Receptor pharmacology of carvedilol in the human heart

Roles of β-adrenoceptor Subtypes and Therapeutics in Human Cardiovascular Disease: Heart Failure, Tachyarrhythmias and Other Cardiovascular Disorders

β-Adrenoceptors (β-ARs) provide an important therapeutic target for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Three β-ARs, β1-AR, β2-AR, β3-AR are localized to the human heart. Activation of β1-AR and β2-ARs increases heart rate, force of contraction (inotropy) and consequently cardiac output to meet physiological demand. However, in disease, chronic over-activation of β1-AR is responsible for the progression of disease (e.g. heart failure) mediated by pathological hypertrophy, adverse remodelling and premature cell death. Furthermore, activation of β1-AR is critical in the pathogenesis of cardiac arrhythmias while activation of β2-AR directly influences blood pressure haemostasis. There is an increasing awareness of the contribution of β2-AR in cardiovascular disease, particularly arrhythmia generation. All β-blockers used therapeutically to treat cardiovascular disease block β1-AR with variable blockade of β2-AR depending on relative affinity for β1-AR vs β2-AR. Since the introduction of β-blockers into clinical practice in 1965, β-blockers with different properties have been trialled, used and evaluated, leading to better understanding of their therapeutic effects and tolerability in various cardiovascular conditions. β-Blockers with the property of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), i.e. β-blockers that also activate the receptor, were used in the past for post-treatment of myocardial infarction and had limited use in heart failure. The β-blocker carvedilol continues to intrigue due to numerous properties that differentiate it from other β-blockers and is used successfully in the treatment of heart failure. The discovery of β3-AR in human heart created interest in the role of β3-AR in heart failure but has not resulted in therapeutics at this stage.

Sex/Gender- and Age-Related Differences in β-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in Cardiovascular Diseases

Sex differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) are often recognized from experimental and clinical studies examining the prevalence, manifestations, and response to therapies. Compared to age-matched men, women tend to have reduced CV risk and a better prognosis in the premenopausal period. However, with menopause, this risk increases exponentially, surpassing that of men. Although several mechanisms have been provided, including sex hormones, an emerging role in these sex differences has been suggested for β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling. Importantly, β-ARs are the most important G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), expressed in almost all the cell types of the CV system, and involved in physiological and pathophysiological processes. Consistent with their role, for decades, βARs have been considered the first targets for rational drug design to fight CVDs. Of note, β-ARs are seemingly associated with different CV outcomes in females compared with males. In addition, even if there is a critical inverse correlation between β-AR responsiveness and aging, it has been reported that gender is crucially involved in this age-related effect. This review will discuss how β-ARs impact the CV risk and response to anti-CVD therapies, also concerning sex and age. Further, we will explore how estrogens impact β-AR signaling in women.

Indications of beta-adrenoceptor blockers in Takotsubo syndrome and theoretical reasons to prefer agents with vasodilating activity

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is estimated to account for 1-3% of all patients presenting with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A sudden surge in sympathetic nervous system is considered the cause of TTS. Nonetheless, no specific recommendations have been provided regarding β-blocking therapy. Apart from specific contra-indications (severe LV dysfunction, hypotension, bradycardia and corrected QT interval >500 ms), treatment with a β-blocker seems reasonable until full recovery of LV ejection fraction, though evidence is limited to a few animal studies, case reports or observational studies. In this review, we will reappraise the rationale for β-blocker therapy in TTS and speculate on the pathophysiologic basis for preferring non-selective agents with vasodilating activity over β₁-selective drugs.

Translating Koch's postulates to identify matrix metalloproteinase roles in postmyocardial infarction remodeling: cardiac metalloproteinase actions (CarMA) postulates

The first matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) was described in 1962; and since the 1990s, cardiovascular research has focused on understanding how MMPs regulate many aspects of cardiovascular pathology from atherosclerosis formation to myocardial infarction and stroke. Although much information has been gleaned by these past reports, to a large degree MMP cardiovascular biology remains observational, with few studies homing in on cause and effect relationships. Koch's postulates were first developed in the 19th century as a way to establish microorganism function and were modified in the 20th century to include methods to establish molecular causality. In this review, we outline the concept for establishing a similar approach to determine causality in terms of MMP functions. We use left ventricular remodeling postmyocardial infarction as an example, but this approach will have broad applicability across both the cardiovascular and the MMP fields.

New advances in beta-blocker therapy in heart failure

The use of β-blockers (BB) in heart failure (HF) has been considered a contradiction for many years. Considering HF simply as a state of inadequate systolic function, BB were contraindicated because of their negative effects on myocardial contractility. Nevertheless, evidence collected in the past years have suggested that additional mechanisms, such as compensatory neuro-humoral hyperactivation or inflammation, could participate in the pathogenesis of this complex disease. Indeed, chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system, although initially compensating the reduced cardiac output from the failing heart, increases myocardial oxygen demand, ischemia and oxidative stress; moreover, high catecholamine levels induce peripheral vasoconstriction and increase both cardiac pre- and after-load, thus determining additional stress to the cardiac muscle (1). As a consequence of such a different view of the pathogenic mechanisms of HF, the efficacy of BB in the treatment of HF has been investigated in numerous clinical trials. Results from these trials highlighted BB as valid therapeutic tools in HF, providing rational basis for their inclusion in many HF treatment guidelines. However, controversy still exists about their use, in particular with regards to the selection of specific molecules, since BB differ in terms of adrenergic β-receptors selectivity, adjunctive effects on α-receptors, and effects on reactive oxygen species and inflammatory cytokines production. Further concerns about the heterogeneity in the response to BB, as well as the use in specific patients, are matter of debate among clinicians. In this review, we will recapitulate the pharmacological properties and the classification of BB, and the alteration of the adrenergic system occurring during HF that provide a rationale for their use; we will also focus on the possible molecular mechanisms, such as genetic polymorphisms, underlying the different efficacy of molecules belonging to this class.

S49G and R389G polymorphisms of the β₁-adrenergic receptor influence signaling via the cAMP-PKA and ERK pathways

Two functionally important β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR) polymorphisms have been identified. The R389G polymorphism influences coupling to the Gs-cAMP pathway. R(389)-β1ARs display enhanced activation of cAMP/PKA; they provide short-term inotropic support but also cause a predisposition to cardiomyopathic decompensation. A second S49G polymorphism is implicated in the evolution of heart failure, but the mechanism remains uncertain. This study shows that position 49 and 389 polymorphisms function in a coordinate manner to influence agonist-dependent cAMP/PKA and ERK responses. cAMP/PKA and ERK responses are more robust in HEK293 cells that heterologously overexpress G(49)-β1ARs, compared with S(49)-β1ARs. However, this phenotype is most obvious on a G(389)-β1AR background; the more robust agonist-dependent cAMP/PKA and ERK responses in R(389)-β1AR cells effectively obscure the effect of the S49G polymorphism. We also show that isoproterenol (Iso) and carvedilol activate ERK via a similar EGFR-independent mechanism in cells expressing various β1AR haplotypes. However, Iso activates ERK via an Src-independent pathway, but carvedilol-dependent ERK activation requires Src. Since the S49G polymorphism has been linked to changes in β1AR trafficking, we examined whether β1AR polymorphisms influence partitioning to lipid raft membranes. Biochemical fractionation studies show that all four β1AR variants are recovered in buoyant flotillin-enriched membranes; the distinct signaling phenotypes of the different β1AR variants could not be attributed to any gross differences in basal compartmentalization to lipid raft membranes. The allele-specific differences in β1AR signaling phenotypes identified in this study could underlie interindividual differences in responsiveness to β-blocker therapy and clinical outcome in heart failure.

Targeting cardiac β-adrenergic signaling via GRK2 inhibition for heart failure therapy

Cardiac cells, like those of the other tissues, undergo regulation through membrane-bound proteins known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). β-adrenergic receptors (βARs) are key GPCRs expressed on cardiomyocytes and their role is crucial in cardiac physiology since they regulate inotropic and chronotropic responses of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). In compromised conditions such as heart failure (HF), chronic βAR hyperstimulation occurs via SNS activation resulting in receptor dysregulation and down-regulation and consequently there is a marked reduction of myocardial inotropic reserve and continued loss of pump function. Data accumulated over the last two decades indicates that a primary culprit in initiating and maintain βAR dysfunction in the injured and stressed heart is GPCR kinase 2 (GRK2), which was originally known as βARK1 (for βAR kinase). GRK2 is up-regulated in the failing heart due to chronic SNS activity and targeting this kinase has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy in HF. Indeed, its inhibition or genetic deletion in several disparate animal models of HF including a pre-clinical pig model has shown that GRK2 targeting improves functional and morphological parameters of the failing heart. Moreover, non-βAR properties of GRK2 appear to also contribute to its pathological effects and thus, its inhibition will likely complement existing therapies such as βAR blockade. This review will explore recent research regarding GRK2 inhibition; in particular it will focus on the GRK2 inhibitor peptide known as βARKct, which represents new hope in the treatment against HF progression.

Beta-adrenergic receptors, from their discovery and characterization through their manipulation to beneficial clinical application

β-Adrenergic receptors (β-AR) are central to the overall regulation of cardiac function. From the first proposed receptor/transmitter concept to the latest clinical β-blocker trials β-AR have been shown to play an important role in cardiac disease and heart failure in particular. This study provides a historical perspective, reviews the latest discoveries and beliefs, and discusses the current clinical practices of β-AR and their modulation with their associated guanine-nucleotide regulatory protein/adenylylcyclasesignal transduction pathways.

Drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia in heart failure

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for approximately one-third of all deaths in patients with heart failure, and is generally the result of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The mechanisms of VT/VF associated with heart failure are complex and heterogeneous; they include functional and structural remodeling, as well as neurohormonal activation. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is very useful for preventing SCD, but the improvement of outcome is limited in patients with cardiac dysfunction and advanced heart failure. This article reviews the current status of drug therapy for the treatment of VT/VF in patients with heart failure. Chronic beta-blocker therapy reduces SCD and improves survival. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists are thought to reduce SCD by preventing ventricular remodeling. Amiodarone is potentially effective for preventing VT/VF in patients at high risk, especially those with nonischemic heart failure. This may be a result of the complex pharmacodynamics of amiodarone, which affects many kinds of ion channels/transporters, as well as thyroid function. The pure class III antiarrhythmic drug, nifekalant, is useful in the emergency treatment of VT/VF.

Measurement of inverse agonism in β-adrenoceptors

Increasing numbers of compounds, previously classified as antagonists, were shown to inhibit this spontaneous or constitutive receptor activity, instead of leave it unaffected as expected for a formal antagonist. In addition, some other antagonists did not have any effect by themselves, but prevented the inhibition of constitutive activity induced by thought-to-be antagonists. These thought-to-be antagonists with negative efficacy are now known as "inverse agonists." Inverse agonism at βAR has been evidenced for both subtypes in wild-type GPCRs systems and in engineered systems with high constitutive activity. It is important to mention that native systems are of particular importance for analyzing the in vivo relevance of constitutive activity because these systems have physiological expression levels of target receptors. Studies of inverse agonism of β blockers in physiological setting have also evidenced that pathophysiological conditions can affect pharmacodynamic properties of these ligands. To date, hundreds of clinically well-known drugs have been tested and classified for this property. Prominent examples include the beta-blockers propranolol, alprenolol, pindolol, and timolol used for treating hypertension, angina pectoris, and arrhythmia that act on the β₂ARs, metoprolol, and bisoprolol used for treating hypertension, coronary heart disease, and arrhythmias by acting on β₁ARs. Inverse agonists seem to be useful in the treatment of chronic disease characterized by harmful effects resulting from β₁AR and β₂AR overactivation, such as heart failure and asthma, respectively.

A unique mechanism of beta-blocker action: carvedilol stimulates beta-arrestin signaling

For many years, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers or betaAR antagonists) have provided significant morbidity and mortality benefits in patients who have sustained acute myocardial infarction. More recently, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists have been found to provide survival benefits in patients suffering from heart failure, although the efficacy of different beta-blockers varies widely in this condition. One drug, carvedilol, a nonsubtype-selective betaAR antagonist, has proven particularly effective in the treatment of heart failure, although the mechanism(s) responsible for this are controversial. Here, we report that among 16 clinically relevant betaAR antagonists, carvedilol displays a unique profile of in vitro signaling characteristics. We observed that in beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR)-expressing HEK-293 cells, carvedilol has inverse efficacy for stimulating G(s)-dependent adenylyl cyclase but, nonetheless, stimulates (i) phosphorylation of the receptor's cytoplasmic tail on previously documented G protein-coupled receptor kinase sites; (ii) recruitment of beta-arrestin to the beta2AR; (iii) receptor internalization; and (iv) activation of extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2), which is maintained in the G protein-uncoupled mutant beta2AR(T68F,Y132G,Y219A) (beta2AR(TYY)) and abolished by beta-arrestin2 siRNA. Taken together, these data indicate that carvedilol is able to stabilize a receptor conformation which, although uncoupled from G(s), is nonetheless able to stimulate beta-arrestin-mediated signaling. We hypothesize that such signaling may contribute to the special efficacy of carvedilol in the treatment of heart failure and may serve as a prototype for a new generation of therapeutic beta2AR ligands.

Reducing the Risk of Sudden Death in Heart Failure With β-Blockers

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a serious cardiovascular syndrome that affects nearly 5 million people in the United States. A review of clinical data demonstrates that sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for approximately one-third of all HF deaths. This fatal outcome typically involves an unexpected electrical event leading to sustained cardiac arrhythmias resulting in cardiovascular collapse.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to serve as the basis for this review. Factors contributing directly to incidence of SCD in the HF population may include significant remodeling of the left ventricle (hypertrophy, dilation, and fibrosis) in addition to increased sympathetic activation. Using specific therapies to limit these mechanisms are beneficial in the HF patient by preventing SCD. Beta-blockers play a key role in the prevention of SCD for patients with HF by limiting the effects of circulating norepinephrine and by reducing left ventricular remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

This review outlines the potential mechanisms and contributing factors of SCD in patients with HF and the impact of beta-blocker usage in the prevention of this fatal outcome for this growing patient population.

Carvedilol in chronic heart failure: past, present and future

Large randomized clinical trials of bisoprolol, carvedilol and metoprolol have conclusively demonstrated the efficacy and confirmed safety of β-blockers in patients with chronic heart failure. Recently, the beneficial effects of carvedilol in patients with heart failure soon after an acute myocardial infarction have also been shown. Despite this, β-blockers remain under-prescribed in this condition. This is of particular importance as heart failure is common and increasing in prevalence. In this article, when to start β-blockade and which β-blocker to use is considered. Since carvedilol is the most studied β-blocker in heart failure and has a broad range of activities that extend beyond β-blockade, whether it has possible advantages over other β-blockers is discussed. Also, how the use of β-blockade might evolve with the introduction of device-related therapy in heart failure is considered.

Carvedilol improves left ventricular function in murine coxsackievirus-induced acute myocarditis association with reduced myocardial interleukin-1beta and MMP-8 expression and a modulated immune response

BACKGROUND

Proinflammatory cytokines induce the expression of matrix metalloproteinases that play a crucial role in myocardial remodeling. Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation influences the production of cytokines heralding the possibility of modulating cytokine production by beta-adrenergic blockers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a coxsackievirus B3 murine myocarditis model (BALB/c), effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on myocardial cytokine expression, inflammatory cell infiltration and MMP/TIMP profiles were investigated. In carvedilol-treated mice, a significant improvement in left ventricular function was documented 10 days post infection. In infected mice (n=10), IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta(1) and IL-10 myocardial mRNA abundance were increased significantly (240%, 200%, 161%, and 230%) compared to controls (n=10), while IL-15 mRNA was markedly reduced (70%). Infected mice showed significantly increased infiltrations with CD3-, CD4- and CD8-T-lymphocytes (730%, 1110%, 380%). In the infected mice, myocardial MMP/TIMP profiles presented a significant upregulation of membrane type-1 MMP, MMP-9, MMP-8 and MMP-3 (150%, 160%, 340%, and 270%) and a significant decrease in TIMP-4 levels (75%). Carvedilol attenuated over-expression of myocardial TGF-beta(1), IL-1beta and MMP-8 mRNA expression significantly and induced a relevant IL-10 mRNA expression in the infected mice (n=10). By an unchanged infiltration with CD3-T-lymphocytes, carvedilol showed a representative reduction in CD4-T-lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol treatment in experimental myocarditis leads to reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines and MMPs, which contributes to reduced matrix degradation and ultimately to improved structural integrity of the heart. Besides the antiadrenergic potential, carvedilol is beneficial due to a wide range of biological activities (antiinflammatory, antifibrotic, antioxidative and immunomodulatory).

Critical differences among beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists in myocardial failure: debating the MERIT of COMET

In the United States, carvedilol and metoprolol (tartrate or succinate) are the most commonly employed beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists for the treatment of heart failure. However, use of these agents in patients with heart failure remains extremely low despite overwhelming evidence of their beneficial short- and long-term effects. Because the myocardial pathophysiology associated with heart failure involves not only beta-1 adrenoreceptors but also beta-2 and alpha-1 adrenoreceptors, this indicates a more complex disease process that may require pan-receptor antagonism to provide optimal clinical benefit. Relative to metoprolol (tartrate or succinate), carvedilol represents an extremely complex molecular entity that not only possesses the ability to antagonize all of the principle adrenoreceptors involved in heart failure but also reduces oxidative stress and provides an antiarrhythmic benefit independent of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonism. Taken together, an interesting pharmacologic premise for the superiority of carvedilol relative to metoprolol (tartrate) may exist, but the lack of clinical trials comparing an optimal dose of either extended-release metoprolol (ie, succinate) or immediate-release metoprolol (ie, tartrate) to carvedilol limits the clinical application of the pharmacologic differences between the agents.

Carvedilol blockade of rat myocardial alpha1-adrenoceptors

Carvedilol is a combined alpha(1)- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. The ability of carvedilol to antagonize functional effects mediated through myocardial alpha(1)-adrenoceptors has never been investigated. We tested the ability of carvedilol to antagonize the inotropic effect mediated by myocardial alpha(1)-adrenoceptors compared to the antagonism of beta-adrenoceptors. Papillary muscles from rat heart left ventricle were mounted in an organ bath and concentration-response experiments for the inotropic effects of separate alpha(1)- and beta-adrenoceptor stimulation were performed in the absence and presence of carvedilol. Carvedilol antagonized myocardial alpha(1)-adrenoceptors with an inhibition constant (K(i)) of 11.0+/-3.0 nmol/l and the functional experiments were supported by radioligand-binding studies. Corresponding functional studies on the response to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation revealed a K(i) of 1.2+/-0.35 nmol/l. Thus, carvedilol antagonizes the myocardial alpha(1)-adrenoceptors with a 9-fold lower potency than the beta-adrenoceptors. Antagonism of myocardial alpha(1)-adrenoceptor evoked effects may contribute to clinical effects of carvedilol.

Selective versus nonselective beta-blockade for heart failure therapy: are there lessons to be learned from the COMET trial?

The recently reported COMET trial found that the beta1/beta2/alpha1 receptor blocking agent carvedilol given in a relatively high beta1-receptor blocking dose regimen was superior in mortality reduction to immediate release metoprolol given in a relatively low beta1-receptor blocking dose schedule. We analyze the problems with the trial design of COMET from the standpoint of comparing 2 therapeutic agents at different positions on a common dose-response curve, and discuss the theoretical reasons why postjunctional adrenergic receptor blockade that is in addition to beta1-receptor antagonism will likely produce only minimal or no incremental benefit in chronic heart failure.

Differential effects of carvedilol and atenolol on plasma noradrenaline during exercise in humans

AIMS

Evidence of long-term beneficial effects of beta-blockers on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure has been demonstrated in recent randomized trials. However, not all beta-blockers are identical. Carvedilol, a nonselective beta- and alpha-adrenergic blocker, can potentially blunt the release of noradrenaline by blocking presynaptic beta2-adrenergic receptors. To test this hypothesis, we have compared the effects of carvedilol and atenolol on plasma noradrenaline during exercise in healthy young volunteers.

METHODS

This study investigated the differential effects of 2 weeks pretreatment with carvedilol 25 mg day(-1) and atenolol 50 mg day(-1) on plasma noradrenaline at rest and during exercise on a treadmill in a double-blind randomized crossover study, involving 12 healthy male volunteers (mean age 21.6 +/- 0.3 years).

RESULTS

Haemodynamic parameters at rest and during exercise were not significantly different in either carvedilol or atenolol pretreatment groups. However, carvedilol pretreatment significantly blunted the increase in plasma noradrenaline during exercise [393.8 +/- 51.7 pg ml(-1) (pretreatment) to 259.7 +/- 21.2 pg ml(-1) (post-treatment)], when compared with atenolol [340.4 +/- 54.6 pg ml(-1) (pretreatment) to 396.2 +/- 32.0 pg ml(-1) (post-treatment)]. The difference between carvedilol and atenolol (95% confidence interval) was -145.2, -351.0, P < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that carvedilol but not atenolol significantly blunted the increase in plasma noradrenaline during exercise. These findings may suggest a sympathoinhibitory effect of carvedilol that may enhance its ability to attenuate the cardiotoxicity associated with adrenergic stimulation in patients with heart failure.

Carvedilol increases the production of interleukin-12 and interferon-gamma and improves the survival of mice infected with the encephalomyocarditis virus

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to examine the effects of carvedilol in a murine model of viral myocarditis induced by encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) infection.

BACKGROUND

Cytokines play an important role in the pathophysiology of viral myocarditis. Catecholamines influence the production of cytokines via beta-adrenergic receptors, suggesting that beta-adrenergic blockers could modulate the production of cytokines and exert a therapeutic effect in viral myocarditis by blocking the beta-stimulating action of endogenous catecholamines. In clinical trials, the third-generation, nonselective beta-blocker carvedilol was the first among several beta-blockers to reduce mortality in heart failure. However, the effects of carvedilol in acute viral myocarditis and on cytokine production are unknown.

METHODS

This study compared the effects of carvedilol, the selective beta(1)-blocker metoprolol, and the nonselective beta-blocker propranolol in a murine model of viral myocarditis induced by EMCV.

RESULTS

Carvedilol improved the 14-day survival of the animals, attenuated myocardial lesions on day 7, and increased myocardial levels of interleukin (IL)-12 and interferon (IFN)-gamma, whereas reducing myocardial virus replication. Propranolol also attenuated myocardial lesions, but to a lesser extent, and increased IL-12 and IFN-gamma levels. Metoprolol had no effect in this model. Encephalomyocarditis virus infection increased plasma catecholamine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that by blocking the beta(2)-stimulating effects of catecholamines, carvedilol exerts some of its beneficial effects by increasing the production of IL-12 and IFN-gamma. Carvedilol may be effective in patients with viral myocarditis by boosting IL-12 and IFN-gamma production.

Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling and systolic function in elderly patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that carvedilol therapy in patients with heart failure improves clinical outcome and survival, however, the effects of such treatment on left cardiac morphology and function in elderly patients with severe heart failure has not been widely studied.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of carvedilol at short- and long-term on left ventricular size and performance with mono- and two-dimensional echocardiography, in subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA III functional class, low LV ejection fraction (EF < 35%) and mean age of > 70 years.

METHODS

We studied 48 patients, previously randomized to treatment with either carvedilol or placebo, and we performed echocardiographic evaluation at the start, and after 3 and 12 months. Left ventricular diameters, LV mass and fractional shortening were calculated by Deveraux formula; left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were measured by area-length formula; pulmonary pressure was calculated by tricuspid reflow.

RESULTS

After 3 months, only LV end-diastolic diameter was lower in the carvedilol group compared to the placebo group. Nevertheless, after 12 months, patients on carvedilol treatment showed a LV geometric and functional improvement compared to placebo. We found significant differences in: diastolic (P < 0.01) and systolic diameters (P < 0.001); on LV mass (P < 0.002); on LV systolic volume (P < 0.03); and on LV ejection fraction (P<0.01). Pulmonary pressure was also reduced in beta-blocker subjects (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol therapy for 12 months reduced LV diameters and volumes. Thus, improving cardiac remodeling and LV systolic function in elderly patients with severe heart failure. Several months of therapy are required for these favorable effects to occur, as these changes do not occur in the short term.

Beta-blockers in chronic heart failure: considerations for selecting an agent

Patients with chronic heart failure have increased sympathetic nervous system activity that contributes to deterioration of cardiovascular function over time. Long-term beta-blocker therapy prevents such deterioration through inhibition of this neurohormonal pathway. The impressive survival data collected from several large studies have made beta-blockers a component of standard therapy for New York Heart Association class II to III heart failure. Although there are differences in the pharmacological properties of the beta-blockers shown to improve morbidity and mortality in heart failure, there is little evidence to suggest that such properties constitute any major advantages in clinical outcome. Carvedilol and extended-release metoprolol succinate are 2 beta-blockers currently approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with heart failure. Both agents have shown similar risk reductions in overall and cause-specific mortality; however, no outcome data from a comparative trial are available to support the use of one agent over the other. Regardless of the agent chosen, appropriate dosing and titration of beta-blockers are essential for successful therapy.

Carvedilol does not alter the insulin sensitivity in patients with congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND

Congestive heart failure (CHF) has previously been shown to be associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. A beneficial effect of the non-selective beta-blocker carvedilol has been demonstrated in patients with CHF. However, whether the drug affects the insulin sensitivity (S(i)) is unknown.

AIMS

To investigate whether treatment with carvedilol alters the S(i) in patients with CHF during a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The patients were randomized to receive either carvedilol (n=29) or matched placebo (n=17). Insulin and glucose responses were measured during a 0.3 g/kg intravenous glucose tolerance test, and S(i) was calculated according to Bergman's Minimal Model. Baseline S(i) values correlated significantly with body mass index (r=-0.42, P=0.002), plasma urate (r=-0.42, P=0.002), plasma HDL-cholesterol (r=0.39, P=0.003), maximal oxygen uptake (r=0.35, P=0.009), plasma triglycerides (r=-0.34, P=0.01) and weight (r=-0.29, P=0.03). During the study the insulin sensitivity was unchanged in the carvedilol group compared with placebo (2.63+/-1.45 to 2.38+/-1.64 vs. 2.81+/-2.36 to 2.48+/-1.84x10(-4) min(-1)/mUl(-1), P=0.83).

CONCLUSION

Additional treatment with carvedilol is neutral with regard to influence the insulin sensitivity in patients with mild to moderate CHF.

Differential effects of bucindolol and carvedilol on noradenaline-induced hypertrophic response in ventricular cardiomyocytes of adult rats

In adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, noradrenaline exerts dual effects on protein synthesis: increases via alpha(1)-adrenoceptors and decreases via beta(1)-adrenoceptors. Carvedilol and bucindolol are beta-blockers with additional alpha(1)-adrenoceptor blocking activities. We studied the effects of carvedilol and bucindolol on noradrenaline-induced protein synthesis (assessed by [(3)H]phenylalanine incorporation) in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes. Radioligand binding studies with [(125)I]iodocyanopindolol and [(3)H]prazosin revealed that carvedilol had a much higher affinity to alpha(1)-adrenoceptors than bucindolol (beta(1)-/alpha(1)-adrenoceptor ratio for carvedilol, 1:2.7; for bucindolol, 1:43). Noradrenaline-evoked increases in protein synthesis were enhanced by propranolol (1 microM) and beta(1)-adrenoceptor-selective antagonists bisoprolol (1 microM) and CGP 20712A [1-[2-((3-carbamoyl-4-hydroxy)phenoxy)-ethyl-amino]-3-[4-(1-methyl-4-trifluoromethyl-2-imidazolyl)phenoxy]-2-propranol methanesulfonate] (300 nM). Carvedilol (100 pM-10 microM) inhibited 1 microM noradrenaline-induced increase in protein synthesis with monophasic concentration-inhibition curves independent of whether CGP 20712A was present or not; K(i) values for carvedilol were 5 to 6 nM. In contrast, bucindolol (100 pM-10 microM) inhibited l microM noradrenaline-induced increase in protein synthesis with a bell-shaped concentration-inhibition curve; it increased noradrenaline-induced protein synthesis at 10 nM, although at concentrations >100 nM it was inhibited. In the presence of 300 nM CGP 20712A or 1 microM propranolol, however, bucindolol inhibited 1 microM noradrenaline-induced increase in protein synthesis with monophasic concentration-inhibition curves; K(i) values were 40 to 75 nM. On the other hand, both carvedilol and bucindolol inhibited 1 microM phenylephrine-induced protein synthesis with monophasic concentration-inhibition curves; K(i) values were 4 (carvedilol) and 45 nM (bucindolol). These results indicate that, at low (beta-adrenoceptor blocking) concentrations, bucindolol can enhance noradrenaline-induced protein synthesis whereas it is inhibited by carvedilol.

Synthesis and evaluation of radiolabeled antagonists for imaging of beta-adrenoceptors in the brain with PET

Five potent, lipophilic beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (carvedilol, pindolol, toliprolol and fluorinated analogs of bupranolol and penbutolol) were labeled with either carbon-11 or fluorine-18 and evaluated for cerebral beta-adrenoceptor imaging in experimental animals. The standard radioligand for autoradiography of beta-adrenoceptors, [125I]-iodocyanopindolol, was also included in this survey. All compounds showed either very low uptake in rat brain or a regional distribution that was not related to beta-adrenoceptors, whereas some ligands did display specific binding in heart and lungs. Apparently, the criteria of a high affinity and a moderately high lipophilicity were insufficient to predict the suitability of beta-adrenergic antagonists for visualization of beta-adrenoceptors in the central nervous system.

Comparison of the affinity of beta-blockers for two states of the beta 1-adrenoceptor in ferret ventricular myocardium

We compared the potency of 11 clinically available beta-blockers as antagonists of the positive inotropic effects of (-)-isoprenaline and CGP12177 on ferret ventricular myocardium. (-)-CGP12177, (-)-pindolol and (-)-alprenolol were non-conventional partial agonists with intrinsic activity of 0.7, 0.2 and 0.1 respectively. All beta-blockers antagonized in a concentration-dependent and surmountable manner the positive inotropic effects of both (-)-isoprenaline and CGP12177. The potency of each beta-blocker was consistently higher against (-)-isoprenaline than against CGP12177. Two groups of beta-blockers were identified. In one group the difference between the pK(B) values of blockade against (-)-isoprenaline and CGP12177 was 1.1 - 1.6 log units ((-)-alprenolol, (-)-pindolol, (-)-bupranolol, nadolol and carvedilol). In the other group the pK(B) difference was of 2.1 - 3.0 log units ((-)-atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, sotalol, (-)-propranolol and (-)-timolol). The beta-blockers competed with (-)-[(125)I]-cyanopindolol for binding to ventricular beta(1)-adrenoceptors. The binding affinities correlated with the corresponding blocking potencies against (-)-isoprenaline. On average the pK(i) values were 0.5 log units smaller than the pK(B) values against (-)-isoprenaline but 1.6 log units greater than the pK(B) values against CGP12177. In ferret ventricle the effects of (-)-isoprenaline appear to be antagonized by beta-blockers through the state of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor for which (-)-[(125)I]-cyanopindolol and beta-blockers have high affinity. The cardiostimulant effects of CGP12177 appear to be mediated through a low-affinity state of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor for which beta-blockers have low affinity.

Carvedilol in the failing heart

Patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction of ischemic or nonischemic etiology have shown improvement in morbidity and mortality with carvedilol therapy. In patients with symptomatic (New York Heart Association class II-IV) heart failure, carvedilol improves left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical status, and slows disease progression, reducing the combined risk of mortality and hospitalization. Despite the overwhelming evidence for their benefit, there continues to be a large treatment gap between those who would derive benefit and those who actually receive the drug. In this article, the pharmacology, clinical trial evidence, and the potential differences between carvedilol and other beta blockers are discussed. Carvedilol provides powerful therapy in the treatment of chronic heart failure caused by a variety of etiologies and in a wide array of clinical settings.

Prospective crossover comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the effects of a change of beta-adrenergic blocking agent treatment from metoprolol to carvedilol and vice versa in patients with heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers improve ventricular function and prolong survival in patients with HF. It has recently been suggested that carvedilol has more pronounced effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with metoprolol. It is uncertain whether a change from one beta-blocker to the other is safe and leads to any change of left ventricular function.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with HF due to ischemic (n = 17) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n = 27) that had responded well to long-term treatment with either metoprolol (n = 20) or carvedilol (n = 24) were switched to an equivalent dose of the respective other beta-blocker. Before and six months after crossover of treatment, echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed.

RESULTS

Six months after crossover of beta-blocker treatment, LVEF had further improved with both carvedilol and metoprolol (carvedilol: 32 +/- 3% to 36 +/- 4%; metoprolol: 27 +/- 4% to 30 +/- 5%; both p < 0.05 vs. baseline), without interindividual differences. There were no changes in either New York Heart Association functional class or any other hemodynamic parameters at rest. Dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed a more pronounced increase of heart rate after dobutamine infusion in metoprolol- compared with carvedilol-treated patients. After dobutamine infusion, LVEF increased in the carvedilol- but not in the metoprolol-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

When switching treatment from one beta-blocker to the other, improvement of LVEF in patients with HF is maintained. Despite similar long-term effects on hemodynamics at rest, beta-adrenergic responsiveness is different in both treatments.

Differing beta-blocking effects of carvedilol and metoprolol

BACKGROUND

Metoprolol is a beta(1)-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockades of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Administration of metoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs.

AIMS

To compare beta-blocking effects of metoprolol and carvedilol when applied orally in healthy subjects.

METHODS

We investigated the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of metoprolol (50, 100 and 200 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of a placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Two hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min of exercise, and after 15 min of recovery.

RESULTS

Metoprolol tended to decrease heart rate during exercise (-21%, -25% and -24%) to a greater extent than carvedilol (-16%, -16% and -18%). At rest, increasing doses of metoprolol caused decreasing heart rates (62, 60 and 58 beats/min) whereas increasing doses of carvedilol caused increasing heart rates (62, 66 and 69 beats/min), 50 and 100 mg carvedilol failed to differ significantly from the placebo (71 beats/min).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that clinically recommended doses of carvedilol cause a clinically relevant beta-blockade in humans predominantly during exercise where it appears to be slightly (although not significantly) less effective than metoprolol. On the other hand, the effects of carvedilol on heart rate at rest appear rather weak, particularly in subjects with a low sympathetic tone. This might be caused by a reflex increase on sympathetic drive secondary to peripheral vasodilation resulting from the alpha-blocking effects of the drug. These results might be helpful in explaining why carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, may fail to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and does not decrease nocturnal melatonin release. This, in turn, may be a reason for the weak side-effects of carvedilol resulting from the beta-blockade. In addition, our data might be of interest in the interpretation of the forthcoming results of the COMET trial, although it has to be emphasised that they were derived from healthy subjects and, therefore, cannot be directly extrapolated to patients with heart failure.

Nebivolol, bucindolol, metoprolol and carvedilol are devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in human myocardium

1. The present study investigated whether or not there may be differences in the direct cardiac actions of the novel, highly beta(1)-selective adrenoceptor antagonist nebivolol (NEB) in comparison to metoprolol (MET), bisoprolol (BIS), carvedilol (CAR) and bucindolol (BUC) in human myocardium (n=9). 2. The rank order of beta(1)-selectivity as judged by competition experiments to (3)H-CGP 12.1777 in the presence of CGP 207.12 A (300 nmol l(-1), K(i)beta(2)) or ICI 118.551 (50 nmol l(-1), K(i)beta(1)) were NEB(K(i)beta(2)/K(i)beta(1): 40.7) > BIS(15.6) > MET(4.23) > CAR(0.73) > BUC(0.49). 3. The rank order of the negative inotropic potency of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists measured in left ventricular trabeculae (dilated cardiomyopathy, DCM) as judged by the concentration needed to induce a 50% decrease in isoprenaline (1 micromol l(-1))-stimulated force (IC(50)) was: MET (0.6 micromol l(-1)) > CAR (4.1 micromol l(-1)) > NEB (7.0 micromol l(-1)). 4. NEB, BUC, MET and CAR did not not exert an intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) as determined by measurements of force development in forskolin (0.3 micromol l(-1)) pre-treated left ventricular trabeculae, nor by measuring adenylate cyclase activity in forskolin (0.3 micromol l(-1))-stimulated assays (crude membranes). This also holds true for radioligand binding assays with or without guanine nucleotide guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p). 5. Although all studied beta-adrenoceptor antagonists lack intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), they differ in the beta(1)-selectivity as well as in their direct negative inotropic action. These differences as well as the mode of extracardiac action may have an impact on outcome of patients treated with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Stereoselective effects of (R)- and (S)-carvedilol in humans

Carvedilol is currently used as the racemic mixture, (R,S)-carvedilol, consisting of equal amounts of (R)-carvedilol, an alpha-blocker, and (S)-carvedilol, an alpha- and beta-blocker, which have never been tested in their optically pure forms in human subjects. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received single oral doses of 25 mg (R,S)-carvedilol, 12.5 mg (R)-carvedilol, 12.5 mg (S)-carvedilol, and placebo at 8 AM as well as at 8 PM. Exercise was performed at 11 AM, and heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest and after 10 min of exercise. Urine was collected between 10 AM and 6 PM, as well as between 10 PM and 6 AM, and the amounts of urinary 6-hydroxy-melatonin sulfate (aMT6s) were determined by RIA. Compared to placebo, (R)-carvedilol increased heart rate during exercise (+4%, P < 0.05) and recovery (+10%, P < 0.05); (S)-carvedilol decreased heart rate during exercise (-14%, P < 0.05) and recovery (-6%, P < 0.05), and systolic blood pressure during exercise (-12%, P < 0.05); (R,S)-carvedilol decreased heart rate during exercise (-11%, P < 0.05), and systolic blood pressure at rest (-7%, P < 0.05) and during exercise (-10%, P < 0.05). None of the agents had any significant effect on the release of aMT6s. Our results indicate that only (S)-carvedilol causes beta-blockade, whereas (R)-carvedilol appears to increase sympathetic tone, presumably as a physiological reaction to the decrease of blood pressure caused by alpha-blockade. None of the drugs had any influence on melatonin release. The weak clinical net effect of beta-blockade of (R,S)-carvedilol at rest might be one reason why this drug causes fewer side effects than other beta-blockers, such as a reduction of nocturnal melatonin release.

Bucindolol, a nonselective beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, decreases beta-adrenergic receptor density in cultured embryonic chick cardiac myocyte membranes

Bucindolol and carvedilol, nonselective beta1- and beta2-adrenergic receptor antagonists, have been widely used in clinical therapeutic trials of congestive heart failure. The aim of the current study was to investigate long-term effects of bucindolol or carvedilol on beta-adrenergic receptor protein and gene expression in cardiac myocytes. Embryonic chick cardiac myocytes were cultured and incubated with bucindolol (1 microM), carvedilol (1 microM), or norepinephrine (1 microM) for 24 h. 125I-iodocyanopindolol binding assays demonstrated that incubation with norepinephrine or bucindolol, but not carvedilol, significantly decreased beta-adrenergic receptor density in crude membranes prepared from the myocytes. Neither bucindolol nor carvedilol significantly stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in membranes from drug-untreated cells. Unlike by norepinephrine, the receptor density reduction by bucindolol incubation was not accompanied by a change in beta1-adrenergic receptor messenger RNA abundance. A decrease in membrane beta-adrenergic receptor density without a change in cognate messenger RNA abundance was also observed in hamster DDT1 MF2 cell line incubated with bucindolol (1 microM, 24 h). We conclude that incubation with bucindolol, but not carvedilol, results in true reduction of beta-adrenergic receptor density in chick cardiac myocyte membranes by mechanisms that are distinct from those responsible for receptor density reduction by the agonist norepinephrine.

Characterization of beta(1)-selectivity, adrenoceptor-G(s)-protein interaction and inverse agonism of nebivolol in human myocardium

Intrinsic activity and beta(1)-selectivity are important features of beta-blockers in the treatment of patients with coronary syndromes and heart failure. In human myocardium, intrinsic activity and beta(1)-selectivity of the novel beta-adrenoceptor antagonist nebivolol have not yet been determined. The study examines intrinsic activity, beta-adrenoceptor-G-protein coupling and beta(1)-selectivity of nebivolol and bisoprolol in human ventricular myocardium. Furthermore, intrinsic activity of both compounds is compared to the one of bucindolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in human atrial myocardium. Radioligand binding studies ([(125)I]-lodocyanopindolol) were performed on membrane preparations of human failing and nonfailing myocardium and on COS-7 cells transfected with human beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors, respectively. Functional experiments were carried out on isolated muscle preparations of human left ventricular and right atrial myocardium from failing and nonfailing hearts. Radioligand binding studies reveal 3 - 4 fold beta(1)-selectivity for nebivolol and 16 - 20 fold beta(1)-selectivity for bisoprolol in human myocardium. In COS-7-cells, beta(1)-selectivity is 3 fold for nebivolol and 15 fold for bisoprolol. Neither the binding of nebivolol nor of bisoprolol is affected by the presence of guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p). Nebivolol and bisoprolol exert similar inverse agonist activity in human ventricular as well as atrial myocardium. In atrial myocardium, inverse agonism of both compounds is higher compared to bucindolol, equal to carvedilol and lower compared to metoprolol. Favourable haemodynamic effects of nebivolol in humans are not due to beta(1)-selectivity or partial agonist activity of this agent. Other mechanisms, i.e. the production of nitric oxide, may thus be responsible for its unique haemodynamic profile.

Effect of carvedilol on atrioventricular conduction in the ischemic heart

We compared the effects of carvedilol on atrial-His and His-ventricular conduction with those of propranolol in isolated rat hearts. Hearts were perfused retrograde, and atrial-His and His-ventricular intervals were measured. The effective doses that increased conduction times by 25% were 10(-6) M for atrial-His and 3x10(-6) M for His-ventricular for propranolol, and 8x10(-8) M for atrial-His and 10(-8) M for His-ventricular for carvedilol. Prazosin did not affect the atrial-His and His-ventricular intervals. After ischemia-reperfusion, atrial-His and His-ventricular intervals increased to a greater extent with 10(-6) M carvedilol. To determine the direct membrane effect, we examined the transmembrane action potential in guinea pig papillary muscle. Both drugs decreased the maximum upstroke velocity equally. Our data indicate that carvedilol had a greater effect on atrioventricular conduction in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion than did propranolol. This effect of carvedilol was not due to its alpha-adrenoceptor blocking property or to a direct membrane effect.

Influence of beta-blockers on mortality in chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To briefly discuss the pathophysiology of heart failure and the rationale for the use of beta-blockers in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Key morbidity reduction trials are briefly mentioned, and recent mortality reduction trials are reviewed. General recommendations regarding the use of beta-blockers in heart failure are also included to guide clinical practice.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION

Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses evaluating mortality reduction with beta-blockers in the treatment of heart failure were identified using a MEDLINE search from January 1993 to March 2000. Abstracts and presented results from recent scientific meetings were also considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease hospitalization for worsening heart failure, decrease the need for heart transplant, improve New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and increase left-ventricular ejection fraction. A mortality benefit has recently been demonstrated for patients with chronic heart failure. Carvedilol, bisoprolol, and controlled-release/extended-release metoprolol decreased the risk of dying by 65%, 34%, and 34%, respectively, in patients with primarily NYHA functional class II or III and systolic dysfunction. The benefit of these agents in patients with class IV heart failure or determining whether one agent has an advantage over another is being investigated in ongoing clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Several beta-blockers have demonstrated mortality reduction in the treatment of patients with NYHA functional class II or III heart failure and systolic dysfunction. Beta-blockers should be considered in these patients when they are clinically stable and taking the current standard therapy of a diuretic plus an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or other vasodilator agent.

Binding properties of beta-blockers at recombinant beta1-, beta2-, and beta3-adrenoceptors

The human heart contains at least four distinct beta-adrenoceptor subtypes, three of which have been cloned. However, the binding properties of beta-blockers to the different beta-adrenoceptor subpopulations are not yet thoroughly characterized. Human beta1-, beta2- and beta3-adrenoceptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and [125I]iodocyanopindolol saturation binding, and competition experiments with commonly used beta-blockers were performed in the respective membrane preparations. Atenolol and metoprolol were about fivefold selective for beta1- versus beta2- and beta3-adrenoceptors. Bisoprolol was approximately 15-fold selective for beta1- versus beta2- and approximately 31-fold selective for beta1- versus beta3-adrenoceptors. Carvedilol was nonselective for any beta-adrenoceptor subtype. We conclude that the beta1-selectivities of atenolol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol are lower in COS cell membranes compared with previous investigations performed in native membranes. All beta-blockers investigated bind to beta3-adrenoceptors. Differential binding properties to beta3-adrenoceptors might imply different responses as to body weight, cardiac contractility, heart rate, and growth regulation. This might imply differential indications for the drugs investigated.

Molecular aspects and gene therapy prospects for diastolic failure

Because of safety issues, components of the beta-adrenergic signaling pathway cannot currently be viewed as attractive targets for human gene therapy. Rather, the balance of evidence supports strategies that will target gene products specifically and directly at diastolic regulation. Augmenting the activity of the SR Ca2+ ATPase by AAV-mediated delivery of the SERCA2a gene, directed by a cardiac-specific promoter with a tightly regulable on-off switch is perhaps the most attractive strategy. PLB and cTnI also are attractive targets but only if molecular techniques can be devised to modulate their activity specifically and conditionally. Such techniques may involve modifying the phosphorylation sites in vitro and replacing wild type proteins in the failing heart with the modified forms, again using regulated AAV vectors for gene delivery.

Differential effects of carvedilol on norepinephrine release in normoxic and ischemic heart

Carvedilol is a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with multiple actions, which may contribute to superior cardioprotection in heart failure and myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that carvedilol may modulate presynaptic norepinephrine release in the heart. Therefore, we compared the effects of carvedilol (racemate and both enantiomers) and beta1-selective as well as nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockers on norepinephrine release in isolated perfused rat hearts under normoxic and brief ischemic conditions. Exocytotic release of endogenous norepinephrine was induced by paired electric field stimulations to compare the release before (S1) and after (S2) beta-adrenoceptor blocker application. Metoprolol, bisoprolol, and pindolol (0.1-10 microM) had essentially no effect on exocytotic norepinephrine release under normoxic and ischemic conditions. In contrast, carvedilol exerted a biphasic concentration-response curve (increase followed by suppression) on norepinephrine release. The increase in norepinephrine release was more pronounced with R-carvedilol than with S-carvedilol, indicating an effect independent from beta-receptor antagonism. During ischemia, the facilitatory effect of carvedilol on norepinephrine release was lost, resulting in a concentration-dependent suppression of the release. These results indicate that carvedilol in contrast to classic beta1-selective and -nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockers has pronounced effects on cardiac norepinephrine release with a remarkable difference between normoxic and ischemic conditions. Whereas a facilitation of norepinephrine release prevailed in normoxia, we observed a suppression of the release in ischemia. It remains to be established whether this unique action of carvedilol on cardiac sympathetic neurotransmission is of clinical relevance.

Different intrinsic activities of bucindolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in human failing myocardium

1. Clinical studies have shown different effects of beta-blockers on the beta-adrenergic system, tolerability and outcome in patients with heart failure. 2. The study examines beta-adrenoceptor-G-protein coupling and intrinsic activity of bucindolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in human ventricular myocardium. 3. Radioligand binding studies ([(125)I]-Iodocyanopindolol) were performed in membrane preparations of human failing and nonfailing myocardium. Functional experiments were carried out in isolated muscle preparations of human left ventricular myocardium from failing hearts. 4. Bucindolol and carvedilol bound non-selectively to beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors and exerted guanine nucleotide modulatable binding. Metoprolol was 35-fold beta(1)-selective and lacked guanine nucleotide modulatable binding. 5. All beta-blockers antagonized isoprenaline-induced enhancement of contractility. 6. In preparations in which the coupling of the stimulatory G-protein to adenylate cyclase was facilitated by forskolin, bucindolol increased force of contraction in three and decreased it in five experiments. Carvedilol increased force in one and decreased it in six experiments. Metoprolol decreased force in all experiments by 89. 4+/-2.2% (P<0.01 metoprolol vs carvedilol and bucindolol). The negative inotropic effect of metoprolol was antagonized by bucindolol. 7. It is concluded that differences in intrinsic activity can be detected in human myocardium and have an impact on cardiac contractility. In human ventricular myocardium, bucindolol displays substantially higher intrinsic activity than metoprolol and carvedilol. Bucindolol can behave as partial agonist or partial inverse agonist depending on the examined tissue. 8. Differences in intrinsic activity may contribute to differences in beta-adrenoceptor regulation and possibly to differences in tolerability and outcomes of patients with heart failure.

Deactivation of the sympathetic nervous system in patients with chronic congestive heart failure

In this article, we review the basic biology, signal transduction pathways, and clinical pharmacology associated with cardiac beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-ARs) in the context of the use of beta-blocking agents in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Adrenergic receptors, particularly the beta-AR subtypes (beta(1)-AR and beta(2)-AR), are known to play a critical role in the modulation of cardiac function, providing for both "adaptive" and "maladaptive" compensatory changes. In the context of exercise or self-preservation, the adrenergic nervous system, acting via beta-ARs permits an appropriately rapid, highly-dynamic increase in cardiac function. Conversely, in individuals with chronic congestive heart failure, the sustained, heightened activation of adrenergic nervous system, as manifested by increases in circulating catecholamines, results in down- regulation and desensitization of myocardial beta-ARs, and potentially, significant myocardial damage. A number of recent clinical trials have demonstrated a marked mortality benefit from using beta-blocking agents such as metoprolol and carvedilol in patients with heart failure. The pharmacologic properties of several of these drugs and some of the specifics of their usefulness and limitations are discussed herein.

Acute cardiovascular effects and pharmacokinetics of carvedilol in healthy dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine acute cardiovascular effects and pharmacokinetics of carvedilol in healthy dogs.

ANIMALS

14 mature healthy Beagles.

PROCEDURE

12 dogs were anesthetized with morphine and alpha-chloralose. Catheters were placed in the aorta, left ventricle, and right atrium to record systemic and pulmonary pressures and determine vascular resistance and cardiac output. Electrocardiograms (leads I, aVF, and V3) were recorded to determine electrocardiographic changes. Variables were measured before and after IV injection of incremental doses of carvedilol (cumulative doses, 10, 30, 70, 150, 310, and 630 microg/kg of body weight; n = 6) or vehicle alone (6). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, using 2 conscious dogs given 160 microg of carvedilol/kg as a single IV injection.

RESULTS

Heart rate and velocity of fiber shortening at zero load (Vmax) increased slightly but significantly from baseline values at doses of carvedilol > or = 310 microg/kg and 10 microg/kg, respectively. Carvedilol did not affect systemic and pulmonary pressures or vascular resistances. Intravenous administration of approximately 150 microg of carvedilol/kg resulted in a plasma carvedilol concentration of approximately 100 ng/ml. Mean elimination half-life was 54 minutes, half-life of distribution was 3.5 minutes, and volume of distribution was 2,038 ml/kg.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The therapeutic plasma concentration of carvedilol in humans is 100 ng/ml. At that plasma concentration in dogs, the reduction in afterload and positive inotropic effect that we observed would be beneficial for treating heart failure and minimizing the cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin.

Protective effects of carvedilol against doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in rats

Carvedilol (CAR) is a vasodilating beta-blocker which also has antioxidant properties. CAR produces dose-related reduction in mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that CAR protects against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiomyopathy in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with DOX, CAR, CAR+DOX, or atenolol (ATN)+DOX. DOX (cumulative dose, 15 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally, and CAR (30 mg/kg daily) or ATN (150 mg/kg daily) was administered orally. Three weeks after the completion of these treatments, cardiac performance and myocardial lipid peroxidation were assessed. Mortality was observed in the DOX (25%) and ATN+DOX (12.5%) groups. Compared with control rats, DOX significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (104+/-4 vs. 120+/-4 mmHg, P<0.05) and left ventricular fractional shortening (38.8+/-3.1 vs. 55.4+/-1.3%, P<0.01), and resulted in a significant accumulation of ascites (14.4+/-4.9 vs. 0 ml, P<0.01). CAR significantly prevented the cardiomyopathic changes caused by DOX, while ATN did not. The myocardial thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) content was significantly higher in DOX-treated rats than in control rats (80.4+/-7.1 vs. 51.5+/-1.2 nmol/g heart, p<0.01). CAR prevented the increase in TBARS content (48.8+/-3.0 nmol/g heart, P<0.01 vs. DOX group), whereas ATN had no significant effect (74.3+/-5.2 nmol/g heart). CAR also significantly prevented the increase in both myocardial and plasma cholesterol concentrations caused by DOX. These data indicate that CAR protects against DOX-induced cardiomyopathy and that this effect may be attributed to the antioxidant and lipid-lowering properties of CAR, not to its beta-blocking property.

Long-term effects of carvedilol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with persistent left ventricular dysfunction despite chronic metoprolol. The Heart-Muscle Disease Study Group

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether long-term treatment with the nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent carvedilol may have beneficial effects in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who are poor responders in terms of left ventricular (LV) function and exercise tolerance to chronic treatment with the selective beta-blocker metoprolol.

BACKGROUND

Although metoprolol has been proven to be beneficial in the majority of patients with heart failure, a subset of the remaining patients shows long-term survival without satisfactory clinical improvement.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive DCM patients with persistent LV dysfunction (ejection fraction < or =40%) and reduced exercise tolerance (peak oxygen consumption <25 ml/kg/min) despite chronic (>1 year) tailored treatment with metoprolol and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were enrolled in a 12-month, open-label, parallel trial and were randomized either to continue on metoprolol (n = 16, mean dosage 142+/-44 mg/day) or to cross over to maximum tolerated dosage of carvedilol (n = 14, mean dosage 74+/-23 mg/day).

RESULTS

At 12 months, patients on carvedilol, compared with those continuing on metoprolol, showed a decrease in LV dimensions (end-diastolic volume -8+/-7 vs. +7+/-6 ml/m2, p = 0.053; end-systolic volume -7+/-5 vs. +6+/-4 ml/m2, p = 0.047), an improvement in LV ejection fraction (+7+/-3% vs. -1+/-2%, p = 0.045), a reduction in ventricular ectopic beats (-12+/-9 vs. +62+/-50 n/h, p = 0.05) and couplets (-0.5+/-0.4 vs. +1.5+/-0.6 n/h, p = 0.048), no significant benefit on symptoms and quality of life and a negative effect on peak oxygen consumption (-0.6+/-0.6 vs. +1.3+/-0.5 ml/kg/min, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In DCM patients who were poor responders to chronic metoprolol, carvedilol treatment was associated with favorable effects on LV systolic function and remodeling as well as on ventricular arrhythmias, whereas it had a negative effect on peak oxygen consumption.

Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure

We and others have previously shown that carvedilol improves left ventricular (LV) function and symptoms in chronic heart failure. This improvement in LV function has also been shown to be associated with an improvement in survival. This study evaluates the effect of carvedilol on LV mass, geometry, and degree of mitral regurgitation (MR). In 59 patients with symptomatic heart failure and LV ejection fraction <0.35, previously randomized to either treatment with carvedilol or placebo, we evaluated LV mass, geometry, and degree of MR over the time period of carvedilol treatment. LV mass decreased as early as 4 months into the treatment protocol and continued to decrease over a period of 1 year. LV geometry, defined by the length/diameter ratio, and severity of MR also improved with 4 months of therapy. Thus, compared with placebo treatment, carvedilol decreases LV mass while improving cardiac geometry and decreasing MR in patients with chronic heart failure. These changes occur in association with an improvement in LV systolic function. This process begins by 4 months of treatment and continues for 12 months.