Economic analysis of basiliximab in renal transplantation

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; basiliximab is used to allow delayed introduction of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation and thus delay their renal insult. However, there is only little evidence for the safety and the efficacy of this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of basiliximab induction in liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 89 patients who were classified into two groups: standard triple immunosuppression (IS) regimen of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 47) and induction IS regimen of basiliximab, low dose steroids and MMF with delayed introduction of CNI (n = 42). All patients were followed after liver transplantation for at least six months or until death.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft dysfunction, infection rate or type, or wound healing between both groups. The acute rejection rate was equivalent in both groups. Renal dysfunction in the first six months post-transplant was less in the basiliximab group in comparison to the other group (7.1% and 19.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients.

Basiliximab: efficacy and safety evaluation in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). When administered intravenously at a dosage of 20 mg at the time of transplantation and 4 days later, basiliximab saturates the alpha chain of IL-2R for 4 weeks.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation. Randomized controlled trials showed that basiliximab can significantly reduce the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the risk of adverse events. When compared with other antibodies used for induction, basiliximab showed efficacy and safety profiles similar to daclizumab, another monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of IL-2R. In comparison with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins (rATG), basiliximab showed a similar efficacy. However, in patients at higher risk of rejection, rATG proved to be more effective. No serious safety problems related to basiliximab have been reported.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a solid evidence that basiliximab can significantly decrease the risk of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients without increasing adverse events. This can allow decreased dosage or avoidance of glucocorticoids and reduced dosage of calcineurin inhibitors. On the basis of efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration, and cost effectiveness, basiliximab may be considered the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in standard renal transplant recipients.

Pharmaceutical costs of desensitization therapy in patients awaiting lung transplantation in France

BACKGROUND

Based on solid experience in renal transplant, new treatments aiming to decrease anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in patients awaiting lung transplant have recently been developed. The off-label use of high-dose intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulins (IVIg) and/or plasmapheresis changes the economical weight of pharmaceutical cost before lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the budgetary impact of pharmaceutical costs of desensitization therapy.

METHODS

Two observational studies were conducted in 2009 and 2010 at the Bichat Claude Bernard (BCB) hospital in France. The first assessed the real pharmaceutical costs, and identified cost drivers, of desensitized (D+) patients awaiting lung transplantation. The second compared pharmaceutical and clinical data between D+ and non-treated (D-) patients.

RESULTS

The major cost drivers were IVIg, representing 89.7 % of pharmaceutical costs. The real cost of drugs was €4,392 ± 647 per hospitalization. Mean hospitalization and annual pharmaceutical costs per patient were significantly higher for D+ than for D- patients (€6,972 vs. 2,925 and €13,074 vs. 399). D+ patients had a significantly higher average number of annual hospitalizations than did D- patients. Total IVIg costs represented 98 % of the pharmaceutical costs for desensitization stays. Pharmaceutical costs represented 40 % of total hospitalization costs for D+ versus only 7 % for D-.

CONCLUSION

New desensitization protocols can help to manage the immunological hurdle of anti-donor antibodies in lung transplantation. They are expensive and not yet correctly covered by national health insurance, as they are supported by hospital budgets. A medico-economical evaluation of IVIg use in this indication seems necessary.

Are there real advantages of induction therapy with basiliximab in renal transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have supported the use of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists as induction therapy in renal transplantation. This strategy has reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) but not improved graft survival. Our objective was to investigate the impact of induction therapy using the IL-2R antagonist basiliximab, as compared with no induction therapy, on relevant clinical outcomes-initial length of stay, incidence of ARE, long-term graft function, and graft survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients transplanted in a tertiary care center between 1996 and 2011. We selected patients who received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone (n = 334) to classify as: no induction therapy (n = 131; group 1); induction therapy with basiliximab (n = 203; group 2). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was assessed with the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 72.7 ± 35.4 months. Patients who received basiliximab had a shorter mean hospital stay (19.2 versus 22.5 days; P = .02), lower incidence of ARE (10.8% versus 23.7%; P = .02) and better graft function post transplantation at 12 months (mean eGFR 59.4 ± 18.4 versus 54.8 ± 18.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .015) and 5 years (mean eGFR 64.1 ± 21.5 versus 55.4 ± 19.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .009). On multivariate analysis, induction therapy with basiliximab was independently associated with a lower incidence of ARE and better graft function at 1 and 5 years after transplantation. There was no difference in 5-year graft survival between the two groups (log-rank: P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with basiliximab was associated with a reduced incidence of ARE and better long-term graft function but no difference in 5-year graft survival.

Induction treatment with monoclonal antibodies for heart transplantation

Individualization of induction therapy for heart transplantation (HT) is needed, given that only patients at significant risk for fatal rejection seem to present a favorable risk-benefit ratio. The question whether monoclonal interleukin 2 antagonists or antilymphocyte antibodies should be recommended remains unanswered. As most studies suggest that they have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection, other variables related to safety or management costs should be taken into account. The cytokine release syndrome, associated with the use of OKT3, complicates management of HT patient. The experience in our center with 2 consecutive cohorts, treated with basiliximab (BAS) and OKT3, respectively, suggests that the use of BAS is associated, in addition to similar immunosuppressive efficacy and better safety profile than OKT3, with simpler patient management during the initial hospital stay, which could be associated with a reduction in posttransplant costs. Because few centers continue to use OKT3 as induction therapy in HT, more studies comparing cost-effectiveness of BAS vs polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies (ATG) are needed.

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily since their introduction, but the proportion of new transplant recipients receiving IL2Ra differs around the globe, with 27% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 70% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically identify and summarise the effects of using an IL2Ra, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to another immunosuppressive induction strategy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify new records, and authors of included reports were contacted for clarification where necessary.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing IL2Ra to placebo, no treatment, other IL2Ra or other antibody therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and assessed independently by two authors, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 71 studies (306 reports, 10,537 participants). Where IL2Ra were compared with placebo (32 studies; 5,784 patients) graft loss including death with a functioning graft was reduced by 25% at six months (16 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.98) and one year (24 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), but not beyond this. At one year biopsy-proven acute rejection was reduced by 28% (14 studies: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.81), and there was a 19% reduction in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97). There was a 64% reduction in early malignancy within six months (8 studies: RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.86), and creatinine was lower (7 studies: MD -8.18 micromol/L 95% CI -14.28 to -2.09) but these differences were not sustained.When IL2Ra were compared to ATG (16 studies, 2211 participants), there was no difference in graft loss at any time point, or for acute rejection diagnosed clinically, but the was benefit of ATG therapy over IL2Ra for biopsy-proven acute rejection at one year (8 studies:, RR 1.30 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67), but at the cost of a 75% increase in malignancy (7 studies: RR 0.25 95% CI 0.07 to 0.87) and a 32% increase in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.68 95% CI 0.50 to 0.93). Serum creatinine was significantly lower for IL2Ra treated patients at six months (4 studies: MD -11.20 micromol/L 95% CI -19.94 to -2.09). ATG patients experienced significantly more fever, cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions to drug administration and more leucopenia but not thrombocytopenia. There were no significant differences in outcomes according to cyclosporine or tacrolimus use, azathioprine or mycophenolate, or to the study populations baseline risk for acute rejection. There was no evidence that effects were different according to whether equine or rabbit ATG was used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given a 38% risk of rejection, per 100 recipients compared with no treatment, nine recipients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one recipient having rejection, 42 to prevent one graft loss, and 38 to prevent one having CMV disease over the first year post-transplantation. Compared with ATG treatment, ATG may prevent some experiencing acute rejection, but 16 recipients would need IL2Ra to prevent one having CMV, but 58 would need IL2Ra to prevent one having malignancy. There are no apparent differences between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects.

Probabilistic modeling of cytomegalovirus infection under consensus clinical management guidelines

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen after renal transplantation and remains a major therapeutic challenge with important clinical and economic implications from both direct and indirect consequences of infection.

METHODS

This 5-year study modeled the relationship between CMV infection and biopsy-proven graft rejection, graft loss, or death after renal transplantation in an inception cohort using Canadian consensus guidelines for CMV management as a component of a detailed cost-analysis of viral infection.

RESULTS

Probabilities of CMV viremia and syndrome/disease among 270 sequential graft recipients were 0.27 and 0.09, respectively; 91% of cases occurred in the first 6 months. Probability of CMV infection as the first event was 0.29, with a probability of subsequent biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) of 0.05 (mean: 62+/-26 days, range: 32-85 days), whereas the probability of BPAR as the first event was 0.18, with a probability of subsequent CMV infection of 0.38 (mean: 63+/-31, range: 27-119 days). Probability of freedom from both CMV infection and BPAR throughout the period of observation was 0.53. Time-dependent Cox analysis showed that neither donor/recipient CMV risk stratum nor CMV infection influenced the risks of BPAR (P=0.24; P=0.74) or of graft loss or death (P=0.26; P=0.34). In contrast, BPAR significantly increased the risk of both subsequent CMV infection (hazard ratio=1.77, P=0.03) and of graft loss or death (hazard ratio=8.31, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although current antiviral therapy seems to mitigate the reported deleterious effects of CMV infection on BPAR or graft survival, BPAR remains a significantly risk factor for both CMV infection and functional graft survival.

The use of consensus guidelines for management of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection imposes a significant economic burden on susceptible patients after renal transplantation. Our study was conducted to determine the prediction, probability, consequences, and treatment costs of CMV infection under Canadian consensus guidelines in 270 sequential transplant patients. Transplant patients from donors positive (D(+)) for CMV into recipients negative (R(-)) for CMV received antiviral prophylaxis for 14 weeks and all but donor negative (D(-))/R(-) patients were monitored weekly for the CMVpp65 marker expression. Marker-positive patients and patients with CMV infection or disease received antiviral treatment. Within the first 6 months, 27% of the 270 patients tested had incidences of asymptomatic CMV infection, while 9% had CMV syndrome or disease. Only 1% of patients had infection after 6 months. The CMVpp65 marker levels were significantly greater in patients with syndrome or disease; but post-test probabilities and predictive value of the marker assay were low. Mean direct costs for care were $2256 and ranged from $927 for D(-)/R(-) patients to $7069 in the D(+)/R(-) patients. Extension of antiviral prophylaxis to D(+) or D(+)/R(+) patients significantly increased the estimated mean costs for an absolute reduction to 4% in CMV syndrome or disease. Our studies show that current guidelines for treatment enable effective control of CMV infection; however, alternative strategies have different economic impact.

Update on Pharmacoeconomics in Transplantation

Purpose

To provide current information on pharmacoeconomic outcomes in transplantation for the past 6 years.

Methods

An extensive literature search was undertaken using PubMed and other authenticated Internet sources. Key words used to elicit pertinent studies were “pharmacoeconomics,” “transplantation,” “cost-effectiveness,” “cost-benefit,” “cost-minimization” and “cost-utility” analyses. Studies included in the review contain updated pharmacoeconomic data generated during the past 6 years on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes. These data are used to describe and analyze the cost of drug therapy used in transplantation.

Results

Background information is included in the review to provide a context from which to evaluate new study material. Data extracted from the studies include significant findings and study limitations. Data were stratified into understanding pharmacoeconomic methods and their application to transplantation, maintenance and induction therapies, and management of and costs associated with adverse events and quality-of-life issues.

Conclusions

Continued evolution of pharmacoeconomic analysis is needed so that optimal care can be provided in the most cost-effective manner. Pharmacoeconomic study, done rationally and logically, is an indispensable tool in determining optimal transplantation regimens.

Polyclonal Antibodies in Renal Transplantation—A Relook

Polyclonal antibodies have been used in renal transplantation for the past four decades. Increasing knowledge regarding their varied mechanisms of action have confirmed their versatility in clinical practice. They can be used for induction, reversing acute rejections (especially those resistant to steroids), and possibly conferring an element of allotolerance, thereby reducing chronic allograft nephropathy. Their recent usage as IV bolus, single-dose, preoperative infusion as induction therapy in renal transplantation is an attractive and extremely cost-effective strategy, especially in a developing country such as India.

The role of basiliximab induction therapy in organ transplantation

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the alpha-subunit (CD25) of IL-2 receptors on the surface of activated T lymphocytes, and is a highly effective prophylaxis agent against rejection in organ transplant recipients. Its pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by a biphasic and slow clearance with long terminal half-life and a volume of distribution within the central compartment and outside the circulatory system. Basiliximab induction demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with no increase in the incidence of malignancy, infections or death. It has also been used effectively in high-risk recipients, steroid-sparing and steroid-minimization protocols, and in post-transplant patients with renal dysfunction who would benefit from delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Basiliximab induction therapy given at days 0 and 4 after transplantation appears to be safe and cost-effective for immunoprophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients, specifically in kidney and liver transplantation, when given in conjunction with dual or triple immunosuppressive therapy.

Effective Immunoprophylaxis With Basiliximab Plus Triple Therapy in Renal Transplantation: Five-Year Single-Center Experience

We studied prospectively the efficacy and safety of basiliximab combined with triple immunosuppression in adult recipients of > or = 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. All studied patients received equal immunosuppressive drugs: 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 and on day 4, cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, safety of this therapy, renal graft function, and patient and graft survivals. One hundred seventy-two patients were studied. The HLA-antigen mismatches were 2.9 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD), and the cold ischemia time was 22.0 +/- 7.5 hours. Fifty-three (31.5%) patients experienced delayed graft function. At 12 months, 5 (3.0%) patients experienced acute rejection. Six renal grafts were lost, but not from rejection. Two patients died. Sixty-six infections required treatment in the hospital. One carcinoma of cervix (in situ) and two basal cell carcinomas of skin were detected. Hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine-release syndrome were not observed. At 12 months, serum creatinine was significantly higher (119 +/- 46 micromol/L; P < .001) in patients with delayed graft function than in patients with immediate graft function (99 +/- 26 micromol/L). Patient and graft survivals were 98.8% and 97.1%, respectively. Basiliximab combined with this triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with very low incidence of acute rejections, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high short-term survival rates in adult recipients of deceased donor renal transplant.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in modern immunosuppression regimens for renal transplant recipients

Addition of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) induction to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens reduces biopsy-proven acute rejection by 30-40%. IL-2RA induction facilitates early withdrawal of steroids, and supports the safe use of reduced-exposure CNI or delayed CNI introduction. IL-2RAs and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) show comparable efficacy in patients at standard or low immunologic risk, but the adverse event profiles of lymphocyte-depleting agents are less favorable. IL-2RAs, uniquely, provide effective immunosuppression with similar tolerability to placebo.

Screening to prevent polyoma virus nephropathy: a medical decision analysis

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an emerging medical dilemma in kidney transplantation. Methods to screen before clinical disease are available and early immunosuppression reduction may change the natural history of progression. However, the consequences of an increase in rejection may limit the benefits. In a simulation model a 'screen' versus 'no-screen' strategy was compared. Baseline PVN cumulative incidence was assumed to be 4%. Patients with PVN were modeled to have 4-fold higher risk of graft loss. In the screen strategy, patients positive for blood DNA PCR had their immunosuppression reduced. This pre-emptive change was modeled to reduce progression to overt PVN by 80%. Therapy reduction was associated with a 10% risk of precipitating acute rejection and greater risk of chronic allograft loss. In the baseline case, screening saved 1912 dollars (discounted) and produced 0.020 more quality adjusted life years (QALYs) than not screening. Screening resulted in decreased net QALYs if the false positive viremia rate was >9.5% and the PVN incidence was <2.1%. Much of the cost savings of screening relate to savings from immunosuppression reduction in the screened arm. Screening may well be cost-effective if not cost saving in centers with high PVN rates. There remain significant areas of uncertainty.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of basiliximab, in combination with different maintenance regimens, are extensively addressed in the available literature. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection, allows a safe reduction of steroid dosage, and is associated with economic savings, although there is substantially no proof that basiliximab prolongs either patient or graft survival. Initial basiliximab administration entails a low-risk and is associated with fewer adverse events than T cell depleting agents. However, life-threatening reactions were reported following re-exposure to basiliximab in recipients who lost graft function early after transplantation and, therefore, discontinued all immunosuppressive agents.

Effect of New Immunosuppressive Regimens on Cost of Renal Transplant Maintenance Immunosuppression

Although newer immunosuppressive drugs control acute rejection better and have short-term economic advantages, their long-term cost-effectiveness is unknown. We studied the frequency with which different maintenance immunosuppression regimens were used in 3 renal transplantation cohorts treated in 1990, 1994, and 1998 (total number, 3279). We calculated the mean annual immunosuppressive costs based on the true costs in a medium-sized hospital. Cyclosporine, with or without azathioprine, was used almost exclusively as the initial maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in 1990-1994. In 1998, 65% of patients received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 20% received tacrolimus (Tac). A growing number of patients from 1990-1994 were converted to MMF (12%-17%) and Tac (4%-8%), while treatment of those from the 1998 cohort remained stable. According to year 2000 costs, the mean immunosuppressive cost at 1 year in 1998 (5380 euros) was almost twice that of 1994 (2902 euros) or 1990 (2855 euros). In these 2 groups the mean cost was stable until 1996, then increased faster in the 1994 cohort (24.8%) than in the 1990 cohort (17.3%), although it remained significantly lower than that in 1998. Correction of the evolution of drug prices and the purchasing value of the peseta greatly absorbed these changes. The MMF and Tac regimens showed greater mean graft life, but without reaching statistical significance in a multivariate study. The introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs has had an important economic effect since 1996; its cost-effectiveness is still pending confirmation in Spain.

Two-Hour Post-Dose Cyclosporine Levels in Renal Transplantation in Argentina: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Acute Rejection

Monitoring of cyclosporine (microemulsion CsA) at 2 hours post-dose (C2), a measure of absorption and exposure, appears superior to trough (C0) monitoring for prediction of rejection risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether C2 was cost-effective compared to C0 in Argentina.

METHODS

A predictive decision model was adapted to Argentina to predict costs associated with C0 and C2 measurements in the first year after transplantation. Patients were treated with microemulsion CsA, steroids and azathioprine or MMF. Parameter estimates for the C0 strategy were based on event rates observed in published clinical trials. The model was adapted to Argentinean health system through local protocols and expert opinions; costs were valued in Argentinean pesos and converted to US dollars (1 USD = 2.85 ARS).

RESULTS

Incidence of acute rejection was predicted to be 25.0% at 1-year among patients monitored by C0 and 18.0% by C2. Graft survival was predicted to be 1.4% lower in the C0 group. No important differences were identified in co-morbidity, C0 and C2 monitoring costs, and in ambulatory-based adverse events between C0 and C2 cohorts. The model predicted an average cost per patient of $16,269 for C0 and $16,343 for C2 testing (year 1). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the average daily dose of microemulsion CsA was the most important parameter leading to the incremental cost per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 is expected to provide a potentially important reduction in the risk of acute rejection without increasing the estimated cost of care in the first year post-transplant.

Resource use and treatment costs after kidney transplantation: impact of demographic factors, comorbidities, and complications

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to quantify outcomes, resource use, and treatment costs for the first 2 years after renal transplantation in a "real-life" European setting and to assess the impact of preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications on treatment costs.

METHODS

Inpatient and outpatient records of all patients who received a renal transplant at Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany, between January 1998 and July 2000, were evaluated. Key clinical events were recorded. Direct costs were calculated for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 after transplantation. Cost of organ procurement, pretransplant care, and transplant surgery were excluded. Cost consequences for key clinical events were determined.

RESULTS

Of 204 patients undergoing transplantation, 195 and 149 completed 1 year and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. The outcomes of years 1 and 2, respectively, were as follows: graft failure, 5.4%, 0.7%; acute rejection, 35.9%, 5.4%; cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, 29.2%, 2.0%; and delayed graft function, 30.9%. Costs for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 averaged Euro 15,380, Euro 18,636, and Euro 14,484, respectively. Cost-driving events included graft failure Euro 36,228), acute rejection (Euro 9,638), delayed graft function (Euro7,359), and CMV infection (Euro 4,149). Graft failure and acute rejection for year 1 also added significantly to the costs for year 2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that posttransplant clinical outcomes result in a significant increase in treatment costs. Because the economic impact of primary causes of chronic rejection (acute rejection and CMV) and delayed graft function is substantial, careful selection of the most appropriate immunosuppressive regimen is essential.

Meta-analysis of basiliximab for immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Basiliximab is a high-affinity chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor. Individual studies have shown that it is highly effective in preventing acute rejection and causes no measurable incremental toxicity. However, incorporation of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis into routine practice depends upon the demonstration of benefit across treatment regimens and quantitation of the treatment effect.

METHODS

This study employed a meta-analysis to examine the clinical benefit of basiliximab. Parameter estimates were derived from four randomised prospective double-blind studies conducted in 93 renal transplant centres in 18 countries. A total of 1185 adult primary allograft recipients were randomised within the centres to receive either basiliximab 20mg intravenously on days 0 and 4 or placebo, in addition to double or triple immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporin-microemulsion (Neoral((R))The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.), corticosteroids, and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Key clinical events included patient and graft survival, graft rejection and complications. Analysis was performed using a variable model; odds ratios and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to benefit or to harm one patient were calculated for each principal outcome at 6 or 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

Basiliximab reduced the relative risk (RR) and absolute risk (AR) of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection across all treatment regimens. The overall RR of clinical acute graft rejection was decreased by 35% in patients receiving basiliximab. AR was reduced by 15.6% (pooled incidence: 28.8% vs 44.4%, p < 0.0001), and the NNT for efficacy was six. The reduction in RR of biopsy-proven rejection was similar (32%) with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 11.7% (pooled incidence: 25.1% vs 36.8%, p < 0.0001) and NNT of nine over 6 months. There was a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14). The RR of graft loss was reduced by 26% with an AR reduction of 2.3% (pooled incidence: 6.4% vs 8.7%) and an NNT of 42 over 6 months. The risk of death was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab produces a significant reduction in the RR and AR of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection with a trend towards a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss. The magnitude of protection provided by basiliximab, the fact that it is observed across treatment regimens and the safety of this therapy are arguments for its routine use in renal transplantation.

Basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids in caucasian cadaveric renal transplanted patients: significant decrease in early acute rejection rate and hospitalization time

Safety and tolerability of basiliximab in renal transplantation have been proven in different immunosuppressive regimens. Few informations are available about the association of basiliximab with tacrolimus and steroids. We present a retrospective analysis performed in Caucasian cadaveric renal transplant recipients, comparing a basiliximab, tacrolimus and steroids induction protocol (GrA: 51 patients) with a tacrolimus and steroids protocol (GrB: 46 patients). A significant decrease in acute rejection rate in the first 3 months (2.0% vs. 17.4%; p < 0.01) was noted. Interestingly, the recipients in GrA were at major immunologic risk for the younger age of recipients, the greater number of mismatches and the higher rate of second transplants. The hospitalization times resulted reduced of 5.3 d in GrA vs. GrB (20.8 d vs. 26.1 d; p < 0.05). The adverse events patterns and profiles were similar in the two treatments groups. One patient in each group had a post-transplant lymphoprolipherative disorder. No significant difference was found in patient and graft survival. According to the results of this study, in a Caucasian adult population, basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids is a safe and efficacious tool for acute rejection prevention and it is cost saving by reducing the hospitalization times.

Anti-Interleukin-2 Receptor Antibodies in Transplantation

Two monoclonal antibody preparations against the alpha-chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha) are available for use, basiliximab and daclizumab, a chimeric and a humanised antibody, respectively. The first clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents as induction therapy to reduce the rate of acute rejection after organ transplantation. Basiliximab and daclizumab have a similar effect on prevention of acute rejection. Likewise, incidence of infections and malignancies are not different between the two treatment options. Anti-IL-2Ralpha therapy was very well tolerated in clinical trials. Phase III studies with basiliximab have been undertaken with a two-dose regimen, consisting of two doses of 20mg, in an attempt to saturate the IL-2Ralpha on peripheral blood T lymphocytes for an average of 4-6 weeks. In contrast, the daclizumab dose is corrected for bodyweight and the goal is to achieve IL-2Ralpha blockade for 12 weeks. Phase III efficacy trials with daclizumab have, therefore, been developed with five doses of 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the first 2 months after transplantation. Whether or not it is a benefit to have blockade of the IL-2Ralpha for 10-12 weeks (daclizumab) compared with 4-6 weeks (basiliximab) remains unknown. Assuming 4-6 weeks would be sufficient for prevention of acute rejection, many centres have changed the protocol of daclizumab administration to two doses, the first dose given at the time of transplantation, the second 10 or 14 days after, with good success. Therefore, it seems feasible to limit the dose of daclizumab, which increases the ease of administration and probably also the cost effectiveness of this agent. There are no controlled studies comparing basiliximab and daclizumab, nor have different dose regimens been directly compared in renal transplantation. The data available suggest the differences are small, if present at all, and it is unlikely that such a trial will ever be done. With both compounds, a significant reduction in the number of acute rejection episodes following solid organ transplantation can be obtained without an increase in adverse effects or infectious complications.

An economic model of 2-hour post-dose ciclosporin monitoring in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of microemulsion ciclosporin (cyclosporine; Neoral) by 2-hour post-dose drug concentrations (C2) is an accurate measure of ciclosporin absorption efficiency and exposure, and appears superior to trough (C0) monitoring for prediction of rejection risk. A predictive decision model was used to determine if this approach also reduces total treatment costs in the first 12 months after renal transplantation.

METHODS

Parameter estimates for key clinical events were derived from the literature and from prospective pharmacokinetic studies comprising 234 adult HLA-non-identical renal graft recipients at seven Canadian centres. Patients were treated with microemulsion ciclosporin (Neoral), corticosteroids and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Using the perspective of the Canadian healthcare provider, total treatment costs for the C2 versus the C0 strategy were modelled over 12 months, and then remodelled using conservative estimates to extend the timeframe to 5 years. Health resources were valued in 1999 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection was estimated to be 25% at 1 year in patients monitored by C0 and 18% in those monitored by C2. Patient survival was considered to be independent of monitoring strategy, and graft loss was predicted to be 1.4% lower in the C2 group. The studies suggested no important differences in comorbidity and the costs of C0 and C2 monitoring and ambulatory-based adverse events were held equivalent. Using these inputs, the average cost per patient for the first year post-transplant was Can dollars 46,857 for C0 monitoring and Can dollars 45,306 for C2 monitoring, rising to Can dollars 146,879 and Can dollars 142,569 after 5 years. The predicted cost for initial hospitalisation was Can dollars 11,280 for C0 and Can dollars 10,806 for C2 monitoring. The cost of maintenance immunosuppressive drug use, graft loss and dialysis was Can dollars 19,098 in the C0 group and Can dollars 18,612 in the C2 group, while acute rejection treatment costs were Can dollars 2169 and Can dollars 1577, respectively. An additional Can dollars 14,310 was consumed by other events, including repeat hospitalisation, for each group. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the most influential parameters affecting savings due to C2 monitoring were a reduction in the duration of initial and follow-up hospitalisations and reduced risks of acute rejection and subsequent graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional trough concentration monitoring, ciclosporin monitoring at 2 hours post-dose produced a predicted saving of Can dollars 1551 during the first year after renal transplant. Although modelling assumptions become more restrictive over time, this projection allows a preliminary assessment of the long-term economic impact of the routine use of C2 monitoring.

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily, with 38% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 23% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to systematically identify and summarise the effects of using an IL2Ra, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to other antibody therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (June 2003), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (in The Cochrane Library issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966-November 2002) and EMBASE (1980-November 2002). Reference lists and abstracts of conference proceedings and scientific meetings were hand-searched from 1998-2003. Trial groups, authors of included reports and drug manufacturers were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing IL2Ra to placebo, no treatment, other IL2Ra or other antibody therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen reports from 38 trials involving 4893 participants were included. Where IL2Ra were compared with placebo (17 trials; 2786 patients), graft loss was not significantly different at one (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04) or three years (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.22). Acute rejection (AR) was significantly reduced at six months (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74) and at one year (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.75). At one year, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03) and malignancy (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.36) were not significantly different. Where IL2Ra were compared with other antibody therapy no significant differences in treatment effects were demonstrated, but adverse effects strongly favoured IL2Ra.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Given a 40% risk of rejection, seven patients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one patient having rejection, with no definite improvement in graft or patient survival. There is no apparent difference between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects

Basiliximab: efficacy and tolerability in adults and children

An open, single arm, prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) combined with cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine was performed in four centers in Chile, two adult and two pediatric. The 23 patients who were enrolled were followed for 12 months. There were four acute rejection episodes (three adults and one child) and three graft losses (two adults and one child) during the study. Renal function in both adult and pediatric patients at 6 and 12 months was good. Basiliximab was well tolerated. The incidence of infections was low, with only one CMV infection. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of acute rejection episodes among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab is low, showing that the drug is well tolerated. In particular the number of CMV infections is extremely low.

Basiliximab plus low-dose cyclosporin vs. OKT3 for induction immunosuppression following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Current immunosuppressive therapies are very effective in preventing acute rejection (AR) and graft loss following renal transplantation. Newer agents now make it possible to develop equally efficacious but better tolerated and less toxic strategies. This is especially relevant for our ageing recipients. We now compare the efficacy of basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin therapy to standard OKT3 induction therapy.

METHODS

In this single-centre study, 100 consecutive recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants from November 1998 to August 2000 were treated with basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin, reduced steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Clinical outcomes at 100 d and 1 yr were compared with a group of 26 patients transplanted from March 1995 to November 1998 who received OKT3, delayed full-dose cyclosporin, high-dose steroids and MMF. Amongst basiliximab treated patients, we compared clinical outcomes in those older and younger than 60 yr.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar except for a shorter cold ischaemic time in the basiliximab group. Length of stay, number of readmissions, total hospitalization days and cytomegalovirus infections were lower in the basiliximab group. Despite a 40% reduction in steroids, basiliximab-treated patients had fewer biopsy-proven episodes of AR (basiliximab 14% vs. OKT3 35%) and required less antilymphocyte antibody therapy. Clinical outcomes including patient and graft survival were no different between groups. Long-term graft survival for patients over 60 yr was limited primarily by mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OKT3 induction therapy, the combination of early low-dose cyclosporin and basiliximab is steroid sparing, effective, well tolerated and relatively safe.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of basixilimab induction and calcineurin-sparing protocols in "old to old" programs using Markov models

INTRODUCTION

Markov models are employed in economic analyses to evaluate all possible expectations in a dilemna. The introduction of a new clinical protocol (basiliximab induction with calcineurin-sparing protocols) for a group of kidney transplant recipients receiving organs from marginal donors was validated with a Markov simulation model.

HYPOTHESIS

Calcineurin-sparing protocols using anti-IL-2/antibody induction (Simulect) show a beneficial effect on initial kidney function, reducing transplantation costs reception based upon mean length of stay, mean admission cost, and incidences of delayed graft function and complications during the first month after transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Markov simulation model was established following three different chains. A calcineurin-free regimen with basiliximab induction (chain A), a calcineurin-sparing protocol with basiliximab induction (chain B), and a conventional immunosuppressive regimen (chain C). After designing the Markov chain and cohorts, 31 patients from the "old to old" program were assigned to each chain eight to chain A, (eight to chain B, and 15 to chain C). A month after transplantation a cost-benefit study was performed guided by the three branches of the Markov model.

RESULTS

The Markov model showed a benefit of induction therapies in elderly patients. A cost-benefit model showed that after a month there was a clear benefit from Calcineurin=free plus basiliximab induction therapies, with a slight benefit from calcineurin-sparing protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Markov models are extremely useful when introducing new clinical therapies. In our transplant program, a cost-effective analysis of outcomes in old patients using the Markov model showed a clear benefit of calcineurin-sparing protocols with basixilimab induction.

Lack of economic benefit with basiliximab induction in living related donor adult renal transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation.

SETTING

University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic.

PATIENTS

Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients.

INTERVENTION

The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab-CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow-up. At 12-months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were dollar 51,970.01 and dollar 68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower (dollar 10,148.50 vs dollar 21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost-effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.

Economic implications of the use of basiliximab in addition to triple immunosuppressive therapy in renal allograft recipients: a UK perspective

OBJECTIVE

To compare resource use and costs in renal transplant recipients treated with basiliximab or placebo plus triple immunosuppressive therapy.

DESIGN

International randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; economic evaluation undertaken alongside the efficacy trial. The economic evaluation was performed from a UK National Health Service hospital perspective.

SETTING

31 centres in 12 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

345 renal transplant recipients were enrolled; 340 were randomised (basiliximab 168; placebo 172) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

INTERVENTION

Treatment with placebo or basiliximab (20mg intravenous bolus) on day 0 and day 4 after transplantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resource utilisation in multiple categories and treatment costs for basiliximab and placebo-treated patients during the 6-month post-transplantation period.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in any of the economically important categories of resource use or in the mean cost of treatment per person across the whole trial. The mean cost of treatment, including the cost of basiliximab, was pound 16 095 for basiliximab recipients and pound 15 864 (1997/1998 costs) for placebo recipients, a mean difference of pound 231 (95% CI: - pound 1983 to pound 2446), which was not significant. Basiliximab treatment led to a significant reduction in acute rejection episodes (basiliximab 20.8%; placebo 34.9%; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab therapy confers a significant clinical benefit to renal transplant recipients without increasing overall treatment costs.

Cost evaluation of basiliximab treatment for renal transplant patients in Japan

BACKGROUND

International phase III studies (CHIB 201 and 352) showed that basiliximab, a high affinity chimeric monoclonal antibody interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, is highly effective in preventing acute rejection when used as immunoprophylaxis in patients receiving cyclosporin (Neoral). We conducted a cost evaluation by applying international clinical results to standard Japanese medical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of basiliximab in renal transplant patients receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy using cyclosporin and corticosteroids from the perspective of the healthcare payer in Japan.

STUDY DESIGN

A decision tree model was developed, comprising seven pathways with key clinical events identified after the transplantation. The average first-year treatment costs after transplantation for patients treated with and without basiliximab were calculated using the model. A sensitivity analysis was done to measure the degree of influence of several criteria including the incidences of rejection, and rejection responding to steroid pulse therapy and antibody therapy.

METHODS

Estimates of key clinical events were derived from the international studies. Calculation of direct medical costs were made from the payers' perspective, based on the Social Insurance Medical Fee Table in Japan. The cost of basiliximab was assumed as zero.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Basiliximab use produced an estimated saving of 315,807 yen (2000 values) during the first year after transplantation. Reduced acute rejection treatment and dialysis most influenced the cost saving. The sensitivity analysis showed that the average cost for a patient was lower in the basiliximab group and that the model was effective within the plausible range of each criterion that would reflect renal transplantation in Japan.

CONCLUSIONS

If the cost of basiliximab is less than 315,807 yen, the clinical and economic benefits of basiliximab in the first year after transplantation support the routine use of basiliximab in renal transplantation in Japan.

Basiliximab

Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric (human/murine) monoclonal antibody, is indicated for the prevention of acute organ rejection in adult and paediatric renal transplant recipients in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. Basiliximab significantly reduced acute rejection compared with placebo in renal transplant recipients receiving dual- (cyclosporin microemulsion and corticosteroids) or triple-immunotherapy (azathioprine- or mycophenolate mofetil-based); graft and patient survival rates at 12 months were similar. Significantly more basiliximab than placebo recipients were free from the combined endpoint of death, graft loss or acute rejection 3 years, but not 5 years, after transplantation. The incidence of adverse events was similar in basiliximab and placebo recipients, with no increase in the incidence of infection, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Malignancies or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after treatment with basiliximab were rare, with a similar incidence to that seen with placebo at 12 months or 5 years post-transplantation. Rare cases of hypersensitivity reactions to basiliximab have been reported. The efficacy of basiliximab was similar to that of equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and daclizumab, and similar to or greater than that of muromonab CD3. Basiliximab was as effective as rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) in patients at relatively low risk of acute rejection, but less effective in high-risk patients. Numerically or significantly fewer patients receiving basiliximab experienced adverse events considered to be related to the study drug than ATG or RATG recipients. The incidence of infection, including CMV infection, was similar with basiliximab and ATG or RATG. Basiliximab plus baseline immunosuppression resulted in no significant differences in acute rejection rates compared with baseline immunosuppression with or without ATG or antilymphocyte globulin in retrospective analyses conducted for small numbers of paediatric patients. Limited data from paediatric renal transplant recipients suggest a similar tolerability profile to that in adults. Basiliximab appears to allow the withdrawal of corticosteroids or the use of corticosteroid-free or calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in renal transplant recipients. Basiliximab did not increase the overall costs of therapy in pharmacoeconomic studies.

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab reduces acute rejection without increasing the incidence of adverse events, including infection and malignancy, in renal transplant recipients when combined with standard dual- or triple-immunotherapy. The overall incidence of death, graft loss or acute rejection was significantly reduced at 3 years; there was no significant difference for this endpoint 5 years after transplantation. Malignancy was not increased at 5 years. The overall efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration and cost effectiveness of basiliximab make it an attractive option for the prophylaxis of acute renal transplant rejection.

The use of basiliximab in solid organ transplantation

The risk of acute rejection is at its highest early post-transplant. The use of various antibodies early after transplant achieves potent immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection, allowing the clinician the opportunity to optimise baseline immunosuppressive management and to delay the use of nephrotoxic agents (calcineurin inhibitors), while the graft reaches a baseline function. Basiliximab (Simulect trade mark, Novartis) is a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the alpha-subunit of the human high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2r) complex, consequently inhibiting interleukin-2 (IL-2) binding. IL-2 receptors are selectively expressed on the surface of the activated lymphocytes. Administration of basiliximab inhibits IL-2 mediated activation of lymphocytes, a critical pathway involved in allograft rejection. Several clinical studies have shown that basiliximab administration as an induction agent significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, even in high risk patients. In addition, basiliximab is well-tolerated with minimal side effects.

New developments in immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents and protocols has improved outcomes for renal transplant recipients by decreasing the risk of rejection and by increasing the function and lifespan of the allograft. This article reviews the major changes in the combinations of therapies used: calcineurin inhibitors, target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, non-depleting monoclonal versus depleting monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for induction and increasing emphasis on protocols for reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. The new agents with novel immunological targets such as anti-CD40 ligand, LEA29Y, FTY720, anti-CD20 (rituximab, Rituxan, Mabthera) and anti-CH52 (alemtuzumab, Campath), which are under development but have yet to survive the rigors of clinical trials are also discussed. In the presence of low early rejection rates, immunosuppressive therapy is setting new goals such as better graft function (glomerular filtration rates), reduction in adverse effects such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and drug toxicity and, above all, the prevention of late graft deterioration.

Progress in the clinical application of immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplantation

Although only very few new immunosuppressive drugs have been approved over the past two decades, the introduction of each new drug has progressively reduced the incidence of acute rejection and raised hopes that there would be an increase in long-term allograft survival. It is now consistently possible to achieve acute rejection rates of between 10 and 20%, and in many studies the rate has fallen below 10%. This is important, as acute rejection is one of the most important factors reducing the long-term survival of the allograft as a consequence of the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. The availability of these new agents has allowed experimentation with diverse protocols that explore the possibility of reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. These include both 'avoidance' and 'withdrawal' protocols. The target of rapamycin inhibitors, sirolimus and everolimus, have extended this paradigm. It is possible, but not yet proved, that their antiproliferative effect on smooth muscle will retard the vascular remodelling characteristic of chronic allograft nephropathy, atherosclerosis and hypertension. This review concentrates on the current progress being made in clinical immunosuppression, and includes data presented at the Transplant 2001 meeting of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, held in May 2001.