Long-term nonprogressive human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection in a kidney allograft recipient

Antiretroviral and immunosuppressive drug-drug interactions: an update

With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a chronic disease with more frequent end-stage organ failures. As a result, the question of transplantation in HIV patients is raised more often. However, some of the HAART regimen medications require elimination or metabolism via the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug-resistant protein (MRP) transporters or via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Since these transporters and enzymes are also responsible for the clearance of immunosuppressive drugs, drug-drug interactions are likely to occur. Indeed, profound drug-drug interactions between protease inhibitors and immunosuppressive drugs have been observed and they required reductions in drug dosage. In contrast, HAART using nucleoside or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors without the use of protease inhibitors has been shown to produce less significant drug-drug interactions. It is thus crucial to take into account those potential pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions in order to avoid drug toxicity or a lack of efficacy. The aim of this work was to review and synthesize the international literature on this field in order to give practical recommendations on how to manage immunosuppressive drugs in HIV patients who get transplanted and on how to handle HAART therapy in transplant-recipient patients who get infected with HIV.

Liver transplantation in patients with HIV infection

1. Liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with end-stage liver disease in the era of highly active retroviral therapy has proven to be an effective treatment. The concerns of HIV progression have not been borne out by the growing worldwide experience. 2. CD4 counts are stable and HIV viral load is controllable with medication following liver transplantation. 3. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in HIV-positive recipients is universal, but the severity of recurrence does not appear to be different from that in HIV-negative patients with HCV liver disease. 4. Complex pharmacokinetic interactions between the calcineurin inhibitors used for immunosuppression along with protease inhibitors are present, but management directed at recognizing the need for monitoring levels does not appear to increase the risk of toxicity. 5. The degree of immunosuppression from iatrogenic drug therapy and HIV does not lead to increased risk of infectious complications.

Prolonged survival of rat liver allograft with adenoviral gene transfection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nef

HIV-1 nef is believed to allow immune evasion by modifying cell surface molecules because of certain mechanisms such as downregulation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule complex as well as upregulation of FasL. In the present study, we successfully generated a recombinant adenovirus vector containing HIV-1 nef. We detected the expression of nef in liver infected with AxCANef by immune staining and Western blotting, and confirmed its expression as persistent for more than 4 weeks. Furthermore, the surface expression of MHC class I was downregulated in AxCANef-infected hepatic cells. In addition, we also observed nef-induced FasL upregulation of gene-transfected hepatic cells. Using a DA-to-Lewis orthotopic liver transplantation model, we transfected AxCANef to a liver graft to determine whether nef expression could have an effect on recipient survival. AxCANef significantly prolonged recipient survival time (14.5 days) compared with the uninfected group (11 days) (P <.001) and the AxCALacZ-infected group (11 days) (P <.001). Histologic analysis showed reduction in the number of accumulated inflammatory cells and an increase in apoptotic cells in grafts expressing nef. In conclusion, we showed that the nef gene could prolong survival of rat liver allografts, and this result suggested the potential clinical use of its transfection.

Kidney-pancreas transplantation in a long-term non-progressor HIV-infected recipient

With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV infection has become a chronic disease with more frequent end-stage organ failures. As a result, the question of transplantation in HIV patients is raised more often. Although still subject to controversies, HIV infection is no longer an absolute contraindication to solid organ transplantation. We report a case of combined kidney-pancreas transplantation in a HIV recipient. HIV has remained stable without any antiviral therapy for up to 2 years after transplantation and has reached criteria for inclusion in the long-term nonprogressor (LTNP) group. Grafted organs demonstrated good function without rejection. This case emphasizes the need to consider LTNP HIV patients as a specific subgroup, when discussing solid organ transplantation. HAART is not required, thus sparing drug interactions and their unique immunological features, such as CCR5 mutation, might prevent rejection. This subgroup of HIV patients should be offered less restricted access to transplantation.

Impact of HIV seropositivity on graft and patient survival after cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States in the pre highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era: an historical cohort analysis of the United States Renal Data System

BACKGROUND

National statistics are presented for patient survival and graft survival in patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV+) at the time of renal transplantation in the era prior to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

Historical cohort analysis of 63, 210 cadaveric solitary renal transplant recipients with valid HIV serology entries in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) from 1 January 1987 to 30 June 1997. The medical evidence form was also used for additional variables but, because of fewer available values, was analyzed in a separate model. Outcomes were patient characteristics and survival associated with HIV+ status.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (0.05%) in the study period were HIV+ at transplant. HIV+ patients were comparable to the national renal transplant population in terms of gender and ethnic distribution but were younger and had younger donors and better HLA matching than the USRDS population. Patient and graft three-year survival were significantly reduced in HIV+ recipients (53% graft, 83% patient survival) relative to the USRDS population (73% and 88%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, HIV+ status was independently associated with patient mortality and decreased graft survival in recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis was retrospective and may underestimate the number of HIV+ patients transplanted in the United States. Although the clinical details of patient selection for transplant were unknown, these results show HIV+ patients can have successful outcomes after cadaveric renal transplantation, although outcomes are significantly different from HIV- recipients.