The need for pediatric-specific triage criteria: results from the Florida Trauma Triage Study

Review article: Pre-hospital trauma guidelines and access to lifesaving interventions in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand

The centralisation of trauma services in western countries has led to an improvement in patient outcomes. Effective trauma systems include a pre-hospital trauma system. Delivery of high-level pre-hospital trauma care must include identification of potential major trauma patients, access and correct application of lifesaving interventions (LSIs) and timely transport to definitive care. Globally, many nations endorse nationwide pre-hospital major trauma triage guidelines, to ensure a universal approach to patient care. This paper examined clinical guidelines from all 10 EMS in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. All relevant trauma guidelines were included, and key information was extracted. Authors compared major trauma triage criteria, all LSI included in guidelines, and guidelines for transport to definitive care. The identification of major trauma patients varied between all 10 EMS, with no universal criteria. The most common approach to trauma triage included a three-step assessment process: physiological criteria, identified injuries and mechanism of injury. Disparity between physiological criteria, injuries and mechanism was found when comparing guidelines. All 10 EMS had fundamental LSI included in their trauma guidelines. Fundamental LSI included haemorrhage control (arterial tourniquets, pelvic binders), non-invasive airway management (face mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices) and pleural wall needle decompression. Variation in more advanced LSI was evident between EMS. Optimising trauma triage guidelines is an important aspect of a robust and evidence driven trauma system. The lack of consensus in trauma triage identified in the present study makes benchmarking and comparison of trauma systems difficult.

Evaluation of Highest Level Pediatric Trauma Activation Criteria

BACKGROUND

Despite the presence of a tiered in-hospital trauma triage system for the past decade, trauma centers still struggle with a definitive list of highest level activation criteria. In 2002, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) mandated 6 criteria for highest level activation. However, it is unknown if pediatric trauma centers follow these criteria. The purpose of this study is to identify and categorize the highest level pediatric trauma criteria used by pediatric trauma centers in the United States.

METHODS

In collaboration with the ACS, we reviewed activation criteria for highest level trauma activation for all ACS-verified level I pediatric trauma centers in the United States. Criteria were sorted by 2 reviewers into categories of indicators used for activation: patient demographic, physiologic, anatomic, intervention/resource usage, mechanism, and other.

RESULTS

A total of 51 unique criteria for highest level trauma activation were identified from 54 (96%) of 56 level I pediatric trauma centers. Each center used between 1 and 29 criteria. A total of 42.6% of pediatric trauma centers followed all 6 criteria recommended by ACS. The most commonly omitted criterion was emergency physician discretion. The most common criteria not included in the ACS recommendations, but included in the highest level activation criteria, were amputation proximal to wrist or ankle (63%), and spinal cord injury/paralysis (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in the criteria used for highest level trauma activation among pediatric trauma centers. Further research investigating individual or grouped criteria to determine the most sensitive and specific criteria are necessary for appropriate triage and resource usage.

Compliance to prehospital trauma triage protocols worldwide: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical services (EMS) providers must determine the injury severity on-scene, using a prehospital trauma triage protocol, and decide on the most appropriate hospital destination for the patient. Many severely injured patients are not transported to higher-level trauma centres. An accurate triage protocol is the base of prehospital trauma triage; however, ultimately the quality is dependent on the destination decision by the EMS provider. The aim of this systematic review is to describe compliance to triage protocols and evaluate compliance to the different categories of triage protocols.

METHODS

An extensive search of MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane library was performed to identify all studies, published before May 2018, describing compliance to triage protocols in a trauma system. The search terms were a combination of synonyms for 'compliance,' 'trauma,' and 'triage'.

RESULTS

After selection, 11 articles were included. The studies showed a variety in compliance rates, ranging from 21% to 93% for triage protocols, and 41% to 94% for the different categories. The compliance rate was highest for the criterion: penetrating injury. The category of the protocol with the lowest compliance rate was: vital signs. Compliance rates were lower for elderly patients, compared to adults under the age of 55. The methodological quality of most studies was poor. One study with good methodological quality showed that the triage protocol identified only a minority of severely injured patients, but many of whom were transported to higher-level trauma centres.

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance rate ranged from 21% to 94%. Prehospital trauma triage effectiveness could be increased with an accurate triage protocol and improved compliance rates. EMS provider judgment could lower the undertriage rate, especially for severely injured patients meeting none of the criteria. Future research should focus on the improvement of triage protocols and the compliance rate.

Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prehospital trauma triage ensures proper transport of patients at risk of severe injury to hospitals with an appropriate corresponding level of trauma care. Incorrect triage results in undertriage and overtriage. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends an undertriage rate below 5% and an overtriage rate below 50% for prehospital trauma triage protocols. To find the most accurate prehospital trauma triage protocol, a clear overview of all currently available protocols and corresponding outcomes is necessary.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on all available prehospital trauma triage protocols and determine accuracy of protocol-based triage quality in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

METHODS

A search of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies describing prehospital trauma triage protocols before November 2016. The search terms included "trauma," "trauma center," or "trauma system" combined with "triage," "undertriage," or "overtriage." All studies describing protocol-based triage quality were reviewed. To assess the quality of these type of studies, a new critical appraisal tool was developed.

RESULTS

In this review, 21 articles were included with numbers of patients ranging from 130 to over 1 million. Significant predictors for severe injury were: vital signs, suspicion of certain anatomic injuries, mechanism of injury, and age. Sensitivity ranged from 10% to 100%; specificity from 9% to 100%. Nearly all protocols had a low sensitivity, thereby failing to identify severely injured patients. Additionally, the critical appraisal showed poor quality of the majority of included studies.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows that nearly all protocols are incapable of identifying severely injured patients. Future studies of high methodological quality should be performed to improve prehospital trauma triage protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, level III.

Systematic review and need assessment of pediatric trauma outcome benchmarking tools for low-resource settings

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and disability in children worldwide. The World Health Organization reports that 95% of all childhood injury deaths occur in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Injury scores have been developed to facilitate risk stratification, clinical decision making, and research. Trauma registries in LMIC depend on adapted trauma scores that do not rely on investigations that require unavailable material or human resources. We sought to review and assess the existing trauma scores used in pediatric patients. Our objective is to determine their wideness of use, validity, setting of use, outcome measures, and criticisms. We believe that there is a need for an adapted trauma score developed specifically for pediatric patients in low-resource settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify and compare existing injury scores used in pediatric patients. We constructed a search strategy in collaboration with a senior hospital librarian. Multiple databases were searched, including Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria by two reviewers and underwent qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

The scores identified are suboptimal for use in pediatric patients in low-resource settings due to various factors, including reliance on precise anatomic diagnosis, physiologic parameters maladapted to pediatric patients, or laboratory data with inconsistent accessibility in LMIC.

CONCLUSION

An important gap exists in our ability to simply and reliably estimate injury severity in pediatric patients and predict their associated probability of outcomes in settings, where resources are limited. An ideal score should be easy to calculate using point-of-care data that are readily available in LMIC, and can be easily adapted to the specific physiologic variations of different age groups.

Establishing a standard for assessing the appropriateness of trauma team activation: a retrospective evaluation of two outcome measures

BACKGROUND

Trauma team activation (TTA) is a well-recognised standard of care to provide rapid stabilisation of patients with time-critical, life-threatening injuries. TTA is associated with a substantial use of valuable hospital resources that may adversely impact upon the care of other patients if not carefully balanced. This study aimed to determine which of the two outcome measures would be a better standard for assessing the appropriateness of TTA at a paediatric centre: retrospective major trauma classification as defined within our state, and the use of emergency department high-level resources as recently published by Falcone et al (Falcone Interventions; FI).

METHODS

Trauma registry data and patients' charts between February 2011 and June 2013 were reviewed. Over-triage and under-triage rates for TTA, using both major trauma and FIs as outcome measures, were compared.

RESULTS

Totally, 280 patients received TTA, 243 met major trauma definition and 102 received one or more FIs. The rates of over-triage and under-triage were 39.7% (95% CI 35.0 to 44.6%) and 30.5% (95% CI 26.2 to 35.2%), when the major trauma definition was used as the outcome measure, and 67.5% (95% CI 62.2 to 72.5%) and 10.8% (95% CI 7.9 to 14.8%) when FI was used. Only 17.1% (95% CI 11.4% to 24.7%) of the under-triaged patients using the major trauma definition received one or more FIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of TTA appropriateness varied significantly based on the outcome measure used. FIs better reflected the use of acute-care TTA-related resources compared with the major trauma definition, and it should be used as the gold standard to prospectively assess and refine TTA criteria.

Efficacy of anatomic and physiologic indicators versus mechanism of injury criteria for trauma activation in pediatric emergencies

BACKGROUND

In pediatric trauma patients, adult triage criteria that use mechanism of injury (MOI) have been shown to result in overactivation of trauma teams. Anatomy- and physiology-based (APB) triage criteria have been recommended to improve the accuracy of trauma activations. At our Level 1 academic tertiary pediatric trauma referral center, we recently changed our triage criteria by emphasizing APB criteria and de-emphasizing MOI. This study was conducted to analyze the resulting change in accuracy of activations.

METHODS

This was a criterion standard, cohort-controlled retrospective study comparing patients triaged by MOI criteria (January 2006 to March 2009) to those triaged by APB criteria (April 2009 to June 2010). Patients were subdivided according to trauma activation level as major (TMaj), minor (TMin), or consult (TC). Demographic, vital sign, injury pattern, trauma activation level, and emergency department disposition data were collected. Triage criteria were retrospectively applied to the patients according to the criteria that were in effect when they arrived. Patients were assigned to either high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) groups based on the need for urgent intervention (emergency department procedure, emergent operation, or blood transfusion), admission to intensive care unit, Injury Severity Score [ISS] of greater than 12, or death. Sensitivity and specificity of major activations were calculated using the following groups: true positive, trauma activation and HR; false positive, trauma activation and LR, false negative, no trauma activation and HR; true negative, no trauma activation and LR. Comparisons were then made between the MOI to the APB patients.

RESULTS

The MOI and APB patients were similar in race (p = 0.201), sex (p = 0.639), and age (p = 0.643). The APB criteria resulted in 14% TMaj, 35% TMin, and 51% TC, compared with 41%, 23%, and 36%, respectively, for MOI. Median ISS in the APB group was 16 for TMaj, 5 for TMin, and 4 for TC compared with 8, 4, and 4, respectively, for MOI. Sensitivity for trauma activation of HR patients was 89.2% versus 89.1% (equivalent), while specificity increased from 45.8% to 65.8% for MOI versus APB, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For pediatric trauma patients, the emphasis on APB triage criteria and de-emphasis on MOI results in selection of higher-acuity patients for major activation while maintaining acceptable undertriage and overtriage rates overall. This improved accuracy of major activation results in a more cost-efficient resource use and fewer unnecessary disruptions for the surgeon, operating room, and other staff while maintaining appropriate capture and evaluation of trauma patients. The low sensitivity noted in both the MOI and APB groups is largely caused by the broad definition of HR patients used in this study. We recommend the use of APB criteria for pediatric trauma triage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Physician staffed helicopter emergency medical service dispatch via centralised control or directly by crew - case identification rates and effect on the Sydney paediatric trauma system

Background

Severe paediatric trauma patients benefit from direct transport to dedicated Paediatric Trauma Centres (PTC). Parallel case identification systems utilising paramedics from a centralised dispatch centre versus the crew of a physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) allowed comparison of the two systems for case identification rates and subsequent timeliness of direct transfer to a PTC.

Methods

Paediatric trauma patients over a two year period from the Sydney region with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 were retrospectively identified from a state wide trauma registry. Overall paediatric trauma system performance was assessed by comparisons of the availability of the physician staffed HEMS for patient characteristics, transport mode (direct versus indirect) and the times required for the patient to arrive at the paediatric trauma centre. The proportion of patients transported directly to a PTC was compared between the times that the HEMS service was available versus the time that it was unavailable to determine if the HEMS system altered the rate of direct transport to a PTC. Analysis of variance was used to compare the identifying systems for various patient characteristics when the HEMS was available.

Results

Ninety nine cases met the inclusion criteria, 44 when the HEMS system was operational. Patients identified for physician response by the HEMS system were significantly different to those that were not identified with higher median ISS (25 vs 18, p = 0.011), and shorter times to PTC (67 vs 261mins, p = 0.015) and length of intensive care unit stays (2 vs 0 days, p = 0.045). Of the 44 cases, 21 were not identified, 3 were identified by the paramedic system and 20 were identified by the HEMS system, (P < 0.001). Direct transport to a PTC was more likely to occur when the HEMS dispatch system was available (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20-2.73). The median time (minutes) to arrival at the PTC was shorter when HEMS available (HEMS available 92, IQR 50-261 versus HEMS unavailable 296, IQR 84-583, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Physician staffed HEMS crew dispatch is significantly more likely to identify cases of severe paediatric trauma and is associated with a greater proportion of transports directly to a PTC and with faster times to arrival.

Reports and Session Summaries of the 17th World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine

This section of Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) presents reports and summaries of the 17th World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WCDEM) held in Beijing, China in May and June of 2011.

Abstracts of Congress oral and poster presentations were published on September 1, 2011 as a supplement to PDM (Volume 26, Supplement 1). The 17th WCDEM was attended by 1,600 representatives from more than 57 nations, and the Congress included 315 oral and 211 poster presentations.

Certain reports and summaries from the Beijing 17th World Congress were published in Volume 27, Issue 3 of PDM. The editorial staff of PDM is pleased to present the following additional reports and session summaries.

Reports and session summaries of the 17th World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013:28(1):1-7.

A multicenter prospective analysis of pediatric trauma activation criteria routinely used in addition to the six criteria of the American College of Surgeons

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons has defined six minimum activation criteria (ACS-6) for the highest level of trauma activations at trauma centers. The verification criteria also allow for the inclusion of additional criteria at the institution's discretion. The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the ACS-6 as well as commonly used activation criteria to evaluate overtriage and undertriage rates for pediatric trauma team activation.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected at nine pediatric trauma centers to examine 29 commonly used activation criteria. Patients meeting any of these criteria were evaluated for the use of high-level trauma resuscitation resources according to an expert consensus list. Patients requiring a resource but not meeting any activation criteria were included to evaluate undertriage rates.

RESULTS

During the 1-year study, a total of 656 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 8 years, a median Injury Severity Score of 14, and mortality of 11%. Using all criteria, 55% of patients would have been overtriaged and 9% would have been undertriaged. If only the ACS-6 were used, 24% of patients would have been overtriaged and 16% would have been undertriaged. Among activation criteria with more than 10 patients, those most predictive of using a high-level resource were a gunshot wound to the abdomen (92%), blood given before arrival (83%), traumatic arrest (83%), tachycardia/poor perfusion (83%), and age-appropriate hypotension (77%). The addition of tachycardia/poor perfusion and pretrauma center resuscitation with greater than 40 mL/kg results in eight criteria with an overtriage of 39% and an undertriage of 10.5%.

CONCLUSION

The ACS-6 provides a reliable overtriage or undertriage rate for pediatric patients. The inclusion of two additional criteria can further improve these rates while maintianing a simplified triage list for children.

Factors associated with the interfacility transfer of the pediatric trauma patient: implications for prehospital triage

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to identify prehospital factors associated with increased likelihood of interfacility transfer of pediatric trauma patients. Such factors might serve as a basis for improvements in future field pediatric trauma triage guidelines.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 12 years or younger with blunt, penetrating, or thermal injuries who were transported by ground emergency medical services from the scene to the emergency department of a Level I, II, or III trauma center within the Denver metropolitan area from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008. Characteristics predicting subsequent interfacility transfer to a pediatric trauma center (PTC) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1673 patients were included in the analysis. Variables hypothesized to be most commonly associated with interfacility transfer were age, sex, mechanism of injury, body region of injury, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. The cohort included 1079 males and 593 females. Logistic regression analysis yielded the following as significant predictors of transfer: younger age (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.25), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16), the presence of burns (OR, 37.52; 95% CI, 7.3-191.7), non-accidental trauma (OR, 6.09; 95% CI, 2.44-15.25), falls (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.06-2.48), other motor vehicle-related incidents (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.08-5.19), abdominal injury (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 2.31-12.55), head/neck injury (OR, 7.89; 95% CI, 4.21-14.77), limb injury (OR, 5.31; 95% CI, 2.78-10.16), and multiple injuries (OR, 13.01; 95% CI, 5.0-33.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors highly associated with transfer of an injured child from a non-PTC to a PTC included younger age, burns, non-accidental trauma, head/neck injury, and multiple injuries in younger children. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether these factors may have applicability in future improvements in field pediatric trauma patient triage guidelines.

Trauma Incidents Attended by Emergency Medical Services in Victoria, Australia

Introduction:

International literature describing the profile of trauma patients attended by a statewide emergency medical services (EMS) system is lacking. Most literature is limited to descriptions of trauma responses for a single emergency medical service, or to patients transported to a specific Level-1 trauma hospital. There is no Victorian or Australian literature describing the type of trauma patients transported by a state emergency medical service.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to define a profile of all trauma incidents attended by statewide EMS.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study of all patient care records (PCR) for trauma responses attended by Victorian Ambulance Services for 2002 was conducted. Criteria for trauma categories were defined previously, and data were extracted from the PCRs and entered into a secure data repository for descriptive analysis to determine the trauma profile. Ethics committee approval was obtained.

Results:

There were 53,039 trauma incidents attended by emergency ambulances during the 12-month period. Of these, 1,566 patients were in physiological distress, 11,086 had a significant pattern of injury, and a further 8,931 had an identifiable mechanism of injury. The profile includes minor trauma (n = 9,342), standing falls (n = 20,511), no patient transported (n = 3,687), and deceased patients (n = 459).

Conclusions:

This is a unique analysis of prehospital trauma. It provides a baseline dataset that may be utilized in future studies of prehospital trauma care. Additionally, this dataset identifies a ten-fold difference in major trauma between the prehospital and the hospital assessments.

The availability and use of out-of-hospital physiologic information to identify high-risk injured children in a multisite, population-based cohort

OBJECTIVE

The validity of using adult physiologic criteria to triage injured children in the out-of-hospital setting remains unproven. Among children meeting adult field physiologic criteria, we assessed the availability of physiologic information, the incidence of death or prolonged hospitalization, and whether age-specific criteria would improve the specificity of the physiologic triage step.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective, out-of-hospital cohort of injured children aged < or =14 years collected from December 2005 through February 2007 by 237 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies transporting to 207 acute care hospitals (trauma and nontrauma centers) in 11 sites across the United States and Canada. Inclusion criteria were standard adult physiologic values: systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or =90 mmHg, respiratory rate < 10 or > 29 breaths/min, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < or =12, and field intubation attempt. Seven physiologic variables (including age-specific values) and three demographic and mechanism variables were included in the analysis. "High-risk" children included those who died (field or in-hospital) or were hospitalized > 2 days. The decision tree was derived and validated using binary recursive partitioning.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-five children were included in the analysis, of whom 62 (6.5%) died and 117 (12.3%) were hospitalized > 2 days. Missing values were common, ranging from 6% (respiratory rate) to 53% (pulse oximetry), and were associated with younger age and high-risk outcome. The final decision rule included four variables (assisted ventilation, GCS score < 11, pulse oximetry < 95%, and SBP > 96 mmHg), which demonstrated improved specificity (71.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 66.7-76.6%]) at the expense of missing high-risk children (sensitivity 76.5% [95% CI 66.4-86.6%]).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of high-risk injured children meeting adult physiologic criteria is relatively low and the findings from this sample do not support using age-specific values to better identify such children. However, the amount and pattern of missing data may compromise the value and practical use of field physiologic information in pediatric triage.

Is mechanism of injury alone in the prehospital setting a predictor of major trauma - a review of the literature

Background

The literature identifying mechanism of injury came to prominence in the mid to late 1980s. The current Victorian prehospital triage guidelines do not necessarily reflect the conditions within the Victorian population as the triage guidelines are based on studies undertaken and validated in the U.S.A. The objective of this study was to identify the mechanism of injury alone literature and the predictability of the mechanism criteria.

Methods

A search of the prehospital related electronic databases was undertaken utilising the Ovid and EMASE systems available through the Monash University library. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched from their beginning until the end of June 2006. Selected non-electronic listed prehospital journals were hand searched. References from articles gathered were reviewed.

Results

The electronic database search located 203 articles for review. Three additional articles were identified from the reference lists. Of these articles 17 were considered relevant. After reviewing the articles only five provided sufficient information about mechanism of injury alone and its triage capability. None of the articles identified mechanism of injury criteria as a good predictor of major trauma.

Conclusion

This study identified only five articles on the predictability of the mechanism of injury criteria alone. All studies stated that the mechanism of injury criteria alone are not good predictors of major trauma or the need for trauma team activation. This study was the precursor of a Victorian prehospital study to determine the predictability of the mechanism of injury alone criteria for trauma patients in the Australian context.

The predictive value and appropriate ranges of prehospital physiological parameters for high-risk injured children

OBJECTIVES

To assess: (1) the relative importance of prehospital physiological measures in identifying high-risk children; (2) whether different age-based criteria should be used for each prehospital physiological measure; and (3) outcome-based appropriate ranges of physiological measures in injured children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of injured children 0 to 14 years transported by emergency medical services to 48 statewide hospitals from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2003. We analyzed prehospital physiological measures, including Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate, shock index (heart rate/SBP), and airway intervention. "High-risk" children were defined as those with in-hospital mortality, major nonorthopedic surgery, intensive care unit stay greater than or equal to 2 days, or Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16. Specific age groups included 0 to 2 years, 3 to 5 years, 6 to 10 years, and 11 to 14 years.

RESULTS

A total of 3877 injured children were included in the analysis, of which 1111 (29%) were high risk. Prehospital GCS was the variable of greatest importance in identifying high-risk children, followed by (in order) airway intervention, RR, heart rate, SBP, and shock index. Age modified the effect of prehospital RR (P = 0.0046), heart rate (P = 0.01), and SBP (P = 0.02). There was a linear relationship between GCS and outcome that was consistent across all ages. Specific age-based ranges of other physiological measures were identified for high-risk children.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital GCS and respiratory compromise were the most important physiological measures in identifying high-risk injured children. Age-specific criteria should be considered for RR, heart rate, and SBP.

Predicting hospital mortality among injured children using a national trauma database

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a model that accurately predicts mortality among injured children based on components of the initial patient evaluation and that is generalizable to diverse acute care settings. Important predictive variables obtained in an emergency setting are frequently missing in even large national databases, limiting their effectiveness for developing predictions. In this study, a model predicting pediatric trauma mortality was developed using a national database and methods to handle missing data that may avoid biases that can occur restricting analyses to complete cases.

METHODS

Records of pediatric patients included in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR) between 1996 and 1999 were used as a training set in a logistic regression model to predict hospital mortality using vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and intubation status. Multiple imputation was applied to handle missing data. The model was tested using independent data from the NPTR and National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

RESULTS

Complete case analysis identified only GCS-eye and intubation status as predictors of mortality. A model based on complete case analysis had good discrimination (c-index = 0.784) and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow c-statistic, 6.8) (p > 0.05). Using multiple imputation, three additional predictors of mortality (systolic blood pressure, pulse, and GCS-motor) were identified and improved model performance was observed. The model developed using multiple imputation had excellent discrimination (c-index, 0.947-0.973) in both test datasets. Calibration was better in the NPTR testing set than in the NTDB (Hosmer-Lemeshow c-statistic, 9.2 for NPTR [p > 0.05] and 258.2 for NTDB [p < 0.05]). At a probability cutoff that minimized misclassification in the training set, the false-negative and false-negative rates of the model were better than those obtained with either the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) or Pediatric Trauma Score using data from the NPTR testing set. Although the false-positive rates were lower with the RTS using data from the NTDB, the false-negative rates of the proposed model and the RTS were similar in this test dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Using multiple imputation to handle missing data, a model predicting pediatric trauma mortality was developed that compared favorably with existing trauma scores. Application of these methods may produce predictive trauma models that are more statistically reliable and applicable in clinical practice.

A leap in faith: the impact of removing the surgeon from the level II trauma response

BACKGROUND

Limitation of resident work hours has created the need to explore alternatives to surgeon presence during initial assessment and resuscitation for selected life-threatening injuries in children. We recently eliminated the requirement for surgeon presence during Level II alerts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change on patient care.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of trauma alert activity was performed using data from our trauma registry. In March 2003, responsibility for level II alerts was transferred from the pediatric surgeons (PSs) to the Emergency Department (ED) physicians. We compared the activity in the 18-month period before this change (period 1; n = 627) to that afterward (period 2; n = 587). Outcome measures included injury severity score, emergency department length of stay, missed injuries, abdominal computed tomography use, and mortality. Data were analyzed using log-rank statistic, chi2, or t test, where appropriate, with significance level at P < .05.

RESULTS

During the entire study period, 1499 patients met the trauma alert activation criteria of which 1214 (81%) were level II alerts. The mean injury severity score for period 1 (8.5 +/- 7.3 SD) was similar to period 2 (9.0 +/- 7.1 SD). When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, ED length of stay increased from 135 minutes to 165 minutes (P < .001). In addition, the use of abdominal computed tomography was significantly decreased (53.6% vs 42.6%; P < .001). However, there were no missed injuries and no significant differences in the rate of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, trauma room length of stay was increased, but use of abdominal imaging was decreased with no differences in rate of missed injury or mortality. Emergency Department physicians can safely replace PS during Level II alerts. These findings may be useful to institutions experiencing surgical workforce limitations for trauma alerts.

Derivation of a clinical decision rule to guide the interhospital transfer of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To derive a clinical decision rule for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that enables early identification of patients requiring specialised trauma care.

METHODS

We collected data from 1999 through 2003 on a retrospective cohort of consecutive people aged 18-65 years with a serious head injury (AIS > or =3), transported directly from the scene of injury, and evaluated in the ED. Information on 22 demographical, physiological, radiographic, and lab variables was collected. Resource based "high therapeutic intensity" measures occurring within 72 hours of ED arrival (the outcome measure) were identified a priori and included: neurosurgical intervention, exploratory laparotomy, intensive care interventions, or death. We used classification and regression tree analysis to derive and cross validate the decision rule.

RESULTS

504 consecutive trauma patients were identified as having a serious head injury: 246 (49%) required at least one of the HTI measures. Five ED variables (GCS, respiratory rate, age, temperature, and pulse rate) identified subjects requiring at least one of the HTI measures with 94% sensitivity (95% CI 91 to 97%) and 63% specificity (95% CI 57 to 69%) in the derivation sample, and 90% sensitivity and 55% specificity using cross validation.

CONCLUSIONS

This decision rule identified among a cohort of head injured patients evaluated in the ED the majority of those who urgently required specialised trauma care. The rule will require prospective validation in injured people presenting to non-tertiary care hospitals before implementation can be recommended.

The significance of skull fracture in mild head trauma differs between children and adults

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine whether the age of patients with mild head injury and skull fracture influences the level of risk for acute intracranial injuries.

METHOD

A study was conducted of 156 patients with skull fracture, 60 children (aged <14 years) and 96 adults, detected among 5,097 consecutive patients with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 15-14 points) arriving at the Emergency Department of a Level I University Hospital Trauma Center during 1998. Acute intracranial injuries were defined as traumatic brain injuries identified by cranial computed tomography scan, excluding pneumocephalus.

RESULTS

Compared with the children, this risk of intracranial injury was 13 times greater in the adults aged 14-54 years and 16 times greater in the over-54-year-olds. Besides age over 14 years (p<0.0001), compound skull fracture (p<0.001), and a GCS score of 14 (p<0.001) were factors significantly associated with intracranial injury in the logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Skull fracture in mild head injury implies a greater risk of intracranial injury in adults than in children.

Outcomes research in pediatric settings: recent trends and future directions

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric outcomes research examines the effects of health care delivered in everyday medical settings on the health of children and adolescents. It is an area of inquiry in its nascent stages of development.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review that covered articles published during the 6-year interval 1994-1999 and in 39 peer-reviewed journals chosen for their likelihood of containing child health services research. This article summarizes the article abstraction, reviews the literature, describes recent trends, and makes recommendations for future work.

RESULTS

In the sample of journals that we examined, the number of pediatric outcomes research articles doubled between 1994 and 1999. Hospitals and primary care practices were the most common service sectors, accounting for more than half of the articles. Common clinical categories included neonatal conditions, asthma, psychosocial problems, and injuries. Approximately 1 in 5 studies included multistate or national samples; 1 in 10 used a randomized controlled trial study design. Remarkably few studies examined the health effects of preventive, diagnostic, long-term management, or curative services delivered to children and adolescents.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes research in pediatric settings is a rapidly growing area of inquiry that is acquiring breadth but has achieved little depth in any single content area. Much work needs to be done to inform decision making regarding the optimal ways to finance, organize, and deliver child health care services. To improve the evidence base of pediatric health care, more effectiveness research is needed to evaluate the overall and relative effects of services delivered to children and adolescents in everyday settings.

Use of out-of-hospital variables to predict severity of injury in pediatric patients involved in motor vehicle crashes

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to create a clinical decision rule, on the basis of variables available to out-of-hospital personnel, that could be used to accurately predict severe injury in pediatric patients involved in motor vehicle crashes as occupants.

METHODS

We analyzed the National Automotive Sampling System database, a national probability sample, using pediatric patients up to 15 years old (occupants only) involved in motor vehicle crashes from January 1993 to December 1999. The National Automotive Sampling System database includes patients from regions throughout the country, weighted to represent a nationwide sample. Twelve out-of-hospital variables were used in classification and regression tree analysis to create a decision rule separating children with severe injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > or =16) from those with minor injuries (ISS < 16). Misclassification costs and complexity parameters were selected to yield a decision tree with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the identification of severely injured patients, while also being simple and practical for out-of-hospital use. Probability weights were used throughout the analysis to account for the sampling design and sampling weights.

RESULTS

Using a sample size of 8,392 children, we constructed a decision rule using 3 out-of-hospital variables (Glasgow Coma Scale score, passenger space intrusion > or =6 in [> or =15 cm], and restraint use) to predict those patients with an ISS of 16 or more. Internal cross-validation was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity, yielding values of 92% and 73%, respectively, for the prediction of patients with an ISS of 16 or more.

CONCLUSION

Out-of-hospital variables available to field personnel could be used to effectively triage pediatric motor vehicle crash patients using the decision rule developed here. Prospective trials would be needed to test this decision rule in actual use.

Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to retrospectively measure the accuracy of multiple-casualty incident (MCI) triage algorithms and their component physiologic variables in predicting adult patients with critical injury.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 1,144 consecutive adult patients transported by ambulance and admitted to 2 trauma centers. Association between first-recorded out-of-hospital physiologic variables and a resource-based definition of severe injury appropriate to the MCI context was determined. The association between severe injury and Triage Sieve, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and CareFlight Triage was determined in the patient population.

RESULTS

Of the physiologic variables, the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale had the strongest association with severe injury, followed by systolic blood pressure. The differences between CareFlight Triage, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment were not dramatic, with sensitivities of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 88%), 85% (95% CI 78% to 90%), and 84% (95% CI 76% to 89%), respectively, and specificities of 96% (95% CI 94% to 97%), 86% (95% CI 84% to 88%), and 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%), respectively. Both forms of Triage Sieve were significantly poorer predictors of severe injury.

CONCLUSION

Of the physiologic variables used in the triage algorithms, the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale and systolic blood pressure had the strongest association with severe injury. CareFlight Triage, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment had similar sensitivities in predicting critical injury in designated trauma patients, but CareFlight Triage had better specificity. Because patients in a true mass casualty situation may not be completely comparable with designated trauma patients transported to emergency departments in routine circumstances, the best triage instrument in this study may not be the best in an actual MCI. These findings must be validated prospectively before their accuracy can be confirmed.

Can paramedics using guidelines accurately triage patients?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We determine whether paramedics, using written guidelines, can accurately triage patients in the field.

METHODS

This prospective, descriptive study was conducted at an urban county emergency medical services (EMS) system and county hospital. Paramedics triaged patients, for study purposes only, according to 4 categories: (1) needing to come to the emergency department by advanced life support (ALS) transport, (2) needing to come to the ED by any transport, (3) needing to see a physician within 24 hours, or (4) not needing any further physician evaluation. Medical records that provided patient treatment information to the point of ED disposition were subsequently reviewed (blinded to the paramedic rating) to determine which of the categories was appropriate. The protocol of the EMS system of the study site dictates that all patients should be transported except for those who refuse care and leave against medical advice. Only transported patients were included in the present study. Fifty-four paramedics triaged 1,180 patients.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 43.4+/-17 years; 62.0% were male. Paramedics rated 1,000 (84.7%) of the patients as needing to come to the ED and 180 (15.3%) as not needing to come to the ED. Ratings according to triage category were as follows: 804 (68.1%) category 1, 196 (16.6%) category 2, 148 (12.5%) category 3, and 32 (2.7%) category 4. Seven hundred thirty-six (62.4%) patients were discharged, 298 (25.3%) were admitted, 90 (7.6%) were transferred, 36 (3.1%) left against medical advice, and 20 (1.7%) died. The review panel determined that 113 (9.6%) patients were undertriaged; 55 (48.7%) of these patients were misclassified because the paramedics misused the guidelines. Ninety-nine patients (8.4% of the total sample) were incorrectly classified as not needing to come to the ED. This represented 55% of the patients (99/180) categorized as 3 or 4 by the paramedics. Fourteen patients (1.2% of total) were incorrectly classified as category 4 instead of 3. Of the 113 undertriaged patients, 22 (19.6%) were admitted, 86 (76.1%) were discharged, and 4 (3.5%) were transferred.

CONCLUSION

Paramedics using written guidelines fall short of an acceptable level of triage accuracy to determine disposition of patients in the field.

Pediatric minor head trauma: indications for computed tomographic scanning revisited

BACKGROUND

Although the use of computed tomographic (CT) scanning in severe head trauma is an accepted practice, the indications for its use in minor injury remain ill defined and subjective. We sought to define the incidence and identify risk factors for intracranial injury (ICI) after minor head trauma in children who did not have suspicious neurologic symptoms in the field or on presentation.

METHODS

From January 1, 1992, until April 1, 2000, 569 blunt trauma patients (age < 16 years) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or 15 triaged by American College of Surgeons Pediatric Mechanism Criteria at a Level I trauma center received head CT scan. Loss of consciousness (LOC) status was known for 429. This subgroup was retrospectively reviewed for mechanism, age, Injury Severity Score, LOC status, GCS score, associated injuries, and CT scan findings (normal, fracture only, or intracranial injury). Relative risk values for intracranial injury were generated and statistical significance was assessed.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent (62 of 429) of study patients (GCS score of 14 and 15) had ICI. Sixteen percent of patients (35 of 215) with GCS score of 15 and (-)LOC (negative for LOC) had intracranial injury manifesting as subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or brain contusion. Three required surgery for intracranial mass lesions. One patient deteriorated and required intubation and intensive care unit management. Neither (+)LOC (positive for LOC) nor GCS score of 14 increased the likelihood of intracranial injury over those patients without loss of consciousness or with GCS score of 15. Distant injury was also not an independent predictor of ICI for those with GCS scores of 14 or 15, as 84% of the ICI group had head injury only. Skull fracture was a risk factor for ICI but had poor negative predictive value, as 45% of patients with ICI did not have fractures. Similarly, minor craniofacial soft tissue trauma was a significant risk factor (relative risk, 11) that had marginal negative predictive value (0.95), as 14% (9 of 62) of ICI patients did not have superficial craniofacial injury.

CONCLUSION

A normal neurologic exam and maintenance of consciousness does not preclude significant rates of intracranial injury in pediatric trauma patients. Contrary to convention, neither LOC nor mild altered mentation is a sensitive indicator with which to select patients for CT scanning. Skull fractures and superficial craniofacial injury are similarly unreliable. Identification of these patients is important for the occasional case requiring intervention and for the tracking of complications. A liberal policy of CT scanning is warranted for pediatric patients with a high-risk mechanism of injury despite maintenance of normal neurologic status in the field and at hospital screening.

Effectiveness of a pediatric trauma team protocol

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a pediatric trauma triage system and resource allocation for emergency medicine and trauma services. TRAUMA SYSTEM: Two-tier trauma team activation system that triages patients into Level 1 and Level 2 trauma alert categories based on information provided by pre-hospital providers to pediatric emergency physicians at an American College of Surgeons' Level 1 pediatric trauma center in Columbus, Ohio.

METHODS

Using the hospital trauma registry database and patient medical records, a retrospective chart review was conducted on all (n = 542) admitted pediatric trauma patients from January 1995 through December 1996.

RESULTS

Level 1 patients had a higher median injury severity score and shorter emergency department (ED) length of stay time than Level 2 patients. Level 1 patients were more likely to be admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and remain for more than 24 hours when compared to Level 2 patients. In addition, Level 1 patients were more likely to have procedures performed (eg, intubation, tube thoracostomy, thoracotomy, diagnostic peritoneal lavage) than Level 2 patients. The mortality rate was significantly higher for Level 1 patients and all ED deaths had been triaged to the Level 1 category.

CONCLUSIONS

This pediatric trauma triage system effectively predicts which patients will be more likely to have serious injury. By using a two-tier system, select patients may be managed by a smaller trauma team, thus improving staff utilization and possibly reducing costs while ensuring favorable outcomes.

A prospective population-based study of pediatric trauma patients with mild alterations in consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-14)

OBJECTIVE

Considerable controversy surrounds the appropriate evaluation of children with mild alterations in consciousness after closed head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 13-14). The objective of the current study was to determine the incidence of intracranial lesions in pediatric patients with a field GCS score of 13 or 14 after closed head injuries.

METHODS

The current study is a population-based, multicenter prospective study of all patients to whom emergency medical services responded during a 12-month period. The setting was urban Los Angeles County, encompassing a patient population of 2.3 million children, 13 designated trauma centers, and 94 receiving hospitals.

RESULTS

In the pediatric age group (<15 yr old), 8488 patients were transported by emergency medical services for injuries. Of these, 209 had a documented field GCS score of 13 or 14. One hundred fifty-seven patients were taken to trauma centers, and 135 (86%) underwent computed tomography. Forty-three patients (27.4%) had abnormal results on computed tomographic scans, 30 (19.1%) had an intracranial hemorrhage, and 5 required an operative neurosurgical procedure for hematoma evacuation. Positive and negative predictive values of deteriorating mental status (0.500 and 0.844, respectively), loss of consciousness (0.173 and 0.809), cranial fracture (0.483 and 0.875, and extracranial injuries (0.205 and 0.814) were poor predictors of intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients who have mild alterations in consciousness in the field have a significant incidence of intracranial injury. The great majority of these patients will not require operative intervention, but the implications of missing these hemorrhages can be severe for this subgroup of head-injured patients. Because clinical criteria and cranial x-rays are poor predictors of intracranial hemorrhage, it is recommended that all children with a GCS score of 13 or 14 routinely undergo screening via non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Prehospital triage in the injured pediatric patient

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Identifying major trauma patients in the prehospital setting is essential in determining management, destination, and best utilization of emergency department resources. Few methods of trauma triage have been accepted unanimously. This study prospectively evaluates the efficacy of comprehensive field triage using 12 criteria (simplified version of the American College of Surgeon's guidelines) in 1,285 pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

Major trauma was defined as occurring in those who died in the emergency room, had major surgery (penetrating injury involving surgery of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, or groin), or were admitted directly to the intensive care unit. The correlation between trauma triage criteria, hospital disposition, and triage accuracy were determined prospectively and compared in the pediatric patients (36 months) with an adult cohort of patients (12 months).

RESULTS

A total of 1,285 pediatric trauma patients were evaluated and compared with 1,326 adult trauma patients. The most accurate trauma triage criterion for major injury was a blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg (systolic) with an accuracy of 86%. This was followed by burn greater than 15% total body surface area (79%), Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 12 (78%), respiratory rate less than 10/min or greater than 29/min (73%), and paralysis (50%). Less accurate criteria included a fall from greater than 20 feet (33%); penetrating injury to head, neck, chest, abdomen, or groin (29%); ejection from vehicle (24%); pedestrian struck at greater than 20 mph (16%); paramedic judgement (12%); rollover (3%); and extrication (0%). The Glasgow Coma Scale score was a more accurate indicator of major injury in children than adults, and paramedic judgement was less accurate in children when compared with adults. Of the 379 major pediatric trauma victims, the Revised Trauma Score and Pediatric Trauma Score missed 36% and 45% of these major trauma victims, respectively. The overtriage rate for children was 71% with a sensitivity of 100% (no missed major trauma patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Physiological variables, anatomic site, and mechanism of injury provide a sensitive and safe system of triage. Continued education of prehospital personnel regarding pediatric trauma and stratification of the current triage tools are necessary to minimize overtriage in an era of shrinking resources.

Stable pediatric blunt trauma patients: is trauma team activation always necessary?

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of studies on adult trauma patients have questioned the need for trauma team activation for stable patients dictated only by mechanism of injury. This triage approach seems to burden the limited resources of the trauma center and may prove to be cost-ineffective. The objective of our study was to determine the predictive value and the sensitivity and specificity of blunt injury mechanism for major trauma in stable pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

Patients 0 to 14 years old injured by injury mechanisms modified from the American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria and presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified regional pediatric trauma center from the field between July 1, 1993, and July 31, 1994, were included. Physiologically and anatomically stable patients were identified and subgroup analysis was performed to determine the negative and positive predictive value and sensitivity, and the specificity of blunt injury mechanisms for major trauma [Injury Severity Score > 15] in this group.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients met the study criteria. One hundred forty-three patients (73.6%) had trauma team activation only for mechanism of injury. Of these patients, four patients had Injury Severity Score > 15. The positive and negative predictive values of injury mechanisms modified from the American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria were 2.8% and 90.2%, respectively, for major trauma in stable pediatric blunt trauma patients. The sensitivity and specificity were 44.4% and 24.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Mechanisms of injury seem to have limited value as predictors of injury severity in stable pediatric blunt trauma patients. A modified response level for these patients may prove to be a safe and practical alternative to current practice.