Multiple primary melanoma: a single centre retrospective review

Multiple primary melanomas in Udine, northeastern Italy: a focus on epidemiology and new risk factors

Patients diagnosed with melanoma are at an elevated risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and identify the risk factors associated with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) in patients referred to the melanoma outpatient service of the Dermatology Unit at the University Hospital of Udine, Italy. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients with MPMs. For each patient demographic, clinical, and histological data were collected. For each excised melanoma, we recorded Breslow thickness, histological subtype, and anatomical site. A total of 233 patients with melanoma were included in the study, comprising a subgroup of 51 (22%) patients diagnosed with MPM. The mean Breslow thickness for patients with a single melanoma was significantly higher than the Breslow thickness for the first melanoma in the MPM subgroup. Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in Breslow thickness between the first and second melanomas was observed. In our cohort, patients with MPM had a significantly higher prevalence of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) compared with those with a single melanoma. Our study indicates that the prevalence of MPM in the province of Udine is among the highest reported globally. Our finding aligns with the broader literature, which consistently reports lower thickness in second melanoma compared with first melanoma. Finally, the higher prevalence of NMSC in these patients suggests a potential link to chronic ultraviolet exposure.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics - Update 2024

This guideline was developed in close collaboration with multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma were developed on the basis of systematic literature research and consensus conferences. Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the most dangerous form of skin tumor and accounts for 90 % of skin cancer mortality. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and must always be confirmed by dermoscopy. If melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermoscopy and whole-body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early-stage melanoma. If available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve the clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma is classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. For thin melanomas up to a tumor thickness of 0.8 mm, no further diagnostic imaging is required. From stage IB, lymph node sonography is recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIB/C, whole-body examinations with computed tomography or positron emission tomography CT in combination with magnetic resonance imaging of the brain are recommended. From stage IIB/C and higher, a mutation test is recommended, especially for the BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to perform a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. A stage-based follow-up regimen is proposed, which in the experience of the guideline group covers the optimal requirements, although further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Multiple Primary Melanoma Associated with CDKN2A Mutation-Case Report and Review of the Literature

The CDKN2A gene remains understudied in melanoma compared to BRAF alterations. Inactivation of this tumor suppressor gene through homozygous deletions in the 9p21 chromosomal region leads to cellular proliferation and disrupts pro-apoptotic pathways. Genetic changes in CDKN2A are linked to multiple primary melanomas (MPM), with patients diagnosed with melanoma facing an elevated risk of developing additional primaries. We present the rare case of a 72-year-old Caucasian woman with nine metastasizing melanomas across diverse anatomical sites, posing a diagnostic challenge. Initial diagnosis in 2022 revealed ulcerated superficial spreading melanomas, progressing to intradermal and papillary dermal populations with neurotropism and angiotropism by early 2023. Lymph node metastases were identified, classifying the condition as pT3b N3b. Subsequent assessments in April 2023 revealed clinically suspicious melanocytic lesions diagnosed as intradermal and traumatized junctional nevi. In late 2023, cutaneous pigmented lesions and subcutaneous metastases were confirmed as nodular nevoid low-CSD multiple melanomas. Fluorescence in situ hybridization testing revealed homozygous CDKN2A deletion, necessitating close multidisciplinary collaboration for an optimized care plan for effective monitoring and intervention in this intricate clinical scenario. In summary, this case report highlights the diagnostic challenges of MPM in a single patient. Stressing the importance of immuno-histochemistry and CDKN2A genetic testing, our findings underscore the crucial role of these tools in accurately distinguishing malignant melanocytic proliferations from nevi and characterizing MPM cases.

Simultaneous melanomas in the setting of multiple primary melanomas

It is estimated that about 1-13% of melanoma patients will develop multiple primary melanomas. Although the occurrence of subsequent tumors has been described during the last few years, the development of simultaneous melanomas has not yet been extensively studied. We reviewed our registries to identify patients with multiple primary melanomas. We studied epidemiological, clinical, and histological characteristics of patients who were diagnosed with simultaneous melanomas and compared them with those of patients who developed non-synchronous multiple primary melanomas. As simultaneous were defined subsequent melanomas that were diagnosed either at the same visit or within a time-period of maximum of 1 month. Between 2000 and 2020, 2500 patients were diagnosed with melanoma at Andreas Syggros Hospital. 86 (3.4%) patients presented multiple primary melanomas and among them, 35 (40.7%) developed simultaneous melanomas. Patients with simultaneous melanomas developed more frequently more than 2 tumors. First tumors of patients with non-synchronous melanomas were significantly thicker than second tumors while those of patients with simultaneous melanomas did not differ significantly. Slight differences in the tumor localization, staging and histologic type were observed between the two groups. However significant differences were ascertained between first and second tumors in both groups. Simultaneous melanomas occupy an important proportion of multiple primary melanomas, affecting a non-negligible number of patients. Slight differences between simultaneous and non-synchronous multiple primary melanomas seem to define a distinct subcategory of multiple primary melanomas.

Multiple Primary Melanoma: A Five-Year Prospective Single-Center Follow-Up Study of Two MC1R R/R Genotype Carriers

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary melanoma (MPM) is a diagnostic challenge even with ancillary imaging technologies available to dermatologists. In selected patients' phenotypes, the use of imaging approaches can help better understand lesion characteristics, and aid in early diagnosis and management.

METHODS

Under a 5-year prospective single-center follow-up, 58 s primary melanomas (SPMs) were diagnosed in two first-degree relatives, with fair skin color, red hair, green eyes, and personal history of one previous melanoma each. Patients' behavior and descriptive demographic data were collected from medical records. The information on the first two primary melanomas (PMs) were retrieved from pathology reports. The characteristics of 60 melanomas were collected from medical records, video dermoscopy software, and pathology reports. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) was performed prior to excision of 22 randomly selected melanomas.

RESULTS

From February 2018 to May 2023, two patients underwent a pooled total of 214 excisional biopsies of suspect lesions, resulting in a combined benign versus malignant treatment ratio (NNT) of 2.0:1.0. The number of moles excised for each melanoma diagnosed (NNE) was 1.7:1.0 and 6.9:1.0 for the female and male patient respectively. The in-situ melanoma/invasive melanoma ratio (IIR) demonstrated a higher proportion of in-situ melanomas for both patients. From June 2018 to May 2023, a total of 58 SPMs were detected by the combination of total body skin exam (TBSE), total body skin photography (TBSP), digital dermoscopy (DD), and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) via comparative approach. The younger patient had her PM one month prior to the second and third cutaneous melanomas (CMs), characterizing a case of synchronous primary CM. The male older relative had a total of 7 nonsynchronous melanomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This CM cohort is composed of 83.3% in-situ melanoma and 16.7% invasive melanoma. Both patients had a higher percentage of SPM with clinical nevus-like morphology (84.5%), global dermoscopic pattern of asymmetric multiple component (60.3%) and located on the lower limbs (46.6%). When RCM was performed prior to excision, 81% of SPM had features suggestive of malignancy. As well, invasive melanomas were more frequent in the lower limbs (40%). In the multivariate model, for the two high-risk patients studied, the chance of a not associated with nevus ("de novo") invasive SPM diagnosis is 25 times greater than the chance of a diagnosis of a nevus-associated invasive SPM.

Surveillance After a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Melanoma Follow-Up Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups.

METHODS

A systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later.

RESULTS

A total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols.

Synchronous Melanoma: Definition, Prognosis, and Implications. A Comprehensive Review of Literature

Background

Although multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) have been reported in the literature, the subgroup of synchronous melanomas (SMs) remains understudied.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the English literature from 1972 to 2023 to characterize SM. Our objective was to clarify the definition, determine incidence and prognosis, and present recommendations.

Results

We found 18 case series articles and six case reports that met our criteria. Twelve of eighteen studies defined SM as a second primary melanoma identified within 1 month. The total number of SM patients reported was 1083. The cumulative percentage of MPM in total melanoma patients was 2.9 %, and the cumulative percentage of SM patients in MPM patients was 31.3%. SM patients trended toward higher body anatomical concordance, older age, and male sex. Despite limited data, SMs do not show a worse prognosis for patients compared with single melanomas.

Conclusions

Despite a lack of consensus in the past, we recommend that SM be defined as a second primary melanoma detected within 1 month of the initial diagnosis. SMs comprise almost one-third of MPM cases and do not seem to carry any worse prognosis than the patients presenting with single melanoma. We believe older age and male sex may be more prone to SM. We recommend patient education, self-skin evaluations and TSE at initial and follow-up visits. Neither randomized controlled trials nor meta-analyses on SM exist. Ideally, further studies with a large cohort of patients are needed to accurately define SM.

A practical nomogram and risk stratification system predicting the cancer-specific survival for patients aged >50 with advanced melanoma

Objective

To investigate risk factors for advanced melanoma over 50 years of age and to develop and validate a new line chart and classification system.

Methods

The SEER database was screened for patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma from 2010 to 2019 and Cox regression analysis was applied to select variables affecting patient prognosis. The area under curve (AUC), relative operating characteristic curve (ROC), Consistency index (C-index), decision curve analysis (DCA), and survival calibration curves were used to verify the accuracy and utility of the model and to compare it with traditional AJCC tumor staging. The Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to compare the risk stratification between the model and traditional AJCC tumor staging.

Results

A total of 5166 patients were included in the study. Surgery, age, gender, tumor thickness, ulceration, the number of primary melanomas, M stage and N stage were the independent prognostic factors of CSS in patients with advanced melanoma (P<0.05). The predictive nomogram model was constructed and validated. The C-index values obtained from the training and validation cohorts were 0.732 (95%CI: 0.717-0.742) and 0.741 (95%CI: 0.732-0.751). Based on the observation and analysis results of the ROC curve, survival calibration curve, NRI, and IDI, the constructed prognosis model can accurately predict the prognosis of advanced melanoma and performs well in internal verification. The DCA curve verifies the practicability of the model. Compared with the traditional AJCC staging, the risk stratification in the model has a better identification ability for patients in different risk groups.

Conclusion

The nomogram of advanced melanoma and the new classification system were successfully established and verified, which can provide a practical tool for individualized clinical management of patients.

Association of multiple primary melanomas with malignancy risk: A population-based analysis of entries from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database during 1973-2014

BACKGROUND

Genetic and environmental risk factors have been associated with the development of multiple primary melanomas (MPMs). We hypothesized that individuals with MPMs might have an increased incidence of internal malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk for subsequent malignancies in MPM patients.

METHODS

Multiple primary standardized incidence ratios were analyzed for individuals with ≥1, ≥2 and ≥3 primary melanomas (PMs) recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 1973-2014.

RESULTS

We identified 223,799 individuals with ≥1 PM, 19,709 with ≥2 PMs, and 3,995 with ≥3 PMs. Risks of subsequent internal malignancy increased with number of PMs, with observed:expected ratios of 0.99, 1.14, and 1.23 (P < .05) for patients with ≥1 PM, ≥2 PMs, and ≥3 PMs, respectively. Internal malignancy was higher in younger MPM patients and those with superficial spreading melanoma. The most common malignancies among MPM patients included breast, prostate, thyroid, soft tissue, brain, kidney, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Risk for subsequent cutaneous melanoma increased with observed:expected ratios of 8.09, 22.52, 41.03 (P < .05) for patients with ≥1 PM, ≥2 PMs, and ≥3 PMs, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results records limited information about pigmentation phenotypes, histology, and treatments.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MPMs have an increased risk for subsequent internal and cutaneous malignancies and might benefit from tight adherence to age-specific cancer screening.

Clinical Features and Survival of Multiple Primary Melanoma: A Belgian Single Center Cohort

INTRODUCTION

It remains unclear whether multiple primary melanoma (MPM) patients have a worse survival prognosis compared with single primary melanoma (SPM) patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the demographics, histological features, and survival of MPM versus SPM patients.

METHODS

Cox regression analyses compared survival between SPM and MPM patients. Furthermore, demographics and histological features of the MPM cohort were compared with the SPM patients retrieved from dermatopathology files between 2000 and 2019.

RESULTS

Out of 3853 melanoma patients, 95 MPM patients were retrieved: 81 with two primary melanomas (85.2%) and 14.8% with three or more. Mean Breslow of the first melanoma was 0.84 mm [minimum (min): 0 mm, maximum (max): 16 mm, standard deviation (SD) 1.77] versus 0.37 mm (second MPM) (min: 0 mm, max: 2.5 mm, SD 0.50) and 0.33 mm (third MPM) (min: 0 mm, max: 0.6 mm, SD 0.22). The mean Breslow for the second MPM was significantly higher for men than women (0.59 mm versus 0.27 mm). First and second melanoma in MPM patients developed on preexisting melanocytic nevi in 13% and 12%, respectively. In contrast with the mean age of primary melanoma in Belgium for women (58.2 years) and men (63.3 years), MPM patients developed their first melanoma earlier, at 44.8 years and 54.6 years, respectively. The mean distribution of anatomical localization of primary and secondary melanoma was highly similar in women, whereas in men a shift towards lower extremities was observed (19% versus 28%). The thicker the primary melanoma was, the sooner the second appeared. Follow-up (2-4/year) versus (1/year) yielded a mean Breslow of 0.29 mm and 0.55 mm, respectively. Cox regression analysis with time-varying covariate revealed a tendency for a worse prognosis in 5-year survival rates, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Patient phenotypes were not available on the histological reports.

CONCLUSION

A closer follow-up regimen of MPM versus SPM patients is probably justified.

Synchronous primary cutaneous melanomas: a descriptive study of their clinical features, histology, genetic background of the patients and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Around 0.5% cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients will present with synchronous melanomas when first seen. Moreover, 26%-40% of patients with multiple primary melanomas present with synchronous lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence, clinical and histopathological characteristics, germline mutations and outcome in patients with synchronous melanoma.

METHODS

Clinical and histopathological data from 4703 melanoma patients were included. Clinical, histological and genetic mutational status information was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to investigate survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients (3.06%) presented simultaneously with 2 or more primary melanomas. During follow-up, 25.7% of patients with synchronous melanoma developed a new primary melanoma compared to 8.6% of patients diagnosed with single melanoma (p < 0.001). Germinal CDKN2A mutations were identified in 10.7% of patients with synchronous melanomas and genetic variants in MC1R in 72%. No significant differences in all survival outcomes between patients with synchronous melanomas and single melanomas were found.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous melanomas are more frequent than previously reported and are more frequent in older patients compared to single melanomas. Moreover, these patients have a higher risk of developing a new primary melanoma during follow-up and have higher rates of germline susceptibility variants. Nevertheless, these findings were not associated with worse outcomes.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and shall always be confirmed with dermatoscopy. If a melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermatoscopy and full body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early melanoma. Where available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma shall be classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Thin melanomas up to 0.8 mm tumor thickness do not require further imaging diagnostics. From stage IB onwards, examinations with lymph node sonography are recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIC onwards whole-body examinations with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) in combination with brain magnetic resonance imaging are recommended. From stage III and higher, mutation testing is recommended, particularly for BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to provide a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. There is no evidence to define the frequency and extent of examinations. A stage-based follow-up scheme is proposed which, according to the experience of the guideline group, covers the optimal requirements, but further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2024.

Poorer survival outcomes in patients with multiple versus single primary melanoma

BACKGROUND

Given equivocal results related to overall survival (OS) for patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) compared with those with single primary melanomas (SPMs) in previous reports, the authors sought to determine whether OS differs between these 2 cohorts in their center using their UPCI-96-99 database. Secondary aims were to assess the differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS). In a subset of patients, transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was performed to assess disease-associated genes of interest.

METHODS

This retrospective case-controlled study included patients with MPMs and age-, sex-, and stage-matched controls with SPMs at a 1:1 ratio. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of MPMs on death and recurrence. NanoString PanCancer Immune Profiling was used to assess peripheral blood immune status in patients.

RESULTS

In total, 320 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 47 years; 43.8% were male. Patients with MPMs had worse RFS and OS (P = .023 and P = .0019, respectively). The presence of MPMs was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 4.52, P = .0006), and increased risk of disease recurrence (HR, 2.17; P = .004) after adjusting for age, sex, and stage. The degree of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was different between the first melanoma of MPMs and SPMs. Expression of CXCL6 and FOXJ1 was increased in PBMCs isolated from patients with MPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MPMs had worse RFS and OS compared with patients with SPMs. Immunologic differences were also observed, including TIL content and expression of CXCL6/FOXJ1 in PBMCs of patients with MPMs, which warrant further investigation.

Multiple Primary Melanomas: Retrospective Review in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Multiple primary melanomas (MPM) refer to the occurrence of more than one synchronous or metachronous melanoma in the same individual. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of MPM and describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients with MPM. An observational single-center retrospective study was designed based on a cohort of melanoma patients followed in a tertiary care hospital. Fifty-eight (8.9%) patients developed MPM. Most patients were men (65.5%) and the median age at the time of diagnosis of the first melanoma was 71 years old. The median time of diagnosis of the second melanoma from the first melanoma was 10.9 months, and 77.6% of second melanomas were diagnosed within the first 5 years. In total, 29 (50%) and 28 (48.3%) first and second melanomas were located in the trunk, respectively. Concordance of anatomic site between primary and subsequent melanoma was found in 46.6% of the patients. Proportion of in situ melanomas was increasingly higher in subsequent melanomas (from 36.21% of first melanomas to 100% of fifth melanomas). An increasing rate of melanomas with histological regression was observed within subsequent melanomas (from 60.3% of first melanomas to 80% of third melanomas). Our results support the importance of careful long-term follow-up with total body examination in melanoma patients.

Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus

In spite of the good prognosis of patients with early-stage melanoma, there is a substantial proportion of them that develop local or distant relapses. With the introduction of targeted and immune therapies for advanced melanoma, including at the adjuvant setting, early detection of recurrent melanoma and/or second primary lesions is crucial to improve clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack of universal guidelines regarding both frequency of surveillance visits and diagnostic imaging and/or laboratory evaluations. In this article, a multidisciplinary expert panel recommends, after careful review of relevant data in the field, a consensus- and experience-based follow-up strategy for melanoma patients, taking into account prognostic factors and biomarkers and the high-risk periods and patterns of recurrence in each (sub) stage of the disease. Apart from the surveillance intensity, healthcare professionals should focus on patients' education to perform regular self-examinations of the skin and palpation of lymph nodes.

Assessment of the perceived burden associated with Malignant Melanoma with Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28)

PURPOSE

The impact of malignant melanoma (MM) on patients' psychophysical well-being has been poorly addressed. We aimed to assess the perceived burden in patients with a diagnosis of MM, using two different tools, one generic and one specific for MM, such as Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28), respectively. The correlation between PRISM and MCQ-28 subscales and the relevance of disease and patient-related variables were also investigated.

METHODS

This single-centre, cross-sectional study included all adult consecutive MM patients who attended our Dermatology Unit from December 2020 to June 2021. Demographics and disease-related data were recorded. PRISM and MCQ-28 were administered.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-one patients were included (mean age: 59.5 ±14.9 years.; 48.0% males). Median time from MM diagnosis to inclusion was 36 months. Nearly 80% of the patients had in situ or stage I MM. Overall, 22.2% of the patients reported a PRISM score <100mm and similar percentages provided scores indicating impaired quality of life, as assessed with MCQ-28 subscales. A weak, albeit significant, correlation was found between PRISM scores and ACP, CON and SOC2 subscales. The most relevant association found was that between lower PRISM scores and higher-stage MM.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study population, mostly affected with superficial MM, their perception of the burden associated with MM did not appear either particularly dramatic or disabling. PRISM seems a reliable system for capturing and quantifying the domains correlated with the emotive dimension of MM, especially MM-related concerns and willingness to face life.

Identification of death risk factors of primary melanoma based on the competing risk model

OBJECTIVE

To preliminarily explore death risk factors in primary melanoma patients.

METHOD

Competing risk model analysis was used using a large sample public cohort and Cox proportional hazard model was compared.

RESULT

In the competing risk model analysis, age, gender, ethnicity, stage, site, TMN stage and metastases were the independent risk factors of single primary melanoma (SPM) death. T stage had a particularly important impact on SPM death. T2 stage had a 3.212 times greater risk of interest event than T1 stage [hazard ratio (HR)=3.212, 95%CI: 2.994-3.446], T3 stage was 5.747 times greater than that T1 stage (HR=5.747, 95%CI: 5.337-6.187) and T4 stage had a 7.086 times than T1 stage (HR=7.086, 95%CI: 6.514-7.708). Gender, ethnicity, stage, site, T stage and brain and liver metastases were the independent risk factors of multiple primary melanoma (MPM) death. When some groups had a very high death rate or the reference group had a very low death rate in competing events, the results of Cox proportional hazard model may not be as accurate as the results obtained by fine-Gray regression model.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and therapy, and prevention of tumor progression and metastases of primary melanoma patients are important measures to improve its prognosis and survival.

Indoor tanning exposure in association with multiple primary melanoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk for subsequent new primary melanomas. Indoor tanning is a recognized risk factor for melanoma. This study was aimed at determining the association between indoor tanning and the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of cases with multiple primary melanoma and sex-matched controls with single primary melanoma retrieved at a 1:2 ratio from the Biological Sample and Nevus Bank of the Melanoma Center of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between multiple primary melanoma and risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 330 patients (39.1% men) with a median age of 51 years were enrolled. Compared with patients who had a single primary melanoma, patients with multiple melanomas were younger at the diagnosis of their first primary melanoma and were more likely to be discovered at stage 0 or I and to have had indoor tanning exposure, a family history of melanoma, atypical moles, dysplastic nevi, and a Breslow thickness less than 1 mm. Compared with patients' first melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more likely to be thinner or in situ. The estimated probability of the locus for the second primary being the same as that for the first primary melanoma was 34%. In a multivariate analysis after adjustments for age, a family history of melanoma, the presence of atypical and dysplastic nevi, and recreational sun exposure, indoor tanning remained significantly associated with the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.08; P = .0356).

CONCLUSIONS

Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of second primary melanoma. Subsequent melanomas are more likely to be thin or in situ and to occur in different anatomic locations.

Differences in Risk Factors for Melanoma in Young and Middle-aged Higher-risk Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Differences in risk factors for melanoma between young adults (18-39 years) and middle-aged (40-60 years) are not well documented. In this study, we aimed to determine differences in risk factors and characteristics of melanoma between these groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study is a review on 330 patients, including 250 middle-aged and 80 young adults, during the period 2006-2016 in the Tampere university hospital, in Finland.

RESULTS

Forty-one per cent of middle-aged and 47% of young adults were defined as higher-risk patients. High nevus count was the most common host risk factor in both groups. Young were more likely to have a family history of melanoma. Middle-aged had more often excessive intermittent sun exposure and a history of sunburn. Host risk characteristics were less commonly associated with thicker melanomas.

CONCLUSION

A high number of patients have host risk factors for melanoma. Several differences exist in risk factors and characteristics of melanomas between young adults and middle-aged patients.

Clinical and Histologic Features of Multiple Primary Melanoma in a Series of 31 Patients

BACKGROUND

We reviewed all cases of multiple primary melanoma diagnosed at our department over a 32-year period (1987-2019) to better characterize this subgroup of patients and develop a tailored protocol to offer them closer follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, descriptive study of patients diagnosed with multiple primary melanoma at a tertiary care hospital between January 1987 and March 2019. We collected clinical, epidemiologic, and histologic characteristics of primary and subsequent melanomas and performed a descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (15 men and 16 women) with a median age of 67years (range, 36-85years) were included. Second primary melanomas were diagnosed after a median of 2years (range, 0-4years). The median number of melanomas per patient was 2 (range, 2-6). Twenty-three of the 31 patients, 25 had 2 primary melanomas (80%), 4 had 3 melanomas (13%), and 2 patients each had 5 and 6 primary melanomas. Subsequent melanomas were less invasive than the initial primary melanomas. Median Breslow thickness was 1mm (range, 0.67-4mm) for the first primary melanoma and 0.5mm (range, 0.32-2.42mm) for subsequent melanomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Subsequent melanomas are thinner than primary melanomas. We observed an increase in the number of cases of multiple primary melanoma diagnosed in the last 2years of our study. Our findings highlight the importance of close, long-term follow-up of patients.

High-Throughput Sequencing Identifies 3 Novel Susceptibility Genes for Hereditary Melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most aggressive human cancers due to its high invasiveness. Germline mutations in high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes have been associated with development hereditary melanoma; however, most genetic culprits remain elusive. To unravel novel susceptibility genes for hereditary melanoma, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on eight patients with multiple primary melanomas, high number of nevi, and negative for high and intermediate-risk germline mutations. Thirteen new potentially pathogenic variants were identified after bioinformatics analysis and validation. CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 were identified as the most promising susceptibility genes in hereditary melanoma. In silico analysis of CDH23 and ARHGEF40 variants provided clues for altered protein structure and function associated with the identified mutations. Then, we also evaluated the clinical value of CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 expression in sporadic melanoma by using the TCGA dataset (n = 461). No differences were observed in BRD9 expression between melanoma and normal skin samples, nor with melanoma stage, whereas ARHGEF40 was found overexpressed, and CDH23 was downregulated and its loss was associated with worse survival. Altogether, these results reveal three novel genes with clinical relevance in hereditary and sporadic melanoma.

Clinical histopathological features and CDKN2A/CDK4/MITF mutational status of patients with multiple primary melanomas from Bologna: Italy is a fascinating but complex mosaic

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma (cM) has increased in the last decades. Germline mutations in the high-penetrance melanoma susceptibility gene CDKN2A (Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) are associated with a younger age at diagnosis and an increased risk to develop pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with prior diagnosis of cM referring to our service from January 2005 to May 2017. The aim was to investigate the rate of multiple cMs (MPM), assessing their clinical/pathological features. Moreover, the genetic tests of patients who had undergone CDKN2A/CDKN2B, CDK4 and MITF screening were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients (9.26%) were diagnosed with MPMs: 70 males (60.87%) and 45 women (39.13%). 75 patients (43 males and 32 females) underwent genetic screening for germline mutations. The screening revealed that 4/75 patients (5.33%) were carriers of the non-synonymous missense variation c.442G>A (p.Ala148Thr) in CDKN2A exon 2 in heterozygosis, 3 of whom had at least one in-situ melanoma. In 1 patient (1.33%) we detected the variation c.249C>A, p.His83Gln in CDKN2A exon 2 in heterozygosis and in 1 patient (1.33%) the mutation c.952G>A (p.Glu318Lys) in MITF gene was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the need for a full body skin examination and a prolonged surveillance in patients affected by cM, as MPMs were detected in up to 10% of total cases in our series and synchronous lesions in 1/5. Moreover, it reflects the great variability of cM high-susceptibility genes mutational status within the Italian territory. Patients carrying c.952G>A (p.Glu318Lys) MITF mutation have a higher risk to develop a nodular cM.

Comparison of Survival Between Patients With Single vs Multiple Primary Cutaneous Melanomas

Importance

Melanoma is one of the most rapidly increasing forms of cancer worldwide. Most studies about survival among patients with melanoma consider only the primary tumor and disregard the potential effect of multiple primary tumors. A better understanding of the prognosis of patients with multiple primary melanoma is important for patient counselling and follow-up strategies.

Objective

To describe the epidemiologic features of multiple primary melanoma in patients from the Netherlands.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based cohort study included adults with histologically proven, primary, invasive cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, with a median follow-up of 75.1 months, using data from PALGA, the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology. Follow-up data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Statistical analysis was performed from August 1, 2018, to September 3, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A multivariable Cox model with a time-varying covariate was performed to assess overall survival between patients with a single primary melanoma vs those with multiple primary melanomas. Secondary outcomes included incidence of multiple primary melanoma, differences in Breslow thickness, and time between first and second multiple primary melanoma.

Results

Of the 56 929 study patients, 31 916 (56.1%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 56.4 (16.2) years. A total of 54 645 single primary melanomas and 4967 multiple primary melanomas in 2284 patients were included. The median Breslow thickness decreased from 0.90 mm (interquartile range, 0.55-1.70 mm) for the first melanoma to 0.65 mm (interquartile range, 0.45-1.10 mm) for the second melanoma (P < .001). For their second melanoma, 370 patients (16.2%) had a higher T stage, 1112 (48.7%) had the same T stage, and 802 (35.1%) had a lower T stage. In addition, 841 of 2284 second melanomas (36.8%) in patients with multiple primary melanomas were found during the first year of follow-up, whereas 624 of 2284 (27.3%) were found after 5 years of follow-up. These proportions did not vary when stratified for melanoma stage. Worse overall survival was seen among patients with multiple primary melanomas compared with patients with a single primary melanoma (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.20-1.42; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

A significant decrease in Breslow thickness between the first and second multiple primary melanoma was found, and overall survival among patients with multiple primary melanomas was significantly worse than that among patients with a single primary melanoma. These findings suggest that more strict follow-up strategies may be warranted for patients with multiple primary melanomas.

Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients with Multiple Primary Melanomas

The incidence and patient survival rates of melanoma have increased over the last several decades, with a growing population of patients who develop multiple primary melanomas (MPMs). To determine risk factors for developing MPMs and compare the survival of patients with MPMs to those with single primary melanomas, a prospective, multidisciplinary database of patients with melanoma at a single tertiary care institution was retrospectively reviewed. From 1985 to 2013, 6,963 patients with single primary melanomas and 305 patients with MPMs were identified. Mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 6.3 years for patients with single primary melanomas and 8.8 ± 5.9 years for patients with MPMs. Risk of developing multiple melanomas increased with age at diagnosis of first melanoma (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20 for a 10-year increase in age, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.29, P < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12-1.84, P = 0.005), and white race (HR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.45-6.51). Patients with invasive MPMs had increased risk of melanoma-specific death both before (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.0-2.2) and after adjusting for age, sex, site, race, family history of melanoma, personal history of other cancer, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) stage (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.95-2.2); however, this result did not reach statistical significance.