Predictors of renal transplant histology at three months

Evaluation of the efficacy of HEMO2life®, a marine OXYgen carrier for Organ Preservation (OxyOp2) in renal transplantation: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Preventing ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major issue in kidney transplantation, particularly for transplant recipients receiving a kidney from extended criteria donors (ECD). The main consequence of IRI is delayed graft function (DGF). Hypoxia is one of the key factors in IRI, suggesting that the use of an oxygen carrier as an additive to preservation solution may be useful. In the OxyOp trial, we showed that the organs preserved using the oxygen carrier HEMO2life® displayed significantly less DGF. In the OxyOp2 trial, we aim to definitively test and quantify the efficacy of HEMO2life® for organ preservation in a large population of kidney grafts.

METHODS

OxyOp2 is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, comparative, single-blinded, parallel-group study versus standard of care in renal transplantation. After the selection of a suitable donor according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, both kidneys will be used in the study. Depending on the characteristics of the donor, both kidneys will be preserved either in static cold storage (standard donors) or on machine perfusion (for ECD and deceased-after-cardiac-death donors (DCD)). The kidneys resulting from one donor will be randomized: one to the standard-of-care arm (organ preserved in preservation solution routinely used according to the local practice) and the other to the active treatment arm (HEMO2life® on top of routinely used preservation solution). HEMO2life® will be used for ex vivo graft preservation at a dose of 1 g/l preservation solution. The primary outcome is the occurrence of DGF, defined as the need for renal replacement therapy during the first week after transplantation.

DISCUSSION

The use of HEMO2life® in preservation solutions is a novel approach allowing, for the first time, the delivery of oxygen to organs. Improving graft survival by limiting ischemic lesions is a major public-health goal in the field of organ transplantation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04181710 . registered on November 29, 2019.

Chronic Kidney Allograft Disease: New Concepts and Opportunities

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in most countries and kidney transplantation is the best option for those patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Therefore, there is a significant number of patients living with a functioning kidney allograft. However, progressive kidney allograft functional deterioration remains unchanged despite of major advances in the field. After the first post-transplant year, it has been estimated that this chronic allograft damage may cause a 5% graft loss per year. Most studies focused on mechanisms of kidney graft damage, especially on ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmunity, nephrotoxicity, infection and disease recurrence. Thus, therapeutic interventions focus on those modifiable factors associated with chronic kidney allograft disease (CKaD). There are strategies to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, to improve the immunologic risk stratification and monitoring, to reduce calcineurin-inhibitor exposure and to identify recurrence of primary renal disease early. On the other hand, control of risk factors for chronic disease progression are particularly relevant as kidney transplantation is inherently associated with renal mass reduction. However, despite progress in pathophysiology and interventions, clinical advances in terms of long-term kidney allograft survival have been subtle. New approaches are needed and probably a holistic view can help. Chronic kidney allograft deterioration is probably the consequence of damage from various etiologies but can be attenuated by kidney repair mechanisms. Thus, besides immunological and other mechanisms of damage, the intrinsic repair kidney graft capacity should be considered to generate new hypothesis and potential therapeutic targets. In this review, the critical risk factors that define CKaD will be discussed but also how the renal mechanisms of regeneration could contribute to a change chronic kidney allograft disease paradigm.

Donation after circulatory death is associated with increased fibrosis on 1-year post-transplant kidney allograft surveillance biopsy

AIM

The use of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) provides an invaluable expansion of the organ supply for transplantation. Here, we investigated the effect of DCD on fibrotic changes on 1 1-year post 1-transplant surveillance kidney allograft biopsy.

METHODS

Recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant between 2013 and 2017 at a single institution, who survived 1 year and underwent surveillance biopsy, were included in the analysis (n = 333: 87 DCD kidneys, 246 kidneys donated after brain death [DBD]). Banff scores for interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were summed as IFTA and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

DCD and DBD groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. Delayed graft function was 39% in DCD versus 19% in DBD, P = .0002. Patient and graft survival were comparable for DCD and DBD cohorts. IFTA scores were higher in DCD compared to DBD (2.43±..13 vs. 2.01±..08, P = .0054). On multivariate analysis, the odds of IFTA > 2 in the DCD group was 2.5× higher (95%CI: 1.354.63) than in the DBD group. Within the DCD group, kidneys with IFTA > 2 had inferior 5-year graft survival (P = .037).

CONCLUSION

Compared to DBD kidneys, DCD kidneys developed a greater degree of fibrotic changes on 1-year post-transplant surveillance biopsy, which affected graft longevity within the DCD cohort.

Distinct morphological features of acute tubular injury in renal allografts correlate with clinical outcome

Acute tubular injury (ATI) is common in renal allografts and is related to inferior long-term allograft function. However, it is unknown which of the morphological features of ATI can predict outcome and how they should be graded. Here, we examine features of ATI systematically in protocol biopsies and biopsies for cause to define the most predictive features. Analyses included 521 protocol biopsies taken at 6 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo after transplantation and 141 biopsies for cause from 204 patients. Features of ATI included brush border loss, tubular epithelial lucency, flattening, pyknosis, nuclei loss, and luminal debris, each graded semiquantitatively. Additional immunohistochemical stainings were performed for markers of cell injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), cell death [cleaved caspase-3, fatty acid-coenzyme A ligase 4 (FACL4)], and proliferation (K_i-67). Interobserver reliability was good for pyknosis, flattening, and brush border loss and poor for lucency, nuclei loss, and luminal debris. In protocol biopsies between 6 wk and 6 mo, the degree of ATI remained virtually unchanged. Biopsies for cause had generally higher injury scores. Deceased donor source, delayed graft function, ganciclovir/valganciclovir treatment, and urinary tract infection correlated with ATI. The degree of pyknosis, flattening, and brush border loss correlated best with impaired allograft function. FACL4 expression was observed in areas of ATI. Only patients with K_i-67 expression showed stable or improved allograft function in the longitudinal assessment. Reliable assessment of ATI is possible by semiquantitative grading of tubular epithelial cell brush border loss, flattening, and pyknosis. Examination of K_i-67 expression can help determine the potential for recovery from this damage.

[The pathology of renal transplants]

In order to make an objective assessment of the histopathology of a renal biopsy during a kidney transplant, all the various elements involved in the process must be understood. It is important to know the characteristics of the donor organ, especially if the donor is older than 65. The histopathological features of the donor biopsy, especially its vascular status, are often related to an initial poor function of the transplanted kidney. The T lymphocyte inflammatory response is characteristic in acute cellular rejection; the degree of tubulitis, together with the amount of affected parenchyme, are important factors. The proportion of cellular sub-populations, such as plasma cells and macrophages, is also important, as they can be related to antibody-mediated humoral rejection. Immunofluorescent or immunohistochemical studies are necessary to rule out C4d deposits or immunogloblulins. The presence of abundant deposits of C4d in tubular basement membranes supports a diagnosis of humoral rejection, as does the presence of capillaritis, glomerulitis which, together with vasculitis, are typical diagnostic findings in C4d negative cases. Interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy and glomerular sclerosis, although non-specific, imply a chronic phase. Transplant glomerulopathy and multilamination in more than 6 layers of the tubular and glomerular basement membranes are quasi-specific characteristics of chronic humoral rejection. Electron microscopy is essential to identify of these pathologies as well as to demonstrate the presence of other glomerular renal diseases.

A Comparative Study of the Predictive Values of Urinary Acute Kidney Injury Markers Angiogenin and Kidney Injury Molecule 1 for the Outcomes of Kidney Allografts

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Whether injury-related molecules in urines of individuals with ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) are independent predictors of graft outcomes and provide additional information compared with usual risk factors remains to be established.

Methods

We explored a cohort of 244 kidney transplant recipients who systematically had a urine collection 10 days after transplantation. The injury-related markers kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and angiogenin (ANG) levels in urines were measured. We determined the prognostic values of these markers on graft outcomes.

Results

Urinary KIM-1 and ANG concentrations were strongly correlated to each other and were significantly and independently associated with cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, and plasma creatinine 10 days after transplantation, indicating that these markers reflect the severity of IRI. However, urinary ANG and KIM-1 were not predictive of histological changes on protocol biopsies performed 3 and 12 months after transplantation. Finally, urinary ANG and urinary KIM-1 were not associated with graft survival.

Conclusions

Together, our results indicate that, in a cohort of 244 kidney transplant recipients, urinary ANG and KIM-1 levels in a single measurement 10 days after transplantation reflect the severity of IRI after kidney transplantation, but are neither independent predictors of renal function, histological changes and graft survival.

Zero-Time Renal Transplant Biopsies: A Comprehensive Review

Zero-time kidney biopsies, obtained at time of transplantation, are performed in many transplant centers worldwide. Decisions on kidney discard, kidney allocation, and choice of peritransplant and posttransplant treatment are sometimes based on the histological information obtained from these biopsies. This comprehensive review evaluates the practical considerations of performing zero-time biopsies, the predictive performance of zero-time histology and composite histological scores, and the clinical utility of these biopsies. The predictive performance of individual histological lesions and of composite scores for posttransplant outcome is at best moderate. No single histological lesion or composite score is sufficiently robust to be included in algorithms for kidney discard. Dual kidney transplantation has been based on histological assessment of zero-time biopsies and improves outcome in individual patients, but the waitlist effects of this strategy remain obscure. Zero-time biopsies are valuable for clinical and translational research purposes, providing insight in risk factors for posttransplant events, and as baseline for comparison with posttransplant histology. The molecular phenotype of zero-time biopsies yields novel therapeutic targets for improvement of donor selection, peritransplant management and kidney preservation. It remains however highly unclear whether the molecular expression variation in zero-time biopsies could become a better predictor for posttransplant outcome than donor/recipient baseline demographic factors.

Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions

All causes of renal allograft injury, when severe and/or sustained, can result in chronic histological damage of which interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are dominant features. Unless a specific disease process can be identified, what drives interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy progression in individual patients is often unclear. In general, clinicopathological factors known to predict and drive allograft fibrosis include graft quality, inflammation (whether "nonspecific" or related to a specific diagnosis), infections, such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and genetic factors. The incidence and severity of chronic histological damage have decreased substantially over the last 3 decades, but it is difficult to disentangle what effects individual innovations (eg, better matching and preservation techniques, lower CNI dosing, BK viremia screening) may have had. There is little evidence that CNI-sparing/minimization strategies, steroid minimization or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade result in better preservation of intermediate-term histology. Treatment of subclinical rejections has only proven beneficial to histological and functional outcome in studies in which the rate of subclinical rejection in the first 3 months was greater than 10% to 15%. Potential novel antifibrotic strategies include antagonists of transforming growth factor-β, connective tissue growth factor, several tyrosine kinase ligands (epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor), endothelin and inhibitors of chemotaxis. Although many of these drugs are mainly being developed and marketed for oncological indications and diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a number may hold promise in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, which could eventually lead to applications in renal transplantation.

Early Steroid Withdrawal in Recipients of a Kidney Transplant From a Living Donor: Experience of a Single Mexican Center

BACKGROUND

Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) can improve lipid and hemodynamic profiles without severe acute rejection (AR) events in renal transplant patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of ESW on the frequency and severity of AR.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial was performed on renal transplant recipients with a follow-up of 12 months. In the ESW group, patients were selected for corticosteroid treatment withdrawal on the fifth day post transplantation. In the Control group, patients continued with steroid treatment. All patients were over 18 years of age with panel reactive antibody (PRA) class I and II HLA <20%.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients, 37 in the ESW group (52.1%) and 34 in the Control group (47.9%), had comparable AR incidences at the end of the follow-up (16% vs 15%) (NS) (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.32-3.33). Although renal graft survival was similar between the ESW and Control groups (87% vs 94%), renal function was superior in the ESW group (85 vs 75 mL/min). Additionally, hypertension was less frequent in the ESW group (3% vs 35%), requiring the use of fewer antihypertensives (8% vs 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

ESW was also associated with better blood pressure control and similar AR risk. The ESW group exhibited stable renal function.

An Improved Classification of Kidney Function Recovery Using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Slope Post-transplantation

BACKGROUND

The impact of renal function recovery on graft survival was examined using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope after kidney transplantation (GAP classification); this was compared to the conventional classification of immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), and delayed graft function (DGF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 541 cases of cadaveric renal transplants were reviewed from a prospective transplant database. eGFR and its slope were measured using the harmonic mean over the first week post-transplantation. Next, 495 kidney transplant recipients from an independent institution were assessed to determine the prognostic value of graft function based on the eGFR slope.

RESULTS

The main discrimination of eGFR slopes occurred within the first 7 days. Three groups in the GAP classification (Good graft function, Average graft function, Poor graft function) were defined based on eGFR slope tertiles: good graft function (GGF), average graft function (AGF), and poor graft function (PGF) were defined based on the ΔCrCL per day over the first 7 days: <1 mL/min, 1-4 mL/min, and >4 mL/min, respectively. When applied to the validation cohort, the 5-year graft failure was 20% for the PGF group, 4% for the AGF group, and 3% for the GGF group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated better prediction of long-term graft function with the new classification (C statistic 0.49 [old)] vs 0.61 [new]).

CONCLUSION

The new GAP criteria were better at predicting long-term graft survival and renal function compared to the conventional classification system, and deserve further consideration in future studies.

Correlation of acute tubular injury in reperfusion biopsy with renal transplant outcomes

Acute tubular injury (ATI) is common at reperfusion, but its relationship to graft outcomes is unclear. Prior studies lack standardization of morphological assessments and included elements of acute and chronic tubular injury. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ATI on graft outcomes. Reperfusion biopsies from 2004 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. ATI was assessed by a new standardized scoring system. We also assessed chronic injury (CI) by the Banff criteria. Outcomes evaluated included glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 1 and 5 years and delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), graft and patient survival. ATI did not correlate with DGF, AR, graft or overall survival. Mild-moderate ATI was not predictive of GFR post-transplant. Moderate-severe CI was associated with lower GFR at 5 years with a mean difference of -7.14 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P=.04) and overall survival (HR 2.44, P=.01). Other predictors of graft function included donor age, DGF, and AR. Histologic criteria of ATI at implantation in the absence of donor demographics or clinical information do not provide sufficient predictability in outcomes after transplantation. On the other hand, histologic assessment of CI correlates with GFR and overall survival.

Can pre-implantation biopsies predict renal allograft function in pediatric renal transplant recipients?

Objectives:

To determine the utility of pre-implantation renal biopsy (PIB) to predict renal allograft outcomes.

Methods:

This is a retrospective review of all patients that underwent PIB from January 2003 to December 2011 at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London, United Kingdom. Thirty-two male patients (56%) aged 1.5-16 years (median: 10.2) at the time of transplantation were included in the study and followed-up for 33 (6-78) months. The results were compared with 33 controls.

Results:

The PIB showed normal histopathological findings in 13 patients (41%), mild chronic vascular changes in 8 (25%), focal tubular atrophy in one, moderate to severe chronic vascular change in 3, mild to moderate acute tubular damage in 6, and tissue was inadequate in one subject. Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 3 patients; 2 with vascular changes in PIB, and one with normal histopathological findings. Two subjects with PIB changes lost their grafts. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3-, and 6-months post-transplantation was lower in children with abnormal PIB changes compared with those with normal PIB. There was one case of DGF in the control group, and 4 children lost their grafts including the one with DGF.

Conclusion:

Pre-implantation renal biopsy can provide important baseline information of the graft with implications on subsequent medical treatment for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

The Donor Kidney Biopsy and Its Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Despite a growing organ shortage in the United States, many deceased donor kidneys removed for transplantation are discarded. Kidney biopsy findings often play a role in these discards, although it is not clear whether biopsies reliably inform acceptance decisions. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review of the medical literature on the utility of both procurement and implantation biopsies for predicting posttransplant outcomes. Between January 1, 1994 and July 1, 2014, 47 studies were published in the English language literature that examined the association between pretransplant donor biopsy findings from 50 or more donors (with more than half being from deceased donors) and either posttransplant graft failure, delayed graft function, or graft function. In general, study quality was poor. All were retrospective or did not indicate if they were prospective. Results were heterogeneous, with authors as often as not concluding that biopsy results did not predict posttransplant outcomes. The percent glomerular sclerosis was most often examined, and failed to predict graft failure in 7 of 14 studies. Of 15 semiquantitative scoring systems proposed, none consistently predicted posttransplant outcomes across studies. Routine use of biopsies to help determine whether or not to transplant a kidney should be reexamined.

Donor Kidney Evaluation

In patients with end-stage renal disease, kidney transplantation is the best means to extend survival and offer a better quality of life. The current shortage of organs available for transplantation has led to an effort to expand the kidney donor pool, including the use of nonideal donor kidneys. Assessment of the quality of the donated kidney is essential, and would facilitate the decision to transplant a potential organ or discard it. Multiple clinical and histologic parameters have been examined to evaluate the donor kidney and relate the findings to the graft outcome, but clear-cut criteria are yet to be defined.

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy after kidney transplantation: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Chronic transplant dysfunction after kidney transplantation is a major reason of kidney graft loss and is caused by immunological and non-immunological factors. There is evidence that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may exert a positive effect on renal damage in addition to immunosuppression, by its direct antifibrotic properties. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the role of MMF doses on progression of chronic allograft dysfunction and fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA).

SETTING

Retrospective, cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with kidney transplant in a tertiary care institution. This is a retrospective cohort study that included 79 patients with kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of anti-interleukin 2 antibody induction, MMF, a calcineurin inhibitor±steroids.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

An association of average MMF doses over 1 year post-transplant with progression of interstitial fibrosis (Δci), tubular atrophy (Δct) and estimated-creatinine clearance (eCrcl) at 1 year post-transplant was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A higher average MMF dose was significantly independently associated with better eCrcl at 1 year post-transplant (b=0.21±0.1, p=0.04). In multiple regression analysis lower Δci (b=-0.2±0.09, p=0.05) and Δct (b=-0.29±0.1, p=0.02) were independently associated with a greater average MMF dose. There was no correlation between average MMF doses and incidence of acute rejection (p=0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher average MMF dose over 1 year is associated with better renal function and slower progression of IF/TA, at least partly independent of its immunosuppressive effects.

Biological pathways and potential targets for prevention and therapy of chronic allograft nephropathy

Renal transplantation (RT) is the best option for patients with end-stage renal disease, but the half-life is limited to a decade due to progressive deterioration of renal function and transplant failure from chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which is the leading cause of transplant loss. Extensive research has been done to understand the pathogenesis, the biological pathways of fibrogenesis, and potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of CAN. Despite the advancements in the immunosuppressive agents and patient care, CAN continues to remain an unresolved problem in renal transplantation. The aim of this paper is to undertake a comprehensive review of the literature on the pathogenesis, biological pathways of RT fibrogenesis, and potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and therapy of CAN.

Prevalence and risk factors for early chronic allograft nephropathy in a live related renal transplant program

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a common cause of delayed allograft failure throughout the world. Its prevalence and risk factors vary depending on a number of factors. There is little information on the prevalence and risk factors for early CAN in live related renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence and the risk factors of early CAN in our setup.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, from 2002 to 2005 on patients who had live related kidney transplantation and underwent at least one allograft biopsy within 18 months of transplantation. The biopsies were performed and prepared in accordance with established indications and guidelines. The Banff 97 classification and its updates were used to diagnose and categorize the biopsy pathology. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of CAN on biopsies. Following parameters were compared among the groups: age, sex, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, immunosuppression used, acute rejection (AR) episodes, urinary tract infections (UTIs), viral infections, cyclosporine levels, early and late graft function monitored by serum creatinine.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. The mean age of recipients and donors was relatively young. The majority of the donors were siblings. The overall prevalence of CAN was 25.6% (42/164), between 3 and 18 months post transplantation. The median time to the appearance of CAN was 9 months post-transplant. The prevalence of CAN increased as post-transplant duration increased. In 39 (92.8%) subjects, CAN was detected on the second or subsequent graft biopsy. Only 3 (7.2%) patients showed CAN on the first graft biopsy. The majority of cases belonged to moderate degree or grade II CAN. The mean serum creatinine values were higher in the CAN group at the time of discharge and all times post-transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the results show that serum creatinine at the time of discharge is a useful predictor of later development of chronic changes in the allograft. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors for the early development of chronic changes in living related renal transplant program.

The role of procurement biopsies in acceptance decisions for kidneys retrieved for transplant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a shortage of kidneys for transplant, and many patients on the deceased donor kidney transplant waiting list would likely benefit from kidneys that are currently being discarded. In the United States, the most common reason given for discarding kidneys retrieved for transplant is procurement biopsy results. This study aimed to compare biopsy results from discarded kidneys with discard attributed to biopsy findings, with biopsy results from comparable kidneys that were successfully transplanted.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In this retrospective, observational, case-control study, biopsy reports were examined from 83 kidneys discarded in 2010 due to biopsy findings (cases), 83 contralateral transplanted kidneys from the same donor (contralateral controls), and 83 deceased donors randomly matched to cases by donor risk profile (randomly matched controls). A second procurement biopsy was obtained in 64 of 332 kidneys (19.3%).

RESULTS

The quality of biopsy reports was low, with amounts of tubular atrophy, interstitial inflammation, arteriolar hyalinosis, and acute tubular necrosis often not indicated; 69% were wedge biopsies and 94% used frozen tissue. The correlation between first and second procurement biopsies was poor; only 25% of the variability (R(2)) in glomerulosclerosis was explained by biopsies being from the same kidney. The percentages of glomerulosclerosis overlapped substantially between cases, contralateral controls, and randomly matched controls: 17.1%±15.3%, 9.0%±6.6%, and 5.0%±5.9%, respectively. Of all biopsy findings, only glomerulosclerosis>20% was independently correlated with discard (cases versus contralateral controls; odds ratio, 15.09; 95% confidence interval, 2.47 to 92.41; P=0.003), suggesting that only this biopsy result was used in acceptance decisions. One-year graft survival was 79.5% and 90.7% in contralateral and randomly matched controls, respectively, versus 91.6% among all deceased donor transplants in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of biopsies could lead to unnecessary kidney discards.

Distribution and expression of fibroblast-specific protein chemokine CCL21 and chemokine receptor CCR7 in renal allografts

We aimed to characterize the expression and distribution of the fibroblast surface protein (FSP), the chemokine CC-ligand 21 (CCL21) secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) in renal allograft biopsy specimens obtained from patients after transplantation. We recruited 165 patients who received renal transplants at our center for this study. Histological examination of the renal allograft biopsy specimens was performed using hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, and Masson's trichrome staining. Distribution and expression of FSP, CCL21, and CCR7 were determined using immunohistochemistry staining. Serum creatinine levels were evaluated using an enzymatic sarcosine oxidase method. FSP was mainly localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus of renal interstitial fibroblasts and tubular epithelial cells. Compared with the normal group, an elevated number of FSP-positive fibroblasts were observed in patients with acute/active cellular rejection and chronic/sclerosing allograft nephropathy (P < .05). Patients with chronic/sclerosing allograft nephropathy also showed increased total fibroblasts as compared with borderline changes (P < .05). In a multiple regression analysis, CCR7-positive expression was a strong protective factor for acute/active cellular rejection and recurrent nephropathy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.12, P = .034, and OR = 0.08; P = .036, respectively). In contrast, CCL21-positive expression led to a high susceptibility to recurrent nephropathy among renal transplant patients (OR = 10.41, P = .029). Moreover, FSP and CCL21, or CCL21 and CCR7 were localized in the interstitial fibroblasts and renal tubular epithelium cells. In addition, FSP and CCL21 expression positively correlated with serum creatinine levels. Our results suggested that the CCL21/CCR7 signaling pathway is involved in renal fibrosis in kidney transplant patients. An increased number of FSP-positive fibroblasts may be a risk factor for acute/active cellular rejection and chronic/sclerosing allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation. These findings may help understanding of renal allograft fibrosis.

Influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) exert an adverse impact on graft outcomes after kidney transplantation using organs from donation after brain-stem death (DBD) donors. Here, we examine the impact of DGF and AR on graft survival in kidney transplants using organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of DCD and DBD donor kidney transplants. We compared 1- and 4-year graft and patient survival rates, as well as death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates, between the two groups using univariate analysis, and the impact of DGF and AR on graft function was compared using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty DCD and 206 DBD donor transplants were analyzed. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. The incidence of DGF was higher among DCD recipients (73% vs. 27%, P<0.001), and AR was higher among DBD recipients (23% vs. 9%, P<0.001). One-year and 4-year graft survival rates were similar (DCD 94% and 79% vs. DBD 90% and 82%). Among recipients with DGF, the 4-year DCGS rate was better for DCD recipients compared with DBD recipients (100% vs. 92%, P=0.04). Neither DGF nor AR affected the 1-year graft survival rate in DCD recipients, whereas in DBD recipients, the 1-year graft survival rate was worse in the presence of DGF (88% vs. 96%, P=0.04) and the 4-year DCGS rate was worse in the presence of AR (88% vs. 96%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Despite the high incidence of DGF, medium-term outcomes of DCD kidney transplants are comparable to those from DBD transplants. Short-term graft survival from DCD transplants is not adversely influenced by DGF and AR, unlike in DBD transplants.

Chronic histological damage in early indication biopsies is an independent risk factor for late renal allograft failure

The impact of early histological lesions of renal allografts on long-term graft survival remains unclear. We included all renal allograft recipients transplanted at a single center from 1991 to 2001 (N = 1197). All indication biopsies performed within the first year after transplantation were rescored according to the current Banff classification. Mean follow-up time was 14.8 ± 2.80 years. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, arteriolar hyalinosis and transplant glomerulopathy were independently associated with death-censored graft survival, adjusted for baseline demographic covariates. Arteriolar hyalinosis correlated with interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, mesangial matrix increase, vascular intimal thickening and glomerulosclerosis. Clustering of the patients according to these chronic lesions, reflecting the global burden of chronic injury, associated better with long-term graft survival than each of the chronic lesions separately. Early chronic histological damage was an independent risk factor for late graft loss, irrespective whether a specific, progressive disease was diagnosed or not, while T cell-mediated rejection did not. We conclude that individual chronic lesions like arteriolar hyalinosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, mesangial matrix increase and vascular intimal thickening cannot be seen as individual entities. The global burden of early chronic histological damage within the first year after transplantation importantly affects the fate of the allografts.

Impact of cold ischemia time on graft survival among ECD transplant recipients: a paired kidney analysis

Delays in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney placement increases cold ischemia times (CIT) potentially leading to discard. The effect of increased CIT on ECD kidney transplant outcomes is unknown. We evaluated paired ECD kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted to different recipients) from the SRTR registry transplanted between 1995 and 2009 (n = 17,514). To test the effect of CIT, we excluded paired transplants with the same CIT (n = 3286). Of 14,230 recipients (7115 donors) the median difference in CIT was 5 h (Q1 = 3 h, Q3 = 9 h). Delayed graft function (DGF) was significantly more likely between pairs with greater CIT (35% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) including substantially higher rates for CIT differences ≥ 15 h (42%). Overall graft loss was not significantly different between recipients with higher CIT relative to paired donor recipients with lower CIT (p = 0.47) or for pairs with differences of 1-3 h (p = 0.90), 4-9 h (p = 0.41), 10-14 h (p = 0.36) or ≥ 15 h (p = 0.10). Results were consistent in multivariable models adjusted for recipient factors. Although increasing cold ischemia time is a risk factor for DGF among ECD kidney transplants, there is no effect on graft survival which may suggest an important utility for donor kidneys that may not currently be considered viable.

Influence of CIT-induced DGF on kidney transplant outcomes

Increased cold ischemia time (CIT) predisposes to delayed graft function (DGF). DGF is considered a risk factor for graft failure after kidney transplantation, but DGF has multiple etiologies. To analyze the risk of CIT-induced DGF on graft survival, we evaluated paired deceased-donor kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted to different recipients) in which one donor resulted in DGF and the other did not, using national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data between 2000 and 2009. Of 54 565 kidney donors, 15 833 were excluded for mate kidney non-transplantation, 27 340 because both or neither kidney developed DGF and 2310 for same/unknown CIT. The remaining 9082 donors (18 164 recipients) were analyzed. The adjusted odds (aOR) of DGF were significantly higher when CIT was longer by ≥ 1 h (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.7-2.0), ≥ 5 h (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 2.3-2.9), ≥ 10 h (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.7-2.9) and ≥ 15 h (aOR 4.4, 95% CI 3.4-5.8) compared to shorter CIT transplants. In the multivariable models adjusted for recipient characteristics, graft survival between paired donor transplants, with and without DGF, were similar. These results suggest that DGF, specifically induced by prolonged CIT, has limited bearing on long-term outcomes, which may have important implications for kidney utilization.

How delayed graft function impacts exposure to mycophenolic acid in patients after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma concentrations are highly variable on standard-dose mycophenolate mofetil therapy. At creatinine clearances below 25 mL/min, MPA clearance increases as a result of a higher nonprotein-bound fraction. Patients with delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation are exposed to low total MPA concentrations, when risk of rejection is highest. This study investigated the influence of DGF on MPA exposure and on clinical outcome.

METHODS

Adult renal transplantation patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and either microemulsified cyclosporine (n = 459) or tacrolimus (n = 371) participated in a randomized controlled trial (the Fixed-Dose Concentration-Controlled [FDCC] Study). Abbreviated MPA areas under the curve (AUCs) were obtained on Day 3, Day 10, Week 4, and Month 3, to calculate MPA AUC₀₋₁₂. Free MPA AUC values were available for a subgroup of patients (n = 269).

RESULTS

The overall incidence of DGF was 187 of 830 (23%) and did not differ between cyclosporine-treated (24%) and tacrolimus- (21%) treated patients. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was significantly higher in patients with DGF (13.8% versus 21.4%). Patients with DGF had significantly lower dose-corrected MPA AUC on Day 3 and Day 10. Free MPA fraction and dose-corrected free MPA AUC were significantly higher in patients with DGF, from Day 3 until Month 3. The total number of patients with at least one opportunistic infection was significantly higher in patients with DGF (33.2%) compared with patients without DGF (25.8%) (P = 0.048). Patients with DGF developing opportunistic infections did not have higher total MPA AUC nor higher free MPA AUC compared with those without opportunistic infections.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DGF have significantly lower dose-corrected MPA AUC in the first month after renal transplantation, presumably as a result of enhanced MPA clearance on account of the elevated MPA free fraction. Because patients with DGF have a higher rate of acute rejection and lower MPA exposure, higher dosing of mycophenolate mofetil in such patients may improve outcome. However, the already increased incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with DGF is a concern.

Recipient risk factors associated with delayed graft function: a paired kidney analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation that occurs because of a complex interplay between donor organ quality and the biologic milieu of the recipient. The purpose of the study is to better understand the recipient risk factors leading to DGF.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using United Network for Organ sharing data and identified pairs of primary, adult kidney-only transplants that were procured from the same adult donor with discordant occurrence of DGF (i.e., one kidney of the pair had DGF).

RESULTS

A total of 5382 recipient pairs were analyzed. Recipients with DGF were more likely to be male (67% vs. 59%, P<0.01), African American (36% vs. 27%, P<0.01), obese (30% vs. 19%, P<0.01), diabetic (28% vs. 22%, P<0.01), on maintenance dialysis (92% vs. 83%, P<0.01), and to have longer wait-time (571 vs. 471 days, P<0.01), longer cold ischemia time (22 vs. 20 hr, P<0.01), and donor and recipient size mismatch (32% vs. 24%, P<0.01). Multivariable analyses confirmed these associations and identified panel reactive antibody more than 10% and low center volume as additional risk factors for DGF (odds ratio for panel reactive antibody >10%: 1.17, confidence interval 1.05-1.29, P<0.01; and odds ratio for <83 transplants/year: 1.29, confidence interval 1.17-1.44, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

After fully matching for donor factors, many recipient characteristics were noted to be associated with DGF. Better management of modifiable recipient and transplant risk factors such as obesity, wait time, and cold time may help to reduce the occurrence of DGF.

Assessment of kidney organ quality and prediction of outcome at time of transplantation

The critical importance of donor organ quality, i.e., number of surviving nephrons, ability to withstand injury, and capacity for repair in determining short- and long-term outcomes is becoming increasingly clear. This review provides an overview of studies to assess donor kidney quality and subsequent transplant outcomes based on clinical pathology and transcriptome-based variables available at time of transplantation. Prediction scores using clinical variables function when applied to large data sets but perform poorly for the individual patient. Histopathology findings in pre-implantation or post-reperfusion biopsies help to assess structural integrity of the donor kidney, provide information on pre-existing donor disease, and can serve as a baseline for tracking changes over time. However, more validated approaches of analysis and prospective studies are needed to reduce the number of discarded organs, improve allocation, and allow prediction of outcomes. Molecular profiling detects changes not seen by morphology or captured by clinical markers. In particular, molecular profiles provide a quantitative measurement of inflammatory burden or immune activation and reflect coordinated changes in pathways associated with injury and repair. However, description of transcriptome patterns is not an end in itself. The identification of predictive gene sets and the application to an individualized patient management needs the integration of clinical and pathology-based variables, as well as more objective reference markers of transplant function, post-transplant events, and long-term outcomes.

Transcriptome changes of chronic tubulointerstitial damage in early kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tubulointerstitial damage (TID) is a key feature of chronic kidney transplant failure; however, the associated gene expression changes are poorly defined.

METHODS

This pilot study used RNA from 59 protocol kidney transplant biopsies at implantation, 1, 3, and 12 months (n=18 patients), processed into cDNA and hybridized to 8K human cDNA microarrays. Gene expression was correlated with graft histology categorized by the Banff schema.

RESULTS

Gene and pathway expression were differentially activated according to the time after transplantation. Immune pathway activity peaked at 1 month, fibrotic expression at 3 months, wound healing-remodelling and cell proliferation-repair processes were activated between 3 and 12 months, whereas macrophage-related gene expression occurred late by 12 months. Forty percent of genes and 50% pathways initially activated persisted to 3 months. Biopsies with TID displayed 262 differentially expressed genes (P<0.001, B>2 compared with implantation), dominated by upregulated fibrogenic and immune-related genes reflecting unique immune (10% to 15% of genes) and fibrotic (15% vs. 4% in normal) pathway activation. Profibrotic genes were expressed before interstitial fibrosis was observed by sequential microscopic analysis. Kidneys progressing to TID by 3 months demonstrated 30 unique genes (B>1, P<0.05) versus nonprogressors with 95 genes (B>1, P<0.009). Fourteen of these progressor genes also occurred in the top decile from an independent validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

Allografts display predictable immune and fibrotic gene expression profiles, with patterns of expression gradually varying by time after transplantation. The pathology reflects differential activation of intrinsic pathways. Gene expression predated histologic damage, suggesting its possible use in early diagnostic testing.

Molecular pathways involved in loss of graft function in kidney transplant recipients

Interstitial fibrosis (IF) and tubular atrophy (TA) are integral parts of chronic allograft dysfunction and represent in the new classification a separate entity with or without the identification of a specific etiology. Loss of kidney graft function with IF/TA is one of the causes of most kidney allograft losses. Despite progress in immunosuppression, chronic allograft dysfunction remains the main clinical challenge for improving long-term graft survival. The sustained damage to the allograft does not represent a single entity but the summated effects of tissue injury from several pathogenic insults, as well as the kidney's healing response, modified by alloimmunity and immunosuppression. A major challenge in the future of kidney transplantation includes the study of chronic allograft dysfunction pathogenesis to identify early markers of disease progression, as well as potential therapeutics pathways.

Chronic allograft dysfunction: can we use mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to replace calcineurin inhibitors to preserve graft function?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Graft loss after first year of transplantation can be due to composite of factors that may include immunological and nonimmunological factors. Among the nonimmunological factors, toxicity of immunosuppression drugs, especially calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity is perhaps the leading cause of graft dysfunction. The most common phenotype associated with progressive graft dysfunction is the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy not otherwise specified, a hallmark finding of chronic allograft nephropathy as well as CNI toxicity. Protocol biopsies have demonstrated that histological lesions of CNI toxicity can develop as early as 3 months posttransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early detection of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy offers the opportunity for replacement of the CNI with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Early detection of CNI-associated graft damage even before the onset of graft dysfunction is critical to prevent progressive nephron loss. Furthermore, the conversion to sirolimus in patients with advanced graft dysfunction may not be beneficial.

SUMMARY

Until the day transcriptomic assays and high-density microarrays are available routinely to detect the incipient graft injury, early allograft biopsy, preferably during the first 3-6 months of transplantation can detect the presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy not otherwise specified before the onset of graft dysfunction and replacement of CNI with sirolimus could prevent the progressive nephron loss.

[Screening biopsies in kidney transplantation: from subclinical acute rejection to chronic allograft lesions]

Kidney biopsies for screening purposes have the advantage of revealing the early appearance of lesions having a poor prognosis before kidney function is altered. Early screening of subclinical rejections allows preventive treatment of kidney transplantation in patients taking cyclosporine or azathioprine, thus improving their renal function and reducing the incidence of chronic histological lesions. However, this benefit has yet to be demonstrated in patients taking tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid. As for interstitial fibrosis lesions and tubular atrophy, biopsies can screen subclinical immunological lesions or those related to nephrotoxicity of anticalcineurins, which have a negative prognostic value in terms of graft survival. In addition, detection of these lesions could be a very useful criterion of efficacy in clinical studies. Moreover, they could help decide on modifying immunosuppressor treatment and evaluate the therapeutic strategies in patients at risk for humoral rejection. Finally, given the cost of biopsies and the inconvenience for the patient, the question of the timing and the number of screening biopsies is crucial. However, interventional studies evaluating notably immunosuppressor treatment modifications based on histological data are necessary to justify the daily use of screening biopsies.

A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors

The predictive value of pre-implantation biopsies versus clinical scores has not been studied extensively in marginal donors. Pre-implantation biopsies were performed in 313 kidneys from donors that were > or = 50 years of age (training set, n = 191; validation set, n = 122). The value of the donor clinical parameters and histological results in predicting 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was retrospectively evaluated. In multivariate analysis, the only clinical parameters associated with low eGFR were donor hypertension and a serum creatinine level > or =150 micromol/L before organ recovery. Clinical scores (Nyberg and Pessione) were not significantly associated with graft function. Regarding histological parameters, univariate analysis showed that glomerulosclerosis (GS) (p = 0.02), arteriolar hyalinosis (p = 0.03) and the Pirani (p = 0.02) and chronic allograft damage index (CADI) (p = 0.04) histological scores were associated with low eGFR. The highest performance in predicting low eGFR was achieved using a composite score that included donor serum creatinine (> or =150 micromol/L or <150 micromol/L), donor hypertension and GS (> or =10% or <10%). The validation set confirmed the critical importance of taking into account biopsy and clinical parameters during marginal donor evaluation. In conclusion, clinical scores are weak predictors of graft outcomes with marginal donors. Instead, a simple and convenient composite score strongly predicts graft function and survival and may facilitate optimal allocation of marginal donors.

The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure

Despite the common use of diagnostic pretransplant deceased donor kidney biopsy, there is no consensus on the prognostic significance of the pathologic findings. In order to assist clinicians with interpretation we analyzed 371 pretransplant biopsies and correlated the findings with graft failure. Glomerular pathology was assessed with percent glomerulosclerosis (GS), glomerular size and periglomerular fibrosis (PGF); vascular pathology with arterial wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) and arteriolar hyalinosis and interstitial pathology with measurement of cumulative fibrosis and presence of scar. Using two-thirds of the study population as a model-development cohort, we found that biopsy features independently associated with an increased risk of graft failure were GS > or =15%, interlobular arterial WLR > or =0.5 and the presence of PGF, arteriolar hyalinosis or scar. The Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI), was developed from these parameters and validated on the remaining one-third of the population. Five-year actuarial graft survival was 90% for kidneys with MAPI scores between 0 and 7, 63% for scores from 8 to 11 and 53% for scores from 12 to 15 (p < 0.001). We conclude MAPI may help transplant physicians estimate graft survival from the preimplantation biopsy findings, in clinical situations similar to this study population (cold ischemia over 24 h, GS < 25%).

Four stages and lack of stable accommodation in chronic alloantibody-mediated renal allograft rejection in Cynomolgus monkeys

The etiology of immunologically mediated chronic renal allograft failure is unclear. One cause is thought to be alloantibodies. Previously in Cynomolgus monkeys, we observed a relationship among donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), C4d staining, allograft glomerulopathy, allograft arteriopathy and progressive renal failure. To define the natural history of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and its effect on renal allograft survival, we now extend this report to include 417 specimens from 143 Cynomolgus monkeys with renal allografts. A subset of animals with long-term renal allografts made DSA (48%), were C4d positive (29%), developed transplant glomerulopathy (TG) (22%) and chronic allograft arteriopathy (CAA) (19%). These four features were highly correlated and associated with statistically significant shortened allograft survival. Acute cellular rejection, either Banff type 1 or 2, did not correlate with alloantibodies, C4d deposition or TG. However, endarteritis (Banff type 2) correlated with later CAA. Sequential analysis identified four progressive stages of chronic antibody-mediated rejection: (1) DSA, (2) deposition of C4d, (3) TG and (4) rising creatinine/renal failure. These new findings provide strong evidence that chronic antibody-mediated rejection develops without enduring stable accommodation, progresses through four defined clinical pathological stages and shortens renal allograft survival.

Acute tubular injury in protocol biopsies of renal grafts: prevalence, associated factors and effect on long-term function

Acute tubular injury (ATI) is commonly observed in renal allografts, especially early after transplantation. This study analyzes prevalence and associated clinical conditions of ATI in serial protocol biopsies (pBx) and indication biopsies (iBx), and its impact on long-term graft function. 612 pBx from 204 patients taken at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 151 iBx performed within the first year of transplantation were evaluated. Prevalence of ATI in pBx was 40% (6 weeks), 34% (3 months) and 37% (6 months), and 46% in iBx. ATI was associated with delayed graft function and prolonged cold ischemia time in pBx, and with acute rejections in iBx. The GFR at 1 and 2 years after transplantation correlated inversely with the frequency of ATI in both pBx and iBx (p < 0.001). Prevalence of chronic changes at 6 months was not significantly related to ATI (patients without ATI: 36%, patients with multiple ATI findings: 54%). ATI is linked to inferior long-term graft function. While this suggests lack of recovery from ATI with permanent allograft damage, the underlying molecular mechanisms need yet to be uncovered. Prevention of the potential pathogenetic factors identified in this study might be the key point to attain good long-term graft function.

Long-term renal outcomes after delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) describes dysfunction of the kidney allograft immediately after transplantation and is the most common complication in the immediate posttransplantation period. Although a standardized definition for DGF is lacking, it is most commonly defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. DGF is caused by a variety of factors related to the donor and recipient as well as organ procurement techniques. The occurrence of DGF affects both allograft and patient outcomes. In addition to prolonging hospital stay and increasing the costs associated with transplantation, DGF is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection after transplantation and is associated with poorer long-term graft outcomes. Both immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms contribute to DGF. The risk factors for DGF that have been identified are reviewed as well as the impact of DGF on long-term outcomes.

Immunosuppressive drug therapy and subclinical acute renal allograft rejection: impact and effect

The incidence of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) varies between 5% and 15% with current maintenance immunosuppressive drug regimens. Despite many similarities between SCAR and clinical acute rejection exist, the inflammatory activated cell infiltrates are not completely identical while graft cytokine profiles and counteractive immune responses are characterized by subtle differences that could explain why SCAR is not accompanied by immediate graft dysfunction. Evidence that SCAR contributes to chronic allograft damage (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) and negatively affects graft outcome is counterbalanced by the scarcity of controlled data proving the beneficial effect of SCAR treatment. The development of sensitive and specific noninvasive methods to monitor the immune status of the graft by using mRNA determinations, gene expression analysis (microarrays), proteomic analysis, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, can help to ultimately replace protocol biopsies and also contribute to the further unraveling of the complex underlying immunological mechanisms responsible for SCAR. The latter would enable clinicians to preemptively make strategic adjustments to immunosuppressive therapy in an attempt to further improve renal allograft survival and clinical care of the transplant patient.

Chronic allograft nephropathy: what have we learned from protocol biopsies?

Chronic allograft nephropathy, characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, is still a major cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation. The complex pathophysiology of chronic allograft nephropathy is still poorly understood, and could be clarified by a more systematic performance of implantation and protocol biopsies of the renal allograft. This review highlights the contribution of implantation and protocol biopsies to our current knowledge of the complex interaction of multiple processes, ultimately leading to the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in the transplanted kidney. In addition, the safety and the limitations of protocol biopsies are discussed, as well as potential future directions for clinical practice and clinical research.

Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The term delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly used to describe the need for dialysis after receiving a kidney transplant. DGF increases morbidity after transplantation, prolongs hospitalization and may lead to premature graft failure. Various definitions of DGF are used in the literature without a uniformly accepted technique to identify DGF.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all of the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

RESULTS

We identified 18 unique definitions for DGF and 10 diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of heterogeneous clinical criteria to define DGF has certain limitations. It will lead to delayed and sometimes inaccurate diagnosis of DGF. Hence a diagnostic test that identifies DGF reliably and early is necessary. Heterogeneity, in the definitions used for DGF, hinders the evolution of a diagnostic technique to identify DGF, which requires a gold standard definition. We are in need of a new definition that is uniformly accepted across the kidney transplant community. The new definition will be helpful in promoting better communication among transplant professionals and aids in comparing clinical studies of diagnostic techniques to identify DGF and thus may facilitate clinical trials of interventions for the treatment of DGF.

The utility of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled study

Identification of pathological events in the renal allograft using protocol biopsies at predetermined time intervals may yield useful information and improve outcomes. We examined the influence of decisions taken on the basis of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies findings on 1-year renal allograft function in a prospective randomized study. Out of 102 living-donor allograft recipients, 52 were randomized to undergo protocol biopsies and 50 controls had only indicated biopsies. All acute rejection (AR) episodes (clinical and subclinical) were treated. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose adjustments were made on clinical judgment. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, immunosuppressive drug usage, HLA matches and 2-h cyclosporine levels were similar in both groups. At 1 and 3 months, protocol biopsies revealed borderline (BL) changes in 11.5% and 14% patients, AR in 17.3% and 12% and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 3.8% and 10%. The incidence of clinically evident AR episodes was similar in the two groups, but biopsy group had lower serum creatinine at 6 months (p = 0.0003) and 1 year (p < 0.0001). The renal functions were similar in those with normal histology and BL changes. Protocol biopsies are helpful in detecting subclinical histological changes in the graft and improving short-term renal allograft function.

Can donor implantation renal biopsy predict long-term renal allograft outcome?

BACKGROUND

Donor kidney implantation biopsy (IB) is performed on a regular basis, particularly as part of clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of donor implantation renal biopsy to predict the long-term renal allograft outcome.

METHODS

A Medline search for studies in English was performed with the following key words: implantation biopsy, renal transplantation and long-term outcome.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials involving 8,122 kidney transplants were identified, of which 6 were prospective studies. The histological abnormalities were scored mainly by the Banff schema and the graft outcome was defined either by delineating the delta changes in the pathology score or glomerular filtration rate. Normal histology with a well-functioning renal allograft had a favorable outcome. The extent to which the baseline tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis and vascular changes had on the long-term outcome varied from one study to another.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal IB has a better chance of predicting early graft outcome. The review questions the current wisdom for routine IB on all donors. In some donor kidneys, a biopsy provides significant prognostic information, such as older donor kidney, those with history of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidneys with abnormal creatinine. Future research on IB is necessary to find a more useful method to predict the long-term transplant outcome.