Four-year follow-up of body compostion in lung transplant patients

Lung transplantation outcomes in underweight recipients: A single center experience

Background

Current guidelines recommend a body mass index (BMI) of 16 kg/m² as the minimum threshold for lung transplantation, despite mixed evidence on outcomes in underweight patients. The current study aimed to describe survival outcomes of underweight patients who underwent lung transplantation at a single center.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included adult lung transplant recipients who underwent transplantation for the first time between March 2010 and March 2022 at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center and excluded patients with obesity. We defined an underweight status as a BMI <17 kg/m².

Results

Forty-eight of the 202 lung transplant recipients were underweight at the time of surgery. The underweight patients had similar lengths of hospital (p = 0.53) and intensive care unit (p = 0.81) stays compared to other patients. Thirty-three percent of underweight patients had died within 5-year follow-up, compared to 34% of patients who were not underweight. There was no significant difference in mortality risk between underweight patients and patients with normal BMIs in our multivariable Cox regression model (adjusted HR 1.57, 95%CI: 0.77-3.20, p = 0.21). Exploratory analyses revealed that a pre-transplant BMI <13 kg/m² was associated with a trend towards increased 5-year mortality (adjusted HR 4.00, 95%CI: 0.87-18.35, p = 0.07).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that patients with BMIs of 13-17 kg/m² may be candidates for lung transplantation. Large multi-center cohort studies are needed to confirm the lower BMI limit for safely transplanting patients.

Can we HALT obesity following lung transplant? A Dietitian- and Physiotherapy-directed pilot intervention

INTRODUCTION

Unintentional weight gain, overweight and obesity following solid organ transplantation (SOT) are well-established and linked to morbidity and mortality risk factors. No interventional studies aimed at prevention have been undertaken among lung transplant (LTx) recipients. The combination of group education and telephone coaching is effective in the general population but is untested among SOT cohorts.

METHODS

A non-randomised, interventional pilot study was conducted among new LTx recipients. The control group received standard care. In addition to standard care, the intervention involved four group education and four individual, telephone coaching sessions over 12-months. Data collection occurred at 2 weeks, 3- and 12 months post-LTx. Measurements included weight, BMI, fat mass (FM), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass (FFM), fat-free mass index (FFMI), waist circumference (WC), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), nutrition knowledge, diet, physical activity, lipid profile, HbA_1C , FEV₁ , six-minute walk distance and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Fifteen LTx recipients were recruited into each group. One control participant died 120 days post-LTx, unrelated to the study. There were trends towards lower increases in weight (6.7±7.2kg vs 9.8±11.3kg), BMI (9.6% of baseline vs 13%), FM (19.7% vs 40%), FMI, VAT (7.1% vs 30.8%) and WC (5.5% vs 9.5%), and greater increases in FFM and FFMI (all p>0.05), among the intervention group by 12 months. The intervention was well-accepted by participants.

CONCLUSION

This feasible intervention demonstrated non-significant, but clinically meaningful, favourable weight and body composition trends among LTx recipients over 12 months compared to standard care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001606178) This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

New-onset Obesity After Lung Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients who gain weight after transplantation may experience an upward shift in body mass index (BMI) that places them in the obese category. The incidence, risk factors, and impact on metabolic health and mortality of new-onset obesity have not been documented in the LTx setting.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 564 LTx recipients. Individuals were stratified according to their BMI trajectories from pretransplant evaluation up to 10 y posttransplant. New-onset obesity was defined as a pretransplant BMI <30 kg/m2 and posttransplant BMI >30 kg/m2. The incidence, risk factors, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and mortality of recipients with new-onset obesity were compared with those of nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), consistently obese (BMI >30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), and obese recipients with weight loss (BMI >30 kg/m2 pre-LTx, BMI <30 kg/m2 post-LTx).

RESULTS

We found that 14% of recipients developed obesity after transplantation. Overweight individuals (odds ratio [OR]: 9.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.86-16.69]; P < 0.001) and candidates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 6.93; 95% CI [2.30-20.85]; P = 0.001) and other diagnoses (OR: 4.28; 95% CI [1.22-14.98]; P = 0.023) were at greater risk. Multivariable regression analysis showed that new-onset obesity was associated with a greater risk of metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% CI [1.17-2.46]; P = 0.005), but not of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, than nonobesity. Recipients with new-onset obesity had a survival comparable to that of consistently obese individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater understanding of the multifaceted nature of post-LTx obesity may lead to interventions that are better tailored to the characteristics of these individuals.

Construct and Predictive Validity of Sarcopenia in Lung Transplant Candidates

Rationale: Sarcopenia is associated with disability and death. The optimal definition and clinical relevance of sarcopenia in lung transplantation remain unknown. Objectives: To assess the construct and predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in lung transplant candidates. Methods: In a multicenter prospective cohort of 424 lung transplant candidates, we evaluated limited (muscle mass only) and expanded (muscle mass and quality) sarcopenia definitions from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and a cohort-specific distribution-based lowest quartile definition. We assessed construct validity using associations with conceptually related factors. We evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and frailty using generalized additive models. We also evaluated associations between sarcopenia definitions and key pretransplant outcomes, including disability (quantified by the Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scale [range, 0-3; higher scores = worse disability; minimally important difference, 0.3]) and waitlist delisting/death, by multivariate linear and Cox regression, respectively. Results: Sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 6% to13% by definition used. The limited EWGSOP2 definition demonstrated the highest construct validity, followed by the expanded EWGSOP2 definition and both limited and expanded FNIH and lowest quartile definitions. Sarcopenia exhibited a linear association with the risk of frailty. The EWGSOP2 and expanded lowest quartile definitions were associated with disability, ranging from 0.20 to 0.25 higher Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scores. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of waitlist delisting or death by the limited and expanded lowest quartile definitions (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-9.9 and HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.0, respectively) and the EWGSOP2 limited definition (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.9-8.6) but not with the three other candidate definitions. Conclusions: The prevalence and validity of sarcopenia vary by definition; the EWGSOP2 limited definition exhibited the broadest validity in lung transplant candidates. The linear relationship between low muscle mass and frailty highlights sarcopenia's contribution to frailty and also questions the clinical utility of a sarcopenia cut-point in advanced lung disease. The associations between sarcopenia and important pretransplant outcomes support further investigation into using body composition for candidate risk stratification.

Exercise training for adult lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary transplantation is the final treatment option for people with end-stage respiratory diseases. Evidence suggests that exercise training may contribute to speeding up physical recovery in adults undergoing lung transplantation, helping to minimize or resolve impairments due to physical inactivity in both the pre- and post-transplant stages. However, there is a lack of detailed guidelines on how exercise training should be carried out in this specific sub-population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and safety of exercise training in adult patients who have undergone lung transplantation, measuring the maximal and functional exercise capacity; health-related quality of life; adverse events; patient readmission; pulmonary function; muscular strength; pathological bone fractures; return to normal activities and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 6 October 2020 using relevant search terms for this review. Studies in the CKTR are identified through CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE searches, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included comparing exercise training with usual care or no exercise training, or with another exercise training program in terms of dosage, modality, program length, or use of supporting exercise devices. The study population comprised of participants older than 18 years who underwent lung transplantation independent of their underlying respiratory pathology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed all records identified by the search strategy and selected studies that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. In the first instance, the disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible the decision was taken by a third reviewer. The same reviewers independently extracted outcome data from included studies and assessed risk of bias. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight RCTs (438 participants) were included in this review. The median sample size was 60 participants with a range from 16 to 83 participants. The mean age of participants was 54.9 years and 51.9% of the participants were male. The median duration of the exercise training programs for the groups undergoing the intervention was 13 weeks, and the median duration of training in the active control groups was four weeks. Overall the risk of bias was considered to be high, mainly due to the inability to blind the study participants and the selective reporting of the results. Due to small number of studies included in this review, and the heterogeneity of the intervention and outcomes, we did not obtain a summary estimate of the results. Two studies comparing resistance exercise training with no exercise reported increases in muscle strength and bone mineral density (surrogate outcomes for pathological bone fractures) with exercise training (P > 0.05), but no differences in adverse events. Exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pulmonary function, and death (any cause) were not reported. Three studies compared two different resistant training programs. Two studies comparing squats using a vibration platform (WBVT) compared to squats on the floor reported an improvement in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (28.4 metres, 95% CI 3 to 53.7; P = 0.029; and 28.3 metres, 95% CI 10.0 to 46.6; P < 0.05) with the WBVT. Supervised upper limb exercise (SULP) program improved 6MWT at 6 months compared to no supervised upper limb exercise (NULP) (SULP group: 561.2 ± 83.6 metres; NULP group: 503.5 ± 115.2 metres; P = 0.01). There were no differences in HRQoL, adverse events, muscular strength, or death (any cause). Pulmonary function and pathological bone fractures were not reported. Two studies comparing multimodal exercise training with no exercise reported improvement in 6MWT at 3 months (P = 0.008) and at 12-months post-transplant (P = 0.002) and muscular strength (quadriceps force (P = 0.001); maximum leg press (P = 0.047)) with multimodal exercise, but no improvement in HRQoL, adverse events, pulmonary function, pathological bone fractures (lumbar T-score), or death (any cause). One study comparing the same multimodal exercise programs given over 7 and 14 weeks reported no differences in 6MWT, HRQoL, adverse events, pulmonary function, muscle strength, or death (any cause). Pathological bone fractures were not reported. According to GRADE criteria, we rated the certainty of the evidence as very low, mainly due to the high risk of bias and serious imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In adults undergoing lung transplantation the evidence about the effects of exercise training is very uncertain in terms of maximal and functional exercise capacity, HRQoL and safety, due to very imprecise estimates of effects and high risk of bias.

A GLIMmer of insight into lung transplant nutrition: Enhanced detection of malnutrition in lung transplant patients using the GLIM criteria

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a novel framework for diagnosing malnutrition and requires evaluation in wide-ranging clinical settings. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of malnutrition and its phenotypic characteristics among lung transplantation (LTx) candidates comparing GLIM to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of all adult patients assessed for LTx in a one-year period. Phenotypic criteria included body mass index (BMI), unintentional loss of weight (LOW) over a 12-month period and fat-free mass index (FFMI) using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Systemic inflammation associated with severe end-stage lung disease met GLIM's etiological criterion. Diagnosis of malnutrition, and its severity, were classified according to each of GLIM and ICD-10.

RESULTS

Of 130 patients, 112 (86%) had all data to classify malnutrition. Malnutrition prevalence according to GLIM was 59%, which was markedly greater than using ICD-10 criteria (26%). Half of the LTx patients were moderately malnourished using GLIM, compared to 19% using ICD-10. A similar proportion were severely malnourished using GLIM (9%) and ICD-10 (7%). Fat-free mass (FFM) depletion (47% of all patients) was a major contributor to GLIM-malnutrition. Over 60% of LTx patients with GLIM-malnutrition were not detected as malnourished using ICD-10 criteria.

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition diagnosis using GLIM was higher than using ICD-10 in LTx patients, primarily attributable to the incorporation of quantitative evaluation of FFM depletion. This highlights the utility of the GLIM framework and the importance of including body composition in malnutrition assessment.

Quantity and quality of antigravity muscles in patients undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplantation: 1-year longitudinal analysis using chest computed tomography images

Background

Skeletal muscle dysfunction is a common feature in patients with severe lung diseases. Although lung transplantation aims to save these patients, the surgical procedure and disuse may cause additional deterioration and prolonged functional disability. We investigated the postoperative course of antigravity muscle condition in terms of quantity and quality using chest computed tomography.

Methods

35 consecutive patients were investigated for 12 months after living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). The erector spinae muscles (ESMs), which are antigravity muscles, were evaluated, and the cross-sectional area (ESM_CSA) and mean attenuation (ESM_CT) were analysed to determine the quantity and quality of ESMs. Functional capacity was evaluated by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Age-matched living donors with lower lobectomy were evaluated as controls.

Results

Recipient and donor ESM_CSA values temporarily decreased at 3 months and recovered by 12 months post-operatively. The ESM_CSA of recipients, but not that of donors, surpassed baseline values by 12 months post-operatively. Increased ESM_CSA (ratio to baseline ≥1) may occur at 12 months in patients with a high baseline ESM_CT. Although the recipient ESM_CT may continuously decrease for 12 months, the ESM_CT is a major determinant, in addition to lung function, of the postoperative 6MWD at both 3 and 12 months.

Conclusion

The quantity of ESMs may increase within 12 months after LDLLT in recipients with better muscle quality at baseline. The quality of ESMs is also important for physical performance; therefore, further approaches to prevent deterioration in muscle quality are required.

The quantity of antigravity muscles in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) will increase within 1 year after LTx. The quality of muscles is important for increase of muscle quantity as well as physical performance.https://bit.ly/3bItfB9

Association of Chest CT-Based Quantitative Measures of Muscle and Fat with Post-Lung Transplant Survival and Morbidity: A Single Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study in Korean Population

OBJECTIVE

Abnormal body composition is an important modifiable risk factor in lung transplantation. Therefore, precise quantification of different body components, including muscle and fat, may play an important role in optimizing outcomes in lung transplant patients. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic significance of muscle and subcutaneous fat mass measured on chest CT with regard to lung transplantation survival and other post-transplant outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population included 45 consecutive adult lung transplant recipients (mean age of 47.9 ± 12.1 years; 31 males and 14 females) between 2011 and 2017. Preoperative cross-sectional areas of muscle and subcutaneous fat were semi-automatically measured on axial CT images at the level of the 12th thoracic vertebra (T12). Additional normalized indexed parameters, adjusted for either height or weight, were obtained. Associations of quantitative parameters with survival and various other post-transplant outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients included in the present study, 10 mortalities were observed during the follow-up period. Patients with relative sarcopenia (RS) classified based on height-adjusted muscle area with a cut-off value of 28.07 cm²/m² demonstrated worse postoperative survival (log-rank test, p = 0.007; hazard ratio [HR], 6.39:1) despite being adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (HR, 8.58:1; p = 0.022). Weight-adjusted parameters of muscle area were negatively correlated with duration of ventilator support (R = -0.54, p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (R = -0.33, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RS demonstrate worse survival after lung transplantation that those without RS. Additionally, quantitative parameters of muscles measured at the T12 level on chest CT were associated with the duration of post-lung transplant ventilator support and duration of stay in the ICU.

Trends, Determinants, and Impact on Survival of Post-Lung Transplant Weight Changes: A Single-center Longitudinal Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is commonly seen in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Although previous studies have focused on weight changes at fixed time periods and relatively early after transplant, trends over time and long-term weight evolution have not been described in this population. The study objectives were to document weight changes up to 15 years post-LTx and assess the predictors of post-LTx weight changes and their associations with mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of LTx recipients between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2016 (n = 502). Absolute weight changes from transplant were calculated at fixed time periods (6 mo, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 y), and continuous trends over time were generated. Predictors of weight changes and their association with mortality were assessed using linear and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

LTx recipients experienced a gradual increase in weight, resulting from the combination of multiple weight trajectories. Interstitial lung disease diagnosis negatively predicted post-LTx weight changes at all time points, whereas transplant body mass index categories were significant predictors at earlier time points. Patients with a weight gain of >10% at 5 years had a better survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66), whereas a 10% weight loss at earlier time points was associated with worse survival (1 y: HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.22-3.41 and 2 y: HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.22-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-LTx weight changes display various trajectories, are predicted to some extent by individual and LTx-related factors, and have a negative or positive impact on survival depending on the time post-LTx. These results may lead to a better individualization of weight management after transplant.

Nutrition-related factors associated with waiting list mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease: A retrospective cohort study

Japanese patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) sometimes die waiting for lung transplantation (LTx) because it takes about 2 years to receive it in Japan. We evaluated nutrition-related factors associated with waiting list mortality. Seventy-six ILD patients were hospitalized in Kyoto University Hospital at registration for LTx from 2013 to 2015. Among them, 40 patients were included and analyzed. Patient background was as follows: female, 30%; age, 50.3 ± 6.9 years; body mass index, 21.1 ± 4.0 kg/m² ; 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), 356 ± 172 m; serum albumin, 3.8 ± 0.4 g/dL; serum transthyretin (TTR), 25.3 ± 7.5 mg/dL; and C-reactive protein, 0.5 ± 0.5 mg/dL. Median observational period was 497 (range 97-1015) days, and median survival time was 550 (95% CI 414-686) days. Survival rate was 47.5%, and mortality rate was 38.7/100 person-years. Cox analyses showed that TTR (HR 0.791, 95% CI 0.633-0.988) and 6MWD (HR 0.795, 95% CI 0.674-0.938) were independently correlated with mortality and were influenced by body fat mass and leg skeletal muscle mass, respectively. It is suggested that nutritional markers and exercise capacity are important prognostic markers in waitlisted patients, but further study is needed to determine whether nutritional intervention or exercise can change outcomes.

Nutritional Requirements of Lung Transplant Recipients: Challenges and Considerations

An optimal nutritional status is associated with better post-transplant outcomes and survival. Post-lung transplant nutrition management is however particularly challenging as lung recipients represent a very heterogeneous group of patients in terms of age, underlying diseases, weight status and presence of comorbidities. Furthermore, the post-transplant period encompasses several stages characterized by physiological and pathophysiological changes that affect nutritional status of patients and necessitate tailored nutrition management. We provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding nutritional requirements in the post-lung transplant period from the immediate post-operative phase to long-term follow-up. In the immediate post-transplantation phase, the high doses of immunosuppressants and corticosteroids, the goal of maintaining hemodynamic stability, the presence of a catabolic state, and the wound healing process increase nutritional demands and lead to metabolic perturbations that necessitate nutritional interventions. As time from transplantation increases, complications such as obesity, osteoporosis, cancer, diabetes, and kidney disease, may develop and require adjustments to nutrition management. Until specific nutritional guidelines for lung recipients are elaborated, recommendations regarding nutrient requirements are formulated to provide guidance for clinicians caring for these patients. Finally, the management of recipients with special considerations is also briefly addressed.

Thoracic muscle cross-sectional area is associated with hospital length of stay post lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Low muscle mass is common in lung transplant (LTx) candidates; however, the clinical implications have not been well described. The study aims were to compare skeletal muscle mass in LTx candidates with controls using thoracic muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) from computed tomography and assess the association with pre- and post-transplant clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 527 LTx candidates [median age: 55 IQR (42-62) years; 54% male]. Thoracic muscle CSA was compared to an age- and sex-matched control group. Associations between muscle CSA and pre-transplant six-minute walk distance (6MWD), health-related quality of life (HRQL), delisting/mortality, and post-transplant hospital outcomes and one-year mortality were evaluated using multivariable regression analysis. Muscle CSA for LTx candidates was about 10% lower than controls (n = 38). Muscle CSA was associated with pre-transplant 6MWD, but not HRQL, delisting or pre- or post-transplant mortality. Muscle CSA (per 10 cm² difference) was associated with shorter hospital stay [0.7 median days 95% CI (0.2-1.3)], independent of 6MWD. In conclusion, thoracic muscle CSA is a simple, readily available estimate of skeletal muscle mass predictive of hospital length of stay, but further study is needed to evaluate the relative contribution of muscle mass versus functional deficits in LTx candidates.

Determinants of pre-transplantation pectoralis muscle area (PMA) and post-transplantation change in PMA in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine predictors of pectoralis muscle area (PMA) and assess change in PMA following lung transplantation and its relationship to outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 88 lung transplant recipients at a single center was performed. PMA was determined on a single axial slice from chest computerized tomography. Pectoralis muscle index (PMI) was calculated from the PMA divided by the height squared.

RESULTS

PMI decreased post-transplantation (8.1±2.8 cm² /m² pre-transplantation, 7.5±2.9 cm² /m² at 6 months, and 7.6±2.7 cm² /m² at 12 months, P<.05). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) were predictors of pre-transplant PMI (β=-2.3, P=.001 for COPD; β=2.1, P<.001 for ILD) and percent change in PMI at 12 months post-transplantation relative to baseline (β=19.2, P=.04 for COPD; β=-20.1, P=.01 for ILD). Patients in the highest quartile for PMI change at 12 months had fewer ventilator days compared with patients in the other quartiles (P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Underlying diagnosis was a significant predictor of both pre-transplantation PMI and change in PMI post-transplantation. Further studies of PMI are needed to determine its clinical utility in predicting outcomes following lung transplantation.

Sarcopenia of thoracic muscle mass is not a risk factor for survival in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In lung transplantation (LTx), patients with thoracic muscle sarcopenia may have to require longer to recovery. We measured thoracic muscle volume by using the cross sectional area (CSA) and assessed its effect on early outcomes after LTx.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of thoracic sarcopenia in patients undergoing LTx between January 2010 and July 2015. The lowest CSA quartile (Q1) was defined as sarcopenia.

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients were enrolled. The mean CSA was 58.24±15.82 cm(2). Patients in the highest CSA quartile were more likely to be male (92.6% vs. 17.9%, P<0.001), older (55.2±10.1 vs. 43.2±14.9 years, P=0.001), to have a higher body mass index (BMI) (22.3±4.0 vs. 19.4±3.7 kg/m(2), P=0.007), and to have pulmonary fibrosis (85.2% vs. 35.7%, P=0.003) compared with the lowest CSA quartile. Early outcomes including ventilator support duration [32.9±49.2 vs. 24.5±39.9 days, P= not significant (ns)], intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration (28.4±43.7 vs. 24.4±35.9 days, P= ns) and hospital stay duration (61.4±48.2 vs. 50.8±37.2 days, P= ns) tended to be longer in Q1 than Q4, but the difference was not significant. However, the 1-year survival rate was better in Q1 compared with Q4 (66.6% vs. 46.0%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with thoracic sarcopenia seem to require a longer post-operative recovery time after LTx, this does not compromise their early outcomes. By contrast, patients with larger thoracic muscle volume (Q4) showed poorer survival times.

Pre-transplant wasting (as measured by muscle index) is a novel prognostic indicator in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Frailty in non-transplant populations increases morbidity and mortality. Muscle wasting is an important frailty characteristic. Low body mass index is used to measure wasting, but can over- or underestimate muscle mass. Computed tomography (CT) software can directly measure muscle mass. It is unknown if muscle wasting is important in lung transplantation.

AIM AND METHODS

The aim of this single-center, retrospective cohort study was to determine whether pre-transplant low muscle mass (as measured by CT using Slice-O-matic software at L2-L3 interspace) was associated with post-transplantation mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, or primary graft dysfunction. Lung transplant recipients from 2000 to 2012 with a CT scan less than six months prior to transplant were included. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. Those with low muscle index (lower 25th percentile) had a worse survival (hazard ratio = 3.83; 95% confidence interval 1.42-10.3; p = 0.007) and longer hospital LOS by an estimated 7.2 d (p = 0.01) when adjusted for age and sex as compared to those with higher muscle index.

CONCLUSION

Low muscle index at lung transplantation is associated with worse survival and increased hospital LOS.

Sarcopenia in lung transplantation: a systematic review

Lung transplant candidates and recipients have significant impairments in skeletal muscle mass, strength and function--individual measures of sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle dysfunction has been observed in the pre-transplant and post-transplant period and could have an important effect on transplant outcomes. A systematic review was performed to characterize the techniques used to study sarcopenia and assess the level of impairment throughout the transplant process. Electronic databases were searched (inception to July 2013) for prospective studies measuring at least 1 element of sarcopenia (muscle mass, strength, or function) in lung transplant patients. Eighteen studies were included, and study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. A variety of measurements were used to evaluate sarcopenia in 694 lung transplant patients. Muscle mass in 7 studies was assessed using bioelectrical impedance (n = 4), computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (n = 2), or skin folds (n = 1), and was significantly reduced. Quadriceps strength was examined in 14 studies with computerized dynamometer (n = 10) and hand-held dynamometer (n = 4). Quadriceps strength was reduced in the pre-transplant period (mean range, 49%-86% predicted; n = 455 patients), further reduced immediately after transplant (51%-72%, n = 126), and improved beyond 3 months after transplant (58%-101%, n = 164). Only 2 studies measured lower extremity function (sit-to-stand test). A multitude of measurement techniques have been used to assess individual measures of sarcopenia, with reduced muscle mass and quadriceps strength observed in the pre-transplant and post-transplant period. Further standardization of measurement techniques is needed to assess the clinical effect of sarcopenia in lung transplantation.

Posttransplant sarcopenia: an underrecognized early consequence of liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is believed to reverse the clinical and metabolic abnormalities of cirrhosis. Reduced skeletal muscle mass or sarcopenia contributes to increased mortality and adverse consequences of cirrhosis. Failure of reversal of sarcopenia of cirrhosis after liver transplantation is not well recognized. Six temporally, geographically, and methodologically distinct follow-up studies in 304 cirrhotics reported conflicting data on changes in indirect measures of skeletal muscle mass after transplantation. Distinct measures of body composition but not skeletal muscle mass were used and did not focus on the clinical consequences of sarcopenia after transplantation. A number of studies reported an initial rapid postoperative loss of lean mass followed by incomplete recovery with a maximum follow-up of 2 years. Posttransplant sarcopenia may be responsible for metabolic syndrome and impaired quality of life after liver transplantation. Potential reasons for failure to reverse sarcopenia after liver transplantation include use of immunosuppressive agents [mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and calcineurin inhibitors] that impair skeletal muscle growth and protein accretion. Repeated hospitalizations, posttransplant infections, and renal failure also contribute to posttransplant sarcopenia. Finally, recovery from muscle deconditioning is limited by lack of systematic nutritional and physical-activity-based interventions to improve muscle mass. Despite the compelling data on sarcopenia before liver transplantation, the impact of posttransplant sarcopenia on clinical outcomes is not known. There is a compelling need for studies to examine the mechanisms and consequences of sarcopenia post liver transplantation to permit development of therapies to prevent and reverse this disorder.

Changes in body composition after lung transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of nutritional status, including body composition measurements, in pediatric patients before and after lung transplant (LTx) can aid in adapting nutrition support and physical rehabilitation programs to meet individual patient needs. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the changes in weight, lean body mass (LBM), and body fat (BF) before and after LTx and their association with lung function in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Included were 41 LTx patients, aged 3 months to 20.7 years, who had at least 2 body composition measurements determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar Prodigy, Waukesha, WI) in the first 2 years after LTx were measured pre-LTX and at 12 or 24 months post-LTX, for weight, LBM, and BF.

RESULTS

Pre-LTx, 29% of patients had moderate and 12% had severe chronic malnutrition (growth stunting). This compares with 21% of patients being moderately LBM-depleted and 23% being BF-depleted. The weight change at 12 and 24 months was +9.3% (interquartile range, 5.6%-23%) and +4.7% (0.9%-11.6%), respectively; whereas the LBM change at 12 and 24 months was +15.2% (6.8%-17.1%) and +4.2% (-0.6% to 7.7%), respectively. LBM percentiles correlated with pulmonary function tests ( % predicted forced vital capacity [ρ = 0.36, p = 0.001] and forced expiratory volume in 1 second [ρ = 0.265, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum weight and LBM gain occur at 12 months after LTx, with smaller gains noted at 24 months. Clinicians must look beyond height and weight and evaluate LBM and fat mass in pediatric patients after LTx.

Weight gain in long-term survivors of kidney or liver transplantation--another paradigm of sarcopenic obesity?

OBJECTIVE

Obesity in transplant recipients is a frequent phenomenon but data from body composition analyses in long-term survivors are limited. Body composition and energy metabolism were studied in patients after liver (LTX) and kidney (KTX) transplantation and patients with liver cirrhosis (LCI) or on chronic hemodialysis (HD) and compared to healthy controls.

METHODS

In 42 patients 50.0 mo (median; range 17.1-100.6) after LTX and 30 patients 93.0 mo (31.2-180.1) after KTX as wells as in LCI (n = 39) or HD (n = 10) patients mid-arm muscle and fat area, body cell mass, and phase angle (bioimpedance analysis), and resting energy expenditure (indirect calorimetry, REE(CALO)) were measured.

RESULTS

Obesity was more prevalent in LTX (17%) than LCI (3%) and in KTX (27%) than in HD (10%). In LTX and KTX, phase angle was higher than in end-stage disease (LTX 5.6° [4.1-7.2] versus LCI 4.4° [2.9-7.3], P < 0.001; KTX 5.9° [4.4-8.7] versus HD 4.3° [2.9-6.8]) but was lower in all patient groups than in controls (7.1°; 4.6-8.9; P < 0.001). In LCI and HD REE(CALO) was higher than predicted, while in LTX and KTX REE(CALO) was not different from predicted REE.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite excellent graft function, many long-term LTX or KTX survivors exhibit a phenotype of sarcopenic obesity with increased fat but low muscle mass. This abnormal body composition is observed despite normalization of the hypermetabolism found in chronic disease and cannot be explained by overeating. The role of appropriate nutrition and physiotherapy after transplantation merits further investigation.

Postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass, complications and quality of life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe postoperative undernutrition in terms of postoperative losses of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) with respect to complications, quality of life, readmission, and 1-y mortality after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively followed. ASMM was measured 2 wk before and 2 mo after surgery using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. ASMM consists of arm skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and leg SMM. The association between ≥5% of ASMM decrease and postoperative outcome was analyzed using the chi-square test. A similar approach was used to analyze arm SMM and leg SMM decreases separately.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included (23 male, 34.5% ≥65 y old). Postoperatively, seven patients (24.1%) lost ≥5% ASMM. When analyzed separately, a ≥5% decrease in leg SMM was associated with a decrease in experienced vitality (odds ratio 13.0, 95% confidence interval 1.32-128.11, P = 0.03). In contrast, a ≥5% loss of arm SMM was associated with fewer in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.98, P = 0.04). These patients were characterized by a higher preoperative fat-free mass index (kilograms per meter squared; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that a preoperatively higher fat-free mass index indicates better ability to cope with operative stress, resulting in fewer complications. In addition, postoperative loss of muscle mass was associated with decreased vitality. We advocate further research investigating the effect of preoperative and postoperative nutritional intervention combined with physical exercise programs to increase lean body mass and thereby improve postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery.

Body composition interpretation. Contributions of the fat-free mass index and the body fat mass index

OBJECTIVE

Low and high body mass index (BMI) values have been shown to increase health risks and mortality and result in variations in fat-free mass (FFM) and body fat mass (BF). Currently, there are no published ranges for a fat-free mass index (FFMI; kg/m(2)), a body fat mass index (BFMI; kg/m(2)), and percentage of body fat (%BF). The purpose of this population study was to determine predicted FFMI and BFMI values in subjects with low, normal, overweight, and obese BMI.

METHODS

FFM and BF were determined in 2986 healthy white men and 2649 white women, age 15 to 98 y, by a previously validated 50-kHz bioelectrical impedance analysis equation. FFMI, BFMI, and %BF were calculated.

RESULTS

FFMI values were 16.7 to 19.8 kg/m(2) for men and 14.6 to 16.8 kg/m(2) for women within the normal BMI ranges. BFMI values were 1.8 to 5.2 kg/m(2) for men and 3.9 to 8.2 kg/m(2) for women within the normal BMI ranges. BFMI values were 8.3 and 11.8 kg/m(2) in men and women, respectively, for obese BMI (>30 kg/m(2)). Normal ranges for %BF were 13.4 to 21.7 and 24.6 to 33.2 for men and women, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BMI alone cannot provide information about the respective contribution of FFM or fat mass to body weight. This study presents FFMI and BFMI values that correspond to low, normal, overweight, and obese BMIs. FFMI and BFMI provide information about body compartments, regardless of height.