Association of pain catastrophizing with labor pain and analgesia consumption in obstetrical patients

INTRODUCTION

Pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated negative orientation to painful stimuli which in obstetric patients is associated with fear of overwhelming labor pain and negative pain-related outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively examine the association of pain catastrophizing with maternal labor pain outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of women admitted for a vaginal trial of labor. Subjects completed the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS) questionnaire (scored 0 to 52, higher scores representing greater catastrophizing). Pain was assessed at baseline and at request for neuraxial labor analgesia. Labor and postpartum pain intensity was assessed as the average area under the pain intensity by time curve. Pain at request for analgesia, labor pain, postpartum pain, analgesic consumption, and quality of recovery was compared between high (PCS ≥ 17) and low catastrophizing groups.

RESULTS

Data from 138/157 (88%) subjects were included in the analysis. Median (IQR) pain scores at request for analgesia were 9 (8,10) and 8 (6,9), a difference of 1 (95% CI 0 to 2.5, P = 0.008) in high-catastrophizing and in low-catastrophizing groups, respectively. Adjusted pain during labor, postpartum pain and opioid analgesic use were not significantly different. High-catastrophizers reported less comfort, ability to mobilize and less control during hospitalization. Post-discharge there were no differences in pain or analgesic use.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe greater labor or post-delivery pain or increased analgesic use in high-catastrophizing parturients. High catastrophizers reported greater pain when requesting analgesia, which is consistent with the role of catastrophizing in intensifying the experience of pain.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Importance

General anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal morbidity, and Black and Hispanic pregnant patients have higher rates of general anesthesia use compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts. It is unknown whether risk factors and indications for general anesthesia differ among patients of differing race and ethnicity.

Objective

To evaluate differences in general anesthesia use for cesarean delivery and the indication for the general anesthetic by race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study, electronic medical records for all 35 117 patients who underwent cesarean delivery at Northwestern Medicine's Prentice Women's Hospital from January 1, 2007, to March 2, 2018, were queried for maternal demographics, clinical characteristics, obstetric and anesthetic data, the indication for cesarean delivery, and the indication for general anesthesia when used. Data analysis occurred in August 2023.

Exposure

Cesarean delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The rate of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery by race and ethnicity.

Results

Of the 35 117 patients (median age, 33 years [IQR, 30-36 years]) who underwent cesarean delivery, 1147 (3.3%) received general anesthesia; the rates of general anesthesia were 2.5% for Asian patients (61 of 2422), 5.0% for Black patients (194 of 3895), 3.7% for Hispanic patients (197 of 5305), 2.8% for non-Hispanic White patients (542 of 19 479), and 3.8% (153 of 4016) for all other groups (including those who declined to provide race and ethnicity information) (P < .001). A total of 19 933 pregnant patients (56.8%) were in labor at the time of their cesarean delivery. Of those, 16 363 (82.1%) had neuraxial labor analgesia in situ. Among those who had an epidural catheter in situ, there were no racial or ethnic differences in the rates of general anesthesia use vs neuraxial analgesia use (Asian patients, 34 of 503 [6.8%] vs 1289 of 15 860 [8.1%]; Black patients, 78 of 503 [15.5%] vs 1925 of 15 860 [12.1%]; Hispanic patients, 80 of 503 [15.9%] vs 2415 of 15 860 [15.2%]; non-Hispanic White patients, 255 of 503 [50.7%] vs 8285 of 15 860 [52.2%]; and patients of other race or ethnicity, 56 of 503 [11.1%] vs 1946 of 15 860 [12.3%]; P = .16). Indications for cesarean delivery and for general anesthesia were not different when stratified by race and ethnicity.

Conclusions and Relevance

Racial disparities in rates of general anesthesia continue to exist; however, this study suggests that, for laboring patients who had labor epidural catheters in situ, no disparity by race or ethnicity existed. Future studies should address whether disparities in care that occur prior to neuraxial catheter placement are associated with higher rates of general anesthesia among patients from ethnic and racial minority groups.

A survey of United States obstetric anesthesiologists' perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology fellowship

INTRODUCTION

Subspecialty training in obstetric anesthesiology is associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the demand for fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists far exceeds the supply. This survey study aimed to evaluate the perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology subspecialty training on career trajectory, job satisfaction, quality of life, and job autonomy.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study of fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists in the United States of America. In March and April 2022, program directors of obstetric anesthesiology fellowships distributed an electronic survey link containing 29 multiple-choice questions to their program alumni. Survey content included respondent demographic characteristics, practice models, career information, and perceived value of an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship.

RESULTS

We surveyed 217/502 (43%) fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists with a response rate of 158/217 (73%). Most worked in urban, academic, and level IV perinatal health centers. The majority believed an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship was "extremely beneficial" (77%), enhanced quality of life (84%), improved the quality of patient care (99%), and was influential in helping obtain their first post-training job (86%). The perceived value of the fellowship included an enhanced career trajectory, a sense of purpose, improved job satisfaction, a sense of work community, lower burnout, involvement in maternal health initiatives, increased mentorship, and departmental leadership.

CONCLUSION

In this survey study, fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists perceived a positive impact of fellowship training on career trajectory, job protection and autonomy, quality of life, and job satisfaction. This information may be meaningful to trainees considering pursuing a fellowship and a career in obstetric anesthesiology.

Anesthetic Management of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome During Vaginal Delivery: A Case Report

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare group of vascular disorders characterized by severe headache with or without other neurologic symptoms. Pregnancy is known to precipitate RCVS, typically in the postpartum period. With improved recognition of this condition, RCVS is now increasingly identified in the antepartum period. Labor and vaginal delivery are characterized by fluctuations in hemodynamic and intracerebral pressures and present challenges for intrapartum anesthetic management. We report our experience with a patient with RCVS admitted for external cephalic version and subsequent vaginal delivery.

Postpartum Thyroid Storm in Poorly Controlled Graves' Disease: A Case Report

Hyperthyroidism during pregnancy is a relatively rare event, but poor control of hyperthyroidism during pregnancy is associated with a host of issues. These include intrauterine fetal demise, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, and maternal congestive heart failure. One of the most feared sequelae of hyperthyroidism is thyroid storm, which has a mortality rate >10%. Patients who develop thyroid storm present several challenges to anesthesiologists including hemodynamic instability and medication management. Here, we present the anesthetic management for a parturient whose delivery was complicated by signs and symptoms consistent with thyroid storm.

Effect of companion presence on maternal satisfaction during neuraxial catheter placement for labor analgesia: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Neuraxial labor analgesia is frequently achieved after placing an epidural catheter under sterile conditions. There is no consensus on the risk versus benefit of allowing a parturient's companion to remain during the procedure. We sought to assess the effect of the presence of a companion on maternal satisfaction and anxiety during neuraxial catheter placement for labor analgesia.

METHODS

Healthy nulliparous parturients planning to receive neuraxial labor analgesia after admission to labor, and who had a companion with them at the time of interview, were randomized to having a companion present or not present in the labor and delivery room during neuraxial catheter placement. Participants completed questionnaires to assess maternal anxiety, pain catastrophizing and health literacy. Satisfaction was scored on 5-point Likert scale (1- highly dissatisfied, 2- dissatisfied, 3- neutral, 4- satisfied, 5- highly satisfied).

RESULTS

A total of 143 participants completed the study. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney odds ratio for a random pair of satisfaction scores for a woman with her companion present compared with companion not present was 1.93 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.81, P=0.001). Anxiety scores were decreased following the procedure (P=0.39) in both groups. Eighty-nine percent of women randomized to companion not present would have preferred to have a companion present (P <0.001) compared with only one with their companion present who would have preferred her companion to be not present (P=0.99).

CONCLUSION

Maternal satisfaction can be improved with the presence of a companion in the labor and delivery room at the time of neuraxial catheter placement for labor analgesia.

Anesthetic management of parturients with Arnold Chiari malformation-I: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Consensus regarding the safest mode of delivery and anesthetic management for parturients with Arnold Chiari malformation-I (ACM-I) remains controversial. This study assessed their anesthetic management and reported anesthetic complications during hospitalization for delivery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of patients with ACM-I undergoing vaginal or cesarean delivery. Data were obtained from the electronic databases of four United States academic institutions using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from 2007-2017 at three sites and 2004-2017 at one site. The primary outcome was anesthetic complications.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 185 deliveries in 148 patients. Diagnosis of ACM-I was made prior to delivery in 147 (80%) cases. Pre-delivery neurosurgical consultation for management of ACM-I was performed in 53 (36%) patients. Pre-existing symptoms were recorded for 89 (48%) of the deliveries. Vaginal deliveries occurred in 80 (43%) cases, and 62 women (78%) received neuraxial labor analgesia. Cesarean delivery was performed in 105 (57%) cases, of which 70 women (67%) had neuraxial anesthesia and 34 (32%) received general anesthesia. Post-dural puncture headache was reported in three (2%) patients who had neuraxial anesthesia, and in two (12%) patients with syringomyelia. There was one (3%) reported case of aspiration pneumonia with general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that anesthetic complications occur infrequently in patients with ACM-I regardless of the anesthetic management. Although institutional preference in anesthetic and obstetric care appears to drive patient management, the findings suggest that an individualized approach has favorable outcomes in this population.

Neuraxial labor analgesia is not an independent predictor of perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery of patients with intrauterine fetal demise

INTRODUCTION

The role of neuraxial labor analgesia in perineal trauma following live births is controversial, and no studies have assessed the association in women delivering an intrauterine fetal demise. We evaluated the relationship between neuraxial labor analgesia and perineal laceration in these patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of women with a diagnosis of fetal death after 20weeks of gestation, a vaginal delivery, and an Apgar score of 0 at delivery, during the period from January 2007 through December 2015. The presence of a perineal laceration and its severity, graded from grade I to IV based on the 2014 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 329/422 (78%) patients received neuraxial, and 93/422 (22%) non-neuraxial, labor analgesia. A perineal laceration occurred in 23% in the neuraxial versus 10% in the non-neuraxial analgesia group, a difference of 13% (95% CI of difference 4% to 20%, P=0.005). After adjusting for confounder bias, greater birthweight (OR 4.22, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.92, P<0.001) and lower parity (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.82, P=0.009), but not neuraxial analgesia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.57, P=0.61) were independent predictors of perineal laceration. The maintenance concentration of bupivacaine did not affect the rate of perineal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuraxial labor analgesia does not appear to be an independent risk for a perineal laceration in patients with intrauterine fetal demise. Our data suggests that the use of neuraxial analgesia should not raise concern about increased rates of perineal injury.

Orientation and presence of epithelium are key to endotoxin-induced neutrophil migration

The mechanisms by which endotoxins mediate neutrophil transepithelial migration and lung inflammation are unclear. It was hypothesized that both the presence and orientation of epithelial cells are critical to endotoxin-induced neutrophil migration. Neutrophil migration was compared through naked filters and filters with A549 lung epithelial monolayers grown on the upper and lower surface of permeable filters to simulate the apical and basal directional movement of neutrophils, respectively. The endotoxin, Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide, was placed below the filter, acting as either a basal or an apical stimulus. Endotoxin without serum failed to stimulate neutrophil migration. In the presence of 1% human serum, endotoxin-induced neutrophil migration through naked filters was dose dependent. Endotoxin-induced neutrophil migration across A549 monolayers was minimal when the monolayers were cultured on the upper surface of the filters (basal stimulus). In contrast, neutrophil transepithelial migration was much greater and dependent on both dose and time when the monolayer was cultured on the lower surface of the filter (basal to apical neutrophil directional movement). Furthermore, enhanced neutrophil transepithelial migration was greater with an apical than with a basal stimulus. Endotoxin-induced neutrophil transepithelial migration was markedly inhibited (>95%) by actinomycin D pretreatment of the monolayers, suggesting the necessity for intact protein synthesis capacity of the A549 cells. Thus, both the presence and orientation of airway epithelium are key in supporting endotoxin-mediated lung neutrophilic responses.