Insurance status, geography, race, and ethnicity as predictors of anterior cervical spine surgery rates and in-hospital mortality: an examination of United States trends from 1992 to 2005

Medicaid status is independently predictive of increased complications, readmission, and mortality following primary total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several studies have evaluated the effect of Medicaid insurance status on total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) outcomes and have presented discordant findings. The purpose of this study is to determine if Medicaid status is an independent predictor of all-cause complications, readmission, revision, and mortality following elective primary TSA using a large, national administrative claims database.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients who underwent elective primary TSA from 2016 to 2020. Patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1 proportion based on age, sex, and discharge weight, yielding 15,374 Medicaid cases and 15,448 control cases. Patient demographic and discharge information, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were compared with bivariate analysis. Binary logistic regression was performed to account for the influence of variables other than Medicaid status on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Medicaid patients had higher rates of preoperative comorbidities, higher Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index scores, and lower household incomes than matched controls. Compared to controls, Medicaid patients undergoing TSA had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes, including all-cause complications, readmission, and mortality within 180 days, along with other specific medical and implant-related complications including broken hardware, dislocation, prosthetic loosening, and surgical site infection. Medicaid status was independently predictive of increased rates of all-cause complications within 180 days, readmission within 180 days, dislocation, pneumonia, sepsis, and decreased rates of prosthetic loosening. Medicaid patients had an increased mean cost of $1396 and increased mean length of stay of 0.4 days.

CONCLUSION

Medicaid status was independently predictive of readmission, complications, and mortality within 180 days of primary TSA, as well as other specific medical and surgical complications. Medicaid patients experience higher admission costs and longer hospital stays compared to those with other insurance types. Medicaid status is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes, and orthopedic surgeons need to consider the multitude of disparities that Medicaid patients experience when determining surgical options, treatment plans, and hospital disposition.

Community-level Socioeconomic Status Is a Poor Predictor of Outcomes Following Lumbar and Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare 3 socioeconomic status (SES) indexes and evaluate associations with outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND DATA

Socioeconomic disparities affect patients' baseline health and clinical outcomes following spine surgery. It is still unclear whether community-level indexes are accurate surrogates for patients' socioeconomic status (SES) and whether they are predictive of postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing ACDF (N=1189) or lumbar fusion (N=1136) from 2014 to 2020 at an urban tertiary medical center were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and surgical outcomes (90-day readmissions, complications, and nonhome discharge) were collected from the electronic medical record. SES was extracted from 3 indexes (Area Deprivation Index, Social Vulnerability Index, and Distressed Communities Index). Patients were classified into SES quartiles for bivariate and multivariate regression analysis. We utilized Youden's index to construct receiver operating characteristic curves for all surgical outcomes using indexes as continuous variables.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, lumbar fusion patients in the poorest ADI community exhibited the greatest ODI ( P =0.001) and in the poorest DCI and SVI communities exhibited worse VAS back ( P <0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Preoperatively, ACDF patients in the lowest DCI community had significantly worse MCS-12, VAS neck, and NDI, and in the poorest ADI community had worse MCS-12 and NDI. There were no differences in the magnitude of improvement for any PROM. All indexes performed poorly at predicting surgical outcomes (AUC: 0.467-0.636, all P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Community-wide SES indexes are not accurate proxies for individual SES. While patients from poorer communities present with worse symptoms, community-level SES is not associated with overall outcomes following spine fusion. Patient-specific factors should be employed when attempting to stratify patients based on SES given the inherent limitations present with these indexes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Racial disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of 67,621 patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Racial disparities have been demonstrated in the analysis of perioperative outcomes in minority populations in the field of spine surgery when compared to nonminorities. However, there are limited studies investigating the role of racial disparities in cervical spine surgery in a recent, large patient sample.

PURPOSE

We assessed race and ethnicity as an independent risk factor in outcome disparities following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) among Black or African American (AA), Asian or Pacific Islander (AP), Hispanic (HA), and Native American or Alaska Native (NA) patients compared to White or Caucasian (CA) patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective cohort, large multicenter database study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for ACDFs from 2011 to 2021 by Common Procedural Terminology codes (22551, 22552, 22585, and 22554). Patients were categorized into five cohorts based on race and ethnicity: Asian American or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic, Native American or Alaskan Native, and White or Caucasian.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures for this study were surgical complications, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes within 30-days postoperative.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables or chi-squared test for categorical variables with Bonferroni correction. Controlling for racial demographic and comorbidity differences via model selection by Akaike information criterion by backward stepwise regression, race and ethnicity were isolated as possible independent risk factors for short-term patient outcomes.

RESULTS

67621 patients (54679 CA, 7358 AA, 1429 AP, 399 NA, and 3756 HA) were included in this study. AA race was an independent risk factor for medical complications (OR: 1.330, 95% CI [1.137-1.549], p < .001), operative time (β: 12.162 minutes, 95% CI [10.565-13.758], p < .001), length of stay (β: 0.514 days, 95% CI [0.431-0.597], p < .001), postoperative discharge time (β: 0.439 days, 95% CI [0.388-0.491], p < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR: 1.379, 95% CI [1.142-1.654], p < .001), and a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 2.256, 95% CI [2.022-2.514], p < .001). AP race was an independent risk factor for operative time (β: 14.293 minutes, 95% CI [10.854-17.732], p < .001). HA ethnicity was an independent risk factor for a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 1.395, 95% CI [1.171-1.652], p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CA patients, AA, AP, HA, and NA ACDF patients experience greater comorbidity burden and/or unfavorable 30-day surgical outcomes. These findings support the need for the exploration of interdisciplinary care focused on addressing known causes of disparities in minority patients. Future studies should account for social determinants of health by race and ethnicity to identify additional factors that may contribute to higher rates of complications.

The Role of Risk Tolerance in a Patient's Decision to Undergo Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A patient's decision-making process to undergo surgery is crucial for surgeons to understand for patient-counseling purposes. Total knee and hip arthroplasty, like any other major surgery, is associated with serious, sometimes life-threatening, complications. Using the results of discrete choice experiments (DCEs), we aimed to understand the relationship between a patient's risk tolerance and choosing to undergo surgery in real life.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected DCE results for 142 potential knee or hip arthroplasty clinic patients from October 2021 to March 2022. The DCE presented the patient with 2 scenarios, each of which was made up of different combinations of attributes and levels. A hierarchal Bayesian model was used to obtain a risk score that reflected the risk attributes chosen by each patient. Logistic regressions were then used to evaluate the association between a patient's willingness to incur risk and their decision to undergo a total joint arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Of the 142 patients enrolled in the DCE, 89 (62.3%) underwent a total joint arthroplasty. Risk score (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 6.6, P = 0.04), men (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.9, P = 0.028), and patients who have hip osteoarthritis (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5, P = 0.036) increased the odds of undergoing arthroplasty, whereas physical function of at least 75% at the initial visit (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7, P = 0.004) decreased these odds.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a patient's willingness to incur risk, lower baseline physical function, and men were all independently associated with undergoing total knee arthroplasty. We believe that these findings prompt much-needed future studies that focus solely on the relationship between patients' inherent risk behavior and surgical and patient-reported outcomes.

National Trend of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Indications, Approaches, and Disparities

INTRODUCTION

Rib fractures are among the most frequent injuries in trauma. This study aims to assess the current nationwide trends in operative rib fixation and identify predictors of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).

METHODS

A 5-y (2017-2021) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Adult trauma patients who had at least one rib fracture were included. We analyzed data regarding type of SSRF including open and thoracoscopic approaches and its trends.

RESULTS

A total of 780,275 patients were identified, of which 15,339 patients (1.9%) were managed with SSRF. Trends of both open and endoscopic approaches were increasing during the study period. Patients with ≤2 rib fractures had a decreasing rate of SSRF. Flail chest (odds ratio = 13.42, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of SSRF.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRF is gaining popularity in the management of chest trauma. The presence of a flail segment and multiplicity of rib fractures is among the predictors of SSRF.

Surgical Outcomes and Sociodemographic Disparities Across All Races: An ACS-NSQIP and NHIS Multi-Institutional Analysis of Over 7.5 Million Patients

Background

This study aims to fill the gap in large-scale, registry-based assessments by examining postoperative outcomes across diverse races/ethnicities. The focus is on identifying disparities and comparing them with socioeconomic demographics.

Methods

In a registry-based cohort study using the 2008 to 2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we evaluated 24 postoperative outcomes through multivariable analysis, incorporating 28 preoperative risk factors. In a separate, independent analysis of the 2019 to 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) database, we examined sociodemographic racial/ethnic normative data.

Results

Among 7,504,734 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Database patients specifying race, 83.8% were White (WT), 11.8% Black or African American (B/AA), 3.3% Asian (AS), 0.7% American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), 0.4% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (NH/PI), 7.3% Hispanic. Reoperation trends reveal favorable outcomes for WT, AS, and NH/PI patients compared with B/AA and AI/AN patients. AI/AN patients exhibit higher rates of wound healing issues, while AS patients experience lower rates. AS and B/AA patients are more prone to transfusions, with B/AA patients showing elevated rates of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and insufficiency. Disparities in discharge destinations exist. Hispanic patients fare better than non-WT Hispanic patients, contingent on race. Racial groups (excluding Hispanic patients) with superior surgical outcomes from the NSQIP analysis were found in the NHIS analysis to report higher wealth, better healthcare access, improved food security, greater functional and societal independence, and lower frailty.

Conclusions

Our study underscores racial disparities in surgical outcomes. Focused investigations into these complications could reveal underlying causes, informing healthcare policies to enhance surgical care universally.

Predictors of Nonhome Discharge After Cervical Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a national database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the factors that increase the risk of nonhome discharge after CDR.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As spine surgeons continue to balance increasing surgical volume, identifying variables associated with patient discharge destination can help expedite postoperative placement and reduce unnecessary length of stay. However, no prior study has identified the variables predictive of nonhome patient discharge after cervical disc replacement (CDR).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level CDR between 2011 and 2020. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance was employed to identify the predictors for nonhome discharge destination following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 7276 patients were included in this study, of which 94 (1.3%) patients were discharged to a nonhome destination. Multivariable regression revealed older age (OR: 1.076, P <0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 4.222, P =0.001), BMI (OR: 1.062, P =0.001), ASA class ≥3 (OR: 2.562, P =0.002), length of hospital stay (OR: 1.289, P <0.001), and prolonged operation time (OR: 1.007, P <0.001) as predictors of nonhome discharge after CDR. Outpatient surgery setting was found to be protective against nonhome discharge after CDR (OR: 0.243, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, Hispanic ethnicity, BMI, ASA class, prolonged hospital stay, and prolonged operation time are independent predictors of nonhome discharge after CDR. Outpatient surgery setting is protective against nonhome discharge. These findings can be utilized to preoperatively risk stratify expected discharge destination, anticipate patient discharge needs postoperatively, and expedite discharge in these patients to reduce health care costs associated with prolonged length of hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Does Medicare Insurance Mitigate Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access to Lumbar Spinal Surgery When Compared to Commercial Insurance?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Compare disparities in lumbar surgical care utilization in Commercially insured versus Medicare patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

While disparities in spinal surgery have been previously described, less evidence exists on effective strategies to mitigate them. Theoretically, universal health care coverage under Medicare should improve health care access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Utilizing National Inpatient Sample data (2003-2018), we included inpatient lumbar discectomy or laminectomy/fusion cases in black, white, or Hispanic patients aged 18-74 years, with Commercial or Medicare insurance. A multivariable Poisson distribution model determined race/ethnicity subgroup-specific rate ratios (RRs) of patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to their respective population distribution (using US Census data) based on race/ethnicity, region, gender, primary payor, and age (Commercially insured age subgroups: 18-39, 40-54, and 55-64 y; Medicare age subgroup: 65-74 y).

RESULTS

Of the 2,310,956 lumbar spine procedures included, 88.9%, 6.1%, and 5.0% represented white, black, and Hispanic patients, respectively. Among Commercially insured patients, black and Hispanic (compared to white) patients had lower rates of surgical care utilization; however, these disparities decreased with increasing age: black (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.37-0.38) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.52-0.54) aged 18-39 years versus black (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.63-0.65) aged 55-64 years. Racial/ethnic disparities persisted in Medicare patients, especially when compared to the neighboring age subgroup that was Commercially insured: black (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.61) under Medicare.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in surgical care utilization among black and Hispanic patients persist regardless of health care coverage, and an expansion of Medicare eligibility alone may not comprehensively address health care disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Workman's compensation as exclusion criteria in rotator cuff repair literature - are we inadvertently excluding race?

OBJECTIVE

Despite an equal willingness to participate in clinical trials, there is evidence that several minority populations are systematically under-represented in studies. One potential cause and frequently used exclusionary criterion in orthopedic trials is patients with active workman's compensation (WC) insurance claims. The purpose of this study is to determine demographic differences in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with commercial and government insurance vs workers compensation claims.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a single institution in the northeastern United States from 2018 to 2019. Patients undergoing revision cases were excluded. Chart review was used to extract demographic data such as age, gender, insurance, and reported race.

RESULTS

A total of 4553 patient records were reviewed and included. There were 742 WC patients and 3811 non-WC patients. Two hundred and forty-four patients did not report their race. Overall, WC patients differed from non-WC with respect to race (P < 0.001). One hundred and eleven (15.0%) of WC and 293 (7.7%) non-WC patients reported being 'Black' or 'African American' (P = 0.002). This compares to 368 (49.6%) WC and 2788 (73.2%) non-WC patients who reported 'White' (P < 0.001). About 16.8% of WC patients were identified as 'Hispanic or Latino,' compared to 5.2% of non-WC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

African American and Hispanic/Latino patients are over-represented in workman's compensation patient populations relative to non-workman's compensation. Conversely, white patients are over-represented in non-WC patient populations, which serve as the basis for the majority of clinical study populations. Excluding workman's compensation patients from clinical trials may lead to an underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic/Latino patient populations in orthopedic clinical trials. In doing so, the generalizability of the results of rotator cuff repair clinical outcomes research to all races and ethnicities may be compromised.

Associations of cognitive appraisal and patient activation on disability and mental health outcomes: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery

BACKGROUND

With the increased use of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) to assess spine surgery outcomes, it is important to understand how patients interpret their health changes over time. The measurement of cognitive-appraisal processes enables the quantification of how individuals think about quality of life (QOL). This study examined how appraisal processes were associated with patients' views of their role in managing their health-patient activation.

METHODS

This longitudinal cohort study from August 2019 to January 2022 included 222 adults undergoing spine surgery for cervical (n = 107) and/or lumbar (n = 148) pathology at an academic medical center. PROMs assessed disability (Neck Disability Index for cervical or Oswestry Disability Index for lumbar) and mental health (PROMIS-29 v2.0), cognitive-appraisal processes (QOLAPv2-SF), and patient activation (Patient Activation Measure). ANOVA models were used to examine the relationships between QOL and cognitive appraisal processes before and after surgery, overall and stratified by patient-activation stage. Effect sizes facilitated interpretation.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in pain-related disability and mental health following surgery. Cognitive appraisal processes explained substantial amounts of variance, particularly with changes in mental health (45% before surgery, 75% at three months, and 63%, at 12-months after surgery). With respect to physical disability, less disability was associated with a lesser focus on negative aspects of QOL. Appraisal explained the most variance before surgery for high-activation patients. At 12-months post-surgery, however, appraisal explained the most variance for the low-activation patients. Appraisal explained similar amounts of variance in mental health at baseline and three-months post-surgery for all activation groups, but substantially more variance in the low-activation group at 12-months post-surgery. There were differences in the direction of appraisal-outcome associations by activation group in selected appraisal items/domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive-appraisal processes demonstrate a significant relationship with QOL among spine surgery patients. These processes explain substantial variance in pain-related disability and mental health, especially among those high in activation before surgery and those low in activation at 12-months post-surgery. Our findings suggest that patients' ways of thinking about their health may be effective targets of motivational coaching, to help them become more engaged over the recovery trajectory.

The impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion on spinal research - asking different questions

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In recent years, the field of spine surgery has seen significant advancements in surgical techniques alongside a growing emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

PURPOSE

This paper explores the significant impact of DEI on spine surgery, recognizing its potential to drive innovation, improve patient outcomes, and address healthcare disparities.

STUDY DESIGN

Review.

SIGN/SETTING

The review focuses on the impact of DEI on spine surgery, examining how diverse perspectives influence research and practice in the field.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Not applicable.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

METHODS

The review analyzes the role of DEI in driving innovation and improving patient outcomes in spine surgery and discusses ongoing challenges such as unconscious biases and systemic barriers.

RESULTS

Shifting paradigms in research through diverse perspectives is crucial for broadening the scope of inquiry and challenging existing standards. Efforts to promote diversity, including targeted outreach and mentorship initiatives, are essential for cultivating a more inclusive workforce.

CONCLUSIONS

Embracing diverse perspectives and asking unconventional questions are vital for achieving a comprehensive understanding of spinal health and delivering equitable healthcare. Ongoing challenges highlight the need for continued commitment to DEI principles.

Social determinants of health and disparities in spine surgery: a 10-year analysis of 8,565 cases using ensemble machine learning and multilayer perceptron

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The influence of SDOH on spine surgery is poorly understood. Historically, researchers commonly focused on the isolated influences of race, insurance status, or income on healthcare outcomes. However, analysis of SDOH is becoming increasingly more nuanced as viewing social factors in aggregate rather than individually may offer more precise estimates of the impact of SDOH on healthcare delivery.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of patient social history on length of stay (LOS) and readmission within 90 days following spine surgery using ensemble machine learning and multilayer perceptron.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

8,565 elective and emergency spine surgery cases performed from 2013 to 2023 using our institution's database of longitudinally collected electronic medical record information.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Patient LOS, discharge disposition, and rate of 90-day readmission.

METHODS

Ensemble machine learning and multilayer perceptron were employed to predict LOS and readmission within 90 days following spine surgery. All other subsequent statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28. To further assess correlations among variables, Pearson's correlation tests and multivariate linear regression models were constructed. Independent sample t-tests, paired sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Bonferroni and Tukey corrections, and Pearson's chi-squared test were applied where appropriate for analysis of continuous and categorical variables.

RESULTS

Black patients demonstrated a greater LOS compared to white patients, but race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with 90-day readmission rates. Insured patients had a shorter LOS and lower readmission rates compared to non-insured patients, as did privately insured patients compared to publicly insured patients. Patients discharged home had lower LOS and lower readmission rates, compared to patients discharged to other facilities. Marriage decreased both LOS and readmission rates, underweight patients showcased increased LOS and readmission rates, and religion was shown to impact LOS and readmission rates. When utilizing patient social history, lab values, and medical history, machine learning determined the top 5 most-important variables for prediction of LOS -along with their respective feature importances-to be insurance status (0.166), religion (0.100), ICU status (0.093), antibiotic use (0.061), and case status: elective or urgent (0.055). The top 5 most-important variables for prediction of 90-day readmission-along with their respective feature importances-were insurance status (0.177), religion (0.123), discharge location (0.096), emergency case status (0.064), and history of diabetes (0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that SDOH is influential in determining patient length of stay, discharge disposition, and likelihood of readmission following spine surgery. Machine learning was utilized to accurately predict LOS and 90-day readmission with patient medical history, lab values, and social history, as well as social history alone.

Development of a Novel Risk Stratification Score to Predict 30-Day Mortality in Cervical Trauma Patients: CLAAD Score

STUDY DESIGN

Case control.

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic cervical spine injuries are associated with a substantial risk of mortality. The aim of this study is to develop a novel mortality prediction model for patients with cervical trauma who require operative treatment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with cervical spine trauma have a high risk of postoperative complications and mortality. There are few reliable systems that can accurately predict mortality after surgery for cervical spine trauma, and those that do exist are typically not specific to cervical trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine trauma. Univariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with mortality. Variables that were found to be significant in the univariate models were compiled into a multivariable model. The final model was compared with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), a modified Charlson comorbidity index (mCCI), and the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) in respect to predicting 30-day mortality after cervical trauma. The score was then externally validated using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (6.7%) of 822 patients did not survive 30 days after surgery. The final multivariable logistic regression model consisted of the following variables: circumferential fusion "C." long "L" fusion (more than 4 levels), anemia "A," age over 60 "A," and dialysis "D." The risk of mortality increased with increasing CLAAD score, with mortality rates of 0.9%, 3.1%, 7.4%, 22.7%, and 14.3% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The CLAAD model had an AUC of 0.73 for predicting mortality after cervical trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The CLAAD score is a simple and effective system that can help identify patients at risk of increased mortality within 30 days of cervical trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of Racial/Ethnic Disparities on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Spine Surgery: QOD Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data from the cervical module of a National Spine Registry, the Quality Outcomes Database.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of race and ethnicity with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one year after cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Evidence suggests that Black individuals are 39% to 44% more likely to have postoperative complications and a prolonged length of stay after cervical spine surgery compared with Whites. The long-term recovery assessed with PROMs after cervical spine surgery among Black, Hispanic, and other non-Hispanic groups ( i.e . Asian) remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PROMs were used to assess disability (neck disability index) and neck/arm pain preoperatively and one-year postoperative. Primary outcomes were disability and pain, and not being satisfied from preoperative to 12 months after surgery. Multivariable logistic and proportional odds regression analyses were used to determine the association of racial/ethnic groups [Hispanic, non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and non-Hispanic Asian (NHA)] with outcomes after covariate adjustment and to compute the odds of each racial/ethnic group achieving a minimal clinically important difference one-year postoperatively.

RESULTS

On average, the sample of 14,429 participants had significant reductions in pain and disability, and 87% were satisfied at one-year follow-up. Hispanic and NHB patients had higher odds of not being satisfied (40% and 80%) and having worse pain outcomes (30%-70%) compared with NHW. NHB had 50% higher odds of worse disability scores compared with NHW. NHA reported similar disability and neck pain outcomes compared with NHW.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic and NHB patients had worse patient-reported outcomes one year after cervical spine surgery compared with NHW individuals, even after adjusting for potential confounders, yet there was no difference in disability and neck pain outcomes reported for NHA patients. This study highlights the need to address inherent racial/ethnic disparities in recovery trajectories following cervical spine surgery.

Socioeconomic disparities in lumbar fusion rates were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare access and utilization throughout the US, with variable impact on patients of different socioeconomic status (SES) and race. We characterize pre-pandemic and pandemic demographic and SES trends of lumbar fusion patients in the US.

Methods

Adults undergoing first-time lumbar fusion 1/1/2004-3/31/2021 were assessed in Clinformatics® Data Mart for patient age, geographical location, gender, race, education level, net worth, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the significance of trends over time, with a focus on pandemic trends 2020-2021 versus previous trends 2004-2019.

Results

The total 217,204 patients underwent lumbar fusions, 1/1/2004-3/31/2021. The numbers and per capita rates of lumbar fusions increased 2004-2019 and decreased in 2020 (first year of COVID-19 pandemic), with large variation in geographic distribution. There was overall a significant decrease in proportion of White patients undergoing lumbar fusion over time (OR=0.997, p<.001), though they were more likely to undergo surgery during the pandemic (OR=1.016, p<.001). From 2004-2021, patients were more likely to be educated beyond high school. Additionally, patients in the highest (>$500k) and lowest (<$25k) net worth categories had significantly more fusions over time (p<.001). During the pandemic (2020-2021), patients in higher net worth groups were more likely to undergo lumbar fusions ($150k-249k & $250k-499k: p<.001) whereas patients in the lowest net worth group had decreased rate of surgeries (p<.001). Lastly, patients' CCI increased significantly from 2004 to 2021 (coefficient=0.124, p<.001), and this trend held true during the pandemic (coefficient=0.179, p<.001).

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, our work represents the most comprehensive and recent characterization of SES variables in lumbar fusion rates. Unsurprisingly, lumbar fusions decreased overall with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, disparities in fusion patients across patient race and wealth widened during the pandemic, reversing years of progress, a lesson we can learn for future public health emergencies.

Geospatial Evaluation of Disparities in Access to Cervical Spine Fusion in Metropolitan Areas Across the United States

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study with epidemiologic analysis of public Medicare data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to use geospatial analysis to identify disparities in access to cervical spine fusions in metropolitan Medicare populations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spine fusion is among the most common elective procedures performed by spine surgeons and is the most common surgical intervention for degenerative cervical spine disease. Although some studies have examined demographic and socioeconomic trends in cervical spine fusion, few have attempted to identify where disparities exist and quantify them at a community level.

METHODS

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician billing and Medicare demographic data sets from 2013 to 2020 were filtered to contain only cervical spine fusion procedures and then combined with US Census socioeconomic data. The Moran Index geospatial clustering algorithm was used to identify statistically significant hotspot and coldspots of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members at a county level. Univariate and multivariate analysis was subsequently conducted to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with access to care.

RESULTS

A total of 285,405 cervical spine fusions were analyzed. Hotspots of cervical spine fusion were located in the South, while coldspots were throughout the Northern Midwest, the Northeast, South Florida, and West Coast. The percent of Medicare patients that were Black was the largest negative predictor of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members ( β =-0.13, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to access can have significant impacts on health outcomes, and these impacts can be disproportionately felt by marginalized groups. Accounting for socioeconomic disadvantage and geography, this analysis found the Black race to be a significant negative predictor of access to cervical spine fusions. Future studies are needed to further explore potential socioeconomic barriers that exist in access to specialized surgical care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective.

Impact of Insurance Type on Access to Pediatric Surgical Care

Background

This study aimed to measure the impact of insurance type on access to pediatric surgical care, clinical and surgical scheduling decisions, provider-driven cancelations, and missed care opportunities (MCOs). We hypothesize that patients with public health insurance experience longer scheduling delays and more frequently canceled surgical appointments compared with patients with private health insurance.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent a surgical procedure within the plastic and oral surgery department at our institution in 2019. Propensity score matching and linear regressions were used to estimate the effect of insurance type on hospital scheduling and patient access outcomes while controlling for procedure type and sex.

Results

A total of 457 patients were included in the demographic and clinical characteristics analyses; 354 were included in propensity score matching analyses. No significant differences in the number of days between scheduling and occurrence of initial consultation or number of clinic cancelations were observed between insurance groups (P > 0.05). However, patients with public insurance had a 7.4 times higher hospital MCO rate (95% CI [5.2-9.7]; P < 0.001) and 4.7 times the number of clinic MCOs (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

No significant differences were found between insurance groups in timely access to surgical treatment or cancelations. Patients with public insurance had more MCOs than patients with private insurance. Future research should investigate how to remove barriers that impact access to care for marginalized patients.

Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Increasing evidence demonstrates disparities among patients with differing insurance statuses in the field of spine surgery. However, no pooled analyses have performed a robust review characterizing differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with varying insurance types.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of the PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, and EMBASE was performed for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with private insurance versus government insurance. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and meta-analyses were conducted for 3 perioperative events and 2 types of complications. In addition to pooled analysis, sub-analyses were performed for each outcome in specific government payer statuses.

Results

Thirty-eight studies (5,018,165 total patients) were included. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with government insurance experienced greater risk of 90-day re-admission (OR 1.84, p<.0001), non-routine discharge (OR 4.40, p<.0001), extended LOS (OR 1.82, p<.0001), any postoperative complication (OR 1.61, p<.0001), and any medical complication (OR 1.93, p<.0001). These differences persisted across outcomes in sub-analyses comparing Medicare or Medicaid to private insurance. Similarly, across all examined outcomes, Medicare patients had a higher risk of experiencing an adverse event compared with non-Medicare patients. Compared with Medicaid patients, Medicare patients were only more likely to experience non-routine discharge (OR 2.68, p=.0007).

Conclusions

Patients with government insurance experience greater likelihood of morbidity across several perioperative outcomes. Additionally, Medicare patients fare worse than non-Medicare patients across outcomes, potentially due to age-based discrimination. Based on these results, it is clear that directed measures should be taken to ensure that underinsured patients receive equal access to resources and quality care.

Outcomes and survival analysis of adult cervical deformity patients with 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that adult cervical deformity patients may be at increased risk of death in conjunction with increased frailty or a weakened physiologic state. However, such studies have often been limited by follow-up duration, and longer-term studies are needed to better assess temporal changes in ACD patients and associated mortality risk.

PURPOSE

To assess if patients with decreased comorbidities and physiologic burden will be at lessened risk of death for a greater length of time after undergoing adult cervical deformity surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred ninety ACD patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Morbidity and mortality data.

METHODS

Operative ACD patients ≥18 years with pre-(BL) and 10-year (10Y) data were included. Patients were stratified as expired versus living, as well as temporally grouped by Expiration prior to 5Y or between 5Y and 10Y. Group differences were assessed via means comparison analysis. Backstep logistic regression identified mortality predictors. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survivorship of expired patients. Log rank analysis determined differences in survival distribution groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-six total patients were included (60.97±10.19 years, 48% female, 28.03±7.28 kg/m2). Within 10Y, 12 (18.2% of ACD cohort) expired. At baseline, patients were comparable in age, gender, BMI, and CCI total on average (all p>.05). Furthermore, patients were comparable in BL HRQLs (all p>.05). However, patients who expired between 5Y and 10Y demonstrated higher BL EQ5D and mJOA scores than their earlier expired counterparts at 2Y (p<.021). Furthermore, patients who presented with no CCI markers at BL were significantly more likely to survive until the 5Y-10Y follow-up window. Surgically, the only differences observed between patients who survived until 5Y was in undergoing osteotomy, with longer survival seen in those who did not require it (p=.003). Logistic regression revealed independent predictors of death prior to 5Y to be increased BMI, increased frailty, and increased levels fused (model p<.001). KM analysis found that by Passias et al frailty, not frail patients had mean survival time of 170.56 weeks, versus 158.00 in frail patients (p=.949).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that long-term survival after cervical deformity surgery may be predicted by baseline surgical factors. By optimizing BMI, frailty status, and minimizing fusion length when appropriate, surgeons may be able to further assist ACD patients in increasing their survivability postoperatively.

In-hospital mortality trends after surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar injury: A national inpatient sample database study

Introduction

Given the increasing incidence of traumatic thoracolumbar injuries in recent years, studies have sought to investigate potential risk factors for outcomes in these patients.

Research question

The aim of this study was to investigate trends and risk factors for in-hospital mortality after fusion for traumatic thoracolumbar injury.

Materials and methods

Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion after traumatic injury were queried from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2017. Analysis was performed to identify risk factors for inpatient mortality after surgery.

Results

Patients in 2017 were on average older (51.0 vs. 48.5, P = 0.004), had more admitting diagnoses (15.5 vs. 10.7, p < 0.001), were less likely to be White (75.8% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.006), were from a ZIP code with a higher median income quartile (Quartile 1: 31.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.011), and were more likely to have Medicare as a primary payer (22.9% vs. 30.1%, p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis of demographics and surgical characteristics demonstrated that patients in the in-hospital mortality group (n = 90) were older (70.2 vs. 49.6, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (74.4% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.031), had a great number of admitted diagnoses (21.3 vs. 12.7, p < 0.001), and were more likely to be insured by Medicare (70.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis found age (OR 1.06, p < 0.001) and Black race (OR 3.71, p = 0.007) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Our study of nationwide, traumatic thoracolumbar fusion procedures from 2012 to 2017 in the NIS database found older, black patients were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality after surgery.

Demographic and Socioeconomic Trends in Cervical Fusion Utilization from 2004 Through 2021 and the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Cervical fusion rates increased in the U.S. exponentially 1990-2014, but trends leading up to/during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been fully evaluated by patient socioeconomic status (SES). Here, we provide the most recent, comprehensive characterization of demographic and SES trends in cervical fusions, including during the pandemic.

METHODS

We collected the following variables on adults undergoing cervical fusions, 1/1/2004-3/31/2021, in Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart: age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, provider's practicing state, gender, race, education, and net worth. We performed multivariate linear and logistic regression to evaluate associations of cervical fusion rates with SES variables.

RESULTS

Cervical fusion rates increased 2004-2016, then decreased 2016-2020. Proportions of Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients undergoing cervical fusions increased (OR = 1.001,1.001,1.004, P < 0.01), with a corresponding decrease in White patients (OR = 0.996, P < 0.001) over time. There were increases in cervical fusions in higher education groups (OR = 1.006, 1.002, P < 0.001) and lowest net worth group (OR = 1.012, P < 0.001). During the pandemic, proportions of White (OR = 1.015, P < 0.01) and wealthier patients (OR ≥ 1.015, P < 0.01) undergoing cervical fusions increased.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first documented decrease in annual cervical surgery rates in the U.S. Our data reveal a bimodal distribution for cervical fusion patients, with racial-minority, lower-net-worth, and highly-educated patients receiving increasing proportions of surgical interventions. White and wealthier patients were more likely to undergo cervical fusions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been reported in other areas of medicine but not yet in spine surgery. There is still considerable work needed to improve equitable access to spine care for the entire U.S.

POPULATION

Socioeconomic Disparities in Surgical Care for Congenital Hand Differences

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on access to congenital hand surgery care, hospital admission charges, and analyze these geographic trends across regions of the country.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted of congenital hand surgery performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Multivariate regression was used to analyze the impact of socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 5531 pediatric patients underwent corrective surgery for congenital hand differences, including syndactyly repair (n = 2439), polydactyly repair (n = 2826), and pollicization (n = 266). Patients underwent surgery at significantly earlier age when treated at above-median case volume hospitals (P < .001). Patients with above-median income (P < .001), non-white race (P < .001), commercial insurance (P < .001), living in an urban community (P < .001), and not living in an underserved area (P < .001) were more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Nearly half of patients chose to seek care at a distant hospital rather than the one locally available (49.5%, n = 1172). Of those choosing a distant hospital, most patients chose a higher-volume facility (80.9%, n = 948 of 1172). On multivariate regression, white patients were significantly more likely to choose a more distant, higher-volume hospital (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic and geographic factors significantly contribute to disparate access to congenital hand surgery across the country. Patients with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. Treatment at hospitals with higher case volume is associated with earlier age at surgery and decreased hospital admission charges.

Earlier Tracheostomy Reduces Complications in Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Real-World Practice: Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 2001 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is believed that early tracheostomy in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) may lessen the risk of developing complications and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and critical care stay. This study aims to assess whether early tracheostomy is beneficial in patients with traumatic cervical SCI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2018. Adult patients with a diagnosis of acute complete (ASIA A) traumatic cervical SCI who underwent surgery and tracheostomy were included. Patients were stratified into those receiving early (at or before 7 days) and delayed tracheostomy. Propensity score matching was used to assess the association between delayed tracheostomy and the risk of in-hospital adverse events. Risk-adjusted variability in tracheostomy timing across trauma centers was investigated using mixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

The study included 2001 patients from 374 North American trauma centers. The median time to tracheostomy was 9.2 days (IQR: 6.1-13.1 days), with 654 patients (32.7%) undergoing early tracheostomy. After matching, the odds of a major complication were significantly lower for early tracheostomy patients (OR: .90; 95% CI: .88-.98). Patients were also significantly less likely to experience an immobility-related complication (OR: .90; 95% CI: .88-.98). Patients in the early group spent 8.2 fewer days in the critical care unit (95% CI: -10.2 to -6.61) and 6.7 fewer days ventilated (95% CI: -9.44 to -5.23). There was significant variability in tracheostomy timeliness between trauma centers with a median odds ratio of 12.2 (95% CI: 9.7-13.7), which was not explained by case-mix and hospital-level characteristics.

CONCLUSION

A 7-day threshold to implement tracheostomy seems to be associated with reduced in-hospital complications, time in the critical care unit, and time on mechanical ventilation.

Racial Disparities and Surgical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis 2015-2020

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We identified 57,913 adult patients who underwent elective ACDF spine surgery from 2015 to 2020. Data were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative course, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were stratified by race.

RESULTS

A total of 57,913 patients, white (n = 49,016), African American (AA; n = 7200), Native American (NA; n = 565), and Asian (n = 1132) underwent ACDF fusion surgery. AA patients had higher comorbidities, including diabetes (24.7%), dyspnea (5.9%), and hypertension (61.6%) compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). NA and AA were higher tobacco users, (33.1%) and (28.7%), respectively (P < 0.001). Most of the patients reported in this dataset had single-level surgeries. AAs had a longer average hospital stay (2.51±7.31 days) and operative time (144.13±82.26 min) (P < 0.001). Lower risk of superficial surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.77; P = 0.005) and greater risk of reintubation (ORadj, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (ORadj, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.79; P = 0.001), renal insufficiency (ORadj, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.38-7.20; P = 0.006), and return to the operating room (ORadj, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.65; P < 0.001 were reported in AAs compared with whites. NAs showed an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection compared with whites (ORadj, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.05-6.36; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities were found to independently affect rates of complications after surgery for ACDF.

Inefficiency in Delivery of General Surgery to Black Patients: A National Inpatient Sample Study

Background  Racial disparities in outcomes among patients in the United States are widely recognized, but disparities in treatment are less commonly understood. This study is intended to identify treatment disparities in delivery of surgery and time to surgery for diagnoses managed by general surgeons-appendicitis, cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, abdominal wall hernias, intestinal obstructions, and viscus perforations. Methods  The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to estimate and analyze disparities in delivery of surgery, type of surgery received, and timing of surgery. Age-adjusted means were compared by race/ethnicity and trends in treatment disparities were evaluated from 1993 to 2017. Linear modeling was used to measure trends in treatment and outcome disparities over time. Mediation analysis was performed to estimate contributions of all available factors to treatment differences. Relationships between treatment disparities and disparities in mortality and length of stay were similarly evaluated. Results  Black patients were less likely to receive surgery for appendicitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and hernias, and more likely to receive surgery for obstructions and perforations. Black patients experienced longer wait times prior to surgery, by 0.15 to 1.9 days, depending on the diagnosis. Mediation analysis demonstrated that these disparities are not attributable to the patient factors available in the NIS, and provided some insight into potential contributors to the observed disparities, such as hospital factors and socioeconomic factors. Conclusion  Treatment disparities are present even with common indications for surgery, such as appendicitis, cholecystitis, and gallstone pancreatitis. Black patients are less likely to receive surgery with these diagnoses and must wait longer for surgery if it is performed. Surgeons should plan institution-level interventions to measure, explain, and potentially correct treatment disparities.

Efficacy of an Opioid-Sparing Perioperative Multimodal Analgesia Protocol on Posterior Lumbar Fusion in a Hispanic Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Posterior lumbar fusion surgery has become more common amid an aging population, with degenerative disease as its most common indication. Historically, postoperative pain control for spine surgery has relied on opioids. However, opioid use is associated with adverse effects such as dependence, respiratory depression, and altered cognition. Our study aimed to determine whether an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia regimen (ketorolac, orphenadrine, and gabapentin) could be a viable alternative to diminish opioid use compared with a standard opioid-based regimen in Hispanic patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial of Hispanic patients scheduled to undergo elective posterior spinal fusion. Inclusion criteria included age 30 to 85 years, Hispanic ethnicity, lumbar stenosis between L1 and S1, elective posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score <2, and consent to participate in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups, an experimental multimodal analgesia and control (opioid-based) treatment groups, and outcomes such as morphine milligram equivalents used, visual analog scale score, and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The MMA experimental group used significantly lower amounts of opioid (measured with morphine milligram equivalent) than the opioid-based group during the 12-hour and 24-hour postoperative periods ( P -value = 0.023 and P -value = 0.033, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed in opioid use in the 48-hour postoperative period between both groups ( P -value = 0.066). The MMA group had significantly lower VAS scores reported at the 12-hour, 24-hour, and 48-hour postoperative periods compared with the opioid-based group ( P -values = 0.016, 0.020, and 0.020, respectively). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay between groups ( P -value = 0.169).

DISCUSSION

Implementing an MMA protocol in Hispanic patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion resulted in decreased overall opioid use and decreased pain intensity compared with the opioid-based group. MMA is an effective alternative for pain control in patients who want to avoid opioid use.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Identifier: NCT05413902.

Racial Disparities in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize previous studies evaluating racial disparities in spine surgery.

METHODS

We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for literature on racial disparities in spine surgery. Our review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses guidelines and protocol. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, mortality, surgical management, readmissions, and length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 1753 publications were assessed. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies compared Whites (Ws) and African Americans (AAs) groups; 14 studies reported adverse outcomes for AAs. When compared with Ws, AA patients had higher odds of postoperative complications including mortality, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nervous system complications, bleeding, infection, in-hospital complications, adverse discharge disposition, and delay in diagnosis. Further, AAs were found to have increased odds of readmission and longer length of stay. Finally, AAs were found to have higher odds of nonoperative treatment for spinal cord injury, were more likely to undergo posterior approach in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and were less likely to receive cervical disk arthroplasty compared with Ws for similar indications.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review of spine literature found that when compared with W patients, AA patients had worse health outcomes. Further investigation of root causes of these racial disparities in spine surgery is warranted.

Bias in Care: Impact of Ethnicity on Time to Emergent Surgery Varies Between Subspecialties

INTRODUCTION

Disparity in access to emergency care among minority groups continues to exist despite growing awareness of the effect of implicit bias on public health. In this study, we evaluated ethnicity-based differences in time between admission and surgery for patients undergoing emergent procedures at hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 249,296 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cases from 2006 to 2018 involving general, orthopaedic, and vascular surgeries. Analysis of variance was used to compare "time to operating room" (OR) between ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Notable differences in time to OR were noted among general and vascular surgeries but not orthopaedic surgery. Post hoc comparison identified notable variation in general surgery between White and Black/African Americans. In vascular surgery, notable variations were identified between White and Black/African Americans and White and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that certain surgical subspecialties continue to exhibit disparities in care that may manifest as surgical delay, most notably between White and Black/African Americans. Interestingly, variation in time to OR for patients treated by orthopaedic surgery was not notable. Overall, these results highlight the need for additional research into the role of implicit bias in emergent surgical care in the United States.

Disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion provision and outcomes for cervical stenosis

Background

Disparities in neurosurgical care have emerged as an area of interest when considering the impact of social determinants on access to health care. Decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical stenosis (CS) may prevent progression towards debilitating complications that may severely compromise one's quality of life. This retrospective database analysis aims to elucidate demographic and socioeconomic trends in ACDF provision and outcomes of CS-related pathologies.

Methods

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database was queried between 2016 and 2019 using International Classification of Diseases 10th edition codes for patients undergoing ACDF as a treatment for spinal cord and nerve root compression. Baseline demographics and inpatient stay measures were analyzed.

Results

Patients of White race were significantly less likely to present with manifestations of CS such as myelopathy, plegia, and bowel-bladder dysfunction. Meanwhile, Black patients and Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to experience these impairments representative of the more severe stages of the degenerative spine disease process. White race conferred a lesser risk of complications such as tracheostomy, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury in comparison to non-white race. Insurance by Medicaid and Medicare conferred significant risks in terms of more advanced disease prior to intervention and negative inpatient. Patients in the highest quartile of median income consistently fared better than patients in the lowest quartile across almost every aspect ranging from degree of progression at initial presentation to incidence of complications to healthcare resource utilization. All outcomes for patients age > 65 were worse than patients who were younger at the time of the intervention.

Conclusions

Significant disparities exist in the trajectory of CS and the risks associated with ACDF amongst various demographic cohorts. The differences between patient populations may be reflective of a larger additive burden for certain populations, especially when considering patients' intersectionality.

Cervical Steroid Injections Are Not Effective for Prevention of Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine how often patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and initially treated with cervical steroid injections (CSI) and to determine whether these injections provide any benefit in delaying ultimate surgical treatment.

METHODS

All patients with a new diagnosis of DCM, without previous cervical spine surgery or steroid injections, were identified in PearlDiver, a large insurance database. Steroid injection and surgery timing was identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Multivariate logistic regression identified associations with surgical treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 686 patients with DCM were identified. Pre-surgical cervical spine steroid injections were utilized in 244 patients (35.6%). All patients underwent eventual surgical treatment. Median time from initial DCM diagnosis to surgery was 75.5 days (mean 351.6 days; standard deviation 544.9 days). Cervical steroid injections were associated with higher odds of surgery within 1 year (compared to patients without injections, OR = 1.44, P < .001) and at each examined time point through 5 years (OR = 2.01, P < .001). In multivariate analysis comparing injection types, none of the 3 injection types were associated with decreased odds of surgery within 1 month of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

While cervical steroid injections continue to be commonly performed in patients with DCM, there is an overall increased odds of surgery after any type of cervical injection. Therefore injections should not be used to prevent surgical management of DCM.

Reporting demographics in randomized control trials in spine surgery - we must do better

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Demographic factors contribute significantly to spine surgery outcomes. Although race and ethnicity are not proxies for disease states, the intersection between these patient characteristics and socioeconomic status significantly impact patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of demographic reporting and analysis in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published in the three highest impact spine journals.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We analyzed 278 randomized control trials published in The Spine Journal, Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine between January 2012 - January 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Extracted manuscript characteristics included the frequency of demographic reporting, sample size, and demographic composition of studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of RCTs published between January 2012 - January 2022 in the three highest impact factor spine journals in 2021: The Spine Journal, Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. We determined if age, gender, BMI, race, and ethnicity were reported and analyzed for each study. The overall frequency of demographic reporting was assessed, and the reporting trends were analyzed for each individual year and journal. Among studies that did report demographics, the populations were analyzed in comparison to the national population per United States (US) census reports. Studies were evaluated for bias using Cochrane risk-of-bias.

RESULTS

Our search identified 278 RCTs for inclusion. 166 were published in Spine, 65 in The Spine Journal, and 47 in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. Only 9.35% (N=26) and 3.9% (N=11) of studies reported race and ethnicity, respectively. Demographic reporting frequency did not vary based on the publishing journal. Reporting of age and BMI increased over time, but reporting of race and ethnicity did not. Among RCTs that reported race, 88% were conducted in the US, and 85.71% of the patients in these US studies were White. White subjects were overly represented compared to the US population (85.71% vs. 61.63%, p<.001), and non-White or Black patients were most underrepresented (2.89% vs. 25.96%, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs published in the three highest impact factor spine journals failed to frequently report patient race or ethnicity. Among studies published in the US, study populations are increasingly represented by non-Hispanic White patients. As we strive to care for an increasingly diverse population and reduce disparities to care, spine surgeons must do a better job reporting these variables to increase the external validity and generalizability of RCTs.

Racial and ethnic differences in presentation severity and postoperative outcomes in vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

We assessed the effect of race and ethnicity on presentation severity and postoperative outcomes in those with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), carotid artery stenosis (CAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2020. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting race and/or ethnicity and presentation severity and/or postoperative outcomes for adult patients who had undergone major vascular procedures. They independently extracted the study data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis used random effects models to derive the odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was presentation severity stratified by the proportion of patients with advanced disease, including ruptured vs nonruptured AAA, symptomatic vs asymptomatic CAS, chronic limb-threatening ischemia vs claudication, and complicated vs uncomplicated TBAD. The secondary outcomes included postoperative all-cause mortality and disease-specific outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies met the inclusion criteria. Black (OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.31-13.26), Hispanic (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.85-2.19), and Indigenous (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.39-2.80) patients were more likely to present with ruptured AAAs than were White patients. Black and Hispanic patients had had higher symptomatic CAS (Black: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38; Hispanic: OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.45) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Black: OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.14-2.43; Hispanic: OR, 1.73; 95% CI 1.13-2.65) presentation rates. No study had evaluated the effect of race or ethnicity on complicated TBAD. All-cause mortality was higher for Black (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.51), Hispanic (RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.57-2.31), and Indigenous (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37) patients after AAA repair. Postoperatively, Black (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19-2.00) and Hispanic (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31-1.81) patients were associated with stroke/transient ischemic attack after carotid revascularization and lower extremity amputation (RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.76-2.06; and RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.48-1.94, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain visible minorities were associated with higher morbidity and mortality across various vascular surgery presentations. Further research to understand the underpinnings is required.

Epidemiology of pediatric cartilage restoration procedures in the United States: insurance and geography play a role

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to analyze the epidemiology of children and adolescents undergoing osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the United States.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System, a national database consisting of 49 children's hospitals, was queried for all patients undergoing OAT, OCA, and ACI between 2012 and 2018. Demographic information was collected for each subject. United States Census guidelines were used to categorize hospitals geographically. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 809 subjects with a mean age of 15.4 ± 2.4 years were included in the analysis. Of these, 48.6% underwent OCA, 41.9% underwent OAT, and 9.5% underwent ACI. After adjusting for confounders in a multivariate model, ACI was 3.6 times more likely to be performed in patients with private insurance than those that were publicly insured (95% CI 1.6-8.0, p = 0.002). Furthermore, a patient in the Northeast was 33.1 times more likely to undergo ACI than in the West (95% CI 4.5-246.1, p = 0.001). OAT was performed most frequently in the West and Midwest (52.4% and 51.8% of the time, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the United States, there is substantial variation in the procedures performed for cartilage restoration in children and adolescents. Though ACI is the least commonly selected operation overall, it is significantly more likely to be performed on patients with private insurance and those in the Northeast.

Utilization Trends of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in New York State

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate trends in the utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures in NY state using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and to determine if utilization of IONM resulted in a reduction in postoperative neurological deficits.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

IONM has been available to spinal surgeons for several decades. It has become increasingly prevalent in all facets of spinal surgery including elective ACDF procedures. The utility of IONM for preventing a neurological deficit in elective spine procedures has recently been called into question.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database were accessed to perform a retrospective cohort study comparing monitored versus unmonitored ACDF procedures between 2007 and 2018 as defined by the International Classification of Disease-9 and 10 Procedural Coding System (ICD-9 PCS, ICD-10 PCS) codes. Patient demographics, medical history, surgical intervention, pertinent in-hospital events, and urban versus rural medical centers (as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget) were recorded. Propensity-score-matched comparisons were used to identify factors related to the utilization of IONM and risk factors for neurological deficits after elective ACDF.

RESULTS

A total of 70,838 [15,092 monitored (21.3%) and 55,746 (78.7%) unmonitored] patients' data were extracted. The utilization of IONM since 2007 has increased in a linear manner from 0.9% of cases in 2007 to 36.7% by 2018. Overall, baseline characteristics of patients who were monitored during cases differed significantly from unmonitored patients in age, race/ethnicity, insurance type, presence of myelopathy or radiculopathy, and Charlson Comorbidity Index; however, only race/ethnicity was statistically significant when analyzed using propensity-score-matched. When comparing urban and rural medical centers, there is a significant lag in the adoption of the technology with no monitored cases in rural centers until 2012 with significant fluctuations in utilization compared with steadily increasing utilization among urban centers. From 2017 to 2018, reporting of neurological deficits after surgery resembled literature-established norms. Pooled analysis of these years revealed that the incidence of neurological complications occurred more frequently in monitored cases than in unmonitored (3.0% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of IONM for elective ACDF remains uncertain; however, it continues to gain popularity for routine cases. For medical centers that lack similar resources to centers in more densely populated regions of NY state, reliable access to this technology is not a certainty. In our analysis of intraoperative neurological complications, it seems that IONM is not protective against neurological injury.

Surgical Management of Facial Paralysis: Demographic and Socioeconomic Associations

Objective: To determine demographic and socioeconomic variables associated with whether surgery is performed for patients with facial paralysis (FP). Background: Management of FP may include elective surgery dependent on patient goals of care and physician experience. Methods: The 2016 State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery Services Database for six states were queried to identify patients with FP. These patients were then stratified based on receiving surgery for FP. Demographic and socioeconomic information was collected. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of undergoing FP surgery, as well as the hospital setting in which surgery was performed. Results: Of 20,218 patients with FP, 515 underwent surgery. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo surgery (p < 0.001), as were patients with Medicaid or self-pay insurance (p < 0.001). Those living in rural areas were also less likely to receive surgery (p = 0.001). Individuals receiving surgery in the inpatient setting were more likely to have private insurance, whereas those in the ambulatory setting were more likely to have Medicare (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Several variables are correlated with whether FP is managed surgically, including insurance status, race, and type of residential area.

Socioeconomic Factors Correlation With Idiopathic Scoliosis Curve Type and Cobb Angle Severity

INTRODUCTION

Race and socioeconomic status correlate with disease outcomes and treatment in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) to varying degrees, although there is no clear association with Cobb angle and curve type. The purpose of this study was to assess socioeconomic factors and their association with Cobb angles in patients with IS.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed with the radiographic analysis of 89 patients diagnosed with IS and spinal curves >10° between the ages of six and 18. Associations between the Cobb angles and socioeconomic categorical variables were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and continuous variables using a Spearman Rank correlation.  Results: There were no significant associations between proximal thoracic, main thoracic, or thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angles and sex, insurance type, race, access to healthy food, financial difficulty, or income. BMI and proximal thoracic Cobb angle (ρ = 0.2375, p=0.0268) had a significant positive correlation, and BMI and income (ρ = -0.2468, p=0.0228) shared a significant negative correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of IS proximal thoracic Cobb angles was positively associated with BMI and income. Other socioeconomic factors such as age, race, sex, access to food, insurance, and financial difficulties related to scoliosis treatment were not correlated with Cobb angle severity. The data presented suggest that patients with IS have varying degrees of curve type and severity that overall do not correlate with various socioeconomic factors. Validating which factors are predictive of curve severity could lead to early intervention preventing further morbidity of IS.

Race and Ethnicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Upper-Extremity Journals

PURPOSE

Hand surgery remains one of the least racially and ethnically diverse subspecialties in all of medicine, and minority patients demonstrate overall worse health care outcomes compared with White patients. Our purpose was to determine the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals with an upper-extremity (UE) focus.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs contained in peer-reviewed journals with an UE focus. All articles from 2000 to 2021 were included. Information such as article sample size, center type, funding, and location was recorded. We assessed each article to determine whether demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was reported for study participants.

RESULTS

A total of 481 RCTs in 9 UE journals were included. For UE RCTs, 96% of studies reported age, 90% reported sex, and 5% reported either race or ethnicity. Demographic information about economic status, insurance status, mental health, educational level, and marital status were each reported in <10% of RCTs. Racial representation was highest for White participants (80%) and lowest among American Indian participants. Of studies conducted within the United States, all racial groups except for White patients were underrepresented compared with census data.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic data related to race and ethnicity for patients involved in UE RCTs are infrequently reported. When reported, the racial demographics of UE RCT patients do not match the demographics of the patients in United States. Black patients remain underrepresented in RCTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Academic journals mandating the reporting of demographic data related to race may aid in improved reporting and allow for subsequent aggregation within systematic reviews to assess outcomes for racial minorities.

Association Between Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite an increased understanding of the impact of socioeconomic status on neurosurgical outcomes, the impact of neighborhood-level social determinants on lumbar spine surgery patient-reported outcomes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of geographic social deprivation on physical and mental health of lumbar surgery patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disease from 2015 to 2018 was performed. Surgeries were categorized as decompression only or decompression with fusion. The area deprivation index was used to define social deprivation. Study outcomes included preoperative and change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), depression, and anxiety (mean follow-up: 43.3 weeks). Multivariable imputation was performed for missing data. One-way analysis of variance and multivariable linear regression were used to evaluate the association between area deprivation index and PROMIS scores.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 2010 patients, those with the greatest social deprivation had significantly worse mean preoperative PROMIS scores compared with the least-deprived cohort (mean difference [95% CI]-PF: -2.5 [-3.7 to -1.4]; PI: 3.0 [2.0-4.1]; depression: 5.5 [3.4-7.5]; anxiety: 6.0 [3.8-8.2], all P < .001), without significant differences in change in these domains at latest follow-up (PF: +0.5 [-1.2 to 2.2]; PI: -0.2 [-1.7 to 2.1]; depression: -2 [-4.0 to 0.1]; anxiety: -2.6 [-4.9 to 0.4], all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Lumbar spine surgery patients with greater social deprivation present with worse preoperative physical and mental health but experience comparable benefit from surgery than patients with less deprivation, emphasizing the need to further understand social and health factors that may affect both disease severity and access to care.

Do racial disparities exist in a spine surgery practice that serves a predominately minority population? Outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective review

Background

Racial minority status is associated with inferior peri-operative outcomes following spinal fusion. Findings have largely been reported within institutions serving few minority patients. This study aimed to identify if racial disparities exist for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures within an urban academic medical center which serves a majority non-White population.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent a TLIF procedure at our institution between 06/2016-10/2019. Primary outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 30-day return to the emergency department (ED), 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day complication rates. One-hundred-fifty-six patients (female: male, 99: 57) met inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical data (body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, preoperative lab values) were compared.

Results

The mean LOS was 6.2, 5.9, and 6 days in the White, Hispanic, and Black cohorts, respectively (p = 0.92). There were no differences in discharge disposition between groups (p = 0.52). Thirty-day post-operative complication rates did not differ between groups (p > 0.07). Readmission rates did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). ED visits were more prevalent in the Hispanic group with 16 visits as compared to 8 and 4 in the White and Black groups respectively (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

We found no racial disparities in terms of LOS, discharge disposition, or 30-day readmission rates. Hispanic patients demonstrated an increased utilization of the ED in the early post-operative period. Efforts to overcome language barriers, communicate instructions clearly, and outline post-operative expectations and plans may prevent the need for post-operative ED visits.

Impact of the 2016 American College of Surgeons Guideline Revision on Overlapping Lumbar Fusion Cases at a Large Academic Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) updated its guidelines on overlapping surgery in 2016. The objective was to examine differences in postoperative outcomes following overlapping cases either pre-ACS guideline revision or post-guideline revision, in a coarsened exact matching (CEM) sample.

METHODS

3,327 consecutive adult patients undergoing single-level, posterior lumbar fusion from 2013-2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were separated into a pre-ACS guideline revision cohort (surgery before April 2016) or a post-guideline revision cohort (surgery after October 2016) for comparison. The primary outcomes were proportion of cases performed with any degree of overlap, and adverse events including 30-day and 90-day rates of readmission, reoperation, Emergency Department visit, morbidity, and mortality. Subsequently, CEM was employed among overlapping surgery patients only to assess the impact of the ACS guideline revision on overlapping outcomes, while controlling for attending surgeon and key patient characteristics known to affect surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

After the implementation of the ACS guidelines, fewer cases were performed with overlap (22.0% vs. 53.7%, p<0.001). Patients in the post-ACS guideline revision cohort experienced improved rates of readmission and reoperation within 30 and 90 days. However, when limited to overlapping cases only, no differences were observed in overlap outcomes pre- vs. post-ACS guideline revision. Similarly, when exact matched on risk-associated patient characteristics and attending surgeon, overlapping surgery patients pre- and post-ACS guideline revision experienced similar rates of 30- and 90-day outcomes.

CONCLUSION

After the ACS guideline revision, no discernable impact was observed on postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion cases performed with overlap.

Demographic Predictors of Treatment and Complications for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

PURPOSE

To examine the role of demographics on surgical management and inpatient complications in patients with spinal deformity between 2010 and 2014 via retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). International Classification of Diseases 9th revision codes were used to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of adult spinal deformity (ASD). Multivariable Poisson regression analyses were used to determine whether any individual demographic variables were predictive of surgical management, surgical complexity, postoperative complications and revision operations.

RESULTS

17,433 patients were identified for analysis. Surgical intervention was performed for 94.5% of patients with a primary diagnosis of ASD. Patients at urban teaching hospitals were the most likely to receive surgery (OR= 2.13; 95% CI 1.51-2.95; p < 0.001) relative to rural patients. Female patients were the majority undergoing surgery and were more likely to receive a complication or require a revision when controlling for surgical complexity. Medicare patients were the least likely to undergo surgery and the most likely to receive complex fusion when undergoing an operation. Medicare patients were the least likely to experience complications (OR=0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; p = 0.022) after adjusting for surgical complexity. With regards to race and ethnicity, Hispanics had a decreased likelihood of receiving a revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

There were substantial differences in rates of surgical management, postoperative complications, and revisions among individuals of different demographics including sex, insurance status, ethnicity and hospital teaching status. Further research evaluating the effect of demographics in spine surgery is warranted to fully understand their influence on patient outcomes.

Effect of Household Income on Short-Term Outcomes Following Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection

Objectives  The objective of this study is to elucidate the impact of income on short-term outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  This study was done at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  Over 6 years (from June 7, 2013, to April 24, 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned return to surgery, return to surgery after index admission, and mortality. Univariate analysis was conducted among the entire population with significance set at a p -value <0.05. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis conducted between the lowest (quartile 1 [Q1]) and highest (quartile 4 [Q4]) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p -value <0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and to identify confounding factors. Results  Regression analysis of 273 patients demonstrated decreased rates of unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.015) and reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.035) at 30 days with higher standardized income. Logistic regression between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles demonstrated decreased unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.045) and decreasing but not significant reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.15) for Q4 patients. No significant difference was observed for other metrics of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion  Higher socioeconomic status is associated with decreased risk of unplanned reoperation following CPA tumor resection.

Racial Differences in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Multi-Site Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine disparities within patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at a multi-site tertiary referral center with specific focus on factors related to length of stay (LOS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are previously described racial disparities in spinal surgery outcomes and quality metrics.

METHODS

A total of 278 consecutive patients undergoing ACDF by 8 different surgeons over a 5-year period were identified retrospectively. Demographic data, including age at time of surgery, sex, smoking status, and self-identified race [White or African American (AA)], as well as surgical data and postoperative course were recorded. Preoperative health status was recorded, and comorbidities were scored by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were employed to quantify the degree to which a patient's LOS was related to their self-identified race, demographics, and perioperative clinical data.

RESULTS

Of the 278 patients who received an ACDF, 71.6% (199) self-identified as White and 28.4% (79) identified as AA. AA patients were more likely to have an ACDF due to myelopathy, while White patients were more likely to have an ACDF due to radiculopathy (P=0.001). AA patients had longer LOS by an average of half a day (P=0.001) and experienced a larger percentage of extended stays (P=0.002). AA patients experienced longer overall operation times on average (P=0.001) across all different levels of fusion. AA race was not an independent driver of LOS (β=0.186; P=0.246).

CONCLUSIONS

As hypothesized, and consistent with previous literature on racial surgical disparities, AA race was associated with increased LOS, increased operative times, and increased indication of myelopathy in this study. Additional research is necessary to evaluate the underlying social determinants of health and other factors that may contribute to this study's results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Use of the LACE+ index to predict readmissions after single-level lumbar fusion

OBJECTIVE

Spinal fusion is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures. The LACE (length of stay, acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, and emergency department [ED] visits within the previous 6 months) index was developed to predict readmission but has not been tested in a large, homogeneous spinal fusion population. The present study evaluated use of the LACE+ score for outcome prediction after lumbar fusion.

METHODS

LACE+ scores were calculated for all patients (n = 1598) with complete information who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a single university medical system. Logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of the LACE+ score as a continuous variable to predict hospital readmissions within 30 days (30D), 30-90 days (30-90D), and 90 days (90D) of the index operation. Secondary outcome measures included ED visits and reoperations. Subsequently, patients with LACE+ scores in the bottom decile were exact matched to the patients with scores in the top 4 deciles to control for sociodemographic and procedural variables.

RESULTS

Among all patients, increased LACE+ score significantly predicted higher rates of readmissions in the 30D (p < 0.001), 30-90D (p = 0.001), and 90D (p < 0.001) postoperative windows. LACE+ score also predicted risk of ED visits at all 3 time points and reoperations at 30-90D and 90D. When patients with LACE+ scores in the bottom decile were compared with patients with scores in the top 4 deciles, higher LACE+ score predicted higher risk of readmissions at 30D (p = 0.009) and 90D (p = 0.005). No significant difference in hospital readmissions was observed between the exact-matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that the LACE+ score demonstrates utility in predicting readmissions within 30 and 90 days after single-level lumbar fusion. Future research is warranted that utilizes the LACE+ index to identify strategies to support high-risk patients in a prospective population.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

We sought to determine whether racial and socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) have improved over time. We examined DBS utilization and analyzed factors associated with placement of DBS. The odds of DBS placement increased across the study period, whereas White patients with PD were 5 times more likely than Black patients to undergo DBS. Individuals, regardless of racial background, with 2 or more comorbidities were 14 times less likely to undergo DBS. Privately insured patients were 1.6 times more likely to undergo DBS. Despite increasing DBS utilization, significant disparities persist in access to DBS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:246–254

Demographic predictors of treatments and surgical complications of lumbar degenerative diseases: An analysis of over 250,000 patients from the National Inpatient Sample

ABSTRACT

This was a national database study.To examine the role of comorbidities and demographics on inpatient complications in patients with lumbar degenerative conditions.Degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine account for the most common indication for spine surgery in the elderly population in the United States. Significant studies investigating demographic as predictors of surgical rates and health outcomes for degenerative lumbar conditions are lacking.Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2014 and International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of degenerative lumbar condition. Patients were stratified based on demographic variables and comorbidity status. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine whether any individual demographic variables, such as race, sex, insurance, and hospital status predicted postoperative complications.A total of 256,859 patients were identified for analysis. The rate of overall complications was found to be 16.1% with a mortality rate of 0.10%. Female, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had lower odds of receiving surgical treatment compared to White patients (P<.001). Medicare and Medicaid patients were less likely to be surgically managed than patients with private insurance (OR = 0.75, 0.37; P<.001, respectively). Urban hospitals were more likely to provide surgery when compared to rural hospitals (P < .001). Patients undergoing fusion had more complications than decompression alone (P < .001). Females, Medicare insurance status, Medicaid insurance status, urban hospital locations, and certain geographical locations were found to predict postoperative complications (P < .001).There were substantial differences in surgical management and postoperative complications among individuals of different sex, races, and insurance status. Further investigation evaluating the effect of demographics in spine surgery is warranted to fully understand their influence on patient complications.

The role of postoperative antibiotic duration on surgical site infection after lumbar surgery

OBJECTIVE

Despite a general consensus regarding the administration of preoperative antibiotics, poorly defined comparison groups and underpowered studies prevent clear guidelines for postoperative antibiotics. Utilizing a data set tailored specifically to spine surgery outcomes, in this clinical study the authors aimed to determine whether there is a role for postoperative antibiotics in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI).

METHODS

The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry was queried for all lumbar operations performed for degenerative spinal pathologies over a 5-year period from 2014 to 2019. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics were administered for all surgical procedures. The study population was divided into three cohorts: no postoperative antibiotics, postoperative antibiotics ≤ 24 hours, and postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours. This categorization was intended to determine 1) whether postoperative antibiotics are helpful and 2) the appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotics. First, multivariable analysis with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) was used to determine the association between antibiotic duration and all-type SSI with adjusted odds ratios; second, a three-tiered outcome-no SSI, superficial SSI, and deep SSI-was calculated with multivariable multinomial logistical GEE analysis.

RESULTS

Among 37,161 patients, the postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours cohort had more men with older average age, greater body mass index, and greater comorbidity burden. The postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours cohort had a 3% rate of SSI, which was significantly higher than the 2% rate of SSI of the other two cohorts (p = 0.004). On multivariable GEE analysis, neither postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours nor postoperative antibiotics ≤ 24 hours, as compared with no postoperative antibiotics, was associated with a lower rate of all-type postoperative SSIs. On multivariable multinomial logistical GEE analysis, neither postoperative antibiotics ≤ 24 hours nor postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours was associated with rate of superficial SSI, as compared with no antibiotic use at all. The odds of deep SSI decreased by 45% with postoperative antibiotics ≤ 24 hours (p = 0.002) and by 40% with postoperative antibiotics > 24 hours (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of all-type SSI was highest in the antibiotics > 24 hours cohort, which also had the highest proportions of risk factors, duration of antibiotics failed to predict all-type SSI. On multinomial subanalysis, administration of postoperative antibiotics for both ≤ 24 hours and > 24 hours was associated with decreased risk of only deep SSI but not superficial SSI. Spine surgeons can safely consider antibiotics for 24 hours, which is equally as effective as long-term administration for prophylaxis against deep SSI.

Insurance status as a mediator of clinical presentation, type of intervention, and short-term outcomes for patients with metastatic spine disease

BACKGROUND

It is well established that insurance status is a mediator of disease management, treatment course, and clinical outcomes in cancer patients. Our study assessed differences in clinical presentation, treatment course, mortality rates, and in-hospital complications for patients admitted to the hospital with late-stage cancer - specifically, metastatic spine disease (MSD), by insurance status.

METHODS

The United States National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2012-2014) was queried to identify patients with visceral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) or pathological fracture of the spine in the setting of cancer. Clinical presentation, type of intervention, mortality rates, and in-hospital complications were compared amongst patients by insurance coverage (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial or unknown). Multivariable logistical regression and age sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 48,560 MSD patients were identified. Patients with Medicaid coverage presented with significantly higher rates of MSCC (p < 0.001), paralysis (0.008), and visceral metastases (p < 0.001). Patients with commercial insurance were more likely to receive surgical intervention (OR 1.43; p < 0.001). Patients with Medicaid < 65 had higher rates of prolonged length of stay (PLOS) (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55; p = 0.040) while both Medicare and Medicaid patients < 65 were more likely to have non-routine discharges. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher for patients with Medicaid (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.20-5.89; p = 0.016) and commercial insurance (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.09-2.27;p = 0.013) older than 65.

CONCLUSION

Given the differing severity in MSD presentation, mortality rates, and rates of PLOS by insurance status, our results identify disparities based on insurance coverage.

Overlap Before the Critical Step of Lumbar Fusion Does Not Lead to Increased Short-Term Morbidity

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed the impact of overlapping surgery during different timepoints of neurosurgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of overlap before the critical portion of surgery on short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion.

METHODS

In total, 3799 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over 6 yr (2013-2019) at an academic hospital system were retrospectively studied. Outcomes included 30-d emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. Duration of overlap that occurred before the critical portion of surgery was calculated as a percentage of total beginning operative time. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the impact of incremental 1% increases in the duration of overlap within the whole population and patients with beginning overlap. Subsequently, univariate analysis was used to compare exact matched patients with the least (bottom 40%) and most amounts of overlap (100% beginning overlap). Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients on key demographic factors, as well as attending surgeon. Significance was set at a P-value < .05.

RESULTS

Increased duration of beginning overlap was associated with a decrease in 30-d ED visit (P = .03) within all patients with beginning overlap, but not within the whole population undergoing lumbar fusion. Duration of beginning overlap was not associated with any other short-term morbidity or mortality outcome in either the whole population or patients with beginning overlap.

CONCLUSION

Increased duration of overlap before the critical step of surgery does not predict adverse short-term outcomes after single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion.

The Influence of Household Income on Survival following Posterior Fossa Tumor Resection at a Large Academic Medical Center

Objectives  The present study examines the effect of median household income on mid- and long-term outcomes in a posterior fossa brain tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  The study conducted at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor cases, excluding cerebellar pontine angle tumors, over a 6-year period (June 09, 2013-April 26, 2019) was included in this analysis. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department evaluation, 90-day return to surgery, reoperation within 90 days after index admission, reoperation throughout the entire follow-up period, mortality within 90 days, and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted for the whole population and between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles. Stepwise regression was conducted to identify confounding variables. Results  Lower socioeconomic status was found to be correlated with increased mortality within 90 postoperative days and throughout the entire follow-up period. Similarly, analysis between the lowest and highest household income quartiles (Q1 vs. Q4) demonstrated Q4 to have significantly decreased mortality during total follow-up and a decreasing but not significant difference in 90-day mortality. No significant difference in morbidity was observed. Conclusion  This study suggests that lower household income is associated with increased mortality in both the 90-day window and total follow-up period. It is possible that there is an opportunity for health care providers to use socioeconomic status to proactively identify high-risk patients and provide additional resources in the postoperative setting.