Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments

Factors Associated with Preoperative Patient Expectations in the Cochlear Implant Evaluation Process

OBJECTIVE

To determine what factors are associated with patients' preoperative expectations of their postimplantation experience with their cochlear implant devices.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of data from a prospectively maintained cochlear implant database was conducted.

SETTING

Tertiary, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who underwent a cochlear implant candidacy evaluation and completed the CIQOL-Expectations validated instrument were included.

RESULTS

Age was found to have a weak association with increased expectations in some domains of the CIQOL-Expectations. There were some very weak associations identified between a patient's baseline functional ability and their expectations in the corresponding domain. However, no modifiable variable included in the current analysis was found to have an association with patient expectations.

CONCLUSION

Understanding patient expectations is a critical part of the success of medical interventions such as cochlear implantation. However, they are complex and likely multifactorial, and future studies are needed to look at other potential variables that may contribute to their formation.

Does cochlear implant electrode array design affect audiologic outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting literature regarding whether cochlear implants (CI) electrode array (EA) selection impacts audiologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes for the two EA designs, precurved and straight.

METHODS

A systematic search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and SCOPUS was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported word recognition scores, sentence recognition scores in quiet or noise, or hearing preservation (HP) rates for patients with post-lingual hearing loss who underwent CI with either EA type. Primary outcome measures included mean difference (baseline vs. post-surgery) and proportions (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of 4134 unique abstracts screened, 92 studies (N = 5365 patients, 5658 ears) were included. Mean improvement of overall word recognition scores for patients with precurved EAs (46.5%, 95% CI: 43.13-49.88%) was significantly (p = 0.0009) superior to that of patients with straight EAs (36.33%; 95% CI, 31.4-41.27%). There was no significant difference between mean improvement of Azbio Quiet scores, mean improvement of overall sentences in noise scores, or HP or pure-tone averages between patients with precurved EAs and those with straight EAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Precurved EAs were superior in mean word recognition score improvement, but there was no superior EA design regarding sentence recognition or hearing preservation.

Derivation and Initial Validation of the Utility Function for the Hearing Utility Measure (HUM)

OBJECTIVE

The Hearing Utility Measure (HUM) is a replacement hearing attribute for the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI-3) designed to improve the responsiveness of utility estimates to changes in hearing-related quality of life. The final development step is to derive the instrument's utility scoring function.

METHODS

Residents of Ontario, Canada, aged ≥18 years participated in standard gamble and visual analogue scale exercises. Valuations for levels (response options) within each domain, and for each domain relative to the other domains were elicited and used to generate a hearing utility function. The function outputs hearing utility ranging from 0 = 'unable to hear at all' to 1 = 'perfect hearing' for each of the 25,920 hearing states classifiable by the HUM. Performance was assessed relative to the criterion standard: directly elicited standard gamble utility. Distributions of HUM-derived hearing utility were compared with legacy HUI-3 derived estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 126 respondents participated (mean age 39.2, range 18-85 years, 53% female [67/126]). The utility function performed well in the estimation of directly elicited utilities (mean difference 0.03, RMSE 0.06). Using the legacy HUI-3, estimated hearing utility was 1.0 for 118/126 respondents (93.6%) compared with just 66/126 (52.4%) using the HUM.

CONCLUSION

The new hearing attribute is capable of measuring variations in hearing utility not captured by the legacy HUI-3, especially near the ceiling of hearing function. These findings justify its application and further work to study its measurement properties in hearing loss populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:4754-4762, 2024.

A Consensus to Revise the Minimum Speech Test Battery-Version 3

PURPOSE

The Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adults was introduced in 1996 (Nilsson et al., 1996) and subsequently updated in 2011 (Advanced-Bionics et al., 2011). The MSTB has been widely used by clinicians as a guide for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluations and to document post-operative speech recognition performance. Due to changes in candidacy over the past 10 years, a revision to the MSTB was needed.

METHOD

In 2022, the Institute for Cochlear Implant Training (ICIT) recruited a panel of expert CI audiologists to update and revise the MSTB. This panel utilized a modified Delphi consensus process to revise the test battery and to improve its applicability considering recent changes in CI care.

RESULTS

This resulted in the MTSB-Version 3 (MSTB-3), which includes test protocols for identifying not only traditional CI candidates but also possible candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation and patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss. The MSTB-3 provides information that supplements the earlier versions of the MSTB, such as recommendations of when to refer patients for a CI, recommended patient-reported outcome measures, considerations regarding the use of cognitive screeners, and sample report templates for clinical documentation of pre- and post-operative care. Electronic versions of test stimuli, along with all the materials described above, will be available to clinicians via the ICIT website (https://www.cochlearimplanttraining.com).

CONCLUSION

The goal of the MSTB-3 is to be an evidence-based test battery that will facilitate a streamlined standard of care for adult CI candidates and recipients that will be widely used by CI clinicians.

Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

The process of adapting to communicate with a cochlear implant (CI) is complex. The use of auditory training after cochlear implantation may help to facilitate improvements in postoperative speech recognition and quality-of-life outcomes in new adult CI recipients. However, the effectiveness of auditory training remains uncertain and long-term effects have not been examined in a large sample of new adult CI users. As such, the objective of this study was to examine the influence of common forms of auditory training on speech recognition and CI-related quality-of-life (CI-related QOL) outcomes at 1 year after cochlear implantation. We hypothesized that patients who reported use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) would show improved speech and CIQOL-35 Profile scores at 1 year after activation of their implant, compared with their peers.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a prospective study and was undertaken at a tertiary academic CI center. Participants included 114 adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral hearing loss. Patients serially self-reported use of the following types of post-CI auditory training over their first-year postactivation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech-language pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) CBAT (e.g., self-directed software). Outcomes measures for this study included change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 12-mo post-CI.

RESULTS

Of 114 patients, 94 (82.5%) used one or more auditory training resources. Of these, 19.3% used face-to-face training, 67.5% passive home-based training, and 46.5% CBAT. Of 114 patients, 73 had complete CIQOL data. At 12 mo, only CBAT use was associated with significantly greater improvements in global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores ( d -range  =  0.72-0.87), compared with those not using CBAT. Controlling for demographics and use of multiple training resources, CBAT remained the strongest positive predictor of CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with global score (ß  =  12.019[4.127,19.9]) and all domain scores at 12-mo post-CI: communication (ß  =  11.937[2.456,21.318), emotional (ß  =  12.293[1.827,22.759), entertainment (ß  =  17.014[5.434,28.774), environment (ß  =  13.771[1.814,25.727]), listening effort (ß  =  12.523[2.798,22.248]), and social (ß  =  18.114[7.403,28.826]). No significant benefits were noted with use of CBAT or any other form of auditory training and speech recognition scores at 12-mo post-CI ( d -range  =  -0.12-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Auditory training with CBAT was associated with improved CI-related QOL outcomes at 12-mo post-CI. Given its availability and low cost, this study provides evidence to support using CBAT to improve real-world functional abilities in new adult CI recipients.

Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Chinese Americans

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans after cochlear implantation (CI) using the cross-culturally adapted Chinese Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary care neurotology practice in New York City.

PATIENTS

Thirty adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans (22.8-89.4 yr, mean 48.9 yr) with prelingual (12) or postlingual (18) deafness who underwent CI between 1995 and 2020. All patients were at least 1 year from CI activation.

INTERVENTION

CI.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Chinese CIQOL-10 Global score.

RESULTS

There were no detectable differences in mean Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores between the prelingual (mean 51.9, SD 11.0) and postlingual (mean 44.0, SD 16.4) cohorts (p = 0.1; 95% CI, -2.3 to 18.1; Hedges' g = 0.5). Comparison of the overall cohort (mean 47.1, SD 14.8) with previously published CIQOL-10 Global scores of English-speaking American CI users (mean 51.5, SD 10.4) demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.4-8.4; Hedges' g = 0.4). For the overall cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated that combined household income (p = 0.007, β = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.7-14.0) was positively associated with Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to evaluate QOL after CI in Mandarin-speaking Chinese American adults. The CIQOL-10 Global scores of Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans CI users are significantly worse than those of English-speaking American CI users. Combined household income may be positively associated with QOL in the Mandarin-speaking Chinese American CI population. More resources are needed to assess outcomes and support rehabilitation in this population.

The Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Adults: A Systematic Umbrella Review

OBJECTIVES

The uptake of cochlear implants among adults who could benefit (based on pure-tone audiometry) in developed countries is estimated to be less than 10%. Concerns about potential surgical complications, fear of losing residual hearing, and limited awareness about the benefits of this intervention contribute to the low adoption rate. To enhance quality of life and improve the uptake of cochlear implants, it is essential to have a clear understanding of their benefits.

DESIGN

This umbrella review aims to summarize the major benefits of cochlear implant usage in adults, by synthesizing findings from published review articles. A comprehensive search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar, was conducted. The search was limited to English-language review articles published between 1990 and 2022, focusing on cochlear implant outcomes in at least 5 adults (aged ≥18 years). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, and conducted a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses.

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were included in this review. There were 15 systematic reviews with meta-analysis, 25 systematic reviews without meta-analysis, and 2 systematic scoping reviews. All 42 articles underwent quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses, of which 40% (n = 17) satisfied 9 out of 11 quality criteria. This umbrella review shows that cochlear implants are associated with improvements in speech perception and recognition as well as improved quality of life and cognition. These benefits are observed in a significant proportion of adults undergoing the procedure, highlighting its effectiveness as a viable intervention for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefits of cochlear implantation appear to outweigh the risks and complications associated with the procedure. It is recommended that adults with severe to profound hearing loss in particular, engage in informed discussions with healthcare professionals to consider cochlear implantation as a viable treatment option.

Quality of Life With Cochlear Implantation Using the CIQOL-35 at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center: Our Experience

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 questionnaire (CIQOL-35).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Single-institution tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients 18 years and older who have undergone CI and CIQOL-35 survey.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementing CIQOL-35 from 2019 to 2022 to measure change in QOL after CI. Statistical analysis included nonparametric, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Significance was set at 0.05.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in QOL among CI patients in each of the CIQOL-35 domains.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (40 female, 53 male) aged 20 to 93 years (median 70 years) turned in 164 QOL surveys (68 preactivation, 96 postactivation). Postactivation median QOL was 5 to 15 points higher across all domains ( p < 0.001). QOL score distributions among unilateral CI only, bilateral CI, and unilateral CI with contralateral hearing aid users were not statistically different ( p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that male sex ( β = -2.0; 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to -0.1) was a negative predictor for environment scores and not being married ( β = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 4.0) was a positive predictor for entertainment scores. Median follow-up time was 13 months post-CI (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1-21.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

CI patients experienced improved QOL postactivation among all QOL domains, whereas specific CI use pattern in regard to unilateral, bilateral, or bimodal did not affect QOL. Multivariate analysis identified marital status and sex as possible QOL predictors.

Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVES

There is a limited understanding of the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), given the scarcity of reported cases. We aim to evaluate the audiological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after CI in CMT.

METHODS

Multi-institutional, university-affiliated, tertiary-referral centers, retrospective chart review.Our cohort includes 5 patients with CMT. Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, operation notes, and pre- and post-implantation audiology evaluation. Patients completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global questionnaire.

RESULTS

Pre-implantation, the mean pure tone average was 84.1 ± 7.2 dB, and the mean word recognition score was 2.4% in the implanted ear. AzBio sentence test was performed in quiet, revealing a mean of 4 ± 1.4% in the implanted ear. Post-implantation, PTA results were all within the mild hearing loss range (mean 33.0 ± 5.9 dB). Post-CI, AZ-Bio test results were 5%, 65%, and 74% (for 3 patients), and HINT scores were 55% and 58% (for 2 patients). The mean score of the CIQOL-10 questionnaire was 42.7 ± 10.47 (range 1-100). Patients were most satisfied with their ability to listen to the television or radio, have conversations in a quiet environment, and feel comfortable being themselves.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive series of CI in CMT-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy. Our cohort suggests that CI is a safe and reliable method for hearing rehabilitation that can achieve good speech performance and improve QoL in CMT patients.

Adaptation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile Into German

PURPOSE

The adaptation of existing questionnaires is a valuable method to make instruments available in multiple languages. It is necessary to assure the quality of an adaptation by following adaptation guidelines. The Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile (CIQOL-35 Profile) was developed and validated to measure the functional abilities in English-speaking adult CI users but is not yet available in German. In this study, we performed a cross-cultural adaptation of this instrument to make it applicable in research and rehabilitation with German-speaking patients.

METHOD

This study followed established practice guidelines for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires. Professional translators and health care professionals with experience with patients with hearing loss translated all items forward and backward multiple times. A committee reviewed the process and decided when a satisfactory consensus was achieved. Next, we examined the intelligibility of the German version using cognitive interviews with 15 adult CI users.

RESULTS

For most items, there was no difficulty with direct translation. In items that turned out to be more difficult to translate, it proved to be very helpful to compare the back translation to the original version, discuss the wording in the committee, and ask the source-language questionnaire developer. During the interviews, issues of comprehension for some phrases were identified. These phrases were changed according to the participant's questions and suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS

The CIQOL-35 Profile was successfully adapted into German. The German version of the questionnaire is now available for research and clinical practice. Further validation of the German CIQOL-35 Profile is in progress.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25386571.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Real-world Functioning in Adult Cochlear-implant Users

Hypothesis

As a result of COVID-19 lockdowns and the associated effects on the auditory-social environments of cochlear-implant (CI) users, we expected that adult CI users would report a decrease in real-world communication abilities, a decrease in social isolation, and a decrease in quality of life (QOL) from pre- to post-pandemic.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic brought many changes to the environments in which adults with CIs interact and communicate. However, the impact of these changes on CI users' real-world functioning is not well understood. This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on real-world communication abilities, social isolation, and CI-related QOL in adult CI users.

Methods

Fourteen adult CI users completed self-report questionnaires assessing communication abilities, social isolation, and CI-related QOL at time points before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses at the 2 time points were compared to evaluate changes in CI users' real-world functioning.

Results

Adult CI users showed a significant decrease in self-reported communication ability and a nonsignificant decline in CI-related QOL from before to during COVID-19. However, a nonsignificant trend of a decline in social isolation was also observed in adult CI users.

Conclusion

Findings showed a decrease in self-reported communication abilities and, to a lesser extent, CI-related QOL, suggesting that changes to the auditory-social environment brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted communication abilities in real-world, challenging environments. Yet, the potential decrease in social isolation suggests that these changes may have had an overall positive effect on social interaction, potentially with close family and friends in well-controlled environments. Assessing changes in real-world functioning in the same CI users from both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique glimpse into how changes in the auditory-social environment may impact outcomes in adult CI users.

American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults

The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded over time due to evidence demonstrating identification and implantation of appropriate cochlear implant (CI) candidates lead to significant improvements in speech recognition and quality of life (QoL). However, clinical practice is variable, with some providers using outdated criteria and others exceeding current labeled indications. As a results, only a fraction of those persons who could benefit from CI technology receive it. This document summarizes the current evidence for determining appropriate referrals for adults with bilateral hearing loss into CI centers for formal evaluation by stressing the importance of treating each ear individually and a "revised 60/60 rule". By mirroring contemporary clinical practice and available evidence, these recommendations will also provide a standardized testing protocol for CI candidates using a team-based approach that prioritizes individualized patient care. This manuscript was developed by the Adult Cochlear Implantation Candidacy Task Force of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance using review of the existing literature and clinical consensus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:S1-S14, 2024.

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Social Life

OBJECTIVE

Explore the effects of hearing loss on social life and identify residual social life deficits that remain after cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively obtained data.

SETTING

Tertiary care adult neurotology center.

PATIENTS

Adults between the ages of 35 and 83 years were included with either normal hearing (NH) or a cochlear implant (CI).

INTERVENTIONS

CI and non-CI-specific quality-of-life (QOL) surveys focused on social and overall QOL.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) The difference in QOL survey responses between NH and CI participants. (2) The relationship between CI-specific global and social QOL responses and non-CI-specific social QOL responses in CI users.

RESULTS

A total of 51 participants were included: 31 CI users and 20 NH participants. Of the social QOL questionnaires, CI users reported significantly poorer scores on Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions than NH peers ( p = 0.049). Both Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions scores and Social Isolation Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with the CI-specific social domain of QOL ( r = 0.64 and -0.58, respectively). Only the Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions scores had a moderate association with global CI QOL ( r = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

CI users self-report similar social life outcomes as their NH peers with the exception of poorer self-efficacy in social situations. Moreover, self-efficacy in social interactions and social isolation were associated with social QOL in CI users, and self-efficacy in social interactions was associated with broader CI-related QOL. Findings support the relevance of individuals' perception of social life to their overall QOL with a CI.

Discrepancies Between Expected and Actual Cochlear Implant-Related Functional Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has demonstrated that realistic patient expectations are a critical factor in determining cochlear implant (CI) candidacy. The current study uses the validated Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations (CIQOL-Expectations) instrument to determine expectations of potential CI users and the degree to which their pre-CI expectations are met after implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Sixty adult CI patients.

INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre-CI aided and post-CI consonant-nucleus-consonant word and AzBio sentence scores, pre-CI CIQOL-Expectations, and pre-CI and 3/6/12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 Profile scores.

RESULTS

Mean pre-CI CIQOL-Expectations exceeded 12-month mean CIQOL-35 Profile scores for the global measure and the communication, environment, and listening effort domains ( d = 0.65-0.97). The communication and listening effort domain scores had the largest discrepancy between expected and actual post-CI improvement (actual scores, 15.1 and 16.3 points lower than expected [ d = 0.93-0.97], respectively). For 42% of patients, pre-CI global expectations exceeded 12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 Profile global scores, 49% met their expectations, and actual scores exceeded expectations for only 10% of patients. Similar patterns were seen for all CIQOL domains except emotional.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-CI functional abilities seem to fall short of pre-CI expectations for a substantial percentage of CI users, which was most apparent for the communication and listening effort CIQOL domains. These results may help clinicians direct personalized counseling toward common misconceptions, which can aid shared decision making and potentially minimize the mismatch between expected and realized outcomes.Level of Evidence: III.IRB Pro00073019, approved December 20, 2017 (Medical University of South Carolina).

Using Rasch Analysis to Assess and Improve the Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire With Few Items: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life (YBHRQL) Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life questionnaire is a condition-specific preference-based instrument sensitive to advantages of binaural over monaural hearing. Respondents use 5-point scales to report the difficulty experienced with three dimensions of listening that are easier or more successful when hearing is binaural: understanding speech in spatially separated noise, localizing sources of sound in azimuth, and the associated effort and fatigue. Previously, a preference value was estimated for each combination of dimension and level so that a value of binaural utility could be assigned to a respondent to inform analyses of cost effectiveness. The present objective was to determine whether the questionnaire conforms with the Rasch model sufficiently well for estimates of the binaural abilities of respondents to be obtained on an interval scale to inform parametric analyses of clinical effectiveness.

DESIGN

Data were obtained from unilateral cochlear implantees (N = 418; 209 ≤62 years; 209 ≥63 years) and members of the public (N = 325; 207 ≤62 years; 118 ≥63 years). A subset of implantees (N = 118) responded at test and retest. Responses were fitted to the partial credit model using the Extended Rasch Modeling package. Conformity with the model was evaluated in six ways: the ordering of response categories ( Monotonicity ) was assessed with plots of response probability against ability; differential item functioning ( DIF ) was assessed by analyses of variance of standardized response residuals; alignment of participants' abilities with item difficulties ( Targeting ) was assessed with person-item maps; fit to the model ( Fit ) was assessed by comparing the means and variabilities of observed and expected responses, and by comparing observed values with analyses of simulated datasets; the hypothesis that item difficulties and participants' abilities were measured on a single underlying scale ( Unidimensionality ) was assessed with principal components analyses of standardized response residuals.

RESULTS

Values of fit statistics were toward the lower end of the acceptable range. Comparisons with analyses of simulated datasets showed that low values were primarily the result of the structural limitation of including only three items. Modal values of the probabilities of response categories were ordered monotonically, but some response thresholds were disordered because of under-use of one category. Pooling categories to correct disordered thresholds resulted in estimates of ability that were less discriminatory of differences within and between groups, and showed less reproducibility between test and retest, than did the original estimates. Neither source-related DIF nor gender-related DIF arose. Uniform age-related DIF arose for the speech-in-noise item and could be managed by resolving the item. The resulting estimates of ability and difficulty were well targeted and unidimensional.

CONCLUSIONS

The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life questionnaire, with three items each with five response categories, conforms with the Rasch model sufficiently well to yield practically useful measures of the abilities of participants. The trait measured by the questionnaire aligns with the ability to benefit from binaural hearing. More discriminatory measurement of this ability would be achieved with more items. Nonetheless, the questionnaire possesses the virtue that responses to the same three questions can be scored in different ways to inform parametric analyses of both cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness.

QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

This study aimed to report quality of life (QoL) scores in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to generate guidance for clinicians on using QoL measures to individualize CI counselling and rehabilitation and to increase access to CIs as a mode of rehabilitation. Participants (n = 101) were unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD; n = 17), asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL; n = 26), or bilateral hearing loss (Uni; n = 58). Generic QoL was assessed via the Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), and disease-specific QoL was assessed via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) at preimplantation and at 6 and 12 months of CI use. All groups had significantly increased HUI-3 scores at both intervals. The SSD group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 at visit 3, the AHL group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 and most NCIQ subdomains at both intervals, and the Uni group showed significant benefit with both tests at both intervals. Unilateral CI recipients demonstrate improved QoL within the first 12 months of device use. Regular assessment with generic and disease-specific questionnaires has the potential to play an important role in personalizing treatment and possibly in increasing access to CI provision.

Cochlear Implants for Single-Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience for adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series for adults with SSD who underwent CI between January 2013 and May 2021 at our institution. CNC and AzBio speech recognition scores, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), datalogging, and the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-10 Global measure were utilized.

RESULTS

Sixty-six adults underwent CI for SSD (median 51.3 years, range 20.0-74.3 years), and 57 (86.4%) remained device users at last follow-up. Compared to pre-operative performance, device users demonstrated significant improvement in speech recognition scores and achieved peak performance at six months post-activation for CNC (8.0% increased to 45.6%, p < 0.0001) and AzBio in quiet (12.2% increased to 59.5%, p < 0.0001). THI was decreased at 6 months post-implantation (58.1-14.6, p < 0.0001), with 77% of patients reporting improved or resolved tinnitus. Patients demonstrated improved SSQ12 scores as well as the disease-specific CIQOL-10 Global questionnaire. Duration of deafness was not associated with significant differences in speech recognition performance. Average daily wear time was positively associated with CNC and AzBio scores as well as post-operative CIQOL-10 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein we present the largest cohort of adult CI recipients with SSD with data on speech recognition scores, tinnitus measures, and SSQ12. Novel insights regarding the correlation of datalogging, duration of deafness, and CI-specific quality of life (CIQOL-10) metrics are discussed. Data continue to support CI as an efficacious treatment option for SSD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2362-2370, 2023.

Conditional Minimal Detectable Change for the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile Associated With Improved Functional Abilities 12 Months After Cochlear Implantation

Importance

It is essential to measure an individual patient's baseline and follow-up abilities to demonstrate changes in clinical outcomes over time. Inherent in this strategy is interpreting whether the measured change is clinically significant and beyond measurement error. Conditional minimal detectable change (cMDC) values are widely used in many disciplines but have rarely been established for outcome measures in otolaryngology or hearing research, and never in cochlear implantation.

Objective

To determine cMDC values for the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile instrument to enhance our understanding of the initial and ongoing changes in functional abilities from cochlear implants (CIs).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Item response theory analyses of responses from a multi-institutional cohort of 705 CI users at a tertiary CI center were used to derive standard error (SE) values for each possible CIQOL-35 domain score. Using an iterative approach, these SE values were used to calculate cMDC values for every possible pre-CI and post-CI domain score combination. We then compared pre-CI to 12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 domains scores in an independent cohort of 65 adult CI users to determine whether the measured change exceeded error to be clinically significant. The analysis took place on December 14, 2022.

Interventions

The CIQOL-35 Profile instrument and cochlear implantation.

Results

The cMDC values were smaller for the communication domain, and global measure and cMDC values for all domains were larger at the extremes of the measurement scale. Overall, 60 CI users (92.3%) demonstrated improvement beyond cMDC at 12 months post-CI for at least 1 CIQOL-35 domain, and no patients' scores declined beyond cMDC for any domain. The percentage of CI users demonstrating improvement beyond cMDC varied by domain, with communication (53 [81.5%]) showing the largest number of CI users improving, followed by global (42 [64.6%]) and entertainment (40 [60.9%]). In general, CI users who demonstrated improvement in CIQOL-35 domains had greater improvement in speech recognition scores than patients who did not, but the strength and significance of these associations greatly varied by domain and speech material.

Conclusions and Relevance

This multistep cohort study found that cMDC values for the CIQOL-35 Profile provided personalized thresholds for detecting real changes in patient self-reported functional abilities over time across multiple domains, which may inform clinical decision-making. Moreover, these longitudinal results reveal the domains with more or less improvement, which may aid in patient counseling.

Cochlear Implantation and Educational and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Adolescence

Importance

Cochlear implants (CIs) have been shown to be effective in improving auditory skills and speech and language development. However, less is known about the long-term outcomes of CIs on educational functioning or quality of life.

Objective

To evaluate long-term educational outcomes and quality of life in adolescents over 13 years postimplantation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This longitudinal cohort study included 188 children with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss with CIs from the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study from hospital-based CI programs; a cohort of 340 children with severe to profound hearing loss without CIs from a nationally representative survey (National Longitudinal Transition Study-2; NLTS-2), and results from the literature of comparable children without CIs.

Exposure(s)

Cochlear implantation (early and late).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Adolescent performance on measures of academic achievement (Woodcock Johnson), language (Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language), and quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing).

Results

The CDaCI cohort included 188 children, 136 of whom completed the wave 3 postimplantation follow-up visits (77 [55%] female) with CIs; mean [SD] age was 11.47 [1.27] years. The NLTS-2 cohort included 340 children (50% female) with severe to profound hearing loss without CIs. Children with CIs had better academic performance compared with children without CIs with similar levels of hearing loss. The largest benefits were seen for children who received implants early (prior to age 18 months), who performed at or above age and gender norms for language and academic achievement. Similarly, adolescents with CIs reported better quality of life on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory compared with children without CIs. On a condition-specific measure (Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing), children who received implants early scored higher across all 3 domains than comparisons without CIs.

Conclusions and Relevance

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate long-term educational outcomes and quality of life in adolescents using CIs. This longitudinal cohort study showed better outcomes of CIs in terms of language, academic performance, and quality of life. While the greatest benefits were observed for children who received implants before age 18 months, benefits were also noted for children who received implants later, providing evidence that children with severe to profound hearing loss with CIs can achieve at or above expected levels compared with hearing peers.

Impact of Patient Frailty on Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVE

The process of cochlear implantation (CI) and subsequent post-cochlear implant care is extensive and can be difficult to navigate for patients considered medically frail. This study investigates potential impact of patient frailty on speech recognition and quality of life outcomes after CI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database.

SETTING

Tertiary cochlear implant center.

PATIENTS

Three hundred seventy adults undergoing CI for traditional bilateral hearing loss indication.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of pre-CI to 12-month post-CI change in consonant-nucleus-consonant phoneme/words, AzBio sentences in quiet/+10SNR, and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile domain and global scores based on degree of patient frailty as assessed using the five-factor modified frailty index and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

The average age at implantation was 65.4 years (±SD, 15.7; 19-94 years). Overall, there were minimal to absent and nonsignificant differences in speech recognition outcomes (consonant-nucleus-consonant phoneme/words, and AzBio sentences +10SNR) based on pre-CI patient frailty. The exception was less improvement in AzBio quiet sentence score in patients noted to be severely frail based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (57.1% vs. 35.2%, d = 0.7 [0.3, 1]). Similar findings were observed for CIQOL-35 Profile domain and global scores where no associations were found other than decreased improvement in the social domain in patients noted to be severely frail (21.7 vs. -0.3, d = 1 [0.4, 1.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although some differences in outcomes were noted based on cochlear implant user frailty, these were small and isolated to only a few outcome measures. Therefore, assuming the patient is medically safe for surgery, preoperative frailty should not dissuade clinicians from recommending CI.

Association of Cognitive Impairment Screening Scores With Improvements in Speech Recognition and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation

Importance

Many cochlear implant centers screen patients for cognitive impairment as part of the evaluation process, but the utility of these scores in predicting cochlear implant outcomes is unknown.

Objective

To determine whether there is an association between cognitive impairment screening scores and cochlear implant outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective case series of adult cochlear implant recipients who underwent preoperative cognitive impairment screening with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) from 2018 to 2020 with 1-year follow-up at a single tertiary cochlear implant center. Data analysis was performed on data from January 2018 through December 2021.

Exposures

Cochlear implantation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Preoperative MoCA scores and mean (SD) improvement (aided preoperative to 12-month postoperative) in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phonemes (CNCp) and words (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet (AzBio Quiet), and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile domain and global scores.

Results

A total of 52 patients were included, 27 (52%) of whom were male and 46 (88%) were White; mean (SD) age at implantation was 68.2 (13.3) years. Twenty-three (44%) had MoCA scores suggesting mild and 1 (2%) had scores suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. None had been previously diagnosed with cognitive impairment. There were small to medium effects of the association between 12-month postoperative improvement in speech recognition measures and screening positive or not for cognitive impairment (CNCw mean [SD]: 48.4 [21.9] vs 38.5 [26.6] [d = -0.43 (95% CI, -1.02 to 0.16)]; AzBio Quiet mean [SD]: 47.5 [34.3] vs 44.7 [33.1] [d = -0.08 (95% CI, -0.64 to 0.47)]). Similarly, small to large effects of the associations between 12-month postoperative change in CIQOL-35 scores and screening positive or not for cognitive impairment were found (global: d = 0.32 [95% CI, -0.59 to 1.23]; communication: d = 0.62 [95% CI, -0.31 to 1.54]; emotional: d = 0.26 [95% CI, -0.66 to 1.16]; entertainment: d = -0.005 [95% CI, -0.91 to 0.9]; environmental: d = -0.92 [95% CI, -1.86 to 0.46]; listening effort: d = -0.79 [95% CI, -1.65 to 0.22]; social: d = -0.51 [95% CI, -1.43 to 0.42]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, screening scores were not associated with the degree of improvement of speech recognition or patient-reported outcome measures after cochlear implantation. Given the prevalence of screening positive for cognitive impairment before cochlear implantation, preoperative screening can be useful for early identification of potential cognitive decline. These findings support that screening scores may have a limited role in preoperative counseling of outcomes and should not be used to limit candidacy.

Audiometric and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL-35

OBJECTIVE

Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital system.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure-tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9-64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4-11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%-6%). After a median follow-up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%-86%) (p < .01). SSD subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median scores on the following CIQOL-35 subdomains following implantation: Entertainment (17 preoperatively vs 21 postoperatively), Listening Effort (12 vs 14), Social (17 vs 22), and Global (28 vs 35; p < .05). SSD patients achieved equal or higher postoperative CIQOL-35 scores in most subdomains (6/7) compared to an age-matched group of non-SSD CI recipients who underwent unilaterally (N = 19) or sequential (N = 6) implantation.

CONCLUSION

SSD CI patients not only demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception testing in the implanted ear but also exhibit improvement in multiple QOL subdomains on the CIQOL-35, the only validated cochlear implant QOL instrument.

Predictors of Short-Term Changes in Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed 1) to measure the effect of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) questionnaire and 2) to determine audiologic, demographic, and non-CI/hearing-related QOL factors influencing the CIQOL.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty-seven adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CIQOL-global score preimplantation and 6 months postimplantation. Physical function score as measured by the short-form survey, audiologic, and demographic variables.

RESULTS

CIQOL showed significant improvement from preimplantation to 6 months postactivation with a mean difference of 14.9 points (95% confidence interval, 11.3 to 18.5, p < 0.0001). Improvement in CIQOL (ΔCIQOL) correlated linearly with age ( r = -0.49, p = 0.001) and improvement in speech perception testing ( r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). Multivariate modeling using age and change in consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) score explained 46% of the variability measured by the ΔCIQOL-global score.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all CI recipients achieve significant gains for all domains as measured by the CIQOL. However, younger patients and those with a greater improvement in speech perception performance (CNC) are more likely to achieve a greater CIQOL benefit. Results here suggest the importance of considering preoperative CIQOL and speech perception measures when evaluating predictors of HR-QOL.

Health State Utility Values Associated with Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants in adults remains uncertain despite established clinical benefits. In cost-effectiveness studies, benefit is often measured by change in health state utility value (HSUV), a single number summary of health-related quality of life anchored at 0 (state of being dead) and 1 (perfect health). Small differences in bilateral cochlear implant HSUV change conclusions of published models, and invalid estimates can therefore mislead policy and funding decisions. As such, we aimed to review and synthesize published HSUV estimates associated with cochlear implants.

DESIGN

We included observational or experimental studies reporting HSUV for adult patients (age ≥18 years) with at least moderate-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 1, 2021. Study and participant characteristics and HSUV outcomes were extracted. Narrative synthesis is reported for all studies. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to generate pooled estimates for the mean difference in HSUV for three comparisons: (1) unilateral cochlear implant versus preimplant, (2) bilateral cochlear implants versus preimplant, (3) bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants. Our principal measure was pooled mean difference in HSUV.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies reporting unique patient cohorts were identified. Health Utilities Index, 3 (HUI-3) was the most common HSUV elicitation method. HSUV from 19 preimplant mean estimates (1402 patients), 19 unilateral cochlear implant mean estimates (1701 patients), and 5 bilateral cochlear implants mean estimates (83 patients) were pooled to estimate mean differences in HUI-3 HSUV by network meta-analysis. Compared with preimplant, a unilateral cochlear implant was associated with a mean change in HSUV of +0.17 (95% credible interval [CrI] +0.12 to +0.23) and bilateral cochlear implants were associated with a mean change of +0.25 (95% CrI +0.12 to +0.37). No significant difference in HSUV was detected for bilateral compared with unilateral cochlear implants (+0.08 [95% CrI -0.06 to +0.21]). Overall study quality was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review and network meta-analysis comprise the best-available resource for parameterization of cost-utility models of cochlear implantation in adults and highlight the need to critically evaluate the validity of available HSUV instruments for bilateral cochlear implant populations.Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018091838).

Patient-Related Factors Do Not Predict Use of Computer-Based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

The use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) after cochlear implantation is associated with improved speech recognition and real-world functional abilities. However, patient-related factors associated with CBAT use remain unknown. This study seeks to identify such factors and recognize those at risk for not implementing CBAT.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective natural experiment.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

A total of 117 new adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with bilateral moderate-to-profound hearing loss.

INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographic and lifestyle information, preimplantation aided speech recognition scores, Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) domain and global scores, CIQOL-Expectations scores, and CBAT use in the first 3 months after activation. Patient-related variables included age, sex, race, duration of hearing loss before implantation, hours of CI use per day, hearing-aid use before implantation, living arrangements/marital status, annual household income, employment, technology use, and education.

RESULTS

Overall, 33 new CI users (28.2%) used CBAT in the first 3 months after activation. On bivariate analysis of the pre-CI CIQOL scores, CIQOL-Expectations score, aided speech recognition scores, and demographic/lifestyle factors examined, regular use of smartphone, tablet, or computer technology was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of CBAT use (odds ratio, 9.354 [1.198-73.020]), whereas higher CIQOL-Expectations emotional domain scores were associated with a lower likelihood of CBAT use (d = -0.69 [-1.34 to -0.05]). However, using multivariable analysis to control for potential confounding factors revealed no significant associations between CBAT use in the first 3 months after cochlear implantation and any examined factor.

CONCLUSIONS

No associations between patient demographic, lifestyle, or pre-CI speech recognition and patient-reported outcome measures and CBAT use were identified. Therefore, discussions with all patients after implantation on the availability of CBAT and its potential benefits are warranted. In addition, given the limited overall use of CBAT and its association with improved CI outcomes, future studies are needed to investigate facilitators and barriers to CBAT use.

Evolution of the candidacy requirements and patient perioperative assessment protocols for cochlear implantation

Cochlear implantation as an approved clinical therapy ushered in an exciting era of innovation for the treatment of hearing loss. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of cochlear implants as a treatment option for adults with profound sensorineural hearing loss in 1985. The landscape for treating adults and children with significant hearing loss has changed dramatically over the last three decades. The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolving regulatory process and changes to clinical care. A significant emerging trend in cochlear implantation is the consideration of steroids to preserve hearing during and following surgery. This parallels the quest for hearing preservation in noise-induced hearing disorders, especially considering the current interest in biological drug therapies in this population. The future will likely usher in an era of combination therapeutics utilizing drugs and cochlear implantation. For over 30+ years and following regulatory compliance, the Rocky Mountain Ear Center has developed an extensive candidacy and outcome assessment protocol. This systematic approach evaluates both unaided and aided auditory performance during candidacy stages and post-implantation. Adjunctive measures of cognition and quality-of-life augment the auditory assessment in specific populations. Practical insights into lessons learned have directed further clinical research and have resulted in beneficial changes to clinical care.

Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a functional staging system using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) framework. The CIQOL-35 Profile was developed and validated following a rigorous research design and found to be more comprehensive and psychometrically sound than previous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) applied to adult CI users. However, interpreting the CIQOL-35 Profile (and all PROMs) relative to real-world functioning remains difficult for patients and clinicians, which limits the capacity of PROMs to direct clinical care. To address this limitation, a functional staging system based on PROM scores was developed to provide detailed descriptions of patients' self-reported abilities (clinical vignettes) without sacrificing the inherent value of the psychometrically derived scores. The current study (1) creates an evidence-based CIQOL functional staging system using advanced psychometric techniques, (2) confirms the clarity and meaningfulness of the staging system with patients, and (3) implements the staging system to measure CIQOL stage progression using data from a longitudinal study design.

METHODS

Item response theory (IRT) analyses of CIQOL-35 Profile data from 705 experienced adult CI users and expert opinion were used to determine the cut-scores that separated adjacent stages for the six CIQOL-35 domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social). The research team then created clinical vignettes based on item response patterns for each stage. Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 10 adult CI users to determine the clarity and meaningfulness of the CIQOL stages and associated clinical vignettes. Finally, we prospectively collected CIQOL-35 Profile scores from 42 CI users prior to cochlear implantation and then at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation to measure CIQOL stage progression.

RESULTS

Psychometric analyses identified five statistically distinct stages for the communication domain and three stages for all other domains. Using IRT analysis results for guidance, research team members independently identified the cut-scores that represented transitions between the functional stages for each domain with excellent agreement (κ = 0.98 [95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99]). Next, the key informant interviews revealed that CI users found the clinical vignettes to be clear and only minor changes were required. Participants also agreed that stage progression represented meaningful improvements in functional abilities. Finally, 88.1% of 42 patients in the prospective cohort (n = 37) improved from pre-CI functional stage by at least one functional stage in one or more domains. The communication domain had the greatest number of patients improve by one or more stages (59.5%) and the social domain the fewest (25.6%). There was also a trend for less improvement at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation for patients at higher pre-CI functional stages, even though higher stages were achievable.

CONCLUSION

The new CIQOL functional staging system provides an evidence-based understanding of the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users from pre-CI to 3- to 6-months post-CI activation across multiple domains. In addition, study results provide the proportion of CI users in each stage at each timepoint. Results can be used during discussions of expectations with potential CI users to provide enhanced insight regarding realistic outcomes and the anticipated timing for improvements. The use of the CIQOL functional staging system also presents an opportunity to develop individualized goal-based rehabilitation strategies that target barriers to stage advancement faced by CI users.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 132:S1-S13, 2022.

Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument

Importance

Previous research suggests that clinicians view realistic patient expectations as the most important nonaudiological factor in the decision to proceed with a cochlear implant (CI). However, clinicians have few data to determine whether patients' outcome expectations are realistic.

Objective

To address this unmet clinical need through the development and psychometric analysis of a new patient-reported outcome measure, the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) Expectations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary CI center from February 26, 2020, to August 31, 2021. First, a team comprising 2 CI audiologists, a CI surgeon, a hearing scientist, and 2 psychometricians with experience in instrument development converted all items from the CIQOL-35 Profile instrument into statements reflecting expected outcomes. Then, cognitive interviews with 20 potential CI users assessed the clarity and comprehensiveness of the new instrument. Next, responses to the CIQOL-Expectations instrument for 131 potential adult CI candidates were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Finally, degree to which patient expectations changed from before to after and their CI evaluation appointments was measured.

Intervention

The CIQOL-Expectations instrument.

Results

Of 178 participants, 85 (47.8%) were female, and there was 1 (0.6%) Asian, 26 (14.6%) Black or African American, 1 (0.6%) Latinx, and 150 (84.3%) White individuals. No major content or grammar changes were identified during the cognitive interviews. Overall, all CIQOL domains demonstrated adequate to strong psychometric properties. Several domains did not meet all a priori established indicators of model fit or ability to separate CI users based on response patterns, but all met most indicators. Potential CI users demonstrated the highest mean (SD) expectation scores for the environment (70.2 [20.8]) and social (68.4 [18.0]) domains. In addition, the entertainment (20 [15.3%]) and environment (31 [24.4%]) domains had the highest percentage of patients with expectation scores of 100. Yet, normative CIQOL-35 Profile data from experienced CI users suggested few patients obtain this high degree of functional benefit after implant.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the CIQOL-Expectations instrument may provide an opportunity to assess potential CI users' expected outcomes using modification of an established CIQOL instrument and a patient-centered framework. The included items and domains reflect real-world functional abilities valued by CI users and may provide opportunities for an evidence-based shared decision-making approach to the CI evaluation process. With this instrument, clinicians can compare individual patients' pre-CI outcome expectations with established normative data and provide appropriate counseling.

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness

Background: Hearing-related quality of life (QoL) after cochlear implantation (CI) is as important as audiological performance. We evaluated the functional results and QoL after CI in a heterogeneous patient cohort with emphasis on patients with long-term deafness (>10 years). Methods: Twenty-eight patients (n = 32 implanted ears, within n = 12 long-term deaf ears) implanted with a mid-scala electrode array were included in this retrospective mono-centric cohort study. Speech intelligibility for monosyllables (SIM), speech reception thresholds (SRT50) and QoL with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were registered. Correlation of SIM and QoL was analyzed. Results: SIM and SRT50 improved significantly 12 months postoperatively up to 54.8 ± 29.1% and 49.3 ± 9.6 dB SPL, respectively. SIM progressively improved up to 1 year, but some early-deafened, late implanted patients developed speech understanding several years after implantation. The global and all subdomain QoL scores increased significantly up to 12 months postoperatively and we found a correlation of SIM and global QoL score at 12 months postoperatively. Several patients of the “poor performer” (SIM < 40%) group reported high improvement of hearing-related QoL. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation provides a benefit in hearing-related QoL, even in some patients with low postoperative speech intelligibility results. Consequently, hearing-related QoL scores should be routinely used as outcome measure beside standard speech understanding tests, as well. Further studies with a prospective multi-centric design are needed to identify factors influencing post-implantation functional results and QoL in the patient group of long-term deafness.

Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

Although adult cochlear implant (CI) outcomes have primarily focused on speech recognition scores, the rigorous development of a CI-specific patient-reported outcome measure provides an opportunity for a more comprehensive and ecologically valid approach to measure the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users. Here, we report for the first time normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and global scores and variance for a large, multi-institutional sample of adult CI users.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study design.

SETTING

CI centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred five adults with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss with at least 1 year of CI use.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global scores.

RESULTS

During the development of the CIQOL instruments, 1,000 CI users from all regions of the United States were invited to participate in studies. Of these, 705 (70.5%) completed all portions of the study, and their data are reported here. Mean CIQOL domain scores were highest (indicating better function) for the emotional and social domains and lowest for listening effort. The entertainment and social domains demonstrated the widest distribution of scores and largest standard deviations, indicating greatest variability in function. Overall, there were minimal ceiling and floor effects for all domains.

CONCLUSION

Normative scores from a large sample of experienced adult CI users are consistent with clinical observations, showing large differences in functional abilities and large variability. Normative CIQOL data for adult CI users have the potential to enhance preoperative discussions with CI candidates, improve post-CI activation monitoring, and establish standards for CI centers.

Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today

As biomolecular approaches for hearing restoration in profound sensorineural hearing loss evolve, they will be applied in conjunction with or instead of cochlear implants. An understanding of the current state-of-the-art of this technology, including its advantages, disadvantages, and its potential for delivering and interacting with biomolecular hearing restoration approaches, is helpful for designing modern hearing-restoration strategies. Cochlear implants (CI) have evolved over the last four decades to restore hearing more effectively, in more people, with diverse indications. This evolution has been driven by advances in technology, surgery, and healthcare delivery. Here, we offer a practical treatise on the state of cochlear implantation directed towards developing the next generation of inner ear therapeutics. We aim to capture and distill conversations ongoing in CI research, development, and clinical management. In this review, we discuss successes and physiological constraints of hearing with an implant, common surgical approaches and electrode arrays, new indications and outcome measures for implantation, and barriers to CI utilization. Additionally, we compare cochlear implantation with biomolecular and pharmacological approaches, consider strategies to combine these approaches, and identify unmet medical needs with cochlear implants. The strengths and weaknesses of modern implantation highlighted here can mark opportunities for continued progress or improvement in the design and delivery of the next generation of inner ear therapeutics.

Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hearing implant (HI) use on quality of life (QoL) and to determine which QoL measure(s) quantify QoL with greater sensitivity in users of different types of HIs. Participants were adult cochlear implant (CI), active middle ear implant (VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE (VSB)), or active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (the BONEBRIDGE (BB)) recipients. Generic QoL and disease-specific QoL were assessed at three intervals: pre-activation, 6 months of device use, and 12 months of device use. 169 participants completed the study (110 CI, 18VSB, and 41BB). CI users' QoL significantly increased from 0-6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. On some device-specific measures, their QoL also significantly increased between 6 and 12 m device use. VSB users' QoL significantly increased between all tested intervals with the disease-specific measure but not the generic measure. BB users' QoL significantly increased from 0-6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. In sum, HI users experienced significant postoperative increases in QoL within their first 12 m of device use, especially when disease-specific measures were used. Disease-specific QoL measures appeared to be more sensitive than their generic counterparts.

Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults

OBJECTIVE

Assess associations between postcochlear implant (CI) auditory training and early outcomes related to speech recognition and CI quality of life (CIQOL).

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal, prospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss.

INTERVENTIONS

Self-reported use of three categories of auditory training post-CI activation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) computer-based training (e.g., interactive software).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 3-month post-CI.

RESULTS

Of 72 patients, 52 (72.2%) used an auditory training resource. Of all patients, 18.4% used face-to-face training, 58.3% passive home-based training, and 33.3% computer-based training. At 3 months post-CI, use of any training was associated with greater improvement in speech recognition (d-range = 0.57-0.85) and global and domain-specific CIQOL scores, except entertainment (d-range = -0.33 to 0.77). Use of computer-based training demonstrated the greatest effect, with larger improvements in speech recognition (CNCp: d = 0.69[0.03,1.35]; CNCw: d = 0.80[0.14,1.46]; AzBio: d = 1.11[0.44,1.77]) and global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores (d-range = 0.05-1.35). Controlling for age, sex, household income, and use of multiple training resources, computer-based training remained the strongest positive predictor of speech recognition and CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with CNCp (ß = 33.07[1,43,64.719]), AzBio (ß = 33.03[5.71,60.35]), and CIQOL-global (ß = 10.92[1.15,20.70]) score improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide preliminary evidence-based recommendations for use of specific auditory training resources for new adult CI recipients. Auditory training, especially self-directed computer software, resulted in improved speech recognition and CIQOL outcomes after 3 months and are widely available for CI users.

Best Practices in the Development, Translation, and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Hearing Impairment: Lessons From the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Instruments

This manuscript summarizes available evidence-based best practices in the development, translation, and cultural adaptation of one type of outcome measure for adults with hearing impairment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). It presents the development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) instruments and the ongoing translation and cultural adaptation of the CIQOL-35 Profile from English to French as case studies and discusses useful lessons for selecting, developing, translating, culturally adapting, and using PROMs. Relevant best practice guides are introduced, described and their steps are illustrated with examples. Future trends in hearing-related PROMs, including computerized adaptive testing, patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), economic evaluation and allocation of scarce resources, and PROMs in low-resource settings, are discussed. The manuscript concludes on the lessons that can be learned from implementation science for the successful and sustainable integration of PROMs in clinical practice.

Mythbusters! The Truth about Common Misconceptions in Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear implantation (CI) is the preferred method of hearing rehabilitation when patients cannot perform well with traditional amplification. Unfortunately, there are still significant misconceptions around this life-changing intervention. The goal of this article is to address some of the most common myths around CI surgery. After reading this article, the learner will be able to explain the utility of CI in patients with residual hearing and recognize that insurance coverage is widespread. The reader will be able to list common risks associated with this well-tolerated procedure including anesthetic risk and the risk of vestibular dysfunction. Additionally, the reader will be able to identify the significant positive impact of CI on patients' quality of life. Finally, the reader will identify that many patients can safely have an MRI scan after implantation, including nearly all contemporary recipients.

Development and Critical Evaluation of a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure Sensitive to Binaural Hearing in Adults: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality-of-Life System

OBJECTIVES

The widely-used generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life-the EuroQol Descriptive System (EQ-5D) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI3)-are limited in their response to technologies that improve hearing. The EQ-5D lacks construct validity for hearing, while the HUI3 is restricted by a ceiling effect and by using speech reception as the only evidence of the ability to hear. Consequently, neither measure consistently registers benefits from binaural hearing, such as those from bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation. The objectives were to test whether informants value binaural hearing, to develop a condition-specific preference-based measure sensitive to binaural hearing, to assess the psychometric properties of the new instrument, and to determine whether it meets requirements for informing judgments of cost-effectiveness: does it measure greater gains than do the generic preference-based measures, while avoiding exaggerating losses, and displaying sensitivity to side effects?

DESIGN

Three levels of function, ranging from no difficulty to great difficulty, were defined on each of three dimensions where listening is easier or more successful when hearing is binaural rather than monaural: perception of speech in spatially separated noise, localization of sounds, and effort and fatigue. Informants (N = 203) valued the 27 combinations of levels and dimensions in a time trade-off task with a 10-year time frame to provide a value of binaural-related quality of life ("binaural utility") for each combination. A questionnaire was compiled to allow respondents to report their level of function on each dimension so that a value of binaural utility could be assigned to them. The questionnaire and the age-standardized valuations constitute The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality-of-Life System (YBHRQL). Adult users of unilateral implants (N = 8), bilateral implants (N = 11), or bimodal aiding (N = 9) undertook performance tests of spatial listening and completed the HUI3, EQ-5D, and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaires. They completed the YBHRQL questionnaire 24 and 38 mo later.

RESULTS

Despite long intervals between measurements, the YBHRQL demonstrated desirable psychometric properties: good construct validity evidenced by significant correlations with performance measures and the SSQ index; a greater ability than the EQ-5D or HUI3 to distinguish unilateral, bimodal, and bilateral listening; and good reproducibility. The YBHRQL did not exaggerate losses of utility but was insensitive to a potential side effect of implantation (pain/discomfort). It measured a gain in utility from bilateral compared with unilateral implantation (median = 0.11, interquartile range, 0.03 to 0.16) that was greater than the gain measured by the EQ-5D (0.00, 0.00 to 0.00) but not the HUI3 (0.00, 0.00 to 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The YBHRQL summarizes the contribution of binaural hearing to quality of life by combining the functional status of a listener with the preferences of independent informants. It would be an efficient clinical outcome measure. In addition, if used alongside the EQ-5D or HUI3, it would provide evidence which could beneficially modulate confidence in the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Further research on its sensitivity to side effects, and on the size of the gains in utility which it measures, is needed to determine whether it could stand alone to inform resource-allocation decisions.