NOF-11: a one-year pediatric randomized double-blind comparison of neoral versus sandimmune in orthotopic liver transplantation

Development of a Pediatric Relative Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Database and Identification of Putative Risk Factors Associated With Evaluation of Pediatric Oral Products

Generally, bioequivalence (BE) studies of drug products for pediatric patients are conducted in adults due to ethical reasons. Given the lack of direct BE assessment in pediatric populations, the aim of this work is to develop a database of BE and relative bioavailability (relative BA) studies conducted in pediatric populations and to enable the identification of risk factors associated with certain drug substances or products that may lead to failed BE or different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in relative BA studies in pediatrics. A literature search from 1965 to 2020 was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify BE studies conducted in pediatric populations and relative BA studies conducted in pediatric populations. Overall, 79 studies covering 37 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were included in the database: 4 bioequivalence studies with data that passed BE evaluations; 2 studies showed bioinequivalence results; 34 relative BA studies showing comparable PK parameters, and 39 relative BA studies showing differences in PK parameters between test and reference products. Based on the above studies, common putative risk factors associated with differences in relative bioavailability (DRBA) in pediatric populations include age-related absorption effects, high inter-individual variability, and poor study design. A database containing 79 clinical studies on BE or relative BA in pediatrics has been developed. Putative risk factors associated with DRBA in pediatric populations are summarized.

Long term management of liver transplant rejection in children

The current management of hepatic allograft rejection after liver transplantation in children requires effective baseline immunosuppression to prevent rejection and rapid diagnosis and treatment to manage acute rejection episodes. The subsequent impact on chronic rejection is dependent on the combination of adequate prevention and the treatment of acute rejection. Tacrolimus is a macrolide lactone that inhibits the signal transduction of interleukin-2 (IL-2) via calcineurin inhibition. Introduced in 1989, tacrolimus was first used in the salvage of refractory acute or chronic rejection under cyclosporin or to rescue patients with significant cyclosporin-related complications. The majority of paediatric transplant centres use a combination of steroids with tacrolimus as a basic immunosuppressant regimen following paediatric liver transplantation. This combination has allowed the acute cellular rejection-free rate to increase to between 30 and 60%, while lowering the rate of refractory rejection to less than 5%. Corticosteroid-resistant rejection is commonly treated with monoclonal (muromonab CD3) or polyclonal preparations. Although most episodes of acute cellular rejection occur during the first 6 weeks after liver transplant, the appearance of late acute liver allograft rejection must raise the question of noncompliance, especially in the adolescent population. Chronic rejection is becoming increasingly rare under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Tacrolimus is effective in reversing refractory acute cellular rejection or early chronic rejection in patients initially treated with cyclosporin-based regimens. Patients with a history of noncompliance as well as children with autoimmune liver disease are at risk of chronic rejection. Retransplantation therapy for chronic rejection has, fortunately, become more rare in the tacrolimus era with only 3% of retransplants being performed for this indication. Newer immunosuppressive agents are further modifying the long term management of liver allograft rejection. These include mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin and IL-2 antibodies such as daclizumab. The development of these agents is allowing patient-specific immunosuppressive management to minimise rejection as well as the complications related to immunosuppression.

Cyclosporine monitoring in the early post-transplant period in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Monitoring of CsA blood levels two h post-dose (C2) has shown a higher correlation to drug exposure than monitoring of trough levels (C0) at least in adults, but initial doses and target blood levels of CsA have yet to be established in pediatric transplant patients. The objectives of the study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of CsA administered by NGT in the first days after transplantation and the dose of Sandimmun Neoral required to achieve minimum therapeutic range blood levels. This study included 20 pediatric liver transplant recipients (mean age of 3.2 yr) treated with CsA administered by NGT from day one post-transplant until they were able to ingest oral medication. The study was continued until one yr of post-transplant follow-up. Eight h pharmacokinetic profiles were performed on days one, three, and five post-transplant to determine the minimum dose required to achieve the therapeutic range. All children received an initial dose of 15 mg/kg/day of CsA by NGT. Mean CsA doses administered on days one, three, and five were 16.8, 29.5, and 36.5 mg/kg/day, respectively. Mean C0 levels of 119, 310, and 337 ng/mL and mean C2 levels of 213, 753, and 888 ng/mL were obtained. No correlation was found between C0 and C2 levels and the AUC(0-8 h). Intravenous administration of CsA was required in 55% of patients. The biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate was 45%, with graft and patient survival rates of 95 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor absorption of CsA in small children requires a considerable increase in dose. CsA exposure cannot be estimated by single C0 or C2 determinations in the early post-transplant period.

Pharmacologic monitoring and outcomes of cyclosporine

Cyclosporine was introduced into clinical transplantation as an immunosuppressive agent 20 years ago. Cyclosporine is a critical dose drug with a narrow therapeutic index and requires monitoring through blood levels to avoid rejection through underexposure or toxicity through overexposure. Traditional monitoring was by measuring the trough level taken 12 hours after an oral dose, but the results correlated poorly with drug dose, toxicity, and outcome. Monitoring cyclosporine by calculating total drug exposure correlated better with outcome but was time consuming and labour intensive. An abbreviated measure of exposure over the first 4 hours after administration was found to predict outcome and allow dose adjustment. This was based on the observation that the majority of variability in the absorption of the drug was during the first 4 hours after administration--the absorption phase--and this was not reflected in the trough level. Cyclosporine exerts its immunosuppressive action by inhibition of calcineurin. The peak of this inhibition occurs during the peak concentration of the drug, which occurs during the absorption phase. On the basis of the fact that as a single time point the 2-hour level was the best surrogate marker of the maximum level, a strategy for monitoring by 2-hour levels (C2) evolved. It was shown in all organ types to be the best single point predictor of exposure and has led to an improvement in outcome both in de novo and in maintenance transplant patients.

Impact of cyclosporine on the development of immunosuppressive therapy

With the advent of cyclosporine (CsA) 20 years ago, graft survival increased considerably to more than 80% at 2 years posttransplant. The early formulation of CsA, Sandimmun, is effective in preventing organ rejection, although its absorption profile means it is subject to a high degree of variability. The development of a microemulsion formulation, Neoral, provided a therapy with superior efficacy in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation with an improved pharmacokinetic profile. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including CsA, have a narrow therapeutic range, so frequent blood measurements to control drug levels are required. Recent research has demonstrated that the measurement of blood CsA concentration at 2 hours postdosing--C2 monitoring--has the potential to optimize efficacy and reduce the side effects associated with CNI use. In heart and de novo kidney transplantation, C2 monitoring may help to further reduce the incidence of acute rejection, while in maintenance renal transplant recipients, C2 monitoring can help to detect overexposure and thus allows safe dose reduction, which may improve blood pressure and renal function. C2 monitoring thus facilitates a better balance between effective Neoral immunosuppression and unwanted side effects. Today, CsA remains the cornerstone of immunosuppression, and ongoing studies aim to further optimize patient management strategies with Neoral. With other trials evaluating the impact of Neoral in combination with newer therapies such as Certican, myfortic, and FTY720, the use of CsA in transplant recipients looks set to continue.

Evolution of immunosuppression in liver transplantation: contribution of cyclosporine

Liver transplantation has become the standard therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure, with excellent outcomes in terms of quality of life and length of survival. The use of immunosuppressive agents, without any doubt, has played a crucial role in the establishment of this technique and improved short- and long-term survival rates. Eventually, mortality from acute or chronic rejection may be entirely eliminated. Minimizing the adverse effects of immunosuppressive agents is essential to improve long-term survival and quality of life. In this chapter, we review the history of immunosuppressive agents for liver transplantation with consideration of the pre- and the postcyclosporine eras. We also review the development and contributions of cyclosporine, the excellent outcomes from C2 monitoring, comparisons between the cyclosporine microemulsion and the oil-based formula, as well as between cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus. In addition, details are provided on the newer immunosuppressive agents: mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and the IL-2 receptor antagonists, as well as agents in development: CAMPATH 1-H, thymoglobulin, everolimus, FT720, and FK778.

Neoral dose monitoring using 2-hour cyclosporine post-dose levels in stable children with liver transplants: improvement in renal function

In adult liver transplant recipiens, 2-h post-Neoral (C2) dose monitoring is associated with a lower incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection and improved renal function than C0 (trough level) monitoring. This study examined whether switching from C0 to C2 monitoring during maintenance also improves renal function in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Three boys aged 11-16 yr with stable graft function at 6-50 months after liver transplantation were switched from C0 to C2 monitoring. Median C0 was 148 ng/mL (range 100-186), and median C2 was 767 ng/mL (range 702-1187). At the time of conversion, C2 levels exceeded the recommended targets (0-6 months 1000 ng/mL; > 12 months 600 ng/mL in all children). Within 3 months, serum creatinine level decreased by a median of 42.8%, and glomerular filtration rate increased by a median of 86%. No clinical or biochemical evidence of rejection was noted during the 6-month follow-up. Our results suggest that in pediatric liver transplant recipients, C2 monitoring is associated with greater improvement in renal function than C0 monitoring; switching to C2 monitoring can correct cyclosporine-associated toxicity.

A pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of cyclosporin A. Berlin, Germany, November 19, 2001

A meeting of 14 transplant and pharmacokinetic specialists from Europe and North America was convened in November 2001 to evaluate scientific and clinical data regarding the use of different formulations of cyclosporin A (CsA). The following consensus was achieved. (1) CsA is a critical-dose drug with a narrow therapeutic window. Clinical outcomes after transplantation are affected by the pharmacokinetic properties of CsA, particularly by its bioavailability, and by intrapatient variability in CsA exposure. (2) Standard bioequivalence criteria do not address differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between transplant recipients and healthy volunteers, or between subpopulations of transplant recipients. (3) In some circumstances, currently available formulations of CsA that meet standard bioequivalence criteria are likely to be nonequivalent with respect to pharmacokinetic characteristics. (4) The choice of CsA formulation can affect the short- and long-term clinical outcome. Currently, there is a lack of clinical comparisons between generic CsA formulations and the Neoral formulation (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey). Initial retrospective data from the Collaborative Transplant Study suggest that use of generic CsA formulations may result in reduced graft survival at 1 year. (5) Management of transplant recipients by monitoring Neoral concentrations 2 hours after dosing (C(2)) reduces the incidence and severity of acute rejection compared with monitoring of trough concentrations with no increase in toxicity. C(2) monitoring has been developed based on the pharmacokinetics of Neoral only and has not been evaluated or validated for generic formulations of CsA. (6) The major costs of care after transplantation relate to the management of poor clinical outcomes and toxicity. CsA formulations with different pharmacokinetic properties may be associated with varying clinical outcomes, which would be expected to affect total health care costs. (7) The transplant physician is responsible for selecting immunosuppressive agents and formulations for his or her patients. Any switch between CsA formulations in a particular patient should take place only in a controlled setting with adequate pharmacokinetic monitoring.

Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation

Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide immunosuppressant that interferes with the activity of T cells chiefly via calcineurin inhibition. The original oil-based oral formulation of this drug (Sandimmun)l was characterised by high intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, with poor bioavailability in many patients; a novel microemulsion formulation (Neoral)1 was therefore developed to circumvent these problems. Studies show increases, attributable chiefly to improved absorption in patients who absorb the drug only poorly from the original formulation, in mean systemic exposure to cyclosporin with the microemulsion, with no clinically significant differences in tolerability or drug interaction profiles. Cyclosporin microemulsion is at least as effective as the oil-based formulation in renal, liver and heart transplant recipients, with trends towards decreased incidence of acute rejection with the microemulsion formulation in some (statistically significant in a few) trials. Cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus appear to have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection episodes in most renal, pancreas-kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients. However, there are indications of superior efficacy for tacrolimus in some trials, particularly in the prevention of severe acute rejection and in Black transplant recipients. Current 12-month data also indicate equivalent efficacy of sirolimus in renal transplantation. Conversion from the oil-based to microemulsion formulation in stable renal, liver and heart transplant recipients is achievable with no change in acute rejection rates. The addition of an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody and/or mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin microemulsion plus corticosteroids decreases rates of acute rejection; corticosteroid withdrawal without increased acute rejection rates was also achieved on the addition of these agents in some trials. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown savings in direct healthcare costs in kidney or liver transplantation when cyclosporin microemulsion is used in preference to the oil-based formulation, although studies incorporating indirect costs or expressing costs in terms of therapeutic outcomes are currently unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of cyclosporin microemulsion has consolidated the place of the drug as a mainstay of therapy in all types of solid organ transplantation; research into optimisation of outcomes through more effective therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving this formulation is ongoing. Several novel immunosuppressants have been introduced in recent years: further clinical and pharmacoeconomic research will be needed to clarify the relative positioning of these agents, particularly with respect to specific patient groups. Other new drugs (basiliximab/daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil) offer particular advantages when used in combination with cyclosporin.