Transdiscal L5-S1 screws for the fixation of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a biomechanical evaluation

A Case of Charcot Spine Arthropathy at the Lumbosacral Level in a Patient With Ankylosis of the Spine

Charcot spinal arthropathy, a rare refractory progressive disease, is characterized by symptoms such as pain, deformity, and neurological impairment, which can significantly reduce functional ability, quality of life, and life expectancy. We report a case of Charcot spine at the L5/S1 level with long segment ankylosis to the L5 vertebra. We first performed thorough debridement via a posterior approach. We used antibiotic-containing cement as a spacer to fill the dead space, facilitating the second surgery approach. In the second surgery, transdiscal screws, which have a low profile and strong force, were used as anchors, and bulk bone harvested from both iliac bones was grafted to the intervertebral space. The lumbosacral alignment was kyphotic, and the patient could sit and move independently. Disimpaction was impossible, and a stoma had to be created.

Transdiscal Fixation for Dropped Head Syndrome: A Case Report

Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a rare condition mainly due to neck extensor muscle weakness. The main symptoms of DHS are chin-on-chest deformity, difficulty raising the head against gravity, neck pain, difficulty eating, and difficulty maintaining horizontal gaze. The DHS patients with severe daily life disturbances need surgical intervention, which is usually a long spinal fusion. There are several reports of distal junctional failure due to distal screw loosening, screw pullout, and implant failure because DHS patients are relatively old and may have osteoporosis. To solve this problem, cement-augmented screw fixation is one option. However, due to shoulder shadow, the cervicothoracic junction is complicated to get a clear C-arm image. The report presents the case of a 77-year-old male patient with DHS treated with a novel C-arm-free navigation technique via transdiscal fixation.

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

Objective

An alternative to conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a PLIF with transpedicular oblique screw fixation system. An assessment of new fixation system's viability and efficacy is conducted through a comparison of its biomechanical properties with those of conventional PLIF.

Method

A comprehensive finite element model (FEM) of the lumbar regions L1-L5 was developed and the surgical segment L3-L4 was chosen to comprise the surgical models of both traditional PLIF and new PLIF. In new PLIF model, an analysis was conducted on segmental range of motion (RoM), cage stress, inferior endplates stress, vertebral stress, and internal fixation stress. Three-dimensional printers are utilized to fabricate and assemble the fusion cage and vertebrae, and compression test machines are employed to execute physiological load and extreme load experiments on new PLIF, so as to verify the accuracy of the FEM analysis and the mode of fatigue exhibited by new PLIF.

Results

In new PLIF, the maximum stress on the inferior endplates under physiological loads was reduced in comparison to conventional PLIF. While the maximum stress on the cage, vertebral body, and screw increased, it remained within an acceptable range. The experimental data indicates that new fixation system can endure a vertical load exceeding 2800 N and an ultimate bending moment of 77 Nm.

Conclusion

The new PLIF exhibits a comparable RoM to its predecessor, simultaneously mitigating inferior endplate stress and accommodating physiological loads, which reduce the amount of surgical incision and fusion fixation instruments. Consequently, it emerges as a sanguine surgical approach to fuse the degenerative lumbar spine.

Sacrolumbar Interbody Fusion (SLIF): Feasibility, Technical Nuances, Biomechanical Assessment, and Clinical Outcomes

Introduction

S1-L5 transdiscal screw fixation is a direct stabilization technique used for surgical treatment of high-grade (III-IV) L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. It has not been used for nonspondylolisthetic cases or in combination with an interbody cage (IC). This study aimed to develop a novel, direct S1-L5 sacrolumbar interbody fusion (SLIF) technique, a combination of IC and sacrolumbar transdiscal screw.

Methods

SLIF was tested in cadaveric, clinical, and finite element analysis settings. Three cadaveric lumbar spines were used to test the SLIF procedure before clinical application. Eight patients underwent the SLIF procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analog score for leg and back pain, short form 36, Oswestry disability index, and neurological examination. CT scans of the lumbar spine were used to assess the hardware placement and subsequent fusion. Finite element analysis was performed on a healthy human CT-based L5-S1 model. Intact segment, unilateral facetectomy and discectomy, SLIF, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures were compared in terms of the range of motion (ROM), von Mises stress on hardware, and shear-induced directional deformity. Additionally, the same set of tests were conducted in an osteoporotic model.

Results

Excellent hardware placement was feasible in three cadavers and eight patients. Preoperative neurological deficits improved in all patients. Statistically significant improvements were obtained on all self-reported questionnaire scores. All patients developed solid, Bridwell grade I fusions. Biomechanical testing revealed similar outcomes for TLIF and SLIF regarding the ROM. However, the screw's von Mises stress and shear-induced directional deformity were low for SLIF of healthy and osteoporotic bone.

Conclusions

SLIF is a feasible, safe, and effective L5-S1 fusion option suitable for all clinical scenarios. It provides several biomechanical advantages, yielding excellent clinical outcomes.

Biomechanical analysis of a trans-discal, multi-level stabilization screw (MLSS) at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) of long posterior thoracolumbar instrumentations

PURPOSE

To evaluate proximal junctional biomechanics of a MLSS relative to traditional pedicle screw fixation at the proximal extent of T10-pelvis posterior instrumentation constructs (T10-p PSF).

METHODS

A previously validated three-dimensional osseoligamentous spinopelvic finite element (FE) model was used to compare proximal junctional range-of-motion (ROM), vertebral body stresses, and discal biomechanics between two groups: (1) T10-p with a T10-11 MLSS ("T10-11 MLSS") and (2) T10-p with a traditional T10 pedicle screw ("Traditional T10-PS").

RESULTS

The T10-11 MLSS had a 5% decrease in T9 cortical bone stress compared to Traditional T10-PS. Conversely, the T10 and T11 bone stresses increased by 46% and 98%, respectively, with T10-11 MLSS compared to Traditional T10-PS. Annular stresses and intradiscal pressures (IDP) were similar at T9-T10 between constructs. At the T10-11 disc, T10-11 MLSS decreased annular stresses by 29% and IDP by 48% compared to Traditional T10-PS. Adjacent ROM (T8-9 & T9-10) were similar between T10-11 MLSS and Traditional T10-PS. T10-11 MLSS had 39% greater ROM at T10-11 and 23% less ROM at T11-12 compared to Traditional T10-PS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this FE analysis, a T10-11 MLSS at the proximal extent of T10-pelvis posterior instrumentation resulted in increased T10 and T11 cortical bone stresses, decreased discal annular stress and IDP and increased ROM at T10-11, and no change in ROM at the adjacent level. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of proximal junctional kyphosis, these results require additional biomechanical and clinical evaluations to determine the clinical utility of MLSS on the proximal junctions of thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions.

Comparison of the Fixation Strengths of Screws between the Traditional Trajectory and the Single and Double Endplate Penetrating Screw Trajectories Using Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Models Based on the Finite Element Method

STUDY DESIGN

This is a finite element (FE) study.

PURPOSE

To compare the fixation strength of traditional trajectory (TT) and single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories (SEPST/DEPST) to the osteoporotic vertebral body model based on the FE method.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

SEPST/DEPST have been developed to enhance the fixation strength in patients with diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis (DISH). This technique was also applied to patients with osteoporosis. However, determining the superiority of SEPST/ DEPST is difficult because of the heterogeneous patient backgrounds.

METHODS

Twenty vertebrae (T12 and L1) from 10 patients with osteoporosis (two males and eight females; mean age, 74.7 years) were obtained to create the 10 FE models. First, a single screw was placed with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation strength was compared by axial pullout strength (POS) and multidirectional loading tests. Second, two screws were placed on the bilateral pedicles with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation force of the vertebrae in the constructs in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation was examined.

RESULTS

SEPST and DEPST had 140% and 171% higher POS values than TT, respectively, and the DEPST result was statistically significant (p =0.007). The multidirectional fixation strength was significantly higher in DEPST and SEPST than in TT in the cranial, caudal, and medial directions (p <0.05) but not in the lateral direction (p =0.05). The vertebral fracture strength at the lower instrumented vertebra of the DEPST tended to be higher than that of TT. The vertebral motion angles in SEPST and DEPST were significantly smaller in lateral bending (p =0.02) and tended to be smaller in flexion and extension than in TT (p =0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

This study may provide useful information for spine surgeons in deciding whether to choose the SEPS or DEPS technique for augmenting fixation in osteoporotic vertebral fracture surgery.

Transdiscal instrumentation in single-level lumbosacral fusion for high-grade isthmic pediatric spondylolisthesis: Technical note and review of the literature

Pediatric spondylolisthesis is a common cause of back pain in children, typically managed conservatively with bracing and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. When posterolateral fusion is performed for refractory pain, pseudarthrosis and implant failure may occur, necessitating reoperation. To improve patient outcomes, there is a need for alternative surgical techniques to effectively manage high-grade isthmic slips. Here, the authors report the case of a child with Meyerding grade III anterolisthesis of L5 on S1 who was treated with a single-level, instrumented fusion using bilateral S1-L5 transdiscal screws, supported with L5-S1 posterolateral instrumentation and arthrodesis. Postoperatively, there was improvement in the patient's symptoms with good clinical and radiographic outcomes. The patient continues to be symptom free with radiographic evidence of hardware stability and bony fusion across the segment. The authors detail a novel surgical technique in children as well as a review of lumbosacral transdiscal screw fixation. Further evidence is required to definitively establish the safety, outcomes, and biomechanical strength of this technique.

Efficacy of less Invasive modified O-arm navigated delta fixation in osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis: "a LIMO delta technique"

PURPOSE

In 1994, the technique of transdiscal screws fixation in spondylolisthesis was introduced but did not gained popularity as it failed to address problems with spinal sagittal imbalance, retroverted pelvis, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure and neural injury. Majority of problems were due to lack of clear indications; hence, in this study, with modification of traditional technique and use of O-arm navigation for selected group of patients, we have addressed the above problems and given good to excellent functional outcomes.

METHODS

We did prospective study on 15 patients with osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade 3 & 4 admitted in period 2020-2021. Intraoperative assessment was done in form of blood loss, incision length, operative time and complications. The preoperative & postoperative assessment was done in the form of clinical and radiological parameters.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was of 21.2 months (18-24 months). There was no significant difference between pre- & postoperative spinopelvic parameters. Intraoperative average blood loss was 100 ml (90-120 ml) with mean surgical time of 138 min (120-150 min). Incision length was about 5-6-cms-posterior midline with two paraspinal 1-cm incisions for transdiscal screws. Patients were mobilized on postoperative day-2. There was statistically significant improvement in mean ODI, COMI and VAS for LBP and radicular pain with no intra- or postoperative complication observed till latest follow-up with all patients showing solid monoblock fusion on 1-year follow-up CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

LIMO delta technique is a newly modified version of conventional transdiscal screw technique. Minimal incision, decreased blood loss & operative time with in situ 3-column rigid fixation and solid fusion minimizing risk of complications makes this novel technique safer, simpler & effective in osteoporotic HGS.

Transdiscal Screw Fixation in L5-S1 Adult Spondylolisthesis: Technical Note and Midterm Outcomes of a Case Series

BACKGROUND

Spondylolisthesis changes the pelvic morphology and sagittal spinopelvic alignment with abnormality compared to individuals with similar pelvic morphology. There are many treatment options including a combination of decompression and fusion. In spondylolisthesis patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis, bone to bone contact (closed intradiscal space), and high-grade disc degeneration with disc collapse, fusion is challenging.

METHODS

From 2011 through 2020, an analysis of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis patients who had L5-S1 transdiscal screw fixation with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed. Radiological evaluation and clinical measures were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative complications were analyzed. Also, L5-S1 degree fusion was analyzed using a computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

Eight patients of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with a mean follow-up of 69 (25-122) months. All patients were female; the average age was 58 (43-78) years. 4 patients presented with high-grade spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade III). Among the patients, 3 patients were undergoing revision surgery. Only 5 patients had interbody fusion for their adjacent levels. In the postoperative follow-up, none of the patients had neurological deficits. Radiological evaluations of L5-S1 level showed fusion in all patients. Only 1 patient had rod failure and was advised for revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

L5-S1 transdiscal screw fixation may provide a satisfactory rigid fixation and fusion at the L5-S1 level in cases of spondylolisthesis. This technique requires a surgeon's experience. Despite the challenge of this technique, it can provide a safe option for acquiring rigid stabilization.

Radiological comparison of penetrating endplate trajectory versus anterior bicortical trajectory for sacral pedicle screw insertion in posterior lumbosacral interbody fusion

BACKGROUND

The bicortical or tricortical fixation technique with purchase into the anterior sacral wall or promontory has been recommended to achieve rigid sacral pedicle screw fixation, which carries the potential risk of neurovascular injuries. The penetrating endplate screw (PES) technique was proposed as an alternative screw trajectory to facilitate both strong fixation and safety. However, there has been no report on the practical significance of using the PES technique. The aim of the present study was to investigate radiological outcomes using the PES technique for lumbosacral fusion by comparing it with the anterior bicortical technique.

METHODS

The subjects consisted of 44 patients with L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S using the PES technique (20 patients) or the anterior bicortical technique (24 patients) and were followed up for > 2 years (mean follow-up: 36.6 months). Screw loosening and bone fusion were radiologically assessed and compared between the two groups. Factors contributing to bone fusion were investigated using the following factors: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) body mass index, (4) bone mineral density, (5) screw diameter, (6) screw length, (7) pelvic incidence, (8) crosslink connector, (9) cage material, and (10) sacral screw insertion technique.

RESULTS

Respective screw loosening and bone fusion rates were 10.0 and 90.0% using the PES technique and 29.2 and 79.2% using the anterior bicortical technique, with no significant differences between the two techniques. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the age (odds ratio = 0.87, p = 0.02) and PES technique (odds ratio = 22.39, p = 0.02) were significant independent factors contributing to bone fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate the significance of using the PES technique to improve radiological outcomes. The PES technique could be a valid option for lumbosacral fixation for L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis in terms of improved bone fusion.

Downward penetrating endplate screw technique under O-arm navigation posterior fusion in patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

Background:

A downward penetrating endplate screw (PES) technique combined with caudal anchor screws inserted in the upward direction under O-arm navigation (i.e., crossing screw technique) avoided screw backout and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in three patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).

Methods:

The PES techniques were utilized for patients with T12 (one patient) and L1 (two patients) spontaneous fusion across the targeted vertebrae, with minimal damage to the involved endplates/intervertebral discs. The average number of instrumented vertebrae was 5.3.

Results:

There were no perioperative complications over the mean follow-up period of 28.7 months; no screw loosening, and no PJK.

Conclusion:

The PES technique prevented screw backout, and PJK in three patients with lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures and DISH.

An Alternative Operative Approach to Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Lumbosacral spondylolisthesis is a frequently encountered pathology with high-grade spondylolisthesis being the least common. A circumferential construct is usually the preferred treatment as these can resist the shearing forces present at L5-S1. However, the severity of the slip, sacral inclination, and the slip angle may make a traditional anterior approach difficult to achieve. In this case series, we present three patients with axial back pain that were treated with an anterior L5-S1 transvertebral cage. This technique is intended for both grade II spondylolisthesis and high sacral slope. The L5-S1 transvertebral cage may be sufficient to prevent further listhesis, fuse the patient, and alleviate axial back pain.

Innovation of Surgical Techniques for Screw Fixation in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine

Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly populations and is a major public health problem worldwide. It is not uncommon for spine surgeons to perform spinal instrumented fusion surgeries for osteoporotic patients. However, in patients with severe osteoporosis, instrumented fusion may result in screw loosening, implant failure or nonunion because of a poor bone quality and decreased pedicle screw stability as well as increased graft subsidence risk. In addition, revision surgeries to correct failed instrumentation are becoming increasingly common in patients with osteoporosis. Therefore, techniques to enhance the fixation of pedicle screws are required in spinal surgeries for osteoporotic patients. To date, various instrumentation methods, such as a supplemental hook, sublaminar taping and sacral alar iliac screws, and modified screwing techniques have been available for reinforcing pedicle screw fixation. In addition, several materials, including polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite stick/granules, for insertion into prepared screw holes, can be used to enhance screw fixation. Many biomechanical tests support the effectiveness of these augmentation methods. We herein review the current therapeutic strategies for screw fixation and augmentation methods in the surgical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic spine.

Penetrating Endplate Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Pathological Fracture of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis

With the advancement of cancer treatment and minimally invasive surgery, the indications for surgery for metastatic spinal tumors are expanding. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a noninflammatory skeletal disease characterized by calcification and ossification of ligaments and entheses. In Japan, the prevalence of DISH is increasing with its superaging society. The purpose of this article is to report a case of applying a novel screw technique for pathological fracture in a patient with DISH and spinal metastasis. An 80-year-old man with spinal metastasis presented with acute onset of severe back pain, and investigations revealed a fracture of a metastatic lesion in T10–T12 in the range of DISH. We performed posterior fixation with a percutaneous pedicle screw system using a penetrating endplate technique. The patient's back pain improved, and he was able to mobilize with minimal assistance and survived for 8 months with a good quality of life. Spinal fracture accompanied by DISH sometimes occurs with severe instability because of injury across 3-column injury and its long lever arm. Spinal instability neoplastic score indicates instability of pathological fractures of spinal metastases but needs to be evaluated carefully when DISH is present. The prevalence of DISH is increasing in the elderly, and penetrating endplate screws can be an effective option in posterior fusion surgery for patients with DISH and spinal metastases.

Use of L5-S1 transdiscal screws in the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a technical note

Surgical treatment of L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis consists of a combination of decompression and fusion. One previously discussed mode of fusion is via transdiscal screws. Biomechanical studies of transdiscal screws have demonstrated greater rigidity than traditional pedicle screw fixation, which theoretically translates to a higher fusion rate. Furthermore, when compared to pedicle screw fixation, transdiscal screw fixation also demonstrates improved functional and radiographic outcomes. However, transdiscal screw placement can be technically difficult. At this time, a detailed surgical technique has yet to be reported in the literature. Our surgical technique for transdiscal screw placement using intraoperative C-arm at L5-S1 is described. We include considerations for preoperative planning including necessary imaging and appropriate patient selection. We also discuss intraoperative concerns such as setup, surgical approach, proper screw trajectory, and our method for achieving indirect decompression. The results of thirteen consecutive patients treated with transdiscal screw fixation are described. One patient had subcutaneous seroma requiring reoperation (7.7%), three patients had implant failure (23.1%), and one patient had nonunion (7.7%). Our results suggest that transdiscal screw fixation is a safe and acceptable alternative for stabilization and indirect decompression of L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Recent innovation in intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery may lessen the technical difficulty of transdiscal screw placement and make it even more effective.

Long term outcome and fusion rate of transdiscal fixation for L5-S1 high grade spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

High grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) is a quite rare entity and many techniques are available to address this condition. In 1994 Abdu et al. proposed a transdiscal fixation approach that achieved a good clinical outcome. We analyse outcome and fusion achieved in patients treated by transdiscal fixation after 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed patients operated through transdiscal fixation since 2014 with a follow-up of at least 1 year, and compared preoperative and postoperative clinical measures (ODI, VAS and EQ-5D) and postoperative complications. Also, we analyzed the degree of fusion on CT scan with Lenke and Birdwell criteria.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study with a mean follow-up of 49.4 months (range 12.8-84.1 months). Three cases presented a Meyerding grade IV spondylolisthesis and 9 cases grade III. At 1-year follow-up mean postoperative ODI, VAS and EQ5D scores improved (ODI 13.2 (range 0-30) vs 49.83 (range 15-71.1); p = .005). Equally this improvement was seen in the last follow-up (ODI 9.28 (range 0-35) vs 49.83 (range 15-71.1); p = .005). CT scan showed fusion grade A in 5 patients (41.6%), another 5 as grade B (41.6%) in Lenke classification. According to the Birdwell criteria 4 patients were classified as grade I (33.3%), 7 patients grade II (58.3%). None showed complications postoperatively or radiolucency in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transdiscal fixation shows a good clinical outcome that is maintained throughout a long time period and provides a reliable and suitable fusion.

Biomechanical comparison of 3 types of transdiscal fixation implants for fixing high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are several options for the stabilization of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis including transdiscal screws, the Bohlman technique (transdiscal fibular strut) and the modified Bohlman technique (transdiscal titanium mesh cage). The choice of an optimum construct remains controversial; therefore, we endeavoured to study and compare the biomechanical performance of these 3 techniques.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare 3 types of transdiscal fixation biomechanically in an in vitro porcine lumbar-sacral spine model.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Porcine cadaveric biomechanical study.

METHODS

18 complete lumbar-sacral porcine spines were split into 3 repair groups, transdiscal screws (TS), Bohlman technique, and a modified Bohlman technique (MBT). Range of motion (L3 - S1) was measured in an intact and repaired state for flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right torsion. To recreate a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis a bilateral L5/S1 facetectomy, removing the intervertebral disc completely, and the L5 body was displaced 50%-60% over the sacral promontory. Results were analyzed and compared to intact baseline measurements. Standard quasi-static moments (5 Nm) were applied in all modes.

RESULTS

All range of motion (ROM) were in reference to intact baseline values. TS had the lowest ROM in all modes (p=.006-.495). Statistical difference was found only in extension for TS vs. BT (p=.011) and TS vs. MBT (p=.014). No bone or implant failures occurred.

CONCLUSION

TS provided the lowest ROM in all modes of loading compared to Bohlman technique and MBT. Our study indicates that TS results in the most biomechanically stable construct.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Knowledge of the biomechanical attributes of various constructs could aid physicians in choosing a surgical construct for their patients.

A comparative study of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis

Introduction:

One of the most common types of spinal diseases is spondylolisthesis, which in advanced cases requires surgical intervention. This study aimed to compare the results of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Methods:

A study design that randomized controlled trial. A total of 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of spondylolisthesis at Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated from July 2020 to February 2021 (35 patients underwent L4-L5-S1 and 35 received L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment). The radicular and low back pain (LBP) intensity (Vanguard Australian Shares), blood loss, wound infection, reduction, and quality of life (SF-12 scores) were quantified before the surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in two groups.

Results:

Patients involved in the two groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics. The percent slip in L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 group, respectively, postoperative 81.11% and 57.89%, P = 0.0001. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative were higher in the L4-L5-S1 group when compared to the L5-S1 group (P < 0.05). The wound infection rate of the L4-L5-S1 group was similar to that of the L5-S1 group (8.6% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.303). There was no difference in radicular and LBP intensity, SF-12 scores among patients with L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Both L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 were equally beneficial in improving short-term functional outcomes for patients with high grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. However, L4-L5-S1 was associated with statistically significant higher incidences of blood loss, but it was accompanied by a better reduction. Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering L4-L5-S1.

Posterior spinal fixation using penetrating endplate screws in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis-related thoracolumbar fractures

OBJECTIVE

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)-related vertebral fractures essentially require operative treatment due to severe fracture site instability and high potential risk of posttraumatic neurological deficit. However, the optimal surgical procedure remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of posterior spinal fixation with penetrating endplate screws (PESs) for DISH-related thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational study. They included data from 26 consecutive patients with DISH-related thoracolumbar fractures who were treated with posterior spinal fixation using either conventional pedicle screws (PS group, n = 8) or a combined PES technique (PES group, n = 18) between 2013 and 2019. Age, sex, BMI, bone mineral density, fracture level, use of antithrombotic drug, blood loss, operation time, fixation range, perioperative American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score, implant failure, revision surgery, complications, and mortality were compared. The authors also evaluated screw loosening and bone healing on radiographs and CT scans.

RESULTS

More patients had vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine in the PS group than in the PES group (3 vs 0; p = 0.019). Patients in the PES group had less blood loss (63 vs 173 ml; p = 0.048) and shorter range of fixation (5 vs 5.5 levels; p = 0.041). The screw loosening rate was significantly lower in the PES group than in the PS group (3% vs 49%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior spinal fixation using a PES technique may be an ideal surgical procedure for thoracolumbar fractures with DISH, providing more rigid and less invasive fixation than PS.

Screws Fixation for Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OL-LIF): A Finite Element Study

Background

The combination of screw fixation and cage can provide stability in lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), which is an important technique to treat lumbar degeneration diseases. As the narrow surface cage is developed in oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OL-LIF), screw fixation should be improved at the same time. We used the finite element (FE) method to investigate the biomechanics response by three different ways of screw fixation in OL-LIF.

Methods

Using a validated FE model, OL-LIF with 3 different screw fixations was simulated, including percutaneous transverterbral screw (PTVS) fixation, percutaneous cortical bone trajectory screw (PCBTS) fixation, and percutaneous transpedical screw (PPS) fixation. Range of motion (ROM), vertebral body displacement, cage displacement, cage stress, cortical bone stress, and screw stress were compared.

Results

ROM in FE models significantly decreased by 84-89% in flexion, 91-93% in extension, 78-89% in right and left lateral bending, and 73-82% in right and left axial rotation compared to the original model. The maximum displacement of the vertebral body and the cage in six motions except for the extension of model PTVS was the smallest among models. Meanwhile, the model PTVS had the higher stress of screw-rods system and also the lowest stress of cage. In all moments, the maximum stresses of the cages were lower than their yield stress.

Conclusions

Three screw fixations can highly restrict the surgical functional spinal unit (FSU). PTVS provided the better stability than the other two screw fixations. It may be a good choice for OL-LIF.

Usefulness of dynamic stabilisation with mobile percutaneous pedicle screw for thoracic vertebral fractures in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

We report a case of vertebral fracture with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) who underwent posterior dynamic stabilisation using mobile percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) with 1 above-1 below and obtained good bone fusion. A 76-year-old man experienced severe low back pain after he fell backward 1 m off a stepladder during work. A 12th thoracic vertebral fracture with DISH was observed. As the fractured part was unstable due to a three-column injury, and the conservative treatment of resting was not successful, posterior dynamic stabilisation with a mobile PPS between T11-L1 was performed the 38th day after injury. Immediately after surgery, a fracture gap was observed, but 5 months later, vertebral body height was shortened by about 4 mm, and good bone fusion was observed without loosening of the screw. The mobile PPS flexibly adapts to spinal plasticity and may be useful for bone union in vertebral fractures associated with DISH.

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fracture Accompanied by Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Using Transdiscal Screws for Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Preliminary Results

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective case series enrolled 13 patients who underwent posterior fixation with both transdiscal screws for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (TSDs) and pedicle screws (PSs) to treat spinal injury accompanied by diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).

PURPOSE

To describe the usefulness, feasibility, and biomechanics of TSD.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Vertebral bodies accompanied by DISH generally have lower bone mineral density than normal vertebral bodies because of the stress shielding effect. This phenomenon tends to makes screw fixation challenging. To our knowledge, solutions for this issue have not previously been reported.

METHODS

Patients were assessed using the data on surgical time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, mean number of stabilized intervertebral segments, number of screws used, perioperative complications, union rate, and the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ5D-3L) score at the final follow-up. The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the screw trajectory area, and the actual intraoperative screw insertion torque of TSDs and PSs were also analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The surgical time and estimated intraoperative blood loss were 165.9±45.5 minutes and 71.0±53.4 mL, respectively. The mean number of stabilized intervertebral segments was 4.6±1.0. The number of screws used was 4.9±1.3 for TSDs and 3.0±1.4 for PSs. One death occurred after surgery. The union rate and EQ5D-3L scores were 100% and 0.608±0.128, respectively. The HU value and actual intraoperative screw insertion torque of TSDs were significantly better than those of PSs (p<0.001, p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve stable surgical outcomes using the combination of TSDs and PSs. The HU value and actual intraoperative screw insertion torque were significantly higher for TSDs than for PSs. Based on these results, when treating thoracolumbar spinal fractures accompanied by DISH in elderly populations, the TSD could be a stronger anchor than the PS.

High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Adults: Current Concepts in Evaluation and Management

Background

Information regarding the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adults has been previously described; however, previous descriptions of the evaluation and surgical management of HGS do not represent more recent and now established approaches. The purpose of the current review is to discuss current concepts in the evaluation and management of patients with HGS.

Methods

Literature review.

Results

HGS is diagnosed in up to 11.3% of adults with spondylolisthesis and typically presents as nonspecific lower back pain. Regarding evaluation, a thorough history and physical examination should be performed, which may help predict the presence of HGS. Diagnostic imaging, and specifically the use of spino-pelvic parameters, are now commonly implicated in guiding treatment course and prognosis. When surgical intervention is indicated, surgical approaches include in situ fusion variations, reduction and partial reduction with fusion, and vertebrectomy. Although the majority of studies suggest improvements with these approaches, the literature is limited by a low level of evidence with regards to the superiority of one technique when compared with others.

Conclusions

HGS is a unique cause of low back pain in adults that carries considerable morbidity, but rarely presents with neurologic symptoms. Although the definitions, classifications, and methods of diagnosis of this spinal deformity have been established and accepted, the ideal surgical management of this deformity remains highly debated. Fusion in situ techniques are often technically easier to perform and provide lower risk of neurologic complications, whereas reduction and fusion techniques offer greater restoration of global spino-pelvic balance. Preoperative spino-pelvic parameters may have utility in assisting in procedural selection; however, future, higher-quality and longer-term studies are warranted to determine the optimal surgical intervention among the widely available techniques currently used, and to better define the indications for these interventions.

Results of Using a Novel Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Technique for Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis-The Single or Double Endplates Penetrating Screw (SEPS/DEPS) Technique

Introduction

We have developed the single or double endplates penetrating screw (SEPS/DEPS) technique, which is a novel percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion technique suitable for osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF) patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of this SEPS/DEPS technique with the conventional pedicle screw technique.

Methods

The screw is inserted upward from the outer caudal side of the pedicle toward the inner cranial side. Vertebrae affected with DISH were inserted with screws using the SEPS/DEPS technique, whereas non-fused vertebrae were inserted with screws using the conventional PPS technique. Twelve OVF patients with DISH were included in this study; three with SEPS/DEPS technique only and nine with a hybrid of both the DEPS and the conventional PPS techniques. As a control group, 12 OVF patients with DISH treated by conventional PPS. The rates of implant failures and of surgical complications were compared between the SEPS/DEPS group and the control group. The insertion torque was measured and compared between DEPS and conventional PPS in three hybrid patients.

Results

In the SEPS/DEPS group, 70 screws were inserted with the SEPS/DEPS technique and 56 screws were inserted with the conventional PPS technique. In the control group, 116 screws were inserted using the conventional PPS and the PS techniques. The loosening of screws was significantly less in screws inserted with the SEPS/DEPS technique (0/70 screws, 0%) than with screws inserted with the conventional technique (12/116 screws, 10.3%). The average insertion torque of DEPS was 2.25 Nm, which was 134% higher than that of conventional PPS which was 1.64 Nm (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

This novel SEPS/DEPS technique has a higher insertion torque compared with the conventional PPS techniques and demonstrated itself to be an effective option for patients with concomitant bone fragility due to DISH.

Grade II Spondylolisthesis: Reverse Bohlman Procedure with Transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 Alar Iliac Screws Placed with Robotic Guidance

BACKGROUND

Grade II spondylolisthesis remains a complex surgical pathology for which there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical strategies. Surgical strategies vary regarding extent of reduction, use of instrumentation/interbody support, and anterior versus posterior approaches with or without decompression. Here we provide the first report on the efficacy of robotic spinal surgery systems in support of the treatment of grade II spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Using 2 illustrative cases, we provide a technical report describing how robotic spinal surgery platform can be used to treatment grade II spondylolisthesis with a novel instrumentation strategy.

RESULTS

We describe how the "reverse Bohlman" technique to achieve a large anterior fusion construct spanning the pathological level and buttressed by the adjacent level above, coupled with a novel, high-fidelity posterior fixation scheme with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screws placed in a minimally invasive fashion with robot guidance allows for the best chance of fusion in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse Bohlman technique coupled with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2AI screw fixation accomplishes the surgical goals of creating a solid fusion construct, avoiding neurologic injury with aggressive reduction, and halting the progression of anterolisthesis. The use of robot guidance allows for efficient placement of these difficult screw trajectories in a minimally invasive fashion.

Interbody Bone Graft via Transdiskal Screw Holes as Treatment for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in terms of decompression with surgical reduction or in situ fusion. In situ fusion has the advantage of being less technically demanding. However, the residual bone graft area is extremely limited, and posterolateral bone grafting is complex as the transverse process of the slipped vertebrae is located anterior to the sacral ala, which correlates with high rates of pseudoarthrosis.

METHODS

Four cases of L5/S1 HGS complaining of low back pain were treated using our new bone graft technique with an exposed osseous end plate. Transdiskal screw holes were made from the S1 pedicle, and bone chips were packed into the L5/S disk space through the screw holes. The slipped L5 vertebra was fixed with a combination of L5/S1 transdiskal and L5 pedicle screws.

RESULTS

All cases exhibited good bony fusion, and the low back pain disappeared in all patients up to the 12-month follow-up. This technique involved packing the bone into the closed space, relieving any concerns regarding bone graft migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Transpedicular bone graft via transdiskal screw holes is an easy and practical technique for raising the fusion rate in surgical treatment of HGS.

Posterior L5-S1 transdiscal screws for high grade spondylolisthesis - a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The surgical management of high-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis (HGLS) is complex and aims to achieve both a solid fusion that is able to support the high shear forces of the lumbosacral junction, as well as neural decompression. We performed a systematic literature review of the safety and efficacy of posterior transdiscal (PTD) screw fixation from L5S1 for HGLS and its variations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed in the PubMed database of the studies describing the use of PTD screw fixation for HGLS. Clinical and radiological data were extracted and discussed. Study quality was assessed with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included and reviewed; all of them were level IV of evidence. Two of them had large case series comparing different surgical techniques: one concluded that PTD was associated with better clinical outcomes when compared with standard screw fixation techniques and the other suggesting that the clinical and radiological outcomes of PTD were similar to those when an interbody fusion (TLIF) technique was performed, but PTD was technically less challenging. The remaining five studies included small case series and case reports. All of them reported the successful useful of PTD with or without technical variations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review concludes, with limited level of evidence that PTD fixation is a safe and efficient technique for treating HGLS patients. It is technically less demanding than a circumferential fusion, even though proper screw insertion is more demanding than conventional pedicle screw fixation.

Biomechanical comparison of transdiscal fixation and posterior fixation with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of L5-S1 lumbosacral joint

Transdiscal screw fixation is generally performed in the treatment of high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The main thought of the study is that the biomechanical performances of the transdiscal pedicle screw fixation can be identical to standard posterior pedicle screw fixations with or without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion. Lumbosacral portions and pelvises of 45 healthy lambs' vertebrae were dissected. Animal cadavers were randomly and equally divided into three groups for instrumentation. Three fixation systems, L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation, L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion, and L5-S1 transdiscal pedicle screw fixation, were generated. Axial compression, flexion, and torsion tests were conducted on test samples of each system. In axial compression, L5-S1 transdiscal fixation was less stiff than L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion. There were no significant differences between groups in flexion. Furthermore, L5-S1 posterior fixation was stiffest under torsional loads. When axial compression and flexion loads are taken into consideration, transdiscal fixation can be alternatively used instead of posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis because it satisfies enough stability. However, in torsion, posterior fixation is shown as a better option due to its higher stiffness.

Image guidance in transdiscal fixation for high-grade spondylolisthesis in adults with correct spinal balance

OBJECTIVE Spondylolisthesis is a prevalent spine disease that recent studies estimate could be detected in 9% of the population. High-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS), however, is much less frequent, which makes it difficult to develop a general recommendation for its treatment. Posterior transdiscal fixation was proposed in 1994 for HGS, and the use of spine navigation could make this technique more accessible and reduce the morbidity associated with the procedure. The purpose of this study was to present a case series involving adult patients with HGS and correct spinal alignment who were treated with transdiscal pedicle screw placement guided with neuronavigation and compare the results to those achieved previously without image guidance. METHODS The authors reviewed all cases in which adult patients with correct spinal alignment were treated for HGS with posterior transdiscal instrumentation placement guided with navigation between 2014 and 2016 at their institution. The authors compared preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters on standing radiographs as well as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low-back pain. Follow-up CT and MRI studies and postoperative radiographs were evaluated to identify any screw malplacement or instrumentation failure. Any other intraoperative or postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS Eight patients underwent posterior transdiscal navigated instrumentation placement during this period, with a mean duration of follow-up of 16 months (range 9-24 months). Six of the patients presented with Meyerding grade III spondylolisthesis and 2 with Meyerding grade IV. In 5 cases, L4-S1 instrumentation was placed, while in the other 3 cases, surgery consisted of transdiscal L5-S1 fixation. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean VAS score for low-back pain (6.5 ± 1.5 vs 4 ± 1.7) and the mean ODI score (49.2 ± 19.4 vs 37.7 ± 22) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.012, respectively). Six patients reduced their use of pain medication. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications during the hospital stay, and as of the most recent follow-up, no complications related to pseudarthrosis or hardware failure had been observed. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with posterior transdiscal pedicle screws with in situ fusion achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with HGS and good sagittal spinal balance. The use of navigation and image guidance was associated with improved results in this technique, including a reduction in postoperative and intraoperative complications related to screw malplacement, pseudarthrosis, and instrumentation failure.

Biomechanical properties of posterior transpedicular-transdiscal oblique lumbar screw fixation with novel trapezoidal lateral interbody spacer: an in vitro human cadaveric model

PURPOSE

To investigate biomechanical properties of posterior transpedicular-transdiscal (TPTD) oblique lumbar screw fixation whereby the screw traverses the inferior pedicle across the posterior disc space into the super-adjacent body and lateral trapezoidal interbody spacer.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen osteoligamentous human cadaveric spines (L1-S1) were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR), with pure bending moment set at 7.5 Nm. Surgical constructs included (1) intact spine; (2) bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation at L3-L4; (3) TPTD screw fixation at L3-L4; (4) lateral L3-L4 discectomy; (5) TPTD screw fixation with lateral interbody spacer (TPTD+S); and (6) BPS fixation with lateral interbody spacer (BPS+S). Peak range of motion (ROM) at L3-L4 was normalized to intact for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In FE and LB, all posterior fixation with or without interbody spacers significantly reduced motion compared with intact and discectomy. BPS and BPS+S provided increased fixation in all planes of motion; significantly reducing FE and LB motion relative to TPTD (p = 0.005, p = 0.002 and p = 0.020, p = 0.004, respectively). In AR, only BPS significantly reduced normalized ROM to intact (p = 0.034); BPS+S provided greater fixation compared with TPTD+S (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Investigators found less stiffness with TPTD screw fixation than with BPS regardless of immediate stabilization with lateral discectomy and spacer. Clinical use should be decided by required biomechanical performance, difficulty of installation, and extent of paraspinal tissue disruption.

Transdiscal screw versus pedicle screw fixation for high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis in patients younger than 60 years: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes between transdiscal and conventional pedicle fixation for high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study with patients prospectively followed. Twenty-five consecutive patients with mean age of 36.7 years underwent transdiscal fixation, and 31 other with mean age of 42.0 years to pedicle fixation were clinically and radiographically compared. Clinical assessments were performed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Core Outcomes Measures Index (COMI), Short-Form 12 (SF-12), and pain visual analog scale (VAS). Radiographic spinopelvic parameters were also evaluated. The mean follow-up was 2.7 years (range 2.0-5.3).

RESULTS

Preoperative data were comparable between groups. Surgery time, blood loss, and hospital stay were similar between groups. At last follow-up, clinical and radiographic outcomes were significantly improved in both groups. Postoperatively, both lumbar and leg pain VAS were similar between groups, but ODI (20.2 vs. 31.6, p = 0.010), COMI (1.6 vs. 2.8, p = 0.012), and SF-12 physical (84.3 vs. 61.5, p = 0.004) and mental (81.5 vs. 69.4, p = 0.021) scores were significantly better in the transdiscal group. The neurologic complication rate was similar in both groups. There were 4 pseudoarthroses in the pedicle group, and none in the transdiscal group.

CONCLUSION

L5-S1 transdiscal screw fixation provided better functional and radiographic outcomes at medium-term than conventional pedicle fixation for high-grade spondylolisthesis, although transdiscal sacral screws are difficult to place in correct position.

Biomechanics of transvertebral screw fixation in the thoracic spine: an in vitro study

OBJECTIVE Transvertebral screws provide stability in thoracic spinal fixation surgeries, with their use mainly limited to patients who require a pedicle screw salvage technique. However, the biomechanical impact of transvertebral screws alone, when they are inserted across 2 vertebral bodies, has not been studied. In this study, the authors assessed the stability offered by a transvertebral screw construct for posterior instrumentation and compared its biomechanical performance to that of standard bilateral pedicle screw and rod (PSR) fixation. METHODS Fourteen fresh human cadaveric thoracic spine segments from T-6 to T-11 were divided into 2 groups with similar ages and bone quality. Group 1 received transvertebral screws across 2 levels without rods and subsequently with interconnecting bilateral rods at 3 levels (T8-10). Group 2 received bilateral PSR fixation and were sequentially tested with interconnecting rods at T7-8 and T9-10, at T8-9, and at T8-10. Flexibility tests were performed on intact and instrumented specimens in both groups. Presurgical and postsurgical O-arm 3D images were obtained to verify screw placement. RESULTS The mean range of motion (ROM) per motion segment with transvertebral screws spanning 2 levels compared with the intact condition was 66% of the mean intact ROM during flexion-extension (p = 0.013), 69% during lateral bending (p = 0.015), and 47% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). The mean ROM per motion segment with PSR spanning 2 levels compared with the intact condition was 38% of the mean intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 57% during lateral bending (p = 0.007), and 27% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). Adding bilateral rods to the 3 levels with transvertebral screws decreased the mean ROM per motion segment to 28% of intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 37% during lateral bending (p < 0.001), and 30% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). The mean ROM per motion segment for PSR spanning 3 levels was 21% of intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 33% during lateral bending (p < 0.001), and 22% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Biomechanically, fixation with a novel technique in the thoracic spine involving transvertebral screws showed restoration of stability to well within the stability provided by PSR fixation.

Transdiscal mid- and upper thoracic vertebroplasty: first description of 2 exemplary cases

Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are established treatment methods to reinforce fractured vertebral bodies. In cases of previous pedicle screw instrumentation, vertebral body cannulation may be challenging. The authors describe, for the first time, an approach through the adjacent inferior vertebra and disc space in the thoracic spine for cement augmentation. A 78-year-old woman underwent posterior fusion with pedicle screws after vertebrectomy and reconstruction with cement and Steinmann pins for a pathological T-7 fracture. Two months later she developed a compression fracture of the vertebral body at the lower part of the construct, and a vertebroplasty was performed. Because a standard transpedicular route was not available, an inferior transdiscal trajectory was used for the cement injection. A 73-year-old man with a history of rheumatoid arthritis underwent cervicothoracic fusion posteriorly for subluxation. He developed pain in the upper thoracic area, and the authors performed a transdiscal vertebroplasty at T-2. The standard transpedicular route was not possible. The vertebral body was satisfactorily filled up with cement. Clinically both patients benefited significantly in terms of back pain and showed an uneventful follow-up of 3 months. Transdiscal vertebroplasty can achieve good results in the mid- and upper thoracic spine when a standard transpedicular trajectory is not possible, and can therefore be a good alternative in select cases.

[Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents]

Low back pain is a common cause of lost playing time in young athletes, and spondylolysis is its most common identifiable cause. Despite technological advances in radiology, which can lead to an early diagnosis with better prognosis, progression to spondylolisthesis is sometimes asymptomatic and may not be detected until late stages. There are wide variations, suggesting lack of consensus as regards the objective of treatment, which consists of clinical, radiological, biomechanical or functional improvement. There is also a lack of agreement regarding the ideal conservative treatment, surgical indications and need of slip reduction, and most of the established recommendations are not evidence based. We present a review of literature, which summarizes the current knowledge of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Feasibility and biomechanical performance of a novel transdiscal screw system for one level in non-spondylolisthetic lumbar fusion: an in vitro investigation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS) is currently the "gold standard" fusion technique for spinal instability. A new stabilization system that provides the same level of stability through a less invasive procedure will have a high impact on clinical practice. A new transdiscal screw system is investigated as a promising minimally invasive device.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of a novel transdiscal screw in spinal fixation as an alternative to BPSS, with and without an interbody cage, in non-spondylolisthesis cases.

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study in lumbar cadaveric spines.

METHODS

Twelve lumbar cadaveric segments (L4-S1) were tested under flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Six treatments were simulated as follows: (1) intact, (2) bilateral facetectomy at L4-L5, (3) transdiscal screw system, (4) BPSS, (5) BPSS with transforaminal lumbar interbody cage, and (6) transdiscal screws with transforaminal interbody cage. Specimens were randomly divided into two testing groups: Group 1 (n=6) was tested under the first five conditions, in the order presented, whereas Group 2 (n=6) was tested under the first, second, third, fourth, and sixth conditions, with the fourth condition preceding the third. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone stiffness (NZS) were estimated and normalized with respect to the intact condition to explore statistical differences among treatments using non-parametric approaches.

RESULTS

Significant differences in FE ROM were observed in the pedicle screws-cage condition with respect to the facetectomy (p<.01), the pedicle screw (p=.03), and the transdiscal screw (p<.02) conditions. All fixation constructs significantly restricted LB and AR ROM (p<.01) with respect to facetectomy. In terms of stiffness, the pedicle screw and the transdiscal screw systems increased (p<.01) LB and AR NZS with respect to facetectomy. The pedicle screws-cage condition significantly increased flexion and extension stiffness with respect to all other conditions (p<.05). However, LB NZS for the pedicle screws-cage and the transdiscal screws-cage condition could not be explored due to a testing order bias effect. There was not enough evidence to state any difference between the pedicle and transdiscal screw conditions in terms of ROM or NZS.

CONCLUSIONS

Transdiscal and pedicle screw systems showed comparable in vitro biomechanical performance in the immediate stabilization of a complete bilateral facetectomy. The pedicle screws-cage condition was the most stable in FE motion; however, comparison with respect to the transdiscal screws-cage condition could not be investigated.

Novel lumbosacral axial fixation techniques

For patients with low back pain secondary to pathological motion of an unstable lumbar motion segment, interbody fusion may be indicated. Numerous open and minimally invasive techniques have been traditionally used, but all suffer from shortcomings related to biomechanics or inherent iatrogenic destabilization. A novel transaxial approach to the lumbosacral junction has recently been described which appears to obviate many of the limitations of previous techniques. Preliminary results of the transaxial approach to lumbosacral fixation appear promising.

Placement of thoracic transvertebral pedicle screws using 3D image guidance

Object

Transvertebral pedicle screws have successfully been used in the treatment of high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. An advantage of transvertebral pedicle screws is the purchase of multiple cortical layers across 2 vertebrae, thereby increasing the stability of the construct. At the lumbosacral junction, transvertebral pedicle screws have been shown to be biomechanically superior to pedicle screws placed in the standard fashion. The use of transvertebral pedicle screws at spinal levels other than L5–S1 has not been reported in the literature. The authors describe their technique of transvertebral pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using 3D image guidance.

Methods

Twelve patients undergoing cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar fusion had 41 thoracic transvertebral pedicle screws placed across 26 spinal levels using this technique. Indications for placement of thoracic transvertebral pedicle screws in earlier cases included osteoporosis and pedicle screw salvage. However, in subsequent cases screws were placed in patients undergoing multilevel thoracolumbar fusion without osteoporosis, particularly near the top of the construct. Image guidance in this study was accomplished using the Medtronic StealthStation S7 image guidance system used in conjunction with the O-arm. All patients were slated to undergo postoperative CT scanning at approximately 4–6 months for fusion assessment, which also allowed for grading of the transvertebral pedicle screws.

Results

No thoracic transvertebral pedicle screw placed in this study had to be replaced or repositioned after intraoperative review of the cone beam CT scans. Review of the postoperative CT scans revealed all transvertebral screws to be across the superior disc space with the tips in the superior vertebral body. Six pedicle screws were placed using the in-out-in technique in patients with narrow pedicles, leaving 35 screws that underwent breach analysis. No pedicle breach was noted in 34 of 35 screws. A Grade 1 (< 2 mm) medial breach was noted in 1 screw without clinical consequence. Solid fusion was observed across 25 of 26 spinal levels that underwent transvertebral screw placement including 7 spinal levels located at the top of a multilevel construct.

Conclusions

This report describes the authors' initial in vivo experience with the 3D image-guided placement of 41 thoracic transvertebral pedicle screws. Advantages of thoracic transvertebral screws include the purchase of 2 vertebral segments across multiple cortical layers. A high fusion rate was observed across spinal levels in which transvertebral screws were placed. A formal biomechanical study is needed to assess the biomechanical advantages of this technique and is currently being planned.

Minimal access bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive or "minimal access surgery" (MAS) is being utilized with increasing frequency to reduce approach-related morbidity in the lumbar spine. This paper describes our minimal access technique for posterior bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and spinal instrumentation in a patient with high-grade spondylolisthesis grade (Myerding Grade III) with 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

A 24-year-old lady presented with mechanical back pain and left leg L5 radiculopathy. On examination, she was a thin lady with an obvious step deformity in the lower lumbar spine and otherwise, a normal neurological examination. Imaging showed a grade III isthmic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with foraminal stenosis and focal kyphotic alignment of 20° [slip angle (SA) = 70°]. Conservative measures had failed, and a decision was made to proceed with a MAS-TLIF approach.

RESULTS

The estimated blood loss was less than 100 ml, operating time 150 min, and post-operative hospital stay was 4 days. Post-operatively the patient had significant improvement of back and radicular pain. Improvement in ODI was substantial and sustained at 5 years. A solid fusion was achieved at 8 months. The slip percentage improved from 68 % (pre-op) to 28 % (post-op) and the focal alignment to 20° lordosis (SA = 110°).

CONCLUSIONS

A MAS approach for selected patients with a mobile high-grade spondylolisthesis is feasible, safe and clinically effective, with the added benefit of reduced soft-tissue disruption. Our result of this technique suggests that the ability to correct focal deformity, and achieve excellent radiographic and clinical outcome is similar to the open procedure.

Segmental stiffness achieved by three types of fixation for unstable lumbar spondylolytic motion segments

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the relative stability in lumbar spondylolysis (SP) of a rigid anterior plate (with a novel compression slot) versus traditional posterior pedicle screw (PS) fixation. Summary of Background Data Arthrodesis has been a mainstay of treatment for symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. Posterior PS fixation has become a commonly used adjunct. Some have advocated anterior lumbar interbody fixation (ALIF) plate as an alternative. The relative stability afforded by ALIF in SP has not been well characterized, nor has the contribution afforded by a compression screw slot in an ALIF plate. Methods Calf spine segments were characterized in the normal state, after sectioning the pars (SP model), then after reconstruction with an interbody spacer and either PS/rods, or an ALIF plate, or both. Results ALIF plate conferred stability on the spondylolytic segment only comparable to that of the normal functional spinal unit (FSU). Posterior fixation was more stable than anterior fixation in all testing modes. Addition of an ALIF plate conferred a significant additional stability in those that already had posterior fixation. The utilization of an anterior compression screw conferred additional stability in extension testing only. Conclusions ALIF plate reconstruction in the setting of SP may not confer enough segmental stability to predictably encourage fusion beyond that of the uninstrumented intact FSU. The utilization of an integral compression screw in an ALIF plate may not confer clinically significant additional construct stability in SP.

The European multicenter trial on the safety and efficacy of guided oblique lumbar interbody fusion (GO-LIF)

Background

Because of the implant-related problems with pedicle screw-based spinal instrumentations, other types of fixation have been tried in spinal arthrodesis. One such technique is the direct trans-pedicular, trans-discal screw fixation, pioneered by Grob for spondylolisthesis. The newly developed GO-LIF procedure expands the scope of the Grob technique in several important ways and adds security by means of robotic-assisted navigation. This is the first clinical trial on the GO-LIF procedure and it will assess safety and efficacy.

Methods/Design

Multicentric prospective study with n = 40 patients to undergo single level instrumented spinal arthrodesis of the lumbar or the lumbosacral spine, based on a diagnosis of: painful disc degeneration, painful erosive osteochondrosis, segmental instability, recurrent disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. The primary target criteria with regards to safety are: The number, severity and cause of intra- and perioperative complications. The number of significant penetrations of the cortical layer of the vertebral body by the implant as recognized on postoperative CT. The primary target parameters with regards to feasibility are: Performance of the procedure according to the preoperative plan. The planned follow-up is 12 months and the following scores will be evaluated as secondary target parameters with regards to clinical improvement: VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, short form - 12 health questionnaire and the Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire for patients with spinal claudication. The secondary parameters with regards to construct stability are visible fusion or lack thereof and signs of implant loosening, implant migration or pseudarthrosis on plain and functional radiographs.

Discussion

This trial will for the first time assess the safety and efficacy of guided oblique lumbar interbody fusion. There is no control group, but the results, the outcome and the rate of any complications will be analyzed on the background of the literature on instrumented spinal fusion. Despite its limitations, we expect that this study will serve as the key step in deciding whether a direct comparative trial with another fusion technique is warranted.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials NCT00810433

Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents

A review of the current literature shows that there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Most of the views and recommendations provided in various reports are weakly supported by evidence. There is a limited amount of information about the natural history of the condition, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of various conservative and operative treatments. This systematic review summarises the current knowledge on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and attempts to present a rational approach to the evaluation and management of this condition in children and adolescents.

Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study using human thoracolumbar spines.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the strength of fixation of pedicle screws augmented with Nesplon tape applied sublaminar or applied subpars.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are no reports on the biomechanical assessment of Nesplon tape used for pedicle screw augmentation.

METHODS

Experiment 1: pedicle screws were inserted into bilateral pedicles as follows: (1) pedicle screw alone connected to a rod (PS alone), (2) pedicle screw augmented with Nesplon tape applied sublaminar, connected to a rod [pedicle screw applied sublaminar (PSSL)], and (3) pedicle screw augmented with tape applied subpars, connected to a rod [pedicle screw applied subpars (PSSP)]. The rods were pulled and pushed until the pedicle screw was loose. Experiment 2: 6 thoracolumbar spines were biomechanically tested as follows: axial compression, flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial rotation. This sequence was applied to: (1) the intact spine; (2) the spine made unstable; (3) the spine fixed by pedicle screws and rods (PS alone); (4) the same as 3, but with the pedicle screws augmented using Nesplon tape applied sublaminar (PSSL); and (5) the same as 3, but with pedicle screws augmented using tape applied subpars (PSSP). From the load-deformation curves, stiffness values were calculated.

RESULTS

Experiment 1: the pedicle screws augmented by sublaminar or subpars tape (PSSL or PSSP) showed significantly greater fixation strength compared with those pedicles that were not augmented by tape (PS alone). Experiment 2: a pedicle screw/rod construct augmented by tape provided a stiffer construct than the same construct without augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicle screws that are inserted into the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine and augmented by Nesplon tape applied sublaminar or subpars provide firmer fixation of the screws and a stiffer pedicle screw/rod construct than the same construct without augmentation by tape.

Minimally Invasive Fusion and Fixation Techniques

Instrumented fusion plays an important role in treating a variety of degenerative and traumatic diseases of the spine. Traditional open techniques have been associated with a high degree of approach-related morbidity because of muscle retraction and blood loss. A variety of minimally invasive techniques have been developed for instrumentation of the entire spine. Advances in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms for stable bony fusion should promote the use of even less invasive techniques in the future.