1
|
Bartolozzi AR, Oquendo YA, Koltsov JCB, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Polymethyl methacrylate augmentation and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity patients. Eur Spine J 2024; 33:599-609. [PMID: 37812256 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07966-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a complication following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) possibly ameliorated by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) vertebroplasty of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV). This study quantifies PJK following surgical correction bridging the thoracolumbar junction ± PMMA vertebroplasty. METHODS ASD patients from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and included with immediate postoperative radiographs and at least one follow-up radiograph. PMMA vertebroplasty at the UIV and UIV + 1 was performed at the surgeons' discretion. RESULTS Of 102 patients, 56% received PMMA. PMMA patients were older (70 ± 8 vs. 66 ± 10, p = 0.021), more often female (89.3% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.005), and had more osteoporosis (26.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.013). 55.4% of PMMA patients developed PJK compared to 38.6% of controls (p = 0.097), and the rate of PJK development was not different between groups in univariate survival models. There was no difference in PJF (p > 0.084). Reoperation rates were 7.1% in PMMA versus 11.4% in controls (p = 0.501). In multivariable models, PJK development was not associated with the use of PMMA vertebroplasty (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38-1.60, p = 0.470), either when considered overall in the cohort or specifically in those with poor bone quality. PJK was significantly predicted by poor bone quality irrespective of PMMA use (HR 3.81, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In thoracolumbar fusions for adult spinal deformity, PMMA vertebroplasty was not associated with reduced PJK development, which was most highly associated with poor bone quality. Preoperative screening and management for osteoporosis is critical in achieving an optimal outcome for these complex operations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4, retrospective non-randomized case review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur R Bartolozzi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
| | - Yousi A Oquendo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buckland AJ, Huynh NV, Menezes CM, Cheng I, Kwon B, Protopsaltis T, Braly BA, Thomas JA. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 has a low rate of complications in appropriately selected patients when using a standardized surgical technique. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:53-61. [PMID: 38164083 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b1.bjj-2023-0693.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to reassess the rate of neurological, psoas-related, and abdominal complications associated with L4-L5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) undertaken using a standardized preoperative assessment and surgical technique. Methods This was a multicentre retrospective study involving consecutively enrolled patients who underwent L4-L5 LLIF by seven surgeons at seven institutions in three countries over a five-year period. The demographic details of the patients and the details of the surgery, reoperations and complications, including femoral and non-femoral neuropraxia, thigh pain, weakness of hip flexion, and abdominal complications, were analyzed. Neurological and psoas-related complications attributed to LLIF or posterior instrumentation and persistent symptoms were recorded at one year postoperatively. Results A total of 517 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.0 years (SD 10.3) and their mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.5). A mean of 1.2 levels (SD 0.6) were fused with LLIF, and a mean of 1.6 (SD 0.9) posterior levels were fused. Femoral neuropraxia occurred in six patients (1.2%), of which four (0.8%) were LLIF-related and two (0.4%) had persistent symptoms one year postoperatively. Non-femoral neuropraxia occurred in nine patients (1.8%), one (0.2%) was LLIF-related and five (1.0%) were persistent at one year. All LLIF-related neuropraxias resolved by one year. A total of 32 patients (6.2%) had thigh pain, 31 (6.0%) were LLIF-related and three (0.6%) were persistent at one year. Weakness of hip flexion occurred in 14 patients (2.7%), of which eight (1.6%) were LLIF-related and three (0.6%) were persistent at one year. No patients had bowel injury, three (0.6%) had an intraoperative vascular injury (not LLIF-related), and five (1.0%) had ileus. Reoperations occurred in five patients (1.0%) within 30 days, 37 (7.2%) within 90 days, and 41 (7.9%) within one year postoperatively. Conclusion LLIF involving the L4-L5 disc level has a low rate of persistent neurological, psoas-related, and abdominal complications in patients with the appropriate indications and using a standardized surgical technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Buckland
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia
- Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nam V Huynh
- Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Ivan Cheng
- Austin Spine Surgery, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - J A Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kusins J, Uyekawa S, Singh G, Peng Y, McQuarrie C, Holman P, Cheng I, Jekir M. A Lateral Expandable Cage with Independently Adjustable Anterior and Posterior Heights Can Improve the Pressure Distribution at the Cage-Endplate Interface: A Biomechanics Study. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e722-e731. [PMID: 37898279 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate how the expansion trajectory of a lateral expandable cage affects pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface under well-controlled biomechanical loading conditions. METHODS Three unique vertical height expansion trajectories used by clinically relevant lateral expandable cages were evaluated: craniocaudal, fixed-arc, and independently adjustable anterior and posterior height expansion. Two biomechanical loading scenarios were performed. The first scenario used custom bone foam test blocks to assess resultant pressure distribution at varying test block lordotic angles and expansion heights. The second scenario simulated expansion using synthetic spine units and compared the pressure distribution following expansion. RESULTS For an expandable cage with craniocaudal expansion, the pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface was found to depend heavily on the lordotic angle of the test block (P < 0.001), but not expansion height (P = 0.634). The greatest maximum pressure occurred at higher test block lordotic angles. For an expandable cage with fixed-arc expansion, the pressure distribution shifted anteriorly throughout expansion. In the simulated expansion trials, an expandable cage with adjustable anterior and posterior height expansion was found to improve the pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface, reducing the maximum pressure measurements by 22% and 14% in the craniocaudal and fixed-arc expansion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Of the cage designs evaluated in this study, an expandable cage with independently adjustable anterior and posterior heights lowered the maximum pressure measured at the cage-endplate interface and alleviated the potential of cage edge loading, both of which are important considerations that are fundamental for a successful fusion procedure and the mitigation of implant subsidence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yun Peng
- NuVasive, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Paul Holman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Choi E, Su C, Wu J, Aredo J, Neal J, Leung A, Backhus L, Marchand L, Liang S, Cheng I, Wakelee H, Han S. OA01.01 Second Primary Lung Cancer among Lung Cancer Survivors Who Never Smoked. J Thorac Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.09.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
5
|
Koltsov JCB, Sambare TD, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Patient-level payment patterns prior to single level lumbar decompression are associated with resource utilization, postoperative payments, and adverse events. Spine J 2023; 23:227-237. [PMID: 36241040 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding patient-specific trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) surrounding lumbar spine surgery is critically needed to better inform surgical decision making and the development of targeted interventions. PURPOSE 1) Identify subgroups of patients following distinct patterns in direct healthcare payments pre- and postoperatively, 2) determine whether these patterns are associated with patient and surgical factors, and 3) examine whether preoperative payment patterns are related to postoperative payments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and adverse events. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM Marketscan Research Databases 2007-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE Adults undergoing primary single-level decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis (n=12,394). OUTCOME MEASURES Direct healthcare payments, HCRU payments (15 categories), 90-day complications and all-cause readmission, 2-year reoperation METHODS: Group-based trajectory modeling is an application of finite mixture modeling that is able to identify meaningful subgroups within a population that follow distinct developmental trajectories over time. We used this technique to identify subgroups of patients following distinct profiles in preoperative direct healthcare payments. A separate analysis was performed to identify distinct profiles in payments postoperatively. Patient and surgical factors associated with these payment profiles were assessed with multinomial logistic regression, and associations with adverse events were assessed with risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS We identified 4 preoperative patient payment subgroups following distinct profiles in payments: Pre-Low (5.8% of patients), Pre-Early-Rising (4.8%), Pre-Medium (26.1%), and Pre-High (63.3%). Postoperatively, 3 patient subgroups were identified: Post-Low (8.9%), Post-Medium (29.6%), and Post-High (61.4%). Patients following the higher-cost pre- and postoperative payment profiles were older, more likely female, and had a greater physical and mental comorbidity burden. With each successively higher preoperative payment profile, patients were increasingly likely to have high postoperative payments, use more HCRU (particularly high-cost services such as inpatient admissions, ER, and SNF/IRF care), and experience postoperative adverse events. Following risk adjustment for patient and surgical factors, patients following the Pre-High payment profile had 209.5 (95% CI: 144.2, 309.7; p<.001) fold greater odds for following the Post-High payment profile, 1.8 (1.3, 2.5; p=.003) fold greater odds for 90-day complications, and 1.7 (1.2, 2.6; p=.035) fold greater odds for 2-year reoperation relative to patients following the Pre-Low payment profile. CONCLUSIONS There are identifiable subgroups of patients who follow distinct profiles in direct healthcare payments surrounding lumbar decompression surgery. These payment profiles are related to patient age, sex, and physical and mental comorbidities. Notably, preoperative payment profiles may provide prognostic value, as they are associated with postoperative costs, HCRU, and adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayme C B Koltsov
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Tanmaya D Sambare
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buckland AJ, Braly BA, O'Malley NA, Ashayeri K, Protopsaltis TS, Kwon B, Cheng I, Thomas JA. Lateral decubitus single position anterior posterior surgery improves operative efficiency, improves perioperative outcomes, and maintains radiological outcomes comparable with traditional anterior posterior fusion at minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2023; 23:685-694. [PMID: 36641035 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The advantages of Lateral Single Position surgery (LSPS) in the perioperative period has previously been demonstrated, however 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LSPS versus gold-standard FLIP STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort review. PATIENT SAMPLE Four hundred forty- two patients undergoing lumbar fusion via LSPS or FLIP OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and reasons for reoperation at 30-days, 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years. Radiographic outcomes included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, and segmental lumbar lordosis. METHODS Patients were grouped as LSPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure under the same anesthetic. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2-years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<.05. RESULTS Four hundred forty- two pts met inclusion, including 352 LSPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs 56.9; p≤.001) and smoking status (7% vs 16%; p=.023) between the LSPS and FLIP groups. LSPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p<.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p<.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p<.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs 3.61 days; p<.001) compared to FLIP. LSPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9%vs 34.4%; p=.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p<.001). No differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%LSPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=.125), 90-day (5.1%LSPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.441). LSPS group had a significantly lower preoperative PI-LL (4.1° LSPS vs 8.6°FLIP, p=.018), and a significantly greater postoperative LL (56.6° vs 51.8°, p = .006). No significant differences were noted in rates of fusion (94.3% LSPS vs 97.8% FLIP; p=.266) or subsidence (6.9% LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.260). CONCLUSIONS LSPS and circumferential fusions have similar outcomes at 2-years post-operatively, while reducing perioperative complications, improving perioperative efficiency and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Buckland
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Nicholas A O'Malley
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomas JA, Menezes C, Buckland AJ, Khajavi K, Ashayeri K, Braly BA, Kwon B, Cheng I, Berjano P. Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base. Eur Spine J 2022; 31:2167-2174. [PMID: 35913621 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07229-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide definitions and a conceptual framework for single position surgery (SPS) applied to circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine. METHODS Narrative literature review and experts' opinion. RESULTS Two major limitations of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been (a) a perceived need to reposition the patient to the prone position for posterior fixation, and (b) the lack of a robust solution for fusion at the L5/S1 level. Recently, two strategies for performing single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion have been described. The combination of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position (LALIF), LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (pPSF) in the lateral decubitus position is known as lateral single-position surgery (LSPS). Prone LLIF (PLLIF) involves transpsoas LLIF done in the prone position that is more familiar for surgeons to then implant pedicle screw fixation. This can be referred to as prone single-position surgery (PSPS). In this review, we describe the evolution of and rationale for single-position spinal surgery. Pertinent studies validating LSPS and PSPS are reviewed and future questions regarding the future of these techniques are posed. Lastly, we present an algorithm for single-position surgery that describes the utility of LALIF, LLIF and PLLIF in the treatment of patients requiring AP lumbar fusions. CONCLUSIONS Single position surgery in circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine includes posterior fixation in association with any of the following: lateral position LLIF, prone position LLIF, lateral position ALIF, and their combination (lateral position LLIF+ALIF). Preliminary studies have validated these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA.
| | | | | | - Kaveh Khajavi
- Georgia Spine and Neurosurgery Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Brett A Braly
- The Spine Clinic of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haider G, Wagner KE, Chandra V, Cheng I, Stienen MN, Veeravagu A. Utilization of lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of failed prior TLIF: illustrative case. Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons 2022; 3:CASE2296. [PMID: 35733821 PMCID: PMC9204934 DOI: 10.3171/case2296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of the lateral decubitus approach for L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (LALIF) is a recent advancement capable of facilitating single-position surgery, revision operations, and anterior column reconstruction. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first description of the use of LALIF at L5–S1 for failed prior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and anterior column reconstruction. Using an illustrative case, the authors discuss their experience using LALIF at L5–S1 for the revision of pseudoarthrosis and TLIF failure. OBSERVATIONS The patient had prior attempted L2 to S1 fusion with TLIF but suffered from hardware failure and pseudoarthrosis at the L5–S1 level. LALIF was used to facilitate same-position revision at L5–S1 in addition to further anterior column revision and reconstruction by lateral lumbar interbody fusion at the L1–2 level. Robotic posterior T10–S2 fusion was then added to provide stability to the construct and address the patient’s scoliotic deformity. No complications were noted, and the patient was followed until 1 year after the operation with a favorable clinical and radiological result. LESSONS Revision of a prior failed L5–S1 TLIF with an LALIF approach has technical challenges but may be advantageous for single position anterior column reconstruction under certain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ivan Cheng
- Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California; and
| | - Martin N. Stienen
- Department of Neurosurgery & Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koltsov JCB, Sambare TD, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Healthcare resource utilization and costs 2 years pre- and post-lumbar spine surgery for stenosis: a national claims cohort study of 22,182 cases. Spine J 2022; 22:965-974. [PMID: 35123048 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Improved understanding of the pre- and postoperative trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) is needed to better inform patient expectations and aid in the development of strategies to minimize the significant healthcare burden associated with lumbar spine surgery. PURPOSE Examine the time course of costs and HCRU in the 2 years preceding and following elective lumbar spine surgery for stenosis in a large national claims cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM® Marketscan® Research Databases 2007-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients undergoing elective primary single-level lumbar surgery for stenosis with at least 2 years of continuous health plan enrollment pre- and postoperatively. OUTCOME MEASURES Functional measures, including monthly rates of HCRU (15 categories), monthly gross covered payments (including payments made by the health plan and deductibles and coinsurance paid by the patient) overall, by HCRU category, and by spine versus non-spine-related. METHODS All available patients were utilized for analysis of HCRU. For analysis of payments, only patients on noncapitated health plans providing accurate financial information were analyzed. Payments were converted to 2015 United States dollars using the medical care component of the consumer price index. Trends in payments and HCRU were plotted on a monthly basis pre- and post-surgery and assessed with regression models. Relationships with demographics, surgical factors, and comorbidities were assessed with multivariable repeated measures generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Median monthly healthcare payments 2 years prior to surgery were $275 ($22, $868). Baseline HCRU at 2 years preoperatively was stable or only gradually rising (office visits, prescription drug use), but began an increasingly steep rise in many categories 6 to 12 months prior to surgery. Monthly payments began an increasingly steep rise 6 months prior to surgery, reaching a peak of $1,402 ($634, $2,827) in the month prior to surgery. This was driven by an increase in radiology, office visits, PT, injections, prescription medications, ER encounters, and inpatient admissions. Payments dropped dramatically immediately following surgery. Over the remainder of the 2 years, the median total payments declined only slightly, as a continued decline in spine-related payments was offset by gradually increased non-spine related payments as patients aged. By 2 years postoperatively, the percentage of patients using PT and injections returned to within 1% of the baseline levels observed 2 years preoperatively; however, spine-related prescription medication use remained elevated, as did other categories of HCRU (radiology, office visits, lab/diagnostic services, and also rare events such as inpatient admissions, ER encounters, and SNF/IRF). Patients with a fusion component to their surgeries had higher payments and HCRU preoperatively, and this did not resolve postoperatively. Variations in payments and HCRU were also evident among plan types, with patients on comprehensive medical plans-predominantly employer-sponsored supplemental Medicare coverage-utilizing more inpatient, ER, and inpatient rehabilitation & skilled nursing facilities. Patients on high-deductible plans had fewer payments and HCRU across all categories; however, we are unable to distinguish whether this is because they used fewer of these services or if they were paying for these services out of pocket without submitting to the payer. By 2 years postoperatively, 51% of patients had no spine-related monthly payments, while 33% had higher and 16% had lower monthly payments relative to 2 years preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to characterize time trends in direct healthcare payments and HCRU over an extended period preceding and following spine surgery. Differences among plan types potentially highlight disparities in access to care and plan-related financial mediators of patients' healthcare resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Tanmaya D Sambare
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashayeri K, Alex Thomas J, Braly B, O'Malley N, Leon C, Cheng I, Kwon B, Medley M, Eisen L, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ. Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion shows equivalent results to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at one-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2022; 31:2227-2238. [PMID: 35551483 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07226-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compares perioperative and 1-year outcomes of lateral decubitus single position circumferential fusion (L-SPS) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) for degenerative pathologies. METHODS Multicenter retrospective chart review of patients undergoing AP fusion with L-SPS or MIS TLIF. Demographics and clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared using independent samples t tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 445 patients were included: 353 L-SPS, 92 MIS TLIF. The L-SPS cohort was significantly older with fewer diabetics and more levels fused. The L-SPS cohort had significantly shorter operative time, blood loss, radiation dosage, and length of stay compared to MIS TLIF. 1-year follow-up showed that the L-SPS cohort had higher rates of fusion (97.87% vs. 81.11%; p = 0.006) and lower rates of subsidence (6.38% vs. 38.46%; p < 0.001) compared with MIS TLIF. There were significantly fewer returns to the OR within 1 year for early mechanical failures with L-SPS (0.0% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001). 1-year radiographic outcomes revealed that the L-SPS cohort had a greater LL (56.6 ± 12.5 vs. 51.1 ± 15.9; p = 0.004), smaller PI-LL mismatch (0.2 ± 13.0 vs. 5.5 ± 10.5; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in amount of change in VAS scores between cohorts. Similar results were seen after propensity-matched analysis and sub-analysis of cases including L5-S1. CONCLUSIONS L-SPS improves perioperative outcomes and does not compromise clinical or radiographic results at 1-year follow-up compared with MIS TLIF. There may be decreased rates of early mechanical failure with L-SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, USA.
| | - J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Carlos Leon
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Medley
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leon Eisen
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buckland AJ, Leon C, Ashayeri K, Cheng I, Alex Thomas J, Braly B, Kwon B, Maglaras C, Eisen L. Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations. Eur Spine J 2022; 31:2188-2195. [PMID: 35552530 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07227-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Single position surgery has demonstrated to reduce hospital length of stay, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain, ileus, and complications. ALIF and LLIF surgeries offer advantages of placing large interbody devices under direct compression and can be performed by a minimally invasive approach in the lateral position. Furthermore, simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column is possible in the lateral position without the need for patient repositioning. The purpose of this study is to outline the anatomical and technical considerations for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position. METHODS Surgical technique and technical considerations for reconstruction of the anterior column in the lateral position by ALIF at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. RESULTS Topics outlined in this review include: Operating room layout and patient positioning; surgical anatomy and approach; vessel mobilization and retractor placement for L4-5 and L5-S1 lateral ALIF exposure, in addition to comparative technique of disc space preparation, trialing and implant placement compared to the supine ALIF procedure. CONCLUSIONS Anterior exposure performed in the lateral decubitus position allows safe-, minimally invasive access and implant placement in ALIF. The approach requires less peritoneal and vessel retraction than in a supine position, in addition to allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns when performing 360° Anterior-Posterior fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Leon
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | | | - J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leon Eisen
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wadhwa H, Oquendo YA, Tigchelaar SS, Warren SI, Koltsov JCB, Desai A, Veeravagu A, Alamin TF, Ratliff JK, Hu SS, Cheng I. Advanced Age Does Not Impact Outcomes After 1-level or 2-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E368-E373. [PMID: 34724454 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the effect of increased age on perioperative and postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, and patient-reported pain and disability scores after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA LLIF was developed to minimize soft tissue trauma and reduce the risk of vascular injury; however, there is little evidence regarding the effect of advanced age on outcomes of LLIF. METHODS Patients who underwent LLIF from 2009 to 2019 at one institution with a minimum 6-month follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients less than 18 years old with musculoskeletal tumor or trauma were excluded. The primary outcome was the preoperative to postoperative change in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for back pain. Operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, perioperative and 90-day complications, unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and change in Oswestry Disability Index were also evaluated. Relationships with age were assessed both with age as a continuous variable and segmenting by age below 70 versus 70+. RESULTS In total, 279 patients were included. The median age was 65±13 years and 159 (57%) were female. Age was not related to improvements in back NPRS and Oswestry Disability Index. Operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, perioperative and 90-day complications, unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and radiographic fusion rate also were not related to age. After multivariable risk adjustment, increasing age was associated with greater improvements in back NPRS. The decrease in back NPRS was 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.14, 1.22; P=0.014) points greater for every 10-year increase in age. Age was not associated with rates of complication, readmission, or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS LLIF is a safe and effective procedure in the elderly population. Advanced age is associated with larger improvements in preoperative back pain. Surgeons should consider the benefits of LLIF and other minimally invasive techniques when evaluating elderly candidates for lumbar fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Atman Desai
- Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | | | - John K Ratliff
- Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Buckland AJ, Ashayeri K, Leon C, Cheng I, Thomas JA, Braly B, Kwon B, Eisen L. Anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and patient-related considerations for ALIF, anterior-to-psoas, and transpsoas LLIF approaches. Eur Spine J 2022; 31:2175-2187. [PMID: 35235051 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07127-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Circumferential (AP) lumbar fusion surgery is an effective treatment for degenerative and deformity conditions of the spine. The lateral decubitus position allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior aspects of the spine, enabling instrumentation of both columns without the need for patient repositioning. This paper seeks to outline the anatomical and patient-related considerations in anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine from L1-S1 in the lateral decubitus position. METHODS We detail the anatomic considerations of the lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgical approaches from surgeon experience and comprehensive literature review. RESULTS Single-position AP surgery allows simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column and may combine ALIF, LLIF, and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation techniques from L1-S1 without patient repositioning. Careful history, physical examination, and imaging review optimize safety and efficacy of lateral ALIF or LLIF surgery. An excellent understanding of patient spinal and abdominal anatomy is necessary. Each approach has relative advantages and disadvantages according to the disc level, skeletal, vascular, and psoas anatomy. CONCLUSIONS A development of a framework to analyze these factors will result in improved patient outcomes and a reduction in complications for lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Carlos Leon
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leon Eisen
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ashayeri K, Leon C, Tigchelaar S, Fatemi P, Follett M, Cheng I, Thomas JA, Medley M, Braly B, Kwon B, Eisen L, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion. Spine J 2022; 22:419-428. [PMID: 34600110 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion utilizing anterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous posterior fixation is a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique. Single position lumbar surgery (SPLS) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has been shown to be a safe, effective technique. This study directly compares perioperative outcomes of SPLS with lateral ALIF vs. traditional supine ALIF with repositioning (FLIP) for degenerative pathologies. PURPOSE To determine if SPLS with lateral ALIF improves perioperative outcomes compared to FLIP with supine ALIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing primary AP fusions with ALIF at 5 institutions from 2015 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES Levels fused, inclusion of L4-L5, L5-S1, radiation dosage, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch. METHODS Retrospective analysis of primary ALIFs with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L4-S1 over 5 years at 5 institutions. Patients were grouped as FLIP or SPLS. Demographic, procedural, perioperative, and radiographic outcome measures were compared using independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p <.05. Cohorts were propensity-matched for demographic or procedural differences. RESULTS A total of 321 patients were included; 124 SPS and 197 Flip patients. Propensity-matching yielded 248 patients: 124 SPLS and 124 FLIP. The SPLS cohort demonstrated significantly reduced operative time (132.95±77.45 vs. 261.79±91.65 min; p <0.001), EBL (120.44±217.08 vs. 224.29±243.99 mL; p <.001), LOS (2.07±1.26 vs. 3.47±1.40 days; p <.001), and rate of perioperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.45%; p =.005). Radiation dose (39.79±31.66 vs. 37.54±35.85 mGy; p =.719) and perioperative complications including vascular injury (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), retrograde ejaculation (0.00% vs. 0.81%, p =.328), abdominal wall (0.81% vs. 2.42%; p =.338), neuropraxia (1.61% vs. 0.81%; p =.532), persistent motor deficit (0.00% vs. 1.61%; p =.166), wound complications (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), or VTE (0.81% vs. 0.81%; p =.972) were similar. No difference was seen in 90-day return to OR. Similar results were noted in sub-analyses of single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 fusions. On radiographic analysis, the SPLS cohort had greater changes in LL (4.23±11.14 vs. 0.43±8.07 deg; p =.005) and PI-LL mismatch (-4.78±8.77 vs. -0.39±7.51 deg; p =.002). CONCLUSIONS Single position lateral ALIF with percutaneous posterior fixation improves operative time, EBL, LOS, rate of ileus, and maintains safety compared to supine ALIF with prone percutaneous pedicle screws between L4-S1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Carlos Leon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Seth Tigchelaar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Parastou Fatemi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Matt Follett
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- St. David's Medical Center, Austin Spine Surgery, Austin, Austin Spine - Central Austin Office 3000 N IH 35, Suite 708 Austin, TX 78705 TX, USA
| | - J Alex Thomas
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, 2208 South 17th St. Wilmington, NC 28401, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Mark Medley
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, 2208 South 17th St. Wilmington, NC 28401, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Healthcare Partners Investments, Inc, Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, 9800 Broadway Ext., Ste. 203OKC, OK 73114, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Converse 4, Suite 1 Boston, MA 02120, Boston, MA
| | - Leon Eisen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Aaron J Buckland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ziino C, Bala A, Warren S, Cheng I. Impact of Certificate of Need on Lumbar Discectomy Reimbursement and Utilization. J Surg Orthop Adv 2022; 31:26-29. [PMID: 35377304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The Certificate of Need (CON) program was established to respond to increasing healthcare costs; however, its impact on spine surgery trends is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of CON status on utilization of single-level lumbar discectomy. A combined Medicare and private payor database was used to identify single-level lumbar discectomies performed from 2007 to 2015. Utilization and reimbursement trends were compared using the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) with reimbursement adjusted by the consumer price index. In total, 30,617 lumbar discectomies were analyzed. Procedure utilization increased across all settings. CAGR was highest in the outpatient CON group (19.7%) and lowest in the inpatient non-CON group (0.5%). Reimbursement increased in the outpatient setting (CAGR: 1.2% CON, 1.0% non-CON), but decreased in the inpatient setting (CAGR: -6.1% CON, -5.5% non-CON). These trends are important to consider in a value-based healthcare environment. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(1):026-029, 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chason Ziino
- Stanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, California
| | - Abiram Bala
- Stanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, California
| | - Shay Warren
- Stanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, California
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Warren SI, Wadhwa H, Koltsov JCB, Michaud JB, Cheng I. One surgeon's learning curve with single position lateral lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative outcomes and complications. J Spine Surg 2021; 7:162-169. [PMID: 34296028 PMCID: PMC8261560 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single position (SP) lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) reduces operative time compared to dual positioning. However, the learning curve has not yet been described. The purpose of this study was to define the learning curve SP LLIF with PPSF. METHODS This retrospective case series included the first 161 consecutive patients who underwent SP LLIF and PPSF with the senior author. Primary analysis of operative time versus case number included single level cases without adjacent level procedures. Secondary analyses included 1-3 level cases without adjacent level procedures. Operative time for 2 and 3 level procedures was normalized to single-level cases. The learning curve was assessed with linear regression, which was found to fit the data better than logarithmic regression as judged by R2 values and data visualization. Perioperative outcomes as a function of case number were analyzed by least squares linear regression and Mann Whitney U-tests. RESULTS For single level surgeries without adjacent procedures (n=87), operative time decreased by a total of 28.7 (95% CI, 9.6, 47.9) minutes over the series (P<0.001). For 1-3 level cases with no adjacent procedures (n=131), normalized operative time decreased by 23.1 (7.6, 38.6) minutes (P<0.001). Post-operative change in hematocrit, length of hospital stay, post-operative change in lordosis, 90-day complications, suboptimal screw placement, and 6-week post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score did not correlate with case number. Intraoperative fluids decreased 3.7 mL (95% CI, 0.7, 6.7) per case (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS In SP LLIF with PPSF, case number correlated with decreased operative time, but not complications. The surgeon's prior experience with dual position (DP) LLIF likely contributed to the minimal learning curve observed. Surgeons adopting SP LLIF with minimal prior DP LLIF experience may experience a steeper curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shay I. Warren
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Harsh Wadhwa
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Denduluri SK, Koltsov JCB, Ziino C, Segovia N, McMains C, Falakassa J, Ratliff J, Wood KB, Alamin T, Cheng I, Hu SS. Rod-Screw Constructs Composed of Dissimilar Metals Do Not Affect Complication Rates in Posterior Fusion Surgery Performed for Adult Spinal Deformity. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E121-E125. [PMID: 33633069 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare implant-related complications between mixed-metal and same-metal rod-screw constructs in patients who underwent posterior fusion for adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Contact between dissimilar metals is discouraged due to potential for galvanic corrosion, increasing the risk for metal toxicity, infection, and implant failure. In spine surgery, titanium (Ti) screws are most commonly used, but Ti rods are notch sensitive and likely more susceptible to fracture after contouring for deformity constructs. Cobalt chrome (CC) and stainless steel (SS) rods may be suitable alternatives. No studies have yet evaluated implant-related complications among mixed-metal constructs (SS or CC rods with Ti screws). METHODS Adults with spinal deformity who underwent at least 5-level thoracic and/or lumbar posterior fusion or 3-column osteotomy between January 2013 and May 2015 were reviewed, excluding neuromuscular deformity, tumor, acute trauma or infection. Implant-related complications included pseudarthrosis, proximal junctional kyphosis, hardware failure (rod fracture, screw pullout or haloing), symptomatic hardware, and infection. RESULTS A total of 61 cases met inclusion criteria: 24 patients received Ti rods with Ti screws (Ti-Ti, 39%), 31 SS rods (SS-Ti, 51%), and 6 CC rods (CC-Ti, 9.8%). Median follow-up was 37-42 months for all groups. Because of the limited number of cases, the CC-Ti group was not included in statistical analyses. There were no differences between Ti-Ti and SS-Ti groups with regard to age, body mass index, or smokers. Implant-related complications did not differ between the Ti-Ti and SS-Ti groups (P=0.080). Among the Ti-Ti group, there were 15 implant-related complications (63%). In the SS-Ti group, there were 12 implant-related complications (39%). There were 3 implant-related complications in the CC-Ti group (50%). CONCLUSION We found no evidence that combining Ti screws with SS rods increases the risk for implant-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Chason Ziino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Nicole Segovia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | | | | | - John Ratliff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Todd Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Choi E, Luo S, Tammemägi M, Aredo J, Marchand L, Cheng I, Wakelee H, Han S. PR01.02 Smoking Cessation After Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Risk of Second Primary Lung Cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
19
|
Kleimeyer JP, Koltsov JCB, Smuck MW, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Cervical epidural steroid injections: incidence and determinants of subsequent surgery. Spine J 2020; 20:1729-1736. [PMID: 32565316 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are sometimes used in the management of cervical radicular pain in order to delay or avoid surgery. However, the rate and determinants of surgery following CESIs remain uncertain. PURPOSE This study sought to determine: (1) the proportion of patients having surgery following CESI, and (2) the timing of and factors associated with subsequent surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a large, national administrative claims database. PATIENT SAMPLE The study included 192,777 CESI patients (age 50.9±11.3 years, 55.2% female) who underwent CESI for imaging-based diagnoses of cervical disc herniation or stenosis, a clinical diagnosis of radiculopathy, or a combination thereof. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the time from index CESI to surgery. METHODS Inclusion criteria were CESI for cervical disc herniation, stenosis, or radiculopathy, age ≥18, and active enrollment for 1 year before CESI to screen for exclusions. Patients were followed until they underwent cervical surgery, or their enrollment lapsed. Rates of surgery were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and 99% confidence intervals. Factors associated with subsequent surgery were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Within 6 months of CESI, 11.2% of patients underwent surgery, increasing to 14.5% by 1 year and 22.3% by 5 years. Male patients and those aged 35 to 54 had an increased likelihood of subsequent surgery. Patients with radiculopathy were less likely to undergo surgery following CESI than those with stenosis or herniation, while patients with multiple diagnoses were more likely. Patients with comorbidities including CHF, other cardiac comorbidities or chronic pain were less likely to undergo surgery, as were patients in the northeast US region. Some 33.5% of patients underwent >1 CESI, with 84.6% of these occurring within 1 year. Additional injections were associated with reduced rates of subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS Following CESI, over one in five patients underwent surgery within 5 years. Multiple patient-specific risk factors for subsequent surgery were identified, and patients undergoing repeated injections were at lower risk. Determining which patients may progress to surgery can be used to improve resource utilization and to inform shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Kleimeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Matthew W Smuck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Koltsov JCB, Smuck MW, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Preoperative epidural steroid injections are not associated with increased rates of infection and dural tear in lumbar spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2020; 30:870-877. [PMID: 32789696 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06566-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study objectives were to use a large national claims data resource to examine rates of preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESI) in lumbar spine surgery and determine whether preoperative ESI or the timing of preoperative ESI is associated with rates of postoperative complications and reoperations. METHODS A retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for disc herniation and/or spinal stenosis was undertaken using the MarketScan® databases from 2007-2015. Propensity-score matched cohorts were constructed to compare rates of complications and reoperations in patients with and without preoperative ESI. RESULTS Within the year prior to surgery, 120,898 (46.4%) patients had a lumber ESI. The median time between ESI and surgery was 10 weeks. 23.1% of patients having preoperative ESI had more than one level injected, and 66.5% had more than one preoperative ESI treatment. Patients with chronic pain were considerably more likely to have an ESI prior to their surgery [OR 1.62 (1.54, 1.69), p < 0.001]. Patients having preoperative ESI within in close proximity to surgery did not have increased rates of infection, dural tear, neurological complications, or surgical complications; however, they did experience higher rates of reoperations and readmissions than those with no preoperative ESI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Half of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for stenosis and/or herniation had a preoperative ESI. These were not associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications, even when the ESI was given in close proximity to surgery. Patients with preoperative ESI were more likely to have readmissions and reoperations following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayme C B Koltsov
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
| | - Matthew W Smuck
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cheng I, Stienen MN, Medress ZA, Varshneya K, Ho AL, Ratliff JK, Veeravagu A. Single- versus dual-attending strategy for spinal deformity surgery: 2-year experience and systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:1-12. [PMID: 32650315 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.spine2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is complex and associated with high morbidity and complication rates. There is growing evidence in the literature for the beneficial effects of an approach to surgery in which two attending physicians rather than a single attending physician perform surgery for and oversee the surgical care of a single patient in a dual-attending care model. The authors developed a dual-attending care collaboration in August 2017 in which a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon mutually operated on patients with ASD. METHODS The authors recorded data for 2 years of experience with ASD patients operated on by dual attending surgeons. Analyses included estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusions, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, complication rates, emergency room visits and readmissions, subjective health status improvement, and disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score) and pain (visual analog scale [VAS] score) at last follow-up. In addition, the pertinent literature for dual-attending spinal deformity correction was systematically reviewed. RESULTS The study group comprised 19 of 254 (7.5%) consecutively operated patients who underwent thoracolumbar fusion during the period from January 2017 to June 2019 (68.4% female; mean patient age 65.1 years, ODI score 44.5, VAS pain score 6.8). The study patients were matched by age, sex, anesthesia risk, BMI, smoking status, ODI score, VAS pain score, prior spine surgeries, and basic operative characteristics (type of interbody implants, instrumented segments, pelvic fixation) to 19 control patients (all p > 0.05). There was a trend toward less EBL (mean 763 vs 1524 ml, p = 0.059), fewer intraoperative red blood cell transfusions (mean 0.5 vs 2.3, p = 0.079), and fewer 90-day readmissions (0% vs 15.8%, p = 0.071) in the dual-attending group. LOS and discharge disposition were similar, as were the rates of any < 30-day postsurgery complications, < 90-day postsurgery emergency room visits, and reoperations, and ODI and VAS pain scores at last follow-up (all p > 0.05). At last follow-up, 94.7% vs 68.4% of patients in the dual- versus single-attending group stated their health status had improved (p = 0.036). In the authors' literature search of prior articles on spinal deformity correction, 5 of 8 (62.5%) articles reported lower EBL and 6 of 8 (75%) articles reported significantly lower operation duration in dual-attending cases. The literature contained differing results with regard to complication- or reoperation-sparing effects associated with dual-attending cases. Similar clinical outcomes of dual- versus single-attending cases were reported. CONCLUSIONS Establishing a dual-attending care management platform for ASD correction was feasible at the authors' institution. Results of the use of a dual-attending strategy at the authors' institution were favorable. Positive safety and outcome profiles were found in articles on this topic identified by a systematic literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin N Stienen
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich; and
- 4Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zachary A Medress
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
| | - Kunal Varshneya
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
| | - Allen L Ho
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
| | - John K Ratliff
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- 2Neurosurgery, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yoon JW, Welch RL, Alamin T, Lavelle WF, Cheng I, Perez-Cruet M, Fielding LC, Sasso RC, Linovitz RJ, Kim KD, Welch WC. Remote Virtual Spinal Evaluation in the Era of COVID-19. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:433-440. [PMID: 32699768 DOI: 10.14444/7057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With the COVID-19 pandemic disrupting many facets of our society, physicians and patients have begun using telemedicine as a platform for the delivery of health care. One of the challenges in implementing telemedicine for the spine care provider is completing a comprehensive spinal examination. Currently, there is no standardized methodology to complete a full spinal examination through telemedicine. Methods We propose a novel, remote spinal examination methodology that is easily implemented through telemedicine, where the patient is an active participant in the successful completion of his or her examination. This type of examination has been validated in a neurology setting. To facilitate the telemedicine visit, we propose that video instruction be shared with the patient prior to the telemedicine visit to increase the efficacy of the examination. Results Since the issuance of stay-at-home order across the states, many spine practices around the country have rapidly adopted and increased their telemedicine program to continue provide care for patients during COVID-19 pandemic. At a tertiary academic center in a busy metropolitan area, nearly 700 telemedicine visits were successfully conducted during a 4-week period. There were no remote visits being done prior to the shutdown. Conclusions Implementation of our proposed remote spinal examination has the potential to serve as a guideline for the spine care provider to efficiently assess patients with spine disease using telemedicine. Because these are only suggestions, providers should tailor examination to each individual patient's needs. Level of Evidence V. Clinical Relevance It is likely that physicians will incorporate telemedicine into health care delivery services even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides because of telemedicine's efficiency in meeting patient needs. Using the standard maneuvers provided in our study, spine care providers can perform a nearly comprehensive spine examination through telemedicine. Further studies will be needed to validate the reproducibility and reliability of our methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jang W Yoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Todd Alamin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, California
| | - William F Lavelle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, California
| | - Mick Perez-Cruet
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | | | | | - Kee D Kim
- University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
| | - William C Welch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
E Lindsay S, Alokozai A, Eppler SL, Fox P, Curtin C, Gardner M, Avedian R, Palanca A, Abrams GD, Cheng I, Kamal RN. Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:419-426. [PMID: 31567900 PMCID: PMC8080702 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess bounds of shared decision making in orthopaedic surgery, we conducted an exploratory study to examine the extent to which patients want to be involved in decision making in the management of a musculoskeletal condition. METHODS One hundred fifteen patients at an orthopaedic surgery clinic were asked to rate preferred level of involvement in 25 common theoretical clinical decisions (passive [0], semipassive [1 to 4], equally shared involvement between patient and surgeon [5], semiactive [6 to 9], active [10]). RESULTS Patients preferred semipassive roles in 92% of decisions assessed. Patients wanted to be most involved in scheduling surgical treatments (4.75 ± 2.65) and least involved in determining incision sizes (1.13 ± 1.98). No difference exists in desired decision-making responsibility between patients who had undergone orthopaedic surgery previously and those who had not. Younger and educated patients preferred more decision-making responsibility. Those with Medicare desired more passive roles. DISCUSSION Despite the importance of shared decision making on delivering patient-centered care, our results suggest that patients do not prefer to share all decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lindsay
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kuhn KD, Edamura K, Bhatia N, Cheng I, Clark SA, Haynes CV, Heffner DL, Kabir F, Velasquez J, Spano AJ, Deppmann CD, Keeler AB. Molecular dissection of TNFR-TNFα bidirectional signaling reveals both cooperative and antagonistic interactions with p75 neurotrophic factor receptor in axon patterning. Mol Cell Neurosci 2020; 103:103467. [PMID: 32004684 PMCID: PMC7682658 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2020.103467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
During neural development, complex organisms rely on progressive and regressive events whereby axons, synapses, and neurons are overproduced followed by selective elimination of a portion of these components. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) together with its cognate receptor (Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR1) have been shown to play both regressive (i.e. forward signaling from the receptor) and progressive (i.e. reverse signaling from the ligand) roles in sympathetic neuron development. In contrast, a paralog of TNFR1, p75 neurotrophic factor receptor (p75NTR) promotes mainly regressive developmental events in sympathetic neurons. Here we examine the interplay between these paralogous receptors in the regulation of axon branch elimination and arborization. We confirm previous reports that these TNFR1 family members are individually capable of promoting ligand-dependent suppression of axon growth and branching. Remarkably, p75NTR and TNFR1 physically interact and p75NTR requires TNFR1 for ligand-dependent axon suppression of axon branching but not vice versa. We also find that p75NTR forward signaling and TNFα reverse signaling are functionally antagonistic. Finally, we find that TNFα reverse signaling is necessary for nerve growth factor (NGF) dependent axon growth. Taken together these findings demonstrate several levels of synergistic and antagonistic interactions using very few signaling pathways and that the balance of these synergizing and opposing signals act to ensure proper axon growth and patterning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Kuhn
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - K Edamura
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - N Bhatia
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - I Cheng
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - S A Clark
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - C V Haynes
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - D L Heffner
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - F Kabir
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - J Velasquez
- Blue Ridge Virtual Governor's School, Palmyra, VA 22963, USA
| | - A J Spano
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - C D Deppmann
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
| | - A B Keeler
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
R Kang J, Glaeser JD, Karamian B, Kanim L, NaPier Z, Koltsov J, Thio T, Salehi K, Bae HW, Cheng I. The effects of varenicline on lumbar spinal fusion in a rat model. Spine J 2020; 20:300-306. [PMID: 31377475 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Smoking is detrimental to obtaining a solid spinal fusion mass with previous studies demonstrating its association with pseudoarthrosis in patients undergoing spinal fusion. Varenicline is a pharmacologic adjunct used in smoking cessation which acts as a partial agonist of the same nicotinic receptors activated during tobacco use. However, no clinical or basic science studies to date have characterized if varenicline has negative effects on spinal fusion and bone healing by itself. PURPOSE Our study's aim was to elucidate whether varenicline affects the frequency or quality of posterolateral spinal fusion in a rodent model at an endpoint of 12 weeks. STUDY DESIGN Randomized control trial. PATIENT SAMPLE Fourteen male Lewis rats randomly separated into two experimental groups. OUTCOME MEASURES Manual palpation of fusion segment, radiography, μCT imaging, and four-point bend. METHODS Fourteen male Lewis rats were randomly separated into two experimental groups undergoing L4-L5 posterior spinal fusion procedure followed by daily subcutaneous injections of human dose varenicline or saline (control) for 12 weeks postsurgery. Spine samples were explanted, and fusion was determined via manual palpation of segments by two independent observers. High-resolution radiographs were obtained to evaluate bridging fusion mass. μCT imaging was performed to characterize fusion mass and consolidation. Lumbar spinal fusion units were tested in four-point bending to evaluate stiffness and peak load. Study funding sources include $5000 OREF Grant. There were no applicable financial relationships or conflicts of interest. RESULTS At 3 months postsurgery, 12 out of 14 rats demonstrated lumbar spine fusion (86% fused) with no difference in fusion frequency between the varenicline and control groups as detected by manual palpation. High-resolution radiography revealed six out of seven rats (86%) having complete fusion in both groups. μCT showed no significant difference in bone mineral density or bone fraction volume between groups in the region of interest. Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant different in the average stiffness or peak loads at the fusion site of the varenicline and control groups. CONCLUSION Based on the results of our rat study, there is no indication that varenicline itself has a detrimental effect on the frequency and quality of spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R Kang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Juliane D Glaeser
- Orthopedic Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian Karamian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Linda Kanim
- Orthopedic Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zachary NaPier
- Orthopedic Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jayme Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Thio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Khosrowdad Salehi
- Orthopedic Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hyun W Bae
- Orthopedic Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ajiboye RM, Koltsov JCB, Karamian B, Swinford S, Montgomery BK, Arzeno A, Ziino C, Cheng I. Computer-assisted surgical navigation is associated with an increased risk of neurological complications: a review of 67,264 posterolateral lumbar fusion cases. J Spine Surg 2019; 5:457-465. [PMID: 32042996 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Pedicle screw malposition may result in neurological complications following posterolateral lumbar fusions (PLF). While computer-assisted navigation (NAV) and intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) have been shown to improve safety in deformity surgeries, their use in routine PLFs remain controversial. This study assesses the risk of complications and reoperation for pedicle screw revision following PLF with and without ION and/or NAV surgery. Methods Retrospective analyses were performed using the Truven Health MarketScan® databases to identify patients that had primary PLF with and without NAV and/or ION for degenerative lumbar disorders from years 2007-2015. Patients undergoing concomitant interbody fusions, spinal deformity surgery or fusion to the thoracic spine were excluded. Complications and reoperation for pedicle screw revision within 90 days of surgery were assessed. Results During the study period, 67,264 patients underwent PLFs. NAV only was used in 3.5% of patients, ION only in 17.9% and both NAV and ION in 0.8% of patients. In univariate analyses, there was a difference in the risk of neurological injuries among groups (NAV only: 1.4%, ION only: 0.8%, NAV and ION: 0.5%, No NAV or ION: 0.6%, P<0.001). In multivariable models, the use of NAV was associated with a higher risk of neurological complications when compared to ION only or no ION or NAV [NAV vs. ION only: odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) =2.1 (1.4, 3.2), P=0.002; NAV vs. no ION or NAV: OR and 95% CI =2.5 (1.7, 3.5), P<0.001]. There was no difference in reoperation rates among the groups (P=0.135). Conclusions Although the overall risk of neurological complications following PLFs is low, the use of NAV only was associated with an increased risk of neurological complications. No differences were observed in the rates of pedicle screw revision among groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Brian Karamian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Steven Swinford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Blake K Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Arzeno
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Chason Ziino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Arnold PM, Cheng I, Harris JA, Hussain MM, Zhang C, Karamian B, Bucklen BS. Single-Level In Vitro Kinematic Comparison of Novel Inline Cervical Interbody Devices With Intervertebral Screw, Anchor, or Blade. Global Spine J 2019; 9:697-707. [PMID: 31552149 PMCID: PMC6745635 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219833055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE To compare the biomechanics of integrated anchor and blade versus traditional screw fixation techniques for interbody fusion. METHODS Fifteen cadaveric cervical spines were divided into 3 equal groups (n = 5). Each spine was tested: intact, after discectomy (simulating an injury model), interbody spacer alone (S), integrated interbody spacer (iSA), and integrated spacer with lateral mass screw and rod fixation (LMS+iS). Each treatment group included integrated spacers with either screw, anchor, or blade integrated spacers. Constructs were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) under pure moments (±1.5 N m). RESULTS Across all 3 planes, the following range of motion trend was observed: Injured > Intact > S > iSA > LMS+iS. In FE and LB, integrated anchor and blade significantly decreased motion compared with intact and injured conditions, before and after supplemental posterior fixation (P < .05). Comparing tested devices revealed biomechanical equivalence between screw, anchor, and blade fixation methods in all loading modes (P > .05). CONCLUSION All integrated interbody devices reduced intact and injured motion; lateral mass screws and rods further stabilized the single motion segment. Comparing screw, anchor, or bladed integrated anterior cervical discectomy and fusion spacers revealed no significant differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan A. Harris
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, a Division of Globus Medical,
Inc, Audubon, PA, USA
- Jonathan A. Harris, Globus Medical, Inc, 2560
General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USA.
| | - Mir M. Hussain
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, a Division of Globus Medical,
Inc, Audubon, PA, USA
| | | | - Brian Karamian
- Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Brandon S. Bucklen
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, a Division of Globus Medical,
Inc, Audubon, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arzeno AH, Koltsov J, Alamin TF, Cheng I, Wood KB, Hu SS. Short-Term Outcomes of Staged Versus Same-Day Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Spine Deform 2019; 7:796-803.e1. [PMID: 31495481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2018] [Revised: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Assess differences between staged (≤3 days) and same-day surgery in perioperative factors, radiographic measures, and complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgical adult spinal deformity correction may require combined anterior and posterior approaches. To modulate risk, some surgeons perform surgery that is expected to be longer and/or more complex in two stages. Prior studies comparing staged (≥7 days) and same-day surgery demonstrated mixed results and none have examined results with shorter staging intervals. METHODS Retrospective review of adults undergoing combined anterior/posterior approaches for spinal deformity over a 3-year period at a single institution (n=92). Univariate differences between staged and same-day surgery were assessed with chi-squared, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Generalized estimating equations assessed whether differences in perioperative outcomes between groups remained after adjusting for differences in demographic and surgical characteristics. RESULTS In univariate analyses, staged surgery was associated with a length of stay (LOS) 3 days longer than same-day surgery (9.2 vs. 6.3 days, p < .001), and greater operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, and days in intensive care unit (p < .001 for each). Staged surgery had a higher rate of thrombotic events (p = .011) but did not differ in readmission rates or other complications. Radiographically, improvements in Cobb angle (average 13° vs. 17°, p = .028), lumbar lordosis (average 14° vs. 23°, p = .019), and PI-LL mismatch (average 10° vs. 2° p = .018) were greater for staged surgery, likely related to more extensive use of osteotomies in the staged group. After risk adjustment, taking into account the procedural specifics including longer fusion constructs and greater number of osteotomies, LOS no longer differed between staged and same-day surgery; however, the total operative time was 98 minutes longer for staged surgery (p < .001). Differences in blood loss between groups was accounted for by differences in operative time and patient and surgical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Although univariate analysis of our results were in accordance with previously published works, multivariate analysis allowing individual case risk adjustment revealed that LOS was not significantly increased in the staged group as reported in previous studies. There was no difference in infection rates as previously described but an increase in thrombotic events was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander H Arzeno
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
| | - Jayme Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavillion A FL 1 MC6110, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ho AL, Varshneya K, Medress ZA, Pendharkar AV, Sussman ES, Cheng I, Veeravagu A. Grade II Spondylolisthesis: Reverse Bohlman Procedure with Transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 Alar Iliac Screws Placed with Robotic Guidance. World Neurosurg 2019; 132:421-428.e1. [PMID: 31398524 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grade II spondylolisthesis remains a complex surgical pathology for which there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical strategies. Surgical strategies vary regarding extent of reduction, use of instrumentation/interbody support, and anterior versus posterior approaches with or without decompression. Here we provide the first report on the efficacy of robotic spinal surgery systems in support of the treatment of grade II spondylolisthesis. METHODS Using 2 illustrative cases, we provide a technical report describing how robotic spinal surgery platform can be used to treatment grade II spondylolisthesis with a novel instrumentation strategy. RESULTS We describe how the "reverse Bohlman" technique to achieve a large anterior fusion construct spanning the pathological level and buttressed by the adjacent level above, coupled with a novel, high-fidelity posterior fixation scheme with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screws placed in a minimally invasive fashion with robot guidance allows for the best chance of fusion in situ. CONCLUSIONS The reverse Bohlman technique coupled with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2AI screw fixation accomplishes the surgical goals of creating a solid fusion construct, avoiding neurologic injury with aggressive reduction, and halting the progression of anterolisthesis. The use of robot guidance allows for efficient placement of these difficult screw trajectories in a minimally invasive fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen L Ho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kunal Varshneya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zachary A Medress
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Arjun V Pendharkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric S Sussman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Karamian BA, Liu N, Ajiboye RM, Cheng I, Hu SS, Wood KB. Reliability of radiological measurements of type 2 odontoid fracture. Spine J 2019; 19:1324-1330. [PMID: 31078698 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT It is recognized that radiological parameters of type 2 dens fractures, including displacement and angulation, are predictive of treatment outcomes and are used to guide surgical decision-making. The reproducibility of such measurements, therefore, is of critical importance. Past literature has shown poor interobserver reliability for both displacement and angulation measurements of type 2 dens fractures. Since such studies however, various advancements of radiological review systems and measurement tools have evolved to potentially improve such measurements. PURPOSE To re-examine the inter-rater reliability of measuring displacement and angulation of type 2 dens fractures using modern radiological review systems. Besides quantitative measurements, the reliability of raters in identifying diagnostic classifications based on translational and angulational displacement was also examined. STUDY DESIGN Radiographic measurement reliability and agreement study. PATIENT SAMPLE Thirty-seven patients seen at a single institution between 2002 and 2017 with primary diagnosis of acute type 2 dens fracture with complete computed tomography (CT) imaging. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiological measurements included displacement and angulation. Diagnostic classifications based on consensus-based clinical cutoff points were also recorded. METHODS Measurements were performed by five surgeons with varying years of experience in spine surgery using the hospital's electronic medical record radiological measuring tools. The radiological measurements included displacement and angulation. Diagnostic classifications based on consensus-based clinical cutoff points were also recorded. Each rater received a graphic demonstration of the measurement methods, but had the autonomy to select a best cut from the sagittal CT to measure. All raters were blinded to patient information. RESULTS Measurements for displacement and angulation among the five raters demonstrated "excellent" reliability. Intra-rater reliability was also "excellent" in measuring displacement and angulation. The reliability of diagnostic classification of displacement (above vs. below 5 mm), was found to be "very good" among the raters. The reliability of diagnostic classification of angulation (above vs. below 11°) demonstrated "good" reliability. CONCLUSIONS Advancement of radiological review systems, including review tools and embedded image processing software, has facilitated more reliable measurements for type 2 odontoid fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Karamian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ning Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Remi M Ajiboye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ziino C, Arzeno A, Cheng I. Analysis of single-position for revision surgery using lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation: feasibility and perioperative results. J Spine Surg 2019; 5:201-206. [PMID: 31380473 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To analyze perioperative and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) performed entirely in the lateral position. Traditionally, patients undergoing interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position are placed prone for pedicle screw fixation. However prone positioning carries known risks and may increase surgical time due to the need to re-drape and reposition. Little is published regarding revision surgery in a single position. Methods Sixteen patients over the age of 18 with degenerative lumbar pathology who underwent a revision of previous lumbar fusion using interbody fusion via lateral access and revision of posterior instrumentation from a single surgeon met inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent combined procedures requiring repositioning or had inadequate preoperative imaging were excluded. Patients remained in the lateral decubitus position for the entirety of the procedure including interbody placement, revision of prior instrumentation, and pedicle screw fixation. Demographics, surgical details, and perioperative outcomes were reported. Results The mean operative time was 211 minutes for all cases, 161 minutes for single-level procedures and 296 minutes for two-level procedures. Mean estimated blood loss was 206 cc. The mean patient age was 66, 70% of which were male. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.4 and Charleson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3. All cases were performed on the lumbar spine (T12/L1-L4/L5), with the majority of procedures performed at the L2/3 level (44%). The mean pelvic incidence (PI) was 60 degrees (range, 41-71 degrees) with mean preoperative PI/lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch of 23.9 degrees. Mean postoperative PI/LL mismatch was 12 degrees. Conclusions Revision surgery in the lateral position is feasible with complication rates comparable to published literature. The need to reposition is eliminated and single position surgery reduces operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chason Ziino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Arzeno
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goodnough LH, Koltsov J, Wang T, Xiong G, Nathan K, Cheng I. Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spine Surg 2019; 5:185-193. [PMID: 31380471 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The goal of the current study was to compare the perioperative and post-operative outcomes of eXtreme lateral trans-psoas approach (XLIF) versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis. The ideal approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing single level XLIF (n=21) or ALIF (n=54) for L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2008-2012 from a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed. Groups were compared for peri-operative data (estimated blood loss, operative time, adjunct procedures or additional implants), radiographic measurements (L1-S1 cobb angle, disc height, fusion grade, subsidence), 30-day complications (infection, DVT/PE, weakness/paresthesia, etc.), and patient reported outcomes (leg and back Numerical Rating Scale, and Oswestry Disability Index). Results Estimated blood loss was significantly lower for XLIF [median 100; interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] than for ALIF (median 250; IQR, 150-400 mL; P<0.001), including after adjusting for significantly higher rates of posterior decompression in the ALIF group. There were no significant differences in rates of complications within 30 days, radiographic outcomes, or in re-operation rates. Both groups experienced significant pain relief post-operatively. Conclusions The lateral trans-psoas approach is associated with diminished blood loss compared to the anterior approach in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. We were unable to detect differences in radiographic outcomes, complication rates, or patient reported outcomes. Continued efforts to directly compare approaches for specific indications will minimize complications and improve outcomes. Further studies will continue to define indications for lateral versus anterior approach to lumbar spine for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Henry Goodnough
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Jayme Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Tianyi Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Grace Xiong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Karthik Nathan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Smith MW, Ith A, Carragee EJ, Cheng I, Alamin TF, Golish SR, Mitsunaga K, Scuderi GJ, Smuck M. Does the presence of the fibronectin-aggrecan complex predict outcomes from lumbar discectomy for disc herniation? Spine J 2019; 19:e28-e33. [PMID: 24239034 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2012] [Revised: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/20/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Protein biomarkers associated with lumbar disc disease have been studied as diagnostic indicators and therapeutic targets. Recently, a cartilage degradation product, the fibronectin-aggrecan complex (FAC) identified in the epidural space, has been shown to predict response to lumbar epidural steroid injection in patients with radiculopathy from herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). PURPOSE Determine the ability of FAC to predict response to microdiscectomy for patients with radiculopathy due to lumbar disc herniation STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center prospective consecutive cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with radiculopathy from HNP with concordant symptoms to MRI who underwent microdiscectomy. OUTCOMES MEASURES Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scores (VAS) were noted at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome of clinical improvement was defined as patients with both a decrease in VAS of at least 3 points and ODI >20 points. METHODS Intraoperative sampling was done via lavage of the excised fragment by ELISA for presence of FAC. Funding for the ELISA was provided by Cytonics, Inc. RESULTS Seventy-five patients had full complement of data and were included in this analysis. At 3-month follow-up, 57 (76%) patents were "better." There was a statistically significant association of the presence of FAC and clinical improvement (p=.017) with an 85% positive predictive value. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve plotting association of FAC and clinical improvement demonstrates an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66±0.08 (p=.037). Subset analysis of those with weakness on physical examination (n=48) plotting the association of FAC and improvement shows AUC on ROC of 0.81±0.067 (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS Patients who are "FAC+" are more likely to demonstrate clinical improvement following microdiscectomy. The data suggest that the inflammatory milieu plays a significant role regarding improvement in patients undergoing discectomy for radiculopathy in lumbar HNP, even in those with preoperative weakness. The FAC represents a potential target for treatment in HNP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah W Smith
- Orthopaedics Northeast, 5050 N. Clinton St. Fort Wayne, IN 46825, USA.
| | - Agnes Ith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Eugene J Carragee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - S Raymond Golish
- Department of Orthopedics, Peace Health Oregon St. John- Orthopedics, 1615 Delaware St, Longview, WA 98632, USA
| | - Kyle Mitsunaga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Gaetano J Scuderi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Matthew Smuck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Koltsov JCB, Smuck MW, Zagel A, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Lumbar epidural steroid injections for herniation and stenosis: incidence and risk factors of subsequent surgery. Spine J 2019; 19:199-205. [PMID: 29959098 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbosacral epidural steroid injections (ESIs) have increased dramatically despite a narrowing of the clinical indications for use. One potential indication is to avoid or delay surgery, yet little information exists regarding surgery rates after ESI. PURPOSE The purpose of this research was to determine the proportion of patients having surgery after lumbar ESI for disc herniation or stenosis and to identify the timing and factors associated with this progression. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study was a retrospective review of nationally representative administrative claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan databases from 2007 to 2014. PATIENT SAMPLE The study cohort was comprised of 179,025 patients (54±15 years, 48% women) having lumbar ESIs for diagnoses of stenosis and/or herniation. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the time from ESI to surgery. METHODS Inclusion criteria were ESI for stenosis and/or herniation, age ≥18 years, and health plan enrollment for 1 year before ESI to screen for exclusions. Patients were followed longitudinally until they progressed to surgery or had a lapse in enrollment, at which time they were censored. Rates of surgery were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Demographic and treatment factors associated with surgery were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. No external funding was procured for this research and the authors' conflicts of interest are not pertinent to the present work. RESULTS Within 6 months, 12.5% of ESI patients underwent lumbar surgery. By 1 year, 16.9% had surgery, and by 5 years, 26.1% had surgery. Patients with herniation had surgery at rates of up to five-fold to seven-fold higher, with the highest rates of surgery in younger patients and those with both herniation and stenosis. Other concomitant spine diagnoses, male sex, previous tobacco use, and residence a rural areas or regions other than the Northeastern United States were associated with higher surgery rates. Medical comorbidities (previous treatment for drug use, congestive heart failure, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypercholesterolemia, and other cardiac complications) were associated with lower surgery rates. CONCLUSIONS In the long term, more than one out of every four patients undergoing ESI for lumbar herniation or stenosis subsequently had surgery, and nearly one of six had surgery within the first year. After adjusting for other patient demographics and comorbidities, patients with herniation were more likely have surgery than those with stenosis. The improved understanding of the progression from lumbar ESI to surgery will help to better inform discussions regarding the value of ESI and aid in the shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayme C B Koltsov
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Matthew W Smuck
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Alicia Zagel
- Research Institute, Children's Minnesota, 2525 Chicago Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| | - Serena S Hu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Mail Code 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ziino C, Konopka JA, Ajiboye RM, Ledesma JB, Koltsov JCB, Cheng I. Single position versus lateral-then-prone positioning for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. J Spine Surg 2018; 4:717-724. [PMID: 30714003 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.12.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background To compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusions in two cohorts of patients who either underwent single position or dual position surgery. Methods Patients over the age of 18 with degenerative lumbar pathology who underwent a lumbar interbody fusion via lateral access from 2012-2015 from a single surgeon met inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent combined procedures, had a history of retroperitoneal surgery, or had inadequate preoperative imaging were excluded. Patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation [single-position (SP)] were compared to those turned prone [dual-position (DP)]. Demographics, surgical details, and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 42 SP and 24 DP patients were analyzed. The DP group had a 44.4-minute longer operating room time compared to the SP group (P<0.001) after adjusting for the number of levels operated (P<0.001) and unilateral versus bilateral screw placement (P=0.048). Otherwise, no differences were observed in peri-operative outcomes. Lordosis was not different between groups pre-operatively (P>0.999) or post-operatively (P=0.479), and neither was the pre- to post-operative change (P=0.283). Conclusions Lateral pedicle screw fixation following lateral interbody fusion decreases operating room time without compromising post-operative lordosis, complication rates, or perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chason Ziino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jaclyn A Konopka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Remi M Ajiboye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Justin B Ledesma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jayme C B Koltsov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fogel GR, Rosen L, Koltsov JCB, Cheng I. Neurologic adverse event avoidance in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: technical considerations using muscle relaxants. J Spine Surg 2018; 4:247-253. [PMID: 30069514 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.06.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The retroperitoneal trans-psoas extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) technique has improved over the last decade with increased efficiency and an emphasis on complication avoidance. After all known procedural safeguards are enacted, the most common failure of neuro-monitoring precision may be the use of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants (MR) for induction that is standard of care for anesthesia. Even when non-depolarizing MRs are minimized there is often a small dose given to decrease risk of vocal cord injury with intubation. The most common neurological adverse events (AE) attendant to the lateral approach are thigh dysesthetic pain and hip flexor weakness. The purpose of this study is to present a consecutive series of L3-4 and L4-5 XLIF patients treated by a single surgeon using all procedural safeguards with and without the use of a low dose of non-depolarizing MRs prior to intubation. Methods A retrospective review of 74 consecutive patients treated at 150 levels with XLIF and no muscle relaxants (NMR) were compared to a group of 124 consecutive XLIF patients treated at 238 levels with MR. The surgeon upon discovering a small dose of rocuronium was used for intubation, questioned the effect on the neuromonitoring and NMR group was begun. All procedural technique details remained the same. All patients had XLIF at L3-4, L4-5, or both levels. Perioperative variables were collected, including evoked and free-run EMG readings and postoperative neural and muscular side effects. Hospital records including progress notes describing postoperative symptoms and anesthesia records describing the drugs, dosages, and timing were studied. Clinical records were reviewed at 1, 3 and 6 months for complaints of neurologic AE. Results NMR patients had a perfect twitch test (>99%) immediately. MR patients had slower arrival of the twitch and often settled at a lower level (80-92%). No surgery was attempted until the twitch test was at least 80%. NMR had 8/74 (10.8%) and MR 36/125 (28.8%) thigh AE (thigh dysthetic pain) at 1 month (P<0.005). No lower extremity weaknesses (femoral nerve injury) were observed in the NMR group and three in the MR group. All NMR thigh AEs resolved by the third month postoperative visit compared with 17/125 at 3 months (P=0.001) and 6/125 at 6 months (P=0.176) with persistent thigh AEs in the MR group. Conclusions Eliminating MRs altogether appears to have allowed the evoked and free running EMG to be more reliable and accurate in predicting the proximity of the neurologic structures. Thigh AEs related to neural and muscular integrity in NMR patients were limited and eliminated by the 3rd month. The MR group was significantly more likely to have a thigh AE at 1 month and persistent at 3 months. Neurologic AEs may be limited or eliminated when MRs are avoided in lateral lumbar fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy R Fogel
- Spine Pain Be Gone Clinic, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cheng I, Park DY, Mayle RE, Githens M, Smith RL, Park HY, Hu SS, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Kharazi AI. Does timing of transplantation of neural stem cells following spinal cord injury affect outcomes in an animal model? J Spine Surg 2017; 3:567-571. [PMID: 29354733 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.10.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background We previously reported that functional recovery of rats with spinal cord contusions can occur after acute transplantation of neural stem cells distal to the site of injury. To investigate the effects of timing of administration of human neural stem cell (hNSC) distal to the site of spinal cord injury on functional outcomes in an animal model. Methods Thirty-six adult female Long-Evans hooded rats were randomized into three experimental and three control groups with six animals in each group. The T10 level was exposed via posterior laminectomy, and a moderate spinal cord contusion was induced by the Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study Impactor (MASCIS, W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The animals received either an intrathecal injection of hNSCs or control media through a separate distal laminotomy immediately, one week or four weeks after the induced spinal cord injury. Observers were blinded to the interventions. Functional assessment was measured immediately after injury and weekly using the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating score. Results A statistically significant functional improvement was seen in all three time groups when compared to their controls (acute, mean 9.2 vs. 4.5, P=0.016; subacute, mean 11.1 vs. 6.8, P=0.042; chronic, mean 11.3 vs. 5.8, P=0.035). Although there was no significant difference in the final BBB scores comparing the groups that received hNSCs, the group which achieved the greatest improvement from the time of cell injection was the subacute group (+10.3) and was significantly greater than the chronic group (+5.1, P=0.02). Conclusions The distal intrathecal transplantation of hNSCs into the contused spinal cord of a rat led to significant functional recovery of the spinal cord when injected in the acute, subacute and chronic phases of spinal cord injury (SCI), although the greatest gains appeared to be in the subacute timing group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Don Y Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Mayle
- California Pacific Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael Githens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert L Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Howard Y Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cipriano PW, Yoon D, Gandhi H, Holley D, Thakur D, Hargreaves BA, Kennedy DJ, Smuck MW, Cheng I, Biswal S. 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Chronic Sciatica: Early Results Revealing Spinal and Nonspinal Abnormalities. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:967-972. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
39
|
Veeravagu A, Li A, Swinney C, Tian L, Moraff A, Azad TD, Cheng I, Alamin T, Hu SS, Anderson RL, Shuer L, Desai A, Park J, Olshen RA, Ratliff JK. Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27:81-91. [PMID: 28430052 DOI: 10.3171/2016.12.spine16969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ability to assess the risk of adverse events based on known patient factors and comorbidities would provide more effective preoperative risk stratification. Present risk assessment in spine surgery is limited. An adverse event prediction tool was developed to predict the risk of complications after spine surgery and tested on a prospective patient cohort. METHODS The spinal Risk Assessment Tool (RAT), a novel instrument for the assessment of risk for patients undergoing spine surgery that was developed based on an administrative claims database, was prospectively applied to 246 patients undergoing 257 spinal procedures over a 3-month period. Prospectively collected data were used to compare the RAT to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator. Study end point was occurrence and type of complication after spine surgery. RESULTS The authors identified 69 patients (73 procedures) who experienced a complication over the prospective study period. Cardiac complications were most common (10.2%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to compare complication outcomes using the different assessment tools. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed comparable predictive accuracy between the RAT and the ACS NSQIP calculator (0.670 [95% CI 0.60-0.74] in RAT, 0.669 [95% CI 0.60-0.74] in NSQIP). The CCI was not accurate in predicting complication occurrence (0.55 [95% CI 0.48-0.62]). The RAT produced mean probabilities of 34.6% for patients who had a complication and 24% for patients who did not (p = 0.0003). The generated predicted values were stratified into low, medium, and high rates. For the RAT, the predicted complication rate was 10.1% in the low-risk group (observed rate 12.8%), 21.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 31.8%), and 49.7% in the high-risk group (observed 41.2%). The ACS NSQIP calculator consistently produced complication predictions that underestimated complication occurrence: 3.4% in the low-risk group (observed 12.6%), 5.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 34.5%), and 12.5% in the high-risk group (observed 38.8%). The RAT was more accurate than the ACS NSQIP calculator (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS While the RAT and ACS NSQIP calculator were both able to identify patients more likely to experience complications following spine surgery, both have substantial room for improvement. Risk stratification is feasible in spine surgery procedures; currently used measures have low accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Li
- Departments of 1 Neurosurgery
| | | | - Lu Tian
- Biomedical Data Science, and
| | | | | | - Ivan Cheng
- Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine; and
| | - Todd Alamin
- Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine; and
| | - Serena S Hu
- Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine; and
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dudli S, Sing DC, Hu SS, Berven SH, Burch S, Deviren V, Cheng I, Tay BKB, Alamin TF, Ith MAM, Pietras EM, Lotz JC. ISSLS PRIZE IN BASIC SCIENCE 2017: Intervertebral disc/bone marrow cross-talk with Modic changes. Eur Spine J 2017; 26:1362-1373. [PMID: 28138783 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-4955-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional cohort analysis of patients with Modic Changes (MC). OBJECTIVE Our goal was to characterize the molecular and cellular features of MC bone marrow and adjacent discs. We hypothesized that MC associate with biologic cross-talk between discs and bone marrow, the presence of which may have both diagnostic and therapeutic implications. BACKGROUND DATA MC are vertebral bone marrow lesions that can be a diagnostic indicator for discogenic low back pain. Yet, the pathobiology of MC is largely unknown. METHODS Patients with Modic type 1 or 2 changes (MC1, MC2) undergoing at least 2-level lumbar interbody fusion with one surgical level having MC and one without MC (control level). Two discs (MC, control) and two bone marrow aspirates (MC, control) were collected per patient. Marrow cellularity was analyzed using flow cytometry. Myelopoietic differentiation potential of bone marrow cells was quantified to gauge marrow function, as was the relative gene expression profiles of the marrow and disc cells. Disc/bone marrow cross-talk was assessed by comparing MC disc/bone marrow features relative to unaffected levels. RESULTS Thirteen MC1 and eleven MC2 patients were included. We observed pro-osteoclastic changes in MC2 discs, an inflammatory dysmyelopoiesis with fibrogenic changes in MC1 and MC2 marrow, and up-regulation of neurotrophic receptors in MC1 and MC2 bone marrow and discs. CONCLUSION Our data reveal a fibrogenic and pro-inflammatory cross-talk between MC bone marrow and adjacent discs. This provides insight into the pain generator at MC levels and informs novel therapeutic targets for treatment of MC-associated LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Dudli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - David C Sing
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- Stanford Spine Clinic, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | - Sigurd H Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Shane Burch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Vedat Deviren
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Stanford Spine Clinic, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | - Bobby K B Tay
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Todd F Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | | | - Eric M Pietras
- Division of Hematology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Lotz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, S-1164, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cheng I, Chan K, Wong C, Li L, Chiu K, Cheung R, Yiu E. Neuronavigated high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic post-stroke dysphagia: A randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med 2017; 49:475-481. [DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
42
|
Abstract
Knowledge of the basic principles of parenteral nutrition is essential for any clinician working in paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. This article aims to give a brief review of the up-to-date recommendations for the paediatric population together with practical tips and considerations about current challenges and issues we believe are still open for debate, particularly with regard to neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Paltrinieri
- Neonatal Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - I Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Chitrit
- Department of Pharmacy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - K Turnock
- Neonatal Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Comer GC, Behn A, Ravi S, Cheng I. A Biomechanical Comparison of Shape Design and Positioning of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages. Global Spine J 2016; 6:432-8. [PMID: 27433426 PMCID: PMC4947403 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cadaveric biomechanical analysis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare three interbody cage shapes and their position within the interbody space with regards to construct stability for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS Twenty L2-L3 and L4-L5 lumbar motion segments from fresh cadavers were potted in polymethyl methacrylate and subjected to testing with a materials testing machine before and after unilateral facetectomy, diskectomy, and interbody cage insertion. The three cage types were kidney-shaped, articulated, and straight bullet-shaped. Each cage type was placed in a common anatomic area within the interbody space before testing: kidney, center; kidney, anterior; articulated, center; articulated, anterior; bullet, center; bullet, lateral. Load-deformation curves were generated for axial compression, flexion, extension, right bending, left bending, right torsion, and left torsion. Finally, load to failure was tested. RESULTS For all applied loads, there was a statistically significant decrease in the slope of the load-displacement curves for instrumented specimens compared with the intact state (p < 0.05) with the exception of right axial torsion (p = 0.062). Among all instrumented groups, there was no statistically significant difference in stiffness for any of the loading conditions or load to failure. CONCLUSIONS Our results failed to show a clearly superior cage shape design or location within the interbody space for use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garet C. Comer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Anthony Behn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Shashank Ravi
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States,Address for correspondence Ivan Cheng, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University450 Broadway Street, Redwood City, CA 94063United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Park DY, Cheng I. Response to letter to the editor regarding: "Local versus distal transplantation of human neural stem cells following chronic spinal cord injury" by Cheng et al. Spine J 2016; 16:793-4. [PMID: 27342710 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D Y Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, 1250 16th St., Santa Monica, 90404, USA
| | - I Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St., MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ratliff JK, Balise R, Veeravagu A, Cole TS, Cheng I, Olshen RA, Tian L. Predicting Occurrence of Spine Surgery Complications Using "Big Data" Modeling of an Administrative Claims Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98:824-34. [PMID: 27194492 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.15.00301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative metrics are increasingly important in determining standards of quality for physicians and hospitals. Although complications following spinal surgery have been described, procedural and patient variables have yet to be incorporated into a predictive model of adverse-event occurrence. We sought to develop a predictive model of complication occurrence after spine surgery. METHODS We used longitudinal prospective data from a national claims database and developed a predictive model incorporating complication type and frequency of occurrence following spine surgery procedures. We structured our model to assess the impact of features such as preoperative diagnosis, patient comorbidities, location in the spine, anterior versus posterior approach, whether fusion had been performed, whether instrumentation had been used, number of levels, and use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). We assessed a variety of adverse events. Prediction models were built using logistic regression with additive main effects and logistic regression with main effects as well as all 2 and 3-factor interactions. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization was used to select features. Competing approaches included boosted additive trees and the classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. The final prediction performance was evaluated by estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as predictions were applied to independent validation data and compared with the Charlson comorbidity score. RESULTS The model was developed from 279,135 records of patients with a minimum duration of follow-up of 30 days. Preliminary assessment showed an adverse-event rate of 13.95%, well within norms reported in the literature. We used the first 80% of the records for training (to predict adverse events) and the remaining 20% of the records for validation. There was remarkable similarity among methods, with an AUC of 0.70 for predicting the occurrence of adverse events. The AUC using the Charlson comorbidity score was 0.61. The described model was more accurate than Charlson scoring (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS We present a modeling effort based on administrative claims data that predicts the occurrence of complications after spine surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE We believe that the development of a predictive modeling tool illustrating the risk of complication occurrence after spine surgery will aid in patient counseling and improve the accuracy of risk modeling strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Ratliff
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ray Balise
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Tyler S Cole
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ivan Cheng
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Richard A Olshen
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lu Tian
- Departments of Neurosurgery (J.K.R., A.V., and T.S.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (I.C.), and Health and Research Policy, Division of Biostatistics (R.B., R.A.O., and L.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Phillips FM, Cheng I, Rampersaud YR, Akbarnia BA, Pimenta L, Rodgers WB, Uribe JS, Khanna N, Smith WD, Youssef JA, Sulaiman WAR, Tohmeh A, Cannestra A, Wohns RNW, Okonkwo DO, Acosta F, Rodgers EJ, Andersson G. Breaking Through the "Glass Ceiling" of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41 Suppl 8:S39-43. [PMID: 26839987 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Frank M Phillips
- *Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois †Stanford University, Stanford, California ‡University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada §Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Stanford, California ¶Instituto de Patalogia da Coluna, São Paulo, Brazil
- Spine Midwest, St. Mary's Hospital, Jefferson City, Missouri **University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida ††Orthopaedic Specialists of Northwest Indiana, Munster, Indiana ‡‡University Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada §§Spine Colorado, Durango, Colorado ¶¶Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana
- Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, Spokane, Washington ***Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, Florida †††Neo Spine, Puyallup, Washington ‡‡‡University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania §§§Keck Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To determine the short-term outcomes of two different lateral approaches to the lumbar spine. Methods This was a retrospective review performed with four fellowship-trained spine surgeons from a single institution. Two different approach techniques were identified. (1) Traditional transpsoas (TP) approach: dissection was performed through the psoas performed using neuromonitored sequential dilation. (2) Direct visualization (DV) approach: retractors are placed superficial to the psoas followed by directly visualized dissection through psoas. Outcome measures included radiographic fusion and adverse event (AE) rate. Results In all, 120 patients were identified, 79 women and 41 men. Average age was 64.2 years (22 to 86). When looking at all medical and surgical AEs, 31 patients (25.8%) had one or more AEs; 22 patients (18.3%) had a total of 24 neurologically related AEs; 15 patients (12.5%) had anterior/lateral thigh dysesthesias; 6 patients (5.0%) had radiculopathic pain; and 3 patients (2.5%) had postoperative weakness. Specifically, for neurologic AEs, the DV group had a rate of 28.0% and the TP group had a rate of 14.2% (p < 0.18). When looking at the rate of neurologic AEs in patients undergoing single-level fusions only, the DV group rate was 28.6% versus 10.2% for the TP group (p < 0.03). Conclusion Overall, 18.3% of patients sustained a postoperative neurologic AE following lateral interbody fusions. The TP approach had a statistically lower rate of neurologic-specific AE for single-level fusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States,Address for correspondence Ivan Cheng, MD Stanford University Hospital and Clinics450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063United States
| | - Michael R. Briseño
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Robert T. Arrigo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Navpreet Bains
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Shashank Ravi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States
| | - Andrew Tran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7-T1 to T9-10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2-T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2-T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, United States,Address for correspondence Ivan Cheng, MD 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342Redwood City, CA 94063United States
| | - Eric B. Sundberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Alex Iezza
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, United States,Redwood Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, Santa Rosa, California, United States
| | - Derek P. Lindsey
- Bone and Joint Rehabilitation R&D Center, The Veterans Administration Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - K. Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lü G, Wang B, Li Y, Li L, Zhang H, Cheng I. Posterior vertebral column resection and intraoperative manual traction to correct severe post-tubercular rigid spinal deformities incurred during childhood: minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2015; 24:586-93. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3760-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Revised: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA(∗)(‡)
| | - Suehun Ho
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY(†)
| | - David J Kennedy
- Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA(∗)(‡).
| |
Collapse
|