Detection of K-ras point mutations at codon 12 in pure pancreatic juice for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by PCR-RFLP analysis

Validade dos marcadores tumorais

Considerando-se o número crescente dos chamados marcadores tumorais e a sua incorporação sistemática à prática médica, procedeu-se a um levantamento, por meio de Medline® 1995, na Biblioteca Central do Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA, e revisão de 95 resumos de trabalhos publicados de 1995 a abril de 1997. Verificou-se que a validade dos marcadores é maior para o diagnóstico patológico de alguns tipos tumorais e determinação de alguns fatores prognósticos; que poucos são os de real utilidade clínica, seja para prevenção, diagnóstico ou prognóstico, vez que a maioria deles só alcança significância quando a doença já provoca algum sinal ou sintoma; que a maioria das referências correspondem, a rigor, a trabalhos repetidos, que avaliam os mesmos marcadores, embora em diferentes tumores; e que há trabalhos que se referem a poucos casos, quando não pouquíssimos, e cujos resultados tomam-se, por isso, inconsistentes. Neste artigo, os marcadores tumorais são classificados por tipos (genes, expressões genéticas, substâncias circulantes, substâncias celulares, receptores da membrana celular e índices de proliferação tumoral) e por finalidades (prevenção, detecção, diagnóstico, estadiamento, monitoração terapêutica, seguimento pós-tratamento e prognóstico) e são correlacionados com o(s) tumor(es) em que foram pesquisados. Apresentam-se três grupos de critérios de validação (estatísticos, biomédicos e por finalidades) e resume-se, a partir também de mais 16 outras referências bibliográficas, a utilidade de marcadores dos cânceres de mama [ADN, fração de Fase S, índice de ADN, C-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu), P53, CAT-D, CA15.3 e CEA - sem validade; marcadores tumorais hormonais - úteis para a indicação de hormonioterapia adjuvante ou paliativa]; colorretal [LASA, CA 19.9, índice de ADN, fração de Fase S, p53 e ras - sem validade; CEA-com validade para estadiamento e planejamento cirúrgico, e para seguimento pós-operatório (dosagem seriada a cada 2-3 meses por 2 anos, se houve suspeita de metástase hepática em estádios cirúrgicos II e III)] e de próstata (PSA com utilidade para a detecção, mas associado ao toque retal, em homens acima de 40-50 anos, como indicativos da necessidade de exames mais acurados, e para o seguimento dos casos tratados). E inquestionável a utilidade da dosagem de alfa-feto-proteína (aFP) e da gonadotrofina coriônica (hCG), para o estadiamento, tratamento, avaliação da resposta terapêutica e seguimento dos casos tratados de tumores testiculares (aFP e hCG) e de neoplasia trofoblástica gestacional (hCG). Também inquestionável é o papel da identificação dos marcadores de diferenciação celular no diagnóstico patológico de leucemias e linfomas. Os dilemas evidenciados a partir deste estudo referem-se a cinco binômios: 1) ausência de sinal ou sintoma versus positividade de marcador tumoral; 2) detecção de recidiva assintomática versus a qualidade e a quantidade da sobrevida do indivíduo; 3) natureza da causa versus aumento do marcador; 4) exame falso-positivo versus tratamento; e 5) baixo risco de evolução de neoplasia detectada versus tratamento. Conclui-se que, exceto pelos marcadores de validade estabelecida para o diagnóstico, o seguimento do tratamento ou o prognóstico dos casos de alguns cânceres, o médico precisa, além de conhecer os marcadores tumorais e suas siglas, saber os limites das suas indicações e ter opinião, crítica e método na sua utilização.

A Lateral Flow Biosensor for the Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

A lateral flow biosensor (LFB) is introduced for the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The assay is composed of two steps: circular strand displacement reaction and lateral flow biosensor detection. In step 1, the nucleotide at SNP site is recognized by T4 DNA ligase and the signal is amplified by strand displacement DNA polymerase, which can be accomplished at a constant temperature. In step 2, the reaction product of step 1 is detected by a lateral flow biosensor, which is a rapid and cost effective tool for nuclei acid detection. Comparing with conventional methods, it requires no complicated machines. It is suitable for the use of point of care diagnostics. Therefore, this simple, cost effective, robust, and promising LFB detection method of SNP has great potential for the detection of genetic diseases, personalized medicine, cancer related mutations, and drug-resistant mutations of infectious agents.

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of detecting K-ras mutation in pancreatic juice as a molecular marker for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

K-ras codon 12 mutation is one of the earliest genetic changes in the development of pancreatic cancer (PC) and accurate detection of K-ras mutations is gaining increasing attention in the field of molecular diagnosis.

METHODS

Original research articles which evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of K-ras mutation detection in PC were selected. Data were presented as forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to summarize the overall test performance.

RESULTS

We assessed 16 studies from 15 published articles. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 59% (95%CI: 54%-64%) and 87% (95%CI: 84%-89%), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.13 (95%CI: 2.73-6.25) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.32-0.56), respectively, and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 13.66 (95% CI: 7.25-25.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the analysis of K-ras mutations in pancreatic juice has a considerable diagnostic value in PC. Further studies with rigorous design, large sample size, and multi-regional co-operation are needed.

The diversity between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers: clinical parameters and in vitro models

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be divided into head, body and tail cancers according to the anatomy. Distinctions in tissue composition, vascularization and innervations have been clearly identified between the head and body/tail of the pancreas both in embryological development and in histopathology. To understand the postulated genotype difference, we present comprehensive information on two PDAC cell lines as typical representatives originating from pancreatic head and body/tail cancers, respectively.

DATA SOURCE

In the present review, we compare the difference between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers regarding clinical parameters and introducing an in vitro model.

RESULTS

Increasing evidence has shown that tumors at different locations (head vs body/tail) display different clinical presentation (e.g. incidence, symptom), treatment efficiency (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy) and thus patient prognosis. However, the genetic or molecular diversity (e.g. mutations, microRNA) between the two subtypes of PDAC has not been elucidated so far. They present different chemo- and/or radio-resistance, extracellular matrix adhesion and invasiveness, as well as genetic profiles.

CONCLUSION

Genetic and tumor biological diversity exists in PDAC according to the tumor localization.

Behavioral genetics of the depression/cancer correlation: a look at the Ras oncogene family and the 'cerebral diabetes paradigm'

This study investigates the causes of the observed linkage between depression and later onset of cancer. The prevailing view is that cancer in depressed patients results from a weakened immune system. However, molecular biologists have recognized that dysregulation of the ras proto-oncogene results in impaired serotonin and dopamine synthesis manifesting as major depression. A qualitative review of the literature showed that (1) studies using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory showed a greater correlation between depression and later cancer onset than those employing other measures and (2) the more related the cancer type was to the Ras oncogene family, the greater the correlation between depression and later cancer onset. These results support the hypothesis that the ras proto-oncogene plays a role in the etiology of depression and could be the common denominator in long-observed depression/cancer linkages. Previous depression/cancer linkage studies are confounded in that they failed to analyze cancer type and accurately diagnose depression.

Diagnostic utility of aberrant methylation of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 in pure pancreatic juice for pancreatic carcinoma

The tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI-2) is a Kunitz-type serine proteinase inhibitor. Recently, the aberrant methylation of TFPI-2 was detected frequently in pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) tissues but not in normal pancreatic tissues. We analyzed the aberrant methylation of TFPI-2 in the pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) aspirated endoscopically from patients with various pancreatic diseases. Using the highly sensitive methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and quantitative MSP (Q-MSP) assay, we investigated the aberrant methylation of TFPI-2 in nine human PCa cell lines and in the PPJ from patients with PCa, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). The incidence of aberrant TFPI-2 methylation was seven (77.8%) of nine PCa cell lines by Q-MSP. In cell lines, the expression of TFPI-2 mRNA by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction showed an inverse correlation to the aberrant methylation of TFPI-2. The incidence of aberrant TFPI-2 methylation in the PPJ was 21 (58.3%) of 36 PCa patients, three (17.6%) of 17 IPMN and one (4.8%) of 21 CP by MSP assay. Using a suitable cut-off value of 2.5 according to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the incidence of aberrant TFPI-2 methylation in the PPJ by real-time MSP was 18 (62.1%) of 29 PCa patients, one (5.1%) of 17 IPMN and three (14.3%) of 21 CP, respectively. The incidence of quantitative TFPI-2 hypermethylation in the PPJ with PCa was significantly higher than that with IPMN (P < 0.001) or CP (P < 0.001). Moreover, the aberrant methylation rate of TFPI-2 in the PPJ was 100%, as observed (6/6) in the PCa patients with liver metastasis, and 86.7% (26/30) in stages IVa + IVb of PCa by Q-MSP assay. These results suggest that promoter methylation of TFPI-2 in the PPJ may be a useful marker in the diagnosis and progression of PCa using an endoscopically feasible approach.

Preproenkephalin hypermethylation in the pure pancreatic juice compared with p53 mutation in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Aberrant methylation of CpG islands is a common mechanism for the dysregulation of tumor suppressor genes in a variety of human malignancies. Preproenkephalin ppENK) hypermethylation is recognized in 90% of pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) tissues, but not in normal pancreas. We analyzed ppENK hypermethylation in pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) in patients with PCa, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), and chronic pancreatitis (CP), and elucidated its usefulness as a marker in the diagnosis of PCa compared with p53 mutation.

METHODS

PPJ was collected endoscopically from 28 patients with PCa, 15 patients with IPMN, and 20 patients with CP. DNA was extracted from the supernatant and the sediment of PPJ. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed for hypermethylation analysis of ppENK. In addition, single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing were performed simultaneously to identify p53 mutations.

RESULTS

The incidence of ppENK hypermethylation in the supernatant and/or the sediment of PPJ was 50% (14 of 28) in patients with PCa. In contrast, the incidence of ppENK hypermethylation was 26.7% (4 of 15) in patients with IPMN, and 5% (1 of 20) in patients with CP (P < 0.002). The incidence of p53 mutations in the PPJ was 42.9% (12 of 28) in patients with PCa and 0% (0 of 20) in patients with CP. Furthermore, the incidence of ppENK hypermethylation and/or p53 mutations in the PPJ was enhanced to 67.9% (19 of 28) in patients with PCa in the combination assay.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ppENK hypermethylation in PPJ is specific for cancer, and the combination assay with p53 enhances the genetic diagnosis of PCa.

Aberrant methylation of secreted apoptosis-related protein 2 (SARP2) in pure pancreatic juice in diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Secreted apoptosis-related protein (SARP) families are considered to counteract the oncogenic Wnt signaling pathway, and inactivation of this gene may aid cancer development and progression. Recently, the aberrant methylation of SARP2 was detected frequently in pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) tissue, but not in normal pancreatic tissue. We evaluated the hypermethylation of SARP2 in pure pancreatic juices (PPJ) aspirated endoscopically from patients with PCa, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and a control group who were consequently free of pancreatic diseases according to the differential diagnosis of PCa.

METHODS

We investigated the aberrant methylation of SARP2 in 9 human PCa cell lines and in the PPJ samples from 33 patients with PCa, 20 with IPMN, 19 with CP, and 10 control patients. DNAs extracted from not only sediment, but also the supernatant of the PPJ and PCa cell lines were treated with sodium bisulfite and analyzed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (MSP). Moreover, real-time MSP was also performed for the melting curve analysis and the quantitative analysis of SARP2 in the PPJ.

RESULTS

The incidence of the aberrant methylation of SARP2 using MSP was 8/9 (89%) in PCa cell lines, 26/33 (79%) in the PPJ with PCa, and 17/20 (85%) with IPMN. However, it was only 1/19 (5%) in the PPJ with CP, and 0/10 (0%) in the PPJ of the control patients, respectively. The incidences of aberrant methylation of SARP2 in the PPJ with PCa and IPMN were significantly higher than that in the PPJ with CP (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Melting curve analysis by real-time MSP revealed that the incidences of aberrant methylation of SARP2 in PPJ was 28/33 (85%) with PCa, 9/11 (82%) with the malignant group of IPMN, 5/9 (56%) with the benign group of IPMN and 5/19 (26%) with CP. In this analysis, there were significant differences between PCa and CP (P < 0.001), and between the malignant group of IPMN and CP (P < 0.005). In the quantitative analysis by real-time MSP with a suitable cut-off value, the incidences of aberrant methylation of SARP2 in the PPJ with PCa, the malignant group of IPMN, the benign group of IPMN, and CP were 19/33 (58%), 6/11 (55%), 3/9 (33%), and 2/19 (11%), respectively. The incidence of the aberrant methylation of SARP2 in the PPJ was significantly different between PCa and CP and between the malignant group of IPMN and CP (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypermethylation of SARP2 in the PPJ may be a highly sensitive and useful marker for the detection of pancreatic neoplasms, including PCa and the malignant group of IPMN.

Expression of mesothelin mRNA in pure pancreatic juice from patients with pancreatic carcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, and chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

In the gene expression analysis of pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) according to Ryu et al, the tag for the mesothelin mRNA transcript was present in 7 of 8 SAGE libraries derived from PCa but not in the 2 SAGE libraries derived from normal pancreatic duct epithelial cells. Mesothelin mRNA expression was confirmed with in situ hybridization in all 4 resected primary PCa tumors and with RT-PCR in 18 of 20 PCa cell lines, whereas mesothelin protein expression was confirmed with immunohistochemistry in all 60 resected primary PCa tissues by Argani et al. We evaluated mesothelin mRNA expression in pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) obtained from patients with PCa, chronic pancreatitis (CP), and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas.

METHODS

We evaluated mesothelin mRNA expression in the PPJ obtained from 21 patients with PCa, 22 with CP, and 11 with IPMN with reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). The PCR products were analyzed with agarose gel electrophoresis. DNase I treatment before RT-PCR and direct sequencing of the RT-PCR bands were performed for the analysis of the RT-PCR bands.

RESULTS

Two products, of 308 and 226 bp, were obtained with RT-PCR, and the 308-bp RT-PCR product was confirmed as being that derived from the genomic DNA by direct DNA sequencing. Mesothelin mRNA expression was discovered using RT-PCR in 11 (52%) of 21 patients with PCa, 5 (45%) of 11 with IPMN, and 3 (14%) of 22 with CP. Fisher's exact test revealed significant differences between PCa and CP for mesothelin mRNA (P < 0.01). Moreover, the RT-PCR product (226 bp) of mesothelin mRNA in the PPJ samples with PCa was generally stronger than that in the PPJ samples with IPMN.

CONCLUSION

Expression of mesothelin mRNA in PPJ was not strictly specific to PCa and was apt to be stronger in PCa than in IPMN. Quantitative detection of mesothelin mRNA in PPJ may have potential diagnostic implications for pancreatic tumors.

Endoscopic approach to early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Since its development, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been playing a major role in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. The recent development of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography has accelerated the shift in the role of ERCP toward more therapy-oriented applications. In the diagnosis and treatment of curable pancreatic cancer, however, ERCP remains the mainstay of imaging modalities. ERCP is not simply a method with which to obtain x-ray images of the pancreatic duct. Collection of pure pancreatic juice, transpapillary biopsy/brush cytology of the pancreatic duct, intraductal ultrasonography, and peroral pancreatoscopy are all performed based on the ERCP technique. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has a high spatial resolution and provides tomographic images of the pancreas and its neighboring organs. EUS is now widely used in evaluation of the local extent of pancreatic cancer and the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy/cytology is performed to obtain a histologic diagnosis before beginning chemotherapy. Although the number of pancreatic cancer patients who are candidates for surgery is limited at present, there is an increasing need for ERCP-based techniques in both the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neoplasms.

Chemoprevention for pancreatic cancer

For a number of solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer, efforts aimed at disease prevention may be more successful than currently available anticancer treatments. While specific interventions are emerging to prevent breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, no trials of chemoprevention are being conducted in pancreatic cancer. Importantly, there are significant obstacles to the conduct of such research. However, preclinical and epidemiologic studies suggest that several drugs may have chemopreventive potential in pancreatic cancer. These include aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, somatostatin analogs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and anti-androgenic agents. As the oncology community evaluates some of these agents in large chemoprevention trials for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, it may be found that pancreatic cancer prevention occurs as an unintended, but desirable consequence. Moreover, other general societal trends, such as smoking cessation and the widespread use of cholesterol-lowering agents and aspirin, could have a role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, and in the future, may lead to a decrease in its incidence.

Values of mutations of K-ras oncogene at codon 12 in detection of pancreatic cancer: 15-year experience

AIM: To summarize progress in the study of K-ras gene studies in pancreatic cancer and its potential clinical significance in screening test for early detection of pancreatic cancer, and to differentiate pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis in recent decade.

METHODS: Literature search (MEDLINE 1986-2003) was performed using the key words K-ras gene, pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and diagnosis. Two kind of opposite points of view on the significance of K-ras gene in detection early pancreatic cancer and differentiation pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis were investigated. The presence of a K-ras gene mutation at codon 12 has been seen in 75% - 100% of pancreatic cancers, and is not rare in patients with chronic pancreatitis, and represents an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. However, the significance of the detection of this mutation in specimens obtained by needle aspiration from pure pancreatic juice and from stools for its utilization for the detection of early pancreatic cancer, and differentiation pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis remains controversial.

CONCLUSION: The value of K-ras gene mutation for the detection of early pancreatic cancer and differentiation pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis remains uncertains in clinical pratice. Nevertheless, K-ras mutation screening may increase the sensitivity of FNA and ERP cytology and may be useful in identifying pancreatitis patients at high risk for developing cancer, and as a adjunct with cytology to differentiate pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis.

Detection of p53 gene mutations in the supernatant of pancreatic juice and plasma from patients with pancreatic carcinomas

AIM

The sensitivity of pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) is still low. The usefulness of genetic analyses of PPJ seems to be limited because of insufficient sensitivity or false positivity. To improve the molecular diagnosis of PCa, we analyzed mutations of p53 together with K-ras in DNA extracted not only from the sediment but also from the supernatant of PPJ samples.

METHOD

Polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing were used for analyses of p53 mutations in exons 5-8. K-ras mutations at codon 12 were examined by mutant allele-specific amplification.

RESULTS

In PPJ supernatant from patients with PCa, p53 and K-ras mutations were detected in 42.9% (9 of 21) and 81.0% (17 of 21) of cases, respectively. The incidence of p53 and K-ras mutations in the sediment was 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively. By a combination assay with supernatant and sediment, p53 mutations were detected in 52.4% (11 of 21) of PCa cases. Moreover, p53 mutations were detected in 7 of 15 (46.7%) cases of PCa in which the cytologic diagnosis was negative. Among 25 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), none harbored mutant p53, although K-ras mutations were detected at an incidence of 28% (7 of 25) in the supernatant and 20% (5 of 25) in the sediment. In addition, mutant bands of p53 in plasma were detected in 2 of 11 patients with PCa in whom p53 mutations were detectable in PPJ.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the sensitivity of detection for p53 mutations with high cancer specificity could be improved by using the Sup in PPJ samples of PCa. Genetic analysis of p53 could complement PPJ cytology. p53 mutations were detectable in PCa from plasma samples.

The role of preoperative biopsy in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Cyto-histological diagnosis of pancreatic pathology in the management of suspected pancreatic malignancy is re-evaluated in the light of evolving trends in management and tissue sampling.

METHODS

The literature on cyto-histological diagnosis of pancreatic pathology was reviewed over the period 1977-2003.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoluminal techniques of tissue sampling carry less risk of tumour seeding and are the sampling methods of choice for potentially resectable lesions if a tissue diagnosis will alter therapy. Endosonar-guided biopsy in expert hands appears to be the most reliable tissue sampling technique. Transcoelomic sampling methods should be reserved for those with un-resectable disease. All methods of cyto-histological diagnosis have high specificity but have a low negative predictive value. Therefore, potentially resectable lesions that are highly suspicious for malignancy should be explored even if pre-operative histology or cytology is negative.

N/A

N/A

Quantity of mutant K-ras gene in pancreatic secretions for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma with different assays: analysis of 100 patients

BACKGROUND

Two types of quantitative assay kits for K-ras mutations, PCR-preferential homoduplex formation assay (PHFA) and enriched PCR and enzyme-linked mini-sequence assay (ELMA), were recently developed. The K-ras mutations were analyzed using these assays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA was extracted from the pancreatic juice which was obtained by endoscopy from 38 patients with pancreatic neoplasms (23 adenocarcinomas and 15 intraductal papillary neoplasms) and from 62 without it.

RESULTS

The results of the two methods were mutually correlative. K-ras mutation was detected at high levels (mutant ras genes occupied >2% of all K-ras genes) in 25 of the 38 cases (66%) with pancreatic neoplasm. It was also detected at high levels in 9 of the 14 cases (64%) with pancreatic cyst. In contrast, the mutant gene was detected at a lower level (<2%) in other cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of the mutant ras gene provided a useful tool for diagnosing the pancreatic carcinoma when the percentage of the mutant is high, especially when the types of mutation were either GAT or GTT.

Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases

BACKGROUND

A preoperative tissue diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is desirable but difficult to obtain.

METHODS

Pancreatic brush cytology, salvage cytology, and collection of pancreatic juice were attempted prospectively during ERCP in 34 patients with pancreatic cancer and 11 with chronic pancreatitis. K-ras-2 codon 12 was analyzed for presence and type of point mutations.

RESULTS

Brush cytology coupled with salvage cytology had a sensitivity of 74%. The addition of cytologic analysis of pancreatic juice did not substantially improve sensitivity (76%). K-ras-2 was mutated in both cancer (87%) and pancreatitis (40%). The specificity for cytology was 100% and for K-ras-2 mutations 60%. Combining cytology with mutation analysis increased sensitivity to 93% but reduced the positive predictive value. The negative predictive value never exceeded 75%. None of the patients with chronic pancreatitis had cancer develop (median follow-up 60 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic ductal brushing with salvage cytology is useful in the diagnosis of cancer, whereas cytologic analysis of pancreatic juice can be abandoned. At present, K-ras-2 mutation is not useful for differentiating pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis or the identification of patients with chronic pancreatitis at risk for malignant transformation.

Usefulness of supernatant of pancreatic juice for genetic analysis of K-ras in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma

AIMS

To ascertain whether analysis of K-ras mutations at codon 12 (KRM) in the supernatant of pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) is more useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma (PCa) than that in sediment, the authors analyzed KRM in DNA extract from not only the sediment but also the supernatant of PPJ and compared the results.

METHODOLOGY

PPJ was collected endoscopically from 19 patients with PCa and 25 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). DNA was extracted from the supernatant and the sediment of PPJ. Mutant allele-specific amplification (MASA) was performed for KRM analysis with the DNA extracts from these samples.

RESULTS

The incidence of KRM in the supernatant of PPJ was 89% (17 of 19) in patients with PCa and 28% (7 of 25) in patients with CP, whereas that in the sediment was 79% (15 of 19) in patients with PCa and 20% (5 of 25) in patients with CP. Although there was no significant difference in KRM incidence between supernatant and sediment, the positive rate of KRM was higher in the former. Additionally, with regard to the PCa cases, KRM were found in the supernatant alone in four cases and in the sediment alone in two cases. Consequently, by a combination assay, all of the patients with PCa showed KRM in either the supernatant or sediment of PPJ. Although there was no relation between the incidence of KRM in PPJ and the location and size of tumor, and clinical stage of carcinoma in the patients with PCa, two patients with clinical stage I disease showed KRM in the supernatant.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the positive rate of KRM in the supernatant is not lower than that in the sediment, and simultaneous analysis of KRM in the supernatant and sediment of PPJ enhances the genetic diagnosis of PCa.

Clinical usefulness of K-ras gene mutation detection and cytology in pancreatic juice in the diagnosis and screening of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The significance of K-ras codon 12 mutation in pancreatic juice is still unclear. Although considerable controversy surrounds this question, the diagnostic utility of K-ras in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer (PC) and in PC-risk patients remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To study prospectively the utility of the K-ras gene mutation and cytology in the diagnosis and screening of PC, and to assess its contribution to clinical decision making.

METHODS

Pancreatic juice samples obtained from 90 patients were evaluated prospectively. Group I (n = 40) comprised patients with clinical suspicion of PC; group II (n = 50) comprised 49 patients with chronic pancreatitis and one patient proceeding from a PC family screening. The K-ras mutation was detected by means of artificial restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) in DNA after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

RESULTS

In group I, of those patients with a definitive diagnosis of PC, malignant cells were found in 27% and K-ras mutation in 44%. In five cases, molecular analysis contributed to diagnosis (4/11 with negative cytology and 1/2 with insufficient cytological material). K-ras mutation revealed an early tumour in one patient, and was the only sample available for diagnosis in another. In group II, the K-ras gene mutation was detected in 8/49 patients (16%) with chronic pancreatitis, one of whom developed PC (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

K-ras mutation analysis of pancreatic juice may complement cytological evaluation in the diagnosis of PC, in spite of its limited contribution to clinical decision making. The presence of K-ras mutation in chronic pancreatitis classifies a subgroup of PC-risk patients who should be evaluated carefully by long-term follow-up.

Prospective evaluation of the contribution of K-ras mutational analysis and CA 19.9 measurement to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic contribution of the detection of K-ras mutation and measurement of serum CA 19.9 concentrations to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. These patients had either the presence or absence of a pancreatic mass as determined by imaging procedures. A total of 156 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer or for confirmation and follow-up of their chronic pancreatitis disease were included: 84 patients presenting a pancreatic mass (group 1) and 72 patients without a pancreatic mass (group 2). K-ras mutations were detected by a restriction fragment length polymorphism/polymerase chain reaction (RFLP/PCR) method and CA 19.9 by an immunoluminometric assay. When a pancreatic mass was present, cytology offered a high sensitivity, but with a significant number of inconclusive results and K-ras mutational analysis offered a highly specific test. In the absence of a pancreatic mass, CA 19.9 (cut-off 100 U/ml) increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis by cytology and K-ras mutational analysis did not add significant information. Thus both tests contribute to the clinical decision process when pancreatic cancer is clinically suspected and the cytological report is not conclusive.

Telomerase activity in pure pancreatic juice for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer may be complementary to K-ras mutation

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of K-ras mutation in pancreatic juice for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is questionable. Telomerase is positive in pancreatic cancer but rarely in benign pancreatic diseases. We conducted this study to determine the usefulness of K-ras mutation and telomerase activity in pancreatic juice for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Pancreatic juice collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was examined in 31 patients: 12 with pancreatic cancer, 11 with chronic pancreatitis, and 8 control patients. The K-ras gene was detected by using the restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Telomerase activity was detected by using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol.

RESULTS

K-ras mutation was positive in 75% (9 of 12) of pancreatic cancers and in 27% (3 of 11) of cases of chronic pancreatitis but in none of the control patients. Telomerase activity was detected in 92% (11 of 12) of pancreatic cancers and in 18% (2 of 11) of cases of chronic pancreatitis. The diagnostic value in pancreatic cancer was comparable between K-ras mutation and telomerase when evaluated separately. However, by combining these 2 methods, the specificity rose to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

For the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, telomerase activity in pancreatic juice may possibly be complementary to K-ras mutation because it may decrease the rate of false-positive diagnosis.

Screening for early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in hereditary pancreatitis

Patients with hereditary pancreatitis have a 40% lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Existing methods of diagnosing pancreatic cancer such as tumor markers, endoscopy, and radiological imaging lack the sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis, particularly in a background of chronic pancreatitis. Molecular based strategies offer new avenues of screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in these high-risk patients, which may allow the development of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tests for the early detection of cancer.

K-Ras mutations and benign pancreatic disease

This review addresses the history of the ras oncogene, the techniques used to detect molecular alterations in the ras oncogene, and the application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods to determine point mutations in clinical samples of patients with pancreatic diseases, namely pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. The frequency of ras mutations in pancreatic carcinoma is high, ranging from 70 to almost 100%. The frequence of ras mutations in chronic pancreatitis, either in pancreatic tissue or pancreatic secretions, vary between 0 and 100%. This wide range in part may be owing to differences in sampling, DNA extraction, or PCR method. The meaning of a k-ras mutation is under debate. Taking into account the positivity of ductal hyperplasias in normal pancreas and ras mutations in normal appearing duct cells, this molecular finding may not mean anything. In contrast, ras mutations are associated with smoking, one acknowledged risk factor for pancreatic carcinoma. The need for large prospective cohort studies is emphasized.

Molecular biology of pancreatic cancer; oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes, growth factors, and their receptors from a clinical perspective

Pancreatic cancer represents the fourth leading cause of cancer death in men and the fifth in women. Prognosis remains dismal, mainly because the diagnosis is made late in the clinical course of the disease. The need to improve the diagnosis, detection, and treatment of pancreatic cancer is great. It is in this type of cancer, in which the mortality is so great and the clinical detection so difficult that the recent advances of molecular biology may have a significant impact. Genetic alterations can be detected at different levels. These alterations include oncogene mutations (most commonly, K-ras mutations, which occur in 75% to more than 95% of pancreatic cancer tissues), tumour suppressor genes alterations (mainly, p53, p16, DCC, etc.), overexpression of growth factors (such as EGF, TGF alpha, TGF beta 1-3, aFGF, bTGF, etc.) and their receptors (i.e., EGF receptor, TGF beta receptor I-III, etc.). Insights into the molecular genetics of pancreatic carcinogenesis are beginning to form a genetic model for pancreatic cancer and its precursors. These improvements in our understanding of the molecular biology of pancreatic cancer are not simply of research interest, but may have clinical implications, such as risk assessment, early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation.

Multi-step pancreatic carcinogenesis and its clinical implications

The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer relates mainly to its delayed diagnosis. It has been repeatedly shown that earlier diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is associated with a better outcome. Molecular diagnostic methods (mainly detection of K-ras mutations in pure pancreatic or duodenal juice, on specimens obtained by percutaneous fine-needle aspirations or in stool specimens) can achieve earlier diagnosis in selected subgroups of patients, such as patients with chronic pancreatitis (especially hereditary), adults with recent onset of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and patients with some inherited disorders that predispose to the development of pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence that pancreatic carcinogenesis is a multi-step phenomenon. Screening procedures for precursor lesions in these selected subgroups of patients may reduce the incidence and mortality from pancreatic cancer.

EUS and K-ras analysis of pure pancreatic juice collected via a duodenoscope after secretin stimulation for diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesion: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer remains problematic. This prospective study assessed the utility of a combination of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and genetic analysis of pure pancreatic juice in the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-six patients with suspected pancreatic disease were enrolled and underwent ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde choleangiopancreatography (ERCP), and EUS. Pure pancreatic juice was collected endoscopically after secretin stimulation. K-ras point mutations at codon 12 in the juice were assayed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (20%) patients were found to have solid pancreatic masses including 19 with cancer (7 patients, </= 2 cm) and 17 patients with an inflammatory mass (13 patients, </= 2 cm). US and CT were both less sensitive, particularly in patients with small masses. In 13 patients, small masses (4 cancer and 9 inflammatory masses) were not delineated until EUS. The combination of EUS and K-ras analysis had a high sensitivity (100%; p < 0.05 vs. US) and its accuracy reached 94% (p < 0.01 vs. US).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and K-ras determination in pure pancreatic juice collected via a duodenoscope may be useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions.

Diagnostic p53 immunostaining of endobiliary brush cytology: preoperative cytology compared with the surgical specimen

BACKGROUND

Endobiliary brush cytology is important in the distinction of malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. The additional diagnostic value of p53 immunostaining on these cytology specimens was assessed.

METHODS

All patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endobiliary brush cytology and subsequent surgery at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam during a 3-year period were studied. p53 Immunocytology was compared with the corresponding conventional light microscopic cytology and p53 immunostaining of the subsequent surgical specimen.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with the following diagnoses were included: pancreatic carcinoma (23), bile duct carcinoma (15), ampullary carcinoma (5), lymph node metastases (2), carcinoma of unknown origin (4), chronic pancreatitis (3), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (1). Fifty-one percent of the carcinomas showed positive p53 immunostaining; all four surgical specimens without carcinoma were negative. The sensitivities of conventional light microscopic cytology, p53 immunocytology, and both tests combined were 29%, 24%, and 43%, respectively. These sensitivities were higher in cases of bile duct carcinoma (46%, 40%, and 66%) compared with cases of pancreatic carcinoma (13%, 9%, and 22%). Specificities of both tests were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

p53 Immunostaining on endobiliary brush cytology may be helpful in the diagnosis of malignant extrahepatic bile duct stenosis, especially in patients with bile duct carcinoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)

K-ras point mutations in the supernatants of pancreatic juice and bile are reliable for diagnosis of pancreas and biliary tract carcinomas complementary to cytologic examination

In order to clarify whether DNA analysis for K-ras mutation can be used to diagnose cancers in supernatants of pancreatic juice and bile, samples from 29 cases of pancreatic, biliary tract, gastric, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, 1 malignant lymphoma case, 2 cases of pancreatic adenoma, 9 cases of chronic pancreatitis and 21 other non-cancer cases were examined. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products for K-ras gene codons 2 to 97 of exons 1 and 2 were generated with 33/33 (100%) pancreatic juice and 41/41 (100%) bile samples. By the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) method, point mutations were detected in the pancreatic juice or bile supernatants of 13/13 (100%) pancreas cancer cases, 5/14 (35.7%) biliary tract cancer cases, 1/2 (50.0%) pancreatic adenoma cases and 3/9 (33.3%) chronic pancreatitis cases. Direct sequencing confirmed identical point mutations in the supernatants, malignant cells of cytologic smears of pancreatic juice or bile and cancer tissues. The DNA analysis demonstrated the presence of K-ras point mutations in 3 cases of pancreatic carcinomas with false-negative cytologic diagnoses. This novel method allows simultaneous testing for genetic abnormalities in supernatants of pancreatic juice and bile, after removing cells for cytologic diagnosis and screening for pancreatic and biliary tract tumors.

Pancreatic cancer associated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor production confirmed by immunohistochemistry

We report an 83-year-old man with pancreatic body cancer of 4.5 cm in diameter. Peripheral leukocyte count was 15,700/microl and the serum concentration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was 123 pg/ml (normal, 6.0-21.9 pg/ml) on admission. Furthermore, not only K-ras codon 12 (GGT --> GAT) but also p53 at codon 247 (CGG --> CCG) mutations were identified in the pancreatic juice aspirated endoscopically. We performed chemotherapy with two courses of 5-fluorouracil, pirarubicin hydrochloride, and mitomycin-C, resulting in no beneficial effect. After the second course the patient developed interstitial pneumonia, probably caused by anticancer drugs, and died 4 months after the tumor was detected. In the autopsy tissue, the tumor macroscopically occupied the pancreas body and was 7 x 6 x 5 cm in size. Histopathologic diagnosis of the tumor was poorly differentiated adenosquamous carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining of the autopsy tissue showed that pancreatic cancer cells were positive for G-CSF. This is the first case report of G-CSF-positive pancreatic cancer confirmed by immunohistochemistry.

A case of small pancreatic cancer diagnosed by serial follow-up studies promptly by a positive K-ras point mutation in pure pancreatic juice

We report a 74-yr-old woman who was referred to our hospital because of abdominal fullness. ERP showed a questionable irregularity of the main pancreatic duct at the body. Examination of pure pancreatic juice was positive for K-ras point mutation at codon 12 and negative for cytology. Because neither US nor CT showed apparent lesions in the pancreas, we decided to follow up the patient with serial ERP and pure pancreatic juice studies at 3-month intervals. No changes had been seen up to 18 months later, when cytology was conclusive for malignancy with an apparent stenosis of the main pancreatic duct at the body. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed. A round mass, 12 mm in diameter, was found in the body, which proved to be an adenocarcinoma at histological examination. No extrapancreatic extension and metastases were noted. Although positive K-ras point mutation has been reported in some cases of adenoma or mucinous cell hyperplasia of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis, our case, along with previous reports, indicated the importance of testing K-ras point mutation in pure pancreatic juices for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer at an early stage.

Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Ki-ras mutation analysis from material collected during ERCP has been claimed to improve the diagnosis of pancreatic and bile duct carcinomas as compared with conventional cytology. Our aim was to study the relative contribution of both Ki-ras analysis and brush cytology in patients with a significant stricture at ERCP.

METHODS

Brushings were collected in duplicate for both analyses in 142 patients in whom a definitive diagnosis was obtained by histology or a minimal follow-up of 6 months.

RESULTS

For pancreatic strictures, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Ki-ras analysis vs. cytology in detecting malignancy were 81% vs. 66%, 72% vs. 100%, and 70% vs. 74%, respectively. For biliary strictures, they were 25% vs. 42%, 100% vs. 100%, and 35% vs. 43%, respectively. The combination of the two methods only marginally increased their sensitivity and accuracy in both types of strictures.

CONCLUSION

Ki-ras analysis is a sensitive method for diagnosing pancreatic but not biliary carcinoma. However, its specificity is lowered by a high frequency of Ki-ras mutations in patients with chronic pancreatitis (25%) who did not manifest cancer development within a 6-month follow-up period. In pancreatic duct strictures, brush cytology appears to be more specific in detecting malignancy; specificity for Ki-ras and cytology are equivalent for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct strictures. Therefore, making a clinical decision on the sole basis of Ki-ras analysis is probably not justified in the majority of the cases.

Two-dimensional zymography for analysis of proteolytic enzymes in human pure pancreatic juice

Proteolytic enzymes in human pure pancreatic juice (PPJ), which was collected by cannulating the main pancreatic duct using endoscopy, were investigated by two-dimensional zymography (2-DZ). 2-DZ was carried out by combining isoelectric focusing (IEF) in the first dimension with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in the second dimension, using gels containing casein or gelatin as a substrate for the proteolytic enzymes. After electrophoresis, the gels were incubated in Triton X-100 followed by incubation at 37 degrees C in Tris buffer (pH 8.5) containing CaCl2. By staining the gels with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB R-250), proteolytic enzymes were detected as clear spots and zones against a blue background. Proteinase inhibitors, such as a cysteine proteinase inhibitor (E-64), a metalloproteinase inhibitor (EDTA), and a serine proteinase inhibitor (Pefabloc SC), were added to PPJ in order to determine the types of proteinases. In patients with pancreatic cancer, spots of molecular weight (Mr) 70,000 and isoelectric points (pI) 5.3-5.5 were clearly detected on the gels containing casein and gelatin, while these spots were not detected in the PPJ from healthy subjects. The proteolytic activities of these spots were strongly inhibited by EDTA and Pefabloc SC but not E-64. These results suggest that the spots of Mr 70,000 and pI 5.3-5.5 in PPJ of pancreatic cancer might be matrix metalloproteinase 2, which is a candidate for tumor-associated proteinase. 2-DZ proved to be a tool for analysis of proteolytic enzymes in PPJ and for the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Most cancer detection tests currently performed are based on either antibody assays to a marker protein with altered expression in cancer patients or on imaging studies to identify characteristic lesions. Generally, for a positive result, these detection assays require that a tumor have a significant volume of cancer cells. Advances in diagnostic techniques and technology may allow for cancer detection at earlier stages, when the tumor burden is smaller and potentially more curable. The molecular techniques of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) are highly sensitive methods for detecting a small number of cancer cells. Over the past few years, numerous clinical studies have used PCR techniques to detect physical alterations of genes, such as mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification, the presence of oncogenic viruses, and the expression of genes specific to tissue, cancer, and metastasis. The current status of PCR as a method for detecting marker genes in the management of solid tumors is reviewed.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the clinical utility of PCR and RT-PCR in the detection of solid tumor micrometastasis was conducted.

RESULTS

Amplification by PCR is a highly sensitive method to determine gene expression. A single cell expressing a tumor marker among 10-100 million lymphocytes can be detected by the PCR assay. This approach has been used to detect tumor cells in approximately 18 different solid tumor types, with melanoma and carcinoma of the breast and prostate the most widely investigated to date. PCR-based assays have been used to detect cancer cells in biopsies of solid tissue, lymph nodes, bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other body fluids. Several studies have reported a high specificity and sensitivity of tumor marker detection and a high correlation between PCR results and the presence of metastatic disease. However, in a few studies, PCR assays have not consistently demonstrated a higher sensitivity and specificity of detection than traditional modalities for many types of cancer. There has been a wide range in sensitivity and specificity among the studies, which may be partly attributed to the lack of uniformity among the PCR protocols used in different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR can detect tumor marker-expressing cells that are otherwise undetectable by other means in patients with localized or metastatic cancer. Reports from various study groups have lacked uniformity in their protocols, and this has prevented adequate comparison. The clinical utility of this assay as a tool for the prognosis and management of cancer patients remains and area of active investigation. PCR is a powerful tool in the study of the biology of cancer metastasis and will likely serve as a useful adjunct to clinical decision-making in the future.

Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Most cancer detection tests currently performed are based on either antibody assays to a marker protein with altered expression in cancer patients or on imaging studies to identify characteristic lesions. Generally, for a positive result, these detection assays require that a tumor have a significant volume of cancer cells. Advances in diagnostic techniques and technology may allow for cancer detection at earlier stages, when the tumor burden is smaller and potentially more curable. The molecular techniques of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) are highly sensitive methods for detecting a small number of cancer cells. Over the past few years, numerous clinical studies have used PCR techniques to detect physical alterations of genes, such as mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification, the presence of oncogenic viruses, and the expression of genes specific to tissue, cancer, and metastasis. The current status of PCR as a method for detecting marker genes in the management of solid tumors is reviewed.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the clinical utility of PCR and RT-PCR in the detection of solid tumor micrometastasis was conducted.

RESULTS

Amplification by PCR is a highly sensitive method to determine gene expression. A single cell expressing a tumor marker among 10-100 million lymphocytes can be detected by the PCR assay. This approach has been used to detect tumor cells in approximately 18 different solid tumor types, with melanoma and carcinoma of the breast and prostate the most widely investigated to date. PCR-based assays have been used to detect cancer cells in biopsies of solid tissue, lymph nodes, bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other body fluids. Several studies have reported a high specificity and sensitivity of tumor marker detection and a high correlation between PCR results and the presence of metastatic disease. However, in a few studies, PCR assays have not consistently demonstrated a higher sensitivity and specificity of detection than traditional modalities for many types of cancer. There has been a wide range in sensitivity and specificity among the studies, which may be partly attributed to the lack of uniformity among the PCR protocols used in different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR can detect tumor marker-expressing cells that are otherwise undetectable by other means in patients with localized or metastatic cancer. Reports from various study groups have lacked uniformity in their protocols, and this has prevented adequate comparison. The clinical utility of this assay as a tool for the prognosis and management of cancer patients remains and area of active investigation. PCR is a powerful tool in the study of the biology of cancer metastasis and will likely serve as a useful adjunct to clinical decision-making in the future.

K-ras mutations in the duodenal fluid of patients with pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many patients with carcinoma of the pancreas die because their disease is not detected until late in its course. Methods that detect these cancers earlier will improve patient outcome. Over 80% of pancreatic carcinomas contain mutations in codon 12 of the K-ras gene. Screening duodenal fluid for these mutations may lead to early detection of these cancers and assist in establishing a diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with and without restriction enzyme-mediated mutant enrichment, was performed on DNA isolated from duodenal fluid specimens from 61 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's operation) for either periampullary cancer or a benign condition of the pancreas. Representative sections of pancreas pathology (primary carcinoma, benign tumor, or chronic pancreatitis) from the patients with duodenal fluid specimens containing amplifiable DNA were also analyzed for K-ras mutations. Wild-type and mutant K-ras were detected by hybridization of the PCR products with K-ras codon 12 mutant and wild-type specific probes.

RESULTS

Seven of the 61 duodenal fluid specimens contained DNA that did not amplify. Thirteen (24% of the 54 duodenal fluid specimens with amplifiable DNA and 21% of the total of 61 specimens) contained activating point mutations at codon 12 of the K-ras gene. Mutations were detected in 13 of the 51 duodenal fluid specimens from patients with cancer (sensitivity, 25%), whereas mutations were not detected in any of the 9 amplifiable duodenal fluid specimens from patients with benign conditions of the pancreas (specificity, 100%). One duodenal fluid specimen from a patient with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas had two different K-ras mutations. DNA from three of the primary carcinomas did not amplify or was not available. Twenty-nine (69%) of the 42 primary tumors with amplifiable DNA contained K-ras mutations, whereas 3 (30%) of the 10 pancreata with benign conditions harbored mutations. Twenty-two (65%) of 34 ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas with amplifiable DNA had K-ras mutations. It is noteworthy that the same mutation was present in both the duodenal fluid and the primary carcinomas of 11 (92%) of the 12 patients who had primary tumors with amplifiable DNA as well as K-ras mutations in their duodenal fluid specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of genetic alterations in cancer-causing genes in duodenal fluid may form the basis for the development of new approaches to the detection of carcinoma of the pancreas. Some pancreata without cancer, however, may also harbor K-ras mutations, potentially limiting the specificity of K-ras-based tests.

Absence of K-ras mutations in the pancreatic parenchyma of patients with chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Human pancreatic cancers exhibit a high frequency of K-ras mutations.

METHODS

In this study we used oligonucleotide specific hybridization to compare the frequency of K-ras mutations in genomic DNA samples prepared from 21 normal pancreatic tissues, 26 chronic pancreatitis tissues, and 24 pancreatic cancers.

RESULTS

None of the DNA samples from normal or chronic pancreatitis tissues exhibited a K-ras mutation at codons 12 or 13 of K-ras. In contrast, 17 of 24 DNA pancreatic cancers harbored a K-ras mutation. Validity of the methodology was confirmed by genotyping 7 human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Analysis of focal areas of proliferation from 5 chronic pancreatitis and 5 pancreatic cancer samples processed by selective ultraviolet radiation fractionation (SURF), a procedure used to enrich DNA isolation from foci of proliferating cells, revealed complete concordance with total genomic DNA analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the pancreatic parenchyma in patients with chronic pancreatitis most frequently does not possess a K-ras mutation.

Cholecystokinin A and B receptors are differentially expressed in normal pancreas and pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Cholecystokinin (CCK) plays an important role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. While human CCK-A and -B receptors have been fully characterized, their relative roles in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma remain unclear. Thus, expression of CCK-A and -B receptors in normal human pancreas, pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and other human extrapancreatic tissues and malignancies was examined, using reverse transcription followed by the polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). mRNA isolated from 15 normal pancreas specimens, 22 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and 58 extrapancreatic tissues and tumors was subjected to RT-PCR using primers specific for human CCK-A and -B receptors. Expression of CCK-B receptors was detected in all tissues arising from pancreas and in most extrapancreatic tissues and tumors. In contrast, CCK-A receptors exhibited a more selective pattern of expression in gall bladder, intestine, brain, ovary, spleen, and thymus. Of significance, CCK-A receptors were expressed selectively in all pancreatic adenocarcinomas, but not in any normal pancreas specimens. In situ hybridization, using receptor-specific riboprobes, localized CCK-A receptor expression to ductal cells, the presumed origin of most human pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Southern blot analysis revealed no evidence of CCK-A receptor gene amplification or rearrangement in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Because of its selective expression, the CCK-A receptor may serve as selective biomarker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Sclerosing pancreatitis showing rapidly progressive changes with recurrent mass formation

CONCLUSION

Sclerosing pancreatitis might develop repeatedly or might rapidly extend to the whole pancreas with recurrent mass formation.

BACKGROUND

Nothing is known concerning course or development of sclerosing pancreatitis.

METHODS

A 63-yr-old male was followed up for 2.5 yr.

RESULTS

The patient was admitted because of a tumor in the body and tail of the pancreas. Serum pancreatic enzymes were transiently elevated, but tumor markers were all negative. Imaging studies showed a tumor 7 cm in size. The main pancreatic duct was normal in the head and obstructed at the body on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP). The K-ras oncogene mutation was positive in pure pancreatic juice. Distal pancreatectomy was performed because pancreatic cancer was highly suspected. Pathological findings showed that the tumor was a densely fibrotic mass without malignant cells. Inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the stroma. One year later, another mass 3 cm in size was noted in the remnant pancreatic head. ERCP revealed diffuse irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct, its branches, and the common bile duct. Liver dysfunction improved and an elevation of serum pancreatic enzymes subsided without any specific treatment, and the mass diminished in size. The patterns of various imaging studies on the second tumor were the same as those of the previous resected mass. Corticosteroid was not administered.

Breast cancer genetics: family history, heterogeneity, molecular genetic diagnosis, and genetic counselling

Between 5% and 10% of breast cancer cases can be traced to primary genetic factors. Before the discovery of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, if a first-degree relative in direct genetic lineage had hereditary breast cancer or hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, the best estimate of family members' genetic risk for breast cancer was 50%. Now the lifetime cancer destiny of a patient who carries a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germ line mutation can be determined with an extraordinary degree of precision. However, a major concern facing clinicians is how to use this powerful genetic knowledge without harming the patient. This presentation focuses on the need for (a) compilation of a detailed family history of cancer of all anatomic sites; (b) understanding of the natural history of hereditary breast cancer and its heterogeneous forms and the pathobiology of hereditary breast cancer; and (c) preparation for performance of genetic counseling that is based on the results of DNA sequencing to detect genes related to cancer susceptibility. The discussion addresses the advantages of this molecular genetic movement, which include the abilities (a) to predict who is and who is not at inordinately high risk for cancer; (b) to provide opportunities for highly targeted disease surveillance and management; (c) to give patients the information they need to make appropriate long-term decisions about matters such as procreation; and (d) to give genetic counselors the information they need to appreciate the emotions patients may encounter, such as fear, anxiety, and apprehension, and the ordeal of being subjected to discrimination by insurance companies and employers.

Detection of K-ras point mutations at codon 12 in pancreatic juice for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by hybridization protection assay: a simple method for the determination of the types of point mutation

The present study was undertaken to detect K-ras oncogene point mutations at codon 12 in pure pancreatic juice (PPJ) by the hybridization protection assay (HPA) method for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). This assay can be carried out within 30 min and can determine not only the presence of a mutation, but also the mutational type of K-ras at codon 12. The minimal ratio of mutant DNA detectable by the HPA was 5-10% of the total DNA. PPJ was collected through a cannula under duodenal fiberscope control from 20 patients with PC and 20 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Analysis of PPJ by the HPA revealed that the incidence of K-ras point mutations at codon 12 was 55% (11/20) in patients with PC and 0% (0/20) in those with CP. Mutational types of K-ras at codon 12 in PC were aspartic acid (Asp) in nine cases, both Asp and cysteine in one case, and arginine in one case. Analysis of K-ras point mutations at codon 12 in PPJ using the HPA method seems promising as a new genetic test for the diagnosis of PC, because the HPA method is simple, and can easily determine the mutational type.