Urgent thoracotomy for pulmonary or tracheobronchial injury

[Case report on traumatic complete laryngotracheal separation with a positive outcome]

HISTORY

A 21-year-old female was injured by accidental strangulation. Dyspnea and stridor occurred with delay, and led to emergency intubation.

FINDINGS

Physical examination showed strangulation marks and neck emphysema. Computed tomography confirmed laryngotracheal separation and revealed misplacement of the ventilation tube.

DIAGNOSIS

Further surgical exploration revealed complete laryngotracheal (cricotracheal) separation.

TREATMENT

After initial emergency tracheotomy, cricotracheal reanastomosis was achieved by a two-stage surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Laryngotracheal separation is associated with high mortality. In the case presented herein, the patient survived and was discharged from hospital without a tracheostomy tube despite bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Surgical treatment of bronchial rupture in blunt chest trauma: a review of literature

Bronchial rupture by blunt chest trauma is rare. We present a case of bronchial injury after blunt chest trauma that was repaired surgically by primary reconstruction. We performed a review of literature to verify if primary reconstruction is suitable for the treatment of adult patients with blunt bronchial injury. A systematic search was conducted to identify cohort studies of bronchial rupture after blunt chest trauma in adult patients between 1985 and 2016 (n=215 articles). Studies were included concerning four or more patients and in case patient data could be extracted. This resulted in 19 articles for final review, consisting of 155 patients. Mean age of 155 patients was 28 (range, 18-60) years. The main bronchus was mostly injured (81%), in 5% including an injury of the trachea and in 14% lobar bronchi injury. Surgical repair was performed in 95% of patients: primary anastomosis in 72%, pneumonectomy in 15%, lobectomy or sleeve resection in 12% and other in 1%. Perioperative mortality rate was 10%. Other complications occurred in 17% (empyema, rebleeding, stenosis and fistula, among others). Data concerning the occurrence of long-term complications or long-term follow-up was not found. Statistical evaluation could not be performed due to lack of consistent patient data. No strong recommendations regarding type and timing of surgery can be made based on the available literature. Based on our multidisciplinary opinion we would advocate primary anastomosis in case of stable vital signs with the goal to preserve healthy lung parenchyma. Moreover, it may be considered transferring these rare cases to an experienced thoracic and trauma surgery center.

Trauma pneumonectomy: A narrative review

PURPOSE

Thoracic injuries are common in both blunt and penetrating trauma. Most thoracic injuries are managed non-operatively, approximately 7-20% undergo thoracotomy. Of the injuries requiring thoracotomy, 1-6% ultimately require pulmonary resection. Wedge resection and lobectomies are well-studied in the literature; however, there is a paucity regarding reports on total pneumonectomy in the setting of trauma. Our objectives were to summarize the evidence supporting the role of trauma pneumonectomy (TP) in the current era and reiterate that despite the associated morbidity and mortality TP is justified in selective cases.

METHODS

A review of the world's literature was conducted following standard guidelines. Inclusion criteria included those studies reviewing blunt and penetrating trauma to the lungs in adults (age greater than 15 year) that reported mortality rates and outcome measures.

RESULTS

The PubMed search yielded 713 studies. Of these, 14 studies included pertinent information on TP. Studies included in this review were published from 1985 to 2017 and involved patient data that was collected from 1972 to 2014. Mortality ranged from 50% to 100% (median 63%; mean 68%).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of severe thoracic trauma, pulmonary resection may be necessary. Less aggressive techniques are options in a stable patient; however, in the setting of ongoing hemorrhage, TP should be considered and expediently conducted. The role of damage control thoracic surgery and related techniques is vitally important in these patients to improve the significant mortality of trauma pneumonectomy.

Predictors of outcome in 101 patients requiring emergent thoracotomy for penetrating pulmonary injuries

BACKGROUND

Operative interventions are uncommonly required for penetrating pulmonary injuries. Similarly, because their incidence is low, few series appear sporadically in the literature. Objectives of this study are to identify predictors of outcome for patients requiring emergent thoracotomy for penetrating pulmonary injuries and evaluate the use of tissue sparing versus resective techniques for their management.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective 169-month study of all patients with penetrating pulmonary injuries requiring thoracotomy. The main outcome measures are: physiologic parameters, AAST-OIS injury grade, surgical procedures and mortality. Statistical analysis includes univariate and stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

101 patients required thoracotomy for penetrating pulmonary injuries. Mechanism of injury includes: gunshot wounds (GSW)-73 (72%), stab wounds (SW)-28 (33%). Mean systolic BP 97 ± 47, mean HR 92 ± 47, and mean admission pH 7.22 ± 0.17. Mean RTS 6.25 ± 2.7, mean ISS 36 ± 22. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 5277 ± 4955 mls. Predictors of outcome are: admission pH (p = 0.0014), admission base deficit (p < 0.0001), packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused (p = 0.023), whole blood transfused (p < 0.01). A total of 143 procedures were required in 101 patients: tissue sparing 114 (80%) versus resective procedures 29 (20%). Only pneumonectomy (p = 0.024) predicted outcome. Overall survival 64/101-64%. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) injury grades I-III versus IV-VI predicts survival (p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression identified AAST-OIS injury grades IV-VI (p = 0.007; OR 6.38 [95% CI 1.64-24.78]), intraoperative dysrhythmias (p = 0.003; OR 17.38 [95% CI 2.59-116.49]) and associated cardiac injuries (p = 0.02; OR 8.74 [95% CI 1.37-55.79]) as independent predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of outcome for penetrating pulmonary injuries requiring thoracotomy are identified and must be taken into account in their operative management. Tissue sparing techniques-stapled pulmonary tractotomy is once again validated, and it remains effective as the mainstay for their management; however, only pneumonectomy predicts outcome. AAST-OIS injury grades IV-VI predict outcome with higher injury grades requiring resective procedures.

Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: analysis of 158 patients of a single center

BACKGROUND

Penetrating injuries to the chest present a frequent and challenging problem, but the majority of these injuries can be managed non-\operatively. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of penetrating chest trauma and the ultimate techniques used for operative management, as well as the diagnosis, complications, morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective 9-year review of patients who underwent an operative procedure following penetrating chest trauma was performed. The mechanism of injury, gender, age, physiological and outcome parameters, including injury severity score (ISS), chest abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, lung injury scale score, concomitant injuries, time from admission to operating room, transfusion requirement, indications for thoracotomy, intra-operative findings, operative procedures, length of hospital stay (LOS) and rate of mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1123 patients who were admitted with penetrating thoracic trauma were investigated. Of these, 158 patients (93 stabbings, 65 gunshots) underwent a thoracotomy within 24 h after the penetrating trauma. There were 146 (92.4%) male and 12 (7.6%) female patients, and their mean age was 25.72 9.33 (range, 15–54) years. The mean LOS was 10.65 8.30 (range, 5–65) days. Patients admitted after a gunshot had a significantly longer LOS than those admitted with a stab wound (gunshot, 13.53 9.92 days; stab wound, 8.76 6.42 days, p < 0.001). Patients who died had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) on presentation in the emergency room (42.94 36.702 mm Hg) compared with those who survived (83.96 27.842 mm Hg, p = 0.001). The overall mortality rate was 10.8% (n = 17). Mortality for patients with stab wounds was 8/93 (8.6%) compared with 9/65 (13.8%) for patients with gunshot wounds (p = 0.29). Concomitant abdominal injuries (p = 0.01), diaphragmatic injury (p = 0.01), ISS (p = 0.001), chest AIS score (p < 0.05), ongoing output (p = 0.001), blood transfusion volume (p < 0.01) and SBP (p = 0.001) were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating injuries to the chest requiring a thoracotomy are uncommon, and lung-sparing techniques have become the most frequently used procedures for lung injuries. The presence of associated abdominal injuries increased the mortality five-fold. Factors that affected mortality were ISS, chest AIS score, SBP, ongoing chest output, blood transfusion volume, diaphragmatic injury and associated abdominal injury.

Traumatic Pneumonectomy: A Viable Option for Patients in Extremis

The combination of respiratory insufficiency, right heart failure, and depth of shock is thought to result in mortality approaching 100 per cent after pneumonectomy. We did a retrospective review of patients requiring pneumonectomy over 6 years. Data collected included demographics, emergency department and operating room course, critical care management, complications, and mortality. Seven patients were identified. Mean age was 26.5 years. Five sustained penetrating and two sustained blunt trauma. Mean Injury Severity Score was 26 and Revised Trauma Score was 4.4. Mean admission systolic blood pressure, lactate, and pH were 98 mm Hg, 10.1 mmol/L, and 6.98, respectively. Mean time to operation was 49 minutes. Mean estimated blood loss was 5.4 liters and mean intraoperative transfusion was 13.1 units of packed red blood cells. All seven developed right heart failure. Four required prone ventilation, one oscillating ventilation, four continuous renal replacement, and three extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Four patients died (57%); two of refractory right heart failure within the first 24 hours and two of multiple organ failure on postoperative days 9 and 138. Mean length of stay in survivors was 71 days. All survivors were neurologically intact and none required mechanical ventilation at discharge. The need for pneumonectomy after trauma is rare. Patients undergoing pneumonectomy who present in extremis require significant intra and postoperative support, with a survival of 42 per cent.

Effects of fluid resuscitation on cardiovascular performance after posttraumatic pneumonectomy

BACKGROUND

: Several factors have been implicated in the high-mortality rate of posttraumatic pneumonectomy. In this study, we evaluated the hemodynamic and echocardiographic changes induced by pneumonectomy and fluid resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

: Fourteen dogs were bled to a target mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg. The animals were assigned to two groups: control (no fluid resuscitation) and lactated Ringer's (3 x shed blood volume). The left pulmonary hilum was cross clamped, and the animals were observed for 60 minutes. Systemic hemodynamics was evaluated using Swan-Ganz, arterial catheter, and ultrasonic flow probe. Systemic O2-derived variables were calculated. Ejection fraction was determined by two-dimensional echocardiography.

RESULTS

: Fluid resuscitation improved the mean arterial pressure and systemic oxygen delivery. After pneumonectomy, no significant increase in right ventricular pressure was observed in the LR group. No signs of major ventricular dilation or changes in arterial oxygenation were observed.

CONCLUSION

: Our data suggest that pneumonectomy is not associated with early pulmonary hypertension; gentle fluid resuscitation improves cardiovascular performance and is not associated with an increase in right ventricular pressure.

Mechanical ventilation strategies in massive chest trauma

Patients in extremis because of trauma-related massive chest injury require expedient evaluation and prompt intervention. The initial pathophysiology relates to the significant intrapulmonary shunting caused by disruption of pulmonary capillaries and extravasation into the alveolar spaces. Disproportionate or unilateral lung involvement needs measures more technical than general supportive care. Independent lung ventilation (mostly with unilateral lung involvement) and other strategies like inhaled nitric oxide, prone positioning, partial liquid ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have had good results. Intensivists confronted with this clinical subset may consider using these strategies as alternative/adjunctive options for optimizing respiratory and hemodynamic status in the supportive management of trauma-related acute lung injury (ALI) and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Total Pulmonectomy in Trauma: A Still Unresolved Problem–Our Experience and Review of the Literature

Emergency pneumonectomy for trauma is associated with very high mortality. Despite significant improvement of the intensive care resources, results of this procedure have not been improved during the last 20 years. When performed because of hemorrhagic shock, pneumonectomy is almost always fatal. We present a series of four patients who underwent total pneumonectomy in our trauma center. The main purpose of this study was to describe pathophysiologic changes and to discuss possible therapeutic alternatives based on the literature review after this operation.

Thoracic trauma: when and how to intervene

Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients younger than 40 years of age. Thoracic injuries are common and often can be managed by tube thoracostomy. In many patients, however, the thoracic injuries must be repaired surgically in one of three time periods: immediate, urgent, or delayed thoracotomy. In this article, we describe the general approach to effectively managing thoracic trauma patients. We review common injuries and scenarios that may be encountered by the surgeon and discuss the considerations and variables that enter into the decision-making process for operative intervention.

Pulmonary tractotomy for a patient with traumatic penetrating lung injury: report of a case

We report a case of traumatic hemopneumothorax caused by penetrating lung injury in a 26-year-old man. The patient underwent emergency thoractomy, which revealed hemorrhage in the lingular segment of the left lung. We found the bleeding point and controlled the hemorrhage using pulmonary tractotomy by inserting a linear stapler into the stab wound in the pulmonary parenchyma. The original technique of pulmonary tractotomy was performed for complete through-and-through injury by dividing the bridge of lung tissue between the aortic clamps. We were able to apply this procedure safely to stop bleeding from a stab wound that did not go through the lung. Thus, pulmonary tractotomy is an effective damage-control operation for the lung with obvious advantages over major lung resection.

Damage control surgery for thoracic injuries

Damage control of thoracic injuries begins frequently with an emergency department thoracotomy via an anterolateral incision. Bleeding and air leaks are quickly temporised. As opposed to abdominal damage control where most injuries can be temporised, most thoracic injuries require initial definitive repair. Thus, the goal of thoracic damage control is to perform the least definitive repair using the fastest and easiest techniques to shorten the operative time as much as possible. There are some injuries that can be temporised and require re-operation once physiologic normality has been achieved.

Damage control in the abdomen and beyond

Background

Damage control is not a modern concept, but the application of this approach represents a new paradigm in surgery, borne out of a need to care for patients sustaining multiple high-energy injuries.

Methods

A Medline search was performed to locate English language articles relating to damage control procedures in trauma patients. The retrieved articles were manually cross-referenced, and additional academic and historical articles were identified.

Results and conclusion

Damage control surgery, sometimes known as ‘damage limitation surgery’ or ‘abbreviated laparotomy’, is best defined as creating a stable anatomical environment to prevent the patient from progressing to an unsalvageable metabolic state. Patients are more likely to die from metabolic failure than from failure to complete organ repairs. It is with this awareness that damage control surgery is performed, enabling the patient to maintain a sustainable physiological envelope.

Outcome of Tracheobronchial Injuries: A Long-Term Perspective

BACKGROUND

Tracheobronchial injuries are relatively uncommon, and few data are available on the long-term effects of their treatment.

METHODS

All injuries involving the larynx and trachea, trachea alone, and mainstem bronchus (MSB) treated by one surgeon were followed if they survived 48 hours.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were treated from 1976 to 2001 for blunt and penetrating injuries: 6 laryngotracheal injuries, 27 tracheal wounds, and 27 injuries to the mainstem bronchus. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 26 years. One of six laryngotracheal wounds had a good result. One required tracheal resection and one required permanent tracheostomy. Patients who survived tracheal resection and end-to-end anastomosis had good outcomes; two had granulomata caused by permanent suture use. One patient treated by primary repair developed stenosis requiring resection. Fourteen patients with MSB injury were treated by pneumonectomy, eight of whom survived. Three developed stump leak/empyema and three had cor pulmonale on long-term follow-up. Ten patients had repair of blunt MSB injuries; two developed bronchial stenosis requiring pneumonectomy.

CONCLUSION

Laryngotracheal and MSB injuries often had less than optimal outcomes on long-term observation. Tracheal injuries treated by resection and end-to-end repairs had excellent outcomes. The data should be useful in counseling patients/families and planning follow-up strategies for patients with tracheobronchial injuries.

Thoracotomy for Blunt Trauma: Traditional Indications May Not Apply

The indications for performing as urgent thoractomy after trauma are based on the criteria used for penetrating injuries. However, few data are available on the use of these indications for patients with blunt injuries. In a retrospective study (June 1996 to July 2001), we compared the indications of urgent thoracotomy after blunt injury and penetrating injury in patients who underwent thoracotomy within 24 hours of hospital admission at our institution. Patients with blunt aortic injuries or emergency department thoracotomies were excluded from evaluation. Fifty-nine patients were identified (37 penetrating injuries, 22 blunt injuries). Blunt trauma victims had a higher mortality rate than penetrating trauma victims (73% vs. 22%). Chest tube output was the indication for nontherapuetic thoracotomy in 5 patients with blunt injuries whereas this occurred in only 1 penetrating injury victim (P = 0.04). All 5 blunt injury patients underwent a prior procedure and were coagulopathic when thoracotomy was performed. In conclusion, tho-racotomy following blunt trauma is associated with a high rate of mortality. The rate of non-therapeutic exploration is increased when chest tube output is the indication for thoracotomy after blunt trauma. Since the majority of such patients have multicavitary injuries that require prior operation and are commonly coagulopathic, caution should be exercised when deciding whether to proceed with thoracotomy based solely on chest tube output.

Lung-sparing techniques are associated with improved outcome compared with anatomic resection for severe lung injuries

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary tractotomy was introduced in 1994 as a novel concept for lung salvage after penetrating wounds. Recently, tractotomy has been suggested to increase morbidity and, thus, its practice has been challenged. The purpose of this study was to compare the morbidity and mortality associated with nonanatomic and anatomic lung resection in the management of severe pulmonary injuries.

METHODS

Using our trauma registry, patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center during an 11-year period with thoracic injuries requiring thoracotomy and pulmonary operation were identified. A chart review was performed with attention to patient demographics, operative treatment, and outcome. Pulmonary operations performed were classified as either nonanatomic (wedge resection and tractotomy) or anatomic resection (lobectomy and pneumonectomy). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression as appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 34 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 29 +/- 2 years. Mechanism of injury was predominantly penetrating, with 26 (72%) gunshot wounds and 8 (22%) stab wounds. Intraoperative blood loss and early red blood cell transfusion requirement were lower in patients undergoing nonanatomic resection (3.85 L vs. 11.90 L and 17.4 U vs. 27.9 U, respectively; p < 0.05). Mortality was 4% in the nonanatomic resection group versus 77% in the anatomic resection group.

CONCLUSION

Nonanatomic resection is associated with an improved morbidity and mortality compared with anatomic resection in the management of severe lung injuries. Although not a randomized study, these findings encourage the continued application of lung-sparing procedures when feasible.

Pulmonary tractotomy versus lung resection: viable options in penetrating lung injury

BACKGROUND

Emergency lung resection following penetrating chest trauma has been associated with mortality rates as high as 55-100%. Pulmonary tractotomy is advocated as a rapid alternative method of dealing with deep lobar injuries. We reviewed our experience with resection and tractotomy to determine whether method of management affects mortality or if patient presentation is more critical in determining outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with chest injury seen at an urban Level I trauma center from 2/89-1/99 was performed. All patients undergoing parenchymal surgery were included. Records were abstracted for grade of injury, type of resection, presenting systolic blood pressure (SBP), temperature, Injury Severity Score (ISS), operative time, and estimated blood loss (EBL). Mortality and thoracic complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-six of 2736 patients with penetrating chest trauma underwent thoracotomy, with 70 (28%) requiring some form of lung resection. There were 11 (15.7%) deaths. Patients who died had lower SBP (53 +/- 32 mm Hg vs 77 +/- 28 mm Hg), lower temperature (32.5 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees C vs 34.3 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees C), higher ISS (33 +/- 13 vs 23 +/- 9), and greater EBL (9.8 +/- 4.3 liters vs 2.8 +/- 2.1 liters) compared with survivors (p < 0.05 for all). Mortality was also increased in the presence of cardiac injury (33% with vs 12% without) and the need for laparotomy (26% with vs 9% without) (p < 0.05 for all). Tractotomy was associated with an increased incidence of chest complications (67% vs 24%, p = 0.05) compared with lobectomy with no difference in presenting physiology, operative time, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Lung resection for penetrating injuries can be done safely with morbidity and mortality rates lower than previously reported. Patient outcome is related to severity of injury rather than type of resection. Tractotomy is associated with a higher incidence of infectious complications and is not associated with shortened operative times or survival.

Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review

BACKGROUND

Improved outcomes following lung injury have been reported using "lung sparing" techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter 4-year review of patients who underwent lung resection following injury was performed. Resections were categorized as "minor" (suture, wedge resection, tractotomy) or "major" (lobectomy or pneumonectomy). Injury severity, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three patients (28 blunt, 115 penetrating) underwent lung resection after sustaining an injury. Minor resections were used in 75% of cases, in patients with less severe thoracic injury (chest AIS scores "minor" 3.8 +/- 0.9 vs. "major" 4.3 +/- 0.7, p = 0.02). Mortality increased with each step of increasing complexity of the surgical technique (RR, 1.8; CI, 1.4-2.2): suture alone, 9% mortality; tractotomy, 13%; wedge resection, 30%; lobectomy, 43%; and pneumonectomy, 50%. Regression analysis demonstrated that blunt mechanism, lower blood pressure at thoracotomy, and increasing amount of the lung resection were each independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Blunt traumatic lung injury has higher mortality primarily due to associated extrathoracic injuries. Major resections are required more commonly than previously reported. While "minor" resections, if feasible, are associated with improved outcome, trauma surgeons should be facile in a wide range of technical procedures for the management of lung injuries.

The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is quickly becoming part of the trauma surgeon's practice, but its role in the patient with a penetrating truncal injury is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency ultrasound as it was introduced into five Level I trauma centers for the diagnosis of acute hemopericardium.

METHODS

Surgeons or cardiologists (four centers) and technicians (one center) performed pericardial ultrasound examinations on patients with penetrating truncal wounds. By protocol, patients with positive examinations underwent immediate operation. Vital signs, base deficit, time from examination to operation, operative findings, treatment, and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

Pericardial ultrasound examinations were performed in 261 patients. There were 225 (86.2%) true-negative, 29 (11.1%) true-positive, 0 false-negative, and 7 (2.7%) false-positive examinations, resulting in sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.9%, and accuracy of 97.3%. The mean time from ultrasound to operation was 12.1+/-5 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound should be the initial modality for the evaluation of patients with penetrating precordial wounds because it is accurate and rapid.

Pulmonary tractotomy as an abbreviated thoracotomy technique

BACKGROUND

Operative abbreviated thoracotomy techniques in thoracic trauma include emergency center thoracotomy, ligation of major arterial branches, packing the thoracic cavity for diffuse bleeding, towel clip or Bogota bag closure of the chest, and pulmonary tractotomy. Pulmonary tractotomy with selective vascular ligation was originally described for deep through-and-through lung injuries that did not involve hilar vessels or airways. Pulmonary tractotomy has evolved into use as an abbreviated thoracotomy technique in patients with severe thoracic or multivisceral trauma. As with any operative technique in high-risk patients, specific procedure-related complications may occur and are analyzed herein. The objective of this manuscript is to review the indications, techniques, and results for pulmonary tractotomy in trauma patients requiring abbreviated thoracotomy.

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 30 of 32 consecutive tractotomy patients treated at Ben Taub General Hospital, during a 3-year period. By using a model for logistic regression analysis, the characteristics of each patient and their clinical course were tested for impact on mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of patients had at least one intraoperative parameter indicative of acidosis (pH < 7.2), coagulopathy (prothrombin time > 13.8 or partial thromboplastin time > 38.0 seconds), or hypothermia (core temperature < 34 degrees C), and 50% of patients manifested two of these three parameters. The mortality rate among the 30 patients was 17%. Three of the five patients who died were noted to be acidotic, coagulopathic, and hypothermic. Twelve of 25 patients who survived more than 1 day had at least one thoracic complication. There were no late deaths. There was one failed tractotomy and one missed injury. A second thoracotomy was not required for control of a lung injury in any patient. Logistic regression analysis showed that intraoperative blood loss was the only predictive factor for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary tractotomy is a simple and effective technique in injured patients who require an abbreviated thoracotomy and has an acceptable mortality and complication rate. This follow-up report notes that as definitive therapy, tractotomy continues to allow for direct control of bleeding and air leak and obviates the need for formal resection.

Pulmonary resection for lung trauma

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary resection is rarely required for trauma, and its mortality is reportedly high.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective review of pulmonary resections for trauma was done.

RESULTS

Of 2,455 patients with chest trauma, 183 (7.4%) underwent thoracotomy and 32 (1.3%) required pulmonary resection. Mean age was 28.4 years and mean injury severity score was 24.5. Mechanism of injury was stab wound in 14 patients, gunshot wound in 6, and blunt trauma in 12. Blunt trauma patients had a higher injury severity score (29.6) than penetrating trauma patients (21.4), but this was not significant (p < 0.07). Indications for thoracotomy were hemorrhage in 24 patients, airway disruption in 4, and other indications in 4. Operations consisted of wedge resection (19 patients), lobectomy (9), and pneumonectomy (4). Four (12.5%) patients (pneumonectomy, 2; lobectomy, 1; wedge, 1) died. Mortality for pneumonectomy was 50%, but this was not significantly higher than for lesser resections. Blunt trauma had a higher mortality (33%) than penetrating trauma (0%) (p < 0.02). Nonsurvivors had higher injury severity scores (44.2) than survivors (21.6) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary resection is infrequently required for lung injury. Overall mortality is lower than previously reported, but pneumonectomy has a high mortality. Blunt trauma has a higher mortality than penetrating trauma. Injury severity scores are higher for nonsurvivors than survivors; this shows the importance of associated injuries on outcome.

Postpneumonectomy stump fistula in a ventilated patient

The development of a postpneumonectomy stump fistula in a ventilated patient is a feared and frequently fatal event. Furthermore, the necessity of a pneumonectomy from sequelae of blunt trauma is rare. We describe the salvage of a young patient with a combination of the above events. The method involves the use of a simple intravenous bag "plombage" in combination with a regional thoracoplasty to buttress a resutured bronchial stump.

Transthoracic bronchial intubation in a case of main bronchus disruption

We report on a case of blunt thoracic trauma that resulted in complete disruption of the right main bronchus. Due to massive loss of respiratory volume during thoracotomy, sufficient ventilation could not be maintained via the orotracheal tube. Transthoracic intubation of the left main bronchus via the right bronchial defect was the ultima ratio procedure that allowed reanastomosis of the disrupted right main bronchus.

Complex thoracic injuries

Complex thoracic injuries are a leading cause of death in trauma patients. Four difficult problems of diagnosis and treatment are discussed, including (1) air leak not associated with pneumothorax, (2) management of major thoracic esophageal injuries, (3) penetrating trauma, and (4) retained hemothorax and empyema.

The role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in patients with possible cardiac wounds

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluate surgeon-performed ultrasound in determining the need for operation in patients with possible cardiac wounds.

BACKGROUND DATA

Ultrasound quickly is becoming part of the surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium; however, its role for the patient with penetrating injury is less well-defined. Although accurate for the detection of hemopericardium, the lack of immediate availability of the cardiologist to perform the test may delay the diagnosis, adversely affecting patient outcome. To be an effective diagnostic test in trauma centers, ultrasound must be immediately available in the resuscitation area and performed and interpreted by surgeons.

METHODS

Surgeons performed pericardial ultrasound examinations on patients with penetrating truncal wounds but no immediate indication for operation. The subcostal view detected hemopericardium, and patients with positive examinations underwent immediate operation by the same surgeon. Vital signs, base deficit, time from examination to operation, operative findings, treatment, and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

During 13 months, 247 patients had surgeon-performed ultrasound. There were 236 true-negative and 10 true-positive results, and no false-negative or false-positive results; however, the pericardial region could not be visualized in one patient. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%; mean examination time was 0.8 minute (246 patients). Of the ten true-positive examinations, three were hypotensive. The mean time (8 patients) from ultrasound to operation was 12.1 minutes; all survived. Operative findings (site of cardiac wounds) were: left ventricle (4), right ventricle (3), right atrium (2), right atrium/superior vena cava (1), and right atrium/inferior vena cava (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-performed ultrasound is a rapid and accurate technique for diagnosing hemopericardium. Delay times from admission to operating room are minimized when the surgeon performs the ultrasound examination.

Trauma pneumonectomy revisited: the role of simultaneously stapled pneumonectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare simultaneously stapled pneumonectomy (SSP) with individual ligation (IND) as a method for performing urgent pneumonectomy (Py) for trauma.

METHODS

Twelve patients who required Py were reviewed. SSP was performed in nine cases and IND in three cases. The two groups had statistically similar injury severity scores, presenting systolic blood pressures, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score derived probabilities of survival. An animal model of Py was developed, in which seven animals underwent SSP and seven underwent IND methods. Burst pressures of the pulmonary artery and bronchus were calculated after 14 days.

RESULTS

There were no differences noted in survival rates between SSP (5 (56%)) and IND (1 (33%)), nor in incidence of bronchopleural fistula. The SSP group had a significantly shorter operative time compared with that of IND (88.9 +/- 14.3 minutes vs 213 +/- 57.8 minutes, respectively, p - 0.01). The animal study revealed no difference in burst pressures of the bronchus (SSP = 662.9 +/- 169.9 mm Hg vs. IND = 591.4 +/- 193.2 mm Hg, p = 0.752) or of the pulmonary artery (SSP = 554.3 +/- 195.1 mm Hg vs. IND = 477.7 +/- 247.5 mm Hg, p = 0.529).

CONCLUSION

Survival after pulmonary injuries that require Py depends upon the rapidity of hilar control and of the procedures itself. Simultaneously stapled pneumonectomy is an effective and rapid method of dealing with such rare injuries.

Morbidity and Mortality After Traumatic Pneumonectomy: The Effect of Compromised Oxygenation and Cardiac Function

I describe the pathophysiological and hemodynamic events that occur after an emergency pneumonectomy for trauma and how they impact on subsequent mortality. Four patients were identified as requiring an emergency right pneumonectomy for trauma at a level 1 Urban Trauma Center within a 39-month period. A retrospective review of their hospital course served as the basis for our analysis. Three patients sustained gunshot wounds and one patient was a victim of blunt trauma. Hemodynamic data were available for three patients who survived more than 24 hours. All patients presented in shock and required massive transfusion. One patient died in the operating room due to air embolism and shock. After pneumonectomy, there was an increase in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) more than 2 times normal, which coincided with a decrease in stroke volume, cardiac output, and right and left ventricular stroke work (RVSW/LVSW). The RVSW gradually increased to above normal levels by postoperative day 5, whereas the LVSWI remained below normal. Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developed in all patients early in the postoperative period. There was evidence of oxygen delivery (DO2) dependent of oxygen consumption (VO2) and the DO2 remained below normal despite inotrope administration. The remaining three patients died 7 to 13 days after surgery due to various combinations of ARDS, cardiac failure, and sepsis. Until we have better methods to decrease PAP selectively, traumatic pneumonectomy should be avoided if possible, especially when it involves the right side or is associated with a contralateral lung injury. Early operative intervention and control of the pulmonary hilum may lessen the severity of shock. The hemodynamic changes that occur after pneumonectomy for trauma becomes additive in the presence of ARDS. This combination results in inadequate cardiac function, oxygen transport, and, ultimately, death.

Successful reconstruction for combined tracheal and bronchial disruption

After a head-on automobile collision, a 21-year-old man was admitted with respiratory distress and subcutaneous emphysema. Bronchoscopy revealed a disruption of the trachea and a complete transection of the intermediate bronchus. A right posterolateral thoracotomy was performed, and both lesions were reconstructed primarily using absorbable materials.

Tracheal and main bronchial disruptions after blunt chest trauma: presentation and management

Tracheobronchial disruption is one of the less common injuries associated with blunt thoracic trauma. This injury can be life threatening, however, and failure to diagnose it early can lead to disastrous acute or delayed complications. Nine cases of tracheobronchial disruption in the setting of nonpenetrating thoracic trauma were seen at four Los Angeles trauma centers between 1980 and 1987. Mechanism of injury, presentation, diagnosis, and management of these patients were reviewed. Disruptions involved the trachea in 3 patients, the right bronchus in 5 patients, and the left bronchus in 2 patients. Tracheobronchial disruptions occurred in settings of high-energy impact-type injuries and were more likely to have associated injuries than they were to occur alone. Common presenting signs included subcutaneous emphysema, dyspnea, sternal tenderness, and hemoptysis. Radiographic findings were most commonly pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and clavicle or rib fractures. Rigid bronchoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy were both highly accurate methods for diagnosis but only in the hands of trained cardiothoracic surgeons. Delay in diagnosis increased the likelihood of postoperative complications.

Shock, transfusion, and pneumonectomy. Death is due to right heart failure and increased pulmonary vascular resistance

To determine the physiologic cardiopulmonary abnormalities leading to death when pneumonectomy is required to stop bleeding in patients in hemorrhagic shock, we compared cardiopulmonary responses to resuscitation in pigs undergoing hemorrhagic shock alone, pneumonectomy alone, and hemorrhagic shock plus pneumonectomy. Four shock-plus-pneumonectomy pigs died acutely from right heart failure. When the five remaining shock-plus-pneumonectomy pigs were compared to the two control groups, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) increased to significantly higher levels than would be expected from the increase in PVR noted with resuscitation from shock alone and pneumonectomy alone. Right ventricular compensation maintained cardiac index in the hemorrhage-alone group and the pneumonectomy-alone group but could not maintain cardiac index in the shock-plus-pneumonectomy group, despite maximal increases in right ventricular systolic pressure, heart rate, and right ventricular end diastolic volume. These data indicated that resuscitation from shock plus pneumonectomy cannot be effectively accomplished because increased PVR leads to right ventricular failure, which limits left ventricular preload to levels that are insufficient to maintain cardiac index.