Effect of the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene on response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure

Will the Use of Pharmacogenetics Improve Treatment Efficiency in COVID-19?

The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a global health crisis and the greatest challenge for scientists and doctors. The virus causes severe acute respiratory syndrome with an outcome that is fatal in more vulnerable populations. Due to the need to find an efficient treatment in a short time, there were several drugs that were repurposed or repositioned for COVID-19. There are many types of available COVID-19 therapies, including antiviral agents (remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, oseltamivir), antibiotics (azithromycin), antiparasitics (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin), and corticosteroids (dexamethasone). A combination of antivirals with various mechanisms of action may be more efficient. However, the use of some of these medicines can be related to the occurrence of adverse effects. Some promising drug candidates have been found to be ineffective in clinical trials. The knowledge of pharmacogenetic issues, which translate into variability in drug conversion from prodrug into drug, metabolism as well as transport, could help to predict treatment efficiency and the occurrence of adverse effects in patients. However, many drugs used for the treatment of COVID-19 have not undergone pharmacogenetic studies, perhaps as a result of the lack of time.

Important Pharmacogenetic Information for Drugs Prescribed During the SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)

In December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus-2 pandemic began, causing the coronavirus disease 2019. A vast variety of drugs is being used off-label as potential therapies. Many of the repurposed drugs have clinical pharmacogenetic guidelines available with therapeutic recommendations when prescribed as indicated on the drug label. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of pharmacogenetic biomarkers available for these drugs, which may help to prescribe them more safely.

RAS Genetic Variants in Interaction with ACE Inhibitors Drugs Influences Essential Hypertension Control

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Essential Hypertension (EH) is a common disorder associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Malaysia. To investigate how genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) influence EH control with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor drugs (ACEI).

METHODS

A case-control, cross-sectional population-based nested study (n = 142) included hypertensive subjects treated with ACEI drugs, either lisinopril or enalapril (20 mg, once daily) as monotherapy for 24 weeks. In total seven possible polymorphisms of RAS genes were genotyped. The association between those polymorphisms and the changes in blood pressure were observed in the 24 week treatment.

RESULTS

Statistically significant associations of I, G, T, M and G alleles of ACE (I/D, G2350A), AGT (M235T, T175M and G-6A) respectively were observed in essential hypertensive subjects. The decrease in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure after 24 weeks of treatment of the patients carrying II, GG, and TT genotypes were greater than the groups carrying DD, AA, MM, MM and GG of I/D, G2350A, M235T, T174M and G-6A genotypes respectively. In contrast, No significant difference was observed between renin gene polymorphisms (Bg/I and MboI) and hypertensives.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study shows a possible association of polymorphisms of RAS genes with the risk of non-control of HT in ACEI-treated patients and indicates the importance of all this system's components in regulating HT, it needs to be replicated in other data sources.

Pharmacogenomics of heart failure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) and multiple HF-related phenotypes are heritable. Genes implicated in the HF pathophysiology would be expected to influence the response to treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a series of systematic literature searches on the pharmacogenetics of HF therapy to assess the current knowledge on this field.

RESULTS

Existing data related to HF pharmacogenomics are still limited. The ADRB1 gene is a likely candidate to predict response to β-blockers. Moreover, the cytochrome P450 2D6 coding gene (CYP2D6) clearly affects the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, although the clinical impact of this association remains to be established.

CONCLUSION

Given the rising prevalence of HF and related costs, a more personalized use of HF drugs could have a remarkable benefit for patients, caregivers and healthcare systems.

Vascular effects of quinapril completely depend on ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism

Introduction

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) DD-genotype is associated with increased plasma and myocardial ACE-activity. The influence of the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism on the effects of ACE-inhibition on vascular responses has not been previously described.

Materials and methods

In the randomised, double-blind QUinapril On Vascular ACE and Determinants of Ischemia Study (QUO VADIS), 149 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were randomised to receive either the ACE inhibitor, quinapril, or placebo. In 82 patients, we obtained ACE-genotype, and measured vascular responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) in left internal mammary arteries.

Results

In the placebo group, the mean maximal vasoconstriction to Ang II was significantly lower in patients with the DD-genotype than in those with the ID/II genotype (36.2±5.11% [n=13] vs. 55.6±4.57% [n=25]; p=0.01). In the quinapril group, the mean maximal vasoconstriction to Ang II was similar [n=8] vs. 57.7±4.07% [n=35]; p=0.85). between DD- and ID/II-genotype (59.6±9.19%

Conclusions

DD-genotype patients showed decreased vascular responses to Ang II but treatment with quinapril completely restored the decreased vascular response in DD-genotype patients to the same level as II/ID-genotype patients, while no effect of quinapril was demonstrated in the II/ID-genotype patients.

A Physiologic Approach to the Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension

Hypertension is a multifactorial condition with diverse physiological systems contributing to its pathogenesis. Individuals exhibit significant variation in their response to antihypertensive agents. Traditional markers, such as age, gender, diet, plasma renin level, and ethnicity, aid in drug selection. However, this review explores the contribution of genetics to facilitate antihypertensive agent selection and predict treatment efficacy. The findings, reproducibility, and limitations of published studies are examined, with emphasis placed on candidate genetic variants affecting drug metabolism, the renin-angiotensin system, adrenergic signalling, and renal sodium reabsorption. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified and replicated in unbiased genome-wide association studies of hypertension treatment are reviewed to illustrate the evolving understanding of the disease's complex and polygenic pathophysiology. Implementation efforts at academic centers seek to overcome barriers to the broad adoption of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of hypertension. The level of evidence required to support the implementation of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice is considered.

Pharmacogenomics of heart failure

The combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) blockers remains the essential component of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapy. However, individual patient responses to these pharmacotherapies vary widely. The variability in response cannot be explained entirely by clinical characteristics, and genetic variation may play a role. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the current knowledge in the field of beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetics in HF. β-blocker and ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetic studies performed in patients with HF were identified from the PubMed database from 1966 to July 2011. Thirty beta-blocker and 10 ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetic studies in patients with HF were identified.The ACE deletion variant was associated with greater survival benefit from ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers compared with the ACE insertion. Ser49 in the β1AR, the insertion in the α2CAR, and Gln41 in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase (GRK)-5 are associated with greater survival benefit from β-blockers, compared with Gly49, the deletion, and Leu41, respectively. However, many of these associations have not been validated. The HF pharmacogenetic literature is still in its very early stages, but there are promising candidate genetic variants that may identify which HF patients are most likely to benefit from beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors and patients that may require additional therapies.

Gender specificity of a genetic variant of angiotensin-converting enzyme and risk of coronary artery disease

Etiological factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) involve a wide range of gene and environmental interactions. One of the systems being implicated in the pathophysiology of CAD is the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). However, the genetic polymorphisms of this system have not been widely studied in Iranian patients diagnosed with CAD. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between six gene polymorphisms of RAS components and CAD in a sample of Iranian population. A total of 374 participants were enrolled in a case/control study. The presence of CAD was determined by coronary angiography. Genotyping of six RAS gene polymorphisms was performed using a modified PCR-RFLP method. Our results revealed, for the first time, a significant independent association of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) A-240T polymorphism and incidence of CAD among Iranian women (P=0.005, OR=20.4, 95% CI=2.49-41.2). There has also been a significant difference in genotype distribution of ACE A-240T (P=0.008) and angiotensin II receptor type 2 C3123A polymorphism (P=0.032) in Iranian female participants. In conclusion, TT genotype of ACE A-240T seems to be a genetic risk factor for CAD in Iranian women.

Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism with coronary artery disease in Iranian patients with unipolar depression

OBJECTIVES

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is an increasingly recognized risk factor of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between renin-angiotensin system (RAS) genetic polymorphisms and CAD in a sample of depressed Iranian patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 191 patients with a history of unipolar depression were enrolled in a case/control study. The presence of MDD was reconfirmed at study entry using DSM-IV criteria and CAD was diagnosed by coronary angiography. Genotyping of six RAS genes polymorphisms was performed by a modified PCR-RFLP method.

RESULTS

DD genotype of ACE I/D was independently associated with the incidence of CAD in depressed patients (P=0.011, OR=9.41, 95% CI: 1.68-17.81). Moreover, serum creatinine (P=0.033, OR=11.91, 95%CI: 7.23-15.62) was an independent predictor of CAD among depressed individuals.

CONCLUSION

ACE I/D polymorphism may play a major role in the development of CAD amongst Iranian depressed patients.

Pharmacogenetics in chronic heart failure: new developments and current challenges

The individual patient responses to chronic heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies are highly variable. This variability cannot be entirely explained by clinical characteristics, and genetic variation may play a role. Therefore, this review will summarize the background pharmacogenetic literature for major HF pharmacotherapy classes (ie, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin, and loop diuretics), evaluate recent advances in the HF pharmacogenetic literature in the context of previous findings, and discuss the challenges and conclusions for HF pharmacogenetic data and its clinical application.

Genetic tailoring of pharmacotherapy in heart failure: optimize the old, while we wait for something new

BACKGROUND

The combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers remains the essential component of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapy. However, individual patient responses to these pharmacotherapies vary widely. The variability in response cannot be explained entirely by clinical characteristics, and genetic variation may play a role. The purpose of this review is to examine our current state of understanding of beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetics in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetic studies performed in patients with HF were identified from the Pubmed database from 1966 to July 2011. Thirty beta-blocker and 10 ACE inhibitor pharmacogenetic studies in patients with HF were identified. The ACE deletion variant was associated with greater survival benefit from ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers compared with the ACE insertion. Ser49 in the beta-1 adrenergic receptor, the insertion in the alpha-2C adrenergic receptor, and Gln41 in G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 are associated with greater survival benefit from beta-blockers, compared with Gly49, the deletion, and Leu41, respectively. However, many of these associations have not been validated.

CONCLUSIONS

The HF pharmacogenetic literature is still in its very early stages, but there are promising candidate genetic variants that may identify which HF patients are most likely to benefit from beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors and patients that may require additional therapies.

Genomic variation and neurohormonal intervention in heart failure

Neurohormonal activation is an important driver of heart-failure progression, and all pharmacologic interventions that improve heart-failure survival inhibit this systemic response to myocardial injury. Adrenergic stimulation of beta(1) receptors in the kidney results in the release of plasma renin, the conversion of peptide precursors to angiotensin II (a2), and ultimately the production of aldosterone. beta(1)-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and aldosterone receptor antagonists all act by inhibiting the activity of critical protein of this core pathway: the beta(1) receptor, ACE, the a2 receptor, and aldosterone synthase. Investigation of the pharmacogenetic interactions of the ACE D/I polymorphism and heart-failure therapy demonstrates the power of genomics to target therapeutics. This review explores how genetic variation in genes involved in neurohormonal activation influences heart-failure outcomes and the impact of pharmacotherapy.

Significance of genetic polymorphisms of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a component of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). The RAAS – involved primarily in blood pressure and sodium homeostasis – is activated in many renal and cardiovascular diseases, and therapy with ACE inhibitors and other blockers of the RAAS has proven to be clinically beneficial. Plasma and tissue levels of ACE are at least partially determined by a genetic polymorphism based on the presence (insertion [I]) or absence (deletion [D]) of a 287 base pair element in intron 16. In particular Asian subjects with the DD genotype (and increased ACE activity) have been reported to be at higher risk for cardiovascular disorders and nephropathy. Numerous studies evaluated the role of the ACE I/D polymorphism as well as other genetic variants of the RAAS in the context of RAAS inhibitor therapy. However, as race and environmental factors, such as salt intake also affect treatment response most studies were underpowered leading to conflicting results.

Renin-angiotensin system and alpha-adducin gene polymorphisms and their relation to responses to antihypertensive drugs: results from the GENRES study

BACKGROUND

Polymorphisms in genes coding for components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and alpha-adducin (ADD1) have been reported to be associated with blood pressure (BP) responses to antihypertensive agents. The results, however, have not been consistent and most of the earlier studies have been small and lacked placebo-control. Therefore, the association of common polymorphisms in these genes with BP responses to four different antihypertensive drugs was analyzed in a controlled study.

METHODS

The study included 208 hypertensive Finnish men from the GENRES study. All of them used amlodipine 5 mg, bisoprolol 5 mg, hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 25 mg, and losartan 50 mg daily, each for 4 weeks as a monotherapy in a double-blind, randomized, study. The treatment periods were separated by 4-week placebo periods. Both 24-h ambulatory (ABP) and office BP (OBP) measurements were carried out. The polymorphisms analyzed were ADD1 Gly460Trp, angiotensinogen (AGT) Met235Thr, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1) 1166A/C.

RESULTS

The presence of 460Trp allele of ADD1, previously suggested to be a marker of thiazide responsiveness, did not predict a better response to HCT. There was no significant association of AGT Met235Thr, ACE I/D, and AGTR1 1166A/C polymorphisms with BP responses to the study drugs. ADD1 460Trp and AGT 235Thr alleles were associated with higher systolic white coat effect (WCE) during the placebo periods (P values 0.03 and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Common polymorphisms of ADD1, AGT, ACE, and AGTR1 do not markedly predict BP responses to amlodipine, bisoprolol, HCT, and losartan, at least in white hypertensive men.

Genetics of dilated cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a myocardial disease characterized by dilatation and impaired systolic function of the left or both ventricles. The etiology of DCM is multifactorial, and many different clinical conditions can lead to the phenotype of DCM. During recent years it has become evident that genetic factors play an important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic DCM. The genetics of DCM have been under intensive investigation lately, and thereby the knowledge on the genetic basis of DCM has increased rapidly. The genetic background of the disease seems to be relatively heterogeneous, and the disease-associated mutations concern mostly single families and only few affected patients. Disease-associated mutations have been detected e.g. in genes encoding sarcomere, cytoskeletal, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved with regulation of Ca(2+) metabolism. The mechanisms, by which mutations eventually result in clinical heart failure, are complex and not yet totally resolved. DCM causes considerable morbidity and mortality. Better knowledge of the genetic background and disease-causing mechanisms would probably help us in focusing early treatment on right subjects and potentially also developing new treatment modalities and improving cardiac outcome in the affected patients. This review deals with DCM of genetic origin.

ACE phenotyping as a first step toward personalized medicine for ACE inhibitors. Why does ACE genotyping not predict the therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibition?

Angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Not all patients respond to ACE inhibitors, and it has been suggested that genetic variation might be a useful marker to predict the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs. In particular, the ACE insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism has been investigated in this regard. Despite a decade of intensive research involving the genotyping of thousands of patients, we still do not know whether ACE genotyping helps in predicting the success of ACE inhibition. This review critically addresses the concept that predictive information on therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibitors might be obtained based on ACE genotyping. It answers the following questions: Do higher ACE levels really result in higher Ang II levels? Is ACE the only converting enzyme in humans? Does ACE inhibition affect ACE expression? Why does ACE have 2 catalytically active domains? What is the relevance of ACE inhibitor-induced signaling through membrane-bound ACE? The review ends with the proposal that ACE phenotyping may prove to be a better first step toward personalized medicine for ACE inhibitors than ACE genotyping.

Exploring design-related bias in clinical studies on receptor genetic polymorphism of hypertension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although several candidate genes of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) have been investigated, the gene-drug relationship remains unclear. The objective was to appraise the elements of research methodology and explore potential biases, which may be contributing to discordant results in the gene-drug interaction assessment for RAAS.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies involving candidate polymorphisms, searching PubMed, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were identified. Nine studies had a genomic evaluation as the primary question. Six studies investigated more than one gene. A gene-drug interaction was evaluated in two studies and only one of the studies had a placebo arm for accurately exploring the interaction. Almost, 90% of the studies had sample sizes of less than 500 patients. Four studies combined the allele frequencies of the heterozygotes group with one of the homozygotes groups. Almost one quarter of the studies combined different therapeutics in one group. Five studies included patients in one group from previous studies in which selection criteria were not quite similar.

CONCLUSION

Most studies contain several methodological limitations. Also biases driven from patient selection, combining different alleles, combining different therapeutics, and combining end points may have occurred in these studies. These limitations and biases may contribute to inconsistency of the results of these studies.

Pharmacogenetics of antihypertensive treatment

Hypertension is a common disorder associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, in the US only about one-third of those who are aware of their hypertensive status have their blood pressure adequately controlled. One reason for this is the variable and unpredictable response individuals have to pharmacologic treatment. Clinicians often resort to "trial-and-error" to match patients with effective drug treatment. Hypertension pharmacogenetics seeks to find genetic predictors of drug response. To date, more than forty studies have investigated associations between genetic polymorphisms and response to antihypertensive drugs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers have been most frequently studied, followed by angiotensin II blockers, diuretics, adrenergic alpha-agonists, and calcium channel blockers. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system genes have been the most widely studied, with the angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D variant being typed in about one-half of all hypertension pharmacogenetic studies. In total, 160 possible gene polymorphism-drug interactions have been explored, with about one-quarter of these showing that genes predict drug response. However, disparate and conflicting findings have been the rule rather than the exception, and the discovery of clinically relevant antihypertensive drug-response genes remains elusive. While there is a growing enthusiasm that pharmacogenetics of hypertension is important, the translation of pharmacogenetic findings to clinical practice in the future will depend on additional studies to enhance our pharmacogenetics knowledge base, the availability of pharmacogenetic screening tests that are affordable and easy to implement in clinical practice, a cohort of clinicians who are trained to interpret genetic test results, and health care systems that pay for them. Caution regarding the future of hypertension pharmacogenetics is warranted.

Drug-gene interaction between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and antihypertensive therapy

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of a variety of effective drugs, inadequate control of blood pressure is common. There are some indications that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene modifies the response to antihypertensive drugs, but the results have been inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the ACE gene modifies blood pressure differences among subjects using diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium-channel antagonists, or ACE inhibitors.

METHODS

Data were used from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based, prospective, cohort study in the Netherlands, which started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years or older. Data from 3 subsequent cross-sectional investigations were used, as well. Subjects were included if they had high blood pressure during one or more examinations and/or used monotherapy with a diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium-channel antagonist, or ACE inhibitor. A marginal, generalized, linear model was used to assess the association between the mean difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure and antihypertensive classes stratified by the 3 genotypes.

RESULTS

In total, 3025 hypertensive individuals were included, and 6500 measurements of blood pressure were taken. The percentages of DD, ID, and II genotypes were 28.3%, 51.4%, and 20.3%, respectively. The mean differences in systolic blood pressure between the II and DD genotypes were 0.23 mm Hg (95% CI -5.48 to 5.94) for diuretics, -2.41 mm Hg (95% CI -6.72 to 1.90) for beta-blockers, 2.12 mm Hg (95% CI -4.64 to 8.89) for calcium-channel antagonists, and -2.01 mm Hg (95% CI -9.82 to 5.79) for ACE inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjusted mean difference in diastolic and systolic blood pressure among diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium-channel antagonist, or ACE inhibitor users was not modified by the ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism.

Pharmacogenomics in cardiovascular disease: the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in improving drug therapy

Pharmacogenomics is the study of how an individual's genetic inheritance affects the body's response to drugs. Pharmacogenomics holds the promise that drugs might one day be tailor-made for individuals and adapted to an individual's genetic makeup. Several studies have shown that both adverse and beneficial responses to cardiovascular drugs can be influenced by single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes coding for metabolising enzymes, drug transporters and drug targets. Despite the large amount of data about gene-drug interactions, the translation of pharmacogenomics in clinical practise is slow. To improve this, there is a need of new technology and large prospective trials allowing for simultaneous analysis of multiple genetic variants in molecular pathways that could affect drug disposition and action.

Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review

Background

Pharmacogenetic testing to individualize ACE inhibitor therapy remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect modification of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on any outcome in patients treated with ACE inhibitors for cardiovascular and/or renal disease.

Methods

Our systematic review involved searching six electronic databases, then contacting the investigators (and pharmaceutical industry representatives) responsible for the creation of these databases. Two reviewers independently selected relevant randomized, placebo-controlled trials and abstracted from each study details on characteristics and quality.

Results

Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. Despite repeated efforts to contact authors, only four of the eleven studies provided sufficient data to quantify the effect modification by genotypes. We observed a trend towards better response to ACE inhibitors in Caucasian DD carriers compared to II carriers, in terms of blood pressure, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, ACE activity and progression to end-stage renal failure. Pooling of the results was inappropriate, due to heterogeneity in ethnicity, clinical domains and outcomes.

Conclusion

Lack of sufficient genetic data from the reviewed studies precluded drawing any convincing conclusions. Better reporting of genetic data are needed to confirm our preliminary observations concerning better response to ACE inhibitors among Caucasian DD carriers as compared to II carriers.

Pharmacogenetic association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism on blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in relation to antihypertensive treatment: the Genetics of Hypertension-Associated Treatment (GenHAT) study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that blood pressure response to antihypertensive medications is influenced by genetic variation in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but no clinical trails have tested whether the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism modifies the association between the type of medication and multiple cardiovascular and renal phenotypes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a double-blind, active-controlled randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment that included hypertensives > or =55 years of age with > or =1 risk factor for cardiovascular disease. ACE I/D genotypes were determined in 37 939 participants randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin treatments and followed up for 4 to 8 years. Primary outcomes included fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included stroke, all-cause mortality, combined CHD, and combined cardiovascular disease. Fatal and nonfatal CHD occurred in 3096 individuals during follow-up. The hazard rates for fatal and nonfatal CHD and the secondary outcomes were similar across antihypertensive treatments. ACE I/D genotype group was not associated with fatal and nonfatal CHD (relative risk of DD versus ID and II, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.07) or any secondary outcome. The 6-year hazard rate for fatal and nonfatal CHD in the DD genotype group was not statistically different from the ID and II genotype group by type of treatment. No secondary outcome measure was statistically different across antihypertensive treatment and ACE I/D genotype strata.

CONCLUSIONS

ACE I/D genotype group was not a predictor of CHD, nor did it modify the response to antihypertensive treatment. We conclude that the ACE I/D polymorphism is not a useful marker to predict antihypertensive treatment response.

Mortality in patients with hypertension on angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor treatment is influenced by the ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism

BACKGROUND

The response to angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor therapy is highly variable. Residual ACE activity during treatment, potentially modified by the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism, may explain part of this variability. We studied the possible interaction between ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with hypertension and the ACE I/D polymorphism in incident heart failure and death.

METHODS

We studied 3365 hypertensive participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study, without heart failure at baseline for whom ACE-genotyping was successful. Incident heart failure was defined according to established criteria. In addition, total and cardiovascular mortality were studied as endpoints. A Cox regression model with use of ACE-inhibitors defined as time-dependent covariates was used for data-analysis. Interaction was tested in this model assuming an allele-effect relationship.

RESULTS

Although we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of ACE-inhibitors, there was significant interaction between the ACE I/D polymorphism (II-ID-DD) and ACE-inhibitor use in the prediction of total and cardiovascular mortality. Mortality risk associated with treatment increased with the number of D alleles present; e.g. for total mortality in the II genotype group: RR=0.95 (95% CI 0.63-1.45), in the ID genotype group: RR=1.08 (95% CI 0.84-1.38) and in the DD genotype group: RR=1.61 (95% CI 1.18-2.18). No statistically significant interaction was found for incident heart failure.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest a relative resistance to ACE-inhibitor therapy in subjects with hypertension and the DD genotype compared to the II genotype, with the ID genotype in an intermediate position.

Drug-gene interactions between genetic polymorphisms and antihypertensive therapy

Genetic factors may influence the response to antihypertensive medication. A number of studies have investigated genetic polymorphisms as determinants of cardiovascular response to antihypertensive drug therapy. In most candidate gene studies, no such drug-gene interactions were found. However, there is observational evidence that hypertensive patients with the 460 W allele of the alpha-adducin gene have a lower risk of myocardial infarction and stroke when treated with diuretics compared with other antihypertensive therapies. With regard to blood pressure response, interactions were found between genetic polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and diuretics, the alpha-adducin gene and diuretics, the alpha-subunit of G protein and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, and the ACE gene and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists. Other studies found an interaction between ACE inhibitors and the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism, which resulted in differences in AT(1) receptor mRNA expression, left ventricular hypertrophy and arterial stiffness between different genetic variants. Also, drug-gene interactions between calcium channel antagonists and ACE I/D polymorphism regarding arterial stiffness have been reported. Unfortunately, the quality of these studies is quite variable. Given the methodological problems, the results from the candidate gene studies are still inconclusive and further research is necessary.

The Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Polymorphism in Congestive Heart Failure

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a zinc metallopeptidase, with primary known functions of converting angiotensin I into the vasoactive and aldosterone-stimulating peptide angiotensin II and inactivating bradykinin. There is high variability among individuals in ACE concentrations, mainly due to the presence of a genetic polymorphism. The ACE gene has, in fact, insertion/deletion polymorphism in intron 16, consisting of a 287-base pair Alu repeat sequence, with three genotypes: insertion polymorphism, insertion/deletion polymorphism, and deletion polymorphism. The genetic effect accounts for 47% of the total variance of serum ACE. The determination of this polymorphism has allowed researchers to study the implications of the ACE gene in many case-control studies of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction and hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. We review the current knowledge about the ACE gene polymorphism and its implications in heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Interpretation of the results of studies about the role of this polymorphism are controversial. The repetition of epidemio-genetic studies and the creation of adequate experimental studies will help to definitively establish the pathogenetic role of the permanent increase in ACE expression associated with the deletion polymorphism genotype.

Pharmacogenetics of hypertension treatment

The extent of blood pressure lowering by anti-hypertensive agents is difficult to predict for individual patients, even when evaluated in the context of biochemical or demographic information. Genetic predictors (mainly single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) have been the focus of several recent studies and are gaining much attention. We have conducted a literature search for studies in which the lowering of ambient blood pressure by specific drugs or drug classes in humans was related to specific genotypes. Twenty-eight studies were identified, of which six had a single-dose design, and the remaining 22 studied drug effects after more than 4 weeks of drug administration. Virtually all were association studies. Prospective trials that compared the prognostic value of genetic methods to routine clinical practice were not identified. Almost all studies used a candidate-gene design, usually with a very small number of SNPs (typically one). Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions were studied only rarely. Only one study targeted genes involved in drug metabolism. Most candidate-genes were part of the renin-angiotensin system. By far the most extensively studied has been the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism (15 studies) but, to date, no clear picture has emerged for this or other genetic variants. Thus, the potential for utility of genetic characterization of individual patients as a predictor of anti-hypertensive response has yet to be realized.

Polymorphisms in the RAS and cardiac function

Since the discovery of the polymorphism in the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and the consequences of this polymorphism on the activity levels of the enzyme, numerous association studies have been performed. However, these investigations do not often adhere to the most stringent criteria for such studies. The initial study reporting a positive association of the ACE polymorphism and myocardial infarction showed an increased risk of the DD genotype. This initial association was eventually refuted by a large, well conducted association study, which found a risk ratio of 1.02 after combining their own data with all published data. Although such large, well conducted association studies have not been performed in left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the association between DD genotype and hypertrophy is more convincing with a 192% excess risk of LV hypertrophy in untreated hypertensives. The role of ACE genotype in LV growth is well established, especially in athletes. In heart failure, large studies or meta-analyses have not been performed, because most studies have selected different end-points. This hampers a proper meta-analysis of the results obtained in associations with heart failure. As most association studies do not fulfill the criteria for good association studies and use too small sample sizes, it remains important to perform a meta-analysis to add meaning to the results of such studies. Above all, it is important to obey the rules set for association studies, large sample size, small P values, report associations that make biological sense and alleles that affect the gene product in a physiologically meaningful way.

Pharmacogenetic approaches to hypertension therapy: design and rationale for the Genetics of Hypertension Associated Treatment (GenHAT) study

The Genetics of Hypertension Associated Treatment (GenHAT) study will determine whether variants in hypertension susceptibility genes interact with antihypertensive medication to modify coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in hypertensives. GenHAT is an ancillary study of the Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, ALLHAT, a double-blind, randomized trial of 42 418 hypertensives, 55 years of age or older, with systolic or diastolic hypertension and one or more risk factors for cardiovascular disease. About 50% are non-white, and about half are female. ALLHAT completes follow-up in March 2002. GenHAT is typing variants in hypertension genes; completion of genotyping is scheduled for 2003. Analysis of gene-treatment interactions in relation to outcomes include CHD, stroke, heart failure, and blood pressure lowering. To our knowledge, GenHAT is the largest pharmacogenetic study ever conducted. An added strength is its ability to link gene-treatment interactions with important clinical outcomes across diverse ethnic and gender groups.

Pharmacogenomics of primary hypertension--the lessons from the past to look toward the future

A number of recent reviews have addressed the issue of the pharmacogenomics of primary hypertension and related complications by considering the data on the genotype-drug response relationship. Here we mainly discuss the methodological aspects of this issue, trying to integrate 'traditional' clinical and experimental pathophysiology and therapy-pharmacology with the 'new' genetics. Such integration is indispensable to: a). define the appropriate 'context' (genetic background, environment, age, gender, phase of hypertension, previous therapy etc.) in which a given genotype-drug response relationship should be tested (it is indeed likely that many discrepancies among published data originate from context's interference); b). assign the correct clinical meaning to the results obtained by statistics and functional genetics methodologies; c). define a novel clinical entity caused by a disease favoring allele, alone or in combination with other alleles, with a consistent clinical picture, prognosis and responsiveness to the appropriate drug; d). estimate the size of the population target amenable to benefit from a therapeutic intervention developed according to the pharmacogenomics' principles; e). develop a novel drug that selectively interferes with the sequence of events triggered by the genetic mechanism(s) underlying the clinical entity. Peculiar to this strategy is to look for consistency among findings gathered from different 'contexts' after having properly accounted for the context's dependency of the results.

Pharmacogenomics of congestive heart failure

Information on the probable efficacy and safety of drugs for individualized patients should change both the economics and the management of congestive heart failure. Rapidly profiling patients should enhance the ability to develop "designer" drugs for those with similar disease phenotypes. Pharmacogenomics also may resurrect promising drugs that did not show benefit when previously added to standard therapy. The promise of pharmacogenomics has to be tempered, however, by a sensitivity to concerns regarding the potential misuse of genomic information, including loss of confidentiality for the patient, as well as possible stigmatization of groups. Such difficult genoethical issues must be addressed in order to reap the full benefits of this evolving and exciting field.

Pharmacogenomics: the future of drug therapy

Pharmacogenomics aims to optimize patient management by customizing and synthesizing drugs based on genetic variations in drug response. Polymorphisms affecting metabolism, receptors, and absorption can influence drug sensitivity, toxicity, and dosing. The Human Genome Project, DNA chips, and bioinformatics advance the practice of this field by, respectively, identifying polymorphisms related to drug response, determining an individual's profile of polymorphisms, and integrating data to facilitate clinical decision making. Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics include increasing efficacy and preventing adverse drug reactions, thus improving patient care and decreasing costs. These factors imply that a thorough understanding of the principles and applications of pharmacogenomics will be an indispensable part of the future of drug therapy in clinical medicine.

New aspects on angiotensin-converting enzyme: from gene to disease

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a well known zinc-metallopeptidase that converts angiotensin I to the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II and that degrades bradykinin, a powerful vasodilator, both for regulation of vascular tone and cardiac functions. Other natural substrates of ACE were identified broadening the functions of this enzyme within different physiological contexts such as neuronal metabolism, hematopoiesis, digestion and reproduction. Synthetic substrates were developed for the determination of ACE activity in various biological fluids, mostly human plasma, for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and other granulomatous diseases. After the successful use of captopril, the first ACE inhibitor in the treatment of hypertension, a number of molecules were synthesized and used in the treatment of congestive heart failure and for preventing cardiac impairment after myocardial infarction. This class of antihypertensive drugs benefited from structural data on carboxypeptidases active site, as ACE molecule has not yet been crystallized. In the last two decades ACE gene has been cloned that allowed the identification (i) of two isoenzymes, one called somatic ACE resulting from gene duplication and primarily expressed in endothelial cells, and the other, called germinative or testicular ACE, resulting from the transcription in the male reproductive system of a more simple gene, (ii) of an hydrophobic C-terminal peptide for membrane-anchoring and specifically cleaved by a metalloprotease to release soluble forms of both isoenzymes, and (iii) of several allelic polymorphisms, one of them consisting of an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in a short intronic Alu sequence that could account for half the variance in plasma ACE level and resulting in a large inter-individual variability; moreover this I/D polymorphism was proposed as a genetic marker for identifying individuals at high risk of ischemic heart disease and of anticipating in one individual the efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy, although conflicting data arose from the past decade literature. Moreover, ACE gene cloning has confirmed the expression of the enzyme in endothelial cell, in particular as an ecto-enzyme facing the vascular lumen, but not to the same extent with regard to the vascular origin of the cells. Plasma ACE in healthy subjects arises essentially from the endothelium. On the other hand, in granulomatous diseases where a local stimulation of macrophages leads to an abnormal ACE secretion, it can also be found in other biological fluids such as cerebrospinal and broncho-alveolar fluids. Low plasma ACE levels result from endothelium impairment such as in deep vein thrombosis or in endothelio-toxic anticancer therapies. Another cause of low, sometimes undetectable, plasma ACE levels is the use of an ACE inhibitor, but this is without any significance with regard to its clinical benefits. Albeit molecular cloning has provided a number of new details on ACE structure and function, many questions still remain, in particular about its tertiary structure including glycosylations, about its tissue-specific expression and regulation, and also about the exact significance of the I/D polymorphism in cardiovascular pathology including the pharmacogenomic field.

Pharmacogenetics and cancer therapy

Pharmacogenetics is the study of how genetic variations affect drug response. These variations can affect a patient's response to cancer drugs, for which there is usually a fine line between a dosage that has a therapeutic effect and one that produces toxicity. Gaining better insight into the genetic elements of both the patient and the tumour that affect drug efficacy will eventually allow for individualized dosage determination and fewer adverse effects.

Pharmacogenetics: an opportunity for a safer and more efficient pharmacotherapy

Drug treatment is in many cases ineffective. Besides patients who do not respond to the treatment despite receiving expensive drugs, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as a consequence of the treatment, is estimated to cost the US society 100 billion USD and over 100,000 deaths per year. Pharmacogenetics is the discipline which takes the patient's genetic information of drug transporters, drug metabolizing enzymes and drug receptors into account to allow for an individualized drug therapy leading to optimal choice and dose of the drugs in question. It is believed that much cost for the society can be saved in this manner. Many drug transporters are polymorphic. In addition, the majority of phase I and phase II dependent drug metabolism is carried out by polymorphic enzymes which can cause abolished, quantitatively or qualitatively altered or enhanced drug metabolism. Stable duplication, multiduplication or amplification of active genes, most likely in response to dietary components that have resulted in a selection of alleles with multiple noninducible genes, has been described. Several examples exist where subjects carrying certain alleles suffer from a lack of drug efficacy because of ultrarapid metabolism caused by multiple genes or by induction of gene expression, or, alternatively, adverse effects from the drug treatment as a result of the presence of defective alleles. The information about the role of polymorphic drug receptors for efficiency of drug therapy is more scarce, although promising examples are seen in drug treatment of asthma where the efficiency can be severely enhanced by predictive genotyping of the drug targets. In addition, certain polymorphic genes can be used as markers for optimization of the drug therapy. It is likely that predictive genotyping is of benefit in 10-20% of drug treatment and thereby allows for prevention of causalities as a cause of ADRs and thus improves the health for a significant fraction of the patients. In 15-40% of the cases, the penetrance of genetic polymorphism is of less importance because of the polygenic influence on the outcome of drug treatment and in 50% of the cases, pharmacogenetics would be without influence because of other more important physiological and environmental factors. In the present contribution an overview about our present knowledge how polymorphic genes can influence the drug efficacy is presented. Some emphasis will be given to different forms of cytochrome P450 which are of importance for drug metabolism.

Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy

There is great heterogeneity in the way humans respond to medications, often requiring empirical strategies to find the appropriate drug therapy for each patient (the "art" of medicine). Over the past 50 years, there has been great progress in understanding the molecular basis of drug action and in elucidating genetic determinants of disease pathogenesis and drug response. Pharmacogenomics is the burgeoning field of investigation that aims to further elucidate the inherited nature of interindividual differences in drug disposition and effects, with the ultimate goal of providing a stronger scientific basis for selecting the optimal drug therapy and dosages for each patient. These genetic insights should also lead to mechanism-based approaches to the discovery and development of new medications. This review highlights the current status of work in this field and addresses strategies that hold promise for future advances in pharmacogenomics.

Failure of aldosterone suppression despite angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor administration in chronic heart failure is associated with ACE DD genotype

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess whether the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism influences the adequacy of the neurohormonal response to ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of CHF, and aldosterone levels closely relate to outcome in patients with CHF. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors suppress the RAAS, but a significant proportion of patients exhibit elevated serum levels of aldosterone despite long-term administration of apparently adequate doses of these agents.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 132 patients with CHF (ejection fraction <45%) receiving long-term therapy with ACE inhibitors for over six months. Patients taking aldosterone antagonists were excluded from the study. "Aldosterone escape" was defined as being present when plasma aldosterone levels were above the normal range in our laboratory (>42 nmol/L). Patients were then divided into two subgroups according to the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of aldosterone escape. Genotype analysis for the ACE I/D polymorphism was performed by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The prevalence of aldosterone escape in our patients was 10% (13/132). The two groups of patients did not differ regarding the dose of ACE inhibitor, diuretics and their renal function. There was a statistically significant different distribution of genotypes between the two groups, with a higher proportion of DD genotype in group 1 compared with group 2 (62% vs. 24%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CHF with aldosterone escape have a higher prevalence of DD genotype compared with patients with aldosterone within the normal limits. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism contributes to the modulation and adequacy of the neurohormonal response to long-term ACE-inhibitor administration in CHF.

Are we ready for pharmacogenomics in heart failure?

Heart failure is a major health problem and is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. Recently, the role of the genetic background in the onset and development of the disease has been evidenced in both heart failure with and without systolic dysfunction, and in familial and non-familial forms of this condition. Familial forms of dilated cardiomyopathy are more frequent than previously thought. Various modes of inheritance and phenotypes have been reported and this condition appears genetically highly heterogenous. Five genes (dystrophin, cardiac actin, desmin, lamin A/C and delta-sarcoglycan), and additional loci, have been identified in families in which dilated cardiomyopathy is isolated or associated with other cardiac or non-cardiac symptoms. It has been postulated that the molecular defect involved could lead to abnormal interactions between cytoskeletal proteins, responsible either for defect in force transmission or for membrane disruption. More recently, the identification of mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins has led to a second hypothesis in which the disease might also result from a force generation defect. In non-monogenic dilated cardiomyopathy, susceptibility genes (role in the development of the disease) and modifier genes (role in the evolution/prognosis of the disease) have so far been identified. Some data suggest that the efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and side-effects, might be related to some genetic polymorphisms, such as the I/D polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene. Although preliminary, these data are promising and might be the first step towards application of phamacogenetics in heart failure. This is of paramount importance as the medical treatment of heart failure is characterized by the need for polypharmacy. One of the major challenges of the next millenium, therefore, will be to identify genetic factors which might help define responders to major treatment classes, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists, spironolactone, vasopeptidase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists.

Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms: potential mechanisms for their association with cardiovascular diseases

Since the first description of the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism more than a decade ago, many hundreds of investigations have reported associations between this polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases. Subsequently, similar studies were performed in relationship with several other renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms, most notably the angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism and the angiotensin AT(1) receptor A1166C polymorphism. Surprisingly however, especially in view of the many contradictory results that have been obtained, very little attention has been paid to the mechanism(s) that may link these genetic variants and respective diseases. Here, we review the limited evidence that is currently available on the functional consequences (including compensatory mechanisms) of the above three renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms, in order to provide an explanation for the reported associations (or lack thereof) between these polymorphisms and cardiovascular diseases.

Advances in pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics

Large differences among normal human subjects in the efficacy and safety of many therapeutic agents are caused by genetically controlled polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and drug receptors. Development of pharmacogenomics as a new field has accelerated progress in pharmacogenetics by elucidating at the level of the human genome the inherited basis for those large interindividual variations. Examples discussed in this review illustrate how this approach can be used not only to guide new drug discovery but also to individualize therapy. Adverse drug reactions, often attributable to large differences among subjects in drug response, constitute a leading cause of death in the USA. Such high morbidity and mortality could be reduced by application of the principles of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, defined broadly as the study of genetically caused variability in drug response.