Diagnosis and management of blunt small bowel injury: a survey of the membership of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Jejunal perforation after a trivial trauma: A case report

Jejunal perforation after a trivial trauma is a rare event. We present a case of a 23-year-old man, a truck driver who suffered jejunal perforation following a jump from the Indian jumbo truck, approximately 2 m height from the ground. This case report highlights the importance of careful evaluation of a symptomatic patient after a trivial injury, and the challenges faced by surgeons in the low recourse-setting.

Delayed Small Bowel Perforation in a Pre-Existing Ventral Hernia After Blunt Trauma

A hollow viscus injury is an uncommon but potentially dangerous intra-abdominal injury that can result from blunt abdominal trauma. It can be misdiagnosed in patient, particularly when the patient has other concerning findings. Also, diagnosis can be increasingly difficult in a patient with a pre-existing ventral hernia and chronic abdominal pain. In this case we present a 66-year-old women, with a history of a large ventral hernia and chronic abdominal pain, who presented to the emergency department after a motor vehicle crash (MVC). Patient denied abdominal tenderness at the time of presentation and the initial computed tomography (CT) did not demonstrate any abnormal findings within the abdomen. Patient later began experiencing increased abdominal pain and presented with a small bowel perforation within the hernia that required a bowel resection and hernia repair.  A review of the literature reveals that not only are hollow viscus injuries rare but there appears to be few documented cases of viscus injuries occurring within a existing ventral hernia.

Findings requiring immediate surgery in blunt abdominal trauma patients with isolated free fluid without solid organ injury on abdominal computed tomography: Retrospective laboratory, clinical and radiologic analysis. A case control study

BACKGROUND

Determining surgical treatment is difficult in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) patients with isolated free fluid without solid organ injury (IFFWSOI) on abdominal computed tomography (CT). We investigated the laboratory, clinical, and radiologic features of BAT patients with IFFWSOI on abdominal CT requiring surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was performed for patients treated at our government-established regional tertiary trauma center from March 2014 to August 2018. A total of 501 patients were identified and reviewed. Patients were divided into Surgery and No Surgery groups for analysis. The Surgery group included patients who underwent surgery during the index admission, while the No Surgery group included patients who did not undergo surgery.

RESULTS

There were significantly more cases of severe fluid collection (61.5% vs. 11.8%; p < 0.001), car accidents (69.2% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (87.2% vs. 58.8%; p = 0.031) at the emergency department in the Surgery group. Regarding laboratory studies performed at the emergency department, only the median amylase level was significantly higher in the No Surgery group (54.5 U/L vs. 62.5 U/L; p = 0.048). On multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustments for age and sex, the odds ratio (OR) for severe fluid collection on abdominal CT to predict surgery was 13.52 (p = 0.006), while the OR for abdominal pain was 7.34 (p = 0.036) and the OR for car accident was 2.14 (p = 0.329). In addition, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, delta neutrophil index, and C-reactive protein, showed the same propensity as the other model, although statistical significance was retained only for severe fluid collection.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment should be actively considered in the presence of a large volume of intra-abdominal free fluid, especially when concomitant with abdominal pain or after car accidents in BAT patients without solid organ injury.

Outcomes of selective surgery in patients with suspected small bowel injury from blunt trauma

Purpose

The role of initial conservative therapy with selective surgery for patients with suspected blunt bowel injury by radiologic evaluation is less clear. The aim of the study is to assess the outcomes of patients who received initial conservative therapy with selective delayed surgery, compared to emergency surgery.

Methods

During this 8-year study, a total of 77 patients who were hemodynamically stable were enrolled, in which computed tomography verified suspected bowel injury from blunt trauma (mesenteric hematoma, mesenteric fat infiltration, bowel wall thickening, and free fluid without solid organ injury) was managed with either initial conservative therapy with selective delayed surgery (group A; n = 42) or emergency surgery (group B; n = 35). The clinical outcomes including the rate of negative or nontherapeutic exploration and postoperative complications, between the groups were compared.

Results

The enrolled patients had a mean age of 41 years including 51 men and 26 women. No difference in the clinical characteristics was found between the groups. In group A, 18 patients underwent delayed surgery and 24 recovered without surgery. Among patients who underwent surgery, 3 (17%) underwent negative or nontherapeutic explorations. In group B, 13 (37%) underwent negative or nontherapeutic explorations. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients and there was no difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Initial conservative therapy with selective delayed surgery did not increased severe postoperative complications and had a low rate of negative or nontherapeutic surgical explorations in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected blunt bowel injury.

Hollow viscus injuries: predictors of outcome and role of diagnostic delay

INTRODUCTION

Hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) are uncommon but potentially catastrophic conditions with high mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of this study was to analyze our 16-year experience with patients undergoing surgery for blunt or penetrating bowel trauma to identify prognostic factors with particular attention to the influence of diagnostic delay on outcome.

METHODS

From our multicenter trauma registry, we selected 169 consecutive patients with an HVI, enrolled from 2000 to 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed to assess determinants of mortality, morbidity, and length of stay by univariate and multivariate analysis models.

RESULTS

Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 15.9% and 36.1%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 23±7 days. Morbidity was independently related to an increase of white blood cells (P=0.01), and to delay of treatment >6 hours (P=0.033), while Injury Severity Score (ISS) (P=0.01), presence of shock (P=0.01), and a low diastolic arterial pressure registered at emergency room admission (P=0.02) significantly affected postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that patients with clinical signs of shock, low diastolic pressure at admission, and high ISS are at increased risk of postoperative mortality. Leukocytosis and delayed treatment (>6 hours) were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. More effort should be made to increase the preoperative detection rate of HVI and reduce the delay of treatment.

Pediatric Trauma: Current Concepts and Treatments

Injured children represent a complex management problem for the trauma surgeon. Physiologic and psychological factors have been shown to influence outcome; however, more importantly, injury patterns and treatment algorithms differ from those recommended for adults. Children often do well after major injuries, but surgeons must use appropriate treatment to maximize the physiologic responses and the innate healing abilities of the growing child. Historically, surgeons have defined childhood as prepubertal, but a child's physiologic response to injury extends well into the third decade of life, making treatment of a 20-year-old similar to that of a 10-year-old, rather than that of a 40-year-old. The distribution of pediatric trauma facilities across the country has limited the access of the injured child to these centers. Adult centers more often serve as the first and definitive treatment provider for children. This article reviews the current concepts of trauma treatments for children. It is hoped that the adult trauma surgeons caring for injured children might gain information that will be of assistance in their daily practice.

Concomitant hollow viscus injuries in patients with blunt hepatic and splenic injuries: an analysis of a National Trauma Registry database

INTRODUCTION

Non-operative management has become the standard approach for treating stable patients sustaining blunt hepatic or splenic injuries in the absence of other indications for laparotomy. The liberal use of computed tomography (CT) has reduced the rate of unnecessary immediate laparotomies; however, due to its limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of hollow viscus injuries (HVI), this may be at the expense of a rise in the incidence of missed HVI. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of concomitant HVI in blunt trauma patients diagnosed with hepatic and/or splenic injuries, and to evaluate whether a correlation exists between this incidence and the severity of hepatic or splenic injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study involving blunt trauma patients with splenic and/or liver injuries, between the years 1998 and 2012 registered in the Israel National Trauma Registry. The association between the presence and severity of splenic and/or liver injuries and the incidence of HVI was examined.

RESULTS

Of the 57,130 trauma victims identified as suffering from blunt torso injuries, 2335 (4%) sustained hepatic injuries without splenic injuries (H group), 3127 (5.4%) had splenic injuries without hepatic injuries (S group), and 564 (1%) suffered from both hepatic and splenic injuries (H+S group). Overall, 957 patients sustained 1063 HVI. The incidence of HVI among blunt torso trauma victims who sustained neither splenic nor hepatic injuries was 1.5% which is significantly lower than in the S (3.1%), H (3.1%), and H+S (6.7%) groups. In the S group, there was a clear correlation between the severity of the splenic injury and the incidence of HVI. This correlation was not found in the H group.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of blunt splenic and/or hepatic injuries predicts a higher incidence of HVI, especially if combined. While in blunt splenic injury patients there is a clear correlation between the incidence of HVI and the severity of splenic injury, such a correlation does not exist in patients with blunt hepatic injury.

A novel practical scoring for early diagnosis of traumatic bowel injury without obvious solid organ injury in hemodynamically stable patients

OBJECTIVES

To develop a scoring tool based on clinical and radiological findings for early diagnosis and intervention in hemodynamically stable patients with traumatic bowel and mesenteric injury (TBMI) without obvious solid organ injury (SOI).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for all traumatic abdominal injury patients in Qatar from 2008 to 2011. Data included demographics and clinical, radiological and operative findings. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the predictors for the need of therapeutic laparotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 33 ± 15. Motor Vehicle Crashes (58%) and fall (21%) were the major MOI. Using Receiver operating characteristic curve, Z-score of >9 was the cutoff point (AUC = 0.98) for high probability of the presence of TBMI requiring surgical intervention. Z-Score >9 was found to have sensitivity (96.7%), specificity (97.4%), PPV (93.5%) and NPV (98.7%). Multivariate regression analysis found Z-score (>9) to be an independent predictor for the need of exploratory laparotomy (OR7.0; 95% CI: 2.46-19.78, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This novel tool for early diagnosis of TBMI is found to be simple and helpful in selecting stable patients with free intra-abdominal fluid without SOI for exploratory Laparotomy. However, further prospective studies are warranted.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of isolated small bowel perforations after blunt abdominal injury in low income settings: analysis of twenty three new cases

BACKGROUND

Isolated small bowel injury (ISBI) related to abdominal blunt trauma is rare. Timely diagnosis could be difficult, especially in the absence of modern imaging and laparoscopic facilities. The determinants of mortality under such circumstances are unclear.

METHODS

This study presents twenty three cases of ISBI related to blunt abdominal injury identified between January 2005 and December 2009 in a level III Hospital in Limbe, Cameroon. Data were retrieved from an ongoing prospective study on injuries and augmented by analysis of individual patient's files. We analysed information regarding modalities of diagnosis, delay between injury and diagnosis, operative findings, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

The ages of our patients ranged from 7 to 38 years with a mean of 19 years. Thirteen patients were children below the age of 16. The most frequent mechanism of injury was a fall (n=11). Associated lesions were identified in 7 patients. Delay between injury and diagnosis was above 12h in 16 patients. Fifteen cases were admitted with obvious signs of peritonitis. Erect chest X-ray identified a pneumoperitoneum in 11 of the 17 patients for whom it was requested. Most perforations were located in the ileum. A total of 7 complications occurred in 5 patients. These included 4 cases of post-operative peritonitis. Two patients with at least one associated lesion died.

CONCLUSION

ISBI is seldom suspected. This causes delay in diagnosis and most cases present with a diffuse peritonitis. Early diagnosis and management in low income environment is likely to be improved by a greater awareness of clinicians about this injury, serial clinical assessment and repeated erect chest X-ray, rather than sophisticated tools such as CT scan or laparoscopy.

Blunt hollow viscus and mesenteric injury: still underrecognized

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of more accurate imaging modalities, specifically multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), the diagnosis of non-ischemic (NI-) and ischemic (I-) blunt hollow viscus and mesenteric injury (BHVMI) remains challenging. We hypothesized that BHVMI can be still missed with newer generations of MDCT and that patients with I-BHVMI have a poorer outcome than those with NI-BHVMI.

METHODS

We performed an eight-year retrospective review at a level 1 trauma center. Ischemic-BHVMI was defined as devascularization confirmed at laparotomy. Non-ischemic-BHVMI included perforation, laceration, and hematoma without devascularization. The sensitivity of each generation of MDCT for BHVMI was calculated. Potential predictors and outcomes of I-BHVMI were compared to the NI-BHVMI group.

RESULTS

Of 7,875 blunt trauma patients, 67 patients (0.8 %) were included in the BHVMI group; 13 patients did not have any CT findings suggestive of BHVMI (sensitivity 81 %), and 11 of them underwent surgical intervention without delay (<5 h). Newer generations of MDCT were not associated with higher sensitivity. Patients with I-BHVMI had a significantly higher rate of delayed laparotomy ≥ 12 h (23 % versus 2 %; p = 0.01) and a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median 14 versus 9 days; p = 0.02) than those with NI-BHVMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Even using an advanced imaging technique, the diagnosis of I-BHVMI can be delayed, with significant negative impact on patient outcome.

Multi-detector CT (MDCT) in bowel and mesenteric injury

Objectives: To evaluate multi-detector CT (MDCT) findings in bowel and mesenteric injury due to blunt abdominal trauma. Method: Retrospective evaluation of MDCT scan reports of patients admitted in Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar with bowel and mesenteric injury during the period of January 2005 to April 2008. Results: MDCT, without using oral contrast, clearly demonstrated various specific and less specific findings of bowel and mesenteric injury. Conclusion: Multi-detector CT is an excellent diagnostic modality in bowel and mesenteric injury. Routine administration of oral contrast agent is not mandatory for initial evaluation of these patients.

Laparoscopy Decreases the Laparotomy Rate in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Background. This study evaluated the use of laparoscopy in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients. Patients admitted from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2006 (prior to the adoption of laparoscopy for patients with blunt abdominal trauma) were categorized as group A. Patients admitted from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2010, when laparoscopy was included in the algorithm for the management of blunt abdominal trauma, were categorized as group B. Results. There were 47 patients in group A and 57 patients in group B. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, injury severity score, and injuries requiring surgical intervention between the groups (all, P > .05). Patients in group B had a shorter hospital stay (11 days vs 21 days, P < .001) and shorter ICU stay (0 [0, 1] days vs 0 [0, 9] days, P = .029). In group A, 6 of 47 patients (12.8%) underwent a nontherapeutic laparotomy. In contrast, 9 of 57 patients (15.8%) in group B avoided a nontherapeutic laparotomy because no significant intra-abdominal findings warranting an intervention were disclosed by laparoscopy. The incidence of laparotomy for patients with significant injuries in group B was lower than in group A (4.2% vs 100.0%; P < .001). There was no difference in the complication rate between the groups. Conclusions. Laparoscopy is feasible and safe for the diagnosis and treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma and can reduce the laparotomy rate.

A diagnostic delay of 5 hours increases the risk of death after blunt hollow viscus injury

BACKGROUND

Hollow viscus injuries (HVI) are uncommon after blunt trauma, and accomplishing a timely diagnosis can be difficult. Time to operative intervention has been implicated as a risk factor for mortality, but reports are conflicting.

METHODS

All blunt trauma admissions to an academic level 1 trauma center from January 1992 to September 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of blunt HVI were included. Patients who died within 24 hours were excluded. Data regarding patient demographics, injuries, time from admission until laparotomy, length of stay, and mortality were recorded, and a multivariate analysis to determine independent risk factors for mortality was carried out. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 35,033 blunt trauma admissions, there were 195 (0.6%) HVI patients with the following characteristics (data expressed as mean +/- 1 SD): mean age of 35 years +/- 16 years, Injury Severity Score of 17 +/- 11, time from admission to laparotomy of 5.9 hours +/- 5.8 hours, operative blood loss of 1500 mL +/- 1800 mL, and length of stay of 19 days +/- 23 days. Twelve percent presented with a systolic pressure <90 mm Hg and 9% died. Independent risk factors for mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, p = 0.005), Abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score (OR = 2.5, p = 0.011), the presence of a significant extra-abdominal injury (OR = 3.4, p = 0.043), and a delay of more than 5 hours between admission and laparotomy (OR = 3.2, p = 0.0499). Eighty-six percent of the deaths in patients who had a delay of >5 hours were because of abdominal-related sepsis.

CONCLUSION

HVI occurred in less than 1% of all blunt trauma admissions. Delays in operative intervention are associated with an increased mortality. A high index of suspicion is needed to make a timely diagnosis and minimize risk.

Management of blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries: Experience at the Alfred hospital

BACKGROUND

The incidence of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) has increased recently in blunt abdominal trauma, possibly due to an increasing number of high-speed motor accidents and the use of seat belts.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to identify the factors determining the time of surgical intervention and how they affect the outcome of the patient with BBMI. This was achieved by reviewing our experience as a major Victorian trauma service in the management of bowel and mesenteric injuries and comparing this to the experiences reported in the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective study reviewing 278 consecutive patients who presented to the Alfred trauma center with blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries over a 6-year period.

RESULTS

The patient cohort comprised 278 patients with BBMI (66% were male, 34% were female), of whom 80% underwent a laparotomy, 17% were treated conservatively and 3% were diagnosed post-mortem. In terms of time from admission to laparotomy, 67% were treated within 0-4 h, 9% within 4-8 h, 3% within 8-12 h, 10% within 12-24 h, 4% within 24-48 h and 7% at >48 h. A focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed in 86 patients, of whom 51% had a positive FAST, 44% had a negative FAST and 4% had an equivocal FAST. Overall, 13% of the patient cohort did not have a FAST. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were undertaken preoperatively in 68% of the patients, revealing free gas (22% of patients), bowel-wall thickening (31%), fat and mesenteric stranding or hematoma (38%) and free fluid with no solid organ injury (43%).

CONCLUSION

The timing of surgical intervention in cases of BBMI is mostly determined by the clinical examination and the results of the helical CT scan findings. The FAST lacks sensitivity and specificity for identifying bowel and mesenteric trauma. A delayed diagnosis of > 48 h has a significantly higher bowelrelated morbidity but not mortality.

Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far? The Impact of Missed Abdominal Injuries in the Era of Nonoperative Management

Nonoperative management for traumatic injuries has significantly influenced trauma care during the last decade. We undertook this study to assess the impact of nontherapeutic laparotomies for suspected abdominal injuries compared with delayed laparotomies for questionable abdominal injuries for patients with abdominal trauma. The records of patients admitted to the trauma service between 2002 and 2007 who underwent laparotomies deemed nontherapeutic or delayed were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, severity of injury, management scheme, and outcome data were analyzed. Sixteen patients underwent delayed laparotomies, whereas 26 patients incurred nontherapeutic laparotomies. Injury severity scores, Glasgow coma scale scores, abdominal abbreviated injury scale score (AIS), and age were similar for both populations. Delayed laparotomies occurred an average of 7 ± 9 days postinjury. Intensive care unit length of stay (26 ± 24 vs 10 ± 6 days), hospital length of stay (40 ± 37 vs 11 ± 10 days), ventilator days (31 ± 29 vs 11 ± 10), and number of abdominal operative procedures (1.9 ± 1.5 vs 1 ± 0) were significantly higher in the delayed laparotomies group versus the nontherapeutic laparotomies group, respectively. Delayed diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries yielded a significantly increased morbidity and mortality. During the evolving era of technological imaging for traumatic injuries, we must not allow the nonoperative pendulum to swing too far.

Clinical significance of isolated intraperitoneal fluid on computed tomography in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma

PURPOSE

The finding of isolated free intraperitoneal fluid (FIPF) on computed tomography of the abdomen (CTA) in children after blunt trauma is of unclear clinical significance and raises suspicion for a solid or hollow viscus injury. In our institution, pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting with isolated FIPF on CTA who are hemodynamically stable and have no peritoneal signs on initial physical examination (iPE) have been historically approached nonoperatively. We reviewed our level 1 trauma center experience with this subset of the trauma population and sought to (1) justify an initial nonoperative approach and (2) identify early predictors of the eventual need for surgical exploration.

METHODS

Data on all trauma patients less than 14 years of age admitted to our hospital from 2001 to 2006 after Blunt Abdominal Trauma (BAT) whose screening CTA showed FIPF and no other radiographic signs of solid or hollow viscus injury were retrieved from the local trauma registry. Clinical progress, operative findings, and follow-up were obtained by hospital and office chart review, as well as telephone contact. Mechanism of injury (MOI); Injury Severity Score (ISS); Revised Trauma Score; Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS); the presence of abdominal tenderness or external signs of injury on iPE; and quantity, location, and density of the FIPF were statistically analyzed as possible early predictors of the eventual need for surgical exploration.

RESULTS

A total of 670 children admitted to our institution after blunt trauma were evaluated with CTA during the time of enrollment. Isolated FIPF was found in 94 individuals (14%). Mean age was 9.7 (+/-SD 3.2) years; 52% were males. Motor vehicle crash was the most common MOI. Mean PTS was 10.6 (+/-SD 1.8). Mean ISS was 10.2 (+/-SD 7.2). Free intraperitoneal fluid was most commonly found in only one intraperitoneal region (93%). Most patients (97%) were discharged home without undergoing a surgical procedure. Three other patients developed peritonitis on serial physical examination and were surgically explored. Hollow viscus injuries were found in 2 of these individuals and treated with primary repair or segmental bowel resection. All surgical patients enjoyed a full recovery, with no postoperative complications. The presence of abdominal tenderness on iPE and the quantity of FIPF on initial CTA were the only studied variables to reach statistical significance as predictors of the eventual need for operative intervention. Follow-up after hospital discharge was obtained in 46.8% (44/94) and averaged 124.9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of pediatric blunt trauma patients with isolated FIPF on CTA ever reported. Our findings justify an initial nonoperative approach for the management of these individuals. Abdominal tenderness on iPE and the quantity of FIPF on initial CTA were predictors of the eventual need for operative intervention.

Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare patients with "isolated" blunt small bowel injury (SBI) to patients with multiple intra-abdominal injuries and analyze whether delayed laparotomy affected outcome.

METHODS

Medical records of patients that suffered a blunt SBI between 1994 and 2005 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those with isolated SBI and those with other associated intra-abdominal injuries ("non-isolated"). The method of diagnosis, time to operation, small bowel Organ Injury Scale (OIS) assessment (grade >or= 2), injury severity score (ISS), morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 62 (68.9%) isolated cases and 28 (31.1%) non-isolated cases. Isolated cases required more supplementary diagnostic methods than the non-isolated cases. Non-isolated cases had a shorter diagnosis to treatment period (p < .01) and a higher ISS (mean 22.5 vs. 17.2 in "isolated" group). Morbidity (51.6% and 53.6%) and mortality (16.1% and 28.6%) did not differ significantly between the isolated and non-isolated groups. Delays in diagnosis were common in the isolated group, but this did not affect outcome. Patients with associated injuries, and higher ISS, had higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries significantly affected the presentation and time to diagnosis of patients with SBI, but not morbidity or mortality. Delayed surgical treatment in the isolated cases was not associated with an increased incidence of complications. Patients inflicted with more severe associated injuries were less likely to survive the trauma.

Hollow viscus injury

BACKGROUND

Hollow viscus injuries are uncommon and occur in approximately 1% of all blunt trauma patients.

DISCUSSION

These injuries are often not suspected and are difficult to diagnosis. Morbidity and mortality are high, and a negative abdominal computed tomography is not sufficient to rule out these injuries in certain clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Using a case-based approach, the epidemiology and diagnostic pathways to manage hollow viscus injuries are reviewed.

Use of laparoscopy in evaluation and treatment of penetrating and blunt abdominal injuries

Use of laparoscopy in penetrating trauma has been well established; however, its application in blunt trauma is evolving. The authors hypothesized that laparoscopy is safe and feasible as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in both the patients with penetrating and blunt trauma. Trauma registry data and medical records of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy for abdominal trauma were reviewed. Over a 4-year period, 43 patients (18 blunt trauma / 25 penetrating trauma) underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 9 (50%) blunt trauma and 9 (36%) penetrating trauma patients. Diagnostic laparoscopy was negative in 33% of blunt trauma and 52% of penetrating trauma patients. Sensitivity/specificity of laparoscopy in patients with blunt and penetrating trauma was 92%/100% and 90%/100%, respectively. Overall, laparotomy was avoided in 25 (58%) patients. Use of laparoscopy in selected patients with blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma is safe, minimizes nontherapeutic laparotomies, and allows for minimal invasive management of selected intra-abdominal injuries.

Fatores preditivos de morbimortalidade no trauma de intestino delgado

OBJETIVO: Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar o diagnóstico e o tratamento das lesões de intestino delgado e determinar os fatores que influenciaram a morbimortalidade. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo incluindo 410 pacientes com lesão de intestino delgado operados entre janeiro de 1994 e dezembro de 2004. Os dados coletados incluíram: mecanismo de trauma, métodos diagnósticos, tempo transcorrido até a intervenção cirúrgica, grau das lesões, índices de trauma, conduta cirúrgica (sutura ou ressecção e anastomose), morbidade (especialmente fístula) e mortalidade. A comparação entre os grupos foi feita usando os testes de Fisher e Yates. RESULTADOS: O mecanismo de trauma foi penetrante em 321 pacientes (78,3%) e fechado em 89 (21,7%). Houve mais pacientes tratados cirurgicamente com intervalo maior que 6 horas após o trauma no grupo trauma contuso se comparados com trauma penetrante (p<0,05). Sutura da lesão foi feita em 52,2% dos pacientes e ressecção e anastomose em 46,8%, e ambos procedimentos apresentaram a mesma incidência de fístula (4,7%). A morbidade foi de 35,1%. A incidência de fistula foi maior nos pacientes submetidos à laparotomia com mais de 12 horas após o trauma quando comparados com aqueles operados com menos de 12 horas (8,3% vs. 4,3%; sem diferença estatística), mas isto não foi fator determinante para maior mortalidade. A mortalidade foi de 13,7% e foi relacionada com escores de gravidade mais elevados. CONCLUSÃO: A lesão de intestino delgado é freqüente após o trauma abdominal, sendo mais comum nos traumas penetrantes. O diagnóstico desta lesão após trauma fechado pode ser difícil, com demora para o tratamento cirúrgico. A ocorrência de fistula não esteve relacionada aos seguintes fatores analisados: mecanismo de trauma, tempo transcorrido entre o trauma e a operação, conduta cirúrgica, lesões intra-abdominais associadas ou gravidade das lesões. A mortalidade esteve relacionada com lesões associadas.

Isolated injury of the superior mesenteric artery caused by a lap belt in a child

Isolated vascular injuries are rare in cases of blunt abdominal trauma, and superior mesenteric artery injury is extremely rare but potentially lethal. The incidence of this kind of life-threatening injury has increased in recent years. The diagnosis of these isolated injuries is difficult, and its delay is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality. The authors report on the case of a child with an isolated injury of the superior mesenteric artery caused by a lap belt, during a motor-vehicle crash which was successfully managed. Correct use of all types of restraints is to be recommended. The diagnosis of this rare intraabdominal vascular injury is possible especially when the major signs are evident, but an awareness of this rare possibility is essential for the outcome.

Perforating small bowel injuries in children: influence of time to operation on outcome

The purpose of this study was to determine whether delay in the diagnosis of small bowel injury (SBI) affected the outcome of paediatric patients who required surgical interventions in the treatment of small bowel injuries. A retrospective chart review was performed on children with traumatic SBI requiring surgical management between January 2000 and December 2002. Diagnostic interval was defined as the time from presentation to operative treatment and delay was an interval of greater than 8 h. Thirteen patients were admitted for operative treatment of SBI. Nine cases were the result of motor vehicle trauma. The mean diagnostic interval for all patients was 9.1 h+/-7.4 h (range 0.6 h-22.5 h). Six patients had a diagnostic delay with a mean diagnostic interval of 15.5 h+/-5.5 h. There was no statistically significant difference found between the prompt and delayed diagnosis groups in terms of complications or length of hospital stay. Our finding of no difference between the prompt and delayed diagnosis groups and a diagnostic delay no longer than 22.5 h may suggest that our local methods of diagnosis and treatment assist in the prevention of unnecessary complications and death.

Computed tomographic scanning and selective laparoscopy in the diagnosis of blunt bowel injury: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

We prospectively evaluated whether computed tomographic (CT) scanning and selective laparoscopy (LP) for the diagnosis of blunt bowel injury (BBI) could prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy and delayed diagnosis.

METHODS

Between April 1994 and May 2002, hemodynamically stable patients suspected of having BBI were enrolled in this study. Patients with hemodynamic instability or solid organ injuries with hemoperitoneum were excluded. All patients underwent a physical examination and contrast CT scanning at admission and once again approximately 12 hours (range, 6-24 hours) after admission. LP was performed under general anesthesia in patients who had local peritoneal signs and indirect CT signs (bowel thickening or isolated intraperitoneal fluid) or in whom abdominal pain or tenderness increased or intraperitoneal fluid increased on the repeat CT scan. The indications for a celiotomy were diffuse peritonitis, pneumoperitoneum on the abdominal CT scan, or bowel perforation visible on LP.

RESULTS

During the study period, 399 of 1,074 patients admitted for blunt torso injuries were enrolled in this study. Eleven patients underwent emergency celiotomy and 11 underwent LP immediately after admission to the emergency department. One nontherapeutic laparotomy was performed among the patients who underwent celiotomy. The LPs revealed seven bowel perforations and one mesenteric laceration. After a repeat CT scan, three and seven of the patients underwent laparotomy and LP, respectively. Four bowel perforations were found by LP. The remaining 198 patients were treated conservatively, and no complications related to a delayed BBI diagnosis occurred.

CONCLUSION

CT scanning and selective LP can prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy and delayed diagnosis in patients with suspected BBI.

Unsuspected internal organ traumatic injuries

Emergency medicine physicians can avoid missed traumatic intra-abdominal injury by adopting a paradigm for patient evaluation that recognizes the patterns of injury associated with pathology, the importance of positive and negative physical findings, and the limitations of diagnostic studies. The burden of avoiding missed traumatic injuries does not rest with emergency medicine physicians alone, however. A missed diagnosis may be the result of a medical error involving multiple systems and individuals.Ultimately, decreasing the incidence of missed traumatic injury is an opportunity for quality improvement for all practitioners involved in the care of patients with trauma.

Hollow viscous injury in the pediatric patient

Injuries to the gastrointestinal tract account for 1% to 15% of intraabdominal injuries in children. Most hollow visceral injuries occur following some form of blunt trauma and motor vehicle accidents remain the most common mechanism of injury. The diagnosis of blunt intestinal injury is difficult and often delayed. Current imaging modalities are imprecise and contribute to delay. Delay is associated with morbidity and mortality in both children and adults, but the length of delay remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to examine the current diagnosis and management of hollow visceral injury in children.

Blunt injury to mesentery and small bowel:

Helical CT now allows rapid acquisition of sections through the abdomen and pelvis with optimal vascular opacification and minimal motion artifact. Oral contrast may aid in the identification of subtle bowel and mesenteric injuries and does not have any significant deleterious effects. CT findings of extraluminal enteric contrast, active hemorrhage, or free intraperitoneal-retroperitoneal air allow accurate diagnosis of SBMI in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma. Mesenteric hematoma in association with bowel wall thickening or the presence of significant amounts of free fluid without solid organ injury is highly suspicious for SBMI requiring laparotomy. CT alone or in concert with DPL and physical examination is a valuable tool in the timely diagnosis and treatment of bowel and mesenteric injury caused by blunt trauma.

Delay in Diagnosis of Hollow Viscus Injuries: Effect on Outcome

Delay in the recognition of hollow viscus injury may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately the early diagnosis of these injuries remains a diagnostic challenge increasing the likelihood of delay. Patients transferred to Level I trauma centers from outlying institutions may be at increased risk of morbidity from hollow viscus injury, as there is an inherent delay associated with transfer. Herein we reviewed our institution's 11-year experience with the diagnosis and treatment of hollow viscus injury caused by blunt mechanism. Forty-one patients met defined criteria of hollow viscus injury. Patients were stratified into two groups: interval to operating room ≤24 hours versus >24 hours. Length of hospital stay, number of ventilator days, and percentage of patients developing acute respiratory distress syndrome were significantly greater in the >24-hour group. Mortality was not significantly different between the groups (26.7% vs 36.4%). Patients transferred from other institutions were more likely to experience complications and operative delay. In conclusion delay in operative intervention (>24 hours) adversely affected outcomes. Early transfer of patients to Level I trauma centers may improve outcomes. A high index of suspicion and the use of multiple diagnostic modalities may lead to earlier operative treatment and improved outcome.

Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial

OBJECTIVES

Blunt SBI is infrequent and its diagnosis may be difficult, especially in the face of confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methods for making the diagnosis of blunt SBI.

METHODS

Patients with blunt small bowel injury (SBI) were identified from the registries of 95 trauma centers for a 2-year period (1998-1999). Patients with SBI (cases) were matched by age and Injury Severity Score with a blunt trauma patient receiving an abdominal workup who did not have SBI (controls).

RESULTS

Logistic regression models were unable to differentiate SBI with perforation from SBI without perforation. Thirteen percent of patients with documented perforating SBI had normal abdominal computed tomographic scans preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Alone or in combination, current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated SBI. Improvements in diagnostic methods and approaches are needed to ensure the prompt diagnosis of this uncommon but potentially devastating injury.

The seromuscular tear and other intestinal lesions in the seatbelt syndrome: a clinical and pathologic study of 29 cases

The authors describe the clinical and pathologic findings in 29 patients with injuries from motor vehicle accidents. The seromuscular tear (SMT), the hallmark intestinal injury of the seatbelt syndrome, is an unambiguous lesion similar in all segments of bowel and is caused by a tear that separates the inner muscularis from the submucosa. It is characterized by (1) a wedge that strips the submucosa from the inner circular muscle; (2) a bending retraction of the torn muscularis toward the uninvolved bowel wall; (3) mucosal-submucosal fold effacement, causing the mucosa-submucosa bridge spanning the tear to become paper thin; and (4) the vulnerability of this bridge to ischemia that in 35% of the tears studied culminated in incipient or frank perforations and/or gangrene. Large SMTs, particularly the circumferential degloving type, are most prone to develop these complications. These findings militate against the idea that the SMT is a trivial lesion. The SMT occurred in 90% of patients in this report and accounted for 65% of all intestinal lesions. Seventy-three percent of the tears developed in the colon, and one third of all SMTs occurred in the sigmoid colon. Two thirds of all intestinal and mesenteric injuries clustered in three sites: the ileocecal region, the sigmoid colon, and the jejunum. Perforations were the principal lesion in the jejunum and SMTs at the other two locations. Ninety percent of patients experienced two or more intestinal lesions. This suggests the simultaneous action of different traumatic mechanisms on the bowel and its mesenteries in seatbelted persons who are in motor vehicle accidents.

Intra-abdominal gastrointestinal tract injuries following blunt trauma: the experience of an Australian trauma centre

AIMS

The aim of the study was to use the extensive experience of an Australian Level I trauma centre to develop guidelines for diagnosis and management of significant gastrointestinal tract injuries (GITIs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 74 patients admitted to Westmead Hospital between 1985 and 1996 who had sustained major gastrointestinal tract (GIT) injuries following blunt trauma. The patients were identified from the trauma unit database. Clinical information was retrieved from the database and augmented by a review of the medical records.

RESULTS

Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 55 (92%) admissions. Laparotomy was performed as a result of a positive diagnostic peritoneal lavage in 26 (35.1%) patients, abdominal signs in 20 (27%), diagnostic findings on computed tomography in 19 (25.7%), haemodynamic instability in eight (10.8%) and a positive contrast study in one (1.4%) patient. There was a total of 95 injuries: one gastric (1.1%), eight duodenal (8.4%), 64 small bowel (67.3%), two appendiceal (2.1%), 19 colonic (20%) and one rectal (1.1%). Thirty day mortality was 23% (17 patients). Seven (9.5%) patients died within 24h of injury, three (4.1%) of which were directly related to the GIT. Ten (13.5%) patients died within 2 weeks of admission, three (4.1%) of which were attributable to the GIT. Thirty day GIT morbidity was 29.7% (22 patients). The development of GIT morbidity was significantly related to a delay to laparotomy of more than 24h (P=0.036) and tachycardia on presentation (P=0.023). Associated injuries, injury severity scores (ISS) and age did not significantly impact on GITI related morbidity and mortality.

DISCUSSION

Major GITIs are associated with a high mortality due to the severity and complexity of associated injuries. Morbidity from GITIs correlates to delays in diagnosis and management.

Isolated free fluid on computed tomographic scan in blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review of incidence and management

BACKGROUND

Abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan is accepted as the primary diagnostic modality in stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. A recent survey of 328 trauma surgeons demonstrated marked variation in the management of patients with head injuries and the finding of free intra-abdominal fluid without solid organ injury on CT scan. This study was undertaken to attempt to determine what to do when free fluid without solid organ injury is seen on abdominal CT scan in patients with blunt trauma.

METHODS

Articles concerning the incidence and significance of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan of blunt trauma patients without solid organ injury were systematically reviewed. A MEDLINE search was performed using terms such as tomography-x-ray computed, wounds-nonpenetrating, small intestine/injuries, time factors, and abdominal trauma and diagnostic tests. Bibliographies of pertinent articles were reviewed. Appropriate articles were evaluated for quality and data were combined to reach a conclusion.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis could not be performed because no randomized, prospective, controlled trials could be found. Forty-one articles were excluded from the analysis because they looked at only patients with known injuries to intestine, diaphragm, or pancreas and the investigation of the CT scan findings did not include negative scans. Ten articles, which described CT scan results for all patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma for a defined period of time, formed the basis of this study. Isolated free fluid was seen in 463 (2.8%) of over 16,000 blunt trauma patients scanned. A therapeutic laparotomy was performed in only 122 (27%) of these patients.

CONCLUSION

The isolated finding of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan in patients with blunt trauma and no solid organ injury does not warrant laparotomy. Alert patients may be followed with physical examination. Patients with altered mental status should undergo diagnostic peritoneal lavage.

Intra-abdominal free fluid without solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma: an indication for laparotomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), in whom intra-abdominal free fluid but no solid organ injury is found on imaging, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of this finding.

METHODS

All patients presenting with suspected BAT to a provincial trauma center over a 30-month period were reviewed. A screening focused abdominal sonogram for trauma scan was obtained in every case. Stable patients with positive or indeterminate scans underwent computed tomographic scanning. Those with free fluid but without visible solid organ injury were studied. Radiologic interpretation, clinical management, and operative findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 1,367 patients (2%) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-one patients (75%) underwent exploratory laparotomy, which for 16 (76%) was therapeutic: bowel injuries were found in 10 patients, mesentery injuries in 6, and injuries to solid organs in 3. In five patients, laparotomy was nontherapeutic. Those with more than a trace of free fluid were significantly more likely to have a therapeutic procedure. Seven patients (25%) were observed, of whom two failed nonoperative management and underwent therapeutic laparotomies within 24 hours of admission for missed colon, splenic, and hepatic injuries. The presence of abdominal seat belt bruising or a Chance-type fracture in the study patients was associated with a 90% and 100% therapeutic laparotomy rate, respectively. Computed tomographic scan findings were variable and were not able to predict injury severity or need for surgery.

CONCLUSION

The finding of more than trace amounts of free fluid in the absence of solid organ injury in BAT is often associated with clinically significant visceral injury. Early laparotomy is recommended for these patients.

Is delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma a valid quality improvement measure in the era of nonoperative management of abdominal injuries?

BACKGROUND

Review of hemodynamically stable patients who undergo laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission is an American College of Surgeons quality improvement filter. We reviewed our recent experience with patients who underwent laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission to evaluate the reasons for delay, and to determine whether they were because of failure of nonoperative management or other causes.

METHODS

The registry at our Level I trauma center was searched from January 1998 through December 2000 for patients who required a laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission. Of 3,369 admitted blunt trauma patients, 90 (2.7%) underwent laparotomy for trauma, of which 26 (29%) were identified as delayed laparotomies greater than 4 hours after admission.

RESULTS

The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash, the mean Injury Severity Score was 18, and 65% of the patients had significant distracting injuries. Five patients had laparotomy greater than 24 hours after admission. The average time to the operating room in the remaining patients was 8.6 hours. Clinical examination (61%) findings were the most common indication for operation. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract injury was the most common injury associated with delay in laparotomy (58%).

CONCLUSION

GI tract injuries are the predominant injury leading to delayed laparotomy for blunt trauma (58%). Failed nonoperative management of solid organ injuries occurred less frequently (15%). Future efforts should concentrate on earlier identification of GI tract injury. Delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma is a valid quality improvement measure.

Surgery of the small intestine

The small intestine is the portal of entry of virtually all nutrients and is also the site of diverse inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. This field has recently attracted intense excitement as a result of novel clinical and experimental techniques, combined modality therapies, and basic science applications. This review will highlight important clinical advances in surgery for Crohn disease, short bowel syndrome, transplantation, trauma, and polyposis. Promising experimental approaches, novel methods of clinical assessment, and multimodality treatment will also be considered.

Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy

BACKGROUND

Mandatory celiotomy has been proposed for all patients with unexplained free fluid on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning after blunt abdominal injury. This recommendation has been based upon retrospective data and concerns over the potential morbidity from the late diagnosis of blunt intestinal injury. This study examined the rate of intestinal injury in patients with free fluid on abdominal CT after blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter prospective series of all patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to four level I trauma centers over 22 months. Data were collected concurrently at the time of patient enrollment and included demographics, injury severity score, findings on CT scan, and presence or absence of blunt intestinal injury. This database was specifically queried for those patients who had free fluid without solid organ injury.

RESULTS

In all, 2,299 patients were evaluated. Free fluid was present in 265. Of these, 90 patients had isolated free fluid with only 7 having a blunt intestinal injury. Conversely, 91% of patients with free fluid did not. All patients with free fluid were observed for a mean of 8 days (95% confidence interval 6.1 to 10.4, range 1 to 131). There were no missed injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Free fluid on abdominal CT scan does not mandate celiotomy. Serial observation with the possible use of other adjunctive tests is recommended.

Blunt thoraco-abdominal injury

Recent advances in blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma management include improvements in imaging, particularly in trauma bay ultrasound. Indications for non-operative management have expanded for solid organ and aortic injury. The physiology of abdominal compartment syndrome continues to be defined, with resulting improvements in care.

Concomitant Blunt Enteric Injuries with Injuries of the Liver and Spleen: A Dilemma for Trauma Surgeons

Prompt identification of enteric injuries after blunt trauma remains problematic. With the increased utilization of nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma gastrointestinal disruptions may escape timely detection and repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate blunt enteric injuries requiring operative repair in adult patients and the association of concomitant hepatic and/or splenic injuries. Over a 10-year period (January 1990 through December 1999) 1648 patients suffered blunt liver, spleen, and/or enteric injuries, with 87 (5.3%) of these requiring operative repairs of the enteric injury. These patients had enteric injury only (EI) (60.9%; 53 of 87), concomitant enteric/splenic injury (ESI) (10.3%; 9 of 87), concomitant enteric/hepatic injury (EHI) (13 8%-12 of 87), and enteric/hepatic/splenic injury (EHSI) 14.9% (13 of 87). A delay in treatment of >8 hours from presentation of EI compared with either EHI or ESI was not significantly different between the two groups. EHSI had exploratory laparotomy more expeditiously related to hemodynamic instability. Mortality rates were higher with EHI related to hemorrhagic shock and/or severe traumatic brain injury. Morbidity was not related to a delay in diagnosis until the period of delay was greater than 24 hours. The nonoperative management of blunt solid organ injury does not delay the detection and treatment of concomitant bowel injuries compared with isolated blunt enteric injuries. Occult enteric injury with solid organ injury has a low incidence and represents a continuing challenge to the clinical acumen of the trauma surgeon.

CT of blunt trauma bowel and mesenteric injury: typical findings and pitfalls in diagnosis

Detection of bowel and mesenteric injury can be challenging in patients after blunt abdominal trauma. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical to decrease patient morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary modality for the imaging of these patients. Signs of bowel perforation such as free air and contrast material are virtually pathognomonic. Bowel-wall thickening, free fluid, and mesenteric infiltration may be seen with this type of injury and partial thickness injuries. The authors present and discuss the range of CT findings seen with bowel and mesenteric injuries. Examples of observation and interpretation errors are also provided to highlight pitfalls encountered in the evaluation of abdominopelvic CT scans in patients after blunt trauma.

Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

Blunt small bowel injury (SBI) is uncommon, and its timely diagnosis may be difficult. The impact of operative delays on morbidity and mortality has been unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of diagnostic delays to morbidity and mortality in blunt SBI.

METHODS

Patients with blunt SBI with perforation were identified from the registries of eight trauma centers (1989-1997). Patients with duodenal injuries were excluded. Data were extracted by individual chart review. Patients were classified as multi-trauma (group 1) or near-isolated SBI (group 2 with Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 2 for other body areas). Time to operation and its impact on mortality and morbidity was determined for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients met inclusion criteria: 66.2% were male, mean age was 35.2 years (range, 1-90 years) and mean Injury Severity Score was 16.7 (range, 9-47). 100 patients had multiple injuries (group 1). There were 21 deaths (10.6%) with 9 (4.5%) attributable to delay in operation for SBI. In patients with near-isolated SBI, the incidence of mortality increased with time to operative intervention (within 8 hours: 2%; 8-16 hours: 9.1%; 16-24 hours: 16.7%; greater than 24 hours: 30.8%, p = 0.009) as did the incidence of complications. Delays as short as 8 hours 5 minutes and 11 hours 15 minutes were associated with mortality attributable to SBI. The rates of delay in diagnosis were not significantly associated with age, gender, intoxication, transfer status, or presence of associated injuries.

CONCLUSION

Delays in the diagnosis of SBI are directly responsible for almost half the deaths in this series. Even relatively brief delays (as little as 8 hours) result in morbidity and mortality directly attributable to "missed" SBI. Further investigation into the prompt diagnosis of this injury is needed.