Rectal Cancer in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients: Pattern of Clinical Presentation and Case-Matched Comparison of Outcomes

Red Flag Signs and Symptoms for Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as a diagnosis at younger than age 50 years, is increasing, and so-called red flag signs and symptoms among these individuals are often missed, leading to diagnostic delays. Improved recognition of presenting signs and symptoms associated with EOCRC could facilitate more timely diagnosis and impact clinical outcomes.

Objective

To report the frequency of presenting red flag signs and symptoms among individuals with EOCRC, to examine their association with EOCRC risk, and to measure variation in time to diagnosis from sign or symptom presentation.

Data Sources

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through May 2023.

Study Selection

Studies that reported on sign and symptom presentation or time from sign and symptom presentation to diagnosis for patients younger than age 50 years diagnosed with nonhereditary CRC were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently in duplicate for all included studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to measure risk of bias. Data on frequency of signs and symptoms were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were pooled proportions of signs and symptoms in patients with EOCRC, estimates for association of signs and symptoms with EOCRC risk, and time from sign or symptom presentation to EOCRC diagnosis.

Results

Of the 12 859 unique articles initially retrieved, 81 studies with 24 908 126 patients younger than 50 years were included. The most common presenting signs and symptoms, reported by 78 included studies, were hematochezia (pooled prevalence, 45% [95% CI, 40%-50%]), abdominal pain (pooled prevalence, 40% [95% CI, 35%-45%]), and altered bowel habits (pooled prevalence, 27% [95% CI, 22%-33%]). Hematochezia (estimate range, 5.2-54.0), abdominal pain (estimate range, 1.3-6.0), and anemia (estimate range, 2.1-10.8) were associated with higher EOCRC likelihood. Time from signs and symptoms presentation to EOCRC diagnosis was a mean (range) of 6.4 (1.8-13.7) months (23 studies) and a median (range) of 4 (2.0-8.7) months (16 studies).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with EOCRC, nearly half of individuals presented with hematochezia and abdominal pain and one-quarter with altered bowel habits. Hematochezia was associated with at least 5-fold increased EOCRC risk. Delays in diagnosis of 4 to 6 months were common. These findings highlight the need to identify concerning EOCRC signs and symptoms and complete timely diagnostic workup, particularly for individuals without an alternative diagnosis or sign or symptom resolution.

Distinct clinical characteristics in stage III rectal cancer among different age groups and treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

There is a rapidly increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) which threatens the survival of young people, while aging also represents a challenging clinical problem.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognosis in stage III rectal cancer (RC), to help optimize treatment strategies.

Design and methods

This study included 757 patients with stage III RC, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The whole cohort was categorized as very early onset (VEO, ⩽30 years old), early onset (EO, >30 years old, ⩽50 years old), intermediate onset (IO, >50 years, ⩽70 years), or late onset (LO, >70 years old).

Results

There were more female VEO patients than males, more mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, pre-treatment cT4 stage, and higher pre-treatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 compared with the other three groups. VEO patients had the worst survival with the highest RC-related mortality (34.5%), recurrence (13.8%), and metastasis (51.7%). LO patients had the highest non-RC-related mortality rate (16.6%). The Cox regression model showed VEO was a negative independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival [DFS, hazard ratio (HR): 2.830, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.633-4.904, p < 0.001], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, HR: 2.969, 95% CI: 1.720-5.127, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS, HR: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.102-4.249, p = 0.025), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 2.321, 95% CI: 1.145-4.705, p = 0.020). LO was a negative independent factor on DFS (HR: 1.800, 95% CI: 1.113-2.911, p = 0.017), DMFS (HR: 1.903, 95% CI: 1.150-3.149, p = 0.012), OS (HR: 2.856, 95% CI: 1.745-4.583, p < 0.001), and CSS (HR: 2.248, 95% CI: 1.282-3.942, p = 0.005). VEO patients had better survival in the total neoadjuvant therapy-like (TNT-like) pattern on DFS (p = 0.039). IO patients receiving TNT-like patterns had better survival on DFS, OS, and CSS (p = 0.006, p = 0.018, p = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusion

In stage III RC, VEO patients exhibited unique clinicopathological characteristics, with VEO a negative independent prognostic factor for DFS, DMFS, OS, and CSS. VEO and IO patients may benefit from a TNT-like treatment pattern.

Identifying individualized prognostic signature and unraveling the molecular mechanism of recurrence in early-onset colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; < 50 years old) is increasing worldwide, with a high recurrence rate. The inherent heterogeneity of EOCRC makes its treatment challenging. Hence, to further understand the biology and reveal the molecular mechanisms of EOCRC, a recurrence risk signature is needed to guide clinical management.

METHODS

Based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes in each sample, a prognostic signature was developed and validated utilizing multiple independent datasets. The underlying molecular mechanisms between distinct prognostic groups were explored via integrative analysis of multi-omics data.

RESULTS

The prognostic signature consisting of 6 gene pairs (6-GPS) could predict the recurrence risk for EOCRC at the individual level. High-risk EOCRC classified by 6-GPS showed a poor prognosis but a good response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, high-risk EOCRC was characterized by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enriched angiogenesis, and had higher mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, we identified four genes associated with relapse-free survival in EOCRC, including SERPINE1, PECAM1, CDH1, and ANXA1. They were consistently differentially expressed at the transcriptome and proteome levels between high-risk and low-risk EOCRCs. They were also involved in regulating cancer progression and immune microenvironment in EOCRC. Notably, the expression of SERPINE1 and ANXA1 positively correlated with M2-like macrophage infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that 6-GPS can robustly predict the recurrence risk of EOCRC, and that SERPINE1, PECAM1, CDH1, and ANXA1 may serve as potential therapeutic targets. This study provides valuable information for the precision treatment of EOCRC.

Early Age of Onset Is an Independent Predictor for a Worse Response to Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sporadic Rectal Cancer Patients

The incidence of rectal cancer (RC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset RC-EORC). EORC patients are more likely to present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis than late-onset RC (LORC; aged ≥ 50) patients. As a consequence, more EORC patients undergo neoadjuvant therapies. The response to treatment in EORC patients is still unknown. This study aims to explore the effect of age of onset on the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapies in sporadic locally advanced RC (LARC) patients. Based on an institutional prospectively maintained database, LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapies and radical surgery between January 2010 and December 2022 were allocated to the EORC and LORC groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of incomplete response (Dworak 0-2). A total of 326 LORC and 79 EORC patients were included. Pre-neoadjuvant tumor features were comparable. A significantly higher rate of incomplete response was observed in EORC patients (49% vs. 35%; p = 0.028). From multivariable analysis, early age of onset, smoking and extramural invasion presented as independent risk factors for a worse response. This study demonstrates that an early age of onset is related to a worse response and calls for different multimodal strategies in this group of patients.

Different Oncologic Outcomes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Regression Analysis on 2073 Patients

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset CRC-EOCRC). Recent studies highlighted the biological and clinical differences between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC-age ≥ 50), while comparative results about long-term survival are still debated. This study aimed to investigate whether age of onset may impact on oncologic outcomes in a surgical population of sporadic CRC patients. Patients operated on for sporadic CRC from January 2010 to January 2022 were allocated to the EOCRC and LOCRC groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence/progression-free survival (R/PFS). A total of 423 EOCRC and 1650 LOCRC was included. EOCRC had a worse R/PFS (p < 0.0001) and cancer specific survival (p < 0.0001) compared with LOCRC. At Cox regression analysis, age of onset, tumoral stage, signet ring cells, extramural/lymphovascular/perineural veins invasion, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for R/P. The analysis by tumoral stage showed an increased incidence of recurrence in stage I EOCRC (p = 0.014), and early age of onset was an independent predictor for recurrence (p = 0.035). Early age of onset was an independent predictor for worse prognosis, this effect was stronger in stage I patients suggesting a potentially—and still unknown—more aggressive tumoral phenotype in EOCRC.

Time to diagnosis and treatment in younger adults with colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Background

The incidence of colorectal cancer is rising in adults <50 years of age. As a primarily unscreened population, they may have clinically important delays to diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to review the literature on delay intervals in patients <50 years with colorectal cancer (CRC), and explore associations between longer intervals and outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS were searched until December 2, 2021. We included studies published after 1990 reporting any delay interval in adults <50 with CRC. Interval measures and associations with stage at presentation or survival were synthesized and described in a narrative fashion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Institute of Health Economics Case Series Quality Appraisal Checklist, and the Aarhus Checklist for cancer delay studies.

Results

55 studies representing 188,530 younger CRC patients were included. Most studies used primary data collection (64%), and 47% reported a single center. Sixteen unique intervals were measured. The most common interval was symptom onset to diagnosis (21 studies; N = 2,107). By sample size, diagnosis to treatment start was the most reported interval (12 studies; N = 170,463). Four studies examined symptoms onset to treatment start (total interval). The shortest was a mean of 99.5 days and the longest was a median of 217 days. There was substantial heterogeneity in the measurement of intervals, and quality of reporting. Higher-quality studies were more likely to use cancer registries, and be population-based. In four studies reporting the relationship between intervals and cancer stage or survival, there were no clear associations between longer intervals and adverse outcomes.

Discussion

Adults <50 with CRC may have intervals between symptom onset to treatment start greater than 6 months. Studies reporting intervals among younger patients are limited by inconsistent results and heterogeneous reporting. There is insufficient evidence to determine if longer intervals are associated with advanced stage or worse survival.

Other

This study’s protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42020179707).

Microsatellite instability in rectal cancer: what does it mean? A study of two randomized trials and a systematic review of the literature

Currently, compelling evidence illustrates the significance of determining microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The association of MSI with proximal CRC is well established, however, its implications in patients with rectal cancer remain undefined. We therefore aimed to determine the role of MSI with respect to incidence and outcome in patients with rectal cancer, by the examination of patients from two prospective phase III trials: TME trial and PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial (n=1250). No differences in terms of overall survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.69-1.47) and disease-free survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.68-1.45) were observed in patients with MSI compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer. In addition, we performed a literature review to evaluate the overall prevalence, the effect on survival and the response to neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with MSI rectal cancer compared with MSS rectal cancer. The total number of MSI cases in the included studies (including our own) was 1220 (out of 16526 rectal cancer patients), with an overall prevalence of 6.7% (SE 1.19%). Both for overall survival as for disease-free survival there was no impact of MSI status on prognosis (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.77-1.29 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.60-1.22, respectively). The risk ratio for downstaging and pCR showed also no impact of MSI status (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.55 and RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22 respectively). In conclusion, rectal cancer patients with MSI form a distinct and rare subcategory, however, there is no prognostic effect of MSI in rectal cancer patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in young non-metastatic rectal cancer patients after curative resection: a population-based analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in young non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) patients after curative resection.

METHODS

Young RC patients (under 50 years of age) from 2010 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Those patients randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The independent prognostic factors for OS were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. A nomogram model was built based on the independent prognostic variables and was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total number of 3026 young RC patients were extracted from SEER database. OS nomogram was constructed based on race, histological type, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and number of lymph nodes (LN) examined. C-index, ROC curves, calibration plot, and DCA curves presented satisfactory performance of the above nomogram in predicting the prognosis of young non-metastatic RC patients after curative resection. The nomogram can identify three subgroups of patients at different risks, which showed different prognostic outcomes both in the training cohort and validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established a reliable and insightful nomogram to predict OS for young non-metastatic RC patients after curative resection. The nomogram may provide accurate prognosis prediction to guide individualized follow-up and treatment plans.

Early age of onset is an independent predictor for worse disease-free survival in sporadic rectal cancer patients. A comparative analysis of 980 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

while interest on early-onset colorectal cancer (age ≤49) is on the rise, studies on early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) are limited. The aim of this study was to compare predictors for disease progression/recurrence between sporadic EORC and late-onset RC patients (LORC).

METHODS

163 EORC and 830 LORC operated between January 1st^, 2010 and April 30th^, 2021 at a tertiary center were included. Demographics, tumor characteristics, microsatellite status, gene mutations (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3Kca) and oncologic outcomes were compared. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of variables on recurrence/progression and death. Recurrence/Progression free survival (R/PFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Mean age of EORC was 42.16, (46% aged 45-49). A majority of EORC patients had a family history for CRC (p = 0.01) and underwent total neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.01). EORC patients showed a higher rate of low-grade tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001), stage III-IV (p = 0.001), microsatellite instability (p = 0.02), locoregional nodal (p = 0.001) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, more EORC patients underwent adjuvant treatment (p < 0.0001). Mutations were mostly reported among LORC cases (p = 0.04), whereas EORC patients showed a worse R/PFS (p = 0.02), even at stage I (p = 0.04). CSS did not differ (p = 0.11) across groups. Multivariate analysis indicated age of onset (p = 0.04) was an independent predictor for progression/recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Age of onset was shown to be an independent unfavorable predictor. Delayed diagnosis could explain this effect in the more advanced stages, while the worse outcomes in stage I may suggest a more aggressive disease behavior.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Have We Addressed Concerns and Needs of the Target Population?

Despite the recognized benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, uptake is still suboptimal in many countries. In addressing this issue, one important element that has not received sufficient attention is population preference. Our review provides a comprehensive summary of the up-to-date evidence relative to this topic. Four OVID databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE® ALL, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, and Global Health. Among the 742 articles generated, 154 full texts were selected for a more thorough evaluation based on predefined inclusion criteria. Finally, 83 studies were included in our review. The general population preferred either colonoscopy as the most accurate test, or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as the least invasive for CRC screening. The emerging blood test (SEPT9) and capsule colonoscopy (nanopill), with the potential to overcome the pitfalls of the available techniques, were also favored. Gender, age, race, screening experience, education and beliefs, the perceived risk of CRC, insurance, and health status influence one’s test preference. To improve uptake, CRC screening programs should consider offering test alternatives and tailoring the content and delivery of screening information to the public’s preferences. Other logistical measures in terms of the types of bowel preparation, gender of endoscopist, stool collection device, and reward for participants can also be useful.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD): A novel approach to the local treatment of early rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete local resection is currently the treatment of choice for low-risk early rectal cancer; however, the ideal resection technique for such tumours is still debated. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) is a new technique which combines the ergonomic advantages of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with the minimally invasive approach of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcomes of TEM-ESD in treating early rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all cases of rectal adenocarcinomas treated with TEM-ESD in Karlsruhe Municipal Hospital between 2012 and 2019, as well as the perioperative and follow-up data of the patients.

RESULTS

We identified 40 cases (19 low-risk and 21 high-risk carcinomas) matching our criteria. The median size of the lesions was 3.8 cm and the median operating time 48.5 min. En bloc resection was possible in all cases, while histologically complete resection was confirmed in 18 of 19 low-risk tumours and in 30 out of all lesions. The resection was curative in 19 cases. No scarring of the mesorectum was reported during the completion of total mesorectal excision for high-risk tumours. There was only 1 case of local recurrence among patients treated with curative intent, with an overall survival rate of 100% and a disease-free survival rate of 96% at both 2 and 5 years for these patients.

CONCLUSION

TEM-ESD is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for resecting early rectal cancer, offering very good long-term outcomes.