Basophil activation test in food allergy: is it ready for real-time?

Basophil Activation Test for the Improved Diagnosis of Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As an ex-vivo test of allergic effector cell activation, basophil activation testing (BAT) to allergen enables quantification of the in-vivo IgE-mediated allergic response. BAT thus holds promise in the diagnosis and monitoring of peanut and tree nut allergies. Recent systematic analyses and expert recommendations support a role for BAT in the diagnosis of peanut and tree nut allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic cut-offs for BAT in peanut and tree nut allergy have been identified. Consistently, BAT can discriminate with high sensitivity and specificity between allergy and tolerance when measured against oral food challenges. Furthermore, the utilization of BAT has can increase the sensitivity and specificity of peanut allergy and tree nut allergy diagnosis, both alone and in conjunction with specific IgE testing and skin prick testing. BAT is a promising tool in the diagnosis of peanut and tree nut allergy.

A Streamlined Strategy for Basophil Activation Testing in a Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The basophil activation test (BAT) has been limited to research settings owing to technical issues. Novel approaches using dry, ready-to-use reagents and streamlined protocols offer greater flexibility and may open opportunities for easier implementation in clinical research.

OBJECTIVE

Using a streamlined basophil activation test (sBAT) strategy and the settings of the baseline study of the Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Toddlers with Peanut Allergy (EPITOPE) trial of EPicutaneous ImmunoTherapy, we aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing BAT in a multicenter trial and to evaluate its utility in predicting the outcomes of peanut double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

METHODS

Whole blood samples were collected from subjects aged 1 to 3 years (n = 241) undergoing baseline eligibility DBPCFC in the EPITOPE study across 15 clinical sites in North America. After preparation with sBAT reagents, processed samples were analyzed in a single central laboratory within 5 days of collection and preparation. The eliciting dose (ED) at DBPCFC was determined using, Practical Allergy (PRACTALL) criteria. Using a machine learning approach that incorporated BAT-derived features, clinical characteristics, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E, the ability to predict outcomes of interest (ED ≤ 300 mg or > 300 mg] and use of epinephrine) was assessed using data randomly split into training (n = 182) and validation (n = 59) subsets.

RESULTS

The expression of basophil activation markers CD203c and CD63 correlated with ED and severity outcomes of DBPCFC. Most informative concentrations of peanut extract in the sBAT assay for these associations were 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL. Using machine learning to assess the ability to predict the outcomes of DBPCFC, the best models using only the BAT-derived features provided relatively high sensitivities of 0.86 and 0.85 for predicting ED and epinephrine use, respectively, whereas specificities were lower, ranging from 0.60 to 0.80. Although including specific immunoglobulin E and skin prick test data in addition to those from sBAT did not improve the ability to identify individuals most at risk for severe reactions, it did improve the ability to identify patients with an ED greater than 300 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to facilitating implementation in multicenter trials, sBAT retains the potential of BAT to characterize allergic patients and confirms its potential to contribute to predicting the outcome of oral food challenges.

Applications of basophil activation test in paediatric allergic diseases

Basophilic granulocytes, containing and releasing histamine after a specific allergy stimulation, are directly involved in IgE-mediated allergic reactions. CD63 is a transmembrane protein of secretory lysosomes of basophils and its upregulation is related with the release of histamine to the extracellular space during IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Basophil activation test (BAT) measures the activation of circulating basophils upon the in vitro stimulation of living blood cells with specific allergens. Such a test is particularly safe and reproducible and has recently emerged as a new promising diagnostic tool for allergic diseases. BAT can be used to diagnose food allergy and represents a promising alternative to oral food challenge tests, especially in children as it is less invasive, safer, and cheaper than the gold standard tests. As a biomarker of tolerance and reactivity, it is also useful to monitor natural resolution and clinical response to immune-modulatory treatments. Regarding drug allergies, BAT is even the only possible applicable diagnostic tool for allergy reactions to some drugs, because of the lack of alternative test, or given that those commonly used are unreliable, or equivocal. Additionally, BAT allows to screen patients with more active urticarial and identify Hymenoptera-allergic patients with negative venom-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E. In respiratory allergic diseases, BAT can facilitate the diagnosis of local allergic rhinitis and evaluate basophil allergen sensitivity in allergic asthma. Although IgE-sensitization in allergic asthma is usually demonstrated by skin prick test and specific IgE, those tests do not predict the clinical allergy contribution to asthma pathogenesis. To date, the potential of BAT in the diagnostic work-up of allergic diseases is well established, but a better standardization of its use is needed. This narrative review summarizes the state-of-the-art BAT technology and applications in pediatric allergic diseases, focusing on immune-related mechanisms and the BAT real clinical utility.

Buckwheat Allergy in Asia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Buckwheat (BW) allergy is a significant issue in Asia. This review delves into three types of BW allergy: immediate food allergy; food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) as a subset of immediate food allergy; and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES); by comparing data from Asian and non-Asian countries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies on BW have been published in Japan and Korea, and only a few studies on the topic have been done outside Asia. To date, seven components of common BW (Fagopyrum esculentum) and four components of Tartary BW (Fagopyrum tartaricum) have been implicated in BW allergy. Although BW-sIgE has limited utility for evaluating immediate BW allergy, Fag e 3-specific IgE, one of the components of common BW, and the skin prick test are diagnostically useful. The present review aims to shed light on the current state of knowledge, highlight research gaps, and suggest future directions in the management and understanding of BW allergy.

Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity to casein (casein-specific CD-sens) predicts allergic reactions at a milk challenge in most but not all patients

BACKGROUND

The basophil activation test is an emerging clinical tool in the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy (CMA). The aim was to assess the association between the basophil allergen threshold sensitivity to the major milk protein casein (casein-specific CD-sens), the levels of milk- and casein-specific Immunoglobulin E antibodies (IgE-ab), and the severity of allergic reactions at milk challenges.

METHODS

We enrolled 34 patients aged 5-15 (median 9) years who underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled milk-challenge (DBPCMC) as screening before inclusion in an oral immunotherapy study for CMA. The severity of the allergic reaction at the DBPCMC was graded using Sampson's severity score. Venous blood was drawn before the DBPCMC. Milk- and casein-specific IgE-ab were analyzed. Following in vitro stimulation of basophils with casein, casein-specific CD-sens, was determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients completed the DBPCMC. There were strong correlations between casein-specific CD-sens and IgE-ab to milk (rs = 0.682, p < .001), and between casein-specific CD-sens and IgE-ab to casein (rs = 0.823, p < .001). There was a correlation between the severity of the allergic reaction and casein-specific CD-sens level (rs = 0.395, p = .041) and an inverse correlation between casein-specific CD-sens level and the cumulative dose of milk protein to which the patient reacted at the DBPCMC (rs = -0.418, p = .027). Among the 30 patients with an allergic reaction at the DBPCMC, 67% had positive casein-specific CD-sens, 23% had negative casein-specific CD-sens, and 10% were declared non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Two thirds of those reacting at the DBPMC had positive casein-specific CD-sens, but reactions also occurred despite negative casein-specific CD-sens. The association between casein-specific CD-sens and the severity of the allergic reaction and cumulative dose of milk protein, respectively, was moderate.

Indirect Basophil Activation Test for Peanut Allergy Diagnosis Using Human Donor Basophils

The basophil activation test (BAT) is a promising test for the replacement of the expensive, time-consuming, and patient-unfriendly oral food challenge (OFC). However, the BAT requires a fresh blood sample which has to be analyzed within 1 day, which can be a logistical constraint. The indirect or passive basophil activation test (iBAT) with human donor basophils and patient serum that can be stored for a long time (1) enables laboratories to perform the assay at any time, (2) gives the possibility to analyze different allergens in the course of time without the need of a new blood sample, and (3) does not suffer from inconclusive results due to nonresponder basophils. The advantage of this iBAT with human donor basophils over the use of basophil or mast cell lines is that this iBAT can be executed without the need of laboratory facilities for cell culture.

Peanut allergy in an adult following cardiac transplant from a non-atopic donor

We present a 62-year-old woman with severe heart failure and who required cardiac transplantation. On postoperative day 22, she experienced anaphylaxis to peanut, with an elevated peanut-specific immunoglobulin E level. This case highlights the differential diagnosis of posttransplantation anaphylaxis as well as the appropriate evaluation.

Food allergy, mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment: Innovation through a multi-targeted approach

The incidence of food allergy (FA) has continued to rise over the last several decades, posing significant burdens on health and quality of life. Significant strides into the advancement of FA diagnosis, prevention, and treatment have been made in recent years. In an effort to lower reliance on resource-intensive food challenges, the field has continued work toward the development of highly sensitive and specific assays capable of high-throughput analysis to assist in the diagnosis FA. In looking toward early infancy as a critical period in the development of allergy or acquisition of tolerance, evidence has increasingly suggested that early intervention via the early introduction of food allergens and maintenance of skin barrier function may decrease the risk of FA. As such, large-scale investigations are underway evaluating infant feeding and the impact of emollient and steroid use in infants with dry skin for the prevention of allergy. On the other end of the spectrum, the past few years have been witness to an explosive increase in clinical trials of novel and innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at the treatment of FA in those whom the disease has already manifested. A milestone in the field, 2020 marked the approval of the first drug, oral peanut allergen, for the indication of peanut allergy. With a foundation of promising data supporting the safety and efficacy of single- and multi-allergen oral immunotherapy, current efforts have turned toward the use of probiotics, biologic agents, and modified allergens to optimize and improve upon existing paradigms. Through these advancements, the field hopes to gain footing in the ongoing battle against FA.