Infection concomitant with pediatric renal allograft rejection

HHV-6 infection in a pediatric kidney transplant patient

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection can induce unusual complications in transplant patients, such as interstitial pneumonitis, encephalitis and marrow aplasia. We describe the clinical course of HHV-6 infection in a girl with renal transplantation. She presented with diarrhea and poor feeding on day 36 post-transplantation (Tx), after a 5-day steroid pulse for clinical signs of acute rejection. A week later she developed fever and had elevated plasma creatinine and lactic dehydrogenase levels, but a physical examination did not reveal any anomalies with respect to suggest rash, pneumonitis, encephalitis or lymphadenopathy. Two weeks later, the patient developed anemia and leucopenia. HHV-6 was the only pathogen detected by the PCR assay of the serum and marrow aspiration. The patient had a successful recovery without specific treatment. This case report highlights the wide spectrum of complications resulting from HHV-6 infection in immunosuppressed patients.

Emerging viral infections in transplantation

Viral infections are an important complication of transplantation. The introduction of more potent immunosuppressive agents over the past decade correlates with an increase in the rate of hospitalizations of transplant patients with infections. Specifically, viral infections have emerged as a major source of morbidity and mortality in transplantation. There are several potential intervention strategies in the face of emerging infections and it is likely that the approach will differ depending on the virus in question. These include viral surveillance and pre-emptive therapy, intervention of the transplant community, and policy change at the level of government, blood bank and organ procurement organizations. This review focuses on the emergence of the herpesviruses; HHV-6 and HHV-7. In addition, the issue of virus transmission through organ transplant is addressed with a discussion of West Nile virus and the rabies virus.

Systemic Herpes Simplex Virus Infection Following Cadaveric Renal Transplantation: A Case Report

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection usually occurs in immunocompromised or severely debilitated patients. It is not so common in patients with renal transplants. The diagnosis can only be made histologically. It usually occurs during or shortly after treatment of graft rejection with high-dose steroids. We have recently experienced a case of HSV esophagitis and nephropathy in the renal allograft biopsy, which was identified by histology, immunostaining, and electron microscopy. A 43-year-old woman underwent cadaveric renal transplantation with cyclosporine and prednisolone treatment. Twelve months later, she developed renal insufficiency and proteinuria. Allograft renal biopsy showed some evidence of acute rejection. She was treated with 3 successive days of methylprednisolone (1.0 g/d) intravenously and continued tapering of steroids. Three weeks after steroid pulse therapy, she had throat pain, oral cavity ulcer, dysphagia, and febrile sensation. Esophagoscopy revealed multiple confluent ulcers in the whole esophagus, and biopsy showed enlarged epithelial cells with prominent nuclei. Immunohistochemically, the epithelial cells were positive with a monoclonal antibody to HSV type 1. She was started on acyclovir intravenously, which was continued for a week. After a week, her symptoms began to improve and repeat endoscopy showed no residual esophagitis. A renal allograft infection with HSV can persist in heavily immunosuppressed patients with recurrent rejection episodes. HSV mainly affects tubular cells causing necrosis, a major reason for functional deterioration. A biopsy is required for diagnosis.

A reverse transcription-nested PCR assay for HHV-6 mRNA early transcript detection after transplantation

Monitoring of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation is important, especially in immunocompromised patients such as transplant recipients. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) is a useful method to distinguish between latent and active infection. Here, a RT-nested PCR coupled with a colorimetric plate hybridization assay was established to detect HHV-6 types A and B U79/80 mRNAs. After confirming the reliability of the assay on HHV-6 cultures, it was applied to the detection of HHV-6 reactivation after renal (27 patients), bone marrow (14 patients) or heart (7 patients) transplantation. A total of 206 blood samples were tested from renal (137), bone marrow (58) and heart (11) transplant recipients. U79/80 mRNAs were found in 32 samples that were considered as indicative of HHV-6 reactivation: 15, 13 and 5 from kidney, bone marrow and heart transplant recipients, respectively. Finally, U79/80 mRNA detection was correlated with clinical manifestations including leucopenia, skin rash, graft rejection or dysfunction and diarrhoea.

Update on human herpesvirus 6 biology, clinical features, and therapy

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a betaherpesvirus that is closely related to human cytomegalovirus. It was discovered in 1986, and HHV-6 literature has expanded considerably in the past 10 years. We here present an up-to-date and complete overview of the recent developments concerning HHV-6 biological features, clinical associations, and therapeutic approaches. HHV-6 gene expression regulation and gene products have been systematically characterized, and the multiple interactions between HHV-6 and the host immune system have been explored. Moreover, the discovery of the cellular receptor for HHV-6, CD46, has shed a new light on HHV-6 cell tropism. Furthermore, the in vitro interactions between HHV-6 and other viruses, particularly human immunodeficiency virus, and their relevance for the in vivo situation are discussed, as well as the transactivating capacities of several HHV-6 proteins. The insight into the clinical spectrum of HHV-6 is still evolving and, apart from being recognized as a major pathogen in transplant recipients (as exemplified by the rising number of prospective clinical studies), its role in central nervous system disease has become increasingly apparent. Finally, we present an overview of therapeutic options for HHV-6 therapy (including modes of action and resistance mechanisms).

Third dose of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation

Antibody induction therapy is frequently used in pediatric renal transplantation to reduce risk of early rejection. We previously reported lower rates of human herpes virus type 6 (HHV-6) reactivation in patients receiving monoclonal antibody induction with basiliximab, compared to patients receiving antithymocyte globulin/antilymphocyte globulin treatment. Subclinical rejection events were still present in many patients in the first 6 months after transplantation. This prompted a third dose of basiliximab to be administered at day 21 in addition to the standard two doses given immediately prior to transplantation and on day 4. No significant reduction of subclinical rejections was noted in the 11 patients receiving triple dosing of basiliximab. Two patients developed an allergic reaction responsive to intravenous fluids, steroids, and antihistamines with full resolution within 30 minutes of administration. There was no increase in de novo infection or reactivation of HHV-6 or Epstein-Barr virus in this group compared to patients receiving two doses of basiliximab. The goal of reduction of early subclinical rejection events was not achieved with the third dosing of basiliximab in this initial group of pediatric renal transplant patients. However, 63.6% of patients receiving triple basiliximab remained free of clinical and/or subclinical rejection for the first 6 months posttransplant compared to only 36.4% remaining rejection-free for the same interval in the group who received the conventional two doses of basiliximab.

Simulect and HHV-6 in pediatric renal transplantation

Herpes virus reactivation is of increasing interest as we aim to decrease morbidity and mortality in the pediatric renal transplant population. We previously reported increased reactivation of HHV-6 and Epstein Barr virus (EBV) with anti-thymocyte globulin/ALG induction therapy. HHV-6 reactivation and de novo infection has been monitored in 31 consecutive pediatric renal transplant patients receiving antibody induction with Simulect. Human Herpes virus-6 (HHV-6) was correlated with EBV reactivation and de novo infection rates, allograft function at 1 year, donor source and number, and patient age and gender. One HHV-6 de novo infection was associated with an early grade II rejection that was steroid resistant but ATG/ALG responsive. Sixteen of 31 (54.8%) patients had HHV-6 reactivation during the first year and eight patients had a prior reactivation profile before transplant. Thirteen patients (41.9%) were naïve to EBV infection prior to transplant with evidence of primary infection in 11 of 13 patients between 6 weeks and 1 year posttransplant. EBV reactivation was noted in four patients with past immunity to EBV. IgM Ab to EBV or HHV-6 during the first year posttransplant did not correlate with risk of rejection during the first year or graft function one year posttransplant. The only patient with positive HHV-6 IgM Ab in the first posttransplant month was a de novo infection in a 2-year-old boy who was naïve for HHV-6 at the time of transplant. Simulect appears safe in pediatric renal transplant with low risk of HHV-6 or EBV infection in the first 1 to 2 months posttransplant.

Vaccinations for adult solid-organ transplant recipients: current recommendations and protocols

Recipients of solid-organ transplantation are at risk of severe infections due to their life-long immunosuppression. Despite emerging evidence that vaccinations are safe and effective among immunosuppressed patients, most vaccines are still underutilized in these patients. The efficacy, safety, and protocols of several vaccines in this patient population are poorly understood. Timing of vaccination appears to be critical because response to vaccinations is decreased in patients with end-stage organ disease and in the first 6 months after transplantation. For these reasons, the primary immunizations should be given before transplantation, as early as possible during the course of disease. Vaccination strategy should include vaccination of household contacts and health care workers at transplant centers unless contraindicated. No conclusive data are available on the use of immunoadjuvants and screening for protective titers. Most vaccines appear to be safe in solid-organ transplantation recipients, but live vaccines should be avoided until further studies are available. The risk of rejection appears minimal. Recommended vaccines include pneumovax, hepatitis A and B, influenza, and tetanus-diphtheria. We outline specific protocols and recommendations in this particular patient population. Specific contraindications exist for other vaccines, such as yellow fever, oral polio vaccine, bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and vaccinia. We conclude that solid-organ recipients will benefit from consistent immunization practices. Further studies are recommended to improve established protocols in this patient population.

Human herpesvirus-6 and -7 infections in transplantation

Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) and human herpesvirus-7 (HHV-7) are ubiquitous in the human population and cause exanthem subitum, a benign disease seen in infancy. The viruses remain latent in the body after primary infection, and reactivate in immunocompromised patients. HHV-6 infection occurs in nearly 50% of all bone marrow and in 20-30% of solid-organ transplant recipients, 2-3 weeks following the procedure. It has been suggested that the viral infection and activation result in clinical symptoms, including fever, skin rash, pneumonia, bone marrow suppression, encephalitis, and rejection. In order to understand the viral infection in greater detail, several studies investigating the route of viral transmission and diagnostic procedures have been carried out. In contrast to studies of HHV-6 infection in organ-transplant recipients, the number of studies examining HHV-7 infection in these patients is limited. According to several recent studies, HHV-7 may act as a cofactor for cytomegalovirus disease in organ-transplant recipients.

Antiviral prophylaxis may prevent human herpesvirus-6 reactivation in bone marrow transplant recipients

Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) infects the majority of children under the age of 2 years causing roseola infantum. Following short self-limited disease, the virus enters into a latency phase in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). It has been previously reported that HHV-6 reactivation from latency, in immunocompromised patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT), could result in febrile illness, pneumonitis, meningitis, and/or encephalitis. In our study, 14 BMT patients received two different antiviral prophylactic therapies: 8 patients received acyclovir, whereas 6 patients received ganciclovir. Clinical manifestations and virus recovery were monitored pre- and post-BMT by polymerase chain reaction tests of cord blood cells cultured with the patients' PBL. No HHV-6 recovery was shown in the 6 patients treated with ganciclovir, whereas 3 of the 8 acyclovir-treated patients experienced virus reactivation 20-21 days post-BMT. One of the 3 patients was asymptomatic but had late engraftment; the second patient had prolonged fever, skin rash, and hemorrhage; the third patient experienced prolonged fever, pneumonitis, marrow rejection, and fatal encephalitis. It is concluded that viral reactivation may be prevented by prophylactic treatment with ganciclovir. Our observation awaits further documentation in prospective randomized trials in high-risk BMT recipients.

Epstein-Barr virus infection is associated with endothelial Bcl-2 expression in transplant liver allografts

INTRODUCTION

In liver transplant recipients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease, we reported a low rate of acute rejection after stopping or markedly lowering immunosuppression. This observation led to the hypothesis that EBV, as a means of viral persistence, induces expression of antiapoptotic factors and these factors, in turn, confer protection to the transplanted organ. Bcl-2, an antiapoptotic factor induced by EBV in various host cells, is not normally expressed in the liver. We questioned whether bcl-2 is expressed in the transplanted liver and whether its expression is modified by EBV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective liver biopsy specimen from liver transplant patients diagnosed with EBV (n=12) were examined for the presence of bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry and compared with EBV (-) transplant (n=15), and nontransplant (n=13) livers.

RESULTS

The most significant finding was the presence of endothelial bcl-2 expression in the majority of EBV (+) transplant samples examined (67%) and its relative absence in the other two groups (P<0.005). There was also bcl-2 expression in the hepatocytes and lymphocytes of the majority of transplant liver samples, irrespective of EBV status.

DISCUSSION

We have identified a strong association between EBV infection and endothelial bcl-2 expression in transplant livers. We also found that transplantation, in itself, was associated with bcl-2 expression in the hepatocytes and lymphocytes of liver allografts.

Association between Epstein-Barr virus infection and late acute transplant rejection in long-term transplant patients

Recently we reported about a possible involvement of extrarenal systemic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in graft deteriorating immune processes. We now examined whether Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may also be associated with late renal graft injury. We analyzed the expression of early antigen-, viral capsid antigen-, and a latency-associated EBV-RNA-transcript, which is not translated into protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of kidney transplant patients with histologically proven late acute rejection and no signs of CMV or any other infection (A), patients with stable graft function (B), and healthy probands (C). A total of 40% in group A vs. 5 and 0% in groups B and C, respectively, expressed early antigen-mRNA (P<0.05) suggesting an activation of lytic EBV infection. Response to steroid bolus therapy in group A was comparably poor with that observed in CMV-related graft injury. Our data suggest that extrarenal lytic EBV infection may also be involved in the pathogenesis of late graft injury. A controlled ganciclovir trial may prove the significance of our observation.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay spot detection of interferon-gamma and interleukin 5-producing cells as a predictive marker for renal allograft failure

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the short-term survival of renal transplants, many allografts fail over the 5-10 years after transplantation. We sought to identify an immunologic assay that could identify those patients at high risk for future allograft failure.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 23 renal allograft recipients with acute and/or chronic graft dysfunction and from 22 controls. Isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were tested for interferon (IFN)-gamma and interleukin (IL)-5 production using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. IFN-gamma:IL-5 ratios were calculated and compared between groups. Among the 23 patients with graft dysfunction, the ratios were also compared with graft function at 6 months.

RESULTS

IFN-gamma:IL-5 ratios of > or = 15 were associated with allograft rejection episodes in 8 of 12 cases, whereas 10 of 11 episodes of graft dysfunction from other causes (infection, drug toxicity, obstruction) were associated with values <15. All normal controls had values <15 (22/22). Among the graft recipients with acute renal failure, all patients with IFN-gamma:IL-5 ratios <15 exhibited improved renal function at 6-month follow-up (14/14), whereas 8 of 9 patients with IFN-gamma:IL-5 ratios > or = 15 developed allograft failure at 6 months (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.3%).

CONCLUSION

In renal transplant recipients with acute allograft dysfunction, mitogen-induced peripheral blood lymphocyte IFN-gamma:IL-5 ratios > or = 15 were highly predictive of allograft failure within 6 months of the assay. This test may be a useful prognostic marker for identification of transplant recipients with acute graft dysfunction who are at high risk for future graft loss and thus allow targeted therapeutic interventions to prolong graft survival.