Mycophenolate mofetil-based, cyclosporine-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression: first-3-months analysis of efficacy and safety in two cohorts of renal allograft recipients

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Wound Healing Complications in Kidney Transplantation: Old Myths and New Realities

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I) lacks nephrotoxicity, has antineoplastic effects, and reduces viral infections in kidney transplant recipients. Earlier studies reported a significant incidence of wound healing complications and lymphocele. This resulted in the uncomfortable willingness of transplant clinicians to use these agents in the immediate posttransplant period. As evidence and experience evolved over time, much useful information became available about the optimal use of these agents. Understandably, mTOR-I effects wound healing through their antiproliferative properties. However, there are a lot of other immunological and nonimmunological factors which can also contribute to wound healing complications. These risk factors include obesity, uremia, increasing age, diabetes, smoking, alcoholism, and protein-energy malnutrition. Except for age, the rest of all these risk factors are modifiable. At the same time, mycophenolic acid derivatives, steroids, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have also been implicated in wound healing complications. A lot has been learnt about the optimal dose of mTOR-I and their trough levels, its combinations with other immunosuppressive medications, and patients' profile, enabling clinicians to use these agents appropriately for maximum benefits. Recent randomized control trials have further increased the confidence of clinicians to use these agents in immediate posttransplant periods.

New Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Agents

Since the early 1980s, the combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone has been the mainstay tripledrug immunosuppressive regimen used in transplantation. However, advances in drug research, design, and development have allowed for the introduction of new agents that have greatly increased the number of immunosuppressive agents available for use in transplant recipients. Particularly, the newer antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs (agents that directly inhibit the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes) have had an important impact on patient outcomes posttransplant. These agents are mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus.

Immunosuppression in the era of biological agents

Immunosuppression is the mayor mechanism to prevent allograft rejection and to induce tolerance. Since the first solid organ transplant, the development of safe and effective immunosuppressive regimens was a constant over the last decades. A lot of immunosuppressants have been discovered, and today the immunosuppressive agents are classified in two broad groups: Xenobiotic immunosuppressants and biological immunosuppressants. Xenobiotics, like corticoids and calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors, mainly interfere with the intracellular molecular mechanisms of the various types of cells involved in the immune response and generally these immunosuppressants are used early on in the transplantation process to prevent rejection as well as in long-term maintenance therapy. On the other hand, target molecules of biological immunosuppressants are on the surface of these immunological cells and normally in clinical immunosuppressive protocols have been used as auxiliary agents of xenobiotics to prevent rejection as well as in the treatment of acute rejection. However, these xenobiotics and biological agents have multiple side effects; that is why there has been a search for new drugs to minimise these side effects and to improve patients' quality of life. In this way, new biological agents have been proposed as maintenance immunosuppressive agents. The majority of these new immunosuppressive agents are polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies and recently the so-called fusion proteins may be the start of a new era of biological immunosuppression for maintenance regimens.

Immunological risk in recipients of kidney transplants from extended criteria donors

BACKGROUND

Determining if a kidney from a marginal donor is likely to elicit a strong and specific immune response, leading to an increased risk of acute rejection, is of importance in renal transplantation.

METHODS

In this study, we analysed the effect of extended criteria donor (ECD) on the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and the effect of immunological risk factors on graft outcome in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 2121 patients) grafted with ECD (n = 656 patients) or optimal donor (OD) (n = 1465 patients).

RESULTS

The incidence of BPAR was not statistically different between the ECD group recipients (105/656, 16%) and the OD group recipients (251/1465, 17%) (P = 0.52). These values remained similar after adjustment for immunological risk [defined as retransplantation and/or panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level >20%] (P = 0.92 for patients with immunological risk and P = 0.47 for patients without immunological risk). We next analysed the death-censored graft survival data for OD and ECD groups, as a function of immunological status, and found that the immunological risk factor did not affect graft survival in ECD transplant recipients (P = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

Although our groups were not homogenous, our study did not reveal an increased risk of acute rejection in recipients of ECD allograft.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive strategy in elderly recipients of renal allografts from deceased donors: 1-year results from a prospective single center trial

Recently published data from our center have demonstrated the feasibility of a nephrotoxicity- and atherogenicity-free, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppressive protocol for elderly recipients of kidneys from elderly cadaveric donors. We investigated a therapeutic regimen of strictly monitored MMF (target mycophenolic acid [MPA] trough levels between 2-6 microg/mL) and steroids combined with a polyclonal-monoclonal induction regimen consisting of a low-dose, single shot of rabbit ATG (ATG-Fresenius) and the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R)-antibody basiliximab (d0 and d4). Between 1997 and 2007, we treated 175 elderly patients with an MMF-based, calcinearin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppressive protocol. For the present cohort, 30 elderly recipients (67.8 +/- 3.8 years) of renal transplants from deceased donors (69.4 +/- 13.3 years) were recruited consecutively for this 5-year prospective, open, single center, pilot trial. One-year results of this clinical trial were patient and renal allograft survivals of 87% and 83%, respectively; death-censored 1-year graft survival was 97%. Mostly steroid-sensitive rejection episodes were observed in 46% of patients, with only 3 patients requiring serum antibody therapy. Renal allograft function was satisfactory, as reflected by a mean serum creatinine of 1.78 +/- 0.45 mg/dL and a Nankivell glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 48.8 +/- 13.9 mg/dL at 6 months. Twenty-three percent of all patients demonstrated cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections; however, only 3.3% developed CMV disease. Application of a combined polyclonal-monoclonal induction regimen using a nephrotoxicity- and atherogenicity-free, MMF-based immunosuppressive maintenance protocol in elderly cadaveric kidney transplant recipients led to acceptable short-term outcomes, albeit at the expense of an increased rejection rate, comparable to that previously published for elderly (>50 years) recipients of allografts from elderly (>50 years) cadaveric donors.

Mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin-inhibitor reduction: recent progress

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has greatly contributed to acute rejection rate reduction. Because of its immunosuppressive potency it was initially thought that MMF would help in reducing/avoiding CNI-related nephrotoxicity. Elective avoidance of CNI in induction and maintenance MMF-based immunosuppression has resulted in an increased risk for acute and chronic rejection. A recent meta-analysis suggests that CNI elimination in patients on MMF with progressive renal dysfunction is associated with a better outcome, although more data are needed to support any recommendation. So far, the more conservative approach involving CNI minimization with MMF has been associated with amelioration of renal function and low risk for rejection, providing an adequate risk/benefit balance. However, MMF with belatacept might pave the way for CNI-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Meanwhile, the assessment of immunological risk by new monitoring tools could be a prerequisite to further implement such CNI sparing strategies.

Renal transplantation from extended criteria cadaveric donors: problems and perspectives overview

The critical shortage of organs available for renal transplantation has led to the consideration of alternative strategies for increasing the donor pool. Recently, the cadaveric kidney donor pool extended to donors who might have been deemed unsuitable in early times, leading to the concept of marginal donors and more recently to the notion of expanded criteria donors. Such organs are eligible for organ donation but, because of extreme age and other clinical characteristics, are expected to produce allograft at risk for diminished post-transplant function. Thus, the challenge is now to reduce the difference between graft outcome from patients grafted with marginal and 'optimal' donors. This implies appropriate transplantation strategies during pre-, peri- and post-transplantation phases including reduction of cold ischemia time, recipient selection, adaptation of immunosuppressive drug regimens, increase in nephron mass by dual kidney transplantation, and improvement in the graft selection process using histological criteria. This review summarizes current definition of a marginal donor and provides some guidance for clinical management of such transplant.

Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments

Owing to the increasing disparity of organ demand and organ supply the search for optimal immunosuppressive strategies has become a central issue in kidney transplantation (KTX). In the focus today are modifications of the use of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs, Cyclosporine A/Tacrolimus) and steroids, as they are nephrotoxic and promote cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These modifications can either be withdrawal or avoidance of these substances in combination with new and/or established immunosuppressants. Because about half of all KTXs are performed by or with the help of urologists' knowledge of modern immunosuppressive regimens is crucial also for urologists. We performed a literature research (PubMed, DIMDI, medline) for CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols and studies to elucidate their influence on graft-function and graft- and patient-survival. New substances and actual studies were also evaluated. Several published reports on CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols after KTX exist, including withdrawal, reduction or avoidance. The time of reduction seems to be crucial: an initially increased immune response should be counterbalanced by an initially intensified immunosuppression. Therefore, late steroid withdrawal seems to be safer than early withdrawal especially in Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance also seems feasible on a CNI based regimen, especially in context with induction therapy. Withdrawal or avoidance of CNIs seems feasible with mycophenolate acid and/or induction therapy with IL 2-receptor antibodies as co-immunosuppressants. This is of interest in grafts with deteriorating function or from donors with extended criteria. Also, CNI- and steroid-free immunosuppression can be successfully performed with new immunosuppressants but results are yet premature. CNI- and/or steroid reduction, withdrawal or even avoidance is feasible. As long-term graft function is the goal of KTX and as more kidneys from donors with extended criteria are transplanted "tailored immunosuppression" will replace standards in the future.

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI MINIMIZATION: The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI WITHDRAWAL: CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI AVOIDANCE: Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.

Toxicity-sparing protocols using mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

The introduction of triple-therapy regimens that include a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), steroids, and azathioprine greatly reduced the risk of acute rejection in renal transplantation. However, the long-term use of both CNIs and steroids is associated with serious toxicities that ultimately can impact patient/graft survival. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a highly effective immunosuppressant with no known nephrotoxicity, has been shown to provide benefits in preserving long-term renal allograft function relative to azathioprine. For these reasons, MMF has become an integral component of toxicity-sparing maintenance regimens that seek to minimize patient exposure to CNIs and steroids. This paper provides an overview of current strategies for reducing the toxicities associated with these agents, which include both withdrawal and avoidance regimens with or without induction therapy. Data are accumulating that toxicity-sparing regimens involving MMF are safe and decrease the risk of side effects that accompany the use of CNIs and steroids. Future studies will determine how to best implement these regimens in the renal transplant population.

Conversion from Cyclosporine to Sirolimus in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) has mainly been done in clinical conditions warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation. Little is known about the clinical outcome of conversion in renal transplant recipients without transplant dysfunction.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, multicentric pilot study evaluates the safety and efficacy of converting patients with stable renal function from CsA to SRL.

RESULTS

Forty stable patients on CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1.5 g/day), and steroids (ST) were converted at 7.6+/-1.4 months after renal transplantation. At 1 year, graft and patient survival was 100% and the incidence of acute rejection 5%. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increased from 54+/-18 to 66+/-16 ml/min (P<0.0001). Blood pressure remained unchanged. A gradual increase in the incidence and severity of proteinuria was observed from month 6 onwards with de novo proteinuria in 30% of the patients at 1 year. Protein excretion was below 1 g/day in 12.5%, between 1 and 3 g/day in 17.5% and above 3 g/day in 7.5% of the proteinuric cohort (P=0.0043, compared to baseline). No predictors could be identified for the development of proteinuria. All patients had a reduction in protein excretion following renin-angiotensin blockade and were continued on SRL.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of stable renal transplant recipients from a CsA-MMF-ST to a SRL-MMF-ST regimen is safe and results in improved renal function but is associated with the development of proteinuria in 30% of the patients requiring renin-angiotensin blockade.

A calcineurin antagonist-free induction/maintenance strategy for immunosuppression in elderly recipients of renal allografts from elderly cadaver donors: long-term results from a prospective single centre trial

BACKGROUND

With the aim to improve the inferior outcomes in elderly recipients of kidneys from elderly cadaver donors, we applied and investigated a therapeutic regimen consisting of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppressive (i.s.) induction/maintenance protocol. In this article, we report the long-term results of this clinical trial.

METHODS

A total of 89 recipients (mean age: 63.8 yr) of kidneys from cadaver donors (mean age: 66.8 yr) were consecutively recruited for this 5-yr, prospective, open, single centre, pilot trial. Induction therapy consisted of MMF and steroids in conjunction with a short course (4-10 d) of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Maintenance treatment was performed with MMF/steroids or MMF alone under strict therapeutic drug monitoring by aiming target mycophenolic acid (MPA)-trough levels between 2 and 6 mg/mL.

RESULTS

Cumulative 5-year patient and renal allograft survival was 87.69% and 69.81%, respectively. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 23.6% (21 patients). Long-term function of the old renal allografts proved to be satisfactory as reflected by serum creatinine-values of 1.53 mg/dL and urea-values of 57.9 mg/dL at 5 yr.

CONCLUSION

Application of a nephrotoxicity- and atherogenicity-free, MMF-based i.s. induction/maintenance protocol in elderly recipient of kidneys from elderly cadaver donors leads to improved long-term outcomes which are comparable with data from young recipients who have received allografts from young cadaver donors.

Effect of immunosuppressive agents on long-term survival of renal transplant recipients: focus on the cardiovascular risk

In the control of acute rejection, attention is being focused more and more on the long-term adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents used. Since cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in renal transplant recipients, optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors is essential in the long-term management of these patients. Unfortunately, several commonly used immunosuppressive drugs interfere with the cardiovascular system. In this review, the cardiovascular adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents currently used for maintenance immunosuppression are thoroughly discussed. Optimising immunosuppression means finding a balance between efficacy and safety. Corticosteroids induce endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus, and impair fibrinolysis. The use of corticosteroids in transplant recipients is undesirable, not only because of their cardiovascular effects, but also because they induce such adverse effects as osteoporosis, obesity, and atrophy of the skin and vessel wall. Calcineurin inhibitors are the most powerful agents for maintenance immunosuppression. The calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin (cyclosporine) not only induces these same adverse effects as corticosteroids but is also nephrotoxic. Tacrolimus has a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile than ciclosporin and is also less nephrotoxic. It has little or no effect on blood pressure and serum lipids; however, its diabetogenic effect is more prominent in the period immediately following transplantation, although at maintenance dosages, the diabetogenic effect appears to be comparable to that of ciclosporin. The diabetogenic effect of tacrolimus can be managed by reducing the dose of tacrolimus and early corticosteroid withdrawal. The effect of tacrolimus on endothelial function has not been completely elucidated. The proliferation inhibitors azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have little effect on the cardiovascular system. Yet, indirectly, by inducing anaemia, they may lead to left ventricular hypertrophy. MMF is an attractive alternative to azathioprine because of its higher potency and possibly lower risk of malignancies. Sirolimus also induces anaemia, but may be promising because of its antiproliferative features. Whether the hyperlipidaemia induced by sirolimus counteracts its beneficial effects is, as yet, unknown. It may be combined with MMF, however, initial attempts resulted in severe mouth ulcers.

Cyclosporine: 20 years of experience at the University of Munich

The history of solid organ transplantation is, from an immunotherapeutic standpoint, divided in the era before and after the introduction of cyclosporine to the clinic. The introduction of cyclosporine to the clinic in 1978 is looked upon as a turning point in transplantation. The immediate success of the new drug was based on the reduction of early graft rejection and the substantial improvement of 1-year graft survival. With growing experience in the use of this new compound, together with the ability to measure drug levels in serum, allograft rejection and organ survival could be improved even further. Because of the clinical results, cyclosporine became the gold standard in immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation. Even after 20 years, as more and more new immunosuppressants emerge, the clinical evaluation of a new drug is frequently compared versus a cyclosporine-based regimen. Today, cyclosporine is probably one of the best investigated drugs in the field of organ transplantation. Beside the undoubted benefits of cyclosporine, experimental and clinical studies have also revealed some unwanted effects, such as nephrotoxicity and an increased risk in development of malignant tumors. Here, we review the experience at our institution with transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine as the main immunosuppressant over the past 20 years.

Cyclosporine C2 monitoring improves renal dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CyA) toxicity is a potential cause of renal dysfunction, which occurs in 38% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients within 5 years. Reducing CyA to "sub-therapeutic" trough (C0) levels increases the risk of rejection. The 2-hour post-dose concentration (C2) is favored as the best single-point surrogate measure of CyA area under the curve (AUC), which reflects drug exposure. In this investigation we assess the effect of conversion to CyA C2 monitoring on renal dysfunction after LTx.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (M:F = 12:3), aged 47 +/- 14 years (range 28 to 62), 3.5 +/- 2.7 (0.2 to 9.0) years post-LTx, with C0 in the therapeutic range (maintenance 100 to 200 microg/liters) (Behring/EMIT immunoassay) and abnormal renal function, were converted from C0 monitoring to C2 monitoring with dose reductions targeting C2 levels of 300 to 600 microg/liter over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

CyA dose was reduced from 6.4 +/- 7.3 (1.2 to 27.9) to 3.1 +/- 2.7 (0.8 to 9.0) mg/kg/day (p = 0.04), with a reduction in C2 levels from 799 +/- 341 (299 to 1,466) to 390 +/- 148 (195 to 675) microg/liter (p < 0.001). Improvements in serum creatinine (0.20 +/- 0.07 [0.12 to 0.35] vs 0.16 +/- 0.04 [0.11 to 0.22] mmol/liter [p = 0.005]) were maintained during the study follow-up period of 1 year. Only 1 patient developed acute rejection and group mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) remained stable (2.4 +/- 1.0 [1.1 to 4.0] vs 2.4 +/- 1.2 [1.1 to 4.6] liters).

CONCLUSIONS

C2 monitoring is a practical method of improving renal dysfunction that allows safe dose reductions of CyA when formal AUC monitoring is not feasible. Extended use of this strategy is associated with long-term benefits.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on antithymocyte globulin and mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric kidney transplantation: results after 5 years

Kidney grafts from suboptimal donors are more likely to suffer the nephrotoxic side-effects of cyclosporine than kidneys from standard donors. In an attempt to avoid the use of cyclosporine, we carried out a prospective study in low-immunological risk recipients of suboptimal kidneys, using an immunosuppressive protocol combining Thymoglobuline in induction with a bi-therapy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) <50% receiving a first renal transplant from a suboptimal donor (age >or=50, non heart beating, arterial hypertension, or acute renal failure) or a kidney at risk of delayed graft function (DGF) because of a prolonged cold ischaemia time (CIT) of 24 h or more, were eligible for this trial. Between September 1996 and December 1999, 30 patients were enrolled for the trial and treated with MMF 2 g orally, pre-operatively, and 3 g daily, post-operatively; Thymoglobuline 2 mg/kg IV pre-operatively, 1.5 mg/kg IV the next day, and for doses of 1 mg/kg IV given on alternate days; and prednisolone 0.25 mg/kg per day, reduced progressively from the end of the first month to 0.1 mg/kg per day by 3 months post-transplant. Cyclosporine was added only if rejection grade II or higher, or a reduction in MMF below 1 g daily, occurred. Ten patients (30%) suffered from DGF, and one kidney suffered primary non function. Seven patients (24%) suffered acute rejection (six were biopsy proven, 3 grade I and 3 grade II). MMF dosage was reduced in 28 patients because of adverse events, and calcineurin inhibitors were introduced in 16 patients. There were 14 episodes of opportunistic infection (cytomegalovirus (CMV 10), Herpes zoster 2, Listeria monocytogenes 1, Pseudomonas aeuruginosa 1), and 7 malignancies (skin 2, thyroid 1, lung 1, Kaposi's sarcoma 2, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder 1). Mean serum creatinine was 178, 199, 213, and 218 micromol/l at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after transplantation, respectively. Actuarial patient and graft (after censoring for death) survival was 94% and 83% after 1 year and 79% and 65% after 5 years, respectively. These results show that with the combination of MMF, Thymoglobuline and steroids the use of cyclosporine can be delayed, and in a few cases completely avoided, with good efficacy in terms of prevention of rejection and recovery of renal function. Regardless of acceptable patient and graft survival, side-effects of MMF at the doses used in this protocol were common and led to overimmunosuppression in the long-term. Starting MMF at low dose, MPA monitoring and probably CMV prophylaxis may improve the results of this regimen.

Renal function and safety of heart transplant recipients switched to mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

We evaluated cyclosporine (CSA) dose reduction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment versus maintained CSA dosage and azathioprine (AZA) in HTX regarding renal function and safety from CSA nephrotoxicity (creatinine > 1.7 mg/dL).

METHODS

Fourteen recipients (group 1: 12 men, 2 women) with CSA-based immunosuppression (plus azathioprine and/or steroids) were started on 2000 mg MMF/d. Azathioprine was discontinued and CSA tapered to trough whole blood levels of 70 to 120 microg/L. Ten recipients (group 2: seven men, three women) were maintained on their CSA dosages. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, uric acid, urea nitrogen, and rejection were monitored.

RESULTS

Mean age was 58 (range 44 to 69 years) and 48 years (range 24 to 61 years) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1 creatinine fell from 2.7 +/- 0.8 to 1.9 +/- 0.5 mg/dL (baseline vs control 2: P =.001); uric acid and urea nitrogen remained constant. CSA levels decreased from 173 +/- 56 to 110 +/- 33 microg/L (P =.02). In group 2 creatinine (2.4 +/- 0.7 vs 2.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL), uric acid, urea nitrogen, and CSA levels remained constant. Comparison between groups showed higher creatinine clearance (50 +/- 18 vs 29 +/- 14 mL/min; group 1 vs group 2: P =.02), lower CSA levels (110 +/- 33 vs 161 +/- 35 microg/L; P <.001) and a trend toward lower serum creatinine (1.9 +/- 0.5 vs 2.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, P =.077). There were two rejections >/= 1B according to ISHLT in the study and four in the control group. Two deaths occurred in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from AZA to MMF after CSA reduction improves creatinine clearance in HTX recipients and reduces serum creatinine. No negative effect on patient safety was identified by rejection rate or survival.

Onset and duration of cytomegalovirus immediate early 1 mRNA expression in the blood of renal transplant recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) messenger (m) RNA expression in circulating leukocytes reflects directly viral activity in the human host. In this study, sixty-nine patients were monitored prospectively for CMV infection and mRNA expression during the first year after renal transplantation. Of the 69 recipients, 58 (84%) recipients were positive for CMV immediate early 1 (IE1) mRNA as detected by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. The median onset of IE1 expression started at day 22 after transplantation and continued for a median duration of 82 days. IE1 mRNA expression started significantly earlier in recipients who developed an active CMV infection (P = 0.001) and in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treated recipients (P = 0.002). The duration of IE1 mRNA expression was significantly longer in recipients that had previously an early onset of IE1 mRNA expression (P = 0.001) and in recipients with active CMV infection (P = 0.007). Remarkably, longer prednisolone intake was correlated with a significantly (P = 0.02) shorter duration of IE1 expression compared to a longer duration of IE1 expression in recipients with only a short prednisolone intake. In recipients infected with glycoprotein B (gB) type 1 CMV strains, the duration of IE1 expression was significantly (P = 0.04) shorter compared to recipients infected with non-gB type 1 CMV strains (64 days vs. 150 days). The study indicates that multiple factors play a role in the onset and/or duration of CMV IE1 mRNA expression, for example, MMF treatment, prednisolone intake, and gB type of the specific CMV strain. The clinical significance of these correlations remains to be studied in more detail.

Tailoring immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients

During the past decade several new potent immunosuppressive agents with different modes of action and different side-effect profiles have become available. Nowadays immunosuppression after renal transplantation is no longer one single regimen applicable to all patients. In the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive protocol, individual drug-related toxicity, recipient-related risk factors as well as donor organ characteristics have to be taken into account. This article will give an overview of the most recently developed immunosuppressive agents available for clinical use. Their individual mode of action and their different efficacy and safety profile will be described as basis for selection of each of these drugs in an attempt to tailor the optimal therapeutic regimen for the individual patient both in terms of short-term and long-term outcome.

Influence of hepatocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and mycophenolic acid on endothelin-1 synthesis in human endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictive peptide which plays an important pathophysiological role in ischaemic renal failure and drug-induced renal injury such as cyclosporin A (CsA)- and tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity. In contrast, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) seem to accelerate renal regeneration after ischaemic and drug-induced renal injury. This study aimed to investigate the influence of HGF and EGF on ET-1 synthesis in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and renal artery endothelial cells (RAEC). In addition, we have investigated whether mycophenolic acid (MPA), a new immunosuppressive drug, which in contrast to CsA and tacrolimus lacks nephrotoxic side effects, modulates ET-1 synthesis in endothelial cells.

METHODS

ET-1 release was measured with a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ET-1 mRNA expression was investigated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

HGF and EGF (0.001-10 nM) exerted a significant concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on ET-1 release by HUVEC and RAEC (minimum 56.1+/-4.3% of control, n=6, mean+/-SE). The suppressive effect of HGF and EGF on ET-1 synthesis was dose-dependently antagonized by the tyrosine kinase inhibitors tyrphostin AG1478, lavendustin A and methyl 2,5-dihydroxycinnamate. Incubation of HUVEC and RAEC with MPA (2.5, 10, 25, and 50 microg/ml) for 3-5 h induced a significant reduction of ET-1 mRNA expression. After 48 h incubation with MPA (1-50 microg/ml) a significant decrease of ET-1 release and DNA content per culture well was observed, whereas ET-1 release referred to the DNA content in the corresponding culture well did not differ significantly from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings demonstrate that HGF and EGF reduce ET-1 synthesis in endothelial cells via their receptor tyrosine kinase activity and suggest that the renoprotective effects of HGF and EGF might be linked to their inhibitory action on ET-1 synthesis. This study also provides evidence that, in contrast to CsA and tacrolimus, MPA does not stimulate ET-1 synthesis. This might explain the clinical observation that renal function often improves when CsA or tacrolimus is replaced by mycophenolate mofetil.

Non-radioactive determination of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydro-genase (IMPDH) in peripheral mononuclear cells

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive activity of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is based on the reversible inhibition of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) by mycophenolic acid (MPA). It was the aim of this study to develop a nonradioactive method for specific measurement of IMPDH activity in isolated peripheral mononuclear cells (MNC).

METHODS

The procedure is based on the incubation of lysed MNC with inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP) followed by direct chromatographic determination of produced xanthosine 5'-monophosphate (XMP). IMPDH activity was measured in MNC of MMF-treated patients and nontreated volunteers.

RESULTS

The within-run (n = 10) and between-run (n = 20) coefficients of variation (CV) for IMPDH activity were < 8% and < 10%, respectively. IMPDH activity in 60 healthy volunteers (19-63 yr) ranged from 4.72 to 32.92 nmol/h/mg protein (mean = 18.39 +/- 6.24). The IC(50) for in vitro inhibition of IMPDH activity was about 2 to 3 microg/L. Application of a single dose of 1 g MMF in dialysis patients resulted in a significant inhibition (by 47-95%; p < 0.05) of IMPDH activity in lysed MNC.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed assay specifically and reliably measures IMPDH activity in MNC. The procedure is applicable to evaluate pharmacodynamic activity in MMF-treated patients. The observed interindividual variability of IMPDH activity may reflect pharmacodynamic differences in MMF-treated patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil impairs healing of left-sided colon anastomoses

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate healing and consequent leakage from bowel anastomoses are a significant cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Immunosuppressive drugs are known to disturb healing processes and to impair the mechanical stability of bowel anastomosis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes and has been shown to be effective in preventing allograft rejection after organ transplantation. Adverse effects are few; however, nothing is known in regard to possible adverse effects of MMF administration on the healing of bowel anastomosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of systemic MMF administration on the healing of colon anastomoses in rats.

METHODS

Rats underwent laparotomy, division of the left colon, and sigmoidostomy. MMF (25 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally in two groups (n=21 per group) 3 days before surgery and then once daily until euthanization (7 animals per group; 2, 4, and 6 days after surgery). Bursting pressure measurements, histologic evaluation, morphometric analysis, mucin and collagen staining, and BrdU immunohistochemistry of the anastomotic site were performed. Furthermore, matrix protein expression at the anastomotic site was determined by collagen I and fibronectin Western blots.

RESULTS

Administration of MMF significantly decreased anastomotic bursting pressure postoperatively. Accordingly, histology, mucin staining, and BrdU immunohistochemistry and measurements of the colonic crypt depth showed more extended inflammation, a significantly lower proliferation rate, and a significantly thinned mucosal layer in the MMF-treated groups when compared to control animals, whereas matrix synthesis at the anastomotic site was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of the immunosuppressive agent MMF significantly impairs healing and mechanical stability of colon anastomosis in rats during the early postoperative period. MMF act to disturb host reparative processes mainly by impairment of reparative colonic epithelium proliferation and less by a disturbance of matrix synthesis.

Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients: report of an initial experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of RAPA conversion in patients undergoing cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) toxicity.

METHODS

Twenty renal transplant recipients were switched to fixed dose rapamycin (RAPA) (5 mg/day) 0 to 204 months posttransplant. Drug monitoring was not initially used to adjust doses. The indications for switch were chronic CsA or Tac nephrotoxicity (12), acute CsA or Tac toxicity (3), severe facial dysmorphism (2), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in remission (2), and hepatotoxicity in 1. Follow-up is 7 to 24 months.

RESULTS

In the 12 patients switched because of chronic nephrotoxicity there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine [233+/-34 to 210+/-56 micromol/liter (P<0.05) at 6 months]. Facial dysmorphism improved in two patients. No relapse of PTLD was observed. Five patients developed pneumonia (two Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, one infectious mononucleosis with polyclonal PTLD lung infiltrate) and two had bronchiolitis obliterans. There were no deaths. RAPA was discontinued in four patients, because of pneumonia in two, PTLD in one, and oral aphtous ulcers in one. RAPA levels were high (>15 ng/ml) in 7 of 13 (54%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RAPA conversion provides adequate immunosuppression to enable CsA withdrawal. However, when converting patients to RAPA drug levels should be monitored to avoid over-immunosuppression and adequate antiviral and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis should be given.

The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients

With the development of new immunosuppressive agents, the focus of anti-rejection therapy has shifted from prevention of acute allograft rejection to an emphasis on sufficient immunosuppression with minimal toxicity. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a recently developed immunosuppressive drug, which acts to inhibit T and B cell proliferation by blocking the production of guanosine nucleotides required for DNA synthesis. It also prevents the glycosylation of adhesion molecules that are involved in attachment of lymphocytes to endothelium and potentially in leukocyte infiltration of an allograft during an immune response. High-quality randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that MMF, when used with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids, reduces the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes in kidney and heart transplants, improves patient and graft survival in heart allograft recipients and increases renal allograft survival at 3 years. It has also been effective in reversing acute and resistant rejection episodes in heart, kidney and liver recipients. The ability of MMF to facilitate sparing of other immunosuppressive agents, particularly in CsA-related nephrotoxicity, is also promising. By permitting reduction in CsA doses, MMF may stabilize or improve renal graft function in patients with CsA-related nephrotoxicity or chronic allograft nephropathy. Early results of phase I and II trials evaluating MMF therapy in liver and combined pancreas/kidney transplant recipients are encouraging. The main adverse effects associated with oral or intravenous MMF are gastrointestinal and hematologic in nature. Although the direct costs of using MMF vs. azathioprine (AZA) are higher, the decreased incidence and treatment of acute rejection in patients treated with MMF supports its use as a cost-effective option during the first year following transplantation.Thus, MMF has become an important therapeutic tool in the transplant clinician's armamentarium. Ongoing issues to be resolved in clinical trials include the role of MMF in the absence of other potent agents, e.g., as monotherapy or with a steroid but without calcineurin inhibitor; whether MMF will have an impact on chronic allograft dysfunction; and the cost-effectiveness of treatment following the first year of transplantation.

Improvement of impaired renal function in heart transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a common problem after cardiac transplantation. We have studied the impact of CsA dose reduction in association with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment on renal function in heart transplant recipients with suspected CsA nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine level >2 mg/dl).

METHODS

Twelve heart transplant recipients (11 men, 1 woman; 111 to 1813 days after transplantation) with CsA-based immunosuppression (plus azathioprine and/or steroids) and a serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dl were started on a daily dose of 2000 mg of MMF. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the underlying disease in nine patients, ischemic cardiomyopathy in three patients. Mean patient age was 57 years (range 44-69 years). Azathioprine was discontinued and CsA slowly tapered. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine level, urea nitrogen, and uric acid were monitored. CsA levels were measured, and CsA dose was adjusted for whole blood levels of 70-120 microg/L. Ten patients still had endomyocardial biopsies, whereas one had echocardiographic controls only.

RESULTS

One grade 1B rejection episode according to ISHLT (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation) was observed until 1 year after the switch to MMF. One patient was excluded due to gastrointestinal side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from azathioprine to MMF with consecutive reduction of CsA in heart transplant recipients with CsA-impaired renal function improves renal function as evidenced by lower serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, uric acid, and higher creatinine clearance.

Withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been demonstrated to decrease episodes of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. The utility of MMF after 1 year is less clear.

METHODS

Forty-five stable renal transplant recipients on maintenance therapy of cyclosporine microemulsion, MMF, and prednisone had MMF withdrawn at approximately 1 year after transplantation. A matching concurrent group of 45 stable renal transplant recipients served as the case control group.

RESULTS

Two of 45 patients in the MMF withdrawal group suffered an acute rejection episode as opposed to 1 of 45 in the control group. Both patients who rejected in the withdrawal group had adequate cyclosporine levels and had no recent decrease in prednisone dose. There was no evidence of an increased incidence of proteinuria or increased creatinine levels in the MMF withdrawal group.

CONCLUSION

In general, withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated. No increased risk of rejection could be demonstrated in this patient group. A larger study will be needed to confirm our result.

Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil in conjunction with stepwise withdrawal of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now part of standard immunosuppression in the first phase after renal transplantation. A relevant question is if it can replace drugs such as cyclosporine (CsA) in the maintenance treatment, improving cardiovascular risk profile.

METHODS

In 17 patients with a stable renal function (at least 6 months) posttransplantation, we studied the effect of CsA replacement by MMF. After starting MMF (1 g b.i.d.), CsA dosage was reduced from regular to low (median trough level 130 microg/L, respectively, 45 microg/L), followed by complete withdrawal, while prednisone (7.5 mg daily) was continued. We measured ambulatory blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, renal vascular resistance, and metabolic factors at start and after 8 weeks on regular, low-dose CsA, respectively, no CsA with MMF and prednisone.

RESULTS

Two patients dropped out after the switch to low-dose CsA/MMF, due to diarrhea in one and a steroid responsive rejection in the other. The complete switch from CsA to MMF was successful in all 15 patients and accompanied by a decrease in 24 hr systolic blood pressure (from 152+/-13 to 145+/-13 mmHg; P<0.01), diastolic blood pressure (93+/-9 to 89+/-12 mmHg; P<0.05), RVR (0.29+/-0.06 to 0.25+/-0.09 mmHg.ml/min; P<0.05), and an increase in glomerular filtration rate (46.6+/-8.8 to 58.0+/-10.5 ml/min; P<0.01) and renal plasma flow. Intermediate low density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased (0.79+/-0.37 to 0.41+/-0.16 mmol/L; P<0.01). High density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased, but remained in the safe range. After 1 year two patients stopped the MMF; one because of Kaposi's sarcoma and one because of recurrent infections

CONCLUSIONS

The stepwise switch from CsA to MMF was safe and mostly successful, and had beneficial effects on blood pressure, glomerular hemodynamics, and lipid profile. Beneficial trends were already present after partial withdrawal of CsA.

Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: long-term consequences and challenges for the future

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK506) are associated with dose- and efficacy-limiting adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, which may diminish their overall benefits for long-term graft survival. Nephrotoxicity is difficult to distinguish from chronic allograft rejection and is a particular problem in the setting of renal transplantation. Minimizing immunosuppressant-induced nephrotoxicity could improve long-term renal allograft survival. However, to obtain significant long-term improvement in renal allograft outcomes, it may be necessary to adopt new immunosuppressive regimens that rely less on calcineurin inhibitors. Recipients of other transplanted organs, as well as patients with autoimmune diseases who require immunosuppressant therapy, could also benefit from this change in immunosuppressive drug strategy because their healthy, native kidneys are particularly susceptible to the nephrotoxic effects of CsA and FK506. CsA- and FK506-sparing regimens, which use reduced doses of CsA and FK506 in combination with other nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressants, may be the best current option for reducing nephrotoxicity. The chemical immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used as part of CsA- and FK506-sparing regimens that provide improved renal function while maintaining adequate immunosuppression. Such regimens should reduce patient morbidity and mortality. Also, because immunosuppressant-induced nephrotoxicity has been associated with significant financial costs, CsA- and FK506-sparing regimens should result in substantial savings in health care costs.