Lower Success Rate of Débridement and Implant Retention in Late Acute versus Early Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Staphylococcus spp. Results from a Matched Cohort Study

Early-Outcome Differences between Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections-A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are serious complications after arthroplasty, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and complex treatment processes. The outcomes of different PJI entities are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to access the early outcomes of different PJI entities. A retrospective, single-center study was conducted. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with PJI treated between 2018 and 2019 were evaluated 12 months after the completion of treatment. Primary endpoints were mortality, relapse free survival (RFS) and postoperative complications (kidney failure, sepsis, admission to ICU). A total of 115 cases were included [19.1% early (EI), 33.0% acute late (ALI), and 47.8% chronic infections (CI)]. Patients with ALI were older (p = 0.023), had higher ASA scores (p = 0.031), preoperative CRP concentrations (p = 0.011), incidence of kidney failure (p = 0.002) and sepsis (p = 0.026). They also tended towards higher in-house mortality (ALI 21.1%, 13.6% EI, 5.5% CI) and admission to ICU (ALI 50.0%, 22.7% EI, 30.9% CI). At 12 months, 15.4% of patients with EI had a relapse, compared to 38.1% in ALI and 36.4% in CI. There are differences in patient characteristics and early outcomes between PJI entities. Patients with EI have better early clinical outcomes. Patients with ALI require special attention during follow-up because they have higher occurrences of relapses and postoperative complications than patients with EI and CI.

Outcomes After Successful Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention Therapy for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Controversy surrounds debridement, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) for treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Data regarding DAIR's rate of infection resolution is variable with little investigation of functional outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 191 DAIR cases at a single institution from 2008 to 2020. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS) scores were collected. Patient Reported Outcome Scores were obtained from 60 cases. Median follow-up (IQR) was 4.5 (2.1 to 7.6) versus 3.0 (1.2 to 5.3) years for the control group. Mean scores were compared to a cohort of uncomplicated total knee arthroplasties matched by age, body mass index, and sex using generalized linear models adjusted for follow-up duration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves for PJI were constructed.

RESULTS

Mean Patient Reported Outcome Scores for the DAIR cohort were 57.2 ± 19.7 for KOOS-JR, 41.6 ± 7.1 for PROMIS physical health (PH), and 46.6 ± 8.7 for PROMIS mental health (MH). Mean control group values were 65.8 ± 21.0 for KOOS-JR, 44.6 ± 8.4 for PROMIS PH, and 49.2 ± 9.2 for PROMIS MH. No difference was observed in KOOS-JR (P = .83) or PROMIS MH (P = .11). PROMIS PH was lower in the DAIR cohort compared to the control group (P = .048). Median follow-up (years) for all 191 cases was 5.9 (range, 0.5 to 13.1). Survivorship (years) without subsequent operation for infection was 84% at 1, 82% at 2, and 79% at 5.

CONCLUSION

Knee and MH outcomes in successful DAIR procedures were similar to uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. DAIR's success rate was 79% in treating acute PJI at 5 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

High treatment failure rate in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection

Aims

A higher failure rate has been reported in haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to non-haematogenous PJI. The reason for this difference is unknown. We investigated the outcome of haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI to analyze the risk factors for failure in both groups of patients.

Methods

Episodes of knee or hip PJI (defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria) treated at our institution between January 2015 and October 2020 were included in a retrospective PJI cohort. Episodes with a follow-up of > one year were stratified by route of infection into haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI. Probability of failure-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between groups using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis was applied to assess risk factors for failure.

Results

A total of 305 PJI episodes (174 hips, 131 knees) were allocated to the haematogenous (n = 146) or the non-haematogenous group (n = 159). Among monomicrobial infections, Staphylococcus aureus was the dominant pathogen in haematogenous PJI (76/140, 54%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in non-haematogenous PJI (57/133, 43%). In both groups, multi-stage exchange (n = 55 (38%) in haematogenous and n = 73 (46%) in non-haematogenous PJI) and prosthesis retention (n = 70 (48%) in haematogenous and n = 48 (30%) in non-haematogenous PJI) were the most common surgical strategies. Median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 13.5 weeks (range, 0.5 to 218 weeks) and similar in both groups. After six years of follow-up, the probability of failure-free survival was significantly lower in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous PJI (55% vs 74%; p = 0.021). Infection-related mortality was significantly higher in haematogenous than non-haematogenous PJI (7% vs 0% episodes; p = 0.001). Pathogenesis of failure was similar in both groups. Retention of the prosthesis was the only independent risk factor for failure in multivariate analysis in both groups.

Conclusion

Treatment failure was significantly higher in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous PJI. Retention of the prosthesis was the only independent risk factor for failure in both groups.

Local Administration of Antibiotics in Orthopedics and Traumatology

2022 marks the 50th anniversary of the development of the antibiotic loaded PMMA chain. The loading of bone cements with antibiotics was a major advance in the treatment of musculoskeletal infections and is still a proven standard today. The research and use of novel antibiotic carriers continues to be an important part of research in the context of musculoskeletal infections. The article provides an overview of the various local antibiotics available and their specifics. In addition, current adapted treatment concepts are discussed.

Incidence, functional outcomes and cure rate of hematogenous infection in a 2,498 Total Knee Arthroplasties cohort

PURPOSE

The primary aim of the present study is to report the late acute hematogenous (LAH) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cure rate following Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated by means of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in a long-term follow-up. The secondary purpose is to report the functional outcomes at that follow-up and to compare them with a non-infected group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study cohort consists of 2,498 TKA performed from September 2005 to April 2010 that had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The diagnosis of PJI and classification into LAH was done in accordance with the Zimmerli criteria. The primary outcome was the failure rate, defined as death before the end of antibiotic treatment, a further surgical intervention for treatment of infection, life-long antibiotic suppressive treatment or chronic infection. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten patients were diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI during the study period (0.4%). All of them were managed with DAIR, which was performed by a knee surgeon and/or PJI surgeon. The failure rate was 0% at the 8.5-year (SD, 2.4) follow-up mark. The KSS score was 82.1 vs. 84.1 (p n.s.) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although the literature suggests that TKA DAIR for LAH periprosthetic joint infection is associated with high rates of failure, the results presented here suggest a high cure rate with good functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Debridement, antimicrobials, and implant retention in the treatment of late acute and early acute Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common microbe in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Debridement, antimicrobials, and implant retention (DAIR) are often-recommended treatment modality for acute PJIs, even though it has had relatively poor outcomes in some studies. In this study, we wanted to examine treatment results with a multidisciplinary team in a specialised centre and obtain further information for treatment decisions in acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs.

METHODS

All consecutive haematogenous late acute and postoperative early acute hip and knee Staphylococcus aureus PJIs treated with DAIR during 2011-2016 were included in this retrospective study. DAIR within three weeks from symptom onset and the exchange of modular parts were required.

RESULTS

Eighty-five acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs were treated with DAIR in 83 patients: 28 late acute and 57 early acute PJIs. The late acute PJI patients were older and had malignancies more often than the early acute PJI patients. Bacteraemia was present in 50.6% of Staphylococcus aureus PJI patients, more often in late acute (73.1%) than in early acute (40.4%) patients (p = .006). The implant was retained in 80.0%: 89.3% of the late acute and 75.4% of the early acute PJIs. In 17 joints, DAIR failed and the joint had to be removed. Fourteen of these joints were successfully replaced. One infection-related death occurred. The one-year all-cause mortality rate was 3.6%. Suppressive antimicrobial treatment was given to 22 (26.5%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Reasonably good treatment results for acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs are achievable by DAIR in a specialised centre with a strict treatment protocol and a multidisciplinary team. If the DAIR fails, a two-stage exchange is usually still possible, with good results.

Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

In severe cases of periprosthetic joint infection involving negative host-dependent factors, individual-based decisions between a curative therapy vs. salvage procedure are necessary. We aimed to review salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection cases, where a gold standard of a curative two-stage exchange can no longer be achieved. The options of knee arthrodesis, amputation, persistent fistula (stable drainage), or a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in late-onset cases are discussed, including lifelong antibiotic suppression alone.

METHODS

We focused on known salvage procedures for severe periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee, such as amputation, arthrodesis, antibiotic suppression, persistent fistula, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in late-stage infections, and the role of local antibiotics. The current literature regarding indications and outcomes was reviewed.

RESULTS

Whereas a successful single-stage above-knee amputation can be a curative effort in younger patients, this is associated with limited outcome in older patients, as the proportion who receive an exoprosthesis leading to independent mobility is low. Therefore, arthrodesis using an intramedullary modular nail is an option for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday life mobility, when revision total knee arthroplasty is not an option. Carrying out a persistent fistula using a stable drainage system, as well as a lifelong antibiotic suppression therapy, can be an option, in cases where no other surgery is possible. Active clinical surveillance should then be carried out. A debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in combination with local degradable antibiotics can be used and is an encouraging new option, but should not been carried out twice.

CONCLUSION

Whereas the gold standard in periprosthetic joint infection treatment of late infections remains the exchange of the prosthesis, salvage procedures should be considered in the cases of reduced life expectancy, several recurrences of the infection, patients having preference and negative host factors. In these cases, the appropriate salvage procedure can temporarily lead to remission of the infection and the possibility to maintain mobility.

Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Consecutive Series

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) represent a devastating consequence following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In this study, the authors describe a modified surgical technique developed to enhance the classical irrigation and debridement procedure (DAIR) to improve the possibilities of retaining an acutely infected TJA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This technique, debridement antibiotic pearls and retention of the implant (DAPRI), aims to remove the intra-articular biofilm allowing a higher and prolonged local antibiotic concentration by using calcium sulphate antibiotic-added beads in a setting of acute (<4 weeks from symptoms onset) PJI with pathogen identification. The combination of three different surgical techniques (tumor-like synovectomy, argon beam/acetic acid application and chlorhexidine gluconate brushing) aims to remove the bacterial biofilm from the implant without explanting the original hardware.

RESULTS

In total, 62 patients met the acute infection criteria (<4 weeks of symptoms); there were 57 males and five females. The patients' average age at the time of treatment was 71 years (62-77) and the average BMI was 37 kg/m². The micro-organism, always identified through synovial fluid analysis (culture, multiplex PCR or Next Generation Sequencing), was an aerobic Gram + in 76% (S. Coag-Neg 41%; S. aureus 16%), Gram-in 10% (E. coli 4%) and anaerobic Gram + in 4%. The DAPRI treatment was performed at an average of 3 days from symptoms onset (1-7 days). All patients underwent a 12-week course of post-operative antibiotic therapy (6 weeks I.V. and 6 weeks oral). All patients were available at the 2-year minimum FU (24-84 months). A total of 48 (77.5%) patients were infection-free at the final FU, while 14 patients underwent 2-stage revision for PJI recurrence. In total, four patients (6.4%) had a prolonged drainage from the wound after placement of the calcium sulphate beads.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the DAPRI technique could represent a valid alternative to the classic DAIR procedure. The current authors do not recommend this procedure outside of the main inclusive criteria (acute scenario micro-organism identification).

Poor outcome after debridement and implant retention for acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection: a cohort study of 43 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The management of acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (AHI) is challenging and the optimal treatment is not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of AHI, and secondarily to investigate potential risk factors that affect outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 43 consecutive AHIs in a total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2020 at a single center. We used the Delphi international consensus criteria to define infection. Patients were treated by either debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) (n = 25), implant exchange/removal (n = 15), or suppressive antibiotics only (n = 3). AHI was defined as abrupt symptoms of infection ≥ 3 months after implantation in an otherwise well-functioning arthroplasty.

RESULTS

AHI was most often caused by Staphylococcus aureus (16/43) and streptococcal species (13/43), but a broad spectrum of microbes were identified. 25 of 43 were treated with DAIR, with success in 10 of 25, which was significantly lower than in patients treated with removal of the implant with success in 14 of 15. S. aureus infection, knee arthroplasty, and implant age < 2 years were associated with treatment failure. The 2-year mortality rate was 8 of 43.

CONCLUSION

The outcome following DAIR in AHIs was poor. The majority of infections were caused by virulent microbes, and we found a high mortality rate. Removal of the implant should more often be considered.

[Update bone infections]

Bone and joint infections are becoming of great concern in an elderly population with growing numbers of prosthetic joints and comorbidities. This paper summarizes recently published literature on periprosthetic joint infections, vertebral osteomyelitis and diabetic foot infections. According to a new study, in the presence of a hematogenous periprosthetic infection and other inserted joint prostheses that are unremarkable on clinical examination, further invasive or imaging diagnostics may not be necessary. Periprosthetic infections that occur late (> 3 months after joint installation) have a worse outcome. New studies tried to identify factors when prosthesis preservation might still be an option. A new randomized landmark trial from France failed to show non-inferiority for 6 versus 12 weeks of therapy length. Thus, it can be assumed that this will currently become the standard therapy length for all surgical modalities (retention or replacement). Vertebral osteomyelitis is a rather rare bone infection, but the incidence has continued to rise sharply in recent years. A retrospective study from Korea provides information on the distribution of pathogens in different age groups and with selected comorbidities; this could help in the selection of an empiric therapy when pathogen identification is not successful before starting the treatment. The guidelines by the "International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)" have been updated with a slightly different classification. New practice recommendations of the German society of diabetology emphasize an early interdisciplinary interprofessional management. Empirical therapy continues to be based on the severity of the infection and other risk factors (such as previous therapies or ischemia). Microbiological diagnosis from tissue samples is described as superior to smears. According to a randomized pilot study, 3 weeks therapy length for osteomyelitis after debridement appears to be noninferior to 6 weeks.

Dalbavancin in Gram-positive periprosthetic joint infections

OBJECTIVES

The unique properties of dalbavancin (DAL) emphasize the need to explore its clinical benefits to treat periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The present study aimed to compare the treatment outcome of dalbavancin with Standard of Care (SoC) in hip and knee PJIs.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were selected for each group of this study based on our prospectively maintained PJI database. A 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed between patients who received at least two doses of dalbavancin and those who received SoC. Patients were matched based on demographics, joint, patient risk factors, Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, surgical management and type of infection. Treatment outcome was evaluated considering re-infection and re-revision rates, safety and tolerability of dalbavancin after a minimum of 1 year follow-up.

RESULTS

Infection eradication was achieved in 69 (77.5%) and 66 (74.2%) patients of the DAL and SoC groups, respectively. Thirteen (14.6%) patients in the DAL group and 12 (13.5%) patients in the SoC group had an infection-related re-revision. The most prevalent microorganisms among the two groups were Staphylococcus epidermidis (32.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.8%) and Cutibacterium spp. (11.3%). There were significantly less Gram-positive bacteria (P = 0.03) detected in patients who received dalbavancin (17.4%) treatment compared with those treated with SoC (48.0%) in culture-positive re-revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin treatment for Gram-positive PJIs resulted in a similar outcome to SoC, with excellent safety and low rate of adverse effects. Dalbavancin seems to be a promising antimicrobial against PJIs by reducing the risk of Gram-positive re-infections and allowing a less frequent dosage with potential outpatient IV treatment.

Outcomes of Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in a High-Volume Arthroplasty Centre

PURPOSE

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a devastating diagnosis. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a preferred treatment modality for acute PJI. A retrospective analysis of infected primary arthroplasties to evaluate the success of DAIR and factors influencing its outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at our unit between 2010 and 2018. Patients who underwent revision surgery as an index procedure, arthroscopic washout and those with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as revision arthroplasty for recurrence of infection within 2 years of the index procedure. Chi-square and Fischer's exact test were used to compare between patient factors and DAIR outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to analyse implant survivorship following DAIR.

RESULTS

Of the sixty patients (40 knees, 20 hips) who underwent DAIR, eighteen (13 knees, 5 hips) required revision arthroplasty within 2 years accounting for a success rate of 70%. Predictive factors for revision were American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score of greater than 2 (p = 0.021), BMI > 35 (p = 0.046), C Reactive protein (CRP) > 200 mg/L (p = 0.007) and Staphylococcus aureus growth (p = 0.012). The five-year survival rate for DAIR was 70%, which remained constant after two years from DAIR.

CONCLUSION

Success rate of DAIR in PJI was 70% which was comparable to similar studies in the literature. ASA > 2, BMI > 35, CRP > 200 and staphylococcus aureus growth were predictors for DAIR failure. Implant survival rate and duration were better following DAIR in early-onset PJI.

Does Preoperative Glycemic Control Restore Immune Defense Against Implant-related Infection in Mice With Diabetes?

BACKGROUND

The presence of Type II diabetes is a well-established risk factor for bone and joint infection, especially in patients with poor glycemic control. However, few studies have investigated the effect of the duration of preoperative glycemic intervention. For patients with poor glycemic control, the effect of the duration of preoperative glycemic intervention remains unknown. Many glycemic biomarkers including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol have different response rates to glycemic change. It is unclear which biomarker is more closely related to the decrease in infection proportion after preoperative glycemic intervention.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there an effect of the duration of preoperative insulin therapy in mice with diabetes receiving an experimental intra-articular implant? (2) Of the three commonly used biomolecules for monitoring blood glucose levels (HbA1c, fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol), is one more closely related to decrease in infection proportion after presurgical insulin therapy?

METHODS

With a well-established protocol, Type II diabetes was modeled in female 10-week-old C57BL/6 mice by maintaining them on a high-fat diet (60% fat) for 8 months; control mice without diabetes received a normal low-fat diet (10% fat). Mice with Type II diabetes were randomized into groups to receive preoperative glycemic intervention with insulin for 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, or 28 days, and investigators were blinded to the randomization. Mice with and without diabetes then received a surgically inserted wire into the femoral canal in a retrograde fashion and received a local or systemic challenge with Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli (n = 20 for each bacteria challenge [systemic or local]/timepoint). The proportion of culture-positive joint samples was calculated. An additional 10 mice with Type II diabetes were treated with insulin for 28 days and the HbA1c, fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol levels were consecutively monitored. Fisher exact tests and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to analyze the different between different groups, with p < 0.05 taken as significant.

RESULTS

When insulin therapy was administered, the proportion of bone and joint infections decreased in mice with Type II diabetes, reaching asymptotic levels after 3 days of treatment for the systemic (S. aureus: 7 of 20 mice with diabetes on 3-day therapy, p < 0.001; 8 of 20 on 5-day, p = 0.002; 10 of 20 on 7-day, p = 0.01; 9 of 20 on 14-day, p = 0.006; and 8 of 20 on 28-day, p = 0.002 versus 18 of 20 in the no insulin therapy group; E. coli: 6 of 20 on 3-day therapy, p = 0.004; 7 of 20 on 5-day, p = 0.01; 7 of 20 on 7-day, p = 0.01; 6 of 20 on 14-day, p = 0.004; and 7 of 20 on 28-day, p = 0.01 versus 16 of 20 in the no insulin therapy group) or local bacterial challenge (S. aureus: 11 of 20 on 3-day therapy, p = 0.001; 12 of 20 on 5-day, p = 0.003; 10 of 20 on 7-day, p < 0.001; 12 of 20 on 14-day, p = 0.003; and 13 of 20 on 28-day, p = 0.008 versus 20 of 20 in the no insulin therapy group; E. coli: 10 of 20 on 3-day therapy, p = 0.003; 10 of 20 on 5-day, p = 0.003; 9 of 20 on 7-day, p = 0.001; 11 of 20 on 14-day, p = 0.008; and 10 of 20 on 28-day, p = 0.003 versus 19 of 20 in no insulin therapy group). Even after 28 days of insulin therapy, the proportion of bone and joint infections was still higher (statistically insignificant with large absolute difference, except for one instance) in mice with diabetes than in control mice without diabetes after systemic (S. aureus: 8 of 10 mice with diabetes on 28-day therapy versus 4 of 20 mice without diabetes, p = 0.30; E. coli: 7 of 20 on 28-day therapy versus 1 of 20 mice without diabetes, p = 0.04) or local challenge (S. aureus: 13 of 20 mice on 28-day therapy versus 8 of 20 mice without diabetes, p = 0.21; E. coli: 10 of 20 on 28-day therapy versus 5 of 20 mice without diabetes, p = 0.19). HbA1c and fructosamine levels were lagging indicators of the decrease in infection proportion after insulin treatment. In contrast, the 1,5-anhydroglucitol level increased quickly (reflecting lower blood glucose levels) in response to short-term glycemic control. Moreover, the time required for changes in 1,5-anhydroglucitol levels to be detected was no more than 3 days (3 days insulin therapy 1.86 ± 0.20 [95% CI -1.27 to -0.45]; p˂0.001 versus no insulin therapy 1.00 ± 0.11).

CONCLUSION

In a model of mice with Type II diabetes, prolonged preoperative glycemic intervention did not further reduce the proportion of bone and joint infections compared with that achieved with short-term intervention of 3 days.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Compared with HbA1c and fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitol might be a better indicator for risk stratification and guiding the timing for elective surgery. Comparative study of these three biomarkers based on patient samples is warranted to further confirm this conclusion.

Outcome and failure analysis of 132 episodes of haematogenous periprosthetic joint infections – a cohort study

Background

Outcome of haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and reasons for failure are largely unknown.

Methods

Outcome of consecutive patients with haematogenous PJI treated at our institution between 2010 and 2019 was evaluated. Failure was classified as persistence or relapse of infection or new infection. Failure-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Proportions between groups were compared with Fisher's exact test.

Results

132 haematogenous PJI episodes involving knee (n=76), hip (n=54), shoulder (n=1) or elbow (n=1) prostheses experienced by 110 patients were included. Median follow-up was 20.7 months (range, 0.2-89.9 months). Haematogenous PJI were caused by Staphylococcus aureus (n=49), Streptococcus spp. (n=36), Enterococcus faecalis (n=17), Enterobacterales (n=16), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=9) and others (n=6). Debridement and implant retention were performed in 50 (38%), prosthesis exchange or removal in 79 (60%) and no surgery in 3 episodes (2%). Treatment failed in 42 episodes (32%), including 6 infection-related deaths. Among 36 non-fatal failures, 21 were caused by a new pathogen and 8 by the same pathogen, in 7 episodes no pathogen was isolated. Of all non-fatal failures, 19 (53%) PJI were of haematogenous origin. Identification of the primary focus, causative pathogen and CRIME80-Score did not influence treatment outcome, but failure rate was higher following prosthesis retention compared to multi-stage exchange.

Conclusions

Persistence-/relapse-free survival after treatment of haematogenous PJI was high (84%). New haematogenous PJI due to the same or a new pathogen occurred frequently, reducing the treatment success to 62% after 4 years of follow-up, suggesting an individual predisposition to haematogenous PJI. The outcome was similar for different pathogens, but worse in episodes treated with prosthesis retention compared to multi-stage exchange.

Irrigation and Debridement With Implant Retention: Does Chronicity of Symptoms Matter?

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a rare, yet devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chronic infection is generally considered a contraindication to debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); however, outcomes stratified by chronicity have not been well documented.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all DAIR cases performed at a single institution from 2008 to 2015 was performed. Chronicity of PJI was categorized as acute postoperative, chronic, or acute hematogenous. Failure after DAIR, defined as re-revision for infection recurrence with the same organism, was evaluated between the 3 chronicity groups at 90 days as well as at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 248 patients undergoing DAIR for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty PJI were included. Categorization of PJI was acute (acute postoperative) in 59 cases (24%), chronic in 54 (22%), and acute hematogenous in 135 (54%). DAIR survivorship was 47% (range 0.3-10 years). Overall, there were 118 (47.6%) treatment failures after DAIR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. There was no difference in failure rate between total hip or total knee arthroplasty patients (P = .07). Patients infected with Staphylococcus conferred a higher risk of failure for all DAIR procedures regardless of chronicity category.

CONCLUSION

Identification of microbial species prior to undertaking DAIR may be more clinically relevant than stratification according to chronicity category when considering treatment options.

Current Insights in the Evaluation and Treatment of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty is a widely successful procedure, but a small percentage of patients have a postoperative course complicated by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJI is a difficult problem to diagnose and to treat, and the management of PJI differs, depending on the acuity of the infection. This paper discusses the established and newer technologies developed for the diagnosis of PJI as well as different treatment considerations and surgical solutions currently available.

[Septic revision arthroplasty: how to confirm diagnosis, plan surgery and manage follow-up treatment]

BACKGROUND

Septic revision arthroplasty represents an interdisciplinary challenge in terms of diagnosis as well as surgical and follow-up treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

The implementation of a standardized diagnostic algorithm including anamnesis, clinic, imaging, blood sampling and joint aspiration is essential. Depending on the duration of the symptoms acute (< 3 weeks) and chronic (> 3 weeks) infections are distinguished.

THERAPY

While acute infections show an immature biofilm and can usually be addressed surgically via debridement and changing the mobile parts, chronic infections almost always require a complete change of the implant. This can be done in one or two stages, depending on the general condition of the patient, the pathogen, its resistances as well as the wound conditions. The surgical revision is always followed by a resistance-based antibiotic treatment.

Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with debridement, antibiotics, and retention of the implant (DAIR) often results in failure. An important evidence gap concerns the treatment with rifampicin for PJI. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the outcome of staphylococcal hip and/or knee PJI after DAIR, focused on the role of rifampicin. Studies published until September 2, 2020 were included. Success rates were stratified for type of joint and type of micro-organism. Sixty-four studies were included. The pooled risk ratio for rifampicin effectiveness was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.22). The pooled success rate was 69% for Staphylococcus aureus hip PJI, 54% for S aureus knee PJI, 83% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) hip PJI, and 73% for CNS knee PJI. Success rates for MRSA PJI (58%) were similar to MSSA PJI (60%). The meta-analysis indicates that rifampicin may only prevent a small fraction of all treatment failures.

Controversy about the Role of Rifampin in Biofilm Infections: Is It Justified?

Rifampin is a potent antibiotic against staphylococcal implant-associated infections. In the absence of implants, current data suggest against the use of rifampin combinations. In the past decades, abundant preclinical and clinical evidence has accumulated supporting its role in biofilm-related infections.In the present article, experimental data from animal models of foreign-body infections and clinical trials are reviewed. The risk for emergence of rifampin resistance and multiple drug interactions are emphasized. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing no beneficial effect of rifampin in patients with acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection treated with prosthesis retention is critically reviewed and data interpreted. Given the existing strong evidence demonstrating the benefit of rifampin, the conduction of an adequately powered RCT with appropriate definitions and interventions would probably not comply with ethical standards.

One-year infection control rates of a DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure after primary and prosthetic-joint-infection-related revision arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study

Introduction: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedures are effective treatments for acute postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infections. However, literature reporting on the effectiveness of DAIR procedures performed after a one- or two-stage revision because of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (PJI-related revision arthroplasty) is scarce. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the infection control after 1 year of a DAIR procedure in the case of an early postoperative infection either after primary arthroplasty or after PJI-related revision arthroplasty. Materials and methods: All patients treated with a DAIR procedure within 3 months after onset of PJI between 2009 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Data were collected on patient and infection characteristics. All infections were confirmed by applying the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2014 criteria. The primary outcome was successful control of infection at 1 year after a DAIR procedure, which was defined as the absence of clinical signs, such as pain, swelling, and erythema; radiological signs, such as protheses loosening; or laboratory signs, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) ( < 10 ) with no use of antibiotic therapy. Results: Sixty-seven patients were treated with a DAIR procedure (41 hips and 26 knees). Successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after primary arthroplasty ( n = 51 ) and after prior PJI-related revision arthroplasty ( n = 16 ) were 69 % and 56 %, respectively ( p = 0.38 ). The successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after an early acute infection ( n = 35 ) and after a hematogenous infection ( n = 16 ) following primary arthroplasty were both 69 % ( p = 1.00 ). Conclusion: In this limited study population, no statistically significant difference is found in infection control after 1 year between DAIR procedures after primary arthroplasty and PJI-related revision arthroplasty.

Risk factors affect success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in periprosthetic joint infection

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most devastating complication of joint replacement that seriously affects the quality of life and causes a heavy burden to the families and society. Due to shorter hospital stays, lower costs, improved joint function and less morbidity, a process of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is recommended as the preferred treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection. However, the factors that impact the success rate of DAIR remain controversial. This article evaluates the influential factors of DAIR and provides insights for orthopaedics surgeons to make optimal decisions to improve the success rate of DAIR.

Conclusion

The poor general condition of patients, high preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level, repeated joint surgeries, and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections may be associated with lower DAIR success rate. To the contrary, early surgery, radical debridement, exchange of removable components, washing with iodine and vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) may improve the success rate of DAIR. A sinus tract may not be absolutely contraindicated, but surgeons should treat it with caution. As there is no consensus on many issues, more high-quality research is required.

Similar risk of complete revision for infection with single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 242,179 patients

Background and purpose - The optimal type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee are subject to debate. We compared the risk of complete revision (obtained by a 1- or 2-stage procedure) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between patients receiving a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics and patients receiving multiple doses of antibiotics for prevention of PJI. Patients and methods - A cohort of 130,712 primary total hip and 111,467 knee arthroplasties performed between 2011 and 2015 in the Netherlands was analyzed. We linked data from the Dutch arthroplasty register to a survey collected across all Dutch institutions on hospital-level antibiotic prophylaxis policy. We used restricted cubic spline Poisson models adjusted for hospital clustering to compare the risk of revision for infection according to type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis received. Results - For total hip arthroplasties, the rates of revision for infection were 31/10,000 person-years (95% CI 28-35), 39 (25-59), and 23 (15-34) in the groups that received multiple doses of cefazolin, multiple doses of cefuroxime, and a single dose of cefazolin, respectively. The rates for knee arthroplasties were 27/10,000 person-years (95% CI 24-31), 40 (24-62), and 24 (16-36). Similar risk of complete revision for infection among antibiotic prophylaxis regimens was found when adjusting for confounders. Interpretation - In a large observational cohort we found no apparent association between the type or duration of antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of complete revision for infection. This does question whether there is any advantage to the use of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis beyond a single dose.

Rare Occurrence of Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection Due to Fusobacterium Nucleatum in the Background of a Dental Procedure: A Case Report

Objective

Fusobacterium nucleatum is an anaerobic gram‐negative bacilli that is one of the oral and other mucosal surface microbiota. It involves a wide range of human diseases and was first found in periodontal diseases, but reports of bone‐related infections caused by F. nucleatum are rare, especially periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Methods

Here, we present the first case of acute hematogenous PJI of the hip joint caused by F. nucleatum, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) was performed.

Results

The patient was successfully treated with DAIR, identification of isolates by metagenomics next‐generation sequencing was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction.

Conclusions

For stable acute hematogenous PJI after hip replacement, quick and accurate diagnosis, the identification of pathogenic microorganisms, and the use of DAIR combined with sufficient sensitive antibiotics have a certain clinical effect and can achieve the purpose of both preserving the prosthesis and infection control.

Prosthetic joint infection. A relevant public health issue

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common complication of the knee and hip arthroplasty and represents a huge challenge for physicians. PJI raises serious social, economic and clinical concerns in the public health that need a comprehensive approach to better focus on proven strategies for disease prevention and treatment. History and clinical signs on joint site are useful means for suspecting PJI that need to be confirmed through major and minor diagnostic criteria. The pathogen isolation and the resulting antibiogram are crucial to guide the correct antibiotic strategy and together with surgical treatment (prosthesis revision and spacer implantation) represent the cornerstones to eradicate the infection before attempting a new arthroplasty. External fixator with removal of the spacer may be an option before performing a new arthroplasty when the infection does not heal. Arthrodesis may also be considered if the arthroplasty is contraindicated. Limb amputation is the last chance when pathogen eradication failed and might lead to life-threatening situations.