Population pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in critically ill trauma patients on once-daily regimens

What is the right gentamicin dose for multiple trauma patients? A Monte Carlo simulation exploration study

Background

The appropriate dose of gentamicin is important to prevent and treat infections. The study aimed to determine the optimal dose of gentamicin to achieve the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK) targets for efficacy and safety in multiple trauma patients.

Methods

PK parameters of gentamicin in multiple trauma patients were gathered to develop a one-compartment PK model for prediction. The Monte Carlo simulation method was performed. The 24-h area under the concentration time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24h/MIC) ≥50 was defined for the infection prevention target. AUC24h/MIC ≥110 or the maximum serum concentration to MIC ratio ≥8-10 was for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infection target. The risk of nephrotoxicity was the minimum serum concentration ≥2 mg/L. The optimal dose of gentamicin was determined when the efficacy target was >90% and the risk of nephrotoxicity was lowest.

Results

The optimal gentamicin dose to prevent infection when the MIC was <1 mg/L was 6-7 mg/kg/day. A higher dose of gentamicin up to 10 mg/kg/day could not reach the target for treating serious Gram-negative infection when the expected MIC was ≥1 mg/L. The probability of nephrotoxicity was minimal at 0.2-4% with gentamicin doses of 5-10 mg/kg/day for 3 days.

Conclusions

Once daily gentamicin doses of 6-7 mg/kg are recommended to prevent infections in patients with multiple trauma. Gentamicin monotherapy could not be recommended for serious infections. Further clinical studies are required to confirm our results.

Population Pharmacokinetics and AUC-Guided Dosing of Tobramycin in the Treatment of Infections Caused by Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria

PURPOSE

Tobramycin (TOB) exhibits variable pharmacokinetic properties due to the clinical condition of patients. This study aimed to investigate the AUC-guided dosing of TOB based on population pharmacokinetic analysis in the treatment of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2020 after obtaining approval from our institutional review board. For 53 patients who received therapeutic drug monitoring of TOB, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed with covariates of estimated glomerular filtration rate using serum creatinine (eGFRcre) on clearance (CL) and weight on both CL and V_d in exponential error modeling (CL = 2.84 × [weight/70] × eGFRcre^0.568, interindividual variability [IIV] = 31.1%; V_d = 26.3 × [weight/70], IIV = 20.2%; residual variability = 28.8%).

FINDINGS

The final regression model for predicting 30-day mortality was developed with risk factors of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose to MIC ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 0.996; 95% CI, 0.968-1.003) and serum albumin (OR = 0.137; 95% CI, 0.022-0.632). The final regression model for predicting acute kidney injury was developed with the risk factors of C-reactive protein (OR = 1.136; 95% CI, 1.040-1.266) and AUC during a 72-hour period after the first dose (OR = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000-1.001). A dose of 8 or 15 mg/kg was beneficial for achievement of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose/MIC >80 and trough concentration <1 µg/mL in patients with preserved kidney function and TOB CL >4.47 L/h/70 kg in the events of MIC of 1 or 2 µg/mL, respectively. We propose that the first dose of 15, 11, 10, 8, and 7 mg/kg for eGFRcre >90, 60 to 89, 45 to 59, 30 to 44, and 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m² be followed by therapeutic drug monitoring at peak and 24 hours after the first dose.

IMPLICATIONS

This study suggests that TOB use encourages the replacement of trough- and peak-targeted dosing with AUC-guided dosing.

Aminoglycosides' dosing and monitoring practices in critically ill patients in Quebec hospitals

Considering the aminoglycosides' characteristics in terms of efficacy and toxicity, multiple dosing recommendations and nomograms have been suggested over several decades. The objective is to describe the dosing and monitoring practices of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin in critically ill patients across health care institutions in the province of Quebec.This survey was developed with multiple-choices and short answers and targeted the lead pharmacist responsible of antimicrobial stewardship in each health care institution.Gentamicin and tobramycin dosing regimens were in-line with guidelines from different countries. Amikacin was not commonly used in Quebec. Therapeutic targets were generally consistent with the literature.Dosing adaptation were mostly done based on clinician judgment or with homemade software. Given the variability seen across practices in Quebec institutions, standardization and optimization of aminoglycosides therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered.

Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Medications in Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review of Current Literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for renal support has increased substantially in critically ill children compared with intermittent modalities owing to its preferential effects on hemodynamic stability. With the expanding role of CRRT, the quantification of extracorporeal clearance and the effect on primary pharmacokinetic parameters is of the utmost importance. Within this review, we aimed to summarize the current state of the literature and compare published pharmacokinetic analyses of commonly used medications in children receiving CRRT to those who are not.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature within electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Published studies that were included contained relevant information on the use of commonly administered medications to children, from neonates to adolescents, receiving CRRT. Pharmacokinetic parameters that were analyzed included volume of distribution, total clearance, extracorporeal clearance, area under the curve, and elimination half-life. Information regarding CRRT circuit, flow rates, and membrane components was analyzed to investigate differences in pharmacokinetics between each modality.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the final inclusion criteria within this systematic review, totaling 833 pediatric patients, with 586 receiving CRRT. Antimicrobials were the most common pharmacological class represented within the literature, representing 81% (35/43) of studies analyzed. Children receiving CRRT largely had similar volume of distribution and total clearance to critically ill children not receiving CRRT, suggesting reno-protective dose adjustments may lead to subtherapeutic dosing regimens in these patients. Overall, there was a tendency for hydrophilic agents, with a low protein binding to undergo elevated total clearance in these children. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the large variability amongst patient populations and heterogeneity with CRRT modalities, flow rates, and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within studies. This review was able to identify that variation in solute removal, or CRRT modalities, properties (i.e., flow rates), and membrane composition, may have differing effects on the pharmacokinetics of commonly administered medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The current state of the literature regarding medications administered to children receiving CRRT largely focuses on antimicrobials. Significant gaps remain with other commonly used medications such as sedatives and analgesics. Overall reporting of patient clinical characteristics, CRRT settings, and circuit composition was poor, with only 10% of articles including all relevant information to assess the impact of CRRT on total clearance. Changes in pharmacokinetics because of CRRT often required higher than labeled doses, suggesting renally adjusted or reno-protective doses may lead to subtherapeutic dosing regimens. A thorough understanding of the interplay between patient, drug, and CRRT-circuit factors are required to ensure adequate delivery of dosing regimens to this vulnerable population.

Risk Factors Associated with Suboptimal Tobramycin Levels in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Optimal aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill patients represents a challenge for practitioners, especially in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). MICU patients exhibit altered pharmacokinetics due to pathophysiological changes the body undergoes in critical illness, leading to possible treatment failure. The literature surrounding optimal dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring strategies of aminoglycosides in MICU patients is scarce and conflicting. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated risk factors for suboptimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment. Currently, no definitive risk factors have been identified to predict suboptimal aminoglycoside target obtainment in MICU patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for suboptimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment in patients receiving tobramycin in the MICU.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients 18-89 years old who received at least one 7 mg/kg tobramycin dose in the MICU from January, 1 2015 to September, 30 2020. Patients also had to have at least two detectable drug levels obtained at least one half-life apart following the first tobramycin dose. The primary outcome was to determine the incidence of optimal pharmacokinetic target obtainment, defined as a tobramycin maximum concentration (C_max) ≥ 10 mcg/ml, and to identify the risk factors for suboptimal (C_max < 10 mcg/mL) pharmacokinetic target obtainment, in MICU patients. Secondary outcomes were compared between suboptimal and optimal target obtainment in patients with culture confirmed gram-negative infection susceptible to tobramycin. These secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and vasopressor duration in those with shock.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients were included in this retrospective study. For the primary outcome, 187 (81.3%) patients achieved optimal target obtainment. Through multivariate logistic regression, female sex and serum albumin < 2.5 g/dL were identified as independent risk factors for suboptimal target obtainment; [OR = 2.14; 95% CI (1.05-4.37), p = 0.037], [OR = 2.50; 95% CI (1.21-5.19), p = 0.014], respectively. Fifty-four (23%) patients had culture-confirmed gram-negative infections susceptible to tobramycin and were included in the subgroup analysis. Of these 54 patients, 11 (20.4%) did not achieve optimal target concentrations. In patients with culture-confirmed gram-negative infection, there was no difference between patients with optimal target obtainment and suboptimal target obtainment in ICU LOS, hospital LOS, all-cause mortality, or vasopressor duration in those with shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients receiving their first dose of tobramycin in the MICU, 81.3% obtained an optimal serum concentration. Female sex and serum albumin < 2.5 g/dL were identified as risk factors for suboptimal target obtainment; however, further research is warranted to assess the utility of using these two covariates as risk factors for more aggressive dosing in critically ill MICU patients.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of tobramycin dosing in critically ill patients: the Hartford nomogram does not fit

OBJECTIVES

Extended-interval dosing of tobramycin is widely applied in patients with the Hartford nomogram as a representative, while this dosing approach has not been extensively evaluated in critically ill patients. The goal of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin and to evaluate the appropriateness of the Hartford nomogram in critically ill patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed based on a medical critical care database. The extracted concentration data of tobramycin were used for the construction of the population pharmacokinetic model using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Real-world data-based simulations were conducted to evaluate the pharmacodynamic target attainment (Cmax/MIC ≥10) and safety (concentration <0.5 mg/L for at least 4 h) of the Hartford nomogram.

RESULTS

A population pharmacokinetic model was built based on 307 measurements in 140 unique patients and externally validated by an independent study dataset. A two-compartment model was optimal for the structure model and creatinine clearance remained as the only covariate in the final model correlating to the clearance of tobramycin. Simulations indicated that the Hartford nomogram is effective for infections due to pathogens with an MIC of ≤1 mg/L, but not with an MIC of 2 mg/L. The percentage of patients who reached the non-toxicity target was quite low under the Hartford nomogram and a further extension of the dosing interval was necessary to minimize the toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hartford nomogram was not suitable for critically ill patients with pathogen MICs of 2 mg/L and drug monitoring is required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

Aminoglycosides in Critically Ill Septic Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Multicenter, Observational Study

PURPOSE

Data on aminoglycoside stewardship in critically ill septic patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) needing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are scarce. The objectives of the study were to determine, during CRRT, the time window with low likelihood for safe reinjection and the proportion of inappropriate reinjection.

METHODS

A post hoc observational analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing the risk of hemodialysis catheter infection with ethanol lock vs placebo in critically ill patients with AKI was conducted. Eligible patients were adults in intensive care units from 6 French hospitals. Any patient with AKI needing CRRT and receiving an antimicrobial therapy for a septic episode occurring before (≤24 hours) or during CRRT was included. The aminoglycoside orders were left to the physicians' discretion, but high dose once daily was the schedule of aminoglycoside administration.

FINDINGS

A total of 145 septic episodes treated by aminoglycosides were analyzed in patients receiving CRRT. A mean (SD) of 1.6 (0.8) amikacin and 1.8 (1.2) gentamicin administrations per patient were observed. During CRRT, C_max was 17.3 mg/L (interquartile range, 13.2-22.5 mg/L) for gentamicin and 50 mg/L (interquartile range, 43.7-76.6 mg/L) for amikacin. The plasma drug concentration at 24 hours (C_H24) was 2.3 mg/L (interquartile range, 1.6-3.2 mg/L) for gentamicin and 9.3 (interquartile range, 6.6-12.0 mg/L) for amikacin. Sixty-five C_min dosages remained above the reinjection threshold. Inappropriate reinjection was observed in 11 of 65 episodes (17%). Inappropriate reinjection (defined by, at the reinjection time, C_min dosages above the threshold; ie, C_min >2 mg/L for gentamicin and >5 mg/L for amikacin) was observed in 17% of analyzed episodes. Most patients did not need reinjection until approximately ≥30 hours after their initial administration.

IMPLICATIONS

During CRRT, as indicated by the C_H24 value, which was higher than the recommended threshold, the interval to obtain a C_min low enough to allow for redosing aminoglycosides is significantly longer than 24 hours. This interval is not always respected and leads to an of inappropriate reinjection rate of 17%. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ISRCTNCT00875069. (Clin Ther. 2021;XX:XXX-XXX) © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Aminoglycosides in the Intensive Care Unit: What Is New in Population PK Modeling?

Background: Although aminoglycosides are often used as treatment for Gram-negative infections, optimal dosing regimens remain unclear, especially in ICU patients. This is due to a large between- and within-subject variability in the aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in this population. Objective: This review provides comprehensive data on the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in patients hospitalized in the ICU by summarizing all published PopPK models in ICU patients for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. The objective was to determine the presence of a consensus on the structural model used, significant covariates included, and therapeutic targets considered during dosing regimen simulations. Method: A literature search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed database, using the terms: ‘amikacin’, ‘gentamicin’, ‘tobramycin’, ‘pharmacokinetic(s)’, ‘nonlinear mixed effect’, ‘population’, ‘intensive care’, and ‘critically ill’. Results: Nineteen articles were retained where amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin pharmacokinetics were described in six, 11, and five models, respectively. A two-compartment model was used to describe amikacin and tobramycin pharmacokinetics, whereas a one-compartment model majorly described gentamicin pharmacokinetics. The most recurrent significant covariates were renal clearance and bodyweight. Across all aminoglycosides, mean interindividual variability in clearance and volume of distribution were 41.6% and 22.0%, respectively. A common consensus for an optimal dosing regimen for each aminoglycoside was not reached. Conclusions: This review showed models developed for amikacin, from 2015 until now, and for gentamicin and tobramycin from the past decades. Despite the growing challenges of external evaluation, the latter should be more considered during model development. Further research including new covariates, additional simulated dosing regimens, and external validation should be considered to better understand aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in ICU patients.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations of Antibiotics of Last Resort in Treating Gram-Negative Infections in Adult Critically Ill Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide an overview of antimicrobials that are considered last resort for the treatment of resistant gram-negative infections in adult critically ill patients. The role in therapy, pharmacodynamic (PD) goals, and pharmacokinetic (PK) changes in critical illness for aminoglycosides, polymyxins, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and fluoroquinolones are summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Altered PK in septic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is observed with many of our agents of last resort. Based on the available literature, dosage adjustments may be required to optimize PK parameters and meet PD targets for most effective bacterial killing. Data is limited, studies are conducted in heterogeneous patient populations, and conclusions are frequently conflicting. Strategic dosing regimens such as high-dose extended interval dosing of aminoglycosides or loading doses with colistin and polymyxin B are examples of ways to optimize antibiotic PK in critically ill patients. Benefits of these strategies must be balanced with risks of increased toxicity. Patients with resistant gram-negative infections may present with septic shock in the ICU. Sepsis can significantly alter the PK of antibiotics and require dosage adjustments to attain optimal drug levels. An understanding of PK and PD properties of these agents of last resort will help to maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing toxic effects.

Implication of Haemodiafiltration Flow Rate on Amikacin Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

To analyse the effect of haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) flow rate on amikacin pharmacokinetics and blood concentrations.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Patients receiving CVVHDF and amikacin treatment were included. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Bayesian analysis. Spearman correlation test was used in order to assess the influence of CVVHDF flux on amikacin minimum concentration (Cmin) and plasma clearance.

RESULTS

Thirty patients undergoing CVVHDF procedures were included. The treatment with amikacin started at an initial mean dose of 12.4 (4.1) mg/kg/day. An association between the flow rate and Cmin value (r = 0.261; p = 0.161) and plasma clearance was found (r = 0.268; p = 0.152). Four patients (13.3%) were not able to achieve peak concentration over MIC value higher than 8. In 4 patients, amikacin had to be discontinued due to a high Cmin value.

CONCLUSIONS

Amikacin clearance in patients with CVVHDF is affected by the flow rate used. Therefore, CVVHDF dose should be taken into account when dosing amikacin.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling as tools to personalize gentamicin therapy

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling are all tools that can be applied to personalize gentamicin therapy. This review summarizes and evaluates literature knowledge on the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gentamicin and identifies areas where further research is required to successfully individualize gentamicin therapy using modelling and simulation techniques. Thirty-five studies have developed a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin and 15 studies have made dosing recommendations based on Monte Carlo simulation. Variability in gentamicin clearance was most commonly related to renal function in adults and body weight and age in paediatrics. Nine studies have related aminoglycoside exposure indices to clinical outcomes. Most commonly, efficacy has been linked to a Cmax/MIC ≥7-10 and a AUC24/MIC ≥70-100. No study to date has shown a relationship between predicted achievement of exposure targets and actual clinical success. Five studies have developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict bacteria killing and regrowth following gentamicin exposure and one study has developed a deterministic model of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. More complex semi-mechanistic models are required that consider the immune response, use of multiple antibiotics, the severity of illness, and both efficacy and toxicity. As our understanding grows, dosing of gentamicin based on sound pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles should be applied more commonly in clinical practice.

Determinants of gentamicin concentrations in critically ill patients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis

When treating critically ill patients with gentamicin for severe infection, peak concentrations (C_max) determine clinical efficacy and trough concentrations (C_min) determine toxicity. Despite administration of body weight-standardised starting doses, a wide range of C_max is generally observed. Furthermore, in therapeutic drug monitoring, several measures of renal function are used to predict appropriate C_min and gentamicin dosing intervals, but the most accurate predictor is not known. This study aimed to quantify the impact of several patient parameters on gentamicin C_max values and to determine which measure of renal function best predicts gentamicin clearance (CL). Clinical data and serum gentamicin levels were retrospectively collected from all critically ill patients treated with gentamicin at our intensive care unit between 1 January and 30 June 2011. Data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM v.7.1.2). A two-compartmental model was developed based on 303 gentamicin concentration-time data from 44 critically ill patients. Serum albumin levels explained 25% of interindividual variability in the volume of distribution (V_d). Creatinine clearance calculated from the creatinine concentration in a 6-h urine portion (CalcCL_Cr) resulted in acceptable estimation of gentamicin CL, whilst serum creatinine (SCr) and creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CGCL_Cr) overestimated gentamicin CL and therefore underestimated C_min. In conclusion, low albumin concentrations resulted in a larger V_d and lower C_max of gentamicin. These results suggest that use of a higher gentamicin starting dose in critically ill patients with hypoalbuminaemia may prevent underdosing. Urinary CalcCL_Cr is a better predictor of C_min than SCr or CGCL_Cr.

Extended-Interval Dosing of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

Although aminoglycosides remain an essential part of therapy of severe gram-negative infections in critically ill patients, the use of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing (EIAD) in this population is highly controversial. The rationale for EIAD is based on major pharmacodynamic characteristics of the aminoglycosides, which include concentration-dependent bactericidal effects, postantibiotic effect, and adaptive resistance. Alterations in the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in the critically ill have been well documented, including changes in both drug distribution and elimination. These pharmacokinetic alterations may prevent critically ill patients from realizing the potential benefits of EIAD by reducing serum concentrations achieved by recommended EIAD regimens and may perhaps place patients at risk of therapeutic failure. Although numerous studies of EIAD have been conducted, there is a lack of data specifically concerning the efficacy and safety of EIAD in the critically ill. The most appropriate methods for monitoring EIAD in this population are also not clearly established. There are thus many questions regarding the suitability of EIAD in the critically ill. This article briefly reviews the rationale for EIAD and data related to the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and clinical monitoring of EIAD in critically ill patients. Considerations and recommendations for use of EIAD in the critically ill are provided.

Pharmacokinetic Alterations of Antimicrobials in the Critically Ill

Critical illness is accompanied by multiple physiologic alterations that affect the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials. Although the pharmacokinetics of a number of antimicrobials have been studied in critically ill individuals, an understanding of the physiological alterations in critical illness and general pharmacokinetic principles of antimicrobials is imperative for appropriate selection, dosing, and prediction of toxicity.

Drug Utilization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Monitoring Prescribing Trends and Establishing Prioritization of Pharmacotherapeutic Evaluation of Critically Ill Children

The primary objective of this study was to characterize the drug exposure for children hospitalized in the authors' institution's pediatric intensive care unit for the year 2002. Secondary objectives included the examination of drug utilization differences among various age criteria and the suitability of the most prevalent resources for pediatric dosing guidance. Many of the most commonly prescribed agents in the pediatric intensive care unit fall into the broad categories of pain management/sedation and anti-infectives. Based on the generally narrow windows afforded by each of these drug classes, it is obvious that more, well-defined investigations in critically ill children are warranted. The existing dosing guidance for many of these agents is neither generalizable nor sufficient to accommodate the diversity in pediatric intensive care unit patients, and the current drug monographs fall short of any practical dosing information.

An open prospective study of amikacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients during treatment with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration

Background

The objectives of the current study were to determine amikacin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing treatment with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and to determine whether peak and trough concentration data could be used to predict pharmacokinetic parameters. An open prospective study was undertaken, comprising five critically ill patients with sepsis requiring CVVHDF.

Methods

Peak and trough plasma concentrations and multiple serum levels in a dosage interval were measured and the latter fitted to both a one- and two-compartment model. Blood and ultrafiltrate samples were collected and assayed for amikacin to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters; total body clearance (TBC), elimination rate constant (k) and volume of distribution (V_d). The concentration of amikacin in ultrafiltrate was used to determine the clearance via CVVHDF. CVVHDF was performed at prescribed dialysate rates of 1-2l h^-1 and ultrafiltration rate of 2l h^-1. Blood was pumped at 200ml/min using a Gambro blood pump and Hospal AN69HF haemofilter. Amikacin dosing was according to routine clinical practice in the Intensive Care Unit.

Results

The multi serum level study indicated that the one compartment model was adequate to characterize the pharmacokinetics in these patients suggesting that peak and trough plasma level data may be used to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters and to optimise individual patient dosing during treatment with CVVHDF. CVVHDF resulted in an amikacin k of 0.109+/−0.025 h, t_1/2 of 6.74 +/− 1.69h, TBC of 3.39+/−0.817 h^-1, and V_d of 31.4 +/− 3.27. The mean clearance due to CVVHDF of 2.86 l h^-1 is similar to the creatinine clearance of 2.74 +/−0.4 lh^-1. Amikacin was significantly cleared by CVVHDF, and its half life in patients on CVVHDF was approximately 2–3 times that reported in subjects without renal impairment and not undergoing haemodiafiltration for any reason.

Conclusions

CVVHDF contributes significantly to total clearance of amikacin. The use of pharmacokinetic parameter estimates obtained from two steady state serum-drug concentrations (peak and trough) can be used to guide individualised dosing of critically ill patients treated with CVVHDF. This is considered a useful strategy in this patient cohort, particularly in avoiding the risk of underdosing.

Sub-optimal serum gentamicin concentrations in sickle cell disease patients utilizing the Hartford protocol

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Several studies have reported that use of the Hartford nomogram in different patients' population was associated with low serum gentamicin concentrations (SGC) at different intervals or midpoints. This study was intended to determine the prevalence and predictors of SGC in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) as another population representing low SGC while utilizing the Hartford protocol.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was carried out in a University-teaching hospital in Oman. The study was conducted from January 2005 through May 2008 and included all adult patients with SCD admitted during that time. Four-hundred and seven SGC representing 248 SCD patients were evaluated. The serum gentamicin concentration was considered sub-optimal if it was <2μg/mL (baseline of Hartford nomogram). Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Eighty-three percent (n=339) of SGC were sub-optimal. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that sub-optimal SGC were associated with younger patients with higher creatinine clearance. Specifically, patients who were ≤23years old were twice more likely to have sub-optimal SGC compared with those who were >23years of age (95% CI: 1·14-3·45; P=0·015). Patients with creatinine clearance of ≥200mL/min were 5·20 times more likely to have sub-optimal SGC compared with those with creatinine clearance <200mL/min (95% CI: 1·81-14·49; P=0·002). Furthermore, the logistic model also demonstrated that higher serum urea was associated with low SGC, with each one unit increase in serum urea, patients were 17% less likely to have sub-optimal SGC (95% CI: 0·72-0·96; P=0·011). Additionally, patients who were on piperacillin±tazobactam therapy given concurrently with gentamicin were 53% less likely to have sub-optimal SGC (95% CI: 0·28-0·83; P=0·009).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A majority of patients with SCD had sub-optimal SGC. The pharmacokinetic profile of such patients is apparently too variable to fit the existing Hartford protocol. The Hartford nomogram should be modified to address this issue. Otherwise, clinicians should revert to multiple daily dosing.

Tobramycin disposition in ICU patients receiving a once daily regimen: population approach and dosage simulations

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT? It is well known that tobramycin given as an once daily dose according to the usual recommendations needs therapeutic drug monitoring by measurement of peak and trough concentrations. In the literature, there are only few published studies on the population pharmacokinetics of once daily tobramycin in critically ill patients. Glomerular filtration rate and bodyweight were identified as covariates contributing to the inter-individual variability in the disposition of aminoglycosides. The study, by Peris-Marti et al. [24], only evaluated the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of a 4 mg kg(-1) dose of tobramycin given once daily in critically ill patients. The authors concluded with a simulation showing that for a theoretical MIC of 1 or 2 mg l(-1) , a 7 mg kg(-1) dose was required.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our results confirm the high variability of tobramycin disposition in intensive care patients and consequently the possible lack of effectiveness. By using a population pharmacokinetic approach, two explicative covariates (height and Cockcroft creatinine clearance) added to a two-compartment model with proportional error, explained much of the inter-individual variability of tobramycin disposition in the critically ill patient population. In a median ICU patient, simulations were performed at various dosage regimens and peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Drug monitoring is required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of tobramycin (TOB) in critically ill patients (ICU) by a population pharmacokinetic approach, to determine the covariates involved, and to simulate tobramycin dosage regimens.

METHODS

Forty-nine adult ICU patients received TOB (5 mg kg(-1) ) once daily. NonMem modelling was performed on 32 patients. The 17 other patients were used for the qualification process by normalized prediction distribution error. Then Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with a proportional error best fitted the data. TOB total clearance (CL(TOB) ) was significantly correlated with Cockcroft creatinine clearance (COCK) and height. TOB clearance was 4.8 ± 1.9 l h(-1) (range 1.22-8.95), the volume of distribution of the central compartment was 24.7 ± 3.7 l (range 17.34-32.83) and that of the peripheral compartment and the inter-compartmental clearance were 30.6 l and 4.74 l h(-1) , respectively. Only 29% of the patients presented a target AUC between 80 and 125 mg l(-1) h and 61% were lower than 80 mg l(-1)  h. After considering COCK and height, MCS showed that only 50% of the population could achieve the target AUC for the 375 and 400 mg dosages.

CONCLUSION

Even after taking into account COCK and height, for strains with an MIC ≤ 1 mg l(-1) , MCS doses evidenced that peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Combination therapy in addition to drug monitoring are required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

Aminoglycoside pharmacokinetic parameters in neurocritical care patients undergoing induced hypothermia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of mild-to-moderate induced hypothermia-a neuroprotectant and/or therapeutic strategy for the management of intracranial hypertension in neurologically injured patients-on the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycoside therapy.

DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic analysis.

SETTING

Critical care unit at a university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Three patients, aged 22, 24, and 47 years, who received tobramycin and had documented tobramycin levels while undergoing induced hypothermia for more than 24 hours for intracranial hypertension.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each of the three patients, predicted pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution, first-order elimination rate constant, half-life, and renal drug clearance) based on population data were compared with their actual pharmacokinetic parameters that were calculated based on observed tobramycin serum levels. All three patients had a normal creatinine clearance, estimated according to established methods. When pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated after the first tobramycin dose using a one-compartment method, all patients had a slower first-order elimination rate and a larger volume of distribution compared with predicted population estimates.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that induced hypothermia may result in impaired elimination of aminoglycosides. Caution should be exercised when attempting to use predicted pharmacokinetic parameters to dose aminoglycosides in this patient population, and first-dose pharmacokinetics should be considered to optimize the dose and dosing interval early in the course of therapy. Further investigation of this phenomenon with greater numbers of patients are needed to confirm these findings and to determine optimal dosing strategies of aminoglycosides in patients undergoing induced hypothermia.

Management of aminoglycosides in the intensive care unit

Antibacterial resistance is increasing throughout the world, while the development of new agents is slowly progressing. In addition, the increasing prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance may force many practitioners to choose an aminoglycoside agent in gram-negative regimens. Aminoglycosides are bactericidal agents with potent activity against gram-negative infections and activity against gram-positive infections when added to a cell wall active antimicrobial-based regimen. These agents may be dosed multiple times a day or consolidated as high-dose, extended-interval dosing to maximize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties to achieve possible improved efficacy with reduced toxicity. Clinical application includes the treatment of bacteremia, endocarditis, health-care and nosocomial pneumonias, intra-abdominal infections, and others. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are potential risks of aminoglycoside therapy that may be minimized with serum monitoring and short courses of therapy.

Vancomycin dosing for pneumonia in critically ill trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin has been recommended as the treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia with a desired trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initial dosing of vancomycin for MRSA pneumonia in critically ill adult trauma patients.

METHODS

Critically ill adult trauma patients were retrospectively identified for inclusion into the study. Patients initiated at a dose of 1 g intravenously (i.v.) every 8 hours were compared with patients initiated at a dose of 1 g i.v. every 12 hours. Baseline continuous demographic variables and steady-state vancomycin trough concentrations were compared between the two groups using a Student's t test (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

There were 36 patients who satisfied criteria for inclusion, 17 patients in the 1 g every 8 hour group and 19 patients in the 1 g every 12 hour group. The mean steady-state trough concentration was higher in the 1 g every 8 hour group versus the 1 g every 12 hour group (11.1 vs. 6.8 mg/L, p = 0.014). A steady-state trough concentration greater than 15 mg/L was achieved in 23.5% of the patients in the 1 g every 8 hour group and none of the patients in the 1 g every 12 hour group.

CONCLUSION

A vancomycin regimen of 1 g i.v. every 12 hours in critically ill trauma patients with MRSA pneumonia and normal renal function is unlikely to achieve trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L. Doses of at least 1 g i.v. every 8 hours are needed.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in critically ill patients: pilot study evaluating the first dose

Gentamicin is extensively used in the treatment of severe Gram-negative bacterial infections. A loading dose of 7 mg/kg is recommended to achieve a maximum concentration (C(max)) above 16 mg/L. We studied gentamicin pharmacokinetic data from patients treated between January 2006 and June 2008 in two intensive-care units. The Sawchuk and Zaske one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate the gentamicin volume of distribution (the 32 patients had a median age of 68 years (23 men)). The median volume of distibution (V(d)) per kilogram of body weight (V(d)/kg) was 0.41 L/kg (interquartile range of 0.36-0.46 L/kg), with no correlations with age, Charlson comorbidity score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and creatinine serum level (r(2) = 0.016, 0.058, 0.037, and 0.067, respectively). Women had a significantly higher median V(d)/kg (0.50 vs. 0.40 L/kg, p 0.002) and lower C(max) (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/L, p 0.016), despite similar dose/kg. In a logistic regression model, only sex (female: OR 0.032; 95% CI 0.03-0.387) and dose/kg (per mg/kg: OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.17-8.79) were significantly associated with the achievement of C(max) above 16 mg/L. Gentamicin clearance was 57 mL/min (interquartile range of 44.7-78 mL/min) and decreased with age (r(2) = 0.178, p 0.016), SOFA score (r(2) = 0.199, p 0.011) and creatinine clearance (r(2) = 0.258, p 0.003). Gentamicin V(d) was increased in critically ill patients, particularly in women. Therefore, high gentamicin loading doses should be given to all patients, especially women, independently of organ failure. Gentamicin clearance decreases with age, SOFA score, and renal failure.

Pharmacokinetic variability of extended interval tobramycin in burn patients

BACKGROUND

Aminoglycosides are mandatory in the treatment of severe infections in burns. However, their pharmacokinetics are difficult to predict in critically ill patients. Our objective was to describe the pharmacokinetic parameters of high doses of tobramycin administered at extended intervals in severely burned patients.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 23 burned patients receiving tobramycin in combination therapy for Pseudomonas species infections in a burn ICU over 2 years in a therapeutic drug monitoring program. Trough and post peak tobramycin levels were measured to adjust drug dosage. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from two points first order kinetics.

RESULTS

Tobramycin peak concentration was 7.4 (3.1-19.6)microg/ml and Cmax/MIC ratio 14.8 (2.8-39.2). Half-life was 6.9 (range 1.8-24.6)h with a distribution volume of 0.4 (0.2-1.0)l/kg. Clearance was 35 (14-121)ml/min and was weakly but significantly correlated with creatinine clearance.

CONCLUSION

Tobramycin had a normal clearance, but an increased volume of distribution and a prolonged half-life in burned patients. However, the pharmacokinetic parameters of tobramycin are highly variable in burned patients. These data support extended interval administration and strongly suggest that aminoglycosides should only be used within a structured pharmacokinetic monitoring program.

Bioavailability of Oral Fluconazole in Critically Ill Abdominal Trauma Patients With and Without Abdominal Wall Closure: a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-apposed fascial edges, known as laparostomy patients, have traditionally been given intravenous medications, because enteral absorption of medications was thought to be unpredictable. We hypothesized that critically ill patients with "open abdomens" would have bioavailability similar to that of matched patients with closed fascial edges.

METHODS

Fluconazole, a commonly prescribed anti-fungal with good bioavailability was used as a marker of absorption. Postoperative abdominal trauma patients were enrolled in a case-control (laparostomy versus closed abdomen) crossover design study to receive either an oral or parenteral fluconazole (400 mg loading dose followed by 200 mg QD) for one week. After a washout period, the alternate route of administration was used for the second week. Blood levels were collected at the end of each week of therapy. Rectal swab stool specimens were cultured for fungi on days 0, 7, and 15.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were studied. The mean injury severity score was 23 (range 9-41). The bioavailability of enteral fluconazole was 51% +/- 30% in the open abdomen and 63% +/- 19% (p = 0.347) in the closed abdomen patients. There was great variation in the bioavailability between the individual patients, with a range of 30%-100% in both groups. Three patients developed rectal colonization with Candida krusei.

CONCLUSION

The bioavailability of enterally dosed fluconazole was highly variable in both the open and closed abdomen patients. Intravenous administration of pharmaceuticals may provide more reliable serum levels in the first 2 weeks after trauma-related laparotomy.

Factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations in patients of a surgical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Co-morbidity, medical and surgical interventions often cause alterations to drug plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters in critically ill patients. In the present study, we investigated parameters influencing plasma caspofungin concentrations in patients of a surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

METHODS

In a monocentre open study, caspofungin trough concentrations (C(24)) were determined for a group of SICU patients. A linear-mixed model was then used to assess factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 40 SICU patients were enrolled. Age and body weight ranged from 22 to 76 years and 47 to 108 kg, respectively. All participants received a caspofungin loading dose of 70 mg and a maintenance dose of 50 mg/day. The median duration of therapy was 10 days. Caspofungin C(24) in SICU patients varied more than those determined for healthy subjects reported in previous studies (0.52-4.08 microg/mL versus 1.12-1.78 microg/mL). According to our model, caspofungin C(24) were predicted to be significantly higher in patients with body weight <75 kg (P=0.019) and patients with albumin concentration >23.6 g/L (P=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that body weight and albumin concentration influence caspofungin C(24) in SICU patients and should therefore be considered prognostic factors.

Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Open Fractures: An Evidence-Based Guideline

BACKGROUND

Prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics are often cited as the standard of care for prevention of infective complications of open fractures. The origins of these recommendations are obscure, however, and multi-drug-resistant systemic infections attributable to antibiotic overuse are common life-threatening problems in current intensive care unit practice.

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically the effects of prophylactic antibiotic administration on the incidence of infections complicating open fractures.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized bibliographic search of published research and citation review of relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

All published clinical trials claiming to evaluate, or cited elsewhere as being authoritative regarding, the role of antibiotics in open fracture management were identified and then evaluated according to published guidelines for evidence-based medicine. Only small studies (<20 patients), practice surveys, pharmacokinetic studies, and reviews or duplicative publications presenting primary data already considered were excluded from analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information on demographics, study dates, fracture grade, antibiotic type, duration and route of administration, surgical interventions, infection-related outcomes, and the methodologic quality of the studies was extracted by the authors. The primary results were submitted to the Therapeutic Agents Committee of the Surgical Infection Society for review prior to creation of the final consensus document.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Current antibiotic management of open fractures is based on a small number of studies that generally are more than 30 years old and do not reflect current management priorities in trauma and critical care. With a few noteworthy exceptions, these primary studies suffer from a variety of methodologic problems, including co-mingling of prospective and retrospective data sets, absence of or inappropriate statistical analysis, lack of blinding, or failure of randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the conclusion that a short course of first-generation cephalosporins, begun as soon as possible after injury, significantly lowers the risk of infection when used in combination with prompt, modern orthopedic fracture wound management. There is insufficient evidence to support other common management practices, such as prolonged courses or repeated short courses of antibiotics, the use of antibiotic coverage extending to gram-negative bacilli or clostridial species, or the use of local antibiotic therapies such as beads. Large, randomized, blinded trials are needed to prove or disprove the value of these traditional approaches. Such trials should be performed in patients with high-grade fractures who (1) are well-stratified according to the degree of local injury and (2) undergo standardized fracture and wound management. Trials also must be powered to study the effects of extended antibiotic coverage on nosocomial infections. Antibiotic regimens confirmed to improve local fracture outcomes in such studies could then be used rationally, balancing the risks of local fracture-related infections and of multi-drug-resistant systemic infections to achieve optimal global outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic changes in critical illness

Physiologic alterations in critically ill patients can significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the critically ill patient population. Understanding these pharmacokinetic changes is essential relative to optimizing drug therapy. This article outlines the major differences seen in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs in critically ill patients. Important strategies for drug therapy dosing and monitoring in these patients are also addressed.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases

This review outlines some of the many factors a clinician must consider when selecting an antimicrobial dosing regimen for the treatment of infection. Integration of the principles of antimicrobial pharmacology and the pharmacokinetic parameters of an individual patient provides the most comprehensive assessment of the interactions between pathogen, host, and antibiotic. For each class of agent, appreciation of the different approaches to maximize microbial killing will allow for optimal clinical efficacy and reduction in risk of development of resistance while avoiding excessive exposure and minimizing risk of toxicity. Disease states with special considerations for antimicrobial use are reviewed, as are situations in which pathophysiologic changes may alter the pharmacokinetic handling of antimicrobial agents.

Pharmacodynamics and dosing of aminoglycosides

Aminoglycosides are concentration-dependent killing agents whose pharmacodynamic predictors of efficacy are the area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio and the peak to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio. Prospective studies have shown that these agents can be given once-daily or less frequently in most clinical settings, with equal efficacy and possible reduced toxicity. Dosages for different clinical settings have been studied and methods are available to monitor once-daily dosing.

Clinical predictors of subtherapeutic aminoglycoside levels in trauma patients undergoing once-daily dosing

BACKGROUND

After publication of the Hartford nomogram in 1995, conflicting data have emerged regarding the use of once-daily aminoglycoside (ODA) regimens in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize a trauma patient population with low 10-hour aminoglycoside levels (THL) within the Hartford ODA protocol.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who received aminoglycosides were eligible for study. Clinical and demographic data were prospectively collected. Patients were dosed according to the Hartford protocol and a THL was obtained. Patients with THL < 2.0 microg/mL (OFF cohort) were compared with those falling within the nomogram (ON cohort).

RESULTS

Of 79 patients receiving ODA therapy, 46 (58.2%) patients fell off the nomogram. The OFF cohort was associated with younger age and higher creatinine clearance, and related inversely to net resuscitative volume.

CONCLUSION

Trauma patients undergoing ODA therapy with low THL are younger and exhibit less net preaminoglycoside resuscitative volume and higher creatinine clearance. These findings may have important clinical implications regarding antibiotic efficacy in these select patients.