Peripartum racial/ethnic disparities

Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization Among Racial/Ethnic and Nativity Subgroups in the United States

Objective

To evaluate disparities in prenatal care among granular (disaggregated) racial/ethnic subgroups overall and by nativity.

Methods

We analyzed singleton live births among United States (US) residents from the National Center for Health Statistics Birth Certificate Data (2018-2022) to evaluate first trimester prenatal care initiation and prenatal care adequacy using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions and used marginal effects to assess adjusted differences among 7 broad racial/ethnic categories (e.g., Asian) and 16 disaggregated subgroups (e.g., Chinese). Disaggregated subgroups came from Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and Hispanic categories.

Results

Among the sample (n=15,882,850), 78.4% had first trimester prenatal care, and 76.2% had adequate prenatal care. Adjusted rates of first trimester prenatal care ranged from 60.1% among NHPI individuals to 82.5% among White individuals, and prenatal care adequacy ranged from 54.3% among NHPI individuals to 80.1% among White individuals. Compared to US-born individuals, foreign-born individuals had lower first trimester care and prenatal care adequacy among most racial/ethnic broad categories and subgroups. The rates of both outcomes among each NHPI subgroup were lower than every other racial/ethnic subgroup evaluated.

Conclusions

Significant disparities in first trimester prenatal care initiation and adequacy exist based on race/ethnicity and nativity, with the largest disparities among NHPI individuals. These findings highlight the need for focused public health interventions to address disparities in prenatal care access and quality, ultimately promoting both infant and maternal health equity.

Investigating disparity in labor epidural analgesia management in black vs. white women: a retrospective case-control study (2018-2022)

BACKGROUND

Disparities in labor epidural analgesia (LEA) management could reduce maternal satisfaction and increase risk. We compared times from the first administration of breakthrough pain medication (top-up) to LEA replacement to evaluate disparities across race.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (01-01-2018 to 12-31-2022), all patients with LEA and maternal race/ethnicity of non-Hispanic White or Black were eligible. Patients with a scheduled cesarean delivery, previous back instrumentation, or maternal age < 18 were excluded. We used a Cox Proportional Hazards model to evaluate our primary outcome. Predefined top-up medications given ≥60 minutes from initial LEA placement and before replacement were valid. Any replacement ≥60 minutes from the initial LEA was valid. We also studied secondary outcomes incidence of epidural replacement and postoperative patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

There were 11,168 total patients receiving LEA, with 479 (5.5%) replacements in White patients and 127 (5.0%) in Black patients. There were 387 (3.5%) LEAs with a top-up followed by replacement within 24 hours. After adjusting for confounders, no association was detected between race and LEA management (Hazard Ratio 0.82; 95% CI 0.63, 1.06; P = 0.13). We failed to detect an association between patient race and the incidence of replacement (P = 0.23). We found that race (P = 0.02) and LEA replacement (P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of lower postpartum satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We didn't detect disparity in treatment at our institution with standardized LEA management protocols. However, Black women and those with LEA replacements were less satisfied. Future studies should evaluate the generalizability and explore interventions that improve patient satisfaction.

Individual and County-Level Factors Associated with Severe Maternal Morbidity at Delivery: An Investigation of a Privately Insured Population in the United States, 2008 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

 Few studies have explored the impact of county-level variables on severe maternal morbidity (SMM) subtypes. To address this gap, this study used a large commercial database to examine the associations between individual- and county-level factors and SMM.

STUDY DESIGN

 This retrospective cohort study used data from the Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from 2008 to 2018. The primary outcomes of this study were any SMM, nontransfusion SMM, and nine specific SMM subtypes. Temporal trends in the prevalence of SMM and SMM subtypes were assessed using Joinpoint Regression. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of individual- and county-level factors with SMM.

RESULTS

 Between 2008 and 2018, there was not a significant change in the prevalence of any SMM (annual percent change [APC]: -0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.2, 0.5). Significant increases in prevalence were identified for three SMM subtypes: other obstetric (OB) SMM (APC: 10.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 21.5) from 2013 to 2018, renal SMM (APC: 8.5, 95% CI: 5.5, 11.6) from 2008 to 2018, and sepsis (APC: 23.0, 95% CI: 6.5, 42.1) from 2014 to 2018. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed variability in individual and county risk factors across different SMM subtypes. Adolescent mothers (odds ratio [OR]: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.40) and women in the 40 to 55 (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.51) age group were found to be at significant risk of other OB SMM and renal SMM, respectively. For every increase in rank within a county's socioeconomic social vulnerability index (SVI), the risk of respiratory SMM increased 2.8-fold, whereas an increase in rank in the racial/ethnic minority SVI was associated with a 1.6-fold elevated risk of blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

 This study underscores the complex association between individual and county factors associated with SMM, emphasizing the need for multifaced approaches to improve maternal care.

KEY POINTS

· No increase in composite SMM rates from 2008 to 2018.. · Increases in obstetric SMM subtypes and sepsis.. · Risk factor profiles may differ across SMM subtypes.. · Key risk factors: age, comorbidities, prenatal care.. · County socioeconomic status associated with respiratory SMM risk..

Are rates of clinical interventions during pregnancy and childbirth different for refugees and asylum seekers in high-income countries? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Adequate maternity care and appropriate clinical interventions during labour and delivery can reduce adverse perinatal outcomes, but unnecessary interventions may cause harm. While studies have shown that refugees and asylum seekers face important barriers when accessing maternity care, there is a lack of high-quality quantitative data on perinatal health interventions, such as induction of labour or caesarean sections, among refugees and asylum seekers and the findings reported in the literature tend to be inconsistent. Our goal was to examine and synthesise the evidence regarding the rates of intrapartum clinical interventions in women who are refugees and asylum seekers in high-income countries compared to other population groups.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published in English since 2011 that report original quantitative findings regarding intrapartum clinical interventions among refugees and asylum seekers in high-income countries compared to those in non refugee, non asylum seeker populations. We examined reported rates of clinical pain relief, labour induction and augmentation, episiotomies, instrumental deliveries, and caesarean sections.

RESULTS

Twenty-five papers were included in the review. Findings indicate that refugees and asylum seekers were less likely to receive pain relief, with 16 out of 20 data points showing unadjusted ORs ranging from 0.20 (CI: 0.10-0.60) to 0.96 (CI: 0.70-1.32). Similarly, findings indicate lower odds of instrumental delivery among refugees and asylum seekers with 14 of 21 data points showing unadjusted ORs between 0.25 (CI: 0.15-0.39) and 0.78 (CI: 0.47-1.30); the remaining papers report no statistically significant difference between groups. There was no discernable trend in rates of labour induction and episiotomies across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies included in this review suggest that asylum seekers and refugees are less likely to receive clinical pain relief and experience instrumental delivery than non-refugee groups in high-income countries. This review strengthens our understanding of the links between immigration status and maternity care, ultimately informing policy and practice to improve perinatal health and the provision of care for all.

Patient- and Hospital- Level Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity: a Retrospective Multistate Analysis, 2015-2020

The rate of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in the United States (US) rose roughly 9% among all insured racial/ethnic groups between 2018 and 2020, disproportionately affecting racial and ethnic minority populations. Limited research on hospital-level factors and SMM found that even after adjusting for patient-level factors, women of all races delivering in high Black-serving delivery units had higher odds of SMM. Our retrospective cohort study augments the current understanding of multi-level racial/ethnic disparities in SMM by analyzing patient- and hospital- level factors using multistate data from 2015 to 2020. Because rises in SMM have been driven in part by an increase in blood transfusions, multivariable logistic regression models were employed to estimate the impact of patient- and hospital-level factors on the adjusted odds of experiencing any SMM, with and without blood transfusions, as well as blood transfusions alone. Our cohort consisted of 3,497,233 deliveries: 56,885 (1.63%) with any SMM, 16,070 (0.46%) with SMM excluding blood transfusion, and 45,468 (1.30%) with blood transfusions alone. We found that Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and delivering at Black-serving delivery-units, both independently and interactively, increase the odds of any SMM with or without blood transfusions. Our findings illustrate the persistence of structural- and individual- level racial and ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes over time and emphasize the need for multi-level public policies to address racial/ethnic disparities in maternal healthcare.

Structural Racism and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia Among Non-Hispanic Black Birthing People

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between structural racism and labor neuraxial analgesia use.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed 2017 U.S. natality data for non-Hispanic Black and White birthing people. The exposure was a multidimensional structural racism index measured in the county of the delivery hospital. It was calculated as the mean of three Black-White inequity ratios (ratios for lower education, unemployment, and incarceration in jails) and categorized into terciles, with the third tercile corresponding to high structural racism. The outcome was the labor neuraxial analgesia rate. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs of neuraxial analgesia associated with terciles of the index were estimated with multivariate logistic regression models. Black and White people were compared with the use of an interaction term between race and ethnicity and the racism index.

RESULTS

Of the 1,740,716 birth certificates analyzed, 396,303 (22.8%) were for Black people. The labor neuraxial analgesia rate was 77.2% for Black people in the first tercile of the racism index, 74.7% in the second tercile, and 72.4% in the third tercile. For White people, the rates were 80.4%, 78.2%, and 78.2%, respectively. For Black people, compared with the first tercile of the racism index, the second tercile was associated with 18.4% (95% CI, 16.9-19.9%) decreased adjusted odds of receiving neuraxial analgesia and the third tercile with 28.3% (95% CI, 26.9-29.6%) decreased adjusted odds. For White people, the decreases were 13.4% (95% CI, 12.5-14.4%) in the second tercile and 15.6% (95% CI, 14.7-16.5%) in the third tercile. A significant difference in the odds of neuraxial analgesia was observed between Black and White people for the second and third terciles.

CONCLUSION

A multidimensional index of structural racism is associated with significantly reduced odds of receiving labor neuraxial analgesia among Black people and, to a lesser extent, White people.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Importance

General anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal morbidity, and Black and Hispanic pregnant patients have higher rates of general anesthesia use compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts. It is unknown whether risk factors and indications for general anesthesia differ among patients of differing race and ethnicity.

Objective

To evaluate differences in general anesthesia use for cesarean delivery and the indication for the general anesthetic by race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study, electronic medical records for all 35 117 patients who underwent cesarean delivery at Northwestern Medicine's Prentice Women's Hospital from January 1, 2007, to March 2, 2018, were queried for maternal demographics, clinical characteristics, obstetric and anesthetic data, the indication for cesarean delivery, and the indication for general anesthesia when used. Data analysis occurred in August 2023.

Exposure

Cesarean delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The rate of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery by race and ethnicity.

Results

Of the 35 117 patients (median age, 33 years [IQR, 30-36 years]) who underwent cesarean delivery, 1147 (3.3%) received general anesthesia; the rates of general anesthesia were 2.5% for Asian patients (61 of 2422), 5.0% for Black patients (194 of 3895), 3.7% for Hispanic patients (197 of 5305), 2.8% for non-Hispanic White patients (542 of 19 479), and 3.8% (153 of 4016) for all other groups (including those who declined to provide race and ethnicity information) (P < .001). A total of 19 933 pregnant patients (56.8%) were in labor at the time of their cesarean delivery. Of those, 16 363 (82.1%) had neuraxial labor analgesia in situ. Among those who had an epidural catheter in situ, there were no racial or ethnic differences in the rates of general anesthesia use vs neuraxial analgesia use (Asian patients, 34 of 503 [6.8%] vs 1289 of 15 860 [8.1%]; Black patients, 78 of 503 [15.5%] vs 1925 of 15 860 [12.1%]; Hispanic patients, 80 of 503 [15.9%] vs 2415 of 15 860 [15.2%]; non-Hispanic White patients, 255 of 503 [50.7%] vs 8285 of 15 860 [52.2%]; and patients of other race or ethnicity, 56 of 503 [11.1%] vs 1946 of 15 860 [12.3%]; P = .16). Indications for cesarean delivery and for general anesthesia were not different when stratified by race and ethnicity.

Conclusions and Relevance

Racial disparities in rates of general anesthesia continue to exist; however, this study suggests that, for laboring patients who had labor epidural catheters in situ, no disparity by race or ethnicity existed. Future studies should address whether disparities in care that occur prior to neuraxial catheter placement are associated with higher rates of general anesthesia among patients from ethnic and racial minority groups.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Delivery In-Hospital Mortality or Maternal End-Organ Injury: A Multistate Analysis, 2007-2020

Background: In the United States, Black maternal mortality is 2-4 × higher than that of White maternal mortality, with differences also present in severe maternal morbidity and other measures. However, limited research has comprehensively studied multilevel social determinants of health, and their confounding and effect modification on obstetrical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective multistate analysis of adult inpatient delivery hospitalizations (Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Washington) between 2007 and 2020. Multilevel multivariable models were used to test the confounder-adjusted association for race/ethnicity and the binary outcomes (1) in-hospital mortality or maternal end-organ injury and (2) in-hospital mortality only. Stratified analyses were performed to test effect modification. Results: The confounder-adjusted odds ratio showed that Black (1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-1.36) and Hispanic (1.14, 95% CI: 1.11-1.18) as compared with White patients were more likely to die in-hospital or experience maternal end-organ injury. For Black and Hispanic patients, stratified analysis showed that findings remained significant in almost all homogeneous strata. After statistical adjustment, Black as compared with White patients were more likely to die in-hospital (1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.82). Conclusions: Black and Hispanic patients had higher adjusted odds of in-patient mortality and end-organ damage after birth than White patients. Race and ethnicity serve as strong predictors of health care inequality, and differences in outcomes may reflect broader structural racism and individual implicit bias. Proposed solutions require immense and multifaceted active efforts to restructure how obstetrical care is provided on the societal, hospital, and patient level.

Review of racial/ethnic disparities in obstetrics-related anesthesia administration and pain management

While racial/ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes including mortality and severe maternal morbidity are well documented, there is limited information on disparities in obstetric anesthesia practices. This paper reviews literature on racial/ethnic disparities in peripartum anesthesia administration and postpartum pain management. Current literature demonstrates racial/ethnic disparities in several aspects of obstetric anesthesia care including neuraxial administration for vaginal labor pain, neuraxial versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, post neuraxial anesthesia complications, postpartum pain management and postdural puncture headache treatment practices. However, many studies are dated or have limited data from single institutions or states. More research on nation-wide racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia is needed to understand its broader practice and management in the USA.

Maternal and Delivery Characteristics and Self-Reported Perceived Control During Labor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between maternal and delivery characteristics and self-reported perceived control during childbirth.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial was conducted to compare labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation with expectant management in low-risk nulliparous people. Six to 96 hours after delivery, participants who experienced labor completed the Labor Agentry Scale, a validated self-administered questionnaire to ascertain perceived control during childbirth. Scores range from 29 to 203, with higher scores indicating a sense of greater control. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine which maternal and delivery characteristics were associated with the Labor Agentry Scale score. Eligible characteristics included age, self-reported race and ethnicity, marital status, employment status, type of insurance, previous pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol use, mode of delivery, labor pain (0-10 points), and a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications. Significant variables ( P <.05) were retained in the final multivariable model, and adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) between groups were estimated.

RESULTS

Of 6,106 people enrolled in the trial, 6,038 experienced labor, of whom 5,750 (95.2%) completed the Labor Agentry Scale and were included in this analysis. Mean [95% CI] adjusted Labor Agentry Scale scores were significantly lower among those who identified as Asian (-6.4 [-10.5 to -2.3]) or Hispanic (-3.7 [-5.7 to -1.7]) compared with White, smoked compared with did not smoke (-2.8 [-5.5 to -0.1]), had BMIs of 35 or higher compared with less than 30 (-2.0 [-3.8 to -0.2]), were unemployed (-3.15 [-4.76 to -1.55]), did not have private health insurance (-2.61 [-4.47 to -0.76]), underwent operative vaginal (-5.1 [-7.7 to -2.6]) or cesarean (-14.4 [-16.1 to -12.6]) delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, and reported greater labor pain score of 8 or higher compared with less than 8 (-11.9 [-13.4 to -10.4]). Mean [95% CI] adjusted Labor Agentry Scale scores were significantly higher among people who were employed compared with unemployed (3.2 [1.6-4.8]) and had private compared with nonprivate insurance (2.6 [0.76-4.5]).

CONCLUSION

In nulliparous people at low risk, unemployment, lack of private health insurance, Asian race, Hispanic ethnicity, smoking, operative delivery, and more labor pain were associated with lower perceived control during labor.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01990612.

Postpartum Hemorrhage-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Causes

The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is increasing worldwide and in the United States. Coinciding, is the increased rate of severe maternal morbidity with blood transfusion in the United States over the past 2 decades. Consequences of PPH can be life-threatening and carry significant cost burden to the health care system. This review will discuss the current trends, distribution, and risk factors for PPH. Causes of PPH will be explored in detail.

Health equity research in obstetric anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Health equity is an important priority for obstetric anesthesia, but describing disparities in perinatal care process and health outcome is insufficient to achieve this goal. Conceptualizing and framing disparity is a prerequisite to pose meaningful research questions. We emphasize the need to hypothesize and test which mechanisms and drivers are instrumental for disparities in perinatal processes and outcomes, in order to target, test and refine effective countermeasures.

RECENT FINDINGS

With an emphasis on methodology and measurement, we sketch how health systems and disparity research may advance maternal health equity by narrating, conceptualizing, and investigating social determinants of health as key drivers of perinatal disparity, by identifying the granular mechanism of this disparity, by making the economic case to address them, and by testing specific interventions to advance obstetric health equity.

SUMMARY

Measuring social determinants of health and meaningful perinatal processes and outcomes precisely and accurately at the individual, family, community/neighborhood level is a prerequisite for healthcare disparity research. A focus on elucidating the precise mechanism driving disparity in processes of obstetric care would inform a more rational effort to promote health equity. Implementation scientists should rigorously investigate in prospective trials, which countermeasures are most efficient and effective in mitigating perinatal outcome disparities.