Lymphatic mapping in early stage breast cancer: comparison between periareolar and subdermal injection

The combination of blue dye and radioisotope versus radioisotope alone during sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a systematic review

Background

The combination of blue dye and radioisotope is most widely used to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer. However, some individual studies suggested that dual tracers did not have an advantage over radioisotope alone in detecting SLNs. We performed a systematic review to investigate the added value of blue dye in addition to radioisotope.

Methods

We searched Pubmed and Embase. Prospective studies that compared the combination of radioisotope and blue dye with radioisotope alone were selected. The identification rate of SLNs and the false-negative rate were the main outcomes of interest. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated by using random-effects model.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included. The combination of radioisotope and blue dye showed higher identification rate than radioisotope alone (OR = 2.03, 95 % CI 1.53–2.69, P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was revealed for patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.64, 95 % CI 0.82–3.27, P > 0.05), or for studies with high proportion of patients with positive lymphoscintigraphy (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 0.83–2.39, P > 0.05). Dual tracers did not significantly lower the false-negative rate compared with radioisotope alone (OR = 0.76, 95 % CI 0.44–1.29, P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Although the combination of blue dye and radioisotope outperformed radioisotope alone in SLN detection, the superiority for dual tracers may be limited for patients with positive lymphoscintigraphy or for those after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Besides, the combined modality did not help lower the false-negative rate.

Meta-analysis of superficial versus deep injection of radioactive tracer and blue dye for lymphatic mapping and detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for axillary staging in early breast cancer. Currently, no consensus exists on the optimal site of injection of the radioactive tracer or blue dye.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer or blue dye for lymphatic mapping and SLNB was performed. The axillary and extra-axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates obtained by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative SLNB were evaluated. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent c.i. were estimated using fixed-effect analyses, or random-effects analyses if there was statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0·050).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer for axillary SLN identification on lymphoscintigraphy (OR 1·59, 95 per cent c.i. 0·79 to 3·17), during surgery (OR 1·27, 0·60 to 2·68) and for SLN identification using blue dye (OR 1·40, 0·83 to 2·35). The rate of extra-axillary SLN identification was significantly greater when deep rather than superficial injection was used (OR 3·00, 1·92 to 4·67). The discordance rate between superficial and deep injections ranged from 4 to 73 per cent for axillary and from 0 to 61 per cent for internal mammary node mapping.

CONCLUSION

Both superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer and blue dye are effective for axillary SLN identification. Clinical consequences of discordance rates between the two injection techniques are unclear. Deep injections are associated with significantly greater extra-axillary SLN identification; however, this may not have a significant impact on clinical management.

[Sentinel node in melanoma and breast cancer. Current considerations]

The main objectives of sentinel node (SN) biopsy is to avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomies and to identify the 20-25% of patients with occult regional metastatic involvement. This technique reduces the associated morbidity from lymphadenectomy and increases the occult lymphatic metastases identification rate by offering the pathologist the or those lymph nodes with the highest probability of containing metastatic cells. Pre-surgical lymphoscintigraphy is considered a "road map" to guide the surgeon towards the sentinel nodes and to localize unpredictable lymphatic drainage patterns. The SPECT/CT advantages include a better SN detection rate than planar images, the ability to detect SNs in difficult to interpret studies, better SN depiction, especially in sites closer to the injection site and better anatomic localization. These advantages may result in a change in the patient's clinical management both in melanoma and breast cancer. The correct SN evaluation by pathology implies a tumoral load stratification and further prognostic implication. The use of intraoperative imaging devices allows the surgeon a better surgical approach and precise SN localization. Several studies reports the added value of such devices for more sentinel nodes excision and a complete monitoring of the whole procedure. New techniques, by using fluorescent or hybrid tracers, are currently being developed.

Contribution of Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Women with Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results of the SENTI-ENDO Study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate detection rate and anatomical location of sentinel lymph node (SLN) at lymphoscintigraphy, to compare short and long lymphoscintigraphy protocols, and to correlate lymphoscintigraphic and surgical mapping of SLN in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

Subanalysis of the prospective multicenter study Senti-endo performed from July 2007 to August 2009. Patients with stage I and II EC received four cervical injections of 0-2 mL of unfiltered technetium sulphur colloid the day before (long protocol) or the morning (short protocol) before surgery. SLN detection used a combined technetium/patent blue labeling technique, and all patients had a systematic bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were enrolled in the study and 118 (94.5 %) underwent a lymphoscintigraphy. Of these 118 patients, 44 (37 %) underwent a short protocol and 66 (56 %) a long protocol (data on lymphoscintigraphy were not available in eight patients). Lymphoscintigraphic detection rate was 74.6 % (34 % for short protocol and 60.2 % for long protocol). No difference in the detection rate was observed according to lymphoscintigraphy protocol (p = 0.22), but a higher number of SLN was noted for the long protocol (p = 0.02). Aberrant drainage was noted on lymphoscintigraphy in 30.5 % of the patients. Paraaortic SLNs were exclusively detected using the long protocol. A poor correlation was noted between short (κ test = 0.24) or long lymphoscintigraphy (κ test = 0.3) protocol and SLN surgical mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that preoperative lymphoscintigraphy allowed a high SLN detection rate and that long lymphoscintigraphy protocol was associated with a higher detection of aberrant drainage especially in the paraaortic area.

Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Axillary node status is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with invasive breast cancer. Sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) is widely accepted and the preferred procedure for identifying lymph-node metastasis. SLNB allows focused excision and pathological examination of the most likely axillary lymph nodes to receive tumor metastases while avoiding morbidities associated with complete axillary nodal dissection. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, the process of SLNB has undergone continual modification and refinement; however, the procedure varies between institutions and controversies remain. In this review, we examine the technical issues that influence the success of lymph node mapping, discuss the controversies, and summarize the indications and contraindications for axillary node mapping and biopsy in clinical practice.

Axillary lymph node drainage pathways from intradermal and intraparenchymal breast planes

BACKGROUND

To compare functional anatomy of breast peri-areolar and peri-tumoral lymphatic drainage basins.

METHODS

Fifteen breast cancer patients received simultaneous peri-areolar (intradermal) and peri-tumoral (intraparenchymal) injections of human polyclonal immunoglobulin (HIG) labeled with (99m)Tc and (111)In 2 to 4 h before axillary lymph node clearance surgery. Resected nodes (range 5-20; median 16) were individually counted for (99m)Tc and (111)In in a well-counter and ranked according to activity content (echelon). Activity in distal nodes was negligible so extraction efficiency (E) of HIG in the first echelon node was calculated as counts divided by total counts in the chain.

RESULTS

Five- to 10-fold more activity was recovered after intradermal injection. The injection planes identified the same first echelon node in 10 patients (group 1) but different in five (group 2). In group 1, intradermal E correlated with intra-parenchymal E (r = 0.82; P < 0.01). E of intradermal first echelon nodes in group 2 was 51 (SD 13)%, similar to intradermal E in group 1 (58 [23]%). E of intraparenchymal first echelon nodes in group 2, however, was 28 (6)%, lower than intraparenchymal E in group 1 (54 [20]%; P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph nodes extract approximately 50% of HIG. Extracted HIG does not cascade to distal nodes, validating HIG for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy. HIG injected intradermally at the areola drains via a single route to the axilla. In two-thirds of patients, peri-tumoral HIG follows a similar route, but in one-third of patients drainage from the parenchymal plane is more complex, with more than one route to the axilla.

Functional variation in lymph node arrangements within the axilla

The aim of the project was to identify how lymphatic pathways are functionally arranged within the axilla (i.e., single linear chains, branching chains, and networks). We used ex vivo dual isotope radioassay of individual nodes resected at axillary lymphatic clearance surgery in breast cancer patients given simultaneous intradermal breast and intradermal hand injections (n = 15) or simultaneous intradermal breast and parenchymal breast injections (n = 15) of differentially labelled human immunoglobulin (Tc-99m-HIG and In-111-HIG). Nodes were ranked according to isotope content and activity-rank profiles constructed for each of the two injection sites. The majority of profiles following intradermal breast injection (17/30) were mono-exponential, consistent with a simple linear chain of nodes, with each node extracting a constant fraction of incoming HIG. In 15/17 of these, the accompanying profile from the alternative injection site was also mono-exponential and, in 11/15, essentially parallel. The profile appeared biphasic in 12/30 intradermal breast injections and of these 9/12 were accompanied by a biphasic profile (7/9 parallel) from the alternative injection site. In one patient, both profiles were polyphasic and parallel. Considering the respective shapes of paired profiles and whether the two injection sites shared the same first echelon nodes, functional lymph node arrangements are proposed. The commonest is a single linear chain, then a chain branching into two linear chains, and, least common, a network.

The sentinel node in breast cancer

Biopsy of the sentinel lymph node now forms part of routine management in many centres dealing with early stage breast cancer. This article seeks to discuss developments over the past number of years and to summarise current practice.

[Functional anatomy of the lymphatic drainage of the breast: contribution of sentinel lymph node biopsy]

OBJECTIVE

To make a development on the recent data of the literature concerning the functional anatomy of the lymphatic drainage of the breast, observed during interventions of sentinel lymph node biopsy; to compare the descriptive anatomy taking into consideration these new results.

METHODS

The population of our descriptive anatomical study is made-up of five patients. All the patients underwent a radical mastectomy during which, an injection of 2 ml of patented blue, realized at the periareolar area allowed to observe the glandular lymphatic vessels. Bibliographic researches were undertaken on Internet site of the National Library of Medicine and on Internet site of the library of anatomy (Faculté de médecine des Saints-Pères Paris).

RESULTS

Lymphatic anatomy of the breast was described since more than one century starting from works undertaken on anatomical subjects. Recent works, completed during sentinel lymph node biopsy, enriched these descriptive data of new functional anatomical data on the lymphatic drainage of the breast. Thus, the superficial ways of lymphatic drainage already described by Sappey, drain the surface glandular parenchyma until in the axillary lymph node. A deep plexux described more recently by Hidden drain the deep glandular parenchyma until in the internal mammary lymph nodes and the axillary lymph nodes. The results of our in vivo study corroborated the descriptive and functional data ever known.

CONCLUSION

Thanks to the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique, the descriptive anatomy described since 1885, grows rich by new functional data which make it possible on the one hand, to understand at best the descriptive anatomy, and on the other hand, to apprehend the lymphonodal metastatic risk in breast cancer. These recent data are of an interest real, as well anatomical as therapeutic, and constitute a interesting research orientation.

Results of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer are predictive of identification of axillary sentinel lymph nodes

The aim of this study was to identify the variables associated with successful peroperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization. We studied 201 patients with T1, T2, N0 invasive breast cancer who underwent a SLN procedure from 1999 to 2003. Of these 201 patients, 55 underwent peritumoral and 146 underwent periareolar radioisotope injection before the blue dye injection. All patients were operated on by breast conservative surgery and axillary dissection after SLN biopsy. Age, weight, menopausal status, previous biopsy, localization of the tumor, results of lymphoscintigraphy, site of radiotracer injection, tumor size, tumor grade, experience of surgeons, and the number of invaded axillary nodes were analyzed to determine whether they had any significant correlation with successful identification of SLN. Variables found to have a statistically significant influence on the SLN identification rate and on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy identification were introduced into a univariate and multivariate logistic regression model. In multivariate analysis, successful lymphoscintigraphy (P < 0.0001) and the absence of metastatic axillary nodes (P < 0.005) were associated with successful identification of SLNs. The peritumoral injection of radiotracer (P < 0.001), patient age > 60 years (P < 0.003), and localization of the tumor in the upper outer quadrant (P < 0.004) were associated with failure of lymphoscintigraphic visualization of SLN. The technique of SLN detection thus appears to be better for patients with low risk of invaded axillary lymph nodes.

A further validation of subareolar injection technique for breast sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

In this study we performed subdermal injection of (99m)Tc-labeled albumin combined with subareolar (SA) injection of blue dye, and we compared this technique with two techniques previously used in terms of the success of sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification, false-negative (FN) rate, and the overall accuracy and sensitivity of the three procedures. In all patients we performed a complete axillary lymph node dissection.

METHODS

From January 1999 to September 2004, a total of 195 patients with localized breast cancer were treated. Patients were subdivided into three groups. In patients in group 1 (n = 115; January 1999 to December 2001), lymphoscintigraphy together with injection of vital dye was performed; in group 2 (n = 40; January to October 2002), SA injection of blue dye alone was performed; and in group 3 (n = 40; November 2002 to September 2004), SA injection of blue dye and subdermal injection of radioisotope was performed.

RESULTS

The success rate of identifying an SLN by a combination of the two techniques was 95% in group 1 and 100% in group 3. The FN rate was 9% in group 1 and 0% in groups 2 and 3. The overall accuracy of lymphatic mapping was 97% in group 1 and 100% in groups 2 and 3. Sensitivity was 91% in group 1 and 100% in groups 2 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of SA injection for SLN biopsy using dual tracers demonstrates a high SLN identification rate and an absent FN rate. We propose that injection into the SA plexus is the optimal way to perform lymphatic mapping of the breast. This technique seems to be feasible even in patients with multicentric cancers.

The sentinel node in breast cancer: an update

There has been rapid acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer over the past 10 years. This article seeks to highlight the controversies and to summarise its current status.

The efficacy of 99mTc-HIG for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Tc-HIG on SLN identification in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen women (18 tumours) with early-stage breast cancer were included. On the day of the operation, 111 MBq Tc-HIG was injected around the tumour or biopsy scar in all patients. Subsequently, dynamic lymphoscintigraphic images were taken for 30 min. After this, static images were recorded at 15-20 min intervals until the SLN was visualized. Patients were taken to the operating room 2-4 h after radiopharmaceutical injection. Before the incision, 5 ml of isosulfan blue dye solution was injected peritumourally in all subjects. Aided by blue dye and gamma probe SLN detection was done during the operation.

RESULTS

In 17/18 tumours, SLN was detected with Tc-HIG lymphoscintigraphy. The mean visualization time for axillary SLNs was 49.94+/-11.25 min and for internal mammary SLNs was 52.50+/-10.60 min. In 15 of the tumours, only one SLN was detected in the axillary region. However, in two tumours, SLNs were found in both axillary and internal mammary regions. With blue dye mapping, axillary SLNs were found in 17/18 tumours. With the application of intraoperative gamma probe, all axillary and internal mammary SLNs were detected in 18 tumours.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that Tc-HIG may be a suitable agent for SLN detection by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe application in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Factors predicting failure to identify a sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is widely accepted as a minimally invasive method of nodal staging, failure to identify an SLN mandates a level I/II axillary node dissection. The purpose of this study was to elucidate factors that independently predict failure to identify an SLN.

METHODS

Using a large multicenter prospective study of SLN biopsy for patients with invasive breast cancer, we performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to determine clinicopathologic factors predictive of failure to identify an SLN.

RESULTS

Of the total 4131 patients in the study, an SLN was not identified in 249 (6.0%). Tumor location (P = .409), biopsy type (P = .079), surgery type (P = .380), and histologic subtype (P = .999) were not significant predictors of failure to identify an SLN. On multivariate analysis, age greater than 60 years (OR = 1.469; 95% CI, 1.116-1.934, P = .006), nonpalpable tumors (OR = 0.639; 95% CI, 0.479-0.852, P = .002), injection technique with blue dye alone (OR = 0.389, 95% CI, 0.259-5.86, P < .001), and surgical experience of less than 10 SLN biopsy cases (OR = 1.886; 1.428-2.492, P < .001) were significant independent predictors of failure to identify an SLN. Optimal SLN biopsy technique using an intradermal and/or subareolar injection of radioactive colloid and blue dye can improve SLN identification rates regardless of patient and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age and tumor palpability significantly affect the ability to identify an SLN in patients with breast cancer. Optimal injection technique can significantly improve sentinel node identification rate regardless of these factors.

Update on detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is now the practice of choice for the management of many patients with breast cancer. This was not true in the early 1990s, when the first such procedures were performed and protocols for such were refined often. This was also not true in the first years of the 21st century, when a decade of collective experience and information acquired from numerous clinical investigations dictated additional subtle and not-so-subtle refinements of the procedures. However, it is true today; reports of the latest round of clinical investigations indicate that there are several breast cancer sentinel node procedures that result in successful identification of potential sentinel nodes in nearly all patients who are eligible for such procedures. A significant component of many of these successful sentinel node procedures is a detection and localization protocol that involves radiotracer methodologies, including radiopharmaceutical administration, preoperative nuclear medicine imaging, and intraoperative gamma counting. The present state and roles of nuclear medicine protocols used in breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures is reviewed with emphasis on discussion of recent results, unresolved issues, and future considerations. Included are brief reviews of present radiotracer and blue-dye techniques for node localization, including remarks about injection strategies, counting probe technology, and radiation safety. Included also are discussions of on-going investigations of the implications of the presence of micrometastases; of the management value of detection, localization, and excision of extra-axillary nodes such as internal mammary nodes; and of the broad range of recurrence rates presently being reported. Remarks on the present and possible near- and long-term roles for nuclear medicine in the staging of breast cancer patients including comments on positron emission tomography and intraoperative imaging conclude the article.

[Sentinel lymphonodectomy -- new surgical standard for the evaluation of the axilla:an overview. Part 1]

Complete axillary dissection is still integral component of breast cancer treatment, but significant morbidity is associated with this procedure. Sentinel lymphonodectomy can replace complete axillary dissection in selected cases and can significantly reduce morbidity. Sentinel lymphonodectomy has become a new surgical standard and should be offered to all patients with unicentric tumors of less than 3 cm in diameter. Open questions concern the localization of the market injection, the significance of detecting and extirpation of extra-axillary lymph nodes, the applicability of the method to multicentric tumors, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, after previous breast biopsy, to DCIS and tumors of more than 3 cm in diameter. Clinical trials have to establish whether axillary dissection after finding a micrometastasis in the sentinel node is necessary or not.

Validation of axillary sentinel lymph node detection in the staging of early lobular invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have shown that regional lymph node involvement in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma can be evaluated by resection of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (ASLN). Axillary lymphadenectomy may be unnecessary in the absence of ASLN involvement. In the current study, the authors compared the results of ASLN resection in patients with lobular invasive carcinoma (LIC) with the results from patients with ductal invasive carcinoma (DIC) in terms of detection rates and false-negative rates.

METHODS

For ASLN detection, technetium 99m sulfur-colloid and patent blue were injected around the tumor. Each patient underwent both ASLN resection and complete axillary lymphadenectomy. Detection rates and false-negative rates were evaluated in patients with LIC and in patients with DIC.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-three patients with invasive, early-stage breast carcinoma were enrolled in the study (208 patients with DIC and 35 patients with LIC). The median patient age, pathologic tumor size, hormone receptor status, and rates of involved lymph nodes were equivalent for both groups. ASLN detection and false-negative rates did not differ for patients with LIC and patients with DIC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASLN detection rate was not dependent on the pathologic type of invasive carcinoma. Pathologic examination of ASLN in patients with LIC and in patients with DIC predicted axillary lymph node status with the same predictive value in terms of lymph node metastasis. For patients with LIC, ASLN examination overestimated the rate of micrometastasis as diagnosed by immunohistochemical techniques. These results will require confirmation in larger studies.