Effects of nebivolol on human platelet aggregation

Long-term efficacy of vasodilating β-blocker in patients with acute myocardial infarction: nationwide multicenter prospective registry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Long-term benefit of vasodilating β-blockers is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefit of vasodilating β-blockers over conventional β-blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

Using nationwide prospective multicenter Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry data, we analyzed 3-year clinical outcomes of 7,269 patients with AMI who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and β-blocker therapy. Patients were classified according to treatment strategy (vasodilating β-blockers vs. conventional β-blockers). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 3 years. Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences of baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In 3,079 pairs (6,158 patients) of propensity score-matched patients, the primary outcome occurred significantly less in the vasodilating β-blockers group compared with the conventional β-blockers group (7.6% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.003). Among the secondary outcomes, cardiac death occurred significantly less in the vasodilating β-blockers group than in the conventional group (3.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.015). The incidence rates of MI (2.4% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.160) or hospitalization for HF (2.6% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.192) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Vasodilating β-blocker therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes compared with conventional β-blocker therapy in AMI patients undergoing PCI during 3 years follow-up. Vasodilating β-blockers could be recommended preferentially for these patients.

Comparison of Nebivolol and Bisoprolol for Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Patients

Introduction Beta-blockers again are now considered as first-line therapy for various cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we compare the cardiovascular event between two beta-blocker, i.e. Nebivolol and Bisoprolol. Materials and Methods It is a two-arm open-label randomized prospective study that was conducted from 1st Jan 2016 to 30th July 2019 in tertiary care hospital, Nawabshah. One thousand and fifty-six (n=1056) hypertensive patients were enrolled after informed consent, which were randomized into two equal groups. Patients were followed up for one year. Results Comparison between Nebivolol and Bisoprolol showed that all-cause mortality (9.8% vs 11.48%), cardiovascular mortality (5.4% vs 7.0%), all-cause hospitalization (14.4% vs 16.3%), and cardiovascular hospitalization (9.8% vs 12.09%) was numerically lower in nebivolol but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Further large scale multicentric trials with a longer follow up period are needed to compare various beta-blockers for cardiovascular event.

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

β-blockers are associated with decreased leucocyte-platelet aggregate formation and lower residual platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate after angioplasty and stenting

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of β-blockers on the long-term prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease may in part be attributable to decreased platelet activation. In this prospective cohort study, we sought to investigate the impact of concomitant β-blocker therapy on sensitive markers of platelet activation and aggregation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monocyte-platelet (MPA) and neutrophil-platelet aggregate (NPA) formation in vivo and in response to the platelet agonist adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were determined by flow cytometry in 258 patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. On-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients of the study population (67·8%) received β-blockers. Treatment with β-blockers was associated with significantly lower MPA and NPA formation in vivo and in response to ADP compared to patients without β-blockers (all P ≤ 0·01). The inverse associations of MPA and NPA formation with β-blocker therapy remained statistically significant after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics by multivariate linear regression analyses (all P < 0·05). Moreover, high levels of MPA in response to ADP as well as high levels of NPAin vivo and in response to ADP were significantly less frequent in patients with β-blocker treatment (all P < 0·05). Finally, on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP by MEA was significantly lower in patients receiving β-blockers (P = 0·005).

CONCLUSION

β-Blockers are associated with decreased leucocyte-platelet aggregate formation and lower on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy following angioplasty and stenting.

Targeting Nitric Oxide with Natural Derived Compounds as a Therapeutic Strategy in Vascular Diseases

Within the family of endogenous gasotransmitters, nitric oxide (NO) is the smallest gaseous intercellular messenger involved in the modulation of several processes, such as blood flow and platelet aggregation control, essential to maintain vascular homeostasis. NO is produced by nitric oxide synthases (NOS) and its effects are mediated by cGMP-dependent or cGMP-independent mechanisms. Growing evidence suggests a crosstalk between the NO signaling and the occurrence of oxidative stress in the onset and progression of vascular diseases, such as hypertension, heart failure, ischemia, and stroke. For these reasons, NO is considered as an emerging molecular target for developing therapeutic strategies for cardio- and cerebrovascular pathologies. Several natural derived compounds, such as polyphenols, are now proposed as modulators of NO-mediated pathways. The aim of this review is to highlight the experimental evidence on the involvement of nitric oxide in vascular homeostasis focusing on the therapeutic potential of targeting NO with some natural compounds in patients with vascular diseases.

Influence of Different β-Blockers on Platelet Aggregation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The use of β-blockers in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease is associated with a decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris and mortality of patients. Due to the severity of the disease and previous cardiovascular interventions, many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) use dual antiplatelet therapy to achieve greater inhibition of platelet aggregation. The influence of β-blockers on platelet aggregation in patients using antiplatelet therapy is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of different β-blockers on platelet aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.

METHODOLOGY

The study included 331 patients who were treated at the Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center Kragujevac during 2011. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the type of β-blockers that were used (bisoprolol, nebivolol, metoprolol, and carvedilol). Platelet aggregation was measured using the multiplate analyzer and expressed through the value of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test (to assess the effect of clopidogrel), ASPI test (to assess the effect of acetyl salicylic acid), TRAP test (to assess baseline platelet aggregation), and the ratio of ADP/TRAP and ASPI/TRAP ASPI/TRAP (ASPI - aranchidonic acid induced aggregation, TRAP - thrombin receptor activating peptide) representing the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation compared to the basal value. In consideration were taken the representation of demographic, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and cardiovascular medications between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients who used nebivolol had a significantly lower value of the ratio of ADP/TRAP (0.39 ± 0.30) compared to patients who used bisoprolol (0.48 ± 0.26; P = .038), and trend toward the lower values of ADP test (328.0 ± 197.3 vs 403.7 ± 213.2; P = .059), while there was no statistically significant difference in values of other laboratory parameters of platelet function between other groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CAD on dual antiplatelet therapy who used nebivolol had significantly lower levels of residual ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared to baseline than patients who used bisoprolol.

Anti-thrombotic effects of nebivolol and carvedilol: Involvement of β2 receptors and COX-2/PGI2 pathways

BACKGROUND

Third generation β-adrenolytics, such as selective β1 adrenoceptor antagonist nebivolol and non-selective β1/β2 and α1 adrenoceptor antagonist carvedilol, display beneficial nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilator activities that contribute to their therapeutic efficacy. In the present work, we analyzed whether nebivolol and carvedilol, as well as other β-adrenolytics with similar pharmacological profiles (selective β1 adrenoceptor antagonist - atenolol and non-selective α/β adrenoceptor antagonist - labetalol), possess the ability to induce PGI2-dependent anti-thrombotic activity in vivo in normotensive rats.

METHODS

Anti-thrombotic effects of nebivolol and carvedilol were studied in vivo in anaesthetized rats with extracorporeal circulation superfusing collagen strips. We also assessed vasodilation induced by these drugs in isolated perfused guinea pig hearts according to Langendorff's procedures.

RESULTS

Nebivolol (both d- and l-isomers) (0.1-1mgkg(-1)) and carvedilol (1-3mgkg(-1)), but not atenolol (1mgkg(-1)) or labetalol (3mgkg(-1)), induced a dose-dependent and sustained anti-thrombotic response in rat model of thrombosis with extracorporeal circulation. The cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, rofecoxib (1mgkg(-1)) and indomethacin (5mgkg(-1)) abrogated this response, while l-NAME (5mgkg(-1)) had no significant effect. In the presence of β1/β2 adrenoceptor antagonist nadolol (1mgkg(-1)), but not in the presence of selective β1 adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol (4mgkg(-1)), anti-thrombotic responses to nebivolol, as well as carvedilol, were lost. Neither nebivolol nor carvedilol affected platelet aggregation in vitro, however both nebivolol and carvedilol induced NO-dependent vasodilation in guinea pig coronary circulation that was not dependent on β2 adrenoceptors.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time that nebivolol and carvedilol, independently of their adrenergic receptor blocking activities, induced anti-thrombotic effects in vivo that involved β2 adrenoceptors and the activation of the COX-2/PGI2 pathway.

Stimulation of platelet nitric oxide production by nebivolol prevents thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

dl-Nebivolol, a selective β1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, besides its hypotensive activity exerts vasodilatory and platelet inhibitory effects in vitro by a mechanism involving nitric oxide (NO). Our aim was to evaluate whether nebivolol exerts in vivo antithrombotic effects, to unravel the mechanism of this action and to clarify the relative roles of its 2 enantiomers: d- and l-nebivolol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In wild-type mice, dl-nebivolol, l-nebivolol, and d-nebivolol, but not bisoprolol, reduced mortality consequent to platelet pulmonary thromboembolism induced by the intravenous injection of collagen plus epinephrine (-44%, -45%, -29%, respectively; P<0.05), whereas in eNOS(-/-) mice only dl-nebivolol and d-nebivolol were effective. dl-Nebivolol, l- and d-nebivolol reduced photochemical damage-induced femoral artery thrombosis in wild-type mice, whereas in eNOS(-/-) mice only dl-nebivolol and d-nebivolol were active. Moreover, dl-nebivolol and l-nebivolol increased plasma, urinary-, and platelet-derived nitrites and nitrates (NOx), NO degradation products, in wild-type but not in eNOS(-/-) mice. In vivo platelet activation, assessed by platelet P-selectin expression, was reduced by dl-nebivolol and l- and d-nebivolol in wild-type mice but only by dl-nebivolol and d-nebivolol in eNOS(-/-) mice. In bone marrow-transplanted, chimeric mice with only blood cells, and not the endothelium, producing NO dl-nebivolol and l-nebivolol maintained their antithrombotic activity, whereas they lose it in chimeras with only endothelium, and not blood cells, producing NO. In vitro, with isolated platelets, dl-nebivolol and l-nebivolol, but not d-nebivolol and bisoprolol, increased platelet cGMP and NOx formation. Treatment with dl-nebivolol and l-nebivolol increased phophorylated eNOS in platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that dl-nebivolol exerts an antithrombotic activity by stimulating the formation of NO by platelets, and that this effect is generated by its l-enantiomer, whereas the d-enantiomer exerts a weak antiplatelet effect because of β-adrenergic receptor-independent stimulation of adenyly cyclase. These results confirm that platelet-derived NO plays a role in thrombosis prevention and it may represent a target of pharmacological intervention.

Both carvedilol and nebivolol may improve platelet function and prothrombotic state in patients with nonischemic heart failure

It is unclear whether carvedilol and nebivolol will produce different effects on platelet function and prothrombotic state in heart failure (HF). Thus, we compared their effects on these functions in patients with nonischemic HF. We included 61 patients with symptomatic nonischemic HF having ejection fraction ≤40%. The patients were randomized to carvedilol (n = 31) or nebivolol (n = 30). Analyses were made at baseline, 3, and 6 months. At 6 months, mean platelet volume (MPV) was significantly lowered by both carvedilol and nebivolol therapy. However, MPV tended to be lower in the carvedilol group (7.7 ± 1.0 vs 8.0 ± 0.7 fL, P = .05). Fibrinogen and d-dimer levels were significantly decreased in but comparable in both the groups. Carvedilol and nebivolol have similar beneficial effects on platelet function and prothrombotic state in patients with nonischemic HF.

Nebivolol: an endothelium-friendly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker

Nebivolol is a highly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker, which also stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase and scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS). These characteristics endow nebivolol, compared with conventional β-blockers, with a favorable hemodynamic profile for the treatment of hypertension, chronic heart failure, and possibly other cardiovascular diseases. Nebivolol is a racemic mixture of d- and l-isomers. Its β1-antagonistic properties reside primarily with d-nebivolol although both isomers are capable of increasing the release of NO from the endothelium after binding to β2- or β3-adrenergic receptors. The latter action results in vasodilatation and reduced vascular resistance. Nebivolol also scavenges ROS in a receptor-independent manner by direct interaction with free radicals. By scavenging ROS nebivolol not only reduces oxidant stress but also augments NO bioavailability. The endothelial nitric oxide synthase -stimulating and ROS scavenging effects of nebivolol act synergistically to provide cardiovascular protection in addition to its β1-antagonistic action.

Nebivolol: impact on cardiac and endothelial function and clinical utility

Endothelial dysfunction is a systemic pathological state of the endothelium characterized by a reduction in the bioavailability of vasodilators, essentially nitric oxide, leading to impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation, as well as disarrangement in vascular wall metabolism and function. One of the key factors in endothelial dysfunction is overproduction of reactive oxygen species which participate in the development of hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes, cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and stroke. Because impaired endothelial activity is believed to have a major causal role in the pathophysiology of vascular disease, hypertension, and heart failure, therapeutic agents which modify this condition are of clinical interest. Nebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker with high selectivity for β1-adrenergic receptors and causes vasodilation by interaction with the endothelial L-arginine/ nitric oxide pathway. This dual mechanism of action underscores several hemodynamic qualities of nebivolol, which include reductions in heart rate and blood pressure and improvements in systolic and diastolic function. Although nebivolol reduces blood pressure to a degree similar to that of conventional β-blockers and other types of antihypertensive drugs, it may have advantages in populations with difficult-to-treat hypertension, such as patients with heart failure along with other comorbidities, like diabetes and obesity, and elderly patients in whom nitric oxide-mediated endothelial dysfunction may be more pronounced. Furthermore, recent data indicate that nebivolol appears to be a cost-effective treatment for elderly patients with heart failure compared with standard care. Thus, nebivolol is an effective and well tolerated agent with benefits above those of traditional β-blockers due to its influence on nitric oxide release, which give it singular hemodynamic effects, cardioprotective activity, and a good tolerability profile. This paper reviews the pharmacology structure and properties of nebivolol, focusing on endothelial dysfunction, clinical utility, comparative efficacy, side effects, and quality of life in general with respect to the other antihypertensive agents.

Nebivolol regulates eNOS and iNOS expressions and alleviates oxidative stress in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

AIMS

Oxidative stress-induced cell damage is reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. This study investigated the neuroprotective effect of nebivolol against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion insult in rats.

MAIN METHODS

The model adopted was that of surgically-induced forebrain ischemia, performed by means of bilateral common carotid artery occlusion for 1h, followed by reperfusion for 24 h. The effects of 5 and 10 mg/kg nebivolol, treated for 7 days prior to ischemia/reperfusion insult, were investigated by estimating endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthases (eNOS and iNOS) protein expressions and assessing oxidative stress-related biochemical parameters in the rat forebrain. Also, infarct volume measurement and histopathological study of the forebrain were examined.

KEY FINDINGS

Administration of nebivolol increased eNOS expression with simultaneous decrease in iNOS expression in a dose dependent manner. Moreover, nebivolol inhibited ischemia/reperfusion-induced depletion of reduced glutathione level and decreased the elevated total nitric oxide end production and malondialdehyde levels, superoxide dismutase and lactate dehydrogenase activities. A notable finding is that catalase activity was not changed in response to either ischemia/reperfusion insult or nebivolol treatment. However, the results confirmed that nebivolol significantly reduced infarct volume and alleviated ischemia/reperfusion-induced histopathological changes.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study demonstrates the neuroprotective effect of nebivolol against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion insult. Neuroprotection observed with nebivolol may possibly be explained by regulating eNOS and iNOS expressions and by inhibition of oxidative stress-induced injury. Thus, nebivolol may be considered as a potential candidate for treatment in patients who are prone to stroke.

The influence of bisoprolol dose on ADP-induced platelet aggregability in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy

PURPOSE

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended after acute coronary syndrome or after percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary stent implantation. Many of the patients on dual antiplatelet therapy receive β-blockers; some of them could have antiaggregatory effect. Bisoprolol is a highly selective adrenoceptor-blocker, which is often used in the settings of percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. Its antiaggregative effect has not been extensively studied. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of bisoprolol on ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

Platelet aggregability has been measured in 100 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with multiplate analyzer using ADP test in blood samples anticoagulated with heparin. ADP test values have been expressed by arbitrary units/minute. In univariate and multivariate regression analyses, we have investigated the influence of bisoprolol and its dose and also different factors, such as risk factors, concomitant drugs and their dosage, laboratory findings, on ADP test values.

RESULTS

Univariate regression analysis showed significant correlation between the bisoprolol dose and the ADP test value (P=0.046, B=52.55, 95% confidence interval 0.87-104.23), which was also shown in the multivariate regression analysis (P=0.018; B=57.011; 95% confidence interval 10.455-103.567).

CONCLUSION

We have identified a positive correlation between bisoprolol dose and ADP-induced platelet aggregability in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.

Cardiovascular protective effects of nebivolol in Zucker diabetic fatty rats

BACKGROUND

Although effective in reducing blood pressure, therapy with a first-generation [beta]-blocker is currently controversial in metabolic syndrome due to its negative impact on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

We evaluated the effects of nebivolol, a third-generation highly selective [beta]-blocker with additional vasodilating activity, versus the traditional [beta]-blocker atenolol in controlling functional and morphological cardiovascular damage in a rat model of metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

During 6 months, Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats and control lean Zucker rats (LZR) were studied. The experimental groups were: untreated ZDF, ZDF along with nebivolol, ZDF along with atenolol and LZR. Blood pressure, plasma insulin, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose and platelet aggregation were evaluated. Malondialdehyde, reduced glutathione (GSH)/oxidized glutathione (GSSG) ratio, CuZn superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase were determined in heart homogenates and transforming growth factor [beta]1 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression, by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Vascular reactivity, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, PAI-1, enhanced nitric oxide synthase and collagen expression were evaluated in aorta.

RESULTS

Nebivolol and atenolol presented a similar reduction in blood pressure. However, nebivolol showed a better lipid profile, preserved left ventricular function, a significant control in left ventricular geometry and moderated left ventricular hypertrophy versus atenolol. Significant reduction in platelet aggregation and a substantial endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent relaxation in vessels were also shown in the nebivolol group versus atenolol group. Antioxidant defenses were preserved by nebivolol with a reduction in oxidative stress parameters. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, PAI-1 and eNOS were favorably modulated with nebivolol in vessel wall. TGF[beta]1, PAI-1 and accumulation of collagen-III and collagen-I were also diminished in heart with nebivolol.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides substantial information supporting an actual protective role of nebivolol in comparison with atenolol in experimental metabolic syndrome.

Nebivolol: the somewhat-different beta-adrenergic receptor blocker

Although its clinical use in Europe dates almost 10 years, nebivolol is a beta-blocker that has been only recently introduced in the U.S. market. Like carvedilol, nebivolol belongs to the third generation of beta-blockers, which possess direct vasodilator properties in addition to their adrenergic blocking characteristics. Nebivolol has the highest beta(1)-receptor affinity among beta-blockers and, most interestingly, it substantially improves endothelial dysfunction via its strong stimulatory effects on the activity of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase and via its antioxidative properties. Because impaired endothelial activity is attributed a major causal role in the pathophysiology of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the endothelium-agonistic properties of nebivolol suggest that this drug might provide additional benefit beyond beta-receptor blockade. Although lesser beta-blocker-related side effects have been reported in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or impotence taking nebivolol, side effects and contraindications overlap those of other beta-blockers. Clinically, this compound has been proven to have antihypertensive and anti-ischemic effects as well as beneficial effects on hemodynamics and prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Further studies are now necessary to compare the benefit of nebivolol with that of other drugs in the same class and, most importantly, its prognostic impact in patients with hypertension.

Nitric oxide mechanisms of nebivolol

β-blockers are among the most widely used drugs in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, although they are associated with increased peripheral resistance. Third-generation β-blockers avoid this adverse effect by inducing vasodilation through different mechanisms. In particular, nebivolol, a highly selective blocker of β1-adrenergic receptors, is the only β-blocker known to induce vascular production of nitric oxide, the main endothelial vasodilator. The specific mechanism of nebivolol is particularly relevant in hypertension, where nitric oxide dysfunction occurs. Indeed, nebivolol is able to reverse endothelial dysfunction. Nebivolol induces nitric oxide production via activation of β3-adrenergic receptors, which can explain the good metabolic profile observed after treatment with this drug. Moreover, nebivolol can also stimulate the β3-adrenergic receptor-mediated production of nitric oxide in the heart, and this stimulation can result in a greater protection against heart failure. In conclusion, nebivolol has a unique profile among antihypertensive drugs, adding to a very high selectivity against β1 adrenergic receptors, and an agonist action on β3 receptors and nitric oxide (NO), which has led to clinically significant improvements in hypertensive patients.

Nebivolol: a highly selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that causes vasodilation by increasing nitric oxide

Nebivolol (Bystolic) is a cardioselective beta 1 (beta(1))-adrenergic receptor blocker with endothelium-dependent vasodilating properties. The endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by nebivolol is blocked by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and guanylate cyclase. Nebivolol also increases in vitro and in vivo nitric oxide (NO), which is an essential signaling molecule involved in the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis. This review summarizes the data involving nebivolol and NO bioavailability. Endothelium-dependent relaxation of blood vessels, which is impaired in hypertensive animals and humans, is reversed by nebivolol treatment. Animals exhibiting endothelial dysfunction also show an improvement in NO-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling and an increase in NO bioavailability when treated with nebivolol. When blood vessel and cultured endothelial cells from hypertensive animals are treated with nebivolol, there is a decrease in superoxide production and an increase in the expression and activity of endothelial NOS (eNOS). As a result of the increased bioavailability of NO, nebivolol also increases in vivo arterial distensibility, glomerular filtration rate, and renal plasma flow. In normotensive volunteers, nebivolol infusion increases the forearm blood flow, an effect that is blocked by inhibitors of NOS and restored by the NOS substrate, L-arginine. In hypertensive patients, chronic treatment with nebivolol improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation induced by acetylcholine and shear stress and reverses endothelium-dependent vasoconstriction. Furthermore, nebivolol displays distinct hemodynamic properties in patients that include improvements in stroke volume and a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance. These studies demonstrate that nebivolol produces endothelium-dependent vasodilation by increasing NO release, decreasing oxidative stress to increase NO bioavailability, or both. The NO-dependent vasodilatory action of nebivolol, coupled with its high beta(1)-adrenergic receptor selectivity, is unique among the clinically available beta-blockers and contributes to its efficacy and improved tolerability (e.g., less fatigue and sexual dysfunction) as an antihypertensive agent.

Beta-blockers in the management of hypertension: focus on nebivolol

Hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor but most patients remain asymptomatic for many years. Successful therapy not only needs to be effective, it also needs to be well tolerated. beta-blockers are well established as effective antihypertensive agents. However, one major drawback to the currently available beta-blockers, particularly the noncardioselective beta-blockers, is their side-effect profile, including sexual dysfunction, fatigue, depression and metabolic abnormalities such as impaired glucose tolerance and lipid abnormalities. Nebivolol (Bystolic), a novel, highly cardioselective, third-generation beta-blocker that recently received approval by the US FDA for the treatment of hypertension in the USA, is effective in treating blood pressure and has a favorable side-effect profile. Studies conducted in Europe, where nebivolol has been available for some time for the treatment of hypertension, have shown that nebivolol achieves blood pressure reductions comparable to other beta-blockers but with fewer side effects. Additionally, nebivolol has demonstrated similar efficacy in blood pressure reduction when compared with calcium channel blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. When combined with hydrochlorothiazide there was an additive antihypertensive effect. Lastly, nebivolol exhibits a vasodilatory property that is related to its effect on nitric oxide, an intrinsic vasodilator produced in the vascular endothelium. Nebivolol enhances nitric oxide bioavailability. Studies have also demonstrated nebivolol's ability to function as an antioxidant and decrease markers of oxidative stress. These effects are believed to ultimately produce a modulation of the endothelial dysfunction typically seen in hypertension.

Long-term nebivolol administration reduces renal fibrosis and prevents endothelial dysfunction in rats with hypertension induced by renal mass reduction. J Hypertens. 2007;25:2486-2496. [PMID: 17984671 DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282efeecb]

OBJECTIVES

D/L-Nebivolol is a lypophilic beta1-adrenergic antagonist which is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and can increase nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability with its subsequent vasodilating properties. The purpose of the present work was to assess the effect of long-term nebivolol administration on both renal damage and endothelial dysfunction induced by renal mass reduction (RMR) in rats. Atenolol, which does not increase NO bioavailability, was included in the study as a comparative beta-adrenoceptor antagonist.

METHODS

Rats were subjected to both right nephrectomy and surgical removal of two-thirds of the left kidney in order to retain approximately one-sixth of the total renal mass. One week after ablation, rats were distributed randomly according to the following experimental groups: control group containing RMR rats without treatment; RMR rats treated daily with nebivolol for 6 months (drinking water, 8 mg/kg per day); and RMR rats treated daily with atenolol for 6 months (drinking water, 80 mg/kg per day). A group of sham-operated animals was also included.

RESULTS

Administration of either nebivolol or atenolol similarly reduced arterial pressure in comparison with RMR untreated animals; however, animals receiving nebivolol presented lower levels of collagen type I expression as well as lower glomerular and interstitial fibrosis than those receiving atenolol. Urinary excretion of oxidative stress markers were also lower in animals receiving nebivolol than in rats treated with atenolol. Furthermore, nebivolol prevented RMR-induced endothelial dysfunction more efficiently than atenolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebivolol protects against renal fibrosis, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction better than equivalent doses, in terms of arterial pressure reduction, of atenolol in a hypertensive model of renal damage induced by RMR.

Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lowering BP to normal levels without quality of life deterioration is the most important means of reducing cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have challenged the position of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) as first-line antihypertensive drugs. Nebivolol is a third-generation, highly selective beta(1)-blocker that causes vasodilation through nitric oxide (NO) release. This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs and placebo in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Twelve randomized controlled studies were included in which nebivolol 5 mg once daily was compared with the recommended clinical doses of other antihypertensive drugs (n = 9), placebo (n = 2), and both (n = 1). The clinical studies were selected after a MEDLINE search up to 2007 using the key words 'nebivolol' and 'hypertension.'

RESULTS

Antihypertensive response rates (the percentage of patients achieving target BP levels or a defined DBP reduction) were higher with nebivolol than with ACE inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; p = 0.001) and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.41; p = 0.001) and similar to beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) and the angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARA) losartan. Moreover, a higher percentage of patients receiving nebivolol achieved target BP levels compared with patients treated with losartan (OR 1.98; p = 0.004), CCAs (OR 1.44; p = 0.024), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.35; p = 0.012). The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events did not differ between nebivolol and placebo; adverse event rates were significantly lower with nebivolol than losartan (OR 0.52; p = 0.016), other beta-blockers (OR 0.56; p = 0.007), nifedipine (OR 0.49; p < 0.001), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 0.59; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Results of previous pharmacokinetic studies suggest that nebivolol 5 mg may not conform completely to the definition of a classic beta-blocker demonstrating additional antihypertensive effect due to endothelial NO release-mediated vasodilation. This meta-analysis showed that nebivolol 5 mg achieved similar or better rates of treatment response and BP normalization than other drug classes and other antihypertensive drugs combined, with similar tolerability to placebo and significantly better tolerability than losartan, CCAs, other beta-blockers, and all antihypertensive drugs combined. Although not definitive, this meta-analysis suggests that nebivolol 5 mg is likely to have advantages over existing antihypertensives and may have a role in the first-line treatment of hypertension.

Nebivolol: pharmacologic profile of an ultraselective, vasodilatory beta1-blocker

Beta-blockers are well-established therapeutic agents in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, these agents are highly heterogeneous. Beta-blockers differ in their ancillary pharmacologic properties, which are clinically important. Nebivolol is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenergic receptor blocker that induces vasodilation through stimulation of the endothelial nitric oxide/L-arginine pathway. As a racemic mixture of d- and l-enantiomers, nebivolol is highly lipophilic and rapidly absorbed. Nebivolol undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism through the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) system. As a result of genetic polymorphisms, CYP2D6 has variable activity, manifested by extensive and poor metabolizers of nebivolol. Time to maximum concentration is 0.5 to 2 hours, and half-life is 11 hours in extensive metabolizers; these values are about 3 times longer in poor metabolizers. Urinary and fecal excretion of unchanged nebivolol is less than 0.5% of the dose. Nebivolol has a unique hemodynamic profile of reduced systemic vascular resistance and increased left ventricular function. These properties are attributed to its vasodilating action and contrast with the hemodynamic effects of conventional beta-blockers. Nebivolol is thus a novel beta-blocker with several important pharmacologic properties that distinguish it from traditional beta-blockers. These unique properties may confer clinical benefits beyond simple blood pressure lowering.

Metabolic profile of nebivolol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with unique characteristics

beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have historically been considered an effective and safe option for first-line treatment of hypertension. However, very recently, it has been proposed that beta-blockers should no longer be considered suitable for first-line therapy in the patient with uncomplicated hypertension because of unfavourable morbidity and mortality data. New evidence from recent clinical studies of nebivolol, a third-generation highly selective beta(1)-blocker with additional endothelial nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilating activity, confirms previous findings that this drug differs from other beta-blockers. The combined mechanisms of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism and NO-mediated vasodilation may potentiate the blood pressure-lowering effect of this agent, and confer a broader favourable metabolic profile, which may be clinically relevant for hypertensive patients. The antioxidant properties of nebivolol and its neutral or even favourable effects on both carbohydrate and lipid metabolism are well documented. These properties consistently differentiate nebivolol from nonvasodilating beta-blockers such as atenolol, metoprolol or bisoprolol. Therapeutic indications for beta-blockers include a wide range of co-morbidities found in hypertensive patients, including ischaemic heart disease, tachyarrhythmias and heart failure. Given that the majority of hypertensive patients require more than one drug to control blood pressure, the multiple mechanisms of action and favourable metabolic profile of nebivolol could make it an alternative therapeutic option for hypertensive patients requiring beta-adrenoceptor therapy.

Effects of nebivolol on platelet activation in hypertensive patients: A comparative study with metoprolol

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of nebivolol on platelet activation in hypertensive patients by measuring mean platelet volume (MPV) and plasma soluble P-selectin (sP-sel) levels and compared with those of the patients taking metoprolol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in grade 1 hypertension were enrolled in this prospective, blinded randomized study. Seventy two patients completed the study. After baseline assessment, each patient was randomly allocated to 5 mg daily dose of nebivolol (n=37, 20 male) or 100 mg daily dose of metoprolol (n=35, 18 male) and treated for 6 months. Blood pressure, heart rate, lipid profile, plasma glucose, sP-selectin levels, platelet counts and MPV were measured before and after treatment.

RESULTS

At the end of 6 months, nebivolol significantly decreased MPV and plasma sP-selectin levels (7.59+/-0.78 fl vs. 7.42+/-0.74 fl, p<0.001; 1.29+/-0.46 ng/ml vs. 1.21+/-0.36 ng/ml, p=0.002, respectively) compared to those of pretreatment. Although pretreatment sP-selectin levels of the two groups were similar, posttreatment plasma sP-selectin levels were significantly reduced with nebivolol compared with those of metoprolol group (1.21+/-0.36 ng/ml vs. 1.46+/-0.30 ng/ml, p=0.008). In contrast, metoprolol treatment did not cause any significant change in platelet activation parameters after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Beneficial effects of nebivolol on platelet activation were more potent than those of metoprolol. We consider that decreased platelet activation with nebivolol might play a role to reduce thrombotic risk in hypertensive patients.

Influence of Nebivolol and Metoprolol on Inflammatory Mediators in Human Coronary Endothelial or Smooth Muscle Cells. Effects on Neointima Formation After Balloon Denudation in Carotid Arteries of Rats Treated with Nebivolol

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a critical role in all stages of atherogenesis. Proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) and endothelial cells (EC) enhancing the inflammatory response, both contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis. Anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative therapy seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effect of the beta-blocker nebivolol in comparison to metoprolol in vitro and to find out whether nebivolol inhibits neointima formation in vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Real-time-RT-PCR revealed a decrease in VCAM-1, ICAM-1, PDGF-B, E-selectin and P-selectin mRNA expression in human coronary artery EC and SMC incubated with nebivolol for 72 hours while metoprolol did not have this effect. Nebivolol reduced MCP-1 and PDGF-BB protein in the culture supernatant of SMC and EC, respectively. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with nebivolol for 0 or 35 days before and 28 days after carotid balloon injury. Immunohistological analyses showed that pre-treatment with nebivolol was associated with a decreased number of SMC layers and macrophages and an increased lumen area at the site of the arterial injury. The intima area was reduced by 43% after pre-treatment.

CONCLUSION

We found that nebivolol reduced the expression of proinflammatory genes in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro whereas metoprolol did not. In vivo, nebivolol inhibited neointima formation by reducing SMC proliferation and macrophage accumulation.

Nebivolol: new therapy update

Nebivolol is a beta-blocker under U.S. Food and Drug Administration review for the treatment of hypertension. The unique pharmacologic properties of nebivolol include high specificity for the beta-1 receptor and a nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory effect. The agent provides significant blood pressure reduction from baseline values as compared with placebo. Clinical trials have demonstrated that nebivolol reduces blood pressure similarly to atenolol, bisoprolol, amlodipine, nifedipine, lisinopril, and hydrochlorothiazide. The tolerability of nebivolol is similar to or better than that of these agents. In elderly patients (> or = 70 years of age) with clinically stable congestive heart failure, the addition of nebivolol to the treatment regimen improved the time to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospital admissions over that of placebo. If approved, nebivolol would likely be a viable alternative therapy for hypertension and heart failure; however, additional studies are needed in patients having coronary artery disease.

Nebivolol

Nebivolol is a third-generation beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. It differs from other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists as it combines highly selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist properties with nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory actions and beneficial effects on endothelial function. Nebivolol is approved in Europe and several other countries for the treatment of essential hypertension and in Europe for the treatment of stable mild or moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) in addition to standard therapies in elderly patients aged >or=70 years. Nebivolol is an effective antihypertensive agent and is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. The drug also effectively decreased the composite endpoint of mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with CHF and was generally well tolerated in this population. Nebivolol should be considered as an alternative first-line treatment option for patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate essential hypertension and in elderly patients with CHF.

Nebivolol: novel β-blocker with nitric oxide-induced vasodilation

β-blockers have been widely used for the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure and angina, as well as in the post-myocardial infarction population. Both β1 selective and nonselective agents are available. Nebivolol is a new highly β1 selective antagonist with a nonadrenergic, nitric oxide potentiating vasodilatory property, which is unique among β-blockers. In addition, nebviolol does not inhibit the increase in the heart rate response to exercise, which is unique among β-blockers. Nebviolol has been tested successfully in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in both hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Involvement of nitric oxide in both central and peripheral haemodynamic effect of d/l-nebivolol and its enantiomers in rats

The cardiovascular profile of the racemate D/L-nebivolol and its enantiomers administered by intravenous (i.v.) or by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route was investigated in anaesthetized normotensive rats. D/L-Nebivolol (0.1-0.5 mg/kg) induced a dose-related reduction in blood pressure when administered by i.c.v. route. These hypotensive effects were more marked as compared to those achieved by peripheral administration of D/L-nebivolol (0.1-1 mg/kg i.v.). Both enantiomers contributed to the hypotensive effect of D/L-nebivolol by i.c.v. route, while the effects of the drug on blood pressure by i.v. route were due to the d-enantiomer. The bradycardic effect of the racemic form given i.v. was dose-related and, at the highest dose (1 mg/kg), was more pronounced as compared to i.c.v. route. D-Nebivolol was responsible for chronotropic effects by both the i.v. and i.c.v. route, although by i.c.v. route L-nebivolol also induced a reduction in heart rate. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) administered at 5 mg/kg i.v. bolus + 0.1 mg/kg/min infusion or at 2.5 mg/kg i.c.v. counteracted the effects of D/L-nebivolol (either 1 mg/kg i.v. or 0.5 mg/kg i.c.v.) on blood pressure, while it did not inhibit the cardiovascular changes induced by isoprenaline (300 ng/kg i.v.) or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; 400 ng/kg i.v.). In addition, i.c.v. effects of D/L-nebivolol on blood pressure and heart rate were not affected by pre-treatment with atropine (2 mg/kg i.v.). The present findings demonstrate that D/L-nebivolol produced haemodynamic changes following both peripheral and central administration; these latter findings are mainly due to its L-enantiomer and these effects involve the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway.

Is the effect of antihypertensive drugs on platelet aggregability and fibrinolysis clinically relevant?

Hypertension is associated with decreased fibrinolytic potential, mainly expressed as elevated plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels, and increased platelet aggregability, which may account in part for the increased risk of atherosclerosis and its clinical complications in hypertensive patients. The effects of antihypertensive drugs on this prothrombotic state have been investigated and controversial findings have been reported, possibly because of differences in study designs, patients selected, and methodology used. Scarce and conflicting data exist about the effects of diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the fibrinolytic system, whereas ACE inhibitors have generally been reported to improve the fibrinolytic balance by decreasing plasma PAI-1 levels, calcium channel antagonists have been shown to increase tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity, and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists seem to exert neutral effects. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists, calcium channel antagonists, and AT(1)-receptor antagonists have been reported to exert anti-aggregatory effects on platelets, while contrasting data exist about the influence of ACE inhibitors. Clinical implications of the changes induced by antihypertensive drugs on the fibrinolytic balance and platelet function are still debated. In particular, the question of whether these changes may translate into different degrees of cardiovascular protection in hypertensive patients remains unanswered. While awaiting more information from clinical trials, the choice of antihypertensive drugs, particularly in high-risk patients, should take into account effects beyond their BP-lowering efficacy. Selected agents should have a favorable, or at least neutral, impact on fibrinolytic function and platelet activity.

Vasodilating beta-adrenoceptor blockers as cardiovascular therapeutics

beta-Adrenoceptor blocking agents (beta-blockers) have been established as therapeutics for treatment of patients with hypertension, ischemic heart diseases, chronic heart failure, arrhythmias, and glaucoma. However, their clinical use is limited because some patients are adversely affected by their side effects. The discovery of cardioselective (beta(1)-selective) blockers has overcome some of the problems. Current retrospective studies have revealed that vasodilating beta-blockers (so-called beta-blockers of the third generation) have advantages over the conventional type of beta-blockers in terms of minimizing the adverse effects and improving the disease-derived dysfunction, thus enhancing the quality of life variables. Some of the possible advantages include improvement of insulin resistance, decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in association with increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, attenuation of bronchial asthma attack and respiratory dysfunction, alleviation of coronary vasospasm provocation, peripheral circulatory disturbances, and erectile dysfunction, and better patient compliance. Release of nitric oxide, antioxidant action, beta(2)-adrenoceptor activation, Ca(2+) entry blockade, and other mechanisms underlying the vasodilating action may be responsible for the beneficial therapeutic effects of these agents.

Pharmacological modulation of platelet function in hypertension

Platelets exert a considerable influence on human morbidity and mortality. The rationale for their study in hypertension follows the observation that the major consequences of hypertension are stroke and myocardial infarction. However, the etiology of these consequences in hypertension is, paradoxically, not hemorrhagic (as might be expected from the effects of high blood pressure), but occlusive, with thrombus being the culprit lesion. Mechanisms of platelet activation include high shear force, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, endothelial changes, and the presence of comorbidity, such as atrial fibrillation. The treatment of high blood pressure brings about a reversal of the changes seen in the cell. This could be in part due to the direct effect of the drug on the megakaryocyte and/or the platelets themselves, or it might simply be due to the reduction in blood pressure. Some drugs, such as calcium channel antagonists and angiotensin II receptor blockers, however, might have direct effects on platelet biochemistry other than reducing blood pressure. Finally, antiplatelet drugs are becoming an important part of the management of high-risk hypertensives, which aim to minimize vascular complications.

Treatment of scleroderma: an update

The goal of this article is to update the reader and focus on novel therapies and clinical trials published since our last review [6]. Evidence suggests that drug intervention should target one or all of three biological processes: vascular disease, autoimmunity and tissue fibrosis. Efforts should be made to classify the subtype of scleroderma, to determine the activity of the disease process and the degree of specific organ involvement before specific treatment decisions are made. Cyclophosphamide in fibrosing alveolitis, intravenous prostaglandins and other vasodilators for the vascular disease, endothelin-1 inhibition in pulmonary hypertension and immunosuppressive therapy for early inflammatory disease, all appear to have benefit. Several agents used in vitro and in animal models of fibrosis also show promise including anti-transforming growth factor-beta, the statins and anti-integrins. More experience in well-designed clinical trials is needed to define the role of these agents in treating scleroderma.