Vaccinations for rheumatoid arthritis

Low vaccination rates and awareness status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cross-sectional survey study

To examine the pneumococcal, haemophilus influenza, hepatitis A virus (HAV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine rates and and predictors of vaccination among a Türkiye population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. In this multicenter, cross-sectional study, vaccination levels and related factors were questioned by face-to-face survey method during routine clinical examination of patients with RA followed in different regions of Türkiye. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software package, version 26. A total of 715 patients (mean age 53.1 ± 13 years), of whom 552 (77.2%) were women, were included in this study. The rate of vaccine awareness education in the whole patient group was 40.1%. The vaccination rates for influenza, pneumococcal, HAV, and HBV were 34.3%, 21.8%, 12.3%, and 28.5%, respectively. It was noteworthy that the level of vaccine awareness education was a positive predictive factor affecting vaccination in all vaccine types (p < 0.001, for all vaccine types). The rates of low income were higher in the vaccinated group for pneumococcal (p < 0.001) and haemophilus influenza (p = 0.011) vaccine than in the unvaccinated group. The participants with living in a rural area were significantly higher in the unvaccinated group for HAV and HBV vaccine than in the vaccinated group (p < 0.001). The frequency of less than two medical visits per year was significantly higher in the unvaccinated group for pneumococcal (p < 0.014) and haemophilus influenza (p < 0.001 ) and HBV vaccine (p = 0.009) than in the vaccinated group. multivariate analysis found that rural area (for Haemophilus influenza and HAV vaccines) and financial income (Pneumococcal vaccine) in specifically were associated with increased vaccination rates (p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of vaccination education was significantly higher in the vaccinated group for all vaccine types, which is noteworthy as a result of the positive effect of education on vaccination (p < 0.001). Vaccination awareness education and rates are low in primary prevention for RA patients. Vaccination awareness training is important in increasing the level of vaccine rates.

Engaging Multistakeholder Perspectives to Identify Patient-Centered Research Priorities Regarding Vaccine Uptake Among Adults With Autoimmune Conditions

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to prioritize topics for future patient-centered research to increase uptake of common vaccines, such as for pneumococcal pneumonia, influenza, herpes zoster, human papillomavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, among adults living with autoimmune conditions.

METHODS

A steering committee (SC) was formed that included clinicians, patients, patient advocates, and researchers associated with rheumatic diseases (psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis), inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis. Through a scoping review and discussions, SC members identified research topics regarding vaccine uptake and/or hesitancy for prioritization. A larger multistakeholder alliance that included patients and patient advocates, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, regulators, and vaccine manufacturers conducted a modified Delphi exercise online with three rating rounds and one ranking round. Frequency analysis and comparisons across stakeholder groups were conducted. A weighted ranking score was generated for each item in the ranking round for final prioritization.

RESULTS

Through the Delphi process, 33 research topics were identified, of which 13 topics were rated as critical by more than 70% of all stakeholders (n = 31). The two highest ranked critical topics per the full stakeholder group were "How well a vaccine works for adults with autoimmune conditions" and "How beliefs about vaccine safety affect vaccine uptake."

CONCLUSION

A multistakeholder group identified key topics as critically important priorities for future research to decrease vaccine hesitancy and improve uptake of vaccines for adults with autoimmune conditions.

From vaccines to nanovaccines: A promising strategy to revolutionize rheumatoid arthritis treatment

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a joint-related autoimmune disease that is difficult to cure. Most therapeutics act to alleviate the symptoms but not correct the causes of RA. Novel strategies that specifically target the causes are highly needed for RA management. Currently, early interruption of RA is increasingly suggested but the corresponding therapeutics are not available. Vaccines that have shown great success to combat infection, cancer, degenerative diseases, autoimmune diseases, etc. are ideal candidates for a new generation of anti-RA therapeutics to correct the causes and prevent RA or interrupt RA in early phases. Anti-RA vaccines can be divided into two major categories. One is to induce neutralizing antibodies and the other is to induce antigen-specific immune tolerance. The vaccines are inherently linked to nanotechnology because they usually need a biomacromolecule or carrier to provoke sufficient immune responses. In the past decade, designed nanocarriers such as nanoparticles, liposomes, nanoemulsion, etc., have been applied to optimize the vaccines for autoimmune disease treatment. Nanotechnology endows vaccines with a higher biostability, tunable in vivo behavior, better targeting, co-delivery with stimulatory agents, regulatory effects on immune responses, etc. In this review, unmet medical needs for RA treatment and anti-RA vaccinology are first introduced. The development of anti-RA therapies from vaccines to nanovaccines are then reviewed and perspectives on how nanotechnology promotes vaccine development and advancement are finally provided. In addition, challenges for anti-RA vaccine development are summarized and advantages of nanovaccines are analyzed. In conclusion, nanovaccines will be a promising strategy to revolutionize the treatment of RA by correcting the causes in an early phase of RA.

Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs) Kinetics during Rituximab Chemotherapy and Performance of Hepatitis B Vaccine before Immunosuppression: Two Prospective Studies

Rituximab promotes strong immunosuppression leading to a high risk of hepatitis B reactivation (HBV-R) and chronic infection. Current recommendations on HBV-R prevention are expensive and poorly individualized. In resolved hepatitis B patients, previous studies suggest that anti-HBs titers before immunosuppression can predict HBV-R risk. However, guidelines claim that additional data are necessary before recommending spare drug prophylaxis in patients with high anti-HBs titers. On the other hand, in patients with no previous contact with HBV, guidelines recommend vaccine before immunosuppression despite minimal evidence available. To shed light on these knowledge gaps, two prospective studies were conducted to evaluate anti-HBs in hematological cancer patients treated with rituximab. In the first study, anti-HBs-positive patients were referred for following up antibody titers before and during immunosuppression. Patients with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL before immunosuppression had no negative seroconversion (anti-HBs loss), in contrast to 18% of those with anti-HBs < 100 mIU/mL. In the second study, patients with no previous contact with HBV were invited to receive HBV vaccine before rituximab chemotherapy. None seroconverted with anti-HBs. In conclusion, both studies reinforce the need to review concepts about HBV prevention during immunosuppression on current guidelines. Narrowing the use of drug prophylaxis and improving vaccine indications are recommended.

Predictors of Influenza Vaccination in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis 2017-2021: Results From the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort

Objective

Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a higher risk for infections, including influenza and related complications. We identified influenza vaccination coverage in adults newly diagnosed with RA and examined sociodemographic RA characteristics and attitudes associated with vaccination.

Methods

We used data from patients enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort between September 2017 and February 2021. At enrollment, participants reported their vaccination status in the previous year and completed the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of vaccination in the year after RA diagnosis.

Results

The baseline analytic sample of 431 patients were mostly White (80%) women (67%) with a mean age of 56 (SD 14) years. Prediagnosis, influenza vaccine coverage was 38%, increasing to 46% post diagnosis in the longitudinal sample (n = 229). Participants with previous influenza vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 15.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.37‐36.90), on biologics or JAKs (OR 5.42; 95% CI 1.72‐17.03), and with a higher change in BMQ Necessity‐Concerns Differential scores (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02‐1.15) had greater odds, whereas women (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14‐0.71), participants with a non‐White racial background (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04‐0.51), and participants currently smoking (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02‐0.37) had lower odds of influenza vaccine coverage.

Conclusion

Influenza vaccination coverage in patients with early RA remains below national targets in adults living with a chronic condition. Discussing vaccine history and medication attitudes at initial clinic visits with new patients with RA may enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.

The Safety and Immunologic Effectiveness of the Live Varicella-Zoster Vaccine in Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy : A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The safety and effectiveness of live virus vaccines, such as the varicella-zoster vaccine, are unknown in patients with inflammatory diseases receiving immunomodulatory therapy such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the live attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL) in patients receiving TNFis.

DESIGN

Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02538341).

SETTING

Academic and community-based rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology practices.

PATIENTS

Adults aged 50 years or older receiving TNFis for any indication.

INTERVENTION

Random assignment to ZVL versus placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) from serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells measured at baseline and 6 weeks after vaccination. Suspected varicella infection or herpes zoster was clinically assessed using digital photographs and polymerase chain reaction on vesicular fluid.

RESULTS

Between March 2015 and December 2018, 617 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ZVL (n = 310) or placebo (n = 307) at 33 centers. Mean age was 62.7 years (SD, 7.5); 66.1% of participants were female, 90% were White, 8.2% were Black, and 5.9% were Hispanic. The most common TNFi indications were rheumatoid arthritis (57.6%) and psoriatic arthritis (24.1%); TNFi medications were adalimumab (32.7%), infliximab (31.3%), etanercept (21.2%), golimumab (9.1%), and certolizumab (5.7%). Concomitant therapies included methotrexate (48.0%) and oral glucocorticoids (10.5%). Through week 6, no cases of confirmed varicella infection were found; cumulative incidence of varicella infection or shingles was 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0% to 1.2%). At 6 weeks, compared with baseline, the mean increases in geometric mean fold rise as measured by gpELISA and ELISpot were 1.33 percentage points (CI, 1.17 to 1.51 percentage points) and 1.39 percentage points (CI, 1.07 to 1.82 percentage points), respectively.

LIMITATION

Potentially limited generalizability to patients receiving other types of immunomodulators.

CONCLUSION

This trial informs safety concerns related to use of live virus vaccines in patients receiving biologics.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the American College of Rheumatology.

Incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for potentially preventable infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have high infection rates. Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster (HZV), and influenza are common and potentially preventable causes of morbidity and mortality. Vaccinations have been shown to reduce the rates of these infections. In this study, we aim to determine incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for Streptococcus pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections in patients with RA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the adult RA hospitalizations in 2016 from the National Inpatient Sample database. We limited the RA cases to hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of S. pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections. The total number of discharges, age, length of stay, mortality, and hospital charges were recorded.

RESULTS

In 2016, 552,230 adult hospitalizations had either a primary or secondary diagnosis of RA. Among this group, there were 1120 hospitalizations for influenza, 590 hospitalizations for herpes zoster, and 785 hospitalizations for S. pneumoniae. These infections constituted 0.5% of RA hospitalizations and were a more common cause of hospitalizations when compared to non-RA hospitalizations. Aggregate annual national hospital charges reached $124 million and an aggregate annual LOS of 13,750 days.

CONCLUSION

Infections, such as influenza, HZV, and S. pneumoniae, remain a common cause of inpatient morbidity and mortality among RA patients. Additionally, the economic burden of these infections is significant. Universal vaccination programs in RA patients, as well as other interventions aiming to improve quality of care of this susceptible population, should be further studied to reduce hospitalizations, cost, morbidity, and mortality. Key Points • Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster, and influenza infections remain an important preventable cause of hospitalizations among RA patients and carry significant economic burden.

How to Manage COVID-19 Vaccination in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: An Expert Opinion by IMIDs Study Group

Since March 2020, the outbreak of Sars-CoV-2 pandemic has changed medical practice and daily routine around the world. Huge efforts from pharmacological industries have led to the development of COVID-19 vaccines. In particular two mRNA vaccines, namely the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and a viral-vectored vaccine, i.e. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), have recently been approved in Europe. Clinical trials on these vaccines have been published on the general population showing a high efficacy with minor adverse events. However, specific data about the efficacy and safety of these vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are still lacking. Moreover, the limited availability of these vaccines requires prioritizing some vulnerable categories of patients compared to others. In this position paper, we propose the point of view about the management of COVID-19 vaccination from Italian experts on IMIDs and the identification of high-risk groups according to the different diseases and their chronic therapy.

Risk of Serious Infection Among Initiators of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Plus Methotrexate Versus Triple Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of serious infections between the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) plus methotrexate (MTX) versus triple therapy among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Using claims data from Truven MarketScan (2003-2014), we conducted a cohort study to compare RA patients receiving MTX who added a TNFi (TNFi plus MTX group) versus MTX plus hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine (triple therapy group). The primary outcome was any serious infection (i.e., a composite end point of hospitalized bacterial and opportunistic infections or herpes zoster). Secondary outcomes were individual components of the composite end point. To adjust for baseline confounding, we used propensity score (PS)-based fine stratification and weighting. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the outcomes.

RESULTS

After PS stratification (PSS) and weighting, we included a total of 45,208 TNFi plus MTX initiators and 1,387 triple therapy initiators. Mean age was 53 years and 70% were female. The incidence rate of any serious infection per 100 person-years was 2.46 in the TNFi plus MTX group and 2.03 in the triple therapy group. The PSS-weighted HR for any serious infection comparing TNFi plus MTX versus triple therapy was 1.23 (95% CI 0.87-1.74). For the secondary outcomes, the PSS-weighted HR was 1.41 (95% CI 0.85-2.34) for bacterial infection and 0.80 (95% CI 0.55-1.18) for herpes zoster.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world cohort of RA patients, we noted no substantially different risk of any serious infection, bacterial infection, or herpes zoster after initiating TNFi plus MTX versus triple therapy, although CIs were wide.

OMIC Technologies and Vaccine Development: From the Identification of Vulnerable Individuals to the Formulation of Invulnerable Vaccines

Routine vaccination is among the most effective clinical interventions to prevent diseases as it is estimated to save over 3 million lives every year. However, the full potential of global immunization programs is not realised because population coverage is still suboptimal. This is also due to the inadequate immune response and paucity of informative correlates of protection upon immunization of vulnerable individuals such as newborns, preterm infants, pregnant women, and elderly individuals as well as those patients affected by chronic and immune compromising medical conditions. In addition, these groups are undervaccinated for a number of reasons, including lack of awareness of vaccine-preventable diseases and uncertainty or misconceptions about the safety and efficacy of vaccination by parents and healthcare providers. The presence of these nonresponders/undervaccinated individuals represents a major health and economic burden to society, which will become particularly difficult to address in settings with limited public resources. This review describes innovative and experimental approaches that can help identify specific genomic profiles defining nonresponder individuals for whom specific interventions might be needed. We will provide examples that show how such information can be useful to identify novel biomarkers of safety and immunogenicity for future vaccine trials. Finally, we will discuss how system biology “OMICs” data can be used to design bioinformatic tools to predict the vaccination outcome providing genetic and molecular “signatures” of protective immune response. This strategy may soon enable identification of signatures highly predictive of vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy/protection thereby informing personalized vaccine interventions in vulnerable populations.

Clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

The present study was conducted by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. In this retrospective nationwide study, we included 3748 RA patients who received influenza vaccinations in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and 3748 matched RA patients who did not receive influenza vaccinations. We followed the patients from 4 weeks after influenza vaccination to the end of the influenza season in each year. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, including disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, we used the Cox proportional hazards regression model to analyze the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination.

RESULTS

The influenza vaccination rate in RA patients was 14.8% in 2008, 19.8% in 2009 and 9.50% in 2010. Receiving influenza vaccine was associated with reduced risk of hospitalization for septicemia, bacteremia or viremia (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.94), and lower risk of mortality (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39-0.97). The effectiveness was particularly significant in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RA patients receiving influenza vaccine have significantly lower morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients. Further studies are needed to explore effective policies to increase the vaccination rate in elderly RA patients.

VACCINATION IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES: AN ALLY OR AN ENEMY?

The importance of comorbid infections in rheumatology has recently increased substantially, particularly due to the introduction of biological agents into clinical practice. One of the ways to solve the above problem is to investigate and actively use different vaccines. The paper deals with the issues concerning the use of vaccines against influenza and pneumococcal infections in rheumatic patients. It discusses the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination in preventing respiratory infections as the most common cause of an adverse outcome in rheumatic diseases. Main areas for future investigations of the considered problem are shown.

 

The Safety and Immunogenicity of Live Zoster Vaccination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Before Starting Tofacitinib: A Randomized Phase II Trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of herpes zoster, and vaccination is recommended for patients ages 50 years and older, prior to starting treatment with biologic agents or tofacitinib. Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA. We evaluated its effect on the immune response and safety of live zoster vaccine (LZV).

METHODS

In this phase II, 14-week, placebo-controlled trial, patients ages 50 years and older who had active RA and were receiving background methotrexate were given LZV and randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo 2-3 weeks postvaccination. We measured humoral responses (varicella zoster virus [VZV]-specific IgG level as determined by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and cell-mediated responses (VZV-specific T cell enumeration, as determined by enzyme-linked immunospot assay) at baseline and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 14 weeks postvaccination. End points included the geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in VZV-specific IgG levels (primary end point) and T cells (number of spot-forming cells/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) at 6 weeks postvaccination.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive tofacitinib (n = 55) or placebo (n = 57). Six weeks postvaccination, the GMFR in VZV-specific IgG levels was 2.11 in the tofacitinib group and 1.74 in the placebo group, and the VZV-specific T cell GMFR was similar in the tofacitinib group and the placebo group (1.50 and 1.29, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients in the tofacitinib group (5.5%) and 0 patients (0.0%) in the placebo group. One patient, who lacked preexisting VZV immunity, developed cutaneous vaccine dissemination 2 days after starting tofacitinib (16 days postvaccination). This resolved after tofacitinib was discontinued and the patient received antiviral treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients who began treatment with tofacitinib 2-3 weeks after receiving LZV had VZV-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to LZV similar to those in placebo-treated patients. Vaccination appeared to be safe in all of the patients except 1 patient who lacked preexisting VZV immunity.

[Long-term glucocorticoid therapy : Is there a safe dosage?]

Glucocorticoids have been successfully used for a long time to treat a wide range of chronic inflammatory diseases. Despite the well-accepted efficacy, possible adverse effects still provoke discussions among patients and physicians. In particular, the long-term use of glucocorticoids at higher dosages may cause unwanted adverse effects; therefore, the question arises if conditions for a safe long-term treatment regimen with these drugs can be defined. Studies specifically and comprehensively addressing this question are missing; therefore, a multidisciplinary task force comprised of medical experts and patients was formed to analyze and discuss the existing literature in order to identify conditions where long-term glucocorticoid treatment has an acceptably low level of harm. The group agreed that the actual level of harm of long-term glucocorticoid therapy depends on both drug (dose and duration) and patient-specific characteristics. The patient-specific parameters (some of which can be modified by patients and/or physicians) should always be monitored before and during treatment with glucocorticoids and optimized if necessary. A positive benefit-risk ratio can be achieved when current knowledge and existing recommendations are kept in mind and implemented in clinical practice.

A time-adjustable pulsatile release system for ketoprofen: In vitro and in vivo investigation in a pharmacokinetic study and an IVIVC evaluation

A time-adjustable pulsatile release system (TAPS) containing ketoprofen (KF) as an active pharmaceutical agent was developed having been designed for bedtime dosing and releasing drug in the early morning to control the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The formulation involved a tablet core (KF) and a control-release layer, and the coating membrane was composed of EC and Eudragit L100. A single-factor study, a central composite design and a response surface method were selected to optimize the formula and the optimum prescription was as follows: tablet core (KF 50mg, MCC 70mg, lactose 40mg, L-HPC 38mg), and film (EC 7.8g, Eudragit L100 4.2g, PEG 6000 1.8g in 95% alcohol each 200ml). The in vivo release behavior of the tablets was evaluated in Beagle dogs after a parallel oral administration of KF TAPS tablets and commercial KF capsules, when it was found that the KF TAPS tablets released the drug after a lag-time of 3.458h and the T_max was 5.833h. The relative bioavailability was 85.01%, and the two formulations were bioequivalent in terms of C_max and AUC_0-t and the in vitro- in vivo correlations indicated that test formulation had a good in vivo-in vitro correlation (r=0.9703). These results show that the novel drug delivery system (TAPS) has the potential to be used as a KF preparation with chronophamacokinetics characteristics.

Barriers to Immunizations and Strategies to Enhance Immunization Rates in Adults with Autoimmune Inflammatory Diseases

For as long as there have been immunizations, there have been barriers to them. Immunization rates in the United States are below target. Rheumatologists and rheumatology practitioners need to understand the issues of immunizations in patients with autoimmune inflammatory disease to identify and overcome barriers to immunization. Several strategies for overcoming these barriers are discussed.