1
|
Yan Q, Zhong X, Li J, Zhao L, Niu J, Song D, Wang J, Teng Y, Wu T, Sun X, Chen R, Wang S, Zou J. Modified transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency: an effective treatment measure for lumbar radiculopathy. Front Surg 2025; 12:1566661. [PMID: 40352305 PMCID: PMC12062145 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1566661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2025] [Accepted: 04/09/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent condition encountered in the clinical diagnosis and management of spinal surgery. Certain people may experience excruciating radicular pain in the lower extremities. If these symptoms are not promptly alleviated, they may progressively deteriorate, ultimately resulting in radiating pain in the lower extremities, advancing neurological impairments, and potential trouble in standing, significantly impairing the patient's quality of life. Consequently, clinicians require an expedited and efficacious approach to address radicular discomfort resulting from lumbar radiculopathy and promptly reinstate the patient's normal functionality. Objectives This study seeks to assess the effectiveness of a modified transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in conjunction with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treating lumbar radiculopathy using a retrospective analysis. Methods Our study examined patients with unilateral lower limb radicular pain persisting for three months or more due to LDH, in whom conservative therapies were ineffective, from January 1, 2023, to October 31, 2023. This trial comprised 106 patients who received modified TFESI alongside PRF. We evaluated clinical efficacy and follow-up at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery primarily using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab score. Results Patients who received modified TFESI in conjunction with PRF exhibited substantial enhancements across all three assessment instruments (VAS, ODI, MacNab) when compared to pre-treatment evaluations (p < 0.0001). The alleviation of radicular discomfort was notably enduring, meeting the patients' expectations. At the 12-month follow-up, we noted that patients often achieved substantial pain alleviation within 6 months, and only a minor proportion of patients encountered pain recurrence by the 12th month, with no notable problems detected. Conclusions The modified TFESI in conjunction with PRF is a safe, cost-efficient, and successful therapy modality. Our findings indicated that this method can efficiently and swiftly relieve patients' radicular discomfort and produce enduring therapeutic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Yan
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xianggu Zhong
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiarong Li
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Wuzhong People’s Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Leyu Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Junjie Niu
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Dawei Song
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jinning Wang
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yun Teng
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Tianyi Wu
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiao Sun
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Shuangfei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Chenghang Hospital, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Zou
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goode AP, Goertz C, Chakraborty H, Salsbury SA, Broderick S, Levy BT, Ryan K, Settles S, Hort S, Dolor RJ, Chrischilles EA, Kasper S, Stahl JE, Almond C, Reed SD, Shannon Z, Harris D, Daly J, Winokur P, Lurie JD. Implementation of the American- College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain (IMPACt-LBP): protocol for a healthcare systems embedded multisite pragmatic cluster-randomised trial. BMJ Open 2025; 15:e097133. [PMID: 40139699 PMCID: PMC11950946 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) is a key source of medical costs and disability, impacting over 31 million Americans at any given time and resulting in US$100-US$200 billion per year in total healthcare costs. LBP is one of the leading causes of ambulatory care visits to US physicians; problematically, these visits often result in treatments such as opioids, surgery or advanced imaging that can lead to more harm than benefit. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Guideline for Low Back Pain recommends patients receive non-pharmacological interventions as a first-line treatment. Roadmaps exist for multidisciplinary collaborative care that include well-trained primary contact clinicians with specific expertise in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, such as physical therapists and doctors of chiropractic, as first-line providers for LBP. These clinicians, sometimes referred to as primary spine practitioners (PSPs) routinely employ many of the non-pharmacological approaches recommended by the ACP guideline, including spinal manipulation and exercise. Important foundational work has demonstrated that such care is feasible and safe, and results in improved physical function, less pain, fewer opioid prescriptions and reduced utilisation of healthcare services. However, this treatment approach for LBP has yet to be widely implemented or tested in a multisite clinical trial in real-world practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Implementation of the American College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain trial is a health system-embedded pragmatic cluster-randomised trial that will examine the effect of offering initial contact with a PSP compared with usual primary care for LBP. Twenty-six primary care clinics within three healthcare systems were randomised 1:1 to PSP intervention or usual primary care. Primary outcomes are pain interference and physical function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms collected via patient self-report among a planned sample of 1800 participants at baseline, 1, 3 (primary end point), 6 and 12 months. A subset of participants enrolled early in the trial will also receive a 24-month assessment. An economic analysis and analysis of healthcare utilisation will be conducted as well as an evaluation of the patient, provider and policy-level barriers and facilitators to implementing the PSP model using a mixed-methods process evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study received ethics approval from Advarra, Duke University, Dartmouth Health and the University of Iowa Institutional Review Boards. Study data will be made available on completion, in compliance with National Institutes of Health data sharing policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05626049.
Collapse
Grants
- UL1 TR002537 NCATS NIH HHS
- U24 AT011189 NCCIH NIH HHS
- U24 AT009676 NCCIH NIH HHS
- UG3 AT011187 NCCIH NIH HHS
- UH3 AT011187 NCCIH NIH HHS
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health
- NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Coordinating Center through cooperative agreement from NCCIH, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), NIAMS, the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), and the NIH Office of Disease Prevention (ODP)
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory by cooperative agreements (Clinical Coordinating Center and Data Coordinating Center) from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam P Goode
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Goertz
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hrishikesh Chakraborty
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | - Samuel Broderick
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Barcey T Levy
- Family and Community Medicine, The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Kelley Ryan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sharon Settles
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shoshana Hort
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Rowena J Dolor
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Chrischilles
- College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Stacie Kasper
- Family and Community Medicine, The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - James E Stahl
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Chandra Almond
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zacariah Shannon
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | - Debra Harris
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeanette Daly
- Family and Community Medicine, The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Patricia Winokur
- Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jon D Lurie
- Medicine, Orthopaedics, Health Policy, and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Window P, Bada E, Stovell MG, Ahuja S, Beard DJ, Gardner A, Foster NE. Healthcare Professionals' Decision-Making Regarding Lumbar Fusion Surgery or Conservative Care for Adults With Severe, Persistent Low Back Pain: An Australian Cross-Sectional Survey Using Case Vignettes. Global Spine J 2025:21925682251323865. [PMID: 39999768 PMCID: PMC11863196 DOI: 10.1177/21925682251323865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 01/30/2025] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional Survey. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to describe clinicians' decision-making regarding suitability of patient cases for lumbar fusion surgery or conservative care and the level of equipoise to randomise participants into a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS An online survey distributed via Australian professional networks to clinicians involved in low back pain care, collected data on clinical discipline, clinical experience, practice setting and preferred care of five patient case vignettes (ranging in age, pain duration, BMI, imaging findings, neurological signs/symptoms). Clinicians were asked about preferred clinical care and willingness to randomise each case. RESULTS Of 101 respondents (31 orthopaedic surgeons, 17 neurosurgeons, 50 allied health professionals (AHPs), 1 pain physician, 1 nurse), 44% worked in public health services only, 36.4% in both public and private, 19.2% in private only. 46.5% had over 20 years clinical experience. Conservative care was preferred for all cases (83.1%-90.9%). Surgeons preferred an anterior approach to lumbar fusion (range 40.6%-68.4%). On average 51.9% (range: 47%-55%) indicated willingness to randomise cases, with orthopaedic (61.5%) and neurosurgeons (64.9%) more willing than AHPs (44.4%). Willingness to randomise was highest in younger cases with shorter pain duration, no neurological symptoms/signs and localised degeneration, and lowest when cases had high BMI, longer pain duration, and inadequate conservative management. Willingness to randomise was higher in those in private (70.3%) vs public health care services (43.6%). CONCLUSIONS Over half of respondents reported willingness to randomise cases, indicating sufficient clinical equipoise for a future RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Window
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Eniola Bada
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew G Stovell
- Orthopaedic Department, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sashin Ahuja
- Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - David J Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrian Gardner
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chiu AP, Lesnak J, Gabriel K, Price TJ, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bobos P, Curatolo M. Human molecular mechanisms of discogenic low back pain: A scoping review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2025; 27:104693. [PMID: 39374801 PMCID: PMC11807758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
The limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying human discogenic low back pain (DLBP) has hampered the development of effective treatments. While there is much research on disc degeneration, the association between degeneration and pain is weak. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify pain-inducing molecular mechanism to facilitate the development of mechanism-specific therapeutics. This scoping review aims to determine the current knowledge of molecular mechanisms associated with human DLBP. A systematic search on CENTRAL, CINAHL, Citation searching, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and World Health Organization was performed. Studies with human DLBP as diagnosed by discography or imaging that analyzed human disc tissues and reported pain-related outcomes were included, and those on predominant radicular pain were excluded. The search returned 6012 studies. Most studies did not collect pain-related outcomes. Those that included pain assessment relied on self-report of pain intensity and disability. Six studies qualified for data extraction and synthesis. The main molecular mechanisms associated with DLBP were the expressions of nociceptive neuropeptides and cytokines, particularly TNF-αdue to its strong association with pain outcomes. Activation of NF-κB signaling pathway, alterations in adrenoceptor expressions, and increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) were also associated with DLBP through regulation of pro-inflammatory factors and pain-related neuropeptides. Current evidence converges to TNF-α, NF-κB signaling, and ROS-induced pro-inflammation. Major weaknesses in the current literature are the focus on degeneration without pain phenotyping, and lack of association of molecular findings with pain outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This scoping review identified TNF-α, NF-κB signaling, and ROS-induced pro-inflammation as relevant mechanisms of human discogenic low back pain. Major weaknesses in the current literature are the focus on degeneration without pain phenotyping, and lack of association of molecular findings with pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby P Chiu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Learning, Evidence And Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph Lesnak
- Department of Neuroscience and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, University of Texas at Dallas, USA
| | - Katherin Gabriel
- Department of Neuroscience and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, University of Texas at Dallas, USA
| | - Theodor J Price
- Department of Neuroscience and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, University of Texas at Dallas, USA
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Medical School, Aalborg University, Denmark; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mech-Sense, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Pavlos Bobos
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michele Curatolo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Learning, Evidence And Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maras G, Olmez SB, Degerli Maras B, Citaker S. The Turkish minimum dataset for chronic low back pain research: a cross-cultural adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Task Force Research Standards. Physiother Theory Pract 2025; 41:309-316. [PMID: 38566565 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2337789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has produced a minimal data set to promote more accurate and consistent reporting of clinical trials, facilitating easier comparison of research on low back pain patients worldwide. The NIH-minimal dataset has not been previously translated into Turkish, and its features are currently unknown. This study aimed to adapt the NIH-Minimal Data Set into Turkish and investigate its validity and reliability in Turkish-speaking patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS In the study, 245 patients with CLBP were included. Test-retest and internal consistency analyzes were performed to evaluate the reliability of the NIH-minimal dataset. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) value was used to assess test-retest analysis. Cronbach's alpha value was calculated for internal consistency. Total impact scores of the NIH-minimal dataset were compared with total scores of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to assess construct validity. The minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated based on the standard error of measurement (SEM95). RESULTS The NIH-Minimal Data Set was found to have high test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.928) and high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.905). The NIH-minimal dataset correlated well with RMDQ and ODI (r = 0.750 and 0.810, respectively). There were no floor or ceiling effects. Also, SEM95 and MDC95 for the total score were 4.57 and 12.55, respectively. CONCLUSION Considering all these data, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the NIH-minimal dataset is a valid and reliable outcome measure for evaluating patients with CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokhan Maras
- Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
| | - Sevim Beyza Olmez
- Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | | | - Seyit Citaker
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Callens J, Lavreysen O, Goudman L, De Smedt A, Putman K, Van de Velde D, Godderis L, Ceulemans D, Moens M. Does rehabilitation improve work participation in patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2025; 57:jrm25156. [PMID: 39749418 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v57.25156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with therapy-refractory chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery experience increased disability, resulting in substantial loss of employment and consequently lower quality of life. Despite findings that rehabilitation improves socio-economic outcomes in other chronic pain conditions, evidence for patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery is limited. A systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of rehabilitation interventions and their effectiveness to improve work participation for patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery. METHODS MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist and GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence. The review protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022346091). RESULTS The search yielded 1,289 publications. Full-text screening of 48 articles resulted in the inclusion of 6 publications. The included interventions comprised multiple treatment components, consisting of back school, self-care, functional restoration, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, physiotherapy, and digital care programmes to improve work participation. CONCLUSION Rehabilitation to improve return to work for patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery was supported only by low-certainty evidence. Rehabilitation therapies that are personalized and that integrate the patient's work seem most suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Callens
- STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Olivia Lavreysen
- Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ann De Smedt
- STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- Faculty of Medicine and Healthcare Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Program, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium; IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Heverlee, Belgium
| | - Dries Ceulemans
- Faculty of Medicine and Healthcare Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Program, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maarten Moens
- STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Cluster Neurosciences, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Danazumi MS, Ford JJ, Kaka B, Hahne AJ. Current Physiotherapy Assessment and Treatment Practices for Low Back Pain in Nigeria: A National Survey. PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2025; 30:e70011. [PMID: 39612351 DOI: 10.1002/pri.70011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in physiotherapy care for Low Back Pain (LBP) worldwide, studies suggest that physiotherapists in Nigeria do not adhere to international guidelines, and it is not known whether recent treatment approaches developed for LBP are recognized or applied by physiotherapists in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the current assessment and treatment practices used by physiotherapists in Nigeria for people with recent onset, recurrent and chronic LBP. DESIGN A descriptive cross-sectional electronic national survey. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred and sixty-seven registered physiotherapists who treat LBP across all 36 states of Nigeria completed the survey anonymously via REDCap. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-seven physiotherapists (mean age = 37.6 years, SD = 9.1; 53.6% female) completed the survey in full. Although most physiotherapists (> 95%) regularly applied traditional assessment methods (e.g., history of presenting complaint, observation for spinal deformity, palpation), only approximately 30% screened for red flag pathology. Very few physiotherapists assessed patients with LBP for psychological distress (< 8%) or risk stratification/prognostic factors (< 4%). For treatment, electrophysical agents and muscle techniques (e.g., massage) predominated (> 95%), while few physiotherapists used cognitive-behavioural strategies (< 2%), individualised multimodal treatment programs (e.g., cognitive functional therapy, StarT Back or STOPS, < 1.5%), validated outcome measures (< 15%), clinical practice guidelines (< 10%) or a clinical reasoning strategy/framework (< 20%). Most Nigerian physiotherapists (> 99%) expressed interest in learning evidence-based LBP assessment and treatment methods from international experts. CONCLUSION There is very limited application of contemporary assessment and treatment practices for LBP by Nigerian physiotherapists; however, they are very interested in learning these methods from international experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musa Sani Danazumi
- School of Allied Health, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon J Ford
- School of Allied Health, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bashir Kaka
- Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Andrew J Hahne
- School of Allied Health, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meester RJ, Jacobs WCH, Spruit M, Kroeze RJ, van Hooff ML. Prognostic Factors for Outcome of Fusion Surgery in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2025; 15:251-266. [PMID: 39303056 PMCID: PMC11559952 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241286031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to identify prognostic factors, encompassing biomedical and psychosocial variables, linked to outcome of fusion surgery for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in single or two-level lumbar degenerative spinal disorders. Identifying these factors is crucial for decision making and therefore long-term treatment outcome. METHODS A systematic search (PROSPERO ID: CRD4202018927) from January 2010 to October 2022 was conducted, utilizing Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, CENTRAL). Prognostic factors associated with various outcomes, including functional status, back and leg pain, health-related quality of life, complications, return to work, and analgesic use, were assessed. Risk of bias was determined using QUIPS, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE approach. RESULTS Of the 9852 initially screened studies, eleven studies (n = 16,482) were included in the analysis. In total, 161 associations were identified, with 67 prognostic factors showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thirty associations were supported by two or more studies, and only eight associations were eligible for meta-analyses: female gender remained statistically significant associated with decreased postoperative back pain, but negatively associated with complication rates and functional status, and smoking with increased postoperative back pain. CONCLUSION Only female gender and smoking were consistently associated with outcome of fusion for CLBP. Most of the included studies exhibited low to moderate methodological quality, which may explain the relatively weak associations identified for the assessed prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinse J. Meester
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Spruit
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Kroeze
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda L. van Hooff
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nigru AS, Benini S, Bonetti M, Bragaglio G, Frigerio M, Maffezzoni F, Leonardi R. External validation of SpineNetV2 on a comprehensive set of radiological features for grading lumbosacral disc pathologies. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 20:100564. [PMID: 39640208 PMCID: PMC11617751 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
Background In recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models has revolutionized the diagnosis of Low Back Pain (LBP) and associated disc pathologies. Among these, SpineNetV2 stands out as a state-of-the-art, open-access model for detecting and grading various intervertebral disc pathologies. However, ensuring the reliability and applicability of AI models like SpineNetV2 is paramount. Rigorous validation is essential to guarantee their robustness and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts and imaging protocols. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of MRI images of 1747 lumbosacral intervertebral discs (IVDs) from 353 patients (mean age, 54 ± 15.4 years, 44.5% female) with various spinal disorders, collected between September 2021 and February 2023 at X-Ray Service s.r.l. The SpineNetV2 system was used to grade 11 distinct lumbosacral disc pathologies, including Pfirrmann grading, disc narrowing, central canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, (upper and lower) endplate defects, (upper and lower) marrow changes, (right and left) foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, using T2-weighted sagittal MR images. Performance metrics included accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, F1 score, Matthew's Correlation Coefficient, Brier Score Loss, Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, and Cohen's kappa coefficients. Two expert radiologists provide annotations for these discs. The evaluation of SpineNetV2's grading is compared against expert radiologists' assessments. Results SpineNetV2 demonstrated strong performance across various metrics, with high agreement scores (Cohen's Kappa, Lin's Concordance, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient exceeding 0.7) for most pathologies. However, lower agreement was found for foraminal stenosis and disc herniation, underscoring the limitations of sagittal MR images for evaluating these conditions. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of external validation, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessments of deep learning models. SpineNetV2 exhibits promising results in predicting disc pathologies, with findings guiding further improvements. The open-source release of SpineNetV2 enables researchers to independently validate and extend the model's capabilities. This collaborative approach promotes innovation and accelerates the development of more reliable and comprehensive deep learning tools for the assessment of spine pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alemu Sisay Nigru
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa, 11, Brescia 25123, Italy
| | - Sergio Benini
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy
| | - Matteo Bonetti
- X-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
- Poliambulatorio Oberdan, Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
| | - Graziella Bragaglio
- X-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
- Poliambulatorio Oberdan, Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
| | - Michele Frigerio
- Poliambulatorio Oberdan, Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
| | - Federico Maffezzoni
- X-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
- Poliambulatorio Oberdan, Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leonardi
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tai D, Kim E, Grover P, Rodriguez A, Olivier TJ, Annaswamy TM. Low-value interventions to deimplement: A secondary analysis of a systematic review of low back pain clinical practice guidelines. PM R 2024. [PMID: 39444252 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a secondary review of low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) identified in a recently conducted systematic review and to synthesize and summarize low-value recommendations as practices that may be candidates for deimplementation. LITERATURE SURVEY LBP (subacute or chronic) CPGs in English (symptom based, created by a governmental or professional society, published between January 1990 and May 2020) were previously identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ortho Guidelines, CPG Infobase, Emergency Care Research Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. METHODOLOGY Twenty-one CPGs were reviewed from a systematic review (previously published). Full-text review of all 21 CPGs was conducted, and three recommendation categories indicative of low value (recommend strongly against, recommend weakly against, inconclusive/insufficient evidence) were identified using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) language and approach. SYNTHESIS One hundred thirty-five low-value recommendations were identified and classified under eight intervention categories: orthotics/support, traction, physical modalities, pharmacological interventions, injections, surgery, bed rest, and miscellaneous. Traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (TUS), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) had the most CPGs recommend strongly against their usage. Opioids were recommended strongly against by four CPGs. No significant difference (p > .05) was found between CPG quality and a specific deimplementation recommendation or between CPG quality and the number of strongly against, weakly against, and inconclusive/insufficient evidence recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians managing patients with chronic LBP should consider deimplementing these low-value interventions (traction, TENS, TUS, and SSRI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Tai
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eunyeop Kim
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Prateek Grover
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn State Health Rehabilitation Hospital, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Thiru M Annaswamy
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn State Health Rehabilitation Hospital, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kale A, Taneja A, Sharma P. A Comparative Study Between Selective Nerve Root Blocks Versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection in the Management of Lumbar Radiculopathy. Cureus 2024; 16:e72224. [PMID: 39583438 PMCID: PMC11584173 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Lumbar radiculopathy is one of the most common disorders encountered by a spine surgeon. The condition involves back pain, which may radiate to the lower limbs, and neurological symptoms, which involve a specific nerve root. Caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) and selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are two of the most common interventions, which are used to control the pain and neurological symptoms associated with chronic lumbar radiculopathy. This study compares the two nonsurgical treatment procedures and aims to assist medical professionals dealing with this condition, in making an informed decision regarding which procedure would be better suited for their patients. Our study showed that CESIs better alleviated pain and had a greater improvement in functional impairment at short-term (one month) follow-up. However, both procedures had similar efficacy at three-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Kale
- Orthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND
| | - Ayush Taneja
- Orthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND
| | - Pankaj Sharma
- Orthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajkovic CJ, Merckling ML, Lee AW, Subah G, Malhotra A, Thomas ZD, Zeller SL, Wainwright JV, Kinon MD. Conservative management of spinal pathology with autologous conditioned serum: A systematic review of the literature. World J Orthop 2024; 15:870-881. [PMID: 39318497 PMCID: PMC11417626 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i9.870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic inflammatory pain is associated with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-1, an inflammatory cytokine, and activity on its receptor (IL-1R). In response, the body produces IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) to reduce this signaling. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) is the only biologic therapy for spinal pathologies that enhances the action of endogenous IL-1Ra reserves to improve symptoms. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of ACS in treating pain and disability caused by spinal pathologies.
AIM To evaluate the use of ACS as a conservative management option for spinal pathology.
METHODS A systematic review of PubMed/Medline was performed to identify studies investigating administration of ACS for treatment of any spinal pathology.
RESULTS Six articles were included, comprising 684 patients treated with epidural (n = 133) or transforaminal (n = 551) ACS injections. Patients had an average age of 54.0 years with slight female predominance (53.2%). The lumbar spine was most commonly treated, with 567 patients (82.9%) receiving injections for lumbar radiculopathy (n = 67), degenerative disc disease (DDD) (n = 372), or spinal stenosis (n = 128); cervical injections were performed in 109 patients (15.9%). Mean (SD) follow-up was 21.7 (4.8) weeks from first ACS injection. All studies investigating mechanical lumbar and lumbar or cervical radicular pain reported significant pain reduction at final follow-up compared to baseline. ACS achieved comparable or superior results to lumbar epidural steroid injections. Adverse events were reported in 21 patients (3.1%), with no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION ACS injection is a safe and effective intervention for pain reduction in many spinal pathologies, including cervical and lumbar radiculopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Rajkovic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Matthew L Merckling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Alyssa W Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Galadu Subah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Aryan Malhotra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Zachary D Thomas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Sabrina L Zeller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - John V Wainwright
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Merritt D Kinon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Campbell WA, Chick JFB, Shin DS, Makary MS. Value of interventional radiology and their contributions to modern medical systems. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 4:1403761. [PMID: 39086502 PMCID: PMC11288872 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1403761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Interventional radiology (IR) is a unique specialty that incorporates a diverse set of skills ranging from imaging, procedures, consultation, and patient management. Understanding how IR generates value to the healthcare system is important to review from various perspectives. IR specialists need to understand how to meet demands from various stakeholders to expand their practice improving patient care. Thus, this review discusses the domains of value contributed to medical systems and outlines the parameters of success. IR benefits five distinct parties: patients, practitioners, payers, employers, and innovators. Value to patients and providers is delivered through a wide set of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Payers and hospital systems financially benefit from the reduced cost in medical management secondary to fast patient recovery, outpatient procedures, fewer complications, and the prestige of offering diverse expertise for complex patients. Lastly, IR is a field of rapid innovation implementing new procedural technology and techniques. Overall, IR must actively advocate for further growth and influence in the medical field as their value continues to expand in multiple domains. Despite being a nascent specialty, IR has become indispensable to modern medical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warren A. Campbell
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Jeffrey F. B. Chick
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - David S. Shin
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mina S. Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilligan C, Volschenk W, Russo M, Green M, Gilmore C, Mehta V, Deckers K, De Smedt K, Latif U, Sayed D, Georgius P, Gentile J, Mitchell B, Langhorst M, Huygen F, Baranidharan G, Patel V, Mironer E, Ross E, Carayannopoulos A, Hayek S, Gulve A, Van Buyten JP, Tohmeh A, Fischgrund J, Lad S, Ahadian F, Deer T, Klemme W, Rauck R, Rathmell J, Maislin G, Heemels JP, Eldabe S. Five-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up of Restorative Neurostimulation Shows Durability of Effectiveness in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:930-943. [PMID: 38483366 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with refractory, mechanical chronic low back pain associated with impaired neuromuscular control of the lumbar multifidus muscle have few treatment options that provide long-term clinical benefit. This study hypothesized that restorative neurostimulation, a rehabilitative treatment that activates the lumbar multifidus muscles to overcome underlying dysfunction, is safe and provides relevant and durable clinical benefit to patients with this specific etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective five-year longitudinal follow-up of the ReActiv8-B pivotal trial, participants (N = 204) had activity-limiting, moderate-to-severe, refractory, mechanical chronic low back pain, a positive prone instability test result indicating impaired multifidus muscle control, and no indications for spine surgery. Low back pain intensity (10-cm visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and quality of life (EuroQol's "EQ-5D-5L" index) were compared with baseline and following the intent-to-treat principle, with a supporting mixed-effects model for repeated measures that accounted for missing data. RESULTS At five years (n = 126), low back pain VAS had improved from 7.3 to 2.4 cm (-4.9; 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5 cm; p < 0.0001), and 71.8% of participants had a reduction of ≥50%. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 39.1 to 16.5 (-22.7; 95% CI, -25.4 to -20.8; p < 0.0001), and 61.1% of participants had reduction of ≥20 points. The EQ-5D-5L index improved from 0.585 to 0.807 (0.231; 95% CI, 0.195-0.267; p < 0.0001). Although the mixed-effects model attenuated completed-case results, conclusions and statistical significance were maintained. Of 52 subjects who were on opioids at baseline and had a five-year visit, 46% discontinued, and 23% decreased intake. The safety profile compared favorably with neurostimulator treatments for other types of back pain. No lead migrations were observed. CONCLUSION Over a five-year period, restorative neurostimulation provided clinically substantial and durable benefits with a favorable safety profile in patients with refractory chronic low back pain associated with multifidus muscle dysfunction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02577354; registration date: October 15, 2016; principal investigator: Christopher Gilligan, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. The study was conducted in Australia (Broadmeadow, New South Wales; Noosa Heads, Queensland; Welland, South Australia; Clayton, Victoria), Belgium (Sint-Niklaas; Wilrijk), The Netherlands (Rotterdam), UK (Leeds, London, Middlesbrough), and USA (La Jolla, CA; Santa Monica, CA; Aurora, CO; Carmel, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Kansas City, KS; Boston, MA; Royal Oak, MI; Durham, NC; Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland, OH; Providence, RI; Spartanburg, SC; Spokane, WA; Charleston, WV).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Christopher Gilmore
- Center for Clinical Research, Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Barts Neuromodulation Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kristiaan Deckers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Kris De Smedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Peter Georgius
- Sunshine Coast Clinical Research, Noosa Heads, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Pain and Neuromodulation Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Vikas Patel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eugene Mironer
- Carolinas Center for the Advanced Management of Pain, Spartanburg, NC, USA
| | - Edgar Ross
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Salim Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ashish Gulve
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Jeffrey Fischgrund
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oakland University, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Shivanand Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Farshad Ahadian
- Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - William Klemme
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - James Rathmell
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Greg Maislin
- Biomedical Statistical Consulting, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | | | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mauck MC, Aylward AF, Barton CE, Birckhead B, Carey T, Dalton DM, Fields AJ, Fritz J, Hassett AL, Hoffmeyer A, Jones SB, McLean SA, Mehling WE, O'Neill CW, Schneider MJ, Williams DA, Zheng P, Wasan AD. [Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach : German version]. Schmerz 2024:10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x. [PMID: 38381187 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. METHODS A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered. CONCLUSION The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Mauck
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7011, 27599-7010, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Aileen F Aylward
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chloe E Barton
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7011, 27599-7010, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brandon Birckhead
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy Carey
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Diane M Dalton
- Department of Physical Therapy, Boston University, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Sargent, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron J Fields
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Kalifornien, USA
| | - Julie Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Afton L Hassett
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anna Hoffmeyer
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sara B Jones
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samuel A McLean
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7011, 27599-7010, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Wolf E Mehling
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Kalifornien, USA
| | - Conor W O'Neill
- Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Kalifornien, USA
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy and Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David A Williams
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Patricia Zheng
- Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Kalifornien, USA
| | - Ajay D Wasan
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang S, Jing S, Wang S, Jia F. From drugs to biomaterials: a review of emerging therapeutic strategies for intervertebral disc inflammation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 14:1303645. [PMID: 38352058 PMCID: PMC10861683 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1303645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (LBP) is an increasingly prevalent issue, especially among aging populations. A major underlying cause of LBP is intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), often triggered by intervertebral disc (IVD) inflammation. Inflammation of the IVD is divided into Septic and Aseptic inflammation. Conservative therapy and surgical treatment often fail to address the root cause of IDD. Recent advances in the treatment of IVD infection and inflammation range from antibiotics and small-molecule drugs to cellular therapies, biological agents, and innovative biomaterials. This review sheds light on the complex mechanisms of IVD inflammation and physiological and biochemical processes of IDD. Furthermore, it provides an overview of recent research developments in this area, intending to identify novel therapeutic targets and guide future clinical strategies for effectively treating IVD-related conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhan Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Shaoze Jing
- Department of Orthopedics, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Shanxi Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Fajing Jia
- Department of General Practice, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Canós-Verdecho Á, Robledo R, Izquierdo R, Bermejo A, Gallach E, Abejón D, Argente P, Peraita-Costa I, Morales-Suárez-Varela M. Confirmatory study of the usefulness of quantum molecular resonance and microdissectomy for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy in a prospective cohort at 6 months follow-up. Scand J Pain 2024; 24:sjpain-2023-0077. [PMID: 38447036 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint and while prognosis is usually favorable, some patients experience persistent pain despite conservative treatment and invasive treatment to target the root cause of the pain may be necessary. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient outcomes after treatment of lumbar radiculopathy (LR) with quantum molecular resonance radiofrequency coblation disc decompression and percutaneous microdiscectomy with grasper forceps (QMRG). METHODS This prospective cohort study was carried out in two Spanish hospitals on 58 patients with LR secondary to a contained hydrated lumbar disc hernia or lumbar disc protrusion of more than 6 months of evolution, which persisted despite conservative treatment with analgesia, rehabilitation, and physiotherapy, and/or epidural block, in the previous 2 years. Patients were treated with QMRG and the outcomes were measured mainly using the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions, Numeric Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, SF12: Short Form 12 Health Survey, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement, and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale. RESULTS Patients who received QMRG showed significant improvement in their baseline scores at 6 months post-treatment. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold was met by 26-98% of patients, depending on the outcome measure, for non-sleep-related outcomes, and between 17 and 62% for sleep-related outcome measures. Of the 14 outcome measures studied, at least 50% of the patients met the MCID threshold in 8 of them. CONCLUSION Treatment of LR with QMRG appears to be effective at 6 months post-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángeles Canós-Verdecho
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Ruth Robledo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Rosa Izquierdo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Ara Bermejo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Elisa Gallach
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Psychiatry Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - David Abejón
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Calle Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Argente
- Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Surgical Specialities Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Isabel Peraita-Costa
- Unit of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Food Sciencs, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Universitat de València, Av. Vicent Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), The Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - María Morales-Suárez-Varela
- Unit of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Food Sciencs, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Universitat de València, Av. Vicent Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), The Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen B, Yang Y, Wang H, Guo X, Wu Z, Lan Z. Is radiofrequency ablation effective in treating patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:412-420. [PMID: 38222705 PMCID: PMC10783354 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aims This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and explore the role of diagnostic genicular nerve blocks in predicting treatment outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and nine randomized controlled trials involving 714 participants were included in the analysis. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and subgroup analyses were performed. The primary outcome measures were pain scores at 6 and 12 months, assessed using visual analogue scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results The meta-analysis revealed that RFA demonstrated a significant short-term efficacy in reducing pain compared to the control group at 6 months, as indicated by the pain scores [weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.69, 95% CI: -3.99, -1.40]. Similarly, WOMAC scores at 6 months favored the RFA group (WMD: -4.40, 95% CI: -7.12, -1.68). However, the long-term efficacy of RFA at 12 months remained uncertain for both pain scores (WMD: -0.88, 95% CI: -2.36, 0.61) and WOMAC (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.25, 0.32). Subgroup analysis suggested that a positive result from the diagnostic genicular nerve blocks test was associated with a more favourable short-term outcome. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides moderate-quality evidence supporting the short-term efficacy of RFA in reducing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion of a diagnostic genicular nerve blocks test prior to RFA may help identify patients likely to benefit from the procedure. But it still needs more large sample studies to verify the results. However, further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of RFA in managing knee osteoarthritis pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingkeng Chen
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery, Shishi Saite Hospital, Middle of North Ring Road, Shishi City, Quanzhou
| | - Yang Yang
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli South Street, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli South Street, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China
| | - Xuefang Guo
- Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital, Quanzhou
| | - Zhiqiang Wu
- Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital, Quanzhou
| | - Zhibin Lan
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli South Street, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zaina F, Côté P, Cancelliere C, Di Felice F, Donzelli S, Rauch A, Verville L, Negrini S, Nordin M. A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Persons With Non-specific Low Back Pain With and Without Radiculopathy: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 104:1913-1927. [PMID: 36963709 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To Identify evidence-based rehabilitation interventions for persons with non-specific low back pain (LBP) with and without radiculopathy and to develop recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to inform the World Health Organization's (WHO) Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR). DATA SOURCE We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database, PEDro, the Trip Database, the Index to Chiropractic Literature and the gray literature. STUDY SELECTION Eligible guidelines were (1) published between 2009 and 2019 in English, French, Italian, or Swedish; (2) included adults or children with non-specific LBP with or without radiculopathy; and (3) assessed the benefits of rehabilitation interventions on functioning. Pairs of independent reviewers assessed the quality of the CPGs using AGREE II. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified 4 high-quality CPGs. Recommended interventions included (1) education about recovery expectations, self-management strategies, and maintenance of usual activities; (2) multimodal approaches incorporating education, exercise, and spinal manipulation; (3) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs combined with education in the acute stage; and (4) intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation that includes exercise and cognitive/behavioral interventions for persistent pain. We did not identify high-quality CPGs for people younger than 16 years of age. CONCLUSION We developed evidence-based recommendations from high-quality CPGs to inform the WHO PIR for people with LBP with and without radiculopathy. These recommendations emphasize the potential benefits of education, exercise, manual therapy, and cognitive/behavioral interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zaina
- ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolina Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Alexandra Rauch
- Sensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation Unit, Department for Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Leslie Verville
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stefano Negrini
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "La Statale", Milan, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Awadalla AM, Aljulayfi AS, Alrowaili AR, Souror H, Alowid F, Mahdi AMM, Hussain R, Alzahrani MM, Alsamarh AN, Alkhaldi EA, Alanazi RC. Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e47908. [PMID: 38034203 PMCID: PMC10683841 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
A herniated disc in the spine is a condition during which a nucleus pulposus is displaced from intervertebral space. It is a common cause of back pain. The patients who experience pain related to a herniated disc often remember an inciting event that caused their pain. This activity reviews the evaluation and management of lumbar disc herniation and discusses the role of the healthcare team in evaluating and improving care for patients with this condition. Data sources were PubMed/Medline and Embase. Our review investigated English-language articles (from 2010 to 2023) according to the PRISMA guidelines. Overall, there were seven articles. Surveys and analyses of national databases were the most widely used methods (n=7). The search identified 777 studies; 7 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Further understanding of spinal disc herniation and treatment protocols may help improve evaluation and management in the future. Our research covered a range of management options. Disc herniation is a frequent problem for internists, emergency department doctors, nurse practitioners, and primary care physicians. To manage efficiently, an interprofessional team is needed. The first course of treatment is conservative, with paracetamol and anti-inflammatories being frequently used to relieve pain. A chemist must supervise the use of opioid analgesics in certain situations. Although surgery is sometimes the final option, patients frequently have neurological damage and lingering discomfort. In circumstances where physical treatment is not working, MRI interpretation becomes necessary. Primary care physicians or mental health professionals should handle back pain as it is frequently linked to mental health issues. Results can be enhanced by regular exercise and preserving a healthy body weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram M Awadalla
- Neurological Surgery, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU
| | - Alaa S Aljulayfi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
| | | | - Hatem Souror
- Medicine and Surgery, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Fay Alowid
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
| | | | - Remaz Hussain
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
| | | | | | | | - Reem C Alanazi
- Family Medicine, Primary Health Care Corporation, Riyadh, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Raffaeli W, Felzani G, Tenti M, Greco L, D’Eramo MP, Proietti S, Morone G. A Nutritional Supplement as Adjuvant of Gabapentinoids for Adults with Neuropathic Pain following Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke: Preliminary Results. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2563. [PMID: 37761760 PMCID: PMC10531277 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gabapentinoids are first choice drugs for central neuropathic pain (CNP) despite limited evidence of efficacy and side effects affecting therapy outcomes. Nutraceuticals could improve their efficacy and tolerability. Our aim is to investigate the effect of NACVAN®, in addition to gabapentinoids, on pain symptomatology in CNP patients. The effect of 6 weeks of treatment of NACVAN® was preliminary observed among 29 adult inpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI) or stroke-related CNP recruited to the experimental group. Pain intensity, neuropathic pain, and quality-of-life were measured at baseline (T0) and after 3 (T1) and 6 weeks (T2). Change in each outcome over time was assessed through a repeated measures analysis of variance or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Preliminary results show a significant reduction in pain intensity (T0 → T1, p = 0.021; T0 → T2, p = 0.011; T1 → T2, p = 0.46), neuropathic symptoms (T0 → T1, p = 0.024; T0 → T2, p = 0.003), and evoked pain (T0 → T2, p = 0.048). There were no significant reductions in other neuropathic pain dimensions and in quality-of-life components. No side-effects were detected. NACVAN® could have a beneficial adjuvant effect when used as an add-on to gabapentinoids in patients suffering from CNP due to SCI or stroke, with no adverse effect. Future analysis on a larger sample, compared with a placebo condition, could confirm these preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Raffaeli
- ISAL Foundation, Institute for Research on Pain, 47921 Rimini, Italy;
| | | | - Michael Tenti
- ISAL Foundation, Institute for Research on Pain, 47921 Rimini, Italy;
| | - Luca Greco
- San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, 67039 Sulmona, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Proietti
- Unit of Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology, San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, 67039 Sulmona, Italy
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murphy DR, Justice BD, Borkan J. Using medical storytelling to communicate problems and solutions in the low back pain conundrum: an evidence-based tale of twins. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:25. [PMID: 37553703 PMCID: PMC10410981 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00499-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low back pain (LBP) is the number one cause of disability world-wide. It is also the most expensive area in healthcare. Patient-centered innovations are needed. This paper uses medical storytelling to illustrate the common problems that often lead to unnecessary suffering for patients, and costs to society. We present innovative solutions, including narrative interventions. METHODS We use medical storytelling to present a scenario in which hypothetical twin patients with identical LBP episodes enter the healthcare system, with one twin managed in an appropriate manner, and the other inappropriately. RESULTS One twin becomes a chronic LBP sufferer, while the other experiences quick resolution, despite identical conditions. Recommendations are made to de-implement inappropriate action and to implement a more productive approach. CONCLUSIONS Many patients with LBP descend into chronic pain. This is rarely inevitable based on clinical factors. Much of chronic LBP results from how the condition is handled within the healthcare system. Medical narrative may be one innovation to illustrate the problem of current LBP management, recommend solutions and foster changes in clinical behavior. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The starkly different outcomes for each identical twin are illustrated. Recommendations are made for reframing the situation to de-implement the inappropriate and to implement a more appropriate approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald R Murphy
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 133 Dellwood Road, Cranston, RI, 02920, USA.
| | - Brian D Justice
- Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, 165 Court Street, Rochester, NY, 14647, USA
| | - Jeffrey Borkan
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 111 Brewster St, Pawtucket, RI, 02860, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Olivier TJ, Baltich Nelson B, Pham T, Trivedi K, Patel A, Sharma GS, Konda C, Annaswamy TM. Quality of clinical practice guidelines on interventional management of low back pain: A systematic review. PM R 2023; 15:1038-1051. [PMID: 35014199 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To appraise the quality of low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) that include interventional management recommendations and to associate their quality with characteristics including publication year and creating organization. TYPE: Systematic Review. LITERATURE SURVEY LBP (subacute or chronic) CPGs in English (symptom based, governmental or professional society created, January 1990-May 2020) were found using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ortho Guidelines, CPG Infobase, ECRI, Guidelines International Network, NICE, and SIGN. METHODOLOGY In this third order systematic review, search results were deduplicated, title and abstract screened by two independent reviewers, and full texts reviewed by four reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Resulted CPGs were appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Tool by four appraisers each. Association of their quality with creating organization, geographical region, and year of creation was calculated. SYNTHESIS Seven hundred fourteen screened documents resulted in 21 final CPGs. On appraisal, average overall CPG quality was 5.2 (range 2.5-6.75). Domain 5 (applicability) had the lowest average (44%) and domain 4 (clarity of presentation) had the highest average score (82%). For overall recommendation, 16 received "yes" or "yes with modifications," six received unanimous "yes" and two unanimous "no" votes. The interrater agreement of domain scoring was excellent (0.8-1.0; p < .001). There was no association found between quality of CPG and (1) year of publication (R2 = 0.0006), (2) whether the CPG was updated or new (p = .17), and (3) region of publication (p = .37). CONCLUSIONS The majority of the 21 CPGs identified in this systematic review were of high quality, but overall quality and recommendation ratings were variable. The quality of appraised CPGs showed no association with their characteristics. Some domains such as "applicability" scored uniformly lower, revealing opportunity for improvement in future CPG development. LBP CPGs should be scrutinized before adopting their recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Olivier
- University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Tri Pham
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kavita Trivedi
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ankit Patel
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - G Sunny Sharma
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Chaitanya Konda
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thiru M Annaswamy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Olivier TJ, Konda C, Pham T, Baltich Nelson B, Patel A, Sharma GS, Trivedi K, Annaswamy TM. Clinical practice guidelines on interventional management of low back pain: A synthesis of recommendations. PM R 2023; 15:1052-1063. [PMID: 36507598 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the recommendations on the interventional management of subacute and chronic nonradicular low back pain (LBP) from the 21 quality-appraised clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) identified in a previously published paper: "Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Interventional Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review." By disseminating this information, we aimed to facilitate the implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice. TYPE: Systematic Review LITERATURE SURVEY: Electronic bibliographic databases, guideline databases, and gray literature were searched from January 2016 to January 2020 to identify CPGs that met study criteria. METHODOLOGY A total of 21 CPGs were quality appraised and interventional management recommendations were extracted and organized into several treatment categories including epidural steroid injections, radiofrequency procedures (RF), facet injections, sacroiliac injections, and prolotherapy. Within each treatment category, the recommendations were organized based on two factors: quality of CPG and strength of recommendation. SYNTHESIS Overall, there was no consistency in recommendations for or against any interventional procedure, even when accounting for the quality of the CPG. In all of the CPGs reviewed, the most common strength of recommendation was weakly for. The second, third, and fourth most common strength of recommendations were inconclusive, weakly against, and strongly against, respectively, and the least common was strongly for. The treatment categories with the greatest number of recommendations were RF procedures (most common strength of recommendation was weakly for) and facet procedures. Among the high-quality CPGs, the most common strength of recommendation was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Most of the interventional management recommendations for management of nonradicular LBP in the 21 CPGs appraised in this review were either weakly for, weakly against, or inconclusive, with several recommendations within each treatment category contradicting each other. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument quality appraisals of CPGs on interventional management of LBP were of unclear utility in guiding clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Olivier
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Chaitanya Konda
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Tri Pham
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Becky Baltich Nelson
- Clinical Library, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ankit Patel
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - G Sunny Sharma
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kavita Trivedi
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thiru M Annaswamy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brintz CE, Coronado RA, Schlundt DG, Jenkins CH, Bird ML, Bley JA, Pennings JS, Wegener ST, Archer KR. A Conceptual Model for Spine Surgery Recovery: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Expectations, Experiences, and Satisfaction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:E235-E244. [PMID: 36580586 PMCID: PMC10949898 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Qualitative interview study. OBJECTIVE The aim was to develop a conceptual model for Spine Surgery Recovery in order to better understand why patients undergo lumbar spine surgery and what factors influence patient satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Quantitative studies have assessed patients' expectations for lumbar spine surgery outcomes, with greater expectation fulfillment leading to higher satisfaction. However, there is limited literature using qualitative methods to understand the patient perspective from the decision to undergo lumbar spine surgery through long-term recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 20 participants (nine females, mean age ±SD=61.2±11.1 yr) and three focus groups with 12 participants (nine females, mean age ±SD=62.0±10.9 yr). Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed. Two independent researchers coded the transcripts using a hierarchical coding system. Major themes were identified and a conceptual model was developed. RESULTS A total of 1355 coded quotes were analyzed. The decision to have lumbar spine surgery was influenced by chronic pain impact on daily function, pain coping, and patient expectations. Results demonstrated that fulfilled expectations and setting realistic expectations are key factors for patient satisfaction after surgery, while less known constructs of accepting limitations, adjusting expectations, and optimism were found by many patients to be essential for a successful recovery. Emotional factors of fear, anxiety, and depression were important aspects of presurgical and postsurgical experiences. CONCLUSION Our Spine Surgery Recovery conceptual model provides guidance for future research and clinical practice to optimize treatment and improve overall patient satisfaction. Recommendations based on this model include the assessment of patient expectations and mental well-being throughout postoperative recovery as well as preoperatively to help set realistic expectations and improve satisfaction. Educational, acceptance-based or positive psychological interventions may be potentially beneficial for addressing key factors identified in this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie E. Brintz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rogelio A. Coronado
- Vanderbilt Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Mackenzie L. Bird
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jordan A. Bley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jacquelyn S. Pennings
- Vanderbilt Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephen T. Wegener
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kristin R. Archer
- Vanderbilt Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hanna M, Perrot S, Varrassi G. Critical Appraisal of Current Acute LBP Management and the Role of a Multimodal Analgesia: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther 2023; 12:377-398. [PMID: 36765012 PMCID: PMC10036717 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00479-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute low back pain (LBP) stands as a leading cause of activity limitation and work absenteeism, and its associated healthcare expenditures are expected to become substantial when acute LBP develops into a chronic and even refractory condition. Therefore, early intervention is crucial to prevent progression to chronic pain, for which the management is particularly challenging and the most effective pharmacological therapy is still controversial. Current guideline treatment recommendations vary and are mostly driven by expertise with opinion differing across different interventions. Thus, it is difficult to formulate evidence-based guidance when the relatively few randomized clinical trials have explored the diagnosis and management of LBP while employing different selection criteria, statistical analyses, and outcome measurements. This narrative review aims to provide a critical appraisal of current acute LBP management by discussing the unmet needs and areas of improvement from bench-to-bedside, and proposes multimodal analgesia as the way forward to attain an effective and prolonged pain relief and functional recovery in patients with acute LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdi Hanna
- Director of the Analgesics and Pain Research Unit, APR (Ltd) Sunrise, Beckenham Place Park, Beckenham, Kent, London, BR35BN, UK.
| | - Serge Perrot
- Pain Centre, Cochin Hospital, INSERM U987, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu P, Wu Y, Xiao Z, Gold LS, Heagerty PJ, Annaswamy T, Friedly J, Turner JA, Jarvik JG, Suri P. Estimating individualized treatment effects using a risk-modeling approach: an application to epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain 2023; 164:811-819. [PMID: 36036907 PMCID: PMC9968359 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Conventional "1-variable-at-a-time" analyses to identify treatment effect modifiers are often underpowered and prone to false-positive results. This study used a "risk-modeling" approach guided by the Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement framework: (1) developing and validating a multivariable model to estimate predicted future back-related functional limitations as measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and (2) stratifying patients from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESIs) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis into subgroups with different individualized treatment effects on RMDQ scores at the 3-week follow-up. Model development and validation were conducted in a cohort (n = 3259) randomly split into training and testing sets in a 4:1 ratio. The model was developed in the testing set using linear regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection regularization and 5-fold cross-validation. The model was then applied in the testing set and subsequently in patients receiving the control treatment in the RCT of LESI. R2 values in the training set, testing set, and RCT were 0.38, 0.32, and 0.34, respectively. There was statistically significant modification ( P = 0.03) of the LESI treatment effect according to predicted risk quartile, with clinically relevant LESI treatment effect point estimates in the 2 quartiles with greatest predicted risk (-3.7 and -3.3 RMDQ points) and no effect in the lowest 2 quartiles. A multivariable risk-modeling approach identified subgroups of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with a clinically relevant treatment effect of LESI on back-related functional limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinyan Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 357232,Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Yitao Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 357232,Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Ziyu Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 357232,Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Laura S. Gold
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Box 359455, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Patrick J. Heagerty
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 357232,Seattle, WA 98104, USA
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Box 359455, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Thiru Annaswamy
- Dallas VA Medical Center, 4500 S. Lancaster Rd. Dallas, TX 75216, USA
| | - Janna Friedly
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Box 359455, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359612, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Judith A. Turner
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jeffrey G. Jarvik
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Box 359455, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
- Departments of Radiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359612 Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Pradeep Suri
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Box 359455, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359612, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
- Division of Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Stark CW, Isaamullah M, Hassan SS, Dyara O, Abd-Elsayed A. A Review of Chronic Pain and Device Interventions: Benefits and Future Directions. Pain Ther 2023; 12:341-354. [PMID: 36581788 PMCID: PMC10036715 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00470-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is a debilitating condition with a growing prevalence both in the USA and globally. The complex nature of this condition necessitates a multimodal approach to pain management that extends beyond the established pharmaceutical interventions currently employed. A variety of devices comprising both invasive and noninvasive approaches are available to patients, serving as adjuvants to existing regimens. The benefits of these interventions are notable for their lack of addiction potential, potential for patient autonomy regarding self-administration, minimal to no drug interaction, and overall relative safety. However, there remains a need for further research and more robust clinical trials to assess the true efficacy of these interventions and elucidate if there is an underlying physiological mechanism to their benefit in treating chronic pain or if their effect is predominantly placebo in nature. Regardless, the field of device-based intervention and treatment remains an evolving field with much promise for the future chronic pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cain W Stark
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Mir Isaamullah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | | | - Omar Dyara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Geyer D, Vessey JA, Chen A, DiFazio RL. Parental Caregiver Expectations and Satisfaction Following Hip Reconstruction and Spinal Fusion in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Orthop Nurs 2023; 42:94-102. [PMID: 36944203 DOI: 10.1097/nor.0000000000000928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Children with severe (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] IV-V) cerebral palsy (CP) exhibit profound physical and developmental impairments and require assistance for all activities of daily living. No curative treatments exist although surgical procedures to correct underlying hip and spine deformities can improve their quality of life. Despite the efficacy of these surgeries, little is known regarding parental caregivers' expectations specific to surgical outcomes and their satisfaction with surgical outcomes. The purpose was to explore parental caregiver expectations and satisfaction with hip and spine surgeries that their children with GMFCS IV-V CP underwent. Variations among preoperative expectations, changes in expectations over time, and the relationship of expectations on caregiver satisfaction were examined. A qualitative descriptive approach with conventional content analysis was utilized. Three preoperative caregiver expectation themes were identified: increasing functionality, increasing comfort, and maintaining health and averting crisis. These themes were still present at 5-year follow-up; however, more caregivers refocused their expectations from improving function to providing palliation. A clear relationship between expectations and caregiver satisfaction, however, was not identified. A deeper understanding surrounding caregiver expectation and satisfaction following surgical procedures is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Geyer
- David Geyer, MSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA; and Medical, Surgical and Behavioral Health Programs, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Anna Chen, BSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Rachel L. DiFazio, PhD, RN, FAAN, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Judith A Vessey
- David Geyer, MSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA; and Medical, Surgical and Behavioral Health Programs, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Anna Chen, BSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Rachel L. DiFazio, PhD, RN, FAAN, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anna Chen
- David Geyer, MSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA; and Medical, Surgical and Behavioral Health Programs, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Anna Chen, BSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Rachel L. DiFazio, PhD, RN, FAAN, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel L DiFazio
- David Geyer, MSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA; and Medical, Surgical and Behavioral Health Programs, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Anna Chen, BSN, RN, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
- Rachel L. DiFazio, PhD, RN, FAAN, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gilligan C, Volschenk W, Russo M, Green M, Gilmore C, Mehta V, Deckers K, De Smedt K, Latif U, Sayed D, Georgius P, Gentile J, Mitchell B, Langhorst M, Huygen F, Baranidharan G, Patel V, Mironer E, Ross E, Carayannopoulos A, Hayek S, Gulve A, Van Buyten JP, Tohmeh A, Fischgrund J, Lad S, Ahadian F, Deer T, Klemme W, Rauck R, Rathmell J, Schwab F, Maislin G, Heemels JP, Eldabe S. Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:98-108. [PMID: 36175320 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restorative neurostimulation is a rehabilitative treatment for patients with refractory chronic low back pain (CLBP) associated with dysfunction of the lumbar multifidus muscle resulting in impaired neuromuscular control. The ReActiv8-B randomized, sham-controlled trial provided evidence of the effectiveness and safety of an implanted, restorative neurostimulator. The two-year analysis previously published in this journal demonstrated accrual of clinical benefits and long-term durability. OBJECTIVE Evaluation of three-year effectiveness and safety in patients with refractory, disabling CLBP secondary to multifidus muscle dysfunction and no indications for spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective, observational follow-up of the 204 implanted trial participants. Low back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol quality of life survey, and opioid intake were assessed at baseline, six months, and one, two, and three years after activation. The mixed-effects model repeated measures approach was used to provide implicit imputations of missing data for continuous outcomes and multiple imputation for proportion estimates. RESULTS Data were collected from 133 participants, and 16 patients missed their three-year follow-up because of coronavirus disease restrictions but remain available for future follow-up. A total of 62% of participants had a ≥ 70% VAS reduction, and 67% reported CLBP resolution (VAS ≤ 2.5cm); 63% had a reduction in ODI of ≥ 20 points; 83% had improvements of ≥ 50% in VAS and/or ≥ 20 points in ODI, and 56% had these substantial improvements in both VAS and ODI. A total of 71% (36/51) participants on opioids at baseline had voluntarily discontinued (49%) or reduced (22%) opioid intake. The attenuation of effectiveness in the imputed (N = 204) analyses was relatively small and did not affect the statistical significance and clinical relevance of these results. The safety profile remains favorable, and no lead migrations have been observed to date. CONCLUSION At three years, 83% of participants experienced clinically substantial improvements in pain, disability, or both. The results confirm the long-term effectiveness, durability, and safety of restorative neurostimulation in patients with disabling CLBP associated with multifidus muscle dysfunction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02577354.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Christopher Gilmore
- Center for Clinical Research, Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Barts Neuromodulation Center, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kristiaan Deckers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Kris De Smedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Peter Georgius
- Sunshine Coast Clinical Research, Noosa Heads, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Pain and Neuromodulation Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Vikas Patel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eugene Mironer
- Carolinas Center for the Advanced Management of Pain, Spartanburg, NC, USA
| | - Edgar Ross
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Salim Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ashish Gulve
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Jeffrey Fischgrund
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oakland University, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Shivanand Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Farshad Ahadian
- Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - William Klemme
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - James Rathmell
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frank Schwab
- Northwell Health Orthopaedic Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Greg Maislin
- Biomedical Statistical Consulting, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | | | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Usefulness of discography, discoblock and a new mechanical method for identifying a painful segment/disc. Neurochirurgie 2023; 69:101397. [PMID: 36502874 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2022.101397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously described a procedure for eliciting deep spatial discrimination of individual segments in the healthy lumbar spine of normal subjects: the percutaneous mechanical provocation (PMP) test. Our goal was to devise a method for accurate identification of the spinal level of pathology in chronic low back pain (CLBP). In the present study, we validated the PMP test, using a subgroup of CLBP patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). Because there is clinical consensus that IS back pain originates in the slipped segment/disc, the level of pathology can be directly compared to the result of the PMP test. The test is agnostic with respect to the underlying pathological mechanism, and therefore might be useful in identifying the involved segment(s) irrespective of the painful structure. METHODS In 37 patients with confirmed IS (slippage 3-15mm), we compared sensitivity between the PMP test, the widely used provocative discography test and the discoblock test. RESULTS The PMP test reliably identified the slip level in patients with IS, with sensitivity of 92%. Accepting the slipped disc as the origin of pain in IS, the sensitivity of the provocative discography and discoblock tests were 49% and 35%, respectively: i.e., too low to be contributive in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS The PMP test reliably identified the origin of localized pain in IS as the slip level, but should be used with care in CLBP patients in selecting discogenic pain patients for fusion surgery, since the specificity of the test is not known and it may be positive for any origin of localized pain.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gilligan C, Volschenk W, Russo M, Green M, Gilmore C, Mehta V, Deckers K, De Smedt K, Latif U, Georgius P, Gentile J, Mitchell B, Langhorst M, Huygen F, Baranidharan G, Patel V, Mironer E, Ross E, Carayannopoulos A, Hayek S, Gulve A, Van Buyten JP, Tohmeh A, Fischgrund J, Lad S, Ahadian F, Deer T, Klemme W, Rauck R, Rathmell J, Maislin G, Heemels JP, Eldabe S. Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:87-97. [PMID: 35088722 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired neuromuscular control and degeneration of the multifidus muscle have been linked to the development of refractory chronic low back pain (CLBP). An implantable restorative-neurostimulator system can override the underlying multifidus inhibition by eliciting episodic, isolated contractions. The ReActiv8-B randomized, active-sham-controlled trial provided effectiveness and safety evidence for this system, and all participants received therapeutic stimulation from four months onward. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the two-year effectiveness of this restorative neurostimulator in patients with disabling CLBP secondary to multifidus muscle dysfunction and no indications for spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Open-label follow-up of 204 participants implanted with a restorative neurostimulation system (ReActiv8, Mainstay Medical, Dublin, Ireland) was performed. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry disability index [ODI]), quality-of-life (EQ-5D-5L), and opioid intake were assessed at baseline, six months, one year, and two years after activation. RESULTS At two years (n = 156), the proportion of participants with ≥50% CLBP relief was 71%, and 65% reported CLBP resolution (VAS ≤ 2.5 cm); 61% had a reduction in ODI of ≥20 points, 76% had improvements of ≥50% in VAS and/or ≥20 points in ODI, and 56% had these substantial improvements in both VAS and ODI. A total of 87% of participants had continued device use during the second year for a median of 43% of the maximum duration, and 60% (34 of 57) had voluntarily discontinued (39%) or reduced (21%) opioid intake. CONCLUSIONS At two years, 76% of participants experienced substantial, clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, or both. These results provide evidence of long-term effectiveness and durability of restorative neurostimulation in patients with disabling CLBP, secondary to multifidus muscle dysfunction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT02577354.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Christopher Gilmore
- Center for Clinical Research, Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Barts Neuromodulation Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kristiaan Deckers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Kris De Smedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Peter Georgius
- Sunshine Coast Clinical Research, Noosa Heads, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Pain and Neuromodulation Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Vikas Patel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eugene Mironer
- Carolinas Center for the Advanced Management of Pain, Spartanburg, NC, USA
| | - Edgar Ross
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Salim Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ashish Gulve
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Jeffrey Fischgrund
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oakland University, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Shivanand Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Farshad Ahadian
- Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - William Klemme
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - James Rathmell
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Greg Maislin
- Biomedical Statistical Consulting, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | | | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Benes LL, Keefe FJ, DeBar LL. Treating Persistent Pain: A Nurse Co-Led, Interdisciplinary Model for Primary Care. Pain Manag Nurs 2022; 23:728-736. [PMID: 35922272 PMCID: PMC9771916 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The public health crisis of chronic pain has only increased in recognition since the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Relieving Pain in America (2011) called for a cultural transformation in the way pain is viewed, treated, and put forward specific recommendations for action. The National Pain Strategy (NPS) provides a roadmap for putting these recommendations into practice. We implemented a program that placed nurses and behavioral specialists at the head of an interdisciplinary team utilizing best practices. In this program, nurses enacted the NPS recommendations to advance care for patients with persistent pain on long-term opioid treatment. This program promoted professional growth in nurses along with fostering success for patients. Compared with patients receiving usual care, patients in the program achieved greater reductions in pain severity, pain-related disability, and pain-related functional interference and reported greater satisfaction with pain-related care and primary care services. This article will detail the NPS-aligned practice approaches these nurses and their teams used, describe the training for the nurses, and speak to opportunities to enhance the nurse's capacity for this role in hopes of providing a model for the future implementation of an NPS-based approach by nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank J Keefe
- Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lynn L DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Canós-Verdecho Á, Robledo R, Izquierdo R, Bermejo A, Gallach E, Argente P, Peraita-Costa I, Morales-Suárez-Varela M. Preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of quantum molecular resonance coablative radiofrequency and microdiscectomy. Pain Manag 2022; 12:917-930. [PMID: 36196857 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2022-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether there exists a difference in efficacy in the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy with quantum molecular resonance coablative radiofrequency, and quantum molecular resonance coablative radiofrequency and percutaneous microdiscectomy with grasper forceps (QMRG). Patients & methods: A total of 28 patients from La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital in Valencia were enrolled in a retrospective cohort. Results: Treatment with QMRG significantly improved non-sleep-related and sleep-related outcome measures. At 6 months post-intervention, treatment with QMRG resulted in significantly better scores in numeric rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 12 Health Survey Physical and Total, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, sleep disturbance and the two sleep problems indexes. Conclusion: Treatment of lumbar radiculopathy with QMRG appears to be more effective at 6 months post-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángeles Canós-Verdecho
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Ruth Robledo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Rosa Izquierdo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Ara Bermejo
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Elisa Gallach
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Pilar Argente
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.,Department of Surgical Specialities, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain
| | - Isabel Peraita-Costa
- Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Unit of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Food Sciences, Toxicology & Forensic Medicine, Universitat de València, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP). The Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, 28029, Spain
| | - María Morales-Suárez-Varela
- Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Unit of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Food Sciences, Toxicology & Forensic Medicine, Universitat de València, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP). The Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, 28029, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Percutaneous Intervertebral-Vacuum Polymethylmethacrylate Injection for Foraminal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2022; 165:e712-e720. [PMID: 35787962 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous intervertebral-vacuum polymethylmethacrylate injection (PIPI) is a minimally invasive procedure for low back pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Patients with DLS often have radiculopathy as a result of foraminal stenosis in addition to low back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of PIPI for foraminal stenosis with radiculopathy in elderly patients with DLS. METHODS We included patients with de novo DLS aged 65 years or older who underwent PIPI. The presence of an intervertebral vacuum on computed tomography and bone marrow edema on magnetic resonance imaging was required for inclusion. The intersegmental radiologic parameters on plain radiographs and computed tomography and the extent of bone marrow edema on magnetic resonance imaging were measured. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS We enrolled 40 patients with DLS who underwent PIPI. There were 16 men and 24 women, and the mean age was 79.0 ± 6.3 years. The mean foraminal height and extent of bone marrow edema showed a significant increase and reduction, respectively, after PIPI (P < 0.05). VAS score for radiculopathy and ODI significantly improved after PIPI (P < 0.01). The minimum clinically important differences in VAS score for radiculopathy and ODI at the final follow-up were 73.9% and 63.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PIPI is a minimally invasive procedure not only for low back pain but also for radiculopathy in elderly patients with DLS. It leads to intervertebral stabilization and indirect decompression of the foramen.
Collapse
|
36
|
Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach. Pain Rep 2022; 7:e1019. [PMID: 36203645 PMCID: PMC9529058 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Literature on current treatments for chronic low back pain (cLBP) were reviewed and 4 interventions were recommended for inclusion in a multisite cLBP clinical trial. Introduction: Objective: Methods: Conclusion:
Collapse
|
37
|
Malik KM, Nelson AM, Chiang TH, Imani F, Khademi SH. The Specifics of Non-specific Low Back Pain: Re-evaluating the Current Paradigm to Improve Patient Outcomes. Anesth Pain Med 2022; 12:e131499. [PMID: 36937089 PMCID: PMC10016128 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-131499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of pain and debility worldwide and the most frequent reason for work-related disability. Global expenditures related to LBP are staggering and amount to billions of dollars each year in the United States alone. Yet, despite the considerable healthcare resources consumed, the care provided to patients with LBP has regularly been cited as both ineffective and exorbitant. Among the myriad reasons for this suboptimal care, the current approach to evaluation and management of patients with LBP is a likely contributor and is hitherto un-investigated. Following the current methodology, over 90% of patients with LBP are provided with no specific diagnosis, are managed inconsistently, and receive no express preventative care. We believed that this approach added costs and promoted chronic unresolved pain and disability. This narrative review highlights problems with the current methodology, proposes a novel concept for categorizing patients with LBP, and recommends strategies for improvement. Stratifying patients according to the etiology, in lieu of the prospects for morbidity, the strategy proposed in this article may help ascertain the cause of patient's LBP early, consolidate treatments, permit timely preventative measures, and, as a result, may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid M Malik
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
| | - Ariana M. Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Ting-Hsuan Chiang
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed-Hossein Khademi
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gianola S, Bargeri S, Cinquini M, Iannicelli V, Meroni R, Castellini G. More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted? BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:184. [PMID: 35790902 PMCID: PMC9254584 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01621-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews can apply the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II tool to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treating low back pain (LBP); however, when appraisals differ in CPG quality rating, stakeholders, clinicians, and policy-makers will find it difficult to discern a unique judgement of CPG quality. We wanted to determine the proportion of overlapping CPGs for LBP in appraisals that applied AGREE II. We also compared inter-rater reliability and variability across appraisals. METHODS For this meta-epidemiological study we searched six databases for appraisals of CPGs for LBP. The general characteristics of the appraisals were collected; the unit of analysis was the CPG evaluated in each appraisal. The inter-rater reliability and the variability of AGREE II domain scores for overall assessment were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient and descriptive statistics. RESULTS Overall, 43 CPGs out of 106 (40.6%) overlapped in seventeen appraisals. Half of the appraisals (53%) reported a protocol registration. Reporting of AGREE II assessment was heterogeneous and generally of poor quality: overall assessment 1 (overall CPG quality) was rated in 11 appraisals (64.7%) and overall assessment 2 (recommendation for use) in four (23.5%). Inter-rater reliability was substantial/perfect in 78.3% of overlapping CPGs. The domains with most variability were Domain 6 (mean interquartile range [IQR] 38.6), Domain 5 (mean IQR 28.9), and Domain 2 (mean IQR 27.7). CONCLUSIONS More than one third of CPGs for LBP have been re-appraised in the last six years with CPGs quality confirmed in most assessments. Our findings suggest that before conducting a new appraisal, researchers should check systematic review registers for existing appraisals. Clinicians need to rely on updated CPGs of high quality and confirmed by perfect agreement in multiple appraisals. TRIAL REGISTRATION Protocol Registration OSF: https://osf.io/rz7nh/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gianola
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via R.Galeazzi 4, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Silvia Bargeri
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via R.Galeazzi 4, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Cinquini
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Meroni
- Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Differdange, Luxembourg
- Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute, Differdange, Luxembourg
| | - Greta Castellini
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via R.Galeazzi 4, 20162, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pulling BW, Braithwaite FA, Moseley GL, Jensen MP, Burke ALJ, Collins KL, Hull MJ, Jones HG, Cyna AM, Ferencz N, Stanton TR. Suggestions in Hypnosis to Aid Pain Education (SHAPE) in People with Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized, Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2022; 70:251-276. [PMID: 35969169 DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2022.2105147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating and burdensome condition, and new treatment strategies are needed. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the feasibility of undertaking a controlled clinical trial investigating a novel intervention for people with CLBP: hypnotically reinforced pain science education, and (2) the acceptability of the intervention as rated by participants. A priori feasibility and intervention acceptability criteria were set. Twenty participants with CLBP were recruited and randomized to receive: (1) hypnotically delivered pain science education that utilizes hypnotic suggestions to enhance uptake of pain science concepts; or (2) pain science education with progressive muscle relaxation as an attention control. Twenty participants were recruited, however, not solely from the hospital waitlist as intended; community sampling was required (13 hospital, 7 community). Most criteria were met in the community sample but not the hospital sample. Protocol modifications are needed before progressing to a full scale randomized controlled trial for hypnotically reinforced pain science education. Improvements in relevant secondary outcomes paired with moderate-high treatment acceptability ratings are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W Pulling
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide
| | - Felicity A Braithwaite
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Anne L J Burke
- Psychology Department, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia.,School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kathryn L Collins
- Psychology Department, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia.,School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Melissa J Hull
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide
| | - Hannah G Jones
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide.,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Allan M Cyna
- Department of Women's Anaesthesia, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Nicki Ferencz
- Paediatric Chronic Pain Service, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
What Are the Mechanisms of Action of Cognitive-Behavioral, Mind-Body, and Exercise-based Interventions for Pain and Disability in People With Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain?: A Systematic Review of Mediation Studies From Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:502-509. [PMID: 35686580 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review examined studies that used mediation analysis to investigate the mechanisms of action of cognitive-behavioral, mind-body, and exercise-based interventions for pain and disability in people with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched 5 electronic databases for articles that conducted mediation analyses of randomized controlled trials to either test or estimate indirect effects. RESULTS We found 17 studies (n=4423), including 90 mediation models examining the role of 22 putative mediators on pain or disability, of which 4 had partially mediated treatment effect; 8 had mixed results, and 10 did not mediate treatment effect. The conditions studied were chronic whiplash-associated pain, chronic low back pain, chronic knee pain, and mixed group of chronic primary musculoskeletal pain. DISCUSSION We observed that several of the studies included in our systematic review identified similar mechanisms of action, even between different interventions and conditions. However, methodological limitations were common. In conclusion, there are still substantial gaps with respect to understanding how cognitive-behavioral, mind-body, and exercise-based interventions work to reduce pain and disability in people with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
|
41
|
Zafereo J, Uhlenbrock B, Watson S, Wang-Price S, Noe C, Jarrett RB, Meltzer KJ, Huang M. Using quantitative sensory testing to predict attrition in an interdisciplinary pain management program: a pilot study. Pain Manag 2022; 12:623-633. [PMID: 35345888 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To determine the extent to which quantitative sensory testing (QST) predicted attrition in an interdisciplinary pain program (IPP). Patients & methods: Participants (n = 53) enrolled in an IPP completed pretreatment assessments of QST and the PROMIS-29 quality of life survey. Results & conclusion: Compared with completers, non-completers (24.5%) reported significantly higher pain intensity (7.1, 95% CI [5.8, 8.4] versus 5.4, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]) and cold hyperalgesia (14.6°C, 95% CI [8.8, 20.4] versus 7.5°C, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]), with both variables also predicting attrition. This finding highlights a potentially novel and clinically significant use of QST. Higher overall pain intensity and the presence of remote cold hyperalgesia may identify patients at risk for dropping out of an IPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Zafereo
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Brittany Uhlenbrock
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Seth Watson
- School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Sharon Wang-Price
- School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Carl Noe
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Robin B Jarrett
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Karen J Meltzer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mu Huang
- Department of Applied Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Orrillo E, Vidal Neira L, Piedimonte F, Plancarte Sanchez R, Astudilllo Mihovilovic S, Narvaez Tamayo MA, Rekatsina M, Varrassi G. What Is New in the Clinical Management of Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e22992. [PMID: 35464575 PMCID: PMC8996822 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition associated with disability. Treating patients with LBP becomes further complicated by the potential presence of underlying conditions, such as cancer or traumatic injury, or biopsychosocial aspects. LBP usually has a neuropathic component that must be assessed and treated appropriately. Pharmacological management of LBP requires a thorough knowledge of the available agents and the mechanisms of the LBP. Although there are effective pharmacological treatments for LBP, it is important to consider safety issues. Fixed-dose combination products may be helpful, as they can reduce opioid consumption without sacrificing analgesic benefits. Neuromodulation is an important and sometimes overlooked treatment option for LBP and may be appropriate for chronic LBP requiring long-term treatment. Imaging studies support neuroplastic changes in the brain as a result of neuromodulation. Interventional approaches to chronic LBP are numerous and must be appropriately selected based on the individual patient. Evidence in support of epidural injections for LBP is strong for short-term pain control but moderate to limited for long-term relief. Rehabilitation for LBP can be an important element of long-term care, and new forms of rehabilitation programs are being developed using telemedicine. A variety of new and established treatments are available for patients with LBP, and clinicians and patients may benefit from emerging new treatment modalities.
Collapse
|
43
|
Haladay D, Ditwiler RE, Klein AB, Miro R, Lazinski M, Swisher LL, Beckstead J, Wolfson J, Hardwick D. Goal Attainment Scaling in Outpatient Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e32457. [PMID: 35254282 PMCID: PMC8938834 DOI: 10.2196/32457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient engagement in decisions regarding their health care may lead to improved outcomes and improved adherence to treatment plans. While there are several options for involving patients in their health care, goal setting is a readily accessible method for physical therapists to increase the involvement of patients in health care decisions. Physical therapy goals are often generated by health care providers based on subjective information or standardized, fixed-item, patient-reported outcome measures. However, these outcome measures may not fully reveal the activity and participation limitations of individual patients. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a patient-centered approach that allows patients to set meaningful goals. While GAS has been shown to be reliable, valid, and sensitive to change in various populations, there is limited evidence in the United States on utilizing GAS in physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Objective The purpose of this paper is to describe the protocol for a study to (1) develop a way to apply GAS procedures for physical therapists treating patients with chronic LBP in the United States and (2) test the feasibility of applying GAS procedures for chronic LBP in an outpatient physical therapy setting. Methods This study used a mixed methods design with 2 phases: qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative phase of the study employed focus groups of patients with chronic LBP to identify an inventory of goals that were important and measurable. A series of prompts was developed from this inventory to assist physical therapists in collaboratively establishing goals with patients in a clinical setting. The quantitative phase of the study pilot-tested the inventory developed in the qualitative phase in patients with chronic LBP to determine feasibility, reliability, validity, and responsiveness. We also plan to compare how well GAS reveals change over time relative to traditional, fixed-item, patient-reported measures. Results Phase 1 data collection was completed in June 2020, while data collection for phase 2 was performed between March 2021 and December 2021. We anticipate that this study will demonstrate that GAS can be implemented successfully by outpatient physical therapists, and that it will demonstrate clinically important changes in patients with chronic LBP. Conclusions GAS represents an opportunity for patient-centered care in the physical therapy management of chronic LBP. While GAS is not new, it has never been studied in real-world physical therapy for chronic LBP in a clinical setting. Due to unique time and productivity constraints, for GAS to be successfully implemented in this environment, we must demonstrate that clinicians can be trained efficiently and reliably, that GAS can be implemented in a clinical setting in under 15 minutes, and that GAS is able to detect clinically meaningful changes in patient outcomes. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/32457
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Haladay
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Rebecca Edgeworth Ditwiler
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Aimee B Klein
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Rebecca Miro
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Matthew Lazinski
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Laura Lee Swisher
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jason Beckstead
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jay Wolfson
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Dustin Hardwick
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kodumudi V, Bibb LA, Adalsteinsson JA, Shahriari N, Skudalski L, Santiago S, Grant-Kels JM, Lu J. Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part II. Dermatomyositis and Scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87:21-38. [PMID: 35202777 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The second article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for dermatomyositis and scleroderma that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Kodumudi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
| | - Lorin A Bibb
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
| | | | - Neda Shahriari
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Sueheidi Santiago
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
| | - Jane M Grant-Kels
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hamdalla G, Jabbari GM, Abushegarh MY, Abulnaja YH, Dallak EE, AlHammali KA, Almomin IA, AlHuwaymili AS, AlTwalah SF, Hassan AE, AlRuwaili OM. Review on Lower Back Pain Management in Primary Health Care. ARCHIVES OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.51847/pefqvhsg8e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
46
|
Brodney S, Sepucha K, Chang Y, Moulton B, Barry MJ. Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon. JB JS Open Access 2022; 7:JBJSOA-D-21-00149. [PMID: 35350122 PMCID: PMC8947679 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Decision aids (DAs) are utilized to ensure that patients are informed and involved in the decision-making process. Although DAs improve decision quality, other aspects of the decision-making process, such as trust and regret, are seldom measured. The objective of the present study was to determine whether patients given a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery had greater trust and lower regret at 6 months postoperatively. Methods: Consecutive patients were identified who underwent a hip or knee replacement or spine surgery from October 2018 to January 2020 and were subsequently surveyed at 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes included the Trust in the Surgical Decision and Decision Regret Scales. The primary analysis compared scores of patients who reviewed at least some of the DA to those who had not received or reviewed it. A sensitivity analysis compared patients with a DA order who reported reviewing it to those who did not. Multivariable models analyzed whether DA exposure predicted trust or regret. An exploratory mediation analysis examined the direct and indirect effects of DA exposure, including through the Shared Decision Making Process score. Results: The response rate was 56% (700 of 1,253). In the primary analysis, the proportion of patients who reported complete trust was 50.9% among those with no DA review and 63.8% among those with DA review (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.36). A nonsignificant effect was observed comparing a DA order (59.9%) versus no DA order (51.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 2.11). Regret was unrelated to DA exposure. In the mediation analysis, 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 3.1% to 35.4%) of the effect of DA review on trust could be attributed to increased shared decision making. Conclusions: Patients who reviewed a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery reported higher trust in their surgeons. Clinical Relevance: Providing patients with a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery can improve trust in the surgeon. Improving trust between patients and surgeons may improve communication and help patients make better health decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Brodney
- Informed Medical Decisions Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ben Moulton
- Informed Medical Decisions Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael J Barry
- Informed Medical Decisions Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gaonkar B, Cook K, Yoo B, Salehi B, Macyszyn L. Imaging Biomarker Development for Lower Back Pain Using Machine Learning: How Image Analysis Can Help Back Pain. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2393:623-640. [PMID: 34837203 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1803-5_33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
State-of-the-art diagnosis of radiculopathy relies on "highly subjective" radiologist interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the lower back. Currently, the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy and associated lower back pain lacks coherence due to an absence of reliable, objective diagnostic biomarkers. Using emerging machine learning techniques, the subjectivity of interpretation may be replaced by the objectivity of automated analysis. However, training computer vision methods requires a curated database of imaging data containing anatomical delineations vetted by a team of human experts. In this chapter, we outline our efforts to develop such a database of curated imaging data alongside the required delineations. We detail the processes involved in data acquisition and subsequent annotation. Then we explain how the resulting database can be utilized to develop a machine learning-based objective imaging biomarker. Finally, we present an explanation of how we validate our machine learning-based anatomy delineation algorithms. Ultimately, we hope to allow validated machine learning models to be used to generate objective biomarkers from imaging data-for clinical use to diagnose lumbar radiculopathy and guide associated treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilwaj Gaonkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Kirstin Cook
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bryan Yoo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Banafsheh Salehi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luke Macyszyn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Petrucci G, Papalia GF, Russo F, Vadalà G, Piredda M, De Marinis MG, Papalia R, Denaro V. Psychological Approaches for the Integrative Care of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:60. [PMID: 35010319 PMCID: PMC8751135 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common cause of disability worldwide, affecting about 12% to 30% of the adult population. Psychological factors play an important role in the experience of pain, and may be predictive of pain persistence, disability, and long-term sick leave. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and to describe the most common psychological approaches used to treat patients who suffer from CLBP. A systematic search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Central. Overall, 16 studies with a total of 1058 patients were included in the analysis. Our results suggest that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) interventions are both associated with an improvement in terms of pain intensity and quality of life when singularly compared to usual care. Disability also improved in both groups when compared to usual care. Significant differences in fear-avoidance beliefs were noted in the CBT group compared to usual care. Therefore, psychological factors are related to and influence CLBP. It is crucial to develop curative approaches that take these variables into account. Our findings suggest that CBT and MBSR modify pain-related outcomes and that they could be implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Petrucci
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Giuseppe Francesco Papalia
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Fabrizio Russo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Gianluca Vadalà
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Michela Piredda
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (M.G.D.M.)
| | - Maria Grazia De Marinis
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (M.G.D.M.)
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.F.P.); (G.V.); (R.P.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mustafa R, Kissoon NR. Approach to Radiculopathy. Semin Neurol 2021; 41:760-770. [PMID: 34826877 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain and neck pain, often with associated radiculopathy, are two of the most common reasons for referral to the outpatient neurology clinic. A thorough clinical evaluation remains paramount in establishing an accurate diagnosis and subsequently an appropriate treatment plan. In this article, we review anatomic considerations for spondylotic radiculopathy; outline the clinical approach for the evaluation of these patients, including discussion of electrodiagnostic and imaging modalities; and address treatment options based on a stratified treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafid Mustafa
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Narayan R Kissoon
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.,Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Valentine KD, Cha T, Giardina JC, Marques F, Atlas SJ, Bedair H, Chen AF, Doorly T, Kang J, Leavitt L, Licurse A, O'Brien T, Sequist T, Sepucha K. Assessing the quality of shared decision making for elective orthopedic surgery across a large healthcare system: cross-sectional survey study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:967. [PMID: 34798866 PMCID: PMC8605511 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04853-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical guidelines recommend engaging patients in shared decision making for common orthopedic procedures; however, limited work has assessed what is occurring in practice. This study assessed the quality of shared decision making for elective hip and knee replacement and spine surgery at four network-affiliated hospitals. Methods A cross-sectional sample of 875 adult patients undergoing total hip or knee joint replacement (TJR) for osteoarthritis or spine surgery for lumbar herniated disc or lumbar spinal stenosis was selected. Patients were mailed a survey including measures of Shared Decision Making (SDMP scale) and Informed, Patient-Centered (IPC) decisions. We examined decision-making across sites, surgeons, and conditions, and whether the decision-making measures were associated with better health outcomes. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of patients within surgeons. Results Six hundred forty-six surveys (74% response rate) were returned with sufficient responses for analysis. Patients who had TJR reported lower SDMP scores than patients who had spine surgery (2.2 vs. 2.8; p < 0.001). Patients who had TJR were more likely to make IPC decisions (OA = 70%, Spine = 41%; p < 0.001). SDMP and IPC scores varied widely across surgeons, but the site was not predictive of SDMP scores or IPC decisions (all p > 0.09). Higher SDMP scores and IPC decisions were associated with larger improvements in global health outcomes for patients who had TJR, but not patients who had spine surgery. Conclusions Measures of shared decision making and decision quality varied among patients undergoing common elective orthopedic procedures. Routine measurement of shared decision making provides insight into areas of strength across these different orthopedic conditions as well as areas in need of improvement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04853-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Valentine
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. .,Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tom Cha
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Felisha Marques
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Steven J Atlas
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hany Bedair
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,North Shore Medical Center, MA, Salem, USA
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.,Newton Wellesley Hospital, MA, Newton, USA
| | | | - James Kang
- Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.,Newton Wellesley Hospital, MA, Newton, USA
| | - Lauren Leavitt
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Adam Licurse
- Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.,Newton Wellesley Hospital, MA, Newton, USA
| | - Todd O'Brien
- Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), MA, Boston, USA
| | - Thomas Sequist
- Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Quality and Patient Experience, Mass General Brigham Health System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), 100 Cambridge Street, 16th floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|