Prognostic value of clinical and radiological signs in the postoperative outcome of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

Surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: systematic review of current practices and open questions

BACKGROUND

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae(sDAVF) represent the most common spinal vascular malformation. Therapeutic strategies include both surgical and endovascular approaches. Surgical interruption of the fistula is crucial to prevent the onset and progression of neurological symptoms. Despite a range of surgical techniques, little research has evaluated their relative efficacy. This review aims to summarize the available surgical techniques and identify open questions for future research.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases to identify surgically treated cohorts of sDAVF. Five commonly reported surgical steps were analyzed: type of approach, temporary clipping, shunt disruption method, fistulous vein management, and epidural vessel management. In addition, open questions lacking consensus or evidence were identified for pre, intra and postoperative stages.

RESULTS

63 of 115 analyzed cohorts described surgical techniques. The most commonly used approach was single-level laminectomy (52.4%). Temporary clipping was used in 11.1% of cases, while 15.9% of studies reported excision of intradural arterialized veins. There was wide variation in the methods used to close the fistula, with the most frequent being coagulation alone (27.5%). The management of epidural vessels was reported in 11.1% of studies. Sixteen major open questions were identified with a wide variety of technical nuances.

DISCUSSION

Surgical treatment of sDAVF is not a standardized procedure but rather encompasses significantly different techniques. The lack of controlled trials leaves many questions unanswered, including optimal surgical strategies and the role of adjunct imaging and monitoring techniques. Further research is required to address these gaps and refine treatment protocols.

Surgical evolution in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula treatment-a 7 years monocentric experience

Accounting for 70% of all spinal vascular malformations, spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF) are the most common type of malformation. Interruption of the fistulous arterialized vein point is the goal of surgical treatment. The aim of the study was to compare open surgery (laminectomy) versus minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in SDAVF treatment. Between March 2013 and March 2020, we retrospectively collected 21 consecutive adult patients with SDAVF. Since March 2017, MIS has been routinely used for surgical treatment. Pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations used Aminoff-Logue score (ALS). Complication rate was noted. Post-operative occlusion of the malformation was confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in all patients. MIS was compared to open surgery in terms of efficacy and complications with statistical evaluation. Standard laminectomy was performed in 12 patients and MIS technique in 9 patients. No difference was noted on pre-operative parameters. ALS and MRI signs of myelopathy were improved in all cases except for 1 patient in each group. All SDAVFs were excluded based on post-operative DSA. Significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in terms of perioperative blood loss (p<0.001), post-operative pain visual analog scale values (p<0.001), and first time out of bed (p<0.001). Wrong level surgery occurred in one patient in each group; patients were re-operated using the same technique. No infection or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted. In our experience, MIS is a safe alternative to open laminectomy for SDAVF treatment. MIS contributes to patient comfort and minimizes blood loss without increasing complication rate.

Recurrence Rates Following Treatment of Spinal Vascular Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spinal vascular malformations (SVMs), including arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), are a varied group of vascular lesions that can be subclassified according to localization, vascular structure, and hemodynamics. Early intervention is necessary to halt progression of disease and minimize irreversible dysfunction. We sought to characterize initial treatment success and recurrence rates following interventional treatment of various types of SVMs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. SVMs were categorized into 4 groups: dural AVFs, perimedullary AVFs, intramedullary AVMs, and extradural-intradural AVMs (e.g., epidural, paraspinal). Initial occlusion, recurrence, and complication rates were compared using random-effects analysis.

RESULTS

There were 112 manuscripts included, with a total of 5626 patients with SVM. For treatment, 2735 patients underwent endovascular embolization, 2854 underwent surgical resection, and 37 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. The initial treatment success and overall recurrence rates following surgical resection of all SVMs were 89.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-98.5%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 0.9%-3.7%), respectively. Those rates following endovascular embolization were 55.9% (95% CI: 30.3%-81.5%) and 27.7% (95% CI: 11.2%-44.2%), respectively. Higher rates of initial treatment success and lower rates of recurrence with surgery were observed in all subtypes compared to embolization. Overall complication rates were higher after embolization for each of the SVM categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of SVMs provided higher rates of initial complete occlusion and lower rates of recurrence than endovascular techniques. Attaining technical success through obliteration must still be weighed against clinical impact and natural history of the specific vascular malformation.

Imaging characteristics, misdiagnosis and microsurgical outcomes of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: a retrospective study of 32 patients

Background

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is an extremely rare spinal vascular malformation. As SDAVF exhibits no specific clinical manifestations nor diverse imaging results, it is easily misdiagnosed, resulting in delayed treatment and irreversible neurological damage. Most patients were initially misdiagnosed, but there were few reports on reducing misdiagnosis.

Methods

A total of 32 consecutive patients, who presented to our institution (Shanghai Deji Hospital) with SDAVF between June 2013 and January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, follow-up, and clinical outcomes. The Aminoff-Logue scale (ALS) was used to assess clinical outcomes.

Results

Of the 32 enrolled patients (3 females, mean age 59.1±3.8 years), 23 patients (71.9%) were misdiagnosed as acute myelitis (11 patients), intramedullary tumors (6 patients), lumbar disc herniation (4 patients), and other conditions (2 patients). All patients underwent surgical procedures under electrophysiological monitoring. Fistulas were found in all 32 patients and were successfully occluded. The mean follow-up period was 19.22±8.21 months (ranging from 2 weeks to 30 months). One year later, 20 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 14 showed no T2 edema, and the edema was relieved in 6 patients. A total of 10 patients underwent enhancement MRI and no enhancement signs were detected. Among the 27 patients with long-time follow-up, the fistula had no residual or recurrence, 21 patients showed decreased ALS scores (P<0.05). Six patients exhibited nonsignificant improvement. No aggravating patient was found. Prognosis differed significantly between patients with ALS <6 and those with ALS ≥6 (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Spinal angiography should be performed with full intubation, and microcatheter angiography can reduce misdiagnosis. SDAVF must be differentiated from acute myelitis, intramedullary tumor, and other spinal vascular malformations. Microsurgical treatment is effective with a low recurrence rate.

Progressive Myelopathy With Acute Worsening After Steroids and Lumbar Puncture

We present the case of a 73-year-old woman with a 3-month history of non-traumatic thoracic myelopathy. Initial MRI showed a T6-conus T2 signal hyperintensity. Based on this presentation, and given a personal and family history of autoimmune disease, our patient was first managed as an inflammatory transverse myelitis. Subsequent worsening after lumbar puncture and steroids prompted re-evaluation, ultimately identifying the cause as a thoracic spinal dural AV fistula. Both investigation of possible transverse myelitis with lumbar puncture and empiric treatment with steroids may not only result in diagnostic delays but also precipitate venous infarction and irreversible harm. While the MRI often provides the initial diagnosis, clinical suspicion for this under-diagnosed cause of myelopathy should be raised in older patients with a more progressive thoracic myelopathy with worsening after lumbar puncture and/or steroids. Definitive and time-sensitive treatment by interventional neuroradiology or neurosurgery results in stabilization or improvement of disability in most cases.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with treated spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To define the pattern of long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs).

DESGIN

Prospective cohort study based on constantly recruiting patients with SDAVFs in two medical centres in China.

SETTING

Patients with SDAVFs were recruited consecutively between March 2013 and December 2014 in two referral centres.

PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort of 94 patients with SDAVFs was included in this study, and 86 patients (mean age 53.0 years, 71 men) completed the study. Patients who had previously undergone endovascular or neurosurgical treatment or had neurological dysfunction caused by other diseases or refused treatment were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent neurosurgery or endovascular embolisation. These patients were evaluated with the modified Aminoff and Logue's Scale (mALS) 1 day before and 3, 6, 12 and 72 months after treatments.

RESULTS

The duration of symptoms ranged from 0.5 to 66 months (average 12.8 months). The location of SDAVFs was as follows: 33.7% above T7, 50.0% between/include T7 and T12% and 16.3% below T12. 75 patients (87.2%) underwent neurosurgical treatment, and 9 patients (10.5%) underwent endovascular treatment. 58 patients (67.4%) exhibited an improvement in mALS of one point or greater at 72 months. Patients with less disability were more likely to improve at 72 months (p<0.05). 48 patients (55.8%) showed deterioration at 72 months compared with 12 months. 61% of the patients suffered numbness, and 22% had pain before treatment. However, 81% of patients had numbness, and 28% had pain after treatment. This deterioration was related to 1-year mALS and age.

CONCLUSION

Nearly two-thirds of the patients experienced clinical improvement at 72 months, and preoperative (1 day before treatment) mALS was the strongest predictor of clinical improvement. However, 55.8% of patients showed deterioration after temporary recovery. All patients with SDAVFs should accept treatment as soon as possible.

Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings on the prognosis of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) treated surgically.

METHOD

A total of 76 patients from Jan 1, 2013, to June 30, 2020, were enrolled in this study. Their spinal neurological function was evaluated and graded by the modified Aminoff-Logue Scale (mALS). Preoperative and 3 months postoperative MRI results were evaluated, and their relationship with patients' pre- and postoperative spinal neurological function at 1 year after surgery was calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), the chi-square test, and others were used to investigate the prognostic value of MRI for patients with SDAVFs treated surgically.

RESULTS

According to our results, the extent of spinal edema on preoperative MRI was significantly correlated with the patients' degrees of preoperative spinal neurological dysfunction. The severity of preoperative spinal neurological dysfunction was significantly greater in patients whose extent of spinal edema was identified at ≥ 5 vertebral levels. Importantly, patients with a reduction in the degree of spinal edema ≥ 50% on 3-month postoperative MRI demonstrated significant improvement in spinal neurological function 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In patients with SDAVFs, the extent of spinal edema on preoperative MRI may predict the severity of preoperative spinal neurological dysfunction. There was a significant correlation between the degree of reduction in spinal edema at 3 months after operation and patients' clinical outcomes 1 year after surgery.

Prognostic factors in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas treated surgically

OBJECTIVE

To research prognostic factors in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas at 1 year after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective study was performed for all patients diagnosed with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVFs) and treated surgically from Jan 1, 2013 to June 30, 2020 in our hospital. Medical records and pre-operative imaging results (MRI and DSA) of 103 patients were analyzed. Neurological function was evaluated by modified Aminoff-Logue Scale (mALS) consecutively at the day before surgery, 6 months and 1year after surgery. Pearson's χ² test and binary logistic regression were used to find promising predictive factors.

RESULT

A total of 76 patients (mean age 56 ± 11 years, 64 (84.2%) are male) with 76 fistulas met inclusive criteria. The mean interval from onset to diagnosis was 14 ± 15 months. Among the fistulas, 8 (10.5%) were located at T1-T6, 42 (55.3%) were located at T7-12, and 26 (34.2%) were located below T12. Compared with pre-operative mALS scores, 54 (71.06%) patients received improvement, and 22 (28.94%) patients felt worse or stable. The binary logistic regression reveals pre-operative mALS score and length of flow voids on T2-WI of pre-operative MRI are predictors of clinical improvement at 1 year after surgery in patients with SDAVFs.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that pre-operative mALS score and length of flow voids on T2-WI of pre-operative MRI are predictors of clinical improvement for patients with SDAVFs.

Vascular Spinal Cord Disorders

Vascular disorders of the spinal cord are uncommon yet under-recognized causes of myelopathy. Etiologies can be predominantly categorized into clinical and radiographic presentations of arterial ischemia, venous congestion/ischemia, hematomyelia, and extraparenchymal hemorrhage. While vascular myelopathies often produce significant morbidity, recent advances in the understanding and recognition of these disorders should continue to expedite diagnosis and proper management, and ideally improve patient outcomes. This article comprehensively reviews relevant spinal cord vascular anatomy, clinical features, radiographic findings, treatment, and prognosis of vascular disorders of the spinal cord.

Vascular Myelopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurologists should be able to identify clinical and neuroimaging features that distinguish vascular disorders from other causes of myelopathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although certain clinical features suggest a vascular etiology in acute and chronic myelopathy settings, accurate MRI interpretation within the clinical context is key. Recent studies have shown vascular myelopathies are frequently misdiagnosed as transverse myelitis, and recognition of this diagnostic pitfall is important. Many different vascular mechanisms can cause myelopathy; this article provides a comprehensive review that simplifies disease categories into arterial ischemia, venous congestion/ischemia, hematomyelia, and extraparenchymal hemorrhage.

SUMMARY

It is important to recognize and manage vascular disorders of the spinal cord as significant causes of acute, subacute, and progressive myelopathy.

Neuroimaging of Spinal Cord and Cauda Equina Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the neuroimaging of disorders of the spinal cord and cauda equina, with a focus on MRI. An anatomic approach is used; diseases of the extradural, intradural-extramedullary, and intramedullary (parenchymal) compartments are considered, and both neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions are covered. Differentiating imaging features are highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although T2-hyperintense signal abnormality of the spinal cord can have myriad etiologies, neuroimaging can provide specific diagnoses or considerably narrow the differential diagnosis in many cases. Intradural-extramedullary lesions compressing the spinal cord have a limited differential diagnosis and are usually benign; meningiomas and schwannomas are most common. Extradural lesions can often be specifically diagnosed. Disk herniations are the most commonly encountered mass of the epidural space. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy can cause a characteristic pattern of enhancement, which may be mistaken for an intrinsic myelopathy. A do-not-miss diagnosis of the extradural compartment is idiopathic spinal cord herniation, the appearance of which can overlap with arachnoid cysts and webs. Regarding intrinsic causes of myelopathy, the lesions of multiple sclerosis are characteristically short segment but can be confluent when multiple. Postcontrast MRI can be particularly helpful, including when attempting to differentiate the long-segment myelopathy of neurosarcoidosis and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and when characterizing spinal cord tumors such as primary neoplasms and metastases. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula is another do-not-miss diagnosis, with characteristic MRI features both precontrast and postcontrast. Tract-specific white matter involvement can be a clue for diseases such as subacute combined degeneration, paraneoplastic myelopathy, and radiation myelitis, whereas gray matter-specific involvement can suggest conditions such as cord infarct, viral myelitis, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG associated disorder.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of the neuroimaging findings of the many causes of spinal cord and cauda equina dysfunction is critical for both neurologists and neuroradiologists. A structured approach to lesion compartmental location and imaging feature characterization is recommended.

Long-term surgical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) is an extremely rare vascular entity that is usually misdiagnosed. We sought to determine the long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing microsurgical treatment for delayed diagnosis of spinal dAVF. This retrospective study identified patients with delayed diagnosed spinal dAVF at our institution from 2009 to 2018. Patients' data, including demographics, imaging, and follow-up data, were evaluated. This cohort included 65 consecutive patients with 68 dAVFs and a male-to-female ratio of 4:1 and a mean age of 53.5 ± 13.7 years. The presenting symptoms consisted of limb weakness (n = 42, 64.6%), paraparesis (n = 34, 52.3%), sphincter disturbances (n = 8, 12.3%), and pain (n = 13, 20.0%). The proportion of patients with each symptom significantly increased and patients experienced increased disability when the diagnosis was finalized. The mean length of delay of diagnosis was 20.7 ± 30.0 months. Surgery resulted in complete occlusion of the fistula on the first attempt in all patients. Three patients developed recurrent fistulas, and three died in the follow-up period. Improved motor function was achieved in 38 patients (59.5%). Other symptoms, such as sensory disorders, sphincter dysfunction, and pain, improved by 37.3%, 32.3%, and 66.7%, respectively. Patients with spinal dAVF usually exhibit progressive ascending myelopathy and often remain misdiagnosed for months to years. Some patients' increased disability cannot be reversed through surgery.

Lack of Prognostic Model Validation in Low Back Pain Prediction Studies: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency with which prediction studies for low back pain outcomes utilize prospective methods of prognostic model validation.

METHOD

Searches of Medline and Embase for terms "predict/predictor," "prognosis," or "prognostic factor." The search was limited to studies conducted in humans and reported in the English language. Included articles were all those published in 2 Spine specialty journals (Spine and The Spine Journal) over a 13-month period, January 2013 to January 2014. Conference papers, reviews, and letters were excluded. The initial screen identified 55 potential studies (44 in Spine, 11 in The Spine Journal); 34 were excluded because they were not primary data collection prediction studies; 23 were not prediction studies and 11 were review articles. This left 21 prognosis papers for review, 19 in Spine, 2 in The Spine Journal.

RESULTS

None of the 21 studies provided validation for the predictors that they documented (neither internal or external validation). On the basis of the study designs and lack of validation, only 2 studies used the correct terminology for describing associations/relationships between independent and dependent variables.

DISCUSSION

Unless researchers and clinicians consider sophisticated and rigorous methods of statistical/external validity for prediction/prognostic findings they will make incorrect assumptions and draw invalid conclusions regarding treatment effects and outcomes. Without proper validation methods, studies that claim to present prediction models actually describe only traits or characteristics of the studied sample.

Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Clinical Outcome After Surgery Versus Embolization: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) are rare vascular spinal malformations. According to the reported data, surgery seems to result in better occlusion rates than endovascular treatment. However, the post-treatment evolution of neurological symptoms stratified by the treatment remains unknown. The main objective of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes for patients according to the treatment method.

METHODS

The data from 63 patients with SDAVFs from 2000 to 2017 at 4 academic neurosurgical departments were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative examination neurological status was assessed using the Aminoff-Logue scale (ALS), which evaluates gait and micturition disturbances. Initial occlusion, late recurrence, and complications of the 2 techniques were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Patients who had undergone surgery and embolization improved clinically on the ALS (P = 0.0009), and no significant differences were found between the 2 techniques. Subgroup analysis using the ALS showed that patients who had undergone surgery and embolization without late recurrence improved (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0334, respectively) and that patients who had undergone surgery or embolization with late recurrence did not improve. The initial occlusion rate was in favor of surgery, with 91.3% versus 70% for endovascular treatment (P = 0.050). The late recurrence rate was higher for embolization (21.4% vs. 9.1% for surgery; P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery can be proposed as first-line treatment of SDAVFs after multidisciplinary discussion between neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists. The development of late recurrence negatively affects the neurological outcome of patients.

Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula-results of endovascular and surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

The results of treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) have been controversial. The goal of this study was to compare results of endovascular and surgical treatments to contribute to determining an optimal treatment strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the set of 24 SDAVF patients (11 in the endovascular and 13 in the surgical group) was performed. The clinical effect (using the modified Rankin scale [mRS]), the radicality, and the number of clinical recurrences as well as the impact of age, the level of impairment, and the duration of symptoms before the treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

The average age was 60.1 ± 8.4 years. The median duration of symptoms before establishing a diagnosis was 12 (1-70) months. Clinical improvement was reported in 11 out of 24 (45.8%) patients (36.4% following embolization and 53.8% following surgery, p = 0.444). Radical performance was achieved in 47.4% of endovascular versus 92.9% of surgical procedures (p = 0.009). Clinical recurrence was reported in 35.3% of patients in the endovascular group, whereas no clinical recurrence was reported in the surgical group (p = 0.0133). The graphical residuum after 1 surgery out of 14 (7.1%) was cured early during the control angiography. Clinical improvement was reported 42.1% of patients with mRS ≤ 3 versus 60% of patients with mRS ≥ 4 and, in 57.1% of patients aged ≥ 60 versus in 30% of patients < 60 years (p > 0.05 in both cases). The impact of the duration of symptoms on the clinical results was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical treatment of SDAVF appeared to be a more efficient method in terms of the clinical effect, radicality, and lower recurrence rate in comparison with the endovascular treatment. No statistically significant dependence of the clinical result on age, deficit burden, or symptom duration was found.

Comparison of Endovascular Embolization and Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Intradural Dorsal Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUND

We compared the outcomes of endovascular embolization and surgery and investigated the factors affecting the clinical outcomes of spinal intradural dorsal arteriovenous fistulas (SIDAVFs).

METHODS

The medical records of 26 patients who had undergone endovascular embolization or surgery for SIDAVFs from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The recurrence rate and clinical outcomes for each treatment modality were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify significant factors influencing the clinical outcomes using the Aminoff and Logue (AL) score.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients, 14 (56%) had undergone endovascular embolization and 11 (44%) had undergone surgery as the initial treatment. Embolization was applied as the primary treatment for most patients. Surgery was chosen for patients with difficult superselection (n = 5), multiple feeders (n = 2), or easy surgical accessibility (n = 4). Of the 14 patients who had undergone embolization as initial treatment, 5 (36%) had developed a recurrence within an average of 29.6 months (range, 2-87). One patient with recurrent SIDAVF was treated with repeat embolization and four with surgery. None of patients in the surgical group developed recurrence. Embolization as the initial treatment resulted in significantly greater recurrence compared with surgery (odds ratio, 2.222; 95% confidence interval, 1.369-3.608; P = 0.046). Surgery resulted in better clinical outcomes than embolization (P = 0.021). The final AL score was also strongly affected by the preoperative AL score, micturition score, and recurrence (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, and P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have shown that surgery results in a low recurrence rate and superior clinical outcomes. A multidisciplinary and ordered decision is crucial for the treatment choice to ensure better outcomes, especially for patients with a definite neurologic deficit at diagnosis.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Surgical Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Technique and Results

Objective and Background:

Data on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) during surgery of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of IOM during microsurgery for SDAVFs.

Materials and Methods:

From March 2007 to March 2013, 12 patients had microsurgery with IOM for SDAVFs. The IOM included somatosensory-evoked potentials, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and – in selected cases – D-Waves. All patients were evaluated at admission and at follow-up (6, 12, and 24 months) with Aminoff–Logue Disability Scale for Gait-Aminoff–Logue Disability Scale (G-ALS) and Micturition-Aminoff–Logue Disability Scale (M-ALS).

Statistical Analysis Used:

Logistic regression was used for detecting the clinical risk factors influencing neurological functions after the treatment.

Results:

During surgery, we registered the absence of significant modifications of evoked potentials in nine cases (75%), while improvement of MEPs occurred in three cases (25%). No false-negative case was registered, and IOM predicted the absence of new postoperative neurological deficit in all patients. At 24-month follow-up, nine patients improved their overall neurological status, while three patients remained stable. At univariate analysis, Aminoff–Logue Disability Scales for Gait and Micturition (G + M-ALS) score at 24-month follow-up was directly associated with the duration of symptom before the surgery (P = 0.024), preoperative G-ALS (P = 0.02), M-ALS (P = 0.022), and G + M-ALS scores (P = 0.045), and improvement of IOM after occlusion of the fistula (P = 0.025).

Conclusions:

In our series, no significant worsening of evoked potentials occurred and subsequently the surgical strategy was not changed by IOM. However, no false-negative case was registered, and IOM predicted the absence of new postoperative neurological deficit in all patients. Patients with improvement of IOM parameters after occlusion of the fistula had greater chances of postsurgical improvement at the univariate analysis.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas : a prospective cohort study in two Chinese centres

BACKGROUND

The short-term outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) have not been defined in large cohorts.

OBJECTIVE

To define the short-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with SDAVFs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 112 patients with SDAVFs were included consecutively in this study. The patients were serially evaluated with the modified Aminoff and Logue's Scale (mALS) one day before surgery and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify demographic, clinical and procedural factors related to favourable outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (mean age 53.5 years, 78 were men) met the criteria and are included in the final analyses. Duration of symptom ranged from 0.5 to 66 months (average time period of 12.7 months). The location of SDAVFs was as follows: 31.6% above T7 level, 48.4% between T7 and T12 level (including T7 and T12) and 20.0% below T12 level. A total of 81 patients (86.2%) underwent neurosurgical treatment, 10 patients (10.6%) underwent endovascular treatment, and 3 patients (3.2%) underwent neurosurgical treatment after unsuccessful embolisation. A total of 78 patients demonstrated an improvement in mALS score of one point or greater at 12 months. Preoperative mALS score was associated with clinical improvement after adjusting for age, gender, duration of symptoms, location of fistula and treatment modality using unconditional logistic regression analysis (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Approximately four fifths of the patients experienced clinical improvement at 12 months and preoperative mALS was the strongest predictor of clinical improvement in the cohort.

Spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula with intradural drainage: three surgical cases with long-term follow-up

Spinal extradural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVF) with intradural drainage are uncommon vascular lesions that cause venous congestive myelopathy. We present three SEDAVF with intradural drainage treated with surgical disconnection of the intradural drainage via a single level laminectomy, followed by transarterial embolization (TAE) with Onyx if spontaneous thrombosis of the extradural fistula did not occur spontaneously. All patients improved their neurological condition and no congestive myelopathy recurrence was noted after mean follow-up of 84 months. We believe that SEDAVF with intradural drainage constitute a specific entity that should be included in the classifications of spinal arteriovenous malformations.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for postoperative spinal dural arterio-venous fistula patients: An observational cohort study

Spinal dural arterio-venous fistula (SDAVF) is a common type of spinal vascular malformation. Surgical obliteration of the fistula can cure SDAVF anatomically, but the functional outcome is unsatisfactory.The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on the functional recovery of postoperative SDAVF patients.This prospective cohort study included postoperative SDAVF patients. Patients were divided into control and HBOT groups. Patients in control group received conventional treatment, whereas those in the HBOT group received conventional treatment plus HBOT (2.0 atmospheric pressure absolute, 14 days). Follow-up was done at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery for evaluation, including symptoms. To assess the effectiveness of HBOT on SDAVF patients, we compared the postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and neurological outcomes of each group with respect to modified Aminoff-Lougue scale and modified Denis Pain and Numbness Scale.From September 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014, 33 SDAVF patients (27 male) treated by microsurgery were included in this study. Sixteen patients were in the HBOT group and 17 patients were in the control group. At 24 months follow-up, the improvement of mDPNS for the HBOT group was significantly larger than those of the control group (2.25 vs 0.88; P = 0.005). In the HBOT group, the average length of hypersignal in magnetic resonance imaging T2 image decrease at 3 months after surgery was 3.25 compared with 2.29 in the control group (P = 0.009). No major adverse effects were reported for all 16 patients who received HBOT.The current findings suggest that HBOT is an effective and safe treatment to relieve lower body pain and numbness for postoperative SDAVF patients.

Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Review

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is a rare disease, the etiology of which is not entirely clear. It is the most common vascular malformation of the spinal cord, comprising 60-80 % of the cases. The clinical presentation and imaging findings may be nonspecific and misleading, often mistaking it for other entities like demyelinating or degenerative diseases of the spine.This chapter describes the imaging findings, clinical signs, and symptoms of this disease and also the available treatment options according to the current literature.Angiography is still considered the gold standard for diagnosis; however, MRI/MRA is increasingly used as a screening tool. Modern endovascular techniques are becoming increasingly more effective in treating SDAVF offering a less invasive treatment option; however, they still lag behind surgical success rates which approach 100 %. The outcome of both treatment options is similar if complete obliteration of the fistula is obtained and depends mainly on the severity of neurological dysfunction before treatment.Heightened awareness by radiologists and clinicians to this rare entity is essential to make a timely diagnosis of this treatable disease. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is required in order to make appropriate treatment decisions.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Delayed Diagnosis of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are commonly missed on imaging or misdiagnosed as inflammatory or neoplastic processes. We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas referred to our institution that were missed or misdiagnosed on initial imaging and studied the clinical consequences of missing or misdiagnosing the lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas diagnosed at our institution between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2014. A lesion was defined as "misdiagnosed" if initial MR imaging or CT myelography demonstrated characteristic imaging features of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula but the patient was clinically or radiologically misdiagnosed. Outcomes included length of delay of diagnosis, increased disability (increase in mRS or Aminoff motor disability of ≥1 point) between initial imaging evaluation and diagnosis date, and posttreatment disability.

RESULTS

Fifty-three consecutive spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas that were initially misdiagnosed despite having characteristic imaging findings on MR imaging or CT myelography were included in our study. Eight patients (18.9%) underwent spinal angiography before referral, which was interpreted as having negative findings but was either incomplete (6 cases) or retrospectively demonstrated the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (2 cases). The median time of delayed diagnosis was 6 months (interquartile range, 2-14 months). Fifty-one patients (96.2%) had increased disability between the initial study, which demonstrated features of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, and diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) developed a new requirement for a walker or wheelchair. Following treatment, 21 patients (41.2%) had an improvement of 1 point on the mRS or Aminoff motor disability scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with characteristic imaging features results in high rates of additional disability that are often irreversible despite surgical or endovascular treatment of the fistula.

Value of prominent flow voids without cord edema in the detection of spinal arteriovenous fistulae

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (SDAVF) in patients presenting with prominent vascular flow voids on imaging without other imaging findings suggestive of SDAVF.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients from January 1, 2005 to March 1, 2012 who underwent spinal angiography for suspected SDAVF with prominent vascular flow voids on prior imaging. We excluded patients with other major spinal pathology or other imaging findings of SDAVF including cord hyperintensity, enhancement, or expansion. We calculated the proportion of patients with positive findings for SDAVF on angiography and evaluated the prevalence of SDAVF for this finding alone and in correlation with clinical findings.

RESULTS

18 patients underwent spinal angiography for prominent flow voids on imaging without other spinal pathology or imaging findings of SDAVF. Three had a SDAVF detected on angiography. The prevalence of SDAVF in this population was low, only 17% (95% CI 6-39%). All of the patients with positive angiography findings had myelopathy, increasing the prevalence to 100% if the additional clinical finding of myelopathy was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Prominent flow voids without other imaging findings suggestive of SDAVF is poorly predictive of the presence of a SDAVF, unless myelopathy is present clinically.

Comparison of surgical and endovascular approach in management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: A single center experience of 27 patients

Background:

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is a rare spinal vascular malformation with an annual incidence of 5-10 cases per million. The data on efficacy, recurrence rates and complications of endovascular versus surgical treatment of SDAVF is limited.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 27 adult patients with a diagnosis of SDAVF and who underwent treatment at Duke University Hospital between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 2012. We compared the outcome measures by Aminoff–Logue score (ALS) in patients who underwent treatment with endovascular embolization versus surgical ligation of fistula. We compared complication rates, recurrence rates as well as data on long-term follow up in these patients.

Results:

Out of 27 patients in the study, 10 patients underwent endovascular embolization (Onyx was used in 5 patients and NBCA in 5 patients) as the first line therapy. Seventeen patients underwent surgical ligation as initial therapeutic modality. Patients in both groups showed significant improvement in clinical status (ALS) after treatment. One patient in endovascular group developed spinal infarction due to accidental embolization of medullary artery. Three patients in embolization group had recurrence of fistula during the course of follow up requiring surgical ligation. Two patients in surgical group developed local wound infection. None of the patients in surgical group had recurrence of fistula during the course of follow up.

Conclusions:

Endovascular embolization and surgical ligation are effective treatment strategies for SDAVF. Our observations show that surgical ligation may offer permanent cure without any recurrence. Endovascular approach is associated with higher incidence of recurrence, especially with use of onyx.