1
|
Leng N, Mittel AM, Levine D, Nitta S, Berman MF, Hua M, Patel VI, Kurlansky PA, Takayama H, Melo MFV. Intraoperative Factors Associated With Mechanical Ventilation Duration Following Aortic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2025; 39:1205-1213. [PMID: 40037958 PMCID: PMC11993328 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation is a common complication after major aortic surgery. The relationship between prolonged ventilation and intraoperative variables influenced by anesthesiologists, such as ventilation practices, fluid administration, and blood pressure control during major aortic surgery is unknown. We sought to identify perioperative factors, including intraoperative physiologic and anesthesia-related variables, which are associated with ventilation duration following aortic surgery. DESIGN Single-center retrospective observational study. SETTING A tertiary, high-volume cardiac surgery referral center. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients undergoing major aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS None (retrospective observational study). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was the duration of postoperative ventilation (hours). Mixed-effects regression was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcome. Among the 647 patients included in this study, the median of postoperative mechanical ventilation duration was 9.0 (IQR 6.0, 14.4) hours, with 73 (11.3%) of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Variables significantly associated with the outcome were increases in pre- to post-CPB driving pressure (β = 4.23; 95% CI [0.08, 8.39]; p = 0.04), reduction in pre- to post-CPB end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (β = -5.12; 95% CI [-8.85, -1.39]; p < 0.001), and normalized transfusion volumes (β = 11.14; 95% CI [4.36, 17.91]; p < 0.001). Mechanical power was not associated with postoperative ventilation duration (β = -2.29; 95% CI [-6.48, 1.90]; p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing major aortic surgery are at risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation. Transfusion volume and pre- to post-CPB changes in driving pressures and end-tidal carbon dioxide are significantly associated with postoperative ventilation duration. Intraoperative mechanical ventilator power is not a significant predictor of mechanical ventilation duration after major aortic surgery. These variables are potentially modifiable by anesthesiologists and may be future therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Leng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Aaron M Mittel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | - Dov Levine
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Suzuka Nitta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mitchell F Berman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - May Hua
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul A Kurlansky
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Center for Innovation and Outcomes Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac, Vascular & Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marcos F Vidal Melo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karaarslan E, Tire Y, Tutar MS, Akıncı N, Mermer HA, Uyar S, Ateş D, Şimşek G, Kozanhan B. The effect of bilateral rectus sheath and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks on mechanical power in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2025; 25:186. [PMID: 40241019 PMCID: PMC12004598 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-03062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of bilateral rectus sheath blocks (RSBs) and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) blocks on mechanical power (MP) in patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Additionally, we sought to evaluate the impact of these blocks on postoperative pain and quality of patient recovery. METHODS In this prospective, double-blind study, 66 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into two groups: Group C (control), which received a standard analgesic intravenous regimen; and Group B (block), which received bilateral RSB and OSTAP blocks. Intraoperative mechanical power was measured for all patients. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and recovery quality was measured using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire. RESULTS The mechanical power values for patients in Group C were consistently greater at all measured times: baseline, before bridion, and after bridion. Although the difference at baseline was not statistically significant, significant differences were observed before and after bridion (p values = 0.112, 0.021, and 0.003, respectively). Patients in Group B exhibited significantly lower VAS scores at all time points (30 min, 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h) (p < 0.05). Additionally, essential variations were noted in the administration of rescue analgesia between the groups (p < 0.001). Regarding tramadol consumption, Group C patients had significantly greater values [84 (74-156) vs. 0 (0-75), median (25-75th percentiles)] (p < 0.001). For the QoR-15 scores, Group C also had significantly greater values [129 (124-133) vs. 122 (115-125), median (25-75th percentiles)] (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Bilateral RSB and OSTAP blocks significantly reduce mechanical power during surgery. Moreover, they significantly decrease postoperative pain and analgesic consumption and increase patient recovery scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study protocol was registered in the international database ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT06202040). This study was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation of Konya City Hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esma Karaarslan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
| | - Yasin Tire
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Sami Tutar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Nuran Akıncı
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Hasan Alp Mermer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Sami Uyar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Dilek Ateş
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Gürcan Şimşek
- General Surgery Department, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Betül Kozanhan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang NR, Zhang LZ, Chen Y, Zhang S, Li S, Gu XK, Li J, Li H. Intraoperative protective ventilation with or without periodic lung recruitment manoeuvres on pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery (REMAIN-1): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2025; 15:e093360. [PMID: 40082005 PMCID: PMC11906986 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after abdominal surgery and significantly affect postoperative outcomes. Intraoperative protective ventilation (IPV) has been demonstrated to mitigate PPCs. However, the comparative effectiveness of two common IPV regimens-IPV with or without periodic lung recruitment manoeuvres (PLRM)-in preventing PPCs is unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of these two IPV regimens on PPCs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. A total of 1060 patients at intermediate or high risk for PPCs, scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery, will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either an IPV with PLRM (intensive IPV group) or an IPV without PLRM (moderate IPV group). Patients assigned to the intensive IPV group will receive positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6-10 cm H2O with lung recruitment manoeuvres performed every 30 min. Patients in the moderate IPV group will receive the same level of PEEP without lung recruitment manoeuvres. Both groups will receive a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg predicted body weight and an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.3-0.4. The primary outcome is respiratory failure within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include other PPCs, extrapulmonary complications, unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit, length of postoperative hospital stay and mortality from any cause. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. The first participant was recruited on 9 October 2022, with an estimated completion date of 30 May 2025. The results of this trial are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05556174.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan-Rong Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Li-Zhen Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi Chen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Song Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shan Li
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao-Ke Gu
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abram J, Spraider P, Martini J, Velik-Salchner C, Dejaco H, Augustin F, Putzer G, Hell T, Barnes T, Enk D. Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation - A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2025; 103:111785. [PMID: 40020438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 12/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/03/2025]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Comparison of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in thoracic surgery procedures requiring one-lung ventilation. DESIGN Prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Operating theater at a university hospital, Austria. PATIENTS Patients scheduled for elective, thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS Participants received ventilation randomly either with FCV or PCV per-protocol for the duration of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS The primary endpoint was oxygenation assessed by paO2 / FiO2 ratio 30 min after the start of OLV. Secondary endpoints included the required minute volume for CO2 removal, applied mechanical power and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. MAIN RESULTS A total of 46 patients were enrolled and 43 included in the primary analysis. The primary endpoint paO2 / FiO2 ratio was significantly higher in the FCV group (n = 21) compared to the control group (PCV n = 22) (187 vs 136 mmHg, MD 39 (95 % CI 1 to 75); p = 0.047). The required respiratory minute volume to obtain comparable mild hypercapnia during OLV was significantly lower in FCV (3.0 vs 4.5 l/min, MD -1.3 (95 % CI -1.9 to -0.8); p < 0.001). The applied mechanical power was also significantly lower (3.5 versus 7.6 J/min, MD -3.8 (95 % CI -5.3 to -2.7); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this single-center randomized controlled trial, flow-controlled ventilation improved gas exchange parameters in terms of oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and reduced the mechanical impact of artificial ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Abram
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Patrick Spraider
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Judith Martini
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Corinna Velik-Salchner
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hannes Dejaco
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Augustin
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gabriel Putzer
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias Hell
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tom Barnes
- University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, SE109LS London, United Kingdom
| | - Dietmar Enk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yessenbayeva GA, Meyerbekova AM, Kim SI, Zhumabayev MB, Berdiyarova GS, Shalekenov SB, Zharlyganova DS, Mukatova IY, Yukhnevich YA, Klyuyev DA, Yaroshetskiy AI. Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in reverse Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2025; 25:61. [PMID: 39915702 PMCID: PMC11803948 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-02933-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/09/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High and individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during laparoscopic surgery may improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. METHODS We searched RCTs in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from from from January 2000 to December 2023 comparing the different intraoperative PEEP (low PEEP (LPEEP): 0-5 mbar; moderate PEEP (MPEEP): 6-9 mbar; high PEEP (HPEEP): >=10 mbar; individualized PEEP (iPEEP): PEEP set by special physiological technique) on arterial oxygenation, respiratory compliance (Cdyn) or driving pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in patients during laparoscopic surgery in reverse Trendelenburg position. We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and predictive intervals (PI) using random-effects models. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was applied. RESULTS 8 RCTs (n = 425) met the inclusion criteria. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased PaO2/FiO2 (+ 129.93 [+ 75.20; +184.65] mmHg, p < 0.0001) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 34.92, p < 0.0001; I2 89%). iPEEP vs. LPEEP also increased PaO2/FiO2 + 130.23 [+ 57.18; +203.27] mmHg, p = 0.0005) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 26.95, p < 0.0001; I2 93%). HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 15.06 [5.47; +24.65] ml/mbar, p = 0.002) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 93.16, p < 0.0001; I2 96%). iPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 22.46 [+ 8.56; +36.35] ml/mbar, p = 0.002) with high variability of the true effect (Chi2 53.92, p < 0.0001; I2 96%). HPEEP group had higher MAP as compared to LPEEP) + 4.36 [+ 0.36;+8.36], p = 0.03), variability of the true effect was nonsignificant. HR did nit differ between all comparisons. CONCLUSION In patients with obesity undergoing surgery in the reverse Trendelenburg position HPEEP and iPEEP may improve oxygenation, decrease driving pressure, and increase dynamic compliance compared to LPEEP with high variation of true effect without relevant hemodynamic compromise. Data with MPEEP comparisons are inconclusive. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42023488971; registered December 14, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sergey I Kim
- Multidisciplinary Hospitals Named After Professor H.J.Makazhanov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
| | | | - Gulbanu S Berdiyarova
- Kazakhstan Medical University "Higher School of Health Care Organization", Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrey I Yaroshetskiy
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
- Pulmonology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8/2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Düring S, Parhar KKS, Adhikari NKJ, Urner M, Kim SJ, Munshi L, Liu K, Fan E. Understanding ventilator-induced lung injury: The role of mechanical power. J Crit Care 2025; 85:154902. [PMID: 39241350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation stands as a life-saving intervention in the management of respiratory failure. However, it carries the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Despite the adoption of lung-protective ventilation strategies, including lower tidal volumes and pressure limitations, mortality rates remain high, leaving room for innovative approaches. The concept of mechanical power has emerged as a comprehensive metric encompassing key ventilator parameters associated with the genesis of ventilator-induced lung injury, including volume, pressure, flow, resistance, and respiratory rate. While numerous animal and human studies have linked mechanical power and ventilator-induced lung injury, its practical implementation at the bedside is hindered by calculation challenges, lack of equation consensus, and the absence of an optimal threshold. To overcome the constraints of measuring static respiratory parameters, dynamic mechanical power is proposed for all patients, regardless of their ventilation mode. However, establishing a causal relationship is crucial for its potential implementation, and requires further research. The objective of this review is to explore the role of mechanical power in ventilator-induced lung injury, its association with patient outcomes, and the challenges and potential benefits of implementing a ventilation strategy based on mechanical power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan von Düring
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Ken Kuljit S Parhar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Neill K J Adhikari
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Martin Urner
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - S Joseph Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Laveena Munshi
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Kuan Liu
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Obeidat SS, Suleiman A, Ahrens E, Needham MJ, Stewart C, Khany M, Tartler TM, Zucco L, Pandit JJ, Schaefer MS, Ramachandran SK. Real-World Evaluation of i-gel Introduction on Intraoperative Airway-Related Safety Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Hospital Network. Anesth Analg 2025; 140:253-261. [PMID: 39804591 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000007043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events. METHODS Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salameh S Obeidat
- From the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, Oregon
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J Needham
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Catriona Stewart
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mitra Khany
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Liana Zucco
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jaideep J Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Satya Krishna Ramachandran
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu C, Zhang R, Li J, Ren L, Gu Z, Wei R, Zhang M. Association of mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications among young children undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: A retrospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2025; 42:64-72. [PMID: 39628416 PMCID: PMC11620292 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have discussed the correlation between mechanical power (MP) and lung injury. However, evidence regarding the relationship between MP and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in children remains limited, specifically during one-lung ventilation (OLV). OBJECTIVES Propensity score matching was employed to generate low MP and high MP groups to verify the relationship between MP and PPCs. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors of PPCs in young children undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). DESIGN A retrospective study. SETTING Single-site tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS Children aged ≤2 years who underwent VATS between January 2018 and February 2023. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The incidence of PPCs. RESULTS Overall, 581 (median age, 6 months [interquartile range: 5-9.24 months]) children were enrolled. The median [interquartile range] MP during OLV were 2.17 [1.84 to 2.64) J min-1. One hundred and nine (18.76%) children developed PPCs. MP decreased modestly during the study period (2.63 to 1.99 J min-1; P < 0.0001). In the propensity score matched cohort for MP (221 matched pairs), MP (median MP 2.63 vs. 1.84 J min-1) was not associated with a reduction in PPCs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.87 to 2.37; P = 0.16). In the propensity score matched cohort for dynamic components of MP (139 matched pairs), dynamic components (mean 2.848 vs. 4.162 J min-1) was not associated with a reduction in PPCs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.85 to 3.10; P = 0.15).The multiple logistic analysis revealed PPCs within 7 days of surgery were associated with male gender, OLV duration >90 min, less surgeon's experience and lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) value. CONCLUSIONS MP and dynamic components were not associated with PPCs in young children undergoing VATS, whereas PPCs were associated with male gender, OLV duration >90 min, less surgeon's experience and lower PEEP value. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR2300074649.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Change Zhu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai (CZ, MZ), Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai (LR, ZG, RW), Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (RZ, JL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
González-Castro A, Fajardo Campoverdi A. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. Med Intensiva 2025; 49:59-60. [PMID: 39567348 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2024.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 10/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro González-Castro
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Spain; Grupo Internacional de Ventilación Mecánica, WeVent, Spain.
| | - Aurio Fajardo Campoverdi
- Critical Care Unit, Hospital Biprovincial Quillota-Petorca, Chile; Grupo Internacional de Ventilación Mecánica, WeVent, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee HJ, Lee HW. Comprehensive Strategies for Preoperative Pulmonary Risk Evaluation and Management. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2025; 88:90-108. [PMID: 39474732 PMCID: PMC11704732 DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly increase morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, particularly those with pulmonary conditions. PPC incidence varies widely, influenced by factors such as surgery type, patient age, smoking status, and comorbid conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure. While preoperative pulmonary function tests and chest radiographs are crucial for lung resection surgery, their use should be judiciously tailored to individual risk profiles. Effective risk stratification models, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Arozullah respiratory failure index, Gupta Calculators, and Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) model, play a key role in predicting PPCs. Key strategies to diminish PPCs include preoperative optimization of respiratory conditions, smoking cessation, and respiratory rehabilitation. In patients with COPD and asthma, it is crucial to maintain optimal disease control through inhaled therapies, systemic corticosteroids, and tailored preoperative respiratory exercises. Anemia and hypoalbuminemia are significant predictors of PPCs and require meticulous management. The choice and duration of anesthesia also notably influence PPC risk, with regional anesthesia being preferable to general anesthesia when possible. Comprehensive preoperative evaluations and tailored interventions are essential for enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing PPC incidence. Additional studies involving domestic patients are necessary to refine national guidelines for managing those at risk of PPCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Jin Lee
- Division of Respiratory and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Woo Lee
- Division of Respiratory and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu C, Zhang M, Zhang S, Zhang R, Wei R. Lung-protective ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications during pulmonary resection in children: A prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:889-897. [PMID: 39238348 PMCID: PMC11556870 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children are more susceptible to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) due to their smaller functional residual capacity and higher closing volume; however, lung-protective ventilation (LPV) in children requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV) has been relatively underexplored. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of LPV and driving pressure-guided ventilation on PPCs in children with OLV. DESIGN Randomised, controlled, double-blind study. SETTING Single-site tertiary hospital, 6 May 2022 to 31 August 2023. PATIENTS 213 children aged < 6 years, planned for lung resection secondary to congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. INTERVENTIONS Children were randomly assigned to LPV ( n = 142) or control ( n = 71) groups. Children in LPV group were randomly assigned to either driving pressure group ( n = 70) receiving individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to deliver the lowest driving pressure or to conventional protective ventilation group ( n = 72) with fixed PEEP of 5 cmH 2 O. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were pulmonary mechanics, oxygenation and mechanical power. RESULTS The incidence of PPCs did not differ between the LPV (24/142, 16.9%) and the control groups (15/71, 21.1%) ( P = 0.45). The driving pressure was lower in the driving pressure group than in the 5 cmH 2 O PEEP group (15 vs. 17 cmH 2 O; P = 0.001). Lung compliance and oxygenation were higher while the dynamic component of mechanical power was lower in the driving pressure group than in the 5 cmH 2 O PEEP group. The incidence of PPCs did not differ between the driving pressure (11/70, 15.7%) and the 5 cmH 2 O PEEP groups (13/72, 18.1%) ( P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS LPV did not decrease the occurrence of PPCs compared to non-protective ventilation. Although lung compliance and oxygenation were higher in the driving pressure group than in the 5 cmH 2 O PEEP group, these benefits did not translate into significant reductions in PPCs. However, the study is limited by a small sample size, which may affect the interpretation of the results. Future research with larger sample sizes is necessary to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR2200059270.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Change Zhu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (CZ, SZ, RW), Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (CZ, MZ), Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (RZ)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Percy AG, Keim G, Bhalla AK, Yehya N. Mechanical Power in Decelerating Flow versus Square Flow Ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology 2024; 141:1095-1104. [PMID: 39190682 PMCID: PMC11560697 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical power is a summary variable quantifying the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. The original mechanical power equation was developed using square flow ventilation. However, most children are ventilated using decelerating flow. It is unclear whether mechanical power differs according to mode of flow delivery. This study compared mechanical power in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome who received both square and decelerating flow ventilation. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients were ventilated on decelerating flow and then placed in square flow and allowed to stabilize. Ventilator metrics from both modes were collected within 24 h of acute respiratory distress syndrome onset. Paired t tests were used to compare differences in mechanical power between the modes. RESULTS This study enrolled 185 subjects with a median oxygenation index of 9.5 (interquartile range, 7 to 13) and median age of 8.3 yr (interquartile range, 1.8 to 14). Mechanical power was lower in square flow mode (mean, 0.46 J · min-1 · kg-1; SD, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.50) than in decelerating flow mode (mean, 0.49 J · min-1 · kg-1; SD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.53) with a mean difference of 0.03 J · min-1 · kg-1 (SD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.014 to 0.038; P < 0.001). This result remained statistically significant when stratified by age of less than 2 yr in square flow compared to decelerating flow and also when stratified by age of 2 yr or greater in square flow compared to decelerating flow. The elastic contribution in square flow was 70%, and the resistive contribution was 30%. CONCLUSIONS Mechanical power was marginally lower in square flow than in decelerating flow, although the clinical significance of this is unclear. Upward of 30% of mechanical power may go toward overcoming resistance, regardless of age. This is nearly three-fold greater resistance compared to what has been reported in adults. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Percy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Garrett Keim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anoopindar K Bhalla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nadir Yehya
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahrens E, Wachtendorf LJ, Hill KP, Schaefer MS. Considerations for Anesthesia in Older Adults with Cannabis Use. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:933-943. [PMID: 39617807 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01161-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
Over the past decade, legislative changes occurred in the USA and the western world that were followed by a substantial increase in reported use of cannabis among the general population. Among patients undergoing anesthesia for surgery or interventional procedures, older patients-often defined as adults over 65 years-are one of the fastest-growing populations. Within this group, the prevalence of cannabis use almost tripled over the past decade. In addition to habitual cannabis use, recommendations for treatment of chronic pain with cannabinoids have become increasingly more common. The clinical relevance of cannabis use in older adults is supported by recent studies linking it to increased anesthetic requirements as well as respiratory, cardiovascular, and psychiatric complications following surgery. Still, evidence remains equivocal, as these associations may largely depend on the type, frequency, and route of cannabis administration, and current research is mostly limited to retrospective cohort studies. Multisystemic effects of cannabis can become especially relevant in patients of advanced age undergoing anesthesia, characterized by physiological and pharmacodynamic alterations as well as a higher risks of drug-to-drug interactions. Best-practice guidelines emphasize the need for detailed, systematic preoperative screening for habits of cannabis use, including the history, type, and frequency, to guide perioperative management in these patients. This review discusses considerations for anesthesia in older patients with habitual cannabis use while highlighting strategies and recommendations to ensure safe and effective anesthesia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin P Hill
- Division of Addiction Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wachtendorf LJ, Ahrens E, Suleiman A, von Wedel D, Tartler TM, Rudolph MI, Redaelli S, Santer P, Munoz-Acuna R, Santarisi A, Calderon HN, Kiyatkin ME, Novack L, Talmor D, Eikermann M, Schaefer MS. The association between intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and perioperative healthcare-associated costs: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Clin Anesth 2024; 98:111567. [PMID: 39191081 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE A low dynamic driving pressure during mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia has been associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRC), a key driver of healthcare costs. It is, however, unclear whether maintaining low driving pressure is clinically relevant to measure and contain costs. We hypothesized that a lower dynamic driving pressure is associated with lower costs. DESIGN Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING Two academic healthcare networks in New York and Massachusetts, USA. PATIENTS 46,715 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ambulatory (inpatient and same-day admission) surgery between 2016 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS The primary exposure was the median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs, which were matched with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to report absolute differences in total costs in United States Dollars (US$). We assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk of PRC (score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications [SPORC] ≥ 7) and effect mediation by rates of PRC (including post-extubation saturation < 90%, re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation within 7 days) and other major complications. MAIN RESULTS The median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure was 17.2cmH2O (IQR 14.0-21.3cmH2O). In adjusted analyses, every 5cmH2O reduction in dynamic driving pressure was associated with a decrease of -0.7% in direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs (95%CI -1.3 to -0.1%; p = 0.020). When a dynamic driving pressure below 15cmH2O was maintained, -US$340 lower total perioperative healthcare-associated costs were observed (95%CI -US$546 to -US$132; p = 0.001). This association was limited to patients at high baseline risk of PRC (n = 4059; -US$1755;97.5%CI -US$2495 to -US$986; p < 0.001), where lower risks of PRC and other major complications mediated 10.7% and 7.2% of this association (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative mechanical ventilation targeting low dynamic driving pressures could be a relevant measure to reduce perioperative healthcare-associated costs in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Queen Rania St, Amman, 11942, Jordan; Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America.
| | - Dario von Wedel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America
| | - Maíra I Rudolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, Cologne 50937, Germany.
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milan, Italy.
| | - Peter Santer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Abeer Santarisi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Jordan University Hospital, Queen Rania St, Amman 11942, Jordan.
| | - Harold N Calderon
- Department of Finance, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Michael E Kiyatkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America.
| | - Lena Novack
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen 45147, Germany.
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Suleiman A, Munoz-Acuna R, Redaelli S, Ahrens E, Tartler TM, Ashrafian S, Hashish MM, Santarisi A, Chen G, Riedel S, Talmor D, Baedorf Kassis EN, Schaefer MS, Goodspeed V. Previous Coronavirus Disease-2019 Infection and Lung Mechanics in Surgical Patients: A Hospital Registry Study. Anesth Analg 2024; 139:997-1005. [PMID: 39058628 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000007015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term pulmonary complications have been reported after a coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesized that a history of COVID-19 is associated with a measurable decrease in baseline respiratory system compliance in patients undergoing general anesthesia. METHODS In this hospital registry study, we included adult patients undergoing general anesthesia between January 2020 and March 2022 at a tertiary health care network in Massachusetts. We excluded patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status >IV, laryngoscopic surgeries, and patients who arrived intubated. The primary exposure was a history of COVID-19. The primary outcome was baseline respiratory system compliance (mL/cmH 2 O). Effects of severity of infection, surges (Alpha 1 , Alpha 2 , Delta, and Omicron), patient demographics, and time between infection and assessment of compliance were investigated. RESULTS A total of 19,921 patients were included. Approximately 1386 (7.0%) patients had a history of COVID-19. A history of COVID-19 at any time before surgery was associated with a measurably lower baseline respiratory system compliance (ratio of means adj = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.97; P < .001; adjusted compliance difference: -1.6 mL/cmH 2 O). The association was more pronounced in patients with a severe form of COVID-19 (ratio of means adj = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99; P = .02, adjusted compliance difference: -2 mL/cmH 2 O). Alpha 1 , Alpha 2 , and Delta surges, but not Omicron, led to a lower baseline respiratory system compliance ( P < .001, P = .02, and P < .001). The Delta surge effect was magnified in Hispanic ethnicity ( P -for-interaction = 0.003; ratio of means adj = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P = .001; adjusted compliance difference: -4.6 mL/cmH 2 O). CONCLUSIONS A history of COVID-19 infection during Alpha 1 , Alpha 2 , and Delta surges was associated with a measurably lower baseline respiratory system compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiman Suleiman
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Simone Redaelli
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Ahrens
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tim M Tartler
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Ashrafian
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - May M Hashish
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abeer Santarisi
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Guanqing Chen
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stefan Riedel
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Talmor
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elias N Baedorf Kassis
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Valerie Goodspeed
- From the Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pozzi T, Coppola S, Catozzi G, Colombo A, Chioccola M, Duscio E, Di Marco F, Chiumello D. Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 2024; 38:1135-1143. [PMID: 38884875 PMCID: PMC11427604 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01170-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP. METHODS Sixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH2O was studied. RESULTS The application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH2O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 - 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 - 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 - 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 - 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance. CONCLUSION Mechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Pozzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Coppola
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Catozzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Colombo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mara Chioccola
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Duscio
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiano Di Marco
- Pulmonary Medicine Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Davide Chiumello
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy.
- Coordinated Research Center On Respiratory Failure, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhu C, Zhang R, Zhang S, Wang G, Yu S, Wei R, Zhang M. Risk of pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection in children. Minerva Anestesiol 2024; 90:882-891. [PMID: 39381869 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.24.18142-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Children are more susceptible to PPCs owing to smaller functional residual capacity and greater closing volume. Risk factors of PPCs in children undergoing lung resection remain unclear. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled children who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between January 2018 and February 2023. The primary outcome was PPC occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for PPCs. RESULTS Overall, 640 children were analyzed; their median age was 7 (interquartile range: 5-11) months, and the median tidal volume was 7.66 (6.59-8.49) mL/kg. One hundred and seventeen (18.3%) developed PPCs. PPCs were independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.88; P=0.008), longer OLV duration (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0-1.01; P=0.001), and less surgeon's experience (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.03-2.7; P=0.036). When low-tidal-volume cutoff was defined as <8 mL/kg, PEEP level was a protective factor for PPCs (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00; P=0.046). Additionally, PPCs were associated with increased hospital stay (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Male sex, longer OLV duration, less surgeon's experience, and lower PEEP were risk factors of PPCs in children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Our findings may serve as targets for prospective studies investigating specific ventilation strategies for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Change Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rufang Zhang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Saiji Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoqing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenghua Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mazhong Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China -
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scaramuzzo G, Karbing DS, Ball L, Vigolo F, Frizziero M, Scomparin F, Ragazzi R, Verri M, Rees SE, Volta CA, Spadaro S. Intraoperative Ventilation/Perfusion Mismatch and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 141:693-706. [PMID: 38768389 PMCID: PMC11389881 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pulmonary complications can increase hospital length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Although many factors can increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, it is not known whether intraoperative ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch can be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after major noncardiac surgery. METHODS This study enrolled patients undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery and evaluated intraoperative V/Q distribution using the automatic lung parameter estimator technique. The assessment was done after anesthesia induction, after 1 h from surgery start, and at the end of surgery. Demographic and procedural information were collected, and intraoperative ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at each timepoint. Patients were followed up for 7 days after surgery and assessed daily for postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence. RESULTS The study enrolled 101 patients with a median age of 71 [62 to 77] years, a body mass index of 25 [22.4 to 27.9] kg/m2, and a preoperative Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score of 41 [34 to 47]. Of these patients, 29 (29%) developed postoperative pulmonary complications, mainly acute respiratory failure (23%) and pleural effusion (11%). Patients with and without postoperative pulmonary complications did not differ in levels of shunt at T1 (postoperative pulmonary complications: 22.4% [10.4 to 35.9%] vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications:19.3% [9.4 to 24.1%]; P = 0.18) or during the protocol, whereas significantly different levels of high V/Q ratio were found during surgery (postoperative pulmonary complications: 13 [11 to 15] mmHg vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications: 10 [8 to 13.5] mmHg; P = 0.007) and before extubation (postoperative pulmonary complications: 13 [11 to 14] mmHg vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications: 10 [8 to 12] mmHg; P = 0.006). After adjusting for age, ARISCAT, body mass index, smoking, fluid balance, anesthesia type, laparoscopic procedure and surgery duration, high V/Q ratio before extubation was independently associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 1.147; 95% CI, 1.021 to 1.289; P = 0.02). The sensitivity analysis showed an E-value of 1.35 (CI, 1.11). CONCLUSIONS In patients with intermediate or high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications undergoing major noncardiac surgery, intraoperative V/Q mismatch is associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Increased high V/Q ratio before extubation is independently associated with the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first 7 days after surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Scaramuzzo
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Dan Stieper Karbing
- Respiratory and Critical Care Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Vigolo
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Martina Frizziero
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Ragazzi
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marco Verri
- Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Stephen Edward Rees
- Respiratory and Critical Care Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Carlo Alberto Volta
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Savino Spadaro
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bokerd S, Suwanruangsri V, Chinchalongporn W, Chanchitsopon V. Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Fascia iliaca block versus general anesthesia, a retrospective study. Vascular 2024:17085381241273306. [PMID: 39121914 DOI: 10.1177/17085381241273306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to compare rates of perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially pulmonary complication, between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed under general anesthesia (GA) and under fascia iliaca block (FIB). METHODS Patients diagnosed with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who were treated with EVAR were included. Retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative results including mortality and morbidity within 30 days were collected. Statistical analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between EVAR under FIB and EVAR under GA was performed. A univariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with increased 30-day mortality. RESULTS This study included 119 patients, 75 in the FIB group and 44 in the GA group. Most patients were male, with 62 (82.5%) in the FIB group and 31 (70.2%) in the GA group, and most patients were hypertensive, with 57 (76%) in the FIB group and 36 (81.8%) in the GA group. Smoking and coronary artery disease (CAD) was more prevalent in the FIB group, p < .05. Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different between the FIB group and the GA group (1 (1.3%) vs 2 (4.5%), p = .554). Pulmonary complication was lower in the FIB group than in the GA group (1.3% vs 11.4%, p = .026). ICU stay was shorter in the FIB group than in the GA group (0.2 vs 4.5 days, p = .012). Univariate analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was associated with higher 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular aneurysm repair under FIB was feasible. Compared to GA, this approach resulted in lower postoperative pulmonary complications and shorter ICU stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surakiat Bokerd
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Veera Suwanruangsri
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Wanchai Chinchalongporn
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Virapat Chanchitsopon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ratajczak N, Munoz-Acuna R, Redaelli S, Suleiman A, Seibold EL, von Wedel D, Shay D, Ashrafian S, Chen G, Sundar E, Ahrens E, Wachtendorf LJ, Schaefer MS. Increased Postoperative Opioid Consumption in the Presence of Coadministration of 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 3 Antagonists with Acetaminophen: A Hospital Registry Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 141:326-337. [PMID: 38700445 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acetaminophen and 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are administered as standard prophylaxes for postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Preclinical studies, however, suggest that 5-HT3 antagonists may compromise acetaminophen's analgesic effect. This hospital registry study investigates whether 5-HT3 antagonists mitigate the analgesic effect of prophylactic acetaminophen in a perioperative setting. METHODS This study included 55,016 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for ambulatory procedures at a tertiary healthcare center in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022. Using binary exposure variables and a comprehensive selection of preplanned patient- and procedure-related covariates for confounder control, the authors investigated whether intraoperative 5-HT3 antagonists affected the association between pre- or intraoperative acetaminophen and postoperative opioid consumption, gauged by opioid dose in milligram oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered in the postanesthesia care unit. A multivariable, zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was applied. RESULTS A total of 3,166 patients (5.8%) received only acetaminophen, 15,438 (28.1%) only 5-HT3 antagonists, 31,850 (57.9%) both drugs, and 4,562 (8.3%) neither drug. The median postanesthesia care unit opioid dose was 7.5 mg OME (interquartile range, 7.5 to 14.3 mg OME) among 16,640 of 55,016 (30.2%) patients who received opioids, and the mean opioid dose was 3.2 mg OME across all patients (maximum cumulative dose, 20.4 mg OME). Acetaminophen administration was associated with a -5.5% (95% CI, -9.6 to -1.4%; P = 0.009; adjusted absolute difference, -0.19 mg OME; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.05; P = 0.009) reduction in opioid consumption among patients who did not receive a 5-HT3 antagonist, while there was no effect in patients who received a 5-HT3 antagonist (adjusted absolute difference, 0.00 mg OME; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.05; P = 0.93; P for interaction = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS A dose-dependent association of pre- or intraoperative acetaminophen with decreased postoperative opioid consumption was not observed when 5-HT3 antagonists were coadministered, suggesting that physicians might consider reserving 5-HT3 antagonists as rescue medication for postoperative nausea or vomiting when acetaminophen is administered for pain prophylaxis. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Ratajczak
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Eva-Lotte Seibold
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dario von Wedel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Denys Shay
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Ashrafian
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eswar Sundar
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aşar S, Rahim F, Rahimi P, Acicbe Ö, Tontu F, Çukurova Z. Novel Oxygenation and Saturation Indices for Mortality Prediction in COVID-19 ARDS Patients: The Impact of Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power. J Intensive Care Med 2024; 39:595-608. [PMID: 38179691 PMCID: PMC11092301 DOI: 10.1177/08850666231223498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Background: The oxygenation index (OI) and oxygen saturation index (OSI) are proven mortality predictors in pediatric and adult patients, traditionally using mean airway pressure (Pmean). We introduce novel indices, replacing Pmean with DP (ΔPinsp), MPdyn, and MPtot, assessing their potential for predicting COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) mortality, comparing them to traditional indices. Methods: We studied 361 adult COVID-19 ARDS patients for 7 days, collecting ΔPinsp, MPdyn, and MPtot, OI-ΔPinsp, OI-MPdyn, OI-MPtot, OSI-ΔPinsp, OSI-MPdyn, and OSI-MPtot. We compared these in surviving and non-surviving patients over the first 7 intensive care unit (ICU) days using Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed AUC and CI values for ICU mortality on day three. We determined cut-off values using Youden's method and conducted multivariate Cox regression on parameter limits. Results: All indices showed significant differences between surviving and non-surviving patients on the third day of ICU care. The AUC values of OI-ΔPinsp were significantly higher than those of P/F and OI-Pmean (P values .0002 and <.0001, respectively). Similarly, AUC and CI values of OSI-ΔPinsp and OSI-MPdyn were significantly higher than those of SpO2/FiO2 and OSI-Pmean values (OSI-ΔPinsp: P < .0001, OSI-MPdyn: P values .047 and .028, respectively). OI-ΔPinsp, OSI-ΔPinsp, OI-MPdyn, OSI-MPdyn, OI-MPtot, and OSI-MPtot had AUC values of 0.72, 0.71, 0.69, 0.68, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively, with cut-off values associated with hazard ratios and P values of 7.06 (HR = 1.84, P = .002), 8.04 (HR = 2.00, P ≤ .0001), 7.12 (HR = 1.68, P = .001), 5.76 (HR = 1.70, P ≤ .0001), 10.43 (HR = 1.52, P = .006), and 10.68 (HR = 1.66, P = .001), respectively. Conclusions: Critical values of all indices were associated to higher ICU mortality rates and extended mechanical ventilation durations. The OI-ΔPinsp, OSI-ΔPinsp, and OSI-MPdyn indices displayed the strongest predictive capabilities for ICU mortality. These novel indices offer valuable insights for intensivists in the clinical management and decision-making process for ARDS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinan Aşar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bakırköy Dr SadiKonuk Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Rahim
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Payam Rahimi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bakırköy Dr SadiKonuk Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Özlem Acicbe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Şişli HamidiyeEtfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Furkan Tontu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ağrı Training and Research Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
| | - Zafer Çukurova
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bakırköy Dr SadiKonuk Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu HM, Zhang GW, Yu H, Li XF, Yu H. Association between mechanical power during one-lung ventilation and pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lung resection surgery: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:176. [PMID: 38760677 PMCID: PMC11100229 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of mechanical power on pulmonary outcomes after thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation was unclear. We investigated the association between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection surgery. METHODS In this single-center, prospective observational study, 622 patients scheduled for thoracoscopic lung resection surgery were included. Volume control mode with lung protective ventilation strategies were implemented in all participants. The primary endpoint was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications during hospital stay. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between mechanical power and outcomes. RESULTS The incidence of pulmonary complications after surgery during hospital stay was 24.6% (150 of 609 patients). The multivariable analysis showed that there was no link between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection with standardized lung-protective ventilation, no association was found between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: ChiCTR2200058528, date of registration: April 10, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Mei Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
- West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Gong-Wei Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China (Airport) Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610072, China
| | - Hong Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xue-Fei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hai Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yoon S, Nam JS, Blank RS, Ahn HJ, Park M, Kim H, Kim HJ, Choi H, Kang HU, Lee DK, Ahn J. Association of Mechanical Energy and Power with Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lung Resection Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Data. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:920-934. [PMID: 38109657 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical power (MP), the rate of mechanical energy (ME) delivery, is a recently introduced unifying ventilator parameter consisting of tidal volume, airway pressures, and respiratory rates, which predicts pulmonary complications in several clinical contexts. However, ME has not been previously studied in the perioperative context, and neither parameter has been studied in the context of thoracic surgery utilizing one-lung ventilation. METHODS The relationships between ME variables and postoperative pulmonary complications were evaluated in this post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter randomized clinical trial of lung resection surgery conducted between 2020 and 2021 (n = 1,170). Time-weighted average MP and ME (the area under the MP time curve) were obtained for individual patients. The primary analysis was the association of time-weighted average MP and ME with pulmonary complications within 7 postoperative days. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationships between energy variables and the primary outcome. RESULTS In 1,055 patients analyzed, pulmonary complications occurred in 41% (431 of 1,055). The median (interquartile ranges) ME and time-weighted average MP in patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications versus those who did not were 1,146 (811 to 1,530) J versus 924 (730 to 1,240) J (P < 0.001), and 6.9 (5.5 to 8.7) J/min versus 6.7 (5.2 to 8.5) J/min (P = 0.091), respectively. ME was independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (ORadjusted, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.80]; P = 0.001). However, the association between time-weighted average MP and postoperative pulmonary complications was time-dependent, and time-weighted average MP was significantly associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in cases utilizing longer periods of mechanical ventilation (210 min or greater; ORadjusted, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93]; P = 0.007). Normalization of ME and time-weighted average MP either to predicted body weight or to respiratory system compliance did not alter these associations. CONCLUSIONS ME and, in cases requiring longer periods of mechanical ventilation, MP were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, University of Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Sik Nam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Randal S Blank
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Hyun Joo Ahn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - MiHye Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Heezoo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Jin Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hoon Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun-Uk Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Do-Kyeong Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joonghyun Ahn
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Data Science Research Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gama de Abreu M, Costa ELV. Mechanical Energy and Power: Time to Incorporate Them into Routine Monitoring of Mechanical Ventilation? Anesthesiology 2024; 140:877-880. [PMID: 38592353 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Division of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Outcomes Research Consortium, and Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Integrated Hospital-Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Munoz-Acuna R, Tartler TM, Azizi BA, Suleiman A, Ahrens E, Wachtendorf LJ, Linhardt FC, Chen G, Tung P, Waks JW, Schaefer MS, Sehgal S. Recovery and safety with prolonged high-frequency jet ventilation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A hospital registry study from a New England healthcare network. J Clin Anesth 2024; 93:111324. [PMID: 38000222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To investigate post-procedural recovery as well as peri-procedural respiratory and hemodynamic safety parameters with prolonged use of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) versus conventional ventilation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. DESIGN Hospital registry study. SETTING Tertiary academic teaching hospital in New England. PATIENTS 1822 patients aged 18 years and older undergoing catheter ablation between January 2013 and June 2020. INTERVENTIONS HFJV versus conventional mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. In secondary analyses we assessed the effect of HFJV on intra-procedural hypoxemia, defined as the occurrence of peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) <90%, post-procedural respiratory complications (PRC) as well as intra-procedural hypocarbia and hypotension. Multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for patient and procedural characteristics, were applied. MAIN RESULTS 1157 patients (63%) received HFJV for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of 307 (253-360) minutes. The median (IQR) length of stay in the PACU was 244 (172-370) minutes in patients who underwent ablation with conventional mechanical ventilation and 226 (163-361) minutes in patients receiving HFJV. In adjusted analyses, patients undergoing HFJV had a longer PACU length of stay (adjusted absolute difference: 37.7 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7-65.8; p = 0.008). There was a higher risk of intra-procedural hypocarbia (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 5.90; 95%CI 2.63-13.23; p < 0.001) and hypotension (ORadj 1.88; 95%CI 1.31-2.72; p = 0.001) in patients undergoing HFJV. No association was found between the use of HFJV and intra-procedural hypoxemia or PRC (p = 0.51, and p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSION After confounder adjustment, HFJV for catheter ablation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation was associated with a longer length of stay in the PACU. It was further associated with an increased risk of intra-procedural abnormalities including abnormal carbon dioxide homeostasis, as well as intra-procedural arterial hypotension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Basit A Azizi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Queen Rania St, Amman, Jordan, 11942, Jordan.
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Felix C Linhardt
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Patricia Tung
- Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Jonathan W Waks
- Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
| | - Sankalp Sehgal
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Golino G, Forin E, Boni E, Martin M, Perbellini G, Rizzello V, Toniolo A, Danzi V. Secondary pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 patient: A case managed with VV-ECMO. IDCases 2024; 36:e01956. [PMID: 38681081 PMCID: PMC11047182 DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2024.e01956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Air leak syndrome, including pneumomediastinum (PM), pneumopericardium, pneumothorax, or subcutaneous emphysema, is primarily caused by chest trauma, cardiothoracic surgery, esophageal perforation, and mechanical ventilation. Secondary pneumomediastinum (SP) is a rare complication, with a much lower incidence reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our patient was a 44-year-old nonsmoker male with a previous history of obesity (Body Mass Index [BMI] 35 kg/m2), hyperthyroidism, hypokinetic cardiopathy and atrial fibrillation in treatment with flecainide, who presented to the emergency department with 6 days of fever, cough, dyspnea, and respiratory distress. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed based on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). After initiation of mechanical ventilation, a chest computed tomography (CT) on the first day revealed bilateral multifocal ground-glass opacities, consolidation and an extensive SP and pneumoperitoneum. Our therapeutic strategy was initiation of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) as a bridge to recovery after positioning 2 drains (mediastinal and pleural), for both oxygenation and carbon dioxide clearance, to allow protective and ultra-protective ventilation to limit ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and the intensity of mechanical power for lung recovery. After another chest CT scan which showed a clear reduction of the PM, 2 pronation and neuromuscular relaxation cycles were also required, with improvement of gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. On the 15th day, lung function recovered and the patient was then weaned from VV-ECMO, and ultimately made a good recovery and was discharged. In conclusion, SP may be a reflection of extensive alveolar damage and should be considered as a potential predictive factor for adverse outcome in critically ill SARS-CoV2 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianlorenzo Golino
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forin
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Elisa Boni
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Marina Martin
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Guido Perbellini
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Veronica Rizzello
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Anna Toniolo
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| | - Vinicio Danzi
- Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vicenza 36100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abram J, Spraider P, Wagner J, Putzer G, Ranalter M, Rinner S, Lindner AK, Glodny B, Hell T, Barnes T, Enk D, Martini J. Individualised flow-controlled ventilation reduces applied mechanical power and improves ventilation efficiency in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension model. Intensive Care Med Exp 2024; 12:27. [PMID: 38451347 PMCID: PMC10920549 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-024-00608-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and effects of individualised flow-controlled ventilation (FCV), based on compliance guided pressure settings, compared to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) model. The primary aim of this study was to investigate oxygenation. Secondary aims were to assess respiratory and metabolic variables and lung tissue aeration. METHODS Pigs were randomly assigned to FCV (n = 9) and PCV (n = 9). IAH was induced by insufflation of air into the abdomen to induce IAH grades ranging from 0 to 3. At each IAH grade FCV was undertaken using compliance guided pressure settings, or PCV (n = 9) was undertaken with the positive end-expiratory pressure titrated for maximum compliance and the peak pressure set to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg. Gas exchange, ventilator settings and derived formulas were recorded at two timepoints for each grade of IAH. Lung aeration was assessed by a computed tomography scan at IAH grade 3. RESULTS All 18 pigs (median weight 54 kg [IQR 51-67]) completed the observation period of 4 h. Oxygenation was comparable at each IAH grade, but a significantly lower minute volume was required to secure normocapnia in FCV at all IAH grades (7.6 vs. 14.4, MD - 6.8 (95% CI - 8.5 to - 5.2) l/min; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction of applied mechanical power being most evident at IAH grade 3 (25.9 vs. 57.6, MD - 31.7 (95% CI - 39.7 to - 23.7) J/min; p < 0.001). Analysis of Hounsfield unit distribution of the computed tomography scans revealed a significant reduction in non- (5 vs. 8, MD - 3 (95% CI - 6 to 0) %; p = 0.032) and poorly-aerated lung tissue (7 vs. 15, MD - 6 (95% CI - 13 to - 3) %, p = 0.002) for FCV. Concomitantly, normally-aerated lung tissue was significantly increased (84 vs. 76, MD 8 (95% CI 2 to 15) %; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Individualised FCV showed similar oxygenation but required a significantly lower minute volume for CO2-removal, which led to a remarkable reduction of applied mechanical power. Additionally, there was a shift from non- and poorly-aerated lung tissue to normally-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Abram
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Patrick Spraider
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Julian Wagner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gabriel Putzer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Manuela Ranalter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sarah Rinner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Bernhard Glodny
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias Hell
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tom Barnes
- Professor Emeritus, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Dietmar Enk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Judith Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
von Wedel D, Redaelli S, Suleiman A, Wachtendorf LJ, Fosset M, Santer P, Shay D, Munoz-Acuna R, Chen G, Talmor D, Jung B, Baedorf-Kassis EN, Schaefer MS. Adjustments of Ventilator Parameters during Operating Room-to-ICU Transition and 28-Day Mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 209:553-562. [PMID: 38190707 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202307-1168oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategies have been proven beneficial in the operating room (OR) and the ICU. However, differential practices in ventilator management persist, often resulting in adjustments of ventilator parameters when transitioning patients from the OR to the ICU. Objectives: To characterize patterns of ventilator adjustments during the transition of mechanically ventilated surgical patients from the OR to the ICU and assess their impact on 28-day mortality. Methods: Hospital registry study including patients undergoing general anesthesia with continued, controlled mechanical ventilation in the ICU between 2008 and 2022. Ventilator parameters were assessed 1 hour before and 6 hours after the transition. Measurements and Main Results: Of 2,103 patients, 212 (10.1%) died within 28 days. Upon OR-to-ICU transition, VT and driving pressure decreased (-1.1 ml/kg predicted body weight [IQR, -2.0 to -0.2]; P < 0.001; and -4.3 cm H2O [-8.2 to -1.2]; P < 0.001). Concomitantly, respiratory rates increased (+5.0 breaths/min [2.0 to 7.5]; P < 0.001), resulting overall in slightly higher mechanical power (MP) in the ICU (+0.7 J/min [-1.9 to 3.0]; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, increases in MP were associated with a higher 28-day mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.14; P < 0.001; adjusted risk difference, 0.7%; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.0, both per 1 J/min). Conclusion: During transition of mechanically ventilated patients from the OR to the ICU, ventilator adjustments resulting in higher MP were associated with a greater risk of 28-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario von Wedel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
| | - Maxime Fosset
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- Medical Intensive Care Unit and PhyMedExp, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Peter Santer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
| | - Denys Shay
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
| | - Boris Jung
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Medical Intensive Care Unit and PhyMedExp, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Elias N Baedorf-Kassis
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, and
- Department of Anesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Elefterion B, Cirenei C, Kipnis E, Cailliau E, Bruandet A, Tavernier B, Lamer A, Lebuffe G. Intraoperative Mechanical Power and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Noncardiothoracic Elective Surgery Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:399-408. [PMID: 38011027 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pulmonary complications is a major issue that affects outcomes of surgical patients. The hypothesis was that the intraoperative ventilation parameters are associated with occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Lille University Hospital, France. The study included 33,701 adults undergoing noncardiac, nonthoracic elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between January 2010 and December 2019. Intraoperative ventilation parameters were compared between patients with and without one or more postoperative pulmonary complications (respiratory infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, and aspiration pneumonitis) within 7 days of surgery. RESULTS Among 33,701 patients, 2,033 (6.0%) had one or more postoperative pulmonary complications. The lower tidal volume to predicted body weight ratio (odds ratio per -1 ml·kgPBW-1, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.14; P < 0.001), higher mechanical power (odds ratio per 4 J·min-1, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.49; P < 0.001), dynamic respiratory system compliance less than 30 ml·cm H2O (1.30; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.46; P < 0.001), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 96% (odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.96; P < 0.001), and lower end-tidal carbon dioxide (odds ratio per -3 mmHg, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P = 0.023) were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients with postoperative pulmonary complications were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 6.6 to 10.1; P < 0.001), had longer hospital length of stay (subhazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.45), and higher in-hospital (subhazard ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 4.1 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and 1-yr mortality (subhazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.33 to 3.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the study's population, decreased rather than increased tidal volume, decreased compliance, increased mechanical power, and decreased end-tidal carbon dioxide were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Elefterion
- Lille University Hospital, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lille, France
| | - Cedric Cirenei
- Lille University Hospital, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lille, France
| | - Eric Kipnis
- Lille University Hospital, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lille, France
| | - Emeline Cailliau
- Lille University Hospital, Biostatistics Department, Lille, France
| | - Amélie Bruandet
- Lille University Hospital, Medical Information Department, Lille, France
| | - Benoit Tavernier
- Lille University Hospital, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lille, France; and Lille University F-59000, ULR 2694-METRICS: Health Technology Assessment and Medical Practices Evaluation, Lille, France
| | - Antoine Lamer
- Lille University, Lille University Hospital, ULR 2694-METRICS: Health Technology Assessment and Medical Practices Evaluation, Lille, France
| | - Gilles Lebuffe
- Lille University Hospital, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lille, France: Lille University F-59000, ULR 7365-Research Group on Injectable Forms and Associated Technologies, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
El-Khatib M, Zeeni C, Shebbo FM, Karam C, Safi B, Toukhtarian A, Nafeh NA, Mkhayel S, Shadid CA, Chalhoub S, Beresian J. Intraoperative mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications in low-risk surgical patients: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:82. [PMID: 38413871 PMCID: PMC10898029 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02449-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Mechanical power (MP) was shown to be a valuable indicator for MV outcomes in critical care patients. The aim of this study is to assess the association between intraoperative MP in low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia and PPCs. METHODS Two-hundred eighteen low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative mechanical ventilatory support parameters were collected for all patients. Postoperatively, patients were followed throughout their hospital stay and up to seven days post discharge for the occurrence of any PPCs. RESULTS Out of 218 patients, 35% exhibited PPCs. The average body mass index, tidal volume per ideal body weight, peak inspiratory pressure, and MP were significantly higher in the patients with PPCs than in the patients without PPCs (30.3 ± 8.1 kg/m2 vs. 26.8 ± 4.9 kg.m2, p < 0.001; 9.1 ± 1.9 ml/kg vs. 8.6 ± 1.4 ml/kg, p = 0.02; 20 ± 4.9 cmH2O vs. 18 ± 3.7 cmH2O, p = 0.001; 12.9 ± 4.5 J/min vs. 11.1 ± 3.7 J/min, p = 0.002). A multivariable regression analysis revealed MP as the sole significant predictor for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications [OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2, p = 0.036]. CONCLUSIONS High intraoperative mechanical power is a risk factor for developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Furthermore, intraoperative mechanical power is superior to other traditional mechanical ventilation variables in identifying surgical patients who are at risk for developing postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03551899; 24/02/2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad El-Khatib
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Carine Zeeni
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Fadia M Shebbo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Cynthia Karam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Bilal Safi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Aline Toukhtarian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Nancy Abou Nafeh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Samar Mkhayel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Carol Abi Shadid
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Sana Chalhoub
- Department of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jean Beresian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO-Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mounier R, Diop S, Kallel H, Constantin JM, Roujansky A. Tidal volume in mechanically ventilated patients: Searching for Cinderella's shoe rather than 6 mL/kg for all. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2024; 43:101356. [PMID: 38365168 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- R Mounier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France; Université Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U955, Équipe 15, Institut Mondor de la Recherche Biomédicale, Université Paris-Est-Créteil, France.
| | - S Diop
- Department of Anesthesiology, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France; Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - H Kallel
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, French Guiana; Tropical Biome et Immunopathologie CNRS UMR-9017, Inserm U 1019, Université de Guyane, French Guiana
| | - J M Constantin
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Paris, France
| | - A Roujansky
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, French Guiana; Tropical Biome et Immunopathologie CNRS UMR-9017, Inserm U 1019, Université de Guyane, French Guiana
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Scharffenberg M, Mandelli M, Bluth T, Simonassi F, Wittenstein J, Teichmann R, Birr K, Kiss T, Ball L, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ, Gama de Abreu M, Huhle R. Respiratory mechanics and mechanical power during low vs. high positive end-expiratory pressure in obese surgical patients - A sub-study of the PROBESE randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2024; 92:111242. [PMID: 37833194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We aimed to characterize intra-operative mechanical ventilation with low or high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres (RM) regarding intra-tidal recruitment/derecruitment and overdistension using non-linear respiratory mechanics, and mechanical power in obese surgical patients enrolled in the PROBESE trial. DESIGN Prospective, two-centre substudy of the international, multicentre, two-arm, randomized-controlled PROBESE trial. SETTING Operating rooms of two European University Hospitals. PATIENTS Forty-eight adult obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS Intra-operative protective ventilation with either PEEP of 12 cmH2O and repeated RM (HighPEEP+RM) or 4 cmH2O without RM (LowPEEP). MEASUREMENTS The index of intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment and overdistension (%E2) as well as airway pressure, tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), resistance, elastance, and mechanical power (MP) were calculated from respiratory signals recorded after anesthesia induction, 1 h thereafter, and end of surgery (EOS). MAIN RESULTS Twenty-four patients were analyzed in each group. PEEP was higher (mean ± SD, 11.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6 cmH2O, P < 0.001) and driving pressure lower (12.8 ± 3.5 vs. 21.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O, P < 0.001) during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP, while VT and RR did not differ significantly (7.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8 ml∙kg-1, P = 0.835; and 14.6 ± 2.5 vs. 15.7 ± 2.0 min-1, P = 0.150, respectively). %E2 was higher in HighPEEP+RM than in LowPEEP following induction (-3.1 ± 7.2 vs. -12.4 ± 10.2%; P < 0.001) and subsequent timepoints. Total resistance and elastance (13.3 ± 3.8 vs. 17.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O∙l∙s-2, P = 0.009; and 15.7 ± 5.5 vs. 28.5 ± 8.4 cmH2O∙l, P < 0.001, respectively) were lower during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP. Additionally, MP was lower in HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP group (5.0 ± 2.2 vs. 10.4 ± 4.7 J∙min-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this sub-cohort of PROBESE, intra-operative ventilation with high PEEP and RM reduced intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment as well as driving pressure, elastance, resistance, and mechanical power, as compared with low PEEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION The PROBESE study was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov, identifier: NCT02148692 (submission for registration on May 23, 2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Scharffenberg
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Maura Mandelli
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16131 Genoa, Italy
| | - Thomas Bluth
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Francesca Simonassi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16131 Genoa, Italy
| | - Jakob Wittenstein
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Teichmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Katharina Birr
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Kiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive-, Pain- and Palliative Care Medicine, Radebeul Hospital, Academic Hospital of the Technische Universität Dresden, Heinrich-Zille-Strasse 13, 01445 Radebeul, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16131 Genoa, Italy; Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16131 Genoa, Italy; Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care & Anesthesiology (L E I C A), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA; Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA.
| | - Robert Huhle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rubulotta F, Blanch Torra L, Naidoo KD, Aboumarie HS, Mathivha LR, Asiri AY, Sarlabous Uranga L, Soussi S. Mechanical Ventilation, Past, Present, and Future. Anesth Analg 2024; 138:308-325. [PMID: 38215710 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation (MV) has played a crucial role in the medical field, particularly in anesthesia and in critical care medicine (CCM) settings. MV has evolved significantly since its inception over 70 years ago and the future promises even more advanced technology. In the past, ventilation was provided manually, intermittently, and it was primarily used for resuscitation or as a last resort for patients with severe respiratory or cardiovascular failure. The earliest MV machines for prolonged ventilatory support and oxygenation were large and cumbersome. They required a significant amount of skills and expertise to operate. These early devices had limited capabilities, battery, power, safety features, alarms, and therefore these often caused harm to patients. Moreover, the physiology of MV was modified when mechanical ventilators moved from negative pressure to positive pressure mechanisms. Monitoring systems were also very limited and therefore the risks related to MV support were difficult to quantify, predict and timely detect for individual patients who were necessarily young with few comorbidities. Technology and devices designed to use tracheostomies versus endotracheal intubation evolved in the last century too and these are currently much more reliable. In the present, positive pressure MV is more sophisticated and widely used for extensive period of time. Modern ventilators use mostly positive pressure systems and are much smaller, more portable than their predecessors, and they are much easier to operate. They can also be programmed to provide different levels of support based on evolving physiological concepts allowing lung-protective ventilation. Monitoring systems are more sophisticated and knowledge related to the physiology of MV is improved. Patients are also more complex and elderly compared to the past. MV experts are informed about risks related to prolonged or aggressive ventilation modalities and settings. One of the most significant advances in MV has been protective lung ventilation, diaphragm protective ventilation including noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Health care professionals are familiar with the use of MV and in many countries, respiratory therapists have been trained for the exclusive purpose of providing safe and professional respiratory support to critically ill patients. Analgo-sedation drugs and techniques are improved, and more sedative drugs are available and this has an impact on recovery, weaning, and overall patients' outcome. Looking toward the future, MV is likely to continue to evolve and improve alongside monitoring techniques and sedatives. There is increasing precision in monitoring global "patient-ventilator" interactions: structure and analysis (asynchrony, desynchrony, etc). One area of development is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in ventilator technology. AI can be used to monitor patients in real-time, and it can predict when a patient is likely to experience respiratory distress. This allows medical professionals to intervene before a crisis occurs, improving patient outcomes and reducing the need for emergency intervention. This specific area of development is intended as "personalized ventilation." It involves tailoring the ventilator settings to the individual patient, based on their physiology and the specific condition they are being treated for. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes by optimizing ventilation and reducing the risk of harm. In conclusion, MV has come a long way since its inception, and it continues to play a critical role in anesthesia and in CCM settings. Advances in technology have made MV safer, more effective, affordable, and more widely available. As technology continues to improve, more advanced and personalized MV will become available, leading to better patients' outcomes and quality of life for those in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Rubulotta
- From the Department of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lluis Blanch Torra
- Department of Critical Care, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kuban D Naidoo
- Division of Critical Care, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Hatem Soliman Aboumarie
- Department of Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lufuno R Mathivha
- Department of Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Mechanical Circulatory Support, The Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand
| | - Abdulrahman Y Asiri
- Department of Internal Medicine and Critical Care, King Khalid University Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University
| | - Leonardo Sarlabous Uranga
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sabri Soussi
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto
- UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Université de Paris Cité, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tartler TM, Ahrens E, Munoz-Acuna R, Azizi BA, Chen G, Suleiman A, Wachtendorf LJ, Costa ELV, Talmor DS, Amato MBP, Baedorf-Kassis EN, Schaefer MS. High Mechanical Power and Driving Pressures are Associated With Postoperative Respiratory Failure Independent From Patients' Respiratory System Mechanics. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:68-79. [PMID: 37695139 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES High mechanical power and driving pressure (ΔP) have been associated with postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) and may be important parameters guiding mechanical ventilation. However, it remains unclear whether high mechanical power and ΔP merely reflect patients with poor respiratory system mechanics at risk of PRF. We investigated the effect of mechanical power and ΔP on PRF in cohorts after exact matching by patients' baseline respiratory system compliance. DESIGN Hospital registry study. SETTING Academic hospital in New England. PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia between 2008 and 2020. INTERVENTION None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary exposure was high (≥ 6.7 J/min, cohort median) versus low mechanical power and the key-secondary exposure was high (≥ 15.0 cm H 2 O) versus low ΔP. The primary endpoint was PRF (reintubation or unplanned noninvasive ventilation within seven days). Among 97,555 included patients, 4,030 (4.1%) developed PRF. In adjusted analyses, high intraoperative mechanical power and ΔP were associated with higher odds of PRF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.50]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.45 [95% CI, 1.31-1.60]; p < 0.001, respectively). There was large variability in applied ventilatory parameters, dependent on the anesthesia provider. This facilitated matching of 63,612 (mechanical power cohort) and 53,260 (ΔP cohort) patients, yielding identical baseline standardized respiratory system compliance (standardized difference [SDiff] = 0.00) with distinctly different mechanical power (9.4 [2.4] vs 4.9 [1.3] J/min; SDiff = -2.33) and ΔP (19.3 [4.1] vs 11.9 [2.1] cm H 2 O; SDiff = -2.27). After matching, high mechanical power and ΔP remained associated with higher risk of PRF (aOR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.17-1.45]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12-1.46]; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS High mechanical power and ΔP are associated with PRF independent of patient's baseline respiratory system compliance. Our findings support utilization of these parameters for titrating mechanical ventilation in the operating room and ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Basit A Azizi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eduardo L V Costa
- Divisão de Pneumologia, Cardiopulmonary Department, Heart Institute (INCOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel S Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marcelo B P Amato
- Divisão de Pneumologia, Cardiopulmonary Department, Heart Institute (INCOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Elias N Baedorf-Kassis
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ofoma UR. Mechanical Power and Safer Lung Ventilation: Not Ready for Prime Time. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:150-153. [PMID: 38095523 PMCID: PMC10751058 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Uchenna R Ofoma
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Spraider P, Abram J, Martini J, Putzer G, Glodny B, Hell T, Barnes T, Enk D. Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass - A single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2023; 91:111279. [PMID: 37797394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Multifactorial comparison of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in terms of oxygenation in cardiac surgery patients after chest closure. DESIGN Prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Operating theatre at an university hospital, Austria. PATIENTS Patients scheduled for elective, open, on-pump, cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to either individualized FCV (compliance guided end-expiratory and peak pressure setting) or control of PCV (compliance guided end-expiratory pressure setting and tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg) for the duration of surgery. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome measure was oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) 15 min after intraoperative chest closure. Secondary endpoints included CO2-removal assessed as required minute volume to achieve normocapnia and lung tissue aeration assessed by Hounsfield unit distribution in postoperative computed tomography scans. MAIN RESULTS Between April 2020 and April 2021 56 patients were enrolled and 50 included in the primary analysis (mean age 70 years, 38 (76%) men). Oxygenation, assessed by PaO2/FiO2, was significantly higher in the FCV group (n = 24) compared to the control group (PCV, n = 26) (356 vs. 309, median difference (MD) 46 (95% CI 3 to 90) mmHg; p = 0.038). Additionally, the minute volume required to obtain normocapnia was significantly lower in the FCV group (4.0 vs. 6.1, MD -2.0 (95% CI -2.5 to -1.5) l/min; p < 0.001) and correlated with a significantly lower exposure to mechanical power (5.1 vs. 9.8, MD -5.1 (95% CI -6.2 to -4.0) J/min; p < 0.001). Evaluation of lung tissue aeration revealed a significantly reduced amount of non-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV (5 vs. 7, MD -3 (95% CI -4 to -1) %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing on-pump, cardiac surgery individualized FCV significantly improved oxygenation and lung tissue aeration compared to PCV. In addition, carbon dioxide removal was accomplished at a lower minute volume leading to reduced applied mechanical power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Spraider
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julia Abram
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Judith Martini
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Gabriel Putzer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Glodny
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias Hell
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tom Barnes
- University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, SE109LS London, United Kingdom
| | - Dietmar Enk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
O'Gara BP, Tung MG, Kennedy KF, Espinosa-Leon JP, Shaefi S, Gluck J, Raz Y, Seethala R, Reich JA, Faugno AJ, Brodie D, Garan AR, Grandin EW. Outcomes With Single-Site Dual-Lumen Versus Multisite Cannulation for Adults With COVID-19 Respiratory Failure Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:1716-1726. [PMID: 37548506 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether multisite versus single-site dual-lumen (SSDL) cannulation is associated with outcomes for COVID-19 patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). DESIGN Retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Propensity score matching (2:1 multisite vs SSDL) was used to control for confounders. PATIENTS The matched cohort included 2,628 patients (1,752 multisite, 876 SSDL) from 170 centers. The mean ( sd ) age in the entire cohort was 48 (11) years, and 3,909 (71%) were male. Patients were supported with mechanical ventilation for a median (interquartile range) of 79 (113) hours before VV-ECMO support. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was 90-day survival. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge, duration of ECMO support, days free of ECMO support at 90 days, and complication rates. MAIN RESULTS There was no difference in 90-day survival (49.4 vs 48.9%, p = 0.66), survival to hospital discharge (49.8 vs 48.2%, p = 0.44), duration of ECMO support (17.9 vs 17.1 d, p = 0.82), or hospital length of stay after cannulation (28 vs 27.4 d, p = 0.37) between multisite and SSDL groups. More SSDL patients were extubated within 24 hours (4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.001). Multisite patients had higher ECMO flows at 24 hours (4.5 vs 4.1 L/min, p < 0.001) and more ECMO-free days at 90 days (3.1 vs 2.0 d, p = 0.02). SSDL patients had higher rates of pneumothorax (13.9% vs 11%, p = 0.03). Cannula site bleeding (6.4% vs 4.7%, p = 0.03), oxygenator failure (16.7 vs 13.4%, p = 0.03), and circuit clots (5.5% vs 3.4%, p = 0.02) were more frequent in multisite patients. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study of COVID-19 patients requiring VV-ECMO, 90-day survival did not differ between patients treated with a multisite versus SSDL cannulation strategy and there were only modest differences in major complication rates. These findings do not support the superiority of either cannulation strategy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian P O'Gara
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew G Tung
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin F Kennedy
- Department of Medicine, Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Juan P Espinosa-Leon
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shahzad Shaefi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jason Gluck
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT
| | - Yuval Raz
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Raghu Seethala
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John A Reich
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony J Faugno
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Division of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - A Reshad Garan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - E Wilson Grandin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhang YY, Zhang YM, Wu SL, Wei M, Deng ZP, Lei XY, Bai YP, Wang XB. Association of mechanical power during one-lung ventilation and post-operative pulmonary complications among patients undergoing lobectomy: a protocol for a prospective cohort study. Updates Surg 2023; 75:2365-2375. [PMID: 37540406 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01595-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
The association of intra-operative mechanical power (MP) with post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) has been described before, but it is uncertain whether the potential inherent bias can limit the use of this parameter, particularly in the context of one-lung ventilation. This single-center study aims to investigate the effect of MP during one-lung ventilation (OLV), and the risks of PPCs in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. This prospective observational study is being conducted in an academic tertiary hospital in mainland China. Participants diagnosed with lung cancer, and aged 50 to 80 years are eligible. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is performed for all patients. The primary outcome is the occurrence of PPCs over 5 consecutive days after the surgery, or until discharge from the hospital. Secondary outcomes include the composite conditions of PPCs, in-hospital stay, systematic inflammation tested by blood samples, and changes in aeration compartments in the ventilated lung as assessed by CT scans. We aim to evaluate the association of mean MP and the temporal patterns in the trend of MP during OLV with the occurrence of PPCs. A total of 120 patients will be enrolled in this study. The study protocol has received approval from the Ethics Committee of the affiliated hospital of Southwest Medical University, China (Reference number: KY2022162). The findings will be made available to the funder and researchers via scientific conferences and peer-reviewed publications. This controlled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Southwest Medical University(ChiCTR2200062173), and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register website ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=172533&htm=4 , ChiCTR2200062173). A written consent was obtained from each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Ying Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25 of Taiping Street, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Mei Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25 of Taiping Street, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, People's Republic of China
| | - Song-Lin Wu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Wei
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Peng Deng
- Faculty of Computer Science, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Xian-Ying Lei
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Ping Bai
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25 of Taiping Street, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiao-Bin Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25 of Taiping Street, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rudolph MI, Azimaraghi O, Salloum E, Wachtendorf LJ, Suleiman A, Kammerer T, Schaefer MS, Eikermann M, Kiyatkin ME. Association of reintubation and hospital costs and its modification by postoperative surveillance: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Clin Anesth 2023; 91:111264. [PMID: 37722150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We estimated hospital costs associated with postoperative reintubation and tested the hypothesis that prolonged surveillance in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) modifies the hospital costs of reintubation. DESIGN Retrospective observational research study. SETTING Two tertiary care academic healthcare networks in the Bronx, New York and Boston, Massachusetts, USA. PATIENTS 68,125 adult non-cardiac surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia between 2016 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS The exposure variable was unplanned reintubation within 7 days of surgery. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was direct hospital costs associated with patient care related activities. We used a multivariable generalized linear model based on log-transformed costs data, adjusting for pre- and intraoperative confounders. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). In the key secondary analysis, we examined if prolonged postoperative surveillance, defined as PACU utilization (≥4 h) modifies the association between reintubation and costs of care. MAIN RESULTS 1759 (2.6%) of patients were re-intubated within 7 days after surgery. Reintubation was associated with higher direct hospital costs (adjusted model estimate 2.05; 95% CI: 2.00-2.10) relative to no reintubation. In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, the adjusted absolute difference (ADadj) in costs amounted to US$ 18,837 (95% CI: 17,921-19,777). The association was modified by the duration of PACU surveillance (p-for-interaction <0.001). In patients with a shorter PACU length of stay, reintubation occurred later (median of 2 days; IQR 1, 5) versus 1 days (IQR 0, 2; p < .001), and was associated with magnified effects on hospital costs compared to patients who stayed in the PACU longer (ADadj of US$ 23,444, 95% CI: 21,217-25,799 versus ADadj of US$ 17,615, 95% CI: 16,350-18,926; p < .001). CONCLUSION Postoperative reintubation is associated with 2-fold higher hospital costs. Prolonged surveillance in the recovery room mitigated this effect. The cost-saving effect of longer PACU length of stay was likely driven by earlier reintubation in patients who needed this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maíra I Rudolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Omid Azimaraghi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Elie Salloum
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Tobias Kammerer
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Dϋsseldorf University Hospital, Dϋsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Michael E Kiyatkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yessenbayeva GA, Yukhnevich YA, Khamitova ZK, Kim SI, Zhumabayev MB, Berdiyarova GS, Shalekenov SB, Mukatova IY, Yaroshetskiy AI. Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:371. [PMID: 37950169 PMCID: PMC10638810 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02337-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during laparoscopic surgery may increase oxygenation and respiratory compliance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the impact of different intraoperative PEEP strategies on arterial oxygenation, compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients. METHODS We searched RCTs in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 2012 to April 2022 comparing the different intraoperative PEEP (Low PEEP (LPEEP): 0-4 mbar; Moderate PEEP (MPEEP): 5-8 mbar; high PEEP (HPEEP): >8 mbar; individualized PEEP - iPEEP) on arterial oxygenation, respiratory compliance (Cdyn), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and predictive intervals (PI) using random-effects models. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was applied. RESULTS 21 RCTs (n = 1554) met the inclusion criteria. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased PaO2 (+ 29.38 [16.20; 42.56] mmHg, p < 0.0001) or PaO2/FiO2 (+ 36.7 [+ 2.23; +71.70] mmHg, p = 0.04). HPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2 (+ 22.00 [+ 1.11; +42.88] mmHg, p = 0.04) or PaO2/FiO2 (+ 42.7 [+ 2.74; +82.67] mmHg, p = 0.04). iPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2/FiO2 (+ 115.2 [+ 87.21; +143.20] mmHg, p < 0.001). MPEEP vs. LPEP, and HPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2 or PaO2/FiO2 significantly with different heterogeneity. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 7.87 [+ 1.49; +14.25] ml/mbar, p = 0.02). MPEEP vs. LPEEP, and HPEEP vs. MPEEP did not impact Cdyn (p = 0.14 and 0.38, respectively). iPEEP vs. LPEEP decreased driving pressure (-4.13 [-2.63; -5.63] mbar, p < 0.001). No significant differences in MAP or HR were found between any subgroups. CONCLUSION HPEEP and iPEEP during PNP in non-obese patients could promote oxygenation and increase Cdyn without clinically significant changes in MAP and HR. MPEEP could be insufficient to increase respiratory compliance and improve oxygenation. LPEEP may lead to decreased respiratory compliance and worsened oxygenation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022362379; registered October 09, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sergey I Kim
- Multidisciplinary hospitals named after Professor H.J.Makazhanov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
| | - Murat B Zhumabayev
- National Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | | | | | | | - Andrey I Yaroshetskiy
- Pulmonology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University, 8/2, Trubetskaya str. 119991, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Boesing C, Schaefer L, Schoettler JJ, Quentin A, Beck G, Thiel M, Honeck P, Kowalewski KF, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM, Luecke T, Krebs J. Effects of individualised positive end-expiratory pressure titration on respiratory and haemodynamic parameters during the Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum: A randomised crossover physiologic trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:817-825. [PMID: 37649211 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during surgery promotes dorsobasal atelectasis formation, which impairs respiratory mechanics and increases lung stress and strain. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can reduce pulmonary inhomogeneities and preserve end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), resulting in decreased inspiratory strain and improved gas-exchange. The optimal intraoperative PEEP strategy is unclear. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of individualised PEEP titration strategies on set PEEP levels and resulting transpulmonary pressures, respiratory mechanics, gas-exchange and haemodynamics during Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum. DESIGN Prospective, randomised, crossover single-centre physiologic trial. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS Thirty-six patients receiving robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. INTERVENTIONS Randomised sequence of three different PEEP strategies: standard PEEP level of 5 cmH 2 O (PEEP 5 ), PEEP titration targeting a minimal driving pressure (PEEP ΔP ) and oesophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration (PEEP Poeso ) targeting an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure ( PTP ) of 0 cmH 2 O. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was the PEEP level when set according to PEEP ΔP and PEEP Poeso compared with PEEP of 5 cmH 2 O. Secondary endpoints were respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, gas-exchange and haemodynamic parameters. RESULTS PEEP levels differed between PEEP ΔP , PEEP Poeso and PEEP5 (18.0 [16.0 to 18.0] vs. 20.0 [18.0 to 24.0]vs. 5.0 [5.0 to 5.0] cmH 2 O; P < 0.001 each). End-expiratory PTP and lung volume were lower in PEEP ΔP compared with PEEP Poeso ( P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively), but driving pressure, lung stress, as well as respiratory system and dynamic elastic power were minimised using PEEP ΔP ( P < 0.001 each). PEEP ΔP and PEEP Poeso improved gas-exchange, but PEEP Poeso resulted in lower cardiac output compared with PEEP 5 and PEEP ΔP . CONCLUSION PEEP ΔP ameliorated the effects of Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during surgery on end-expiratory PTP and lung volume, decreased driving pressure and dynamic elastic power, as well as improved gas-exchange while preserving cardiac output. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028559, date of registration 2022/04/27). https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00028559.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Boesing
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (CB, LS, JJS, AQ, GB, MT, TL, JK), Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany (PH, KFK), Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa (PP), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care - San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy (PP) and Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (PRMR)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Suleiman A, Azizi BA, Munoz-Acuna R, Ahrens E, Tartler TM, Wachtendorf LJ, Linhardt FC, Santer P, Chen G, Wilson JL, Gangadharan SP, Schaefer MS. Intensity of one-lung ventilation and postoperative respiratory failure: A hospital registry study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101250. [PMID: 37236317 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies linked a high intensity of mechanical ventilation, measured as high mechanical power (MP) to postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) in the setting of two-lung ventilation. We investigated whether a higher MP during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is associated with PRF. METHODS In this registry-based study, adult patients who underwent general anesthesia with OLV for thoracic surgeries between 2006 and 2020 at a New England tertiary healthcare network were included. The association between MP during OLV and PRF (emergency non-invasive ventilation or reintubation within seven days) was assessed in a cohort weighted through a generalized propensity score conditional on a priori defined preoperative and intraoperative factors. Dominance of components of MP and intensity of OLV versus two-lung ventilation in predicting PRF was investigated. RESULTS Out of 878 included patients, 106 (12.1%) developed PRF. The median (IQR) MP during OLV was 9.8 J/min (7.5-11.8) and 8.3 J/min (6.6-10.2) in patients with and without PRF respectively. A higher MP during OLV was associated with PRF (ORadj 1.22 per 1 J/min increase; 95%CI 1.13-1.31; p < 0.001) and characterized by a U-shaped dose-response curve, with the lowest probability of PRF (7.5%) at 6.4 J/min. Dominance analysis of PRF predictors showed a stronger contribution of driving pressure over respiratory rate and tidal volume, the dynamic over the static component of MP, and MP during OLV over two-lung ventilation (contribution to Pseudo-R2: 0.017, 0.021, and 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSION A higher intensity of OLV, mainly driven by driving pressure, is dose-dependently associated with PRF and might constitute a target for mechanical ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Basit A Azizi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix C Linhardt
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Santer
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wilson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sidhu P Gangadharan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ghiani A, Kneidinger N, Neurohr C, Frank S, Hinske LC, Schneider C, Michel S, Irlbeck M. Mechanical Power Density Predicts Prolonged Ventilation Following Double Lung Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11506. [PMID: 37799668 PMCID: PMC10548550 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) after lung transplantation poses several risks, including higher tracheostomy rates and increased in-hospital mortality. Mechanical power (MP) of artificial ventilation unifies the ventilatory variables that determine gas exchange and may be related to allograft function following transplant, affecting ventilator weaning. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive double lung transplant recipients at a national transplant center, ventilated through endotracheal tubes upon ICU admission, excluding those receiving extracorporeal support. MP and derived indexes assessed up to 36 h after transplant were correlated with invasive ventilation duration using Spearman's coefficient, and we conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the accuracy in predicting PMV (>72 h), expressed as area under the ROC curve (AUROC). PMV occurred in 82 (35%) out of 237 cases. MP was significantly correlated with invasive ventilation duration (Spearman's ρ = 0.252 [95% CI 0.129-0.369], p < 0.01), with power density (MP normalized to lung-thorax compliance) demonstrating the strongest correlation (ρ = 0.452 [0.345-0.548], p < 0.01) and enhancing PMV prediction (AUROC 0.78 [95% CI 0.72-0.83], p < 0.01) compared to MP (AUROC 0.66 [0.60-0.72], p < 0.01). Mechanical power density may help identify patients at risk for PMV after double lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ghiani
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Lung Center Stuttgart–Schillerhoehe Lung Clinic GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Hospital GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kneidinger
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Neurohr
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Lung Center Stuttgart–Schillerhoehe Lung Clinic GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Hospital GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ludwig Christian Hinske
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schneider
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Michel
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Irlbeck
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
An MZ, Xu CY, Hou YR, Li ZP, Gao TS, Zhou QH. Effect of intravenous vs. inhaled penehyclidine on respiratory mechanics in patients during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med 2023; 23:353. [PMID: 37726724 PMCID: PMC10508004 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02653-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimising postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery is of utmost importance. A major factor contributing to PPCs is the driving pressure, which is determined by the ratio of tidal volume to lung compliance. Inhalation and intravenous administration of penehyclidine can improve lung compliance during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the efficacy of inhaled vs. intravenous penehyclidine during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in mitigating driving pressure and mechanical power among patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS A double-blind, prospective, randomised study involving 176 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery was conducted. These patients were randomly divided into two groups, namely the penehyclidine inhalation group and the intravenous group before their surgery. Driving pressure was assessed at T1 (5 min after OLV), T2 (15 min after OLV), T3 (30 min after OLV), and T4 (45 min after OLV) in both groups. The primary outcome of this study was the composite measure of driving pressure during OLV. The area under the curve (AUC) of driving pressure from T1 to T4 was computed. Additionally, the secondary outcomes included mechanical power, lung compliance and the incidence of PPCs. RESULTS All 167 participants, 83 from the intravenous group and 84 from the inhalation group, completed the trial. The AUC of driving pressure for the intravenous group was 39.50 ± 9.42, while the inhalation group showed a value of 41.50 ± 8.03 (P = 0.138). The incidence of PPCs within 7 days after surgery was 27.7% in the intravenous group and 23.8% in the inhalation group (P = 0.564). No significant differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our study found that among patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery, no significant differences were observed in the driving pressure and mechanical power during OLV between those who received an intravenous injection of penehyclidine and those who inhaled it. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of PPCs between the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zi An
- Anesthesia Medicine, Jiaxing University Master Degree Cultivation Base, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of anaesthesiology, Jiaxing Chinese Medical Hospital, No. 1501, Zhongshan East Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Cheng-Yun Xu
- Anesthesia Medicine, Jiaxing University Master Degree Cultivation Base, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of anaesthesiology and pain medicine, affiliated hospital of Jiaxing University, No.1882, South Central Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yue-Ru Hou
- Anesthesia Medicine, Jiaxing University Master Degree Cultivation Base, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of anaesthesiology and pain medicine, affiliated hospital of Jiaxing University, No.1882, South Central Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhen-Ping Li
- Department of anaesthesiology and pain medicine, affiliated hospital of Jiaxing University, No.1882, South Central Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Te-Sheng Gao
- Department of anaesthesiology, Jiaxing Chinese Medical Hospital, No. 1501, Zhongshan East Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Qing-He Zhou
- Department of anaesthesiology and pain medicine, affiliated hospital of Jiaxing University, No.1882, South Central Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Takahashi K, Toyama H, Ejima Y, Yang J, Kikuchi K, Ishikawa T, Yamauchi M. Endotracheal tube, by the venturi effect, reduces the efficacy of increasing inlet pressure in improving pendelluft. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291319. [PMID: 37708106 PMCID: PMC10501657 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In mechanically ventilated severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, spontaneous inspiratory effort generates more negative pressure in the dorsal lung than in the ventral lung. The airflow caused by this pressure difference is called pendelluft, which is a possible mechanisms of patient self-inflicted lung injury. This study aimed to use computer simulation to understand how the endotracheal tube and insufficient ventilatory support contribute to pendelluft. We established two models. In the invasive model, an endotracheal tube was connected to the tracheobronchial tree with 34 outlets grouped into six locations: the right and left upper, lower, and middle lobes. In the non-invasive model, the upper airway, including the glottis, was connected to the tracheobronchial tree. To recreate the inspiratory effort of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, the lower lobe pressure was set at -13 cmH2O, while the upper and middle lobe pressure was set at -6.4 cmH2O. The inlet pressure was set from 10 to 30 cmH2O to recreate ventilatory support. Using the finite volume method, the total flow rates through each model and toward each lobe were calculated. The invasive model had half the total flow rate of the non-invasive model (1.92 L/s versus 3.73 L/s under 10 cmH2O, respectively). More pendelluft (gas flow into the model from the outlets) was observed in the invasive model than in the non-invasive model. The inlet pressure increase from 10 to 30 cmH2O decreased pendelluft by 11% and 29% in the invasive and non-invasive models, respectively. In the invasive model, a faster jet flowed from the tip of the endotracheal tube toward the lower lobes, consequently entraining gas from the upper and middle lobes. Increasing ventilatory support intensifies the jet from the endotracheal tube, causing a venturi effect at the bifurcation in the tracheobronchial tree. Clinically acceptable ventilatory support cannot completely prevent pendelluft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Takahashi
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Toyama
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ejima
- Division of Surgical Center and Supply, Sterilization, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Jinyou Yang
- Department of Biophysics, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Kenji Kikuchi
- Department of Finemechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takuji Ishikawa
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masanori Yamauchi
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tharp WG, Neilson MR, Breidenstein MW, Harned RG, Chatfield SE, Friend AF, Nunez D, Abnet KR, Farhang B, Klick JC, Horn N, Bender SP, Bates JHT, Dixon AE. Effects of obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and body position on mechanical power of intraoperative ventilation: an observational study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2023; 134:1390-1402. [PMID: 37022962 PMCID: PMC10211461 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00551.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanical power can describe the complex interaction between the respiratory system and the ventilator and may predict lung injury or pulmonary complications, but the power associated with injury of healthy human lungs is unknown. Body habitus and surgical conditions may alter mechanical power but the effects have not been measured. In a secondary analysis of an observational study of obesity and lung mechanics during robotic laparoscopic surgery, we comprehensively quantified the static elastic, dynamic elastic, and resistive energies comprising mechanical power of ventilation. We stratified by body mass index (BMI) and examined power at four surgical stages: level after intubation, with pneumoperitoneum, in Trendelenburg, and level after releasing the pneumoperitoneum. Esophageal manometry was used to estimate transpulmonary pressures. Mechanical power of ventilation and its bioenergetic components increased over BMI categories. Respiratory system and lung power were nearly doubled in subjects with class 3 obesity compared with lean at all stages. Power dissipated into the respiratory system was increased with class 2 or 3 obesity compared with lean. Increased power of ventilation was associated with decreasing transpulmonary pressures. Body habitus is a prime determinant of increased intraoperative mechanical power. Obesity and surgical conditions increase the energies dissipated into the respiratory system during ventilation. The observed elevations in power may be related to tidal recruitment or atelectasis, and point to specific energetic features of mechanical ventilation of patients with obesity that may be controlled with individualized ventilator settings.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Mechanical power describes the complex interaction between a patient's lungs and the ventilator and may be useful in predicting lung injury. However, its behavior in obesity and during dynamic surgical conditions is not understood. We comprehensively quantified ventilation bioenergetics and effects of body habitus and common surgical conditions. These data show body habitus is a prime determinant of intraoperative mechanical power and provide quantitative context for future translation toward a useful perioperative prognostic measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Tharp
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Maegan R Neilson
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Max W Breidenstein
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Ryan G Harned
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Sydney E Chatfield
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Alexander F Friend
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Denis Nunez
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Kevin R Abnet
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Borzoo Farhang
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - John C Klick
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Nathan Horn
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - S Patrick Bender
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Jason H T Bates
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| | - Anne E Dixon
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Azizi BA, Munoz-Acuna R, Suleiman A, Ahrens E, Redaelli S, Tartler TM, Chen G, Jung B, Talmor D, Baedorf-Kassis EN, Schaefer MS. Mechanical power and 30-day mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with and without Coronavirus Disease-2019: a hospital registry study. J Intensive Care 2023; 11:14. [PMID: 37024938 PMCID: PMC10077655 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-023-00662-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies linked a high intensity of ventilation, measured as mechanical power, to mortality in patients suffering from "classic" ARDS. By contrast, mechanically ventilated patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 may present with intact pulmonary mechanics while undergoing mechanical ventilation for longer periods of time. We investigated whether an association between higher mechanical power and mortality is modified by a diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS This retrospective study included critically ill, adult patients who were mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h between March 2020 and December 2021 at a tertiary healthcare facility in Boston, Massachusetts. The primary exposure was median mechanical power during the first 24 h of mechanical ventilation, calculated using a previously validated formula. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. As co-primary analysis, we investigated whether a diagnosis of COVID-19 modified the primary association. We further investigated the association between mechanical power and days being alive and ventilator free and effect modification of this by a diagnosis of COVID-19. Multivariable logistic regression, effect modification and negative binomial regression analyses adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, severity of disease and in-hospital factors, were applied. RESULTS 1,737 mechanically ventilated patients were included, 411 (23.7%) suffered from COVID-19. 509 (29.3%) died within 30 days. The median mechanical power during the first 24 h of ventilation was 19.3 [14.6-24.0] J/min in patients with and 13.2 [10.2-18.0] J/min in patients without COVID-19. A higher mechanical power was associated with 30-day mortality (ORadj 1.26 per 1-SD, 7.1J/min increase; 95% CI 1.09-1.46; p = 0.002). Effect modification and interaction analysis did not support that this association was modified by a diagnosis of COVID-19 (95% CI, 0.81-1.38; p-for-interaction = 0.68). A higher mechanical power was associated with a lower number of days alive and ventilator free until day 28 (IRRadj 0.83 per 7.1 J/min increase; 95% CI 0.75-0.91; p < 0.001, adjusted risk difference - 2.7 days per 7.1J/min increase; 95% CI - 4.1 to - 1.3). CONCLUSION A higher mechanical power is associated with elevated 30-day mortality. While patients with COVID-19 received mechanical ventilation with higher mechanical power, this association was independent of a concomitant diagnosis of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basit A Azizi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boris Jung
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elias N Baedorf-Kassis
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline Ave 330, Boston, MA, USA.
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Suleiman A, Munoz-Acuna R, Azimaraghi O, Houle TT, Chen G, Rupp S, Witt AS, Azizi BA, Ahrens E, Shay D, Wongtangman K, Wachtendorf LJ, Tartler TM, Eikermann M, Schaefer MS. The effects of sugammadex vs. neostigmine on postoperative respiratory complications and advanced healthcare utilisation: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:294-302. [PMID: 36562202 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Reversing neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex can eliminate residual paralysis, which has been associated with postoperative respiratory complications. There are equivocal data on whether sugammadex reduces these when compared with neostigmine. We investigated the association of the choice of reversal drug with postoperative respiratory complications and advanced healthcare utilisation. We included adult patients who underwent surgery and received general anaesthesia with sugammadex or neostigmine reversal at two academic healthcare networks between January 2016 and June 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative respiratory complications, defined as post-extubation oxygen saturation < 90%, respiratory failure requiring non-invasive ventilation, or tracheal re-intubation within 7 days. Our main secondary outcome was advanced healthcare utilisation, a composite outcome including: 7-day unplanned intensive care unit admission; 30-day hospital readmission; or non-home discharge. In total, 5746 (6.9%) of 83,250 included patients experienced postoperative respiratory complications. This was not associated with the reversal drug (adjusted OR (95%CI) 1.01 (0.94-1.08); p = 0.76). After excluding patients admitted from skilled nursing facilities, 8372 (10.5%) patients required advanced healthcare utilisation, which was not associated with the choice of reversal (adjusted OR (95%CI) 0.95 (0.89-1.01); p = 0.11). Equivalence testing supported an equivalent effect size of sugammadex and neostigmine on both outcomes, and neostigmine was non-inferior to sugammadex with regard to postoperative respiratory complications or advanced healthcare utilisation. Finally, there was no association between the reversal drug and major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted OR 1.07 (0.94-1.21); p = 0.32). Compared with neostigmine, reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex was not associated with a reduction in postoperative respiratory complications or post-procedural advanced healthcare utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - R Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - O Azimaraghi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, Bronx, USA
| | - T T Houle
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - G Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - S Rupp
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, Bronx, USA
| | - A S Witt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, Bronx, USA
| | - B A Azizi
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - E Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - D Shay
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, MA, Boston, USA
| | - K Wongtangman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, Bronx, USA
| | - L J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - T M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - M Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, Bronx, USA
| | - M S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tartler TM, Wachtendorf LJ, Suleiman A, Blank M, Ahrens E, Linhardt FC, Althoff FC, Chen G, Santer P, Nagrebetsky A, Eikermann M, Schaefer MS. The association of intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and nonhome discharge: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2023; 70:359-373. [PMID: 36697936 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02378-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether intraoperative ventilation using lower driving pressure decreases the risk of nonhome discharge. METHODS We conducted a historical cohort study of patients aged ≥ 60 yr who were living at home before undergoing elective, noncardiothoracic surgery at two tertiary healthcare networks in Massachusetts between 2007 and 2018. We assessed the association of the median driving pressure during intraoperative mechanical ventilation with nonhome discharge using multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for patient and procedural factors. Contingent on the primary association, we assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk and mediation by postoperative respiratory failure. RESULTS Of 87,407 included patients, 12,584 (14.4%) experienced nonhome discharge. In adjusted analyses, a lower driving pressure was associated with a lower risk of nonhome discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.93, per 10 cm H2O decrease; P < 0.001). This association was magnified in patients with a high baseline risk (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.81, per 10 cm H2O decrease, P-for-interaction < 0.001). The findings were confirmed in 19,518 patients matched for their baseline respiratory system compliance (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.00; P = 0.04 for low [< 15 cm H2O] vs high [≥ 15 cm H2O] driving pressures). A lower risk of respiratory failure mediated the association of a low driving pressure with nonhome discharge (20.8%; 95% CI, 15.0 to 56.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative ventilation maintaining lower driving pressure was associated with a lower risk of nonhome discharge, which can be partially explained by lowered rates of postoperative respiratory failure. Future randomized controlled trials should target driving pressure as a potential intervention to decrease nonhome discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Michael Blank
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix C Linhardt
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Friederike C Althoff
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Santer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Nagrebetsky
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jo YY, Chang YJ, Lee D, Kim YB, Jung J, Kwak HJ. Comparisons of Mechanical Power and Respiratory Mechanics in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation and Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020201. [PMID: 36836435 PMCID: PMC9967818 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
We compared the effects of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) on respiratory mechanics and mechanical power (MP) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopy. Fifty patients aged 65-80 years scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either the VCV group (n = 25) or the PCV group (n = 25). The ventilator had the same settings in both modes. The change in MP over time was insignificant between the groups (p = 0.911). MP significantly increased during pneumoperitoneum in both groups compared with anesthesia induction (IND). The increase in MP from IND to 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (PP30) was not different between the VCV and PCV groups. The change in driving pressure (DP) over time were significantly different between the groups during surgery, and the increase in DP from IND to PP30 was significantly higher in the VCV group than in the PCV group (both p = 0.001). Changes in MP during PCV and VCV were similar in elderly patients, and MP increased significantly during pneumoperitoneum in both groups. However, MP did not reach clinical significance (≥12 J/min). In contrast, the PCV group had a significantly lower increase in DP after pneumoperitoneum than the VCV group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hyun Jeong Kwak
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-32-460-3637; Fax: +82-32-469-6319
| |
Collapse
|