What Influences Decision-Making for Cochlear Implantation in Adults? Exploring Barriers and Drivers From a Multistakeholder Perspective

Understanding hearing health-care access in Australia: Users' perspectives

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate the barriers and enablers to current hearing health-care services in Australia for middle-aged and older adults who use cochlear implants (CI) and/or hearing aids.

METHODS

Adults aged 40 years and older from the Hearing impairment Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS), with adequate English language skills, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their hearing intervention journey. A thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts via inductive coding.

RESULTS

Thirty-one hearing device users (15 hearing aid users, 9 CI users and 7 bimodal users) across Australia enrolled in the interview. Themes identified include hearing care management, alternative support services, patient self-management and accessibility to hearing services.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicated the need for primary health and hearing care professionals to reconsider their clinical approach with individuals with hearing loss. Rehabilitation, primary health and hearing care services ought to work together to create an integrated hearing care journey for patients.

Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Hearing Loss in Patients With Limited English Proficiency

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians face challenges in managing the growing population of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) and hearing loss (HL) in the United States. This study seeks to investigate provider perspectives on evaluating, counseling, and treating HL in LEP patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

Researchers employed a mixed methods design: (1) structured clinician interviews, (2) cross-sectional, national electronic survey, both regarding perspectives on managing hearing loss in LEP patients. Structured interviews were analyzed using modified grounded theory.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine providers participated in interviews (16 otologists, 13 audiologists). The most reported non-English language was Spanish, followed by Chinese languages. Four thematic domains were derived: barriers to care, cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluation, counseling, and ideal resources. Major barriers were patient desire (97%; n = 28), and lack of validated tests (72%; n = 21). Methods of CI evaluation included improvising on validated speech perception testing (59%; n = 17) and use of non-speech evaluation (52%; n = 15). One-quarter forgoes speech testing in non-Spanish-speaking patients (24%; n = 7). Suggestions to improve management include in-person interpreters (62%; n = 18) and testing battery in all languages (31%; n = 9). National survey results (n = 87 providers) demonstrated that respondents were significantly less confident in the methods of speech perception testing and in counseling on surgical hearing rehabilitation in LEP.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians encounter challenges in managing LEP patients with HL, including limitations in audiometric and CI candidacy assessment, communication barriers, information accessibility, and cultural competency. Opportunities for improving care include developing language-specific test batteries, linguistically and culturally appropriate education materials, and cultural competency training.

The Memphis SOUND Project: The Development of a Community-Based Research Project to Address Hearing Health Disparities Among Black Adults Who Qualify for Cochlear Implants

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to introduce the concept of community-based participatory research as a means to understand barriers to cochlear implant access racially minoritized populations.

BACKGROUND

Black adults living in the United States experience unique barriers to cochlear implantation. Community-based research approaches can be used to understand and address these barriers.

APPLICATION

The Memphis SOUND Project is a community-based research initiative that seeks to address hearing health disparities by examining utilization of hearing healthcare among Black adults. Preliminary findings introduce motivators and barriers related to CI intervention in this population.

CONCLUSION

This Memphis SOUND Project provides valuable insights to the benefits of community-based research in understanding and addressing CI utilization disparities.

Impact of paediatric cochlear implantation on family life: a conceptual framework informed by parents

PURPOSE

While the impact of paediatric cochlear implantation on parents and siblings are recognised, limited evidence exists regarding the effect of paediatric cochlear implantation on the entire family life (e.g., routine interactions, family activities). This study aimed to describe the impact of paediatric cochlear implantation on family life as perceived by parents, using concept mapping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parents of paediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients (n = 29) participated in this concept mapping study to generate, group, and rate statements regarding the impact of paediatric cochlear implantation on family life.

RESULTS

In total, 99 unique statements described the impact of paediatric cochlear implantation on family life. The concept map revealed six concepts, namely (i) Financial Outlay and Supports; (ii) Education and Therapy; (iii) Responsibilities and Sacrifices; (iv) Extended Family and Community; (v) Spouses and Siblings and (vi) Achievements and Enrichments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the multiple areas of family life affected by paediatric cochlear implantation. To improve patient-and-family-centered care, these factors must be considered during pre-operative and successive counselling of paediatric CI recipients and their families.

Barriers to Cochlear Implant Uptake in Adults: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide access to sound and help mitigate the negative effects of hearing loss. As a field, we are successfully implanting more adults with greater amounts of residual hearing than ever before. Despite this, utilization remains low, which is thought to arise from barriers that are both intrinsic and extrinsic. A considerable body of literature has been published in the last 5 years on barriers to adult CI uptake, and understanding these barriers is critical to improving access and utilization. This scoping review aims to summarize the existing literature and provide a guide to understanding barriers to adult CI uptake.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed articles involving adults, written in English, and accessible with a university library subscription. A cutoff of 20 years was used to limit the search. Barriers uncovered in this review were categorized into an ecological framework.

RESULTS

The initial search revealed 2,315 items after duplicates were removed. One hundred thirty-one articles were reviewed under full-text, and 68 articles met the inclusion criteria.

DISCUSSION

Race, ethnicity, and reimbursement are policy and structural barriers. Public awareness and education are societal barriers. Referral and geographical challenges are forms of organizational barriers. Living context and professional support are interpersonal barriers. At the individual level, sound quality, uncertainty of outcome, surgery, loss of residual hearing, and irreversibility are all barriers to CI uptake. By organizing barriers into an ecological framework, targeted interventions can be used to overcome such barriers.

Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites

OBJECTIVE

To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.

STUDY SAMPLE

A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.

RESULTS

Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).

CONCLUSIONS

CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.

Impact of adult cochlear implantation on the partner relationship: a conceptual framework informed by cochlear implant recipient and partner perceptions

PURPOSE

(1) To understand the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the partner relationship, as perceived by adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients and their intimate partners. (2) To generate a conceptual framework for guiding future research and clinical adult cochlear implantation interventions.

METHOD

Concept mapping, a participatory, mixed-method approach, was used for data collection, analysis and interpretation. Participants attended sessions to generate, sort and rate statements describing the changes in their relationship due to cochlear implantation. Participants included 15 CI recipients (mean age: 51.6 years; SD: 8.2) and 12 partners (mean age: 50.9 years; SD: 8.2).

RESULTS

Five concepts emerged from the data, describing changes in the partner relationship following cochlear implantation: (1) Social Interactions, (2) Partner Involvement, (3) Communication, (4) Emotional Adjustment, and (5) Relationship Intimacy. The concept Relationship Intimacy was rated the highest in positivity and importance. Findings also underscored improved social interactions, communication dynamics, and emotional adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The Relationship Intimacy cluster emerged as pivotal, highlighting its essential role in improving post-implantation relationships. CI recipients experienced enhanced autonomy, while partners' roles evolved regarding assistance and support. The diverse effects of implantation on partner relationships highlight the importance of adopting a patient- and family-centered approach to audiological intervention.

Clinical Applications for Spread of Excitation Functions Obtained Via Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (eCAP)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical utility of spread of excitation (SOE) functions obtained via electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) to 1) identify electrode array tip fold-over, 2) predict electrode placement factors confirmed via postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, and 3) predict postoperative speech recognition through the first year post-activation in a large clinical sample.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred seventy-two ears (238 patients) with Cochlear Ltd. CIs (mean age = 46 yr, range = 9 mo-93 yr, 50% female) implanted between August 2014 and December 2022 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

eCAP SOE widths (mm) (probe electrodes 5, 11, and 17), incidence of electrode tip fold-over, CT imaging data (electrode-to-modiolus distance, angular insertion depth, scalar location), and speech recognition outcomes (consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC], AzBio quiet, and +5 dB SNR) through the first year after CI activation.

RESULTS

1) eCAP SOE demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7% for identifying tip fold-over instances that were confirmed by CT imaging. In the current dataset, the tip fold-over incidence rate was 3.1% (7 patients), with all instances involving a precurved electrode array. 2) There was a significant positive relationship between eCAP SOE and mean electrode-to-modiolus distance for precurved arrays, and a significant positive relationship between eCAP SOE and angular insertion depth for straight arrays. No relationships between eCAP SOE and scalar location or cochlea diameter were found in this sample. 3) There were no significant relationships between eCAP SOE and speech recognition outcomes for any measure or time point, except for a weak negative correlation between average eCAP SOE widths and CNC word scores at 6 months post-activation for precurved arrays.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of intraoperative CT or fluoroscopic imaging, eCAP SOE is a reasonable alternative method for identifying electrode array tip fold-over and should be routinely measured intraoperatively, especially for precurved electrode arrays with a sheath.

Variability in clinicians' prediction accuracy for outcomes of adult cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVE

The variability in outcomes among adult cochlear implant (CI) users poses challenges for clinicians in accurately predicting the benefits of the implant for individual candidates. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and confidence of clinicians in predicting speech perception outcomes for adult CI users one-year post-implantation.

DESIGN

Participants were presented with comprehensive information on pre-implantation, one-month post-implantation, and six-month post-implantation data for 10 case studies. The cases encompassed a range of one-year post-implantation phoneme scores, from low performers (27%) to high performers (92%). Participants were tasked with predicting the speech perception outcomes for these cases one year after implantation.

STUDY SAMPLE

Forty-one clinicians completed the full outcome prediction survey.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed a significant over-prediction of low performance by clinicians. Interestingly, clinicians tended to predict average performance (73-76% phoneme score) even when provided with information suggesting lower-than-average performance. Most clinicians expressed confidence in their predictions, irrespective of their accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying signs of low performance, particularly in the early post-implantation period, can enable clinicians to implement early interventions. Further research into accurate outcome prediction is essential for managing expectations, providing counselling, increasing CI adoption, and optimising clinical care for both high and low performers.

Why Do Cochlear Implant Candidates Defer Surgery? A Retrospective Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE(S)

Despite undergoing thorough cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluation and counseling, some patients ultimately elect against implantation. This study sought to identify patient-related and socioeconomic factors predicting CI deferral.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult (≥18 years old) CI candidates presenting between 2007 and 2021 at a tertiary academic CI center was performed. The primary outcome was device implantation. Data collected included age, gender, hearing status, race, zip code of residence, median family income (MFI), distance traveled from the CI center, marital status, employment status, and insurance status. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients qualifying for CI were included, encompassing 77 adults deferring surgery (CI-deferred) and 123 consecutive adults electing for surgery (CI-pursued). Age, gender, hearing status, insurance type, employment status, distance from the implant center, and MFI were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). Compared to CI-pursued patients, CI-deferred patients were more likely to be non-Caucasian (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.015) and unmarried (55.8% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.015). On multivariable logistic regression, older age (OR 0.981, 0.964-0.998, p = 0.027), African American race (OR 0.227, 0.071-0.726, p = 0.012), and unmarried status (OR 0.505, 0.273-0.935, p = 0.030) were independent predictors of implant deferral.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that increasing age at evaluation, African American race, and unmarried status are predictors for deferring CI surgery despite being implant candidates. These patients may benefit from increased outreach in the form of counseling, education, and social support prior to undergoing CI surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 - retrospective study with internal control group Laryngoscope, 134:2857-2863, 2024.

Seven-Year Revision Rates for Cochlear Implants in Pediatric and Adult Populations of an Integrated Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE

We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts.

PATIENTS

Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25).

CONCLUSION

We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.

Identity change of late-deafened adults after receiving cochlear implants

PURPOSE

The aim of this research was to understand how adults reconceptualise their identity when experiencing hearing loss as an adult, and how their identity might change with a cochlear implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using an online survey administered through cochlear implant social media groups, with follow-up semi-structured interviews, participants answered questions about their hearing loss and cochlear implant experiences. Forty-four people answered the survey and 16 participated in an in-depth interview. All were older than 18 years, once had heard, became deafened in adulthood and had at least one cochlear implant.

RESULTS

The decision to have a cochlear implant often meant acknowledging they were no longer a hearing person. After having an implant four themes emerged. (1) Some participants maintained a hearing identity through hearing loss and after cochlear implantation, while others returned to their hearing identity. (2) Others acknowledged a confused identity, neither deaf nor hearing. In unexpected findings, (3) during the progression of hearing loss, some participants had identified as hearing but could not hear, however after implantation, they became deaf people who could hear. (4) Furthermore, after implantation, some participants identified as disabled when they had not done so when less able to hear.

CONCLUSION

Given the prevalence of hearing loss in later life, it is important to understand the way these adults understand their identity through the progression of hearing loss and after becoming cochlear implant recipients. The belief people have of themselves impacts healthcare choices and affects their commitment to ongoing rehabilitation.

Investigating Deferral Rates in Cochlear Implantation: How Often Do Candidates Defer and Why?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the rate at which cochlear implant (CI) candidates decline surgery and identify associated factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred ninety-three CI candidates from July 1989 to December 2020 with complete demographic and socioeconomic data.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, sex, race, marital and employment status, median household income percentile, distance-to-CI-center, and residence in a medically underserved county.

RESULTS

Of the 493 CI candidates included, 80 patients (16.2%) declined surgery. Based on chart checking, the most common reason patients did not receive the implant was due to loss of follow-up (38%). African American patients were 73% less likely to undergo implantation compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.27 [0.11-0.68]; p = 0.005). Asian patients were 95% less likely to undergo implantation (OR, 0.05 [0.009-0.25]; p = 0.0003) compared with White patients. For every 1-year age increase, patients were 4% less likely to undergo implantation (OR, 0.96 [0.94-0.98]; p < 0.0001) and for every 10-year age increase, the patients were 33% less likely. Compared with their single counterparts, married patients were more likely to undergo implantation (OR, 1.87 [1.12-3.15]; p = 0.02). No differences were observed when comparing implanted and nonimplanted CI candidates in sex, employment status, distance-to-CI-center, or median family income percentile. A χ2 test of independence showed no association between receiving CIs and living in medically underserved counties ( χ2 = 2; N = 493; 0.3891; p = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Not infrequently, CI candidates decline surgery. Although demographic factors (race, age, and marital status) were associated with the cochlear implantation decision, socioeconomic factors (median family income and residence in a medically underserved community) were not. Perhaps cultural components of a patient's race have a larger impact on whether or not the patients get implanted.

Why Do Candidates Forgo Cochlear Implantation?

OBJECTIVE

Identify barriers and facilitating factors in cochlear implant (CI) utilization by comparing functional measures between CI candidates who undergo or forgo implantation.

METHODS

Forty-three participants were separated into two groups: (1) 28 participants who underwent CI and (2) 15 participants who elected not to proceed with CI despite meeting eligibility criteria (no-CI). Prior to implantation, all participants completed the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-Expectations instrument. They were also surveyed on factors contributing to their decision to either undergo or forgo CI. Word and speech recognition were determined using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and the AzBio tests, respectively.

RESULTS

CIQOL-Expectations scores were indistinguishable between groups, but there were substantial differences in baseline CIQOL-35 Profile scores. Compared to the CI group, the no-CI group exhibited higher pre-CI scores in the Emotional (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) and Entertainment (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) domains. Survey data revealed that the most commonly reported barriers to pursuing CI in the no-CI cohort were fear of surgical complications (85%), cost associated with implantation (85%), and perception that hearing was not poor enough for CI surgery (85%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this study indicate that functional outcome expectations are similar between candidates who elect to receive or forgo CI, yet those who forgo CI have higher baseline CI-specific QOL abilities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:3548-3553, 2023.

Using x-ray micro computed tomography to quantify intracochlear fibrosis after cochlear implantation in a Guinea pig model

Cochlear implants (CIs) allow individuals with profound hearing loss to understand speech and perceive sounds. However, not all patients obtain the full benefits that CIs can provide and the cause of this disparity is not fully understood. One possible factor for the variability in outcomes after cochlear implantation, is the development of fibrotic scar tissue around the implanted electrode. It has been hypothesised that limiting the extent of fibrosis after implantation may improve overall CI function, and longevity of the device. Currently, histology is often used to quantify the extent of intracochlear tissue growth after implantation however this method is labour intensive, time-consuming, often involves significant user bias, and causes physical distortion of the fibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate x-ray micro computed tomography (μCT) as a method to measure the amount and distribution of fibrosis in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. Adult guinea pigs were implanted with an inactive electrode, and cochleae harvested eight weeks later (n = 7) and analysed using μCT, to quantify the extent of tissue reaction, followed by histological analysis to confirm that the tissue was indeed fibrotic. Cochleae harvested from an additional six animals following implantation were analysed by μCT, before and after contrast staining with osmium tetroxide (OsO4), to enhance the visualisation of soft tissues within the cochlea, including the tissue reaction. Independent analysis by two observers showed that the quantification method was robust and provided additional information on the distribution of the response within the cochlea. Histological analysis revealed that μCT visualised dense collagenous material and new bone formation but did not capture loose, areolar fibrotic tissue. Treatment with OsO4 significantly enhanced the visible tissue reaction detected using μCT. Overall, μCT is an alternative and reliable method that can be used to quantify the extent of the CI-induced intracochlear tissue response and will be a useful tool for the in vivo assessment of novel anti-fibrotic treatments.

Models of service delivery in adult cochlear implantation and evaluation of outcomes: A scoping review of delivery arrangements

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe available evidence of cochlear implantation delivery arrangements in adults and the outcomes by which these service models are measured.

METHODS

Scoping review of English language, primary studies conducted on adults (≥18 years) with ten or more subjects, published between January 2000 and June 2022, which assessed the effects of delivery arrangements of cochlear implantation were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, AMED, PsycINFO, LILACS, KoreaMed, IndMed, Cochrane CRCT, ISRCTN registry, WHO ICTRP and Web of Science were systematically searched. Included studies had to have a method section explicitly measure at least one of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) outcome category. Criteria for systematic reviews and delivery arrangement category based on EPOC taxonomy was included in data extraction. Data was narratively synthesized based on EPOC categories.

RESULTS

A total of 8135 abstracts were screened after exclusion of duplicates, of these 357 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Around 40% of the studies investigated how care is delivered, focusing on quality and safety systems. New care pathways to coordinate care and the use of information and communication technology were emerging areas. There was little evidence on continuity, coordination and integration of care, how the workforce is managed, where care is provided and changes in the healthcare environment. The main outcome measure for various delivery arrangements were the health status and performance in a test.

CONCLUSION

A substantial body of evidence exists about safety and efficacy of cochlear implantation in adults, predominantly focused on surgical aspects and this area is rapidly growing. There is a lack of evidence on aspects of care delivery that may have more impact on patients' experience such as continuity, coordination and integration of care and should be a focus of future research. This would lead to a better understanding of how patient's view CI experience, associated costs and the value of different care models.

Examining the Spatial Varying Effects of Sociodemographic Factors on Adult Cochlear Implantation Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression

OBJECTIVE

To (i) demonstrate the utility of geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) in describing geographical patterns of adult cochlear implant (CI) incidence in relation to sociodemographic factors in a publicly funded healthcare system, and (ii) compare Poisson regression and GWPR to fit the aforementioned relationship.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of provincial CI Program database.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Adults 18 years or older who received a CI from 2020 to 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CI incidence based on income level, education attainment, age at implantation, and distance from center, and spatial autocorrelation across census metropolitan areas.

RESULTS

Adult CI incidence varied spatially across Ontario (Moran's I = 0.04, p < 0.05). Poisson regression demonstrated positive associations between implantation and lower income level (coefficient = 0.0284, p < 0.05) and younger age (coefficient = 0.1075, p < 0.01), and a negative association with distance to CI center (coefficient = -0.0060, p < 0.01). Spatial autocorrelation was significant in Poisson model (Moran's I = 0.13, p < 0.05). GWPR accounted for spatial differences (Moran's I = 0.24, p < 0.690), and similar associations to Poisson were observed. GWPR further identified clusters of implantation in South Central census metropolitan areas with higher education attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult CI incidence demonstrated a nonstationary relationship between implantation and the studied sociodemographic factors. GWPR performed better than Poisson regression in accounting for these local spatial variations. These results support the development of targeted interventions to improve access and utilization to CIs in a publicly funded healthcare system.

Distance and Socieoeconomic Status as Barriers to Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the distance burden for access to cochlear implant (CI)-related services and to assess whether socioeconomic disadvantage or level of education and occupation influenced uptake of CIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

A CI services provider operating across multiple centers.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing CI surgery in a 2-year period between March 2018 and February 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnosis of hearing loss, CI surgery, and subsequent habilitation and mapping.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Distance traveled by patients to their audiological diagnostic, CI surgery hospital, and habilitation sites; subjects' index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage (IRSAD) and index of education and occupation (IEO).

RESULTS

n = 201 children and n = 623 adults. There was a significant difference across IRSAD domains for children (p < 0.0001) and adults (p < 0.0001), and IEO in children (p = 0.015) and adults (p < 0.0001) when tested for equal proportions. The median driving distance from home to the diagnostic audiological site for children was 20 km (mean, 69 km; range, 1-1184 km; upper quartile, 79 km; lower quartile, 8 km). There was no significant difference between the driving distances from home to the CI surgery hospital site, or the mapping/habilitation sites between children and adults. There was no correlation for age at first surgery and either IRSAD/IEO.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of distance for access to CI in Australia is significant for the upper quartile who may not live within the large city centers. Greater consideration needs to be given regarding barriers to CI for those in lower socioeconomic and educational groups to ensure equity of access across different socioeconomic and educational level backgrounds.

Assessing Patient Barriers to Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate barriers that deter adult patients from following through with cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and phone survey.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Between January 2019 and August 2021, 113 patients, without a previous cochlear implant (CI), were determined to be candidates for cochlear implantation. Thirty-eight (33.6%) patients deferred cochlear implantation. Survey response rate was 61.1% (22/36).

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic, socioeconomic, otologic history, and comorbidity factors associated with deferment of cochlear implantation. Patient survey assessment of factors that had the greatest impact, rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the most impactful), on their decision to defer a CI.

RESULTS

Out of the 113 patients who met inclusion criteria, 75 (66.3%) underwent cochlear implantation and 38 (33.6%) patients deferred. Comparing implanted versus deferred groups, there was no statistical difference in age (67.1 y versus 68.5 y; p = 0.690) or male sex (53.3% versus 57.9%; p = 0.692). The deferred group had higher mean neighborhood disadvantage state decile (5.3 versus 4.3; p = 0.064) and national percentile (73.0 versus 66.2; p = 0.106) scores, although neither were statistically significant. A greater proportion of the deferred group were not living independently at time of CI evaluation (13.2 versus 2.7%; p = 0.017). Fear of losing residual hearing was rated the highest among the survey respondents (mean rating of 5.1), followed by general medical health (4.9) and cost and financial concerns (3.6).

CONCLUSION

The greatest concern among the patients was the fear of losing residual hearing. Spending greater time educating patients about the success and failure rates of cochlear implantation may reduce patient hesitancy with implantation.

Factors Influencing Postoperative Experiences in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Multistakeholder Perspective

OBJECTIVE

To explore factors influencing postoperative experiences of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients, determine the impact of each factor, and conceptualize recipients' postoperative journey.

STUDY DESIGN

Participatory mixed methods; concept mapping.

SETTING

Tertiary care (private and public).

PATIENTS

Ninety-three participated in the brainstorming activity. Eighty-nine completed the sorting tasks (96% retention rate): CI recipients (n = 44), significant others (n = 13), CI audiologists (n = 14) and surgeons (n = 5), CI clinics' administration staff (n = 5) and managers (n = 3), and CI manufactures' clinical support staff (n = 5).

INTERVENTIONS

Rehabilitative (CIs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Statements were generated and rated by participants. Similarity of grouping of the statements informed the matrices used for cluster analysis to form concepts.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven unique statements described the factors influencing adapting to, use, and maintenance of CIs after implantation. These were grouped, and five concepts were identified: financial considerations, complications, device usability and durability, device programming and adaptation, and patient motivation and supports. Although statements within the concepts financial considerations and complications were negatively rated, statements within the concepts device programming and adaptation, and patient motivation and supports were mostly rated as having positive influence in patients' postoperative journey. The concept device usability and durability contained both negatively and positively rated statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative experience of adult CI recipients is a multifaceted journey with several challenges to address to improve services. Although support from and connection with family and clinicians, and simplicity of using a CI device facilitated the experience, medical and surgical complications, durability, and cost of maintaining the device challenged the postoperative experience.

Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To examine patterns of change and plateau in speech recognition scores in postlingually hearing impaired adult cochlear implant recipients. The study also examines variations in change patterns for different speech materials and testing conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

Used systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

Articles in English reporting speech recognition scores of adults with postlingual hearing loss at pre-implantation and at least two post-implantation time points were included. Statistically significant changes were determined by meta-analysis and the 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 22 articles representing 1954 patients were included. Meta-analysis of mean difference demonstrated significant improvements in speech recognition score for words in quiet (37.4%; 95% confidence interval [34.7%, 40.7%]), sentences in quiet (49.4%; 95% confidence interval [44.9%, 53.9%]), and sentences in noise (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [25.2%, 36.4%]) from pre-op to 3 months. Scores continued to increase from 3 to 12 months but did not reach significance. Similarly, significant improvements from pre-op to 3 months were observed for consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) words in quiet (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [33.8%, 40.4%]), hearing in noise test (HINT) sentences in quiet (46.5%; 95% confidence interval [37.0%, 56.0%]), AzBio sentences in quiet (45.9%; 95% confidence interval [44.2%, 47.5%]), and AzBio sentences in noise (26.4%; 95% confidence interval [18.6%, 34.2%]). HINT sentences in noise demonstrated improvement from pre-op to 3 months (35.1%; 95% confidence interval [30.0%, 40.3%]) and from 3 to 12 months (15.5%; 95% confidence interval [7.2%, 23.8%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean speech recognition scores demonstrate significant improvement within the first 3 months, with no further statistically significant improvement after 3 months. However, large individual variation should be expected and future research is needed to explain the sources of these individual differences. Laryngoscope, 2022.

Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions

The importance of tele-audiology has been heightened by the current COVID-19 pandemic. The present article reviews the current state of tele-audiology practice while presenting its limitations and opportunities. Specifically, this review addresses: (1) barriers to hearing healthcare, (2) tele-audiology services, and (3) tele-audiology key issues, challenges, and future directions. Accumulating evidence suggests that tele-audiology is a viable service delivery model, as remote hearing screening, diagnostic testing, intervention, and rehabilitation can each be completed reliably and effectively. The benefits of tele-audiology include improved access to care, increased follow-up rates, and reduced travel time and costs. Still, significant logistical and technical challenges remain from ensuring a secure and robust internet connection to controlling ambient noise and meeting all state and federal licensure and reimbursement regulations. Future research and development, especially advancements in artificial intelligence, will continue to increase tele-audiology acceptance, expand remote care, and ultimately improve patient satisfaction.

Current demographic and auditory profiles of adult cochlear implant candidates and factors affecting uptake

OBJECTIVES

Despite growth of CI and widening of implantation criteria, penetration rates remain low and the clinical profile of adult CI candidates has not substantially changed. This study evaluated the demographic and auditory profiles of current adult CI candidates and identified factors affecting CI uptake.

DESIGN

Preoperative data from patients who underwent CI candidacy evaluation between 2016-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data included demographics, medical reports, audiological results, and reasons for not pursuing implantation. Comparisons between candidates who pursued implantation and those who did not were performed.

STUDY SAMPLE

Ninety-five candidates (54 females), average age 52 years.

RESULTS

Most candidates exhibited post-lingual bilateral hearing loss with mean unaided PTA4 of 105dBHL and monosyllabic word score of 26%. Forty-nine candidates were implanted, and the main reason for not pursuing CI was candidates' reluctance. Candidates that pursued CI were mostly younger females with poorer unaided PTA4. Age was the only significant predictor of CI uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

While current candidates demonstrated greater demographic diversity and better speech perception compared to previous findings, unaided thresholds are still within the profound range. Our findings indicate that eligible candidates face barriers to the utilisation of CI, some of which are modifiable by means of updated candidacy protocols.