Pelvic fractures in pregnant multiple trauma patients

Incidence of fracture hospitalization and surgery during pregnancy in Finland-1998-2017: a retrospective register-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of all major fractures and surgery during pregnancy and the outcomes of pregnancy in Finland between 1998 and 2017.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using nationwide data from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care and the Finnish Medical Birth Register. As participants we included all women aged between 15 and 49 years from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2017 and their ≥ 22-week pregnancies.

RESULTS

Of a total 629,911 pregnancies, 1813 pregnant women were hospitalized with a fracture diagnosis, yielding an incidence of 247 fractures/100,000 pregnancy-years. Of these, 24% (n = 513/2098) were treated operatively. The most common fractures were fractures of the tibia, ankle, and the forearm, which made up half of all fractures. The incidence of pelvic fractures was 6.8/100,000 pregnancy-years, with an operation rate of 14%. The stillbirth rate of all fracture patients was low at 0.6% (n = 10/1813), although this was 1.5-fold the overall stillbirth rate in Finland. Lumbosacral and comminuted spinopelvic fractures resulted in preterm delivery in 25% (n = 5/20) of parturients, with a stillbirth rate of 10% (n = 2/20).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of fracture hospitalization during pregnancy is lower than in the general population, and fractures in this population are more often treated conservatively. A higher proportion of preterm deliveries and stillbirths occurred in women with lumbosacral and comminuted spinopelvic fractures. Maternal mortality and stillbirth rates remain low among women with fractures leading to hospitalization or surgery during pregnancy.

[The (severely) injured pregnant patient from the perspective of trauma surgery]

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause for nonpregnancy-linked maternal mortality in pregnant women, even though the exact incidence for accidents in pregnancy is unknown. Trauma management concepts applied for nonpregnant adult patients are just as valid for injured and severely injured pregnant women but in addition trauma management has to consider the unique physiological and pathophysiological conditions for a favorable maternal and fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE

Overview of current data about the epidemiology, injury mechanisms, maternal and fetal outcome and recommendations on the management of injured pregnant women based on a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Currently, there is no evidence indicating an association between maternal injury severity, the physiological condition and the fetal outcome. Practice guidelines for trauma management in pregnancy recommend prioritization of maternal treatment and resuscitation for optimal initial treatment of the fetus. The current recommendations for trauma room management in pregnancy, surgical treatment, including damage control surgery, are based on weak evidence.

CONCLUSION

The examination, stabilization and treatment of injured pregnant women has priority for fetal survival and outcome. The management of severe trauma in pregnancy requires a multidisciplinary expertise and team approach consisting of surgeons, anesthetists, radiologists, obstetricians and neonatologists, so that for a severely injured gravida, the decision for admission to designated trauma centers is already preclinically made. The principles of management and treatment of severely injured pregnant women should adhere to the treatment principles of nonpregnant trauma victims.

Management of Pelvic Ring Injury Patients With Hemodynamic Instability

Pelvic ring injuries (PRI) are among the most difficult injuries to deal with in orthopedic trauma. When these injuries are accompanied by hemodynamic instability their management becomes significantly more complex. A methodical assessment and expeditious triage are required for these patients followed by adequate resuscitation. A major triage decision is whether these patients should undergo arterial embolization in the angiography suit or prompt packing and pelvic stabilization in the operating room. Patient characteristics, fracture type and injury characteristics are taken into consideration in the decision-making process. In this review we discuss the acute evaluation, triage and management of PRIs associated with hemodynamic instability. An evidence based and protocol driven approach is necessary in order to achieve optimal outcomes in these patients.

Combined Acetabulum Fracture and Hip Dislocation in an 18-Year-Old Female at 35-Week Gestation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Caring for an injured, pregnant patient can be a management challenge. We report the case of an 18-year-old female who sustained a left acetabulum fracture with a concurrent hip dislocation at 35 weeks' gestation following a motor vehicle accident. Through an interdisciplinary, team-based approach, the patient was guided through obstetric delivery and orthopedic surgical fracture fixation without complication. By being familiar with the unique challenges in management posed by pregnant patients, orthopedic surgeons can be better equipped to minimize morbidity and mortality in this patient population while maximizing clinical outcomes.

Pelvic post-traumatic asymmetry: Assessment and sequenced treatment

The most common cause of post-traumatic pelvic asymmetry is, by far, initial nonoperative treatment.

Open reduction and internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures are recommended to avoid pelvic nonunion or subsequent structural deformities.

The most common symptom is pelvic pain. Pelvic instability is another symptom, as well as persistent urogenital problems and neurological sequelae.

Preoperative evaluation of these patients requires careful clinical and functional assessment, in addition to a complete radiological study.

Surgical treatment of pelvic fracture nonunions is technically demanding and has potentially serious complications.

We have developed a new classification that modifies and completes Mears and Velyvis’s classification in which we highlight two types of post-traumatic sequelae with different clinical conditions and whose basic differentiating element is whether pelvic deformity is present or not. Based on this classification, we have established our strategy of surgical treatment.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170069.

Lateral Compression-I Pelvic Ring Injury: Not Benign to the Developing Fetus

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether certain patterns of pelvic ring injury are associated with more frequent intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD).

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Of 44 pregnant patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures, 40 had complete records that allowed determination of fetal viability. χ2 tests were used for categorical variables (Fisher exact tests when expected cell counts were fewer than 5), and t tests were used for continuous variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Fetal or maternal death.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had isolated acetabular fractures, 25 had isolated pelvic ring injuries, and 3 had acetabular fractures with concomitant pelvic ring injuries. Maternal and fetal mortality were 2% and 40%, respectively. No patients with isolated acetabular fractures experienced IUFD, compared with 68% (15/22) of those with isolated pelvic ring injuries (P < 0.0001). Eight (53%) of 15 IUFDs were associated with lateral compression (LC)-I pelvic ring injuries (Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 61-B2). Of the 13 LC-I pelvic ring injuries, 8 (62%) resulted in IUFD. Pelvic ring stability, Young-Burgess classification, and operative treatment were not associated with IUFD. Maternal Glasgow Coma Scale (average 13.2) and Injury Severity Score (average 18.2) at admission were predictive of IUFD.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent pelvic fractures in gravid trauma patients are LC-I. Although the rate of maternal mortality was low, the risk of IUFD was quite high (40%). LC-I pelvic ring injuries often had catastrophic outcomes, with IUFD in 62% of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Update on open reduction and internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures during pregnancy: case reports

This article aims to report four cases of unstable pelvic fractures in pregnant women treated by open reduction and internal fixation.

Cases report

The study included four cases of pregnant women with unstable pelvic fractures; their outcomes were analyzed and discussed. Data were obtained from two University Hospitals. The mean age of women was 23 years; most (3/4) were primiparous, with a mean pregnancy age of 23 weeks. Two women had Malgaigne-type fractures and the other two had symphyseal disjunction associated with acetabular fractures. All fractures were treated surgically. One foetus was dead on admission to hospital. The other three developed well, along with their mothers. Good evolution was only possible with careful pre-, peri-, and postoperative care for the mother, as well as foetal assessment by a multidisciplinary team. In complex cases such as those presented in the present study, pre-, peri-, and postoperative care are mandatory, as well as the presence of a multidisciplinary team. The mother's life always takes priority in acute clinical pictures, as it offers the best chance of survival to both mother and child.

Late reconstruction of severe open-book deformities of the pelvis - tips and tricks

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of treatment for open book pelvic injuries after high-energy trauma is to control haemorrhage and to close the pelvic ring anatomically. Less commonly, patients may present late with malunion or non-union.

METHODS

We reviewed five operatively treated patients with delayed severe open book deformities who had a diastasis of more than 6 cm. We describe the pre-operative workup, surgical strategy and challenges experienced. They specifically include: extensive scar and contracture formation, malunion, urogenital prolapse and difficult reduction of vertical shear element. A 5 to 15-point clinical scoring system based on quality of life regarding pain, ambulation, social function, continence control and presence of prolapse is proposed.

RESULTS

One elderly patient had early mortality after surgery. The other four patients had quality of life improvement by 3 to 5 points after one year. Correction is often clinically successful despite technical challenges and unpredictable radiological results.

CONCLUSION

External fixator and the C-clamp are good reduction tools. Powerful implants should be used and fixation of the posterior ring is mandatory. Staged urogenital and pelvic floor reconstruction is recommended before bony reconstruction to minimize the risk of wound contamination. Patients receiving this complex procedure have a good chance for improvement in pain and functional status.

Treatment of Pregnant Patients With Orthopaedic Trauma

Fracture management in pregnant patients is challenging. Anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy increase the complexity of treatment. Maternal trauma increases the risk of fetal loss, preterm birth, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, and maternal death. Initial resuscitation and treatment in a facility equipped to handle the orthopaedic injury and preterm births are paramount. Pelvic and acetabular injuries are potentially life threatening. The benefits and risks of surgical treatment must be carefully considered. The risks posed by anesthetic agents, antibiotic agents, anticoagulant agents, and radiation exposure must be understood. Positioning of the patient can affect the viability of the fetus. If surgery is necessary, the left lateral decubitus position decreases fetal hypotension. A specialized team including an obstetrician, perinatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, general trauma surgeon, critical care specialist, emergency medicine specialist, anesthesiologist, radiologist, and nurse must collaborate to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

Caesarean section rates following pelvic fracture: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Following pelvic fracture in females of childbearing age, the question of whether or not natural pregnancy and childbirth can occur is often asked by both patients and clinicians. The following is a systematic review of the literature examining caesarean section rate in patients with prior pelvic fracture.

METHODS

An extensive search of the English-language literature was performed to include all articles describing pregnancy outcomes in women with prior pelvic fracture. The primary outcomes analyzed were vaginal delivery and caesarean section. Secondary outcomes investigated included the rate of new caesarean section, indications for caesarean section, and caesarean section rates with operative versus nonoperative treatment of the pelvic fracture.

RESULTS

Eight articles assessing 148 patients who underwent childbirth after pelvic fracture were eligible for inclusion. Among the 148 patients who underwent childbirth after pelvic fracture, 79 (53%) delivered vaginally and 69 (47%) underwent caesarean section. When patients who had already undergone a caesarean section prior to their pelvic fracture were excluded, 137 patients remained. Among these 137 patients, 79 (58%) delivered vaginally and 58 (42%) had caesarean section performed. Indications for caesarean section were sporadically listed but in some series did include patient or obstetrician preference as a result of prior pelvic fracture. Prior pelvic fixation had no demonstrable effect on pregnancy outcomes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior pelvic fracture undergo caesarean section at a rate greater than those without prior pelvic fracture. The cause for this is not entirely understood but seems to be related at least in part to patient and obstetrician bias rather than solely due to the pelvic fracture and cephalopelvic disproportion.

Management of pelvic injuries in pregnancy

Pelvic fractures in pregnant women are usually high-energy injuries associated with risk of mortality to both mother and fetus. The mother's life always takes priority in the acute setting as it offers the best chance of survival to both the mother and the fetus. Indications for operative intervention of acute pubic symphysis rupture depend on presence of an open disruption, amount of displacement, and degree of disability. Chronic symphyseal instability related to pregnancy is a challenging problem and the first line of treatment is nonoperative care. A previous pelvic fracture is not a contraindication by itself to vaginal delivery.

[Selection of access and positioning for operative treatment of pelvic injuries. Decision-making strategies]

Surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries requires in-depth knowledge of the topographic anatomy of the pelvic bones, joints and soft tissue structures. A wide range of stabilizing techniques is available including bridging plate osteosynthesis, iliosacral compression screw osteosynthesis and transpubic positioning screws. In this article the different treatment strategies with the respective surgical approaches and patient positioning for pelvic ring fractures and combined lesions of the pelvic ring and acetabulum are presented. Pelvic ring lesions with rotational instability are approached from the anterior and occasionally from both the anterior and posterior based on the amount and localization of the instability. In vertically unstable lesions the most unstable part must be addressed first by reduction and fixation of the dislocated part to the axial skeleton. In combined fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum dorsal stabilization is carried out first.

Operative fixation of acetabular fractures in the pregnant patient

OBJECTIVE

To describe in utero radiation exposures in pregnant patients undergoing acetabular fracture repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University-affiliated regional trauma center.

PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS

Eight pregnant patients with acetabular fractures treated over a 6-year period. There were an additional 518 acetabular fractures in nonpregnant patients treated during the same time period.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum fracture.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

None. This is a descriptive series reporting fetal radiation doses, fetal fluoroscopy exposure times, and fetal viability after treatment.

RESULTS

The gestational age of the fetuses at presentation ranged from 5 to 26 weeks. Infant delivery averaged 27 weeks from the time of surgery and all pregnancies reached 36 weeks. Apgar scores were normal each child including 1 twin delivery. There were 4 posterior wall fractures, 3 transverse or posterior wall fractures, and 1 posterior column fracture. Intraoperative pelvic fluoroscopy averaged 39 seconds. There were no operative complications and fracture reductions were anatomic in 7 patients. Computed tomography scan of the pelvis conferred the greatest exposure risk to the fetus and fluoroscopy conferred the least. In each case that required a computed tomography scan of the pelvis, the calculated radiation exposure dose to the fetus was greater than 5 cGy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that with a team approach and the judicious use of radiographic imaging during the surgical care of a displaced acetabular fracture in the pregnant patient, minimal risk to the baby can be achieved in pursuit of acceptable articular reductions.

Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient

Trauma affects up to 8% of pregnancies and is the leading cause of death among pregnant women in the United States. A pregnancy test is mandated for all females of childbearing age who are involved in trauma. Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient is managed similarly to that for all trauma patients. Initial resuscitation efforts should focus on the pregnant patient because stable patient vital signs provide the best chance for fetal survival. In the stable patient, fetal assessment and a pelvic examination are mandatory. Radiographs as well as abdominal ultrasound of the patient and fetal ultrasound are useful. No known biologic risks are associated with magnetic resonance imaging, and no specific fetal abnormalities have been linked with standard low-intensity magnetic resonance imaging. Emergency surgery can be safely performed in most pregnant patients. Avoiding patient hypotension and using left lateral decubitus positioning increase the likelihood of success for the patient and fetus. An experienced multidisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, perinatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, anesthesiologist, radiologist, and nursing staff will optimize the treatment of both the pregnant patient and her fetus.

Treatment of unstable fractures of the pelvic ring in pregnancy

Unstable fractures of the posterior pelvic ring during pregnancy are rare. Pregnancy increases the high demands on the therapy of these types of fractures. The aim of the therapeutic strategy in such a situation is a good functional outcome of the mother without influencing the fetal health. Some osteosynthetic techniques result in good functional outcomes, but they are associated with high amounts of ionizing radiation. We report the case of a pregnant woman who sustained a vertical unstable fracture of the posterior pelvic ring as a result of a traffic accident. The fracture was treated surgically by open reduction and internal fixation with two transiliac reconstruction plates with minimal radiographic exposure to the fetus. One year later, a good functional result concerning the mother was shown. The child was healthy without any signs of prenatal impairment. Surgical treatment of an unstable fracture of the pelvic ring during pregnancy is possible with a justifiable risk to the mother and the child. Consideration of the expected fetal radiation exposure in the course of the therapy is particularly recommended. Using minimal doses of ionizing radiation, the described method results in a good clinical outcome of the mother while simultaneously reducing the radiation exposure of the fetus to an acceptable level.

Help! My Orthopaedic Patient is Pregnant!

Caring for a pregnant patient is a possibility in every field of nursing. Understanding the effects various illnesses may have on pregnancy and vice versa is important in preventing damage to the fetus and/or complications for the pregnant woman. This article assists orthopaedic nurses to practice proactively and anticipate problems during the care of the pregnant patient and avoid undesirable outcomes. Selected physiologic changes in pregnancy and their implications of orthopaedic conditions are described. Implications for nursing care with pregnant women with an orthopaedic condition are also discussed.

Management of general surgical problems in the pregnant patient

BACKGROUND

General surgeons are frequently consulted for nonobstetrical surgical problems in pregnant women, as up to 2% of pregnancies are complicated by such problems. Concerns over the increased morbidity for both the pregnant patient and the fetus are unique to this population.

DATA SOURCES

A review of the English language literature surrounding nonobstetrical surgical issues was collected through a Medline search and review of relevant society and academy papers.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript offers a review of current information regarding aspects of surgical care in the pregnant patient. Areas discussed include anesthesiology, radiology, laparoscopy, and specific common and uncommon surgical diseases found in the pregnant patient.

Pelvic fractures in pregnancy: factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes associated with pelvic fractures in pregnancy.

METHODS

A literature review of pelvic and acetabular fractures during pregnancy was performed, providing 101 cases for analysis (1 case report was included). Factors influencing maternal and fetal mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pelvic and acetabular fractures during pregnancy were associated with a high maternal (9%) and a higher fetal (35%) mortality rate. Automobile-pedestrian collisions had a trend toward a higher maternal mortality rate, and vehicular collisions had a trend toward a higher fetal mortality rate, compared with falls. Injury severity influenced both maternal and fetal outcomes. Fracture classification (simple vs. complex), fracture type (acetabular vs. pelvic), the trimester of pregnancy, and the era of literature reviewed did not influence mortality rates. When considering potential causes of fetal death, direct trauma to the uterus, placenta, or fetus was not associated with a higher fetal mortality rate, compared with maternal hemorrhage. Pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery has rarely been reported in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic and acetabular fractures in pregnancy continue to be associated with a high fetal mortality rate. Mechanism of injury and injury severity appeared to influence mortality rates, whereas the fracture classification, the fracture type, the trimester of pregnancy, and the era of literature reviewed did not.

Standardized outcome evaluation after blunt multiple injuries by scoring systems: a clinical follow-up investigation 2 years after injury

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the state of rehabilitation in patients with blunt multiple injuries 2 years after their initial injuries, using several standardized scales and a recently described comprehensive scoring system, by means of a prospective clinical multicenter study.

METHODS

Two years after the initial injury, patients with blunt multiple injuries (Injury Severity Score > or = 16) underwent a clinical follow-up in 5 German Level I trauma centers. The reassessment included a complete head-to-toe examination of the musculoskeletal system and a neurologic examination. The following patient-assessed health status scores were used to determine the quality of life: Short-Form 12, Functional Independence Measurement, and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Moreover, a comprehensive scoring system developed in our department (Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome [HASPOC]) was used that includes provider-report (physician's examination) and self-report (score systems) criteria.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four of 312 patients who had been injured between January 1995 and July 1996 were reexamined between January 1, 1997, and July 1, 1998. Among the remaining 58 patients, 9 had died by the time of follow-up, and 49 patients had not accepted the invitation. The mean age of those patients who underwent reexamination was 36 +/- 13 years, the mean Injury Severity Score was 24 +/- 6, and the mean initial Glasgow Coma Scale score was 11 +/- 4 (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score of 3.3 +/- 1.1; AIS face, 1.4 +/- 0.1; AIS chest, 3.0 +/- 0.8; AIS abdomen, 1.7 +/- 0.6; and AIS extremities, 3.4 +/- 0.8). The general outcome (Short-Form 12) was as follows: grade I, 9%; grade II, 25%; grade III, 29%; grade IV, 25%; grade V, 6%; and grade VI, 6%. The outcome of the injured extremity demonstrated moderate or severe restrictions according to the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in 41% of injuries of the lower extremity and in 16% of injuries of the upper extremity. Among patients with injuries to the lower extremity, 52% experienced pain or impaired ability to walk related to an injury of the foot or ankle, 31% indicated pain after a knee or thigh injury, and 27% indicated pain after a femoral or hip injury. The most severe deficits in the range of motion occurred in the foot and the ankle region (13.4% deficit of range of motion < 20% of normal range, p < 0.05 to other injuries). The results of the outcome obtained by self-report correlated with the clinical examination when a scoring system was used that was described recently, the HASPOC.

CONCLUSION

In a standardized multicenter reexamination of patients with blunt multiple injuries, the general outcome was usually fair or good. Both the complaints and the objective results of specific extremity areas demonstrated that most limitations were because of injuries below the knee. These results were adequately reflected by a comprehensive scoring system, combining self-report and provider report (HASPOC).