effect of ARBs on BK is constrained by the short half-life of BK and because ACE inhibitors block the degradation of BK, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that an ACE inhibitor can potentiate ARB-induced increases in renal interstitial fluid (RIF) BK levels. We used a microdialysis technique to recover BK and cGMP in vivo from the RIF of sodium-depleted, conscious Sprague-Dawley rats infused for 60 minutes with the AT(1) receptor blocker valsartan (0.17 mg/kg per minute), with the active metabolite of the ACE inhibitor benazepril (benazeprilate, 0.05 mg/kg per minute), or with the specific AT(2) receptor blocker PD 123,319 (50 microg/kg per minute) alone or combined. Each animal served as its own control. RIF BK and cGMP levels increased significantly over 1 hour in response to valsartan, benazeprilate, or both but not to a vehicle control (P<0.01). The combined benazeprilate-valsartan effect was greater than the sum of their individual effects, suggesting potentiation rather than addition, and was abolished by PD 123,319. We demonstrate for the first time that an ACE inhibitor (benazepril) and an ARB (valsartan) potentiate each other, and we postulate that such combinations may be beneficial in clinical states marked by Ang II elevation, such as chronic heart failure, postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction, and hypertension.

Effects of ACE inhibitor, AT1 antagonist, and combined treatment in mice with heart failure

We tested the hypothesis that a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (AT1-ant) may have an additive cardioprotective effect in mice with heart failure (HF), because these two agents could have other mechanisms of action besides interrupting the renin-angiotensin system. ACEi prevent degradation of bradykinin. During treatment with AT1-ant, increased angiotensin II could activate AT2 receptors, with an antitrophic effect. To test this hypothesis, we used a mouse model of HF induced by myocardial infarction. Seven days after surgery, mice were divided into six groups and treated for 23 weeks: (a) sham ligation; (b) HF-vehicle; (c) HF-ACEi; (d) HF-AT1-ant; (e) HF-ACEi + AT1-ant (half dose of each); and (f) HF-ACEi + AT1-ant (full dose of each). Cardiac function was evaluated in conscious mice during the treatment period. The HF-vehicle group showed significantly decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), shortening fraction (SF), and cardiac output (CO) and increased LV dimensions, interstitial collagen, and myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA) compared with controls. Treatment with ACEi or AT1-ant significantly increased EF, SF, and CO and decreased LV dimensions and MCSA in mice with HF. However, a combination of these drugs did not improve cardiac function more than ACEi or AT1-ant alone. We concluded that ACEi and AT1-ant have similar cardioprotective effects and may reach maximal effect when given individually; thus no further improvement can be achieved with combined therapy in mice with HF.

Pilot study of combined blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in essential hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Additive hemodynamic effects of combined blockade of the renin-angiotensin system by an angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II antagonist have been observed in sodium-depleted normotensive volunteers and in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the same additive hemodynamic effects occur in patients with hypertension and to verify the safety of such an approach.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, pilot study.

PATIENTS

177 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 95-115 mmHg after a 4-week placebo run-in period] were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Combination therapy consisting of 50 mg losartan daily and 10 mg enalapril daily was administered for 6 weeks. The effects of this therapeutic regimen was compared with similar groups of patients who received either 50 mg losartan daily or 10 mg enalapril daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

24-hour ambulatory mean DBP and clinic DBP measured at trough after 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

24-hour ambulatory mean DBP did not significantly differ between treatment groups although the combination tended to lower BP more. The combination therapy was more effective on clinic DBP measured at trough than was losartan by 3.2 mmHg [confidence interval (95%, CI) 0.7-5.7 mmHg, P = 0.012], and more effective than enalapril by 4.0 mmHg (95% CI, 1.5-6.4 mmHg, P = 0.002). In a subgroup of 28 patients, higher plasma active renin and angiotensin I levels during blockade by the combination therapy were observed. This finding confirmed that the combination of the two agents inhibited the renin-angiotensin system to a greater extent than did either agent alone.

CONCLUSION

A combination of 10 mg enalapril daily and 50 mg losartan daily safely induces a supplementary, although modest, fall in clinic DBP in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Additive hypotensive effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin-receptor antagonism in essential hypertension

The study was designed to assess the antihypertensive effect of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonism in patients with essential hypertension. Twenty patients with uncontrolled ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (BP) after 6 weeks of ACE inhibitor monotherapy (benazepril, 20 mg, o.d.) were randomized to receive double-blind valsartan, 80 mg, o.d. (AT1 antagonist) or matching placebo for 5 weeks while continuing to receive background benazepril. Then patients crossed over to the alternative regimen for a second 5-week period. The 24-h ambulatory BP was monitored on the final day of the benazepril monotherapy period and on the final day of each double-blind treatment period. Valsartan added to benazepril produced a significant antihypertensive effect with a benefit over placebo of 6.5 +/- 12.6/4.5 +/- 8.0 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) for average awake ambulatory BP (p < 0.05), 7.1 +/- 9.4/5.6 +/- 6.5 mm Hg for asleep BP (p < 0.01), and 6.8 +/- 9.7/4.9 +/- 6.8 mm Hg for average 24-h ambulatory BP (p < 0.01). Pulse rate was unaffected. Plasma active renin was higher on the benazepril-valsartan combination compared with benazepril-placebo (p < 0.05). There was no change in routine biochemical variables when valsartan was added to benazepril. Six patients reported mild dizziness or fatigue (three also with placebo). These data suggest that in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with an ACE inhibitor, the addition of an AT1 antagonist provides a powerful and safe antihypertensive drug combination.

Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure

The level of inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) provided by standard doses of ACE inhibitors may only be partial during long-term treatment in patients with severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Partial ACE inhibition with time is often referred to as escape from ACE inhibition and labeled ACE escape. Several lines of evidence suggest that ACE escape occurs in patients with severe CHF. Plasma levels of angiotensin II rise above initial values during long-term ACE inhibition, and the effects of ACE inhibitors on cardiac remodeling and lowering of sympathetic nervous system activity attenuate after 1 year of treatment. Moreover, angiotensin II type I receptor blockade (ARB) produces clinical and hemodynamic benefits in patients with CHF who are already receiving ACE inhibitors. The therapeutic implications of ACE escape include evaluation of higher- than-standard doses of ACE inhibitors and routine addition of ARB to ACE inhibition in patients with severe CHF. Data are reviewed to demonstrate that ACE escape reflects inadequate ACE dosage rather than a decrease in ACE inhibition occurring with time.

Cardiovascular effects of combination of perindopril, candesartan, and amlodipine in hypertensive rats

The combination therapy with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists, or calcium channel antagonists may exert more beneficial effects on cardiovascular diseases than monotherapy. Perindopril, candesartan cilexetil, or amlodipine alone or the combination of low doses of each agent was administered orally to stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) for 4 weeks to compare the hypotensive or cardiovascular effects. Although perindopril (2 mg/kg), candesartan cilexetil (2 mg/kg), or amlodipine (3 mg/kg) alone caused comparable hypotensive effects in SHRSP, monotherapy with perindopril or candesartan decreased left ventricular (LV) weight; mRNA levels for atrial natriuretic factor, skeletal alpha-actin, and collagen types I and III; and aortic weight and platelet-derived growth factor-beta receptor tyrosine phosphorylation to a greater extent than monotherapy with amlodipine. Although monotherapy with a low dose (0.2 mg/kg) of perindopril or candesartan cilexetil did not significantly reduce the LV mRNA levels and aortic platelet-derived growth factor-beta receptor phosphorylation of the SHRSP, combination therapy at such a low dose normalized these parameters more potently than the use of amlodipine (3 mg/kg) alone. Although perindopril or candesartan cilexetil alone at 0.05 mg/kg did not decrease the blood pressure of the SHRSP, such a low dose of combination therapy decreased LV weight and atrial natriuretic factor mRNA levels of the SHRSP to a greater extent than amlodipine alone or amlodipine combined with perindopril or candesartan cilexetil. Our results provide evidence that suggests the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an AT(1) receptor antagonist may be more effective in the treatment of cardiac and vascular diseases than the combination of a calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor or an AT(1) receptor antagonist or monotherapy with each agent.

Ovariectomy alters the chronic hemodynamic and sympathetic effects of ethanol in radiotelemetered female rats

This study determined the chronic hemodynamic effects of ethanol in telemetered freely moving female Sprague-Dawley rats. The role of ovarian hormones and sympathetic activity in the modulation of ethanol responses was also investigated. Changes in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and plasma estrogen and norepinephrine (NE, as index of sympathetic activity) were evaluated in pair-fed sham-operated (SO) and ovariectomized (OVX) rats receiving liquid diet with or without ethanol (5%, w/v) for 12 weeks. OVX caused a significant increase (about 40 g) in body weight, compared with the sham operation, which was apparent after two weeks and remained so for the duration of the study. The body weight showed gradual and similar increases in both ethanol and control groups. Ethanol feeding had no effect on the plasma estrogen level in SO or OVX rats. Daily ethanol intake was significantly (P < 0.05) less in OVX compared with SO rats whereas the blood ethanol concentration were similar in the two groups except for a significantly (P < 0.05) higher level in OVX rats at weeks 8, 10, and 11. Ethanol feeding caused significant (P < 0.05) decreases in BP in SO rats that started at week land reached maximal response (approximately 10 mmHg) at week 6 and remained at that level till the end of week 12. In OVX rats, ethanol had no effect on BPduring the first 5 weeks of the study. A slight but significant reduction in BP (about 5 mmHg) by ethanol in OVX rats started to appear at week 6 and remained for the following 5 weeks. The reduced hypotensive effect of ethanol in OVX rats was associated with an increase in the sympathetic activity as indicated by the significant (P < 0.05) increases in plasma NE levels. This sympathoexcitatory effect of ethanol was not demonstrated in SO rats. The HR was not affected by ethanol in the two groups of rats except for significant (P < 0.05) increases at weeks 1 through 3 in SO rats. The present findings suggest that the ovarian hormones modulate, at least partly, the hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of chronic ethanol feeding in female rats. Ethanol lowers BP in female rats and this effect was delayed and diminished in OVX rats due possibly to the associated increase in sympathetic activity.

Does blockade of angiotensin II receptors offer clinical benefits over inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme?

Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists represent a new class of drugs for the treatment of hypertension. They are specific for the renin-angiotensin system, selective for the angiotensin AT1 receptor, and act independently of the angiotensin II synthetic pathway. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system at the receptor level should therefore be more complete. The high circulating levels of angiotensin II following angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade could be beneficial in stimulating other unblocked angiotensin receptors, especially the AT2 receptor. It has been proposed that the angiotensin AT2 receptor, which is re-expressed or up-regulated during pathological circumstances, counterbalances the effect of the stimulation of the angiotensin AT1 receptor. Through this mechanism, angiotensin AT1 antagonists may be superior to ACE inhibitors in cardiac and vascular remodelling as well as in kidney insufficiency. Long-term trials are required to demonstrate the possible clinical superiority of this new class of antihypertensive agents.