Pitfalls of PRAME Immunohistochemistry in a Large Series of Melanocytic and Nonmelanocytic Lesions With Literature Review

BRCA1-associated-protein-1 inactivated melanocytic tumours: characterisation of the clinicopathological spectrum and immunohistochemical expression pattern of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma

AIMS

BRCA1-associaed protein-1 (BAP1) inactivated tumours (BIMT) are rare melanocytic tumours that may be mistaken for Spitz tumours or melanoma. They occur sporadically or in association with the BAP1 tumour predisposition syndrome (BAP1-TPDS), which may be complicated by uveal or cutaneous melanoma, mesothelioma, basal cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. The aim of this study was to characterise the clinicopathological features and the immunohistochemical expression pattern of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) of BIMT in a large patient cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ethical approval was obtained, haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were reviewed, PRAME immunohistochemistry was performed and clinical follow-up was obtained from patient records. Sixty-five BIMT from 38 patients (F:M = 4.4:1) were identified. BIMT were typically located on the trunk and head and neck (median size = 0.5 cm). Seven patients with BAP1-TPDS (range = 16-66 years, median = 25) had multiple BIMT (median = 5), while sporadic BIMT were solitary (median patient age = 39 years). One of seven patients with BAP1-TPDS developed additional malignancies (mesothelioma and cutaneous spindle cell melanoma) and died of complications of mesothelioma. All other patients are alive without recurrence of BIMT (median follow-up = 42 months). BIMT presented as intradermal, nodular aggregates of epithelioid melanocytes with low mitotic activity and moderate to severe cytological atypia in 63% of cases. A background conventional naevus was present in 64%. PRAME immunohistochemistry showed negative or weakly patchy positive staining in all BIMT.

CONCLUSIONS

BIMT are more common in a sporadic setting and behave indolently, despite worrying cytological atypia. PRAME immunohistochemistry is a reassuring tool in distinguishing BIMT from melanoma.

Subungual melanoma: molecular analysis of 31 cases from early stage to invasive melanoma

AIMS

The distinction between the benign subungual melanocytic lesions and an early lesion of subungual melanoma (SUM) remains a diagnostic challenge. We evaluated the routine diagnostic utility of array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) to detect whole-genome copy number variations (CNV) as well as targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in SUM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective study included 20 cases of in situ SUM and 11 cases of invasive SUM. Analysis by aCGH detected common oncogene amplifications in all but one case of invasive SUM (n = 10) and in all cases of in situ SUM with a melanocyte count (MC) >45/mm (n = 4 true positive) and the average number of CNV was 8.5. Thirteen remaining cases of in situ SUM gave false negative results (n = 13), owing to a lack of sufficient melanocytes to analyse (median MC of 35.35; range: 10.16-39.5). Molecular analysis failed in four cases (three in situ SUM and one invasive SUM) due to insufficient amounts of DNA. Across the whole cohort, the sensitivity of aCGH was 52%, but when adjusting the cutoff to MC >45/mm, the sensitivity was 93%. Targeted NGS was less informative than aCGH analyses in our series of SUM.

CONCLUSION

To distinguish malignant from benign lesions, especially in situ SUM versus atypical lentiginous melanocytic proliferations, aCGH analysis should be performed when the MC is above 45 melanocytes per linear millimetre. This pangenomic method can detect oncogene amplifications, as well as a number of CNV >3, which strongly support the diagnosis of malignancy.

Appropriate Statistical Methods to Assess Cross-study Diagnostic 23-Gene Expression Profile Test Performance for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Comparing studies of molecular ancillary diagnostic tests for difficult-to-diagnose cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms presents a methodological challenge, given the disparate ways accuracy metrics are calculated. A recent report by Boothby-Shoemaker et al investigating the real-world accuracy of the 23-gene expression profile (23-GEP) test highlights this methodological difficulty, reporting lower accuracy than previously observed. However, their calculation method-with indeterminate test results defined as either false positive or false negative-was different than those used in previous studies. We corrected for these differences and recalculated their reported accuracy metrics in the same manner as the previous studies to enable appropriate comparison with previously published reports. This corrected analysis showed a sensitivity of 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.1%-100%) and specificity of 94.4% (91.6%-96.9%). We then compared these results directly to previous studies with >25 benign and >25 malignant cases with outcomes and/or concordant histopathological diagnosis by ≥3 dermatopathologists. All studies assessed had enrollment imbalances of benign versus malignant patients (0.8-7.0 ratio), so balanced cohorts were resampled according to the lowest common denominator to calculate point estimates and CIs for accuracy metrics. Overall, we found no statistically significant differences in the ranges of 23-GEP sensitivity, 90.4%-96.3% (95% CI, 80.8%-100%), specificity, 87.3%-96.2% (78.2%-100%), positive predictive value, 88.5%-96.1% (81.5%-100%), or negative predictive value, 91.1%-96.3% (83.6%-100%) between previous studies and the cohort from Boothby-Shoemaker et al with this unified methodological approach. Rigorous standardization of calculation methods is necessary when the goal is direct cross-study comparability.

PRAME Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) immunohistochemistry has proven helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign melanocytic tumors. We studied PRAME IHC expression in 46 thin melanomas and 39 melanocytic nevi, mostly dysplastic nevi. Twenty-six percent (26.09%) of the melanomas showed diffuse PRAME staining in over 76% of the tumor cells (4+), and 34.78% of the melanomas showed PRAME expression in over 51% of the tumor cells (3+ or 4+), while 8% were entirely negative for PRAME. No melanocytic nevi were PRAME 4+ or 3+. More than half of the nevi (64%) were entirely negative for PRAME staining, and 36% of the nevi showed staining expression in 1-25% (1+) or 26-50% of the cells (2+). No nevi were stained with a color intensity of 3, while 16.67% of the melanomas were stained with this color intensity. Most nevi (78.57%) were stained with an intensity of 1. With a lower positivity threshold, sensitivity increases with still reasonable specificity. The best accuracy was obtained for the 2+ positivity threshold. In conclusion, PRAME staining helps distinguish thin melanomas from dysplastic nevi. However, the threshold of positivity should be lowered in order not to miss thin melanomas.

Characterization of PRAME immunohistochemistry reveals lower expression in pediatric melanoma compared to adult melanoma

Pediatric melanomas are rare tumors that have clinical and histological differences from adult melanomas. In adult melanoma, the immunohistochemical marker PRAME is increasingly employed as a diagnostic adjunct. PRAME is also under investigation as a target structure for next-generation immunotherapies including T-cell engagers. Little is known about the characteristics of PRAME expression in pediatric melanoma. In this retrospective study, samples from 25 pediatric melanomas were compared with control groups of melanomas in young adults (18-30 years; n = 32), adult melanoma (>30 years, n = 30), and benign melanocytic nevi in children (0-18 years; n = 30) with regard to the immunohistochemical expression of PRAME (diffuse PRAME expression >75%/absolute expression). Pediatric melanomas show lower diffuse PRAME expression (4%) and lower absolute PRAME expression (25%) compared to young adult melanomas (15.6%/46.8%) and adult melanomas (50%/70%). A significant age-dependent expression could be observed. An analysis of event-free survival shows no prognostic role for PRAME in pediatric melanoma and young adult melanoma, but a significant association with diffuse PRAME expression in adulthood. The age dependency of PRAME expression poses a potential pitfall in the diagnostic application of melanocytic tumors in young patients and may limit therapeutic options within this age group. The immunohistochemical expression of the tumor-associated antigen PRAME is an increasingly important diagnostic marker for melanocytic tumors and is gaining attention as a possible immunotherapeutic target in melanoma. As the available data primarily stem from adult melanoma, and given the clinical and histological distinctions in pediatric melanomas, our understanding of PRAME expression in this specific patient group remains limited. The age-dependent low PRAME expression shown here constrains the use of this marker in pediatric melanoma and may also limit the use of immunotherapeutic strategies against PRAME in young patients.

A rare case of multifocal craniospinal leptomeningeal melanocytoma: A case report and scoping review

Introduction

Leptomeningeal melanocytomas are rare tumours originating from neural crest derived melanocytes. They are usually solitary and presentation with multifocal meningeal melanocytoma is very rare and indicative of potentially more aggressive behaviour. This case report and scoping review sought to evaluate the presentation, and key radiological features that can help differentiate multifocal meningeal melanocytoma from other differentials and provide a discussion of the key management and prognostic points once these tumours are diagnosed.

Case presentation

A 26 year old male presented with neck pain radiating to both shoulders and subjective weakness in left shoulder movement. MRI demonstrated a large enhancing C2-C3 intradural-extramedullary lesion with further lesions at the T7/T8 level, left cerebellopontine angle and midline suprachiasmatic region. Whilst the imaging appearances were initially thought be indicative of a phacomatosis such as NF2-related schwannomatosis, surgical excision of the cervical tumour confirmed a melanocytic tumour of leptomeningeal origin, consistent with multifocal meningeal melanocytoma. Patient made a good post-operative recovery and remains under half yearly radiological surveillance, with repeat MRI 6 months after surgery demonstrating subtle growth of the untreated intracranial and spinal lesions.

Literature review and conclusions

This is the first description, to our knowledge, of a multifocal meningeal melanocytoma associated with both cerebellopontine angle and suprasellar lesions. This case and included scoping review highlight the need to consider this rare diagnosis whenever multifocal craniospinal lesions are encountered, and the need to consider aggressive management through surgical resection and adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy once these tumours are diagnosed.