The Use of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Surgical Blood Loss: A Review Basic Science, Subspecialty Studies, and The Evolution of Use in Spine Deformity Surgery

Risk Factors Involved in the Blood (Leukocyte-Depleted Suspended Red Blood Cells and Plasma) Transfusion During Glioma Operations

Background

The use of blood transfusion in surgery is increasing, and the blood supply is getting tighter. The number of glioma surgeries is increasing year by year, and reports of studies on blood transfusion in glioma surgery are relatively rare.

Purpose

To investigate the risk factors for intraoperative blood (leukocyte-depleted suspended red blood cells and plasma) transfusion in glioma patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 200 glioma patients who had been operated on in a general teaching hospital in China from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022. In terms of whether blood transfusion (leukocyte-depleted suspended red blood cells and plasma) was used intraoperatively, patients were divided into a transfusion group (n=82) and a non-transfusion group (n=118). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion.

Results

The rate of intraoperative transfusion rate in the 200 glioma patients was 41%. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that operation time, intraoperative blood loss ≥500 mL, vascular involvement, and the extent of tumor resection (total resection) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion (P<0.05). Patient height was a protective factor against intraoperative blood transfusion (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The risk of intraoperative blood transfusion was higher in glioma patients with longer operation time, more intraoperative blood loss, vascular involvement, and total tumor resection. Clinically, efforts should be made to avoid these transfusion-related risk factors to minimize the risk of blood transfusion in patients.

Minimizing Blood Loss Using Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Liposuction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Liposuction has become the most sought-after aesthetic surgery across the globe, increasing the demand for more developments in patient safety protocols. Evidence of the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing intraoperative blood loss with minimal complications have led to its widespread applications across various surgical operations. However, the role and effectiveness of TXA in liposuction is not fully understood. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effectiveness of TXA in minimizing intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing liposuction.

METHODS

In adherence to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases including, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included without time frame limitations. Our primary outcomes were hemoglobin levels, hematocrit levels, lipoaspirate volume, and associated complications.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive analysis of five RCTs published between 2021-2023, involving 334 patients. The pooled mean difference for postoperative hemoglobin levels was statistically significant in favor of local TXA administration (MD 0.54; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). Analysis of postoperative hematocrit levels (g/dL) and lipoaspirate volume (L) mean differences were statistically insignificant (MD 0.76; P = 0.35; I2 = 0%) and (MD 0.19; P = 0.82; I2 = 85%) respectively. No complications related to the use of TXA occurred.

CONCLUSION

Although a statistically significant difference was seen in postoperative hemoglobin levels, it is imperative that the results are interpreted with caution, given the preliminary nature of the observed effect. Further large well-designed RCTs are required to solidify current TXA protocols and to provide comprehensive guidelines for its application in liposuction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Safety of tranexamic acid in surgically treated isolated spine trauma

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic antifibrinolytic drug, effectively reduces blood loss by inhibiting plasmin-induced fibrin breakdown. This is the first study in the United Kingdom to investigate the effectiveness of TXA in the surgical management of isolated spine trauma.

AIM

To assess the safety of TXA in isolated spine trauma. The primary and secondary outcomes are to assess the rate of thromboembolic events and to evaluate blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusion, respectively.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients aged ≥ 17 years with isolated spine trauma requiring surgical intervention over a 6-month period at two major trauma centers in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

We identified 67 patients: 26 (39%) and 41 (61%) received and did not receive TXA, respectively. Both groups were matched in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and mechanism of injury. A higher proportion of patients who received TXA had a subaxial cervical spine injury classification or thoracolumbar injury classification score > 4 (74% vs 56%). All patients in the TXA group underwent an open approach with a mean of 5 spinal levels involved and an average operative time of 203 min, compared with 24 patients (58%) in the non-TXA group who underwent an open approach with an average of 3 spinal levels involved and a mean operative time of 159 min. Among patients who received TXA, blood loss was < 150 and 150-300 mL in 8 (31%) and 15 (58%) patients, respectively. There were no cases of thromboembolic events in any patient who received TXA.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that TXA is safe for isolated spine trauma. It is challenging to determine whether TXA effectively reduces blood loss because most surgeons prefer TXA for open or multilevel cases. Further, larger studies are necessary to explore the rate, dosage, and mode of administration of TXA.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Craniofacial Surgery

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) refers to a patient centered, multidisciplinary team developed pathway aimed at reducing the surgical stress response and facilitating expedited patient postoperative recovery. These protocols have been largely developed in the general surgery literature and have led to vast improvements in the patient experience. ERAS protocols are generally substantiated on 3 phases along the continuum of surgical care: preadmission optimization, intraoperative treatment, and postoperative management. In this article, the evidence for ERAS development in craniomaxillofacial surgery will be reviewed, and recommendations from prior studies for enhanced recovery will be outlined.

Treatment of patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression using an enhanced recovery after surgery program

Purpose: The aims of this study were to introduce a new medical, pathway based on the concept of "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), and to test whether the ERAS program could improve clinical metrics among such patients. Methods: Data from patients with MESCC (n = 98), collected between December 2016 and December 2019 (Non-ERAS cohort), and from 86 patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression collected between January 2020 and December 2022 (ERAS cohort), were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated by decompressive surgery combined with transpedicular screw implantation and internal fixation. Patient baseline clinical characteristics were collected and compared between the two cohorts. Surgical outcomes analyzed included operation time; intraoperative blood loss; postoperative length of hospital stay; time to ambulation, regular diet, urinary catheter removal, and radiation therapy; perioperative complications; anxiety; depression; and satisfaction with treatment. Results: No significant differences in clinical characteristics were found between the non-ERAS and enhanced recovery after surgery cohorts (all p > 0.050), indicating that the two cohorts were comparable. Regarding surgical outcomes, the enhanced recovery after surgery cohort had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001); shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001); shorter time to ambulation (p < 0.001), regular diet (p < 0.001), urinary catheter removal (p < 0.001), radiation administration (p < 0.001), and systemic internal therapy (p < 0.001); lower perioperative complication rate (p = 0.024); less postoperative anxiety (p = 0.041); and higher score for satisfaction with treatment (p < 0.001); whereas operation time (p = 0.524) and postoperative depression (p = 0.415) were similar between the two cohorts. Compliance analysis demonstrated that ERAS interventions were successfully conducted in the vast majority of patients. Conclusion: The enhanced recovery after surgery intervention is beneficial to patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, according to data on intraoperative blood loss; length of hospital stay; time to ambulation, regular diet, urinary catheter removal, radiation exposure, and systemic internal therapy; perioperative complication; alleviation of anxiety; and improvement of satisfaction. However, clinical trials to investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery are needed in the future.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

Several previous meta-analyses have been published, followed by additional randomized clinical trials investigating the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. As a result, the purpose of this research is to present an updated quantitative analysis of the existing literature and to further explicate its effectiveness.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the application of TXA and placebo in patients undergoing PLIF surgery from their establishment to December 31, 2021. Data on clinical outcomes, perioperative outcomes, and complications were collected. The summary statistics for continuous and dichotomous variables were derived as weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies enrolling 1088 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results revealed that TXA can decrease intraoperative blood loss (WMD: -84.83, P < 0.0001), total blood loss (WMD: -189.93, P < 0.00001), hidden blood loss (WMD: -134.69, P = 0.002), postoperative drainage (WMD: -100.71, P < 0.00001), postoperative hemoglobin loss (WMD: 6.21, P < 0.00001), operative time (WMD: -3.80, P = 0.007), hospital stay (WMD: -1.86, P = 0.001), and transfusion rates (RR: 0.41, P < 0.00001) in PLIF without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events (RR: 0.80, P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

TXA can considerably decrease surgical blood loss, postoperative drainage, reduce operative times, hospital stays, and transfusion rates. Furthermore, the TXA group had lower postoperative hemoglobin drop values than the placebo group.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols in craniomaxillofacial surgery: an evidence-based review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) refers to a patient centered, multidisciplinary team developed pathway aimed at reducing the surgical stress response and facilitating expedited patient postoperative recovery. These protocols have been largely developed in the general surgery literature and have led to vast improvements in the patient experience. With a growing shortage of hospital resources during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a growing push to apply these principles to a wide variety of specialties.

RECENT FINDINGS

ERAS protocols are generally substantiated on three phases along the continuum of surgical care: preadmission optimization, intraoperative treatment, and postoperative management. In this article, the evidence for ERAS development in craniomaxillofacial surgery will be reviewed, and recommendations from prior studies for enhanced recovery will be outlined.

SUMMARY

ERAS protocols have been proven effective in many surgical arenas, however, modification is needed for the craniomaxillofacial population. The implications for widespread implementation of ERAS protocols during these procedures are a potentially shortened length of stay, expedited early return to function, reduction in narcotic dependence, and reduction in postdischarge complications necessitating additional intervention.

Post-operative tranexamic acid decreases chest tube drainage following vertebral body tethering surgery for scoliosis correction

PURPOSE

Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis requiring chest tube(s) (CT). We sought to assess the efficacy of post-op intravenous tranexamic acid (IV TXA) in reducing CT drainage and retention.

METHODS

35 VBT patients received 24 h of post-op IV TXA (2 mg/kg/h) were compared to 49 who did not. Group comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationships between TXA and both CT drainage and retention time.

RESULTS

There were no group differences at baseline (Table). CTs placed for thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar (TL) curves were assessed separately. For TH CT, there was less total CT drainage in the TXA group (TXA 569.4 ± 337.4 mL vs. Non-TXA 782.5 ± 338.9 mL; p = 0.003) and shorter CT retention time (TXA 3.0 ± 1.3 vs. Non-TXA 3.9 ± 1.4 days; p = 0.003). For TL CT, there was less total CT drainage in the TXA group (TXA 206.8 ± 152.2 mL vs. Non-TXA 395.7 ± 196.1 mL; p = 0.003) and shorter CT retention time (TXA 1.7 ± 1.3 vs. Non-TXA 2.7 ± 1.0 days; p = 0.001). Following multivariate analysis, use of TXA was the only significant predictor of both drainage in T and TL CTs (p = 0.012 and p = 0.002, respectively) as well as T and TL CT retention time (p = 0.008 and p = 0.009, respectively). There were no differences in LOS (p = 0.863) or ICU stay (p = 0.290).

CONCLUSION

IV TXA results in a significant decrease in CT drainage and retention time. CT retention is decreased by 1 day for those that receive TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in patients with posterior operation of multilevel thoracic spine stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

This study was a randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of the usage of intravenous tranexamic acid during posterior operation of multilevel thoracic spine stenosis for controlling perioperative blood loss.

Methods

Sixty eight patients with multilevel thoracic spine stenosis were randomized into the tranexamic acid group receiving 15 mg/kg body weight before the skin incision was made and 1 mg/kg body weight per hour during operation or the control group receiving the same dose of placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) intravenously. Pedicle screw fixation, laminectomy and selective discectomy were performed. Intraoperative and perioperative total blood loss were compared. The necessity and amount for blood transfusion, blood coagulation function, durations of postoperative hospital stays were compared. The complications of tranexamic acid were also investigated such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, lower limb venous thrombosis.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, ASA status, pathology required surgery, preoperative hemoglobin, operation time, laminectomy segments and discectomy segments between the tranexamic acid and control groups. The intraoperative blood loss (455.9 ± 206.6 ml vs 580.6 ± 224.3 ml, p < 0.05) and total blood loss (675.3 ± 170.3 ml vs 936.8 ± 306.4 ml, p < 0.01) in tranexamic acid group were significant lower than those in control group. The means of blood unit transfused (2.5 ± 1.0 vs 4.7 ± 2.4, p < 0.05) and Hb reduction in 48 h (22.5 ± 3.4 g/L vs 25.3 ± 3.9 g/L, p < 0.01) were significantly lower in tranexamic acid group than that in control group. There were no statistically significant differences in blood coagulation function pre-operation or 48 h post-operation between the tranexamic acid and the control groups. The requirements for patients to receive blood transfusion were fewer and durations of post-operational hospital stays were shorter in the tranexamic acid group, however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. There was no significant difference in superficial or deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs or deterioration of neurological function between tranexamic acid group and control group.

Conclusions

Application of intravenous tranexamic acid significantly reduces intraoperative and perioperative total blood loss without significant side effects in posterior operation of multilevel thoracic spine stenosis.

Trial registration

At Chinese Clinal Trial Registry. http://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2100054221. Registered on 11/12/2021.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05361-2.

Tranexamic acid use is associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss during spine surgery for Marfan syndrome

PURPOSE

The utility of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) is uncertain given associated aberrations within the vasculature and clotting cascade. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the association of TXA use with intraoperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusions in patients with MFS who underwent spinal arthrodesis.

METHODS

We queried our institutional database for MFS patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis for scoliosis between 2000 and 2020 by one surgeon. We excluded procedures spanning < 4 vertebral levels, those using anterior or combined anterior/posterior approaches, and those involving growing rods, postoperative infection, or spondylolisthesis. Fifty-two patients met our criteria, of whom 22 were treated with TXA and 30 were not. Mean differences in blood loss, transfusion volume, and proportions receiving transfusion were compared between TXA and the control groups using Student t, chi-squared, or Fisher exact tests. Alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

MFS patients treated with TXA experienced less mean (± standard deviation) intraoperative blood loss (1023 ± 534 mL) compared to the control group (1436 ± 1022 mL) (p = 0.01). The TXA group had estimated blood volume loss of 27% ± 16% compared to 36% ± 21% for controls (p = 0.05). No differences were found in allogeneic transfusion rate (p = 0.66) or transfusion volume (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between TXA use and reduced blood loss during surgical treatment of MFS-associated scoliosis, suggesting that the connective tissue deficiency in MFS does not interfere with TXA's mechanism of action.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Progress on the application of tranexamic acid in adolescent spine corrective surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To review the advances in the application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in adolescent spinal corrective surgery.

METHODS

The mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic, effectiveness, dosage, safety as well as methods of administration were comprehensively summarized by consulting domestic and overseas related literature about the application of TXA in adolescent spinal corrective surgery in recent years.

RESULTS

TXA efficaciously reduce intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate and volume, postoperative drainage volume in adolescent spinal corrective surgery. At present, the most common method of administration in adolescent spinal corrective surgery is that a loading dose is given intravenously before skin incision or induction of anesthesia, followed by a maintenance dose until the end of the surgery. The range of loading dose and maintenance dose is 10-100 mg/kg and 1-10 mg/(kg·h), respectively. No drug related adverse event has been reported in this range.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness and safety of TXA in adolescent spinal surgery have been basically confirmed. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage, method of administration as well as whether it could reduce blood loss after surgery.

[Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid sequential rivaroxaban on blood loss in elderly patients during lumbar interbody fusion]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect and safety of tranexamic acid sequential rivaroxaban on perioperative blood loss and preventing thrombosis for elderly patients during lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) with a prospective randomized controlled study.

METHODS

Between April and October 2019, the elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases requiring LIF were included in the study, among which were 80 patients met the selection criteria. According to the antifibrinolysis and anticoagulation protocols, they were randomly divided into a tranexamic acid sequential rivaroxaban group (trial group) and a simple rivaroxaban group (control group) on average. Finally, 69 patients (35 in the trial group and 34 in the control group) were included for comparison. There was no significant difference in general data ( P>0.05) such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, diseased segment, type of disease, and preoperative hemoglobin between the two groups. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage within 3 days after operation, perioperative total blood loss, and proportion of blood transfusion patients were compared between the two groups, as well as postoperative venous thrombosis of lower extremities, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding-related complications.

RESULTS

The operations of the two groups completed successfully, and there was no significant difference in the operation time ( P>0.05); the intraoperative blood loss, drainage within 3 days after operation, and perioperative total blood loss in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05). The proportion of blood transfusion patients in the trial group was 25.71% (9/35), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [52.94% (18/34)] ( χ 2=5.368, P=0.021). Postoperative incision bleeding occurred in 4 cases of the trial group and 3 cases of the control group, and there was no significant difference in bleeding-related complications between the two groups ( P=1.000). There was 1 case of venous thrombosis of the lower extremities in each group after operation, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the two groups ( P=1.000). Besides, no pulmonary embolism occurred in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative use of tranexamic acid sequential rivaroxaban in elderly LIF patients can effectively reduce the amount of blood loss and the proportion of blood transfusion patients without increasing the risk of postoperative thrombosis.

Tranexamic acid reduces blood cost in long-segment spinal fusion surgery: A randomized controlled study protocol

OBJECTIVE

Long-segment spinal fusion surgery was associated with substantial perioperative blood loss which may increase hospitalization expenses and mortality rates. Substantial studies have reported that tranexamic acid (TXA) could reduce blood products and cost after joint arthroplasty surgery. However, there still exists controversy regarding the efficacy of TXA in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. We performed this protocol to design a randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in decreasing transfusion rate of allogeneic blood products and transfusion cost in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients.

METHODS

This study was carried out as a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial on patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who prepared for long-segment spinal fusion surgery from December 2018 to December 2019. It was authorized via the Institutional Review Committee in Southwest Medical University (ky2019225). Eighty patients were divided randomly into 2 groups (Experimental group = 40, control group = 40). The patients in the experimental group received 1000 mg of TXA mixed in 100 mL normal saline as a single dose intravenously over 20 minutes before the skin incision was made. Control group received equivalent normal saline without TXA. Primary outcomes included total blood loss, estimated intraoperative blood loss, hematocrit and hemoglobin decline, postoperative drain amount, intra-/postoperative allogeneic transfusion amount and rate, and total transfusion cost. Secondary outcomes included surgical time, thrombotic complications including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. All the needed analyses were implemented through utilizing SPSS for Windows Version 20.0.

RESULTS

Table showed the relevant clinical outcomes between experimental group and control group.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesized that TXA was effective and safe in reducing blood transfusion and cost in long-segment spinal fusion surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5854).

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements after periacetabular osteotomy

AIMS

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. There remains a lack of prospective evidence for the use of TXA in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study was to determine if intravenous (IV) TXA is effective in reducing calculated blood loss and transfusions after PAO.

METHODS

This was a single-centre prospective double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of 81 patients aged 12 to 45 years undergoing elective PAO by a single surgeon. The intervention group (n = 40) received two doses of IV TXA of a maximum 1 g in each dose; the control group (n = 41) received two doses of 50 ml 0.9% saline IV. The primary outcome was perioperative calculated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included allogenic transfusions and six-week postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographics or intraoperative variables between study groups. The TXA group demonstrated lower mean calculated blood loss (1,265 ml, (SD 321) vs 1,515 ml, (SD 394); p = 0.002) and lower frequency of allogenic transfusion (10%/n = 4 vs 37%/n = 15; p = 0.008). Regression analyses associated TXA use with significant reductions in calculated blood loss (p < 0.001) and transfusion (p = 0.007) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, preoperative haemoglobin, cell-saver volume, intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure, and operating time. No patients suffered venous thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, IV TXA decreased postoperative calculated blood loss by 293 ml and reduced the frequency of allogenic transfusions by 73% (37% vs 10%) following PAO. TXA may be safe and effective for reducing blood loss in patients undergoing PAO. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1151-1157.

Intraoperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Fluid management has been widely recognized as an important component of the perioperative care in patients undergoing major procedures including spine surgeries. Patient- and surgery-related factors such as age, length of the surgery, massive intraoperative blood loss, and prone positioning, may impact the intraoperative administration of fluids. In addition, the type of fluid administered may also affect post-operative outcomes. Published literature describing intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing major spine surgeries is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we reviewed current literature on intraoperative fluid management and its association with post-operative complications in spine surgery.

Comparison of Intravenous versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Nondeformity Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, interferes with fibrinolysis and has been used for many years to reduce blood loss during spine surgery. The purpose of our meta-analysis was to compare the effect of intravenous versus topical administration of TXA in patients undergoing nondeformity spine surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP to find studies that met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, including 660 patients. The surgical methods used in the included studies were nondeformity spine surgery. No significant differences were found in the two groups regarding total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, hematocrit, hemoglobin, fibrinogen, postoperative prothrombin time (PT), postoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), drainage volume, and blood transfusion rate. There were statistically significant differences in the two groups in terms of preoperative PT (MD = -0.39, 95% CI: [-0.63, -0.15], P=0.002) and preoperative APTT (MD = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.57, 1.68], P=0.002) and preoperative APTT (MD = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.57, 1.68].

CONCLUSION

During nondeformity spine surgery, intravenous administration of TXA did not have a significant effect on the decrease of blood loss and blood transfusion rate compared with the topical group. According to the pooled analysis of PT and APTT, intravenous and topical application of TXA may have different effects on the coagulation pathway. More high-quality RCTs are needed to explore the optimal dosage, method, timing in the future in order to recommend TXA widespread use in spine surgery.

Blood loss and perioperative transfusions related to surgery for spinal tumors. Relevance of tranexamic acid

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce bleeding. Patients with spinal tumors are fragile and acute anemia may be harmful. Tumor excision surgery is reputed to be hemorrhagic and treatment may increase thromboembolic complications. The aim of this study was to compare blood loss with or without perioperative TXA injection. The transfusion-related and postoperative complications were documents.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data involved 83 patients with spinal tumors who underwent decompressive surgery associated with bone fixation. Tranexamic acid was used arbitrarily in 36 of them, while the other 47 did not receive TXA. The overall, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss was recorded. Blood loss was reported relative to the number of fixed levels and the number of levels decompressed by laminectomy. Transfusions were quantified in number of red blood cell packets and erythrocyte volume. Postoperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

Epidemiological and morphological data were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the overall, intraoperative, and postoperative blood loss. A significant reduction in postoperative bleeding was found in the TXA group when the volume was related to the number of decompressed levels. A significant reduction (P<0.05) in the volume of transfused blood was identified in the treated group. No predictor of blood loss was identified, and no additional complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of TXA appears to be moderate during spinal tumor surgery since it does not lead to a reduction in perioperative bleeding. However, a significant reduction in transfusion volume was found without an increase in complications.