Competency-Based Curriculum Development to Meet the Needs of People With Disabilities: A Call to Action

Access to Care for Patients With Disabilities

When equitable care is considered, patients with disabilities are often not included. This is unfortunate because patients with disabilities experience some of the most pronounced barriers to care of any marginalized group. Special attention should go this group in order to increase access and improve quality of care. Telehealth and other technological strategies can help to decrease some of these disparities. A focus on this population needs to be included throughout medical education so that physicians can have an increasing understanding of the challenges faced as well as potential solutions.

"The Scarlet Letter B": A qualitative study to improve health care provider education for patients who are blind or low-vision

BACKGROUND

Individuals who are blind or low-vision face multiple barriers to quality health care, including insufficient training for health care providers and staff. Limited research has examined provider and staff skills and knowledge gaps, attitudinal barriers, or relevant training needs specific to caring for blind or low-vision patients.

OBJECTIVE

In this qualitative study, we sought to understand, from the perspective of blind or low-vision individuals, what needs to be known and improved to better care for this population.

METHODS

We conducted four structured focus groups with 22 blind or low-vision individuals. Questions assessed general health care impressions, positive and negative health care experiences, and recommendations for training providers.

RESULTS

Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted, which identified three overlapping, training-focused themes: 1) disability etiquette and communication, 2) understanding barriers to care, and 3) dismantling ableist stereotypes and misconceptions. The need for health care provider and staff empathy and compassion is emphasized as a central, core theme shared by each of the training-focused themes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm and expand previous calls for improved education regarding the health care needs for patients who are blind or low vision. Most significantly, we draw from recent literature in health professions education to propose training interventions targeted to the training needs identified via thematic analysis. We advocate for educational design and implementation that is community-engaged and centers the patient who is blind or low vision as the educator.

Cross-sectional analysis of disability education in American Medical Schools

Greater than 25% of the American population has a disability. The demand for disability-informed physicians underscores the need to better prepare physicians to care for patients with disabilities. This study presents findings from three Qualtrics survey studies that investigated (1) medical students' exposure to patients with disabilities while on clinical rotations at Western University of Health Sciences, (2) students' perceived preparedness to care for patients with disabilities nationwide, and (3) the effectiveness of Special Olympics online modules to teach students about caring for patients with disabilities. Descriptive analysis from these studies together indicated that medical students did not feel prepared to care for patients with disabilities. To remedy this, Special Olympics online modules for healthcare professionals were found to effectively enhance student physician training. These findings highlight a critical need for improved medical training to prepare the next generation of physicians to care for patients with disabilities, while outlining a possible educational tool that could be incorporated into medical school curriculum.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkships in medical school: A valuable and integrated addition to the advanced clerkships

The medical specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) focuses on quality of life, function, ability, and interdisciplinary care. PM&R clerkships are uniquely qualified to teach medical students about rehabilitation and the spectrum of postacute care, medical knowledge, and medical decision making related to health care affecting people with disabilities, health care disparities affecting people with disabilities, and the communication and teamwork strategies to provide a patient-centered approach to optimize function and outcomes. PM&R clerkships can be used to fulfill stakeholder and governing body requirements, such as medical knowledge, rehabilitation, critical judgment, health disparities, ethics, communication, teamwork, and patient-centered medical care, in order to maintain accreditation and provide a high-quality education This review provides both a rationale for a medical student clerkship in PM&R and an effective example of such an experience that has been implemented during medical school training.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinical experiences: A narrative review of curricula and educational interventions

Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) is a specialty of medicine that focuses on function and the care of people with disabilities. Many medical schools offer PM&R content by means of PM&R clerkships for career development purposes with varying curricula and assessments; however, there is limited information regarding the optimal way to teach clinical skills relating to the field of PM&R. This narrative review study was performed to evaluate PM&R specific clinical curricular interventions. The review included a PubMed search that yielded 63 articles and a Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) search of 175 articles. A total of 14 articles were selected for review. PM&R clerkships were found to have a variety of educational interventions, including inpatient and outpatient clinical experiences, lectures, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), case discussions, written examinations, physical examination sessions, cadaver sessions, small group discussions, and virtual education. PM&R rotations can improve neurologic and musculoskeletal physical examination skills, PM&R specific knowledge, and confidence in PM&R skills. More research is needed to determine the optimal methods to teach and assess PM&R knowledge and skills in the clinical setting to drive future PM&R curriculum development and educational innovations.

Dismantling Ableism in Undergraduate Medical Education: Promising Practices in Disability-Conscious Training

The healthcare workforce in the United States does not provide the same standard of care for people with disabilities as for nondisabled people. Many academic medical institutions do not routinely offer disability-conscious medical training, and many clinicians and medical educators feel ill-equipped to incorporate anti-ableist learning goals into their curricula. Drawing on a critical review of the literature and interviews with medical educators, representatives of professional organizations, and disability advocates, this article presents promising practices for disability-conscious undergraduate medical education. Disability-conscious education, which is grounded in the insights of disability studies and disability rights and justice frameworks, is distinguished from disability-specific education, which may not extend beyond biomedical models of disability. First, we define current approaches to teaching about disability, highlighting limitations and opportunities for further development. We then identify and analyze approaches to teaching about disability that support the development of disability consciousness among learners. With attention to both curricular format and theoretical frameworks, we offer concrete approaches that medical schools can take to equip students with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practices they need to provide equitable care for patients with disabilities.

Internal medicine residents' self-described knowledge of general medical versus disability-focused concerns: An exploratory study

BACKGROUND

The dearth of disability-focused education in United States residency programs fuels health care disparities faced by persons with disabilities (PWD). However, it has yet to be demonstrated that physicians-in-training feel less comfortable managing disability-specific health concerns than they do other medical conditions.

OBJECTIVE OR HYPOTHESIS

To assess Internal Medicine (IM) residents' level of comfort in managing disability-specific versus general internal medical (GIM) concerns. We hypothesized that: 1) IM residents are less comfortable managing disability-specific health conditions than other GIM conditions; 2) IM residents feel increasingly comfortable handling GIM conditions over the course of their training, but not in addressing disability-specific concerns, and; 3) prior exposure to PWD improves IM residents' comfort in managing disability-specific conditions.

METHODS

An exploratory study utilizing a Likert Scale-based survey assessing IM residents' level of comfort in managing GIM and disability-focused conditions was developed then distributed through 3 IM programs. Main measures included residents' level of comfort in managing a variety of medical conditions, including those pertaining to the care of PWD. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and independent sample t-tests.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 298 residents and 127 completed it (response rate of 42.6 %). Participants were less comfortable providing disability-focused care than GIM care. Upper-level residents were more comfortable than first-year residents in managing GIM conditions, but not in providing disability-focused care.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal medicine residents are inadequately trained to provide care for PWD. There is a need to incorporate disability-specific learning objectives into graduate medical program requirements and curricula.

Disability's absence from admissions nondiscrimination and recruitment initiatives in Top-Tier US allopathic medical schools

BACKGROUND

Diversity in medical school students is essential to ensure that future physicians can care for a range of patients from different backgrounds. However, disability is often overlooked and there are potential examples of discrimination in US medical schools.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if students with disabilities are included in online recruitment, diversity equity and inclusion (DEI), or nondiscrimination materials for US allopathic medical schools.

METHODS

In this descriptive study, the authors reviewed publicly available data from websites of the top ranked 51 US allopathic medical schools to assess inclusion of disability in recruitment efforts or antidiscrimination statements.

RESULTS

The results showed that just under one third of these schools (31 %) mention disability within their DEI or published recruitment efforts. Most commonly (27.5 %), disability is mentioned in a general diversity statement.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that there is a need for greater inclusion of disability in US medical schools' recruitment efforts. This is essential to ensure that people with disabilities are not discriminated against in medical school applications and is one of many factors that will contribute to future physicians being prepared to care for patients with disabilities.

Reducing barriers through education: A scoping review calling for structured disability curricula in surgical training programs

BACKGROUND

Patients with disabilities face widespread barriers to accessing surgical care given inaccessible health systems, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and perpetuation of health inequities. One barrier is the lack of education, and therefore awareness, among trainees/providers, of the need for reasonable accommodations for surgical patients with disabilities.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature on the current state of disabilities curricula in medical education and graduate residency curriculum.

RESULTS

While the literature does demonstrate a causal link between reasonable accommodation training and positive patient-provider relationships and improved clinical outcomes, in practice, disability-focused curricula are rare and often limited in time and to awareness-based didactic courses in medical education and surgical training.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of structured curricula to educate on anti-ableism and care for patients with disabilities promotes a system of structural "ableism." Expanding disability curricula for medical students and trainees may be an opportunity to intervene and promote better surgical care for all patients.

Innovation in Medical Education on Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities: Report on the National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education-Medical Initiative

The lack of physician training in serving patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) has been highlighted as a key modifiable root cause of health disparities experienced by this high-priority public health population. To address gaps in medical education regarding the lack of IDD curriculum, lack of evaluation/assessment, and lack of coordination across institutions, the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and Dentistry created the National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education-Medical (NICHE-MED) Initiative in 2016. The aims of NICHE-MED are to: (1) impact medical students' attitudes and/or knowledge to address underlying ableism and address how future physicians think about disability; (2) apply a lens of health equity and intersectionality, centering people with IDD, but fostering conversation and learning about issues faced by other disability and minoritized populations; and (3) support community-engaged scholarship within medical education. As of 2024, the NICHE-MED initiative consists of close to 40 Medical School Partners, each with their own community-engaged disability curriculum intervention paired with a rigorous evaluation that ties centrally to coordinated program evaluation. The NICHE-MED initiative demonstrates implementation success at scale and is a successful community-engaged curriculum change model that may be replicated regarding disability more broadly and regarding necessary medical education efforts that center other marginalized populations.

Integrating Disability Education into the Preclinical Neurology Curriculum

Medical school curricula often lack specific disability educational content. This project, driven by medical students, identified specific disability-centered educational learning points that could be integrated into existing preclinical neurology content as part of an integrated disability curriculum.

Nothing About Us Without Us: Improving Representation of Disability in Medical School Curriculum Through Explicit Inclusion

ABSTRACT

Medical school curricula across the United States fail to adequately prepare students to provide high-quality care to and advocate for patients with disabilities. To address this shortcoming at one large, urban medical school, the Curriculum Committee at Sidney Kimmel Medical College formed a taskforce of students and faculty to evaluate the degree and quality of disability representation in its undergraduate medical education curriculum. Taskforce members solicited input from five community members in various fields of disability advocacy to craft recommendations that reflected this community's vision for disability education in undergraduate medical education. Community partners suggested areas of focus including clinical skills, accessibility of healthcare facilities, awareness of intersectionality with other identities, acknowledgment of bias, and respect for the patient's autonomy via their "right to risk." The taskforce report to the curriculum committee included nine recommendations for curricular revision based on community partner suggestions, six of which were accepted and are being implemented into the curricular content for the class of 2026 and beyond. This novel approach to implementing curricular change could encourage other medical schools to evaluate their own curricula through the lens of disability and prompt curricular revision with the input of community partners with disabilities, students, and, faculty.

Disability Education for Health Personnel and Impact on Health Outcomes for Persons with Autism: A Scoping Review

Autism manifests in various progressive, fluctuating, or static differences that may be disabling. This requires healthcare staff to provide individualized, culturally competent care for autistic people (AP). However, staff are underprepared since disability curricula are not universally implemented, which may exacerbate health disparities for AP. The Alliance for Disability in Health Care Education (ADHCE) delineated staff competencies to address disparities. The purpose of this review was to describe what is known about disability education initiatives and health-related outcomes for AP. The review included published literature on disability education for any health personnel providing services to AP in any setting where healthcare services are delivered. In June 2023, six databases were queried. Of 3,396 screened reports, 42 were extracted. Most articles originated in the United States and reported various instructional strategies on child-focused educational content for small interprofessional groups in various settings. The biomedical and biopsychosocial disability models were prominent. The training covered few, if any, ADHCE competencies and rarely involved collaboration with AP. Positive outcomes included improved functional health, behavior, and communication. Patient-reported outcomes and physical and psychosocial health were underreported. Future initiatives should involve scaled-up global efforts, address core competencies for care across the lifespan, and establish community partnerships to ensure meaningful outcomes.

Disability health in medical education: development, implementation, and evaluation of a pilot curriculum at Stanford School of Medicine

Background

People with disabilities face significant healthcare disparities due to barriers to accessing care, negative attitudes of providers, and lack of education on disabilities for healthcare professionals. Physicians report discomfort when interacting with patients with disabilities, adding to the disparity, warranting research on medical school education.

Objective

Two educational interventions were structured: (1) a brief 2-h intervention in the mandatory curriculum and (2) a 9-week elective course which included interactions with individuals with disabilities through workshops and partner programs. We predicted that both of these interventions would result in improvements in attitude and empathy toward individuals with disabilities and reduce student anxiety.

Methods

During the 2018-2019 academic year, 54 students completed the surveys for the 2-h intervention and 8 students completed the 2-h intervention and elective course. Pre-, post-, and delayed post-intervention surveys (3 months after post survey) measured students' attitudes, using validated surveys on attitudes, empathy and anxiety toward individuals with disabilities.

Results

Both educational interventions resulted in improved attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. However, students reported only feeling prepared to care for patients with disabilities after the elective course. The elective course, but not the 2-h course, significantly decreased student anxiety levels, likely due to more individual time working with individuals with disabilities. Delayed analysis after 3 months showed that both interventions had a lasting impact on attitudes and behavior change when caring for individuals with disabilities.

Conclusion

Medical education is effective at improving medical students' attitudes and behaviors toward individuals with disabilities. A 2-h session can lead to a modest improvement in attitudes. However, more dedicated time and exposure to persons with disabilities results in a greater improvement in students' attitudes, anxiety and preparedness.

Training an Anti-Ableist Physical Therapist Workforce: Critical Perspectives of Health Care Education That Contribute to Health Inequities for People With Disabilities

Americans with disabilities represent the largest historically underserved and marginalized health disparity population in the United States. This perspective piece will raise the awareness of physical therapist faculty and clinicians on gaps in health care provider knowledge about disability and provide actionable strategies, frameworks, and resources available to improve disability competence to make changes in clinical education and practice. In this perspective piece, 3 contributions are made. First, health disparities experienced by Americans with disabilities as a result of health care providers' biased assumptions about disability and lack of disability competence are described through an in-depth illustration of lived experiences of people with disabilities. Second, a discussion of disability competence in physical therapist education is provided. Finally, critical and evidence-based insights and actionable frameworks and resources to address disability competence training gaps and to promote anti-ableist practice are provided.

Twelve tips for including disability education in undergraduate medical education

Disability is a large and growing minority population worldwide. People with disabilities continue to experience health and healthcare disparities. Despite multiple calls to action to provide disability education within undergraduate medical education as a strategy to mitigate ongoing inequities, robust disability education is not routinely provided across medical schools. This article provides twelve tips that any medical school faculty can utilize to integrate meaningful disability education within existing core medical education.

Disability-Specific Education in US Internal Medicine Primary Care Residency Programs: A Survey of Program Directors

Phenomenon: The dearth of disability-specific education in United States medical schools and residency programs has perpetuated health care inequities experienced by people with disabilities. In this study, we surveyed internal medicine primary care residency program directors about the disability-specific education they offer their learners, their attitudes toward physicians' preparedness to care for people with disabilities, and their perceived challenges to offering more robust disability-specific education. Approach: We developed an on-line survey and forwarded it in 3 weekly emails during October of 2022 to 104 primary care residency program directors. We collected basic information about the residency programs and queried whether they were providing disability-specific education to their residents, which topics were being covered, and perceived barriers to offering additional disability-focused curricula. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and independent samples t-tests. Findings: Forty-seven program directors responded (response rate 45.2%). The largest plurality of programs was in the Northeast, their average number of primary care residents was 15.6, most (67.4%) hosted primary care clinics in hospitals or academic centers, and 55.6% had affiliated divisions or departments of rehabilitation medicine. The majority of respondents felt that both internists and their own residents (88.3% and 77.8%, respectively) are inadequately educated in the care of people with disabilities, yet only 13 (28.9%) offered disability-focused curricula, and they tended to be narrow in scope. Only 8 of those 13 respondents (61.5%) reported that their disability curricula were required, rather than optional. Participants listed a number of barriers to implementing disability-focused education including a lack of advocacy for such work (65.2%), lack of time in the curriculum (63.0%), lack of expectation by educational governing boards that physicians understand disability-specific care considerations (60.9%), and lack of affiliated expertise in the care of people with disabilities (52.2%). Insights: While the program directors training future primary care physicians largely understand that physicians are inadequately prepared to offer equitable health care to individuals with disabilities, few of them are offering disability-specific education to their residents and most see significant barriers to doing so.

Disability Competent Care in Pediatric Milestones

This cross-sectional study examines how disability competencies are addressed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s milestones for pediatric specialties.

Creating an anti-ableist learning environment: Development of a novel disability-related microaggressions session for medical and dental students and mixed methods analysis of impact on learning and empowerment

BACKGROUND

Disability-related microaggressions are unique among microaggressions in the assumptions they reflect and the verbal and non-verbal forms they take. They impact patients and providers alike. Yet, medical and dental students are not routinely educated about disability-related microaggressions. A medical school student-faculty team harnessed Kern's six-step curriculum design process to co-produce a novel 90-min educational intervention centered on recognizing and responding to disability-related microaggressions. The session was piloted in February 2022 as a required element of the school's mandatory professional development training for first-year medical and dental students.

OBJECTIVE

This mixed-methods study examined session impact on student-reported learning pertinent to addressing and mitigating disability-related microaggressions.

METHODS

Voluntary surveys were distributed to all first-year students to capture pre-/post-session self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and comfort, as well as post-session reflection on lessons learned. Quantitative data was analyzed using summary statistics, unpaired t-tests, and Mann Whitney U tests; qualitative data was analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 61 % (100/164) pre-session and 25 % (41/164) post-session. Post-session, there was significantly increased student agreement with statements addressing microaggressions knowledge, comfort teaching others, and strategies to support disability-sensitive workplaces. Post-session narrative reflections revealed learning within five themes: nature of microaggressions, identifying microaggressions, preventing microaggressions, responding to microaggressions, and medical student empowerment. Ninety-three percent of post-session respondents (38/41) agreed the session empowered them to actively contribute to anti-ableist learning environments.

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot educational intervention provides a promising strategy to foster anti-ableism and advocacy among first-year medical/dental students. While limited by low response rate, small sample size, participant self-selection for survey participation, and unlinked individual pre- and post-session responses, mixed methods analysis suggests the session had a positive impact on student action-oriented knowledge and empowerment.

Teaching Physician Assistant Students to Care for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

ABSTRACT

The purposes of this educational activity were to instill in students a greater empathy for patients with intellectual developmental disabilities, give students a better understanding of how to obtain a medical history for patients with communication limitations, teach students practical tips for obtaining a medical history and physical examination to increase competence in their future practice, and to build a relationship with a local organization that serves people with intellectual disabilities. An experiential learning activity was added to the curriculum of two courses for first-year PA students to accomplish these goals. The course instructors engaged in several planning meetings with a local residential facility for people with intellectual disabilities, including choosing patients that the students would assess. The students made 3 visits to the facility. The visits included interactive lectures by a physical therapist, occupational therapist, nurse practitioner, medical doctor, and dentist. Two of the facility involved patient visits at designated homes on campus. The students then wrote comprehensive visit notes with patient identifying information removed and submitted them for grading. Students expressed feeling better prepared to assess people with intellectual disabilities and having an increased appreciation for obtaining quality medical histories. The partner facility also reported they received positive feedback from staff participants and indicated they would like to continue this partnership.

Introduction to Disability and Antiableist Health Care: A Pilot, Student-Led Module for Preclinical Medical Students

ABSTRACT

Physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians often care for disabled patients, who comprise America's largest marginalized population. Despite medical students' and physicians' discomfort with caring for disabled patients and the pervasiveness of ableism in health care, medical education lacks disability-focused education. Kern's approach to curriculum development and disability community input were used to design a three-part, elective curriculum for first-year medical students. Part one introduced disability models and language. Part two described how to perform a comprehensive history and physical examination for a disabled patient using ADEPT-CARE. Part three provided an overview of disability history and the disability rights movement. The curriculum's goal was to improve students' attitudes regarding disability health and self-perceived knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with disabilities. The curriculum was evaluated through presurvey and postsurvey. Students favorably reviewed the curriculum. One hundred percent of students ( n = 21) agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum improved their knowledge of disability health, increased their perceived confidence in caring for patients with disabilities, and enhanced their medical education. There were no statistically significant differences in students' attitudes toward patients with disabilities after curriculum completion. Our asynchronous module provides one potential curriculum for increasing preclinical medical students' self-perceived knowledge of disability health.

Challenges of competency-based curriculum in teaching learners with learning disabilities

Background

Zimbabwean government adopted competency-based curriculum in 2017 as a measure to prepare learners for life and work in an indigenised economy and increasingly globalised and competitive environment. The government also sought to ensure that learners develop skills necessary for lifelong learning in line with the emerging opportunities.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to explore challenges faced by teachers in the implementation of competency-based curriculum to learners with learning disabilities in Mhangura of Makonde District in Zimbabwe.

Methods

A constructivist lived experience perspective underpinned this research, in which a single case study was used to interact with participants on challenges faced by teachers in the implementation of competency-based curriculum to learners with learning disabilities. Purposive sampling was used to select nine participants (five males and four females). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and transcribed verbatim. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data sources.

Results

Results indicated that participants were facing several challenges in implementing competency-based curriculum to learners with learning disabilities. Among the cited challenges were negative attitudes towards learners with learning disabilities, poor teacher preparation, lack of resources and poor collaboration.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the objectives of competency-based curriculum are noble to learners, but its implementation is not inclusive.

Contribution

The study findings will assist in identifying areas that need to be improved and need strengthening. The education policy makers in the country will have a better understanding of challenges faced by teachers in the implementation of competency-based curriculum in Zimbabwe.

The Dearth of Disability Medical Education and a Partial Solution

Issue: While over one-quarter of adult Americans have a disability, there is a paucity of disability-specific curricula in American medical schools and residency programs. Potential consequences of this educational dearth include persistent inaccessibility of health care facilities and delivery of inequitable health care to individuals with disabilities. Evidence: Several working groups have proposed disability-specific competencies for health professions education and means by which to integrate them into existing curricula. A limited number of medical schools and residency programs have formally introduced disability-specific materials into their curricula. To our knowledge, however, there are no generalist (internal medicine or family medicine) residency programs that offer specialized training in the clinical care of people with disabilities. Implications: Offering generalist physicians the opportunity to acquire the clinical and cognitive skills required to provide thorough and equitable health care to people with disabilities is critically important. There are too few physiatrists to see to their care needs. In this manuscript, we present a novel concentration in an Internal Medicine residency program in the care of individuals with a variety of disabilities. Our hope is that this work will initiate discussions among educational leaders about how to address the lack of graduate medical education-level training in disability care. We also hope it will afford program directors the opportunity to implement similar concentrations and tracks and will eventually produce a generation of generalists who are well-equipped to help care for people with disabilities.

Disability competency training in medical education

PURPOSE

Lack of health care providers' knowledge about the experience and needs of individuals with disabilities contribute to health care disparities experienced by people with disabilities. Using the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education, this mixed methods study aimed to explore the extent the Core Competencies are addressed in medical education programs and the facilitators and barriers to expanding curricular integration.

METHOD

Mixed-methods design with an online survey and individual qualitative interviews was used. An online survey was distributed to U.S. medical schools. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted via Zoom with five key informants. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen medical schools responded to the survey. Many schools reported addressing most of the Core Competencies. The extent of disability competency training varied across medical programs with the majority showing limited opportunities for in depth understanding of disability. Most schools had some, although limited, engagement with people with disabilities. Having faculty champions was the most frequent facilitator and lack of time in the curriculum was the most significant barrier to integrating more learning activities. Qualitative interviews provided more insight on the influence of the curricular structure and time and the importance of faculty champion and resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the need for better integration of disability competency training woven throughout medical school curriculum to encourage in-depth understanding about disability. Formal inclusion of the Core Competencies into the Liaison Committee on Medical Education standards can help ensure that disability competency training does not rely on champions or resources.

Developing Disability-Focused Pre-Health and Health Professions Curricula

People with disabilities (PWD) comprise a significant part of the population yet experience some of the most profound health disparities. Among the greatest barriers to quality care are inadequate health professions education related to caring for PWD. Drawing upon the expertise of health professions educators in medicine, public health, nursing, social work, and physician assistant programs, this forum showcases innovative methods for teaching core disability skills and concepts grounded in disability studies and the health humanities. Each of the essays offers practical guidance for developing curricular interventions appropriate for students at various levels of training and familiarity with disability to be implemented in classroom discussions, case-based learning, lectures, panels, and clinical simulations across the full spectrum of pre-health and health professions education.

Disability education and implications for genetic counselor training

The genetic counseling (GC) community has faced criticism about the duality of promoting patient autonomy while also advocating for individuals with disabilities. This study assessed the attitudes of the disability community and GCs to identify content that should be included in GC disability education and evaluate the landscape of GC disability education. Members of the disability community and GCs completed an electronic survey distributed through electronic listservs and partnering organizations. A total of 672 responses were analyzed from both the disability community (n = 596) and the GC community (n = 76). Members of the disability community noted differences in GC comfort level discussing different aspects of disability with GCs being perceived as being very knowledgeable about medical aspects 71% of the time versus 49% of the time when discussing social/lifestyle aspects of disability. This discordance was reflected in GCs reported comfort level in discussing medical aspects (89%) and social aspects of disability (65%) during a session. Most GC respondents (71%) felt they received adequate knowledge during their disability education and variation was reported in the execution of disability education by training programs. Disability education content recommendations from the disability community and GCs included emphasizing four key aspects of disability: medical, social/lifestyle, lived experience, and the disability rights movement. Respondents of both cohorts stressed the inclusion of and exposure to persons with disabilities in disability education to understand the lived experience of persons with disabilities. The disability community identified additional disability education content to be included such as empathy training, family hardships, and mental health. The results of this study have practice implications and provide a foundation for training expectations to ensure future GCs possess the necessary skills to improve the quality of services provided to families and persons with disabilities.

Exposing the disability-related hidden curriculum in case-based learning: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

People with disabilities face significant health disparities. Studies show that healthcare professionals harbor negative attitudes towards disability, compromising the quality of care. These attitudes, in unwritten, unofficial, and even unintended ways can be passed from providers to learners in the medical education setting.

OBJECTIVE

Using a Critical Disability Studies (CDS) paradigm, the authors uncovered the disability-related hidden curriculum within Case-Based Learning (CBL) and proposed guidelines for promoting a disability-conscious medical education that resists ableism.

METHODS

The study team conducted a qualitative analysis of all CBL cases from the pre-clerkship curriculum (n = 53) at Sidney Kimmel Medical College. The authors employed a directed content analysis approach to develop a codebook based on case examination, literature review, and CDS concepts. Two researchers coded all cases and assessed intercoder reliability. The results informed the development of an explanatory model.

RESULTS

Only four of 53 cases overtly mentioned disability, none of which defined disability according to CDS. Coding did not identify content challenging stereotypical views of disability. Additionally, two cases included content fueling negative attitudes of disability.

CONCLUSION

By inadequately addressing disability from a CDS perspective, harmful assumptions of disability may go unchallenged, driving a hidden curriculum within CBL. This phenomenon leaves medical students ill-prepared to care for people with disabilities and creates physicians ill-equipped to teach the next generation. Since many health professions utilize CBL to educate students, these cases provide an untapped opportunity to resist ableism and better prepare students to address the negative attitudes driving health disparities experienced by people with disabilities.

Student-driven disability advocacy and education within the health professions: pilot survey results from a single-day virtual conference

BACKGROUND

Health professional programs can promote equitable healthcare delivery but few programs include disability in these efforts. Limited opportunities exist for health professional students to engage with disability education within the classroom or beyond. The Disability Advocacy Coalition in Medicine (DAC Med) is a national interprofessional student-led organization which hosted a virtual conference for health professional students in October 2021. We describe the impact of this single-day virtual conference on learning and the current state of disability education across health professional programs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized a 17-item post-conference survey. A 5-point Likert scale-based survey was distributed to conference registrants. Survey parameters included background in disability advocacy, curricular exposure to disability, and impact of the conference.

RESULTS

Twenty-four conference attendees completed the survey. Participants were enrolled in audiology, genetic counseling, medical, medical scientist, nursing, prosthetics and orthotics, public health, and 'other' health programs. Most participants (58.3%) reported not having a strong background in disability advocacy before the conference, with 26.1% indicating they learned about ableism in their program's curriculum. Almost all students (91.6%) attended the conference to learn how to be a better advocate for patients and peers with disabilities, and 95.8% reported that the conference provided this knowledge. Eighty-eight percent of participants agreed that they acquired additional resources to better care for patients with disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Few health professional students learn about disability in their curriculum. Single-day virtual, interactive conferences are effective in providing advocacy resources and empowering students to employ them.

Impairment and Disability Identity and Perceptions of Trust, Respect, and Fairness

Importance

Most studies use impaired functioning alone to specify populations with disabilities. However, some people with functional impairments do not identify as disabled. With functional status-based definitions, studies have shown disparate care quality for people with disabilities.

Objective

To examine whether impairment and disability identity have different associations with perceived health care experiences and explore factors associated with disability identification.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used a nationally representative survey of US adults conducted from April 20 through May 31, 2021, and analyzed between June 1 and August 31, 2022. Survey participants were 1822 English- or Spanish-speaking adults responding either online or via telephone.

Exposures

Using 8 survey questions, participants were grouped according to presence of impairment and disability identity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Likert scale measures of trust, respect, and fairness (henceforth, procedural justice measures) were dichotomized. Sociodemographic characteristics and rates of procedural justice responses were compared across groups. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusting for baseline characteristics were performed to (1) estimate associations of impairment and disability identity with perceptions of procedural justice and (2) explore factors associated with disability identification. Analyses applied survey weights.

Results

Of 6126 individuals invited to participate, 1854 (30.3%) completed the survey. Thirty-two were excluded due to unreportable gender, for a final analytic sample of 1822 participants. Participants with impairments (n = 816; mean [SD] age, 48.1 [17.0] years; 51.2% women, 48.8% men) had worse perceptions on 7 of 10 procedural justice measures (crude) compared with those without impairments (n = 1006; mean [SD] age, 49.6 [18.1] years, 55.1% female, 44.9% male). Among respondents with impairments, those who did (n = 340) vs did not (n = 476) identify as disabled gave better ratings for clinician communication efforts (a lot of effort, 38.8% vs 31.0%) and having health goals understood (understood very or fairly well, 77.2% vs 70.1%) but gave worse ratings for respect (almost never felt inferior or talked down to, 66.1% vs 59.1%). Disability identification was associated with more reports of unfair treatment (31.0% vs 22.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.12-2.42) and of being unafraid to ask questions or disagree (50.5% vs 40.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.04-20.19). Income and employment were associated with disability identification.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional survey study of US adults, health care perceptions differed between groups defined by impairment status and disability identity. These findings suggest that, alongside functional measures, health systems should capture disability identity to better address disparities for people with impairments.

Sustained Impact of a Virtual Disability Education Curriculum With Fourth-Year Medical Students in a Mandatory Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clerkship

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to measure the short- and long-term impact of a virtual disability education curriculum associated with a 2-wk mandatory physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship for fourth-year medical students.

DESIGN

A prospective pre-post intervention survey-based study measuring the impact of a virtual disability education series at 1-wk and 6-mo time points after a mandatory physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship including 8 hrs of virtual didactics with an emphasis on physical disabilities. The surveys assessed the overall virtual curriculum, perceived benefit of a virtual encounter, and the long-term applicability of the information learned from the clerkship.

RESULTS

The physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship was effective in improving medical students' perceived comfort and clinical knowledge regarding treatment of persons with disabilities ( P < 0.01). There were no statistical differences at the 6-mo time point, indicating sustained benefit and integration of knowledge in the long term ( P > 0.05). In addition, 84% of students reported using the information in clinical experiences at 6 mos.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship including a virtual disability education curriculum improved long-term perceived medical student comfort and knowledge of treating persons with disabilities, with a focus on those with physical disabilities. Virtual encounters with persons with disabilities are viable and impactful avenues to provide this education.

A scoping review for designing a disability curriculum and its impact for medical students

Background

There is an increasing need for a standardized undergraduate disability curriculum for medical students to better equip students with the proper training, knowledge, and skills to provide holistic care for individuals with disabilities.

Objectives

The aim of this scoping review was to better understand and analyze the current body of literature focusing on best practice for including disability curricula and its impact on undergraduate medical students.

Results

Three major components for designing a disability curriculum for undergraduate medical students were obtained from our analysis. The components were: (1) effective teaching strategies, (2) competencies required for disability curriculum, and (3) impact of disability curriculum on medical students.

Conclusions

Current literature revealed that exposing medical students to a disability curriculum impacted their overall perceptions about people with disabilities. This allowed them to develop a sense of understanding towards patients with disabilities during their clinical encounters. The effectiveness of a disability curriculum is dependent on the extent to which these interventions are incorporated into undergraduate medical education.

Using a life course health development framework to combat stigma-related health disparities for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disability (I/DD)

In the U.S., 1 in 6 children has an intellectual and/or developmental disability (I/DD). This population experiences a multitude of negative health outcomes across the life course, relative to the general population. Stigma-the social devaluation of individuals with certain characteristics, identities, or statuses within interpersonal, educational, healthcare, and policy contexts-is a potentially preventable contributor to health disparities. To date, existing approaches for addressing and preventing stigma are limited to discrete and siloed interventions that often fail to address the lifelong, cumulative impacts of the specific types of stigma experienced by the I/DD population. In the current paper, we describe three elements of Life Course Health Development (LCHD)-a novel translational framework that draws on evidence from biology, sociology, epidemiology, and psychology-that healthcare providers can use to prevent stigma-related health disparities and improve outcomes for individuals with I//DDs. We discuss the utility of targeting prevention to sensitive periods; prioritizing interventions for the most damaging types of stigmas; and leveraging supports from multiple service systems and sectors. By incorporating evidence from life course science into efforts to address stigma-related health disparities, providers can more effectively and strategically prevent and combat stigma-related health disparities for the I/DD population in childhood and across the life course.

A new measure of physicians' erroneous assumptions towards adults with intellectual disability: A first study

BACKGROUND

Incomplete knowledge and unfamiliarity with intellectual disability (ID) contribute to erroneous assumptions of physicians towards ID, which negatively impact the health equity of people with ID. This study aimed to identify the erroneous assumptions that, based on the ID stakeholders' perceptions, were the most prevalent in physicians and damaging for the healthcare of adults with ID, verify their unidimensionality and that no personal characteristics of ID stakeholders were associated with their ratings of erroneous assumptions' prevalence and damage.

METHODS

Seventy-four possible physician erroneous assumptions were developed concerning health, daily living skills and quality of life of individuals with ID. ID stakeholders rated each one for perceived prevalence in physicians and damage for the healthcare of adults with ID. Frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis and correlations were run separately for participants' prevalence and damage ratings.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven erroneous assumptions were identified as those perceived most prevalent and damaging. Their unidimensionality was ascertained and participants' characteristics were not associated with their prevalence and damage ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified assumptions are appropriate to represent the items of a new instrument that can be used in medical education to guide the development of curricula to change erroneous assumptions.

The need to include intellectual/developmental disability in medical school curriculum: The perspective of a student advocate

Medical students receive very little instruction related to caring for people with intellectual/developmental disabilities. As a result, medical students and physicians alike report low levels of confidence in their ability to provide care to this population. In this piece, I provide a medical student's perspective on how to implement changes in the medical school curriculum such that our future physicians are more prepared to provide care to people with intellectual/developmental disabilities.

Going Virtual: A Virtual Summer Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Externship Experience for Medical Students

ABSTRACT

Opportunities for early medical student exposure to the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) are desirable for promoting the field as a career choice and are useful for introducing students to the care of people with disabilities. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical education and caused the cancellation of many in-person clinical programs, including the Medical Student Summer Clinical Externship in PM&R supported by the Association of Academic Physiatrists. This article describes the process by which an in-person summer clinical externship program was effectively converted into a Virtual PM&R Experience using a combination of independent assignments and small-group sessions. A total of 87 medical students completed the Virtual PM&R Experience over two summers. The participants of the program met the program learning objectives, including enhancing their understanding of physiatry as a career and recognizing the medical and social issues that affect persons with disability.

Have Almost Fifty Years Of Disability Civil Rights Laws Achieved Equitable Care?

For almost fifty years, federal civil rights laws such as Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, and Section 1557 and other provisions of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have prohibited discrimination against Americans with disabilities, including in health care. Despite these laws, disabled Americans continue to experience disparities in health and health care, from preventive care to home and community-based services. In its 2022 Health Equity Framework for People with Disabilities, the National Council on Disability highlighted some of these disparities and recommended remedies. To explore these concerns, this article examines disability inequities and potential solutions within six areas. It concludes by recommending the ratification of the 2006 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to reinvigorate US efforts to maximize the health and dignity of disabled Americans and support their full participation in the community.

Reimagining Undergraduate Medical Education in a Post-COVID-19 Landscape

Online education due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused many medical schools to increasingly employ asynchronous and virtual learning that favored student independence and flexibility. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted existing shortcomings of the healthcare field in providing for marginalized and underserved communities. This perspective piece details the authors' opinions as medical students and medical educators on how to leverage the aspects of pandemic medical education to train physicians who can better address these needs.

Retrospective Study on the Effect of the Timing of Exposure on Confidence Level in Applying to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Programs

ABSTRACT

Residency specialty choice, a complex decision-making process, is often influenced by confidence level built upon knowledge, experience, and fit with the specialty. Despite the need for physiatrists with population growth, especially people with disability and older patients, limited growth in the number of residency positions and delayed exposure to the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation potentially contribute to a lack of confidence in pursuing physical medicine and rehabilitation. Early introduction to a specialty has been shown to impact specialty selection. Thus, this study aims to explore the impact of timing of exposure to physiatry on the confidence level of physical medicine and rehabilitation residents in their specialty choice. A survey for current physical medicine and rehabilitation residents was developed and distributed to residency program directors with a request to forward it to all residents. The response rate was low at 13%; however, the results provide a window into the experience of today's medical and premedical students. Interestingly, of the 175 respondents, a similar number reported first exposure to physiatry during third year and before medical school. In addition, earlier exposure was associated with higher confidence levels in specialty choice, the most powerful factor being the exposure to the specialty before starting medical school or during the preclinical years in medical school. These findings highlight opportunities to improve the physiatry workforce by providing earlier exposure to the specialty, even before medical school. Based on the results of the survey and ongoing discussions among medical students, residents, and faculty leaders, the authors review current recruitment efforts and new ideas.

Evaluation of the Association of Academic Physiatrists Medical Student Summer Clinical Externship

ABSTRACT

The Medical Student Summer Clinical Externship is an 8-wk program hosted by the Association of Academic Physiatrists and offered to first year medical students. Various institutions sponsor participants and provide clinical exposure and mentorship opportunities to promote interest in the field. The program has had more than 100 medical student participants. Students were asked to complete a preparticipation and postparticipation survey. Results revealed a statistically significant increase in interest in physiatry and participants' scores for comfort and experience level in obtaining a history of present illness, general physical examination, and managing developmental, musculoskeletal, and neurologic disabilities. The Medical Student Summer Clinical Externship program provides an opportunity for mentorship and exposure to various subspecialties that likely reinforces student interest in those who are predisposed to physiatry. Students' increased comfort level in treating patients with developmental, musculoskeletal, and neurologic disabilities may lead to improvements in the quality of and access to care received by these populations. All participants gain an increased awareness of the scope of practice of physiatry that will hopefully lead to the increased integration of physical medicine and rehabilitation into the care plans and as a standard of care for patients who might greatly benefit.

Evaluation of Disability Education and Emergency Preparedness Curricula of Physician Assistant Programs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate whether physician assistant (PA) programs in the Midwest integrate both disabilities and emergency preparedness education into 1 curriculum.

METHODS

A convenience sample was utilized to survey program directors and deans of PA programs. Emails were obtained from the Physician Assistant Education Association. A 26, closed-ended question Qualtrics survey was based on an original study by Tanenhaus et al.

RESULTS

Out of 43 accredited physician assistant programs surveyed, 9 programs replied (21%), and 1 program did not complete the survey. Six of the 10 programs (66%) responded that their program provided lectures specific to emergency preparedness. All 9 programs responded they do not offer a graduate-level track or concentration in emergency/disaster preparedness, and they do not offer a dual degree or a multidisciplinary program that highlights emergency/disaster preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was conducted to bring awareness to physician assistant students' education regarding disabilities and emergency preparedness. As public health crises continue to arise, such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19), it is critical to have appropriately trained health care professionals. The study revealed that most programs lack a graduate-level track or concentrations, dual degrees, or extracurricular opportunities related to disabilities and emergency and disaster preparedness.

Learners With Disabilities: An Important Component of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Medical Education

The population of people with physical or sensory disabilities is growing, yet they are underrepresented in the medical and other health professions. At the same time, there is a clear need to enhance didactic curricular content and clinical training experiences that explicitly address the full scope of medical needs that individuals with disabilities have. These gaps represent missed opportunities to advance the health of an important, underserved, and growing population. Based on the authors' experience, the inclusion of people with physical or sensory disabilities in medical education greatly enhances the education of all learners and the professional development of faculty and staff, providing invaluable perspectives on the significant abilities of individuals with diverse physical or sensory disabilities. There are additional efforts and costs associated with the education of a medical student who is blind, is deaf, uses a wheelchair, or has another disability. But based on the authors' experience, it is clear that the societal return on investment is enormous, and the costs associated with a failure to embrace full inclusivity are much greater. Medical education institutions should recognize the population of people with disabilities as a vital component of their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion and strive to provide inclusive education for learners with disabilities.

Now Is the Time: A Primer on How to Be a Disability Education Champion in Your Medical School

ABSTRACT

One in four noninstitutionalized adults in the United States lives with a disability. People with disabilities have frequent interactions with the medical community and the healthcare system yet experience disparities in access and outcomes. The Association of American Medical Colleges has included disability in its definition of diversity as one of the aspects of patient care that may affect health equity. However, training in the lived experience of disability is not always included in medical education. Physiatrists make excellent disability champions in medical schools, given their training and experience in the care of individuals with disabilities. Here, we describe strategies for physiatrists to increase disability education in medical schools and an overview of standards and tools (Liaison Committee on Medical Education standards; Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation standards; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health language; and the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education published by the Alliance for Disability in Health Care Education) physiatrists can use to facilitate interactions with medical school educational leadership. Specific examples are provided along with a framework to guide the development of disability champions in medical schools.

Dismantle Ableism, Accept Disability: Making the Case for Anti-Ableism in Medical Education

There currently exists an exciting impetus for increased diversity among medical trainees and improved equity in medical care received by patients. Yet, inclusion of disability within these efforts is often forgotten, allowing the current cultural narrative of ableism to shape medical training. National structural challenges as early as medical school admissions and ableist barriers throughout the educational pipeline have yielded 1) a concerningly low prevalence of medical students and physicians in the US who identify as disabled and 2) propagation of systemic misunderstandings on disability in our healthcare system. This perspective addresses the need for a re-evaluation of diversity in medicine which includes ability status and a commitment to anti-ableism as a critical part of the conversation. We propose reforms and important considerations that could have meaningful implications necessary for improving the culture of disability inclusion in medical education.