Surveillance of Duodenal Polyposis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Should the Spigelman Score Be Modified?

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes: Small Bowel Cancer Risk and Endoscopic Surveillance Strategies

Background: Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Lynch syndrome (LS), and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), are associated with an increased risk of small bowel cancer (SBC). Due to the low incidence and non-specific presentation of SBC, effective surveillance strategies are essential for early detection and management. This review aims to evaluate and compare current endoscopic techniques for small bowel surveillance in these patients. Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies sourced from PubMed. Various endoscopic modalities, including capsule endoscopy (CE), device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), and intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE), were assessed for their diagnostic yield, safety, and clinical utility. Surveillance recommendations of the different syndromes were also examined. Results: CE offers high sensitivity but lacks histological sampling capability. DAE, including double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), enables direct visualization, biopsy, and therapeutic interventions, albeit with greater procedural complexity. In FAP, duodenal surveillance follows the Spigelman classification to stratify cancer risk, while jejunal and ileal polyps remain less studied. LS patients have an increased SBC risk, warranting tailored endoscopic approaches. In PJS, surveillance aims to mitigate intussusception risks and allow early malignancy detection. Conclusions: Optimized surveillance strategies in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes require a multimodal approach, integrating advanced endoscopic techniques with genetic risk stratification. Centralized care in tertiary centers improves outcomes by ensuring standardized surveillance protocols and enhancing early cancer detection. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to CE and DAE is shaping promising prospects for the future surveillance of small bowel polyps by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing the duration of the diagnostic process. Further research should investigate AI-assisted imaging and molecular biomarkers to optimize screening strategies.

Thirty-year compliance with a surveillance program for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis is an inherited genetic disorder responsible for multiple anomalies. Lifelong surveillance protocols are essential to detect and prevent adverse developments. However, limited data exist regarding the long-term feasibility of such programs. This study aims to evaluate the compliance with a surveillance program for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The study collated data from all patients who underwent surgery between January 1981 and December 1993, excluding non-French residents. Recorded characteristics included medical history, follow-up results, the indications for operations or other procedures, outcomes of these interventions, and patient status at the end of the follow-up period. One hundred and sixty-four patients were enrolled, comprising 86 females (52.4%). The median age at the time of colorectal resection was 29.6 years [10-67]. Thirty-six (22.0%) were diagnosed with cancer at the time of their surgery. Fifty-eight patients (35.3%) passed away at a median age of 52 years [18-95]. During the follow-up period, 47 patients developed duodenal or reservoir adenomas requiring invasive procedures, or desmoid tumors necessitating treatment. After a possible 30 years of follow-up, 49 survivors (46.2%) are still under observation, while 57 (53.8%) have been lost to follow-up. After 30 years of follow-up, the survival rate was 74.2% for patients who remained under observation, but only 58.2% for those lost to follow-up. Long-term follow-up of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis is associated with a high rate of loss to follow-up. However, those who remain under observation maintain an excellent prognosis. Understanding the reasons for loss to follow-up is challenging but may help in reducing this high attrition rate.

Endoscopic indicators in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing duodenal resections - a nationwide Danish cohort study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) predisposes individuals to duodenal adenomas. This study describes the histopathological features of endoscopic and surgical specimens from the duodenum, as well as genotype-phenotype associations.

METHODS

All known FAP patients were included from the Danish Polyposis Register. FAP patients were defined as having more than 100 cumulative colorectal adenomas and/or having a known germline pathogenic variant in the APC gene. Endoscopic procedures, histopathology, and genetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 500 FAP patients, 70.6% underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at least once. Of these, 59.2% presented with detectable duodenal adenomas. The most severe morphology was tubular in 62.7% patients, tubulovillous in 25.4%, and villous in 12.0%, while the most severe dysplasia was low-grade in 67.5% patients, high-grade in 25.4%, and 6.7% had adenocarcinoma. In 6.2% of FAP patients, duodenal resection was recommended, including 29% with duodenal adenocarcinoma. The risk of duodenal surgery was 1.31 per 1,000 person-years (median age: 53 years). The predominant reason for surgery was extensive polyposis (67.7%). Of the patients who underwent duodenal resection, a median of six (IQR: 4-8) EGDs were performed within five years prior to surgery, but 67.6% and 83.9% never underwent a duodenal polypectomy or endoscopic mucosa resection, respectively. Of note, seventeen of 500 patients (3.4%) developed duodenal adenocarcinoma, of which 47% were advanced at diagnosis. Genetic evaluations revealed various pathogenic variants in the APC gene, with no strong genotype-phenotype association.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of duodenal adenomas and cancer in FAP warrants vigilant endoscopic surveillance. Nevertheless, the need for duodenal surgery persists and should together with endoscopic practice be monitored in national registers.

Impact of Endoscopic Treatment in Severe Duodenal Polyposis: A National Study in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop duodenal adenomas with a risk of progression to duodenal cancer. Endoscopic management of FAP duodenal adenomas has been proposed as a less-invasive option than surgery, but available data still are limited. Our aims were to assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic treatment in duodenal polyposis and to evaluate its long-term efficacy in terms of recurrence and malignant degeneration.

METHODS

FAP patients with stage IV duodenal polyposis were enrolled in 5 French centers as part of a national cohort and followed up for a median period of 5.66 years (interquartile range, 6.39 y). Primary outcomes were duodenal surgery-free and cancer-free survival. Two groups of patients were identified according to endoscopic procedures: group 1: resection and or destruction (by argon plasma coagulation) of duodenal polyps, and group 2: papillectomy.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled (29 men; median age, 44 y). Endoscopic therapy was performed in 37 patients in group 1 and in 19 patients in group 2. Duodenal cancer-free and surgery-free survival were 95.8% at 5 years and 92.6% at 10 years. Four patients required surgery and 2 patients developed cancers. In the 58 patients, the calculated Spigelman score decreased from 9.24 points at entry to 6.35 at 5 years and then plateaued. Complications (mostly bleeding and perforation) occurred in 20 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term cohort follow-up evaluation, endoscopic treatment of patients with severe duodenal polyposis appears relatively safe and effective as an alternative to surgery for the prevention of cancer.

The Spigelman Staging System and the Risk of Duodenal and Papillary Cancer in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have an almost 20% lifetime risk of duodenal adenocarcinoma, currently the leading cause of death in FAP. The Spigelman staging system provides guidance on the surveillance intervals and timing of prophylactic surgery. Still, its accuracy in predicting duodenal and papillary cancer development has not been systematically evaluated. We investigated the sensitivity and cancer risk of the Spigelman stages.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane and used a random-effects model to pool effect sizes.

RESULTS

After removing duplicate entries, we screened 1,170 records and included 27 studies for quantitative analysis. Once duodenal polyposis reaches Spigelman stage IV, the risk of duodenal and papillary cancers increased to 25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12%-45%). However, the sensitivity of Spigelman stage IV for these cancers was low (51%, 95% CI 42%-60%), especially for papillary adenocarcinoma (39%, 95% CI 16%-68%). We investigated the reasons behind these low values and observed that duodenal cancer risk factors included polyps >10 mm, polyp count >20, and polyps with high-grade dysplasia. Risk factors associated with papillary cancer included a papilla with high-grade dysplasia or >10 mm. The evidence on other risk factors was inconclusive.

DISCUSSION

The current Spigelman staging system had a low sensitivity for duodenal and papillary adenocarcinomas. Two Spigelman variables (duodenal villous histology and polyp count) and the lack of papilla-specific variables likely contributed to the low sensitivity values for duodenal and papillary cancers, respectively. While clinicians may be familiar with its current form, there is an urgent need to update it.

[Results of Endoscopic Screening and Therapy of the Duodenum in MUTYH-associated Polyposis]

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is a very rare autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome. It is caused by a homozygous or compound heterozygous germline mutation in the MUTYH gene. MAP is characterised by numerous colorectal adenomas; furthermore there is an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the phenotype can be highly variable; for example, affected individuals also have an increased risk of polyps of the upper gastrointestinal tract and development of duodenal carcinomas.This study included 15 patients with evidence of a pathogenic MUTYH variant, who were screened at the National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results were prospectively recorded in a database from 2012 to 2023.At least one EGD (median 4, range 1-15) was performed in 15 patients, seven of whom carried a homozygous and 8 a compound heterozygous pathogenic MUTYH variant. The median surveillance period was 115 months (range, 3-215 months). The median age at baseline was 44 (range 17-65) years. A total of 72 EGDs were performed (median 4; range 1-15). Five patients had duodenal adenomas; histology showed tubular adenomas with low grade intraepithelial dysplasia (LGIEN) in all of these cases. The total number of duodenal adenomas detected was 48, and the median number was 3 (range, 1-37). Neither high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIEN) nor duodenal cancer was detected during the surveillance period.Patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis should be managed in a multidisciplinary centre for hereditary tumour disease. Our cohort showed more patients with duodenal adenomas than in previously published data. However, no progression to HGIEN or duodenal carcinomas was observed as a result of the endoscopic therapy performed.

Progression of duodenal neoplasia to advanced adenoma in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a lifetime risk of developing duodenal adenomas approaching 100%, and the relative risk for duodenal cancer compared with the general population is high. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the progression of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas (NADAs) and risk factors for advanced lesions in patients with FAP.

METHODS

Of 248 patients with 139 pedigrees at 2 institutes, we assessed 151 patients with 100 pedigrees with a pathogenic germline variant in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene, excluding mosaic variants. We evaluated the prevalence of NADAs in patients with FAP, the progression of these adenomas to advanced adenoma during the observation period, and the risk factors for the lifetime development of high-grade dysplasia (HGD), large (≥ 10 mm) duodenal adenomas, and Spiegelman stage IV.

RESULTS

During the median observation period of 7 years, the incidences of patients with NADAs, with more than 20 polyps, with polyps ≥ 10 mm, with HGD, and with stage IV at the last esophagogastroduodenoscopy were increased 1.6-fold, 1.7-fold, 5-fold, 22-fold, and 9-fold, respectively. Intramucosal cancer occurred in three patients (2%), but no patients developed invasive cancer during the observation period because we performed endoscopic intervention for advanced adenomas. Stage progression was observed in 71% of 113 patients. Stage IV was more common in women, patients with a history of colectomy, and those with a 3' side mutation in their adenomatous polyposis coli gene.

CONCLUSIONS

NADAs in patients with FAP frequently become exacerbated. Our findings suggest that patients with FAP who develop duodenal adenomas should be surveyed to prevent the development of duodenal cancer.

Updated Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome marked by extensive colorectal polyposis and a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Having access to screening and enrollment programs can improve survival for patients with FAP by enabling them to undergo surgery before the development of colorectal cancer. Provided that there are a variety of surgical options available to treat colorectal polyps in patients with adenomatous polyposis, the appropriate surgical option for each patient should be considered. The gold-standard treatment to reduce this risk is prophylactic colectomy, typically by the age of 40. However, colectomy is linked to morbidity and constitutes an ineffective way at preventing extra-colonic disease manifestations, such as desmoid disease, thyroid malignancy, duodenal polyposis, and cancer. Moreover, extensive studies have been conducted into the use of chemopreventive agents to prevent disease progression and delay the necessity for a colectomy as well as the onset of extracolonic disease. The ideal chemoprevention agent should demonstrate a biologically plausible mechanism of action and provide safety, easy tolerance over an extended period of time and a lasting and clinically meaningful effect. Although many pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical products have been tested through the years, there has not yet been a chemoprevention agent that meets these criteria. Thus, it is necessary to develop new FAP agents that target novel pathways, such as the mTOR pathway. The aim of this article is to review the prior literature on FAP in order to concentrate the current and future perspectives of diagnosis and treatment. In conclusion, we will provide an update on the diagnostic and therapeutic options, surgical or pharmaceutical, while focusing on the potential treatment strategies that could further reduce the risk of CRC.

Laboratory variation in the grading of dysplasia of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients

To prevent duodenal and ampullary cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, a diagnosis of high grade dysplasia (HGD) plays an important role in the clinical management. Previous research showed that FAP patients are both over- and undertreated after a misdiagnosis of HGD, indicating unwarranted variation. We aimed to investigate the laboratory variation in dysplasia grading of duodenal adenomas and explore possible explanations for this variation. We included data from all Dutch pathology laboratories between 1991 and 2020 by retrieving histology reports from upper endoscopy specimens of FAP patients from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA). Laboratory variation was investigated by comparing standardized proportions of HGD. To describe the degree of variation between the laboratories a factor score was calculated. A funnel plot was used to identify outliers. A total of 3050 specimens from 25 laboratories were included in the final analyses. The mean observed HGD proportion was 9.4%. The top three HGD-diagnosing laboratories diagnosed HGD 3.9 times more often than the lowest three laboratories, even after correcting for case-mix. No outliers were identified. Moderate laboratory variation was found in HGD diagnoses of duodenal tissue of FAP patients after adjusting for case-mix. Despite the fact that no outliers were observed, there may well be room for quality improvement. Concentration of these patients in expertise centers may decrease variation. To further reduce unwarranted variation, we recommend (inter)national guidelines to become more uniform in their recommendations regarding duodenal tissue sampling and consequences of HGD diagnoses.

Upper Gastrointestinal Screening of Polyp Load in Children With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Is It Required?

Objectives and study

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a propensity to form not only large bowel polyps but also upper gastrointestinal (GI) polyps with malignant potential. International guidance suggests that upper GI screening need not begin until patients are at least into their twenties. It is our experience that patients develop upper GI polyps long before this point which have the potential for malignant change.

Methods

A prospective record of all upper GI endoscopies in children (aged 9 to 17) with FAP was kept across a 12-year period by 1 surgeon in our center. For each scope performed, we recorded the location, histology, and treatment of upper GI polyps.

Results

Twent-eight patients aged 9 to 17 underwent a total of 48 esophagogastroduodenoscopies across a 12-year period. Thirty-eight esophagogastroduodenoscopies (79%) identified at least 1 gastric or duodenal polyp in 22 (79%) patients; 10 (36%) patients had gastric adenomas. Eight (29%) patients showed very high numbers of polyps. All 21 patients who had duodenal polyps had adenomas. None had yet developed malignancy, but 1 patient required extensive polyp excision and one is awaiting endoscopic mucosal resection.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that young people with FAP are at the risk of developing upper GI polyps long before current guidance suggests screening the upper GI tract. We advocate for screening of the upper GI tract to start along with colonoscopy and happen at the same sitting for pediatric and young adult patients with FAP.

Endoscopic Surveillance and Treatment of Upper GI Tract Lesions in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-A New Perspective on an Old Disease

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Patients with FAP develop up to thousands of colorectal adenomas as well as lesions in the upper GI tract. In FAP, the upper digestive lesions include gastric fundic gland polyps (FGPs), antrum adenomas, duodenal or small intestinal adenomas, and carcinoma. Patients, after colectomy, are still at significant risk for extracolonic malignancies. Advances in endoscope resolution and optical enhancement technologies allow endoscopists to provide assessments of benign and malignant polyps. For this reason, in the past decades, endoscopic resection techniques have become the first line of treatment in patients with polyps in the upper GI, whereby polyps and even early cancers can be successfully cured. In FAP patients, endoscopic ampullectomy appears to be a safe and effective way of treating patients with ampullary tumors. According to current indications, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stenting of the main pancreatic duct follow ampullectomy.

Role of endoscopy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary disease that, without intervention, will cause nearly all patients to develop colorectal cancer by the age of 45. However, even after prophylactic colorectal surgery the eventual development of duodenal adenomas leads to an additional risk of duodenal and ampullary cancers. Endoscopy is an essential part of the multidisciplinary management of FAP to aid the early identification or prevention of advanced gastrointestinal malignancy. This review article details the current evidence and consensus guidance available regarding the role of endoscopic surveillance and treatment strategies for FAP.

Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas

Duodenal polyps are found in 0.1 % to 0.8 % of all upper endoscopies. Duodenal adenomas account for 10 % to 20 % of these lesions. They can be sporadic or occur in the setting of a hereditary predisposition syndrome, mainly familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy is the cornerstone of management of duodenal adenomas, allowing for diagnosis and treatment, primarily by endoscopic mucosal resection. The endoscopic treatment of duodenal adenomas has a high morbidity, reaching 15 % in a prospective study, consisting of bleeding and perforations, and should therefore be performed in expert centers. The local recurrence rate ranges from 9 % to 37 %, and is maximal for piecemeal resections of lesions > 20 mm. Surgical resection of the duodenum is flawed with major morbidity and considered a rescue procedure in cases of endoscopic treatment failures or severe endoscopic complications such as duodenal perforations. In this paper, we review the existing evidence on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.

Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review

Adenomatous polyposis (AP) diseases, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP (AFAP), and MUTYH‐associated polyposis (MAP), are the second most common hereditary causes of colorectal cancer. A frequent extra‐colonic manifestation of AP disease is duodenal polyposis, which may lead to duodenal cancer in up to 18% of AP patients. Endoscopic surveillance is recommended at 0.5‐ to 5‐year intervals depending on the extent of polyp growth and histological progression. Although the Spigelman classification is traditionally used to determine surveillance intervals, it lacks information on the (peri‐)ampullary site, where 50% of duodenal carcinomas are located. Hence, information on the papilla has recently been added as a prognostic marker. Patients with duodenal adenoma(s) ≥10 mm and ampullary adenomas of any size are suggested to be referred to an expert center for endoscopic therapy, particularly endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ampullectomy. Nonetheless, despite the logic of this approach, the long‐term efficacy of endoscopic therapy is still to be demonstrated.

Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Almost all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop duodenal adenomas, with a 4% to 18% risk of progression into duodenal cancer. Prophylactic endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas may prevent cancer and is considered safer than surgical alternatives; however, data are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess safety and effectiveness of endoscopic duodenal interventions in patients with FAP.

METHODS

We performed a historical cohort study including patients with FAP who underwent an endoscopic duodenal intervention between 2002 and 2018. Safety was defined as adverse event rate per intervention and effectiveness as duodenal surgery-free and duodenal cancer-free survival. Change in Spigelman stage was assessed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

In 68 endoscopy sessions, 139 duodenal polypectomies were performed in 49 patients (20 men; median age, 43). Twenty-nine patients (14 men; median age, 49) underwent a papillectomy. After polypectomy, 9 (13%) bleedings and 1 (2%) perforation occurred, all managed endoscopically. Six (21%) bleedings (endoscopically managed), 4 (14%) cases of pancreatitis, and 1 (3%) perforation (conservatively treated) occurred after papillectomy. Duodenal surgery-free survival was 74% at 89 months after polypectomy and 71% at 71 months after papillectomy; no duodenal cancers were observed. After a median of 18 months (interquartile range, 10-40; range, 3-121) after polypectomy, Spigelman stages were significantly lower (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our FAP patients, prophylactic duodenal polypectomies were relatively safe. Papillectomies showed substantial adverse events, suggesting its benefits and risk should be carefully weighted. Both were effective, however, because surgical interventions were limited and none developed duodenal cancer.

Dye chromoendoscopy leads to a higher adenoma detection in the duodenum and stomach in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Backround and study aims  Duodenal cancer is the cancer most often seen in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who have undergone risk-reducing colonic surgery. Almost all patients with FAP eventually develop duodenal adenomas and risk for duodenal cancer is up to 12 % with poor prognosis. In addition, there is a rising concern regarding increased gastric cancer risk in patients with FAP. Our aim was to enhance polyp detection by using CE (CE) with the application of indigo carmine dye. Patient and methods  We conducted a prospective, blinded study of patients with FAP undergoing endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. First, a standard white-light examination (WLE) was done followed by an examination performed by an endoscopist who was blinded to the previous examination, using chromoendoscopy (CE) (0.4 % indigo carmine dye). Results  Fifty patients were included in the study. Using WLE, a median number of 13 adenomas (range 0-90) was detected compared to 23 adenomas/patient (range 0-150; P  < 0.0001) detected after staining, leading to a higher Spigelman stage in 16 patients (32 %; P  = 0.0003). CE detected significantly more larger adenomas (> 10 mm) than WLE (12 vs. 19; P  = 0.0391). In the gastric antral region, a median number of 0 adenomas (range 0-6) before and 0.5 adenomas (range 0-7) after staining ( P  = 0.0025) were detected. Conclusion  This prospective endoscopic trial, to our knowledge the largest in patients with FAP, showed a significant impact of CE on adenoma detection and therapeutic management in the upper gastrointestinal tract. This leads to more intensive surveillance intervals.

Ten-year impact of pancreaticoduodenectomy on bowel function and quality of life of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) carry a risk of duodenal adenocarcinoma. These patients, who already have an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), sometimes require pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This work aims to evaluate the long-term consequences of the combination of PD + IPAA.

METHODS

All patients with IPAA due to FAP who underwent PD from 1991 to 2017 were included (PD + IPAA group). Patients were matched 1:1 according to age, sex, ASA score and presence of colorectal cancer. Fecal continence and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using the Wexner score and the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-two PD + IPAA patients were matched with thirty-two IPAA-only patients. In each group, the response rate to the questionnaire was 78% (25/32). No differences were noted between PD + IPAA and IPAA-only groups in terms of daytime fecal frequency (6.0 vs 6.0; p = 0.362), Wexner score (3/20 vs 4/20; p = 0.984) and global QoL score (83.3/100 vs 83.3/100; p = 0.401). In the PD + IPAA group, 26% of patients developed diabetes a median period of 10.0 years after PD. The global QoL for these patients was significantly altered (p = 0.011), while daytime fecal frequency was unaffected (p = 0.092) as fecal continence (p = 0.475).

CONCLUSION

In FAP patients with IPAA, PD does not affect bowel function or QoL.

Eflornithine plus Sulindac for Prevention of Progression in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of combination therapy with eflornithine and sulindac, as compared with either drug alone, in delaying disease progression in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis are unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of eflornithine and sulindac, as compared with either drug alone, in adults with familial adenomatous polyposis. The patients were stratified on the basis of anatomical site with the highest polyp burden and surgical status; the strata were precolectomy (shortest projected time to disease progression), rectal or ileal pouch polyposis after colectomy (longest projected time), and duodenal polyposis (intermediate projected time). The patients were then randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 750 mg of eflornithine, 150 mg of sulindac, or both once daily for up to 48 months. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was disease progression, defined as a composite of major surgery, endoscopic excision of advanced adenomas, diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia in the rectum or pouch, or progression of duodenal disease.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients underwent randomization. Disease progression occurred in 18 of 56 patients (32%) in the eflornithine-sulindac group, 22 of 58 (38%) in the sulindac group, and 23 of 57 (40%) in the eflornithine group, with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 1.32) for eflornithine-sulindac as compared with sulindac (P = 0.29) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.36 to 1.24) for eflornithine-sulindac as compared with eflornithine. Among 37 precolectomy patients, the corresponding values in the treatment groups were 2 of 12 patients (17%), 6 of 13 (46%), and 5 of 12 (42%) (hazard ratios, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.32] and 0.20 [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.32]); among 34 patients with rectal or ileal pouch polyposis, the values were 4 of 11 patients (36%), 2 of 11 (18%), and 5 of 12 (42%) (hazard ratios, 2.03 [95% CI, 0.43 to 9.62] and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.24 to 2.90]); and among 100 patients with duodenal polyposis, the values were 12 of 33 patients (36%), 14 of 34 (41%), and 13 of 33 (39%) (hazard ratios, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.34 to 1.52] and 0.76 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.64]). Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the incidence of disease progression was not significantly lower with the combination of eflornithine and sulindac than with either drug alone. (Funded by Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01483144; EudraCT number, 2012-000427-41.).

A Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Benign and Malignant Ampullary Lesions: Management in Hereditary and Sporadic Settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to examine the historical roots of endoscopic management of ampullary lesions and explore emerging data on improved techniques, technologies, and outcomes. Of specific interest was answering whether there exists a reasonable body of data to support one resection technique or strategy above others.

RECENT FINDINGS

Review of recent literature suggests the continued use of endoscopic ampullectomy is a safe and effective means of curative treatment of ampullary adenomas. Complications are relatively infrequent and complete endoscopic resection is possible in a majority of cases, with proper patient and lesion selection. Greater than 2 decades of experience with endoscopic ampullectomy have shown this to be a viable, well-tolerated, and highly effective means of treating ampullary adenomas. While few concrete guidelines exist to advise endoscopists on the ideal technique for resection, experience, patient selection, and prior planning can greatly influence the technical and clinical success of endoscopic ampullectomy.

Pancreas- and Pylorus-Preserving Duodenectomy for Advanced Familial Duodenal Polyposis

Most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) will develop duodenal polyps and 5% progress to cancer. Those with Spigelman stage IV have a 36% risk of cancer at 10 years. Endoscopic surveillance is necessary with local ablation for early disease. Unresectable duodenal disease and severe dysplasia are an indication for prophylactic radical surgery by pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy. Some preliminary results have shown better outcomes with duodenectomy. A 45-year-old female with FAP had restorative proctocolectomy at 24 years, desmoid of the mesentery with regression after sulindac, two pregnancies, and at the age of 37 years had duodenal polyposis stage III carpeting the periampullary region. Endoscopic papillectomy and extensive piecemeal mucosectomy was performed but was unsuccessful due to recurrence. After 7 years of regular endoscopic surveillance, focal high-grade dysplasia was diagnosed at the last evaluation. Some diminutive polyps were seen in the small-bowel capsule endoscopy. MRCP showed a normal biliary and pancreatic duct without visualization of the Santorini duct. A pancreas and pylorus-preserving duodenectomy was performed with 3 main steps: (1) duodenectomy with preservation of the pancreas and the pylorus; (2) reconstruction with an advanced jejunal limb and duodenojejunostomy; (3) reimplantation of the biliary and pancreatic duct in the jejunal loop. The patient was discharged on the 11th postoperative day without complications. In conclusion, pancreas- and pylorus-preserving duodenectomy is a promising alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal polyposis that allows complete endoscopic surveillance.

Colorectal family polyadenomatous diseases. What management in 2020?

Nearly 5% of colorectal cancers are hereditary colorectal cancers, including adenomatous polyposis. The aim of this review was to highlight the current management of adenomatous polyposis. The two main genetic conditions responsible for adenomatous polyposis are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (caused by an autosomal dominant mutation of the APC gene) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) (caused by bi-allelic recessive mutations of the MUTYH (MutY human homolog) gene). FAP is characterized by the presence of >1000 polyps and a young age at diagnosis (mean age of 10). In the absence of screening, the risk of colorectal cancer at age 40 is 100%. It is recommended to start screening at the age of 10-12 years. For patients with FAP and MAP, it is also recommended to screen the upper gastrointestinal tract (stomach and duodenum). In FAP, prophylactic surgery aims to reduce the risk of death without impairment of patient quality of life. The best age for prophylactic surgery is not well-defined; in Europe, prophylactic surgery is usually performed at age 20 as the risk of cancer increases sharply during the third decade. There are three main surgical procedures employed: total colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis, restorative coloproctectomy with a J pouch anastomosis and coloproctectomy with a stoma. Restorative coloproctectomy with J pouch anastomosis is the reference procedure; however, disease can vary in severity from one patient to another and this must be taken into account to decide which procedure should be performed. In conclusion, the management of adenomatous polyposis is complex but is well-defined by guidelines, particularly in France.

Acute Pancreatitis Caused by Ampullary Duodenum Adenoma in a Patient with Adenomatous Polyposis Coli with Billroth II Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy

Patient: Male, 73

Final Diagnosis: Pancreatitis

Symptoms: Upper abdominal pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure:—

Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology