"Progress in Medicine Is Slower to Happen": Qualitative Insights Into How Trans and Gender Nonconforming Medical Students Navigate Cisnormative Medical Cultures at Canadian Training Programs

Exploring Self-Censorship and Self-Disclosure Among Clinical Medical Students with Minoritized Identities

Introduction

Self-censorship and self-disclosure are two ways students negotiate and reconcile their personal identities with their burgeoning professional identities in order to succeed in the clinical learning environment. In this study, the authors explored how clinical medical students with minoritized identities navigate self-censorship and self-disclosure. Overall, the authors sought to better characterize perceived educational safety among minoritized medical students and identify strategies to better support trainees from diverse backgrounds.

Methods

The authors utilized constructivist grounded theory methodology and conducted individual qualitative interviews from 2022-2024 with 16 clinical medical students in the United States who held one or more minoritized identities.

Results

Participants viewed censorship as a mechanism for self-preservation in the context of biased and hierarchical learning environments, while disclosure served as a tool for connection and practicing authenticity. Navigating censorship and disclosure while holding the weight of minoritized identities proved challenging and affected learning. However, perceiving safety, trust, and invitation from others could facilitate this process. While participants noted the power of disclosure in improving patient care, many found it difficult to engage in disclosure while maintaining professional boundaries. Despite these challenges, participants found ways to use both censorship and disclosure to assert their identities and reclaim power in their identity narratives.

Conclusions

Exploring self-censorship and self-disclosure provides valuable insight into perceived educational safety among students with minoritized identities. It is important for educators to be mindful of self-censorship and co-construct opportunities for disclosure with learners in order to promote inclusivity and equity within the clinical learning environment.

"I Say I'm Kind of Out": An Insider Qualitative Study of Queer Medical Students

BACKGROUND

United Kingdom Queer medical students' experiences have only been explored in depth in one previous study, despite longstanding calls to address National Health Service queerphobia. The study aims to combine our participants' data with personal insights from the Queer medical student research team to both record Queer medical students' experiences and provide practical actions that can promote support, inclusivity and celebration for Queer medical students.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants across three medical schools in England and Scotland. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Insider insights were combined with analysis to generate practical advice for educators.

RESULTS

Participants had a broad range of Queer identities, including non-binary, bisexual and asexual identities. Four themes were identified, as well as a table of practical advice: Developing a unified Queer medical student identity: the cognitive and emotional process of aligning Queer and medical student identities; A culture of discrimination: actions occurring at cultural, system and individual levels that result in negative queerphobic experiences; A counterculture of support: representation and support provided by Queer faculty and doctors and Queer friends, and in curriculum material; Belonging and not belonging: thoughts and feelings of acceptance and value within academic, clinical and social environments.

DISCUSSION

Queer medical students continue to experience discrimination despite calls for change. We suggest a deeper cultural reimagination of belonging as a Queer medical student, alongside practical support from educators to create this, is needed to improve Queer medical students' experiences.

Unravelling epistemic injustice in medical education: The case of the underperforming learner

CONTEXT

Epistemic injustice refers to a wrong done to someone in their capacity as a knower. While philosophers have detailed the pervasiveness of this issue within healthcare, it is only beginning to be discussed by medical educators. The purpose of this article is to expand the field's understanding of this concept and to demonstrate how it can be used to reframe complex problems in medical education.

METHODS

After outlining the basic features of epistemic injustice, we clarify its intended (and unintended) meaning and detail what is required for a perceived harm to be named an epistemic injustice. Using an example from our own work on introversion in undergraduate medical education, we illustrate what epistemic injustice might look like from the perspectives of both educators and students and show how the concept can reorient our perspective on academic underperformance.

RESULTS

Epistemic injustice results from two things: (1) social power dynamics that give some individuals control over others, and (2) identity prejudice that is associated with discriminatory stereotypes. This can lead to one, or both, forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial and hermeneutical. Our worked example demonstrates how medical educators can be unaware of when and how epistemic injustice is happening, yet the effects on students' well-being and sense of selves can be profound. Thinking about academic underperformance with epistemic injustice in mind can reveal an emphasis within current educational practices on diagnosing learning deficiencies, to the detriment of holistically representing its socially constructed and structural nature.

CONCLUSIONS

This article builds upon recent calls to recognise epistemic injustice in medical education by clarifying its terminology and intended use and providing in-depth application and analysis to a particular case: underperformance and the introverted medical student. Equipped with a more sophisticated understanding of the term, medical educators may be able to re-conceptualise long-standing issues including, but also beyond, underperformance.

Student-Led Webinar to Support LGBTQ+ Students Applying to Medical School During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, non-binary, two-spirit, and other (LGBTQ+) students are a diverse group with unique and frequently overlooked needs in medical training. The present study was designed to understand the concerns of LGBTQ+ applicants to medical school and examine the effectiveness of a webinar in alleviating concerns. Sixty participants joined webinars discussing the medical school application process with particular attention to concerns pertinent to the LGBTQ+ population. Pre and post surveys were administered to examine webinar effectiveness and participant concerns. Results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Pre-medical students reported that the webinar format was helpful for their application process. Specifically, pre- and post-test analyses revealed that the webinar increased both students' preparedness as well as their confidence in disclosing their LGBTQ+ identity or being "out" when applying to medical school. Student-led, online webinars increase LGBTQ+ students' confidence and help address SGM students' concerns about applying to medical school.

"Will I be able to be myself? Or will I be forced to lie all the time?": How Trans and Non-Binary Students Balance Professionalism, Authenticity, and Safety in Canadian Medical Programs

Introduction

Promoting the inclusion of trans and non-binary (TNB) medical trainees is a key step in building an inclusive health workforce well-positioned to provide high-quality healthcare to all patients. Existing data on the experiences of TNB physicians and trainees describe widespread challenges related to prejudice and discrimination, with most trainees concealing their gender identity for fear of discrimination. We aimed to understand how TNB medical students have experienced professionalism and professional identity formation.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of data gathered in a constructivist grounded theory study. The authors conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews in 2017 with seven current or recently graduated TNB Canadian medical students.

Results and Discussion

From medical school application to graduation, TNB medical students reported feeling tensions between meeting expectations of professionalism, being their authentic selves, and seeking to avoid conscious and implicit biases. These tensions played out around issues of disclosure, foregrounding identity through impression management, and responding to identity exemplars. The tension between TNB trainees' desire to bring their whole selves to the practice of medicine and feeling pressured to de-emphasize their gender is ironic when considering the increased call for medical trainees from equity-seeking communities. The most commonly used behavioural frameworks of professionalism were inherited from prior generations and restrict students whose experiences and community-based knowledge are most needed. Demands of professionalism that are incompatible with authentic professional identity development place an inordinate burden on trainees whose identities have been excluded from normative concepts of the professional, including TNB trainees.

Pride & prejudice: A scoping review of LGBTQ + medical trainee experiences

PURPOSE

LGBTQ + medical trainees experience significant discrimination. These individuals are stigmatized within a hetero- and cis-normative system, resulting in poorer outcomes in mental health and increased stress regarding career trajectory compared with their hetero- and cis-identifying counterparts. However, literature on the barriers experienced during medical training in this marginalized group is limited to small heterogeneous studies. This scoping review collates and explores prominent themes in existing literature on the personal and professional outcomes of LGBTQ + medical trainees.

METHODS

We searched five library databases (SCOPUS, Ovid-Medline, ERIC, PsycINFO and EMBASE) for studies that investigated LGBTQ + medical trainees' academic, personal, or professional outcomes. Screening and full text review were performed in duplicate, and all authors participated in thematic analysis to determine emerging themes, which were iteratively reviewed to consensus.

RESULTS

From 1809 records, 45 met inclusion criteria (κ = 0.57). Major themes that emerged in the literature included the prevalence of discrimination and mistreatment faced by LGBTQ + medical trainees from colleagues and superiors, concerns regarding disclosure of sexual and/or gender minority identity, and overall negative impacts on mental health including higher rates of depression, substance use, and suicidal ideation. There was a noted lack of inclusivity in medical education and having an LGBTQ + identity had a large impact on career trajectory. Community with peers and mentors was an important determinant of success and belonging. There was a noteworthy lack of research on intersectionality or positive interventions that improved outcomes for this population.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review highlighted important barriers facing LGBTQ + medical trainees, identifying substantial gaps in the existing literature. Research on supportive interventions and predictors of training success is lacking and will be important to foster an inclusive education system. These findings provide critical insights for education leaders and researchers to help create and evaluate inclusive and empowering environments for trainees.

Medical Student Perspectives on Sexual and Gender Minority Acceptance in Surgical Specialties and Sexual and Gender Minority Education

BACKGROUND

The topics of healthcare for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) patients and inclusion of LGBTQ+ health providers remain overlooked. Some specialties may be perceived as less inclusive to LGBTQ+ trainees. This study aimed to describe the perspectives of current medical students regarding LGBTQ+ education and the acceptance of LGBTQ+ trainees among different specialties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional voluntary and anonymous online survey was distributed through REDCap to all medical students (n = 495) at a state medical school. Medical students' sexuality and gender identity were queried. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and the responses were classified into two groups: LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+.

RESULTS

A total of 212 responses were queried. Of the respondents who agreed that certain specialties are less welcoming to LGBTQ+ trainees (n = 69, 39%), orthopedic surgery, general surgery and neurosurgery were identified most frequently (84%, 76%, and 55%, respectively). After analyzing sexual orientation as an influence on choosing a future specialty for residency, only 1% of non-LGBTQ+ students indicated that their sexual orientation influences their specialty of choice in comparison with 30% of LGBTQ+ students (P < 0.001). Finally, more non-LGBTQ+ students indicated that they believe they are receiving appropriate education on caring for LGBTQ+ patients as compared to LGBTQ+ students (71% and 55%, respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LGBTQ+ students are still hesitant to pursue careers in General Surgery as compared to their non-LGBTQ+ peers. The perception that surgical specialties are the least welcoming to LGBTQ+ students continues to be a concern for all students. Further strategies of inclusivity and their effectiveness need to be studied.

Pre- and peri-traumatic event stressors drive gender differences in chronic stress-related psychological sequelae: A prospective cohort study of COVID-19 frontline healthcare providers

Women are at heightened risk for chronic stress-related psychological sequelae (SRPS), including major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in response to potentially traumatic events, including the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have examined pre- and peri-event stressors that could account for gender differences in chronic SRPS. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective cohort study of healthcare providers (HCPs) caring for patients with COVID-19 at a large tertiary care hospital in New York City, and measured mental health risk factors and symptoms of MDD, GAD, and PTSD at baseline (April 2020) and at a 7-month follow-up (December 2020). We defined chronic SRPS as the presence of probable MDD, GAD, and/or PTSD at both timepoints. We conducted a mediation analysis to evaluate whether pre- and peri-event stressors explained women's increased risk for chronic SRPS. Among our sample of 786 HCPs, 571 (72.6%) were women. Compared with men, women were twice as likely to have chronic SRPS (18.7% vs. 8.8%, χ²[1] = 11.38, p < 0.001). However, after accounting for pre- and peri-event stressors, being a woman was no longer associated with chronic SRPS (p = 0.58). The pre- and peri-event stressors that accounted for this heightened risk among women included being in a woman-prevalent profession (specifically nursing; estimate = 0.08, SE = 0.04, p = 0.05), pre-pandemic burnout (estimate = 0.11, SE = 0.05, p = 0.04), greater family-related (estimate = 0.09, SE = 0.03, p = 0.004), infection-related (estimate = 0.06, SE = 0.02, p = 0.007), and work-related concerns (estimate = 0.11, SE = 0.03, p < 0.001), and lower leadership support (estimate = 0.07, SE = 0.03, p = 0.005). These findings can inform institutional interventions to mitigate the risk of chronic SRPS among women HCPs.

Redressing injustices: how women students enact agency in undergraduate medical education

This study presents descriptions of epistemic injustice in the experiences of women medical students and provides accounts about how these students worked to redress these injustices. Epistemic injustice is both the immediate discrediting of an individual's knowledge based on their social identity and the act of persistently ignoring possibilities for other ways of knowing. Using critical narrative interviews and personal reflections over an eight-month period, 22 women students during their first year of medical school described instances when their knowledge and experience was discredited and ignored, then the ways they enacted agency to redress these injustices. Participants described three distinct ways they worked to redress injustices: reclaiming why they belong in medicine, speaking up and calling out the curriculum, and uplifting one another. This study has implications for recognizing medical students as whole individuals with lived histories and experiences and advocates for recognizing medical students' perspectives as valuable sources of knowledge.

Experiences of transgender and nonbinary physicians during residency training

Background: Little is known about the experiences of transgender and gender non-binary (TNB) physicians in medical residency training programs. Aim: To identify the self-reported experiences and needs of TNB individuals during medical residency in United States training programs. Methods: An online, anonymous survey of TNB current residents and recent graduates was designed. Results: A total of 26 respondents completed the survey. The most common reported gender identity was non-binary or gender queer (n = 11, 42.3%) and male or transgender man (n = 7, 26.9%). About half of participants (n = 14, 53.8%) had undergone gender affirming interventions prior to residency. Most participants (n = 19, 73.1%) did not know all the gender affirming healthcare benefits offered by their program. The majority (n = 21, 80.8%) also reported 2 hours or less of transgender-related didactics in residency. Respondents were most likely to disclose their gender identity to other residents (n = 19, 73.1%) and faculty (n = 19, 73.1%) and were least likely to disclose their identity to patients (n = 6, 23.1%). Most respondents (n = 15, 57.7%) stated that program faculty and staff communicated support for their gender identity. Most participants (n = 16, 61.5%) reported that they perceived transgender residents to be treated similarly to their non-transgender peers in their training program, while the remainder (n = 7, 26.9%) disagreed or strongly disagreed. Nevertheless, approximately three-quarters of trainees (n = 22, 84.6%) self-reported microaggressions during their training program and non-binary and transfeminine trainees were more likely to report these experiences than transmasculine people. Nearly a quarter of transfeminine and non-binary participants reported macroaggressions, with none of the transmasculine respondents reporting these negative experiences. Most macroaggressions were from program faculty. Discussion: This study highlights that while most physicians in residency report support from their program for their TNB identity, TNB physicians still experience significant barriers and prejudices throughout training and more action is needed among program faculty for support of TNB trainees.

"I might not fit that doctor image": Ideal worker norms and women medical students

Despite the increasing numbers of women students in medical schools, focused attention on their perceptions about medical school and the medical profession remain underexamined. These perceptions are important to understand, particularly since women students are likely burdened with a host of gender norms related to work, family, and their future roles as physicians. Early experiences in medical school offer important insights into the larger student experience and are tied to academic outcomes and feelings of belonging. To examine early experiences of women medical students, this qualitative study used sensemaking theory to describe the current context and "story" of ideal worker norms. Critical qualitative interviews of 38 women students were performed during their first 2 months of medical school and explored both how the students perceived and experienced ideal worker norms, and how they made sense of the "story" of ideal worker norms. The participants described ways they encountered gendering and ideal worker norms through displays of nurturing behaviour, expectations to balance a future family, and whether they looked or acted the part of a doctor. This article highlights the challenges women medical students are already aware they will face, the opportunities they look forward to, and the strengths they anticipate leaning on to navigate their profession. Results from this study have implications for women medical students' learning experiences and transitions into medical school and for faculty, staff, and scholars concerned with challenging gendering norms that shape medical education.

Thinking about social power and hierarchy in medical education

CONTEXT

Social power has been diversely conceptualised in many academic areas. Operating on both the micro (interactional) and macro (structural) levels, we understand power to shape behaviour and knowledge through both repression and production. Hierarchies are one organising form of power, stratifying individuals or groups based on the possession of valued social resources.

DISCUSSION

Medicine is a highly organised social context where work and learning are contingent on interaction and thereby influenced greatly by social power and hierarchy. Despite the relevance of power to education research, there are many unrealized opportunities to use this construct to expand our understanding of how physicians work and learn. Hierarchy, when considered in our field, is typically gestured to as an omnipresent feature of the clinical environment that harms low-status individuals by repressing their ability to communicate openly and exercise their agency. This may be true in many circumstances, but this conceptualization of hierarchy neglects consideration of other aspects of hierarchy that may be generative for understanding the experiences of medical learners. For example, medical learners may experience the superimposition of multiple hierarchies, some of which are fluid and some of which are calcified, some of which are productive and helpful and some of which are oppressive and harmful. Power may work 'up' and 'across' hierarchical ranks, rather than just from higher status to lower status individuals.

CONCLUSION

The conceptualizations of how social power shapes human behaviour are diverse. Often paired with hierarchy, or social arrangement, these social scientific ideas have much to offer our collective study of the ways that health professionals learn and practice. Accordingly, we posit that a consideration of the ways social power works through hierarchies to nurture or harm the growth of learners should be granted explicit consideration in the framing and conduct of medical education research.

Integrating trans health knowledge through instructional design: preparing learners for a continent - not an island - of primary care with trans people

In recent years the need to teach primary care providers to better care for transgender and non-binary (trans) patients has garnered significant scholarly and public attention. The alarming why motivating this surge in trans health primary care education has already been firmly established and needs no further comment. Instead, we offer new perspectives on how to do trans health primary care education. From treasured 'trans 101' educational interventions to trans health 'clinical pearls', the prevailing model used to teach primary care learners represents time-limited cultural competency-based education, which we argue creates an isolated education 'island'. In rethinking this approach, we present an introduction to the concepts of knowledge integration and the transfer of learning and apply them to show how trans health knowledge and skills should be structured within existing curricula to support effective learning and application. These instructional design considerations have yet to be extensively explored when teaching primary care learners trans health content and may be critical to building pedagogy that ultimately improves healthcare delivery. We conclude that trans health - and trans patients themselves - must not be treated as an isolated education island of knowledge and practice. Rather, it is the responsibility of educators to design instruction that encourages learners to integrate this knowledge with foundational principles of primary care; building bridges across a continent of primary care practice landscapes in turn.

Transgender health in medical education

Transforming our world the 2030 agenda for sustainable development is working towards a world that reflects equity, with universal respect for human dignity, pledging to leave no one behind. However, transgender and gender-diverse individuals experience significant health inequities, including negative health outcomes and multiple barriers to accessing care. In this article, we first highlight the health inequities that transgender and gender-diverse people face globally. We describe important aspects of transgender and gender-diverse health care, including the design and provision of health services, epidemiological considerations, transition-related care, changes in transition-related goals, cultural considerations, and political and legal issues. We then review the existing global literature on incorporating transgender health into medical curricula. We make a case for prioritizing improved education in medical schools on the specific health needs of transgender and gender-diverse people as part of addressing global health inequities in care. Our recommendations for comprehensive education on transgender health include cultural humility and anti-oppression training; involvement of transgender and gender-diverse community members; integration of transgender and gender-diverse health into curricula; practice-focused and in situ training; staff development in medical schools; and improving access to careers in medicine for transgender and gender-diverse people.

Nevertheless, They Persisted: How Women Experience Gender-Based Discrimination During Postgraduate Surgical Training

OBJECTIVE

More women than ever are pursuing surgical specialties despite historical dominance by men. The objective of this study was to examine how surgical residents experience gender-based discrimination during their residency training, including the common sources, settings, and implications of these experiences.

DESIGN

A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used to combine results from an initial quantitative survey of surgical residents of all genders at the University of Calgary with qualitative data derived from interviews with surgical residents who identified as women.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-seven surgical residents of all genders completed a survey. Fourteen women completed a one-to-one, semistructured interview.

RESULTS

Women reported significantly more frequent experiences of gender-based discrimination than men, particularly regarding lack of respect from others, inappropriate jokes or comments, and hostile or humiliating behaviors. Nursing staff and patients were reported as prominent sources of discrimination, and the emergency and operating rooms were the most common settings. The qualitative findings highlighted the additional challenges for women during surgical residency, including navigating the relationships with nursing, having to work "twice as hard" to receive respect from patients and nurses, reports of persistent harassment and bullying, becoming desensitized to mistreatment and discrimination, and the influence of their gender on the quality of their education as well as their well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing number of women entering surgical specialties, women surgical residents report frequent and severe experiences of gender-based discrimination during their training, even at an academic institution where over half of residents are women.

Gendered Expectations: Strategies for Navigating Structural Challenges in Support of Transgender and Nonbinary Trainees in Academic Medicine

Members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community experience marginalization, bias, and discrimination, including in the world of academic medicine. People who are transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) experience further marginalization compared with individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer. According to a recent survey, more than half of medical students who are TGNB chose not to disclose their gender identities during training due to fears of discrimination, feeling a lack of support, and concerns about future career options. Academic medicine has historically pathologized TGNB individuals, perpetuating discrimination structurally and reinforcing discriminatory behaviors of peers and faculty. In this Perspective, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges that administrators and educators face in creating a learning environment that is inclusive of TGNB trainees. They outline opportunities for change and provide strategies to address administrative and educational challenges, including those related to institutional climate, policies, data collection, physical spaces, health care, curriculum, mentoring, and the evaluation of TGNB trainees. Finally, the authors issue a call to action for medical educators and administrators to create environments in which trainees who are TGNB can fulfill their educational mission: to learn the practice of medicine.