A Comparison of High and Usual Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients With Obesity: A Post Hoc Analysis of an International, Pragmatic, Single-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Protein Delivery in Critical Care- What Have Recent Trials Shown Us?

Determining the optimal protein intake for intensive care unit (ICU) and post-ICU patients is a multifaceted challenge. Firstly, it is essential to avoid both underdosing (<1.0 g/kg) and overdosing (>1.6 g/kg) of actual protein intake. Secondly, the actual protein intake may deviate from the prescribed amount. Thirdly, phenotyping and endotyping are becoming increasingly crucial in tailoring protein targets. Additionally, a gradual increase in protein intake is essential during the first 4 to 5 days of ICU stay. Furthermore, no established protein targets exist for post-ICU patients, indicating the need for nutritional intervention research to identify optimal protein intake strategies.

Why One-Size-Fits-All Doesn't Work in Intensive Care Unit Nutrition?

Nutrition therapy is a complex intervention with several underlying considerations that may influence effectiveness. Considerations include the mechanism of action of the intervention and the patient phenotype, including sex, ethnicity, body composition, and the patients' nutritional and inflammatory status. Energy and protein targets are elements of nutrition therapy that may be particularly influenced by individual patient factors. Biomarkers may provide a useful tool to monitor and individualize nutrition therapy in the future. The considerations mentioned, with many yet to be studied, highlight the rationale for more individualized interventions moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.

Nutritional Support in the ICU

Critical illness is a complex condition that can have a devastating impact on health and quality of life. Nutritional support is a crucial component of critical care that aims to maintain or restore nutritional status and muscle function. A one-size-fits-all approach to the components of nutritional support has not proven beneficial. Recent randomized controlled trials challenge the conventional strategy and support the safety and potential benefits of below-usual calorie and protein intakes at the early, acute phase of critical illness. Further research is needed to define optimal nutritional support throughout the intensive care unit stay. Individualized nutritional strategies relying on risk assessment tools or biomarkers deserve further investigation in rigorously designed, large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. Importantly, although nutritional support is crucial, it might not be sufficient to enhance the recovery of critically ill patients. Thus, achieving the greatest efficacy may require individualized nutritional support combined with early, prolonged physical rehabilitation within a multimodal, holistic care program throughout the patient's recovery journey.

The effect of high protein dosing in critically ill patients: an exploratory, secondary Bayesian analyses of the EFFORT Protein trial

BACKGROUND

The EFFORT Protein trial assessed the effect of high vs usual dosing of protein in adult ICU patients with organ failure. This study provides a probabilistic interpretation and evaluates heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTE).

METHODS

We analysed 60-day all-cause mortality and time to discharge alive from hospital using Bayesian models with weakly informative priors. HTE on mortality was assessed according to disease severity (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score), acute kidney injury, and serum creatinine values at baseline.

RESULTS

The absolute difference in mortality was 2.5% points (95% credible interval -6.9 to 12.4), with a 72% posterior probability of harm associated with high protein treatment. For time to discharge alive from hospital, the hazard ratio was 0.91 (95% credible interval 0.80 to 1.04) with a 92% probability of harm for the high-dose protein group compared with the usual-dose protein group. There were 97% and 95% probabilities of positive interactions between the high protein intervention and serum creatinine and SOFA score at randomisation, respectively. Specifically, there was a potentially relatively higher mortality of high protein doses with higher baseline serum creatinine or SOFA scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate to high probabilities of harm with high protein doses compared with usual protein in ICU patients for the primary and secondary outcomes. We found suggestions of heterogeneity in treatment effects with worse outcomes in participants randomised to high protein doses with renal dysfunction or acute kidney injury and greater illness severity at baseline.

Dietary protein in the ICU in relation to health outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critical care nutrition guidelines recommend provision of higher protein doses than recommended in health. These recommendations have been predominately based on lower quality evidence and physiological rationale that greater protein doses may attenuate the significant muscle loss observed in critically ill patients. This review discusses the mechanistic action of protein in the critically ill, details results from recent trials on health outcomes, discusses considerations for interpretation of trial results, and provides an overview of future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two recent large clinical trials have investigated different protein doses and the effect on clinical outcome. Important findings revealed potential harm in certain sub-groups of patients. This harm must be balanced with the potential for beneficial effects on muscle mass and physical function given that two recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses demonstrated attenuation of muscle loss with higher protein doses. Utilizing biological markers such as urea: creatinine ratio or urea levels may prove useful in monitoring harm from higher protein doses.

SUMMARY

Future research should focus on prospectively investigating biological signatures of harm as well as taking into the consideration elements that will likely enhance the effectiveness of protein dose.

Personalized Nutrition in the Pediatric ICU: Steering the Shift from Acute Stress to Metabolic Recovery and Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Nutrition significantly impacts the outcomes of critically ill children in intensive care units (ICUs). Due to the evolving metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immunological disorders associated with severe illness or trauma, there are dynamically changing phases of energy needs requiring tailored macronutrient intake.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the changing dietary needs from the acute phase through recovery, provide recommendations for implementing evidence-based strategies to ensure adequate energy and nutrient provision in pediatric ICUs, and optimize patient outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE-PubMed database was conducted, focusing on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews related to the nutrition of critically ill children. The study highlights recent guidelines using the GRADE approach, supplemented by relevant adult studies, current clinical practices, challenges, gaps in knowledge, and future directions for research aimed at improving nutritional interventions.

RESULTS

Early personalized, incremental enteral feeding helps mitigate the negative energy balance during the acute phase, aids organ function restoration in the stabilization phase, and supports growth during the recovery phase and beyond. Conversely, early full nutritional support, high protein doses, or isolated micronutrient administration have not demonstrated benefits due to anabolic resistance in these patients. Moreover, early parenteral nutrition during the acute phase may suppress autophagy and lead to worse outcomes. Accurate assessment of nutritional status and monitoring of daily energy and protein needs are crucial.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong evidence supports the establishment of a dedicated nutritional team and the implementation of individualized nutritional protocols in the ICU to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill children.

Characterizing and Predicting Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Low or High Protein Doses with Moderate Energy Support: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Finding the best energy and protein dose and timing for critically ill patients remains challenging. Distinct populations may react differently to protein load. This study aimed to characterize and predict outcomes of critically ill patients who received moderate energy and high or low protein doses during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

The cohort included 646 adult patients (70% men and 30% women) hospitalized in Beilinson Hospital ICU (Petah Tikva, Israel) for over 5 days between 2011 and 2018. Patients received 10-20 kcal/kg/day and were classified into two groups: low (LP) and high (HP) protein support (≤1 g/kg/day vs. >1 g/kg/day), the LP group comprising 531 patients (82%) and the HP group 115 patients (18%). Multiple logistic regression was used to describe associations between patients' characteristics and 90-day survival in the LP and HP groups.

RESULTS

Among LP, increased age, APACHE II, and receiving supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) were associated with decreased survival (OR = 0.986, 95% CI [0.973, 0.999]; OR = 0.915, 95% CI [0.886, 0.944], OR = 0.579, 95% CI [0.366, 0.917]). Trauma admission was associated with increased survival (OR = 1.826, 95% CI [1.001, 3.329]). Among HP, increased age was associated with decreased survival (OR = 0.956, 95% CI [0.924, 0.998]). Higher BMI was associated with improved survival (OR = 1.137, 95% CI [1.028, 1.258]). Likewise, in the HP group, the BMI of elderly survivors was higher compared to non-survivors (27.1 ± 6.2 vs. 24.7 ± 4.8, t (113) = 2.3, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in patients with moderate energy support and low protein administration, survivors were younger, with a lower APACHE II score, mainly suffering from trauma and without renal failure. In the patients receiving high protein support, younger patients with a high BMI not suffering from sepsis were more likely to survive. We suggest confirming these findings with prospective RCTs.