Use of cisapride in treatment of constipation in children

Oral domperidone has no additional effect on chronic functional constipation in children: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic constipation represents a common problem in children. The treatment of functional constipation is challenging. Some studies have investigated the effect of prokinetic agents as potential therapies for motility disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract with paradoxical results. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of oral domperidone in the treatment of chronic functional constipation in children.

METHOD

A total of 105 children with chronic functional constipation (according to Rome III criteria) who were referred to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic were recruited in this double-blind randomized clinical trial. The study subjects were randomly divided into two groups, the first of which received polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution 0.6 g/kg/day two times a day for 6 months and domperidone syrup 0.15 mL/kg three times a day for 3 months (case group) while the second one received PEG with the same dose for 6 months and placebo for 3 months with the same dose (control group). The two groups were compared regarding their symptoms and Rome III criteria through 1, 3, and 6 months following therapy. Primary outcome was response to treatment, and a response was defined as decrease in signs and symptoms that did not fulfill Rome III criteria. Secondary outcome measures were side effects during the course of treatment.

RESULTS

A significant difference was observed both before and after PEG and domperidone treatment and before and after PEG and placebo treatment regarding Rome III criteria. There was no significant difference in response to treatment between the two study groups during 1 (p = 1), 3 (p = 0.799), and 6 (p = 0.403) month follow up periods. Also, the two groups were not significantly different regarding the Rome III criteria during the mentioned follow up periods. There were no side effects during the course of treatment.

CONCLUSION

There was no additional effect of domperidone as adjunct to PEG in the treatment of children with constipation.

Oral prucalopride in children with functional constipation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prucalopride is a selective, high-affinity 5-HT4 receptor agonist with gastrointestinal prokinetic activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride oral solution in children, ages 4 years or older to 12 years or younger, with functional constipation.

METHODS

A single oral dose of 0.03 mg/kg prucalopride was administered to 38 children to characterize prucalopride pharmacokinetics (NCT01674166). Thereafter, 37 children entered an open-label extension period in which 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg of prucalopride was administered once per day for 8 weeks to investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability (NCT01670669).

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation [SD]) Cmax, tmax, and AUC∞ (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity) were 3.8 (0.6) ng/mL, 1.8 (0.9) hour, and 65.3 (10.6) ng · h · mL, respectively, with limited (16%) variability in Cmax and AUC∞. Mean (SD) t1/2 was 19.0 (3.1) hours. On average, mean (SD) renal clearance (0.25 [0.08] L · h · kg) accounted for 54% of the apparent total plasma clearance (0.46 [0.07] L · h · kg). The apparent volume of distribution was 12.6 (2.6) L/kg. Prucalopride treatment resulted in a mean bowel movement frequency of 6.8/week, normal stool consistency, and reduced frequency of fecal incontinence. During the 8-week extension, 70% of study participants had at least 1 adverse event (all but 1 of mild/moderate intensity, 19% considered related to prucalopride). No children discontinued prucalopride because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profile of a single dose of prucalopride oral solution (0.03 mg · kg · day) generally resembled the profile in adults (2-mg tablet) but reflected lower systemic exposure in children. Prucalopride treatment for 8 weeks demonstrated an apparent favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in children with functional constipation.

Cisapride for intestinal constipation

BACKGROUND

Cisapride is a propulsive agent, withdrawn from most of the world's health institutes because of its recorded fatalities in addition to serious side effects such as severe arrhythmias. However it is widely available in third world countries and can be easily purchased through the Internet.  We did a systematic review to assess its efficacy and safety in relieving constipation.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to assess Cisapride's role and safety as a prokinetic drug in the management of constipation and constipation predominant Irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS).The secondary objective is to assess Cisapride's efficacy in improving symptoms of constipation and IBS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane methodology was followed to find available RCTs that assessed the efficacy of cisapride. Electronic databases searched November 2009:Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library 2009 issue 4MEDLINE (from 1966)EMBASE (from 1980)

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs comparing cisapride to placebo or to active comparators were included. We included patients of all ages who had functional constipation or C-IBS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eight RCTs were included, comparing cisapride to a placebo on patients with constipation or C-IBS. The studies were pooled and analysed and a combined effect was calculated using meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

8 trials included in the review for a total 424 patients who were randomised to Cisapride or placebo, of which 157 were children and 284 were female. Intervention duration was 8 to 12 weeks. Dosage of Cisapride in the adult and children trials were 5mg TDS and 0.2mg/kg/dose TDS respectively.Cisapride showed significant benefit in investigators' assessment of clinical improvement (OR: 0.45, P=0.03), likelihood of passing daily stools (OR: 0.22, P<0.001), passage of normal stools (OR: 0.06, P<0.001) and total gastrointestinal transit time (MD: -19.47, P<0.00001). However Cisapride showed no benefit in global improvement of symptoms (MD: 0.11, P=0.99), abdominal pain (MD: 1.94, P=0.56), stool frequency: weekly (MD: 3.36, P=0.11), visual analogue scale (MD: -0.23, P=0.66), stool consistency (MD: 0.32, P=0.50), bloating (MD: 3.93, P=0.44), persistent bloating(OR: 1.11, P=0.83), 'feeling of incomplete evacuation' (MD: -3.80, P=0.08), straining (MD -0.95, p=0.19).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No clear benefit can be demonstrated with cisapride. We do not feel that cisapride can be justifiably used for chronic constipation or irritable bowel disease given its side effects of arrhythmia and associated 175 recorded deaths.

Management of chronic functional constipation in childhood

Chronic functional constipation is a common problem in childhood, with soiling a significant issue. The morbidity is high and the treatment is complex. There is a very poor evidence base for the drug treatments used and there are considerable differences in practice in different units. The key to successful management is early diagnosis and prompt treatment with an emphasis on holistic care with multidisciplinary support where needed. For example, the practical approach in our unit at the Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, England emphasizes the non-drug aspects including patient education and behavioral modification and uses stimulant laxatives, usually in a high dose as first-line therapy. There is an urgent need for prospective comparative studies to investigate different treatment regimens and for longitudinal studies to examine the long-term outcome of chronic constipation and the factors that determine it. The lack of a significant evidence base for the use of the most widely used agents proves a significant challenge in the production of evidence-based guidelines and highlights the paucity of data for most of the widely used treatments for childhood constipation.

Evaluation and treatment of constipation in children: summary of updated recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

Constipation is a common pediatric problem. To assist health care professionals who care for children with constipation, the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) previously published a clinical guideline based on an integration of medical evidence with expert opinion. To evaluate studies published since then, the NASPGHAN Constipation Guideline Committee performed a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature since 1997, to identify, review and rate the quality of new evidence. Based on this review, the recommendations of the original clinical guideline were reaffirmed with several modified according to the new evidence. Below is a summary of the evidence reviewed for this update. The complete revised guideline is available online in its entirety.

Evaluation and treatment of constipation in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

Constipation, defined as a delay or difficulty in defecation, present for 2 or more weeks, is a common pediatric problem encountered by both primary and specialty medical providers. The Constipation Guideline Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) has formulated a clinical practice guideline for the management of pediatric constipation. The Constipation Guideline Committee, consisting of two primary care pediatricians, a clinical epidemiologist, and pediatric gastroenterologists, based its recommendations on an integration of a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature combined with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method. The Committee developed two algorithms to assist with medical management, one for older infants and children and the second for infants less than 1 year of age. The guideline provides recommendations for management by the primary care provider, including evaluation, initial treatment, follow-up management, and indications for consultation by a specialist. The Constipation Guideline Committee also provided recommendations for management by the pediatric gastroenterologist.

Clinical approach to fecal soiling in children

Fecal soiling is common in childhood and can be caused by stool toileting refusal, fecal incontinence due to organic disease, or encopresis due to functional constipation. Anatomical, neurologic, and inflammatory causes for fecal soiling are ruled out by history and physical examination and, if necessary, by anorectal manometry, barium enema, and rectal biopsy. The initial treatment suggestion for children with stool toileting refusal is to put the child back into pull-ups or diapers. Most children with fecal soiling due to organic disease continue with some degree of incontinence despite optimal medical management. Antegrade enema administration helps those with severe fecal incontinence due to organic causes who do not respond to medical management. Successful treatment of constipation and encopresis requires a combination of medical therapy, nutritional intervention, behavioral intervention, and long-term compliance with laxative use. The combined treatment approach improves the constipation and encopresis in all patients who comply with the treatment program. In some children, cow's milk protein intolerance may be the cause. In them, cow's milk protein needs to be eliminated.

Advances in the management of pediatric constipation

Constipation in children is a common concern. There is no single treatment; many children do not respond and continue to have chronic problems. This lack of response is multifactorial, but it is most likely related to the fact that the exact pathophysiology of constipation in children is not known. Diagnostic criteria (Rome II classification) and algorithms proposed by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (NASPGN) for evaluation and treatment of children with constipation were recently published and are summarized here. The effectiveness of new treatments such as dietary interventions, prokinetic agents, biofeedback, and polyethylene-glycol electrolyte (PEG) solutions is discussed in this review.

Cisapride for the treatment of constipation in children: A double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cisapride is effective in the treatment of children with constipation.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which children with chronic constipation were randomly assigned to treatment with cisapride or placebo for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty children were enrolled, and 36 completed the therapy. Treatment successes occurred in 13 of 17 (76%) subjects in the cisapride group and 8 of 19 (37%) subjects in the placebo group (P <.03). The odds ratio for response after cisapride administration was 8.2 times higher (95% CI 1.3 to 49.4). During cisapride therapy, there was a significant improvement in number of spontaneous bowel movements per week (from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 4.1 +/- 1.1), and there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (1.8 +/- 0.5 to 0.08 +/- 0.4), percent with encopresis (82% vs 23%), number of laxative doses per week (from 10.3 +/- 2.6 to 0.8 +/- 0.6), percent using laxatives (77% to 24%), and total gastrointestinal transit time (from 115.0 +/- 3.7 hours to 77.0 +/- 11.1 hours). With placebo, there were no significant changes in the number of spontaneous bowel movements (from 1.0 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.6), percent with encopresis (74% vs 47%), or total gastrointestinal transit time (from 112.5 +/- 4.9 hours to 95.4 +/- 9.8 hours); but there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (from 1.3 +/- 0.4 to 0.4 +/- 0.2) and number of laxative doses used per week (from 11.5 +/- 2.9 to 2.05 +/- 0.7). The final number of spontaneous bowel movements, fecal soiling episodes, laxatives used, or percent patients with encopresis was not different when patients receiving cisapride were compared with those receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

Cisapride was effective in the treatment of children with constipation.

Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. A medical position statement of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

Constipation, defined as a delay or difficulty in defecation, present for 2 or more weeks, is a common pediatric problem encountered by both primary and specialty medical providers.

METHODS

The Constipation Subcommittee of the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition has formulated clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric constipation. The Constipation Subcommittee, consisting of two primary care pediatricians, a clinical epidemiologist, and pediatric gastroenterologists, based its recommendations on an integration of a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature combined with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method.

RESULTS

The Subcommittee developed two algorithms to assist with medical management, one for older infants and children and the second for infants less than 1 year of age. The guidelines provide recommendations for management by the primary care provider, including evaluation, initial treatment, follow-up management, and indications for consultation by a specialist. The Constipation Subcommittee also provided recommendations for management by the pediatric gastroenterologist.

CONCLUSIONS

This report, which has been endorsed by the Executive Council of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, has been prepared as a general guideline to assist providers of medical care in the evaluation and treatment of constipation in children. It is not intended as a substitute for clinical judgment or as a protocol for the management of all patients with this problem.

[Management of chronic constipation in the infant]

Constipation is a common symptom of various pathologies with dysfunction of the intestinal motricity which largely differ in their expression and severity. However chronic idiopathic constipation is by far the most frequent condition. Only constipations associated with symptoms such as poor nutritional status, failure to thrive, signs of upper intestinal tract obstruction (gross abdominal distention), or showing resistance to the usual therapeutic approach, justify investigations looking for an organic disease, mainly Hirschsprung disease. Treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation requires, first to evacuate the fecal mass, then to prevent its reconstitution mainly by dietetic measures, regular large hydration, stool modifying therapy, daily bowel habit, and regular physical activities; in addition it is important that clear and reassuring explanations be given to the parents.

Cisapride in management of chronic pediatric constipation

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to explore the use of cisapride in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in children.

METHODS

Seventy-nine children were screened. Seventy-three of them met the selection criteria that included clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and histopathologic investigations. These patients entered a week-long phase I of disimpaction using lactulose. Four of them were noncompliant and thus were excluded from the next phase. In phase II sixty-nine patients were assigned to two treatment groups: 0.3 mg/kg cisapride four times a day versus matching placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind study. The two groups that completed phase II were similar in age and duration of symptoms, confirmed by statistical analysis. Stool frequency was assessed weekly, beginning at the end of the disimpaction phase and continuing for 9 weeks. Total gastrointestinal transit time was measured twice, on completion of phase I and 9 weeks later. Transit time is the time required for a carmine marker taken orally after overnight fast to appear in the stool.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between stool frequency per week before and after cisapride treatment, stool frequency per week at the end of phase II with cisapride versus placebo, and total gastrointestinal transit time before and after treatment with cisapride (p < 0.05 for all values). No such difference was demonstrated when comparing stool frequency per week or total gastrointestinal transit time before and after placebo (p > 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride may have a role in the management of chronic idiopathic constipation in children.

Functional gut disorders: from motility to sensitivity disorders. A review of current and investigational drugs for their management

Functional gut disorders include several clinical entities defined on the basis of symptom patterns (e.g., functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain, functional abdominal bloating), for which there is no established pathophysiological mechanism. Because there is no well-defined pathophysiological target, treatment should be aimed at symptom improvement. Prokinetics and antispasmodics have been widely used in the treatment of functional gut disorders on the assumption that disordered motility is the underlying cause of symptoms, and symptom improvement is indeed achievable with these compounds in some, but not all, patients with features of hypo- or hypermotility, respectively. In the first part of this review, we cover the basic pharmacology and discuss the rationale for the clinical use of prokinetics and antispasmodics. On the other hand, in the past few years, the explosive growth in the research focusing on visceral sensitivity and visceral reflexes has suggested that at least some patients with functional gut disorders have altered visceral perception. Thus, the second part of the review covers these developments and focuses on studies addressing the issue of drugs modulating visceral sensitivity.